Bug#396851: marked as done (FTBFS: Non-ascii '�' in input, consider using package inputenc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:02:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396851: fixed in ecasound2.2 2.4.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: ecasound2.2
Version: 2.4.4-3
Severity: serious

This package fails to build:

> Automatic build of ecasound2.2_2.4.4-3 on coconut0 by sbuild/ia64 0.49
...
> Output written on users_guide.dvi (25 pages, 46080 bytes).
> Transcript written on users_guide.log.
> dvips -Ppdf -o users_guide.ps users_guide.dvi
> This is dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software 
> (www.radicaleye.com)
> ' TeX output 2006.11.01:1024' -> users_guide.ps
> . 
> [1] [1] 
> [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] 
> [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] 
> ps2pdf users_guide.ps ecasound_users_guide.pdf
> mkdir -p html_uguide
> hevea -o html_uguide/users_guide.html users_guide.latex
> ./users_guide.latex:13: Warning: File \jobname.htoc not found
> Giving up command: \verbatim
> Giving up command: \begin
> ./users_guide.latex:357: Error while reading LaTeX:
>   Non-ascii '�' in input, consider using package inputenc
> Adios
> make[2]: *** [users_guide.dvi] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/tbm/ecasound2.2-2.4.4/Documentation/users_guide'
> make[1]: *** [docs_guides] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/ecasound2.2-2.4.4/Documentation'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ecasound2.2
Source-Version: 2.4.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ecasound2.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ecasound-el_2.4.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecasound2.2/ecasound-el_2.4.4-4_all.deb
ecasound2.2_2.4.4-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/ecasound2.2/ecasound2.2_2.4.4-4.diff.gz
ecasound2.2_2.4.4-4.dsc
  to pool/main/e/ecasound2.2/ecasound2.2_2.4.4-4.dsc
ecasound_2.4.4-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecasound2.2/ecasound_2.4.4-4_amd64.deb
libecasound-ruby1.8_2.4.4-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecasound2.2/libecasound-ruby1.8_2.4.4-4_amd64.deb
libecasound2.2-dev_2.4.4-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecasound2.2/libecasound2.2-dev_2.4.4-4_amd64.deb
libecasoundc2.2-dev_2.4.4-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecasound2.2/libecasoundc2.2-dev_2.4.4-4_amd64.deb
libkvutils2.2-dev_2.4.4-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecasound2.2/libkvutils2.2-dev_2.4.4-4_amd64.deb
python-ecasound2.2_2.4.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/e/ecasound2.2/python-ecasound2.2_2.4.4-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ecasound2.2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  4 Nov 2006 13:42:53 +0900
Source: ecasound2.2
Binary: libkvutils2.2-dev libecasound-ruby1.8 libecasoundc2.2-dev 
python-ecasound2.2 libecasound2.2-dev ecasound ecasound-el
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.4.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 ecasound   - Multitrack-capable audio recorder and effect processor
 ecasound-el - emacs binding files for ecasound sound editing environment
 libecasound-ruby1.8 - ruby binding files for ecasound
 libecasound2.2-dev - development files for ecasound
 libecasoundc2.2-dev - c binding files for ecasound (devel)
 libkvutils2.2-dev - kvutils library required for ecasound - development
 python-ecasound2.2 - python binding files for ecasound 2.2
Closes: 396851
Changes: 
 ecasound2.2 (2.4.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Bug fix: "FTBFS: Non-ascii character in input, consider using package
 inputenc", thanks to Martin Michlmayr (Closes: #396851).
 Remove the weird bit from documentation.
Files: 
 6c93badf48bc25437b19424dd7682fa3 1161 sound extra ecasound2.2_2.4.4-4.dsc
 8f28950303baa206caae526aa03cc4cd 122600 sound extra ecasound2.2_2.4.4-4.diff.gz
 aadda92db24c47edc9bfee698828612c 16766 python extra 
python-ecasound2.2_2.4.4-4_all.deb
 458

Bug#396279: x11-common: sarge to etch upgrade fails if xlbiff is installed.

[Steve Langasek]

severity 395927 serious
severity 396279 important
thanks

On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:29:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:

> > The Sarge package xlbiff includes the file /usr/X11R6/bin/xlbiff

> The xlbiff package in sarge is at version 4.1-1, and x11-common in etch
> already has a conflicts: with xlbiff (<= 4.1-1.1).  Do you have any idea
> what's missing here?

Ah, apparently the answer is that a new upload of xlbiff was made that
didn't include the fixed path, and the conflicts from x11-common was
insufficient for this case.

This was reported as bug #395927 in xlbiff, and has now been fixed in
unstable in version 4.1-4; and I'm bumping the urgency of that xlbiff
package so that the fix should reach testing tomorrow.

That makes 396279 an issue of insufficiently tight conflicts which will not
affect etch proper, so it should not be RC.  Swapping bug severities
accordingly.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#396279: x11-common: sarge to etch upgrade fails if xlbiff is installed.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 395927 serious
Bug#395927: xlbiff: Causes upgrade of x11-common to fail with "trying to 
overwrite `/usr/X11R6/bin', which is also in package xlbiff"
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'

> severity 396279 important
Bug#396279: x11-common: sarge to etch upgrade fails if xlbiff is installed.
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395278: marked as done (ttf-vlgothic: installation failure due to invalid characters)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:47:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395278: fixed in ttf-vlgothic 20061026-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: ttf-vlgothic
Version: 20061021-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

I noticed ttf-vlgothic failed to install by:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ttf-vlgothic.postinst: line 33: 　: command not found

I found there was invalid prefix characters on this line.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ttf-vlgothic
Source-Version: 20061026-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ttf-vlgothic, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ttf-vlgothic_20061026-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/ttf-vlgothic/ttf-vlgothic_20061026-1.diff.gz
ttf-vlgothic_20061026-1.dsc
  to pool/main/t/ttf-vlgothic/ttf-vlgothic_20061026-1.dsc
ttf-vlgothic_20061026-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/ttf-vlgothic/ttf-vlgothic_20061026-1_all.deb
ttf-vlgothic_20061026.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/ttf-vlgothic/ttf-vlgothic_20061026.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ttf-vlgothic 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:45:39 +0900
Source: ttf-vlgothic
Binary: ttf-vlgothic
Architecture: source all
Version: 20061026-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 ttf-vlgothic - Japanese TrueType font from Vine Linux
Closes: 395278
Changes: 
 ttf-vlgothic (20061026-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * New upstream release
   * fix debian/copyright file with upstream LICENSE.en
 .
 ttf-vlgothic (20061021-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix invalid multibyte "space" character breaks postinst.
 Thanks to Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Frank Küster
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #395278)
 .
   * debian/control:
 - Standards-Version to 3.7.2.2.
Files: 
 9938ba4fc07f50e15616eee7bc98b9cb 604 x11 optional ttf-vlgothic_20061026-1.dsc
 cdcc8c72b8c9ea21d6a9bb254083ffa5 4824650 x11 optional 
ttf-vlgothic_20061026.orig.tar.gz
 ccaf813e0c1d2243e4e4b00770122dab 5394 x11 optional 
ttf-vlgothic_20061026-1.diff.gz
 89121119abeba22a21891a0864b7d55c 4821602 x11 optional 
ttf-vlgothic_20061026-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFTBn+2Dd9TugeVcERAlFZAJwJ78HSqwB02w0JBf58tcla5o+ZBQCgiRoL
r4jXCe3k0rwTRz0uepsbZbI=
=EqDk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#394845: marked as done (davfs2_1.1.2-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing define)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394845: fixed in davfs2 1.1.2-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: davfs2
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of davfs2_1.1.2-1 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20061021-1248

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), po-debconf, libssl-dev, libxml2-dev, 
> libneon26-dev

[...]

>   SSL is supported by neon
> 
> Now run 'make' to compile davfs2
> 
> dh_testdir
> /usr/bin/make
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/davfs2-1.1.2'
> hppa-linux-gnu-gcc -DPROGRAM_NAME=\"mount.davfs\" 
> -DSYS_CONF=\"/etc/davfs2/davfs2.conf\" -DSYS_SECRETS=\"/etc/davfs2/secrets\" 
> -DDOC_DIR=\"/usr/share/doc/davfs2\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -I. -I./src  -Wall -Wall 
> -g -O2 -I/usr/include/neon -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNE_LFS -c src/cache.c -o 
> src/cache.o
> src/cache.c: In function 'dav_open':
> src/cache.c:826: error: 'O_FSYNC' undeclared (first use in this function)
> src/cache.c:826: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> src/cache.c:826: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[1]: *** [src/cache.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/davfs2-1.1.2'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=davfs2&ver=1.1.2-1


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: davfs2
Source-Version: 1.1.2-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
davfs2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

davfs2_1.1.2-1.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/davfs2/davfs2_1.1.2-1.1.diff.gz
davfs2_1.1.2-1.1.dsc
  to pool/main/d/davfs2/davfs2_1.1.2-1.1.dsc
davfs2_1.1.2-1.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/davfs2/davfs2_1.1.2-1.1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated davfs2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 12:17:23 +1100
Source: davfs2
Binary: davfs2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.2-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luciano Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 davfs2 - mount a WebDAV resource as a regular file system
Closes: 394845
Changes: 
 davfs2 (1.1.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * NMU.
   * Defined O_FSYNC and O_ASYNC in src/cache.h (closes: #394845).
Files: 
 00b0894b012bea80558719b015d1cc73 617 utils extra davfs2_1.1.2-1.1.dsc
 4f6b882c7823583467adcb67085cef63 35674 utils extra davfs2_1.1.2-1.1.diff.gz
 0960827be1fc0e7118959514a53171a5 69666 utils extra davfs2_1.1.2-1.1_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFTBZOipBneRiAKDwRAuYxAJ98zHkhwcObhVaZ+C1PQ1iUPV59SgCbB7Sp
avh40vqiOgoY2ntOEY7bAvE=
=KXAv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Processed: closing 385660

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # fixed but not done? sigh
> close 385660 1.8.70-1
Bug#385660: bogofilter/qdbm build fails testsuite due to bus errors in vlopen
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.8.70-1, send any further explanations to Clint 
Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395019: More details regarding disk numbering change

[Paul TBBle Hampson]

For people (like me) who've picked up this bug via rc-alert or
apt-list-bugs and paniced..

The change is simply that partition numbers start at 1, not 0.
See [1]

As for the bug itself...

I'd suggest a NEWS.Debian file entry that says that grub2 users
must do an install-grub and update-grub cycle when upgrading to
this version, and make update-grub deal with the new numbering,
as well as telling users to update any static grub.cfg stanzas.

I guess the hard part is fixing the existing groot line in grub.cfg.
Maybe reconvert the boot/root device, and if it comes out as ,1
higher than current groot, make the change, otherwise whinge to the
user that the system may be unbootable until the groot is fixed?

(Presumably, that's done in the postinst script. However, update-grub
shouldn't be run, since install-grub hasn't been run and the change
to the groot line in the grub.cfg isn't actually effective until
update-grub is run)

Given that I don't think you can tell where grub2 was installed to
in the first place, detected which version of the grub2 bootsector
stuff is in use would be basically ineffective, so update-grub
can't be relied up.

The only people who'd see this then early-adopters in sid and
etch.

If 1.95 could be snuck into the etch release, then the
list of people who'll get bitten by this shrinks enormously,
but that's something for the grub2 maintainers and the RMs to
decide amongst themselves.

I'd vote for it, since the upgrade process described above is kind of
fragile and that way only people who're expected to be able to deal with
whinging upgrade scripts will see whinges from the upgrade script.

Of course, this'd require updating d-i with the new grub udeb.
I get the impression that's harder than just migrating to etch.

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/grub-devel@gnu.org/msg02180.html

-- 
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.


pgptWJAhoFxWP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#396842: marked as done (util-linux: FTBFS (amd64): install: cannot stat `sys-utils/rdev': No such file or directory)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:02:28 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396842: fixed in util-linux 2.12r-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.12r-14
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'util-linux' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:

# /usr/bin/make disk-utils/raw - this is done above if linux/raw.h exists
touch build
rm -rf debian/tmp*
install -d 
debian/tmp/{DEBIAN,bin,sbin,etc/init.d,usr/{bin,sbin,lib/mime/packages,share/{locale/{ca,cs,da,de,es,et,fi,fr,it,ja,nl,pt_BR,sl,sv,tr}/LC_MESSAGES,man/{man1,man8},info,util-linux,doc/util-linux/examples,lintian/overrides}}}
install -s sys-utils/arch text-utils/more sys-utils/dmesg  debian/tmp/bin
install -s disk-utils/mkswap hwclock/hwclock disk-utils/{blockdev,raw,isosize} 
mount/pivot_root login-utils/agetty 
disk-utils/{{fsck,mkfs}.{minix,cramfs},mkfs} fdisk/{cfdisk,fdisk,sfdisk} 
debian/tmp/sbin
install -s sys-utils/{ipcs,ipcrm,setsid} 
misc-utils/{namei,setterm,mcookie,whereis,ddate} getopt/getopt 
text-utils/{rev,line,pg} disk-utils/fdformat debian/tmp/usr/bin
installmisc-utils/chkdupexe  debian/tmp/usr/bin
install -s sys-utils/readprofile disk-utils/elvtune  sys-utils/{tunelp,cytune} 
sys-utils/rdev debian/tmp/usr/sbin
install: cannot stat `sys-utils/rdev': No such file or directory
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1

With the attached patch 'util-linux' can be built on amd64.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/util-linux-2.12r/debian/patches/10amd64-rdev.dpatch 
./debian/patches/10amd64-rdev.dpatch
--- ../tmp-orig/util-linux-2.12r/debian/patches/10amd64-rdev.dpatch 
2006-11-03 09:09:06.0 +
+++ ./debian/patches/10amd64-rdev.dpatch2006-11-03 09:07:57.0 
+
@@ -5,14 +5,15 @@
 ## DP: hacking "architecture detection" to get rdev on amd64 too.
 
 @DPATCH@
 util-linux/MCONFIG.old 2005-03-02 23:14:51.424457925 +0100
-+++ util-linux/MCONFIG 2005-03-02 23:22:06.749245047 +0100
-@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
- # Select for CPU i386 if the binaries must be able to run on an intel 386
- # (by default i486 code is generated, see below)
- CPU=$(shell uname -m)
--ARCH=$(shell echo $(CPU) | sed 's/i.86/intel/;s/arm.*/arm/')
-+ARCH=$(shell echo $(CPU) | sed 's/i.86/intel/;s/arm.*/arm/;s/x86_64/intel/')
+diff -urN ../tmp-orig/util-linux-2.12r/sys-utils/Makefile ./sys-utils/Makefile
+--- ../tmp-orig/util-linux-2.12r/sys-utils/Makefile2004-11-15 
17:47:47.0 +
 ./sys-utils/Makefile   2006-11-03 09:05:30.0 +
+@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
+ endif
+ endif
  
- # If HAVE_PAM is set to "yes", then login, chfn, chsh, and newgrp
- # will use PAM for authentication. Additionally, passwd will not be
+-ifeq "$(ARCH)" "intel"
++ifneq (,findstring("$(ARCH)",intel x86_64))
+ MAN8:=$(MAN8) rdev.8 ramsize.8 rootflags.8 vidmode.8
+ USRSBIN:=$(USRSBIN) rdev
+ endif

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: util-linux
Source-Version: 2.12r-15

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
util-linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bsdutils_2.12r-15_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/bsdutils_2.12r-15_i386.deb
cfdisk-udeb_2.12r-15_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/cfdisk-udeb_2.12r-15_i386.udeb
fdisk-udeb_2.12r-15_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/fdisk-udeb_2.12r-15_i386.udeb
mount_2.12r-15_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/mount_2.12r-15_i386.deb
util-linux-locales_2.12r-15_all.deb
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux-locales_2.12r-15_all.deb
util-linux_2.12r-15.diff.gz
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12r-15.diff.gz
util-linux_2.12r-15.dsc
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12r-15.dsc
util-linux_2.12r-15_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.12r-15_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated util-linux package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  3 Nov 2006 20:44:05 -0700
Source: util-linux
Binary: uti

Bug#391167: marked as done (libnss-ldap: can't boot since 251-5.2 upgrade)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375077: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


'aptitude upgrade' yesterday and this morning my debian etch
is buggy. libnss/udev waiting for 2, 4, 8, 16, ... 64s and so on.
I made a CTRL-C but gdm don't start ...

