Bug#597483: strongswan-dbg: Uninstallable in unstable

[Adam D. Barratt]

Package: strongswan-dbg
Version: 4.4.1-3
Severity: serious

Hi,

strongswan-dbg is uninstallable in unstable as it depends on the
strongswan binary package, which appears to no longer exist.

Regards,

Adam



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595903: marked as done (apt-setup: Fail to set up DVD as APT source during installation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:17:07 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#595903: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.47
has caused the Debian Bug report #595903,
regarding apt-setup: Fail to set up DVD as APT source during installation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
595903: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595903
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package:  apt-setup
Version:  1:0.46
Severity: grave
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
UserTags: debian-edu

I ran into this with the daily built DVD for Debian Edu.  The
installation fail because the installer is unable to find the packages
it should install in the pre-pkgsel step.  The reason is that the
sources.list file have no valid APT sources, not even the installation
DVD.

I tracked it further down to apt-setup and the 40cdrom script, which
fail to get the DVD added as a source.  The reason seem to be that
'apt-cdrom add' fail because /sys/ is not mounted when it is called.

I assume this happen with the Debian DVD too, and set the severity to
grave.

I am not quite sure how to fix this properly, but using in-target
instead of chroot when running 'apt-cdrom add' might be a solution.

The daily built Debian Edu DVD can be fetched from
http://ftp.skolelinux.org/cd-squeeze-test-dvd/ > (or ftp and
rsync) if you want to test this yourself.

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-setup
Source-Version: 1:0.47

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-setup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-cdrom-setup_0.47_all.udeb
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.47_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.47_all.udeb
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.47_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.47_all.udeb
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.47_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.47.dsc
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup_0.47.dsc
apt-setup_0.47.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup_0.47.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Otavio Salvador  (supplier of updated apt-setup package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:06:01 -0300
Source: apt-setup
Binary: apt-setup-udeb apt-mirror-setup apt-cdrom-setup
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:0.47
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team 
Changed-By: Otavio Salvador 
Description: 
 apt-cdrom-setup - set up a CD in sources.list (udeb)
 apt-mirror-setup - set up a mirror in sources.list (udeb)
 apt-setup-udeb - Configure apt (udeb)
Closes: 595903
Changes: 
 apt-setup (1:0.47) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Joey Hess ]
   * When cdrom-detect/hybrid is true, the CD is not mountable by apt,
 so behave the same as for a hd-media install.
   * Needs cdrom-detect 1.35.
 .
   [ Colin Watson ]
   * Use chroot-setup.sh to mount /proc and /sys in the target when running
 apt-cdrom (closes: #595903).  This would normally need di-utils 1.80;
 but to avoid breaking d-i squeeze alpha 1 (and possibly beta 1) initrds,
 I've temporarily copied a chunk of code from chroot-setup.sh into two
 apt-setup generator scripts.  This should be cleaned up once
 compatibility with older initrds is no longer necessary.
 .
   [ Updated translations ]
   * Asturian (ast.po) by maacub
   * Bulgarian (bg.po) by Damyan Ivanov
   * Bosnian (bs.po) by Armin Beširović
   * Danish (da.po) by Anders Jenbo
   * Persian (fa.po) by Ebrahim Byagowi
   * Finnish (fi.po) by Esko Arajärvi
   * Kazakh (kk.po) by Baurzhan Muftakhidinov
   * Panjabi (pa.po) by A S Alam
   * Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
   * Telugu (te.po) by Arjuna Rao Chavala
Checksums-Sha1: 
 8d66bbd5acd424fc7480dd87a820530c55cd7da1 1528 apt-setup_0.47.dsc
 9da4e07f27ff7574f19c8b71ba2273cbc9e4ea6f 242780 apt-setup_0.47.tar.gz
 68bae554193803bf8cae4c96b2a035999857bb84 46358 apt-setup-udeb_0.47_all.udeb
 aaf97b67bbf0958054e842a8468670f192237f02 64060 apt-mirror-setup_0.47_all.udeb
 ecf0768ec3534dcb4b5f88b19c3dd32db08ed5a8 82104 apt-cdrom-set

Bug#597478: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#597478: fglrx-modules-dkms: fails to build kernel module on amd64

[Michael Gilbert]

On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:02:18 -0400 Michael Gilbert wrote:

> package: fglrx-modules-dkms
> version: 1:10-9-1
> severity: grave
> tags: pending
> 
> due to a function rename, the kernel module now fails to build on
> amd64:
> 
>CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/10-9/build/kcl_ioctl.o
>/var/lib/dkms/fglrx/10-9/build/kcl_ioctl.c: In function
>‘KCL_IOCTL_AllocUserSpace32’: 
> /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/10-9/build/kcl_ioctl.c:196:
>error: implicit declaration of function ‘compat_alloc_user_space’
> 
> i will commit a fix soon.

fix commited now.  note, this appears to be due to a function rename in
the 2.6.32-23 (or maybe -22) kernel sources.

mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597478: fglrx-modules-dkms: fails to build kernel module on amd64

[Michael Gilbert]

package: fglrx-modules-dkms
version: 1:10-9-1
severity: grave
tags: pending

due to a function rename, the kernel module now fails to build on
amd64:

   CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/10-9/build/kcl_ioctl.o
   /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/10-9/build/kcl_ioctl.c: In function
   ‘KCL_IOCTL_AllocUserSpace32’: /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/10-9/build/kcl_ioctl.c:196:
   error: implicit declaration of function ‘compat_alloc_user_space’

i will commit a fix soon.

mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: numpy memory corruption patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 581058 patch
Bug #581058 [python-numpy] Running pylint on a file with just "import numpy" 
corrupts memory
Added tag(s) patch.
> severity 581058 serious
Bug #581058 [python-numpy] Running pylint on a file with just "import numpy" 
corrupts memory
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
581058: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581058
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597461: marked as done (Please add support for wheezy)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:47:07 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#597461: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #597461,
regarding Please add support for wheezy
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597461
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.23
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid

The next release will be called wheezy. Please add support for that.

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-debian-xen-1 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii  wget  1.12-2.1   retrieves files from the web

Versions of packages debootstrap recommends:
ii  gnupg 1.4.10-4   GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep

debootstrap suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: debootstrap
Source-Version: 1.0.24

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

debootstrap-udeb_1.0.24_all.udeb
  to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.24_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.24.dsc
  to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.24.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.24.tar.gz
  to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.24.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.24_all.deb
  to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.24_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 597...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess  (supplier of updated debootstrap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:40:00 -0400
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team 
Changed-By: Joey Hess 
Description: 
 debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian system
 debootstrap-udeb - Bootstrap the Debian system (udeb)
Closes: 521196 597461
Changes: 
 debootstrap (1.0.24) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Miguel Figueiredo ]
   * Apply patches from by Jonathan Klee and Guillaume Chauvel
 to add support to https (closes: #521196).
 .
   [ Colin Watson ]
   * Add (Ubuntu) natty as a symlink to gutsy.
 .
   [ Joey Hess ]
   * Add support for wheezy. Closes: #597461
Checksums-Sha1: 
 52cb034418dc799f20c8880e7aca7a43765e03aa 1652 debootstrap_1.0.24.dsc
 1d230a5125c4523e4d506215d3f4c4c4ed33e630 54397 debootstrap_1.0.24.tar.gz
 a89a769512122504f888b454cc47cc28ee84dbf7 55484 debootstrap_1.0.24_all.deb
 103e8b53f3a1394e1d716ef5e90db0eaf7a94f4e 18220 debootstrap-udeb_1.0.24_all.udeb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 bca7d67af9173dcc4e5b8c148484955886aabf40a52884db2cd0d4a04b1f950c 1652 
debootstrap_1.0.24.dsc
 3bf1afc38e65dc335443cf349b754883abaaa85d68909d67fcd946a496fb3192 54397 
debootstrap_1.0.24.tar.gz
 b3134df4692935c58e4ef284a5334d02fd326093a73fd3658b37c5dc21db1dfa 55484 
debootstrap_1.0.24_all.deb
 39ed88f1eaab525841bfd144278918bbd6f035e14008773ea4e7d9aa6fc257ab 18220 
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.24_all.udeb
Files: 
 c2978c6822826b0ea9fcdffdb655c6f5 1652 admin extra debootstrap_1.0.24.dsc
 dd1cf7271d14dc7c983d7e0595cc1942 54397 admin extra debootstrap_1.0.24.tar.gz
 61ed16ec8177d64800477f5eb43223f9 55484 admin extra debootstrap_1.0.24_all.deb
 ddb3ba479882ae6df452838dc4a4922c 18220 debian-installer extra 
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.24_all.udeb
Package-Type: udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQIVAwUBTJa8U8kQ2SIlEuPHAQhRZhAApMKw1ZNs8Dl7W0T+YBGhPSq6nds5dqGl
rJ56vf4dUQ66s9enwmhqWB4xyt+nmGwFG3xbzaWTywXHx+ZISwR2flbk05Ix7lJP
V7ofCPJDd7hOvPIs3It6BRNkcYMVohc++XYimNbaYQSw0Mog8ABVBdtY+t2+cTpT
fUNd9mmhfHgpWHplPteaoZIrrIYAJ+WBEWB4xk+3olmRv8iL3jEAkJwEnQnjgcIG
FQKghC9nJfhE/WxJaRmpf08E9otnxWE/yG5r8NaWKBPUBArsKn8B///vFDeuyqjI
ndFsBtDPHaoLz3hRzTlbWOZv2lEVjC/PKXgJbUjkUmxOcnpFIcXuLw2VWC7XQWOI
HopP1a3RCLWF+Z3EaRG0Tu9rlUN0awsgY0t

Bug#597475: debian-installer: Screen flashes on and off after fresh installation of squeeze.

[Ryan David Larrowe]

Package: debian-installer
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

After installing debian squeeze when starting the
gui the monitor turns on and off with white streaks when it is on.

-- System Information:
I am using Debian Squeeze released on 7-15-10 for X86.  I have an
ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP 8X with 512MB RAM.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: CVE-2010-2055

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forcemerge 584653 595701
Bug#584653: ghostscript: does not honor -P- option
Bug#595701: ghostscript: CVE-2010-2055 code loaded from current directory
Forcibly Merged 584653 595701.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595701
584653: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584653
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595701: CVE-2010-2055

[Michael Gilbert]

forcemerge 584653 595701
thanks

On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:16:38 +0200 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:

> Hi Michael, 
> 
> Isn't this CVE-2010-2055 a duplicate of the RC bugs #584653 #584663 ?

yes, it appears so.  thanks.

mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597469: qt4-x11: ftbfs buildd ran out of disk space

[Michael Gilbert]

package: qt4-x11
version: 4:4.6.3-2
severity: grave

https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=qt4-x11&ver=4:4.6.3-2&arch=s390&stamp=1283800739&file=log



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#587290: [Debootloaders-yaboot] Bug#587290: How does linux-base modify /etc/yaboot.conf ?

[Ben Hutchings]

On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 01:48 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
[...]
> > I could change linux-base.postinst to avoid adding space between name,
> > '=' and value when updating the configuration but it seems simple enough
> > to make ybin accept that too.
> 
> Yes, it's simple. And I think you can't avoid the quotes, because of
> spaces ? (I bet some people put spaces in FS labels ?). So yes, ybin
> needs fixing, I'll try having a look at that (and Rick's code).

The quotes are needed because of the '=' sign, not because of spaces.
Spaces in labels are possible but extremely problematic, so
linux-base.postinst will never try to use such labels.

> BTW, I'm very curious why we didn't get hit by that earlier. It seems
> your code affected yaboot around the time Debian switched to mandatory
> UUID/labels, right ?

I believe that the installer has used UUIDs in most configuration files
starting with lenny, but there may be exceptions to this.  The reason
for the recent transition is the change in PATA/IDE drivers which causes
their device names to change, but even on systems without any PATA
devices SCSI device names are unstable.

> Is your script only triggered for that ? Is it only
> done once during the transition (as seems to imply the function's name
> from where it's called in your perl code) or on every kernel upgrade ?

It should only run once, unless the user explicitly reconfigures the
linux-base package (dpkg-reconfigure).

> > Yes, all parts of yaboot should really be using the same configuration
> > parser.  Reimplementing it is crazy.
> 
> Well, I'm not sure anyone is able/willing to do that here… Let's just
> fix the most obvious bug for now, right ?

Right, I'm just saying that that would be the ideal.

> > By the way, I think this bug should be merged with #580455.
> 
> Tried doing it, but didn't work; should I rather forcemerge or try
> setting both to the same severity first ? (I don't like messing with so
> high severity when it's not my bugs)

Either will work.  'forcemerge' will set all the merged bugs to the
severity of the first one you specify.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#597262: patch

[dann frazier]

tags 597262 + patch
thanks

sys/user.h on armel has a conflicting definition of 'struct user'.
This patch renames bip's structure to avoid the conflict.
diff -urpN bip-0.8.6.orig/src/irc.h bip-0.8.6/src/irc.h
--- bip-0.8.6.orig/src/irc.h	2010-09-12 16:47:57.0 +
+++ bip-0.8.6/src/irc.h	2010-09-19 23:48:43.0 +
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct channel {
 #define IRC_TYPE_LOGING_CLIENT (2)
 #define IRC_TYPE_TRUST_CLIENT (3)
 
-struct user {
+struct bipuser {
 	/** client connection static data **/
 
 	char *name;
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ struct link {
 	hash_t chan_infos;		/* channels we want */
 	list_t chan_infos_order;	/* for order only */
 
-	struct user *user;
+	struct bipuser *user;
 
 	/** server connection static data **/
 	/* server list */
diff -urpN bip-0.8.6.orig/src/log.c bip-0.8.6/src/log.c
--- bip-0.8.6.orig/src/log.c	2010-09-12 16:47:57.0 +
+++ bip-0.8.6/src/log.c	2010-09-19 23:48:05.0 +
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ void log_flush_all(void)
 	}
 }
 
-log_t *log_new(struct user *user, const char *network)
+log_t *log_new(struct bipuser *user, const char *network)
 {
 	log_t *logdata;
 
diff -urpN bip-0.8.6.orig/src/log.h bip-0.8.6/src/log.h
--- bip-0.8.6.orig/src/log.h	2010-09-12 16:47:57.0 +
+++ bip-0.8.6/src/log.h	2010-09-19 23:47:46.0 +
@@ -59,10 +59,10 @@ typedef struct log
 	int backlogging;
 	int lastfile_seeked;
 
-	struct user *user;
+	struct bipuser *user;
 } log_t;
 
-log_t *log_new(struct user *user, const char *network);
+log_t *log_new(struct bipuser *user, const char *network);
 void logdata_free(log_t *logdata);
 
 void log_join(log_t *logdata, const char *ircmask, const char *channel);

Processed: patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 597262 + patch
Bug #597262 [bip] bip: FTBFS on armel: error: redefinition of 'struct user'
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
597262: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597262
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#587290: [Debootloaders-yaboot] Bug#587290: How does linux-base modify /etc/yaboot.conf ?

[Benjamin Cama]

Hi Ben,

Le samedi 18 septembre 2010 à 22:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> The value of the kernel (or rather initramfs) root parameter generally
> does need to include an '=' character and linux-base.postinst is correct
> to use it.  It must then double-quote the value in yaboot.conf so that
> it is handled correctly by the main configuration parser in cfg.c.
> Therefore, ybin also needs to accept this format.

Thanks for the check in cfg.c, I didn't have the idea to go there. I
think most people relied on what ybin told them (i.e. "I don't grok
this"). The problem being that ybin never ever understood this syntax,
and the stricter "simple" one was the de-facto standard. This is why
your change hurt so much (#580455 lists now at least 5 persons
affected), and I'm generally reluctant to ancient file format change.
But you're right in that ybin is buggy.

