Bug#612964: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-fbdev: touchscreen of Neo Freerunner unusable because touches are misplaced)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:10:16 +0100 with message-id 20110212081016.gj21...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#612964: fix has caused the Debian Bug report #612964, regarding xserver-xorg-video-fbdev: touchscreen of Neo Freerunner unusable because touches are misplaced to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 612964: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612964 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev Version: 1:0.4.2-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system My Neo freerunner was broken by the upgrade to wheezy. When I touch the touchscreen in one location, I get either no response or a misplaced touch. I don't know how to fix this because 0.4.2-2 is the only available version, and xserver-xorg-video-glamo appears to be broken. Sorry I can't include the info automatically generated by reportbug, because it's not available on my Freerunner and I'm writing this from my desktop. I've copied my xorg.conf and my Xorg.0.log below xorg.conf # complementary information on the touch screen as the # input device is provided by udev Section Device Identifier Glamo 3362 Driver fbdev EndSection Section Module Loadglx Loaddri2 EndSection Xorg.0.log [89.204] X.Org X Server 1.9.4 Release Date: 2011-02-04 [89.241] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 [89.242] Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.31-rc9 armv5tel Debian [89.242] Current Operating System: Linux freerunner 2.6.29-20100313.git973a41fc #1 Sat Aug 7 17:45:57 GMT-3 2010 armv4tl [89.243] Kernel command line: rootfstype=jffs2 root=/dev/mtdblock6 console=ttySAC2,115200 console=tty0 loglevel=8 regular_boot mtdparts=physmap-flash:-(nor);neo1973-nand:0x0004(u-boot),0x0004(u-boot_env),0x0080(kernel),0x000a(splash),0x0004(factory),0x0f6a(rootfs) rootfstype=ext3 root=/dev/mmcblk0p2 rootdelay=5 [89.245] Build Date: 09 February 2011 08:17:52AM [89.245] xorg-server 2:1.9.4-1 (Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org) [89.246] Current version of pixman: 0.21.4 [89.247]Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. [89.247] Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. [89.252] (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Fri Feb 11 22:22:16 2011 [89.385] (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf [89.385] (==) Using system config directory /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d [89.397] (==) No Layout section. Using the first Screen section. [89.397] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults. [89.398] (**) |--Screen Default Screen Section (0) [89.398] (**) | |--Monitor default monitor [89.420] (==) No device specified for screen Default Screen Section. Using the first device section listed. [89.421] (**) | |--Device Glamo 3362 [89.421] (==) No monitor specified for screen Default Screen Section. Using a default monitor configuration. [89.422] (==) Automatically adding devices [89.422] (==) Automatically enabling devices [89.532] (WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic does not exist. [89.532]Entry deleted from font path. [89.533] (WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/ does not exist. [89.534]Entry deleted from font path. [89.534] (WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/ does not exist. [89.535]Entry deleted from font path. [89.535] (WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1 does not exist. [89.536]Entry deleted from font path. [89.537] (WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi does not exist. [89.537]Entry deleted from font path. [89.537] (WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi does not exist. [89.538]Entry deleted from font path. [89.541] (WW) The directory /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType does not exist. [89.542]Entry deleted from font path. [89.542] (==) FontPath set to: /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc, built-ins [89.543] (==) ModulePath set to /usr/lib/xorg/modules [89.543] (II) The server relies on udev to provide the list of input devices. If no devices become available, reconfigure udev or disable AutoAddDevices. [89.544] (II) Loader magic: 0x1b37c0 [89.544] (II) Module ABI versions: [89.545]X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4
Bug#606442: Now affects testing
tags 606442 + wheezy thanks FYI, vim 7.3 migrated to testing when squeeze was released, so this bug affects testing now. Regards, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Now affects testing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 606442 + wheezy Bug #606442 [vimhelp-de] vimhelp-de: Doesn't work with vim 7.3 Added tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 606442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606442 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613013: luatex: fails to upgrade in absence of fmtutil.cnf
Package: luatex Version: 0.60.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 Setting up luatex (0.60.2-1) ... Building format(s) --byengine luatex. This may take some time... fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/fmtutil.GqN8HXC0 Please include this file if you report a bug. That file contains: /usr/bin/fmtutil: line 362: /usr/share/texmf/texconfig/tcfmgr: No such file or directory fmtutil: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found. So it seems that luatex fails to configure in absence of that config file. I *guess* that this config file is put in place by the postinst / configure step of some other texlive package, maybe texlive-base. Then luatex should (directly or indirectly) depend on texlive-base. Possibly the bug is in a package that luatex depends on, or recommends, rather than in luatex itself. The information hereunder is for the state _after_ I fixed the issue manually, by first having all texlive-related packages installed and configured correctly. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_LU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_LU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages luatex depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-7 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libpng12-0 1.2.27-2+lenny4 PNG library - runtime ii libpoppler50.12.4-1.2PDF rendering library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime Versions of packages luatex recommends: ii texlive-luatex2009-11TeX Live: LuaTeX packages luatex suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612964: [pkg-fso-maint] fix
Lancelot du Lac lance...@contrees-du-reve.com writes: Calibration is not perfect, I did it through trial and error. Did you write /etc/pointercal yourself? The one from pkg-fso has always been ok for me so I wonder if devices really vary that much. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613017: rxvt-unicode-256color: Package not installable
Package: rxvt-unicode-256color Version: 9.09-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The package is not installable. It is in conflict with rxvt-unicode, and then with itself as it provides rxvt- unicode. See attached output of apt-cache info rxvt-unicode-256color. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (650, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable'), (5, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-rc5taz1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Package: rxvt-unicode-256color Priority: optional Section: x11 Installed-Size: 2984 Maintainer: Decklin Foster deck...@red-bean.com Architecture: i386 Source: rxvt-unicode Version: 9.09-5 Provides: rxvt-unicode, x-terminal-emulator Depends: libafterimage0 (= 2.2.9), libc6 (= 2.9), libcairo2 (= 1.2.4), libfontconfig1 (= 2.8.0), libfreetype6 (= 2.2.1), libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1), libglib2.0-0 (= 2.12.0), libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.8.0), libice6 (= 1:1.0.0), libjpeg62 (= 6b1), libperl5.10 (= 5.10.1), libpng12-0 (= 1.2.13-4), librsvg2-2 (= 2.26.0), libsm6, libtiff4, libx11-6, libxext6, libxft2 ( 2.1.1), libxrender1, zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4), base-passwd (= 2.0.3.4), ncurses-term (= 5.4-7) Recommends: ttf-dejavu, ttf-sazanami-gothic Conflicts: rxvt-unicode Filename: pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode-256color_9.09-5_i386.deb Size: 1292082 MD5sum: f0521a48cfee5fb51635625f0c9c531a SHA1: 18e4bcdcacd2602b6f7c090414dc1240e33b8a14 SHA256: bc3765f8ebfcd035299269f10206b483f839c249137c6c125e672f15f16cef1c Description: multi-lingual terminal emulator with Unicode support for X11 rxvt-unicode is a modern, Unicode-aware color xterm replacement that uses significantly less memory than a conventional xterm and many other Unicode supporting terminal emulators. . It supports using multiple fonts at the same time, including Xft fonts, and client-server technology to reduce memory consumption when using multiple windows. . This package is configured with 256-color support, and TERM set to rxvt-unicode-256color. Any other systems you log into must have this terminfo entry installed!
