Bug#398391: marked as done (imhangul: postinst fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/imhangul.postinst: line 9: /usr/sbin/update-gtk-immodules: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:47:54 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#398391: fixed in imhangul 0.9.13-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: imhangul Version: 0.9.13-3 Severity: serious Justification: makes package uninstallable Usertags: grid5000 Hi, During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a problem with your package: Setting up imhangul (0.9.13-3) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/imhangul.postinst: line 9: /usr/sbin/update-gtk-immodules: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing imhangul (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 The full log is available from http://ox.blop.info/bazaar/buildlogs/20061113/ The piuparts run was done on about 40 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing an etch i386 environment (not unstable). Internet was not accessible from the build systems. About Grid'5000: Grid'5000 is an highly reconfigurable experimental Grid platform gathering 9 sites and featuring a total of 5000 CPUs. It serves as a testbed for research in Grid Computing. See https://www.grid5000.fr/ -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: imhangul Source-Version: 0.9.13-3.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of imhangul, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: imhangul_0.9.13-3.1.diff.gz to pool/main/i/imhangul/imhangul_0.9.13-3.1.diff.gz imhangul_0.9.13-3.1.dsc to pool/main/i/imhangul/imhangul_0.9.13-3.1.dsc imhangul_0.9.13-3.1_i386.deb to pool/main/i/imhangul/imhangul_0.9.13-3.1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated imhangul package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:19:22 +0100 Source: imhangul Binary: imhangul Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.13-3.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Changwoo Ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: imhangul - A Hangul (Korean) input module for GTK+ Closes: 398391 Changes: imhangul (0.9.13-3.1) unstable; urgency=high . * Non-maintainer upload. * Add missing dependency on libgtk2.0-bin. Closes: #398391 * Prevent failing during postrm/purge if libgtk2.0-bin is not there. Files: ac331554402c1904ad486544f5a4ebbe 605 gnome optional imhangul_0.9.13-3.1.dsc 85efd7a9d76a8acc0af7f70545affe6f 3619 gnome optional imhangul_0.9.13-3.1.diff.gz bc17ff72b401be4632b78b9b2d9ecd1a 170690 gnome optional imhangul_0.9.13-3.1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFYedLmdOZoew2oYURAsFKAJ9OLfmp1uge1ZusGmHWFNVTUc+CcwCgrEuI CHna8u7l7Jm4QkFIGtBW0vA= =IFA3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 399600 serious Bug#399600: deluge-torrent does not start Severity set to `serious' from `important' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed (with 1 errors): your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 399337 +confirmed +pending Unknown tag/s: +pending. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#399337: bashdb: I can't install it There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#389681: Bug#399706: Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57
Junichi Uekawa wrote: Please follow up this discussion in 399706. I agree Ruby is stupid here, but I don't intend to work around it. I don't think so. It is not a bug of Ruby and it is bug of apt-listbugs. I think that the behaviour is intended by the upstream author of SOAP4r. The current author of apt-listbugs should ask the upstream or correct his code. -- ay P.S. I will reassign the bug to apt-listbugs later. Please reassign the bug to libruby1.8 if you ask the upstream and the upstream changes the code. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399629: gaim fails to connect to MSN or yahoo after upgrade
Package: gaim Version: 1:2.0.0+beta5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable gaim fails to connect to my MSN or Yahoo accounts after upgrading. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.060919 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gaim depends on: ii gaim-data1:2.0.0+beta5-1 multi-protocol instant messaging c ii libaspell15 0.60.4-4GNU Aspell spell-checker runtime l ii libatk1.0-0 1.12.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libavahi-compat-howl00.6.15-1Avahi Howl compatibility library ii libc62.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo21.2.4-4 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libdbus-1-3 0.94-2 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.71-3 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcrypt11 1.2.3-2 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.4-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnutls13 1.4.4-2 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.10-2 Core GStreamer libraries and eleme ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.20-3The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkspell0 2.0.10-3+b1 a spell-checking addon for GTK's T ii libice6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncursesw5 5.5-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpango1.0-01.14.7-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libperl5.8 5.8.8-6.1 Shared Perl library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-7 PNG library - runtime ii libsm6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-2 library for program launch feedbac ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-3 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor1 1.1.7-4 X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxfixes3 1:4.0.1-4 X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio ii libxi6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4.1 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml2 2.6.27.dfsg-1 GNOME XML library ii libxrandr2 2:1.1.0.2-4 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.1-3 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxss1 1:1.1.0-1 X11 Screen Saver extension library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages gaim recommends: ii gstreamer0.10-alsa0.10.10-2 GStreamer plugin for ALSA ii gstreamer0.10-esd 0.10.4-3 GStreamer plugin for ESD ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-base0.10.10-2 GStreamer plugins from the base ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-good0.10.4-3 GStreamer plugins from the good -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397835: [Amsn-devel] Bug#397835: Perhaps a doubt
