Bug#611008: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze
Le Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:50:08AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi release heros, while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package (see debdiff). Hi Andreas, Steffen and release team, are you sure that a rebuild is necessary ? The package seems to work on my system, and has already been rebuilt against R 2.10 as I explained in http://bugs.debian.org/611008#10 Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#599983: give back swt-gtk?
This doesn't look like a specific error in swt-gtk; if possible, a give-back may resolve this issue (or at least get a slightly more informative error message). Don Armstrong -- Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies [...] a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. [...] This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron. [...] [I]s there no other way the world may live? -- President Dwight D. Eisenhower, April 16, 1953 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610991: [PATCH] debian/control: add install-info to dpkg Depends
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Julien Cristau wrote: In other words, how about something like this patch? I don't think that's a good idea at this point. A year ago, maybe. One issue Sven mentioned on irc is that an unknown number of packages would start shipping /usr/share/info/dir.gz on rebuild if we were to do this. What about a Recommends instead of a Depends? buildd do not install Recommends AFAIK so it would not introduce breakages on bin-nmu. And it would give the proper hint to apt-get which is that he's supposed to install install-info on upgrade. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: fixed 611008 in 2.1-4+b1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 611008 2.1-4+b1
Bug #611008 {Done: Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org} [r-other-mott-happy]
does not run with current version of R in squeeze
Bug Marked as fixed in versions r-other-mott-happy/2.1-4.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
611008: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611008
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#603974: removing live-installer from squeeze
2011/1/25 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Hello.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 603974 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye
Hi,
there seems to be no update or progress on this bug (or the other
'serious' one) in a month, so I'll remove live-installer from squeeze
later this week.
I do not understand this?
I told you that the problem is the anna-install in the role created. A small
bug that is not dependent on the squashfs kernel-modules.
Anna-install if you invoke from anywhere outside that function works
correctly:
lib/live-installer/squashfs:
#!/bin/sh -e
# Debian (live-initramfs, live-boot)
PLACES=$PLACES /cdrom/live/filesystem.squashfs
# Ubuntu (casper)
PLACES=$PLACES /cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs
squashfs_prepare() {
#anna-install squashfs-modules || true
if [ -x /sbin/depmod ]; then
depmod -a /dev/null 21 || true
fi
modprobe squashfs || true
modprobe loop || true
-
live-installer.postinst:
#!/bin/sh -e
anna-install squashfs-modules
sleep 5
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
db_capb backup
. /usr/lib/base-installer/library.sh
# Architecture and OS detection
ARCH=`udpkg --print-architecture`
OS=`udpkg --print-os`
NEWLINE=
---
I tried to include the squashfs-modules within the installer and it works
well.
And if we put the kernel-di in binary, which is the dependency you ask, also
works correctly.
Debconf not understand well, je je, so now turn to read the manual. But I
thought that with this information you help us find the solution.
Greetings.
Cheers,
Julien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNPhLEAAoJEDEBgAUJBeQMKbcQAKG9G2s+iDGHZJILNiNZjM/Q
2EMF8Zb+Pl9LCLNkP/IyqUZkl0cqzzhbCfM1M0vXZGcfbtsRM1Ef9ls7XV2jQFoJ
UPDSs+TNtY2nlKbhFYo2xK2fbp+TSpEweWAWA+B+hBm8Ip70TatYwL1Idutnycx8
baiiBeAG2Cz4cm27KXv0bC5o/swnrJil6BUgz72zOi4CdHAv1F5b07NKv3irCW6+
e/W59A8jFsa+T6E7gpMINGG3o3kMZP1tJxnsznDPTxlsXh4CvE5DnxdkdYeMNmFD
GVAQA8i59EtBK+4Ra5RDQLB6pSVHhl32PzV215GWfuaLqPq92QjTcHqI43Jd+eNs
SIkzpPsVfY3GKu6zhjSv+VfJVwg9MiYHGGCSK9IXrN/GBdFfGVX9P5NSOrAdguAv
JBwUhta+uI0eaqCHM9nY9H7XZ1yLEtv6VgpD85OcbNr4DEB/b1TMDfm4mxzm8AqI
hJ5h8+eU1HUJowj9hGgYTBKxR6OBktdk9Db6nSQZYAGWzKsCxxnQE81Hql6olvh8
xahzFueiJYglzA8i5bcgdnryqRMCCVD59RtWGuWdgyQWcD8qyfWSsmPOMiS6WCd1
aaJcH7QtELgpagX0Gb568VXedm+e3ty4S2Ee1AmXAfux3ixN8KL4dBhnooaDTb2I
XKw3k05jPQKPQjxhybV0
=ReyR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
José A. González
Siempre GNU Linux-libre.
Bug#610991: [PATCH] debian/control: add install-info to dpkg Depends
On 2011-01-25 09:08 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Julien Cristau wrote: In other words, how about something like this patch? I don't think that's a good idea at this point. A year ago, maybe. One issue Sven mentioned on irc is that an unknown number of packages would start shipping /usr/share/info/dir.gz on rebuild if we were to do this. What about a Recommends instead of a Depends? buildd do not install Recommends AFAIK so it would not introduce breakages on bin-nmu. And it would give the proper hint to apt-get which is that he's supposed to install install-info on upgrade. There's a little problem with that, install-info conflicts with Lenny's texinfo version, so if that is installed¹ apt-get has to do one of the following: 1) ignore the recommends 2) upgrade texinfo along dpkg 3) remove texinfo and its reverse dependencies Tests are necessary to ensure that apt does 1) or 2) and not 3), possibly wiping out a texlive-full installation. Cheers, Sven ¹ Which is the case on 5 out of 6 Debian installations, according to popcon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610991: [PATCH] debian/control: add install-info to dpkg Depends
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:08:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Julien Cristau wrote: In other words, how about something like this patch? I don't think that's a good idea at this point. A year ago, maybe. One issue Sven mentioned on irc is that an unknown number of packages would start shipping /usr/share/info/dir.gz on rebuild if we were to do this. What about a Recommends instead of a Depends? buildd do not install Recommends AFAIK so it would not introduce breakages on bin-nmu. And it would give the proper hint to apt-get which is that he's supposed to install install-info on upgrade. I really don't see the point. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#611008: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze
Hi again, On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:00:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package (see debdiff). Hi Andreas, Steffen and release team, are you sure that a rebuild is necessary ? The package seems to work on my system, and has already been rebuilt against R 2.10 as I explained in http://bugs.debian.org/611008#10 Ahh, I obviosely missinterpreted your mail. I can confirm that on an up to date squeeze system (amd64) the currently available r-other-mott-happy_2.1-4+b1_amd64.deb works until library(happy) I have not done further testing of the packag. Steffen, do you have any hint what exactly is broken? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610749: fakeroot fails ownership with kfreebsd systems
A comment just for the record. måndag den 24 januari 2011 klockan 22:10 skrev Aurelien Jarno detta: Ok, I have finally understood the problem: 1) in eglibc we implement at* functions, but mark them as stub as the emulation for FreeBSD 7.x kernels is not perfect. FreeBSD 8.x have this syscalls natively, and thus don't need emulation. 2) newer versions of tar start to use the fstatat syscall. 3) fakeroot doesn't emulate this syscall because it is marked as stub in eglibc. Even before the original bug report, I did verify that fakeroot tar -cf /tmp/df.tar /etc/default is able to arrive at ownership 'root:root', which does also with kfreebsd-amd64/unstable. Does this correlate completely? No self-contradictions? Mats E Andersson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611008: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#611008: Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze
On 01/25/2011 09:46 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi again, On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:00:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package (see debdiff). Hi Andreas, Steffen and release team, are you sure that a rebuild is necessary ? The package seems to work on my system, and has already been rebuilt against R 2.10 as I explained in http://bugs.debian.org/611008#10 Ahh, I obviosely missinterpreted your mail. I can confirm that on an up to date squeeze system (amd64) the currently available r-other-mott-happy_2.1-4+b1_amd64.deb works until library(happy) I have not done further testing of the packag. Steffen, do you have any hint what exactly is broken? Hello, this is weird. I got a complaint when I ran it on a squeeze system the day before yesterday. I then compiled it myself. I suggest to enhance the packaging as Andreas has suggested, with or without the debhelper dependency, I do not care so much, and then reupload to proposed updates, closing that bug again. Many greetings Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:50:08 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi release heros, while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package (see debdiff). You can't upload to tpu a version lower than what's in sid. Plus, it seems the bug is not understood at this point. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#610257: Bug#610300: dropbox 1.0.17 distribution now complies to copyright complaints
Hi! Am 25.01.2011 00:41, schrieb Rian Hunter: we recently released a distribution of dropbox that corrects all the complains listed in these debian bug reports. thanks for the feedback, please let me know if there is anything i can do to make dropbox comply to any more possible copyright requirements. get the new build at: Thanks for keeping us updated, however, dropbox has been removed from the Debian archive in the meantime, one of the reasons was, that it's maintainer expressed, that he didn't had any interest in maintaining dropbox in Debian. Of course there are no reasons that's no permanent ban; should a new volunteer step up to maintain dropbox in Debian (or the former maintainer change his opinion), dropbox can be added to the Debian archive again. Best regards, Alexander, ftp-assistant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611039:
Tags: moreinfo thanks Unless you provide a lot more info, no one will be able to help you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:12:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:50:08 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi release heros, while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package (see debdiff). You can't upload to tpu a version lower than what's in sid. Plus, it ^ obviously meant greater here. I shouldn't send mail before coffee. seems the bug is not understood at this point. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:12:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: while the bug would be fixed in unstable after a simple rebuild it concerns the Squeeze release. I prepared a fixed version of the package (see debdiff). You can't upload to tpu a version lower than what's in sid. Understood the hint (modulo s/lower/higher/) about tpu und changed changelog target distribution to unstable. Plus, it seems the bug is not understood at this point. I might consider uploading to unstable the proposed version (+Debhelper 7) in any case. This is suboptimal for unstable because R version is higher there but I might check in my unstable chroot if it at least passes the library(happy) check. This enables us to be fast once Steffen gives better explanation and is a good and reasonable update of packaging for unstable anyway. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611039: Issue fixed inadvertently while troubleshooting
Surprisingly, this issue got fixed automatically while I was trying to troubleshoot it. The following steps seems to have fixed it for me. (1) Removed ~/.gconf/desktop/%gconf.xml using tty1 (Ctrl + Alt + F1). susam@nifty:~/.gconf/desktop$ mv %gconf.xml %gconf.xml-backup (2) Logged into GNOME desktop as 'susam'. After logging in, keyboard input worked. (3) Logged out of GNOME desktop and returned to tty1 (Ctrl + Alt + F1). (4) Restored the original %gconf.xml susam@nifty:~/.gconf/desktop$ mv %gconf.xml-backup %gconf.xml (5) Logged into GNOME desktop as 'susam'. Surprise! Keyboard input worked fine again! In other words, I could not really establish what caused the problem and what fixed it. Anyone has a clue? Regards, Susam Pal
Bug#547280: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:18:01 + with message-id e1phfyl-0007rq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#547280: fixed in samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #547280, regarding Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 547280: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547280 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Severity: serious Package: samba4 Version: 4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912-1 User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc Hi! This source package contains the following files from the IETF under non-free license terms: + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4514.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4522.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/draft-armijo-ldap-syntax-00.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4533.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4530.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4527.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4515.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4531.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4528.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4512.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc3296.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4519.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc2307.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4516.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4511.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc2696.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4513.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4521.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4529.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4526.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4532.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4524.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc2849.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4520.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4518.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4523.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4517.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc2891.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4510.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4525.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/heimdal/lib/wind/rfc3491.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/heimdal/lib/wind/rfc4013.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/heimdal/lib/wind/rfc4518.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/heimdal/lib/wind/rfc3454.txt + samba4-4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912/source4/heimdal/lib/wind/rfc3490.txt The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: * http://bugs.debian.org/199810 * http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation * http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments The lenny/squeeze release policy says binary and source packages must each be free: * http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt * http://release.debian.org/squeeze/rc_policy.txt The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy: * http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg There are (at least) three ways to fix this problem. In order of preference: 1. Ask the author of the RFC to re-license the RFC under a free license. A template for this e-mail request can be found at http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments 2. Remove the non-free material from the source, e.g., by re-packaging the upstream archive and adding 'dfsg' to the Debian package version name. 3. Move the package to non-free. General discussions are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in the thread with Subject: Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages. Thanks, Simon ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: samba4 Source-Version: 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-1 We believe that the bug you reported
Bug#610746: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#610746: Bug#610746: Bug#610746: xfce4-session crashes at startup after today's apt update
severity 610746 important retitle 610746 balou theme makes xfce4-session segfaults on some situation thanks On lun., 2011-01-24 at 17:49 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: * On 2011 24 Jan 17:22 -0600, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Yeah, the backtrace is useless indeed. It'd help if you could install all the relevant -dbg packages. xfce4-session-dbg doesn't exist so if you can rebuild it it'd help. I might be able to provide you an unstriped package but not right now. Do so at your leisure, if you'd like me to test more. As it is known how to replicate the crash, should this arise again it should be easy to direct reporters to this report. Ok, an unstripped binary package is available at http://molly.corsac.net/~corsac/debian/xfce4/xfce4-session_4.6.2-3_i386.deb Please install all the relevant -dbg packages plus this one and try to get another backtrace. At the time I filed the report, I didn't realize it was self-inflicted. Well, self-inflicted maybe, but it's still nasty :) Please downgrade the severity of this report to Normal if possible. I'll go for important :) Regards, -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:48:01 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: I might consider uploading to unstable the proposed version (+Debhelper 7) in any case. This is suboptimal for unstable because R version is higher there but I might check in my unstable chroot if it at least passes the library(happy) check. This enables us to be fast once Steffen gives better explanation and is a good and reasonable update of packaging for unstable anyway. Well, the debhelper bump is definitely a no-no for squeeze. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#610746: Bug#610746: Bug#610746: xfce4-session crashes at startup after today's apt update
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 610746 important Bug #610746 [xfce4-session] xfce4-session crashes at startup after today's apt update Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' retitle 610746 balou theme makes xfce4-session segfaults on some situation Bug #610746 [xfce4-session] xfce4-session crashes at startup after today's apt update Changed Bug title to 'balou theme makes xfce4-session segfaults on some situation' from 'xfce4-session crashes at startup after today's apt update' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 610746: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610746 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611071: lesstif2-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing)