So i downgrade from 251-5.2 to 251-5.1 with dpkg -i
and all is fine again.

Guy

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.5Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6.ds1-4  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkrb531.4.4-1  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap  180-1.1 Pluggable Authentication Module al
ii  nscd 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Name Service Cache 

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#375077: marked as done (udevd: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server -> boot fails)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375215: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-1
Severity: grave

To relevant parts of nsswitch.conf on my system look like this:

passwd:files ldap
group: files ldap
shadow:files ldap

libnss_ldap is configured to query a remote LDAP server.
This makes booting stuck if you use udevd (which most systems will
do nowadays) so I'm filing this bug grave.
These are the messages I get:

INIT: version 2.86 booting
Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) -
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://foo.bar:
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) -
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://foo.bar:
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) -
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://foo.bar:
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server (sleeping 4 seconds)
...
And so on. The sleep interval is doubled each time(4,8,16,32,64
seconds...). The boot process get's stuck completely. If I press STRG+C,
udevd is killed and no devices are created, causing to fail the boot
process completely.

I had to boot from a rescue CD to fix this and remove the above lines
from nsswitch.conf again.

Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.1
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.2Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkrb531.4.3-7  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap   180-1  Pluggable Authentication Module al
ii  nscd  2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Name Service Cache 

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gn

Bug#391167: marked as done (libnss-ldap: can't boot since 251-5.2 upgrade)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375215: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


'aptitude upgrade' yesterday and this morning my debian etch
is buggy. libnss/udev waiting for 2, 4, 8, 16, ... 64s and so on.
I made a CTRL-C but gdm don't start ...

So i downgrade from 251-5.2 to 251-5.1 with dpkg -i
and all is fine again.

Guy

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.5Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6.ds1-4  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkrb531.4.4-1  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap  180-1.1 Pluggable Authentication Module al
ii  nscd 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Name Service Cache 

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#375077: marked as done (udevd: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server -> boot fails)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375077: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-1
Severity: grave

To relevant parts of nsswitch.conf on my system look like this:

passwd:files ldap
group: files ldap
shadow:files ldap

libnss_ldap is configured to query a remote LDAP server.
This makes booting stuck if you use udevd (which most systems will
do nowadays) so I'm filing this bug grave.
These are the messages I get:

INIT: version 2.86 booting
Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) -
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://foo.bar:
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) -
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://foo.bar:
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) -
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://foo.bar:
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server (sleeping 4 seconds)
...
And so on. The sleep interval is doubled each time(4,8,16,32,64
seconds...). The boot process get's stuck completely. If I press STRG+C,
udevd is killed and no devices are created, causing to fail the boot
process completely.

I had to boot from a rescue CD to fix this and remove the above lines
from nsswitch.conf again.

Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.1
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.2Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkrb531.4.3-7  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap   180-1  Pluggable Authentication Module al
ii  nscd  2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Name Service Cache 

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gn

Bug#396836: gaim-encryption: Segfaults on loading

[Leo Antunes]

tags 396836 unreproducible
--

Can you provide mor details regarding this segfault? Does it happen only
on startup? Or anytime you load the plugin during gaim use?

Could you try reseting your generetad keys to see if it persists? (Keep
the old ones as backup, in case this proves helpful they can highlight
the problem)

Did you say it still happens exactly the same way (apart from the error
output) using the libc from unstable?

According to the backtrace, it seems more likely to be a libnspr bug,
since the free() is being called from deep inside the nss/nspr stack,
but nevertheless, we should take a better look.

Thanks for the help
Cheers

-- 
Leo Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#391167: marked as done (libnss-ldap: can't boot since 251-5.2 upgrade)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391167: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


'aptitude upgrade' yesterday and this morning my debian etch
is buggy. libnss/udev waiting for 2, 4, 8, 16, ... 64s and so on.
I made a CTRL-C but gdm don't start ...

So i downgrade from 251-5.2 to 251-5.1 with dpkg -i
and all is fine again.

Guy

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.5Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6.ds1-4  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkrb531.4.4-1  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap  180-1.1 Pluggable Authentication Module al
ii  nscd 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Name Service Cache 

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#391053: marked as done (libnss-ldap: /lib/init/rw is not created on upgrade)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390926: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.2
Severity: important

/lib/init/rw is not created (at least on upgrades), rendering system
unbootable.
Creating this directory by hand solved the issue.

Regards

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.30.13  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libkrb53  1.3.6-2sarge3  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap2  2.1.30-8   OpenLDAP libraries

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#390926: marked as done (libnss-ldap needs a versioned dependency on initscripts)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391053: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


This version of libnss-ldap attempts to do something about the issue
that the ldap server might be unreachable due to not-yet started
services. (i.e. bind-policy soft)

Well. There are two simple technical issues with the solution.

The first one is that it attempts to touch a file in a directory that
does not exist. /etc/init.d/libnss-ldap needs /lib/init/rw to exist but
does not make sure.
Simple fix is to create the dir manually.

Second of all, from the changelog.Debian I understand that some file
should be created as soon as possible after boot start. That is also not
taken care of. The changelog mentions 'just before udev'.
I don't know about others' systems, but on mine the root filesystem is
still ro at that point in time. So I created a link
/etc/rcS/S11libnss-ldap. This is done just after the root filesystem
becomes writable in S10.

With these two fixes things work (until now) as expected.


Most of this system is testing, with a small number of unstable
packages (libnss-ldap being an excellent example :-).


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.5Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6.ds1-4  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkrb531.4.4-1  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap  180-1.1 Pluggable Authentication Module al
ii  nscd 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Name Service Cache 

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#391053: marked as done (libnss-ldap: /lib/init/rw is not created on upgrade)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391053: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.2
Severity: important

/lib/init/rw is not created (at least on upgrades), rendering system
unbootable.
Creating this directory by hand solved the issue.

Regards

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.30.13  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libkrb53  1.3.6-2sarge3  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap2  2.1.30-8   OpenLDAP libraries

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Processed: gaim-encryption: Segfaults on loading

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 396836 unreproducible
Bug#396836: Segfaults on loading
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390926: marked as done (libnss-ldap needs a versioned dependency on initscripts)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390926: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


This version of libnss-ldap attempts to do something about the issue
that the ldap server might be unreachable due to not-yet started
services. (i.e. bind-policy soft)

Well. There are two simple technical issues with the solution.

The first one is that it attempts to touch a file in a directory that
does not exist. /etc/init.d/libnss-ldap needs /lib/init/rw to exist but
does not make sure.
Simple fix is to create the dir manually.

Second of all, from the changelog.Debian I understand that some file
should be created as soon as possible after boot start. That is also not
taken care of. The changelog mentions 'just before udev'.
I don't know about others' systems, but on mine the root filesystem is
still ro at that point in time. So I created a link
/etc/rcS/S11libnss-ldap. This is done just after the root filesystem
becomes writable in S10.

With these two fixes things work (until now) as expected.


Most of this system is testing, with a small number of unstable
packages (libnss-ldap being an excellent example :-).


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.5Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6.ds1-4  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkrb531.4.4-1  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap  180-1.1 Pluggable Authentication Module al
ii  nscd 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Name Service Cache 

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#375215: marked as done (libnss-ldap hangs udev at startup)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375077: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-1
Severity: critical

After I installed libnss-ldap, udevd stalled at startup, 
waiting for libnss-ldap, which can't connect to a remote LDAP 
server, since networking is not yet set up at that time.

Since libnss-ldap can't connect to LDAP server, it just keeps 
retrying, rendering system unusable without root password.

Ctrl-c can be used for killing udev start, but it needs to be 
started later on manually, or else stuff will break. My X 
server died, because it did not find a mouse.

Regards,
Gašper Žejn

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#375215: marked as done (libnss-ldap hangs udev at startup)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375215: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-1
Severity: critical

After I installed libnss-ldap, udevd stalled at startup, 
waiting for libnss-ldap, which can't connect to a remote LDAP 
server, since networking is not yet set up at that time.

Since libnss-ldap can't connect to LDAP server, it just keeps 
retrying, rendering system unusable without root password.

Ctrl-c can be used for killing udev start, but it needs to be 
started later on manually, or else stuff will break. My X 
server died, because it did not find a mouse.

Regards,
Gašper Žejn

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#375077: marked as done (udevd: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server -> boot fails)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391167: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-1
Severity: grave

To relevant parts of nsswitch.conf on my system look like this:

passwd:files ldap
group: files ldap
shadow:files ldap

libnss_ldap is configured to query a remote LDAP server.
This makes booting stuck if you use udevd (which most systems will
do nowadays) so I'm filing this bug grave.
These are the messages I get:

INIT: version 2.86 booting
Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) -
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://foo.bar:
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) -
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://foo.bar:
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) -
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://foo.bar:
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[374]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server (sleeping 4 seconds)
...
And so on. The sleep interval is doubled each time(4,8,16,32,64
seconds...). The boot process get's stuck completely. If I press STRG+C,
udevd is killed and no devices are created, causing to fail the boot
process completely.

I had to boot from a rescue CD to fix this and remove the above lines
from nsswitch.conf again.

Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.1
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.2Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkrb531.4.3-7  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap   180-1  Pluggable Authentication Module al
ii  nscd  2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Name Service Cache 

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gn

Bug#375215: marked as done (libnss-ldap hangs udev at startup)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391167: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-1
Severity: critical

After I installed libnss-ldap, udevd stalled at startup, 
waiting for libnss-ldap, which can't connect to a remote LDAP 
server, since networking is not yet set up at that time.

Since libnss-ldap can't connect to LDAP server, it just keeps 
retrying, rendering system unusable without root password.

Ctrl-c can be used for killing udev start, but it needs to be 
started later on manually, or else stuff will break. My X 
server died, because it did not find a mouse.

Regards,
Gašper Žejn

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#377895: marked as done (libnss-ldap: Problem with "-" in LDAP Base DN)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377895: fixed in libnss-ldap 251-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.2Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkrb531.4.3-7  MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap   180-1  Pluggable Authentication Module al
ii  nscd  2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Name Service Cache 

-- debconf information:
  libnss-ldap/dblogin: false
  libnss-ldap/override: true
* shared/ldapns/base-dn: o=free-4ever,dc=net
* shared/ldapns/ldap-server: ldaps://annuaire.free-4ever.net:636
  libnss-ldap/confperm: false
* libnss-ldap/rootbinddn: cn=admin,o=free-4ever,dc=net
* shared/ldapns/ldap_version: 3
  libnss-ldap/binddn: cn=proxyuser,dc=exemple,dc=net
* libnss-ldap/nsswitch:
  libnss-ldap/dbrootlogin: true

I'm running Etch updated. With the new libnss-ldap, debconf can't upgrade 
because it found a "-" in my Base DN.
Here is a copy/paste of the error:
--
Number found where operator expected at -e line 1, near "s-^uri .*-uri 
ldaps:\/\/annuaire.free-4"
Bareword found where operator expected at -e line 1, near "4ever"
(Missing operator before ever?)
syntax error at -e line 1, near "s-^uri .*-uri ldaps:\/\/annuaire.free-4"
Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.
dpkg : erreur de traitement de libnss-ldap (--configure) :
 le sous-processus post-installation script a retourné une erreur de sortie 
d'état 255
Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution :
 libnss-ldap
--

Regards
Guillaume

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-ldap
Source-Version: 251-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libnss-ldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:19:59 -0400
Source: libnss-ldap
Binary: libnss-ldap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 251-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libnss-ldap - NSS module for using LDAP as a naming service
Closes: 375077 375215 377895 390241 390926 390957 391053 391167 391829 394152
Changes: 
 libnss-ldap (251-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #377895, #390241, #390957)
   * Resolve timing issues,
 Closes: #375077, #375215, #390926, #391053, #391167, #394152, #391829
Files: 
 c3313601fbda4794f0ee940c65784897 669 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.dsc
 346c7b583c98376dc452ce8a560328a3 118805 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6.diff.gz
 7a4f26e121d21ff235595d7bbb2c68b5 100350 net extra libnss-ldap_251-6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS/36rzgMPqB3kigRAhzgAJ9FO9MqddmNqc6AY97QsGbaqwVUuACeIVhh
T//scPH2J0t+ruTS0y/ejLk=
=Tu+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#311188: debian-edu-config release critical bug

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Steffen,

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:32:21PM +1100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> I know that this is an old and long discussed bug, but please allow me to 
> raise the discussion again right now as I think that the issue is not 
> completely clear.

> First of all the bug is called: "debian-edu-config: Messes "programmatically" 
> with conffiles of other packages"

> The word programmatically also appears in the etch rc policy under point 3 
> (Configuration files), however I have to ask, because there is one exception. 
> It is allowed, if a user explecitely runs an editor.
> Well if someone installs the debian-edu-config package on plain debian, 
> *nothing* will happen at all, except that the cfengine scripts are installed, 
> but cfengine is not started by the maintainer scripts.
> Therefore the user has to explicetely run the cfengine command to activate 
> the 
> scripts and therefore configure the system, which I would call "running an 
> editor scpifically" .
> Of course debian-edu works out of the box and this command is started by the 
> debian-edu-install-udeb package (by its finish-install.d part in particular).
> This IMHO means that there is no RC bug in debian-edu-config about messing up 
> with other packages conffiles.

> What do you think?

In the original bug report, Jonas said:

> Extensions are added to the base-config package that messes with a bunch
> of conffiles based on debconf values.

Is this no longer what happens?  If not, if instead debian-edu-config is
only supplying configuration for cfengine, then I agree with you that this
bug should no longer be considered RC.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396980: mlton_20061026-1 (hppa/unstable): FTBFS: regression in supported archs?

[Steve Langasek]

Package: mlton
Version: 20061026-1
Severity: serious

Hi Stephen,

The fix for bug #394981 isn't propagating to testing, because the new
version of mlton now fails to build on all architectures except for i386,
not all with the same error.  Since Packages-arch-specific already lists
mlton as being supported only on i386 hppa powerpc sparc, I think this is a
significant regression; but in any case the package will not propagate to
testing until these build failures are fixed, or the binary packages are
removed from the archive by the ftp team.