Hi Andreas, First, I think you copied the wrong URL, it should have been http://bugs.debian.org/397835 instead of http://bugs.debian.org/397853 Thankfully, the bug id was in the CC list. Anyways, I was first surprised by what you said, but I still took the time to check. I think this bug report is invalid because I can now confirm to you that none of the images are taken from the official client. We did have in an old version (2 or 3 years old) some pixmaps from msn, but then we completely removed them in order to avoid any legal infrigement. I wasn't able to find the *.xpm files mentioned in the bug report, there are some xbm files though, and they were done by someone from the team. the xbm format is a linux image format and cannot have been copied from the windows msn client. This also is true for all the png images as well as sounds. The images were created using InkScape by our graphics artist. The sounds were played on a guitar and recorded by a friend of Alvaro, the project owner. Here is a screenshot showing you the soccer and rubber duck display pictures from amsn and from the official windows live messenger client : http://www.amsn-project.net/~kakaroto/display_pics.jpg The images on the left are from the microsoft product while the images on the right are from aMSN. As you can see they look alike and can be confusing but they are not the same images at all. Actually, I noticed a few cases where our graphic artist designed an image and that we later found out that it ressembles the official client's image, those are pure coincidences. I hope this answers your questions. If you have any other question, don't hesitate to ask. Thank you, KaKaRoTo On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 06:05:36PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: Hi, it seems that we need your help - there is a bug report questioning where these files come from, and it couldn't be clarified up to now. The full bug report is available at http://bugs.debian.org/397853 Any feedback from your side is welcome. For Debian, being sure about legal issues is a major topic, and if we cannot settle this quite soon, we will unfortunatly be forced to remove this package from the next stable version, Etch, something I wouldn't like to see happen. Cheers, Andi * Goneri Le Bouder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061110 02:55]: The same logo (MSN Messenger) is used on this picture: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/messenger/images/home_page_winxp.jpg Some pixmaps in /usr/share/amsn/skins/default are concerned too. displaypic: ball.png (from WinXP?) rubberduck.png (from WinXP?) pixmaps: alarm.png amsnnicon.png away.png back.png baway.png bbusy.png blocked.png boffline.png bonline.png busy.png butinvite.png butinvite_hover.png ... sounds: I don't have a Windows to chekc, but these sounds seem to be copied from Messenger installation winicons: away.ico brb.ico busy.ico hidden.ico inactive.ico lunch.ico msn.ico offline.ico online.ico phone.ico -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397623: gimp-help: FTBFS: tries to fetch a DTD from the internet and FTBFS if it fails
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 02:25:47PM -0500, Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right, but I can't rebuild this until xsltproc is fixed. I knew I saw the gimp-help name somewhere... I'm on it... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#398563: poppassd: diff for NMU version 1.8.5-3.1
tags 398563 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my poppassd 1.8.5-3.1 NMU. diff -Nru /tmp/dnGDzWSJFT/poppassd-1.8.5/debian/changelog /tmp/D3vuDdgJJt/poppassd-1.8.5/debian/changelog --- /tmp/dnGDzWSJFT/poppassd-1.8.5/debian/changelog 2006-11-21 19:57:16.0 +0100 +++ /tmp/D3vuDdgJJt/poppassd-1.8.5/debian/changelog 2006-11-21 19:57:16.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +poppassd (1.8.5-3.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Don't try to use update-inetd at purge time unless it is actually +available; fixes purge in some cases, patch from Andreas Henriksson. +(Closes: #398563) + + -- Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:54:57 +0100 + poppassd (1.8.5-3) unstable; urgency=low * Move debian/copyright and debian/watch back to the old location. With diff -Nru /tmp/dnGDzWSJFT/poppassd-1.8.5/debian/postrm /tmp/D3vuDdgJJt/poppassd-1.8.5/debian/postrm --- /tmp/dnGDzWSJFT/poppassd-1.8.5/debian/postrm2006-11-21 19:57:16.0 +0100 +++ /tmp/D3vuDdgJJt/poppassd-1.8.5/debian/postrm2006-11-21 19:57:16.0 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ #!/bin/sh set -e -update-inetd --remove '^poppassd' -update-inetd --comment-chars #disabled# --enable poppassd + +if which update-inetd /dev/null 21 ; then + update-inetd --remove '^poppassd' + update-inetd --comment-chars #disabled# --enable poppassd +fi #DEBHELPER#
Bug#399787: marked as done (libpam-ldap.postinst: 40: Syntax error: } unexpected (expecting fi))
Your message dated Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:47:21 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#399787: fixed in libpam-ldap 180-1.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libpam-ldap Version: 180-1.3 Severity: serious the postinst script libpam-ldap.postinst is missing a closing fi statement. This makes the package uninstallable, so I'm filing this bug with severity serious. Cheers, Michael -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.19-rc6 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libpam-ldap depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.5.9 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libldap2 2.1.30-13.2 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam0g 0.79-4 Pluggable Authentication Modules l libpam-ldap recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libpam-ldap Source-Version: 180-1.4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libpam-ldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libpam-ldap_180-1.4.diff.gz to pool/main/libp/libpam-ldap/libpam-ldap_180-1.4.diff.gz libpam-ldap_180-1.4.dsc to pool/main/libp/libpam-ldap/libpam-ldap_180-1.4.dsc libpam-ldap_180-1.4_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libpam-ldap/libpam-ldap_180-1.4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libpam-ldap package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:19:45 -0800 Source: libpam-ldap Binary: libpam-ldap Architecture: source i386 Version: 180-1.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libpam-ldap - Pluggable Authentication Module allowing LDAP interfaces Closes: 399787 Changes: libpam-ldap (180-1.4) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix a brown paper bag bug in the last upload -- maybe I should check shell syntax of my maintainer script fixes before uploading. :/ Closes: #399787. Files: b0abb46c4ab773655f9549f32d0e72b5 633 admin extra libpam-ldap_180-1.4.dsc b7713281b518f193ec46d2908a2b0bda 21119 admin extra libpam-ldap_180-1.4.diff.gz 1e5cd413e23fd8ddf9851b4fde0c263c 62910 admin extra libpam-ldap_180-1.4_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFY6kEKN6ufymYLloRAjWlAJ0QBoF6l+w2rPxhiSmAkoRss5ofBQCfQzXk qmOIrwOJL8OT5SztCMhKDPg= =bffO -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#398058: [NFS] nhfsstone license
I have a copy on my system from 2000... The terms look like If you make changes, don't call it nhfsstone. I guess you'll be ok if you call it nhfsstone-gpl. marty -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: forcibly merging 399656 399791
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 forcemerge 399656 399791 Bug#399656: iceweasel: about:iceweasel still shows firefox Bug#399791: about box still uses the term firefox Forcibly Merged 399656 399791. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: re: #399791: about box still uses the term firefox
