Bug#644930: bad LANG env crashes gnucash on File->New account
Hi, # Which deb files built from the patched source did you install? The -bin only. # binary package libgtk2.0-bin is not the one that has the problem. Please Well, yes, now that you mention it.. right. # make sure to install the patched package libgtk2.0-0 before checking There's a couple of deb to be built but only those below get actually built. # whether your issue is fixed. And of course you need to restart gnucash # to see any effect. *g sure, thanks anyway. I rebuilt the complete sources w/o docs. debs I have now: -rw-r--r-- 1 radtkens radtkens 425470 11 ott 13.55 libgtk2.0-bin_2.24.4-3_all.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 radtkens radtkens 6704120 11 ott 13.55 libgtk2.0-common_2.24.4-3_all.deb Nothing more. It is not possible to _just_ recompile this stuff w/o having to fix a variety of issues that keeps creeping up. I invested already a lot of time into the matter, not sure whether I'll be able to continue like this. Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510027: pavucontrol_0.9.7-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: undefined reference to `AO_store_full_emulation'
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 20:15 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > your package failed to build from source. Since #510027 has been fixed for some time now and the affected package builds fine[1], I'd like to close this bug in a few days. Any objections? Best regards Alexander Kurtz [0] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pavucontrol signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 643758 + pending Bug #643758 [src:python-django] python-django: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.0.8: AttributeError: DjangoHTMLTranslator instance has no attribute 'param_separator' Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 643758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#618046: batmon.app: FTBFS: BatteryModel.m:308: undefined reference to `assert'
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 17:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. Since both #618046 and #618077 have been fixed for some time now and the affected packages build fine[1][2], I'd like to close these bugs in a few days. Any objections? Best regards Alexander Kurtz [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=etoile [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=batmon.app signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#645005: git: installation failure: cannot remove `/usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks': Not a directory
Hi Simon, Simon Chopin wrote: > I was also confronted to the problem. I slightly modified the postinst > script to skip the whole thing if the version provided as argument is an > empty string. Good catch. That doesn't take care of the case where the sysadmin or a previous partial run of postinst has already replaced .../doc/contrib/hooks with a symlink, though. So the immediate problem was that the postinst was using "test -d" to check for "is a directory rather than a symlink to one", which doesn't match the behavior of the test utility which uses stat(2), not lstat(2). That this code is run when configuring git for the first time just makes it easier to trigger. How about this? The patch you sent would go on top. -- >8 -- Subject: debian/git.postinst: use "! test -L && test -d" to check for contrib/hooks symlink As noticed in debian-1.7.4.1-4~7 (debian/git-el: avoid spurious doc/git/contrib/emacs.old directory, 2011-03-09), "test -d" does not distinguish between directories and symlinks to directories, while "rmdir" does. So the test to check if .../doc/contrib/hooks has already been replaced by a symlink yields never succeeds, and git.postinst tries to remove the directory to make room for a new symlink and fails: Setting up git (1:1.7.7-1) ... rmdir: cannot remove `/usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks': Not a directory This normally should not happen much in practice --- it would not be very common for the old contrib hooks path to already be a symlink if I am upgrading from a version where it was a directory. But due to a mistake in the guarding "dpkg --compare-versions" call, this code is run when installing git for the first time, too. The fix is simple: the intent of this test was always "is just a directory and not a symlink to one", so let's just say so explicitly. (The "dpkg --compare-versions" call will be corrected in a separate patch.) Reported-by: Євгеній Мещеряков Fixes: http://bugs.debian.org/645005 Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder --- debian/changelog|8 debian/git.postinst |1 + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 644ffc85..14152309 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +git (1:1.7.7-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * git.postinst: check if /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks is a +symlink before changing it to one (thx Євгеній Мещеряков; closes: +#645005). + + -- Jonathan Nieder Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:03:36 -0500 + git (1:1.7.7-1) unstable; urgency=low * new upstream release. diff --git a/debian/git.postinst b/debian/git.postinst index 8cf7ad3a..4815da6e 100644 --- a/debian/git.postinst +++ b/debian/git.postinst @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ fi # 1.7.7-1 replaces /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks with a symlink, # but dpkg doesn't do so on package upgrade if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt '1:1.7.7-1' && + ! test -L /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks && test -d /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks; then rmdir /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks && ln -s ../../../git-core/contrib/hooks \ -- 1.7.7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645056: fonts-unfonts-extra: Installation failure
Package: fonts-unfonts-extra Version: 1.0.2-080608-3 Severity: serious Justification: rc_policy.txt item 2 clause 3 Unpacking fonts-unfonts-extra (from .../fonts-unfonts-extra_1.0.2-080608-3_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fonts-unfonts-extra_1.0.2-080608-3_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/etc/fonts/conf.d/90-ttf-unfonts-extra.conf', which is also in package ttf-unfonts-extra 1.0.2-080608-2 configured to not write apport reports Is the file correctly named in this package? If so, some conflicts are in order. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.6-ibid-1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash fonts-unfonts-extra depends on no packages. Versions of packages fonts-unfonts-extra recommends: ii fonts-unfonts-core 1.0.2-080608-4 fonts-unfonts-extra suggests no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645005: git: installation failure: cannot remove `/usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks': Not a directory
Package: git Version: 1:1.7.7-1 Followup-For: Bug #645005 Hi, I was also confronted to the problem. I slightly modified the postinst script to skip the whole thing if the version provided as argument is an empty string. I attached the patch to this mail. Cheers, Simon >From 1b7039ad6c0e59f3e2ea644e39cd7854154309f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Chopin Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:28:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] postinst: Fix fresh install contrib/hooks cleaning The postinstall script now only attempts the removal if the version string given as argument $2 is not empty, i.e. if it is in fact an upgrade. --- debian/git.postinst |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/git.postinst b/debian/git.postinst index 8cf7ad3..332d77c 100644 --- a/debian/git.postinst +++ b/debian/git.postinst @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ fi # 1.7.7-1 replaces /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks with a symlink, # but dpkg doesn't do so on package upgrade -if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt '1:1.7.7-1' && +if test -n "$2" && dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt '1:1.7.7-1' && test -d /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks; then rmdir /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks && ln -s ../../../git-core/contrib/hooks \ -- 1.7.7
Bug#645009: git: unable to make backup link [...] Too many links
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Antti Kultanen wrote: unable to make backup link of `./usr/lib/git-core/git-send-pack' before installing new version: Too many links Do you use btrfs? Yes. Yes I do. What's going on? Thanks, Antti -- // http://www.pyksy.fi/ // pyksy @IrcNet // -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645054: ccontrol: Missing dependency on python-eggtrayicon
Package: ccontrol Version: 0.9.1+20071204-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 Without the python library contained in the python-eggtrayicon package, gccontrol will not start up. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ccontrol depends on: ii binutils 2.21.52.20110606-2 ii ccache3.1.6-1 ii gcc 4:4.6.1-2 ii libc6 2.13-21 ii make 3.81-8.1 ii python2.7.2-8 ccontrol recommends no packages. Versions of packages ccontrol suggests: ii distcc 3.1-4+b1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#643382: marked as done (geomview: FTBFS: mgrib.c:163:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])
Your message dated Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:02:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#643382: fixed in geomview 1.9.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #643382, regarding geomview: FTBFS: mgrib.c:163:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 643382: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643382 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: geomview Version: 1.9.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs hardening-format-security hardening Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../.. -I../../../../include -g -O2 > -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat > -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -Wall -c mgrib.c -fPIC -DPIC -o > .libs/mgrib.o > In file included from ../../../../include/point.h:28:0, > from ../../../../include/mg.h:33, > from mgrib.c:32: > ../../../../include/hpoint3.h: In function 'HPt3TransPt3': > ../../../../include/hpoint3.h:280:5: warning: dereferencing type-punned > pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing] > mgrib.c: In function 'mgrib_ctxcreate': > mgrib.c:163:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments > [-Werror=format-security] > mgrib.c:164:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments > [-Werror=format-security] > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > make[6]: *** [mgrib.lo] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/23/geomview_1.9.4-2_lsid64.buildlog This happened because since dpkg 1.16.0 [0], hardening flags are enabled under various conditions. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/09/msg1.html A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: geomview Source-Version: 1.9.4-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of geomview, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: geomview_1.9.4-3.diff.gz to main/g/geomview/geomview_1.9.4-3.diff.gz geomview_1.9.4-3.dsc to main/g/geomview/geomview_1.9.4-3.dsc geomview_1.9.4-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geomview/geomview_1.9.4-3_amd64.deb libgeomview-1.9.4_1.9.4-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geomview/libgeomview-1.9.4_1.9.4-3_amd64.deb libgeomview-dev_1.9.4-3_amd64.deb to main/g/geomview/libgeomview-dev_1.9.4-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 643...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steve M. Robbins (supplier of updated geomview package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:07:15 -0500 Source: geomview Binary: geomview libgeomview-1.9.4 libgeomview-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.9.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team Changed-By: Steve M. Robbins Description: geomview - interactive geometry viewing program libgeomview-1.9.4 - geomview library runtime libgeomview-dev - geomview library development package Closes: 466995 643382 Changes: geomview (1.9.4-3) unstable; urgency=low . * rules: Disable strict-aliasing. Empty dependency_libs in .la file. . * patches/04_sprintf-string-literal.patch: New. Ensure format strings are literals. Closes: #643382. . * geomview.menu: * geomview.xpm: New. * Install menu and associated icon. . * geomview.desktop: Fix categories, remove encoding. Set icon to geomview.xpm path. Closes: #466995. Checksums-Sha1: 7764792923e2a30fcd3d8c51c7d3a75fa3973a63 1481 geomview_1.9.4-3.dsc 3e38ea47e9c74cfc456090dfc968a20b23ecfe61 12711 geomview