Please work with the porters for these architectures to determine an
appropriate course of action, so that mlton can be included in etch.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#378346: libgail crashes on alpha

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 04:42:30PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > At the very least, I would appreciate it if you could verify whether
> > > the bug is reproducible or not.
> > > See bug #378346 for the bug report.
> > Here is the error that triggers the abort:
> > ** ERROR **: file gailtreeview.c: line 3604 (garbage_collect_cell_data):
> > assertion failed: (GAIL_IS_TREE_VIEW (data))
> > aborting...
> > And here is the backtrace (stripped):
> > #9  0x02000202403c in g_logv () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> > #10 0x020002024084 in g_log () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> > #11 0x020002024114 in g_assert_warning () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> > #12 0x020002ee5c40 in gail_tree_view_new ()
> >from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so
> > Will try to get libgail.so rebuilt to take a look.

>  I suggest you install libgail-dbg, and libgtk2.0-0-dbg to get a nicer
>  backtrace.  Could you try rebuilding against Gtk 2.10 / Gail 1.9 from
>  experimental?  This would permit isolating the fix and perhaps
>  backporting it if it's fixed in 1.9.

First, here's a fresh backtrace from unstable with libgail-dbg and
libgtk2.0-0-dbg:

(gdb) bt
#0  0x020002187a78 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6.1
#1  0x020001e735d0 in pthread_kill () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2  0x020001e73638 in raise () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#3  0x0200021877e4 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6.1
#4  0x020002188db0 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6.1
#5  0x020001fbe588 in g_logv () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6  0x020001fbe5d4 in g_log () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7  0x020001fbe66c in g_assert_warning () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8  0x020002e69398 in garbage_collect_cell_data (data=0x120919480)
at gailtreeview.c:3604
#9  0x020001fb047c in g_source_is_destroyed ()
   from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 0x020001fb2e34 in g_main_context_dispatch ()
   from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#11 0x020001fb6e14 in g_main_context_check ()
   from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#12 0x020001fb7354 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#13 0x02000145b698 in IA__gtk_main () at gtkmain.c:1003
#14 0x0237f4e0 in gnc_ui_start_event_loop ()
   from /usr/lib/gnucash/gnucash/libgncmod-gnome-utils.so.0
#15 0x0001200034e0 in _start ()
(gdb) 

Steps to reproduce: file->new->new file, enable 'business accounts' in
addition to 'common accounts', and complete the setup.

The bug is not reproducible on amd64 following these steps, so it doesn't
appear to be a simple 64-bit problem, unfortunately.

I'm going to give the experimental gtk/gail a try, but it'll be a while
before I'm there; will send another mail with the results.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

Bug#396973: marked as done (gdb: can not debug any program linked with pthread.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:53:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (No subject header)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gdb
Version: 6.4.90.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Any program linked with "-lpthread" will make GDB unusable with the following
error:

  Cannot find user-level thread for LWP 28988: generic error

Here's an example:

  $ cat simple.c
  int main(void) {
return 0;
  }
  $ gcc -O0 -g simple.c -o simple -lpthread
  $ gdb ./simple
  GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian
  Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
  welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
  Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
  There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
  This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library 
"/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".

  (gdb) break simple.c:2
  Breakpoint 1 at 0x8048372: file simple.c, line 2.
  (gdb) run
  Starting program: /home/nicholas/simple 
  warning: Lowest section in system-supplied DSO at 0xe000 is .hash at 
e0b4
  [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
  Error while reading shared library symbols:
  Cannot find new threads: generic error
  Cannot find user-level thread for LWP 29015: generic error
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0xf7f92010 in _dl_debug_state () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #1  0xffdd2530 in ?? ()
  #2  0xf7f88c35 in dl_main () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #3  0xf7f953e8 in _dl_sysdep_start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #4  0xf7f86b46 in _dl_start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #5  0xf7f867b7 in _start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  (gdb) c
  Continuing.
  Cannot find user-level thread for LWP 29015: generic error
  (gdb) c
  Continuing.
  Cannot find user-level thread for LWP 29015: generic error
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0xf7f92010 in _dl_debug_state () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #1  0xffdd2530 in ?? ()
  #2  0xf7f88c35 in dl_main () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #3  0xf7f953e8 in _dl_sysdep_start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #4  0xf7f86b46 in _dl_start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #5  0xf7f867b7 in _start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2

This is especially annoying as the actual program, despite linking with
pthread is single-threaded. It works fine if you remove "-lpthread" from the
compile line. I tried two gcc versions:

  gcc version 4.1.2 20061028 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-19)

and

  gcc version 4.0.4 20060904 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-7)

both are affected, leading me to think that this is an error in gdb (or
possibly libpthread.)

Nick Lewycky

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.1
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages gdb depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libncurses5  5.5-5   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libreadline5 5.2-1   GNU readline and history libraries

gdb recommends no packages.

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
--- End Message ---

Bug#396973: gdb: can not debug any program linked with pthread.

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:05:32PM -0500, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> Attached. Here's the exact session I ran:

> ptrace(0x19 /* PTRACE_??? */, 29003, 0xc, 0xff888354) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid 
> argument)

> >>Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
> >>Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> >>Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.1
> > 
> > Does this mean you're running a 32-bit installation and a 64-bit
> > kernel?  Did you build the kernel yourself?
> 
> Yes and yes.

It completely didn't occur to me until just now, but this was the right
question.  A 32-bit GDB will not work on threaded programs on a 64-bit
kernel; it's just broken.  I believe the problem is a ptrace operation
that is not properly emulated by the 32-bit compatibility layer.  I'm
afraid this is a kernel bug.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#375518: marked as done (cenon.app: Critical error executing Cenon)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:18:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375518: fixed in cenon.app 3.81-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: cenon.app
Version: 3.80-1
Severity: important

 When I run 'Cenon' or 'openapp Cenon.app' I get next error:

Critical Error in Cenon
Index 0 is out of range 0 (in 'objectAtIndex:')

 If you need any specific info, tell me.

 Greets.

David


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages cenon.app depends on:
ii  gnustep-back0.10  0.10.2-1   The GNUstep GUI Backend
ii  libc6 2.3.6-13   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgnustep-base1.11   1.11.2-3   GNUstep Base library
ii  libgnustep-gui0.100.10.2-1   GNUstep Gui Library
ii  libobjc1  1:4.1.0-4  Runtime library for GNU Objective-

cenon.app recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cenon.app
Source-Version: 3.81-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cenon.app, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cenon.app_3.81-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cenon.app/cenon.app_3.81-2.diff.gz
cenon.app_3.81-2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cenon.app/cenon.app_3.81-2.dsc
cenon.app_3.81-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cenon.app/cenon.app_3.81-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cenon.app package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  4 Nov 2006 01:50:33 +0100
Source: cenon.app
Binary: cenon.app
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.81-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 cenon.app  - Vector graphics tool for GNUstep
Closes: 375518
Changes: 
 cenon.app (3.81-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Apply patch from Kaloian Doganov to fix the
 NSSearchPathForDirectoriesInDomains. (Closes: #375518)
Files: 
 7a5ead9a2fb44020f75f563ba5fdc159 700 graphics optional cenon.app_3.81-2.dsc
 16b116515ac134d76e0e77ee61d3b6cb 4844 graphics optional 
cenon.app_3.81-2.diff.gz
 1485e96cd2da497f22badd45b383ab6f 1526484 graphics optional 
cenon.app_3.81-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS+jFrynHGRJLYfoRA77rAJ0VzastfCfNiJDSZbzce/nRB4TIhACfec+3
PCnM8kGO/87o8r8v85IvuqM=
=RzRS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#396973: gdb: can not debug any program linked with pthread.

[Nick Lewycky]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:05:32PM -0500, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> 
>>Attached. Here's the exact session I ran:
> 
>>ptrace(0x19 /* PTRACE_??? */, 29003, 0xc, 0xff888354) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid 
>>argument)
> 
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.1
>>>
>>>Does this mean you're running a 32-bit installation and a 64-bit
>>>kernel?  Did you build the kernel yourself?
>>
>>Yes and yes.
> 
> It completely didn't occur to me until just now, but this was the right
> question.  A 32-bit GDB will not work on threaded programs on a 64-bit
> kernel; it's just broken.  I believe the problem is a ptrace operation
> that is not properly emulated by the 32-bit compatibility layer.  I'm
> afraid this is a kernel bug.

Ok, I agree with you that the kernel is the issue here, but that can't
be the whole explanation.

I just rolled back to my previous kernel, 2.6.15.6 x86_64 and the
example works fine. So the architecture alone isn't the issue, unless
the kernel developers ripped support out, deliberately breaking
backwards compatibility with userspace.

Would you like another strace?

Nick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#392776: MBR still useful

[Paul TBBle Hampson]

Just a quick note, I noticed this bug using rc-alert.

mbr is still useful, at least in one specific case,
which is when using grub and a Highpoint HPT366 or 370
device (and possible later devices)

Basically, these IDE/RAID controllers use a sector on
the disk which is also one of the sectors grub tries
to install its stage 1.5 loader into when installed
as the MBR.

The trivially easy solution is to install grub as
the boot sector on your /boot (or /) partition, and
install mbr onto the MBR.

See bug #394868 for details of the HPT/grub conflict

-- 
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.


pgpIt8UmQmn1D.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#396973: gdb: can not debug any program linked with pthread.

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 07:29:59PM -0500, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

Obviously not for everyone; it passes the testsuite during package
build.

I can only assume that either your C library or kernel has somehow
gotten broken.  Could you run "strace -o strace.log gdb ./simple", run
the program to the error, and send me that log?

> Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
> Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.1

Does this mean you're running a 32-bit installation and a 64-bit
kernel?  Did you build the kernel yourself?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Patch for ktorrent FTBFS (#395897)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 395897 patch fixed-upstream
Bug#395897: FTBFS: now: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395897: Patch for ktorrent FTBFS (#395897)

[Ted Percival]

tags 395897 patch fixed-upstream
stop

Upstream removed the LDFLAGS in revision 594434 [1].

This patch removes all three instances of LDFLAGS from the source,
equivalent to the upstream change. It fixed FTBFS on my powerpc machine
and passed "program starts OK" testing.

[1] Upstream revision 594434:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/ktorrent/configure.in.in?rev=594434&view=rev

-- 
tp
diff -ru ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1/configure ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1-new/configure
--- ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1/configure	2006-10-10 02:09:14.0 +1000
+++ ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1-new/configure	2006-11-04 09:57:50.0 +1000
@@ -31299,7 +31299,6 @@
 
 #MIN_CONFIG(3.3)
 CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS $KDE_DEFAULT_CXXFLAGS $USE_EXCEPTIONS $USE_RTTI"
-LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -Wl -z now"
 
 
 # Check whether --enable-largefile or --disable-largefile was given.
diff -ru ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1/configure.in ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1-new/configure.in
--- ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1/configure.in	2006-10-10 02:09:08.0 +1000
+++ ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1-new/configure.in	2006-11-04 09:57:33.0 +1000
@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@
 
 #MIN_CONFIG(3.3)
 CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS $KDE_DEFAULT_CXXFLAGS $USE_EXCEPTIONS $USE_RTTI"
-LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -Wl -z now"
 
 dnl PACKAGE set before
 
diff -ru ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1/configure.in.in ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1-new/configure.in.in
--- ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1/configure.in.in	2006-10-10 02:04:11.0 +1000
+++ ktorrent-2.0.3+dfsg1-new/configure.in.in	2006-11-04 09:57:40.0 +1000
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 #MIN_CONFIG(3.3)
 CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS $KDE_DEFAULT_CXXFLAGS $USE_EXCEPTIONS $USE_RTTI"
-LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -Wl -z now"
 
 AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(ktorrent,2.0.3)
 


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: [bugzilla #395094] bug only affects sarge now

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 395094 + sarge
Bug#395094: CVE-2006-545[3-5]: Multiple security issues in bugzilla
Tags were: confirmed security
Tags added: sarge

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396973: gdb: can not debug any program linked with pthread.

[Nick Lewycky]

Package: gdb
Version: 6.4.90.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Any program linked with "-lpthread" will make GDB unusable with the following
error:

  Cannot find user-level thread for LWP 28988: generic error

Here's an example:

  $ cat simple.c
  int main(void) {
return 0;
  }
  $ gcc -O0 -g simple.c -o simple -lpthread
  $ gdb ./simple
  GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian
  Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
  welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
  Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
  There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
  This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library 
"/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".

  (gdb) break simple.c:2
  Breakpoint 1 at 0x8048372: file simple.c, line 2.
  (gdb) run
  Starting program: /home/nicholas/simple 
  warning: Lowest section in system-supplied DSO at 0xe000 is .hash at 
e0b4
  [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
  Error while reading shared library symbols:
  Cannot find new threads: generic error
  Cannot find user-level thread for LWP 29015: generic error
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0xf7f92010 in _dl_debug_state () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #1  0xffdd2530 in ?? ()
  #2  0xf7f88c35 in dl_main () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #3  0xf7f953e8 in _dl_sysdep_start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #4  0xf7f86b46 in _dl_start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #5  0xf7f867b7 in _start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  (gdb) c
  Continuing.
  Cannot find user-level thread for LWP 29015: generic error
  (gdb) c
  Continuing.
  Cannot find user-level thread for LWP 29015: generic error
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0xf7f92010 in _dl_debug_state () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #1  0xffdd2530 in ?? ()
  #2  0xf7f88c35 in dl_main () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #3  0xf7f953e8 in _dl_sysdep_start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #4  0xf7f86b46 in _dl_start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  #5  0xf7f867b7 in _start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2

This is especially annoying as the actual program, despite linking with
pthread is single-threaded. It works fine if you remove "-lpthread" from the
compile line. I tried two gcc versions:

  gcc version 4.1.2 20061028 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-19)

and

  gcc version 4.0.4 20060904 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-7)

both are affected, leading me to think that this is an error in gdb (or
possibly libpthread.)

Nick Lewycky

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.1
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages gdb depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libncurses5  5.5-5   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libreadline5 5.2-1   GNU readline and history libraries

gdb recommends no packages.

-- debconf-show failed


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395094: [bugzilla #395094] bug only affects sarge now

[Alexis Sukrieh]

tags 395094 + sarge
thanks

I've just uploaded bugzilla 2.22.1 to sid, urgency set to high.
That bug is now closed in sid.

We can focus on the sarge patches now.