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 399791 serious Bug#399791: about box still uses the term firefox Severity set to `serious' from `important' thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399664: marked as done (gpgsm: gpsm is missing a Replaces: gnupg2)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:34:17 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#399664: gpgsm: gpsm is missing a Replaces: gnupg2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gpgsm Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious in today's upgrade: dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/gpgsm_2.0.0-2_amd64.deb (--unpack) : tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/gnupg2/pcsc-wrapper », qui appartient aussi au paquet gnupg2 sorry for the french, but I suppose you can recognize the error ;) Cheers, -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 2.0.0-4 * Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: gpgsm Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious in today's upgrade: dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/gpgsm_2.0.0-2_amd64.deb (--unpack) : tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/gnupg2/pcsc-wrapper », qui appartient aussi au paquet gnupg2 sorry for the french, but I suppose you can recognize the error ;) Fixed in incoming. -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#399659: backing off corrects the issue
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Sergei Golovan wrote: Change between 1.1.2-2 and 1.1.2-3 didn't touch LDAP support at all. Well, that is odd then Could you upgrade only ejabberd to 1.1.2-3 (and erlang-base and erlang-nox to 1:11.b.2-1 as well)? I didn't notice erlang being upgraded, but it is indeed at 11.b.2-1 Just to make sure that it's not erlang/ejabberd fault (after that the bug may be closed or reassigned). I've not yet had my first cup of coffee, so I'll blame this on just getting up and not being up to snuff... but I'm not sure what you are asking. it seems like I have shown: * erlang* 11.b.2-1 and ejabberd 1.1.2-2 work * erlang* 11.b.2-1 and ejabberd 1.1.2-3 fail however, I do have a non-server machine I can replicate the database to for testing (I've forgotten how to create a db dump, will have to look that up again) All machines are current as of yesterday. just let me know combinations you would like to see tested. Thanks, -- Rick Nelson darkangel I generally don't use anything that has experimental and warning pasted all over it darkangel no, I'm not that dumb... hehe Knghtbrd ... * darkangel considers downloading the latest unstable kernel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#399787: libpam-ldap.postinst: 40: Syntax error: } unexpected (expecting fi)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 399787 pending patch Bug#399787: libpam-ldap.postinst: 40: Syntax error: } unexpected (expecting fi) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending, patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396226: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#396226: samba: Messes up file permissions when POSIX ACLs are
tags 396226 unreproducible moreinfo thanks We had previously never run a kernel with ACL support enabled. Since the upgrade, we are seeing very strange permission behavior. It appears to berelated to POSIX ACL support in Samba. It seems that what's happening is this. We have a number of files that are user/group writable (permissions 0664). When a user that is someone other than the Unix owner of the file writes to it, the permissions switch to 0474 (-r--rwxr--) and an ACL is added with this second user getting read/write permission to it. Unfortunately, the Unix owner of the file now is locked out of writing to it. We never had any problem with permissions on these files before using the ACL-enabled kernel. Well, first of all, the smb.conf would help a lot, here John, we would really need your smb.conf, details about the ACL-enabled filesystem and every other needed information. I have tried to reprocude that bug here. I have an XFS file system on /var and the following in smb.conf [public] directory mask=0700 browseable=yes comment=Public read only=no create mask=0770 public=yes path=/var/tmp/samba-test [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/samba-test ls -la total 8 drwxrwsr-x 2 bubulle bikinibottom 16 2006-11-21 20:13 . drwxrwxrwt 7 rootroot 4096 2006-11-21 05:31 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 bubulle bikinibottom6 2006-11-21 20:07 foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/samba-test cat foo test bubulle and spongebob are both members of bikinibottom group spongebob connect the share from a WinXP client, then modifies foo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/samba-test cat foo test test by Spongebog Square Pants [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/samba-test ls -la total 8 drwxrwsr-x 2 bubulle bikinibottom 16 2006-11-21 20:13 . drwxrwxrwt 7 rootroot 4096 2006-11-21 05:31 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 bubulle bikinibottom 38 2006-11-21 20:15 foo So, nothing unexpected here... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#399709: use sysconf
too lazy to make a patch for this crap code but it's pretty easy to get PAGE_SHIFT via sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) and much less ugly... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: patch to automatically skip db-config when client not available.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 398545 + patch Bug#398545: sitebar: postinst fails: missing depend on mysql-client There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW # tags 353079 pending Bug#353079: linux-2.6.15-1-alpha-generic: srm_env broken, returns EFAULT There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 370356 pending Bug#370356: bootcd: image generation fails with mkisofs Rock Ridge filename collision problem There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 382293 pending Bug#382293: bootcd: the image kernel panics because of a syntax error on /init There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 394392 pending Bug#394392: msync() in recent kernels fails LSB There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 395581 pending Bug#395581: bootcd: missing binary-arch target in debian/rules (Policy 4.9) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 396544 pending Bug#396544: bootcd+dash fails due to bashisms There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 397946 pending Bug#397946: linux-2.6: Request for SCTP update There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 398172 pending Bug#398172: Please enable CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE on k7 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399787: libpam-ldap.postinst: 40: Syntax error: } unexpected (expecting fi)
tags 399787 pending patch
thanks
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:42:21AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
the postinst script libpam-ldap.postinst is missing a closing fi
statement. This makes the package uninstallable, so I'm filing this bug
with severity serious.