Bug#645046: marked as done (git-annex stops working with git v1.7.7)
Your message dated Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:02:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#645046: fixed in git-annex 3.20111011 has caused the Debian Bug report #645046, regarding git-annex stops working with git v1.7.7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 645046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645046 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: git-annex Version: 3.20110928 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, After upgrading git to version 1.7.7, git-annex is no longer able to retrieve data from remotes. Test case: $ $ cd /tmp/ $ mkdir annex1 $ cd annex1 $ git init Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/annex1/.git/ $ git annex init "test annex" init test annex ok $ echo 123 > blubb $ git annex add . add blubb ok (Recording state in git...) $ git commit -m "add blubb" [master (root-commit) 401da9d] add blubb 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 12 blubb $ cd /tmp $ git clone annex1 annex2 Cloning into annex2... done. $ cd annex2 $ git annex init "test annex2" init test annex2 (merging origin/git-annex into git-annex...) ok $ git annex get . fatal: Could not switch to '.git/annex/objects/6f/v3/WORM-s4-m1318381546--blubb': No such file or directory Switching back to git v1.7.6.3 solves the issue. Best regards, Matthias -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages git-annex depends on: ii curl7.21.7-3 ii git [git-core] 1:1.7.7-1 ii libc6 2.13-21 ii libffi5 3.0.10-2 ii libgmp102:5.0.2+dfsg-1 ii libpcre38.12-4 ii openssh-client 1:5.9p1-1 ii rsync 3.0.8-1 ii uuid1.6.2-1.1 ii wget1.13-1 git-annex recommends no packages. Versions of packages git-annex suggests: ii bup ii gnupg 1.4.11-3 ii graphviz 2.26.3-7 -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: git-annex Source-Version: 3.20111011 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of git-annex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: git-annex_3.20111011.dsc to main/g/git-annex/git-annex_3.20111011.dsc git-annex_3.20111011.tar.gz to main/g/git-annex/git-annex_3.20111011.tar.gz git-annex_3.20111011_i386.deb to main/g/git-annex/git-annex_3.20111011_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 645...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joey Hess (supplier of updated git-annex package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:00:02 -0400 Source: git-annex Binary: git-annex Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.20111011 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joey Hess Changed-By: Joey Hess Description: git-annex - manage files with git, without checking their contents into git Closes: 644278 645046 Changes: git-annex (3.20111011) unstable; urgency=low . * This version of git-annex only works with git 1.7.7 and newer. The breakage with old versions is subtle, and affects the annex.numcopies settings in .gitattributes, so be sure to upgrade git to 1.7.7. (Debian package now depends on that version.) * Don't pass absolute paths to git show-attr, as it started following symlinks when that's done in 1.7.7. Instead, use relative paths, which show-attr only handles 100% correctly in 1.7.7. Closes: #645046 * Fix referring to remotes by uuid. * New or changed repository descriptions in uuid.log now have a timestamp, which is used to ensure the newest description is used when the uuid.log has been merged. * Note that older versions of git-annex will display the timestamp as part of the repository description, which is ugly but otherwise harmless. * Add timestamps to trust.log and rem
Bug#645047: bison fails to upgrade, file conflict between libbison-dev and liby-dev
Package: libbison-dev Version: 1:2.5.dfsg-2 Severity: serious Hi, when trying to upgrade bison I get: The following extra packages will be installed: libbison-dev The following NEW packages will be installed: libbison-dev 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/289 kB of archives. After this operation, 324 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done (Reading database ... 292433 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libbison-dev (from .../libbison-dev_1%3a2.5.dfsg-2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libbison-dev_1%3a2.5.dfsg-2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/liby.a', which is also in package liby-dev 1:2.5.dfsg-1 configured to not write apport reports dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libbison-dev_1%3a2.5.dfsg-2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) If libbison-dev is supposed to replace libydev, it needs proper Breaks/Replaces against libydev [1]. Cheers, Michael [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-486 Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash libbison-dev depends on no packages. Versions of packages libbison-dev recommends: iu bison 1:2.5.dfsg-2 libbison-dev suggests no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611176: marked as done (Multiple security vulnerabilities, including account compromise)
Your message dated Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:55:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#611176: fixed in bugzilla 3.6.2.0-4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #611176, regarding Multiple security vulnerabilities, including account compromise to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611176: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611176 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: bugzilla Version: 3.0.4.1-2+lenny2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: bugzilla Version: FILLINAFFECTEDVERSION Severity: FILLINSEVERITY Tags: security Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was published for bugzilla. CVE-2010-4568[0]: | ** RESERVED ** | This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that | will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the | candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be | provided. If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the CVE id in your changelog entry. For further information see: [0] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-4568 http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4568 - -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNQBmsAAoJEFOUR53TUkxRgrAP/jL0yZw/L/rJNDukhVM+J4DT 3XJp1+PGnP7/kLf16tWz3TTiJnKEXBEp/mlZPdjgl6wvtaT7HAa0XxoGEEKvb9zg o0pgdVnpLIh1Uod+vAlNKZgcISD/3Mdj1QRUxZCRRLeGz6C1drajMA9PZVGEYSd1 hcGXxcfFbOkOrNOsubXFgMgrr8lW7xlcVo5PEsFFuXpCK8CxEAaCP4F5IkKq9kA5 gbqZnW4yx4wuEAS/5KyN1FAz1yhAjhhiN1bD08didBmOM0d49GmP4mPDo7XqmW22 SI2AWHpYsVSdbnu5X7SWWWJTqw6FPSWTeAIDTRXkgO6LCnY6jz+EwltGmVNecRjv 5SerGEv3mdO9UCQ7rfdfHwQHhuMp78jkg+mqa94wIVjj9IqEslhZpLvOyhEKwuXm 9CCw83J7v/v76C90A8T3VZN64RX76Fxs/kGnbsyeiCsDTbVYEPKgUKbBd78AnuOI 5sncfwe6YxKuYvfKMz9LK5GSuk6pmL6K4B8kNVdDY5Xl38HFbw73Yg1GEqOmdqRi xdMzfIdUgDKniiC6CDJs6sixCNf9H4EC/fKzzkacOJ6s3XqcSVJFBiPH4ZL7ypAp TPtHIP54SiDKJqOqhP4HnyeCQLQ9BOKt6poTqtnjOz5zwveZCndIOI/YnQyYmaZQ w+MYBc5b2s7d0FkFKTXS =50Zi -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: bugzilla Source-Version: 3.6.2.0-4.4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bugzilla, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bugzilla3-doc_3.6.2.0-4.4_all.deb to main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla3-doc_3.6.2.0-4.4_all.deb bugzilla3_3.6.2.0-4.4_all.deb to main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla3_3.6.2.0-4.4_all.deb bugzilla_3.6.2.0-4.4.debian.tar.gz to main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla_3.6.2.0-4.4.debian.tar.gz bugzilla_3.6.2.0-4.4.dsc to main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla_3.6.2.0-4.4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 611...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jonathan Wiltshire (supplier of updated bugzilla package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:35:55 +0100 Source: bugzilla Binary: bugzilla3 bugzilla3-doc Architecture: source all Version: 3.6.2.0-4.4 Distribution: stable-security Urgency: low Maintainer: Raphael Bossek Changed-By: Jonathan Wiltshire Description: bugzilla3 - web-based bug tracking system bugzilla3-doc - comprehensive guide to Bugzilla Closes: 611176 Changes: bugzilla (3.6.2.0-4.4) stable-security; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * Add security patches (Closes: #611176): - 79_cve-2010-4572.sh (CVE-2010-4572) - 80_cve-2010-4567_cve-2011-0048.sh (CVE-2010-4567 CVE-2011-0048) - 81_cve-2010-4568.sh (CVE-2010-4568) - 82_cve-2011-0046.sh (CVE-2011-0046) - 83_cve-2011-2978.sh (CVE-2011-2978) - 84_cve-2011-2381.sh (CVE-2011-2381) - 85_cve-2011-2380.sh (CVE-2011-2979, CVE-2011-2380) - 86_cve-2011-2379.sh (CVE-2011-2379) Checksums-Sha1: 3d4bd0d3f7f8243f9e5413e30802e60a49c7a72a 1819
Bug#645046: git-annex stops working with git v1.7.7
Package: git-annex Version: 3.20110928 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, After upgrading git to version 1.7.7, git-annex is no longer able to retrieve data from remotes. Test case: $ $ cd /tmp/ $ mkdir annex1 $ cd annex1 $ git init Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/annex1/.git/ $ git annex init "test annex" init test annex ok $ echo 123 > blubb $ git annex add . add blubb ok (Recording state in git...) $ git commit -m "add blubb" [master (root-commit) 401da9d] add blubb 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 12 blubb $ cd /tmp $ git clone annex1 annex2 Cloning into annex2... done. $ cd annex2 $ git annex init "test annex2" init test annex2 (merging origin/git-annex into git-annex...) ok $ git annex get . fatal: Could not switch to '.git/annex/objects/6f/v3/WORM-s4-m1318381546--blubb': No such file or directory Switching back to git v1.7.6.3 solves the issue. Best regards, Matthias -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages git-annex depends on: ii curl7.21.7-3 ii git [git-core] 1:1.7.7-1 ii libc6 2.13-21 ii libffi5 3.0.10-2 ii libgmp102:5.0.2+dfsg-1 ii libpcre38.12-4 ii openssh-client 1:5.9p1-1 ii rsync 3.0.8-1 ii uuid1.6.2-1.1 ii wget1.13-1 git-annex recommends no packages. Versions of packages git-annex suggests: ii bup ii gnupg 1.4.11-3 ii graphviz 2.26.3-7 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#375252: we do not have a license to distribute partlibrary
reopen 375252 severity 375252 serious thanks http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/partlibrary/current/copyright is incorrect, no where in the package does it say it is GPL; and no where on the website does it say it has any license at all. In fact, upstream (qcad) doesn't have the license to even distribute those files. Removal will be requested. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: we do not have a license to distribute partlibrary
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 375252
Bug #375252 {Done: Jan Hauke Rahm } [partlibrary]
partslibrary: license
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> severity 375252 serious
Bug #375252 [partlibrary] partslibrary: license
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
375252: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=375252
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: severity of 643758 is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 643758 serious Bug #643758 [src:python-django] python-django: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.0.8: AttributeError: DjangoHTMLTranslator instance has no attribute 'param_separator' Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 643758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#597933: updates?