-- 
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0x1EE5DD34
Debian   http://www.debian.org
Backup Manager   http://www.backup-manager.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396702: marked as done (ikiwiki: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'perlmagick')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:47:28 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396702: fixed in ikiwiki 1.32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: ikiwiki
Version: 1.31
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'ikiwiki' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

t/readfile.ok
t/syntax...
#   Failed test 'IkiWiki/Plugin/img.pm'
#   in t/syntax.t at line 16.
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 46.
dubious
Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
DIED. FAILED test 31
Failed 1/46 tests, 97.83% okay
t/titlepageok
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
---
t/syntax.t 1   256461   2.17%  31
Failed 1/14 test scripts, 92.86% okay. 1/274 subtests failed, 99.64% okay.
make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
make[1]: Leaving directory `/ikiwiki-1.31'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

This is caused by a missing Build-Depends on 'perlmagick' as can be
seen from the following:

# perl -c IkiWiki/Plugin/img.pm
Can't locate Image/Magick.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl 
/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5 
/usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl 
.) at IkiWiki/Plugin/img.pm line 9.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at IkiWiki/Plugin/img.pm line 9.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ikiwiki-1.31/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/ikiwiki-1.31/debian/control 2006-10-28 03:15:15.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2006-11-02 12:18:56.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: web
 Priority: optional
 Build-Depends: perl, debhelper (>= 5)
-Build-Depends-Indep: dpkg-dev (>= 1.9.0), markdown, libhtml-template-perl, 
libhtml-scrubber-perl, wdg-html-validator, libtext-wikiformat-perl, 
libhtml-parser-perl, liburi-perl
+Build-Depends-Indep: dpkg-dev (>= 1.9.0), perlmagick, markdown, 
libhtml-template-perl, libhtml-scrubber-perl, wdg-html-validator, 
libtext-wikiformat-perl, libhtml-parser-perl, liburi-perl
 Maintainer: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 XS-Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.kitenet.net/ikiwiki/trunk

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ikiwiki
Source-Version: 1.32

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ikiwiki, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ikiwiki_1.32.dsc
  to pool/main/i/ikiwiki/ikiwiki_1.32.dsc
ikiwiki_1.32.tar.gz
  to pool/main/i/ikiwiki/ikiwiki_1.32.tar.gz
ikiwiki_1.32_all.deb
  to pool/main/i/ikiwiki/ikiwiki_1.32_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ikiwiki package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  3 Nov 2006 14:46:37 -0500
Source: ikiwiki
Binary: ikiwiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.32
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 ikiwiki- a wiki compiler
Closes: 396702
Changes: 
 ikiwiki (1.32) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add a separate pass to find page links, and only render each page once,
 instead of over and over. Typical speedup is ~4x. Max possible speedup:
 8x.
   * Add "scan" parameter to hook(), which is used to make the hook be called
 during the scanning pass, as well as the render pass. The meta and tag
 plugins need to use the new scan parameter, so will any others that modify
 %links.
   * Now that links are calculated in a separate pass, it can also
 precalculate backlinks in one pass, which is O(N^2) instead of the
 previous code that was O(N^3). A very nice speedup for wikis with lots
 (thousands) of pages.
   * Stylish update to the ikiwiki logo, thanks to Recai Oktaş and Selçuk
 Erdem.
   * Add a default stylesheet entry for the pagecloud.
   * Add examples page with some examples of things that can be d

Bug#380056: marked as done (python-tunepimp: missing library dependency)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:47:51 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380056: fixed in libtunepimp 0.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-tunepimp
Version: 0.4.2-3.1
Severity: serious

The package is missing dependency on libtunepimp3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages python-tunepimp depends on:
ii  python2.3.5-11   An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-ctypes 0.9.9.6-1  Python package to create and manip
ii  python-support0.3.8  automated rebuilding support for p

python-tunepimp recommends no packages.

-- 
Michał Politowski
Talking has been known to lead to communication if practiced carelessly.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libtunepimp
Source-Version: 0.4.2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libtunepimp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libtunepimp-bin_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp-bin_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
libtunepimp-perl_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp-perl_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
libtunepimp3-dev_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp3-dev_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
libtunepimp3_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp3_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.diff.gz
libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.dsc
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.dsc
python-tunepimp_0.4.2-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/python-tunepimp_0.4.2-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libtunepimp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  3 Nov 2006 20:37:31 +0100
Source: libtunepimp
Binary: libtunepimp3-dev libtunepimp3 libtunepimp-perl python-tunepimp 
libtunepimp-bin
Architecture: source powerpc all
Version: 0.4.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libtunepimp-bin - libtunepimp simple tagging applications
 libtunepimp-perl - libtunepimp perl bindings
 libtunepimp3 - MusicBrainz tagging library and simple tagger application
 libtunepimp3-dev - MusicBrainz tagging library -- development files
 python-tunepimp - libtunepimp python bindings (default package)
Closes: 373455 378091 380056
Changes: 
 libtunepimp (0.4.2-4) unstable; urgency=HIGH
 .
   * ACK libtunepimp 0.4.2-3.0etch1 NMU. And re-add the changes that
 were removed silently by the last two NMUs.
 closes: Bug#378091
   * ACK NMUs 0.4.2-3.2 and 0.4.2-3.1 (python transition).
 closes: Bug#380056, #373455
   * Urgency high upload for critical security fix.
   * The NMU contains the original patch from
 
http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/attachment/ticket/1764/libtunepimp-0.4.2-lookuptools.cpp-fix-buffer-overflow.diff
 The final upstream changeset seems more complete and correct.
 http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/changeset/7935
Files: 
 aa1faadb7b5c0acf054fc0884c28eeab 999 libs optional libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.dsc
 85edb817cee3d5a00460039f1a5121ab 156683 libs optional 
libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.diff.gz
 733e0ac0c404d50a38618151e6aec12b 26788 python optional 
python-tunepimp_0.4.2-4_all.deb
 741b01190d213d397f0b9f301c6bbd3a 333756 libdevel optional 
libtunepimp3-dev_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
 e98e3c92600d1d51e98520928065d40b 303222 libs optional 
libtunepimp3_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
 0fb008b27ea9c6f5a7c79ff0d9ff5ef0 28900 sound optional 
libtunepimp-bin_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
 ba355e35232004ba3b92bf7653d18eb7 71886 perl optiona

Bug#378091: marked as done (libtunepimp: buffer overflow)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:47:51 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378091: fixed in libtunepimp 0.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libtunepimp
Version: 0.4.2-3
Version: 0.3.0-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch

Hi!

http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/1764 describes some buffer
overflows in libtunepimp. For your convenience, these are the ubuntu
debdiffs for 0.4.2 and 0.3.0 (for sarge-security):

  http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/libtunepimp-0.4.2.buffer-overflow.diff
  http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/libtunepimp-0.3.0.buffer-overflow.diff

I asked for a CVE on vendor-sec, will forward it here as soon as it is
assigned.

Thanks,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org

In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libtunepimp
Source-Version: 0.4.2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libtunepimp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libtunepimp-bin_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp-bin_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
libtunepimp-perl_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp-perl_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
libtunepimp3-dev_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp3-dev_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
libtunepimp3_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp3_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.diff.gz
libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.dsc
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.dsc
python-tunepimp_0.4.2-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtunepimp/python-tunepimp_0.4.2-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libtunepimp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  3 Nov 2006 20:37:31 +0100
Source: libtunepimp
Binary: libtunepimp3-dev libtunepimp3 libtunepimp-perl python-tunepimp 
libtunepimp-bin
Architecture: source powerpc all
Version: 0.4.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libtunepimp-bin - libtunepimp simple tagging applications
 libtunepimp-perl - libtunepimp perl bindings
 libtunepimp3 - MusicBrainz tagging library and simple tagger application
 libtunepimp3-dev - MusicBrainz tagging library -- development files
 python-tunepimp - libtunepimp python bindings (default package)
Closes: 373455 378091 380056
Changes: 
 libtunepimp (0.4.2-4) unstable; urgency=HIGH
 .
   * ACK libtunepimp 0.4.2-3.0etch1 NMU. And re-add the changes that
 were removed silently by the last two NMUs.
 closes: Bug#378091
   * ACK NMUs 0.4.2-3.2 and 0.4.2-3.1 (python transition).
 closes: Bug#380056, #373455
   * Urgency high upload for critical security fix.
   * The NMU contains the original patch from
 
http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/attachment/ticket/1764/libtunepimp-0.4.2-lookuptools.cpp-fix-buffer-overflow.diff
 The final upstream changeset seems more complete and correct.
 http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/changeset/7935
Files: 
 aa1faadb7b5c0acf054fc0884c28eeab 999 libs optional libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.dsc
 85edb817cee3d5a00460039f1a5121ab 156683 libs optional 
libtunepimp_0.4.2-4.diff.gz
 733e0ac0c404d50a38618151e6aec12b 26788 python optional 
python-tunepimp_0.4.2-4_all.deb
 741b01190d213d397f0b9f301c6bbd3a 333756 libdevel optional 
libtunepimp3-dev_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
 e98e3c92600d1d51e98520928065d40b 303222 libs optional 
libtunepimp3_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
 0fb008b27ea9c6f5a7c79ff0d9ff5ef0 28900 sound optional 
libtunepimp-bin_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb
 ba355e35232004ba3b92bf7653d18eb7 71886 perl optional 
libtunepimp-perl_0.4.2-4_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS

Bug#393149: marked as done (uae: cannot open display)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:49:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393149: fixed in uae 0.8.25-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: uae
Version: 0.8.25-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

uae errors when run:

Found 1 joystick(s)
Testing the RDTSC instruction ... done.
Calibrating delay loop.. ok - 3096.73 BogoMIPS
Found 1 joystick(s)
Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
Xlib: No protocol specified


(UAE:3927): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:  


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages uae depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.12.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo21.2.4-1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libfontconfig1   2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.12.4-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.8.20-2The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6  1:1.0.1-2   X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpango1.0-01.14.5-1Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libsm6   1:1.0.1-3   X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6 2:1.0.3-2   X11 client-side library
ii  libxcursor1  1.1.7-4 X cursor management library
ii  libxext6 1:1.0.1-2   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxfixes3   1:4.0.1-4   X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio
ii  libxi6   1:1.0.1-3   X11 Input extension library
ii  libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4.1 X11 Xinerama extension library
ii  libxrandr2   2:1.1.0.2-4 X11 RandR extension library
ii  libxrender1  1:0.9.1-3   X Rendering Extension client libra

uae recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: uae
Source-Version: 0.8.25-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
uae, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

uae_0.8.25-4.diff.gz
  to pool/contrib/u/uae/uae_0.8.25-4.diff.gz
uae_0.8.25-4.dsc
  to pool/contrib/u/uae/uae_0.8.25-4.dsc
uae_0.8.25-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/contrib/u/uae/uae_0.8.25-4_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated uae package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  3 Nov 2006 21:07:08 +
Source: uae
Binary: uae
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.8.25-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 uae- The Ubiquitous Amiga Emulator
Closes: 393149
Changes: 
 uae (0.8.25-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Update/fix uae-confwrap example script.
   * Disabling preserve_home_in_writing_optionsfile.diff patch - code
 srcpys randomly w/ possibly random effects. Thanks to Steve Langasek
 hints. Hopefully (closes: #393149).
Files: 
 398b3dbf221d96e63da526444eeadab1 673 contrib/otherosfs optional 
uae_0.8.25-4.dsc
 fabd02521cc423ff9f0c2e71bacd5333 35114 contrib/otherosfs optional 
uae_0.8.25-4.diff.gz
 3c02b3bbd15b44acf898e18927e5d064 837174 contrib/otherosfs optional 
uae_0.8.25-4_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS7ENzCVHePKM0QIRAuVNAJ44DwgyqZkxeTJ1swQNi7b4by6aQwCfVaGa
ZlSAplc3AlmNDDZNLrfWFlM=
=6HM8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#395094: CVE-2006-545[3-5]: Multiple security issues in bugzilla

[Alexis Sukrieh]

tags 395094 + confirmed
thanks

* Ben Hutchings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
> Upstream security advisory: http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.18.5/
> 
> These are fixed in 2.22.1 which would be suitable for sid.

I'm working on the packaging of that new upstream release.
 
-- 
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0x1EE5DD34
Debian   http://www.debian.org
Backup Manager   http://www.backup-manager.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#394626: closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#394626: fixed in qdbm 1.8.70-1.1)

[Aurélien GÉRÔME]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:03:36PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Sorry, it didn't occur to me that you would feel strongly about being
> credited here.  This doesn't mean that I don't appreciate your work, it just
> means (in my case) that I didn't use your patch directly, but re-derived it
> after testing on alpha.  FWIW, the maintainer's upload also doesn't appear
> to credit you; as I don't intend to re-NMU just to fix the crediting, you
> might ask the maintainer to make this change in his next version.

I bear no grudge against you for this. It is just a trivial workaround
anyway, the real bug being in gcc (#394630). Also, my wording may
have been too strong.

I have been told that I am not qualified to even be accepted in NM (not
being visible on the BTS for instance), so I was a bit blood-headed
when I looked at the changelog entry. :)

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Free Software Developer
  `- Unix Sys & Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#391780: mell: fails to install

[Tatsuya Kinoshita]

On October 12, 2006 at 10:42PM +0900,
tats (at debian.org) wrote:

> tags 391780 patch
> thanks
>
> On October 11, 2006 at 11:21PM +0200,
> allomber (at math.u-bordeaux.fr) wrote:
[...]
> > 
> > It was recorded today.
>
> The log seems that this bug is a different bug of #391778, and
> it is affected by other packages.
>
> To prevent an effect by other package when byte-compiling, please
> use -no-site-file option in emacsen-install.

I've prepared NMU mell_1.0.0-6.1 to fix this RC bug (bug#391780)
and lintian errors (bug#392602).  If the maintainer don't make an
objection to it, I'll do NMU next week.


--- mell-1.0.0-6/debian/changelog
+++ mell-1.0.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+mell (1.0.0-6.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * NMU to fix an RC bug and lintian errors.
+  * debian/emacsen-install.in: Use the -no-site-file option to prevent
+installation failure with xemacs21.  (Closes: Bug#391780)
+  * debian/control: Move debhelper and dpatch from Build-Depends-Indep
+to Build-Depends.  (Closes: Bug#392602)
+  * debian/rules: Use `make distclean' instead of `make clean' to remove
+configure generated files.
+  * debian/copyright: Update the postal address of FSF and mention
+Debian packaging conditions.
+  * debian/control: Set Standards-Version to 3.7.2.
+
+ -- Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat,  4 Nov 2006 07:26:16 +0900
+
 mell (1.0.0-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * README.Debian: Add notice about setup suggested by
--- mell-1.0.0-6/debian/control
+++ mell-1.0.0/debian/control
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 Section: editors
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Hidetaka Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), dpatch
-Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), dpatch
+Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 
 Package: mell
 Architecture: all
--- mell-1.0.0-6/debian/copyright
+++ mell-1.0.0/debian/copyright
@@ -18,9 +18,10 @@
 
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software
-   Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
-   02111-1307, USA.
+   Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301 USA
 
 On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
 Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
 
+The Debian packaging is distributed under the same conditions as
+the upstream.
--- mell-1.0.0-6/debian/emacsen-install.in
+++ mell-1.0.0/debian/emacsen-install.in
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 SITELISP=/usr/share/${FLAVOR}/site-lisp
 ELCDIR=${SITELISP}/${PACKAGE}
 APELDIR=${SITELISP}/apel
+SITEFLAG=-no-site-file
 FLAGS="${SITEFLAG} -q -batch -l ./path.el -l ${APELDIR}/poe.elc -f 
batch-byte-compile"
 STAMP="${ELCDIR}/compile-stamp"
 
--- mell-1.0.0-6/debian/rules
+++ mell-1.0.0/debian/rules
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp debian/emacsen-install
-   -$(MAKE) clean
+   -$(MAKE) distclean
 
dh_clean 
 


Thanks,
--
Tatsuya Kinoshita


pgpyLTu6VpCxu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: Bug#395094: CVE-2006-545[3-5]: Multiple security issues in bugzilla

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 395094 + confirmed
Bug#395094: CVE-2006-545[3-5]: Multiple security issues in bugzilla
Tags were: security
Tags added: confirmed

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395094: CVE-2006-545[3-5]: Multiple security issues in bugzilla

[Alexis Sukrieh]

* Ben Hutchings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
> Based on the advisory at http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.18.5/ I
> would say that:
[...]