> I could change linux-base.postinst to avoid adding space between name,
> '=' and value when updating the configuration but it seems simple enough
> to make ybin accept that too.

Yes, it's simple. And I think you can't avoid the quotes, because of
spaces ? (I bet some people put spaces in FS labels ?). So yes, ybin
needs fixing, I'll try having a look at that (and Rick's code).

BTW, I'm very curious why we didn't get hit by that earlier. It seems
your code affected yaboot around the time Debian switched to mandatory
UUID/labels, right ? Is your script only triggered for that ? Is it only
done once during the transition (as seems to imply the function's name
from where it's called in your perl code) or on every kernel upgrade ?

> Yes, all parts of yaboot should really be using the same configuration
> parser.  Reimplementing it is crazy.

Well, I'm not sure anyone is able/willing to do that here… Let's just
fix the most obvious bug for now, right ?

> By the way, I think this bug should be merged with #580455.

Tried doing it, but didn't work; should I rather forcemerge or try
setting both to the same severity first ? (I don't like messing with so
high severity when it's not my bugs)

Regards,
benjamin




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#521956: marked as done (ksymoops: FTBFS: current binutils static libs need -lz)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:50:06 +0100 (WEST)
with message-id <20100919225006.40e25c2...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package ksymoops has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #521956,
regarding ksymoops: FTBFS: current binutils static libs need -lz
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
521956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ksymoops
Version: 2.4.11-1
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
gcc io.o ksyms.o ksymoops.o map.o misc.o object.o oops.o re.o symbol.o -g -O2 
-Dlinux -Wall -Wno-
conversion -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes 
-DINSTALL_PREFIX="\"/usr\"" 
-DCROSS="\"\""  -DDEF_KSYMS=\"/proc/ksyms\" -DDEF_LSMOD=\"/proc/modules\" -
DDEF_OBJECTS=\"/lib/modules/*r/\" -DDEF_MAP=\"/boot/System.map-*r\"  
-Wl,-Bstatic -lbfd -liberty -Wl,-
Bdynamic -o ksymoops
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.3/../../../../lib/libbfd.a(compress.o): In 
function 
`bfd_uncompress_section_contents':
/tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:96: 
undefined reference to 
`inflateInit_'
/tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:103: 
undefined reference to 
`inflate'
/tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:106: 
undefined reference to 
`inflateReset'
/tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:108: 
undefined reference to 
`inflateEnd'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [ksymoops] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/ksymoops-2.4.11'
make: *** [build] Error 2
-- 
Daniel Schepler



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.4.11-1+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/521956 in Debian BTS
against the package ksymoops. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/597388. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#593683: linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders

[Ben Hutchings]

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 15:53 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> BTW,
> 
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 04:38:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > (Reopening the bug out of an abundance of caution; if lenny grub really
> > > doesn't need to be added to the Breaks, please close again - but please 
> > > also
> > > let me know why, so we can write the release notes appropriately.)
> 
> > I think the release notes should encourage people to update their boot
> > loader first.
> 
> Adding extra steps to the release-notes-recommended upgrade path is always a
> poor substitute for having the system automatically upgrade packages for you
> in the intended order.  If you believe that users should be encouraged to
> update their boot loader before upgrading their kernel, then please declare
> this in the Breaks: for the package so that we do the right thing for *all*
> users, including those who don't read the release notes; as
> 
> shows, even DDs who should know better often upgrade without reading the
> release notes.
> 
> Conversely, if you disagree that there's any reason for the kernel to
> declare a Breaks: against the old bootloaders, then I disagree that we
> should document this in the release notes either. :)

I agree that this information should be in the Breaks field; I'm just
not totally confident that this will reliably result in the right
upgrade sequence.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#593683: linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders

[Steve Langasek]

BTW,

On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 04:38:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > (Reopening the bug out of an abundance of caution; if lenny grub really
> > doesn't need to be added to the Breaks, please close again - but please also
> > let me know why, so we can write the release notes appropriately.)

> I think the release notes should encourage people to update their boot
> loader first.

Adding extra steps to the release-notes-recommended upgrade path is always a
poor substitute for having the system automatically upgrade packages for you
in the intended order.  If you believe that users should be encouraged to
update their boot loader before upgrading their kernel, then please declare
this in the Breaks: for the package so that we do the right thing for *all*
users, including those who don't read the release notes; as

shows, even DDs who should know better often upgrade without reading the
release notes.

Conversely, if you disagree that there's any reason for the kernel to
declare a Breaks: against the old bootloaders, then I disagree that we
should document this in the release notes either. :)

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#593683: linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders

[Steve Langasek]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 08:53:07PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > grub uses a public interface. There is no need for depends in this case.
> > However if the public interface is changed, it needs to be handled
> > accordingly.

> And the public interface hasn't changed.

In my testing, I can confirm that installing a squeeze kernel package on a
system with lenny grub succeeds in updating /boot/grub/menu.lst without
incident.  So you may be right that this is a non-issue.  I'm asking the
folks who commented on the mailing list for logs, to help pinpoint if
there's something here that we've overlooked; but we shouldn't hold up our
call for upgrade testing waiting for such logs to appear, in the absence of
some other evidence of a problem when using grub.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#571255: Udev 151-2 upgrade problem on debian-testing-'squeeze' i386 cd binary1 20090302-04-:09

[Steve Langasek]

Ciao Marco,

I've been working on wrapping my head fully around the various issues with
the udev and kernel upgrade, to ensure we have it documented properly in the
release notes.  It's clear to me that we will need to include documentation
of this issue in the release notes no matter what changes are made to the
packages, because users will need to know that the new udev won't work
correctly with the Debian 2.6.26 kernels.  At the same time, I think
something needs to change in the packages to improve the 'dist-upgrade'
experience, because we both know many users won't read the release notes.

First, what happened to the idea of using 'Breaks'?  This was proposed
months ago, but it hasn't been implemented yet in the package.  Should I
provide a patch that implements this?

Second, I've done some research and testing regarding the nature of the
incompatibility with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED.  From what I see, the primary
impact of dropping the compat code from udev is that udev rules will no
longer be applied to certain devices, such as block devices and network
devices.  This will break /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules, and
break any permission-setting on disks (e.g., the 'disk' and 'floppy' groups)
and certain alias symlinks for CD drives, but those are the only problems
I've been able to identify on a standard as a result of running udev 160
with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED; and of these, only 70-persistent-net.rules is
potentially a boot-breaker, and would still permit booting the system far
enough to rescue by hand at console (i.e., the same process one would use if
a newer kernel was installed but not configured to boot by default, which is
one of the scenarios that currently permits bypassing this preinst error).

So do you know of any other things that will break, or can you provide
pointers to other areas I should look at?  You mention in the bug that some
rules "will not work in ways beyond most people's ability to understand",
but I don't even see any documentation here for those of us who *do* have
the ability to understand and want to try to explain it to the others.  :-)
If there aren't any other issues, then IMHO the case is clear for
downgrading the CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED handling from a preinst abort to a
preinst debconf note (i.e.: interrupt the upgrade before udev unpack, to
make sure the admin gets the message before we proceed).  Right now, the
cure (aborting the install of a core package during a dist-upgrade, leaving
apt in a difficult-to-fix state) is definitely much worse than the disease
(some devices not fully configured after reboot if the kernel isn't
upgraded, requiring the user to grab a console shell to install a proper
kernel).

Third, you write that the old udev *also* won't work with the new kernel.
Can you be more specific?  In my testing, this also works fine; I wasn't
able to identify anything out of place when rebooting to a 2.6.32 Debian
kernel with a lenny udev.

Finally, you comment in
 that "the new
kernel (indirectly) depends on a newer udev."  In my testing, I'm able to
install a 2.6.32-5 kernel package from squeeze directly onto lenny without
upgrading udev in the process.  When you say it "indirectly depends", do you
mean that there is a *logical* dependency that isn't reflected in the
package dependencies, or are you referring to some earlier situation whereby
upgrading the kernel package did pull in a udev upgrade at the same time?


To summarize, with the information I have available, I believe there are two
changes that should be made to the udev package:

 - add the Breaks: linux-image-2.6-$flavor
   (<< $SYSFS_DEPRECATED_fixed_version) to udev, as discussed
 - change the preinst CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED abort to a debconf error note
   warning users about the network, permissions problems if they don't
   install a new kernel

But I know that I may have overlooked some details.  If you see any problems
with my suggestion, please let me know what they are so that I can look for
better solutions.

And if there aren't problems with this proposal, I'm happy to prepare a
patch to the package for this if that would be helpful to you.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: multiboot: FTBFS in squeeze: rm: cannot remove `debian/multiboot/usr/share/info/dir': No such file or directory

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 595876 = confirmed
Bug #595876 [multiboot] multiboot: FTBFS in squeeze: rm: cannot remove 
`debian/multiboot/usr/share/info/dir': No such file or directory
Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595876
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595876: multiboot: FTBFS in squeeze: rm: cannot remove `debian/multiboot/usr/share/info/dir': No such file or directory

[gregor herrmann]

tag 595876 = confirmed
thanks

On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:15:36 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:

> > Sory for not cc'ing you in my last reply; can you reproduce this bug?
> Yes, I just rechecked and it fails on both my i386 and my x86_64
> squeeze installations with the install-info package removed.

Interesting.

Ah, now I see that I have install-info installed in my sid cowbuilder
chroot.
 
> > (And if you can: the fix would be to put
> > "dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | install-info"
> > into the build-deps
> As I understand this, it means dpkg (>= 1.15.4) *or* install-info,
> right? The version of dpkg that is installed on my systems fulfills
> this requirement yet the package failed to build. Shouldn't the package
> build depend on both packages instead of either of them?

$ lintian-info -t missing-dependency-on-install-info
N: missing-dependency-on-install-info
N:
N:   This package appears to contain at least one info document but does
N:   not depend on dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | install-info as recommended by
N:   Policy. This dependency is needed for the transition to triggerized
N:   install-info to correctly build the info directory during partial
N:   upgrades from lenny.
N:   
N:   Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 12.2 (Info documents) for
N:   details.
N:   
N:   Severity: normal, Certainty: possible
N:

BTW: the package already has "Depends: dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | install-info" :)

And I confused Depends and Build-Depends-Indep in my quick mail, sorry.

So, why do I have install-info in my chroot?

I guess that's why:

belanna:/# apt-get remove install-info
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  info install-info
WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
  install-info (due to grep)
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 659kB disk space will be freed.
You are about to do something potentially harmful.
To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'

> And the info package depends on it. I'd argue, that the multiboot
> package should depend on the virtual package info-browser instead of
> the install-info package.
> Or the dependency on anything info related could be eliminated since
> the multiboot package also contains the information in html format so it
> is still usable without an info browser. The manpages-dev package for
> example does not depend on man-browser, it merely suggests it.

Maybe, but that's out of the scope of this bug report :)
 
> > or to "rm -rf" the dir, IMO)
> As I said, I'd vote to add install-info as a build dependency since
> documentation is the purpose of this package. 

Ok ... but:

I guess I'm to tired for today: Anyway I tried now:
+ removed install-info from the chroot
- first build without install-info in the build-deps and with "rm -f"
- second build with install-info
+ both builds succeed and both packages have the identical contents

So IMO the only problem is the "rm" of the not existing file in
debian/rules (in the case without install-info). And changing this to
"rm -f" so that it works both with and without install-info would be
the easiest solution.

But I'd appreciate you checking and I will take again tomorrow.


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Pogues: Boys From The County Hell


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: notfound 571255 in 0.125-7+lenny3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> notfound 571255 0.125-7+lenny3
Bug #571255 [udev] Udev 151-2 upgrade problem on debian-testing-'squeeze' i386 
cd  binary1 20090302-04-:09
Bug No longer marked as found in versions udev/0.125-7+lenny3.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
571255: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571255
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597461: Please add support for wheezy

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.23
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid

The next release will be called wheezy. Please add support for that.

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-debian-xen-1 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii  wget  1.12-2.1   retrieves files from the web

Versions of packages debootstrap recommends:
ii  gnupg 1.4.10-4   GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep

debootstrap suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597460: Please add support for Wheezy

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Package: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.5.6
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze, sid

Hi,

the next release will be called wheezy. Please add that to

  /usr/share/cdebootstrap/suites

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-debian-xen-1 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cdebootstrap depends on:
ii  debian-archive-keyring2010.08.28 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a
ii  gpgv  1.4.10-4   GNU privacy guard - signature veri
ii  libc6 2.11.2-5   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libdebian-installer-extra40.75   Library of some extra debian-insta
ii  libdebian-installer4  0.75   Library of common debian-installer
ii  wget  1.12-2.1   retrieves files from the web

cdebootstrap recommends no packages.

cdebootstrap suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#591962: marked as done (jwchat: does not build .swf files from source)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:02:23 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#591962: fixed in jwchat 1.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #591962,
regarding jwchat: does not build .swf files from source
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
591962: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591962
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jwchat
Version: 1.0final-6
Severity: serious

Hi,

jwchat ships multiple .swf files but they are not built from source. This is a 
policy  and licence violation (the source is not shipped.)

Cheers,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jwchat
Source-Version: 1.0+dfsg-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jwchat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/j/jwchat/jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
  to main/j/jwchat/jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb
  to main/j/jwchat/jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb
jwchat_1.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to main/j/jwchat/jwchat_1.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 591...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Lincoln de Sousa  (supplier of updated jwchat package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:42:28 -0300
Source: jwchat
Binary: jwchat
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian XMPP Maintainers 
Changed-By: Lincoln de Sousa 
Description: 
 jwchat - a full featured, web-based Jabber chat client
Closes: 591962
Changes: 
 jwchat (1.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   [Lincoln de Sousa]
 .
   * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format
   * Migrating package from cdbs to debhelper 7.0.50~
   * Changing the rule get-orig-source to generate a dfsg compatible
 package striping swf files from the orig (Closes: #591962)
   * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.1
   * Removing po-debconf from the Build-Depends-Indep list.
 .
   [Marcelo Jorge Vieira]
 .
   * Fixing the default backend
   * Fixing Debugger dependency
   * Changing information about packaging from old maintainers to
 Debian XMPP Team.
   * Removing sound support.
   * Setting a port for apache VirtualHost.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 2209aad3aa629cab21d6c71fff585a76b7c68dfd 2006 jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
 5aff9bdd1455dcc83273e6dc0eec4e39240c8e92 318936 jwchat_1.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
 f4700a7ef46649f6442128ff64337bd48889dc92 14157 jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
 eb203a9e2141e5643d3d8184461ba7a5539cb0ba 1013996 jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 b4f7e4610ae3bb1c046ba5ef7f2790e611c10e8002a16cb2cdae3c61f2edb4dc 2006 
jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
 88e86dd98f617976af2f10a629dd733a674d72d74b816a6fcca8c25731143cc0 318936 
jwchat_1.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
 c690f0e6568da811e3adfec5291949243628f67de8317a746d2b32e3d031d9eb 14157 
jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
 32a61989767d6f78ea6d3109fc1ef289ef3fafa99805d6b17eadf041c1d6abfb 1013996 
jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb
Files: 
 19f2fb4ae5692a41747eb687812bf6cd 2006 web optional jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
 c5d8e5cb80128678ee03d08d432f4974 318936 web optional 
jwchat_1.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
 c52fda8554fb05c643393c973e414985 14157 web optional 
jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
 db3fd7dd2024393d42afd9e5058d62bd 1013996 web optional jwchat_1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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Processed: unable to reproduce debian bug #595833 (firegpg FTBFS)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 595833 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #595833 [firegpg] firegpg: FTBFS in squeeze: ipc.h:60:23: error: 
nsIThread.h: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> severity 595833 important
Bug #595833 [firegpg] firegpg: FTBFS in squeeze: ipc.h:60:23: error: 
nsIThread.h: No such file or directory
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595833: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595833
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#584350: refcard: FTBFS: xmlroff segfaults on japanese PDF

[Simon Paillard]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:49:54PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2010-09-19 20:58, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > Could you please send the list of the packages you have in your sid
> > system ? It hope it will help
> 
> I built using a clean chroot with only the build deps.
> Did ja not compile or does it just look bad?