Sigh, I suck. Fixed package on its way to incoming; here's the incremental
NMU diff.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
diff -u libpam-ldap-180/debian/changelog libpam-ldap-180/debian/changelog
--- libpam-ldap-180/debian/changelog
+++ libpam-ldap-180/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+libpam-ldap (180-1.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix a brown paper bag bug in the last upload -- maybe I should check
+shell syntax of my maintainer script fixes before uploading. :/
+Closes: #399787.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:19:45 -0800
+
libpam-ldap (180-1.3) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u libpam-ldap-180/debian/libpam-ldap.postinst
libpam-ldap-180/debian/libpam-ldap.postinst
--- libpam-ldap-180/debian/libpam-ldap.postinst
+++ libpam-ldap-180/debian/libpam-ldap.postinst
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
# way of dealing with multiple hits.
value=$value parameter=$parameter perl -i -p -e 's/^#*
*\Q$ENV{parameter}\E .*/$ENV{parameter} $ENV{value}/i
and $match=1 unless ($match)' $CONFFILE
+ fi
}
disable_param()
Processed: poppassd: diff for NMU version 1.8.5-3.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 398563 + patch Bug#398563: poppassd: postrm fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/poppassd.postrm: line 3: update-inetd: command not found Tags were: patch Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397835: [Amsn-devel] Amsn-devel post from [EMAIL PROTECTED] requires approval (fwd)
Hi Andreas, It's me again. We have now added new icons for aMSN, and removed those illegal ones from the latest SVN version. I do understand you don't want those icons to be in your debian package so don't worry, you don't need them, those are .ico icons and are the icons used in the taskbar of Windows only! Since Debian is for Linux and not Windows, this means that this does not affect you at all. You can use the 0.96 release source file, and delete the winicons/ directory before creating your debian package, this should not affect you in any way. if you still need anything, don't hesitate to write to me. Thank you for your help. KaKaRoTo On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:32:38PM -0500, Youness Alaoui wrote: Hey, Sorry, didn't see Alvaro already responded to your message, this only confirms (partially) what I first said. About the .ico files, they can't be from the official client, the quality of the icons is too bad to be coming from a Microsoft product :-p Seriously though, i'm also concerned about those images, so I'm comparing these images to the ones in Windows live messenger and they are not the same, but I do think they are the same as the windows messenger. I just downloaded and installed a resource viewer and it looks like the icons from windows messenger are the same as the ones we use with aMSN, although in windows messenger, they are stored as pngs, not icons. So I don't know if it's just a coincidence, or if they were done based on windows messenger icons or if they were copied. Anyways, since there is a doubt, I suggest we change those icons. We will change those icons for the 0.96 release, which is already out but not yet officially announced. I propose Gus's icons from the Emerald skin. I'll take care of contacting him and ask him, then we'll have to move fast in order to repackage everything. Thanks Andreas for letting us know about this. I'll keep you posted. KaKaRoTo On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 12:56:26AM +0100, Álvaro J. Iradier wrote: Hi, I'm sure display pics are not from MSN Messenger. They are the same concept, but someone (I can't remember who) made them. There's a rubber duck in MSN Messenger, but not the same pic as in AMSN. Same for other pics. About the sounds, they were record by Luis Carlos Gallego, a guitar player friend of mine, so they are NOT from M$ at all. I'm in doubt about the .ico files... Not sure where they come from. We should check and replace inmediately if they are from the original messenger (maybe use the ones from the .png files). Greets. On 11/21/06, Vivia Nikolaidou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Andreas Barth, Thank you for contacting us about this issue. Personally I am not sure where these files came from, as they were there when I joined the amsn team:), but I am asking the question to the team. (The original email is attached) The amsn-devel list is subscription-only. I will approve your message, but I kindly request you to subscribe to the list, so you can receive follow-up on this subject. Thank you very much, Vivia Nikolaidou -- Forwarded message -- From: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:05:36 +0100 Subject: Re: Bug#397835: Perhaps a doubt Hi, it seems that we need your help - there is a bug report questioning where these files come from, and it couldn't be clarified up to now. The full bug report is available at http://bugs.debian.org/397853 Any feedback from your side is welcome. For Debian, being sure about legal issues is a major topic, and if we cannot settle this quite soon, we will unfortunatly be forced to remove this package from the next stable version, Etch, something I wouldn't like to see happen. Cheers, Andi * Goneri Le Bouder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061110 02:55]: The same logo (MSN Messenger) is used on this picture: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/messenger/images/home_page_winxp.jpg Some pixmaps in /usr/share/amsn/skins/default are concerned too. displaypic: ball.png (from WinXP?) rubberduck.png (from WinXP?) pixmaps: alarm.png amsnnicon.png away.png back.png baway.png bbusy.png blocked.png boffline.png bonline.png busy.png butinvite.png butinvite_hover.png ... sounds: I don't have a Windows to chekc, but these sounds seem to be copied from Messenger installation winicons: away.ico brb.ico busy.ico hidden.ico inactive.ico lunch.ico msn.ico offline.ico online.ico phone.ico -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- Forwarded message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Date: Subject: confirm 0c5b6bb5b4c7a19f9e2ac11cd86588abac2676e0
Processed: reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 399571 ! Bug#399571: mozilla-mplayer: plugin does not handle media types in mozilla (and firefox) Bug reopened, originator set to Alvaro Martinez Echevarria [EMAIL PROTECTED]. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399697: python-numeric: Fails to build 2.3 version
* Daniel Schepler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061121 14:13]: As the subject says, if I build python-numeric under pbuilder, the resulting package has no contents for python2.3, nor any Provides of python2.3-numeric. Since pygame still Build-Depends on python2.3-numeric, I'm marking this as an RC bug. Does that also happen when building within etch (as there are different versions of python etc)? If not, then this is not RC for Etch at least. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: re: about:iceweasel still shows firefox
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 399656 serious Bug#399656: iceweasel: about:iceweasel still shows firefox Bug#399791: about box still uses the term firefox Severity set to `serious' from `minor' thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 398666 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 severity 398666 grave Bug#398666: flashplugin-nonfree: fails to install with debconf noninteractive with message download or license refused Severity set to `grave' from `important' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 399712 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22 severity 399712 important Bug#399712: gnomebaker: Segfault before burning a DVD Severity set to `important' from `grave' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#399754: FTBFS: Can not require network during build
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 399754 important Bug#399754: FTBFS: Can not require network during build Severity set to `important' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 399781 to gpgsm, found 399781 in 2.0.0-3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22 reassign 399781 gpgsm Bug#399781: gpgsm: Missing conflict or replaces on gnupg2 (= 2.0.0-2) Bug reassigned from package `gpgsm' to `gpgsm'. # goddamn v-t misuse found 399781 2.0.0-3 Bug#399781: gpgsm: Missing conflict or replaces on gnupg2 (= 2.0.0-2) Bug marked as found in version 2.0.0-3. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399656: about:iceweasel still shows firefox
severity 399656 serious thank you this bug is a serious policy violation because the term firefox itself is now non-free. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399732: marked as done (xorg-docs: FTBFS: need David's home to be built )