Ben, thanks a lot for your work regarding that issue.
If you have an alioth account, feel free to ask Sean Finney to add you
to the webapps-common team, so you can commit to the bugzilla SVN repo.

I'm going to review and apply your patches as soon as possible.

Thanks again, your help is pretty welcome, as bugzilla really needs
attention, time and work.
 
Regards,

-- 
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0x1EE5DD34
Debian   http://www.debian.org
Backup Manager   http://www.backup-manager.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395252: embedded code copies are not RC

[Aurélien GÉRÔME]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:34:37PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> That benchmark was done on x86.  But let's face it, it's the
> architecture that counts.  Mind that I am writing this from a PPC, which
> is my main machine..

I disagree, amd64 would be the architecture which counts and amd64
has enough registers to cope with PIC code, but I will not fall in
the game of what architecture counts, even if for me, it would rather
be powerpc anyway.

> > Then, I can agree with you that static linking has better performance.
> > Therefore, what I can recommand is to build mplayer statically, but
> > with a Debian up-to-date ffmpeg package. I am CCing Samuel Hocevar
> > to get his opinion on the matter...
> 
> I know that distro people dislike static linking, but multimedia players
> are speed-critical applications.  Not everybody has a multi-GHz machine
> and even on those high definition content takes them to the limit...

This is a false argument. Come one please, do not attempt to tell me
that you can decently play a H.264-encoded video on a non-GHz machine
even with SIMD instruction-set, I will not believe you.

> > > Plus I expect random bugs to creep up.  As mentioned above  FFmpeg is
> > > highly volatile and fast-moving.  Backwards-compatibility is not a
> > > priority.
> > 
> > That will *not* happen with an up-to-date ffmpeg package which other
> > packages might benefit from.
> 
> What I'm afraid of is that such an updated package might not sit well
> with xine and the other users of FFmpeg.

That is why I would like the opinion of Sam on the matter. He told
me on IRC that he needed some time to investigate the matter...

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Free Software Developer
  `- Unix Sys & Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#394626: closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#394626: fixed in qdbm 1.8.70-1.1)

[Steve Langasek]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:07:18AM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:49:35AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >* Use -O0 in CXXFLAGS in plus/Makefile.in instead of -O1, to avoid an
> >  ICE when building on alpha.  Closes: #394626.

> I thought people were credited in changelog entries when they provided
> a patch which was later applied/adapted. I must have been wrong...

Sorry, it didn't occur to me that you would feel strongly about being
credited here.  This doesn't mean that I don't appreciate your work, it just
means (in my case) that I didn't use your patch directly, but re-derived it
after testing on alpha.  FWIW, the maintainer's upload also doesn't appear
to credit you; as I don't intend to re-NMU just to fix the crediting, you
might ask the maintainer to make this change in his next version.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

Bug#393149: uae: cannot open display

[Steve Langasek]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:18:59PM +0100, Stephan A Suerken wrote:
> > pwd_optionsfile is declared as char*, then used via strcpy() without
> > initialization.  And conveniently, this is in the code related to retrieving
> > $HOME from the environment.  Looks like a broken Debian patch to me.

> Argl, what a bummer ;(. For simplicity, -4 will have this patch
> disabled, and will close the bug.

> Re-open if that does not fix the problem, but it smells just like it.

Ok.  FWIW, the original upstream code also appears to contain a security
hole, because reading configuration data from the current directory means
other users may have control over your configuration -- in the case of an
emulator like uae, I would imagine this could amount to an arbitrary code
execution bug.  Would you accept a patch that completely drops reading the
config from $PWD?

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311188: debian-edu-config release critical bug

[Christian Perrier]

> What do you think?


*I* do think that, if that bug is RC for debian-edu-config, then
another one should be opened for localization-config, which does
exactly the same (actually not in very good shape for etch as it
basically does nothing). BTW, localization-config is maintained as
part of debian-edu, originally. I happen to be its maintainer right
now, but essentially as an interim while Konstantinos Margaritis is
away.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Foo

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> found 396964 2.8.5-2sarge2.1
Bug#396964: lynx: uses .mime.types and .mailcap from the current directory 
(arbitrary shell code execution)
Bug marked as found in version 2.8.5-2sarge2.1.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: /sbin/dmraid depends on /usr/lib/libz.so.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 396762 patch
Bug#396762: /sbin/dmraid depends on /usr/lib/libz.so.1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395252: embedded code copies are not RC

[Diego Biurrun]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:43:17PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:46:01PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > Removing the embedded copies of FFmpeg libraries from MPlayer is a bad
> > idea.
> 
> For the workload on the security team and the overall quality of Debian
> (a single source package for whatever produced binary packages),
> I strongly disagree.

I won't comment on the workload of the security team, even though Joey
appears to disagree about the issue.

> > The relationship between MPlayer and FFmpeg is very intimate to say the
> > least.  MPlayer uses FFmpeg HEAD via a svn:external declaration.  In the
> > future we will move both to a common repository.  Most FFmpeg developers
> > work on MPlayer as well.
> 
> Other software also use ffmpeg. AFAIK, ffmpeg do *not* need mplayer
> to work.

FFmpeg does not require MPlayer.  I never intended to say that.

> > FFmpeg is highly volatile and fast-moving.  The FFmpeg snapshot in
> > Debian is two months older than the one in MPlayer 1.0rc1.  This may not
> > sound much, but it means more than 600 (!) commits to the FFmpeg
> > repository.
> > 
> > Using the Debian version of FFmpeg in MPlayer would create a beast
> > entirely different from 1.0rc1.  Several codecs have been added which
> > were only available through binaries before, many bugs have been fixed
> > and speed improvements committed.
> 
> The Debian version can also be updated. I fail to see the issue here.

xine upstream currently uses a private fork of an older version of FFmpeg.
Exchanging this for a newer version might bring along problems...

> > A H.264 video decoding benchmark done by a fellow developer gives the
> > following numbers:
> > 
> > self-built custom binary:  13.9 seconds
> > Debian MPlayer package:14.7 seconds
> > binary with Debian's FFmpeg:   17.7 seconds
> > 
> > The Debian FFmpeg binary was built against dynamic FFmpeg, the other two
> > with static FFmpeg.  That's a massive 20% performance degradation..
> > 
> > Using a shared dynamic version of FFmpeg would disable several video
> > filters, so there would be even more feature loss.
> 
> First, on what architecture did you test that? I expect the gap
> to be reduced on non-x86 architectures. x86 is a register-starved
> architecture and one of those four general purpose registers is used
> by PIC code, so dynamic linking can really drop the performance as
> your benchmark shows.

That benchmark was done on x86.  But let's face it, it's the
architecture that counts.  Mind that I am writing this from a PPC, which
is my main machine..

> Then, I can agree with you that static linking has better performance.
> Therefore, what I can recommand is to build mplayer statically, but
> with a Debian up-to-date ffmpeg package. I am CCing Samuel Hocevar
> to get his opinion on the matter...

I know that distro people dislike static linking, but multimedia players
are speed-critical applications.  Not everybody has a multi-GHz machine
and even on those high definition content takes them to the limit...

> > Plus I expect random bugs to creep up.  As mentioned above  FFmpeg is
> > highly volatile and fast-moving.  Backwards-compatibility is not a
> > priority.
> 
> That will *not* happen with an up-to-date ffmpeg package which other
> packages might benefit from.

What I'm afraid of is that such an updated package might not sit well
with xine and the other users of FFmpeg.

Diego


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396762: /sbin/dmraid depends on /usr/lib/libz.so.1

[Steve Langasek]

tags 396762 patch
thanks

FWIW, here's a patch to only link zlib statically to dmraid while linking
dynamically to the other libs.

Since crc32 is the only function used from zlib, the size difference is
minimal.  On i386, here's the before:

$ du -sh debian/dmraid/sbin/dmraid 
160Kdebian/dmraid/sbin/dmraid

and the after:

$ du -sh debian/dmraid/sbin/dmraid 
172Kdebian/dmraid/sbin/dmraid

The patch is not suitable in its present form for platforms that don't use
the GNU linker, but those platforms suck anyway. ;)

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/
diff -u dmraid-1.0.0.rc13/debian/changelog dmraid-1.0.0.rc13/debian/changelog
--- dmraid-1.0.0.rc13/debian/changelog
+++ dmraid-1.0.0.rc13/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+dmraid (1.0.0.rc13-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Statically link against libz, since we only need crc32 from it and
+we can't have binaries in /sbin depending on libs in /usr/lib.
+Closes: #396762.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri,  3 Nov 2006 14:38:54 -0800
+
 dmraid (1.0.0.rc13-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release; closes: #391499.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- dmraid-1.0.0.rc13.orig/1.0.0.rc13/tools/Makefile.in
+++ dmraid-1.0.0.rc13/1.0.0.rc13/tools/Makefile.in
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 TARGETS=\
dmraid
 
-DMRAIDLIBS=-ldmraid -lz
+DMRAIDLIBS=-ldmraid -Wl,-Bstatic -lz -Wl,-Bdynamic
 
 include $(top_srcdir)/make.tmpl
 

Bug#396880: dblatex: error in file dblatex/xsl/docbook.xsl

[Andreas Hoenen]

On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:55:36 PST Steve Langasek wrote:
>Hi Andreas,
>
>On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:02:24PM +0100, Andreas Hoenen wrote:
>> I'm currently working at high pressure on a debian release of dblatex
>> 0.2 with this bug fix included.  I hope to get someone to sponsor the
>> new release quickly, thus hopefully this problem should be out of the
>> world soon.
>
>Do you have packages prepared that are ready for sponsoring?  I may have
>time to sponsor such an upload.
>
>Cheers,
>--
>Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
>Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/
>
>

Thanks for your kind offer.  (We all do hate grave bugs as short before
etch, don't we?)

I have uploaded dblatex 0.2~pre-1 to mentors.debian.net some days ago,
but as it does not fix the grave bug (and as the next upstream version
has been released meanwhile), it does not seem to make much sense to
release it.

Work on 0.2-1 is progressing well, until now all tests succeed.  But I
will sleep one night on it.  If tomorrow I consider the package still in
good shape and the final tests succeed, I will upload it to
mentors.debian.net (and inform you).  Thus I hope to get ready at
Saturday, or at worst at Sunday.  If you could examine the package and
sponsor it, this would be just great, as both my default sponsor, Lucas
Wall, and Andreas Barth who has volunteered to sponsor 0.2~pre-1 seem to
be very busy at the moment.

Regards, Andreas Hoenen
--
Andreas Hoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

GPG: 1024D/B888D2CE
 A4A6 E8B5 593A E89B 496B
 82F0 728D 8B7E B888 D2CE


pgpHUqbljeJQT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: Foo

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 396949 -1
Bug#396949: lynx: uses .mime.types and .mailcap from the current directory 
(arbitrary shell code execution)
Bug 396949 cloned as bug 396964.

> reassign -1 lynx
Bug#396964: lynx: uses .mime.types and .mailcap from the current directory 
(arbitrary shell code execution)
Bug reassigned from package `lynx-cur' to `lynx'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: subversion Debian ci: r745 - trunk/debian

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 393414 pending
Bug#393414: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Tags were: etch-ignore pending
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395493: Can't send messages to list

[Lionel Elie Mamane]

(I am not subscribed to mailman-users; please CC me on replies. Please
 also keep the Debian bug entry in the CC list if appropriate.)

(I'm one of the maintainers of the Mailman package in Debian, the
 OS - slash - "GNU/Linux distribution" that Lukasz is using.)

Mark Sapiro wrote:

>Lukasz Szybalski wrote:

>>On 10/24/06, Mark Sapiro  wrote:

>>> We still don't know what causes the timeout. The smtplib debugging
>>> info would help.

>> Where would i find it or how would i get it. Error, smtp,
>> smtp-failure, syslog has only what i have pasted in.

> The patch to SMTPDirect.py which you say you installed causes
> Pythons smtplib to write debugging info to stderr

Not with the version of smtplib Lukasz has (python 2.3). It writes to
stdout. I sent to Lukasz a version of smtplib that writes debugging
info to stderr.

> which in a normal Mailman environment is logged to Mailman's error
> log.

In the version of Mailman that Lukasz uses, not exactly. It is logged
to a MultiLogger which tries to log to Mailman's error log _and_ to
the stderr of the process. Because the process is running as a daemon,
it does not have a stderr and thus writing to stderr fails, which
falls back (through _logexc_) to ... writing to stderr. Which fails,
but this time the exception (invalid file descriptor) is not caught
and Mailman barfs out with a traceback like (I manually patched the
smptlib on that machine to write to stderr instead of stdout):

 Nov 02 15:21:51 2006 (18279) Uncaught runner exception: [Errno 9] Bad file 
descriptor
Nov 02 15:21:51 2006 (18279) Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 111, in _oneloop
self._onefile(msg, msgdata)
  File "/usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 167, in _onefile
keepqueued = self._dispose(mlist, msg, msgdata)
  File "/usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Queue/OutgoingRunner.py", line 73, in _dispose
self._func(mlist, msg, msgdata)
  File "/var/lib/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/SMTPDirect.py", line 166, in process
conn.quit()
  File "/var/lib/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/SMTPDirect.py", line 93, in quit
self.__conn.quit()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/smtplib.py", line 709, in quit
self.docmd("quit")
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/smtplib.py", line 370, in docmd
self.putcmd(cmd,args)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/smtplib.py", line 326, in putcmd
self.send(str)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/smtplib.py", line 310, in send
if self.debuglevel > 0: print >> sys.stderr, 'send:', `str`
  File "/usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Logging/MultiLogger.py", line 45, in write
_logexc(logger, msg)
  File "/usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Logging/Utils.py", line 22, in _logexc
sys.__stderr__.write('Logging error: %s\n' % logger)
 IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor


Looking at the code, this seems to be fixed in Mailman 2.1.9, and I
would assume probably in some earlier versions, too.


Best Regards,

-- 
Lionel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395094: CVE-2006-545[3-5]: Multiple security issues in bugzilla

[Ben Hutchings]

Upstream security advisory: http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.18.5/

These are fixed in 2.22.1 which would be suitable for sid.

There is no upstream fix for the 2.16 series, as used in sarge.  I am
looking at the upstream fix for the 2.18 series to see whether it is
applicable or easily adaptable to 2.16.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] shortened to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you've signed my GPG key, please send a signature on and to the new uid.
The world is coming to an end.  Please log off.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#396880: dblatex: error in file dblatex/xsl/docbook.xsl

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Andreas,

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:02:24PM +0100, Andreas Hoenen wrote:
> I'm currently working at high pressure on a debian release of dblatex
> 0.2 with this bug fix included.  I hope to get someone to sponsor the
> new release quickly, thus hopefully this problem should be out of the
> world soon.

Do you have packages prepared that are ready for sponsoring?  I may have
time to sponsor such an upload.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396880: dblatex: error in file dblatex/xsl/docbook.xsl

[Andreas Hoenen]

On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:33:02 +0100 Sebastien Blondeel wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Frank K=FCster wrote:
>> Can you please provide an example document that shows this problem?
>> Ideally a minimized one.
>
>I now have a better understanding of the problem.
>
>This works:
>-=3D-=3D-=3D
>
>  "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd";>
>Welcome to my document—quite a small one.
>-=3D-=3D-=3D

You seem to have messed up with the bug report numbers: your explanation
belongs to the — problem, but not to the crash of dblatex with
xsltproc 1.1.18.

