Bug#662750: [Openstack-devel] Bug#662750: python-quantumclient and quantum-server: error when trying to install together
quantum-server/2012.1~e4-1 is on the NEW queue. As soon as it gets approved, i'll fix this. Thnx for the report. On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Package: quantum-server,python-quantumclient > Version: quantum-server/2012.1~e3-1 > Version: python-quantumclient/2012.1~e4-1 > Severity: serious > User: trei...@debian.org > Usertags: edos-file-overwrite > > Date: 2012-03-06 > Architecture: amd64 > Distribution: sid > > Hi, > > automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the > same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has > detected the following problem: > > > WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! > libexpat1 libdb4.8 mime-support python2.7-minimal python2.7 python-minimal > python openssl python-dns python-pkg-resources python-formencode > python-gflags python-paste python-pastedeploy quantum-common > openvswitch-common uuid-runtime openvswitch-switch > quantum-plugin-openvswitch quantum-server python-quantumclient > Authentication warning overridden. > Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) > Selecting previously unselected package libexpat1. > (Reading database ... 10547 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking libexpat1 (from .../libexpat1_2.0.1-7.2_amd64.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package libdb4.8. > Unpacking libdb4.8 (from .../libdb4.8_4.8.30-11_amd64.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package mime-support. > Unpacking mime-support (from .../mime-support_3.52-1_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package python2.7-minimal. > Unpacking python2.7-minimal (from .../python2.7-minimal_2.7.2-13_amd64.deb) > ... > Selecting previously unselected package python2.7. > Unpacking python2.7 (from .../python2.7_2.7.2-13_amd64.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package python-minimal. > Unpacking python-minimal (from .../python-minimal_2.7.2-10_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package python. > Unpacking python (from .../python_2.7.2-10_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package openssl. > Unpacking openssl (from .../openssl_1.0.0g-1_amd64.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package python-dns. > Unpacking python-dns (from .../python-dns_2.3.6-1_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package python-pkg-resources. > Unpacking python-pkg-resources (from > .../python-pkg-resources_0.6.24-1_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package python-formencode. > Unpacking python-formencode (from .../python-formencode_1.2.4-2_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package python-gflags. > Unpacking python-gflags (from .../python-gflags_1.5.1-1_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package python-paste. > Unpacking python-paste (from .../python-paste_1.7.5.1-4_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package python-pastedeploy. > Unpacking python-pastedeploy (from .../python-pastedeploy_1.5.0-2_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package quantum-common. > Unpacking quantum-common (from .../quantum-common_2012.1~e4-1_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package openvswitch-common. > Unpacking openvswitch-common (from .../openvswitch-common_1.4.0-2_amd64.deb) > ... > Selecting previously unselected package uuid-runtime. > Unpacking uuid-runtime (from .../uuid-runtime_2.20.1-4_amd64.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package openvswitch-switch. > Unpacking openvswitch-switch (from .../openvswitch-switch_1.4.0-2_amd64.deb) > ... > Selecting previously unselected package quantum-plugin-openvswitch. > Unpacking quantum-plugin-openvswitch (from > .../quantum-plugin-openvswitch_2012.1~e3-1_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package quantum-server. > Unpacking quantum-server (from .../quantum-server_2012.1~e3-1_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously unselected package python-quantumclient. > Unpacking python-quantumclient (from > .../python-quantumclient_2012.1~e4-1_all.deb) ... > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/python-quantumclient_2012.1~e4-1_all.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite '/usr/share/pyshared/quantum/__init__.py', which is also > in package quantum-server 2012.1~e3-1 > configured to not write apport reports > Processing triggers for man-db ... > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/python-quantumclient_2012.1~e4-1_all.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > > > This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates > sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would > consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming > or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the > circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file > diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a > last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual > Conflict. Please take into account that Repla
