Bug#603898: package misses copyright information

[Ana Guerrero]

Package: adept
Version: 3.0~beta7.2+nmu1+b1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch


Hi!

While checking the QA status of adept (see bug #542232), I discovered adept
is missing the information from where the upstream sources were obtained in the
debian/copyright file, this is required by Policy 12.5.
In Debian natives packages, this information is usually skip but you can find 
the sources easily inside the Debian infrastructure (alioth, git.d.o, svn.d.o, 
etc).
This does not seem to be the case with adept, upstream page seems
to be at http://web.mornfall.net/adept.html including a darcs repository.

Ana



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#599511: marked as done ([chromium-browser] FTBFS: converting to non-pointer type 'unsigned int' from NULL)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 18 Nov 2010 06:50:32 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#599511: fixed in chromium-browser 9.0.576.0~r65344-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #599511,
regarding [chromium-browser] FTBFS: converting to non-pointer type 'unsigned 
int' from NULL
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
599511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: chromium-browser
Version: 7.0.544.0~r61416-1
Severity: serious

Build in a cowbuilder with up-to-date unstable+experimental amd64 in.
sources.list

CXX(target) out/Release/obj.target/glue/webkit/glue/webvideoframe_impl.o
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
webkit/glue/webvideoframe_impl.cc: In member function 'virtual unsigned int 
webkit_glue::WebVideoFrameImpl::texture(unsigned int) const':
webkit/glue/webvideoframe_impl.cc:93:10: error: converting to non-pointer type 
'unsigned int' from NULL
make[1]: *** [out/Release/obj.target/glue/webkit/glue/webvideoframe_impl.o] 
Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/chromium-browser-7.0.544.0~r61416/src'
make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2


--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  500 unstableftp.debian.org 
  500 testing ftp.debian.org 
  500 stable  ftp.debian.org 
1 experimentalwww.debian-multimedia.org 
1 experimentalftp.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
libasound2(>> 1.0.18) | 1.0.23-2
libatk1.0-0   (>= 1.29.3) | 1.30.0-1
libbz2-1.0| 1.0.5-6
libc6   (>= 2.11) | 2.11.2-6
libcairo2  (>= 1.6.0) | 1.9.14-1
libcups2   (>= 1.4.0) | 1.4.4-6
libdbus-1-3(>= 1.0.2) | 1.4.0-1
libdbus-glib-1-2(>= 0.78) | 0.88-2
libevent-1.4-2 (>= 1.4.13-stable) | 1.4.13-stable-1
libexpat1 (>= 1.95.8) | 2.0.1-7
libfontconfig1 (>= 2.8.0) | 2.8.0-2.1
libfreetype6   (>= 2.3.9) | 2.4.2-2
libgcc1  (>= 1:4.1.1) | 1:4.5.1-8
libgconf2-4   (>= 2.27.0) | 2.31.5-1
libgcrypt11(>= 1.4.2) | 1.4.6-1
libgl1-mesa-glx   | 7.8.2-2
 OR libgl1| 
libglewmx1.5   (>= 1.5.4) | 1.5.4-1
libglib2.0-0  (>= 2.18.0) | 2.26.0-1
libgtk2.0-0   (>= 2.18.0) | 2.22.0-1
libicu44 (>= 4.4.1-1) | 4.4.1-6
libjpeg62(>= 6b1) | 6b1-1
libnspr4-0d (>= 1.8.0.10) | 4.8.6-1
libnss3-1d(>= 3.12.3) | 3.12.8-1
libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.20.0) | 1.28.1-1
libpng12-0  (>= 1.2.13-4) | 1.2.44-1
libstdc++6 (>= 4.4.0) | 4.5.1-8
libv8-2.2.24  | 2.2.24-6
libvpx0(>= 0.9.0) | 0.9.2-1
libx11-6  | 2:1.3.3-3
libxext6  | 2:1.1.2-1
libxml2(>= 2.7.4) | 2.7.7.dfsg-4
libxrender1   | 1:0.9.6-1
libxslt1.1(>= 1.1.25) | 1.1.26-6
libxss1   | 1:1.2.0-2
zlib1g   (>= 1:1.2.0) | 1:1.2.5.dfsg-1
xdg-utils | 1.0.2+cvs20100307-2
chromium-browser-inspector| 6.0.472.62~r59676-1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Suggests   (Version) | Installed
-+-===
chromium-browser-l10n| 





-- 
Emil Langrock


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: chromium-browser
Source-Version: 9.0.576.0~r65344-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
chromium-browser, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

chromium-browse

Bug#603662: software-center does not install anything

[Sebastian Heinlein]

The D-Bus activation (start on request) of aptdaemon seems to fail.

Could you please run the aptdaemon in a terminal before starting
software-center:

sudo aptd -td --replace

This should provide more information.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#603882: util-vserver: startup script breaks boot (on sparc)

[Daniel Hokka Zakrisson]

Ivan Jager wrote:
> Package: util-vserver
> Version: 0.30.216-pre2864-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
>
> I'm trying to switch to vservers from openvz because openvz support (for
> sparc) got silently dropped in Lenny. After installing
> linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-sparc64, during boot I get an endless
> stream of "lstat(): No such file or directory"
>
> Fortunately, I was able to ssh in and found /etc/init.d/util-vserver was
> running setattr. Running setattr with the same arguments also produces
> the endless stream of errors. strace shows that it is trying to stat ""
> a lot. I found I could reproduce the stream of errors as a normal user
> by running showattr without arguments instead. I guess it's something in
> the common code that is shared between the two.
>
> I rebuild with debugging and got a backtrace:
> #0  0x00010e88 in lstat ()
> #1  0x000102c4 in iterateFilesystem (path=0x11730 ".") at src/fstool.c:89
> #2  0x000106b8 in processFile (path=0x11730 ".") at src/fstool.c:162
> #3  0x00010ae8 in main (argc=1, argv=) at 
> src/fstool.c:236
>
> (gdb) frame 1
> #1  0x000102c4 in iterateFilesystem (path=0x11730 ".") at src/fstool.c:89
> 89  if (lstat(ent->d_name, &st)==-1) {
> (gdb) print ent
> $1 = (struct dirent64 *) 0xf7ffc000
> (gdb) print *ent
> $2 = {d_ino = 0, d_off = 58613, d_reclen = 0, d_type = 0 '\000',
>   d_name = "\000\000\273\377R\000 \blibtool", '\000' ,
> "\...@\024\000\000\000\000\001h\262g\000
> \bltmain.sh\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\342\372\000\000\000\000\003^`\211\000
> \binstall-sh\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\341o\000\000\000\000\004\222C\314\000
> \004lib_internal\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\342\373\000\000\000\000\005ô\365\000\030\004man\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\...@\032\000\000\000\000\amm\363\000
> \bMakefile.svn\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\344\300\000\000\000\000\a\323N%\000
> \bpathconfig.h\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\341\320\000\000\000\000\tho\216"...}
>
>
> Obviously ent is bogus. The things that look like filenames inside
> d_name are files in the working directory. (In this case
> util-vserver-0.30.216-pre2864)
>
> I tried to reproduce the problem with a small program that just did
> opendir and readir with printf, but that worked fine, so I'm not sure
> where the problem lies exactly. My best current guess is that either
> something is overwriting the data from opendir before readdir gets
> called, or somehow an incompatible opendir and readdir are getting
> linked in. (Is that possible?)  I haven't looked at the internals of how
> opendir and readdir work yet, so I don't really know.
>
> I tried installing util-vserver on a lenny machine, which installed
> version 0.30.216~r2772-6, but that version does not have this problem.
> I also tried transplaning the binary from 0.30.216-pre2864-2 to the
> lenny box, and then I do get the endless stream of errors.
>
> So, to reproduce in a way that is easy to debug:
> install util-vserver-0.30.216-pre2864-2 on a sparc system and run
> showattr.Make sure the startup script won't run or that you're not
> running a vserver kernel to avoid setattr being run at startup.
>
> To reproduce in a way that will leave you without a login prompt:
> install util-vserver-0.30.216-pre2864-2 and boot a sparc system into a
> kernel with vserver support.
>
> Sorry I didn't get around to testing vservers earlier. I was hoping
> openvz support might come back.

What dietlibc version was used to build the binaries? Does it have
http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/m/delta-dietdirent-fix01.diff
applied? IIRC this was one way that problem exhibited itself.

> Thanks,
> Ivan
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (500, 'testing')
> Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-vserver-sparc64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
> Versions of packages util-vserver depends on:
> ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36 Debian configuration management 
> sy
> ii  iproute   20100519-3 networking and traffic control 
> too
> ii  libc6 2.11.2-7   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared 
> lib
> ii  libnss3-1d3.12.8-1   Network Security Service 
> libraries
> ii  make  3.81-8 An utility for Directing 
> compilati
> ii  net-tools 1.60-23+b1 The NET-3 networking toolkit
> ii  util-linux2.17.2-3.3 Miscellaneous system utilities
>
> Versions of packages util-vserver recommends:
> ii  binutils  2.20.1-15  The GNU assembler, linker and 
> bina
> ii  debootstrap   1.0.25 Bootstrap a basic Debian system
>
> Versions of packages util-vserver suggests:
> ii  iptables  1.4.8-3administration tools for packet 
> fi
> ii  linux-image-2.6.32-5-sparc64- 2.6.32

Bug#603878: nvidia-graphics-drivers: various issues upgrading from lenny's nvidia-*-legacy-96xx

[Russ Allbery]

Michael Gilbert  writes:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:44:41 -0800 Russ Allbery wrote:

>> Right, the problem that had is because the version of
>> nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx which works properly with the
>> squeeze Xorg server still hasn't migrated to squeeze.  The upgrade
>> should work fine with the version in unstable.

>> Reassigning this bug and updating the version information accordingly,
>> since this bug is fixed in unstable.  We're just waiting on ia32-libs
>> for the NVIDIA packages to all migrate to squeeze.

> Ok, thanks for the rapid response :)  Interestingly I've been
> working on the ia32-libs issue to get fglrx-driver unblocked as well.

nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-71xx would have had a similar problem, in
that it has no upgrade path, since there's no version of those drivers
available from NVIDIA that work with the latest server.  I hadn't thought
about that.  But it looks like it's not a problem since that wasn't in
stable, nor was nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy (which predates it).  We
got lucky there.

Once nvidia-graphics-drivers{,-legacy-173xx,-legacy-96xx} all propagate,
we have a defined upgrade path for everything that was in lenny, I think.

At some point, we probably do want to push people more towards nouveau,
but the NVIDIA drivers still support some stuff that nouveau doesn't even
on GPUs that nouveau supports.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603882: util-vserver: startup script breaks boot (on sparc)

[Ivan Jager]

Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.216-pre2864-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


I'm trying to switch to vservers from openvz because openvz support (for 
sparc) got silently dropped in Lenny. After installing 
linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-sparc64, during boot I get an endless 
stream of "lstat(): No such file or directory"

Fortunately, I was able to ssh in and found /etc/init.d/util-vserver was 
running setattr. Running setattr with the same arguments also produces 
the endless stream of errors. strace shows that it is trying to stat "" 
a lot. I found I could reproduce the stream of errors as a normal user 
by running showattr without arguments instead. I guess it's something in 
the common code that is shared between the two.

I rebuild with debugging and got a backtrace:
#0  0x00010e88 in lstat ()
#1  0x000102c4 in iterateFilesystem (path=0x11730 ".") at src/fstool.c:89
#2  0x000106b8 in processFile (path=0x11730 ".") at src/fstool.c:162
#3  0x00010ae8 in main (argc=1, argv=) at src/fstool.c:236

(gdb) frame 1
#1  0x000102c4 in iterateFilesystem (path=0x11730 ".") at src/fstool.c:89
89  if (lstat(ent->d_name, &st)==-1) {
(gdb) print ent
$1 = (struct dirent64 *) 0xf7ffc000
(gdb) print *ent
$2 = {d_ino = 0, d_off = 58613, d_reclen = 0, d_type = 0 '\000',
  d_name = "\000\000\273\377R\000 \blibtool", '\000' , 
"\...@\024\000\000\000\000\001h\262g\000 
\bltmain.sh\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\342\372\000\000\000\000\003^`\211\000
 
\binstall-sh\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\341o\000\000\000\000\004\222C\314\000
 
\004lib_internal\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\342\373\000\000\000\000\005ô\365\000\030\004man\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\...@\032\000\000\000\000\amm\363\000
 \bMakefile.svn\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\344\300\000\000\000\000\a\323N%\000 
\bpathconfig.h\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\341\320\000\000\000\000\tho\216"...}


Obviously ent is bogus. The things that look like filenames inside 
d_name are files in the working directory. (In this case 
util-vserver-0.30.216-pre2864)

I tried to reproduce the problem with a small program that just did 
opendir and readir with printf, but that worked fine, so I'm not sure 
where the problem lies exactly. My best current guess is that either 
something is overwriting the data from opendir before readdir gets 
called, or somehow an incompatible opendir and readdir are getting 
linked in. (Is that possible?)  I haven't looked at the internals of how 
opendir and readdir work yet, so I don't really know.

I tried installing util-vserver on a lenny machine, which installed 
version 0.30.216~r2772-6, but that version does not have this problem.  
I also tried transplaning the binary from 0.30.216-pre2864-2 to the 
lenny box, and then I do get the endless stream of errors.