Same as what I mentionned in my intial mail: it compiles but looks bad,
while the previous build currently in sid looks ok. (similar to #492350)

> > Given the current amount of fuzzy strings (I will issue a call for
> > translation using podebconf-report-po), it would be insane to upload
> > now:
> 
> There seems to be a massive fuzzification without change in the
> English original. Maybe this is a change in po4a? A lot of
> strings have only different markup: the  is gone.

Are you sure about the po4a version you use on your machine ? always the
last from sid ?

Indeed, I can't see a recent change in po4a that could explain
the change (but I'm not po4a expert).

-- 
Simon Paillard



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597449: libpulse0 fails to connect to pulseaudio sink over TCP

[Daniel Maier]

Package: libpulse0
Version: 0.9.21-3
Severity: grave

libpulse0 fails to connect to a pulseaudio sink when invoked like:

$ PULSE_SERVER=tcp:10.22.0.21 PULSE_LOG=99 paplay -v question.wav
Opening a playback stream with sample specification 's16le 2ch 44100Hz' and 
channel map 'front-left,front-right'.
Using shared memory pool with 1024 slots of size 64.0 KiB each, total size is 
64.0 MiB, maximum usable slot size is 65496
Trying to connect to 10.22.0.21...
Connection failure: Connection refused

It always fails with "Connection refused" but tcpdump reveals that there
is no connection attempt. If a hostname is used, tcpdump shows that the
hostname is successfully resolved, but it results in the same behaviour.

The machine arch is armel:
Linux bernd 2.6.32-5-orion5x #1 Fri Aug 13 06:13:20 UTC 2010 armv5tel GNU/Linux

This problem lies somewhere in the asynchronous dns resolving, because
compiling the Debian package with --disable-asyncns it works. I am not able to
confirm wether this is a armel specific bug, but with the same versions 
installed
on AMD64 it works fine.

Apart from that the error message might be wrong and is misleading.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597377: marked as done (libqalculate5: conflicts with lenny's qalc over /usr/share/qalculate/elements.xml)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:33:58 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#597377: fixed in libqalculate 0.9.7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #597377,
regarding libqalculate5: conflicts with lenny's qalc over 
/usr/share/qalculate/elements.xml
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597377
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libqalculate5
Version: 0.9.7-3
Severity: serious

Lenny to squeeze upgrade of qalc fails due to file conflict between
old qalc and libqalculate5. Looks like Breaks/Replaces specify wrong
version number.


Распаковывается пакет libqalculate5 (из файла 
.../libqalculate5_0.9.7-3_i386.deb)...
dpkg: не удалось обработать параметр 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libqalculate5_0.9.7-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
 попытка перезаписать /usr/share/qalculate/elements.xml, который уже имеется в 
пакете qalc
configured to not write apport reports
  dpkg-deb: подпроцесс paste убит по 
сигналу (Обрыв канала)
Подготовка к замене пакета qalc 0.9.6-2 (используется файл 
.../archives/qalc_0.9.7-3_i386.deb)...
Распаковывается замена для пакета qalc ...
Обрабатываются триггеры для man-db ...
При обработке следующих пакетов произошли ошибки:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libqalculate5_0.9.7-3_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (300, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libqalculate5 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.11.2-5 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcln6 1.3.1-2  Class Library for Numbers (C++)
ii  libgcc1 1:4.4.4-8GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-02.24.1-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libstdc++6  4.4.4-8  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxml2 2.7.7.dfsg-4 GNOME XML library

libqalculate5 recommends no packages.

libqalculate5 suggests no packages.

-- debconf-show failed


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libqalculate
Source-Version: 0.9.7-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libqalculate, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libqalculate-dev_0.9.7-4_amd64.deb
  to main/libq/libqalculate/libqalculate-dev_0.9.7-4_amd64.deb
libqalculate-doc_0.9.7-4_all.deb
  to main/libq/libqalculate/libqalculate-doc_0.9.7-4_all.deb
libqalculate5_0.9.7-4_amd64.deb
  to main/libq/libqalculate/libqalculate5_0.9.7-4_amd64.deb
libqalculate_0.9.7-4.debian.tar.gz
  to main/libq/libqalculate/libqalculate_0.9.7-4.debian.tar.gz
libqalculate_0.9.7-4.dsc
  to main/libq/libqalculate/libqalculate_0.9.7-4.dsc
qalc_0.9.7-4_amd64.deb
  to main/libq/libqalculate/qalc_0.9.7-4_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 597...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Vincent Legout  (supplier of updated libqalculate package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:37:05 +0200
Source: libqalculate
Binary: qalc libqalculate5 libqalculate-dev libqalculate-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.9.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Vincent Legout 
Changed-By: Vincent Legout 
Description: 
 libqalculate-dev - Powerful and easy to use desktop calculator - development
 libqalculate-doc - Powerful and easy to use desktop calculator - documentation
 libqalculate5 - Powerful and easy to use desktop calculator - library
 qalc   - Powerful and easy to use command line calculator
Closes: 597377
Changes: 
 libqalculate (0.9.7-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Update Breaks and Replace fields for libqalculate5. (Closes: #597377)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 fcbb07765a0cf8384f9b6e0c6ee2c276b989a314 1224 libqalculate_0.9.7-4.dsc
 a8dba2363d22b294686d8c0cf5be21b45ad4dcb8 7655 
libqalculate_0.9.7-4.debian.tar.gz
 ef

Bug#597321: marked as done (potool: lenny to squeeze upgrade fails)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:34:50 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#597321: fixed in potool 0.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597321,
regarding potool: lenny to squeeze upgrade fails
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597321
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: potool
Version: 0.11-1
Severity: grave

Upgrade of potool from lenny to squeeze version using
'apt-get upgrade -t testing' fails.

Output of 'LANG=C sudo apt-get -f install':

0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Setting up potool (0.11-1) ...
update-alternatives: unable to make 
/usr/share/man/pl_PL.UTF-8/man1/poedit.1.gz.dpkg-tmp a symlink to 
/etc/alternatives/poedit.pl.1.gz: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing potool (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 potool
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


Postinst references /usr/share/man/pl_PL.UTF-8/man1/potooledit.1.gz,
while package contains /usr/share/man/pl/man1/potooledit.1.gz.
This leads to a failure with dpkg 1.14.29.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (900, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages potool depends on:
ii  libc6   2.7-18lenny4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libglib2.0-02.16.6-3 The GLib library of C routines

potool recommends no packages.

potool suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: potool
Source-Version: 0.11-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
potool, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

potool_0.11-2.diff.gz
  to main/p/potool/potool_0.11-2.diff.gz
potool_0.11-2.dsc
  to main/p/potool/potool_0.11-2.dsc
potool_0.11-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/potool/potool_0.11-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 597...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marcin Owsiany  (supplier of updated potool package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:14:37 +0100
Source: potool
Binary: potool
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany 
Changed-By: Marcin Owsiany 
Description: 
 potool - A program to aid manipulation of gettext po files
Closes: 597321
Changes: 
 potool (0.11-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Update Polish manpage path in update-alternatives invocation. The wrong
 path (apart from making the Polish manpage version unavailable via 'poedit'
 name) caused postinst failures with lenny's dpkg version, which made it a
 grave bug. Closes: #597321
Checksums-Sha1: 
 358f9c2e0f4304534370db76b82bfc93757a02a6 1254 potool_0.11-2.dsc
 4699acd0192c0113f5609bfb1f030c4af6d27f6d 5615 potool_0.11-2.diff.gz
 c126913df993c0c29b0da9ea94858125f47fd7d1 31886 potool_0.11-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 b888ee37060fd83583ef2153762e610d6a244252bdac33619ca959a934ca16fa 1254 
potool_0.11-2.dsc
 6d8b82d5487cce1c0deb931836e63b52e42e04ff246afec066e68ecf9dfd8ca6 5615 
potool_0.11-2.diff.gz
 da31f761abd8ba6e70e6a213658a7a5fcd7c99da29c2164bc0e4f4b439ca0f79 31886 
potool_0.11-2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 eb5e00e128dae8551dd9b3679dbe65f3 1254 utils optional potool_0.11-2.dsc
 635a7ea50a79557ce4af8fc7cb54f1d2 5615 utils optional potool_0.11-2.diff.gz
 95ad2b952ebbf9135144c73207cb3b33 31886 utils optional potool_0.11-2_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJMlmozAAoJENv0gMYC+Ub884IIALOu6vNLOHP8rD5t50d6tpiA
SgMlRlOylqfwVAgkt32LFOigJWTVc5kVk+Lo/lmDdRmpB2NXHDVWW1wqLmI9QIg/
v77I8Ks/wbSqiyOJjWbKZ+7AAPtEqC4GAa5hbNCJX4gOG/4ZqE9q+YF1rxybIO4b
QYAKQFOzWf1ek0EJO7IgRrKcFQ5rmmf

Processed: severity of 565738 is grave

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 565738 grave
Bug #565738 [drupal6] drupal6: Bad apache configuration - Should not 
install/enable anything in /etc/apache2/conf.d/drupal
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
565738: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565738
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595876: multiboot: FTBFS in squeeze: rm: cannot remove `debian/multiboot/usr/share/info/dir': No such file or directory

[Justus Winter]

Hey Gregor :)

> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:29:55 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
> 
> > install-info needs to be added to the list of build dependencies or
> > rm debian/$(package)/usr/share/info/dir
> > removed from debian/rules. But since this is a package containing
> > documentation, I'd say we should go with the first option.
> 
> Sory for not cc'ing you in my last reply; can you reproduce this bug?
Yes, I just rechecked and it fails on both my i386 and my x86_64
squeeze installations with the install-info package removed.

# dpkg -l dpkg install-info
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
ii  dpkg   1.15.8.4   Debian package management system
un  install-info(no description available)


> (And if you can: the fix would be to put
> "dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | install-info"
> into the build-deps
As I understand this, it means dpkg (>= 1.15.4) *or* install-info,
right? The version of dpkg that is installed on my systems fulfills
this requirement yet the package failed to build. Shouldn't the package
build depend on both packages instead of either of them?

And I just checked and turns out that the multiboot package
installed cleanly without install-info and aptitude show install-info
says:
[...]
Description: Manage installed documentation in info format
 The install-info utility creates the index of all installed
documentation in info format and makes it available to info readers.

And the info package depends on it. I'd argue, that the multiboot
package should depend on the virtual package info-browser instead of
the install-info package.

Or the dependency on anything info related could be eliminated since
the multiboot package also contains the information in html format so it
is still usable without an info browser. The manpages-dev package for
example does not depend on man-browser, it merely suggests it.

> or to "rm -rf" the dir, IMO)
As I said, I'd vote to add install-info as a build dependency since
documentation is the purpose of this package. 

Regards,
Justus


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#597368: Bug#597368: schroot: session handling broken with plain chroots (breaks sbuild)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 597368 + confirmed patch
Bug #597368 [schroot] schroot: session handling broken with plain chroots 
(breaks sbuild)
Added tag(s) confirmed and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
597368: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597368
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597368: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#597368: Bug#597368: schroot: session handling broken with plain chroots (breaks sbuild)

[Roger Leigh]

tags 597368 + confirmed patch
thanks

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 08:32:06PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:31:07AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: schroot
> > Version: 1.4.12-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: break kfreebsd-* buildds
> > 
> > Since version 1.4.12-1, sbuild doesn't work anymore with plain chroots,
> > due to changes in session handling:
> 
> Arg, yes.  Confirmed on my system.

The attached patch:

• Creates a session:chrootname alias for plain chroots, which can
  not create sessions intrinsically, so need this proxy session
  alias in the "session" namespace.
• Always loads chroots if sessions are used, so proxy sessions
  are always present.

Please could you give it a try and let me know if this fixes
your problem?


Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?   http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.
diff --git a/bin/schroot/schroot-options-base.cc b/bin/schroot/schroot-options-base.cc
index bde884a..6d17af3 100644
--- a/bin/schroot/schroot-options-base.cc
+++ b/bin/schroot/schroot-options-base.cc
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ options_base::check_actions ()
   if (this->all_chroots || this->all_source_chroots)
 	this->load_chroots = true;
   if (this->all_sessions)
-	this->load_sessions = true;
+	this->load_chroots = this->load_sessions = true;
 }
   else
 {
diff --git a/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-config.cc b/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-config.cc
index 20c18c6..e38a26f 100644
--- a/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-config.cc
+++ b/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-config.cc
@@ -212,6 +212,17 @@ chroot_config::add (std::string const& chroot_namespace,
   chroots.insert(std::make_pair(name, chroot));
   this->aliases.insert(std::make_pair(fullname, fullname));
 
+  // If a plain chroot, add a proxy session so that --run-session
+  // works.
+  if (chroot_namespace == "chroot" &&
+	  chroot->get_chroot_type() == "plain")
+	{
+	  std::string session_alias = std::string("session") +
+	namespace_separator + name;
+	  if (this->aliases.find(session_alias) == this->aliases.end())
+	this->aliases.insert(std::make_pair(session_alias, fullname));
+	}
+
   // If a source chroot, add -source compatibility alias.
   if (chroot_namespace == "source")
 	{


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#593683: linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders

[Ben Hutchings]

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 10:42 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 05:17:12PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 17:57 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 04:38:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 23:16 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > > s390-tools, lilo, and elilo are the only bootloaders for which 
> > > > > Breaks: were
> > > > > added in the recent upload.  However, there are reports[1],[2] of 
> > > > > serious
> > > > > upgrade failures resulting from not upgrading grub before trying to 
> > > > > upgrade
> > > > > the kernel; and the grub in lenny definitely does not comply with the 
> > > > > new
> > > > > kernel hooks policy (/etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-update-grub only 
> > > > > exists in
> > > > > the squeeze versions).  Is this an oversight, or is there some other
> > > > > explanation for why grub was being left in an inconsistent state for 
> > > > > these
> > > > > users?
> > > > Official kernel packages have never invoked GRUB except by running hook
> > > > commands.
> > > Still they are incompatible. This is what breaks is for.
> > GRUB would always 'break' when a new kernel package was installed if the
> > user or installer didn't set the hook command.  There has been no
> > incompatible change.
> 
> grub uses a public interface. There is no need for depends in this case.
> However if the public interface is changed, it needs to be handled
> accordingly.

And the public interface hasn't changed.

> > > Also the other architectures are missing.
> > No other architectures have an historical default boot loader that used
> > to be run automatically.
> 
> Well, a not so quick grep shows that the old k-p happily also called the
> following bootloaders: colo, palo, sibyl, vmelilo.

Right, these have been broken since we stopped using kernel-package.
However palo normally doesn't need to be invoked, and I don't think we
need to care about vmelilo.

That leaves colo and sibyl (both mips/mipsel).

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#584350: refcard: FTBFS: xmlroff segfaults on japanese PDF

[W. Martin Borgert]

On 2010-09-19 20:58, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Could you please send the list of the packages you have in your sid
> system ? It hope it will help

I built using a clean chroot with only the build deps.
Did ja not compile or does it just look bad?