Package: lesstif2-dev Version: 0.95.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze Justification: renders package unusable I am unable to install lesstif2-dev: root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install lesstif2-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: lesstif2-dev: Depends: libxft-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages Trying to install libxft-dev gives: root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install libxft-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libxft-dev: Depends: libxft2 (= 2.1.14-2) but 2.1.14-2.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611008: marked as done (does not run with current version of R in squeeze)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:48:57 + with message-id e1phgsh-0007j4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#611008: fixed in r-other-mott-happy 2.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #611008, regarding does not run with current version of R in squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611008: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611008 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: r-other-mott-happy Version: 2.1-4+b1 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze sid The current -4 package was built with a version of R 2.10 and is hence incompatible. The current version should not be shipped with squeeze. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-rc5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages r-other-mott-happy depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-9 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii r-base-core 2.12.1-1 GNU R core of statistical computat ii r-cran-g.data 2.0-2 GNU R package for delayed-data ii r-cran-mass [r-cran-vr] 7.3-9-1GNU R package of Venables and Ripl r-other-mott-happy recommends no packages. r-other-mott-happy suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: r-other-mott-happy Source-Version: 2.1-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of r-other-mott-happy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5.diff.gz to main/r/r-other-mott-happy/r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5.diff.gz r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5.dsc to main/r/r-other-mott-happy/r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5.dsc r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5_amd64.deb to main/r/r-other-mott-happy/r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 611...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org (supplier of updated r-other-mott-happy package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:17:57 +0100 Source: r-other-mott-happy Binary: r-other-mott-happy Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.1-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Description: r-other-mott-happy - GNU R package for fine-mapping complex diseases Closes: 611008 Changes: r-other-mott-happy (2.1-5) unstable; urgency=low . [Charles Plessy] * Documented information in ‘debian/upstream-metadata.yaml’. * Removed mention of the bibliographic reference in ‘debian/control’. . [Andreas Tille] * debian/control: - Build-Depends r-base-dev (= 2.10), Depends r-core (= 2.10) and rebuild on current Squeeze system Closes: #611008 - Added myself to uploaders - Standards-Version: 3.9.1 (no changes needed) - Fixed name of Debian Med team - Debhelper 7 - Replaced (Build-)Depends r-cran-vr by r-cran-mass - Recommends: r-cran-vr, r-cran-multicore * Added watch file Checksums-Sha1: 4f84b995e389eb3ab517163f402269659918f080 1444 r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5.dsc ce7b8d667800071f64233cf80e05c3eebf76f57b 4618 r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5.diff.gz 8a7da53ae29640ed16be238df8fc2c80b643ebee 123564 r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2670325156bb207665973de24f7fbf46d78ccd19c4e44c623678269368272861 1444 r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5.dsc 03df4aaf570101b4fa02a112cb5b247f20dc22788c95fe2ebdd5ce5c5dbdd0f6 4618 r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5.diff.gz e5f0ae52bb55c97cfc028d2aa0db64eb72d5027e3ab3a809d14e3c26ea671c44 123564 r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5_amd64.deb Files: 5853c016b9b4c54e983732efd2a2ca02 1444 gnu-r optional r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5.dsc 5f48d3596c4ccd5336c9369ae1f8a3df 4618 gnu-r optional r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5.diff.gz 2912a90e2edb68d4d7fe939a60f00287 123564 gnu-r optional r-other-mott-happy_2.1-5_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP
Bug#610749: fakeroot fails ownership with kfreebsd systems
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: A comment just for the record. måndag den 24 januari 2011 klockan 22:10 skrev Aurelien Jarno detta: Ok, I have finally understood the problem: 1) in eglibc we implement at* functions, but mark them as stub as the emulation for FreeBSD 7.x kernels is not perfect. FreeBSD 8.x have this syscalls natively, and thus don't need emulation. 2) newer versions of tar start to use the fstatat syscall. 3) fakeroot doesn't emulate this syscall because it is marked as stub in eglibc. Even before the original bug report, I did verify that fakeroot tar -cf /tmp/df.tar /etc/default is able to arrive at ownership 'root:root', which does also with kfreebsd-amd64/unstable. Does this correlate completely? In this case, even if fakeroot doesn't intercept the fstatat function, the ownership is already root on the drive, that's why they it is correct in the tarball. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610749: fakeroot fails ownership with kfreebsd systems
Petr Salinger a écrit : reassign 610749 eglibc severity 610749 serious thanks The problems is triggered by the new version of tar that is present only in sid, squeeze is not affected. However given the packages are built in a sid chroot, we might be in trouble, especially given the package has been uploaded almost 50 days ago... Ok, I have finally understood the problem: 1) in eglibc we implement at* functions, but mark them as stub as the emulation for FreeBSD 7.x kernels is not perfect. FreeBSD 8.x have this syscalls natively, and thus don't need emulation. 2) newer versions of tar start to use the fstatat syscall. 3) fakeroot doesn't emulate this syscall because it is marked as stub in eglibc. Even if testing is not affected, it's a serious problem as packages are in unstable before moving to testing. This is way we have roughly 300 broken binary packages in the archive. Therefore I think it should be fixed as soon as possible. IMHO the best way to fix that is to remove the stub for at* functions as we don't want to support 7.x kernel anymore. This fix is long-term-fix. But I do not agree to do it now, for squeeze glibc. The other packages behaviour/code_path might be altered by this change significantly. Better would be to override *at stubs only for fakeroot now. Something like add in fakeroot's configure/configure.ac after AC_CHECK_FUNCS(fchmodat fchownat fstatat mkdirat mknodat openat renameat unlinkat) - case $target_os in kfreebsd*) for ac_func in fchmodat fchownat fstatat mkdirat mknodat openat renameat unlinkat do cat confdefs.h _ACEOF #define `$as_echo HAVE_$ac_func | $as_tr_cpp` 1 _ACEOF done ;; esac - That's indeed another option. Clint, what do you think about it? Note it's only something temporary until we fix the real issue on eglibc. The remaining question is to know if we want that in squeeze or not. The change in eglibc should be synced with 2.12 (2.13) upload. I have already changed that in the SVN on glibc-ports, that way we won't forget about that. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611071: lesstif2-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing)
# Not squeeze-specific, package versions are in sync tag 611071 - squeeze tag 611071 + moreinfo thanks On Tue, January 25, 2011 10:15, Hans Streibel wrote: root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install lesstif2-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: lesstif2-dev: Depends: libxft-dev but it is not going to be installed [...] root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install libxft-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libxft-dev: Depends: libxft2 (= 2.1.14-2) but 2.1.14-2.1 is to be installed Is that a local package, or from a third party repository? The version of libxft2 in both sid and squeeze is 2.1.14-2, which correctly fulfills that dependency. In fact, so far as I can see, there has never been a libxft2 2.1.14-2.1 in the Debian archive. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 611071, tagging 611071
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Package versions are in sync; not squeeze-specific tags 611071 - squeeze Bug #611071 [lesstif2-dev] lesstif2-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing) Removed tag(s) squeeze. tags 611071 + moreinfo Bug #611071 [lesstif2-dev] lesstif2-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing) Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 611071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611071 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611074: libxft-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing)
Package: libxft-dev Version: 2.1.14-2 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze Justification: renders package unusable I am unable to install the package in Squeeze: root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install libxft-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libxft-dev: Depends: libxft2 (= 2.1.14-2) but 2.1.14-2.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install libxft2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done libxft2 is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 66 not upgraded. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: I might consider uploading to unstable the proposed version (+Debhelper 7) in any case. This is suboptimal for unstable because R version is higher there but I might check in my unstable chroot if it at least passes the library(happy) check. This enables us to be fast once Steffen gives better explanation and is a good and reasonable update of packaging for unstable anyway. Well, the debhelper bump is definitely a no-no for squeeze. Ups, that's a bit late for the just uploaded package. However it seems that bug #611008 was a false alarm. I'm waiting for confirmation of the reporter. Just for the sake of interest: The no-no for the Debhelper 5 to 7 bump is only because you consider the *change* with potential consequences as to heavy for last minute Squeeze inclusion or is there something else which makes it a no-no? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611071: marked as done (lesstif2-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing))
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:07:54 +0100 with message-id 20110125110754.ga30...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#611071: lesstif2-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing) has caused the Debian Bug report #611071, regarding lesstif2-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611071 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: lesstif2-dev Version: 0.95.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze Justification: renders package unusable I am unable to install lesstif2-dev: root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install lesstif2-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: lesstif2-dev: Depends: libxft-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages Trying to install libxft-dev gives: root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install libxft-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libxft-dev: Depends: libxft2 (= 2.1.14-2) but 2.1.14-2.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:15:07 +0100, Hans Streibel wrote: Package: lesstif2-dev Version: 0.95.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze Justification: renders package unusable I am unable to install lesstif2-dev: root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install lesstif2-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: lesstif2-dev: Depends: libxft-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages Trying to install libxft-dev gives: root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install libxft-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libxft-dev: Depends: libxft2 (= 2.1.14-2) but 2.1.14-2.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages Broken apt config on your side, I guess. There's no 2.1.14-2.1 libxft2 package in Debian. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:43:11AM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote: On 01/25/2011 11:38 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:02:37AM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote: this is weird. I got a complaint when I ran it on a squeeze system the day before yesterday. I then compiled it myself. Only when loading the library or did you also other stuff? Only loading. OK, so it seems to be a false alarm. Can you please make sure by proper tagging that it is fixed in *all* versions and the report will not stay for testing to prevent that the package will by kicked by accident? Another question about updating the package: It does not seem to need r-cran-vr as Build-Depends but rather r-cran-mass (which was implicitely pulled in when installing r-cran-vr). Thus I fixed the (Build-)Depends and added r-cran-vr to Recommends (because I assume you had some reasons in the first place). I also found r-cran-multicore as (Build-)Depends in some not yet uploaded change in SVN which was not accompanied by a changelog entry. I added this also to Recommends because I do not see a strong dependency - just fix (and comment) this if I was wrong. Fine with me. OK, package just uploaded to unstable. Please have a close look at the just commited changelog for UNRELEASED beta release. You formerly claimed a name change there but you said on the list this would not be the case. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611008: does not run with current version of R in squeeze
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:04:06 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: Just for the sake of interest: The no-no for the Debhelper 5 to 7 bump is only because you consider the *change* with potential consequences as to heavy for last minute Squeeze inclusion or is there something else which makes it a no-no? It's not the minimal required fix for a RC bug - it's a no-no. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#611074: marked as done (libxft-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing))
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:17:00 +0100 with message-id 20110125111700.gc30...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#611074: libxft-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing) has caused the Debian Bug report #611074, regarding libxft-dev: unable to install (Debian Testing) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611074: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611074 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libxft-dev Version: 2.1.14-2 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze Justification: renders package unusable I am unable to install the package in Squeeze: root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install libxft-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libxft-dev: Depends: libxft2 (= 2.1.14-2) but 2.1.14-2.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install libxft2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done libxft2 is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 66 not upgraded. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:19:52 +0100, Hans Streibel wrote: Package: libxft-dev Version: 2.1.14-2 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze Justification: renders package unusable I am unable to install the package in Squeeze: root@hstreibel:~# apt-get install libxft-dev ... Some packages could not be installed. ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libxft-dev: Depends: libxft2 (= 2.1.14-2) but 2.1.14-2.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages You didn't get libxft2 2.1.14-2.1 from Debian. Closing as PEBCAK. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#602697: chef: remove from squeeze because of solr (#602697)? (was Re: Bug#602697: chef-solr depends on solr)
Hi there! Cc:ing all the people that have interacted with this bug. Still true, but this is the last email about this subject from me. On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:47:41 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: Some hints about the chef package in Debian: - Debian has (6-month-old) 0.8.16-4.1, while upstream is at 0.9.12 - popcon show 41 installation (2 recent) for the chef binary package and 2 (0 recent) for the chef-solr binary package - there is an RC bug for chef-solr (#604231, installation fails because of nodedown) Thus, I think the best thing would be to remove chef from squeeze (new bugs created), so then we can remove solr as well. chef has been removed from squeeze because of #610127 and #596351: http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/chef/news/20110121T163911Z.html It's also in lenny (albeit in contrib) so if it were removed then a migration path for those users to a replacement would be good. Given that chef-solr was not in lenny, the above applies to solr only. However, I should say that I do not know at all a good migration path. This concern still stands, but given that no one has shown interest in implementing this in mostly two months, I would say that we should simply remove solr from squeeze. For the Release Team: should I file an RM bug or this one is sufficient? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca pgpxIZ9dwavX3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#610749: fakeroot fails ownership with kfreebsd systems
Therefore I think it should be fixed as soon as possible. IMHO the best way to fix that is to remove the stub for at* functions as we don't want to support 7.x kernel anymore. This fix is long-term-fix. But I do not agree to do it now, for squeeze glibc. The other packages behaviour/code_path might be altered by this change significantly. Better would be to override *at stubs only for fakeroot now. Something like add in fakeroot's configure/configure.ac after AC_CHECK_FUNCS(fchmodat fchownat fstatat mkdirat mknodat openat renameat unlinkat) - case $target_os in kfreebsd*) for ac_func in fchmodat fchownat fstatat mkdirat mknodat openat renameat unlinkat do cat confdefs.h _ACEOF #define `$as_echo HAVE_$ac_func | $as_tr_cpp` 1 _ACEOF done ;; esac - That's indeed another option. Clint, what do you think about it? Note it's only something temporary until we fix the real issue on eglibc. I am unsure what is the real issue. - eglibc providing best-effort fstatat and marking as a stub - fakeroot not intercepting fstatat which exists but is marked as stub - tar using fstatat despite marked as stub The long-term solution is of course bump kfreebsd kernel requirements to 8.1 and drop stub marking in eglibc. The remaining question is to know if we want that in squeeze or not. nice to have for squeeze, have to have in sid Cheers Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#603974: Info provided, help needed!