So, to reproduce in a way that is easy to debug:
install util-vserver-0.30.216-pre2864-2 on a sparc system and run 
showattr.Make sure the startup script won't run or that you're not 
running a vserver kernel to avoid setattr being run at startup.

To reproduce in a way that will leave you without a login prompt: 
install util-vserver-0.30.216-pre2864-2 and boot a sparc system into a 
kernel with vserver support.

Sorry I didn't get around to testing vservers earlier. I was hoping 
openvz support might come back.

Thanks,
Ivan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-vserver-sparc64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages util-vserver depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36 Debian configuration management sy
ii  iproute   20100519-3 networking and traffic control too
ii  libc6 2.11.2-7   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libnss3-1d3.12.8-1   Network Security Service libraries
ii  make  3.81-8 An utility for Directing compilati
ii  net-tools 1.60-23+b1 The NET-3 networking toolkit
ii  util-linux2.17.2-3.3 Miscellaneous system utilities

Versions of packages util-vserver recommends:
ii  binutils  2.20.1-15  The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  debootstrap   1.0.25 Bootstrap a basic Debian system

Versions of packages util-vserver suggests:
ii  iptables  1.4.8-3administration tools for packet fi
ii  linux-image-2.6.32-5-sparc64- 2.6.32-27  Linux 2.6.32 for multiprocessor 64
ii  linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver- 2.6.32-27  Linux 2.6.32 for uniprocessor 64-b
ii  module-init-tools 3.12-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  procps1:3.2.8-9  /proc file system utilities
ii  vlan  1.9-3  user mode programs to enable VLANs
ii  wget  1.

Bug#603878: nvidia-graphics-drivers: various issues upgrading from lenny's nvidia-*-legacy-96xx

[Michael Gilbert]

On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:44:41 -0800 Russ Allbery wrote:

> reassign 603878 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx
> found 603878 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.07-2
> fixed 603878 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.18-1
> close 603878
> thanks
> 
> Michael Gilbert  writes:
> 
> > package: nvidia-graphics-drivers
> > version: 195.36.24-4
> > severity: grave
> 
> > After the call for upgrade testing, I just did a lenny-to-squeeze
> > test on an old system of mine. The nvidia-*-legacy-96xx kernel module
> > and glx were installed under lenny (to support an old nvidia card that
> > none of the newer nvidia drivers support). I followed the upgrade
> > instructions exactly at [0].
> 
> > During the dist-upgrade (section 4.5.6), a lot of xorg drivers and xorg
> > itself ended up getting removed.
> 
> Right, the problem that had is because the version of
> nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx which works properly with the squeeze
> Xorg server still hasn't migrated to squeeze.  The upgrade should work
> fine with the version in unstable.
> 
> Reassigning this bug and updating the version information accordingly,
> since this bug is fixed in unstable.  We're just waiting on ia32-libs for
> the NVIDIA packages to all migrate to squeeze.

Ok, thanks for the rapid response :)  Interestingly I've been
working on the ia32-libs issue to get fglrx-driver unblocked as well.

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#603878: nvidia-graphics-drivers: various issues upgrading from lenny's nvidia-*-legacy-96xx

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 603878 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx
Bug #603878 [nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers: various issues 
upgrading from lenny's nvidia-*-legacy-96xx
Bug reassigned from package 'nvidia-graphics-drivers' to 
'nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 195.36.24-4.
> found 603878 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.07-2
Bug #603878 [nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx] nvidia-graphics-drivers: 
various issues upgrading from lenny's nvidia-*-legacy-96xx
Bug Marked as found in versions nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.07-2.
> fixed 603878 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.18-1
Bug #603878 [nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx] nvidia-graphics-drivers: 
various issues upgrading from lenny's nvidia-*-legacy-96xx
Bug Marked as fixed in versions nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.18-1.
> close 603878
Bug#603878: nvidia-graphics-drivers: various issues upgrading from lenny's 
nvidia-*-legacy-96xx
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Michael Gilbert 


> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603878: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603878
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603878: nvidia-graphics-drivers: various issues upgrading from lenny's nvidia-*-legacy-96xx

[Russ Allbery]

reassign 603878 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx
found 603878 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.07-2
fixed 603878 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.18-1
close 603878
thanks

Michael Gilbert  writes:

> package: nvidia-graphics-drivers
> version: 195.36.24-4
> severity: grave

> After the call for upgrade testing, I just did a lenny-to-squeeze
> test on an old system of mine. The nvidia-*-legacy-96xx kernel module
> and glx were installed under lenny (to support an old nvidia card that
> none of the newer nvidia drivers support). I followed the upgrade
> instructions exactly at [0].

> During the dist-upgrade (section 4.5.6), a lot of xorg drivers and xorg
> itself ended up getting removed.

Right, the problem that had is because the version of
nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx which works properly with the squeeze
Xorg server still hasn't migrated to squeeze.  The upgrade should work
fine with the version in unstable.

Reassigning this bug and updating the version information accordingly,
since this bug is fixed in unstable.  We're just waiting on ia32-libs for
the NVIDIA packages to all migrate to squeeze.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603878: nvidia-graphics-drivers: various issues upgrading from lenny's nvidia-*-legacy-96xx

[Michael Gilbert]

On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:29:03 -0500 Michael Gilbert wrote:
> During the dist-upgrade (section 4.5.6), a lot of xorg drivers and
> xorg itself ended up getting removed.  After the dist-upgrade, I
> manually installed xorg, which removed nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx.  After
> that X still wouldn't work since I still had the old nvidia-based
> xorg.conf.  I removed /etc/X11/xorg.conf and installed
> xserver-xorg-nvidia, which fixed all of the problems.

  ^ correction, that should read "xserver-xorg-nouveau"

Obviously it makes no sense as written.

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603878: nvidia-graphics-drivers: various issues upgrading from lenny's nvidia-*-legacy-96xx

[Michael Gilbert]

package: nvidia-graphics-drivers
version: 195.36.24-4
severity: grave

Hi,

After the call for upgrade testing, I just did a lenny-to-squeeze
test on an old system of mine. The nvidia-*-legacy-96xx kernel module
and glx were installed under lenny (to support an old nvidia card that
none of the newer nvidia drivers support). I followed the upgrade
instructions exactly at [0].

After installing the new kernel and udev and rebooting (section 4.5.5),
X was nonworking (since it was using the new kernel and I hadn't built
a new module).  So I had to boot into single user mode to complete the
rest of the install.

During the dist-upgrade (section 4.5.6), a lot of xorg drivers and
xorg itself ended up getting removed.  After the dist-upgrade, I
manually installed xorg, which removed nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx.  After
that X still wouldn't work since I still had the old nvidia-based
xorg.conf.  I removed /etc/X11/xorg.conf and installed
xserver-xorg-nvidia, which fixed all of the problems.

So, I think this could be fixed by either providing an upgrade path
from the legacy drivers to nouveau or by simply telling the user to
remove nvidia-*-legacy-* packages and /etc/X11/xorg.conf in the release
notes.

Setting the severity at grave since this caused all kinds of upgrade
breakage (that a less technically apt user would have a lot of trouble
with), but I will deffer to your judgment on the severity since its so
late in the release process.

Thanks,
Mike

[0]
http://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#553432: marked as done (CVE-2009-3767: Doesn't properly handle NULL character in subject Common Name)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:58:37 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#553432: fixed in openldap 2.4.11-1+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #553432,
regarding CVE-2009-3767: Doesn't properly handle NULL character in subject 
Common Name
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
553432: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553432
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openldap
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for openldap.

CVE-2009-3767[0]:
| libraries/libldap/tls_o.c in OpenLDAP, when OpenSSL is used, does not
| properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's
| Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows
| man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a
| crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a
| related issue to CVE-2009-2408.


Please coordinate with the security team (t...@security.debian.org) to
prepare packages for the stable and oldstable releases.


If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
CVE id in your changelog entry.

For further information see:

[0] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-3767
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2009-3767
Patch: 
http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/libraries/libldap/tls_o.c.diff?r1=1.8&r2=1.11&f=h

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrsCe4ACgkQNxpp46476aqyOwCfYvjBZj45odwhQLQ7eeFCT9j4
YDcAnjvkFab1GOwO9tv/6iXVVqCW5D/g
=0E+p
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openldap
Source-Version: 2.4.11-1+lenny1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openldap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ldap-utils_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
  to main/o/openldap/ldap-utils_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
libldap-2.4-2-dbg_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
  to main/o/openldap/libldap-2.4-2-dbg_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
libldap-2.4-2_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
  to main/o/openldap/libldap-2.4-2_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
libldap2-dev_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
  to main/o/openldap/libldap2-dev_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
openldap_2.4.11-1+lenny1.diff.gz
  to main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.11-1+lenny1.diff.gz
openldap_2.4.11-1+lenny1.dsc
  to main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.11-1+lenny1.dsc
slapd-dbg_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
  to main/o/openldap/slapd-dbg_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
slapd_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
  to main/o/openldap/slapd_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 553...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Giuseppe Iuculano  (supplier of updated openldap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:37:17 +0100
Source: openldap
Binary: slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.4-2 libldap-2.4-2-dbg libldap2-dev slapd-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4.11-1+lenny1
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian OpenLDAP Maintainers 

Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano 
Description: 
 ldap-utils - OpenLDAP utilities
 libldap-2.4-2 - OpenLDAP libraries
 libldap-2.4-2-dbg - Debugging information for OpenLDAP libraries
 libldap2-dev - OpenLDAP development libraries
 slapd  - OpenLDAP server (slapd)
 slapd-dbg  - Debugging information for the OpenLDAP server (slapd)
Closes: 553432
Changes: 
 openldap (2.4.11-1+lenny1) stable-security; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team.
   * Fixed CVE-2009-3767: libraries/libldap/tls_o.c doesn't properly handle NULL
 character in subject Common Name (Closes: #553432)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 a19367278d150c9638d15ca38debea28422d36be 1831 openldap_2.4.11-1+lenny1.dsc
 bad27f34061482ba559609fadfad28976c4ca3ba 4193523 openldap_2.4.11.orig.tar.gz
 5a18ad3994400eb9073b571794e8ef18bafc373d 148075 
openldap_2.4.11-1+lenny1.diff.gz
 da911938cf9194b47f0927804c57c792a8742cec 1404266 slapd_2.4.11-1+lenny1_i386.deb
 8ba3ee67202970a7d9acbd78b3e056f3561efc7c 244952 
ldap-utils_2.

Processed: severity of 601750 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # package should not be released with squeeze without having this regression 
> being resolved
> severity 601750 serious
Bug #601750 [fai-client] hostname set to debian when doing network boot
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
601750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601750
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603752: CVE-2010-4168

[Steven Chamberlain]

Hi,

Just thought I'd mention, I had trouble connecting to multiplay servers 
*before* I applied this patch, despite the suggestion it 'does not 
change network compatibility at all'.


Anyway, I've play-tested it with the patch, which applies cleanly, 
except it needed CRLF to LF conversion (fromdos), and a modification to 
apply with 'patch -p1' (sed -i 's/src/openttd\/src/').  The direct URL 
to it is:


http://security.openttd.org/en/patch/28.patch

Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 603869 grave
Bug #603869 [librtf-writer-perl] librtf-writer-perl: FTBFS in sid, error in 
Build-Depends-Indep
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603869: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603869
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603867: movabletype-opensource: Fails to install cleanly

[Dominic Hargreaves]

Package: movabletype-opensource
Version: 4.3.4+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

According to the build logs here, this package fails install cleanly
on a new install:

http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/movabletype-opensource.log



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603866: rt3.8-rtfm: Failure to set up database on a clean install

[Dominic Hargreaves]

Package: rt3.8-rtfm
Version: 2.4.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

According to the build logs here, this package fails to install
cleanly:

http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/rt3.8-rtfm.log



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#587668: fixed in desktop-base 6.0.0

[Pompee William]

Hello Francesco,

I confirm that this bug is not completely fixed yet. I thank Yves-Alexis 
for fixing it in part and I thank you for reopening it too.


Regards


PS: I prefer to be the submitter upto the end in order to keep things
clear. Please call me William it sounds more familiar to me. ;-)

Francesco Poli wrote:

found 587668 desktop-base/6.0.0
thanks


On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:33:53 + Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:

[...]

   * {ksplash,kdm}-theme/moreblue-orbit{-default}:
 - drop “Debian” word from image to only use DFSG-free logo. closes: #587668

[...]

It seems to me that there are several other derivative works of the
Debian Open Use Logo with “Debian”

still present in desktop-base_6.0.0.tar.gz.

Here's a list of what I found with a complete review of the package:

./backgrounds/moreblue-orbit-grub.svg.tar.bz2
./backgrounds/gnome-debian-sid-wp.png
./backgrounds/moreblue-orbit-grub.png
./backgrounds/gnome-debian-sid-wp.xcf.gz
./debian-desktop-logo.png
./source/spacefun/splashy.svg
./source/spacefun/grub.svg
./source/spacefun/splash.svg
./splash/spacefun-splash.svg
./splash/gnome-debian-sid-splash.png
./splash/moreblue-orbit-splash.svg.tar.bz2
./splash/gnome-debian-sid-splash.xcf.gz
./grub/spacefun-grub-widescreen.png
./splashy/spacefun/back.png
./splashy/spacefun/error.png
./splashy/spacefun/go.png
./usplash/moreblue-orbit/cmap.gif
./usplash/moreblue-orbit/background.svg

All these images include a “Debian” text clearly derived from
 and have to be modified
in order to become DFSG-free...