Processed: block 607372 with 610676
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 607372 with 610676 Bug #607372 [phpunit] phpunit: Tries to use nonexisting file Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 607372: 610676 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 607372: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607372 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612264: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#612264: tk-tile and tk colliding dir
severity 612264 normal thanks I'm reducing the severity of this bug because I tried to install/remove/reinstall in various order tk-tile and tk-dev without problems. So the issue could be due to some odd setup on the original box. While investigating the problem there, it is better changing the severity, indeed. On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:41:11AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:01:40PM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote: On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org wrote: Package: tcl-dev Version: 8.4.16-2 Severity: serious Unpacking replacement tcl-dev ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tcl-dev_8.5.0-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/include/tcl', which is also in package tk-tile 0.8.2-2.1 configured to not write apport reports Processing triggers for man-db ... /usr/include/tcl in tcl-dev is a symlink to /usr/include/tcl8.5 currently. I think that it's better to keep it this way. So, I'd treat this bug as a tk-tile bug. Uhm, one would not expect tk-tile or any other non-core tcl package has to manage /usr/include/tcl. Instead it is expected the default tcltk package is able to cope with transitioning without glitches. So I'm not sure if some counter-measure should be instead adopted there... -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#612264: tk-tile and tk colliding dir
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 612264 normal Bug #612264 [tcl-dev] tk-tile and tk colliding dir Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 612264: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612264 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613017: marked as done (rxvt-unicode-256color: Package not installable)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:05:31 + with message-id 1297505131.27877.2251.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#613017: rxvt-unicode-256color: Package not installable has caused the Debian Bug report #613017, regarding rxvt-unicode-256color: Package not installable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 613017: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613017 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: rxvt-unicode-256color Version: 9.09-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The package is not installable. It is in conflict with rxvt-unicode, and then with itself as it provides rxvt- unicode. See attached output of apt-cache info rxvt-unicode-256color. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (650, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable'), (5, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-rc5taz1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Package: rxvt-unicode-256color Priority: optional Section: x11 Installed-Size: 2984 Maintainer: Decklin Foster deck...@red-bean.com Architecture: i386 Source: rxvt-unicode Version: 9.09-5 Provides: rxvt-unicode, x-terminal-emulator Depends: libafterimage0 (= 2.2.9), libc6 (= 2.9), libcairo2 (= 1.2.4), libfontconfig1 (= 2.8.0), libfreetype6 (= 2.2.1), libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1), libglib2.0-0 (= 2.12.0), libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.8.0), libice6 (= 1:1.0.0), libjpeg62 (= 6b1), libperl5.10 (= 5.10.1), libpng12-0 (= 1.2.13-4), librsvg2-2 (= 2.26.0), libsm6, libtiff4, libx11-6, libxext6, libxft2 ( 2.1.1), libxrender1, zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4), base-passwd (= 2.0.3.4), ncurses-term (= 5.4-7) Recommends: ttf-dejavu, ttf-sazanami-gothic Conflicts: rxvt-unicode Filename: pool/main/r/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode-256color_9.09-5_i386.deb Size: 1292082 MD5sum: f0521a48cfee5fb51635625f0c9c531a SHA1: 18e4bcdcacd2602b6f7c090414dc1240e33b8a14 SHA256: bc3765f8ebfcd035299269f10206b483f839c249137c6c125e672f15f16cef1c Description: multi-lingual terminal emulator with Unicode support for X11 rxvt-unicode is a modern, Unicode-aware color xterm replacement that uses significantly less memory than a conventional xterm and many other Unicode supporting terminal emulators. . It supports using multiple fonts at the same time, including Xft fonts, and client-server technology to reduce memory consumption when using multiple windows. . This package is configured with 256-color support, and TERM set to rxvt-unicode-256color. Any other systems you log into must have this terminfo entry installed! ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 10:29 +0100, Julien Rabier wrote: The package is not installable. Yes, it is, as attempting to install it shows. adam@kaa:~$ dpkg -l | grep rxvt adam@kaa:~$ apt-get install rxvt-unicode-256color [...] Setting up rxvt-unicode-256color (9.09-5) ... update-alternatives: using /usr/bin/urxvt to provide /usr/bin/rxvt (rxvt) in auto mode. adam@kaa:~$ dpkg -l | grep rxvt ii rxvt-unicode-256color9.09-5 multi-lingual terminal emulator with Unicode support for X11 It is in conflict with rxvt-unicode, and then with itself as it provides rxvt- unicode. That's how virtual packages work; see the Debian Policy Manual for further details. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#613022: fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx
Package: fcitx-data Version: 1:4.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 As fcitx-data contains a file that was previously contained in fcitx, it should Replace: fcitx. Selecting previously deselected package fcitx-data. Unpacking fcitx-data (from .../fcitx-data_1%3a4.0.1-2_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fcitx-data_1%3a4.0.1-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/fcitx/data/gbks2t.tab', which is also in package fcitx 1:3.4.3-1.1 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_LU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_LU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612964: /etc/pointercal
My /etc/pointercal: 557 38667 -4654632 -51172 121 46965312 65536 I don't thing I ever edited that file. By calibration above, I meant the option that I've added in my xorg.conf. -- Christophe TORDEUX 113 rue de la Barrière 19000 Tulle mob: +33-6-86-50-83-65 tel: +33-5-55-93-64-35 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612964: /etc/pointercal
lance...@contrees-du-reve.com writes: My /etc/pointercal: 557 38667 -4654632 -51172 121 46965312 65536 same here: 557 38667 -4654632 -51172 121 46965312 65536 I don't thing I ever edited that file. By calibration above, I meant the option that I've added in my xorg.conf. ah ok. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613022: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#613022: fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx
tags 613022 + pending thanks Will be fixed in next upload in a couple of hours. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#613022: fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 613022 + pending Bug #613022 [fcitx-data] fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613022: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613022 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612033: Slightly different version of Segoon's patch
I already pushed a patch based on conky-tmp.diff that removes the temporary file immediately after warning Segoon but before before noticing that Segoon did the same thing with conky-tmp2.diff . It's pushed on conky's master branch as commit 70b6f35a846f7b85bd11e66c1f23feee6b369688 . The only difference between segoon's version and mine is when we call unlink(). (Segoon does it a bit later) Garo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#604299: Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 07:31:05PM +0100, Eckhart Wörner wrote: Source: knutclient Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt3libs-removal kde3libs-removal Dear maintainer, The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries from Debian shortly after the Squeeze release. The transition phase to KDE4 and Qt4 will finish since both KDE and Nokia upstream don't maintain the old versions of those libraries anymore. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the KDE3/Qt3 libraries have to either get ported to KDE4/Qt4 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: ... - if there is a KDE4/Qt4 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it We are in this case, there is a KDE 4 port for knutclient since some months ago. But the package has not been touch in a couple of years, Arnaud could you please migrate it? If you are not interested in this package anymore, could we orphan or/and update it? thanks, Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613022: marked as done (fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:47:25 + with message-id e1podwj-0001tb...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#613022: fixed in fcitx 1:4.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #613022, regarding fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 613022: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613022 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: fcitx-data Version: 1:4.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 As fcitx-data contains a file that was previously contained in fcitx, it should Replace: fcitx. Selecting previously deselected package fcitx-data. Unpacking fcitx-data (from .../fcitx-data_1%3a4.0.1-2_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fcitx-data_1%3a4.0.1-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/fcitx/data/gbks2t.tab', which is also in package fcitx 1:3.4.3-1.1 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_LU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_LU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: fcitx Source-Version: 1:4.0.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fcitx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fcitx-data_4.0.1-3_all.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-data_4.0.1-3_all.deb fcitx-table-all_4.0.1-3_all.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-table-all_4.0.1-3_all.deb fcitx-table-bingchan_4.0.1-3_all.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-table-bingchan_4.0.1-3_all.deb fcitx-table-cangjie_4.0.1-3_all.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-table-cangjie_4.0.1-3_all.deb fcitx-table-dianbaoma_4.0.1-3_all.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-table-dianbaoma_4.0.1-3_all.deb fcitx-table-erbi_4.0.1-3_all.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-table-erbi_4.0.1-3_all.deb fcitx-table-wanfeng_4.0.1-3_all.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-table-wanfeng_4.0.1-3_all.deb fcitx-table-wbpy_4.0.1-3_all.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-table-wbpy_4.0.1-3_all.deb fcitx-table-wubi_4.0.1-3_all.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-table-wubi_4.0.1-3_all.deb fcitx-table-ziranma_4.0.1-3_all.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-table-ziranma_4.0.1-3_all.deb fcitx-tools_4.0.1-3_i386.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx-tools_4.0.1-3_i386.deb fcitx_4.0.1-3.debian.tar.gz to main/f/fcitx/fcitx_4.0.1-3.debian.tar.gz fcitx_4.0.1-3.dsc to main/f/fcitx/fcitx_4.0.1-3.dsc fcitx_4.0.1-3_i386.deb to main/f/fcitx/fcitx_4.0.1-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 613...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com (supplier of updated fcitx package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:03:26 +0800 Source: fcitx Binary: fcitx fcitx-data fcitx-table-all fcitx-table-bingchan fcitx-table-cangjie fcitx-table-dianbaoma fcitx-table-erbi fcitx-table-wanfeng fcitx-table-wbpy fcitx-table-wubi fcitx-table-ziranma fcitx-tools Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1:4.0.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: IME Packaging Team pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com Description: fcitx - Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) fcitx-data - Data files of Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) fcitx-table-all - Tables of Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) - meta package fcitx-table-bingchan - Bingchan table of Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) fcitx-table-cangjie - Cangjie table of Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) fcitx-table-dianbaoma - Dianbaoma table of Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) fcitx-table-erbi - Erbi table of Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) fcitx-table-wanfeng - Wanfeng table of Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) fcitx-table-wbpy - Wubi-pinyin table of Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) fcitx-table-wubi - Wubi table of Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) fcitx-table-ziranma - Ziranma table of Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM) fcitx-tools - Tools for Free Chinese
Bug#611217: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#611217: CVE-2011-0413: crash after DHCPv6 decline message
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 07:58:24 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:51:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Hmm, that was a misunderstanding, then: It was tagged by release managers as not-a-blocker, i.e. it doesn't hold back the release if not fixed, a fix through unstable would still have been possible. Any way, not it's too late and we need a DSA. I'll open a ticket in the Debian Security Team queue. My apologies for the misunderstanding. I will proceed with fixing this in unstable ASAP, probably this evening. Any news? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613044: foo-yc20: generated files are not generated during build time
Package: foo-yc20 Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 Hi, the files gen/*.cpp are generated from faust/*.dsp but they are not rebuilt. Please regenerate them with faust. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: closing 612883
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 612883 1:3.3.0-1 Bug#612883: Cannot install openoffice.org 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1:3.3.0-1, send any further explanations to Thilo Pfennig thilo.pfen...@alternativnet.de thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 612883: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612883 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613013: luatex: fails to upgrade in absence of fmtutil.cnf
severity 613013 important
tags 613013 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi Lionel,
thanks for the report, very strange
On Sa, 12 Feb 2011, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Setting up luatex (0.60.2-1) ...
Building format(s) --byengine luatex.
This may take some time...
fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/fmtutil.GqN8HXC0
Please include this file if you report a bug.
That file contains:
/usr/bin/fmtutil: line 362: /usr/share/texmf/texconfig/tcfmgr: No such file
or directory
fmtutil: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found.
tcfmgr is in texlive-base, the postinst of luatex checkes that texlive-base
is installed and configured:
stat=$(dpkg-query -W -f='${Status}' texlive-base)
case $stat in
install ok installed)
do_it=1
;;
and only if it is installed and configured the fmtutil-sys call is
run.