I think Frank's request for an example document on the crash is outdated
as any document crashes, the problem is understood and a patched version
is being prepared.

I appreciate your idea about decreasing the urgency of the —
problem, I will look at it, but only after solving the grave bug.

Regards, Andreas Hoenen
--
Andreas Hoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

GPG: 1024D/B888D2CE
 A4A6 E8B5 593A E89B 496B
 82F0 728D 8B7E B888 D2CE


pgpUEbMx5uosu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#396961: binutils-h8300-hms: all symlinks point to /build/buildd/binutils-h8300-hms-2.16.1/debian/binutils-h8300-hms

[Aurelien Jarno]

Package: binutils-h8300-hms
Version: 2.16.1-1
Severity: grave

All is said in the subject. For example:
/usr/h8300-hitachi-coff/bin/ld -> 
/build/buildd/binutils-h8300-hms-2.16.1/debian/binutils-h8300-hms/usr/bin/h8300-hitachi-coff-ld



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

Versions of packages binutils-h8300-hms depends on:
ii  binutils 2.17-3  The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries

binutils-h8300-hms recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed (with 1 errors): serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 389267 serious
Bug#389267: CVE-2006-4294: Directory traversal vulnerability in TWiki
Severity set to `serious' from `important'

> thanks!
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#367973: Twiki - about to miss a release?

[Amaya]

Amaya wrote:
> I am looking at your last package. I am thinking of uploading it as it
> closes several RC and security bugs. Can I add some patches here and
> there (i10 mostly) so that Twiki releases with etch in good shape?

I find your package fine, but i has several lintian warnings:
~/debian/1_sponsored/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>lintian twiki_4.0.4-3_all.deb
W: twiki: image-file-in-usr-lib usr/lib/cgi-bin/twiki/logos/info.gif
W: twiki: image-file-in-usr-lib usr/lib/cgi-bin/twiki/logos/warning.gif
W: twiki: image-file-in-usr-lib usr/lib/cgi-bin/twiki/logos/T-logo34x26-t.gif
W: twiki: image-file-in-usr-lib usr/lib/cgi-bin/twiki/logos/T-logo-140x40-t.gif
W: twiki: package-contains-upstream-install-documentation 
usr/share/doc/twiki/INSTALL.html
W: twiki: malformed-prompt-in-templates twiki/defaultUrlHost
W: twiki: malformed-prompt-in-templates twiki/wikiwebmaster
W: twiki: making-assumptions-about-interfaces-in-templates twiki/samplefiles

Some are uglier than others, but I am really tight on time.
I will wellcome and review patches and upload tkwiki. I will upload
anyway, because it is much better than nothing, but the patches would be
great.

-- 
  ·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
 : :' :-- Emma Goldman
 `. `'   Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
   `- www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com

Bug#367973: Twiki - about to miss a release?

[Amaya]

Sven Dowideit wrote:
> true, I don't do much, other than update the debian package at http://
> members.iinet.net.au/~spos once a month or two, and send it off to my
> sponsor.

May I ask who is your sponsor? Would you accept me as a backup sponsor?

> As a TWiki developer, rather than a debian developer, I don't feel
> supported by you guys, just attacked, but none the less, I maintain
> what i can.

And that is truly appreciated. I feel bad that you feel attacked.
What I am trying to do here is find a way to work together in a more
satisfactory way.

I am looking at your last package. I am thinking of uploading it as it
closes several RC and security bugs. Can I add some patches here and
there (i10 mostly) so that Twiki releases with etch in good shape?

Thanks

-- 
  ·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
 : :' :-- Emma Goldman
 `. `'   Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
   `- www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com

Bug#396931: marked as done (http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/boot.img.gz makes usb-stick unusable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:53:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396931: 
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/boot.img.gz makes 
usb-stick unusable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-report
Version: 02-Nov-2006 16:06  15.0M
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


I downloaded the usb-image from 
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/
ie. the file
boot.img.gz 02-Nov-2006 16:06  15.0M  

Before continuing I get from fdisk -l: 
Disk /dev/sda: 1021 MB, 1021312512 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 124 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *   1 125  997344e  W95 FAT16 (LBA)
Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(123, 254, 63) logical=(124, 42, 45)

As from the manual 
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch04s04.html
I issue 
zcat boot.img.gz > /dev/sda
and get from 'fdisk -l'

Disk /dev/sda: 1021 MB, 1021312512 bytes
32 heads, 61 sectors/track, 1021 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1952 * 512 = 999424 bytes

This doesn't look like a partition table
Probably you selected the wrong device.

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   ? 1547397 1547657  253319   e4  SpeedStor
Partition 1 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(190, 120, 0) logical=(1547396, 26, 15)
Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(544, 125, 44) logical=(1547656, 11, 47)
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda2   ?  515657 1534084   993984023   98  Unknown
Partition 2 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(1010, 16, 43) logical=(515656, 25, 37)
Partition 2 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(205, 205, 22) logical=(1534083, 1, 42)
Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda3   ?  869174 1852732   959953209   7d  Unknown
Partition 3 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(252, 139, 46) logical=(869173, 1, 19)
Partition 3 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(367, 195, 2) logical=(1852731, 20, 61)
Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda4   ?   17157   21421 41615360  Empty
Partition 4 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(0, 10, 0) logical=(17156, 6, 19)
Partition 4 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(0, 0, 0) logical=(21420, 2, 6)
Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary.

Partition table entries are not in disk order

Stick cannot be formatted by cfdisk, but fdisk does the job. 

HTH,
Johannes

I downloaded the file twice, 15.0 MB; same result.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> As from the manual 
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch04s04.html
> I issue 
> zcat boot.img.gz > /dev/sda
> and get from 'fdisk -l'
> 
> Disk /dev/sda: 1021 MB, 1021312512 bytes
> 32 heads, 61 sectors/track, 1021 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 1952 * 512 = 999424 bytes
> 
> This doesn't look like a partition table
> Probably you selected the wrong device.

This is an expected result. The image replaces the partition table with
a single, bootable filesystem.

> Stick cannot be formatted by cfdisk, but fdisk does the job. 

Yes, if you want to put a partition table back on it, you use a tool
like fdisk.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#396949: lynx: uses .mime.types and .mailcap from the current directory (arbitrary shell code execution)

[Piotr Engelking]

Package: lynx-cur
Version: 2.8.7dev1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

Lynx attempts to use the .mime.types and .mailcap files located in the
current directory:

$ strace lynx -dump 2>&1 | grep '^open("[^/]'
open(".mailcap", O_RDONLY)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(".mime.types", O_RDONLY)   = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
$

This allows an attacker to cause lynx to execute arbitrary shell code when a
user runs lynx while visiting a directory with attacker-provided contents.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
 APT prefers testing
 APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages lynx-cur depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]1.5.8   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgnutls13  1.4.4-1 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii  libncursesw5 5.5-5   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-13  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages lynx-cur recommends:
ii  mime-support  3.37-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap

-- debconf information:
* lynx-cur/defaulturl: http://www.google.pl/
 lynx-cur/etc_lynx.cfg:


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#393595: Not fixed

[Steve Langasek]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 01:49:42PM +0100, Carl =?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=BCrstenberg ?= 
wrote:
> This bug is as per today, not fixed:

Yes it is.

> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  libapache2-mod-php5.1: Depends: apache2-common (>= 2.0.55-4) but it
> is not installable

That's not a Debian package.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395181: missing dependency on libdevmapper1.01

[maximilian attems]

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006, Roland Stigge wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> you can either do this:
> 
> ===
> diff -ruN initrd-tools-0.1.84.1.orig/mkinitrd initrd-tools-0.1.84.1/mkinitrd
> --- initrd-tools-0.1.84.1.orig/mkinitrd 2006-04-24 01:08:14.0 +0200
> +++ initrd-tools-0.1.84.1/mkinitrd  2006-11-02 17:23:11.0 +0100
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@
>  EOF
> {
> echo /sbin/cryptsetup
> -   echo /lib/libdevmapper.so.1.01
> +   echo /lib/libdevmapper.so.*
> echo /lib/libpopt.so.0
> } >&6
>  }
> ===
> 
> ... or hard code it again (/lib/libdevmapper.so.1.02) and next time get
> a new bug for free!
> 
> (This is not the first time this happens: See #266591 et al.)
> 
> bye,
>   Roland

initrd-tools is dead.

you want to use initramfs-tools.
-- 
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395493: mailman: smtp-failure:timeout, bad file descriptor, set_debuglevel

[Mark Sapiro]

Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:

> I don't know. Mark Sapiro claims that smtplib debug info goes to
> stderr, but it goes to stdout. Maybe this explains it.

My mistake. In Python 2.4, smtplib.py debug output does go to stderr, 
but in Python 2.3 it goes to stdout.


--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#393149: uae: cannot open display

[Stephan A Suerken]

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat Oct 28 02:44:48 2006):

> Let's go to the source instead.  The following error appears in the build
> log on i386:
>
> gcc-4.0 -I. -I../src/include/ -c  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer  -Wall -Wno-unused 
> -Wno-format -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes 
> -DGCCCONSTFUNC="__attribute__((const))" -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 
> -fno-exceptions -DUNALIGNED_PROFITABLE -fno-strength-reduce 
> -DREGPARAM="__attribute__((regparm(3)))" -DX86_ASSEMBLY -DOPTIMIZED_FLAGS 
> -DUSE_ZFILE -DSUPPORT_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DUAE_FILESYS_THREADS 
> -D__inline__=inline -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include 
> -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 
> -I/usr/include/libpng12   -DSHM_SUPPORT_LINKS=1   main.c -o main.o
> [...]
> main.c: In function 'real_main':
> main.c:379: warning: 'pwd_optionsfile' is used uninitialized in this function
> [...]
>
> pwd_optionsfile is declared as char*, then used via strcpy() without
> initialization.  And conveniently, this is in the code related to retrieving
> $HOME from the environment.  Looks like a broken Debian patch to me.

Argl, what a bummer ;(. For simplicity, -4 will have this patch
disabled, and will close the bug.

Re-open if that does not fix the problem, but it smells just like it.

Thanks for the hint,

Stephan
-- 
Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396862: libgtk-mozembed-ruby: FTBFS: checking for xulrunner-gtkmozembed... Ruby/GTK couldn't be initialized ('Cannot open display: ')

[Steve Langasek]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:30:59PM +, Dafydd Harries wrote:
> Ar 03/11/2006 am 13:08, ysgrifennodd Andreas Jochens:

> > Package: libgtk-mozembed-ruby
> > Version: 0.3.1-6
> > Severity: serious

> > When building 'libgtk-mozembed-ruby' in a clean unstable chroot,
> > I get the following error:

> This source package is deprecated. It has been merged upstream into the
> ruby-gnome2 source package. The libgtk-mozembed-ruby binary package
> Replaces/Provides libgtk-mozembed-ruby1.8. If libgtk-mozembed-ruby1.8 is still
> in the archive, it should be removed.

Please indicate this to the ftp team by filing a bug against ftp.debian.org.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 396932 to ieee80211-source

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 396932 ieee80211-source
Bug#396932: module-assistant: Cannot build ieee80211 module
Bug reassigned from package `module-assistant' to `ieee80211-source'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#367973: Twiki - about to miss a release?

[Sven Dowideit]

true, I don't do much, other than update the debian package at http:// 
members.iinet.net.au/~spos once a month or two, and send it off to my  
sponsor.


As a TWiki developer, rather than a debian developer, I don't feel  
supported by you guys, just attacked, but none the less, I maintain  
what i can.


Sven


On 04/11/2006, at 3:52 AM, Antony Gelberg wrote:

I haven't cc'd the bug 367973 that this comes from - Steve if you  
want the background please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/ 
bugreport.cgi?bug=367973 and http://bugs.debian.org/twiki.


Sven Dowideit:
its stuff like this that just keeps depressing me into not  
finishing the

work i do packaging twiki for debian.


"Stuff like" what?  I think Thijs's point is that you appear to not  
be doing much, for whatever reason, and twiki is going to miss  
another release which is a shame and inconvenience for users.   
There is a 247-day old bug relating to the latest release last  
February, and you haven't even acknowledged it.



your officiousness is a joy, ta.
same sort of thing as when just before the last debian release  
came out,

and some one helpfully filed an un-reproducible RC bug, that didn't
happen for anyone else, but no debian developer came out to help.
you guys really truly don't want help from people outside your  
klic do you.




I'm not really sure what you're complaining about.  Please maintain  
the package or RFA it.  If you are maintaining it, it certainly  
looks like you aren't.


--
Antony Gelberg | Open Source Consultancy
Wayforth   | Software Development
020 7247 1011  | Website Design
http://www.wayforth.co.uk  | Peace-of-mind Support



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396880: dblatex: error in file dblatex/xsl/docbook.xsl

[Sebastien Blondeel]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Can you please provide an example document that shows this problem?
> Ideally a minimized one.

I now have a better understanding of the problem.

This works:
-=-=-=

http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd";>
Welcome to my document—quite a small one.
-=-=-=

This doesn't:
-=-=-=
Welcome to my document—quite a small one.
-=-=-=

But this does:
-=-=-=
Welcome to my document; quite a small one.
-=-=-=

However, I am working on a big document split in several files, all
included from a master. The various parts do not have XML and DOCTYPE
declaration. I can sort that out in the preprocessing/Makefile, but it
would be more convenient if dblatex could be more flexible smooth out
such problems. After all, is not the input supposed to be DocBook?

I guess this can requalify as a wishlist then.

Bug#395382: giflib3g: Vulnerable to CVE-2005-2974 and CVE-2005-3350

[Daniel Baumann]

Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> I noticed that it's non-trivial to install the libgif4 .deb at the
> moment.  It conflicts with libungif4g since the latter ships symlinks of
> libgif.so.4 and libgif.so.4.1.4, and just about everything using
> libungif.so.4 has a versioned dependency so the Provides doesn't help.
> :-(  Guess this won't be possible to fix till after Etch though.  Unless
> you're planning to upload a new libungif4g package with those symlinks
> removed soon?

the bottleneck is NEW processing. once libgif4 is accepted, I'll adjust
both package to match optimally against each other.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396931: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/boot.img.gz makes usb-stick unusable

[Johannes Wiedersich]

Package: installation-report
Version: 02-Nov-2006 16:06  15.0M
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


I downloaded the usb-image from 
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/
ie. the file
boot.img.gz 02-Nov-2006 16:06  15.0M  

Before continuing I get from fdisk -l: 
Disk /dev/sda: 1021 MB, 1021312512 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 124 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *   1 125  997344e  W95 FAT16 (LBA)
Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(123, 254, 63) logical=(124, 42, 45)

As from the manual 
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch04s04.html
I issue 
zcat boot.img.gz > /dev/sda
and get from 'fdisk -l'

Disk /dev/sda: 1021 MB, 1021312512 bytes
32 heads, 61 sectors/track, 1021 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1952 * 512 = 999424 bytes

This doesn't look like a partition table
Probably you selected the wrong device.