I am therefore reopening the bug.
I hope this issue may be fixed soon.


P.S.: Pompee, do you prefer if I set myself as the bug report
submitter? Or do you prefer to keep things as they are?






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: tagging 603788

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 603788 + pending
Bug #603788 [aribas] aribas: fails to upgrade from lenny
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603788: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603788
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#601816: marked as done (Network manager in Gnome and Wired connection)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:02:14 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#530024: fixed in network-manager 0.8.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #530024,
regarding Network manager in Gnome and Wired connection
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
530024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: network-manager-gnome
Version: 0.8.1-1

Hello.

I have Debian Squeeze x64 on Fujitsu siemens Esprimo U9200 laptop. I have
just installed Gnome Desktop environment and my NetworkManager applet can't
detect cable connection (Ethernet connection to laptop's port). When I click
to the applet I see under "Wired Network" message: "device not managed".
Still I can manage it with terminal (ifup/ifdown/ifconfig, etc). I've
reinstalled the system twice and the result is the same.

Thank you.

Vladyslav Zakhozhai
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: network-manager
Source-Version: 0.8.1-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
network-manager, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnm-glib-dev_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
  to main/n/network-manager/libnm-glib-dev_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
libnm-glib-vpn-dev_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
  to main/n/network-manager/libnm-glib-vpn-dev_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
libnm-glib-vpn1_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
  to main/n/network-manager/libnm-glib-vpn1_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
libnm-glib2_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
  to main/n/network-manager/libnm-glib2_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
libnm-util-dev_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
  to main/n/network-manager/libnm-util-dev_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
libnm-util1_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
  to main/n/network-manager/libnm-util1_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
network-manager-dbg_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
  to main/n/network-manager/network-manager-dbg_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
network-manager-dev_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
  to main/n/network-manager/network-manager-dev_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
network-manager_0.8.1-4.debian.tar.gz
  to main/n/network-manager/network-manager_0.8.1-4.debian.tar.gz
network-manager_0.8.1-4.dsc
  to main/n/network-manager/network-manager_0.8.1-4.dsc
network-manager_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
  to main/n/network-manager/network-manager_0.8.1-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 530...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Biebl  (supplier of updated network-manager package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:28:19 +0100
Source: network-manager
Binary: network-manager network-manager-dev libnm-glib2 libnm-glib-dev 
libnm-glib-vpn1 libnm-glib-vpn-dev libnm-util1 libnm-util-dev 
network-manager-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Utopia Maintenance Team 

Changed-By: Michael Biebl 
Description: 
 libnm-glib-dev - network management framework (GLib interface)
 libnm-glib-vpn-dev - network management framework (GLib interface)
 libnm-glib-vpn1 - network management framework (GLib VPN shared library)
 libnm-glib2 - network management framework (GLib shared library)
 libnm-util-dev - network management framework (development files)
 libnm-util1 - network management framework (shared library)
 network-manager - network management framework daemon
 network-manager-dbg - network management framework daemon - debugging symbols
 network-manager-dev - network management framework (development files)
Closes: 530024
Changes: 
 network-manager (0.8.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Raphaël Hertzog ]
   * Integrate debian/ifblacklist_migrate.sh from Ubuntu and install
 it in /usr/lib/NetworkManager. Improve it to disable the interfaces
 with a #NetworkManager# prefix and re-enable them when the package is
 removed. (Closes: #530024)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 e52fdbdbdf0cc922a694d7a37e5871dbfdea9e67 2389 network-manager_0.8.1-4.dsc
 4f89d6d4ebada64ca7a9688b36a27bb0a8e55739 29528 
network-manager_0.8.1-4.debian.tar.gz
 0105a4930764ff52f7fb0d8b12e2229b828050ef 900376 
network-manager_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
 68e486a3242550cd37999b46c5f549174dd15a2a 230098 
network-manager-dev_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
 04b88b47bef956bd3381a350b5638a08b03ac15b 280992 libnm-glib2_0.8.1-4_i386.deb
 

Bug#530024: marked as done (eth0 Wired interface not managed (on squeeze install/upgrade).)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:02:14 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#530024: fixed in network-manager 0.8.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #530024,
regarding eth0 Wired interface not managed (on squeeze install/upgrade).
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
530024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: network-manager
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: important

The wired network interface isn't managed on a default system (>=squeeze).

As far as i understand, this is because:

On a regular Debian system, the file /etc/network/interfaces contains
| allow-hotplug eth0
| iface eth0 inet dhcp

Also, /etc/NetworkManager/nm-system-settings.conf contains:
| [main]
| plugins=ifupdown,keyfile
| 
| [ifupdown]
| managed=false

I don't know if the right way to solve the issue is to:
 1. comment-out the [eth0] entry in /e/n/interfaces
or
 2. set "managed=true" in nm-system-settings.conf
(an kill nm-system-settings or reboot)

Note regarding #1: Every user that upgrade their system from lenny to
   squeeze will face this bug. Do you think it's possible to address
   this problem (dispaying note or whatever).

Thanks,

Franklin

--

Meanwhile, I'll document this behaviour in 
 http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkManager

For reference, syslog reports:

NetworkManager:   starting...
NetworkManager:   (eth0): new Ethernet device (driver: 'e1000e')
NetworkManager:   (eth0): exported as
/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/net_00_1a_6b_38_52_e4
NetworkManager:   Trying to start the system settings daemon...
nm-system-settings:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: init!
nm-system-settings:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: update_system_hostname
nm-system-settings:SCPluginIfupdown: guessed connection type (eth0)
= 802-3-ethernet
nm-system-settings:SCPlugin-Ifupdown:
update_connection_setting_from_if_block: name:eth0, type:802-3-ethernet,
autoconnect:0, id:Ifupdown (eth0), uuid:
681b428f----0104
nm-system-settings:SCPluginIfupdown: management mode: unmanaged
nm-system-settings:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices added (udi:
/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/net_00_1a_6b_38_52_e4, iface: eth0)
nm-system-settings:Ifupdown: get unmanaged devices count: 1


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages network-manager depends on:
ii  adduser  3.110   add and remove users and groups
ii  dbus 1.2.12-1simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  dhcp3-client 3.1.1-6 DHCP client
ii  hal  0.5.12~git20090406.46dc48-2 Hardware Abstraction Layer
ii  ifupdown 0.6.8+nmu1  high level tools to configure netw
ii  libc62.9-4   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdbus-1-3  1.2.12-1simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libdbus-glib 0.80-4  simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libgcrypt11  1.4.4-2 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.20.0-2The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnutls26  2.6.6-1 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii  libgpg-error 1.6-1   library for common error values an
ii  libhal1  0.5.12~git20090406.46dc48-2 Hardware Abstraction Layer - share
ii  libnl1   1.1-5   library for dealing with netlink s
ii  libnm-glib0  0.7.1-1 network management framework (GLib
ii  libnm-util1  0.7.1-1 network management framework (shar
ii  libpolkit-db 0.9-3   library for accessing PolicyKit vi
ii  libpolkit2   0.9-3   library for accessing PolicyKit
ii  libtasn1-3   1.8-1   Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
ii  libuuid1 1.41.3-1universally unique id library
ii  lsb-base 3.2-22  Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii  wpasupplican 0.6.9-2 client support for WPA and WPA2 (I
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-13   compression library - runtime

Versions of packages network-manager recommends:
pn  dnsmasq-base   (no description available)
ii  iptables  1.4.3.2-2  administration 

Bug#603788: aribas: fails to upgrade from lenny

[Ralf Treinen]

>   Preparing to replace aribas 1.63-2 (using .../aribas_1.64-3_amd64.deb) ...
>   ERROR: emacsen-common being used before being configured.
>   ERROR: This is likely a bug in the aribas package, which needs to
>   ERROR: add one of the appropriate dependencies.
>   ERROR: See /usr/share/doc/emacsen-common/debian-emacs-policy.gz
>   ERROR: for details.
>   dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit status 

Changing "Depends: emacsen-common" to "Pre-Depends: emacsen-common"
seems to solve the problem. Needs some further investigation
before uploading that patch.

-Ralf.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603788: reproduce

[Ralf Treinen]

Note to myself how to reproduce this bug:

dbootstrap lenny lenny-chroot
cp emacsen-common_1.4.19_all.deb aribas_1.64-3_amd64.deb ~/tmp/lenny-chroot/tmp/
chroot lenny-chroot
apt-get install aribas
dpkg -i tmp/emacsen-common_1.4.19_all.deb tmp/aribas_1.64-3_amd64.deb

-R.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: severity of 602222 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> severity 60 serious
Bug #60 [bacula] bacula meta-package not installable with recommended 
packages
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
60: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=60
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#601220: noip2: abuse of debconf

[Andres Mejia]

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Jakub Wilk  wrote:
> Package: noip2
> Version: 2.1.9-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 10.7
>
> The only place noip2 store configuration data (apart from the debconf cache)
> is a binary blob in /var/lib/noip2/. This file will be happily overwritten
> on each upgrade using *only* values supplied by debconf.
>
> --
> Jakub Wilk
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMxCocAAoJEC1Os6YBVHX1bBwP/02ty0C3MHO4vcXjLMCnuT4B
> HTSaoUi/vf+k9PBbtFhaKa5iDE6oSOprOFiGDeuwcFeK+zJU8Hoil3XjheA2x+ak
> LXsF9OUrQeuOJ63j4HSRnTYspsK7RX3ezKqUzMyOT4PdIgIXxV4WtytX2jWs+oP1
> JnbctxKRrwyrfSp9uFvhcc6uUFMZVUGAQRqHq/355qJDKN7b03WFl0gveRFASazn
> LyLOC5Dvm6T0VFRrwTMuRttZZGaU8RTANaid6fQkS2lC4Wk/U7xHrxhtJqGovx7j
> CJjH9ZfMuAASPPEJYepNMN6JimLilxl7PYQ8AFLajiK0JOpkIqJsVW7yRLnaIgEc
> KUKIxShr3tTR48OE+SyiTDU5jRt/+J6cWZz78UgJGfQDnKkNtGu9RYV3Y08Pyy5A
> cJr7t9iXYrfqcqTigobP7ybB8Wd4kZdNjJN7lKPGTQC7jntPrp7shaBAa7o3SzNa
> KXIECM2M15hsqZK5bFaV40LTvcmHmUJVM5g4J8pBR4YcJtISzq55uXaYH2DtaixI
> JvibWOkTdQ4ajHfkEfZzp36PQ+i1Pit55U+KzuRzKCz834eWDtCojLKLsKV63cm8
> qDyqZgUchvvUVkWymTRmT2d9vVImfpub5WLrf1BPpz23FaWun+/y/y+JcPjqC79M
> T99gANkfu3c3BvZQH0Zd
> =Wlvg
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>

For anyone looking into resolving this bug, feel free to remove me as
uploader. I no longer use the noip service thus I no longer have any
interest in maintaining this package.

-- 
Regards,
Andres Mejia



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: tagging 603788

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 603788 + confirmed
Bug #603788 [aribas] aribas: fails to upgrade from lenny
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603788: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603788
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#602476: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#602476: policykit-1: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/signalfd.h: No such file or directory

[Timo Juhani Lindfors]

Michael Biebl  writes:
>> | gposixsignal.c:26:26: error: sys/signalfd.h: No such file or directory

Hmm. Is signalfd() used by _g_posix_signal_source_new() is a
Linux-only feature? Man page says

VERSIONS
 signalfd() is available on Linux since kernel 2.6.22.  Working
 support is provided in glibc since version 2.8.  The signalfd4()
 system call (see NOTES) is available on Linux since kernel 2.6.27.

and it is also listed in "Re: Porting upstart to kfreebsd" at

http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-...@lists.debian.org/msg04855.html

under "Linux-specific thing that the current and next versions
use/will use are".

This code did not exist in 0.96-3 so maybe you just need to ask
upstream to think about how they want to this on non-Linux systems?
(I'm assuming this 0.99-1 is not targeting squeeze so we are not in a
hurry.)





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#587668: fixed in desktop-base 6.0.0

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 587668 desktop-base/6.0.0
Bug #587668 {Done: Yves-Alexis Perez } [desktop-base] The 
Debian open logo with "Debian" is not compliant to the Debian policy
Bug Marked as found in versions desktop-base/6.0.0; no longer marked as fixed 
in versions desktop-base/6.0.0 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
587668: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587668
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#587668: fixed in desktop-base 6.0.0

[Francesco Poli]

found 587668 desktop-base/6.0.0
thanks


On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:33:53 + Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:

[...]
>* {ksplash,kdm}-theme/moreblue-orbit{-default}:
>  - drop “Debian” word from image to only use DFSG-free logo. closes: 
> #587668
[...]

It seems to me that there are several other derivative works of the
Debian Open Use Logo with “Debian”

still present in desktop-base_6.0.0.tar.gz.