texlive-base. Then luatex should (directly or indirectly) depend on
texlive-base. Possibly the bug is in a package that luatex depends on,
Impossible, due to some complicated circumstances.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
BRADFORD
A school teacher's old hairy jacket, now severely discoloured by chalk
dust, ink, egg and the precipitations of unedifying chemical
reactions.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#613013: luatex: fails to upgrade in absence of fmtutil.cnf
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 613013 important Bug #613013 [luatex] luatex: fails to upgrade in absence of fmtutil.cnf Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' tags 613013 + unreproducible Bug #613013 [luatex] luatex: fails to upgrade in absence of fmtutil.cnf Added tag(s) unreproducible. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613013 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613050: uninstallable in sid due to new librasqual3-dev
Package: libdf0-dev Version: 1.0.10-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, how history repeats itself... In a move the same as #500083 a new rasqual with librasqual3-dev was uploaded without updating redland with it. (I see a 1.0.12-1 in experimental, though, maybe that should be uploaded to sid)? And librasqual2-dev got removed from the archive now: = [Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:23:46 +] [ftpmaster: Torsten Werner] Removed the following packages from unstable: librasqal2-dev | 0.9.20-1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- [auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by rasqal) -- = This now makes every package build-depending on librdf0-dev uninstallable, because librdf0-dev depends on librasqual2-dev... Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Grüße/Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613050: uninstallable in sid due to new librasqual3-dev
reassign 613050 librdf0-dev found 613050 1.0.10-3 thanks [ almost fullquoting for maintainers' mbox sake ] Hi, On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 03:12:05PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Package: libdf0-dev Hrmpf. reassigning :) Version: 1.0.10-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, how history repeats itself... In a move the same as #500083 a new rasqual with librasqual3-dev was uploaded without updating redland with it. (I see a 1.0.12-1 in experimental, though, maybe that should be uploaded to sid)? Though that one doesn't have a dependency on the correct librasqual3-dev either yet.. And librasqual2-dev got removed from the archive now: = [Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:23:46 +] [ftpmaster: Torsten Werner] Removed the following packages from unstable: librasqal2-dev | 0.9.20-1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- [auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by rasqal) -- = This now makes every package build-depending on librdf0-dev uninstallable, because librdf0-dev depends on librasqual2-dev... Grüße/Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#604347: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:32:42 + with message-id e1pogwg-0001h3...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#604347: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.23-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #604347, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 604347: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604347 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: djvulibre Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt3libs-removal Dear maintainer, The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries from Debian shortly after the Squeeze release. The transition phase to KDE4 and Qt4 will finish since both KDE and Nokia upstream don't maintain the old versions of those libraries anymore. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the KDE3/Qt3 libraries have to either get ported to KDE4/Qt4 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a KDE4/Qt4 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a KDE4/Qt4 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the KDE3/Qt3 and the KDE4/Qt4 version already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the KDE3/Qt3 version Documentation on how to port to KDE4 can be found at: http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Development/Tutorials/KDE4_Porting_Guide Documentation on how to port to Qt4 can be found at: http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/porting4.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Eckhart ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: djvulibre Source-Version: 3.5.23-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of djvulibre, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: djview3_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb to main/d/djvulibre/djview3_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb djview_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb to main/d/djvulibre/djview_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb djvulibre-bin_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb to main/d/djvulibre/djvulibre-bin_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb djvulibre-dbg_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb to main/d/djvulibre/djvulibre-dbg_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb djvulibre-desktop_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb to main/d/djvulibre/djvulibre-desktop_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb djvulibre_3.5.23-4.debian.tar.gz to main/d/djvulibre/djvulibre_3.5.23-4.debian.tar.gz djvulibre_3.5.23-4.dsc to main/d/djvulibre/djvulibre_3.5.23-4.dsc djvuserve_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb to main/d/djvulibre/djvuserve_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb libdjvulibre-dev_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb to main/d/djvulibre/libdjvulibre-dev_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb libdjvulibre-text_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb to main/d/djvulibre/libdjvulibre-text_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb libdjvulibre21_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb to main/d/djvulibre/libdjvulibre21_3.5.23-4_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 604...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Barak A. Pearlmutter b...@debian.org (supplier of updated djvulibre package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:26:14 + Source: djvulibre Binary: libdjvulibre-dev libdjvulibre21 libdjvulibre-text djvulibre-dbg djvulibre-desktop djview djview3 djvuserve djvulibre-bin Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.5.23-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Barak A. Pearlmutter b...@debian.org Changed-By: Barak A. Pearlmutter b...@debian.org Description: djview - Transition package, djview3 to djview4 djview3- Transition package, djview3 to djview4 djvulibre-bin - Utilities for the DjVu image format djvulibre-dbg - Debug symbols for the DjVu image format djvulibre-desktop - Desktop support for the DjVu image format djvuserve - CGI program for unbundling DjVu files on the fly libdjvulibre-dev - Development files for the DjVu image format libdjvulibre-text - Linguistic support files for libdjvulibre libdjvulibre21 - Runtime support for the DjVu image format Closes: 604347 Changes:
Bug#612723: marked as done (iodine overwrites /etc/default/iodine during upgrade with a sourced version of that file)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:33:14 + with message-id e1pogxc-0001w2...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#612723: fixed in iodine 0.6.0~rc1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #612723, regarding iodine overwrites /etc/default/iodine during upgrade with a sourced version of that file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 612723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612723 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: iodine Version: 0.6.0~rc1-4 Severity: serious When I upgrade iodine it'll overwrite my changes in /etc/default/iodine. This appears to be done by this bit in debian/postinst: db_get iodine/start_daemon START_IODINED=$RET db_get iodine/daemon_options IODINED_ARGS=$RET db_get iodine/daemon_password IODINED_PASSWORD=$RET cat EOF /etc/default/iodine # Default settings for iodine. This file is sourced from # /etc/init.d/iodined START_IODINED=$START_IODINED IODINED_ARGS=$IODINED_ARGS IODINED_PASSWORD=$IODINED_PASSWORD EOF Since it sources the file it'll be changed like this after upgrade: $ sudo git diff default/iodine diff --git a/default/iodine b/default/iodine index 4132933..b9384c4 100644 --- a/default/iodine +++ b/default/iodine @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ # /etc/init.d/iodined START_IODINED=true IODINED_ARGS=-c -p 5252 172.31.255.1/27 MY-HOSTNAME -IODINED_PASSWORD=$(cat /etc/iodine/passwd/iodine) +IODINED_PASSWORD=my seekrt password Where my seekrt password is the contents of /etc/iodine/passwd/iodine. There's two things wrong with this: * /etc/default/iodine is sourced as a shell file, and due to constructs like $() you can't source it and write out the relevant variables again without making changes like these. * /etc/default/iodine is a configuration file. You should ask before modifying it as most Debian packages do (per policy) for their configuration files. The iodine package isn't doing this, hence marking this bug as serious. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages iodine depends on: ii adduser 3.112+nmu2 add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36.1 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.11.2-10Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii makedev 2.3.1-89 creates device files in /dev ii udev164-3/dev/ and hotplug management daemo ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime iodine recommends no packages. Versions of packages iodine suggests: ii dnsutils 1:9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1.1 Clients provided with BIND pn fpingnone (no description available) ii gawk 1:3.1.7.dfsg-5 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr pn ipcalc none (no description available) ii iproute 20100519-3 networking and traffic control too -- debconf information excluded ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: iodine Source-Version: 0.6.0~rc1-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of iodine, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: iodine_0.6.0~rc1-5.debian.tar.gz to main/i/iodine/iodine_0.6.0~rc1-5.debian.tar.gz iodine_0.6.0~rc1-5.dsc to main/i/iodine/iodine_0.6.0~rc1-5.dsc iodine_0.6.0~rc1-5_i386.deb to main/i/iodine/iodine_0.6.0~rc1-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 612...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated iodine package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:49:06 +0100 Source: iodine Binary: iodine
Bug#613058: FTBFS: Error: OCAMLOPT: Not found
Source: ocaml-melt Version: 1.3.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: ftbfs Hi, ocaml-melt FTBFS on some architecture. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ocaml-meltsuite=unstable https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=ocaml-meltarch=alphaver=1.3.0-1stamp=1297447688file=logas=raw - /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean dh clean --with ocaml dh_testdir debian/rules override_dh_auto_clean make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-ocaml-melt_1.3.0-1-alpha-viFNgX/ocaml-melt-1.3.0' /usr/bin/make dist-clean make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-ocaml-melt_1.3.0-1-alpha-viFNgX/ocaml-melt-1.3.0' Makefile:31: Config: No such file or directory ocaml configure.ml Error: OCAMLOPT: Not found OCaml bytecode compiler: /usr/bin/ocamlc OCaml version: 3.11.2 - Could you check your package? Best regards, Nobuhiro -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: uninstallable in sid due to new librasqual3-dev
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 613050 librdf0-dev Bug #613050 [libdf0-dev] uninstallable in sid due to new librasqual3-dev Warning: Unknown package 'libdf0-dev' Bug reassigned from package 'libdf0-dev' to 'librdf0-dev'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 1.0.10-3. found 613050 1.0.10-3 Bug #613050 [librdf0-dev] uninstallable in sid due to new librasqual3-dev Bug Marked as found in versions redland/1.0.10-3. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613050: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613050 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612956: marked as done (Unmatched dependencies for nvidia-glx, xserver-xorg-core too new)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:09:34 +0100 with message-id 4d56a2ae.8070...@abeckmann.de and subject line Re: Bug#612956: Unmatched dependencies for nvidia-glx, xserver-xorg-core too new has caused the Debian Bug report #612956, regarding Unmatched dependencies for nvidia-glx, xserver-xorg-core too new to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 612956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612956 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: nvidia-glx Version: 195.36.31-6: amd64 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I am using the current (2011-02-11) version of Debian unstable. Since the last major upgrade of the xorg xwindow system, the nvidia-glx driver refuses to install with the following error message sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: nvidia-glx : Depends: xorg-video-abi-6.0 but it is not installable or xserver-xorg-core ( 2:1.7.7) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages This is true for both of my systems, an older notebook and my new desktop, on which I did a fresh installation of Debian. Using the free drivers won't work for me, as I need full 3D acceleration for my work. I hope this can be fixed soon. Christian -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 260.19.21-1 On 2011-02-11 22:31, Christian Wietholt wrote: Package: nvidia-glx Version: 195.36.31-6: amd64 ... I am using the current (2011-02-11) version of Debian unstable. Since the last major upgrade of the xorg xwindow system, the nvidia-glx driver refuses to install with the following error message Xorg 1.9 is already supported in the driver package in experimental (260.xx), please use the packages from experimental until we upload a newer release to unstable. The 195.xx driver does not support Xorg 1.9 (upstream driver not compatible, not a packaging issue). Andreas ---End Message---