> Given the current amount of fuzzy strings (I will issue a call for
> translation using podebconf-report-po), it would be insane to upload
> now:

There seems to be a massive fuzzification without change in the
English original. Maybe this is a change in po4a? A lot of
strings have only different markup: the  is gone.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#596522: marked as done (empathy: FTBFS: No package 'gcr-0' found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:34:33 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#596522: fixed in empathy 2.31.92-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596522,
regarding empathy: FTBFS: No package 'gcr-0' found
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596522: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596522
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: empathy
Version: 2.31.91-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Hi,

your package FTBFS everywhere:
| configure: error: Package requirements (gcr-0 >= 2.26.0) were not met:
| 
| No package 'gcr-0' found
| 
| Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
| installed software in a non-standard prefix.
| 
| Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GCR_CFLAGS
| and GCR_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
| See the pkg-config man page for more details.
| 
| make: *** [debian/stamp-autotools] Error 1

Full build logs:
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=empathy&suite=experimental

Mraw,
KiBi.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: empathy
Source-Version: 2.31.92-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
empathy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

empathy-common_2.31.92-1_all.deb
  to main/e/empathy/empathy-common_2.31.92-1_all.deb
empathy-dbg_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb
  to main/e/empathy/empathy-dbg_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb
empathy_2.31.92-1.debian.tar.bz2
  to main/e/empathy/empathy_2.31.92-1.debian.tar.bz2
empathy_2.31.92-1.dsc
  to main/e/empathy/empathy_2.31.92-1.dsc
empathy_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb
  to main/e/empathy/empathy_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb
empathy_2.31.92.orig.tar.bz2
  to main/e/empathy/empathy_2.31.92.orig.tar.bz2
nautilus-sendto-empathy_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb
  to main/e/empathy/nautilus-sendto-empathy_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Laurent Bigonville  (supplier of updated empathy package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:05:45 +0200
Source: empathy
Binary: empathy empathy-dbg empathy-common nautilus-sendto-empathy
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.31.92-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Telepathy maintainers 

Changed-By: Laurent Bigonville 
Description: 
 empathy- GNOME multi-protocol chat and call client
 empathy-common - GNOME multi-protocol chat and call client (common files)
 empathy-dbg - GNOME multi-protocol chat and call client (debug symbols)
 nautilus-sendto-empathy - GNOME multi-protocol chat and call client 
(nautilus-sendto plugin
Closes: 596522
Changes: 
 empathy (2.31.92-1) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
 - Bump libtelepathy-glib-dev build-dependency
   * debian/control: Add missing libgcr-dev build-dependency (Closes: #596522)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 f8a9a70ffd886b648a8724c1ab5f9c1499c22d9a 2763 empathy_2.31.92-1.dsc
 f9d5fd1d877ce1963a1b3944beb7970428fe4555 2884267 empathy_2.31.92.orig.tar.bz2
 8c6d00fac6411a7bcf54c6c8504d263f667c64e0 16120 empathy_2.31.92-1.debian.tar.bz2
 2655a6cc6cb0c2ff3075d102ce968674c29981b7 2734250 
empathy-common_2.31.92-1_all.deb
 79a5079f5b41f989f177321617d1f86ffcbaf1f3 1413608 empathy_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb
 8a468412ed6f6a49e456671a9108c014936453d0 2908386 
empathy-dbg_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb
 a8f56fe3632209043a042cb9eee1875876715b5a 848146 
nautilus-sendto-empathy_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 35c4fca19c77000b6965e4b784c4ba8d833d6061de534b631df727ba43fc78ab 2763 
empathy_2.31.92-1.dsc
 c3f0fbc4b5d05b7730c7a41f92ddf3a7e8ca3edbb60df233a318e96511ba36f8 2884267 
empathy_2.31.92.orig.tar.bz2
 8207170638576b082be0f99ad766aac84d0742734d8ea6a1f5ddc89d074432ea 16120 
empathy_2.31.92-1.debian.tar.bz2
 899c4bcc397295b246ddd9c36e42763d8bec351e446c2a2f4e8303e18dd6c96e 2734250 
empathy-common_2.31.92-1_all.deb
 3ded6e6d4de86e5498971c3f8ac5f527898bf5a75b2e9ffe8f1239fc7f107d11 1413608 
empathy_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb
 ad5f8797b7136dd49dc5b8046bc016509968569136b0f1a6e2aa79cd2b52e4ac 2908386 
empathy-dbg_2.31.92-1_amd64.deb
 7a66221e4734d49a16d4cee5edf0dde95fb923142

Bug#597407: marked as done (gettext: install-info installed leads to /usr/share/info/dir.gz in built package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:31:43 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#597407: fixed in gettext 0.18.1.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #597407,
regarding gettext: install-info installed leads to /usr/share/info/dir.gz in 
built package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597407: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597407
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gettext
Version: 0.18.1.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: infodir

This package creates usr/share/info/dir during the build process if the
install-info package is installed. The built package will then contain
the file usr/share/info/dir.gz.

Nobody on d-devel disagreed to set the severity level to 'serious' if
packages in the archive are affected [0] and normal if they ae not. This
is the case on s390 [1].

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/09/msg00302.html
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/s390/gettext/filelist

Sebastian


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gettext
Source-Version: 0.18.1.1-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gettext, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

autopoint_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
  to main/g/gettext/autopoint_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
gettext-base_0.18.1.1-3_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gettext/gettext-base_0.18.1.1-3_amd64.deb
gettext-doc_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
  to main/g/gettext/gettext-doc_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
gettext-el_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
  to main/g/gettext/gettext-el_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
gettext_0.18.1.1-3.debian.tar.gz
  to main/g/gettext/gettext_0.18.1.1-3.debian.tar.gz
gettext_0.18.1.1-3.dsc
  to main/g/gettext/gettext_0.18.1.1-3.dsc
gettext_0.18.1.1-3_amd64.deb
  to main/g/gettext/gettext_0.18.1.1-3_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 597...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Santiago Vila  (supplier of updated gettext package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:09:36 +0200
Source: gettext
Binary: gettext-base gettext gettext-el gettext-doc autopoint
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.18.1.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Santiago Vila 
Changed-By: Santiago Vila 
Description: 
 autopoint  - The autopoint program from GNU gettext
 gettext- GNU Internationalization utilities
 gettext-base - GNU Internationalization utilities for the base system
 gettext-doc - Documentation for GNU gettext
 gettext-el - Emacs po-mode for editing gettext .po files
Closes: 597407
Changes: 
 gettext (0.18.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Do not include /usr/share/info/dir.gz file in binary package if
 install-info is present during the build. Closes: #597407.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b88e8e13558dd7be578dbc6570d3bc691908d21f 1514 gettext_0.18.1.1-3.dsc
 a0e0895538cb4e0f33cd853c8af36d5b58d08ba9 38626 gettext_0.18.1.1-3.debian.tar.gz
 bc8a7f64daa736d5a78d392502f071c47697c1f8 59526 gettext-el_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
 4b8557e523d4eec034e4edd71fdba931d9fe8178 913244 gettext-doc_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
 8956effbe36ee2bd907e98178f4f2edaea33a8e9 626752 autopoint_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
 b4f46ac56a5417fb667a133b6d707e9313995c34 153306 
gettext-base_0.18.1.1-3_amd64.deb
 4abefb5aad842fa2049363bb657e1c81ffba7ec1 2076184 gettext_0.18.1.1-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 5b8d2e5580d210940883303815e19ef412e16e5dde916408912c9ff908072999 1514 
gettext_0.18.1.1-3.dsc
 4abc0b91b0be66fadab95e8b7de622195e9a68218b0e9da915adb88ef9b85448 38626 
gettext_0.18.1.1-3.debian.tar.gz
 6d4c3fe6a57169227e768b05c5f8e7c52747aec332e888e8c96262ce8e54d262 59526 
gettext-el_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
 dde72b1e2c665f512bafb5414f2c27e516f4d6fc72fd4b18883e9deabde96e9f 913244 
gettext-doc_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
 f6312209399a323338fa0854b93a518f415f052ac5164c074b2697ae08db4132 626752 
autopoint_0.18.1.1-3_all.deb
 23ad676a59d2bfcf48be619de915cf7c41c2b7fa57070036717e89770d2c76d7 153306 
gettext-base_0.18.1.1-3_amd64.deb
 35df08028bb2f7d9079f9b3859623674333bbb3c957f0e25bd360cc5dcd01788 2076184 
gettext_0.18.1.1-3_amd64.deb
Files: 
 f89a03083d5e66da4a07a5ac90061571 1514 devel optional gettext_0.18.1.1-3.dsc
 07b

Bug#593707: marked as done (debian-edu-artwork: drop build-dep on libusplash-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:30:44 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#593707: fixed in debian-edu-artwork 0.0.32-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #593707,
regarding debian-edu-artwork: drop build-dep on libusplash-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
593707: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593707
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: usplash
Version: 0.5.19-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid squeeze

15:11 < maks> jcristau: usplash is unmaintained
15:11 < jcristau> ok
15:11 < maks> ho1lger wanted to do something
15:11 < jcristau> should it be in squeeze then?
15:11 < maks> but he did allmost nothing
15:11 < maks> no
15:11 < maks> it squarbles your screen

Cc:ing the maintainers of reverse dependencies so they can adjust their
packages.

Cheers,
Julien

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: debian-edu-artwork
Source-Version: 0.0.32-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debian-edu-artwork, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1.diff.gz
  to main/d/debian-edu-artwork/debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1.diff.gz
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1.dsc
  to main/d/debian-edu-artwork/debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1.dsc
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1_all.deb
  to main/d/debian-edu-artwork/debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1_all.deb
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32.orig.tar.gz
  to main/d/debian-edu-artwork/debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 593...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Holger Levsen  (supplier of updated debian-edu-artwork 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:53:29 +
Source: debian-edu-artwork
Binary: debian-edu-artwork
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.32-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Edu developers 
Changed-By: Holger Levsen 
Description: 
 debian-edu-artwork - Debian Edu themes and artwork
Closes: 593707
Changes: 
 debian-edu-artwork (0.0.32-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Drop debian-edu-artwork-usplash. (Closes: #593707)
   * Bump standards version to 3.9.1, no changes needed.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 3c19d8dad509db50c5524a84b541ce37604e34cd 1398 debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1.dsc
 75bea7c6439d7c7d22ac8d3378824e91290be5e2 23487673 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32.orig.tar.gz
 635ced7c33de78bb5eed5de75451051063045cb5 10255 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1.diff.gz
 79786a664ea4ad1e9c4cff192c49fe31a6959b4d 7264404 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 6424cd8899cc8a411d113f1b663a5d8060c776f07ae017173c19649cfd192b26 1398 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1.dsc
 d8e6e9046733ced69e4a9dfce406a227935dac23b1e6dc34bdd05d69b74c5cb7 23487673 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32.orig.tar.gz
 61bdd1ee199a9fd98ae4560c27bc9c3e9b69a502c012e3b100d3cbe77675422f 10255 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1.diff.gz
 12ea15dd562c1a77b53f462743400274915276686a1f5d001d2174e3ba358567 7264404 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1_all.deb
Files: 
 257208d767e83fa8cd8caa7c2c798f90 1398 graphics optional 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1.dsc
 094a632e1c0990b54a0e18da210fe6d8 23487673 graphics optional 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32.orig.tar.gz
 12aab3a66b311663b2ccdf35a370da2e 10255 graphics optional 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1.diff.gz
 63100d1c40a6930a76a080f291c94c50 7264404 graphics optional 
debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFMlji3UHLQNqxYNSARAqC+AJ47cF5ybJiniy8Wl+WBLRyA/plk7ACgyhpm
44LIB4FSsA7ymfyg+5OGDhY=
=ZbGZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---

Bug#597368: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#597368: schroot: session handling broken with plain chroots (breaks sbuild)

[Roger Leigh]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:31:07AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: schroot
> Version: 1.4.12-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: break kfreebsd-* buildds
> 
> Since version 1.4.12-1, sbuild doesn't work anymore with plain chroots,
> due to changes in session handling:

Arg, yes.  Confirmed on my system.

This is due to "plain" chroots not being session-capable, so we
don't really create a session, we just return the chroot name
as the session name.  This breaks with the separation of the two
namespaces.  NB. while the commit you mentioned is the fix which
caused the breakage, it was only working by accident before--it
should have broken earlier and this commit fixes that.

I think the best fix is to create a compatibility alias in the
session namespace so that all "plain" chroots automatically
get a session created for them, or at least a proxy for a real
session.

Quite busy finishing my PhD work the next two weeks, but I'll see
if I can get it fixed before then.


Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?   http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#595885: strongswan: FTBFS in squeeze: No package 'libnm_glib_vpn' found

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 19/09/10 at 21:18 +0200, René Mayrhofer wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 September 2010 01:40:09 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: strongswan
> > Version: 4.3.2-1.3
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: squeeze sid
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100906 qa-ftbfs
> > Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
> > to build on amd64.
> 
> Could you please try to rebuild with the current 4.4.1-3 package which was 
> unblocked to transition from sid to squeeze? The libnm_glib_vpn package is no 
> longer a dependency.

Sorry, ENOTIME. Close the bug if it is blocking.

- Lucas



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595885: strongswan: FTBFS in squeeze: No package 'libnm_glib_vpn' found

[René Mayrhofer]

On Tuesday 07 September 2010 01:40:09 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: strongswan
> Version: 4.3.2-1.3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: squeeze sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100906 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> 
> Hi,
> 
> During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
> to build on amd64.

Could you please try to rebuild with the current 4.4.1-3 package which was 
unblocked to transition from sid to squeeze? The libnm_glib_vpn package is no 
longer a dependency.

best regards,
Rene


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Processed: found 592243 in rmail/8.14.3-9.3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 592243 rmail/8.14.3-9.3
Bug #592243 [masqmail,rmail] rmail and masqmail: error when trying to install 
together
The source rmail and version 8.14.3-9.3 do not appear to match any binary 
packages
Bug Marked as found in versions rmail/8.14.3-9.3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
592243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592243
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#592243: bug#592243: still open

[Ralf Treinen]

Hi,

#592243 is still open with rmail 8.14.3-9.3:

Unpacking rmail (from .../rmail_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/rmail_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man8/rmail.8.gz', which is also in package 
masqmail 0:0.2.27-1
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/rmail_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

I assume that there was a mistake in the NMU since the Conflicts line
of rmail/8.14.3-9.3 is the same as for rmail/8.14.3-9.2:

Package: rmail
Priority: extra
Section: mail
Installed-Size: 364
Maintainer: Richard A Nelson (Rick) 
Architecture: amd64
Source: sendmail
Version: 8.14.3-9.3
Depends: sendmail-bin | mail-transport-agent, libc6 (>= 2.4), libldap-2.4-2 (>= 
2.4.7)
Conflicts: courier-mta, exim, exim-tls, exim4-daemon-custom, 
exim4-daemon-heavy, exim4-daemon-light, postfix, sendmail (<< 8.13.1-7), smail, 
zmailer


-Ralf.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: found 592243 in

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 592243
Bug #592243 {Done: Jan Hauke Rahm } [masqmail,rmail] rmail and 
masqmail: error when trying to install together
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions sendmail/8.14.3-9.3 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
592243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592243
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: limit source to krb5, tagging 596678

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> #krb5 (1.8.3+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> #  * Bring back a libkrb53 oldlibs package. Note that this is technically a
> #policy violation because it doesn't provide libdes425.so.3 or
> #libkrb4.so.2 and thus provides a different ABI. However, some
> #packages, such as postgres8.4 require the lenny version to be present
> #for the squeeze transition, so we cannot force the removal of
> #libkrb53's reverse dependencies. We can conflict or break with lenny
> #packages that will not work with this libkrb53, but we may break
> #out-of-archive packages without notice. Absent someone coming up with
> #a patch to the modern libk5crypto-3 that allows it to work with the
> #lenny libkrb53 (a weekend's worth of work proved this would be quite
> #difficult), this is the best solution we've come up with, Closes: #596678
> #
> limit source krb5
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'krb5'
Limit currently set to 'source':'krb5'

> tags 596678 + pending
Bug #596678 [libkrb5-3] libkrb5-3: Not co-installable with libkrb53, thus 
breaking upgrades from Lenny
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
596678: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596678
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#584350: refcard: FTBFS: xmlroff segfaults on japanese PDF

[Simon Paillard]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:55:01PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:52:14PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > On 2010-09-19 17:44, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:19:04PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > > > On 2010-09-18 23:04, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > > I still wonder which were your build conditions that allowed you to
> > > > > * successfully * build the package.
> > > > 
> > > > Interesting: Refcard builds fine on my system (sid). Building in
> > > > a clean sid chroot lead to xmlroff crashes. Disabling the
> > > > deprecated gnomeprint backend entirely (GPLIST variable in the
> > > > refcard Makefile), made it work.
> > >
> > > That's why I noticed too
> > > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584350#12) but the
> > > build result for japanese is not correct

And as mentionned, the JA build is not correct.
Could you please send the list of the packages you have in your sid
system ? It hope it will help

> > > > The reason to use gnomeprint was a bug in the default cairo backend.
> > > > But the original bug is still there, I re-checked #492597 and I can
> > > > reproduce the crash in my chroot. Anyway, I will upload refcard now
> > > > and we will see whether xmlroff crashes on other machines...
> > >
> > > But the gnomeprint backend is deprecated #542564
> > 
> > Yes, that's I wrote 14 lines before :~) Using deprecated stuff
> > was necessary at that time, because the other backend used to
> > crash (and still crashes in some cases).
> 
> Oops, I overlooked the word :)
> 
> > Btw. I committed my changes to SVN. Would you mind to build and
> > upload? I'm busy - again - and if you to the build, it is one
> > more check, that my changes are not completely bullshit :~) TIA!
> 
> Sure, once checked that the japanese and generally CJK build looks ok.