Here's a list of what I found with a complete review of the package:

./backgrounds/moreblue-orbit-grub.svg.tar.bz2
./backgrounds/gnome-debian-sid-wp.png
./backgrounds/moreblue-orbit-grub.png
./backgrounds/gnome-debian-sid-wp.xcf.gz
./debian-desktop-logo.png
./source/spacefun/splashy.svg
./source/spacefun/grub.svg
./source/spacefun/splash.svg
./splash/spacefun-splash.svg
./splash/gnome-debian-sid-splash.png
./splash/moreblue-orbit-splash.svg.tar.bz2
./splash/gnome-debian-sid-splash.xcf.gz
./grub/spacefun-grub-widescreen.png
./splashy/spacefun/back.png
./splashy/spacefun/error.png
./splashy/spacefun/go.png
./usplash/moreblue-orbit/cmap.gif
./usplash/moreblue-orbit/background.svg

All these images include a “Debian” text clearly derived from
 and have to be modified
in order to become DFSG-free...

I am therefore reopening the bug.
I hope this issue may be fixed soon.


P.S.: Pompee, do you prefer if I set myself as the bug report
submitter? Or do you prefer to keep things as they are?

-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html
 Need some pdebuild hook scripts?
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4


pgpHV1p69HRmX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: severity of 603858 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 603858 important
Bug #603858 [initramfs-tools] Mount options for proc conflict with /etc/fstab 
breaking /etc/init.d/mountall.sh
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603858
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603858: Mount options for proc conflict with /etc/fstab breaking /etc/init.d/mountall.sh

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: critical
File: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init
Tags: patch

Hi,

I recently installed a squeeze system. The generated /etc/fstab
contains the following line:

   #
   proc/proc   procdefaults0   0

But in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init you have:

   mount -t proc -o nodev,noexec,nosuid none /proc

This causes mount to return an error when mounting all local
filesystems because "proc" and "none" are different divices and it
can't mount /proc again over an existing mountpoint. The
/etc/init.d/mountall.sh script reports a red FAILED because of that.

Node: /etc/mtab is a link to /proc/mounts here. That might affect this
issue.



Please change the mount command for proc to:

  mount -t proc -o nodev,noexec,nosuid proc /proc

MfG
Goswin


-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-book-1 (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages initramfs-tools depends on:
ii  cpio  2.10-1 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  findutils 4.4.2-1utilities for finding files--find,
ii  klibc-utils   1.5.15-1   small utilities built with klibc f
ii  module-init-tools 3.11-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  udev  161-1  /dev/ and hotplug management daemo

Versions of packages initramfs-tools recommends:
ii  busybox   1:1.14.2-2 Tiny utilities for small and embed

initramfs-tools suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#602476: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#602476: policykit-1: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/signalfd.h: No such file or directory

[Michael Biebl]

tags 602476 + help
thanks

On 05.11.2010 08:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Source: policykit-1
> Version: 0.99-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
> 
> Hi,
> 
> your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
> | gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src -I../../src 
> -DPACKAGE_LIBEXEC_DIR=\""/usr/lib/policykit-1"\" 
> -DPACKAGE_SYSCONF_DIR=\""/etc"\" -DPACKAGE_DATA_DIR=\""/usr/share"\" 
> -DPACKAGE_BIN_DIR=\""/usr/bin"\" -DPACKAGE_LOCALSTATE_DIR=\""/var"\" 
> -DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR=\""/usr/share/locale"\" -DPACKAGE_LIB_DIR=\""/usr/lib"\" 
> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT
> -DPOLKIT_BACKEND_I_KNOW_API_IS_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"polkitd-1\" 
> -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include-g -O2 -g 
> -Wall -O2 -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs 
> -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -Wformat -Wformat-security -c -o 
> polkitd-gposixsignal.o `test -f 'gposixsignal.c' || echo './'`gposixsignal.c
> | gposixsignal.c:26:26: error: sys/signalfd.h: No such file or directory
> | gposixsignal.c: In function '_g_posix_signal_source_new':
> | gposixsignal.c:95: warning: implicit declaration of function 'signalfd'
> | gposixsignal.c:95: warning: nested extern declaration of 'signalfd'
> | gposixsignal.c:95: error: 'SFD_NONBLOCK' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
> | gposixsignal.c:95: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> | gposixsignal.c:95: error: for each function it appears in.)
> | gposixsignal.c:95: error: 'SFD_CLOEXEC' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
> | make[4]: *** [polkitd-gposixsignal.o] Error 1
> 
> Full build logs:
>   
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=policykit-1&suite=experimental

Would appreciate some help here from our kfreebsd porters.

Thanks,
Michael


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#602476: policykit-1: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/signalfd.h: No such file or directory

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 602476 + help
Bug #602476 [src:policykit-1] policykit-1: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: sys/signalfd.h: 
No such file or directory
Added tag(s) help.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
602476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602476
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#591882: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 17/11/10 at 21:53 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 21:33 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : 
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:28:54PM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > So, that one is an interesting case, and there are several occurences of
> > > this. It might be a problem in APT. What happens is that, if you install
> > > cimg-dev on lenny, and then upgrade to squeeze, cimg-dev gets removed.
> > > But after the upgrade, you can safely reinstall it. It might be caused
> > > by the handling of Breaks in APT. I'm not sure.
> > 
> > So I have no idea what to do except waiting for other hints or somebody
> > confirming that APT has a problem.
> 
> Same goes for rhythmbox and gnome-core, apparently, and the APT debug
> logs don’t make it easy to understand what happens.

There's already an open APT bug about upgrade issues (#591882, Cced).
Ideally, we would have one bug per type of issue, but I'm having problem
distinguishing the various issues here.

- Lucas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Clone bug to file it also against debian-med

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> clone 601959 -1
Bug#601959: science-linguistics: upgrading from lenny fails
Bug 601959 cloned as bug 603853.

> reassign -1 debian-med
Bug #603853 [science-linguistics] science-linguistics: upgrading from lenny 
fails
Bug reassigned from package 'science-linguistics' to 'debian-med'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions debian-science/0.11.
> retitle -1 debian-med: upgrading from lenny fails
Bug #603853 [debian-med] science-linguistics: upgrading from lenny fails
Changed Bug title to 'debian-med: upgrading from lenny fails' from 
'science-linguistics: upgrading from lenny fails'
> tags -1 pending
Bug #603853 [debian-med] debian-med: upgrading from lenny fails
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #603853 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603853
601959: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601959
-1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603748: [Pkg-erlang-devel] Bug#603748: Bug#603748: CVE-2010-4181

[Moritz Muehlenhoff]

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:51:47PM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Sergei Golovan  wrote:
> >
> > So, I'm closing this bug and will notify YAWS authors shortly.
> >
> 
> The YAWS author has fixed this bug in git repository. I don't think
> that it's necessary
> to apply this patch to YAWS packages in Debian.
> 
> https://github.com/klacke/yaws/commit/29fb4cd7de263d0dc9c82ee8c9b65ad12606326e

Ack. Fortunately Debian/Windows never became reality :-)

Cheers,
Moritz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603748: [Pkg-erlang-devel] Bug#603748: Bug#603748: CVE-2010-4181

[Sergei Golovan]

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Sergei Golovan  wrote:
>
> So, I'm closing this bug and will notify YAWS authors shortly.
>

The YAWS author has fixed this bug in git repository. I don't think
that it's necessary
to apply this patch to YAWS packages in Debian.

https://github.com/klacke/yaws/commit/29fb4cd7de263d0dc9c82ee8c9b65ad12606326e

Cheers!
-- 
Sergei Golovan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

[Moritz Muehlenhoff]

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:13:22PM -0500, Jon Bernard wrote:
> * Moritz Muehlenhoff  wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > > The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> > > that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release as well.
> > > 
> > > > Julien Cristau  writes:
> > > | Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.release
> > > | Subject: Re: Security unblock requests
> > > | Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:13:20 +0200
> > > | Message-ID: <20101023131320.gs3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
> > > |
> > > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 14:37:20 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> More unblock requests:
> > > >> ust/0.7-2.1 -> CVE-2010-3386
> > > >
> > > >  52 files changed, 3116 insertions(+), 1232 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Need more information. Local check:
> > > 
> > > $ debdiff ../build-area/ust_0.7-2.dsc ../build-area/ust_0.7-2.1.dsc | 
> > > lsdiff
> > > ust-0.7/debian/changelog
> > > ust-0.7/debian/patches/CVE-2010-3386--bug598309.diff
> > > ust-0.7/debian/patches/series
> > > 
> > > $ debdiff ../build-area/ust_0.7-2.dsc ../build-area/ust_0.7-2.1.dsc | 
> > > filterdiff -x '*changelog' | wc -l
> > > 50
> > 
> > What is the status? This is still unfixed in Squeeze.
> 
> Hi Moritz, sorry for the delay. I would prefer to backport the upstream
> patch for this bug and create a security update for the version in
> squeeze (version 0.5-1).
> 
> I belive this is the correct thing to do, but I have never dealt with
> a security issue in one of my packages going into a release, so I'm
> a bit nervous about what to do.
> 
> What is your suggestion on how to proceed?

- Create a Squeeze chroot or use a Squeeze installation
- apt-get source ust
- Apply the patch you've referenced
- Set the version to number to "0.5-1+squeeze1" and the "distribution" to 
"testing"
- Build and test
- Send the debdiff to this bug and CC debian-rele...@lists.debian.org for review
- Once acked by them, upload
- Rejoice 

Cheers,
Moritz













-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603841: CVE-2010-4173 libsdp: insecure log file handling

[Moritz Muehlenhoff]

Package: libsdp
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647941
for details.

Please fix this in unstable with an isolated fix and asking
release managers for an unblock afterwards.

Cheers,
Moritz


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de_de.iso-8859...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Bump severity

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 582581 grave
Bug #582581 [monobristol] bristol doesn't start when using monobristol
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'

> tags 582581 sid squeeze
Bug #582581 [monobristol] bristol doesn't start when using monobristol
Added tag(s) squeeze and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
582581: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582581
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: tagging 597047

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 597047 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #597047 [update-notifier] update-notifier: Notification doesn't appear ever 
in minimal graphic system
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
597047: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597047
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597047: update-notifier: Notification doesn't appear ever in minimal graphic system

[Julian Andres Klode]

On Do, 2010-10-07 at 13:13 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Di, 2010-09-21 at 17:49 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > On Do, 2010-09-16 at 11:05 +0400, Stanislav Fyodorov wrote:
> > > Package: update-notifier
> > > Version: 0.99.3debian6
> > > Justification: renders package unusable
> > > Severity: grave
> > > 
> > > I installed Debian squeeze: base system only.
> > > Then I installed some packages:
> > > sudo
> > > pmount
> > > gcc
> > > xserver-xorg
> > > gnome-terminal
> > > metacity
> > > gdm3
> > > gnome-session-common
> > > gnome-control-center
> > > gnome-themes
> > > vim
> > > epiphany
> > > evince
> > > yelp
> > > 
> > > and update-notifier
> > > 
> > > Any notifications do not appear ever.
> > > I tried:
> > > $ ps -e | grep "update"
> > >  2050 ?00:00:00 update-notifier
> > > 
> > > $ sudo /usr/share/update-notifier/notify-reboot-required
> > > $ sudo touch /var/lib/update-notifier/dpkg-run-stamp
> > > Nothing happens and terminal is clean.
> > > 
> > > $ /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check -p
> > > libwebkit-1.0-2
> > > libwebkit-1.0-common
> > > 
> > > $ /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check
> > > 2;0
> > > 
> > > Notification doesn't appear after apt-get update.
> > > 
> > > CDROM detection doesn't give anything.
> > > 
> > > $ sudo killall update-notifier; update-notifier &
> > > [1] 3168
> > > 
> > > My options for update-notifications:
> > > auto_launch false
> > > ..interval 0
> > > 
> > > I have never seen any notification instaed og Preview in 
> > > notiifcation-properties.
> > > 
> > > Probably this package must require something more for declared work. Hope 
> > > we will find out it.
> > Do you have an 'admin' group in /etc/group? That would explain it (see
> > #502392).
> 
> Could you please provide the requested information?
Really, filing an RC bug and then disappearing is not acceptable.

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#603662: software-center does not install anything

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 603662 unreproducible
Bug #603662 [software-center] software-center does not install anything
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603662: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603662: software-center does not install anything

[Julian Andres Klode]

tag 603662 unreproducible
thanks

On Di, 2010-11-16 at 01:48 -0500, AnthonyN wrote:
> Package: software-center
> Version: 2.0.7debian5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> Running testing 32 bit with xfce have it installed multiple times on the same
> hard drive but none are capable of using the software-center.  I have included
> the terminal output I get from all of them when I open the software-center and
> try to install a program.

I have no idea what you are doing, it works perfectly for me. Maybe
Sebastian and/or Michael have an idea.