Bug#613066: deluge-gtk segfaults on start because of new libcairo2 in sid
Package: deluge Version: 1.3.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing new libcairo2_1.10.2-2 in sid deluge-gtk started to segfault on start. After downgrading to older libcairo2_1.8.10-6 deluge-gtk started to work okay as before. PS. Its similar to gentoo's bug #338228 with similar backtrace in gdb. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages deluge depends on: ii deluge-gtk 1.3.1-1 bittorrent client written in Pytho ii python 2.6.6-3+squeeze5 interactive high-level object-orie deluge recommends no packages. deluge suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613067: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.16+git20101210+8bb8231-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: sid wheezy xserver-xorg-video-nouveau that was recently uploaded to unstable requires a = 2.6.34 kernel, but sid has only 2.6.32: $ rmadison linux-2.6 | grep -E 'sid|wheezy|experimental' linux-2.6 | 2.6.32-30 | wheezy | source linux-2.6 | 2.6.32-30 | sid | source linux-2.6 | 2.6.33-1~experimental.3 | experimental | source linux-2.6 | 2.6.37~rc5-1~experimental.3 | experimental | source linux-2.6 | 2.6.37~rc7-1~experimental.1 | experimental | source linux-2.6 | 2.6.37-1~experimental.1 | experimental | source -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-nouveau depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libdrm-nouveau1a 2.4.23-2 Userspace interface to nouveau-spe ii libudev0 165-1 libudev shared library ii xserver-xorg-core [xorg-video 2:1.9.4-1 Xorg X server - core server -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613067: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:29:44 +0100 with message-id 20110212152944.gs8...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#613067: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels has caused the Debian Bug report #613067, regarding xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 613067: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613067 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.16+git20101210+8bb8231-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: sid wheezy xserver-xorg-video-nouveau that was recently uploaded to unstable requires a = 2.6.34 kernel, but sid has only 2.6.32: $ rmadison linux-2.6 | grep -E 'sid|wheezy|experimental' linux-2.6 | 2.6.32-30 | wheezy | source linux-2.6 | 2.6.32-30 | sid | source linux-2.6 | 2.6.33-1~experimental.3 | experimental | source linux-2.6 | 2.6.37~rc5-1~experimental.3 | experimental | source linux-2.6 | 2.6.37~rc7-1~experimental.1 | experimental | source linux-2.6 | 2.6.37-1~experimental.1 | experimental | source -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-nouveau depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libdrm-nouveau1a 2.4.23-2 Userspace interface to nouveau-spe ii libudev0 165-1 libudev shared library ii xserver-xorg-core [xorg-video 2:1.9.4-1 Xorg X server - core server -- Jakub Wilk ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org (12/02/2011): xserver-xorg-video-nouveau that was recently uploaded to unstable requires a = 2.6.34 kernel, but sid has only 2.6.32: […] That's documented, and not a bug in the package. Also, linux-2.6's upload to sid is upcoming. Closing. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#613050: Sorry about this
This clearly shouldn't have been uploaded until raptor2 was accepted into sid (1 month waiting), which is a dependency. I built it against my own local copy. Not sure how to resolve it now. Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611217: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#611217: CVE-2011-0413: crash after DHCPv6 decline message
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:09:30PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 07:58:24 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:51:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Hmm, that was a misunderstanding, then: It was tagged by release managers as not-a-blocker, i.e. it doesn't hold back the release if not fixed, a fix through unstable would still have been possible. Any way, not it's too late and we need a DSA. I'll open a ticket in the Debian Security Team queue. My apologies for the misunderstanding. I will proceed with fixing this in unstable ASAP, probably this evening. Any news? Sigh. Looks like I managed to do everything *except* upload it. Uploading now. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#611217: marked as done (CVE-2011-0413: crash after DHCPv6 decline message)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:17:43 +
with message-id e1poiaj-0004b2...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#611217: fixed in isc-dhcp 4.1.1-P1-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #611217,
regarding CVE-2011-0413: crash after DHCPv6 decline message
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
611217: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611217
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: isc-dhcp-server
Version: 4.1.1-P1-15
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi Ari,
Just as a public record, the following advisory (CVE-2011-0413[0]) has been
published by ISC[1]:
When the DHCPv6 server code processes a message for an address that was
previously declined and internally tagged as abandoned it can trigger an
assert failure resulting in the server crashing. This could be used to
crash DHCPv6 servers remotely. This issue only affects DHCPv6 servers.
DHCPv4 servers are unaffected.
I'm attaching the patch that was used for 4.1-ESV, which applies almost
cleanly in 4.1.1-P1 (3 lines diff between hunks.) I have not tested it, though.
[0]http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-0413
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0413
[1]http://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/advisories/cve-2011-0413
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--- dhcp-4.1-ESV/server/mdb6.c
+++ dhcp-4.1-ESV-R1/server/mdb6.c
@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ move_lease_to_active(struct ipv6_pool *pool, struct iasubopt *lease) {
* Renew an lease in the pool.
*
* To do this, first set the new hard_lifetime_end_time for the resource,
- * and then invoke renew_lease() on it.
+ * and then invoke renew_lease6() on it.
*
* WARNING: lease times must only be extended, never reduced!!!
*/
@@ -1019,12 +1019,24 @@ renew_lease6(struct ipv6_pool *pool, struct iasubopt *lease) {
* If we're already active, then we can just move our expiration
* time down the heap.
*
+ * If we're abandoned then we are already on the active list
+ * but we need to retag the lease and move our expiration
+ * from infinite to the current value
+ *
* Otherwise, we have to move from the inactive heap to the
* active heap.
*/
if (lease-state == FTS_ACTIVE) {
isc_heap_decreased(pool-active_timeouts, lease-heap_index);
return ISC_R_SUCCESS;
+ } else if (lease-state == FTS_ABANDONED) {
+ char tmp_addr[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN];
+lease-state = FTS_ACTIVE;
+isc_heap_increased(pool-active_timeouts, lease-heap_index);
+ log_info(Reclaiming previously abandoned address %s,
+ inet_ntop(AF_INET6, (lease-addr), tmp_addr,
+ sizeof(tmp_addr)));
+return ISC_R_SUCCESS;
} else {
return move_lease_to_active(pool, lease);
}
@@ -1112,7 +1124,8 @@ isc_result_t
decline_lease6(struct ipv6_pool *pool, struct iasubopt *lease) {
isc_result_t result;
- if (lease-state != FTS_ACTIVE) {
+ if ((lease-state != FTS_ACTIVE)
+ (lease-state != FTS_ABANDONED)) {
result = move_lease_to_active(pool, lease);
if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS) {
return result;
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: isc-dhcp
Source-Version: 4.1.1-P1-16
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
isc-dhcp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dhcp3-client_4.1.1-P1-16_all.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/dhcp3-client_4.1.1-P1-16_all.deb
dhcp3-common_4.1.1-P1-16_all.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/dhcp3-common_4.1.1-P1-16_all.deb
dhcp3-dev_4.1.1-P1-16_all.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/dhcp3-dev_4.1.1-P1-16_all.deb
dhcp3-relay_4.1.1-P1-16_all.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/dhcp3-relay_4.1.1-P1-16_all.deb
dhcp3-server_4.1.1-P1-16_all.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/dhcp3-server_4.1.1-P1-16_all.deb
isc-dhcp-client-dbg_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/isc-dhcp-client-dbg_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
isc-dhcp-client-udeb_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.udeb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/isc-dhcp-client-udeb_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.udeb
isc-dhcp-client_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/isc-dhcp-client_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
isc-dhcp-common_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/isc-dhcp-common_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
isc-dhcp-dev_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/isc-dhcp-dev_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
isc-dhcp-relay-dbg_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/isc-dhcp-relay-dbg_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
isc-dhcp-relay_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
to main/i/isc-dhcp/isc-dhcp-relay_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
isc-dhcp-server-dbg_4.1.1-P1-16_i386.deb
to
Bug#613067: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (12/02/2011): That's documented, and not a bug in the package. Also, linux-2.6's upload to sid is upcoming. For the record, I was writing up some doc about it when I received this bug report. That's now in the FAQ, with a pointer to the README.Debian files on git.d.o: http://pkg-xorg.alioth.debian.org/faq/general.html KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#613075: kmix: Doesn't start
Package: kmix Version: 4:4.4.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I can start kmix. I can't see it in my tint2 tray. $ ps -e | grep kmix $ kmix Connecting to deprecated signal QDBusConnectionInterface::serviceOwnerChanged(QString,QString,QString) kmix(12435): _refcount already 0 QSystemTrayIcon::setVisible: No Icon set $ ps -e | grep kmix 198:12435 pts/300:00:00 kmix $ kmix kmix(12435) KMixApp::newInstance: KMixApp::newInstance() Window has not finished constructing yet so ignoring the show() request. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32kakadu2 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages kmix depends on: ii kdebase-runtime 4:4.4.5-1runtime components from the offici ii libasound2 1.0.23-2.1 shared library for ALSA applicatio ii libc6 2.11.2-10Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libkdecore5 4:4.4.5-3the KDE Platform Core Library ii libkdeui5 4:4.4.5-3the KDE Platform User Interface Li ii libphonon4 4:4.6.0really4.4.2-1 the core library of the Phonon mul ii libplasma3 4:4.4.5-3the Plasma Library for the KDE Pla ii libpulse-mainloop-g 0.9.21-3+b1 PulseAudio client libraries (glib ii libpulse0 0.9.21-3+b1 PulseAudio client libraries ii libqt4-dbus 4:4.6.3-4Qt 4 D-Bus module ii libqt4-xml 4:4.6.3-4Qt 4 XML module ii libqtcore4 4:4.6.3-4Qt 4 core module ii libqtgui4 4:4.6.3-4Qt 4 GUI module ii libsolid4 4:4.4.5-3Solid Library for KDE Platform ii libstdc++6 4.4.5-10 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii phonon 4:4.6.0really4.4.2-1 metapackage for the Phonon multime kmix recommends no packages. kmix suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613075: kmix: Doesn't start
severity 613075 important thanks Hello, On šeštadienis 12 Vasaris 2011 18:55:50 kakadu wrote: Package: kmix Version: 4:4.4.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I can start kmix. I can't see it in my tint2 tray kmix target is KDE desktop. The fact that tray icon does not appear in $random desktop environment is not a grave bug: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use the package. but an important one (at best): a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone. What is more, that might as well be tint2 bug. Test kmix under something more mature (e.g. icewm or similar). -- Modestas Vainius mo...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: Re: Bug#613075: kmix: Doesn't start
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 613075 important Bug #613075 [kmix] kmix: Doesn't start Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613075 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613067: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels
* Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org, 2011-02-12, 16:29: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau that was recently uploaded to unstable requires a = 2.6.34 kernel, but sid has only 2.6.32: […] That's documented, I was perfectly aware of that when writing this bug report. and not a bug in the package. I disagree. Also, linux-2.6's upload to sid is upcoming. Then there should be no problem with keeping this bug open until the new kernel reaches testing. -- Jakub Wilk signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 612331 serious Bug #612331 [docvert-openoffice.org] please update for LibreOffice and share/extensions Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 612332 serious Bug #612332 [openoffice.org-zemberek] please update for LibreOffice and share/extensions Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 612333 serious Bug #612333 [openoffice.org-dmaths] please update for LibreOffice and share/extensions Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 612333: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612333 612332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612332 612331: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612331 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: found 604825 in 0.47.0-2+b1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 604825 0.47.0-2+b1 Bug #604825 [inkscape] please build against libwpg 0.2.0 Bug Marked as found in versions inkscape/0.47.0-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 604825: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604825 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
Package: libreoffice-common Version: 1:3a3.3.1~rc1-1 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss from preinst: if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then rm -rf /share rm -rf /user fi Are you mad? You must nod delete arbitrary directories! Some people store important information there. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613050: Sorry about this
[ it would actually help to send also the mail to the submitter and not only the buglog... ] On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:49:06AM -0800, Dave Beckett wrote: This clearly shouldn't have been uploaded until raptor2 was accepted into sid (1 month waiting), which is a dependency. That doesn't matter. raptor might be a dependency but that doesn't help that redland also needs an update (and that one is not anywhere and not in NEW - unless raptor2) I built it against my own local copy. Not sure how to resolve it now. You should never have uploaded directly to sid but do experimental and upload them at all then only when this is sorted out. I'd personally just reupload something which provides librasqual2-dev but thst would hit NEW too because you waited for too long after noticing it was accepted without the rest... Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:43:17PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then rm -rf /share rm -rf /user fi Are you mad? You must nod delete arbitrary directories! Some people store important information there. And what do people store in /share and /user? And you hopefully suggest an alternative way to me how to clean up those broken directories? Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: found 613083 in 1:3.3.1~rc1-1, notfound 613083 in 1:3a3.3.1~rc1-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 613083 1:3.3.1~rc1-1 Bug #613083 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst Bug Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:3.3.1~rc1-1. notfound 613083 1:3a3.3.1~rc1-1 Bug #613083 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst There is no source info for the package 'libreoffice-common' at version '1:3a3.3.1~rc1-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '1:3a3.3.1~rc1-1' Bug No longer marked as found in versions 1:3a3.3.1~rc1-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613083: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613083 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
On Saturday 12 February 2011, you wrote: And what do people store in /share and /user? /share is a common name for additional file systems (e.g. remote NFS shares). You cannot assume that just because a dir is not in the FHS, people don't use it. And you hopefully suggest an alternative way to me how to clean up those broken directories? Delete the files and directories you have created one by one, without -r. Or look if something exists there and warn the user that he should clean up by hand. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
Hi, On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:47:22PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:43:17PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then rm -rf /share rm -rf /user fi Are you mad? You must nod delete arbitrary directories! Some people store important information there. And what do people store in /share and /user? And you hopefully suggest an alternative way to me how to clean up those broken directories? OK; I could rm -rf the subdirs (sid)root@frodo:/# ls -l /user /share/ /share/: insgesamt 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 12. Feb 17:53 config /user: insgesamt 8 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 12. Feb 17:53 extensions drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 12. Feb 17:53 uno_packages and then find out whether the dirs and empty and then remove them. but rm -rf'ingf /user/extensions or even more /user/config is also something you would object against, no? Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:54:22PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Saturday 12 February 2011, you wrote: And what do people store in /share and /user? /share is a common name for additional file systems (e.g. remote NFS shares). You cannot assume that just because a dir is not in the FHS, people don't use it. Ah, yeah, that. We use someting else, so I ddidn't think that /share is that commonly used. Sorry for that. And you hopefully suggest an alternative way to me how to clean up those broken directories? Delete the files and directories you have created one by one, without -r. Probably feasible for /share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml but that's the content of the broken /user: (sid)root@frodo:/user# tree . ├── extensions │ ├── shared │ │ ├── extensions.db │ │ ├── lastsynchronized │ │ ├── log.txt │ │ └── registry │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.bundle.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ │ ├── backenddb.xml │ │ │ └── registered_packages.db │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.executable.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ │ └── backenddb.xml │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.script.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ └── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.sfwk.PackageRegistryBackend │ └── tmp │ ├── extensions │ ├── extensions.db │ └── registry │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.bundle.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ ├── backenddb.xml │ │ └── registered_packages.db │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.executable.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ └── backenddb.xml │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.script.PackageRegistryBackend │ └── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.sfwk.PackageRegistryBackend └── uno_packages └── cache ├── log.txt ├── registry │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.bundle.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ ├── backenddb.xml │ │ └── registered_packages.db │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.executable.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ └── backenddb.xml │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.script.PackageRegistryBackend │ └── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.sfwk.PackageRegistryBackend ├── uno_packages └── uno_packages.db 31 directories, 15 files Or look if something exists there and warn the user that he should clean up by hand. That could be done, yes... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
On Saturday 12 February 2011, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:54:22PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Saturday 12 February 2011, you wrote: And what do people store in /share and /user? /share is a common name for additional file systems (e.g. remote NFS shares). You cannot assume that just because a dir is not in the FHS, people don't use it. Ah, yeah, that. We use someting else, so I ddidn't think that /share is that commonly used. Sorry for that. Having to restore 30GB from backup is annoying, but at least I have a backup :-/ And you hopefully suggest an alternative way to me how to clean up those broken directories? Delete the files and directories you have created one by one, without -r. Probably feasible for /share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml but that's the content of the broken /user: (sid)root@frodo:/user# tree . ├── extensions │ ├── shared │ │ ├── extensions.db │ │ ├── lastsynchronized │ │ ├── log.txt │ │ └── registry │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.bundle.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ │ ├── backenddb.xml │ │ │ └── registered_packages.db │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.executable.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ │ └── backenddb.xml │ │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.script.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ └── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.sfwk.PackageRegistryBackend │ └── tmp │ ├── extensions │ ├── extensions.db │ └── registry │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.bundle.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ ├── backenddb.xml │ │ └── registered_packages.db │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.executable.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ └── backenddb.xml │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.script.PackageRegistryBackend │ └── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.sfwk.PackageRegistryBackend └── uno_packages └── cache ├── log.txt ├── registry │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.bundle.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ ├── backenddb.xml │ │ └── registered_packages.db │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.executable.PackageRegistryBackend │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend │ │ └── backenddb.xml │ ├── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.script.PackageRegistryBackend │ └── com.sun.star.comp.deployment.sfwk.PackageRegistryBackend ├── uno_packages └── uno_packages.db 31 directories, 15 files If you know that this is the complete list, including 15 lines of rm -f and 31 lines of rmdir ... 2 /dev/null || true in depth-first order would seem best to me. Or do find /user -name 'com.sun.star*PackageRegistryBackend' -print0 | xargs -0 --no-run-if-empty rm -rf and then delete the rest by hand. But this is already more fragile. Or look if something exists there and warn the user that he should clean up by hand. That could be done, yes... If you can't limit the list of files, that's the only reasonable solution, IMHO. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612333: please update for LibreOffice and share/extensions
And even if not, closoing a bug when it's not fixed is nonsense, too. This is not just wishlist (which can be closed if you disagree, but as you agree you should fix it it's not to be closed), but a real bug. Ok. I sent an email to the upstream author explaining the situation. Then release the new version, I'll build the new package. For now, you can do but wait! Regards! I. De Marchi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
On Saturday 12 February 2011, Rene Engelhard wrote: if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then BTW, it would be good if you limited the cleanup to the cases where the problematic version was actually installed, i.e. don't clean up if $2 is . (Or have a lower bound for $2 if that is appropriate). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:28:17PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Saturday 12 February 2011, Rene Engelhard wrote: if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then BTW, it would be good if you limited the cleanup to the cases where the problematic version was actually installed, i.e. don't clean up if $2 is . (Or have a lower bound for $2 if that is appropriate). Good point. But there's no lower bound because any libreoffice-common has it :-( Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613085: sobby: Incorrect owner for created autosave.obby in init script
Package: sobby Version: 0.4.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The sobby init-script is configured to create a default autosave.obby file, if there isn't one yet. However, as the file is created by root, the file is owned by root. Therefore, the sobby user is unable to write data to this file and the autosave functionality isn't working. This results in loss of data upon sobby restart. To fix this issue, the owner of the autosave.obby file has to be changed to sobby. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers squeeze-updates APT policy: (500, 'squeeze-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages sobby depends on: ii adduser 3.112+nmu2 add and remove users and groups ii libavahi-client30.6.27-2 Avahi client library ii libavahi-common30.6.27-2 Avahi common library ii libc6 2.11.2-10Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.4.5-8GCC support library ii libglib2.0-02.24.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libglibmm-2.4-1c2a 2.24.2-1 C++ wrapper for the GLib toolkit ( ii libnet6-1.3-0 1:1.3.12-1 Network access framework for IPv4/ ii libobby-0.4-1 0.4.7-1 Synced document buffers ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.2.4.2-1type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libstdc++6 4.4.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxml++2.6-2 2.30.0-1 A C++ interface to the GNOME XML l ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-2 GNOME XML library sobby recommends no packages. sobby suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/default/sobby changed [not included] /etc/init.d/sobby changed [not included] /etc/sobby.conf changed [not included] -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