Given the current amount of fuzzy strings (I will issue a call for
translation using podebconf-report-po), it would be insane to upload
now:

ar  111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
bg  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
ca  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
cs  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
da  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
de  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
el  111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
es  111 ok, 33 fuzzy, 56 todo.
eu  111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
fi  112 ok, 21 fuzzy, 67 todo.
fr  200 ok.
gl  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
he  111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
hi  111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
hu  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
it  110 ok, 22 fuzzy, 68 todo.
ja  111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
lt  111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
ml  14 ok, 186 todo.
ms  111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
nb  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
nl  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
pl  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
pt_BR   111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
pt  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
ro  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
ru  200 ok.
sk  111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
sv  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
tr  111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.
uk  111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
vi  200 ok.
zh_CN   111 ok, 68 fuzzy, 21 todo.
zh_TW   111 ok, 21 fuzzy, 68 todo.


-- 
Simon Paillard



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Escalating severity to RC level

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 597414 grave
Bug #597414 [python-wnck] python-wnck: constants defined as enum instead of 
flags
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
597414: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597414
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597435: gcc-4.5-hppa64: install-info installed leads to /usr/share/info/dir.gz in built package

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Package: gcc-4.5-hppa64
Version: 4.5.1-5
Severity: serious
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: infodir

This package creates usr/share/info/dir during the build process if the
install-info package is installed. The built package will then contain
the file usr/share/info/dir.gz.

Nobody on d-devel disagreed to set the severity level to 'serious' if
packages in the archive are affected [0] and normal if they are not. This
is the case on hppa [1].

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/09/msg00302.html
[1] http://packages.debian.org/experimental/hppa/gcc-4.5-hppa64/filelist

Sebastian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597434: The /etc/courier/imapd IMAP_ULIMITD is too small

[Thomas Goirand]

Package: courier-imap
Version: 4.8.0-1
Severity: grave

In the file /etc/courier/imapd, there is the following:
IMAP_ULIMITD=65536

While it doesn't seem so problematic under i386, under amd64 arch, each time
I want to setup a server with courier-imap, it refuses to start because the
limit is reached. Simply setting this limit to 132072 fixes it 100% of the
times.

This issue has been annoying me for all the duration of Lenny. PLEASE, have
it fixed in Squeeze, this is really an annoyance.

Thanks a lot,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.5
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595871: marked as done (freej: FTBFS in squeeze: make[5]: *** No rule to make target `./Makefile'. Stop.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:41:06 +0200
with message-id <20100919174106.ge4...@belanna.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Closing unreproducible bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #595871,
regarding freej: FTBFS in squeeze: make[5]: *** No rule to make target 
`./Makefile'.  Stop.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
595871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595871
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: freej
Version: 0.10git20100110-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100906 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
to build on amd64.

Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory 
> `/build/user-freej_0.10git20100110-1-amd64-L1eC_p/freej-0.10git20100110/build-core/lib/javascript'
> /usr/bin/make -f ./Makefile  all
> make[5]: ./Makefile: No such file or directory
> make[5]: Entering directory 
> `/build/user-freej_0.10git20100110-1-amd64-L1eC_p/freej-0.10git20100110/build-core/lib/javascript'
> make[5]: *** No rule to make target `./Makefile'.  Stop.
> make[5]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/user-freej_0.10git20100110-1-amd64-L1eC_p/freej-0.10git20100110/build-core/lib/javascript'
> make[4]: *** [all] Error 2

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/09/06/freej_0.10git20100110-1_lsqueeze64.buildlog

It is possible that your package builds fine in sid, but you should make sure
that your package also builds fine in squeeze before the release.

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I'm now closing these unreproducible bugs on Lucas' advice.

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Mercedes Sosa: Estas Alas Nuevas


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#595850: marked as done (gjs: FTBFS in squeeze: modules/console.c:53:18: error: glib.h: No such file or directory)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:41:06 +0200
with message-id <20100919174106.ge4...@belanna.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Closing unreproducible bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #595850,
regarding gjs: FTBFS in squeeze: modules/console.c:53:18: error: glib.h: No 
such file or directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
595850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gjs
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100906 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
to build on amd64.

Relevant part:
> /bin/bash ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. 
> -I/usr/include/xulrunner-1.9.1/unstable -Wfloat-equal -Wsign-compare 
> -Wcast-align -Wpointer-arith -Wnested-externs -Wmissing-prototypes 
> -Wmissing-declarations -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -g -O2 -c -o 
> console_la-console.lo `test -f 'modules/console.c' || echo 
> './'`modules/console.c
> libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. 
> -I/usr/include/xulrunner-1.9.1/unstable -Wfloat-equal -Wsign-compare 
> -Wcast-align -Wpointer-arith -Wnested-externs -Wmissing-prototypes 
> -Wmissing-declarations -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -g -O2 -c modules/console.c  
> -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/console_la-console.o
> modules/console.c:53:18: error: glib.h: No such file or directory
> modules/console.c:54:26: error: glib/gprintf.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from ./gjs/gjs.h:27,
>  from modules/console.c:55:
> ./gjs/context.h:31:25: error: glib-object.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from ./gjs/gjs.h:27,
>  from modules/console.c:55:
> ./gjs/context.h:35: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before 'typedef'
> ./gjs/context.h:45: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before 'gjs_context_get_type'
> ./gjs/context.h:47: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before '*' token
> ./gjs/context.h:48: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before '*' token
> ./gjs/context.h:49: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before 'gjs_context_eval_file'
> ./gjs/context.h:53: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before 'gjs_context_eval'
> ./gjs/context.h:59: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before 'gjs_context_define_string_array'
> ./gjs/context.h:65: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before '*' token
> ./gjs/context.h:66: error: expected ')' before '*' token
> ./gjs/context.h:68: error: expected ')' before '*' token
> ./gjs/context.h:71: error: expected ')' before '*' token
> In file included from ./gjs/gjs.h:28,
>  from modules/console.c:55:
> ./gjs/importer.h:35: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before 'G_BEGIN_DECLS'
> ./gjs/importer.h:47: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 
> 'gboolean'
> In file included from ./gjs/gjs.h:29,
>  from modules/console.c:55:
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:34: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
> '__attribute__' before 'G_BEGIN_DECLS'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:203: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' 
> before 'GDestroyNotify'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:209: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
> '__attribute__' before 'gjs_object_has_property'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:212: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
> '__attribute__' before 'gjs_object_get_property'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:216: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
> '__attribute__' before 'gjs_object_require_property'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:233: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
> '__attribute__' before 'gjs_check_constructing'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:251: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' 
> before 'gssize'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:254: warning: no previous prototype for 'gjs_throw'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h: In function 'gjs_throw':
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:256: error: expected declaration specifiers before 
> 'G_GNUC_PRINTF'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:260: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' 
> before 'GError'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:310: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' 
> before 'gssize'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:317: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' 
> before 'gssize'
> ./gjs/jsapi-util.h:325: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' 
> before 'gsize'
> ./gj

Bug#595837: marked as done (libproxy: FTBFS in squeeze: pacrunner_mozjs.c:33:19: error: jsapi.h: No such file or directory)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:41:06 +0200
with message-id <20100919174106.ge4...@belanna.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Closing unreproducible bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #595837,
regarding libproxy: FTBFS in squeeze: pacrunner_mozjs.c:33:19: error: jsapi.h: 
No such file or directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
595837: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595837
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libproxy
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100906 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
to build on amd64.

Relevant part:
> /bin/bash ../../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=compile gcc 
> -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"libproxy\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"libproxy\" 
> -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"0.3.1\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"libproxy\ 0.3.1\" 
> -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"nathan...@natemccallum.com\" -DPACKAGE=\"libproxy\" 
> -DVERSION=\"0.3.1\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 
> -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 
> -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 
> -DLT_OBJDIR=\".libs/\" -DHAVE_PTHREAD_H=1 -DHAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT=1 
> -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE__BOOL=1 -DHAVE_STDBOOL_H=1 -I.  -I../../src/lib  
> -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L  -std=c99 -g -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -c 
> -o pacrunner_mozjs_la-pacrunner_mozjs.lo `test -f 'pacrunner_mozjs.c' || echo 
> './'`pacrunner_mozjs.c
> libtool: compile:  gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"libproxy\" 
> -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"libproxy\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"0.3.1\" 
> "-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"libproxy 0.3.1\"" 
> -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"nathan...@natemccallum.com\" -DPACKAGE=\"libproxy\" 
> -DVERSION=\"0.3.1\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 
> -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 
> -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 
> -DLT_OBJDIR=\".libs/\" -DHAVE_PTHREAD_H=1 -DHAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT=1 
> -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE__BOOL=1 -DHAVE_STDBOOL_H=1 -I. -I../../src/lib 
> -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -std=c99 -g -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -c 
> pacrunner_mozjs.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/pacrunner_mozjs_la-pacrunner_mozjs.o
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:33:19: error: jsapi.h: No such file or directory
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:45: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 
> 'JSRuntime'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:49: warning: struct has no members
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:56: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before 'dnsResolve'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:91: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' 
> before 'myIpAddress'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c: In function 'ctxs_free':
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:106: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'ctx'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:106: warning: implicit declaration of function 
> 'JS_DestroyContext'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:106: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'ctx'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:107: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'run'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:107: warning: implicit declaration of function 
> 'JS_DestroyRuntime'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:107: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'run'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:108: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'cls'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:108: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'cls'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:109: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'pac'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c: In function 'ctxs_new':
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:115: error: 'JSObject' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:115: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only 
> once
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:115: error: for each function it appears in.)
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:115: error: 'global' undeclared (first use in this function)
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:116: error: 'jsval' undeclared (first use in this function)
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:116: error: expected ';' before 'rval'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:122: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'cls'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:122: error: 'JSClass' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:123: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'cls'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:124: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'cls'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:125: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'cls'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:125: error: 'JS_PropertyStub' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:126: error: 'ctxStore' has no member named 'cls'
> pacrunner_mozjs.c:127: error: 'ctxStore' has no member n

Bug#595876: multiboot: FTBFS in squeeze: rm: cannot remove `debian/multiboot/usr/share/info/dir': No such file or directory

[gregor herrmann]

On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:29:55 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:

> install-info needs to be added to the list of build dependencies or
>   rm debian/$(package)/usr/share/info/dir
> removed from debian/rules. But since this is a package containing
> documentation, I'd say we should go with the first option.

Sory for not cc'ing you in my last reply; can you reproduce this bug?

(And if you can: the fix would be to put
"dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | install-info"
into the build-deps
or to "rm -rf" the dir, IMO)

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Mercedes Sosa: Estas Alas Nuevas


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#595845: namazu2: diff for NMU version 2.0.20-1.0+nmu1

[gregor herrmann]

tags 595845 + patch
tags 595845 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for namazu2 (versioned as 2.0.20-1.0+nmu1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards.

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Die Toten Hosen: Sascha
diff -Nru namazu2-2.0.20/debian/changelog namazu2-2.0.20/debian/changelog
--- namazu2-2.0.20/debian/changelog	2009-12-18 06:41:38.0 +0100
+++ namazu2-2.0.20/debian/changelog	2010-09-19 18:52:42.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+namazu2 (2.0.20-1.0+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix "FTBFS in squeeze: Nonexistent build-dependency: 'tk8.3'"
+switch build dependency to "tk8.4 | wish" since tk8.3 is gone
+(closes: #595845).
+  * Fix lintian error "weak-library-dev-dependency libnmz7-dev on libnmz7" by
+adding "(= ${binary:Version})" to libnmz7-dev's Depends.
+
+ -- gregor herrmann   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:41:39 +0200
+
 namazu2 (2.0.20-1.0) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream.
diff -Nru namazu2-2.0.20/debian/control namazu2-2.0.20/debian/control
--- namazu2-2.0.20/debian/control	2009-12-18 05:50:48.0 +0100
+++ namazu2-2.0.20/debian/control	2010-09-19 18:51:58.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: text
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: NOKUBI Takatsugu 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), perl, kakasi, chasen, libnkf-perl, libfile-mmagic-perl, libtext-kakasi-perl, tk8.3 | wish, lynx, file
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), perl, kakasi, chasen, libnkf-perl, libfile-mmagic-perl, libtext-kakasi-perl, tk8.4 | wish, lynx, file
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: namazu2
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
 
 Package: libnmz7-dev
 Architecture: any
-Depends: libnmz7
+Depends: libnmz7 (= ${binary:Version})
 Conflicts: libnmz3-dev
 Section: libdevel
 Description: full text search engine - header files and static libraries


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: namazu2: diff for NMU version 2.0.20-1.0+nmu1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 595845 + patch
Bug #595845 [namazu2] namazu2: FTBFS in squeeze: Nonexistent build-dependency: 
'tk8.3'
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 595845 + pending
Bug #595845 [namazu2] namazu2: FTBFS in squeeze: Nonexistent build-dependency: 
'tk8.3'
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595845: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595845
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#595876: multiboot: FTBFS in squeeze: rm: cannot remove `debian/multiboot/usr/share/info/dir': No such file or directory

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 595876 = unreproducible
Bug #595876 [multiboot] multiboot: FTBFS in squeeze: rm: cannot remove 
`debian/multiboot/usr/share/info/dir': No such file or directory
Added tag(s) unreproducible; removed tag(s) sid, squeeze, confirmed, and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595876
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595876: multiboot: FTBFS in squeeze: rm: cannot remove `debian/multiboot/usr/share/info/dir': No such file or directory

[gregor herrmann]

tags 595876 = unreproducible
thanks

On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:31:27 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
> to build on amd64.

I can't reproduce this neither in a squeeze nor in a sid (i386
cowbuilder) chroot.