Sebastian, Michael: Any idea?
> 
>  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/connection.py", line 589, in
> msg_reply_handler
> *message.get_args_list()))
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/bus.py", line 75, in error_cb
> callback('')
>   File "/usr/share/software-
> center/softwarecenter/backend/transactionswatcher.py", line 39, in
> _register_active_transactions_watch
> apt_daemon = aptdaemon.client.get_aptdaemon()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/aptdaemon/client.py", line 1008, in
> get_aptdaemon
> False),
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/bus.py", line 244, in get_object
> follow_name_owner_changes=follow_name_owner_changes)
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/proxies.py", line 241, in __init__
> self._named_service = conn.activate_name_owner(bus_name)
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/bus.py", line 183, in
> activate_name_owner
> self.start_service_by_name(bus_name)
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/bus.py", line 281, in
> start_service_by_name
> 'su', (bus_name, flags)))
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/connection.py", line 630, in
> call_blocking
> message, timeout)
> dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ChildExited:
> Launch helper exited with unknown return code 1
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/connection.py", line 589, in
> msg_reply_handler
> *message.get_args_list()))
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/bus.py", line 75, in error_cb
> callback('')
>   File "/usr/share/software-
> center/softwarecenter/backend/transactionswatcher.py", line 39, in
> _register_active_transactions_watch
> apt_daemon = aptdaemon.client.get_aptdaemon()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/aptdaemon/client.py", line 1008, in
> get_aptdaemon
> False),
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/bus.py", line 244, in get_object
> follow_name_owner_changes=follow_name_owner_changes)
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/proxies.py", line 241, in __init__
> self._named_service = conn.activate_name_owner(bus_name)
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/bus.py", line 183, in
> activate_name_owner
> self.start_service_by_name(bus_name)
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/bus.py", line 281, in
> start_service_by_name
> 'su', (bus_name, flags)))
>   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/connection.py", line 630, in
> call_blocking
> message, timeout)
> dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ChildExited:
> Launch helper exited with unknown return code 1
> /usr/share/software-center/softwarecenter/apt/aptcache.py:40: GtkWarning:
> gtk_container_add: assertion `GTK_IS_CONTAINER (container)' failed
>   gtk.main_iteration()
> /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xapian/__init__.py:6495: DeprecationWarning:
> Single argument form of Enquire::set_sort_by_value_then_relevance() is
> deprecated and will be removed in Xapian 1.3.0
>   "in Xapian 1.3.0", DeprecationWarning)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/share/software-center/softwarecenter/view/softwarepane.py", line
> 162, in on_application_request_action
> action_func()
>   File "/usr/share/software-center/softwarecenter/view/appdetailsview.py", 
> line
> 393, in install
> self.backend.install(self.app.pkgname, self.app.appname, self.iconname)
>   File "/usr/share/software-center/softwarecenter/backend/aptd.py", line 109,
> in install
> error_handler=self._on_trans_error)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/aptdaemon/defer.py", line 489, in
> _deferable_function
> return func(*args, **kwargs)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/aptdaemon/errors.py", line 139, in
> _convert_dbus_exception
> raise get_native_exception(error)
> dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ChildExited:
> Launch helper exited with unknown return code 1
> 
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (500, 'testing')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> 
> Versions of packages software-center depends on:
> ii  app-install-data2010.08.21   Application Installer Data Files
> ii  aptdaemon

Bug#603815: scsh: installation fails

[David Rysdam]

Well, here's what I did: 

sudo apt-get install scsh
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 scsh : Depends: scsh-0.6 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages

With all the same system info as the original bug report.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603815: scsh: installation fails

[Marcos Marado]

I see no problem... Can you please be more specific on what's the problem for 
you?

noori:~# aptitude install scsh
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libelfg0{a} scsh scsh-0.6{a} scsh-common-0.6{a}
0 packages upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 75 not upgraded.
Need to get 3,421 kB of archives. After unpacking 10.4 MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y
Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main libelfg0 i386 0.8.13-1 
[56.0 kB]
Get:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main scsh-common-0.6 all 
0.6.7-7 [382 kB]
Get:3 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main scsh-0.6 i386 0.6.7-7 
[2,980 kB]
Get:4 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main scsh all 0.6.6.3 [2,738 B]
Fetched 3,421 kB in 7s (482 kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package libelfg0.
(Reading database ... 238584 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libelfg0 (from .../libelfg0_0.8.13-1_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package scsh-common-0.6.
Unpacking scsh-common-0.6 (from .../scsh-common-0.6_0.6.7-7_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package scsh-0.6.
Unpacking scsh-0.6 (from .../scsh-0.6_0.6.7-7_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package scsh.
Unpacking scsh (from .../archives/scsh_0.6.6.3_all.deb) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up libelfg0 (0.8.13-1) ...
Setting up scsh-common-0.6 (0.6.7-7) ...
Setting up scsh-0.6 (0.6.7-7) ...
Setting up scsh (0.6.6.3) ...

noori:~# scsh
Welcome to scsh 0.6.7 (R6RS)
Type ,? for help.
>

-- 
Marcos Marado



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603598: marked as done (Psql binary license incompatibility)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:33:34 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#603598: fixed in postgresql-8.4 8.4.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #603598,
regarding Psql binary license incompatibility
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
603598: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: postgresql-client
Version: 8.3.12-0lenny1
Severity: serious

During a general conversation about readline licensing, I noticed that psql
links to both libreadline (GPL v2+) and libssl (BSD-like, incompatible with
the GPL), thus ending up with the terms of both licenses applying. My
reasoning is that since the licenses are incompatible with each other, the
binary is technically undistributable. The consensus on #debian-devel was that
this reasoning is correct.

Upstream claims that it should be possible to replace readline with libedit,
and I noticed that libeditline is another option. It would of course be
preferable to use one of those instead of disabling the functionality
completely.

I decided to file this against the version of the package in lenny, since it
in my understanding applies to all versions currently distributed by Debian
(the one in lenny being the oldest).

-- 
Arto Jantunen


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: postgresql-8.4
Source-Version: 8.4.5-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
postgresql-8.4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libecpg-compat3_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/libecpg-compat3_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
libecpg-dev_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/libecpg-dev_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
libecpg6_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/libecpg6_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
libpgtypes3_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/libpgtypes3_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
libpq-dev_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/libpq-dev_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
libpq5_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/libpq5_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-8.4_8.4.5-2.diff.gz
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-8.4_8.4.5-2.diff.gz
postgresql-8.4_8.4.5-2.dsc
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-8.4_8.4.5-2.dsc
postgresql-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-client-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-client-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-client_8.4.5-2_all.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-client_8.4.5-2_all.deb
postgresql-contrib-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-contrib-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-contrib_8.4.5-2_all.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-contrib_8.4.5-2_all.deb
postgresql-doc-8.4_8.4.5-2_all.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-doc-8.4_8.4.5-2_all.deb
postgresql-doc_8.4.5-2_all.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-doc_8.4.5-2_all.deb
postgresql-plperl-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-plperl-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-plpython-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-plpython-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-pltcl-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-pltcl-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-server-dev-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql-server-dev-8.4_8.4.5-2_amd64.deb
postgresql_8.4.5-2_all.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-8.4/postgresql_8.4.5-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 603...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Martin Pitt  (supplier of updated postgresql-8.4 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:02:46 +0100
Source: postgresql-8.4
Binary: libpq-dev libpq5 libecpg6 libecpg-dev libecpg-compat3 libpgtypes3 
postgresql-8.4 postgresql-client-8.4 postgresql-server-dev-8.4 
postgresql-doc-8.4 postgresql-contrib-8.4 postgresql-plperl-8.4 
postgresql-plpython-8.4 postgresql-pltcl-8.4 postgresql postgresql-client 
postgresql-doc postgresql-contrib
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 8.4.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Pitt 
Changed-By: Martin Pitt 
Description: 
 

Bug#603770: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: Out of date checksum again)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:21:00 +
with message-id <20101117172100.ga29...@master.debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#603770: flashplugin-nonfree: Out of date checksum again
has caused the Debian Bug report #603770,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree: Out of date checksum again
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
603770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:2.8.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Adobe has again updated their flash player version 10 (now dated Nov. 11, 2010)

Attempting to install gives the following error:

   ERROR: sha512sum rejected install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz
   More information might be available at:
 http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer

For this package to be usable for any period of time, it needs to not use 
a fixed built-in checksum (which I assume is the source of the error).
Otherwise, it could be broken again by Adobe doing a new release the day
after this is fixed, or the day of the next Debian release for that matter.

Possibly it could give a warning on checksum error and allow the user to
decide whether or not to install rather than failing outright.  I realize
there are potential problems with this approach too, but the current approach
is badly broken and this might make it less of a problem.  FWIW.

-- Package-specific info:
Debian version: squeeze/sid
Architecture: i386
Package version: 1:2.8.2
MD5 checksums:
md5sum: /var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree/*: No such file or directory
md5sum: /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so: No such file or 
directory
Alternatives:
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for flash-mozilla.so.
ls: cannot access /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so: No such 
file or directory
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so: ERROR: cannot open 
`/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so' (No such file or directory)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages flashplugin-nonfree depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36 Debian configuration management sy
ii  gnupg 1.4.10-4   GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.30.0-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libcairo2 1.8.10-6   The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libcurl3-gnutls   7.21.0-1   Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libfontconfig12.8.0-2.1  generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.4.2-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.4.5-6  GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.24.2-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.20.1-2   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libnspr4-0d   4.8.6-1NetScape Portable Runtime Library
ii  libnss3-1d3.12.8-1   Network Security Service libraries
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.28.3-1   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libstdc++64.4.5-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  2:1.3.3-3  X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6  2:1.1.2-1  X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxt61:1.0.7-1  X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  wget  1.12-2.1   retrieves files from the web

flashplugin-nonfree recommends no packages.

Versions of packages flashplugin-nonfree suggests:
pn  flashplugin-nonfree-extrasoun  (no description available)
ii  iceweasel 3.5.15-1   Web browser based on Firefox
pn  konqueror-nsplugins(no description available)
ii  msttcorefonts 2.7transitional dummy package
ii  ttf-dejavu2.31-1 Metapackage to pull in ttf-dejavu-
ii  ttf-mscorefonts-installer [ms 3.3Installer for Microsoft TrueType c
pn  ttf-xfree86-nonfree(no description available)
ii  x-ttcidfont-conf  32 TrueType and CID fonts configurati

-- debconf information:
  flashplugin-nonfree/httpget: false
  flashplugin-nonfree/not_exist:
  flash

Bug#603737: www-myspace-perl 0.92 unusable; not suitable for squeeze

[gregor herrmann]

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:51:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> > Dear release team, could you please remove libwww-myspace-perl from
> > testing?
> Removal hint added.

Thanks, Adam!


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Beatles


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 603598

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 603598 + pending
Bug #603598 [postgresql-client-8.4] Psql binary license incompatibility
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603598: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#538822: Bug#546528: [PATCH] make dash's preinst a C binary

[Jonathan Nieder]

Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:

>> * the preinst isn't idempotent
>> - from a few quick tests, it looks like this could be resolved by changing
>> the execution order to "cp, ln, divert" rather than "divert, cp, ln"; I
>> may have missed something, however
>
> Technically one would need
> 
>   # nothing except dash prerm seems to care about the .distrib
>   # file, so this is relatively safe.
>   cp -dp $dfile $distrib
> 
>   # ln -sf is not idempotent, though ln -s to temporary + mv is.
>   ln -sf $ltarget $tmpfile
>   mv -f $tmpfile $dfile
> 
>   dpkg-divert --package dash --divert $distrib --add $dfile
> 
> The window when this can happen is very short, and the failure modes
> are not so bad (except if ln -sf is interrupted in the middle.  That
> one would mean no /bin/sh).

To be precise, of course "ln -sf dash /bin/sh" is idempotent; it's just that
it's not safe to interrupt it because it works by calling unlink() followed
by symlink().  Sorry for the lack of clarify.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 603807 pending
Bug #603807 [faad] faad segfaults on amd64 due to incorrect pointer size
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603807: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603807
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#538822: Bug#546528: [PATCH] make dash's preinst a C binary

[Jonathan Nieder]

Hi,

Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> This bug report seems to have branched in to a couple of issues relating
> to dash's use of diversions and its use as /bin/sh, rather than the
> original issue of whether the preinst should be moved to something that
> doesn't rely on /bin/sh working; some of these should probably be moved
> elsewhere:

Thanks, this is a good summary.

> * handling of local diversions
> - already #538822
> - as such diversions must have been manually added, for squeeze this may
> be a documented upgrade issue (in the release notes)

This was advertised by bash as the way to use dash as /bin/sh for a long
time.

An automagic upgrade is a lovely thing, but for a few reasons this
seems less important than the other issues, especially:

 - it's a noisy failure, not silent breakage.
 - if those diversions were added in order to set dash as /bin/sh,
   it's easy to repair.

> * extending the handling of /bin/sh to include more shells than bash and dash
> - definitely post-squeeze material

That's probably the right choice, since only one person seems to be
working on it. :(

This is a serious regression from lenny.  I wish it would be fixed
soon in squeeze-backports at least.

The main component (an upgrade path in bash to remove /bin/sh from its
files list without disturbing the configured shell) has been written
and seems to work fine.  See Bug#602483.  I have some cosmetic
improvements saved up for that patch but I can't tell if there's any
interest...

To be clear, anyone can help out with this; it does not have to be a
release manager or bash maintainer.  A nice first step to work towards
would be a collection of updated packages in experimental, so we can
have people test it.

> * the preinst isn't idempotent
> - from a few quick tests, it looks like this could be resolved by changing
> the execution order to "cp, ln, divert" rather than "divert, cp, ln"; I
> may have missed something, however

Technically one would need

# nothing except dash prerm seems to care about the .distrib
# file, so this is relatively safe.
cp -dp $dfile $distrib

# ln -sf is not idempotent, though ln -s to temporary + mv is.
ln -sf $ltarget $tmpfile
mv -f $tmpfile $dfile

dpkg-divert --package dash --divert $distrib --add $dfile

The window when this can happen is very short, and the failure modes
are not so bad (except if ln -sf is interrupted in the middle.  That
one would mean no /bin/sh).