tag 613083 + pending thanks Hi, On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:21:41PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: If you know that this is the complete list, including 15 lines of rm -f and 31 lines of rmdir ... 2 /dev/null || true in depth-first order would seem best to me. Or do I dont, it's the one I just got, though when re-simulating the condition which lead to the dirs in the first place.. I just ended up with this one: --- libreoffice-common.preinst.in 2011-02-10 08:14:58 + +++ libreoffice-common.preinst.in 2011-02-12 18:40:56 + @@ -20,9 +20,52 @@ if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0~rc4-2; then rm_conffile /etc/bash_completion.d/ooffice.sh libreoffice-common fi -if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then - rm -rf /share - rm -rf /user +if [ -n $2 ] dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then + if [ -d /share ]; then + rm -f /share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml + rmdir /share/config2 /dev/null rmdir /share 2 /dev/null || true + fi + + if [ -d /user ]; then + for i in shared tmp; do + rmdir /user/extensions/$i/extensions || true + rm -f /user/extensions/$i/extensions.db + rm -f /user/extensions/$i/lastsynchronized + rm -f /user/extensions/$i/log.txt + rmdir /user/extensions/$i/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.bundle.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rmdir /user/extensions/$i/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rm -f /user/extensions/$i/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/backenddb.xml || true + rm -f /user/extensions/$i/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registered_packages.db || true + rmdir /user/extensions/$i/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rmdir /user/extensions/$i/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.executable.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rm -f /user/extensions/$i/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend/backenddb.xml || true + rmdir /user/extensions/$i/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rmdir /user/extensions/$i/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.script.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rmdir /user/extensions/$i/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.sfwk.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rmdir /user/extensions/$i/registry 2 /dev/null rmdir /user/extensions/$i 2 /dev/null || true + done + rmdir /user/extensions/ 2 /dev/null rmdir /user 2 /dev/null || true + + rm -f /user/uno_packages/cache/log.txt + rmdir /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.bundle.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rmdir /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rm -f /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/backenddb.xml || true + rm -f /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registered_packages.db || true+ rmdir /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rmdir /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rmdir /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.executable.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rm -f /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend/backenddb.xml || true + rmdir /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rmdir /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.script.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null + rmdir /user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.sfwk.PackageRegistryBackend || true 2 /dev/null +
Processed: Re: Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 613083 + pending Bug #613083 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613083: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613083 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: + rmdir /share/config2 /dev/null rmdir /share 2 /dev/null || true 2 /dev/null and || true reversed of course. Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612618: [Pkg-chromium-maint] Bug#612618: FTBFS: chrome/common/metrics_helpers.cc:22:20: error: prtime.h: No such file or directory
Giuseppe Iuculano giuse...@iuculano.it writes: On 02/09/2011 04:42 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: chrome/common/metrics_helpers.cc:22:20: error: prtime.h: No such file or directory Have you installed libnspr4-dev? After setting VERBOSE ?= 1 in debian/rules I see g++ -g -O2 -g -O2 -Werror -pthread -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fvisibility=hidden -pipe -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/include/libxml2 -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/libdrm -O2 -fno-ident -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -fno-rtti -fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wno-abi -fno-tree-sink '-DNO_TCMALLOC' '-DNO_HEAPCHECKER' '-DDISABLE_NACL' '-DCHROMIUM_BUILD' '-DENABLE_REMOTING=1' '-DUSE_PROPRIETARY_CODECS' '-DENABLE_GPU=1' '-DGLEW_MX' '-DGL_GLEXT_PROTOTYPES' '-DHAVE_XINPUT2' '-DUSE_SYSTEM_LIBBZ2' '-DUSE_SYSTEM_ICU' '-DUSE_SYSTEM_LIBXML' '-DUSE_SYSTEM_ZLIB' '-D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS' '-DNDEBUG' '-DNVALGRIND' '-DDYNAMIC_ANNOTATIONS_ENABLED=0' -Iout/Release/obj/gen -Igpu -I. -Ithird_party -Iout/Release/obj/gen/chrome -Ithird_party/mesa/MesaLib/include -Iout/Release/obj/gen/app -Iout/Release/obj/gen/app/app_resources -Iskia/config -Ithird_party/skia/include/config -Ithird_party/skia/include/core -Ithird_party/skia/include/effects -Iskia/ext -Ithird_party/harfbuzz/src -Ithird_party/harfbuzz/contrib -Ithird_party/sqlite -Ithird_party/npapi -Ithird_party/npapi/bindings -MMD -MF out/Release/.deps/out/Release/obj.target/common/chrome/common/metrics_helpers.o.d.raw -c -o out/Release/obj.target/common/chrome/common/metrics_helpers.o chrome/common/metrics_helpers.cc chrome/common/metrics_helpers.cc:22:20: error: prtime.h: No such file or directory which lacks -I/usr/include/nspr. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613085: sobby: Incorrect owner for created autosave.obby in init script
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:44:08PM +0100, Dennis Keitzel wrote:
The sobby init-script is configured to create a default autosave.obby file,
if there isn't one yet. However, as the file is created by root, the file is
owned by root. Therefore, the sobby user is unable to write data to this file
and the autosave functionality isn't working. This results in loss of data
upon sobby restart.
To fix this issue, the owner of the autosave.obby file has to be changed to
sobby.
I see several issues:
1) sobby should print warnings and cry that it cannot write the autosave file.
2) If you apt-get install --reinstall sobby, then the owner's correct,
because the postinst does an unconditional chown.
3) We really want to chown the created file to sobby.
4) At least sobby will serialize its state to the file on SIGTERM, so
it should have an opportunity to save existing data if we chown the
file first.
This should fix it, then, even for existing installations.
diff -u sobby-0.4.7/debian/sobby.init sobby-0.4.7/debian/sobby.init
--- sobby-0.4.7/debian/sobby.init
+++ sobby-0.4.7/debian/sobby.init
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
user_table
chat
EOF
+ chown sobby: $SOBBY_SESSION_FILE
}
do_start() {
diff -u sobby-0.4.7/debian/changelog sobby-0.4.7/debian/changelog
--- sobby-0.4.7/debian/changelog
+++ sobby-0.4.7/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+sobby (0.4.7-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * The init script creates a new session file if it does not exist yet.
+Add a chown call to make it writeable by sobby, which is not run
+as root. Make sure to chown the file before sobby's stopped, in
+ the hope that it writes out...(Closes: #613085)
+
+ -- Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:07:04 +0100
+
sobby (0.4.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Add an init script by adapting an initial proposal by Dustin Kirkland.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- sobby-0.4.7.orig/debian/prerm
+++ sobby-0.4.7/debian/prerm
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# vim:set et ts=2 sw=2:
+
+set -e
+
+# Make sure the autosave file is actually writeable before stopping the
+# server.
+if [ -d /var/lib/sobby ]; then
+ chown -R sobby:sobby /var/lib/sobby
+ chmod 0750 /var/lib/sobby
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
Will upload in a bit...
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#611722: marked as done (nbd: FTBFS: make check-TESTS failure)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:51:11 + with message-id e1polut-00079f...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#611722: fixed in nbd 1:2.9.20-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #611722, regarding nbd: FTBFS: make check-TESTS failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611722 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: nbd Version: 1:2.9.20-1~1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hello, Your package nbd fails to build from source in different arches: armel, powerpc, s390, .. On armel: make check-TESTS make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-nbd_2.9.20-1~1-armel-i5VBn3/nbd-2.9.20' 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 4194304 bytes (4.2 MB) copied, 0.115876 s, 36.2 MB/s ./cmd ** (process:19668): WARNING **: Specifying an export on the command line is deprecated. ** (process:19668): WARNING **: Please use a configuration file instead. make[3]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[3]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make[2]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[2]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. Build killed with signal TERM after 600 minutes of inactivity Find full build log at: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=nbd;ver=1:2.9.20-1~1;arch=armel;stamp=1296509096 Find details at: https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=nbd Best regards -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: nbd Source-Version: 1:2.9.20-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nbd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nbd-client-udeb_2.9.20-2_amd64.udeb to main/n/nbd/nbd-client-udeb_2.9.20-2_amd64.udeb nbd-client_2.9.20-2_amd64.deb to main/n/nbd/nbd-client_2.9.20-2_amd64.deb nbd-server_2.9.20-2_amd64.deb to main/n/nbd/nbd-server_2.9.20-2_amd64.deb nbd_2.9.20-2.diff.gz to main/n/nbd/nbd_2.9.20-2.diff.gz nbd_2.9.20-2.dsc to main/n/nbd/nbd_2.9.20-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 611...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org (supplier of updated nbd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:49:08 +0100 Source: nbd Binary: nbd-server nbd-client nbd-client-udeb Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:2.9.20-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org Description: nbd-client - Network Block Device protocol - client nbd-client-udeb - Network Block Device protocol - client for Debian Installer (udeb) nbd-server - Network Block Device protocol - server Closes: 611722 611836 611978 612388 Changes: nbd (1:2.9.20-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Upload as 2.9.20-2 rather than -1; the previous release was supposed to be uploaded to experimental, but was accidentally uploaded to unstable instead. Hence, consider that one to be -1 and this one to be -2, even though it wasn't. * Steal two commits from git HEAD to fix handling of maxclients value in modern protocol version (which causes a segfault in nbd-server on some architectures), and to fix handling of an unexpected death of the server in nbd-tester-client; Closes: #611722. * Updated translations: - Portuguese, by Américo Monteiro; Closes: #611836. - Russian, by Yuri Kozlov; Closes: #611978. - French, by Christian Perrier; Closes: #612388. Checksums-Sha1:
Processed: tagging 536376
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 536376 + pending Bug #536376 [evas] evas: Not suitable for testing yet Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 536376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536376 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613094: libatlas: Error in cblas_dgemm in ATLAS 3.8.3 in Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 32 bits
Package: libatlas3gf-base
Version: 3.8.3-29
Severity: grave
File: libatlas
Justification: renders package unusable
In Debian GNU/Linux all runs OK, but in the new Debian GNU/kFreeBSD an error
with cblas_dgemm occurs (I don't know if the error
affects to sgemm, cgemm and/or zgemm). If I try to multiply two matrices bigger
than 51x51 elements ATLAS crashes with an
Illegal instruction message. Here is a simple program to demonstrate the fact:
#includecblas.h
#define N 52
int main()
{
double A[N*N],B[N*N],C[N*N];
cblas_dgemm(CblasColMajor,CblasNoTrans,CblasNoTrans,N,N,N,1.0,A,N,B,N,1.0,C,N);
return 0;
}
I don't know if the error persists in the current ATLAS development sources
and/or in pure FreeBSD systems.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-686
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libatlas3gf-base depends on:
ii libc0.1 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.4.5-10 GCC support library
ii libgfortran3 4.4.5-10 Runtime library for GNU Fortran ap
libatlas3gf-base recommends no packages.