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   ? 1547397 1547657  253319   e4  SpeedStor
Partition 1 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(190, 120, 0) logical=(1547396, 26, 15)
Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(544, 125, 44) logical=(1547656, 11, 47)
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda2   ?  515657 1534084   993984023   98  Unknown
Partition 2 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(1010, 16, 43) logical=(515656, 25, 37)
Partition 2 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(205, 205, 22) logical=(1534083, 1, 42)
Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda3   ?  869174 1852732   959953209   7d  Unknown
Partition 3 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(252, 139, 46) logical=(869173, 1, 19)
Partition 3 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(367, 195, 2) logical=(1852731, 20, 61)
Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda4   ?   17157   21421 41615360  Empty
Partition 4 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
 phys=(0, 10, 0) logical=(17156, 6, 19)
Partition 4 has different physical/logical endings:
 phys=(0, 0, 0) logical=(21420, 2, 6)
Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary.

Partition table entries are not in disk order

Stick cannot be formatted by cfdisk, but fdisk does the job. 

HTH,
Johannes

I downloaded the file twice, 15.0 MB; same result.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396932: module-assistant: Cannot build ieee80211 module

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Package: module-assistantVersion: 0.10.7Severity: graveJustification: renders package unusable*** Please type your report below this line ***Cannot build ieee80211 module, this makes impossible to use the bcm43xx
module for wifi cards.dh_gencontrol: command returned error code 65280- -- System Information:Debian Release: testing/unstable  APT prefers testing  APT policy: (500, 'testing')Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bashKernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)Versions of packages module-assistant depends on:ii  libtext-wrapi18n-perl 
0.06-5 internationalizedsubstitute of Teii  perl  5.8.8-6.1  Larry Wall's PracticalExtractionVersions of packages module-assistant recommends:ii  liblocale-gettext-perl    
1.05-1 Using libc functions forinternati- -- no debconf information

Bug#395493: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Bug#395493: mailman: smtp-failure:timeout, bad file descriptor, set_debuglevel

[Lukasz Szybalski]

I replaced these files and everything works again. I'll give it 24h
and put the old files back and see if mailman works again..

Thank you very much.
Lukasz

for the record...


Lukasz Szybalski wrote:

/var/lib/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/SMTPDirect.py

>That is the file i patched SMTPDirect.py
>
> 57 class Connection:
> 58 def __init__(self):
> 59 self.__conn = None
> 60
> 61 def __connect(self):
> 62 self.__conn = smtplib.SMTP()
> 63 self.__conn.set_debuglevel(1)
> 64 self.__conn.connect(mm_cfg.SMTPHOST, mm_cfg.SMTPPORT)
> 65self.__numsessions=mm_cfg.SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION


Temporary SOLUTION?

"replacements for /usr/lib/python2.3/smtplib.py
and /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Logging/Utils.py that will enable
smtplib-debugging to work (you still have to patch SMTPDirect.py) "

I went in and renamed smtplib.py to smtplib.py.1
put the new file in and deleted smtplib.pyc ad smtplib.pyo
Then renamed /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Logging/Utils.py to Utils.py.1
(make sure its this one...there is at least 5 files called Utils.py)
put the new file in and deleted Utils.pyc and Utils.pyo

then
/etc/init.d/mailman restart
tail -f /var/log/mailman/error

while i was watching this i sent an email to my testing group, etc.

Long story short. I replaced these files, removed pyc and pyo and
suddenly everything works like magic again. No more timeouts.
I'll try to get originals back and see how that works. I'll keep you posted.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396880: dblatex: error in file dblatex/xsl/docbook.xsl

[Andreas Hoenen]

You're right, unfortunately dblatex has a problem that has been ignored
by xsltproc before release 1.1.18-1.

The problem has been discussed yesterday/today in the mailing list
dblatex-devel [1] (although the mail thread does not seem to have hit
the list archive yet), resulting in the following simple patch:

diff -u -r1.1 legalnotice.xsl
--- legalnotice.xsl 31 Jul 2005 18:47:23 -  1.1
+++ legalnotice.xsl 2 Nov 2006 23:56:38 -
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 

 
-  
+  
   
 
 %% 

The file to be patched is 
/usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/dblatex/xsl/legalnotice.xsl

I'm currently working at high pressure on a debian release of dblatex
0.2 with this bug fix included.  I hope to get someone to sponsor the
new release quickly, thus hopefully this problem should be out of the
world soon.

[1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=48627

Regards, Andreas Hoenen
--
Andreas Hoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

GPG: 1024D/B888D2CE
 A4A6 E8B5 593A E89B 496B
 82F0 728D 8B7E B888 D2CE


pgpowH0o8D51K.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#396880: dblatex: error in file dblatex/xsl/docbook.xsl

[Frank Küster]

Sebastien Blondeel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Subject: error in file dblatex/xsl/docbook.xsl
> Package: dblatex
> Version: 0.1.10-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> I am running Debian testing.
>
> Since I updated the packages yesterday evening dblatex does not work 
> anymore.

Can you please provide an example document that shows this problem?
Ideally a minimized one.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)

Bug#395382: giflib3g: Vulnerable to CVE-2005-2974 and CVE-2005-3350

[Kevin B. McCarty]

Daniel Baumann wrote:
> giflib 4.x uploaded, replacing giflib 3.x.
> Due to changed binary names, the package has to go through NEW.
> 
> For the impatients, the package is also available at
> http://archive.daniel-baumann.ch/debian/packages/giflib/

Hi Daniel,

Do you plan to add dpatch patches 02 and 03 from libungif4 into the
giflib v4 package?  It looks like they could be needed...

I noticed that it's non-trivial to install the libgif4 .deb at the
moment.  It conflicts with libungif4g since the latter ships symlinks of
libgif.so.4 and libgif.so.4.1.4, and just about everything using
libungif.so.4 has a versioned dependency so the Provides doesn't help.
:-(  Guess this won't be possible to fix till after Etch though.  Unless
you're planning to upload a new libungif4g package with those symlinks
removed soon?

best regards,

-- 
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396875: emacs21-common: Must include a copy of the GFDL

[Andreas Metzler]

On 2006-11-03 Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: emacs21-common
> Version: 21.4a+1-1
> Severity: serious
> 
> The manpages for Emacs and Etags have the following license:
> 
>  Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
>  under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any
>  later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
>  Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
> 
> However, there is no copy of the GFDL in either emacs21-common or the
> emacs21 source package.  This can be remedied by repacking the orig.tar.gz
> so that it includes the removed file etc/gfdl.1; either install that file
> or put a copy of the GFDL into /usr/share/doc/emacs21-common.
> 
> And don't forget to update debian/copyright, of course.

Shipping gfdl.1 will not really solve the bug. Licenses not shipped
in /usr/share/common-licenses/ must be *included* in debian/copyright,
a pointer to another file is not enough.

See policy 12.5.

cu andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396747: marked as forwarded (FTBFS (alpha): attempt to use output operater '<<' on va_list)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:17:36 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #396747,
regarding FTBFS (alpha): attempt to use output operater '<<' on va_list
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Falk,

Find enclosed a response from upstream about a method of fixing this issue.

Do you have an alpha build environment you can try the attached fixes?

Mark

Caulier Gilles caulier.gilles at kdemail.net 
> Hi,
>
> there a compile problem on Alpha CPUs (Debian/Sid, so KDE 3.5.5 I assume)
> Build fine here on i386.  Any idea how to fix it?

This lines are just to debug libtiff loader. You can comment 
Dimg::TiffLoader::lines 79 and 84 to solve the problem.

Also, i suspect than va_list type is unknow on Alpha. This type is defined by 
libtiff. Perhaps header files from this library are different between i386 
and Alpha. 

Solution : try to update libtiff or look if a supplemental libtiff header is 
require into Alpha

Gilles

>
> Achim
>
> --  Forwarded Message  --
>
> Subject: Bug#396747: FTBFS (alpha): attempt to use output operater '<<' on
> va_list Date: Thursday 02 November 2006 19:01
> From: Falk Hueffner 
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System 
>
> Package: digikam
> Version: 1:0.9.0~beta3-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> digikam does not build on Alpha:
>
> [...]
> /bin/sh ../../../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/libs/dimg/loaders
> -I../../../.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I. 
> -I/tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/libs/dimg
> -I/tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/libs/dmetadata
> -I/tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/libs/dcraw
> -I/tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/digikam
> -I/tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam  -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT  -D_REENTRANT 
> -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align
> -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG
> -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute
> -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common
> -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT
> -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -fexceptions -c -o tiffloader.lo
> /tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/libs/dimg/loaders/tiffloader.cpp [...]
> /tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/libs/dimg/loaders/tiffloader.cpp: In
> static member function 'static void
> Digikam::TIFFLoader::dimg_tiff_warning(const char*, const char*, va_list)':
> /tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/libs/dimg/loaders/tiffloader.cpp:79:
> error: no match for 'operator<<' in
> '((kndbgstream*)((kndbgstream*)((kndbgstream*)((kndbgstream*)((kndbgstream*
>)((kndbgstream*)kndDebug(int)().kndbgstream::operator<<(((const
> char*)"[")))->kndbgstream::operator<<(((const char*)(&
> __PRETTY_FUNCTION__->kndbgstream::operator<<(((const char*)"]
> ")))->kndbgstream::operator<<(module))->kndbgstream::operator<<(((const
> char*)"::")))->kndbgstream::operator<<(fmt))->kndbgstream::operator<<(((con
>st char*)"::")) << ap' /usr/include/kde/kdebug.h:457: note: candidates are:
> kndbgstream& kndbgstream::operator<<(short int) [...]
> /tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/libs/dimg/loaders/tiffloader.cpp: In
> static member function 'static void
> Digikam::TIFFLoader::dimg_tiff_error(const char*, const char*, va_list)':
> /tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/libs/dimg/loaders/tiffloader.cpp:84:
> error: no match for 'operator<<' in
> '((kndbgstream*)((kndbgstream*)((kndbgstream*)((kndbgstream*)((kndbgstream*
>)((kndbgstream*)kndDebug(int)().kndbgstream::operator<<(((const
> char*)"[")))->kndbgstream::operator<<(((const char*)(&
> __PRETTY_FUNCTION__->kndbgstream::operator<<(((const char*)"]
> ")))->kndbgstream::operator<<(module))->kndbgstream::operator<<(((const
> char*)"::")))->kndbgstream::operator<<(fmt))->kndbgstream::operator<<(((con
>st char*)"::")) << ap' make[6]: *** [tiffloader.lo] Error 1
> make[6]: Leaving directory
> `/tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/obj-alpha-linux-gnu/digikam/libs/dimg/loaders
> [...]
>
> va_list is an opaque type, it just happens to convert to something
> outputtable on most architectures.
>
>   Falk
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 4.0
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: alpha
> Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.5
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE at euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
>
>
>
>
> ---
--- End Message ---

Bug#391778: marked as done (xemacs21-mule: postinst fails if xemacs21-support is not yet configured)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 10:02:52 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391778: fixed in xemacs21 21.4.19-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: apel
Version: 10.6+0.20060424-1
Severity: serious

Hello Tatsuya,

There is an error when attempting to install apel:

  install/apel: Byte-compiling for xemacs21 (mule) ... done.
  emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor xemacs21
  emacsen-common: byte-compiling for xemacs21

  WARNING:
  Couldn't find obvious defaults for:
  data-directory
  mule-lisp-directory
  lisp-directory
  Perhaps some directories don't exist, or the XEmacs executable,
  /usr/bin/xemacs21
  is in a strange place?Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/debian-startup...
  Loading 00debian-vars...
  No /etc/mailname. Reverting to default...
  ^GSymbol's function definition is void: batch-byte-compile
  xemacs exiting
  .
  emacs-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/emacsen-common 
xemacs21 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-install line 28,  line 
3.
  dpkg: error processing xemacs21-mule (--configure):
   subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 255

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xemacs21
Source-Version: 21.4.19-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xemacs21, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xemacs21-bin_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-bin_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
xemacs21-gnome-mule_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-gnome-mule_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
xemacs21-gnome-nomule_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-gnome-nomule_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
xemacs21-mule_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-mule_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
xemacs21-nomule_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-nomule_21.4.19-2_i386.deb
xemacs21-support_21.4.19-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-support_21.4.19-2_all.deb
xemacs21-supportel_21.4.19-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-supportel_21.4.19-2_all.deb
xemacs21_21.4.19-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21_21.4.19-2.diff.gz
xemacs21_21.4.19-2.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21_21.4.19-2.dsc
xemacs21_21.4.19-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21_21.4.19-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xemacs21 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  4 Nov 2006 00:08:10 +0900
Source: xemacs21
Binary: xemacs21-gnome-mule xemacs21-mule xemacs21-bin xemacs21-gnome-nomule 
xemacs21-supportel xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn xemacs21-support 
xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn xemacs21 xemacs21-nomule
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 21.4.19-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 xemacs21   - highly customizable text editor
 xemacs21-bin - highly customizable text editor -- support binaries
 xemacs21-gnome-mule - highly customizable text editor -- Mule binary
 xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn - highly customizable text editor -- Mule binary 
compiled with Cann
 xemacs21-gnome-nomule - highly customizable text editor -- Non-mule binary
 xemacs21-mule - highly customizable text editor -- Mule binary
 xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn - highly customizable text editor -- Mule binary 
compiled with Cann
 xemacs21-nomule - highly customizable text editor -- Non-mule binary
 xemacs21-support - highly customizable text editor -- architecture independent 
suppo
 xemacs21-supportel - highly customizable text editor -- non-required library 
files
Closes: 366133 391778
Changes: 
 xemacs21 

Bug#393049: Debian Etch freeze... pkg-kde-extras implications

[Mark Purcell]

Hi pkg-kde-extras,

As you might of seen on debian-devel-announce, 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg0.html.

The freeze for etch has been put back a little, it was scheduled for 18 Oct, 
leading to a release of Etch on 4 Dec.

What does this mean for pkg-kde-extras, well it means we have little time left 
to get our part of the archive in shape:

http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Release Critical Bugs:
#396747 digikam FTBFS on alpha, Achim forwarded this upstream
Note this is for 0.9.0-beta3, 0.8.2 is already in etch.  I'm in two minds 
about releasing 0.9.0 beta versions to etch, however from my perspective 
digikam 0.9 is already pretty solid and would be a worthy component in Etch.  
I know the release schedule for digikam has the RC coming out this week and 
the final before xmas, but of course this might just be a little too late to 
make it into the release of Etch...  Although Etch could be delayed so maybe 
we should give it a go.

#   unsermake python 2.4 issues.
I guess this is related to a python migration? ubuntu seem to have a new 
version we could grab and update...

Migration to Testing:
digikamimageplugins 0.9, is awaiting digikam, per above.
kaffeine seems to be stuck on the arm build. - Rebuild should fixup.
kid3 should go in in 3 days...
klibido stuck on arm & m68k - rebuild on arm
kmplayer should go in in 7 days
kompose should go in in 4 days
kscope going in today
ksynaptics stuck on s390, arm and m68k - rebuild
libkexif 0.2.3 in testing with 0.2.4 patch, 0.2.4 stuck, 0.2.5 released 
upstream?
rsibreak stuck on arm (common story) - rebuild
strigi waiting for qt4-11 which is stuck on arm

So one common factor seems to be the arm buildd's failing and not 
rescheduling..  I shall try and get some binary packages built on leisner for 
arm.

Wookey.  If you are able could I ask you to upload the build-deps for:
kaffeine, klibido, ksynaptics, libkexif and rsibreak?  Thanks.

Comments and people to pickup this work is welcome.