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Townes Van Zandt: Talkin' Karate Blues


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#594607: Status in Ubuntu, and Experimental

[Thomas Goirand]

Clint Byrum wrote:
> As far as Debian is concerned, I think we should get the 0.8.4
> package here:
> 
> https://code.launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/ubuntu/maverick/libdbi/upstream-0.8.4
> 
> Into Experimental (cleaned up for Debian of course, there are a few
> Ubuntu-isms there), which would resolve this bug and allow us to
> start moving all other packages that build depend on libdbi0-dev
> to libdbi-dev.
> 
> I will also begin working with Thomas to move the package vcs into
> collab-maint.

That will be great to work on that indeed.

I currently have limited time to work on it as I'm busy with other
Squeeze issues, but if you get in touch with me we can start working on
it anyway. I heard that some people like the ones working on evergreen
library software had issues with libdbi. I'd be happy to provide them a
backport of the 0.8.4 to fix their issues.

Thomas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#595837: libproxy: FTBFS in squeeze: pacrunner_mozjs.c:33:19: error: jsapi.h: No such file or directory

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 595837 + unreproducible
Bug #595837 [libproxy] libproxy: FTBFS in squeeze: pacrunner_mozjs.c:33:19: 
error: jsapi.h: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595837: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595837
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597425: Acknowledgement (no longer ships pkg-config file, which causes FTBFS for other packages)

[Michael Biebl]

A few comments, while looking at your packages:

a/ you use *.install files for libunac1-dev and libunac1, but not for unaccent.
dh_install is recommended over dh_movefiles. Please covert unaccent.files, too.
b/ Please use libunac1 (= ${binary:Version}) instead of
libunac1 (= ${Source-Version})
c/ Please consider adding ${misc:Depends} to your binary packages, as you are
using debhelper.
d/ The build-depends on debconf | debconf-2.0 doesn't make sense to me, and the
changelog does not mention why it was added. I can only assume it was by
accident. You might consider removing it.

Lintian shows some more warnings:

W: unac source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: unac source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.8.0-4
W: unac source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libunac1
W: unac source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends unaccent
W: unac source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libunac1-dev
W: unac source: substvar-source-version-is-deprecated libunac1-dev
W: unac source: ancient-libtool ltconfig
W: libunac1: debian-copyright-file-uses-obsolete-national-encoding at line 1
W: libunac1: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file
usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
W: libunac1: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
W: libunac1: copyright-without-copyright-notice
W: libunac1-dev: debian-copyright-file-uses-obsolete-national-encoding at line 1
W: libunac1-dev: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file
usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
W: libunac1-dev: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
W: libunac1-dev: copyright-without-copyright-notice
W: libunac1-dev: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man3/unac.3.gz 1:
warning: macro `''' not defined
W: unaccent: debian-copyright-file-uses-obsolete-national-encoding at line 1
W: unaccent: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file
usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
W: unaccent: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
W: unaccent: copyright-without-copyright-notice

e/ You use different email addresses / names in debian/control and
debian/changelog while it is preferrable to use the same, otherwise external
tools treat the upload as NMU.


Cheers,
Michael

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#595837: libproxy: FTBFS in squeeze: pacrunner_mozjs.c:33:19: error: jsapi.h: No such file or directory

[gregor herrmann]

tag 595837 + unreproducible
thanks

On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:54:25 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
> to build on amd64.

Builds fine for me in both a sid and a squeeze (i386 cowbuilder)
chroot.
 

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Alanis Morisette: Front Row


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: fixed in svn, upload literally pending

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 593707 + pending
Bug #593707 [debian-edu-artwork] debian-edu-artwork: drop build-dep on 
libusplash-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
> # fixed in svn, upload literally pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
593707: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593707
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: liblunar: diff for NMU version 2.0.1-2.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 594503 + patch
Bug #594503 [liblunar-1-0-dbg] liblunar-1-0-dbg: empty package
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 594503 + pending
Bug #594503 [liblunar-1-0-dbg] liblunar-1-0-dbg: empty package
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
594503: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594503
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#594503: liblunar: diff for NMU version 2.0.1-2.1

[gregor herrmann]

tags 594503 + patch
tags 594503 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for liblunar (versioned as 2.0.1-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards.

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Rolling Stones: Letitrock
diff -u liblunar-2.0.1/debian/changelog liblunar-2.0.1/debian/changelog
--- liblunar-2.0.1/debian/changelog
+++ liblunar-2.0.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+liblunar (2.0.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix "empty package": tell dh_strip about the -dbg package;
+closes: #594503.
+
+ -- gregor herrmann   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:52:38 +0200
+
 liblunar (2.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/control:
diff -u liblunar-2.0.1/debian/rules liblunar-2.0.1/debian/rules
--- liblunar-2.0.1/debian/rules
+++ liblunar-2.0.1/debian/rules
@@ -16,7 +16,9 @@
 	touch install-stamp
 
 binary-arch: install
-	dh binary-arch
+	dh binary-arch --before dh_strip
+	dh_strip -a --dbg-package=liblunar-1-0-dbg
+	dh binary-arch --after dh_strip
 
 binary-indep: install
 	dh binary-indep


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: severity of 597425 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 597425 serious
Bug #597425 [libunac1-dev] no longer ships pkg-config file, which causes FTBFS 
for other packages
Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
597425: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#584350: refcard: FTBFS: xmlroff segfaults on japanese PDF

[Simon Paillard]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:52:14PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2010-09-19 17:44, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:19:04PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > > On 2010-09-18 23:04, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > I still wonder which were your build conditions that allowed you to
> > > > * successfully * build the package.
> > > 
> > > Interesting: Refcard builds fine on my system (sid). Building in
> > > a clean sid chroot lead to xmlroff crashes. Disabling the
> > > deprecated gnomeprint backend entirely (GPLIST variable in the
> > > refcard Makefile), made it work.
> >
> > That's why I noticed too
> > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584350#12) but the
> > build result for japanese is not correct
> >
> > > The reason to use gnomeprint was a bug in the default cairo backend.
> > > But the original bug is still there, I re-checked #492597 and I can
> > > reproduce the crash in my chroot. Anyway, I will upload refcard now
> > > and we will see whether xmlroff crashes on other machines...
> >
> > But the gnomeprint backend is deprecated #542564
> 
> Yes, that's I wrote 14 lines before :~) Using deprecated stuff
> was necessary at that time, because the other backend used to
> crash (and still crashes in some cases).

Oops, I overlooked the word :)

> Btw. I committed my changes to SVN. Would you mind to build and
> upload? I'm busy - again - and if you to the build, it is one
> more check, that my changes are not completely bullshit :~) TIA!

Sure, once checked that the japanese and generally CJK build looks ok.

-- 
Simon Paillard



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#584350: refcard: FTBFS: xmlroff segfaults on japanese PDF

[W. Martin Borgert]

On 2010-09-19 17:44, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:19:04PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > On 2010-09-18 23:04, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > I still wonder which were your build conditions that allowed you to
> > > * successfully * build the package.
> > 
> > Interesting: Refcard builds fine on my system (sid). Building in
> > a clean sid chroot lead to xmlroff crashes. Disabling the
> > deprecated gnomeprint backend entirely (GPLIST variable in the
> > refcard Makefile), made it work.
>
> That's why I noticed too
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584350#12) but the
> build result for japanese is not correct
>
> > The reason to use gnomeprint was a bug in the default cairo backend.
> > But the original bug is still there, I re-checked #492597 and I can
> > reproduce the crash in my chroot. Anyway, I will upload refcard now
> > and we will see whether xmlroff crashes on other machines...
>
> But the gnomeprint backend is deprecated #542564

Yes, that's I wrote 14 lines before :~) Using deprecated stuff
was necessary at that time, because the other backend used to
crash (and still crashes in some cases).

Btw. I committed my changes to SVN. Would you mind to build and
upload? I'm busy - again - and if you to the build, it is one
more check, that my changes are not completely bullshit :~) TIA!



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597425: no longer ships pkg-config file, which causes FTBFS for other packages

[Michael Biebl]

Package: libunac1-dev
Version: 1.8.0-4
Severity: critical

Hi,

the current version of libunac1-dev no longer installs

/usr/lib/libunac.a
/usr/lib/libunac.la
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/unac.pc

While dropping the *.la file might be a valuable goal, I don't think it
is a good idea at this stage of the freeze, especially as you need to
check all rdeps first, if they still reference it in their *.la file.

Even more critical is the removal of the *.pc file, as this breaks other
packages using pkg-config to find unac, and they now FTBFS, e.g. tracker.

Please re-add those files to libunac1-dev, and use the wheezy cycle to
clean-up /usr/lib/libunac.la.

Thanks,
Michael



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libunac1-dev depends on:
ii  libc6-dev 2.11.2-6   Embedded GNU C Library: Developmen
ii  libunac1  1.8.0-4The unac programming library - run

libunac1-dev recommends no packages.

libunac1-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597237: live-manual: includes non-free files

[Francesco Poli]

On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:25:00 +0200 Daniel Baumann wrote:

> On 09/19/2010 04:37 PM, r...@snail.org.uk wrote:
> > I'd suggest such a decision be appended to the upcoming manual's toDo
> > 
> > Updated toDo will help explain to the copyright holders too.
> 
> hm? it's about the debian logo, nothing about live-* stuff.

Wait, we were talking about the Debian website, not about Debian
logos...

Anyway, as I've just said to rama, I agree with you that the Debian
Live Manual todo list is not the most appropriate place for that.


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html
 Need some pdebuild hook scripts?
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4


pgp2nc7HEWc3p.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#597237: live-manual: includes non-free files

[Francesco Poli]

On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:37:56 +0200 r...@snail.org.uk wrote:

> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:39:46 +0200, Francesco Poli 
> wrote:
> 
> > A decision must be taken and then all the copyright holders must be
> > tracked down, contacted and asked to agree to the re-licensing.
> 
> I'd suggest such a decision be appended to the upcoming manual's toDo
> 
> Updated toDo will help explain to the copyright holders too.

Please note that we are talking about the Debian website
 and its copyright notice and license
.

Hence I would tend to think that the Debian Live Manual todo list
 is *not* the most
appropriate place for talking about the re-licensing of the Debian
website...

> 
> If its (re)licencing 'our own stuff' - so be it. 
>
> > If you are willing to help me in generating a reliable list of
> > copyright holders for the Debian website (I think the place to look at
> > is the WWW CVS), I can draft a standardized e-mail message to send to
> > each one of them and collect their replies (those replies should be
> > sent to the e-mail address of bug #238245 or maybe #388141).
> 
> Yes willing to help. 
> I'll mail you once I start to locate enough copyright holders.

I think we should start this discussion over on the bug log of #238245,
where it really belongs.
So, if you are willing to help in generating a reliable list of
copyright holders for the Debian website, please say so here and I'll
move the discussion to the bug log of #238245.

> 
> [...]
> > disappointed by the lack of strictness with which the Debian SC (or
> > even the law) is complied with within the Debian Project.   :-(
> 
> Personally I'm not happy about the position on GFDL - but thats an
> unrelated matter I guess.

I am personally convinced that the right outcome should have been
Option 1 "GFDL-licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases",
but you're right that this is another story...

> 
> All the best,

The same to you!

-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html
 Need some pdebuild hook scripts?
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4


pgps21ynqwsng.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#584350: refcard: FTBFS: xmlroff segfaults on japanese PDF

[Simon Paillard]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:19:04PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2010-09-18 23:04, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > I still wonder which were your build conditions that allowed you to
> > * successfully * build the package.
> 
> Interesting: Refcard builds fine on my system (sid). Building in
> a clean sid chroot lead to xmlroff crashes. Disabling the
> deprecated gnomeprint backend entirely (GPLIST variable in the
> refcard Makefile), made it work.

That's why I noticed too
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584350#12) but the
build result for japanese is not correct

> The reason to use gnomeprint was a bug in the default cairo backend.
> But the original bug is still there, I re-checked #492597 and I can
> reproduce the crash in my chroot. Anyway, I will upload refcard now
> and we will see whether xmlroff crashes on other machines...

But the gnomeprint backend is deprecated #542564

-- 
Simon Paillard



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: libbuffy-bindings: diff for NMU version 0.11+nmu1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 567241 + pending
Bug #567241 [libbuffy-perl] fails after binnmu
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
567241: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567241
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#567241: libbuffy-bindings: diff for NMU version 0.11+nmu1

[gregor herrmann]

tags 567241 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for libbuffy-bindings (versioned as 0.11+nmu1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards.

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Beatles
diff -Nru libbuffy-bindings-0.11/debian/changelog libbuffy-bindings-0.11+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- libbuffy-bindings-0.11/debian/changelog	2010-08-02 11:32:15.0 +0200
+++ libbuffy-bindings-0.11+nmu1/debian/changelog	2010-09-19 17:31:28.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+libbuffy-bindings (0.11+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix "fails after binnmu" by applying the two patches from Niko Tyni:
+- 0001-Stop-writing-C-code-into-Buffy.pm.patch
+- 0002-Fix-inter-target-dependencies-not-to-run-the-build-t.patch
+Closes: #567241
+
+ -- gregor herrmann   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:26:18 +0200
+
 libbuffy-bindings (0.11) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Applied patch by Stefano Rivera. Closes: #586937
diff -Nru libbuffy-bindings-0.11/debian/rules libbuffy-bindings-0.11+nmu1/debian/rules
--- libbuffy-bindings-0.11/debian/rules	2010-08-02 11:32:15.0 +0200
+++ libbuffy-bindings-0.11+nmu1/debian/rules	2010-09-19 17:24:29.0 +0200
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 
 #Architecture
 build: build-stamp
-build-stamp: configure
+build-stamp: config-stamp
 	# Build
 	cd perl && make all OPTIMIZE="$(CXXFLAGS)"
 	cd ruby && make all
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
 binary-indep:
 
 binary: binary-arch binary-indep
-.PHONY: build clean binary-arch binary-indep binary install
+.PHONY: build clean binary-arch binary-indep binary install configure
 
 
 # Personal convenience rules
diff -Nru libbuffy-bindings-0.11/perl/Makefile.PL libbuffy-bindings-0.11+nmu1/perl/Makefile.PL
--- libbuffy-bindings-0.11/perl/Makefile.PL	2010-08-02 11:32:15.0 +0200
+++ libbuffy-bindings-0.11+nmu1/perl/Makefile.PL	2010-09-19 17:24:24.0 +0200
@@ -11,7 +11,9 @@
 
 sub MY::postamble {
 	return <<'MAKE_FRAG';
-buffy_wrap.cc Buffy.pm: ../buffy.i
+Buffy.pm: buffy_wrap.cc
+
+buffy_wrap.cc: ../buffy.i
 	swig -perl -c++ -I/usr/include -o $@ $<
 MAKE_FRAG
 }


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#597237: live-manual: includes non-free files

[Daniel Baumann]

On 09/19/2010 04:37 PM, r...@snail.org.uk wrote:
> I'd suggest such a decision be appended to the upcoming manual's toDo
> 
> Updated toDo will help explain to the copyright holders too.

hm? it's about the debian logo, nothing about live-* stuff.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#592620: marked as done (time: FTBFS in ubuntu due to nonexistent build dependency)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:17:16 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#592620: fixed in time 1.7-23.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #592620,
regarding time: FTBFS in ubuntu due to nonexistent build dependency
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
592620: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592620
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: time
Version: 1.7-23
Severity: important
Justification: fails-to-build-from-source

Hello dear maintainer,

Your package FTBFS on ubuntu due to non existent build dependency automaken

refer:

http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/32/time_1.7-23build1_lubuntu32.buildlog

http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/64/time_1.7-23build1_lubuntu64.buildlog

It can be circumvented by build depending on automake rather than automaken

regards

-- 

Bhavani Shankar.R
https://launchpad.net/~bhavi, a proud ubuntu community  member.
What matters in life is application of mind!,
It makes great sense to have some common sense..!