This bug seems to rely on two missing bits on two packages (patches included).
the package live-build does not include console-setup-udeb in the cdrom
pool/ directory and live-installer do not Depends: on console-setup-udeb.
So the /target system have default /etc/default/keyboard file instead of a
proper one.
Fixing those two above mentioned quirks is not enough it seems, because the
resulting target, although having a proper configuration file, still needs a
setupcon after reboot in order to have things working.
I see that live-installer calls setupcon --save-only in the target, so, by
reading man page, all should be done.
But strangely it is not the case.
Could anyone from debian installer team, with a deeper understanding of d-i
than me, suggests a solution there?
The patches included are there just for convenience.
--
ESC:wq
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
From d59109c0969f4ef0c469bd0a72b940085e243c8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marco Amadori amado...@vdavda.com
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:33:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix missing keyboard setup adding console-setup-udeb dependency (Closes: #603974).
---
debian/changelog |7 ++-
debian/control |3 ++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 9fff7e1..6fa99ad 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
live-installer (30) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+ [ Otavio Salvador ]
* Avoid the build-depends on autotools.
- -- Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:57:25 -0200
+ [ Marco Amadori ]
+ * Fix missing keyboard setup by adding console-setup-udeb
+dependency (Closes: #603974).
+
+ -- Marco Amadori marco.amad...@vdavda.com Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:30:22 +0100
live-installer (29) unstable; urgency=low
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index ca83145..b6beeb0 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ XC-Package-Type: udeb
Architecture: any
Depends:
${shlibs:Depends}, archdetect, base-installer (= 1.105),
- busybox-udeb (= 1:1.13.3), cdebconf-udeb, created-fstab, mounted-partitions
+ busybox-udeb (= 1:1.13.3), cdebconf-udeb, created-fstab, mounted-partitions,
+ console-setup-udeb
Provides: installed-base, kernel-installer
XB-Installer-Menu-Item: 6500
Description: Install the system
--
1.7.2.3
From dce8c569e953722f2191e8126432a55a396acd79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marco Amadori amado...@vdavda.com
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:47:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Do not exclude console-setup-udeb (Helps: #603974)
* it is not in d-i initrd image anymore, and is required to pass keyboard
configuration to /target console-setup package.
Signed-off-by: Marco Amadori amado...@vdavda.com
---
data/debian-cd/squeeze/exclude-udebs |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/data/debian-cd/squeeze/exclude-udebs b/data/debian-cd/squeeze/exclude-udebs
index 1faaa9a..ba3ed4f 100644
--- a/data/debian-cd/squeeze/exclude-udebs
+++ b/data/debian-cd/squeeze/exclude-udebs
@@ -132,7 +132,6 @@ auto-install
libslang2-udeb
kbd-chooser
kbd-udeb
-console-setup-*
# Currently unused
nbd-client-udeb
pwgen-udeb
--
1.7.2.3
Bug#609581: Incompatible licences
Hello Julien, Julien Cristau [2011-01-18 12:01 +0100]: That doesn't address Riddell's point. You're mixing GPL 2 (poppler) with GPL 2+ (PDF reflow plugin) with GPL 3 (calibre). I don't think that works. As I see no way to sensibly untangle this for squeeze, I propose to upload a version to t-p-u which removes the pdfreflow plugin. I still need to build it, as otherwise the build system will fail horribly, but it won't be shipped in the .deb any more. Does that sound acceptable to you? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#609581: Incompatible licences
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:49:38 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: Hello Julien, Julien Cristau [2011-01-18 12:01 +0100]: That doesn't address Riddell's point. You're mixing GPL 2 (poppler) with GPL 2+ (PDF reflow plugin) with GPL 3 (calibre). I don't think that works. As I see no way to sensibly untangle this for squeeze, I propose to upload a version to t-p-u which removes the pdfreflow plugin. I still need to build it, as otherwise the build system will fail horribly, but it won't be shipped in the .deb any more. Does that sound acceptable to you? It does, thanks. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: grub-pc: no easy way to change splash-screens at boot-up
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 605705 506232 Bug#605705: grub-pc: grub does not use desktop-base background image when / is encrypted (LUKS on LVM) Bug#506232: grub-pc: no easy way to change splash-screens at boot-up Bug#561593: background image config/handling (plus password handling) Bug#581049: grub-pc: Use desktop-grub alternative in 05_debian_theme Bug#605023: grub-pc: should copy desktop-grub.png in postinst Forcibly Merged 506232 561593 581049 605023 605705. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 605023: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605023 605705: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605705 561593: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561593 581049: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581049 506232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506232 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#602697: chef: remove from squeeze because of solr (#602697)? (was Re: Bug#602697: chef-solr depends on solr)
2011/1/25 Luca Capello l...@pca.it: It's also in lenny (albeit in contrib) so if it were removed then a migration path for those users to a replacement would be good. Given that chef-solr was not in lenny, the above applies to solr only. However, I should say that I do not know at all a good migration path. This concern still stands, but given that no one has shown interest in implementing this in mostly two months, I would say that we should simply remove solr from squeeze. For the Release Team: should I file an RM bug or this one is sufficient? AFAIK solr has been removed already from squeeze. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: grub-pc: update-grub fails to install bootsplash image from grub2-splashimages
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 605705 606330 Bug#605705: grub-pc: grub does not use desktop-base background image when / is encrypted (LUKS on LVM) Bug#606330: grub-pc: update-grub fails to install bootsplash image from grub2-splashimages Bug#506232: grub-pc: no easy way to change splash-screens at boot-up Bug#561593: background image config/handling (plus password handling) Bug#581049: grub-pc: Use desktop-grub alternative in 05_debian_theme Bug#605023: grub-pc: should copy desktop-grub.png in postinst Forcibly Merged 506232 561593 581049 605023 605705 606330. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 605023: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605023 605705: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605705 606330: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606330 561593: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561593 581049: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581049 506232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506232 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609762: amavisd-milter: Init script changes owner of current directory to 'amavis'
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:07:09PM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:59:41PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: 2011/1/24 Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at: Ok although the PIDFILE line can be removed with the below code. I'm don't see where PIDFILE is removed. Just take a look at the next patch version. It looks OK to me too, with the grain of salt of not being an amavis user. Well I don't think this package will make it into Debian Squeeze as for me a prerequisite is a fixed libmilter version... Reading debian-release, seems that there is no consensus about removing amavisd-milter from squeeze. If you tested things carefully and everything was OK, I'd say upload. That should not make things worse that before, but better, starting real life check. And release team can still remove amavisd-milter from squeeze if needed. If a fixed libmilter version is a pre-requisite for this particular bug report, do not forget to set the corresponding blocker in the BTS. sorry when I kept you from doing other more release-critical work, this was not my intention :-(. No problem. Regards, -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609581: Incompatible licences
Hello Julien,
Julien Cristau [2011-01-25 13:00 +0100]:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:49:38 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
As I see no way to sensibly untangle this for squeeze, I propose to
upload a version to t-p-u which removes the pdfreflow plugin. I still
need to build it, as otherwise the build system will fail horribly,
but it won't be shipped in the .deb any more. Does that sound
acceptable to you?
It does, thanks.
Uploaded, see attached debdiff. The libpoppler binary dependency is
gone.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
diff -u calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/changelog calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/changelog
+++ calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+calibre (0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/rules: Drop pdfreflow extension. It uses libpoppler, which is GPL-2
+only, and thus cannot be linked to the GPL3-only plugin code. This will
+make the PDF conversion fall back to pdftohtml, so PDFs still work.
+(Closes: #609581)
+ * debian/control: Switch Vcs-Bzr: to new squeeze packaging branch.
+
+ -- Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:28:20 +0100
+
calibre (0.7.7+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -u calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/rules calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/rules
--- calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/rules
+++ calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/rules
@@ -52,6 +52,10 @@
# force python2.6, as long as 2.5 is still the default in Debian
find debian/tmp -type f | xargs sed -i '1 { /^#!.*python/
s_^.*$$_#!/usr/bin/python2.6_ }'
+ # remove pdfreflow plugin, as its GPL3 license conflicts with poppler's
+ # GPL2-only (Debian bug #609581)
+ rm debian/tmp/usr/lib/calibre/calibre/plugins/pdfreflow.so
+
install/calibre::
# Create and install some of the man pages
$(MAKE) -C debian/man VERSION=$(MAIN_VERSION)
diff -u calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/control calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/control
--- calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/control
+++ calibre-0.7.7+dfsg/debian/control
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
Standards-Version: 3.8.4
XS-Python-Version: current
Homepage: http://calibre.kovidgoyal.net/
-Vcs-Bzr: https://code.launchpad.net/~calibre-packagers/calibre/debian
+Vcs-Bzr: https://code.launchpad.net/~calibre-packagers/calibre/squeeze
Package: calibre
Architecture: all
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#609581: marked as done (Incompatible licences)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:47:06 + with message-id e1phjeg-000594...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#609581: fixed in calibre 0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1 has caused the Debian Bug report #609581, regarding Incompatible licences to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 609581: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609581 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: calibre calibre is licenced as GPL 3 only. It links to Poppler which is GPL 2 only. These two licences are incompatible, see http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses#GPLv3-incompatible_licenses so the poppler plugin for calibre needs to be removed. Jonathan ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: calibre Source-Version: 0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of calibre, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: calibre-bin_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1_amd64.deb to main/c/calibre/calibre-bin_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1_amd64.deb calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1.diff.gz to main/c/calibre/calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1.diff.gz calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1.dsc to main/c/calibre/calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1.dsc calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1_all.deb to main/c/calibre/calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 609...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org (supplier of updated calibre package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:28:20 +0100 Source: calibre Binary: calibre calibre-bin Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1 Distribution: testing-proposed-updates Urgency: low Maintainer: Miriam Ruiz little_m...@yahoo.es Changed-By: Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org Description: calibre- e-book converter and library management calibre-bin - e-book converter and library management Closes: 609581 Changes: calibre (0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low . * debian/rules: Drop pdfreflow extension. It uses libpoppler, which is GPL-2 only, and thus cannot be linked to the GPL3-only plugin code. This will make the PDF conversion fall back to pdftohtml, so PDFs still work. (Closes: #609581) * debian/control: Switch Vcs-Bzr: to new squeeze packaging branch. Checksums-Sha1: 507fcf4e2292c5432d1b251d6284023693685b9c 2290 calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1.dsc a58f7e1328b51ceab589af38d9691ed5162f5097 14831 calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1.diff.gz 1b30d98fbb1235109e3ad370bb4cae4805c9c4b3 7918792 calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1_all.deb e48bc07ffc8efb25a06cef795f29e336718a8721 109950 calibre-bin_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 69340bdf1d388b3589cd29567968b3964e3643f98020959a395a5563cf4f3eb8 2290 calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1.dsc 84ec49b0eeed93a6ae67124a37037ded47cb44ba3eb2e43d4576d23d3aed6754 14831 calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1.diff.gz 3dd5b23246003a9484363af8358d28bfff2aec59fa1674e45e37f768a6d494fc 7918792 calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1_all.deb d4819e6719d88c2eb6ddcd5468a95b10890abd3d398fbdc75df197dbf6453195 109950 calibre-bin_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1_amd64.deb Files: 1c3b72fbe72d7d943004787746a117d8 2290 text extra calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1.dsc 40fe6fc1d52075d31b4c82b4fe75ed69 14831 text extra calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1.diff.gz 148c280b1779c1749e1436ff5da4388f 7918792 text extra calibre_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1_all.deb 39ceb95a8b30d34254a2a59eb994cc1d 109950 text extra calibre-bin_0.7.7+dfsg-1squeeze1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNPsMKAAoJEPmIJawmtHufi1AP/3Gg8VirzJdVbIja4jcvRtTO 5Ydbes1Jt3hphYGa2ROJGfO9BBXboO+ynYDZ2U+7oKvbMCVgUdksnwfxCas/mm8S uSbH67VEoWByZalWrgauUJ3P7absMcT1AAMCSWKbdlLnM47mWvqgDhScQ+DFo5iO tWuBvpmSronWVbcfycFesv7QoUUGmgUwUMuCt13mIttoHDLcLLUjqtP3Q7+Pu+2K kWhmUcMWcYS29cfysCU/8Rtb6YIEob2/Gnns9ooplcaBu7dtOJieN5nTi7vqoIrm i9Z/2A/LBQwy/8uGy/0HVX5opC0Tgj05TbuKoHa0IXZ+joM86eefVMmKu1N9DrTz CtGhcsmXExOTIjgE9F/kWnN0arvnifOqCD7jQ3vAq9rovcqm3xmb4fYEnZ93Kazf I24aZS/2MnOLiX4YjpCpsrrfb5vcbABSK5ENLFpAkVwvR2232TVASVsjt5mpelV9