Versions of packages libatlas3gf-base suggests:
ii libblas3gf1.2-8 Basic Linear Algebra Reference imp
ii liblapack3gf 3.3.0-3library of linear algebra routines
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613098: Zero is unusable on amd64
Package: openjdk-6-jre-zero Version: 6b18-1.8.3-2 Severity: grave At least on amd64, all tests fail during build, and all non-trivial programs fail. Here's a stack trace from javac -zero compiling a trivial program: java.nio.BufferOverflowException at java.nio.charset.CoderResult.throwException(CoderResult.java:276) at java.lang.StringCoding$StringEncoder.encode(StringCoding.java:260) at java.lang.StringCoding.encode(StringCoding.java:290) at java.lang.String.getBytes(String.java:954) at java.io.UnixFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes0(Native Method) at java.io.UnixFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes(UnixFileSystem.java:243) at java.io.File.isFile(File.java:795) at com.sun.tools.javac.util.JavacFileManager.listDirectory(JavacFileManager.java:336) at com.sun.tools.javac.util.JavacFileManager.list(JavacFileManager.java:926) at com.sun.tools.javac.jvm.ClassReader.fillIn(ClassReader.java:2137) at com.sun.tools.javac.jvm.ClassReader.complete(ClassReader.java:1795) at com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol.complete(Symbol.java:400) at com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol$PackageSymbol.members(Symbol.java:625) at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.MemberEnter.importAll(MemberEnter.java:133) at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.MemberEnter.visitTopLevel(MemberEnter.java:521) at com.sun.tools.javac.tree.JCTree$JCCompilationUnit.accept(JCTree.java:454) at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.MemberEnter.memberEnter(MemberEnter.java:400) at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.MemberEnter.complete(MemberEnter.java:831) at com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol.complete(Symbol.java:400) at com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol$ClassSymbol.complete(Symbol.java:777) at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Enter.complete(Enter.java:465) at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Enter.main(Enter.java:443) at com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.enterTrees(JavaCompiler.java:836) at com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.compile(JavaCompiler.java:741) at com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.compile(Main.java:380) at com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.compile(Main.java:306) at com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.compile(Main.java:297) at com.sun.tools.javac.Main.compile(Main.java:82) at com.sun.tools.javac.Main.main(Main.java:67) Does the package work on any other Shark platform? (-Xint seems to work.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst
On Saturday 12 February 2011, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:21:41PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: If you know that this is the complete list, including 15 lines of rm -f and 31 lines of rmdir ... 2 /dev/null || true in depth-first order would seem best to me. Or do I dont, it's the one I just got, though when re-simulating the condition which lead to the dirs in the first place.. I just ended up with this one: Looks sane to me. Thanks. Cheers, Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613085: marked as done (sobby: Incorrect owner for created autosave.obby in init script)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:58:49 + with message-id e1pomyl-00069x...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#613085: fixed in sobby 0.4.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #613085, regarding sobby: Incorrect owner for created autosave.obby in init script to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 613085: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613085 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sobby Version: 0.4.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The sobby init-script is configured to create a default autosave.obby file, if there isn't one yet. However, as the file is created by root, the file is owned by root. Therefore, the sobby user is unable to write data to this file and the autosave functionality isn't working. This results in loss of data upon sobby restart. To fix this issue, the owner of the autosave.obby file has to be changed to sobby. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers squeeze-updates APT policy: (500, 'squeeze-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages sobby depends on: ii adduser 3.112+nmu2 add and remove users and groups ii libavahi-client30.6.27-2 Avahi client library ii libavahi-common30.6.27-2 Avahi common library ii libc6 2.11.2-10Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.4.5-8GCC support library ii libglib2.0-02.24.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libglibmm-2.4-1c2a 2.24.2-1 C++ wrapper for the GLib toolkit ( ii libnet6-1.3-0 1:1.3.12-1 Network access framework for IPv4/ ii libobby-0.4-1 0.4.7-1 Synced document buffers ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.2.4.2-1type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libstdc++6 4.4.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxml++2.6-2 2.30.0-1 A C++ interface to the GNOME XML l ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-2 GNOME XML library sobby recommends no packages. sobby suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/default/sobby changed [not included] /etc/init.d/sobby changed [not included] /etc/sobby.conf changed [not included] -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: sobby Source-Version: 0.4.7-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sobby, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sobby_0.4.7-3.diff.gz to main/s/sobby/sobby_0.4.7-3.diff.gz sobby_0.4.7-3.dsc to main/s/sobby/sobby_0.4.7-3.dsc sobby_0.4.7-3_amd64.deb to main/s/sobby/sobby_0.4.7-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 613...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org (supplier of updated sobby package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:09:04 +0100 Source: sobby Binary: sobby Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.4.7-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org Changed-By: Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org Description: sobby - a dedicated server for collaborative editing Closes: 613085 Changes: sobby (0.4.7-3) unstable; urgency=low . * The init script creates a new session file if it does not exist yet. Add a chown call to make it writeable by sobby, which is not run as root. Make sure to chown the file before sobby's stopped, in prerm, so that the write on termination has a chance to succeed. (Closes: #613085) Checksums-Sha1: 1ee8b60b665099e48371e026dadad707c41ab123 1075 sobby_0.4.7-3.dsc 984ff138656a86970407dfbdf374e5afa82aa648 10039 sobby_0.4.7-3.diff.gz b8f3e347f18b70760f92db04d604b30a2f2e92b0 140798 sobby_0.4.7-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 1b44305997ba7d9c4cec4c5bb26f03b6b00092553f6d4eea66fc57eb01928235 1075 sobby_0.4.7-3.dsc
Bug#613117: asterisk-espeak: uninstallable on kfreebsd
Package: asterisk-espeak Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious The asterisk-espeak package depends on asterisk, which is not available on kfreebsd. It should probably not be built there until asterisk itself is available. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#613118: asterisk-flite: uninstallable on kfreebsd
Package: asterisk-flite Version: 0.1~beta2-1 Severity: serious The asterisk-flite package depends on asterisk, which is not available on kfreebsd. It should probably not be built there until asterisk itself is available. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#613119: archivemount: uninstallable on kfreebsd
Package: archivemount Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: serious The archivemount package depends on fuse-utils, which is not available on kfreebsd. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#604570: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:37:46 + with message-id e1popye-0005u3...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#612820: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #604570, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 604570: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604570 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: xcardii Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt3libs-removal Dear maintainer, The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries from Debian shortly after the Squeeze release. The transition phase to KDE4 and Qt4 will finish since both KDE and Nokia upstream don't maintain the old versions of those libraries anymore. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the KDE3/Qt3 libraries have to either get ported to KDE4/Qt4 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a KDE4/Qt4 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a KDE4/Qt4 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the KDE3/Qt3 and the KDE4/Qt4 version already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the KDE3/Qt3 version Documentation on how to port to KDE4 can be found at: http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Development/Tutorials/KDE4_Porting_Guide Documentation on how to port to Qt4 can be found at: http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/porting4.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Eckhart ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.9.9-10+rm Dear submitter, as the package xcardii has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the assiciated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/612820 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ---End Message---
Bug#604297: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:59:49 +0100 with message-id 4d572d05.9070...@debian.org and subject line Bug#613032: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #604297, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 604297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604297 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: knetdockapp Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt3libs-removal kde3libs-removal Dear maintainer, The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries from Debian shortly after the Squeeze release. The transition phase to KDE4 and Qt4 will finish since both KDE and Nokia upstream don't maintain the old versions of those libraries anymore. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the KDE3/Qt3 libraries have to either get ported to KDE4/Qt4 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a KDE4/Qt4 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a KDE4/Qt4 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the KDE3/Qt3 and the KDE4/Qt4 version already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the KDE3/Qt3 version Documentation on how to port to KDE4 can be found at: http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Development/Tutorials/KDE4_Porting_Guide Documentation on how to port to Qt4 can be found at: http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/porting4.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Eckhart ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.82.3-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package knetdockapp has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the assiciated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/613032 Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ---End Message---
Bug#604300: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:57:59 +0100 with message-id 4d572c97.5040...@debian.org and subject line Bug#540211: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #604300, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 604300: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604300 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: komba2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt3libs-removal kde3libs-removal Dear maintainer, The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries from Debian shortly after the Squeeze release. The transition phase to KDE4 and Qt4 will finish since both KDE and Nokia upstream don't maintain the old versions of those libraries anymore. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the KDE3/Qt3 libraries have to either get ported to KDE4/Qt4 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a KDE4/Qt4 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a KDE4/Qt4 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the KDE3/Qt3 and the KDE4/Qt4 version already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the KDE3/Qt3 version Documentation on how to port to KDE4 can be found at: http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Development/Tutorials/KDE4_Porting_Guide Documentation on how to port to Qt4 can be found at: http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/porting4.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Eckhart ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.73.beta-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package komba2 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the assiciated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/540211 Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ---End Message---
