date:20070705

Bug#427183: marked as done (classpath - FTBFS: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'NS_DEFINE_IID' with no type)

2007-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2007 06:02:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#427183: fixed in classpath 2:0.95-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: classpath
Version: 2:0.92-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs

hi,

while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:

  gcjwebplugin.cc: At global scope:
  gcjwebplugin.cc:145: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'NS_DEFINE_IID' 
  with no type
  gcjwebplugin.cc:145: error: 'kIPluginTagInfo2IID' was not declared in this 
  scope
  gcjwebplugin.cc:145: error: expected primary-expression before '{' token
  gcjwebplugin.cc:145: error: initializer expression list treated as compound 
  expression
  gcjwebplugin.cc: In function 'gchar* plugin_get_documentbase(NPP_t*)':
  gcjwebplugin.cc:874: error: 'nsresult' was not declared in this scope
  gcjwebplugin.cc:874: error: expected `;' before 'result'
  gcjwebplugin.cc:887: error: 'class nsIPluginInstance' has no member named 
  'GetPeer'
  gcjwebplugin.cc:896: error: 'result' was not declared in this scope
  gcjwebplugin.cc:896: error: 'class nsIPluginInstancePeer' has no member 
  named 'QueryInterface'
  gcjwebplugin.cc:896: error: 'kIPluginTagInfo2IID' was not declared in this 
  scope
  gcjwebplugin.cc:904: error: 'class nsIPluginTagInfo2' has no member named 
  'GetDocumentBase'
  gcjwebplugin.cc:916: error: 'NS_RELEASE' was not declared in this scope
  gcjwebplugin.cc: At global scope:
  gcjwebplugin.cc:145: warning: 'NS_DEFINE_IID' defined but not used
  make[3]: *** [libgcjwebplugin_la-gcjwebplugin.lo] Error 1
  make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/user/classpath-0.92/native/plugin'
  make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
  make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/user/classpath-0.92/native'
  make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
  make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/classpath-0.92'
  make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

The Full Build log is available and can be viewed at:

 http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/06/01/
 
bye,
- michael

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: classpath
Source-Version: 2:0.95-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
classpath, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

classpath-common-unzipped_0.95-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath-common-unzipped_0.95-1_all.deb
classpath-common_0.95-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath-common_0.95-1_all.deb
classpath-doc_0.95-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath-doc_0.95-1_all.deb
classpath-gtkpeer_0.95-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath-gtkpeer_0.95-1_i386.deb
classpath-qtpeer_0.95-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath-qtpeer_0.95-1_i386.deb
classpath_0.95-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath_0.95-1.diff.gz
classpath_0.95-1.dsc
  to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath_0.95-1.dsc
classpath_0.95-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath_0.95-1_i386.deb
classpath_0.95.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath_0.95.orig.tar.gz
gcjwebplugin_0.95-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/classpath/gcjwebplugin_0.95-1_i386.deb
jikes-classpath_0.95-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/classpath/jikes-classpath_0.95-1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated classpath package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:05:44 +0200
Source: classpath
Binary: classpath-qtpeer classpath-gtkpeer gcjwebplugin classpath-doc 
classpath-common-unzipped classpath-common classpath jikes-classpath
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2:0.95-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 classpath  - clean room standard Java libraries
 classpath-common - clean room standard Java libraries - architecture 
independent fil
 classpath-common-unzipped - clean room standard Java libraries -

Bug#430866: apcalc: Dangling pointer for config

2007-07-05 Thread Martin Buck

tags 430866 - security
tags 430866 forwarded patch
severity important
thanks

On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 04:10:08PM -0400, Patricio Rojo wrote:
   I reported this bug as a security hole just because I found what it 
 seems to be a dangling pointer... I have no idea if it could be 
 maliciously exploted... so feel free to downgrade its severity if you 
 can certify otherwise.

Thanks for your report. I've had a look at the code in question. It treats
a struct string * as a char * when it actually should use the s_str
member of struct string (config.c:532 and config.c:545). But it's used
only in printf-style output and the function called (math_error()) protects
against buffer overflow, so I think the worst thing that could happen is
garbage output or under rare circumstances a segfault due to nonexistent
memory being read. I don't see any way to exploit this, so I'm downgrading
the severity.