Bug#611093: freevo: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/folder.png': No such file or directory
Source: freevo Version: 1.9.0-9 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source freevo fails to build from source in a clean sid chroot. The interesting parts of the build log: [...] | creating /build/sbuild-freevo_1.9.0-9-i386-o3xezz/freevo-1.9.0/debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes | copying ./share/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/cdrom.png - /build/sbuild-freevo_1.9.0-9-i386-o3xezz/freevo-1.9.0/debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes | copying ./share/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/folder_image.png - /build/sbuild-freevo_1.9.0-9-i386-o3xezz/freevo-1.9.0/debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes | copying ./share/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/audiocd.png - /build/sbuild-freevo_1.9.0-9-i386-o3xezz/freevo-1.9.0/debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes | copying ./share/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/empty_cdrom.png - /build/sbuild-freevo_1.9.0-9-i386-o3xezz/freevo-1.9.0/debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes | copying ./share/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/playlist_image.png - /build/sbuild-freevo_1.9.0-9-i386-o3xezz/freevo-1.9.0/debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes | copying ./share/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/playlist.png - /build/sbuild-freevo_1.9.0-9-i386-o3xezz/freevo-1.9.0/debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes | copying ./share/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/unknown.png - /build/sbuild-freevo_1.9.0-9-i386-o3xezz/freevo-1.9.0/debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes | creating /build/sbuild-freevo_1.9.0-9-i386-o3xezz/freevo-1.9.0/debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/status [...] | #clean up dreaded folder.png problem | rm debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/folder.png | rm: cannot remove `debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/folder.png': No such file or directory | make: *** [install/freevo] Error 1 share/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/folder.png is a broken symlink, which is probably why it's not getting installed. Simply changing rm to rm -f should fix this bug. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609762: amavisd-milter: Init script changes owner of current directory to 'amavis'
Hi, 2011/1/24 Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at: On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:40:06PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: I can only spot some cosmetic issues, otherwise I see no problem. The change USER - SYSTEMUSER only makes the diff larger and not really necessary. I tend to disagree as USER (as well as USERNAME) is set by the shell and so a [ -n $USER ] || USER=amavis check always evaluates to the user running the init script :-/ - as this is not the desired action I decided to rename USER to SYSTEMUSER (and will also change this in the config file). Good catch. Indeed, $USER is defined on interactive sessions and I was only thinking about starting at boot. Ok, I see how MILTERSOCKET is used now. IMHO it's better to keep the number of command line options as short as possible. I can only agree in principle. Well I don't think this package will make it into Debian Squeeze as for me a prerequisite is a fixed libmilter version... sorry when I kept you from doing other more release-critical work, this was not my intention :-(. I tend to disagree here (as Agustin). If this was the case the package would have the 'squeeze-will-remove' tag at least until now. For what I know amavisd is used in Debian SMTP infrastructure which might be a strong reason to accept this small fix in Debian 6.0. If there are other issues (ie. with libmilter) that's another issue which might indeed cause its removal. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591931: marked as done (xprintmon: not really useful to release squeeze with it)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:57:49 + with message-id e1phkl7-0001tm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#611075: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #591931, regarding xprintmon: not really useful to release squeeze with it to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 591931: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591931 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: xprintmon Version: 0.0.3-1 Severity: serious I do not think it makes sense to release xprintmon in squeeze. (Actually I think noone but me uses it, so I'm also considering to have it removed from unstable, but I most likely will not think enough about that before squeeze is released). Release team: Could you remove it from testing, please? Thanks in advance, Bernhard R. Link ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.0.3-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package xprintmon has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the assiciated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/611075 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ---End Message---
Bug#610257: Bug#610300: dropbox 1.0.17 distribution now complies to copyright complaints
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:41:47 -0800 (PST), Rian Hunter r...@dropbox.com wrote: hi all we recently released a distribution of dropbox that corrects all the complains listed in these debian bug reports. thanks for the feedback, please let me know if there is anything i can do to make dropbox comply to any more possible copyright requirements. get the new build at: http://forums.dropbox.com/topic.php?id=31870 check the README or ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS files included in the distribution for the required copyright notices. thanks a lot! rian Rian, I don't see a license for dropbox in either the README nor ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. I only see licenses for 3rd party software you agregated. I also don't find source code for this release. Forgive me if I'm overlooking something obvious. thanks, stew pgpDdW8NzwCyq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#602697: marked as done (should not be included in squeeze)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:28:20 +0100 with message-id 87hbcx3svf@gismo.pca.it and subject line Re: chef: remove from squeeze because of solr (#602697)? (was Re: Bug#602697: chef-solr depends on solr) has caused the Debian Bug report #602697, regarding should not be included in squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602697: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602697 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: solr Severity: serious Tags: squeeze -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I've written a mail (Remove Solr from Squeeze?) on 2010/10/12 to debian-java and the package's maintainer Jan-Pascal van Best and proposed the removal of solr from Squeeze, mainly because: - - it's already outdated a year by now (see bug #602696 ) - - it doesn't even include all contribs (see bug #602695 ) - - the package has accumulated too many bugs - - there doesn't seem to be enough (wo)man power to maintain the package right now on a standard that would make it fit for Debian _stable_ So until nothing else happens, please don't include solr in Debian squeeze. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJM1oGeAAoJEAf8SJEEK6ZaFiAP/jFmubZ8p3rWiMAAgwKqcttk 3tUbU+w8meAMv89k8k32BdYQMmMzg0K8ecsxJeTNIgV4CRvroUwf3vRL3qd6Tgbr U57wcVB+J6Ionea0oYru35wqGAwBsRm6fFUFRpDWrVJjuRMrrIFz7WUJHmiCmSjO +eUvo/I4hniXcgLEm72Hui/qT6HeYMHKQMlzPbjSVkTbsC/d8Q7TpE/YLu6Q5BeG yKNvyMUou02QUX2wtDIPw2K/j71OuF/PPqWv1hLDdIqbm1sTmbTSKMKmTkG0spQc ySa7djpLiWTffTH3gmKDMqSjnUuRjvJCJowLx85aicKulZuyh+Juo4Ump84V8KJN vBmCWtbI/IzldDWX73eWtkzm29fyDK62ovt7Jqm9IQ5jnrUSeRTJ+xNXfAvRjTKg Hs0jgbNiUMivqlm9wcA5d9vuzZRhchwUm9VtC8UMs3SWW+FAP2oQg/yYETYZ5rs9 xvGMS3tFgJJ1Pe8wuP3IzUo/j7jVOyxMWWOak6orGJApePOk6zG6cIYzSdo6RGfI dflA5MfHEhMOsCR3Q9fd+YRgEdyIOcnGHity31yS0RPsLO78PV8yztW5VLZXQ5f2 52aU1UMFYp2ULtW0wSFayC5lLclGo/fYKzXX+TIwBrUryukiKVPaelJ11TsAYefr PfTZdFLR1T86DewUPivM =TqjB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi there! On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:58:57 +0100, Victor Seva wrote: 2011/1/25 Luca Capello l...@pca.it: It's also in lenny (albeit in contrib) so if it were removed then a migration path for those users to a replacement would be good. Given that chef-solr was not in lenny, the above applies to solr only. However, I should say that I do not know at all a good migration path. This concern still stands, but given that no one has shown interest in implementing this in mostly two months, I would say that we should simply remove solr from squeeze. For the Release Team: should I file an RM bug or this one is sufficient? AFAIK solr has been removed already from squeeze. Thank you for the notification, my fault I did checked before only for chef, bug closed: http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/solr/news/20101215T163915Z.html Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca pgpBPKjHnKCbQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Processed: severity of 567639 is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 567639 serious Bug #567639 [make-doc-non-dfsg] make-doc-non-dfsg: Missing build dependency on texlive-latex-base Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 567639: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567639 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611112: samba4: FTBFS: ERROR: System library kdc of version 0.0.0 not found, and bundling disabled
Source: samba4 Version: 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, your package FTBFS: | Checking for hdb_db_dir : ok | Checking for system kdc : not found | Checking for header kdc.h : yes | Checking for library kdc : yes | Checking for kdc_log : not found | ERROR: System library kdc of version 0.0.0 not found, and bundling disabled | make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 Full build logs: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=samba4suite=experimental KiBi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610749: fakeroot fails ownership with kfreebsd systems
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:00:37PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: That's indeed another option. Clint, what do you think about it? Note it's only something temporary until we fix the real issue on eglibc. If the only downside is that fakeroot will be broken when backported to earlier kFreeBSD versions (were there any without the stub functions?) then it seems like a reasonable workaround. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#611088: apt-dater-host silently ignores ABI-incompatible updates
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity #611088 critical Bug #611088 [apt-dater-host] apt-dater-host silently ignores ABI-incompatible updates Severity set to 'critical' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 611088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611088 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#603974: Logs of live-installer runs
Too ease the resolution of this bug, I attached the log of debian installer with live-installer with and without a Depends: console-setup-udeb in the live-installer debian/control file. In the nodep install I got XKBLAYOUT=us instead of it in /etc/default/keyboard and calling setupcon at first reboot didn't fixed the keyboard layout. Having console-setup-udeb as dependency of live-installer produced a correct value for XKBLAYOUT (it), still setupcon at first reboot does not fix keyboard layout. Using the live-installer with explicit calls for console-setup-udeb (idea took from auto-install postinst) still does not fix the keyboard console but fix it after a setupcon invocking upon first reboot. Test system description: The images were generated with those auto/config files and Makefile attached (there for convenience), with a live-build that includes console-setup-udeb and with live-installer patched as mentioned and put in config/binary_local- udebs/ as needed. -- ESC:wq -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. debian-live-nodep-syslog.txt.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data #!/usr/bin/make -f ISOFILE := $(shell echo live_rb_`date +%F`.iso) IMAGE := binary-hybrid.iso default: config build config: lb config build: $(IMAGE) $(IMAGE): su-to-root -c lb build test: $(IMAGE) su-to-root -c qemu -boot d -cdrom binary.iso -m 256 -net nic,vlan=0 -net user,vlan=0 -net nic,vlan=1 -net tap,vlan=1 -hda hda.qcow2 clean: -su-to-root -c lb clean -find config -maxdepth 1 -type f -delete clean_mounts: -su-to-root -c lb chroot_sysfs remove -su-to-root -c lb chroot_proc remove -su-to-root -c lb chroot_devpts remove set_mounts: -su-to-root -c lb chroot_sysfs install -su-to-root -c lb chroot_proc install -su-to-root -c lb chroot_devpts install dist_clean: clean -su-to-root -c lb clean --purge .PHONY: clean config config Description: application/shellscript
Bug#610749: fakeroot fails ownership with kfreebsd systems
That's indeed another option. Clint, what do you think about it? Note it's only something temporary until we fix the real issue on eglibc. If the only downside is that fakeroot will be broken when backported to earlier kFreeBSD versions (were there any without the stub functions?) then it seems like a reasonable workaround. I am not sure whether I understand your question. The earliest glibc version on kfreebsd have been 2.3 series, almost all *at have been added in 2.4 readelf -s /lib/libc.so.0.1 | grep at | grep GLIBC | grep -v GLIBC_2.3 | grep -v GLIBC_2.4 The exception seems be __openat64_2@@GLIBC_2.7 utimensat@@GLIBC_2.6 __openat_2@@GLIBC_2.7 __readlinkat_chk@@GLIBC_2.5 The openat_2() is used for fortified openat(). Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611088: marked as done (apt-dater-host silently ignores ABI-incompatible updates)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:47:07 +
with message-id e1phmyx-0001kh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#611088: fixed in apt-dater 0.8.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #611088,
regarding apt-dater-host silently ignores ABI-incompatible updates
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
611088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611088
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: apt-dater-host
Version: 0.8.4-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
Hi,
this bug is related to SF Bug#3158198 reported by Mathieu PARENT:
apt-dater-host does silently ignore any ABI-incompatible updates (like bind9).
Users of apt-dater might think that their hosts are up to date while they are
missing important security fixes (i.e. recent bind9 updates).