> * make it a /bin/bash script instead
>
> This is a "no brainer" change in terms of ensuring correctness; no changes
> are required to the remainder of the script.  It does mean that dash can't
> be reinstalled in a situation where the installation of bash is damaged.

That is not a big problem.  dash can't be reinstalled in a situation
where the installation of libc is damaged, either.  In practice what
you would do is, from an open shell,

 1. Reinstall bash.
 2. Reinstall dash.

and all is well again.

> * make it a compiled C program
>
> This means that dash can be reinstalled in situations where both bash and
> dash are damaged or otherwise unavailable and means dash doesn't require
> bash.  Both of these are certainly reasonable goals, but this approach is
> a more fundamental change and may be more difficult to test, so the
> question is whether the potential gains are worth the risk at this stage
> of the release process.

I think this could be done safely, but the effect on maintainability
just doesn't seem worth it.

> Regards,

Thanks.
Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#582311: c-icap in squeeze volatile?

[Mathieu Parent (Debian)]

2010/11/16 Moritz Muehlenhoff :
...
> Squid 3.1 supports ICAP.

Yes, as a client. But I am searching for an ICAP server and not an ICAP client.

Regards

Mathieu Parent



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603817: felix-latin: Missing dependency: felix-data

[loos]

Package: felix-latin
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable

felix-latin depends on felix-data which is unavailable, 
there is a package called felix-latin-data which can be the one that should be 
referenced.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603815: scsh: installation fails

[David Rysdam]

Package: scsh
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Seems to be a package naming problem, but I'm too much of a n00b to
tell what to check beyond that.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#601859: Can't install package, post-installation script returns -1

[Gerfried Fuchs]

Hi!

* Ole Laursen  [2010-10-30 13:37:09 CEST]:
> Package: wesnoth-1.9-core
> Version: 1:1.9.1-1
> Severity: grave
> 
> Can't install the package, got a big bunch of errors from aptitude
> when I installed wesnoth-1.9, seems to come from the postinst script:
> 
> ole:~/$ LANG=C sudo dpkg --configure wesnoth-1.9-core
> Setting up wesnoth-1.9-core (1:1.9.1-1) ...
> dpkg: error processing wesnoth-1.9-core (--configure):
>  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  wesnoth-1.9-core
> 
> I tried commenting out the divert_oldfiles function in
> wesnoth-1.9-core.postinst and now it works. Maybe the script just
> terminates immediately from the "set -e" at the top if the grep
> commands return 1?

 Ouch, right. Will take a look at it, though given that this is a
development release it's not that high on my agenda - I guess I will get
around to fix it for the next upstream release of 1.9.3, whenever that
might be.

> Another oddity is that the editor script is
> /usr/games/wesnoth-1.9_editor (with underscore) contrary to the other
> scripts that are with hyphen, e.g. wesnoth-1.9-nolog.

 That's because the editor script originally was named wesnoth_editor by
upstream. wesnoth-nolog is a wrapper script that redirects output to
/dev/null. They are historically named that way so I won't change that
part.

> By the way, why is it installing in /usr/games instead of /usr/bin?
> That's weird. Is that a leftover from old Unix structure?

 That's part of the FHS. No games are meant to install into the regular
/usr/bin path so they don't clutter the path for the root account (which
doesn't have /usr/games in its $PATH).

> PS: Thanks for packaging wesnoth, I'm going to have my first try at it
> now. :)

 Please notice that wesnoth-1.9 is the development branch and every
update in that version might potentially be incompatible with the former
version, in case of safegames and similar. If you want to take on a
campaign you are well adviced to install wesnoth-1.8 instead and start
from there.

 Thanks,
Rhonda



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603303: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#603303: Bug#603303: ttf-oriya-fonts: purge does not remove oriya fonts from defoma cache

[Kartik Mistry]

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Christian PERRIER  wrote:
>> dpkg --purge ttf-oriya-fonts does NOT tell defoma to update its cache
>> correspondingly.  This is seriously troublesome due to the fact that oriya is
>
> Well, there is no reason as the package no longer provide any
> defoma-related crap.
>
> So, I suspect an upgrade path where this purge failed to happen, for
> an unknown reason.
>
> In any case, if both the following do *not* leave any trace of defoma,
> I'd recommend downgrading this nug to "normal":
>
> - install the package on a clean system, then purge it
> - install the version from lenny, upgrade, then purge

Interesting test case from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/

It looks that we don't have ttf-oriya in above list :)

-- 
Kartik Mistry
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
IRC: kart_ | Identica: @kartikm



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603599: marked as done (Psql binary license incompatibility)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:03:24 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#603599: fixed in postgresql-9.0 9.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #603599,
regarding Psql binary license incompatibility
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
603599: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603599
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: postgresql-client
Version: 8.3.12-0lenny1
Severity: serious

During a general conversation about readline licensing, I noticed that psql
links to both libreadline (GPL v2+) and libssl (BSD-like, incompatible with
the GPL), thus ending up with the terms of both licenses applying. My
reasoning is that since the licenses are incompatible with each other, the
binary is technically undistributable. The consensus on #debian-devel was that
this reasoning is correct.

Upstream claims that it should be possible to replace readline with libedit,
and I noticed that libeditline is another option. It would of course be
preferable to use one of those instead of disabling the functionality
completely.

I decided to file this against the version of the package in lenny, since it
in my understanding applies to all versions currently distributed by Debian
(the one in lenny being the oldest).

-- 
Arto Jantunen


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: postgresql-9.0
Source-Version: 9.0.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
postgresql-9.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libecpg-compat3_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/libecpg-compat3_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
libecpg-dev_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/libecpg-dev_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
libecpg6_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/libecpg6_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
libpgtypes3_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/libpgtypes3_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
libpq-dev_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/libpq-dev_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
libpq5_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/libpq5_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-9.0_9.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-9.0_9.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
postgresql-9.0_9.0.1-2.dsc
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-9.0_9.0.1-2.dsc
postgresql-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-client-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-client-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-client_9.0.1-2_all.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-client_9.0.1-2_all.deb
postgresql-contrib-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-contrib-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-contrib_9.0.1-2_all.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-contrib_9.0.1-2_all.deb
postgresql-doc-9.0_9.0.1-2_all.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-doc-9.0_9.0.1-2_all.deb
postgresql-doc_9.0.1-2_all.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-doc_9.0.1-2_all.deb
postgresql-plperl-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-plperl-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-plpython-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-plpython-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-pltcl-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-pltcl-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
postgresql-server-dev-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql-server-dev-9.0_9.0.1-2_amd64.deb
postgresql_9.0.1-2_all.deb
  to main/p/postgresql-9.0/postgresql_9.0.1-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 603...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Martin Pitt  (supplier of updated postgresql-9.0 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:07:58 +0100
Source: postgresql-9.0
Binary: libpq-dev libpq5 libecpg6 libecpg-dev libecpg-compat3 libpgtypes3 
postgresql-9.0 postgresql-client-9.0 postgresql-server-dev-9.0 
postgresql-doc-9.0 postgresql-contrib-9.0 postgresql-plperl-9.0 
postgresql-plpython-9.0 postgresql-pltcl-9.0 postgresql postgresql-client 
postgresql-doc postgresql-contrib
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 9.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Pitt 
Changed-By: Martin Pitt 
Des

Bug#603680: libnautilus-extension1: breaks nautilus-share upgrade from lenny

[Holger Levsen]

Hi David,

On Mittwoch, 17. November 2010, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> the message I meant was:
> > >   E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be
> > > caused by held packages.
>
> that should be an error message from APT and I can't trigger this one -
> it would be a serious problem if APT would really print that on a normal
> dist-upgrade try (without holds of course)…

Ah. (piuparts doenst use holds.)

> I wouldn't say force, I would "just" recommend it. Its not a strict
> requirement as this specific case is handled by the recommends
> which are activated by default. Other cases will lead to the removal
> of the offending package, which is awkward, but not fatal as it can
> be reinstalled if needed after the upgrade. Also, as said, the notes
> already recommend a split upgrade by first 'upgrade' and then
> 'dist-upgrade' which should take care of getting a new apt & friends
> in as well in most (not all) cases.

Right. I could piuparts do that too, though I'm not convinced I should, unless 
the notes explicitly say one has to.

> >> P.P.S.: Offtopic, but Holger, why does piuparts uses --fix-broken
> >> switch?
> > where do you see this?
> "apt-get -yf dist-upgrade" in your steps -- the -f stands for --fix-broken

Ah. piuparts creates a piuparts-depends-dummy package for the first 
installation of the package, for reasons which are hidden in the history of 
the project... ;-) This packages has all the depends (and conflicts) of the 
package to be tested and is installed with dpkg. Then apt-get install -f is 
run... I _assume_ thats why the -f is also used for apt-get dist-upgrade.

This is code I took over from Lars and it's not the only part where I havent 
fully understood the reasons behind it. But there is work on it being done: 
#588041 #603453

(The master-slave mode of piuparts has another package relationship resolving 
mechanism...)


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#603680: libnautilus-extension1: breaks nautilus-share upgrade from lenny

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

if you intend to reply to this subthread, please use the 587279 bug.

On Mittwoch, 17. November 2010, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I do not think it is correct to ever upgrade a free package to a non-free
> one. Now, apt is not at fault, the problem rather lie in a strange
> interpretation of policy 2.1.2 by some developers. But we cannot ignore the
   2.2.1
> issue either.

No. The "problem" lies in people adding non-free and contrib to their sources. 
So I think apt is actually right in those cases to upgrade to a non-free 
alternative. It's the users choice.

Bill, so far you're the only one in #587279 objecting to the clarification 
making the what-you-call "strange interpretation" crystal clear (and 
following the way it was always handled).


cheers,
Holger



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 603807 https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3110758
Bug #603807 [faad] faad segfaults on amd64 due to incorrect pointer size
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3110758'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603807: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603807
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603807: faad segfaults on amd64 due to incorrect pointer size

[Alessio Treglia]

Package: faad
Version: 2.7-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch sid squeeze upstream

This bug was reported on Ubuntu [1] and it affects Debian Squeeze too.
I've tried to reproduce it and here is the result:

ales...@alessio-laptop:~$ faad -b 2 -f 2 -w sample.aac 
 *** Ahead Software MPEG-4 AAC Decoder V2.7 **

 Build: Oct 26 2009
 Copyright 2002-2004: Ahead Software AG
 http://www.audiocoding.com
 Floating point version

 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 it under the terms of the GNU General Public License.

 **

sample.aac file info:
ADTS, 4.608 sec, 13 kbps, 16000 Hz

  -
 | Config:  2 Ch   |
  -
 | Ch |Position|
  -
 | 00 | Left front |
 | 01 | Right front|
  -

Segmentation fault.aac.


A patch to fix this is available on Launchpad, I'm attaching it here:

--- frontend/audio.c.orig   2010-10-24 15:36:19.673485313 +0800
+++ frontend/audio.c2010-10-24 15:36:43.323775214 +0800
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@
 {
 int ret;
 unsigned int i;
-long *sample_buffer24 = (long*)sample_buffer;
+int *sample_buffer24 = (int*)sample_buffer;
 char *data = malloc(samples*aufile->bits_per_sample*sizeof(char)/8);
 
 aufile->total_samples += samples;
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@
 {
 int ret;
 unsigned int i;
-long *sample_buffer32 = (long*)sample_buffer;
+int *sample_buffer32 = (int*)sample_buffer;
 char *data = malloc(samples*aufile->bits_per_sample*sizeof(char)/8);
 
 aufile->total_samples += samples;


[1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/665802

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages faad depends on:
ii  libc6 2.11.2-7   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfaad2  2.7-4  freeware Advanced Audio Decoder - 

faad recommends no packages.

faad suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603680: libnautilus-extension1: breaks nautilus-share upgrade from lenny

[Bill Allombert]

[Debian policy: For reference, this is bug #603680.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:59:00PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:34, Bill Allombert
>  wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:35:55PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> [… snip …]
> >> apt-squeeze recently (see #591882) got a third option:
> >> c) try installing another or-group member
> >>
> >> Note that while c) seems to be the "captain obvious" solution it introduces
> >> a big problem: a) and b) reduce the number of broken packages,
> >> but c) can add a lot more which could (real-world will tell if really)
> >> work against the current resolver determinism…
> >
> > Probably option c) should be removed. This makes upgrade process much less 
> > predictable.
> > An secondary issue with option c) is that this can lead apt to upgrade free
> > packages with non-free packages, if non-free packages are listed as 
> > alternative.
> 
> Only if the free package is uninstallable in squeeze, but in this case a
> new installation has the same result.

Not necessarily: during an upgrade there are much more constraint to satisfy
that during an installation, as this is the case here.

> APT will try to fix the free package before it tries to fix the packages
> depending on the free one, so the non-free option is still only the fallback.

I do not think it is correct to ever upgrade a free package to a non-free one.
Now, apt is not at fault, the problem rather lie in a strange interpretation of
policy 2.1.2 by some developers. But we cannot ignore the issue either.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. 