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: time
Source-Version: 1.7-23.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
time, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

time_1.7-23.1.diff.gz
  to main/t/time/time_1.7-23.1.diff.gz
time_1.7-23.1.dsc
  to main/t/time/time_1.7-23.1.dsc
time_1.7-23.1_i386.deb
  to main/t/time/time_1.7-23.1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 592...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Salvatore Bonaccorso  (supplier of updated time 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:31:46 +0200
Source: time
Binary: time
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7-23.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen 
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso 
Description: 
 time   - The GNU time program for measuring cpu resource usage
Closes: 592620
Changes: 
 time (1.7-23.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/control: Change Build-Depends on automaken to an alternate
 dependency automake | automaken (Closes: #592620).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 f70f27bdfd935dbae08578267045522425097949 1615 time_1.7-23.1.dsc
 33781a65a8bd0b90d590a163b852276b1b8f6711 91056 time_1.7-23.1.diff.gz
 d9354d65b9308f4826f3aebfca1965ab31cf3c2a 32462 time_1.7-23.1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 8fdcbfde80b8cf67ee2d1a27bc59aec1e804f8724d16e527cb4fbd8e9715f55d 1615 
time_1.7-23.1.dsc
 198edf4387bf891ad192ed90873b0fdefb3f4b98bd454894d7dd2a411b3488c1 91056 
time_1.7-23.1.diff.gz
 274ae8551345f3e95b1fc6cc7749a26bf484ccdc664f6a30f344e7301fd3b9b9 32462 
time_1.7-23.1_i386.deb
Files: 
 4b20a30ccd829e300f4226f97e61ec83 1615 utils standard time_1.7-23.1.dsc
 cb38efbd8ed7298b7a5a81c2e487ca9c 91056 utils standard time_1.7-23.1.diff.gz
 e2eaeb93bce556542da2de1b9e892b75 32462 utils standard time_1.7-23.1_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=lkXc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---

Processed: Re: Bug#595850: gjs: FTBFS in squeeze: modules/console.c:53:18: error: glib.h: No such file or directory

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 595850 + unreproducible
Bug #595850 [gjs] gjs: FTBFS in squeeze: modules/console.c:53:18: error: 
glib.h: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#595871: freej: FTBFS in squeeze: make[5]: *** No rule to make target `./Makefile'. Stop.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 595871 + unreproducible
Bug #595871 [freej] freej: FTBFS in squeeze: make[5]: *** No rule to make 
target `./Makefile'.  Stop.
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595871
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595871: freej: FTBFS in squeeze: make[5]: *** No rule to make target `./Makefile'. Stop.

[gregor herrmann]

tag 595871 + unreproducible
thanks

On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:23:40 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
> to build on amd64.

Builds fine for me in both a squeeze and a sid (i386 cowbuilder) chroot.

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Kante: Ituri (Softdelirium-Remix by T.Leboeg)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#595850: gjs: FTBFS in squeeze: modules/console.c:53:18: error: glib.h: No such file or directory

[gregor herrmann]

tag 595850 + unreproducible
thanks

On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:52:22 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
> to build on amd64.

Builds fine for me in both a squeeze and a sid (i386 cowbuilder)
chroot.
 
Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Neal Casal: Oceanview


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#595848: marked as done (python-csa: FTBFS in squeeze: ImportError: No module named _tkinter, please install the python-tk package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:48:31 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#595848: fixed in python-csa 0.0.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595848,
regarding python-csa: FTBFS in squeeze: ImportError: No module named _tkinter, 
please install the python-tk package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
595848: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595848
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-csa
Version: 0.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100906 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
to build on amd64.

Relevant part:
>  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh clean 
>dh_testdir
>dh_auto_clean
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "setup.py", line 4, in 
> from csa.version import __version__
>   File 
> "/build/user-python-csa_0.0.4-1-amd64-jo5xmn/python-csa-0.0.4/csa/__init__.py",
>  line 25, in 
> from plot import *
>   File 
> "/build/user-python-csa_0.0.4-1-amd64-jo5xmn/python-csa-0.0.4/csa/plot.py", 
> line 21, in 
> import matplotlib.pyplot as _plt
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/matplotlib/pyplot.py", line 78, in 
> 
> new_figure_manager, draw_if_interactive, show = pylab_setup()
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/matplotlib/backends/__init__.py", line 
> 25, in pylab_setup
> globals(),locals(),[backend_name])
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/matplotlib/backends/backend_tkagg.py", 
> line 7, in 
> import Tkinter as Tk, FileDialog
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 41, in 
> raise ImportError, str(msg) + ', please install the python-tk package'
> ImportError: No module named _tkinter, please install the python-tk package
> dh_auto_clean: python2.5 setup.py clean -a returned exit code 1
> make: *** [clean] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/09/06/python-csa_0.0.4-1_lsqueeze64.buildlog

It is possible that your package builds fine in sid, but you should make sure
that your package also builds fine in squeeze before the release.

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-csa
Source-Version: 0.0.4-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
python-csa, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

python-csa_0.0.4-1.1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/p/python-csa/python-csa_0.0.4-1.1.debian.tar.gz
python-csa_0.0.4-1.1.dsc
  to main/p/python-csa/python-csa_0.0.4-1.1.dsc
python-csa_0.0.4-1.1_all.deb
  to main/p/python-csa/python-csa_0.0.4-1.1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sandro Tosi  (supplier of updated python-csa package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:57:45 +0200
Source: python-csa
Binary: python-csa
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.4-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mikael Djurfeldt 
Changed-By: Sandro Tosi 
Description: 
 python-csa - The Connection-Set Algebra implemented in Python
Closes: 595848
Changes: 
 python-csa (0.0.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/control
 - added python-tk to both Build-Depends and Depends (matplotlib needs it);
   Closes: #595848
   * debian/rules
 - commented out override_dh_auto_test, tests are no more shipped with
   upstream tarball (since 0.0.2)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 d9814cca2815e997a5d504a5fa6a578e1cf4b410 1246 python-csa_0.0.4-1.1.dsc
 e219ca6c4a34c905524f6d000af5977b21f505d0 2196 
p

Bug#545052: marked as done (bastille removes all permissions from several executables)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:47:07 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#596954: fixed in bastille 1:3.0.9-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #596954,
regarding bastille removes all permissions from several executables
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596954: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596954
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bastille
Version: 1:3.0.9-12
Severity: normal

bastille set ssh and apt-get permissions to 000, perhaps some others too, I 
haven't checked yet.
This might have happened with the lenny version (1:2.1.1), before I upgraded to 
 1:3.0.9-12, but 
I don't remember exactly.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to de_DE.UTF8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages bastille depends on:
ii  libcurses-perl1.23-1+b1  Curses interface for Perl
ii  perl [perl5]  5.10.0-19  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages bastille recommends:
ii  bind9-host [host]  1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3-1 Version of 'host' bundled with BIN
ii  psad   2.1.3-1.1 The Port Scan Attack Detector
ii  whois  4.7.30an intelligent whois client

Versions of packages bastille suggests:
ii  acct  6.4~pre1-6 The GNU Accounting utilities for p
ii  perl-tk   1:804.028-1+b1 Perl module providing the Tk graph

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bastille
Source-Version: 1:3.0.9-13

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bastille, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a  (supplier of updated bastille 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:46:19 +0200
Source: bastille
Binary: bastille
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:3.0.9-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a 
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a 
Description: 
 bastille   - Security hardening tool
Closes: 545052 596954
Changes: 
 bastille (1:3.0.9-13) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Bastille/Debian_API.pm: Fix bug in the permissions
 definition in the B_statoverride.Also, return inmediately if distribution
 is Debian or if dpkg-statoverride is not available.
 This bug caused bastille to set  permissions when using
 dpkg-statoveride, thus the 'high' urgency. (Closes: #596954, 545052)
   * Bastille/API.pm: do not warn multiple times about the OS not being 
supported,
 just send this message to STDERR once.
   * Use debhelper compatibility version 5
   * debian/control: Depend on perl instead of on perl5.
   * debian/bastille.substvars: removed
Checksums-Sha1: 
 711951cd33626946bba156bcd5f9dfc3093c9e59 1005 bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
 2296aafc39dbdc0b81ec41cab440d24af3ef6411 41519 bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
 66c5989e1ae0c71a409465c328a0433a3d45d6bc 467920 bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 70c7221219204f72fe07653278a045afcb3eb48c555fe43304b8c8e657de27d8 1005 
bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
 3ec654bab55c0599e7de96d5042245fdf674eb4ca2cf725b3b27ba5b532533d9 41519 
bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
 7c886ddf57a481a84b0259530c199c310db25cd385d3a13301d3b34770136b2c 467920 
bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb
Files: 
 908a281b8ba7b9c7300d81ccdad306c8 1005 admin optional bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
 b629a33e3f84d40449b5f031d3d3882c 41519 admin optional bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
 f4650a1e599bd0553525c1b09c7bd147 467920 admin optional 
bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb

-

Bug#596954: marked as done (bastille adds dpkg-statoverride entries that change permissions to 0000 after upgrade)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:47:07 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#596954: fixed in bastille 1:3.0.9-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #596954,
regarding bastille adds dpkg-statoverride entries that change permissions to 
 after upgrade
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596954: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596954
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bastille
Version: 1:3.0.9-12.1
Severity: serious

Hello,

I run the stable release of debian, i.e. lenny (debian 5.0.6).
I wanted to harden my system using bastille, so I installed
the current bastille package from unstable, that supports
also debian 5.0 (lenny). The package from stable supports
only debian releases up to 4.0 (etch).

I used bastille to tighten up the permissions of some system
binaries and bastille set the most permissions to 750
to prevent unprivileged users to use the administration
utilities or removed the suid flag, so that the binaries
cannot be used by non-root users (from ping and mount, for
instance).

After that bastille ran also the dpkg-statoverride command
to prevent resetting the permissions on system upgrades.
However, this part fails and bastille sets the override
permissions to !!!

This means that many of the administration utilitites
have their permissions set to  after upgrade and
cannot be used anymore (even by root)! This happened
to me in last upgrade to debian version 5.0.6 with ping,
for instance:
> ls -l /bin/ping*
-- 1 root root 30788 Jul 27 04:34 /bin/ping
-- 1 root root 26616 Jul 27 04:34 /bin/ping6

This is serious because many important binaries are included,
for instance init, mkfs, mount, apt-get etc. It is also
difficult to find out the reason, because the upgrade
can happen much longer than the bastille hardening process.

I'm including a part of the bastille action log for /sbin/init,
for instance:
...
{Tue Jun  8 20:00:01 2010} ACTION File exists, running
chmod 488 /sbin/init{Tue Jun  8 20:00:01 2010} ACTION change
permissions on /sbin/init from 100755 to 750
{Tue Jun  8 20:00:01 2010} ACTION chmod 750,"/sbin/init";
{Tue Jun  8 20:00:01 2010} ACTION Setting permissions with
dpkg-statoverride:/usr/sbin/dpkg-statoverride --force
  --add #0 #0  /sbin/init
...

Hopefully, this can be repaired quite quickly in ustable,
because this can make the system partly unusable without
knowing about this problem.

Lukas



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bastille
Source-Version: 1:3.0.9-13

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bastille, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a  (supplier of updated bastille 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:46:19 +0200
Source: bastille
Binary: bastille
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:3.0.9-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a 
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a 
Description: 
 bastille   - Security hardening tool
Closes: 545052 596954
Changes: 
 bastille (1:3.0.9-13) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Bastille/Debian_API.pm: Fix bug in the permissions
 definition in the B_statoverride.Also, return inmediately if distribution
 is Debian or if dpkg-statoverride is not available.
 This bug caused bastille to set  permissions when using
 dpkg-statoveride, thus the 'high' urgency. (Closes: #596954, 545052)
   * Bastille/API.pm: do not warn multiple times about the OS not being 
supported,
 just send this message to STDERR once.
   * Use debhelper compatibility version 5
   * debian/control: Depend on perl instead of on perl5.
   * debian/bastille.substvars: removed
Checksums-Sha1: 
 711951cd33626946bba156bcd5f9dfc3093c9e

Bug#596954: marked as done (bastille adds dpkg-statoverride entries that change permissions to 0000 after upgrade)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:47:07 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#545052: fixed in bastille 1:3.0.9-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #545052,
regarding bastille adds dpkg-statoverride entries that change permissions to 
 after upgrade
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
545052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545052
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bastille
Version: 1:3.0.9-12.1
Severity: serious

Hello,

I run the stable release of debian, i.e. lenny (debian 5.0.6).
I wanted to harden my system using bastille, so I installed
the current bastille package from unstable, that supports
also debian 5.0 (lenny). The package from stable supports
only debian releases up to 4.0 (etch).

I used bastille to tighten up the permissions of some system
binaries and bastille set the most permissions to 750
to prevent unprivileged users to use the administration
utilities or removed the suid flag, so that the binaries
cannot be used by non-root users (from ping and mount, for
instance).

After that bastille ran also the dpkg-statoverride command
to prevent resetting the permissions on system upgrades.
However, this part fails and bastille sets the override
permissions to !!!

This means that many of the administration utilitites
have their permissions set to  after upgrade and
cannot be used anymore (even by root)! This happened
to me in last upgrade to debian version 5.0.6 with ping,
for instance:
> ls -l /bin/ping*
-- 1 root root 30788 Jul 27 04:34 /bin/ping
-- 1 root root 26616 Jul 27 04:34 /bin/ping6

This is serious because many important binaries are included,
for instance init, mkfs, mount, apt-get etc. It is also
difficult to find out the reason, because the upgrade
can happen much longer than the bastille hardening process.

I'm including a part of the bastille action log for /sbin/init,
for instance:
...
{Tue Jun  8 20:00:01 2010} ACTION File exists, running
chmod 488 /sbin/init{Tue Jun  8 20:00:01 2010} ACTION change
permissions on /sbin/init from 100755 to 750
{Tue Jun  8 20:00:01 2010} ACTION chmod 750,"/sbin/init";
{Tue Jun  8 20:00:01 2010} ACTION Setting permissions with
dpkg-statoverride:/usr/sbin/dpkg-statoverride --force
  --add #0 #0  /sbin/init
...

Hopefully, this can be repaired quite quickly in ustable,
because this can make the system partly unusable without
knowing about this problem.