Any updates on this bug? 3.0.0 has been out for almost a year now and it would be nice to get the updated version in Debian. -jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: libnsbmp: diff for NMU version 0.0.1-1.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 634414 + pending Bug #634414 [src:libnsbmp] libnsbmp: FTBFS: src/libnsbmp.c:297:11: error: variable 'uheight' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable] Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 634414: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634414 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#634414: libnsbmp: diff for NMU version 0.0.1-1.1
tags 634414 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libnsbmp (versioned as 0.0.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- diff -u libnsbmp-0.0.1/debian/changelog libnsbmp-0.0.1/debian/changelog --- libnsbmp-0.0.1/debian/changelog +++ libnsbmp-0.0.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libnsbmp (0.0.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU. + * Apply patch by Ubuntu / Matthias Klose: +- Don't build with -Werror. Closes: #634414. LP: #831191. + + -- gregor herrmann Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:36:51 +0200 + libnsbmp (0.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release only in patch2: unchanged: --- libnsbmp-0.0.1.orig/Makefile +++ libnsbmp-0.0.1/Makefile @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ # Toolchain flags WARNFLAGS := -Wall -Wundef -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align \ -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes \ - -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -Werror -pedantic + -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -pedantic ifneq ($(GCCVER),2) WARNFLAGS := $(WARNFLAGS) -Wextra endif signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#644679: Seems to work with python 2.7
Hi, Planner seems to work fine with python 2.7. I forced install it using dpkg --force-all -i against the .deb package, created a project, played with it for a while without noting any curious behaviour. Any idea why the package has a python << 2.7 dependency set on ? Regards, Edouard Siha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#614760: [PATCH] plug conversion descriptor leak in unac.c::convert() error path
Sorry for the delayed answer.
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Jean-Francois Dockes wrote:
It would seem that there is some file in your document set which is
crashing recoll. We need to determine which it is, get it out of the
indexed set so that you can begin to use recoll again, and if at all
possible, I would very much like to get a copy to fix the bug (if this
is confidential data, we'll try other ways to get details about the
issue).
For a beginning, we need to have a look at the log file before the point
where recoll crashes.
I rebuilt the package with noopt,nostrip,debug. I debugged it down to
recoll-1.13.04/common/unacpp.cpp, function unacmaybefold(). It is called
with dofold = true. unacfold_string() returns with -1, errno set to 12
(ENOMEM). Then unacmaybefold() goes on to format an error message:
45 if (status < 0) {
46 if (cout)
47 free(cout);
48 char cerrno[20];
49 sprintf(cerrno, "%d", errno);
50 out = string("unac_string failed, errno : ") + cerrno;
51 return false;
52 }
however on line 50 the string concatenation runs out of memory (not
surprising, after unacfold_string() failed with ENONEM, and that's the
source of the std::bad_alloc exception object.
This happens right after the million lines of
:3:../rcldb/rcldb.cpp:813:Db::splitter::takeword: unac failed for [...]
are printed, during which phase the VSZ of the recollindex process grows
constantly. When the process finally reaches the above, the VSZ is
1,521,648 KB.
I followed unacfold_string() to unacmaybefold_string() and started to
suspect that it leaks somewhere. The code was very hard to follow in
gdb/ddd (I guess some optimization remained enabled, because the line
number kept jumping around and it was very hard to set breakpoints). After
a while I got tired and started it under valgrind, and thankfully valgrind
completed the top of the stack: it is indeed convert(), called by
unacmaybefold_string(), that leaks an iconv() conversion descriptor (and
therefore, memory) in the error path(s). (I think it's very wasteful to
open/close a descriptor for the same conversion thousands of times, but I
digress.)
I identified the file that caused this huge number of conversion errors --
it's a Maildir file with a zip and a rar attachment. Both compressed files
have the same contents: two latin2 encoded text files (tables, actually),
1.3 and 1.4 MB in size. In total 5.4 MB of latin2 encoded text that caused
90,228 conversion failures (and presumably leaked the same number of conv
descs).
The following patch fixed my problem. VSZ peaks around 160 MB.
Laszlo
--- build/recoll-1.13.04/unac/unac.c2010-01-30 08:58:40.0 +0100
+++ build2/recoll-1.13.04/unac/unac.c 2011-10-11 23:05:21.0 +0200
@@ -10661,7 +10661,7 @@ static int convert(const char* from, con
if(errno == E2BIG)
/* fall thru to the E2BIG case below */;
else
- return -1;
+ goto err;
} else {
/* The offending character was replaced by a SPACE, skip it. */
in += 2;
@@ -10670,7 +10670,7 @@ static int convert(const char* from, con
break;
}
} else {
- return -1;
+ goto err;
}
case E2BIG:
{
@@ -10690,7 +10690,7 @@ static int convert(const char* from, con
DEBUG("realloc %d bytes failed\n", out_size+1);
free(saved);
*outp = 0;
- return -1;
+ goto err;
}
}
out = out_base + length;
@@ -10698,7 +10698,7 @@ static int convert(const char* from, con
}
break;
default:
- return -1;
+ goto err;
break;
}
}
@@ -10710,6 +10710,9 @@ static int convert(const char* from, con
(*outp)[*out_lengthp] = '\0';
return 0;
+err:
+ iconv_close(cd);
+ return -1;
}
int unacmaybefold_string(const char* charset,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: severity of 621440 is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 621440 serious Bug #621440 [mailavenger] Still uses libdb4.8 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 621440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621440 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644952: librecad in testing contains non-free docs and fonts.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 00:55:58 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: serious > > Hi! Tha package librecad currently in testing (1.0.0~rc1+nolibs-4) > contains non-free docs and fonts. > > I just uploaded a new version to unstable wich corrects this, > but I think it would be good to remove the version in testing. > If they're non-free but redistributable, then this bug should be filed against the package itself, and there's no need for a removal from testing if it's fixed in sid anyway. If they're not redistributable then you need to contact the snapshot.d.o folks as well. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644868: gnustep-back-common: postinst fails: Error: for some reason, argv not properly set up during GNUstep base initialization
Axel Beckert wrote: > Yavor Doganov wrote: > > The only way I see as a workaround is to build gnustep-base with > > --enable-fake-main, which is already the case on a number of *BSD > > systems. > > The fix from back then doesn't help again respectively anymore? Apparently not. There should have been some changes in the FreeBSD kernel and/or glibc in the meantime, as this portion of code in NSProcessInfo is practically the same. > Maybe you forgot the Cc to debian-release@l.d.o in your mail... Hmm, it was intentional, I hesitated to CC release as I'm sure a release manager will comment sooner or later because it blocks the GNUstep transition bug... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: i386: Compiling gcc-snapshots from upstream with multiarch-toolchain?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 637232 644986 Bug#637232: general: Multiarch breaks support for non-multiarch toolchain Bug#644986: i386: Compiling gcc-snapshots from upstream with multiarch-toolchain? Bug#639214: eglibc: changes to paths concerning crt1.o, crti.o and crtn.o breaks building LLVM Trunk Forcibly Merged 637232 639214 644986. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 644986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644986 637232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637232 639214: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639214 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645009: git: unable to make backup link [...] Too many links
Hi Antti, Antti Kultanen wrote: > unable to make backup link of `./usr/lib/git-core/git-send-pack' before > installing new version: Too many links Do you use btrfs? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: i386: Compiling gcc-snapshots from upstream with multiarch-toolchain?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 644986 general Bug #644986 [libc6-dev] i386: Compiling gcc-snapshots from upstream with multiarch-toolchain? Bug reassigned from package 'libc6-dev' to 'general'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions eglibc/2.13-21. > severity 644986 critical Bug #644986 [general] i386: Compiling gcc-snapshots from upstream with multiarch-toolchain? Severity set to 'critical' from 'normal' > merge 637232 644986 Bug#637232: general: Multiarch breaks support for non-multiarch toolchain Bug#644986: i386: Compiling gcc-snapshots from upstream with multiarch-toolchain? Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `affects' don't match: #637232 has `libc6-dev'; #644986 has `' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 644986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644986 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#635342: CVE-2011-2193: Multiple buffer overflows
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:09:27PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:12:08AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 07:05:06PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > > > > > I have prepared a package in SVN which is ready for upload. Before doing > > > so, Moritz, can you look at this additional patch I found in the 2.4 SVN > > > branch? > > > > > > svn diff -r4780:4781 > > > svn://svn.clusterresources.com/torque/branches/2.4-fixes > > > > > > What do you think, should we add that too? There are no additional CVEs > > > for Torque, apparently so maybe this can't be used as an attack vector? > > > > Whether this is exploitable depends very much on the context and I'm not > > familiar with torque, but we should include the fix to err on the safe side. > > > > > Packages (without this second patch) are in my homedir in people.d.o, and > > > signed. I'm going offline until monday morning, so if you check them out > > > and see everything looks good, feel free to move them to the queue. > > > > I'm leaving from DebConf shortly and won't be having proper internet > > access for a few days. Please upload the packages when you find the > > time, we can then process the DSA. > > As this bug is ageing quite nicely I've taken the liberty of uploading > Jordi's package with the additional patch folded in to security-master. > > The changelog: > > torque (2.4.8+dfsg-9squeeze1) squeeze-security; urgency=low > > [ Jordi Mallach ] > * [CVE_2011_2193]: Fix two potential buffer overflows: > jobid length and hostname length weren't properly checked, > and these both allow segfaults/buffer overflow attacks within > the code. > * Update Vcs-* fields to point to the new squeeze branch. > > [ Jonathan Wiltshire ] > * Non-maintainer upload. > * buffer_overflow_in_checkpoint_c.patch: Fix a potential buffer > overflow problem in mom_checkpoint_recover > > It has had only limited testing because I don't have the