There is a simple patch to solve this issue:
===
--- apt-dater-host/trunk/debian/apt-dater-host 2011-01-21 08:51:02 UTC (rev
543)
+++ apt-dater-host/trunk/debian/apt-dater-host 2011-01-21 08:57:45 UTC (rev
544)
@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@
$DPKGARGS = --quiet --simulate --fix-broken --allow-unauthenticated;
}
-unless(open(HAPT, $_GETROOT $DPKGTOOL $DPKGARGS upgrade |)) {
- print \nADPERR: Failed to execute '$_GETROOT $DPKGTOOL $DPKGARGS
upgrade' ($!).\n;
+unless(open(HAPT, $_GETROOT $DPKGTOOL $DPKGARGS dist-upgrade |)) {
+ print \nADPERR: Failed to execute '$_GETROOT $DPKGTOOL $DPKGARGS
dist-upgrade' ($!).\n;
exit(1);
}
while(HAPT) {
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@
}
close(HAPT);
if($?) {
- print \nADPERR: Error executing '$GETROOT $DPKGTOOL $DPKGARGS upgrade'
($?).\n;
+ print \nADPERR: Error executing '$GETROOT $DPKGTOOL $DPKGARGS
dist-upgrade' ($?).\n;
exit(1);
}
HTH,
Thomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages apt-dater-host depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36 Debian configuration management sy
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.24+b1Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii lsb-release 3.2-23.2squeeze1 Linux Standard Base version report
ii openssh-server 1:5.5p1-6secure shell (SSH) server, for sec
ii perl5.10.1-17Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
Versions of packages apt-dater-host recommends:
ii aptitude 0.6.3-3.2 terminal-based package manager (te
ii imvirt0.9.1-pre1 I'm virtualized?
ii sudo 1.7.4p4-2 Provide limited super user privile
apt-dater-host suggests no packages.
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/apt-dater-host.conf changed [not included]
-- debconf information excluded
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: apt-dater
Source-Version: 0.8.4-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-dater, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
apt-dater-dbg_0.8.4-3_i386.deb
to main/a/apt-dater/apt-dater-dbg_0.8.4-3_i386.deb
apt-dater-host_0.8.4-3_all.deb
to main/a/apt-dater/apt-dater-host_0.8.4-3_all.deb
apt-dater_0.8.4-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/a/apt-dater/apt-dater_0.8.4-3.debian.tar.gz
apt-dater_0.8.4-3.dsc
to main/a/apt-dater/apt-dater_0.8.4-3.dsc
apt-dater_0.8.4-3_i386.deb
to main/a/apt-dater/apt-dater_0.8.4-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 611...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org (supplier of updated apt-dater package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:22:29 +0100
Source: apt-dater
Binary: apt-dater apt-dater-dbg apt-dater-host
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.8.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org
Changed-By: Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org
Description:
apt-dater - terminal-based
Bug#611112: marked as done (samba4: FTBFS: ERROR: System library kdc of version 0.0.0 not found, and bundling disabled)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:18:04 + with message-id e1phnsu-0004uj...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#62: fixed in samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #62, regarding samba4: FTBFS: ERROR: System library kdc of version 0.0.0 not found, and bundling disabled to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 62: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=62 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: samba4 Version: 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, your package FTBFS: | Checking for hdb_db_dir : ok | Checking for system kdc : not found | Checking for header kdc.h : yes | Checking for library kdc : yes | Checking for kdc_log : not found | ERROR: System library kdc of version 0.0.0 not found, and bundling disabled | make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 Full build logs: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=samba4suite=experimental KiBi. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: samba4 Source-Version: 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of samba4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libdcerpc-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libdcerpc-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libdcerpc0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libdcerpc0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libgensec-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libgensec-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libgensec0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libgensec0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libndr-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libndr-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libndr-standard-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libndr-standard-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libndr-standard0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libndr-standard0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libndr0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libndr0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libparse-pidl-perl_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libparse-pidl-perl_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libregistry-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libregistry-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libregistry0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libregistry0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libsamba-hostconfig-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libsamba-hostconfig-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libsamba-hostconfig0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libsamba-hostconfig0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libsamba-util-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libsamba-util-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libsamba-util0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libsamba-util0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libsamdb0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libsamdb0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libtorture-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libtorture-dev_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb libtorture0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/libtorture0_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb python-samba_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/python-samba_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb registry-tools_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/registry-tools_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb samba4-clients_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb to main/s/samba4/samba4-clients_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_amd64.deb samba4-common-bin_4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2_all.deb to
Bug#611119: eagle: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8
Source: eagle Version: 5.10.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source eagle FTBFS in a clean i386 sid chroot. Tail of the build log: | fakeroot debian/rules binary | dh_prep | dh_install -i | dh_installchangelogs -i | dh_installdocs -i | dh_link -i | dh_compress -i | dh_fixperms -i | dh_gencontrol -i | dh_md5sums -i | dh_builddeb -i | dpkg-deb: building package `eagle-data' in `../eagle-data_5.10.0-1_all.deb'. | dh_prep | dh_install -a | dh_installchangelogs -a -k doc/UPDATE_en | dh_installdocs -a | dh_installman -a | dh_installmenu -a | dh_installmime -a | dh_link -a | dh_compress -a | dh_strip -a | dh_fixperms -a | dh_installdeb -a | dh_shlibdeps -a | dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8 needed by debian/eagle/usr/lib/eagle/bin/eagle (ELF format: 'elf32-i386'; RPATH: ''). | Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have any shlibs or symbols file. | To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. | dh_shlibdeps: dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/eagle.substvars debian/eagle/usr/lib/eagle/bin/eagle returned exit code 2 | make: *** [binary-arch] Error 9 Perhaps a missing build-dependency? -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610032: CVE-2010-4341
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:16AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: sssd Severity: grave Tags: security Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-4341 for description and patch. What's the status? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610487: asterisk: AST-2011-001: buffer overflow in caller ID URI encoding
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:36:01PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Package: asterisk Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2 Justification: user security hole Severity: grave Tags: security patch upstream *** Please type your report below this line *** The Asterisk project has reported security advisory ASA-2011-011 http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2011-001.html (No CVE ATM) When forming an outgoing SIP request while in pedantic mode, a stack buffer can be made to overflow if supplied with carefully crafted caller ID information. Caller ID information may be provided by remote users. The advisory details potential workaround in the dialplan, but applying it varies greatly on different configurations. Issue applies both to the Lenny and Squeeze packages. For patches: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-voip?view=revrevision=8708 (Squeeze) http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-voip?view=revrevision=8711 (Lenny) What's the status of a Squeeze upload? This should be uploaded with the minimal fix and urgency=high. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610034: CVE-2011-0002: libuser creates LDAP users with a default password
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:37:29AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: libuser Severity: grave Tags: security Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-0002 for a description and patch. I'm not really sure if Debian is affected? Ghe, Are you still maintaining this package? There has been no upload since 2008, popcon is marginal and there's no followup from your side to any of its bugs. If not, we should rather remove it from Squeeze. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611130: CVE-2010-2087
Package: mojarra Severity: grave Tags: security http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-2087 Please get in touch with upstream, whether this has been addressed. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609535: psiconv: Patch for GraphicsMagick API change causing crash on startup
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 609535 + squeeze-will-remove thanks On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 15:11 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Reuben Thomas r...@sc3d.org, 2011-01-19, 19:05: you can always build against ImageMagick instead. I played a little bit more and unfortunately psiconv rebuilt against ImageMagick sometimes produces different images that the one from lenny. For examples/Clipart, the latter produces 71-page TIFF, while the former only a single-page image. In light of the above, the lack of an apparent fix and psiconv's maintenance status, I'm looking at removing it from squeeze in the next few days. The package has two reverse dependencies - abiword and gnumeric - whose maintainers have acked patches dropping the dependencies. Although libpsiconv6 has a fairly substantial reported popcon installation count, a significant number of those are most likely due to the package being pulled in via abiword and/or gnumeric-plugins-extra; the recent count is below 100 and the installation count for the command-line utility barely breaks double figures. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: reassign 608288 to mono
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 608288 mono Bug #608288 [moon] mono: CVE-2010-4254 and CVE-2010-4225 Bug reassigned from package 'moon' to 'mono'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608288 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609535: psiconv: magick/semaphore.c:526: LockSemaphoreInfo: Assertion `semaphore_info-signature == 0xabacadabUL' failed.
Hi Adam, On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 19:40:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 20:15 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: I've verified that with the attached patches, both packages at least build on squeeze without any apparent sign of using psiconv. (They're both already out of sync wrt unstable so would need tpu uploads). abiword / gnumeric maintainers: Do you have any opinions on the suggested patches? As discussed on IRC, it's the right way to go about removing Gnumeric's psiconv dependency. If you're okay with them, would you be able to perform a testing-proposed-updates upload in the next couple of days incorporating the patch? I'll give it a go tomorrow. Kind regards, Ray -- Does Kibo SEE the FNORDS? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610032: CVE-2010-4341
[Moritz Mühlenhoff] What's the status? Been too busy with work and real life to look at sssd, and welcome NMUs to fix it. It is unlikely to change before Squeeze is released, but I hope it will improve in a month or two. I suspect Werner is in the same situation. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: qtiplot/libmuparser0: dependency incorrect
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: package qtiplot libmuparser0 Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'qtiplot', 'libmuparser0' Limit currently set to 'package':'qtiplot', 'libmuparser0' clone 610265 -1 Bug#610265: qtiplot/libmuparser0: dependency incorrect Bug 610265 cloned as bug 611131. reassign -1 libmuparser0 Bug #611131 [qtiplot] qtiplot/libmuparser0: dependency incorrect Bug reassigned from package 'qtiplot' to 'libmuparser0'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions qtiplot/0.9.8-1. retitle -1 libmuparser0: shlibs should give proper versioned dependency Bug #611131 [libmuparser0] qtiplot/libmuparser0: dependency incorrect Changed Bug title to 'libmuparser0: shlibs should give proper versioned dependency' from 'qtiplot/libmuparser0: dependency incorrect' severity -1 serious Bug #611131 [libmuparser0] libmuparser0: shlibs should give proper versioned dependency Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' found -1 1.32-1 Bug #611131 [libmuparser0] libmuparser0: shlibs should give proper versioned dependency Bug Marked as found in versions muparser/1.32-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 611131: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611131 610265: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610265 -1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610032: CVE-2010-4341
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:56:45PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Moritz Mühlenhoff] What's the status? Been too busy with work and real life to look at sssd, and welcome NMUs to fix it. It is unlikely to change before Squeeze is released, but I hope it will improve in a month or two. I suspect Werner is in the same situation. Petter, Werner I've uploaded an NMU to unstable. I could only do artificial tests. since I lack a setup/LDAP to test sssd in practive. Please test the packages in a real sssd setup and request the unblock for Squeeze. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611134: CVE-2011-0011 qemu-kvm: Setting VNC password to empty string silently disables all authentication
Package: kvm Severity: grave Tags: security Please see the following entry in the Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-0011 The impact is not entirely obvious to me? Do I understand it correctly that a malicious application accessing a KVM instance could lock out other apps to this virtual machine? Do you think this needs to be fixed for Squeeze or in a point update? Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611135: gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor (and gvfs-afc-volume-monitor) are respawned continuously, proc goes 100%
Package: gvfs Version: 1.6.4-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hi dear debian people, At some point (I was not able to discover the preconditions yet), my system starts spawning gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor (and/or gvfs-afc-volume-monitor). There seem to be a problem with them, because they are respawned automatically: you can see their pids soar in gnome-system-monitor, for example. Problem is, this brings the cpu to 100%; and for an unknown reason makes some software not display anything anymore (e.g. nautilus). I fix this problem by running $ killall [-9] /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-afc- volume-monitor when it occurs. This works most of the time, but sometimes it just goes on and I'm good to restart. This might be bound to a config problem, since I copied most of the hidden file in ~ from the ubuntu install I ran before installing unstable. I have no idea where this comes from neither do I know what log/config file I could provide to help, but I would be happy to do so! Thanks in advance for your advice, Nicolas -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing-proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gvfs depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-9 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libdbus-1-3 1.2.24-4 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libexpat1 2.0.1-7XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libgconf2-4 2.28.1-6 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgdu0 2.30.1-2 GObject based Disk Utility Library ii libglib2.0-0 2.24.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring0 2.30.1-1 GNOME keyring services library ii libudev0 164-4 libudev shared library ii x11-utils 7.5+4 X11 utilities Versions of packages gvfs recommends: ii dbus 1.2.24-4 simple interprocess messaging syst ii policykit-1-gnome 0.96-3 GNOME authentication agent for Pol Versions of packages gvfs suggests: ii gvfs-backends 1.6.4-3userspace virtual filesystem - bac -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610032: marked as done (CVE-2010-4341)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:34:39 + with message-id e1phqx9-0001yx...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#610032: fixed in sssd 1.2.1-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610032, regarding CVE-2010-4341 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610032: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610032 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sssd Severity: grave Tags: security Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-4341 for description and patch. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: sssd Source-Version: 1.2.1-4.