Lukas



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bastille
Source-Version: 1:3.0.9-13

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bastille, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 545...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a  (supplier of updated bastille 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:46:19 +0200
Source: bastille
Binary: bastille
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:3.0.9-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a 
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a 
Description: 
 bastille   - Security hardening tool
Closes: 545052 596954
Changes: 
 bastille (1:3.0.9-13) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Bastille/Debian_API.pm: Fix bug in the permissions
 definition in the B_statoverride.Also, return inmediately if distribution
 is Debian or if dpkg-statoverride is not available.
 This bug caused bastille to set  permissions when using
 dpkg-statoveride, thus the 'high' urgency. (Closes: #596954, 545052)
   * Bastille/API.pm: do not warn multiple times about the OS not being 
supported,
 just send this message to STDERR once.
   * Use debhelper compatibility version 5
   * debian/control: Depend on perl instead of on perl5.
   * debian/bastille.substvars: removed
Checksums-Sha1: 
 711951cd33626946bba156bcd5f9dfc3093c9e

Bug#545052: marked as done (bastille removes all permissions from several executables)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:47:07 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#545052: fixed in bastille 1:3.0.9-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #545052,
regarding bastille removes all permissions from several executables
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
545052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545052
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bastille
Version: 1:3.0.9-12
Severity: normal

bastille set ssh and apt-get permissions to 000, perhaps some others too, I 
haven't checked yet.
This might have happened with the lenny version (1:2.1.1), before I upgraded to 
 1:3.0.9-12, but 
I don't remember exactly.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to de_DE.UTF8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages bastille depends on:
ii  libcurses-perl1.23-1+b1  Curses interface for Perl
ii  perl [perl5]  5.10.0-19  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages bastille recommends:
ii  bind9-host [host]  1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3-1 Version of 'host' bundled with BIN
ii  psad   2.1.3-1.1 The Port Scan Attack Detector
ii  whois  4.7.30an intelligent whois client

Versions of packages bastille suggests:
ii  acct  6.4~pre1-6 The GNU Accounting utilities for p
ii  perl-tk   1:804.028-1+b1 Perl module providing the Tk graph

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bastille
Source-Version: 1:3.0.9-13

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bastille, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb
  to main/b/bastille/bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 545...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a  (supplier of updated bastille 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:46:19 +0200
Source: bastille
Binary: bastille
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:3.0.9-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a 
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a 
Description: 
 bastille   - Security hardening tool
Closes: 545052 596954
Changes: 
 bastille (1:3.0.9-13) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Bastille/Debian_API.pm: Fix bug in the permissions
 definition in the B_statoverride.Also, return inmediately if distribution
 is Debian or if dpkg-statoverride is not available.
 This bug caused bastille to set  permissions when using
 dpkg-statoveride, thus the 'high' urgency. (Closes: #596954, 545052)
   * Bastille/API.pm: do not warn multiple times about the OS not being 
supported,
 just send this message to STDERR once.
   * Use debhelper compatibility version 5
   * debian/control: Depend on perl instead of on perl5.
   * debian/bastille.substvars: removed
Checksums-Sha1: 
 711951cd33626946bba156bcd5f9dfc3093c9e59 1005 bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
 2296aafc39dbdc0b81ec41cab440d24af3ef6411 41519 bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
 66c5989e1ae0c71a409465c328a0433a3d45d6bc 467920 bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 70c7221219204f72fe07653278a045afcb3eb48c555fe43304b8c8e657de27d8 1005 
bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
 3ec654bab55c0599e7de96d5042245fdf674eb4ca2cf725b3b27ba5b532533d9 41519 
bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
 7c886ddf57a481a84b0259530c199c310db25cd385d3a13301d3b34770136b2c 467920 
bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb
Files: 
 908a281b8ba7b9c7300d81ccdad306c8 1005 admin optional bastille_3.0.9-13.dsc
 b629a33e3f84d40449b5f031d3d3882c 41519 admin optional bastille_3.0.9-13.diff.gz
 f4650a1e599bd0553525c1b09c7bd147 467920 admin optional 
bastille_3.0.9-13_all.deb

-

Bug#597237: live-manual: includes non-free files

[rama]

On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:39:46 +0200, Francesco Poli 
wrote:

> A decision must be taken and then all the copyright holders must be
> tracked down, contacted and asked to agree to the re-licensing.

I'd suggest such a decision be appended to the upcoming manual's toDo

Updated toDo will help explain to the copyright holders too.

If its (re)licencing 'our own stuff' - so be it. 
   
> If you are willing to help me in generating a reliable list of
> copyright holders for the Debian website (I think the place to look at
> is the WWW CVS), I can draft a standardized e-mail message to send to
> each one of them and collect their replies (those replies should be
> sent to the e-mail address of bug #238245 or maybe #388141).

Yes willing to help. 
I'll mail you once I start to locate enough copyright holders.

[...]
> disappointed by the lack of strictness with which the Debian SC (or
> even the law) is complied with within the Debian Project.   :-(

Personally I'm not happy about the position on GFDL - but thats an
unrelated matter I guess.

All the best,

Ram



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597407: gettext: install-info installed leads to /usr/share/info/dir.gz in built package

[Santiago Vila]

El 19/09/10 15:29, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior escribió:

Package: gettext
Version: 0.18.1.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: infodir

This package creates usr/share/info/dir during the build process if the
install-info package is installed. The built package will then contain
the file usr/share/info/dir.gz.

Nobody on d-devel disagreed to set the severity level to 'serious' if
packages in the archive are affected [0] and normal if they ae not. This
is the case on s390 [1].

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/09/msg00302.html
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/s390/gettext/filelist


Thanks for the report. I'm going to fix this right now.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595473: marked as done (does not depend on dbus)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:30:25 +0200
with message-id <20100919143025.ga1...@belanna.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#595473: does not depend on dbus
has caused the Debian Bug report #595473,
regarding does not depend on dbus
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
595473: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595473
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gobby-0.5
Version: 0.4.93-1
Severity: serious

Without dbus installed:

/usr/bin/xauth:  creating new authority file /home/weasel/.Xauthority
wea...@debian:~$ gobby-0.5 
debug1: client_input_channel_open: ctype x11 rchan 3 win 65536 max 16384
debug1: client_request_x11: request from ::1 56470
debug1: channel 1: new [x11]
debug1: confirm x11
process 1757: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to read 
machine uuid: Failed to open "/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": No such file or 
directory
See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue.
process 1757: D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to read 
machine uuid: Failed to open "/var/lib/dbus/machine-id": No such file or 
directory
See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue.

(gobby-0.5:1757): Unique-DBus-WARNING **: Unable to open a connection to the 
session bus: /usr/bin/dbus-launch terminated abnormally without any error 
message

(gobby-0.5:1757): Unique-DBus-WARNING **: Unable to connect to the running 
instance, aborting.
error activating existing gobby instance (libunique): 0
debug1: channel 1: FORCE input drain
debug1: channel 1: free: x11, nchannels 2
wea...@debian:~$ 


And installing dbus but without dbus-x11:


wea...@debian:~$ gobby-0.5 
debug1: client_input_channel_open: ctype x11 rchan 3 win 65536 max 16384
debug1: client_request_x11: request from ::1 33439
debug1: channel 1: new [x11]
debug1: confirm x11

(gobby-0.5:2336): Unique-DBus-WARNING **: Unable to open a connection to the 
session bus: /usr/bin/dbus-launch terminated abnormally without any error 
message

(gobby-0.5:2336): Unique-DBus-WARNING **: Unable to connect to the running 
instance, aborting.
error activating existing gobby instance (libunique): 0
debug1: channel 1: FORCE input drain
debug1: channel 1: free: x11, nchannels 2
wea...@debian:~$ 


So gobby-0.5 probably wants to depend on both dbus and dbus-x11.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 13:10:28 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:

> Actually it's libunique that wants dbus unconditionally if compiled with
> dbus support.  It does have other backends, too, but no way to catch
> this error or to set another backend at runtime.  It thus breaks related
> applications when invoking libunique.
> 
> libunique must thus depend on both dbus and dbus-x11.  This is also
> somewhat a clone of #497401.

I assume 595473 should have been closes together with 595480; the
changelog in libunique 1.1.6-1.1 mentions 595480 twice.

Closing 595473 now.


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Janis Joplin: Summertime


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#597254: mrtgutils: Should mrtg-sensors be a separate package?

[Luciano Bello]

El Sáb 18 Sep 2010, Alan Dennis escribió:
> However, mrtg-sensors is utterly broken without it. Shouldn't mrtg-sensors
> be broken out into a separate package with proper dependancies, maybe
> recommended or suggested by mrtgutils?

I'm totally agree.

I will fix and upload this package during the next week. NMU are welcome 
meanwhile.

Thanks for your bug report, luciano



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: enscribe: diff for NMU version 0.1.0-1.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 595836 + patch
Bug #595836 [enscribe] enscribe: FTBFS in squeeze: Nonexistent 
build-dependency: 'libgd-dev'
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 595836 + pending
Bug #595836 [enscribe] enscribe: FTBFS in squeeze: Nonexistent 
build-dependency: 'libgd-dev'
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595836: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595836
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595836: enscribe: diff for NMU version 0.1.0-1.1

[gregor herrmann]

tags 595836 + patch
tags 595836 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for enscribe (versioned as 0.1.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards.

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Rolling Stones: Itatc
diff -u enscribe-0.1.0/debian/changelog enscribe-0.1.0/debian/changelog
--- enscribe-0.1.0/debian/changelog
+++ enscribe-0.1.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+enscribe (0.1.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix "FTBFS in squeeze: Nonexistent build-dependency: 'libgd-dev'":
+switch order of libgd-dev | libgd2-xpm-dev to put the real package before
+the virtual one (closes: #595836).
+
+ -- gregor herrmann   Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:48:09 +0200
+
 enscribe (0.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream version
diff -u enscribe-0.1.0/debian/control enscribe-0.1.0/debian/control
--- enscribe-0.1.0/debian/control
+++ enscribe-0.1.0/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: sound
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Nick Rusnov 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libgd-dev | libgd2-xpm-dev, libsndfile1-dev, pkg-config, docbook-to-man, dpatch
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libgd2-xpm-dev | libgd-dev, libsndfile1-dev, pkg-config, docbook-to-man, dpatch
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2.0
 
 Package: enscribe


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#597411: ssed: install-info installed leads to /usr/share/info/sdir.gz in built package

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Package: ssed
Version: 3.62-6.4
Severity: serious
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: infodir

This package creates usr/share/info/sdir during the build process if the
install-info package is installed. The built package will then contain
the file usr/share/info/sdir.gz.

Nobody on d-devel disagreed to set the severity level to 'serious' if
packages in the archive are affected [0] and normal if they ae not. This
is the case on armel [1] and s390 [2].

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/09/msg00302.html
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/armel/ssed/filelist
[2] http://packages.debian.org/sid/s390/ssed/filelist

Sebastian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597410: qingy: install-info installed leads to /usr/share/info/dir.gz in built package

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Package: qingy
Version: 0.9.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze, sid
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: infodir

This package creates usr/share/info/dir during the build process if the
install-info package is installed. The built package will then contain
the file usr/share/info/dir.gz.

Nobody on d-devel disagreed to set the severity level to 'serious' if
packages in the archive are affected [0] and normal if they ae not. This
is the case on s390 [1].

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/09/msg00302.html
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/s390/qingy/filelist

Sebastian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597409: tk707: install-info installed leads to /usr/share/info/dir.gz in built package

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Package: tk707
Version: 0.7.21-9
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze, sid
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: infodir

This package creates usr/share/info/dir during the build process if the
install-info package is installed. The built package will then contain
the file usr/share/info/dir.gz.

Nobody on d-devel disagreed to set the severity level to 'serious' if
packages in the archive are affected [0] and normal if they ae not. This
is the case on kfreebsd-* [1], [2].

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/09/msg00302.html
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/kfreebsd-amd64/tk707/filelist
[2] http://packages.debian.org/sid/kfreebsd-i386/tk707/filelist

Sebastian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#592243: marked as done (rmail and masqmail: error when trying to install together)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:32:53 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#592243: fixed in sendmail 8.14.3-9.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #592243,
regarding rmail and masqmail: error when trying to install together
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
592243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592243
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: masqmail,rmail
Version: masqmail/0.2.27-1
Version: rmail/8.14.3-9.2
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite

Date: 2010-08-08
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid

Hi,

automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:


WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  liblockfile1 libpcre3 libfile-copy-recursive-perl libglib2.0-0 libident
  update-inetd masqmail rmail
Preconfiguring packages ...
Authentication warning overridden.
Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?)
Selecting previously deselected package liblockfile1.
(Reading database ... 12247 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking liblockfile1 (from .../liblockfile1_1.08-4_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libpcre3.
Unpacking libpcre3 (from .../libpcre3_8.02-1.1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libfile-copy-recursive-perl.
Unpacking libfile-copy-recursive-perl (from 
.../libfile-copy-recursive-perl_0.38-1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libglib2.0-0.
Unpacking libglib2.0-0 (from .../libglib2.0-0_2.24.1-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libident.
Unpacking libident (from .../libident_0.22-3_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package update-inetd.
Unpacking update-inetd (from .../update-inetd_4.36_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package masqmail.
Unpacking masqmail (from .../masqmail_0.2.27-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package rmail.
Unpacking rmail (from .../rmail_8.14.3-9.2_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/rmail_8.14.3-9.2_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/sbin/rmail', which is also in package masqmail 
0:0.2.27-1
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/rmail_8.14.3-9.2_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates
sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would
consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming
or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the
circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file
diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a
last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual
Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and
diversions should only be used when packages provide different
implementations for the same functionality.

Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):

  /usr/sbin/rmail
  /usr/share/man/man8/rmail.8.gz

This bug is assigned to both packages. If you, the maintainers of
the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package.

-Ralf.

PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors
of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sendmail
Source-Version: 8.14.3-9.3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sendmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libmilter-dev_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
  to main/s/sendmail/libmilter-dev_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
libmilter1.0.1-dbg_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
  to main/s/sendmail/libmilter1.0.1-dbg_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
libmilter1.0.1_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
  to main/s/sendmail/libmilter1.0.1_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
rmail_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
  to main/s/sendmail/rmail_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
sendmail-base_8.14.3-9.3_all.deb
  to main/s/sendmail/sendmail-base_8.14.3-9.3_all.deb
sendmail-bin_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
  to main/s/sendmail/sendmail-bin_8.14.3-9.3_amd64.deb
sendmail-cf_8.14.3-9.3_all.deb
  to main/s/sendmail/sendmail-cf_8.14.3-9.3_all.deb
sendmail-doc_8.14.3-9.3_all.deb

Bug#597407: gettext: install-info installed leads to /usr/share/info/dir.gz in built package

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Package: gettext
Version: 0.18.1.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: infodir

This package creates usr/share/info/dir during the build process if the
install-info package is installed. The built package will then contain
the file usr/share/info/dir.gz.

Nobody on d-devel disagreed to set the severity level to 'serious' if
packages in the archive are affected [0] and normal if they ae not. This
is the case on s390 [1].

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/09/msg00302.html
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/s390/gettext/filelist

Sebastian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Merge bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> merge 596954 545052
Bug#545052: bastille removes all permissions from several executables
Bug#596954: bastille adds dpkg-statoverride entries that change permissions to 
 after upgrade
Merged 545052 596954.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
596954: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596954
545052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545052
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#596954: bastille adds dpkg-statoverride entries that change permissions to 0000 after upgrade

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 545052 serious
Bug #545052 [bastille] bastille removes all permissions from several executables
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'

> merge 596954 545052 serious
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
545052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545052
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#596954: bastille adds dpkg-statoverride entries that change permissions to 0000 after upgrade

[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]

severity 545052 serious
merge 596954 545052 serious
thanks

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:41:20PM +0200, Lukas Baxa wrote:
> After that bastille ran also the dpkg-statoverride command
> to prevent resetting the permissions on system upgrades.
> However, this part fails and bastille sets the override
> permissions to !!!

Thanks for the bug report. Indeed, I have reviewed the Debian integration
with bastille and it was missing code to setup the proper permissions in
binaries. I'm preparing an upload which (hopefully) fixes this issue.

If I cannot get it to be fixed properly I will remove the "Would you like to
set more restrictive permissions on the administration utilities?" question 
(which defaults to  'NO').

Regards

Javier


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#597404: scilab: FTBFS: Could not find or use the Java package/jar jlatexmath-fop used by LaTex Rendering - FOP plugin

[Cyril Brulebois]

Source: scilab
Version: 5.3.0-beta-3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Hi,

your package FTBFS in experimental:
| checking saxon... /usr/share/java//saxon.jar
| configure: error: Could not find or use the Java package/jar jlatexmath-fop 
used by LaTex Rendering - FOP plugin (looking for package 
org.scilab.forge.jlatexmath.fop.JLaTeXMathObj)
| checking jlatexmath-fop... no
| make: *** [debian/stamp-autotools] Error 1

Full build logs:
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=scilab&suite=experimental

Mraw,
KiBi.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org