resources > available for a thorough test. There's a new issue, which should be included: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-2907 Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#555879: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:48:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#555879: fixed in otter 3.3f-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #555879, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 555879: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555879 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: otter Version: 3.3f-1 Severity: minor User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: no-add-needed Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building your executables. More informations can be found at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2009-11-02Packagesfailingbecausebinutils-gold.2BAC8-indirectlinking cc -DTP_NAMES -DTP_SIGNAL -DTP_FORK -DTP_RUSAGE -Wall -g -O2 formed.o display.o callback.o \ ../libotter.a -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXaw -o formed /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_inverted_operators:formed.c:1084: error: undefined reference to 'XCopyArea' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_inverted_operators:formed.c:1088: error: undefined reference to 'XCopyArea' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_inverted_operators:formed.c:1096: error: undefined reference to 'XCopyArea' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_inverted_operators:formed.c:1092: error: undefined reference to 'XCopyArea' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_formula_box:formed.c:1047: error: undefined reference to 'XDrawRectangle' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_formula_box:formed.c:1040: error: undefined reference to 'XDrawImageString' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function arrange_box_atom:formed.c:694: error: undefined reference to 'XTextWidth' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function arrange_box_term:formed.c:606: error: undefined reference to 'XTextWidth' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function arrange_box:formed.c:720: error: undefined reference to 'XTextWidth' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function display_formula:formed.c:469: error: undefined reference to 'XClearWindow' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_formula_box_inverted:formed.c:430: error: undefined reference to 'XFillRectangle' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_formula_box_inverted:formed.c:432: error: undefined reference to 'XSetForeground' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_formula_box_inverted:formed.c:433: error: undefined reference to 'XSetBackground' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_formula_box_inverted:formed.c:437: error: undefined reference to 'XSetForeground' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function draw_formula_box_inverted:formed.c:438: error: undefined reference to 'XSetBackground' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function select_area:formed.c:393: error: undefined reference to 'XSetForeground' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function select_area:formed.c:394: error: undefined reference to 'XFillRectangle' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function select_area:formed.c:396: error: undefined reference to 'XSetForeground' /usr/bin/ld: formed.o: in function main:formed.c:54: error: undefined reference to 'XtAppMainLoop' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function accum_size:display.c:842: error: undefined reference to 'XtStrings' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function accum_size:display.c:843: error: undefined reference to 'XtStrings' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function accum_size:display.c:844: error: undefined reference to 'XtGetValues' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function kill_message:display.c:819: error: undefined reference to 'XtDestroyWidget' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function user_error:display.c:736: error: undefined reference to 'XtStrings' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function user_error:display.c:737: error: undefined reference to 'XtStrings' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function user_error:display.c:738: error: undefined reference to 'XtGetValues' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function user_error:display.c:739: error: undefined reference to 'XtTranslateCoords' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function user_error:display.c:746: error: undefined reference to 'transientShellWidgetClass' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function user_error:display.c:746: error: undefined reference to 'XtCreatePopupShell' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function user_error:display.c:751: error: undefined reference to 'XtCreateManagedWidget' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function user_error:display.c:759: error: undefined reference to 'XtCreateManagedWidget' /usr/bin/ld: display.o: in function user_error:disp
Bug#645009: git: unable to make backup link [...] Too many links
Package: git Version: 1:1.7.7-1 Severity: serious Justification: package uninstallable Unable to upgrade git: -8<- Preparing to replace git 1:1.7.6.3-1 (using .../git_1%3a1.7.7-1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement git ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/git_1%3a1.7.7-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./usr/lib/git-core/git-send-pack' before installing new version: Too many links configured to not write apport reports dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/git_1%3a1.7.7-1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -8<- -8<- % ls -l /usr/lib/git-core/git-send-pack -rwxr-xr-x 106 root root 1244864 Sep 14 18:32 /usr/lib/git-core/git-send-pack -8<- -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages git depends on: ii git-man 1:1.7.7-1 ii libc62.13-21 ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.21.7-3 ii liberror-perl0.17-1 ii libexpat12.0.1-7 ii perl-modules 5.12.4-6 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 Versions of packages git recommends: ii less 444-1 ii openssh-client [ssh-client] 1:5.9p1-1 ii patch2.6.1-2 ii rsync3.0.8-1 Versions of packages git suggests: pn git-arch pn git-cvs pn git-daemon-run | git-daemon-sysvinit pn git-doc pn git-el pn git-email pn git-gui pn git-svn pn gitk pn gitweb -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645008: setools: seinfo cannot run with Python 2.7
Package: setools Version: 3.3.6.ds-7.2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, your package contains seinfo which is by the transition of Python 2.7 in wheezy as default Python completly unusable. Output: ERROR: policydb version 26 does not match my version range 15-24 ERROR: Unable to open policy /etc/selinux/default/policy/policy.26. ERROR: Input/output error Best regards, Ferdinand *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropiate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * What outcome did you expect instead? *** End of the template - remove these lines *** -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages setools depends on: ii bwidget 1.9.5-1 ii libatk1.0-0 2.2.0-1 ii libc6 2.13-21 ii libcairo2 1.10.2-6.1 ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3 ii libfreetype62.4.6-2 ii libgcc1 1:4.6.1-4 ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.4-1 ii libglib2.0-02.28.6-1 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.4-3 ii libpango1.0-0 1.28.4-3 ii libqpol13.3.6.ds-7.2+b1 ii libselinux1 2.1.0-1 ii libsepol1 2.1.0-1.1 ii libsetools-tcl 3.3.6.ds-7.2+b1 ii libsqlite3-03.7.7-2 ii libstdc++6 4.6.1-4 ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-4 ii tk8.5 [wish]8.5.10-1 setools recommends no packages. setools suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645006: gd4o: FTBFS(any-amd64): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.data' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
Package: src:gd4o Version: 1.0~alpha5-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the any-amd64 buildds: gdstubs.c:542:19: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 5 of 'gdImageStringUp' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] /usr/include/gd.h:365:19: note: expected 'unsigned char *' but argument is of type 'char *' gdstubs.c: At top level: gdstubs.c:102:12: warning: 'ftExFlags' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] gdstubs.c:104:12: warning: 'ftExCharmaps' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] ocamlmklib -o gd gd.cmo gdstubs.o -oc ocamlgd -lgd -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lfreetype /usr/bin/ld: gdstubs.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.data' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC gdstubs.o: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [gd.cma] Error 2 Full build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gd4o&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1.0%7Ealpha5-1&stamp=1318351051 Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645005: git: installation failure: cannot remove `/usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks': Not a directory
Package: git Version: 1:1.7.7-1 Severity: serious I'm trying to install git after purging it: # aptitude install git ... Setting up git (1:1.7.7-1) ... rmdir: cannot remove `/usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks': Not a directory I think this is a problem with this part of postinst: if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt '1:1.7.7-1' && test -d /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks; then rmdir /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks && .. dpkg --compare-versions "" lt '1:1.7.7-1' is true and test -d /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/hooks is also true even for symlink. 'man test' says "Except for -h and -L, all FILE-related tests dereference symbolic links.". So as far as I understand behavior of test -d is expected. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=uk_UA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages git depends on: ii git-man 1:1.7.7-1 ii libc62.13-21 ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.21.7-3 ii liberror-perl0.17-1 ii libexpat12.0.1-7 ii perl-modules 5.12.4-6 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 Versions of packages git recommends: ii less 444-1 ii openssh-client [ssh-client] 1:5.9p1-1 ii patch2.6.1-2 ii rsync3.0.8-1 Versions of packages git suggests: pn git-arch pn git-cvs pn git-daemon-run | git-daemon-sysvinit pn git-doc pn git-el pn git-email pn git-gui pn git-svn pn gitk pn gitweb -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644200: marked as done (Two unrelated liby-dev packages in the archive)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:17:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#644200: fixed in bison 1:2.5.dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #644200, regarding Two unrelated liby-dev packages in the archive to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 644200: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644200 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: liby-dev Version: 1:2.5.dfsg-1 Severity: critical <-- snip --> $ apt-cache show liby-dev Package: liby-dev Source: bison Version: 1:2.5.dfsg-1 Installed-Size: 317 Maintainer: Chuan-kai Lin Architecture: amd64 Recommends: bison Description: YACC-compatible parser generator - development library Bison is a general-purpose parser generator that converts a grammar description for an LALR(1) context-free grammar into a C program to parse that grammar. Once you are proficient with Bison, you may use it to develop a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk calculators to complex programming languages. . This package provides the liby.a file including functions needed by yacc parsers. Multi-Arch: same Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/bison/ Tag: devel::library, role::devel-lib Section: libdevel Priority: optional Filename: pool/main/b/bison/liby-dev_2.5.dfsg-1_amd64.deb Size: 288580 MD5sum: 4ffc3a6914a1b8573ef236e22391e6a5 SHA1: 1e4951ae43261ac3bb46cd01dd61d473c5db4ace SHA256: a476b2e2cc0c37cb87eaf725d47da39cbf0bb0afcad629664a0921d298dcacab Package: liby-dev Source: yiff Version: 2.14.5-7 Installed-Size: 460 Maintainer: Phil Brooke Architecture: amd64 Replaces: liby2 (<= 2.12.4-2), liby2-dev, libyiff2-dev Depends: liby2-14 (= 2.14.5-7) Conflicts: liby2-dev, libyiff2-dev Description: Y Sound Server Library Header Files YIFF is a network based and multi client connection system that supports X Window Systems style event and client handling. Internal 3D sound support and client to server IO wrapper code is also available. YIFF is OSS, ALSA, YSound and Y2N compliant. Homepage: http://wolfpack.twu.net/YIFF/ Tag: devel::library, role::devel-lib Section: libdevel Priority: optional Filename: pool/main/y/yiff/liby-dev_2.14.5-7_amd64.deb Size: 103976 MD5sum: 74f9cec1397cd5673ec83e0822285a29 SHA1: 155ba9995679b3f02bba16e564b832ec3b6a5328 SHA256: 8d919cfbfe7ae709eb1b44fe75cbab19aa2d4f480aa748ffa3ebe9d913130584 $ <-- snip --> -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: bison Source-Version: 1:2.5.dfsg-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bison, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bison_2.5.dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz to main/b/bison/bison_2.5.dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz bison_2.5.dfsg-2.dsc to main/b/bison/bison_2.5.dfsg-2.dsc bison_2.5.dfsg-2_amd64.deb to main/b/bison/bison_2.5.dfsg-2_amd64.deb libbison-dev_2.5.dfsg-2_amd64.deb to main/b/bison/libbison-dev_2.5.dfsg-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 644...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chuan-kai Lin (supplier of updated bison package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:34:24 -0700 Source: bison Binary: bison libbison-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:2.5.dfsg-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Chuan-kai Lin Changed-By: Chuan-kai Lin Description: bison - YACC-compatible parser generator libbison-dev - YACC-compatible parser generator - development library Closes: 644200 Changes: bison (1:2.5.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Rename liby-dev to libbison-dev to avoid name conflict with Y sound server library header files (closes: #644200) Checksums-Sha1: 6487bf738f814d925a7a144de21a1a3e3934c4bf 1180 bison_2.5.dfsg-2.dsc c00b3ef5bf949e1ca0d3e8eebff21b190d0a03cf 8192 bison_2.5.dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz 9aa3bc0a8102947091f223ed6c77348b1651a3b3 692414 bison_2.5.dfsg-2_amd64.deb 826fa7e3df743168e52d68528752d5c4765ec58b 288650 libbison-dev_2.5.dfsg-2_amd64.d
Bug#644090: marked as done (spice-gtk: missing dependency on python)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:18:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#644090: fixed in spice-gtk 0.7-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #644090,
regarding spice-gtk: missing dependency on python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
644090: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644090
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-spice-client-gtk
Version: 0.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Tags: patch
python-spice-client-gtk doesn't depend on python.
--
Jakub Wilk
diff -Nru spice-gtk-0.7/debian/control spice-gtk-0.7/debian/control
--- spice-gtk-0.7/debian/control 2011-08-15 18:18:30.0 +0200
+++ spice-gtk-0.7/debian/control 2011-10-02 19:10:41.0 +0200
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.22),
libcairo2-dev (>= 1.2.0),
libpulse-dev,
+ python-support,
python-gtk2-dev (>= 2.0.0),
python-pyparsing,
intltool,
@@ -96,7 +97,7 @@
Package: python-spice-client-gtk
Section: python
Architecture: i386 amd64
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends}
Description: GTK2 widget for SPICE clients (Python binding)
libspice-gtk2 provides gtk2 widget to show spice display
and accept user input.
diff -Nru spice-gtk-0.7/debian/rules spice-gtk-0.7/debian/rules
--- spice-gtk-0.7/debian/rules 2011-08-16 13:32:01.0 +0200
+++ spice-gtk-0.7/debian/rules 2011-10-02 19:10:41.0 +0200
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
dh_installdocs
dh_installexamples
dh_installman
+ dh_pysupport
dh_link
dh_strip
dh_compress
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: spice-gtk
Source-Version: 0.7-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
spice-gtk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gir1.2-spice-client-glib-2.0_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/gir1.2-spice-client-glib-2.0_0.7-3_i386.deb
gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-2.0_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-2.0_0.7-3_i386.deb
gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-3.0_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-3.0_0.7-3_i386.deb
libspice-client-glib-2.0-4_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-glib-2.0-4_0.7-3_i386.deb
libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb
libspice-client-gtk-2.0-1_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-gtk-2.0-1_0.7-3_i386.deb
libspice-client-gtk-2.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-gtk-2.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb
libspice-client-gtk-3.0-1_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-gtk-3.0-1_0.7-3_i386.deb
libspice-client-gtk-3.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-gtk-3.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb
python-spice-client-gtk_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/python-spice-client-gtk_0.7-3_i386.deb
spice-client-gtk_0.7-3_i386.deb
to main/s/spice-gtk/spice-client-gtk_0.7-3_i386.deb
spice-gtk_0.7-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/s/spice-gtk/spice-gtk_0.7-3.debian.tar.gz
spice-gtk_0.7-3.dsc
to main/s/spice-gtk/spice-gtk_0.7-3.dsc
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 644...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Liang Guo (supplier of updated spice-gtk package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:25:53 +0800
Source: spice-gtk
Binary: spice-client-gtk libspice-client-glib-2.0-4
gir1.2-spice-client-glib-2.0 libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev
libspice-client-gtk-2.0-1 gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-2.0
libspice-client-gtk-2.0-dev libspice-client-gtk-3.0-1
gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-3.0 libspice-client-gtk-3.0-dev python-spice-client-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Liang Guo
Changed-By: Liang Guo
Description:
gir1.2-spice-client-glib-2.0 - GObject for communicating with Spice servers
(GObject-Introspecti
gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-2.0 - GTK2 widget for SPICE clients
(GObject-Introspection)
gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-3.0 - GTK3 widget for SPICE clients
(GObject-Introspection)
libspice-client-glib-2.0-4 - GObject for communicating with Spice serve
Bug#639936: marked as done (Don't assume python version 2.6)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:18:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#639936: fixed in spice-gtk 0.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #639936, regarding Don't assume python version 2.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 639936: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639936 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: spice-gtk Version: 0.7-1 Hi, spice-gtk currently assumes the system is on python 2.6. I had to change that as per the debdiff below while syncing to Ubuntu. Since it'll eventually need to be tweaked in debian as well, it would be great if it could be changed now (so as to minimize delta between debian and ubuntu). thanks, -serge === diff -Nru spice-gtk-0.7/debian/changelog spice-gtk-0.7/debian/changelog --- spice-gtk-0.7/debian/changelog 2011-08-16 06:32:01.0 -0500 +++ spice-gtk-0.7/debian/changelog 2011-08-31 15:31:57.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +spice-gtk (0.7-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/python-spice-client-gtk.install: don't lock into any particular +assumptions about python version. + + -- Serge Hallyn Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:31:25 -0500 + spice-gtk (0.7-2) unstable; urgency=low * Rename snappy to spicy-snapshot (Closes: #637983) diff -Nru spice-gtk-0.7/debian/python-spice-client-gtk.install spice-gtk-0.7/debian/python-spice-client-gtk.install --- spice-gtk-0.7/debian/python-spice-client-gtk.install2011-08-15 11:18:30.0 -0500 +++ spice-gtk-0.7/debian/python-spice-client-gtk.install2011-08-31 15:31:10.0 -0500 @@ -1 +1 @@ -usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/SpiceClientGtk.so +usr/lib/python*/*-packages/SpiceClientGtk.so --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: spice-gtk Source-Version: 0.7-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of spice-gtk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gir1.2-spice-client-glib-2.0_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/gir1.2-spice-client-glib-2.0_0.7-3_i386.deb gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-2.0_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-2.0_0.7-3_i386.deb gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-3.0_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-3.0_0.7-3_i386.deb libspice-client-glib-2.0-4_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-glib-2.0-4_0.7-3_i386.deb libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb libspice-client-gtk-2.0-1_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-gtk-2.0-1_0.7-3_i386.deb libspice-client-gtk-2.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-gtk-2.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb libspice-client-gtk-3.0-1_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-gtk-3.0-1_0.7-3_i386.deb libspice-client-gtk-3.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/libspice-client-gtk-3.0-dev_0.7-3_i386.deb python-spice-client-gtk_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/python-spice-client-gtk_0.7-3_i386.deb spice-client-gtk_0.7-3_i386.deb to main/s/spice-gtk/spice-client-gtk_0.7-3_i386.deb spice-gtk_0.7-3.debian.tar.gz to main/s/spice-gtk/spice-gtk_0.7-3.debian.tar.gz spice-gtk_0.7-3.dsc to main/s/spice-gtk/spice-gtk_0.7-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 639...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Liang Guo (supplier of updated spice-gtk package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:25:53 +0800 Source: spice-gtk Binary: spice-client-gtk libspice-client-glib-2.0-4 gir1.2-spice-client-glib-2.0 libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev libspice-client-gtk-2.0-1 gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-2.0 libspice-client-gtk-2.0-dev libspice-client-gtk-3.0-1 gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-3.0 libspice-client-gtk-3.0-dev python-spice-client-gtk Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Liang Guo Changed-By: Liang Guo Description: gir1.2-spice-client-glib-2.0 - GObject for communicating with Spice servers (GObject-Introspecti gir1.2-spice-client-gtk-2.0 - GTK2 widget for SPICE client
Bug#644205: http-support.c httpStatus problem...