Your message dated Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:17:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#399732: fixed in xorg-docs 1:1.2+git20061105-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xorg-docs Version: 1:1.2+git20061105-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Automatic build of xorg-docs_1:1.2+git20061105-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98 Build started at 20061121-1032 ** ... Making clean in sgml make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/xorg-docs-1.2+git20061105/sgml' cd .. /bin/sh /home/david/debian/xorg/git/doc/xorg-docs/missing --run automake-1.10 --foreign sgml/Makefile /bin/sh: /home/david/debian/xorg/git/doc/xorg-docs/missing: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [Makefile.in] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xorg-docs-1.2+git20061105/sgml' make[1]: *** [clean-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xorg-docs-1.2+git20061105' make: *** [clean] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20061121-1035 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD pgpTI4Hx23tpH.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: xorg-docs Source-Version: 1:1.2+git20061105-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xorg-docs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xorg-docs_1.2+git20061105-2.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xorg-docs/xorg-docs_1.2+git20061105-2.diff.gz xorg-docs_1.2+git20061105-2.dsc to pool/main/x/xorg-docs/xorg-docs_1.2+git20061105-2.dsc xorg-docs_1.2+git20061105-2_all.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-docs/xorg-docs_1.2+git20061105-2_all.deb xspecs_1.2+git20061105-2_all.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-docs/xspecs_1.2+git20061105-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xorg-docs package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:52:30 -0500 Source: xorg-docs Binary: xorg-docs xspecs Architecture: source all Version: 1:1.2+git20061105-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: xorg-docs - Miscellaneous documentation for the X.Org software suite xspecs - X protocol, extension, and library technical specifications Closes: 399732 Changes: xorg-docs (1:1.2+git20061105-2) unstable; urgency=low . [ Julien Cristau ] * Call $(MAKE) distclean in debian/rules clean, ignore if it fails, and don't ship files generated by configure (closes: #399732). . [ David Nusinow ] * Add quilt as a build-depend Files: d2a36f997502b2d8aa91f3b89e1943fb 787 x11 optional xorg-docs_1.2+git20061105-2.dsc 59379870ec03e726c5428147fa9055b3 19391 x11 optional xorg-docs_1.2+git20061105-2.diff.gz 128f082d47a54541d313d7ee85823f84 1029746 x11 optional xorg-docs_1.2+git20061105-2_all.deb cfbc8a5ca88b1c8d26994e351a4c59d5 5570506 x11 optional xspecs_1.2+git20061105-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFY78xyLfpNdY0ad8RAjHYAJ9+9Xj7lD8yIf3w5hlEpxOCcfu+LACeLgn8 kpcv28iBOIl35KAlX54qs5M= =qjdX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#399781: marked as done (gpgsm: Missing conflict or replaces on gnupg2 (= 2.0.0-2))
Your message dated Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:02:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#399781: gpgsm: Missing conflict or replaces on gnupg2 (= 2.0.0-2) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gpgsm Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 Upgrades of the gnupg2 family of packages are broken on first try: Preparing to replace gpgsm 2.0.0-1 (using .../gpgsm_2.0.0-3_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gpgsm ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gpgsm_2.0.0-3_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/gnupg2/pcsc-wrapper', which is also in package gnupg2 That is because gpgsm doesn't declare that it replaces files in earlier versions of gnupg2. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gpgsm depends on: ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.3-6 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcrypt11 1.2.3-2 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libgpg-error01.4-2 library for common error values an ii libksba8 1.0.0-1 X.509 and CMS support library ii libpth20 2.0.7-4 The GNU Portable Threads ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-2 userspace USB programming library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime gpgsm recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 2.0.0-4 * Lionel Elie Mamane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: gpgsm Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 Upgrades of the gnupg2 family of packages are broken on first try: Preparing to replace gpgsm 2.0.0-1 (using .../gpgsm_2.0.0-3_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gpgsm ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gpgsm_2.0.0-3_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/gnupg2/pcsc-wrapper', which is also in package gnupg2 That is because gpgsm doesn't declare that it replaces files in earlier versions of gnupg2. Already fixed. -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#384565: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug#384565: monotone - FTBFS: Build killed with signal 15
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 02:04:07PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: It appears the BOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS is the source of monotone's cross-platform issues on Debian. Namely, that monotone fails to run (deadlock) on s390, hppa, sparc, mips, and mipsel, but runs fine on i386, amd64, ia64, alpha and powerpc [1]. [1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=monotone One suggested workaround (by Roman Zippel above) is to remove -DBOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS. The ChangeLog indicates that Nathaniel added this feature on 2005-09-30. Right, makes sense. Thanks, Roman, for tracking this down. So, my questions for the monotone mailing list are... 1. Is this more likely a bug in Boost or a bug in monotone? It is sort of an unfortunate fact of life. But monotone is the simplest place to work around it. 2. Is it reasonable to workaround this bug by removing -DBOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS? Yes, that should work fine, with only some slowdown. 3. Is it worth going to the extra effort to only define -DBOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS on the platforms for which it works? I'll consider this last option if it means a performance improvement of at least, say arbitrarily, a factor of two or so. Debian's freeze and release of Etch is imminent, and I'd like to nail this bug before then. Otherwise, Etch will ship with the last bug-free version of monotone, which was 0.28. I have not had a chance to run any benchmarks. It's certainly less than a factor of 2. Shipping with 0.28 would not be the end of the world (at least it's post-0.26, unlike IIRC latest ubuntu!), but I would say go ahead and do it. (If anyone wants to run some benchmarks of how monotone's speed changes on some interesting operations with and without -DBOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS, that would be cool; we added it as something that would give _some_ win with no downside, so we've never actually bothered to check whether the win is even measurable.) -- Nathaniel -- So let us espouse a less contested notion of truth and falsehood, even if it is philosophically debatable (if we listen to philosophers, we must debate everything, and there would be no end to the discussion). -- Serendipities, Umberto Eco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399798: gnat1: Cannot create: aunit.ali