Imagine a large red swirl here.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#546528: [PATCH] make dash's preinst a C binary

[Adam D. Barratt]

Hi,

This bug report seems to have branched in to a couple of issues relating
to dash's use of diversions and its use as /bin/sh, rather than the
original issue of whether the preinst should be moved to something that
doesn't rely on /bin/sh working; some of these should probably be moved
elsewhere:

* handling of local diversions
- already #538822
- as such diversions must have been manually added, for squeeze this may
be a documented upgrade issue (in the release notes)

* extending the handling of /bin/sh to include more shells than bash and dash
- definitely post-squeeze material

* the preinst isn't idempotent
- from a few quick tests, it looks like this could be resolved by changing
the execution order to "cp, ln, divert" rather than "divert, cp, ln"; I
may have missed something, however

That leaves us with the question of what should be done in terms of not
having dash's preinst be a /bin/sh script.  I think everyone agrees that
this should be done; the current suggestions appear to be:

* make it a /bin/bash script instead

This is a "no brainer" change in terms of ensuring correctness; no changes
are required to the remainder of the script.  It does mean that dash can't
be reinstalled in a situation where the installation of bash is damaged.

* make it a compiled C program

This means that dash can be reinstalled in situations where both bash and
dash are damaged or otherwise unavailable and means dash doesn't require
bash.  Both of these are certainly reasonable goals, but this approach is
a more fundamental change and may be more difficult to test, so the
question is whether the potential gains are worth the risk at this stage
of the release process.

The transition to dash-as-bin-sh won't realistically allow users to remove
bash from squeeze systems without both overriding the package manager and
careful consideration of the consequences in any case - bash is still
essential and there are therefore a number of packages which ship
/bin/bash scripts with no dependency (devscripts being an example I know
ottomh).

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#602888: anything-el: Dependencies missing

[Takaya Yamashita]

Thanks for bug report.

On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:42:25 +0100 (CET)
Richard Levitte  wrote:

> During the installation of this package, it complained because 
> I hadn't installed the following packages:
> 
> - cogre

Hmm...
I cannot reproduce the problem.
Please send more detail for the problem.

> - auto-install-el

It is true that anything-el depends on auto-install-el.
I think anything-el doesn't have to depends on auto-instlal.
So, I created a patch.
This problem is solved of the next release.

---
Best Regards,

 .''`.   Takaya Yamashita
: :'  :  takaya At debian.or.jp
`. `'`   yamashita At takaya.biz
  `- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603732: marked as done (man-db: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lpipeline)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:54:25 +
with message-id <20101117125425.ga3...@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#603732: man-db: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lpipeline
has caused the Debian Bug report #603732,
regarding man-db: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lpipeline
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
603732: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603732
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: man-db
Version: 2.5.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Hi Colin,

your package FTBFS everywhere, with:
|   CCLD   libman.la
| /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpipeline
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Full build logs:
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=man-db&suite=experimental

Mraw,
KiBi.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: man-db
Source-Version: 2.5.9-1

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:23:28PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:55:32PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Colin Watson  (16/11/2010):
> > > This is probably because I forgot to make libpipeline-dev depend on
> > > libpipeline1.  Could you turn these failures into a dep-wait on
> > > libpipeline-dev (>= 1.0.0-3), please?  I think it will work better
> > > with that version.
> > 
> > I did so for “my” archs (kfreebsd-* && sparc). I can do so for others
> > as well if that turns out to be sufficient.
> 
> Thanks.  I see kfreebsd-* worked.  A few (alpha, amd64, s390) failed for
> other reasons, and I had to release 2.5.9 in a hurry to deal with this;
> that should clear up all the remaining build failures.

And let's try actually closing the bug this time, as I intended ...

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@debian.org]

--- End Message ---

Processed: notfound 603732 in man-db/2.5.9-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> notfound 603732 man-db/2.5.9-1
Bug #603732 [src:man-db] man-db: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lpipeline
Bug No longer marked as found in versions man-db/2.5.9-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603732: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603732
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603732: man-db: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lpipeline

[Colin Watson]

Source: man-db
Source-Version: 2.5.9-1

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:55:32PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Colin Watson  (16/11/2010):
> > This is probably because I forgot to make libpipeline-dev depend on
> > libpipeline1.  Could you turn these failures into a dep-wait on
> > libpipeline-dev (>= 1.0.0-3), please?  I think it will work better
> > with that version.
> 
> I did so for “my” archs (kfreebsd-* && sparc). I can do so for others
> as well if that turns out to be sufficient.

Thanks.  I see kfreebsd-* worked.  A few (alpha, amd64, s390) failed for
other reasons, and I had to release 2.5.9 in a hurry to deal with this;
that should clear up all the remaining build failures.

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@debian.org]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603680: libnautilus-extension1: breaks nautilus-share upgrade from lenny

[David Kalnischkies]

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:34, Bill Allombert
 wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:35:55PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
[… snip …]
>> apt-squeeze recently (see #591882) got a third option:
>> c) try installing another or-group member
>>
>> Note that while c) seems to be the "captain obvious" solution it introduces
>> a big problem: a) and b) reduce the number of broken packages,
>> but c) can add a lot more which could (real-world will tell if really)
>> work against the current resolver determinism…
>
> Probably option c) should be removed. This makes upgrade process much less 
> predictable.
> An secondary issue with option c) is that this can lead apt to upgrade free
> packages with non-free packages, if non-free packages are listed as 
> alternative.

Only if the free package is uninstallable in squeeze, but in this case a
new installation has the same result.
APT will try to fix the free package before it tries to fix the packages
depending on the free one, so the non-free option is still only the fallback.

Or could you provide a case in which it behaves differently?


Best regards

David Kalnischkies



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603680: libnautilus-extension1: breaks nautilus-share upgrade from lenny

[David Kalnischkies]

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:24, Holger Levsen  wrote:
> On Dienstag, 16. November 2010, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> First of all: I can't reproduce this E:-message,
>
> thats from piuparts...

the message I meant was:
> >   E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be
> > caused by held packages.

that should be an error message from APT and I can't trigger this one -
it would be a serious problem if APT would really print that on a normal
dist-upgrade try (without holds of course)…


>> So, what we could do now?
>> If i see it correctly, we basically have two options:
>> a) use a newer apt for upgrade
>> b) drop the or
>>
>> b) isn't really an option as other cases will arise (and have already)
>
> or you aware of any? Cause if it's really just a few packages, it sounds
> better to fix those, than to force/recommmend everyone to upgrade apt first.

I wouldn't say force, I would "just" recommend it. Its not a strict
requirement as this specific case is handled by the recommends
which are activated by default. Other cases will lead to the removal
of the offending package, which is awkward, but not fatal as it can
be reinstalled if needed after the upgrade. Also, as said, the notes
already recommend a split upgrade by first 'upgrade' and then
'dist-upgrade' which should take care of getting a new apt & friends
in as well in most (not all) cases.

The general likelihood of this should be relatively low, given that you
need an or-group in a candidate version which if upgraded alone can
be satisfied with an installed package while the candidate of this
package is unsuitable for satisfying it.
Should only happen in <> P.P.S.: Offtopic, but Holger, why does piuparts uses --fix-broken switch?
>
> where do you see this?

"apt-get -yf dist-upgrade" in your steps -- the -f stands for --fix-broken


Best regards

David Kalnischkies



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603785: desktop-base and debian-edu-artwork: error when trying to install together

[Holger Levsen]

On Mittwoch, 17. November 2010, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> I guess this could be managed by an alternative too?

though I might use diversions as a.) I know how to use them and b.) 
#424879 :-)



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#603677: closed by Don Armstrong (reply to ow...@bugs.debian.ogr) (Re: Bug#603677: closed by Julien Cristau (Re: Bug#603677: jabberd14 has incomplete depende

[Dmitry E. Oboukhov]

JC> jcris...@franck:~$ dak ls -a i386 jabberd14
JC> jabberd14 | 1.6.1.1-5+b1 |   testing | i386
JC> jabberd14 | 1.6.1.1-5+b1 |  unstable | i386

jabberd14_1.6.1.1-5+b1_i386.deb 16-Nov-2010 18:18   347K


Ok, it seems to be solved since Yesterday evening, thanks!


-- 
... mpd is off

. ''`.   Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’  :   email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru
`. `~’  GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21
  `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555  E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#603785: desktop-base and debian-edu-artwork: error when trying to install together

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

On Mittwoch, 17. November 2010, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> I guess this could be managed by an alternative too?

good idea, thanks!


cheers,
Holger



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#603677: closed by Don Armstrong (reply to ow...@bugs.debian.ogr) (Re: Bug#603677: closed by Julien Cristau (Re: Bug#603677: jabberd14 has incomplete depende

[Dmitry E. Oboukhov]

DA> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
>> The problem is still reproducible. So or this or 550650 (was done 11
>> Oct) or the other RC must be open (for ex against buildd), but You
>> (You and Julien) prefer to keep your eyes closed. It's a pity.

DA> It's not an RC bug; at most it is severity important.

User upgrades his system and then jabber-server becomes broken. It is
grave severity:

=quote
makes the package *in question unusable* or mostly so, or causes
data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the
accounts of users who use the package.
=cut


DA> [1] Secondly,
DA> this bug only occurs if you've managed to only upgrade jabberd14,


1. When squeeze is released, many people will do like that.
2. I had the bug without upgrade: 
2.1 I had clean lenny
2.2 I added squeeze into sources.list
2.3 I installed jabberd14
2.4 I got the problem


DA> and not libidn11.


DA> This bug is actually a bug in libidn11, not jabberd14,

I agree, but bug against libidn11 was closed 11 Oct,
Now is 17 Nov, bug is still reproducible. So I think that including
version into depends will solve this problem. Or broken libidn11
must be replaced in debian repos.
Until problem is solved a bug must be opened: the problem is exists
and reproducible.

DA> which has already been fixed, and the solution is rebuilding
DA> jabberd14, which has (supposedly) already been queued.

It fits for testing, but I'm afraid that when squeeze is released
and this problem wont be solved: there is no bugreport which is opened.

-- 
... mpd is off

. ''`.   Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’  :   email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru
`. `~’  GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21
  `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555  E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#602810: #602810 ia32-libs fails in postinst due to wrong version conditioning prior to dpkg-divert

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Hi,

The diversion code in postinst was changed some time ago. Please verify
that the problem no longer exists in testing/unstable.

MfG
Goswin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: fixed 602810 in 20100914

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 602810 20100914
Bug #602810 [ia32-libs] ia32-libs fails in postinst due to wrong version 
conditioning prior to dpkg-divert
Bug Marked as fixed in versions ia32-libs/20100914.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
602810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602810
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603677: closed by Don Armstrong (reply to ow...@bugs.debian.ogr) (Re: Bug#603677: closed by Julien Cristau (Re: Bug#603677: jabberd14 has incomplete depende

[Julien Cristau]

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:32:47 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> > The problem is still reproducible. So or this or 550650 (was done 11
> > Oct) or the other RC must be open (for ex against buildd), but You
> > (You and Julien) prefer to keep your eyes closed. It's a pity.
> 
> It's not an RC bug; at most it is severity important.[1] Secondly,
> this bug only occurs if you've managed to only upgrade jabberd14, and
> not libidn11. This bug is actually a bug in libidn11, not jabberd14,
> which has already been fixed, and the solution is rebuilding
> jabberd14, which has (supposedly) already been queued.
> 
jcris...@franck:~$ dak ls -a i386 jabberd14
 jabberd14 | 1.6.1.1-5+b1 |   testing | i386
 jabberd14 | 1.6.1.1-5+b1 |  unstable | i386

jcris...@franck:~$ zcat 
/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz 
|grep-dctrl -PX jabberd14 -sPackage,Version,Depends
Package: jabberd14
Version: 1.6.1.1-5+b1
Depends: adduser, lsb-base (>= 3.0-6), openssl, libjabberd2 (= 1.6.1.1-5+b1), 
libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6~), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libidn11 (>= 1.13), libmysqlclient16 
(>= 5.1.21-1), libpopt0 (>= 1.16), libpq5 (>= 8.4~), libpth20 (>= 2.0.7), 
libstdc++6 (>= 4.4.0)

There was no point keeping this bug open once the rebuild had been
queued (there was nothing to fix in the source package in the first
place), and there's even less point arguing about it now that it's in
the archive.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#603785: desktop-base and debian-edu-artwork: error when trying to install together

[Yves-Alexis Perez]

On mer., 2010-11-17 at 10:13 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Yay.
> 
> debian-edu-artwork used to conflict with desktop-base for exactly this
> reason, 
> I'll see if there is a better solution though.
> 
I guess this could be managed by an alternative too?
-- 
Yves-Alexis


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Processed: reassign 603679 to ia32-libs-dev

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 603679 ia32-libs-dev
Bug #603679 [ia32-libs-dev] ia32-libs-dev: uninstallable on ia64
Ignoring request to reassign bug #603679 to the same package
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603679: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603679
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603677: closed by Don Armstrong (reply to ow...@bugs.debian.ogr) (Re: Bug#603677: closed by Julien Cristau (Re: Bug#603677: jabberd14 has incomplete depende

[Don Armstrong]

On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> The problem is still reproducible. So or this or 550650 (was done 11
> Oct) or the other RC must be open (for ex against buildd), but You
> (You and Julien) prefer to keep your eyes closed. It's a pity.