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sssd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libnss-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb to main/s/sssd/libnss-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb libpam-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb to main/s/sssd/libpam-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb python-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb to main/s/sssd/python-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb sssd_1.2.1-4.1.diff.gz to main/s/sssd/sssd_1.2.1-4.1.diff.gz sssd_1.2.1-4.1.dsc to main/s/sssd/sssd_1.2.1-4.1.dsc sssd_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb to main/s/sssd/sssd_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 610...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org (supplier of updated sssd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:09:21 +0100 Source: sssd Binary: sssd libnss-sss libpam-sss python-sss Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.2.1-4.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Petter Reinholdtsen p...@debian.org Changed-By: Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org Description: libnss-sss - Nss library for the System Security Services Daemon libpam-sss - Pam module for the System Security Services Daemon python-sss - Pam module for the System Security Services Daemon sssd - System Security Services Daemon Closes: 610032 Changes: sssd (1.2.1-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team * Fix CVE-2010-4341 (Closes: #610032) Checksums-Sha1: 6375de3a5fc5a526477c46087dba35691aabe2b1 1592 sssd_1.2.1-4.1.dsc a8c492eb54032159df0fb87d8992b32918998c89 15965 sssd_1.2.1-4.1.diff.gz 5ac8955c55b5261c247605d0c30ad954ec332a50 1727542 sssd_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb 30e9fe6a5cc8bfada190ee13e1bd34d7b8ed5ca6 16298 libnss-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb 2d71707935f7f66cd5c3d7fc1575f6c94c05448d 20528 libpam-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb 1d9bf69e723ad316b5a03e3c754f2bdc1325d163 150038 python-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 3b10b0b419d63fad411582f52ccf9820e018c11688fcc12f00eeeb3d87c7 1592 sssd_1.2.1-4.1.dsc b24a2eac117c53ffec35646aa537c30a2319d3bdb683f396d2ea4a47fee85c7d 15965 sssd_1.2.1-4.1.diff.gz a49f8671cea433bfefd16e45aa152ca844ad204453016f2500afac6d9feccd7e 1727542 sssd_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb 7f72d442876ea44f5ba68f08221fa13263ef85b78d4fce4bbdf6a6f5f81fca57 16298 libnss-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb 641166fd35a934bfe477ee86b5063c528cead09d166200fefc3b699d995b6ed7 20528 libpam-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb 99c3c5cfdbcb16ec6d7935354edb4deac89d6bbe12f04a9b3610484f14ff6898 150038 python-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb Files: 6a77eca3df059b22ded30373c24675ce 1592 utils extra sssd_1.2.1-4.1.dsc a401cdca4085774d143b32b8e25e3d92 15965 utils extra sssd_1.2.1-4.1.diff.gz 49b491229fc109a402376ba5a49892a9 1727542 utils extra sssd_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb c05bc7a04b81dff4a36046630640e182 16298 utils extra libnss-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb 2c868f385e32ab9227909e251b45c0a6 20528 utils extra libpam-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb cea35fc3cd4c459faf70a50c8d656c07 150038 python extra python-sss_1.2.1-4.1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0/PdoACgkQXm3vHE4uylpCcwCfVP37BU9paeK5oeeZSV4vvm1V MEsAnRwlhiERFAv7/6wxjNBksw1Yvcsx =4kfM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End
Bug#609762: amavisd-milter: Init script changes owner of current directory to 'amavis'
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 04:57:42PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: Hi, Hello 2011/1/24 Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at: On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:40:06PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: I can only spot some cosmetic issues, otherwise I see no problem. The change USER - SYSTEMUSER only makes the diff larger and not really necessary. I tend to disagree as USER (as well as USERNAME) is set by the shell and so a [ -n $USER ] || USER=amavis check always evaluates to the user running the init script :-/ - as this is not the desired action I decided to rename USER to SYSTEMUSER (and will also change this in the config file). Good catch. Indeed, $USER is defined on interactive sessions and I was only thinking about starting at boot. Yes therefor I think this change is also necessary do you agree? Ok, I see how MILTERSOCKET is used now. IMHO it's better to keep the number of command line options as short as possible. I can only agree in principle. :-) thanks Well I don't think this package will make it into Debian Squeeze as for me a prerequisite is a fixed libmilter version... sorry when I kept you from doing other more release-critical work, this was not my intention :-(. I tend to disagree here (as Agustin). If this was the case the package would have the 'squeeze-will-remove' tag at least until now. For what I know amavisd is used in Debian SMTP infrastructure which might be a strong reason to accept this small fix in Debian 6.0. If there are other issues (ie. with libmilter) that's another issue which might indeed cause its removal. As far as I know there are not many installations using amavisd-new with milter so I guess the impact should be fairly minimal - my main objection currently is that I have seen no amavisd-milter installation which runs stable with the current libmilter version in testing and I do not see any interest of the release team in fixing it. Thanks Thanks for your valuable input Harald -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609762: amavisd-milter: Init script changes owner of current directory to 'amavis'
2011/1/25 Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 04:57:42PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: Good catch. Indeed, $USER is defined on interactive sessions and I was only thinking about starting at boot. Yes therefor I think this change is also necessary do you agree? Yes. I tend to disagree here (as Agustin). If this was the case the package would have the 'squeeze-will-remove' tag at least until now. For what I know amavisd is used in Debian SMTP infrastructure which might be a strong reason to accept this small fix in Debian 6.0. If there are other issues (ie. with libmilter) that's another issue which might indeed cause its removal. As far as I know there are not many installations using amavisd-new with milter so I guess the impact should be fairly minimal - my main objection currently is that I have seen no amavisd-milter installation which runs stable with the current libmilter version in testing and I do not see any interest of the release team in fixing it. If you're absolutely sure that amavisd-milter is broken due to libmilter (in squeeze) than you should request its removal by the release team. Of course the alternative is to fix libmilter but this might have to wait for r1. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611138: CVE-2010-4438
Package: glassfish Severity: grave Tags: security See http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-4438 Please get in touch with Oracle to check, what unspecified vulnerability they fixed... Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609762: amavisd-milter: Init script changes owner of current directory to 'amavis'
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:16:51PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:07:09PM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:59:41PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: 2011/1/24 Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at: Ok although the PIDFILE line can be removed with the below code. I'm don't see where PIDFILE is removed. Just take a look at the next patch version. It looks OK to me too, with the grain of salt of not being an amavis user. :-) no problem Well I don't think this package will make it into Debian Squeeze as for me a prerequisite is a fixed libmilter version... Reading debian-release, seems that there is no consensus about removing amavisd-milter from squeeze. Well consensus may be nice to be achieved but not a necessity. If you tested things carefully and everything was OK, I'd say upload. I still have to do some tests yet. That should not make things worse that before, but better, starting real life check. Yes but before I will have to clean my old release branch which was rejected. And release team can still remove amavisd-milter from squeeze if needed. True yes If a fixed libmilter version is a pre-requisite for this particular bug report, do not forget to set the corresponding blocker in the BTS. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527862 this bug is already fixed in Debian unstable but there was no request from the maintainer to unblock it in time so the only method would be a t-p-u which I proposed about three weeks ago. sorry when I kept you from doing other more release-critical work, this was not my intention :-(. No problem. Thanks very much for your help! Regards, -- Agustin Kind regards Harald -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#609762: amavisd-milter: Init script changes owner of current directory to 'amavis'
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:51:30PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: 2011/1/25 Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 04:57:42PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: Good catch. Indeed, $USER is defined on interactive sessions and I was only thinking about starting at boot. Yes therefor I think this change is also necessary do you agree? Yes. Ok thanks I tend to disagree here (as Agustin). If this was the case the package would have the 'squeeze-will-remove' tag at least until now. For what I know amavisd is used in Debian SMTP infrastructure which might be a strong reason to accept this small fix in Debian 6.0. If there are other issues (ie. with libmilter) that's another issue which might indeed cause its removal. As far as I know there are not many installations using amavisd-new with milter so I guess the impact should be fairly minimal - my main objection currently is that I have seen no amavisd-milter installation which runs stable with the current libmilter version in testing and I do not see any interest of the release team in fixing it. If you're absolutely sure that amavisd-milter is broken due to libmilter (in squeeze) than you should request its removal by the release team. Yes I am I currently run it with my t-p-u to fix this (and also received the reply of a user which says this). Of course the alternative is to fix libmilter but this might have to wait for r1. Yes but this would have not been really necessary IMHO: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/01/msg00111.html Thanks Bye Harald -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610777: mathgl: FBTFS: broken symbols
On Saturday 22 January 2011 13:23:25 you wrote: On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:19 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Source: mathgl Version: 1.11.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, your package FTBFS on all archs with symbols errors: Hello Cyril and Sylvestre, as far as I can see it built OK on amd64. It failed on the rest of the archs. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mathglsuite=experimenta l Interesting. I had this issues many times when I was trying to sponsor this package. It started working this morning (I don't know why). Dimitrios, sorry for that but could you try to reproduce it on your system ? Sylvestre In my system (amd64)it built OK as it did on amd64 buildd. As far as I can see, on the rest of the archs it failed, because although upload was done on experimental, sid was almost entirely used as chroot for the buildd (e.g. g++ 4.4.5, qt 4.6.3 etc). Since the symbols files were created within an experimental chroot, failure was not a surprise. I will try (by the weekend) to rebuild the packages within sid chroot and change (once more) the symbols files. If possible we should upload to all archs but amd64. Best regards Dimitris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611142: massxpert: Program crashes when clicking left of first monomer vignette
Package: massxpert Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Sending bug report to myself. When clicking left of the first monomer vignette the program crashes. Presumably because of a failed array bound checking. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages massxpert depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-7 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.4.5-8 GCC support library ii libqt4-svg4:4.6.3-4 Qt 4 SVG module ii libqt4-xml4:4.6.3-4 Qt 4 XML module ii libqtcore44:4.6.3-4 Qt 4 core module ii libqtgui4 4:4.6.3-4 Qt 4 GUI module ii libstdc++64.4.5-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii massxpert-data2.4.1-1linear polymer mass spectrometry s massxpert recommends no packages. Versions of packages massxpert suggests: ii massxpert-doc 2.4.1-1Linear polymer mass spectrometry s -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611039: marked as done (gnome: Unable to input through keyboard after logging into GNOME desktop)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:27:51 + with message-id 4d3f5c77.6000...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#611039: Issue fixed inadvertently while troubleshooting has caused the Debian Bug report #611039, regarding gnome: Unable to input through keyboard after logging into GNOME desktop to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611039: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611039 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: gnome Version: 1:2.30+7 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software I use three user accounts on my system: root, susam and guest. After booting the system, when I log into GNOME desktop as 'susam', I am unable to use the keyboard to input any text. Keyboard seems completely unusable then. Even Ctrl + Alt + F1 does not work. To recover from the situation, I log off using the mouse (System Log out from the menu) and log in again as a different user 'guest'. In this account I am able to work properly with the keyboard. So, I have this problem only when I login as 'susam'. My guess is that there is some corrupt GNOME related configuration file for the 'susam' account. Additional notes: 1. Only one account called 'susam' is affected. 2. Mouse works. I can log out using mouse and then use the keyboard again to log in as a different user and work properly. 3. I did nothing unusual when the issue started troubling me. The keyboard was working fine. I was using Iceweasel. I was able to type addresses and visit websites. Suddenly, for no apparent reason keyboard input stopped working. Pressing the keys did nothing. Mouse was still working though. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gnome depends on: ii avahi-daemon0.6.27-2 Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD daemon ii banshee 1.6.1-1.1Media Management and Playback appl ii epiphany-extensions 2.30.2-1 Extensions for Epiphany web browse ii evolution-exchange 2.30.2-1 Exchange plugin for the Evolution ii evolution-plugins 2.30.3-5 standard plugins for Evolution ii evolution-webcal2.28.1-1 webcal: URL handler for GNOME and ii gdm-themes 0.6.2Themes for the GNOME Display Manag ii gedit-plugins 2.30.0-1 set of plugins for gedit ii gnome-codec-install 0.4.7GStreamer codec installer ii gnome-desktop-environment 1:2.30+7 The GNOME Desktop Environment ii gnome-games 1:2.30.2-2 games for the GNOME desktop ii gnome-themes-extras 2.22.0-3 extra themes for the GNOME desktop ii gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg0.10.10-1FFmpeg plugin for GStreamer ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly 0.10.15-1GStreamer plugins from the ugly ii libpam-gnome-keyring2.30.3-5 PAM module to unlock the GNOME key ii rhythmbox-plugins 0.12.8-2 plugins for rhythmbox music player ii software-center 2.0.7debian7 Utility for browsing, installing, ii synaptic0.70~pre1+b1 Graphical package manager ii system-config-printer 1.2.3-3 graphical interface to configure t ii tomboy 1.2.2-2 desktop note taking program using ii totem-mozilla 2.30.2-6 Totem Mozilla plugin ii transmission-gtk2.03-2 lightweight BitTorrent client (GTK Versions of packages gnome recommends: ii browser-plugin-gnash [mozi 0.8.8-5 GNU Shockwave Flash (SWF) player - ii gdebi 0.6.4 Simple tool to install deb files - ii gnome-games-extra-data 2.30.0-1 games for the GNOME desktop (extra ii gnome-office 1:2.30+7 The GNOME Office suite ii liferea1.6.4-1 feed aggregator for GNOME ii menu-xdg 0.5 freedesktop.org menu compliant win ii mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.8-5 dummy package for renaming to brow ii network-manager-gnome 0.8.1-2 network management framework (GNOM ii shotwell 0.6.1-1+b2digital photo organizer ii update-notifier0.99.3debian8 Daemon which notifies about packag Versions of packages gnome suggests: pn gnome-dbg none (no description available) pn
Bug#609722: marked as done (installation-reports: USB Memory Stick Booting wrote Bootsector on USB Stick)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:45:32 +0100 with message-id 20110125234532.ga31...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#609722: is still there has caused the Debian Bug report #609722, regarding installation-reports: USB Memory Stick Booting wrote Bootsector on USB Stick to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 609722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609722 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: installation-reports Severity: normal -- Package-specific info: Boot method: USB Memory Stick Image version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/ (from today) Date: 11/01/2011, 20:00 UTC Machine: IBM Thinkpad T42p Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred rd@omjuta:~$ df -Tl Dateisystem Typ1K‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/sda1 ext359075756 3577696 52497180 7% / tmpfstmpfs 1037132 0 1037132 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 1032784 188 1032596 1% /dev tmpfstmpfs 1037132 764 1036368 1% /dev/shm rd@omjuta:~$ Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[E] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: The installer did write the boot sector of the USB Memory Stick instead of the hard disk. The hard disk did not boot, when I tried to boot from the installer again everything worked well. I did then a grub-install this wrote the boot sector of the hard disk and starting from then I could boot without the USB stick. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20110106 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=netboot == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux ompjuta 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Fri Dec 10 15:32:53 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82855PM Processor to I/O Controller [8086:3340] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: IBM Device [1014:0529] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82855PM Processor to AGP Controller [8086:3341] (rev 03) lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:24c2] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Subsystem: IBM Device [1014:052d] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:24c4] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Subsystem: IBM Device [1014:052d] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #3 [8086:24c7] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Subsystem: IBM Device [1014:052d] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-M) USB2 EHCI Controller [8086:24cd] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Subsystem: IBM Device [1014:052e] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge [8086:2448] (rev 81) lspci -knn: 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801DBM (ICH4-M) LPC Interface Bridge [8086:24cc] (rev 01) lspci -knn: 00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801DBM (ICH4-M) IDE Controller [8086:24ca] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Subsystem: IBM Device [1014:052d] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ata_piix lspci -knn: 00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) SMBus Controller [8086:24c3] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Subsystem: IBM Device [1014:052d]