I decided to try to understand what is wrong with:
# lpinfo -m
lpinfo: Unknown
as it looked as if it might be simpler to debug. In particular, I
needed to know where this useless message "Unknown" originated.
To that end, I installed source and greped, found the likely
candidate, modified the string and recompiled.
Thus I confirm that the message comes from http-support.c, line 1340
which is the default clause in a switch statement:
httpStatus(http_status_t status)/* I - HTTP status code */
{
const char*s;g */
_cups_globals_t *cg = _cupsGlobals();/* Global data */
cg->lang_default = cupsLangDefault();
switch (status)
{
...
ael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#644945: libncurses5-dev: -lncurses fails, /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libncurses.so.5
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 644945 binutils-gold Bug #644945 [libncurses5-dev] libncurses5-dev: -lncurses fails, /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libncurses.so.5 Bug reassigned from package 'libncurses5-dev' to 'binutils-gold'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions ncurses/5.9-2. > forcemerge 644708 644945 Bug#644708: tcsh: FTBFS with binutils-gold: undefined references in ed.screen.c Bug#644945: libncurses5-dev: -lncurses fails, /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find libncurses.so.5 Forcibly Merged 644708 644945. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 644708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644708 644945: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644945 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644980: marked as done (Breaks plugins due to the switch to GTK 3)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:47:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#644980: fixed in nautilus-sendto 3.0.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #644980, regarding Breaks plugins due to the switch to GTK 3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 644980: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644980 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: nautilus-sendto Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: serious User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: nautilus3-transition nautilus-sendto switched to GTK 3 in version 3.0.0 but it didn't change the plugin path /usr/lib/nautilus-sendto/plugins. It needs to declare Breaks against nautilus-sendto-empathy (<< 3.0) and gnome-bluetooth (<< 3.0) to avoid partial upgrades. Loading GTK 2 and GTK 3 in the same process is not allowed. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-486 Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages nautilus-sendto depends on: ii gconf2 2.32.4-1 ii libatk1.0-0 2.2.0-2 ii libc6 2.13-21 ii libcairo2 1.10.2-6.1 ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3 ii libfreetype62.4.6-2 ii libgconf2-4 2.32.4-1 ii libglib2.0-02.30.0-1~sid0 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.6-2 ii libnautilus-extension1 2.30.1-3 ii libpango1.0-0 1.29.4-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 nautilus-sendto recommends no packages. Versions of packages nautilus-sendto suggests: ii evolution3.0.3-2 ii gnome-bluetooth 2.30.0-3 ii icedove 3.1.15-1+b1 ii pidgin | gajim ii python-dbus 0.84.0-2 -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: nautilus-sendto Source-Version: 3.0.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nautilus-sendto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nautilus-sendto_3.0.1-1.debian.tar.gz to main/n/nautilus-sendto/nautilus-sendto_3.0.1-1.debian.tar.gz nautilus-sendto_3.0.1-1.dsc to main/n/nautilus-sendto/nautilus-sendto_3.0.1-1.dsc nautilus-sendto_3.0.1-1_i386.deb to main/n/nautilus-sendto/nautilus-sendto_3.0.1-1_i386.deb nautilus-sendto_3.0.1.orig.tar.xz to main/n/nautilus-sendto/nautilus-sendto_3.0.1.orig.tar.xz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 644...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Biebl (supplier of updated nautilus-sendto package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:52:45 +0200 Source: nautilus-sendto Binary: nautilus-sendto Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.0.1-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Oystein Gisnas Changed-By: Michael Biebl Description: nautilus-sendto - integrates Evolution and Pidgin into the Nautilus file manager Closes: 644980 Changes: nautilus-sendto (3.0.1-1) experimental; urgency=low . [ Laurent Bigonville ] * debian/control.in: - Let dh_installgsettings add correct gsettings backend to Dependencies - Bump debhelper and cdbs build-dependencies accordingly - Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no further chaneges) . [ Michael Biebl ] * debian/watch: - Switch to .xz. * New upstream release. * debian/control.in: - Add Breaks against nautilus-sendto-empathy (<< 3.0) and gnome-bluetooth (<< 3.0) as the plugin path has not changed with the switch to GTK 3 and loading both GTK 2 and GTK 3 in the same process is not allowed. (Closes: #644980) Checksums-Sha1: e90cd7e50821cab2ad4267209bf14a40b12ec31e 2425 nautilus-sendto_3.0.1-1.dsc dfe6189ad7a02b88f50dd37cb5b2a4eba7d28c2e 376892 nautilus-sendto_3.0.1.orig.tar.xz 796726752fbd39d78bf2dd3b7f49f48bdc6ab859 7324 nautilus-sendto_3.0.1-1.debian.tar.gz 1decf17fdaf9f100d551e8669c3ab1ad94d5cb40 191606 naut
Bug#607479: libfcgi-perl/CVE-2011-2766 authentication bypass
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 12:44:33PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:12:18AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > -=| Dominic Hargreaves, 30.09.2011 18:26:41 +0100 |=- > > > I'm reopening the bug, because I believe this fix applies to > > > squeeze, and should be fixed there. > > > > Agreed. > > > > > Has anyone yet contacted the security team about this/is anyone > > > working on packages for squeeze? > > > > I don't think so. > > > > Porting the patch (for some reason it doesn't apply cleanly) is > > trivial. Attached is a patch that does exactly that (to be git > > apply'ed to the debian/0.71-1 tag, which is the squeeze version). > > Did update this receive testing? > > distribution needs to point to stable-security, not unstable. And > while you're at it, please modify 0.71-1+squeeze.1 to 0.71-1+squeeze1 > for consistency. Hello Damyan, are you planning to do this or do you need someone else to take over? IMO this one warrants a DSA. Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#634394: marked as done (gauche-c-wrapper: FTBFS: gcc: error: /usr/lib/libffi_pic.a: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:17:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#634394: fixed in gauche-c-wrapper 0.6.1-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #634394, regarding gauche-c-wrapper: FTBFS: gcc: error: /usr/lib/libffi_pic.a: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 634394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634394 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: gauche-c-wrapper Version: 0.6.1-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110718 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering directory > `/build/gauche-c-wrapper-G704Ix/gauche-c-wrapper-0.6.1/src' > /usr/bin/gauche-package compile --cppflags="-DGAUCHE_API_0_8_8 > -D_GNU_SOURCE" --ldflags="" --libs="/usr/lib/libffi_pic.a " --verbose c-ffi > c-ffi.c c-ffilib.stub closure_alloc.c > gcc: error: /usr/lib/libffi_pic.a: No such file or directory > *** ERROR: command execution failed: gcc -std=gnu99 > '-L/usr/lib/gauche-0.9/0.9.1/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu' -shared -o c-ffi.so > 'c-ffi.o' 'c-ffilib.o' 'closure_alloc.o' -lgauche-0.9 -ldl -lcrypt -lm > -lpthread /usr/lib/libffi_pic.a > Stack Trace: > ___ > 0 (run (string-append "" (x->string (or ld CC)) " " (x->string (or l ... > At line 110 of > "/usr/share/gauche-0.9/0.9.1/lib/gauche/package/compile.scm" > 1 args > > 2 (with-error-handler (lambda (e) (let ((e e)) (%guard-rec e e (else ... > [unknown location] > 3 (usage) > At line 93 of "/usr/bin/gauche-package" > make[2]: *** [c-ffi.so] Error 70 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/07/18/gauche-c-wrapper_0.6.1-4_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: gauche-c-wrapper Source-Version: 0.6.1-4.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gauche-c-wrapper, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gauche-c-wrapper_0.6.1-4.1.debian.tar.gz to main/g/gauche-c-wrapper/gauche-c-wrapper_0.6.1-4.1.debian.tar.gz gauche-c-wrapper_0.6.1-4.1.dsc to main/g/gauche-c-wrapper/gauche-c-wrapper_0.6.1-4.1.dsc gauche-c-wrapper_0.6.1-4.1_i386.deb to main/g/gauche-c-wrapper/gauche-c-wrapper_0.6.1-4.1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 634...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. gregor herrmann (supplier of updated gauche-c-wrapper package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:53:27 +0200 Source: gauche-c-wrapper Binary: gauche-c-wrapper Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.6.1-4.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: NIIBE Yutaka Changed-By: gregor herrmann Description: gauche-c-wrapper - Foreign function interface for Gauche to C libraries Closes: 634394 Changes: gauche-c-wrapper (0.6.1-4.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix "FTBFS: gcc: error: /usr/lib/libffi_pic.a: No such file or directory": apply patch from Ubuntu / Matthias Klose, changing 01_use_installed_libffi.patch: - Search libffi_pic.a in the multiarch location. Closes: #634394. LP: #831289. * Explicitly build-depend on dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.0) to get dpkg-architecture's DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH variable. Checksums-Sha1: 8676d4503ca8c62199c56819669f187153cac7a5 1914 gauche-c-wrapper_0.6.1-4.1.dsc 8db8b44d849aa2ee5c01c96f51c45424455bbb93 4998 gauche-c-wrapper_0.6.1-4.1.debian.tar.gz 2c53dea33e28f4a9576620b9aef166acb47be594 218386 gauche-c-wrapp
Bug#644930: bad LANG env crashes gnucash on File->New account