It's not an RC bug; at most it is severity important.[1] Secondly,
this bug only occurs if you've managed to only upgrade jabberd14, and
not libidn11. This bug is actually a bug in libidn11, not jabberd14,
which has already been fixed, and the solution is rebuilding
jabberd14, which has (supposedly) already been queued.

As such, there's no point in keeping this bug open at all, once the
build has been queued. I was under the mistaken impression that Julien
was the maintainer (since I didn't bother to check), but that doesn't
change the facts surrounding this bug.

 
Don Armstrong

1: important: a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a
package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone. [See
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities for more details.]
-- 
Debian's not really about the users or the software at all. It's a
large flame-generating engine that the cabal uses to heat their coffee
 -- Andrew Suffield (#debian-devel Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:34 -0500)

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603680: libnautilus-extension1: breaks nautilus-share upgrade from lenny

[Bill Allombert]

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:35:55PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 15:21, Holger Levsen  wrote:
> > as I was asked on IRC, this is how piuparts modifies apt+dpkgs
> > defaults,  "most interestingly" it doesnt install recommends...:
> 
> And that is the reason. (or at least the trigger)
> 
> First of all: I can't reproduce this E:-message, what i can see on the other
> hand is that apt-lenny chooses to remove nautilus-share while apt-squeeze
> doesn't if you disable installation of recommends -- both are equal if you do.
> 
> The (simplified) situation seems to be:
> samba-common splits out samba-common-bin in squeeze and "only"
> recommends it.
> nautilus-share depends on: samba-common-bin | samba-common (<< squeeze)
> 
> At the time APT looks at nautilus-share everything is fine, later it will
> upgrade samba and therefore samba-common "breaking" this dependency
> (for the experts: That are the MarkInstall calls doing).
> Not a problem as long as recommends are installed as these will bring in
> the new -bin package on an other way, but if not the dependency is still
> broken at the time we enter step 2: after upgrading all packages APT
> looks again at each dependency in its problemresolver to resolve
> exactly that: Problems -- apt-lenny has only two options:
> a) step back from upgrading an offending package (held back)
> b) remove the offending package
> 
> apt-squeeze recently (see #591882) got a third option:
> c) try installing another or-group member
> 
> Note that while c) seems to be the "captain obvious" solution it introduces
> a big problem: a) and b) reduce the number of broken packages,
> but c) can add a lot more which could (real-world will tell if really)
> work against the current resolver determinism…

Probably option c) should be removed. This makes upgrade process much less 
predictable.
An secondary issue with option c) is that this can lead apt to upgrade free
packages with non-free packages, if non-free packages are listed as alternative.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. 

Imagine a large red swirl here. 



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 602963 normal
Bug #602963 [soundconverter] fails to start: SoundConverter needs gnome-python 
2.10!
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'

> tags 602963 unreproducible
Bug #602963 [soundconverter] fails to start: SoundConverter needs gnome-python 
2.10!
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
602963: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602963
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#603785: desktop-base and debian-edu-artwork: error when trying to install together

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 603785 debian-edu-artwork
Bug #603785 [debian-edu-artwork,desktop-base] desktop-base and 
debian-edu-artwork: error when trying to install together
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-edu-artwork,desktop-base' to 
'debian-edu-artwork'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603785: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603785
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603785: desktop-base and debian-edu-artwork: error when trying to install together

[Holger Levsen]

reassign 603785 debian-edu-artwork
thanks

Hi Ralf,

thanks again for your bug reports! :-)

On Mittwoch, 17. November 2010, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
>   /usr/share/desktop-base/grub_background.sh

$ cat ./art/splash/grub_background.sh
# This script is used by /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme with grub version 2
WALLPAPER="/usr/share/pixmaps/splash/debian-edu-splash-grub.png"
COLOR_NORMAL="white/black"
COLOR_HIGHLIGHT="magenta/black"

Yay.

debian-edu-artwork used to conflict with desktop-base for exactly this reason, 
I'll see if there is a better solution though.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#603749: mahara in sid not affected

[Steffen Joeris]

severity 603749 normal
thx

It seems that the vulnerable file was introduced after 1.2.6, which is 
currently in sid. So as long as a fixed version is uploaded next, everything 
should be fine.

Cheers,
Steffen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Processed (with 5 errors): mahara in sid not affected

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 603749 normal
Bug #603749 [mahara] CVE-2010-3871
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'

> thx
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> It seems that the vulnerable file was introduced after 1.2.6, which is
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> currently in sid. So as long as a fixed version is uploaded next, everything
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> should be fine.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> Cheers,
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Too many unknown commands, stopping here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
603749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#603748: marked as done (CVE-2010-4181)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:34:32 +0300
with message-id 
and subject line Re: [Pkg-erlang-devel] Bug#603748: Bug#603748: CVE-2010-4181
has caused the Debian Bug report #603748,
regarding CVE-2010-4181
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
603748: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603748
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: yaws
Severity: grave
Tags: security

The following vulnerability has been reported in YAWS:

| Directory traversal vulnerability in Yaws 1.89 allows remote attackers
| to read arbitrary files via ..\ (dot dot backslash) and other
| sequences.

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-4181

This seems unfixed/unnoticed upstream AFAICT. Please get in touch with
upstream.

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de_de.iso-8859...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages yaws depends on:
ii  adduser   3.112+nmu1 add and remove users and groups
pn  erlang-abi-11.b.3  (no description available)
pn  erlang-nox (no description available)
ii  libc6 2.11.2-6   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libpam0g  1.1.1-6Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  openssl   0.9.8o-2   Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a

yaws recommends no packages.

Versions of packages yaws suggests:
pn  erlang-dev (no description available)
pn  yaws-chat  (no description available)
pn  yaws-mail  (no description available)
pn  yaws-wiki  (no description available)
pn  yaws-yapp  (no description available)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Sergei Golovan  wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff  wrote:
>>
>> The following vulnerability has been reported in YAWS:
>>
>> | Directory traversal vulnerability in Yaws 1.89 allows remote attackers
>> | to read arbitrary files via ..\ (dot dot backslash) and other
>> | sequences.
>>
>> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-4181
>
> It seems like this vulnerability is specific for MS Windows. I can't
> reproduce it
> on Linux where backslash isn't a directory delimiter (though I've tied only 
> 1.88
> yet, so may be 1.89 is still vulnerable, I'll check it).

I've rechecked YAWS for this vulnerability and found that none of versions
currently in Debian (and also future 1.89) is vulnerable. The vulnerability
is not revealed if YAWS is installed on a Linux system.

So, I'm closing this bug and will notify YAWS authors shortly.

Cheers!
-- 
Sergei Golovan

--- End Message ---

Bug#603785: desktop-base and debian-edu-artwork: error when trying to install together

[Ralf Treinen]

Package: debian-edu-artwork,desktop-base
Version: debian-edu-artwork/0.0.32-1
Version: desktop-base/6.0.0
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite

Date: 2010-11-17
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid

Hi,

automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:


WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  libpcre3 libxml2 ucf libgmp3c2 libmpfr4 cpp-4.4 cpp libdbus-1-3 dbus libxau6
  libxdmcp6 libxcb1 libx11-data libx11-6 dbus-x11 libglib2.0-0
  libdbus-glib-1-2 libidl0 liborbit2 gconf2-common libgconf2-4 psmisc gconf2
  libconfig-inifiles-perl debian-edu-artwork defoma libgtk2.0-common
  libatk1.0-0 libfreetype6 ttf-dejavu-core fontconfig-config libfontconfig1
  libpixman-1-0 libpng12-0 libxcb-render0 libxcb-render-util0 libxrender1
  libcairo2 libavahi-common-data libavahi-common3 libavahi-client3 libcups2
  libjpeg62 libjasper1 fontconfig libpango1.0-common libdatrie1 libthai-data
  libthai0 libxft2 libpango1.0-0 libtiff4 libxcomposite1 libxfixes3
  libxcursor1 libxdamage1 libxext6 libxi6 libxinerama1 libxrandr2
  shared-mime-info libgtk2.0-0 libcroco3 libgsf-1-common libgsf-1-114
  librsvg2-2 librsvg2-common desktop-base

Extracting templates from packages: 44%
Extracting templates from packages: 88%
Extracting templates from packages: 100%
Preconfiguring packages ...
Authentication warning overridden.
Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?)
Selecting previously deselected package libpcre3.
(Reading database ... 12297 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libpcre3 (from .../libpcre3_8.02-1.1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libxml2.
Unpacking libxml2 (from .../libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package ucf.
Unpacking ucf (from .../ucf_3.0025+nmu1_all.deb) ...
Moving old data out of the way
Selecting previously deselected package libgmp3c2.
Unpacking libgmp3c2 (from .../libgmp3c2_2%3a4.3.2+dfsg-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libmpfr4.
Unpacking libmpfr4 (from .../libmpfr4_3.0.0-2_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package cpp-4.4.
Unpacking cpp-4.4 (from .../cpp-4.4_4.4.5-8_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package cpp.
Unpacking cpp (from .../cpp_4%3a4.4.5-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libdbus-1-3.
Unpacking libdbus-1-3 (from .../libdbus-1-3_1.2.24-3_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package dbus.
Unpacking dbus (from .../dbus_1.2.24-3_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libxau6.
Unpacking libxau6 (from .../libxau6_1%3a1.0.6-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libxdmcp6.
Unpacking libxdmcp6 (from .../libxdmcp6_1%3a1.1.0-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libxcb1.
Unpacking libxcb1 (from .../libxcb1_1.6-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libx11-data.
Unpacking libx11-data (from .../libx11-data_2%3a1.3.3-3_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libx11-6.
Unpacking libx11-6 (from .../libx11-6_2%3a1.3.3-3_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package dbus-x11.
Unpacking dbus-x11 (from .../dbus-x11_1.2.24-3_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libglib2.0-0.
Unpacking libglib2.0-0 (from .../libglib2.0-0_2.24.2-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libdbus-glib-1-2.
Unpacking libdbus-glib-1-2 (from .../libdbus-glib-1-2_0.88-2_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libidl0.
Unpacking libidl0 (from .../libidl0_0.8.14-0.1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package liborbit2.
Unpacking liborbit2 (from .../liborbit2_1%3a2.14.18-0.1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package gconf2-common.
Unpacking gconf2-common (from .../gconf2-common_2.28.1-6_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libgconf2-4.
Unpacking libgconf2-4 (from .../libgconf2-4_2.28.1-6_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package psmisc.
Unpacking psmisc (from .../psmisc_22.13-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package gconf2.
Unpacking gconf2 (from .../gconf2_2.28.1-6_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libconfig-inifiles-perl.
Unpacking libconfig-inifiles-perl (from 
.../libconfig-inifiles-perl_2.58-1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package debian-edu-artwork.
Unpacking debian-edu-artwork (from .../debian-edu-artwork_0.0.32-1_all.deb) ...
Adding `diversion of /usr/share/gdm/defaults.conf to 
/usr/share/gdm/defaults.conf.orig by debian-edu-artwork'
Selecting previously deselected package defoma.
Unpacking defoma (from .../defoma_0.11.11_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libgtk2.0-common.
Unpacking libgtk2.0-common (from .../libgtk2.0-common_2.20.1-2_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libatk1.0-0.
Unpacking libatk1.0-0 (fro

Bug#603680: libnautilus-extension1: breaks nautilus-share upgrade from lenny

[Holger Levsen]

Hi David,

thanks for your analysis!

On Dienstag, 16. November 2010, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> First of all: I can't reproduce this E:-message, 

thats from piuparts...

> So, what we could do now?
> If i see it correctly, we basically have two options:
> a) use a newer apt for upgrade
> b) drop the or
>
> b) isn't really an option as other cases will arise (and have already) 

or you aware of any? Cause if it's really just a few packages, it sounds 
better to fix those, than to force/recommmend everyone to upgrade apt first.

> P.S.: If i am right, apt-lenny does install recommends by default,
> which would make this bug an at least not default situation…

yup

> P.P.S.: Offtopic, but Holger, why does piuparts uses --fix-broken switch?

where do you see this?


cheers,
Holger




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#598917: marked as done (gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on powerpc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:09:10 +0100
with message-id <4ce38da6.8000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#598917: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on powerpc
has caused the Debian Bug report #598917,
regarding gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on powerpc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
598917: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598917
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20100918-1
Severity: serious

gcc-snapshot reliably fails to build on powerpc.  Please see [1] for the build
logs.

[1] 
https://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-snapshot&arch=powerpc&ver=20100918-1


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Version: 20101116-1

On 03.10.2010 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote:

Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20100918-1
Severity: serious

gcc-snapshot reliably fails to build on powerpc.  Please see [1] for the build
logs.


--- End Message ---

Processed: Fixed in 1.4.2-2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 602865
Bug #602865 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [php-pear] upgrading from 
Lenny breaks php-pear setup
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> fixed 602865 1.4.2-2
Bug #602865 [php-pear] upgrading from Lenny breaks php-pear setup
There is no source info for the package 'php-pear' at version '1.4.2-2' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.4.2-2'
Bug Marked as fixed in versions 1.4.2-2.
> found 602865 1.4.2-1
Bug #602865 [php-pear] upgrading from Lenny breaks php-pear setup
There is no source info for the package 'php-pear' at version '1.4.2-1' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.4.2-1'
Bug Marked as found in versions 1.4.2-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
602865: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602865
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org