Depending on how long upstream needs to release a fixed version, I'll
either wait for that or upload a new Debian version with the patch below.

Martin


--- apcalc-2.12.1.13/config.c.orig  2007-07-05 09:34:03.0 +0200
+++ apcalc-2.12.1.13/config.c   2007-07-05 09:49:47.0 +0200
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@
}
temp = lookup_long(modes, vp-v_str-s_str);
if (temp  0) {
-   math_error(Unknown mode \%s\, vp-v_str);
+   math_error(Unknown mode \%s\, vp-v_str-s_str);
/*NOTREACHED*/
}
math_setmode((int) temp);
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@
}
temp = lookup_long(modes, vp-v_str-s_str);
if (temp  0) {
-   math_error(Unknown mode \%s\, vp-v_str);
+   math_error(Unknown mode \%s\, vp-v_str-s_str);
/*NOTREACHED*/
}
math_setmode2((int) temp);



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#431123: aptitude: Initializing package states takes very much longer than before +b1

2007-07-05 Thread Nathaniel Smith

On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 07:42:08AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:00:53PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 was heard to say:
  On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:12:11PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
 Does installing the version in experimental fix the problem for you?
  
  Yes, the aptitude in experimental (0.4.4-5~2, which appears to be
  linked against apt 0.6.46.4-0.1, which is no longer in unstable?)
  works fine.
 
   Eh?  I meant 0.4.5.3-1.  Maybe that's not available on your
 architecture?
   
   Anyway, I'm preparing an upload to unstable, which should fix these
 problems for everyone.

Ah, right, x86-64.  The version that went into unstable today seems to
be working fine.

-- Nathaniel

-- 
Of course, the entire effort is to put oneself
 Outside the ordinary range
 Of what are called statistics.
  -- Stephan Spender


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 431324, severity of 431411 is important, tagging 431199

2007-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
 tags 431324 lenny sid
Bug#431324: apt-watch - FTBFS: undefined reference to 
`glade_xml_signal_autoconnect'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

 severity 431411 important
Bug#431411: ivtv: FTBFS on mips
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

 tags 431199 lenny sid
Bug#431199: kwave - FTBFS: error: cannot allocate an object of abstract type 
'FlacDecoder'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#431794: marked as done (whichwayisup: CC-v3.0 licenses do not meet the DFSG)

2007-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:41:05 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#431794: whichwayisup: CC-v3.0 licenses do not meet the DFSG
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: whichwayisup
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

Hi!

The debian/copyright file[1] of this package states, in part:

| All game content, sounds and graphics are licensed
| under Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution license
| ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ )

As I replied[2] to you on debian-legal and debian-devel, I don't think
that CC-v3.0 licenses meet the DFSG.
In that message I referred you to some past threads, among which
you can find a detailed analysis[3] of CC-by-sa-v3.0: most of the
issues found in CC-by-sa-v3.0 also apply to CC-by-v3.0.

Please, try and persuade upstream to relicense (or dual-license) the
game content under the same license as the game code, that is
to say the GNU GPL v2.
Or under some other clearly DFSG-free license, such as the Expat/MIT
license[4].

[1]
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/w/whichwayisup/whichwayisup_0.7.0-1/whichwayisup.copyright
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/05/msg00195.html
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/03/msg00105.html
[4] http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi Francesco,

In my opinion CC-by and CC-by-sa meet the requirements to be DFSG-free. I know
it is a controversial issue, so I won't enter into that fight myself (IANAL).
I'm pretty sure the license text can be improved, as can also most of other
licenses be, but that doesn't make it not DFSG, I think the license grants all
the rights needed to be considered free.

Thanks a lot for your concern anyway, maybe you should try to ask ftpmasters
about it, as they're in fact the authoritative entity that really decide on
which licenses are valid or not in last instance. The package has gone
recently through the NEW queue and was approved, and it doesn't seem that it
just had slip through, as it was clearly announced in the ITP, in the
debian/copyright file, the debian-legal mailing list and to the ftpmasters in
advance, as well as in planet.

¡Descubre una nueva forma de obtener respuestas a tus preguntas!
Entra en Yahoo! Respuestas.
http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome
---End Message---

77 matches

Mail list logo