Bug#567639: severity of 567639 is serious
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 567639 squeeze-can-defer tag 567639 squeeze-ignore kthxbye On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 16:59:02 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: severity 567639 serious thanks make-doc-non-dfsg is unlikely to be a security problem or see other uploads during squeeze's lifetime, the fix is trivial, and the package is arch:all, so, meh, not a blocker. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: severity of 567639 is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was jcris...@debian.org). usertag 567639 squeeze-can-defer Bug#567639: make-doc-non-dfsg: Missing build dependency on texlive-latex-base There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: squeeze-can-defer. tag 567639 squeeze-ignore Bug #567639 [make-doc-non-dfsg] make-doc-non-dfsg: Missing build dependency on texlive-latex-base Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore. kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 567639: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567639 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#587842: My last (hopefully) bits for KDE in Squeeze
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 587842 squeeze-can-defer tag 587842 squeeze-ignore kthxbye On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 23:04:31 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: Hello, On trečiadienis 19 Sausis 2011 11:18:34 Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 02:25:34 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: 4) src:krusader #604196 There are reports that the included fix for this grave bug is wrong. Too bad I would need to do a t-p-u upload in order to include the supposedly right fix ( http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revisionrevision=1169424 + http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revisionrevision=1169519 ). I will test it as best as I can. maybe r1 as well. First of all, some background on the issue: 1) Before 1:2.2.0~beta1-2 was uploaded, upstream [1] and me [2] had some considerations about the fix because it apparently introduced a new regression as serious as a crash [3]. To make things worse, #604196 was later opened saying that the patch didn't actually fix the bug in the end. 2) QCoreApplication::processEvents() [4] is considered to be a dangerous function when called manually. It messes up control flow in unpredictable ways as it triggers processing of the event loop right away. It may even dead lock an application in the worst case scenario (event loop processing from within unfinished event handler, oops). Who knows, maybe #604196 is because of event loop deadlock. The new patch apparently nails and fixes the real cause of the hang-on-quit. Of course if there is release process related reasons to wait (e.g. it's simply too late for t-p-u at this point), we can delay it. But if we could fix it now, we should do it (it's -1 RC bug anyway, karma++ :-)). I think this can wait for r1, and at this point I'm nervous about more changes before the release, so I'll defer this. Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: My last (hopefully) bits for KDE in Squeeze
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was jcris...@debian.org). usertag 587842 squeeze-can-defer Bug#587842: Can stop krusader neither by closing its window nor by Ctrl+q There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: squeeze-can-defer. tag 587842 squeeze-ignore Bug #587842 [krusader] Can stop krusader neither by closing its window nor by Ctrl+q Bug #604196 [krusader] Can stop krusader neither by closing it's window nor by Ctrl+q (again) Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore. Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore. kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 587842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587842 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611135: gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor (and gvfs-afc-volume-monitor) are respawned continuously, proc goes 100%
severity 611135 important kthxbye On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 22:29:19 +0100, Nicolas JEAN wrote: Package: gvfs Version: 1.6.4-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system I don't think so. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#611135: gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor (and gvfs-afc-volume-monitor) are respawned continuously, proc goes 100%
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 611135 important Bug #611135 [gvfs] gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor (and gvfs-afc-volume-monitor) are respawned continuously, proc goes 100% Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 611135: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611135 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611130: CVE-2010-2087
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 611130 squeeze-can-defer tag 611130 squeeze-ignore kthxbye On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 21:43:36 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: mojarra Severity: grave Tags: security http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-2087 Please get in touch with upstream, whether this has been addressed. Not a blocker, can be fixed post release. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#611130: CVE-2010-2087
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was jcris...@debian.org). usertag 611130 squeeze-can-defer Bug#611130: CVE-2010-2087 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: squeeze-can-defer. tag 611130 squeeze-ignore Bug #611130 [mojarra] CVE-2010-2087 Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore. kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 611130: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611130 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: notfixed 611008 in 2.1-4, notfixed 611008 in 2.1-5
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# if the bug is invalid then it should not have a fixed version
notfixed 611008 2.1-4
Bug #611008 {Done: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org} [r-other-mott-happy] does
not run with current version of R in squeeze
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions r-other-mott-happy/2.1-4.
notfixed 611008 2.1-5
Bug #611008 {Done: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org} [r-other-mott-happy] does
not run with current version of R in squeeze
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions r-other-mott-happy/2.1-5.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
611008: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611008
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#587948: marked as done (/usr/bin/mono segfaults if shared memory (/dev/shm) is exhausted)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:19:16 + with message-id e1pht6s-0002sa...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#587948: fixed in mono 2.6.7-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #587948, regarding /usr/bin/mono segfaults if shared memory (/dev/shm) is exhausted to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 587948: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587948 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: mono-gac Version: 2.4.4~svn151842-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable /usr/bin/gacutil segfaults when run, meaning that assemblies cannot be properly installed. This also means that installation of mono-related packages fails. Example: * Installing 1 assembly from libgnomepanel2.24-cil into Mono ** (/usr/share/mono/MonoGetAssemblyName.exe:10491): WARNING **: Thread (nil) may have been prematurely finalized ** (/usr/share/mono/MonoGetAssemblyName.exe:10491): WARNING **: Thread (nil) may have been prematurely finalized ** (/usr/share/mono/MonoGetAssemblyName.exe:10491): WARNING **: Thread (nil) may have been prematurely finalized ** (/usr/share/mono/MonoGetAssemblyName.exe:10491): WARNING **: Thread (nil) may have been prematurely finalized Use of uninitialized value $_ in scalar chomp at /usr/share/cli-common/runtimes.d/mono line 144. Use of uninitialized value $fullname in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/cli-common/runtimes.d/mono line 113. Stacktrace: ** (/usr/lib/mono/2.0/gacutil.exe:10498): WARNING **: Thread (nil) may have been prematurely finalized ** (/usr/lib/mono/2.0/gacutil.exe:10498): WARNING **: Thread (nil) may have been prematurely finalized sh: line 1: 10498 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/gacutil -i `basename /usr/lib/cli/gnome-panel-sharp-2.24/gnome-panel-sharp.dll` /dev/null E: installing Assembly /usr/lib/cli/gnome-panel-sharp-2.24/gnome-panel-sharp.dll failed E: Installation of libgnomepanel2.24-cil with /usr/share/cli-common/runtimes.d/mono failed Note the gacutil invocation. Thanks, -- Fabian Fagerholm fa...@paniq.net -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages mono-gac depends on: ii mono-2.0-gac 2.4.4~svn151842-3 Mono GAC tool (for CLI 2.0) mono-gac recommends no packages. mono-gac suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: mono Source-Version: 2.6.7-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mono, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmono-accessibility1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-accessibility1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-accessibility2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-accessibility2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-bytefx0.7.6.1-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-bytefx0.7.6.1-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-bytefx0.7.6.2-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-bytefx0.7.6.2-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-c5-1.1-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-c5-1.1-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cairo1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cairo1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cairo2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cairo2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cecil-private-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cecil-private-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cil-dev_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cil-dev_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-corlib1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-corlib1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-corlib2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-corlib2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cscompmgd7.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cscompmgd7.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cscompmgd8.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cscompmgd8.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-data-tds1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-data-tds1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-data-tds2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-data-tds2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-data1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-data1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-data2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-data2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-db2-1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-db2-1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-debugger-soft0.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to
Bug#608288: marked as done (mono: CVE-2010-4254 and CVE-2010-4225)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:19:16 + with message-id e1pht6s-0002si...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#608288: fixed in mono 2.6.7-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #608288, regarding mono: CVE-2010-4254 and CVE-2010-4225 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 608288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608288 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: moon Severity: serious Tags: security -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was published for moon. CVE-2010-4254[0]: | Mono, when Moonlight before 2.3.0.1 or 2.99.x before 2.99.0.10 is | used, does not properly validate arguments to generic methods, which | allows remote attackers to bypass generic constraints, and possibly | execute arbitrary code, via a crafted method call. If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the CVE id in your changelog entry. For further information see: [0] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-4254 http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4254 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0bcLIACgkQNxpp46476ar3VQCeMCkgi2LOffgbYtJ1VFi16BZY jA4An3O+Jp9RxvLxI+JdU4RnIuJ1pru7 =Dusj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: mono Source-Version: 2.6.7-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mono, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmono-accessibility1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-accessibility1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-accessibility2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-accessibility2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-bytefx0.7.6.1-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-bytefx0.7.6.1-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-bytefx0.7.6.2-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-bytefx0.7.6.2-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-c5-1.1-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-c5-1.1-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cairo1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cairo1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cairo2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cairo2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cecil-private-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cecil-private-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cil-dev_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cil-dev_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-corlib1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-corlib1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-corlib2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-corlib2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cscompmgd7.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cscompmgd7.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-cscompmgd8.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-cscompmgd8.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-data-tds1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-data-tds1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-data-tds2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-data-tds2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-data1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-data1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-data2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-data2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-db2-1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-db2-1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-debugger-soft0.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-debugger-soft0.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-dev_2.6.7-5_i386.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-dev_2.6.7-5_i386.deb libmono-firebirdsql1.7-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-firebirdsql1.7-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-getoptions1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-getoptions1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-getoptions2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-getoptions2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-i18n-west1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-i18n-west1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-i18n-west2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-i18n-west2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-i18n1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-i18n1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-i18n2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-i18n2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-ldap1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-ldap1.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-ldap2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-ldap2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-management2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-management2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-messaging-rabbitmq2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to main/m/mono/libmono-messaging-rabbitmq2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb libmono-messaging2.0-cil_2.6.7-5_all.deb to
Bug#611119: eagle: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8
tags 69 + patch thanks Hi, | dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8 needed by debian/eagle/usr/lib/eagle/bin/eagle (ELF format: 'elf32-i386'; RPATH: ''). | Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have any shlibs or symbols file. | To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. | dh_shlibdeps: dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/eagle.substvars debian/eagle/usr/lib/eagle/bin/eagle returned exit code 2 | make: *** [binary-arch] Error 9 Perhaps a missing build-dependency? Maybe. Variant of buildd does not include openssl package. Therefore, I think that this problem will not occur in pbuilder. I attached the patch which revised this. Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu eagle-5.10.0-1.1.debdiff Description: Binary data
Processed: Re: eagle: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 69 + patch Bug #69 [src:eagle] eagle: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8 Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 69: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#603974: Info provided, help needed!