Package: libaunit-dev Version: 1.03-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After following instructions in README.Debian, and adding with line to my project.gpr file, I get: gcc-4.1 -c -g -I- -gnatA /usr/share/ada/adainclude/aunit/aunit.ads gnat1: Cannot create: aunit.ali gnatmake: /usr/share/ada/adainclude/aunit/aunit.ads compilation error I am not sure why it wants to recompile the file: /usr/lib/ada/adalib/aunit: total 64 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 326 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 1744 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-assertions.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 7999 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-lists.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 2239 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-options.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 6237 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_cases.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 2814 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_cases-registration.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 6184 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_results.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 6159 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_results-text_reporter.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 3343 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_runner.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 2791 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-tests.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4477 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_suites.ali /usr/share/ada/adainclude/aunit/: total 112 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2074 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2231 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-assertions.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2168 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-assertions.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12361 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-lists.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6693 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-lists.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2452 2006-09-18 08:08 aunit-options.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2124 2006-09-18 08:08 aunit-options.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4572 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_cases.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3703 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_cases.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2587 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_cases-registration.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2412 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_cases-registration.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4725 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_results.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4518 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_results.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5357 2006-09-18 08:08 aunit-test_results-text_reporter.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2174 2006-09-18 08:08 aunit-test_results-text_reporter.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2706 2006-09-18 08:08 aunit-test_runner.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2199 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_runner.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2409 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-tests.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2722 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_suites.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2781 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_suites.ads [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /usr/lib/ada/adalib/aunit/aunit.ali V GNAT Lib v4.1 A -O2 A -fPIC A -gnata A -gnatf A -gnato A -gnatn A -gnatVa A -gnatA P ZX R nvn U aunit%s aunit.ads 35592e27 NE PU PK D aunit.ads 20060917220701 35592e27 D system.ads20051115140645 7ba4417a X 1 aunit.ads 27K9*AUnit 28r17 29l5 29e10 In any case the package looks broken. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-powerpc Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libaunit-dev depends on: ii gnat-4.1 4.1.1-19 The GNU Ada compiler ii libaunit1.03 1.03-2 AUnit, a unit testing framework fo libaunit-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399629: closed by Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#399629: gaim fails to connect to MSN or yahoo after upgrade)
It should work fine with any proxy server, as long as it will forward the proper ports for you. Brent S. Elmer, Ph.D. wrote: So Gaim 2 doesn't work with squid? The previous version of Gaim worked fine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399798: marked as done (gnat1: Cannot create: aunit.ali)
Your message dated Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:55:06 +1100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Disregard has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libaunit-dev Version: 1.03-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After following instructions in README.Debian, and adding with line to my project.gpr file, I get: gcc-4.1 -c -g -I- -gnatA /usr/share/ada/adainclude/aunit/aunit.ads gnat1: Cannot create: aunit.ali gnatmake: /usr/share/ada/adainclude/aunit/aunit.ads compilation error I am not sure why it wants to recompile the file: /usr/lib/ada/adalib/aunit: total 64 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 326 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 1744 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-assertions.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 7999 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-lists.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 2239 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-options.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 6237 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_cases.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 2814 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_cases-registration.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 6184 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_results.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 6159 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_results-text_reporter.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 3343 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_runner.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 2791 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-tests.ali -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4477 2006-09-29 01:28 aunit-test_suites.ali /usr/share/ada/adainclude/aunit/: total 112 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2074 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2231 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-assertions.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2168 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-assertions.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12361 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-lists.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6693 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-lists.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2452 2006-09-18 08:08 aunit-options.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2124 2006-09-18 08:08 aunit-options.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4572 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_cases.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3703 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_cases.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2587 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_cases-registration.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2412 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_cases-registration.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4725 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_results.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4518 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_results.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5357 2006-09-18 08:08 aunit-test_results-text_reporter.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2174 2006-09-18 08:08 aunit-test_results-text_reporter.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2706 2006-09-18 08:08 aunit-test_runner.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2199 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_runner.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2409 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-tests.ads -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2722 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_suites.adb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2781 2006-09-18 08:07 aunit-test_suites.ads [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /usr/lib/ada/adalib/aunit/aunit.ali V GNAT Lib v4.1 A -O2 A -fPIC A -gnata A -gnatf A -gnato A -gnatn A -gnatVa A -gnatA P ZX R nvn U aunit%s aunit.ads 35592e27 NE PU PK D aunit.ads 20060917220701 35592e27 D system.ads20051115140645 7ba4417a X 1 aunit.ads 27K9*AUnit 28r17 29l5 29e10 In any case the package looks broken. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-powerpc Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libaunit-dev depends on: ii gnat-4.1 4.1.1-19 The GNU Ada compiler ii libaunit1.03 1.03-2 AUnit, a unit testing framework fo libaunit-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hello, Please disregard - looks like gnat was confused by an older *.ali file lying around in my project directory. Thanks. -- Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---End Message---
Bug#375943: Stalin in testing?