Hi, On 10/11/2011 02:08 PM CEST +02:00, l...@think-future.com wrote: > As you suggested I built libgtk2.0-bin and tried again. No fix. Sorry. > [...] > > Finally there's the deb files. Well, just the patch didn't fix it. Which deb files built from the patched source did you install? The binary package libgtk2.0-bin is not the one that has the problem. Please make sure to install the patched package libgtk2.0-0 before checking whether your issue is fixed. And of course you need to restart gnucash to see any effect. Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644930: bad LANG env crashes gnucash on File->New account
Hi Micha, Thx for your msg and your work for Debian. As you suggested I built libgtk2.0-bin and tried again. No fix. Sorry. Besides, building libgtk was a PITA, all in caps. It was failing all over the build in docs, tutorials and finally doing the TEST stuff that made debuild stop (despite the "..] Error 2 [ignored]" msg). Calling fakeroot manually and fixing up all docs/.. references in lots of install files and in rules (it _is_ tedious to exclude docs from being configured/built and packaged). Finally there's the deb files. Well, just the patch didn't fix it. Do you mean to also replace the -common stuff? Cheers On Mon2011-10-10@10-18-06PM+0200, Micha Lenk wrote: # Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:18:06 +0200 # From: Micha Lenk # To: l...@think-future.com # CC: 644...@bugs.debian.org, Debian GNOME Maintainers # , cont...@bugs.debian.org # Subject: Re: Bug#644930: bad LANG env crashes gnucash on File->New account # User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) # Gecko/20110822 Lightning/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.12 # # tags 644930 + patch # thanks # # Hi, # # Am 10.10.2011 21:54, schrieb l...@think-future.com: # > Problem description: # > Using "export LANG=de_DE; gnucash" to start gnucash. gnucash crashes upon # > Selecting "File -> New account". # > Same valid for de_DE@UTF-8 maybe others as well. # > export LANG=de_DE.UTF-8; gnucash however works as intended. # > # > Further problem properties: # > - exists iirc since 2008 or earlier # > - gnucash devs at #gnucash hint this might be related to libc or gtk. # # This is very likely a duplicate of Debian bugs #616150 and #634091, # which is IMHO a bug in the gtk+2.0 package. # # If you want you can try my patch for gtk+2.0 that I've posted here: # http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=57;filename=fix_null_pointer_segfault.patch;att=2;bug=616150 # # If you can confirm that this patch fixes your problem, I'll merge this # bug with the other two bugs. # # Regards, # Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: [Reportbug-maint] Bug#644965: reportbug -Q -N bug-ID, subsequent choice "o" -> stacktrace
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 644965 normal Bug #644965 [reportbug] reportbug -Q -N bug-ID, subsequent choice "o" -> stacktrace Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > forcemerge 642939 644965 Bug#642939: reportbug exception when using -N option Bug#644965: reportbug -Q -N bug-ID, subsequent choice "o" -> stacktrace Forcibly Merged 642939 644965. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 644965: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644965 642939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642939 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644965: [Reportbug-maint] Bug#644965: reportbug -Q -N bug-ID, subsequent choice "o" -> stacktrace
severity 644965 normal forcemerge 642939 644965 thanks On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:32, debbug wrote: > Package: reportbug > Version: 6.2.1 > Severity: serious really? if you don't know what severity is for, don't over-inflate it. > > Description: > - Using query mode -Q w/ -N 1234, viewing report, then selecting > "o" in the menu crashes reportbug. > > Trace: > What do you want to do now? [N|x|o|r|b|e|q|?]? ? > N - (default) Show next message (followup). > x - Provide extra information. > o - Show other bug reports (return to bug listing). > r - Redisplay this message. > b - Launch web browser to read full log. > e - Launch e-mail client to read full log. > q - I'm bored; quit please. > ? - Display this help. > What do you want to do now? [N|x|o|r|b|e|q|?]? o > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 2186, in > main() > File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 1073, in main > return iface.user_interface() > File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 1354, in user_interface > package = exinfo.package or exinfo.source > AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'package' also, already reported: thanks for checking. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644980: Breaks plugins due to the switch to GTK 3
Package: nautilus-sendto Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: serious User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: nautilus3-transition nautilus-sendto switched to GTK 3 in version 3.0.0 but it didn't change the plugin path /usr/lib/nautilus-sendto/plugins. It needs to declare Breaks against nautilus-sendto-empathy (<< 3.0) and gnome-bluetooth (<< 3.0) to avoid partial upgrades. Loading GTK 2 and GTK 3 in the same process is not allowed. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-486 Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages nautilus-sendto depends on: ii gconf2 2.32.4-1 ii libatk1.0-0 2.2.0-2 ii libc6 2.13-21 ii libcairo2 1.10.2-6.1 ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3 ii libfreetype62.4.6-2 ii libgconf2-4 2.32.4-1 ii libglib2.0-02.30.0-1~sid0 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.6-2 ii libnautilus-extension1 2.30.1-3 ii libpango1.0-0 1.29.4-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 nautilus-sendto recommends no packages. Versions of packages nautilus-sendto suggests: ii evolution3.0.3-2 ii gnome-bluetooth 2.30.0-3 ii icedove 3.1.15-1+b1 ii pidgin | gajim ii python-dbus 0.84.0-2 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644957: libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly
Hi René I marked the bug as grave for LibreOffice-base (not LibreOffice) because base runs so slowly with openjdk-7-jre that it is unusable. It is not a grave bug for openjdk-7-jre because it can be used for other things. The question seems to be, how can this bug be resolved, whichever package is responsible. It seems to me that at present http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641537 has insufficient information. I appreciate that many people feel that Java is inherently too slow, but it appears, according to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35023 that base still runs OK on earlier versions of openjdk. So which of the changes to openjdk have slowed base down? When we know this we should be in a position to say what the bug is in openjdk or whether some change needs to be made in base to accommodate some intended change in Java. Regards John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644978: sniffit: segfaults on amd64
Package: sniffit Version: 0.3.7.beta-15 Severity: serious Justification: makes package unusable Hi, when running sniffit on amd64 like sniffit -L dns -c /usr/share/doc/sniffit/examples/sample_config_file it will abort with SIGSEGV right away. The problem breaks down to a missing '#include ' in sn_logfile.c which seems to cause gcc to use something wrong for ctime(). As a consequence, at runtime, ctime() returns some pointer which is out of bounds. Adding the missing include fixes the problem. TIA, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: nodejs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 643849 https://github.com/joyent/node/issues/1333 Bug #643849 [nodejs] FTBFS on (backport to Squeeze of) nodejs built for i486 (on amd64 host) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/joyent/node/issues/1333'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 643849: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643849 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644974: swipl.pc links with -lncurses, but doesn't have a dependency on libncurses5-dev
Package: swi-prolog-nox Version: 5.10.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy swipl.pc links with -lncurses, but doesn't have a dependency on libncurses5-dev, causing build failures in ppl. Is linking with ncurses really needed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#632494: marked as done (darcs: FTBFS (tests fail))
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:36:17 +0100 with message-id <20111011093617.GA5043@raleigh> and subject line Done... has caused the Debian Bug report #632494, regarding darcs: FTBFS (tests fail) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 632494: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632494 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: darcs Version: 2.5.2-2 Severity: serious darcs FTBFS on almost all architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=darcs Cheers, Julien --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2.5.2-6 Hi, Fixed by (a) fixing haskell-hashed-storage and (b) disabling another buggy test. Thanks for your report. Cheers, -- Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ] Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ] PhD student [ i...@cs.nott.ac.uk ] signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message ---
Bug#644965: reportbug -Q -N bug-ID, subsequent choice "o" -> stacktrace