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:11:53PM +0100, Marco Amadori wrote: This bug seems to rely on two missing bits on two packages (patches included). the package live-build does not include console-setup-udeb in the cdrom pool/ directory and live-installer do not Depends: on console-setup-udeb. So the /target system have default /etc/default/keyboard file instead of a proper one. Here's an alternative approach which I think is neater, because it follows along with Daniel's previous attempt to fix this bug. The attached patch series reconfigures keyboard-configuration as well as console-setup, and rearranges things a bit so that it actually reconfigures effectively based on the information kbd-chooser provides to /target in its post-base-installer hook. So far I've only done a single test of this with a British English keymap, but it worked fine for that case. I plan to also test some scenario where console-setup would normally use a different codeset to see if that works. Please review and comment. I can go ahead and push these patches to master if people like them. Fixing those two above mentioned quirks is not enough it seems, because the resulting target, although having a proper configuration file, still needs a setupcon after reboot in order to have things working. I did not have this problem in my test. (I don't think it would be release-critical even if I did; this sort of problem is often a boot race and likely only affects the console, not X.) Cheers, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] From 8fd2fdf36ca109c85ed9f5113a497e9cec91e910 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 01:31:21 + Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Move console-setup hook from live-installer.d to post-base-installer.d, so that it can pick up the value of debian-installer/keymap set by kbd-chooser's post-base-installer hook. --- debian/changelog |8 ++ debian/live-installer.install |1 + live-installer.d/console-setup | 24 .../25live-installer-console-setup | 24 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) delete mode 100755 live-installer.d/console-setup create mode 100755 post-base-installer.d/25live-installer-console-setup diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 01e8ea4..bc38ffd 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +live-installer (30) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * Move console-setup hook from live-installer.d to post-base-installer.d, +so that it can pick up the value of debian-installer/keymap set by +kbd-chooser's post-base-installer hook. + + -- Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org Wed, 26 Jan 2011 01:30:15 + + live-installer (29) unstable; urgency=low [ Otavio Salvador ] diff --git a/debian/live-installer.install b/debian/live-installer.install index d96b1cd..6f6a5ba 100644 --- a/debian/live-installer.install +++ b/debian/live-installer.install @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ live-installer.d /usr/lib +post-base-installer.d /usr/lib finish-install.d /usr/lib support/* /lib/live-installer diff --git a/live-installer.d/console-setup b/live-installer.d/console-setup deleted file mode 100755 index 0ab0b5b..000 --- a/live-installer.d/console-setup +++ /dev/null @@ -1,24 +0,0 @@ -#!/bin/sh -e - -# Unfortunately, we can't use in-target here as this doesn't allow to set the -# debconf frontend to noninteractive. - -. /lib/chroot-setup.sh - -if ! chroot_setup; then - logger -t live-installer -- Unexpected error; command not executed: '$@' - exit 1 -fi - -DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive -export DEBIAN_FRONTEND - -# Reconfigure console-setup -if [ -e /target/var/lib/dpkg/info/console-setup.postinst ]; then - log-output -t live-installer chroot /target \ - dpkg-reconfigure --no-reload console-setup - - chroot /target setupcon --save-only -fi - -chroot_cleanup diff --git a/post-base-installer.d/25live-installer-console-setup b/post-base-installer.d/25live-installer-console-setup new file mode 100755 index 000..0ab0b5b --- /dev/null +++ b/post-base-installer.d/25live-installer-console-setup @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +#!/bin/sh -e + +# Unfortunately, we can't use in-target here as this doesn't allow to set the +# debconf frontend to noninteractive. + +. /lib/chroot-setup.sh + +if ! chroot_setup; then + logger -t live-installer -- Unexpected error; command not executed: '$@' + exit 1 +fi + +DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive +export DEBIAN_FRONTEND + +# Reconfigure console-setup +if [ -e /target/var/lib/dpkg/info/console-setup.postinst ]; then + log-output -t live-installer chroot /target \ + dpkg-reconfigure --no-reload console-setup + + chroot /target setupcon --save-only +fi + +chroot_cleanup -- 1.7.2.3 From 09ae1f6deddd0c3abb6b9b68e4c74b323e09e814 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org Date: Wed, 26 Jan
Bug#611152: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: computer turn off when booting
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 Severity: critical Tags: d-i Justification: breaks the whole system Please type your report here. The text will be wrapped to be max 79 chars long per line. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=es_CO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_CO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to es_CO.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36 Debian configuration management sy ii initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.98.7 tools for generating an initramfs pn linux-basenone (no description available) ii module-init-tools 3.12-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 recommends: ii firmware-linux-free 2.6.32-30 Binary firmware for various driver ii libc6-i6862.11.2-9 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 suggests: ii grub 0.97-64GRand Unified Bootloader (dummy pa ii linux-doc-2.6.32 2.6.32-30 Linux kernel specific documentatio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611093: freevo: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/folder.png': No such file or directory
tags 611093 + patch thanks I attached the patch which revised this BUG. Uploader should include #610404 in revision if we install it in squeeze. Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu freevo_1.9.0-9.1.debdiff Description: Binary data
Processed: Re: freevo: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/folder.png': No such file or directory
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 611093 + patch Bug #611093 [src:freevo] freevo: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/folder.png': No such file or directory Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 611093: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611093 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611119: eagle: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8
Thanks - I actually have an upload ready to go. Since these packages are non-free, I build it on both i386 and amd64 using pbuilder and upload the binary packages - that's why we haven't seen this bug before. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611152: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: computer turn off when booting)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:38:05 +1000 with message-id 1296013085.3057.0.camel@localhost and subject line Re: Bug#611152: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: computer turn off when booting has caused the Debian Bug report #611152, regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: computer turn off when booting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 Severity: critical Tags: d-i Justification: breaks the whole system Please type your report here. The text will be wrapped to be max 79 chars long per line. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=es_CO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_CO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to es_CO.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36 Debian configuration management sy ii initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.98.7 tools for generating an initramfs pn linux-basenone (no description available) ii module-init-tools 3.12-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 recommends: ii firmware-linux-free 2.6.32-30 Binary firmware for various driver ii libc6-i6862.11.2-9 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 suggests: ii grub 0.97-64GRand Unified Bootloader (dummy pa ii linux-doc-2.6.32 2.6.32-30 Linux kernel specific documentatio ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 20:46 -0500, Leonardo wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 Severity: critical Tags: d-i Justification: breaks the whole system Please type your report here. The text will be wrapped to be max 79 chars long per line. Try again. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message---
Bug#611119: marked as done (eagle: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:02:15 + with message-id e1phwaf-0001gd...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#69: fixed in eagle 5.10.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #69, regarding eagle: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 69: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: eagle Version: 5.10.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source eagle FTBFS in a clean i386 sid chroot. Tail of the build log: | fakeroot debian/rules binary | dh_prep | dh_install -i | dh_installchangelogs -i | dh_installdocs -i | dh_link -i | dh_compress -i | dh_fixperms -i | dh_gencontrol -i | dh_md5sums -i | dh_builddeb -i | dpkg-deb: building package `eagle-data' in `../eagle-data_5.10.0-1_all.deb'. | dh_prep | dh_install -a | dh_installchangelogs -a -k doc/UPDATE_en | dh_installdocs -a | dh_installman -a | dh_installmenu -a | dh_installmime -a | dh_link -a | dh_compress -a | dh_strip -a | dh_fixperms -a | dh_installdeb -a | dh_shlibdeps -a | dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8 needed by debian/eagle/usr/lib/eagle/bin/eagle (ELF format: 'elf32-i386'; RPATH: ''). | Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have any shlibs or symbols file. | To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. | dh_shlibdeps: dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/eagle.substvars debian/eagle/usr/lib/eagle/bin/eagle returned exit code 2 | make: *** [binary-arch] Error 9 Perhaps a missing build-dependency? -- Jakub Wilk ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: eagle Source-Version: 5.10.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of eagle, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: eagle-data_5.10.0-2_all.deb to non-free/e/eagle/eagle-data_5.10.0-2_all.deb eagle_5.10.0-2.debian.tar.gz to non-free/e/eagle/eagle_5.10.0-2.debian.tar.gz eagle_5.10.0-2.dsc to non-free/e/eagle/eagle_5.10.0-2.dsc eagle_5.10.0-2_amd64.deb to non-free/e/eagle/eagle_5.10.0-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 611...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com (supplier of updated eagle package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:04:45 -0500 Source: eagle Binary: eagle eagle-data Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 5.10.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com Changed-By: Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com Description: eagle - Printed circuit board design tool eagle-data - Data files for Eagle Closes: 69 Changes: eagle (5.10.0-2) unstable; urgency=high . * Added build-depends on libssl-dev (Closes: #69). Checksums-Sha1: 756dbb9be3519e75a3d9e2edcba614e714308163 1277 eagle_5.10.0-2.dsc f4b5895caf4fa3379bb8c379d3f8d521b1bc4dfc 16090 eagle_5.10.0-2.debian.tar.gz 70e5a74ef5411b0c1419291f7ebd8a17c02a0b36 29405814 eagle-data_5.10.0-2_all.deb 1135d1a00a57de01aa3d783419763e5194d729be 6306362 eagle_5.10.0-2_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: a5a4d3679ce95d35f7b5d714224d96c6b5f9a7fedbd6a3a4b4734c2a5c14a484 1277 eagle_5.10.0-2.dsc 0129668c14faa198f73f0e51f6e279e542768c5fb39fa9dbc73d38776c2f4632 16090 eagle_5.10.0-2.debian.tar.gz accf4b1dbce4b5a295ed02775329ec1ce04c321cfc07984d33be71f2c35974f0 29405814 eagle-data_5.10.0-2_all.deb cdb09f10a8e6d4a6055b31879cc9853061d2bb3e6b796eaf73a550bd26c2d944 6306362 eagle_5.10.0-2_amd64.deb Files: 4b2fa78b500d2b3ac46ed765042eec55 1277 non-free/electronics optional eagle_5.10.0-2.dsc 6186098cf999cf5da04102f1b4d50ed6 16090 non-free/electronics optional eagle_5.10.0-2.debian.tar.gz e2094857a7007bddcb559d2671fb0857 29405814 non-free/electronics optional eagle-data_5.10.0-2_all.deb 29f6273ffcdc84c1aded33ee62759422 6306362 non-free/electronics optional eagle_5.10.0-2_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0/l4QACgkQuqVp0MvxKmpytwCbBXvMlOS4jIsRFvTcnLkmH/tF
Bug#611119: marked as done (eagle: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:02:47 + with message-id e1phwal-0001jv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#69: fixed in eagle 5.11.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #69, regarding eagle: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 69: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: eagle Version: 5.10.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source eagle FTBFS in a clean i386 sid chroot. Tail of the build log: | fakeroot debian/rules binary | dh_prep | dh_install -i | dh_installchangelogs -i | dh_installdocs -i | dh_link -i | dh_compress -i | dh_fixperms -i | dh_gencontrol -i | dh_md5sums -i | dh_builddeb -i | dpkg-deb: building package `eagle-data' in `../eagle-data_5.10.0-1_all.deb'. | dh_prep | dh_install -a | dh_installchangelogs -a -k doc/UPDATE_en | dh_installdocs -a | dh_installman -a | dh_installmenu -a | dh_installmime -a | dh_link -a | dh_compress -a | dh_strip -a | dh_fixperms -a | dh_installdeb -a | dh_shlibdeps -a | dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libssl.so.0.9.8 needed by debian/eagle/usr/lib/eagle/bin/eagle (ELF format: 'elf32-i386'; RPATH: ''). | Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have any shlibs or symbols file. | To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. | dh_shlibdeps: dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/eagle.substvars debian/eagle/usr/lib/eagle/bin/eagle returned exit code 2 | make: *** [binary-arch] Error 9 Perhaps a missing build-dependency? -- Jakub Wilk ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: eagle Source-Version: 5.11.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of eagle, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: eagle-data_5.11.0-2_all.deb to non-free/e/eagle/eagle-data_5.11.0-2_all.deb eagle_5.11.0-2.debian.tar.gz to non-free/e/eagle/eagle_5.11.0-2.debian.tar.gz eagle_5.11.0-2.dsc to non-free/e/eagle/eagle_5.11.0-2.dsc eagle_5.11.0-2_amd64.deb to non-free/e/eagle/eagle_5.11.0-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 611...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com (supplier of updated eagle package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:08:12 -0500 Source: eagle Binary: eagle eagle-data Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 5.11.0-2 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com Changed-By: Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com Description: eagle - Printed circuit board design tool eagle-data - Data files for Eagle Closes: 69 Changes: eagle (5.11.0-2) experimental; urgency=low . * Added build-depend on libssl-dev (Closes: #69). Checksums-Sha1: 12651a2c6bb2dc0a200b7f124176be57f2398580 1277 eagle_5.11.0-2.dsc c8e66118525b92f2a8644f48b197ed43f77aaa5f 24202 eagle_5.11.0-2.debian.tar.gz a0b8a2df95cdb8c7b7522f7013fe4ce88bcb1704 30948150 eagle-data_5.11.0-2_all.deb 3a66f947aeb418b5f6401abf2e685cf6a5e2461c 6663412 eagle_5.11.0-2_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 6147b7226fa1d2269585f730cbe15b6ccc60e239305f16d057b5b615c06b95c3 1277 eagle_5.11.0-2.dsc e73f5c3902e2612cc0ded481d246b82152eca6533cce084c74ac3872c6b8f2be 24202 eagle_5.11.0-2.debian.tar.gz 0742d7ef6708ad3d2dbbc78055f49ff3d03253439e9fd4a36f8e62741a0a7a9d 30948150 eagle-data_5.11.0-2_all.deb 65c149e77fff22944be49a95d4416f8fcebbf38c3da75d7d2d07a39b557a3ecf 6663412 eagle_5.11.0-2_amd64.deb Files: 12dec410f51a23b1c4ad61e237cce67e 1277 non-free/electronics optional eagle_5.11.0-2.dsc 307913891a65e92eddeff2056010e1b0 24202 non-free/electronics optional eagle_5.11.0-2.debian.tar.gz 997dc3a0b2251d618effb24735a169bc 30948150 non-free/electronics optional eagle-data_5.11.0-2_all.deb d9a91026550bcdab329a325fa3b924f4 6663412 non-free/electronics optional eagle_5.11.0-2_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0/lxEACgkQuqVp0MvxKmq/HQCfcl/nvlC13OaOFoYQjQO9jqK3