Barak A. Pearlmutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: According to Jeff Siskind (upstream), these license issues are fixed! So I hope Stalin can slip into testing before things freeze too hard. I've released 0.11-1, but it hasn't made it very far yet. At the moment, I'm trying to get the Debian infrastructure to recognize the changes to the architectures list. In any case, I just figured out where I think you're supposed to send a change request, and sent it. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399800: gcin: FTBFS in build environments with /lib64/ installed
Package: gcin Version: 1.2.9-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: patch The gcin package FTBFS on five arches according to [1]. Among those build failures, the ones on amd64 and powerpc seems to be triggered by a braindead test in the configure script. The configure looks for /lib64/ at build time, and if it finds one, it will assume the system use /lib64/ and /usr/lib64/ by default, and happily installs stuff there. Then later when debian/rules tries to move the GTK IM module in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/ and can't find anything there, the build will fail. 1. http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcin I've used the attached patch in Ubuntu, it seems to make gcin to build on i386, amd64, powerpc, and ia64 [2]. (Strangely, the ia64 build for Ubuntu doesn't experience the tsa2d32 segfault failure as it does in Debian.) The sparc build in Ubuntu, as well as the ia64, sparc, and hppa build in Debian, on the other hand, have a different FTBFS problem caused by the tsa2d32 segfault mentioned above. 2. https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gcin/1.2.9-1ubuntu1 Please consider applying this patch to the Debian package. Thanks, Ming 2006.11.21 -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gcin depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.12.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo21.2.4-4 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.4-2The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.20-3The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtk2.0-bin2.8.20-3The programs for the GTK+ graphica ii libpango1.0-01.14.7-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-3 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor1 1.1.7-4 X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxfixes3 1:4.0.1-4 X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio ii libxi6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4.1 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxrandr2 2:1.1.0.2-4 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.1-3 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxtst6 1:1.0.1-5 X11 Testing -- Resource extension Versions of packages gcin recommends: pn gcin-qt3-immodule none (no description available) pn im-switch none (no description available) -- no debconf information #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run ## 50_fix-FTBFS-on-systems-with-lib64-directory.dpatch ## by Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## ## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch. ## ## DP: The handmade configure script tests the existence of /lib64/, and ## DP: if /lib64/ exists, it installs the GTK+ IM module into ## DP: /usr/lib64/, which causes FTBFS on all 64-bit architectures (and ## DP: presumably any build environment with /lib64/ installed). Let's ## DP: stop this madness. @DPATCH@ diff -urNad gcin-1.2.9~/configure gcin-1.2.9/configure --- gcin-1.2.9~/configure 2006-11-20 19:28:20.0 -0600 +++ gcin-1.2.9/configure2006-11-20 19:30:02.0 -0600 @@ -92,9 +92,6 @@ fi LIB='lib' -if [ -d /lib64 ]; then -LIB='lib64' -fi QT_IM='N' for i in qt3 qt4
Bug#398666: flashplugin-nonfree: i have this problem with 9.0.21.78.1 now, using 'dialog'
Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: 9.0.21.78.1 Followup-For: Bug #398666 I don't even get the question for the license with today's update: Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 225914 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.21.55.3 (using .../flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.21.78.1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement flashplugin-nonfree ... Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.21.78.1) ... download or license refused dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: flashplugin-nonfree E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.21.78.1) ... download or license refused dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: flashplugin-nonfree # dpkg --configure -a Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.21.78.1) ... download or license refused dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: flashplugin-nonfree # dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: flashplugin-nonfree is broken or not fully installed # dpkg -l flashplugin-nonfree |grep ^i iF flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.21.78.1Adobe Flash Player plugin installer # egrep -A7 'debconf\/frontend' /var/cache/debconf/config.dat Name: debconf/frontend Template: debconf/frontend Value: Dialog Owners: debconf Name: debconf/priority Template: debconf/priority Value: high Owners: debconf System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages flashplugin-nonfree depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.8 Debian configuration management sy ii gsfonts-x11 0.20 Make Ghostscript fonts available t ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxmu6 1:1.0.2-2 X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxt61:1.0.2-2 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii wget 1.10.2-2 retrieves files from the web Versions of packages flashplugin-nonfree recommends: ii xfs 1:1.0.1-5 X font server -- debconf information: flashplugin-nonfree/httpget: false flashplugin-nonfree/not_exist: flashplugin-nonfree/local: signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#399600: deluge-torrent does not start
Sam Morris wrote: What is the output of the 'locale' command on your system? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ locale LANG=C LANGUAGE=en_CH:en_US:en_GB:en LC_CTYPE=C LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=C LC_COLLATE=C LC_MONETARY=C LC_MESSAGES=C LC_PAPER=C LC_NAME=C LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C LC_MEASUREMENT=C LC_IDENTIFICATION=C LC_ALL= Could you try running 'LANG=C deluge-torrent'? I had already tried that (I had a similar problem with another software), but nothing changes, same error. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399809: flashplugin-nonfree: fails to upgrade from 9.0.21.55.3 to 9.0.21.78.1 and fails to dpkg-reconfigure
Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: 9.0.21.78.1 Severity: grave Tags: confirmed Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] reported this problem: I ran into this (for the first time) when upgrading today: # aptitude dist-upgrade ... Get:11 http://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/contrib flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.21.78.1 [11.6kB] ... Preparing to replace flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.21.55.3 (using .../flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.21.78.1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement flashplugin-nonfree ... Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.21.78.1) ... download or license refused dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 I can't even reconfigure the package to accept the license: # dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: flashplugin-nonfree is broken or not fully installed Edward J. Shornock [EMAIL PROTECTED] reported the same problem. I don't even get the question for the license with today's update: Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 225914 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.21.55.3 (using .../flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.21.78.1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement flashplugin-nonfree ... Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.21.78.1) ... download or license refused dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: flashplugin-nonfree E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.21.78.1) ... download or license refused dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: flashplugin-nonfree # dpkg --configure -a Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.21.78.1) ... download or license refused dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: flashplugin-nonfree # dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: flashplugin-nonfree is broken or not fully installed # dpkg -l flashplugin-nonfree |grep ^i iF flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.21.78.1Adobe Flash Player plugin installer # egrep -A7 'debconf\/frontend' /var/cache/debconf/config.dat Name: debconf/frontend Template: debconf/frontend Value: Dialog Owners: debconf Name: debconf/priority Template: debconf/priority Value: high Owners: debconf signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#399808: mediawiki1.7: segfaults under php 5.2.0-5
Package: mediawiki1.7 Version: 1.7.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable apache2 child process dies with segmentation fault. With php 5.1.6-5 it's ok. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental'), (1, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mediawiki1.7 depends on: ii apache2 2.2.3-3.1 Next generation, scalable, extenda ii apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd] 2.2.3-3.1 Traditional model for Apache HTTPD ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.9 Debian configuration management sy ii mime-support 3.37-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii php5 5.2.0-5server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php5-cli 5.2.0-5command-line interpreter for the p ii php5-mysql5.2.0-5MySQL module for php5 Versions of packages mediawiki1.7 recommends: ii mysql-server-5.1 [mysql-ser 5.1.11beta-1 mysql database server binaries -- debconf information: * mediawiki/webserver: apache, apache2 mediawiki/upgrade-1d4: * mediawiki/upgrade-1d5-adminuser: root * mediawiki/upgrade-1d5: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: flashplugin-nonfree: fails to install with debconf noninteractive with message download or license refused
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 398666 Bug#398666: flashplugin-nonfree: fails to install with debconf noninteractive with message download or license refused 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Vladmimir Stavrinov [EMAIL PROTECTED] stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399316: postinst breaks
also sprach Santiago Garcia Mantinan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.11.21.0723 +1100]: In fact, I'm almost positive that the -e is the wanted stuff there, and not a -n, so the fix should be replacing echo with /bin/echo, I have tested it and it seems to work, but being mdadm a critical package... I'd rather not NMU it unless it is necesary. Nope, I am sure it's -n, because I simply don't want a newline. There are no control characters when interacting with debconf. I have uploaded a version that fixes this. Could you please test -6? -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Bug#399656: about:iceweasel still shows firefox
severity 399656 normal thanks * Michael Gilbert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: severity 399656 serious thank you this bug is a serious policy violation because the term firefox itself is now non-free. Uh, no. The term is trademarked, but that's not necessarily a problem. The fox logo is non-free, but it's not present. -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#399809: flashplugin-nonfree: fails to upgrade from 9.0.21.55.3 to 9.0.21.78.1 and fails to dpkg-reconfigure
Sam, Eduard, The failed upgrade from 9.0.21.55.3 to 9.0.21.78.1 is because I forgot to reset the answer to the question about the license to the default yes. Adding a db_reset fixes that. (Dammit I should have tested this upgrade. Feel free to rub it in, so that I don't forget this.) The failed dpkg-reconfigure and dpkg --configure -a is because failing to install the plugin made the postinst fail, thereby installing the Debian package fail, see bug #387263. I intend to revert the changes for #387263. I intend to document dpkg-reconfigure on http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer to help confused end users solve the problem flash doesn't work with flashplugin-nonfree. Edward, The question for the license no longer appears with debconf priority high, and that is intentional. See #398666 for details. Regards, Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#399656: about:iceweasel still shows firefox
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 399656 normal Bug#399656: iceweasel: about:iceweasel still shows firefox Bug#399791: about box still uses the term firefox Severity set to `normal' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399779: marked as done (python2.4-pexpect: install fails)
Your message dated Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:22:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line python2.4-pexpect: install fails has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: python2.4-pexpect Version: 0.999-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Compiling /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/test/stdio_test_halfclose.py ... File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/test/stdio_test_halfclose.py, line 20 ??? ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages python2.4-pexpect depends on: ii python2.4 2.4.1-2sarge1 An interactive high-level object-o ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hello, On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, root wrote: Package: python2.4-pexpect Version: 0.999-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Compiling /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/test/stdio_test_halfclose.py ... File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/test/stdio_test_halfclose.py, line 20 ??? ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax First of all /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/test/stdio_test_halfclose.py isn't part of python2.4-pexpect. Next, it isn't even part of an official Debian package. It looks like a manually installed python module. Python2.4-pexpect is a sarge only package, the python byte-compilation in etch has been improved such as this situation can't arise anymore because not all python files are byte-compiled but only those from the package. So I'm closing this non-bug. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ ---End Message---
Processed: flashplugin-nonfree: fails to install with debconf noninteractive with message download or license refused
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfound 398666 9.0.21.78.1 Bug#398666: flashplugin-nonfree: fails to install with debconf noninteractive with message download or license refused Bug marked as not found in version 9.0.21.78.1. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