Package: reportbug Version: 6.2.1 Severity: serious Description: - Using query mode -Q w/ -N 1234, viewing report, then selecting "o" in the menu crashes reportbug. Trace: What do you want to do now? [N|x|o|r|b|e|q|?]? ? N - (default) Show next message (followup). x - Provide extra information. o - Show other bug reports (return to bug listing). r - Redisplay this message. b - Launch web browser to read full log. e - Launch e-mail client to read full log. q - I'm bored; quit please. ? - Display this help. What do you want to do now? [N|x|o|r|b|e|q|?]? o Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 2186, in main() File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 1073, in main return iface.user_interface() File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 1354, in user_interface package = exinfo.package or exinfo.source AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'package' -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: EDITOR="/usr/bin/vi" INTERFACE="text" ** /home/user/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version "3.31" mode expert ui text realname "debbug" email "l...@think-future.com" paranoid -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39.3 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii apt 0.8.15.8 ii python2.7.2-8 ii python-reportbug 6.2.1 reportbug recommends no packages. Versions of packages reportbug suggests: ii debconf-utils1.5.40 ii debsums 2.0.49 ii dlocate ii emacs22-bin-common | emacs23-bin-common ii file 5.08-1 ii gnupg1.4.11-3 ii pgpgpg [pgp] 0.13-9 ii postfix [mail-transport-agent] 2.8.3-1 ii python-gtk2 2.24.0-2 ii python-gtkspell ii python-urwid 0.9.9.2-1 ii python-vte 1:0.28.1-2 ii xdg-utils1.1.0~rc1-2 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#644957: libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 641537 openjdk-6-jre, openjdk-7-jre Bug #641537 [openjdk-6-jre] openjdk-6-jre: LibreOffice base runs extremely slowly Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-6-jre' to 'openjdk-6-jre,openjdk-7-jre'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-6/6b23~pre9-1. > block 644957 by 641537 Bug #644957 [libreoffice-base] libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly with newer JDKS Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 644957: 641537 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 644957: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644957 641537: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641537 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644957: libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly
reassign 641537 openjdk-6-jre, openjdk-7-jre block 644957 by 641537 thanks On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 07:45:34AM +0100, John Talbut wrote: > I have reported this issue against openjdk-6-jre, > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641537 . However Aha. it's important for the JDK but "grave" for LibreOffice? no, (But thanks, I'll make this bug blocked by that bug) > the problem is even worse in LibreOffice 3.4.3-3 using > openjdk-7-jre. It has been reported upstream as Maybe, if openjdk-7-jre is worse, you should reassign that bug to both?) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#644245: libreoffice-impress: Impress crash when open many ppt files in same time
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 644245 important Bug #644245 [libreoffice-impress] libreoffice-impress: Impress crash when open many ppt files in same time Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 644245: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644245 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644245: libreoffice-impress: Impress crash when open many ppt files in same time
severity 644245 important thanks Hi, On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:05:48PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > What unrelated software is broken? If this was a general problem > in Impress this would be at most "grave". Please explain > why this should be critical in the definitions of bug severities (see > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities) > [...] > > I opened seven or more ppt files and impress crash all the time! I unknow > > more > > specific issues. There is an new version on stable and unstable. But, I use > > testing version. Thank you very much! Oh my. I should have read more complete. It only crashes if you open 7 or more ppt files at once? Why does that make the software unusable or even break the system? This sounds more like important (which I will now set it to) or even normal to me. Are you sure your memory didn't go out and it got killed by the OOM killer or somesuch (NB: didn't read all the stracktraces)? Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644957: libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly
Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:47:02AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > And because that is unclear you want LibOffice to bear this RC bug until > infinity until someone finds it out (which probably won't happen given > Base frankfly speaking is not a priority for LibreOffice - which I > can completely understand)? I don't believe this is proper action... And I won't work on this either. it's Java, that is slow per definition. If this bug (if we ltet it stay as RC) should block one day the action without any alternative would be to *completely* remove Base. I doubt you want that. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#644957: libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 644957 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35023 Bug #644957 [libreoffice-base] libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35023'. > # maybe you should have used a proper subject... > retitle 644957 libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly with newer JDKS Bug #644957 [libreoffice-base] libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly Changed Bug title to 'libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly with newer JDKS' from 'libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 644957: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644957 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644957: libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly
forwarded 644957 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35023 # maybe you should have used a proper subject... retitle 644957 libreoffice-base: Base runs extremely slowly with newer JDKS thanks Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 07:45:34AM +0100, John Talbut wrote: > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable Why? You can use it. It's just slow. That more fits important to me. Beside the fact that there's no other Java anywhere in Debian. > I have reported this issue against openjdk-6-jre, > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641537 . However > the problem is even worse in LibreOffice 3.4.3-3 using > openjdk-7-jre. It has been reported upstream as And why don't you use openjdk-6 then? LibreOffice doesn't force usage of 7. > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35023 and marked not > their problem on the basis that base works OK with earlier versions > of Java. However, until it can be identified what the change is in > Java that has affected base it cannot be clear whether it is > LibreOffice or a Java problem. And because that is unclear you want LibOffice to bear this RC bug until infinity until someone finds it out (which probably won't happen given Base frankfly speaking is not a priority for LibreOffice - which I can completely understand)? I don't believe this is proper action... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#641405: several Django security issues
Hi Raphaël, Op vrijdag 7 oktober 2011 10:41:26 schreef Thijs Kinkhorst: > > > > > > I have prepared the Squeeze update. I have no way to test it since I > > don't run any website with Django on top of Squeeze currently but I > > don't see any reason why it shouldn't work. The extensive test suites > > passes. > > I've installed it on a test server, can conclude that it doesn't completely > go down in flames but we cannot really test it until Monday. OK, we did some testing in our setup and nothing breaks. > > As for lenny, I think it's too much work given that upstream doesn't > > support it any longer. > > We kind of promised our users that Lenny would be security supported for > one year after the squeeze release. But we'll have to see what we can do > about this. See here a user response to dealing with Lenny in such an ad hoc way: http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2011/10/msg00048.html -- Thijs Kinkhorst – LIS Unix Universiteit van Tilburg – Library and IT Services • Postbus 90153, 5000 LE Bezoekadres > Warandelaan 2 • Tel. 013 466 3035 • G 236 • http://www.uvt.nl signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#643849: FTBFS on (backport to Squeeze of) nodejs built for i486 (on amd64 host)
On 11/10/2011 03:15, Martin Skøtt wrote: > Jérémy, > > I encountered the same error as Jonas when using pbuilder on i386 > (with amd64 kernel) to build a backport for amd64. > > I applied your patch and the build completed nicely. > That's great, Jonas, do you confirm ? Jérémy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#629885: marked as done (batmon.app: FTBFS: BatteryModel.m:308: undefined reference to `assert')
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:47:53 +0300 with message-id <20111011074753.ga...@yavor.doganov.org> and subject line Re: Bug#629885: batmon.app: FTBFS: BatteryModel.m:308: undefined reference to `assert' has caused the Debian Bug report #629885, regarding batmon.app: FTBFS: BatteryModel.m:308: undefined reference to `assert' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 629885: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629885 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: batmon.app Version: 0.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libobjc.so.2, needed by /usr/lib/libgnustep-gui.so, may > conflict with libobjc.so.3 > ./obj/batmon.obj/BatteryModel.m.o: In function `-[BatteryModel update]': > /«BUILDDIR»/batmon.app-0.5/BatteryModel.m:308: undefined reference to `assert' > /«BUILDDIR»/batmon.app-0.5/BatteryModel.m:416: undefined reference to `assert' > /«BUILDDIR»/batmon.app-0.5/BatteryModel.m:437: undefined reference to `assert' > /«BUILDDIR»/batmon.app-0.5/BatteryModel.m:519: undefined reference to `assert' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/06/07/batmon.app_0.5-1_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This bug is apparently fixed with gnustep-base/1.22's reorganized includes. --- End Message ---
Bug#644873: Info received (Bug#644873 closed by Reinhard Tartler (Re: Bug#644873: unmet dependencies: libavcodec53 : Depends: libavutil51 (< 4:0.7.2-99) but 5:0.8-0.1 is to be in
Am 11.10.2011 01:10, schrieb Anti Spam User 3: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnash-common : Depends: libavcodec53 (>= 4:0.7-1) but it is not going to be installed or libavcodec-extra-53 (>= 4:0.7-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libavformat53 (>= 4:0.7-1) but it is not going to be installed Hm, try "apt-get install libavcodec53/wheezy libavformat53/wheezy". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