Bug#604314: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 02:01:13 +0100 with message-id 4d572d59.4070...@debian.org and subject line Bug#612882: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #604314, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 604314: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604314 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: kzenexplorer Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt3libs-removal kde3libs-removal Dear maintainer, The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries from Debian shortly after the Squeeze release. The transition phase to KDE4 and Qt4 will finish since both KDE and Nokia upstream don't maintain the old versions of those libraries anymore. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the KDE3/Qt3 libraries have to either get ported to KDE4/Qt4 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a KDE4/Qt4 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a KDE4/Qt4 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the KDE3/Qt3 and the KDE4/Qt4 version already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the KDE3/Qt3 version Documentation on how to port to KDE4 can be found at: http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Development/Tutorials/KDE4_Porting_Guide Documentation on how to port to Qt4 can be found at: http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/porting4.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Eckhart ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.6-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package kzenexplorer has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the assiciated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/612882 Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ---End Message---
Bug#610777: marked as done (mathgl: FBTFS: broken symbols)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:17:35 + with message-id e1poqal-ua...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#610777: fixed in mathgl 1.11.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #610777, regarding mathgl: FBTFS: broken symbols to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610777: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610777 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: mathgl Version: 1.11.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, your package FTBFS on all archs with symbols errors: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mathglsuite=experimental KiBi. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: mathgl Source-Version: 1.11.0.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mathgl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmgl-data_1.11.0.1-3_all.deb to main/m/mathgl/libmgl-data_1.11.0.1-3_all.deb libmgl-dev_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb to main/m/mathgl/libmgl-dev_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb libmgl-fltk5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb to main/m/mathgl/libmgl-fltk5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb libmgl-glut5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb to main/m/mathgl/libmgl-glut5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb libmgl-qt5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb to main/m/mathgl/libmgl-qt5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb libmgl-wx5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb to main/m/mathgl/libmgl-wx5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb libmgl5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb to main/m/mathgl/libmgl5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb mathgl-doc-en_1.11.0.1-3_all.deb to main/m/mathgl/mathgl-doc-en_1.11.0.1-3_all.deb mathgl-doc-ru_1.11.0.1-3_all.deb to main/m/mathgl/mathgl-doc-ru_1.11.0.1-3_all.deb mathgl_1.11.0.1-3.debian.tar.gz to main/m/mathgl/mathgl_1.11.0.1-3.debian.tar.gz mathgl_1.11.0.1-3.dsc to main/m/mathgl/mathgl_1.11.0.1-3.dsc mathgl_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb to main/m/mathgl/mathgl_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb python-mathgl_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb to main/m/mathgl/python-mathgl_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 610...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos eftax...@otenet.gr (supplier of updated mathgl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:14:00 +0200 Source: mathgl Binary: mathgl mathgl-doc-en mathgl-doc-ru libmgl5 libmgl-data libmgl-dev libmgl-fltk5 libmgl-qt5 libmgl-wx5 libmgl-glut5 python-mathgl Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.11.0.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos eftax...@otenet.gr Description: libmgl-data - library for scientific graphs. (data files) libmgl-dev - library for scientific graphs. (development files) libmgl-fltk5 - library for scientific graphs. (FLTK runtime library) libmgl-glut5 - library for scientific graphs. (GLUT runtime library) libmgl-qt5 - library for scientific graphs. (Qt runtime library) libmgl-wx5 - library for scientific graphs. (wxWidgets runtime library) libmgl5- library for scientific graphs. (main runtime library) mathgl - library for scientific graphs. (utlities and examples) mathgl-doc-en - library for scientific graphs. (English documentation) mathgl-doc-ru - library for scientific graphs. (Russian documentation) python-mathgl - library for scientific graphs. (Python module) Closes: 610777 Changes: mathgl (1.11.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Upload in unstable * Change symbols files for pbuilder --distribution unstable (Closes: #610777) Checksums-Sha1: 5cd24b97df1b698055c9ff9683d0b0bda96ba0fe 1835 mathgl_1.11.0.1-3.dsc f5f6b024f46142afff3f3aedeb4a3478c3452748 26998 mathgl_1.11.0.1-3.debian.tar.gz c727427b1aaa9b4ff6af4d88f864153a02f3e9b5 37400 mathgl_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb 46109842edee1fee3f291c174d86d4d9a7ac2cc4 798962 libmgl5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb abdb0ece4b45fe3768a2e0e338025854e0ec1f67 1017150 libmgl-dev_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb d440e041dd30fc53b739da5adf583a10557c5062 39754 libmgl-fltk5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb 06e7547af9177ff9791a59b63cb0e2e9d5e307ae 54416 libmgl-qt5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb 4e14de7ffd26739133987fd43a30495a066092be 39818 libmgl-wx5_1.11.0.1-3_amd64.deb
Bug#608194: marked as done (lincredits: broken Depends after rebuild)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:38:51 +0100
with message-id 20110212233851.ga6...@jwilk.net
and subject line Re: Bug#608194: lincredits: broken Depends after rebuild
has caused the Debian Bug report #608194,
regarding lincredits: broken Depends after rebuild
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
608194: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608194
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: lincredits
Version: 0.6
Severity: serious
I rebuilt lincredits in a clean sid chroot and the resulting binary
package didn't depend on python anymore. Interesting parts of the build
log:
| dh_python
| dh_python: Doing nothing since dh_pycompat exists; dh_pysupport or
dh_pycentral should do the work. You can remove dh_python from your rules file.
| dh_python: Compatibility levels before 5 are deprecated.
[…]
| dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Depends field of package lincredits: unknown
substitution variable ${python:Depends}
| dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package lincredits: unknown substitution variable
${python:Versions}
--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 0.7
I rebuilt lincredits in a clean sid chroot and the resulting binary package
didn't depend on python anymore.
It looks like this has been fixed.
--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
Bug#604290: kkbswitch removal
As the last upstream release was at 2005, and I believe there is a keyboard indicator / switch utility, I'm fine with removing this package from unstable/testing after the squeeze release. To the best of my knowledge, nothing other than kkbswitch provides per-layout keyboard shortcuts and layout toggle mode in a GUI. Example setup (one that I’m using): – English, Russian and Ukrainian layouts; — Ctrl + Caps Lock, Win + Caps Lock, Alt + Caps Lock to activate the layouts respectively; – Caps Lock to toggle between last two layouts used in the current window. Use case: typing something in Russian in one window and in Ukrainian in another. Access to the English layout is useful in both, pressing Caps Lock switches to it and then back to the previous language. KDE offers the “spare layouts” feature that can achieve toggle mode, but there’s no option to set a shortcut for specific layouts (even MS Windows has this! :-). The workaround (qdbus org.kde.keyboard /Layouts setLayout layout) doesn’t work as it can only switch to non-spare layouts. Moreover, it’s impossible to use shortcuts involving Caps Lock in khotkeys. Thus there’s no viable alternative to kkbswitch for such a use case. Admittedly, it’s uncommon, but not so because it’s not needed; rather, typical ways of setting up three layouts are inconvenient and users avoid them, not knowing of kkbswitch. I guess there’s quite a number of users with such a need, particularly citizens of bilingual countries or those studying foreign languages (native language + English + another language). Besides, kkbswitch is easily configurable via GUI and does its job fine in KDE 4 despite being a six year old KDE 3 application. It just works. Please only remove it after providing another means of solving the above problems. Roman. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610777: fixed in mathgl 1.11.0.1-3
reopen 610777 found 610777 1.11.0.1-3 thanks Hi, | Changes: | mathgl (1.11.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=low | . |* Upload in unstable |* Change symbols files for pbuilder --distribution unstable (Closes: #610777) I'm not sure what that means, but your package still FTBFS on: i386, kfreebsd-i386, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mathgl KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#610777: fixed in mathgl 1.11.0.1-3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 610777
Bug #610777 {Done: Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos eftax...@otenet.gr} [src:mathgl]
mathgl: FBTFS: broken symbols
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
found 610777 1.11.0.1-3
Bug #610777 [src:mathgl] mathgl: FBTFS: broken symbols
Bug Marked as found in versions mathgl/1.11.0.1-3.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
610777: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610777
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#604382: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 05:02:10 + with message-id e1pou66-0002g5...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#604382: fixed in soqt 1.5.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604382, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 604382: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604382 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: soqt Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt3libs-removal Dear maintainer, The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries from Debian shortly after the Squeeze release. The transition phase to KDE4 and Qt4 will finish since both KDE and Nokia upstream don't maintain the old versions of those libraries anymore. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the KDE3/Qt3 libraries have to either get ported to KDE4/Qt4 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a KDE4/Qt4 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a KDE4/Qt4 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the KDE3/Qt3 and the KDE4/Qt4 version already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the KDE3/Qt3 version Documentation on how to port to KDE4 can be found at: http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Development/Tutorials/KDE4_Porting_Guide Documentation on how to port to Qt4 can be found at: http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/porting4.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Eckhart ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: soqt Source-Version: 1.5.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of soqt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libsoqt-dev-common_1.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/s/soqt/libsoqt-dev-common_1.5.0-1_amd64.deb libsoqt4-20_1.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/s/soqt/libsoqt4-20_1.5.0-1_amd64.deb libsoqt4-dev_1.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/s/soqt/libsoqt4-dev_1.5.0-1_amd64.deb soqt_1.5.0-1.diff.gz to main/s/soqt/soqt_1.5.0-1.diff.gz soqt_1.5.0-1.dsc to main/s/soqt/soqt_1.5.0-1.dsc soqt_1.5.0.orig.tar.gz to main/s/soqt/soqt_1.5.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 604...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steve M. Robbins s...@debian.org (supplier of updated soqt package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:52:12 -0600 Source: soqt Binary: libsoqt4-20 libsoqt-dev-common libsoqt4-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.5.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Steve M. Robbins s...@debian.org Changed-By: Steve M. Robbins s...@debian.org Description: libsoqt-dev-common - Qt GUI component toolkit for Inventor - common development files libsoqt4-20 - Qt4 GUI component toolkit for Inventor - runtime libsoqt4-dev - Qt4 GUI component toolkit for Inventor - development Closes: 604382 Changes: soqt (1.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream. . * control: Remove build-deps on libqt3-mt-dev, qt3-dev-tools. Closes: #604382. Checksums-Sha1: 77499da20283d6c7b5938de82135ca483c88e1e5 1071 soqt_1.5.0-1.dsc c64f00f8c219b69f10ddfffe6294fb02be73dd20 1515230 soqt_1.5.0.orig.tar.gz d4c80979c179013d40ad51d87900cc8e6715136a 8527 soqt_1.5.0-1.diff.gz 98e3404a1a1a8d1c3efd49677a73115b388bc61a 306402 libsoqt4-20_1.5.0-1_amd64.deb f04adc48c74c6b9a53658101a986182a4b447957 497870 libsoqt-dev-common_1.5.0-1_amd64.deb c29b2ce8cc5627d4e4e418eb9826e0676edf30ee 415270 libsoqt4-dev_1.5.0-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: b77741978d693ca8c383d741478afacb818f8838a318150d8ede7b9a9e104019 1071 soqt_1.5.0-1.dsc f6a34b4c19e536c00f21aead298cdd274a7a0b03a31826fbe38fc96f3d82ab91 1515230 soqt_1.5.0.orig.tar.gz 58fcb60ec4a82960534d8f3cb510517f6834b40b4143a15e69e76b04285cd4ba 8527 soqt_1.5.0-1.diff.gz