Mark


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#367973: Twiki - about to miss a release?

[Olivier Berger]

Hi.

For what it's worth, I'd like to suggest some of you to have a look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354759 in which I added
a pointer to an unofficial package, which I think was made by the
maintainer...

IMHO, it's not obvious from what appears in bugs.debian.org that TWiki
may be maintained... but I think the maintainer may still be working,
although quite silently...

Just my 2 cents,

Best regards,

Le vendredi 03 novembre 2006 à 16:52 +, Antony Gelberg a écrit :
> I haven't cc'd the bug 367973 that this comes from - Steve if you want 
> the background please see 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=367973 and 
> http://bugs.debian.org/twiki.
> 
> Sven Dowideit:
> > its stuff like this that just keeps depressing me into not finishing the
> > work i do packaging twiki for debian.
> > 
> 
> "Stuff like" what?  I think Thijs's point is that you appear to not be 
> doing much, for whatever reason, and twiki is going to miss another 
> release which is a shame and inconvenience for users.  There is a 
> 247-day old bug relating to the latest release last February, and you 
> haven't even acknowledged it.
> 
> > your officiousness is a joy, ta.
> > 
> > same sort of thing as when just before the last debian release came out,
> > and some one helpfully filed an un-reproducible RC bug, that didn't
> > happen for anyone else, but no debian developer came out to help.
> > 
> > you guys really truly don't want help from people outside your klic do you.
> >
> 
> I'm not really sure what you're complaining about.  Please maintain the 
> package or RFA it.  If you are maintaining it, it certainly looks like 
> you aren't.
> 
-- 
Olivier BERGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF
INT Evry (http://www.int-evry.fr)
OpenPGP-Id: 1024D/6B829EEC

Bug#396903: marked as done (kpowersave: FTBFS: *** YOU'RE USING Autoconf version 2.13. *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:42:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kpowersave,knetworkmanager: FTBFS:*** KDE requires autoconf 
2.53 or newer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: kpowersave
Version: 0.6.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of kpowersave_0.6.2-3 on saturne by sbuild/amd64 85
> Build started at 20061101-1548
> **

[...]

> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> cdbs: already installed (0.4.47)
> debhelper: already installed (5.0.40 >= 5.0.0 is satisfied)
> automake1.9: already installed (1.9.6+nogfdl-2)
> autoconf: already installed (2.60a-4)
> libtool: already installed (1.5.22-4)

[...]

> cp -f /usr/share/libtool/ltmain.sh admin/ltmain.sh
> cp -f /usr/share/libtool/libtool.m4 admin/libtool.m4.in
> make -f admin/Makefile.common cvs
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kpowersave-0.6.2'
> *** YOU'RE USING Autoconf version 2.13.
> *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer
> make[1]: *** [cvs] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kpowersave-0.6.2'
> make: *** [debian/stamp-bootstrap] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20061101-1548
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

-- 
Florent


pgpB1xHJrE3Bf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

I've just tried to rebuild the packages in a clean chroot, and it
worked fine. So it seems that there was a problem with the buildd
(maybe autoconf2.13 was installed by error as suggested by Michael [1]),
and it's why I close the bugs.

Sorry for the report.


[1] : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=396903;msg=10

-- 
Florent


pgpU6uYklMCzM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#396911: marked as done (knetworkmanager: FTBFS: *** AUTOCONF NOT FOUND!. *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:42:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kpowersave,knetworkmanager: FTBFS:*** KDE requires autoconf 
2.53 or newer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: knetworkmanager
Version: 1:0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of knetworkmanager_1:0.1-2 on saturne by sbuild/amd64 85
> Build started at 20061101-1355
> **

[...]

> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> cdbs: already installed (0.4.47)
> debhelper: already installed (5.0.40 >= 5.0.0 is satisfied)
> automake1.9: already installed (1.9.6+nogfdl-2)
> autoconf: already installed (2.60a-4)
> libtool: already installed (1.5.22-4)

[...]

> cp -f /usr/share/libtool/ltmain.sh admin/ltmain.sh
> cp -f /usr/share/libtool/libtool.m4 admin/libtool.m4.in
> make -f admin/Makefile.common cvs
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/knetworkmanager-0.1'
> ./admin/cvs.sh: 651: --version: not found
> *** AUTOCONF NOT FOUND!.
> *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer
> make[1]: *** [cvs] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/knetworkmanager-0.1'
> make: *** [debian/stamp-bootstrap] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20061101-1355
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

-- 
Florent


pgpJOMFmf11y3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

I've just tried to rebuild the packages in a clean chroot, and it
worked fine. So it seems that there was a problem with the buildd
(maybe autoconf2.13 was installed by error as suggested by Michael [1]),
and it's why I close the bugs.

Sorry for the report.


[1] : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=396903;msg=10

-- 
Florent


pgpeVT598siF1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#367973: Twiki - about to miss a release?

[Amaya]

Hi all, I am talking with my MIA-QA-hat on.

Antony Gelberg wrote:
> I haven't cc'd the bug 367973 that this comes from - Steve if you want
> the background please see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=367973 and 
> http://bugs.debian.org/twiki.

Heh, I think you have :)

> Sven Dowideit:
> > its stuff like this that just keeps depressing me into not finishing
> > the work i do packaging twiki for debian.

Sven, I would be happy to help you with these twiki issues.
You can tag the bugs you need help with with the bts tag 'help'.
Would you accept to co-maintain twiki? Would you prefer to to orphan it?
There is no reason to work on something that depresses you.

Let us know how we can bring the fun back into your Debian work! 
We are here to help, and I mean it!

-- 
  ·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
 : :' :-- Emma Goldman
 `. `'   Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
   `- www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com

Bug#396922: FTBFS: Missing Build Dependency on libgmp3-dev

[Ludovic RESLINGER]

Package: guile-1.8
Version: 1.8.1+1-1
Severity: serious


Hi,

guile-1.8 is failing to build during configure stage
with this error:

checking for __gmpz_init in -lgmp... no
configure: error: GNU MP not found, see README
make: *** [debian/stamp/config] Error 1
debuild: fatal error at line 1224:
debian/rules build failed

In README file, upstream author has indicated that the
following dependencies are necessary to build guile-1.8:
- libltdl from libtool. (like it is indicated in #395235).
- GNU MP, at least version 4.1.

To solve this bug, you must add a Build Dependency on
libgmp3-dev (>= 4.1) in debian/control.

Add this dependency may be the solution to solve #395290 too.

Thanks.

Regards,
-- 
.---.  Ludovic RESLINGER
   / \
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]@./ Trumpet Student in CNR
   /`\_/`\ Free Software Developer
  // )X( \\
 | \  :  )|_   _,'|   .''`.
/`\_`>  <_/ \ @==TTT=::_  |  : :'  :
\__/'---'\__/   ((_<=HHH___))   `.|  `. `'`
 `---UUU---'=> `-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#367973: Twiki - about to miss a release?

[Antony Gelberg]

I haven't cc'd the bug 367973 that this comes from - Steve if you want 
the background please see 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=367973 and 
http://bugs.debian.org/twiki.


Sven Dowideit:

its stuff like this that just keeps depressing me into not finishing the
work i do packaging twiki for debian.



"Stuff like" what?  I think Thijs's point is that you appear to not be 
doing much, for whatever reason, and twiki is going to miss another 
release which is a shame and inconvenience for users.  There is a 
247-day old bug relating to the latest release last February, and you 
haven't even acknowledged it.



your officiousness is a joy, ta.

same sort of thing as when just before the last debian release came out,
and some one helpfully filed an un-reproducible RC bug, that didn't
happen for anyone else, but no debian developer came out to help.

you guys really truly don't want help from people outside your klic do you.



I'm not really sure what you're complaining about.  Please maintain the 
package or RFA it.  If you are maintaining it, it certainly looks like 
you aren't.


--
Antony Gelberg | Open Source Consultancy
Wayforth   | Software Development
020 7247 1011  | Website Design
http://www.wayforth.co.uk  | Peace-of-mind Support


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395860: still here in 0.19-2

[Magnus Holmgren]

On Friday 03 November 2006 16:09, Florent Bayle took the opportunity to say:
> It seems that this problem is still here in 0.19-2 :
> > Automatic build of libmail-dkim-perl_0.19-2 on saturne by sbuild/amd64 85
> > Build started at 20061102-2213
> > *
> >*
>
> [...]
>
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libmail-dkim-perl-0.19'
> > /usr/bin/make test TEST_FILES="t/[^v]*.t"  # I really just want to
> > exclude verifier.t make[1]: Entering directory
> > `/build/buildd/libmail-dkim-perl-0.19' PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl
> > "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')"
> > t/[^v]*.t t/verifier
   ^

This borders on the insane ... obviously I should have read dash(1) better; 
then I would have seen that the ^ is a bashism and should have been an !. I 
wonder how many will actually be affected by this.

-- 
Magnus


pgpjMdg7sq35Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#396762: [Utnubu-maintainers] Bug#396762: /sbin/dmraid depends on /usr/lib/libz.so.1

[Loïc Minier]

 CRC implementation in some lines of C:
http://www.w3.org/TR/PNG/#D-CRCAppendix

-- 
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#396874: marked as done (gramps: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'gnome-doc-utils, libxml-parser-perl')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:32:26 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396874: fixed in gramps 2.2.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gramps
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'gramps' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

./configure --enable-packager-mode --prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man 
--sysconfdir=/etc
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... mawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for GDU_MODULE_VERSION_CHECK... configure: error: Package requirements 
(gnome-doc-utils >= 0.3.2) were not met:

No package 'gnome-doc-utils' found

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables 
GDU_MODULE_VERSION_CHECK_CFLAGS
and GDU_MODULE_VERSION_CHECK_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.

make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'gnome-doc-utils, libxml-parser-perl'
to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gramps-2.2.1/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/gramps-2.2.1/debian/control 2006-11-03 13:05:34.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2006-11-03 13:05:29.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: gnome
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>=5.0.37.2), python-xml, python-gnome2, 
python-glade2, docbook-utils, scrollkeeper, gettext, libgconf2-dev, 
python-central (>= 0.4.17)
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>=5.0.37.2), gnome-doc-utils, 
libxml-parser-perl, python-xml, python-gnome2, python-glade2, docbook-utils, 
scrollkeeper, gettext, libgconf2-dev, python-central (>= 0.4.17)
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 XS-Python-Version: current
 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gramps
Source-Version: 2.2.1-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gramps, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gramps_2.2.1-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gramps/gramps_2.2.1-4.diff.gz
gramps_2.2.1-4.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gramps/gramps_2.2.1-4.dsc
gramps_2.2.1-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gramps/gramps_2.2.1-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gramps package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  3 Nov 2006 11:03:35 -0500
Source: gramps
Binary: gramps
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gramps - Genealogical Research and Analysis Management Program
Closes: 396874
Changes: 
 gramps (2.2.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * add missing Build-Depends-Indep. Closes: #396874
Files: 
 02b4b5b36d7615de62162dfc60f9914a 873 gnome optional gramps_2.2.1-4.dsc
 429ad635ed16ee094f1899415056a9cf 297721 gnome optional gramps_2.2.1-4.diff.gz
 6fdae14ba2bfae64871aa8dbc0905b7a 6626252 gnome optional gramps_2.2.1-4_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBRUtrfA9y7Te6Cn61AQLSyQP/SkvHOLyuB9TTnE3eZ+6CYR5tZLQdtXuW
/lfmZnGqbTjoq4atk8ClPjHYkhyjCM3fbDIeZX/6CoKbZJsU4/XTofo5B3v6mG7X
EWJ9hnOD73pEDpobbJAiwNn+QspZ14zlSCsWf/hJfRwUtGhY4FnZ+39mxgNZ0y13
up063GQJoKQ=
=69tZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#282147: #282147: update-inetd broken by user interaction

[Roland Stigge]

Frans Pop wrote:
> Not sure why your previous version did not work, but I doubt it makes very 
> much sense to investigate that.
> Hmm. I seem to remember that I _have_ seen something like this before (not 
> completely sure though): I had a privately built package installed before 
> a new version from the buildds hit the mirrors and that new official 
> version was also installed even though the version numbers were the same; 
> I remember being surprised at that.

Exactly the same for me, and I was suspecting something like this for
your original case.

> Anyway, in general I think it is good practice to always update the 
> version when making a new version of a package available for testing.

Yes, of course.

Will NMU if no other ideas come along during the next days.

bye,
  Roland


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#396911: knetworkmanager: FTBFS: *** AUTOCONF NOT FOUND!. *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer

[Florent Bayle]

Package: knetworkmanager
Version: 1:0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of knetworkmanager_1:0.1-2 on saturne by sbuild/amd64 85
> Build started at 20061101-1355
> **

[...]

> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> cdbs: already installed (0.4.47)
> debhelper: already installed (5.0.40 >= 5.0.0 is satisfied)
> automake1.9: already installed (1.9.6+nogfdl-2)
> autoconf: already installed (2.60a-4)
> libtool: already installed (1.5.22-4)

[...]

> cp -f /usr/share/libtool/ltmain.sh admin/ltmain.sh
> cp -f /usr/share/libtool/libtool.m4 admin/libtool.m4.in
> make -f admin/Makefile.common cvs
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/knetworkmanager-0.1'
> ./admin/cvs.sh: 651: --version: not found
> *** AUTOCONF NOT FOUND!.
> *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer
> make[1]: *** [cvs] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/knetworkmanager-0.1'
> make: *** [debian/stamp-bootstrap] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20061101-1355
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

-- 
Florent


pgpdvY2Pq2fY7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#396903: kpowersave: FTBFS: *** YOU'RE USING Autoconf version 2.13. *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer

[Michael Biebl]

tags 396903 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks

Florent Bayle wrote:
> Package: kpowersave
> Version: 0.6.2-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> 
> Hello,
> 
> There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> 
>> Automatic build of kpowersave_0.6.2-3 on saturne by sbuild/amd64 85
>> Build started at 20061101-1548
>> **
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
>> cdbs: already installed (0.4.47)
>> debhelper: already installed (5.0.40 >= 5.0.0 is satisfied)
>> automake1.9: already installed (1.9.6+nogfdl-2)
>> autoconf: already installed (2.60a-4)
    ^^^
>> libtool: already installed (1.5.22-4)
> 
> [...]
> 
>> cp -f /usr/share/libtool/ltmain.sh admin/ltmain.sh
>> cp -f /usr/share/libtool/libtool.m4 admin/libtool.m4.in
>> make -f admin/Makefile.common cvs
>> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kpowersave-0.6.2'
>> *** YOU'RE USING Autoconf version 2.13.
^
>> *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer
>> make[1]: *** [cvs] Error 1
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kpowersave-0.6.2'
>> make: *** [debian/stamp-bootstrap] Error 2
>> **
>> Build finished at 20061101-1548
>> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> 

Hi Florent,

I can't reproduce this build failure. As you can see [1], it also build
fine on all architectures. My guess is, that your build environment is
broken. Do you by chance have autoconf2.13 installed (which diverts
autoconf-2.60)?

Cheers,
Michael

[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=kpowersave

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#396903: kpowersave: FTBFS: *** YOU'RE USING Autoconf version 2.13. *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 396903 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#396903: kpowersave: FTBFS: *** YOU'RE USING Autoconf version 2.13.  *** KDE 
requires autoconf 2.53 or newer
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]