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 662750 confirmed Bug #662750 [quantum-server,python-quantumclient] python-quantumclient and quantum-server: error when trying to install together Added tag(s) confirmed. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662750 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662741: marked as done (netcat-openbsd: readwrite() HUPs too early)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:35:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662741: fixed in netcat-openbsd 1.105-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #662741, regarding netcat-openbsd: readwrite() HUPs too early to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 662741: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662741 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: netcat-openbsd Version: 1.105-1,1.105-2,1.105-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading to wheezy/sid version of netcat-openbsd, a script using nc does not function correctly. If it is run non-interactively, nc.openbsd quits silently before receiving a server's response unless -q sec option is specified: $ printf "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n" | nc.openbsd www.example.com 80 $ printf "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n" | nc.traditional www.example.com 80 HTTP/1.0 302 Found Location: http://www.iana.org/domains/example/ Server: BigIP Connection: close Content-Length: 0 $ printf "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n" | nc.openbsd -q 1 www.example.com 80 HTTP/1.0 302 Found Location: http://www.iana.org/domains/example/ Server: BigIP Connection: close Content-Length: 0 Note that typing input from terminal does not seem to be affected: $ nc.openbsd www.example.com 80 GET / HTTP/1.0 HTTP/1.0 302 Found Location: http://www.iana.org/domains/example/ Server: BigIP Connection: close Content-Length: 0 -- YOSHINO Yoshihito --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: netcat-openbsd Source-Version: 1.105-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netcat-openbsd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: netcat-openbsd_1.105-4.debian.tar.gz to main/n/netcat-openbsd/netcat-openbsd_1.105-4.debian.tar.gz netcat-openbsd_1.105-4.dsc to main/n/netcat-openbsd/netcat-openbsd_1.105-4.dsc netcat-openbsd_1.105-4_amd64.deb to main/n/netcat-openbsd/netcat-openbsd_1.105-4_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 662...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aron Xu (supplier of updated netcat-openbsd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:18:26 +0800 Source: netcat-openbsd Binary: netcat-openbsd Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.105-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Aron Xu Changed-By: Aron Xu Description: netcat-openbsd - TCP/IP swiss army knife Closes: 662741 Changes: netcat-openbsd (1.105-4) unstable; urgency=high . * High urgency for fixing RC bug. * Fix readwrite() behaviour (Closes: #662741). Checksums-Sha1: 5bce304c288f2315bd0a7d03edb90d44e2327945 1526 netcat-openbsd_1.105-4.dsc 1f9b94bf179cf1c80bfe89b840c1f872e63ad0c2 31187 netcat-openbsd_1.105-4.debian.tar.gz 223a5fcd6656febfe5ab2b3a1c29df2aedd69a5f 39426 netcat-openbsd_1.105-4_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 6826931ab6ddd2eaf3dd4a0840f32f3578a37e212a48602108e9a33213791eff 1526 netcat-openbsd_1.105-4.dsc 5a7fd7045112413d5d59e21031c268adc4f8f7d77eb06f0d0f96dcee72578bb7 31187 netcat-openbsd_1.105-4.debian.tar.gz c8427a58d1c523455bcad595660fba28672aec773fcfa03f81bfdfb2a2e16aea 39426 netcat-openbsd_1.105-4_amd64.deb Files: c601893c1080c4225fad64dd1d3f0949 1526 net important netcat-openbsd_1.105-4.dsc 76b88083b77eb2e6f014cdb3020a96ac 31187 net important netcat-openbsd_1.105-4.debian.tar.gz 86e48c7537d29631c4458b592e8a8601 39426 net important netcat-openbsd_1.105-4_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJPVbzmAAoJEIAhAkTu07wNsSkH/Rrnr5OGpn0QkCvMBUQUpFMi Qq3Yjv2F8ZORxkL89qGweSnNVwmz7ry4Zzcm+/sKJBZTILpyrnq7MU2eV8TsFnGL rF+48G5hoNkIzQ8liAbKOyYGQRlbAohETFjmORG8To6iQ2adFHL4UrFbL+MAQxQP u2JdmGi+r5a+TLkbLNckXY4wovkwijjdufrtK/Jv1OV2uc08tB0w+Bw3XO8QqM7U BcDRbwNXa2cWyyV99PR5tyzUbkCwoYcFw4Dt1BGYn62DQQesjVuUocW+dyQ+LzxG iVag46pB5qr7Q3Tt0zdq8PUq+o4gsexqyZNqojmK2MhR5aJ9xDSna9rxmtT9hDA= =PujZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#662746: mingw32-ocaml: fails to upgrade from squeeze
Le 06/03/2012 08:18, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'squeeze'. > It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'wheezy' fails. > [...] Precision: it fails when using apt, but it works using aptitude. Could you please explain the "serious" severity? Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662751: libterm-ttyrec-plus-perl and ttyrec: error when trying to install together
Package: ttyrec,libterm-ttyrec-plus-perl Version: ttyrec/1.0.8-5 Version: libterm-ttyrec-plus-perl/0.8-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2012-03-06 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! libterm-ttyrec-plus-perl ttyrec Authentication warning overridden. Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Selecting previously unselected package libterm-ttyrec-plus-perl. (Reading database ... 10547 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libterm-ttyrec-plus-perl (from .../libterm-ttyrec-plus-perl_0.08-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package ttyrec. Unpacking ttyrec (from .../ttyrec_1.0.8-5_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ttyrec_1.0.8-5_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/ttyplay', which is also in package libterm-ttyrec-plus-perl 0.08-1 configured to not write apport reports Processing triggers for man-db ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/ttyrec_1.0.8-5_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and diversions should only be used when packages provide different implementations for the same functionality. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /usr/bin/ttyplay This bug has been filed against both packages. If you, the maintainers of the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may then also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug. -Ralf. PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662750: python-quantumclient and quantum-server: error when trying to install together
Package: quantum-server,python-quantumclient Version: quantum-server/2012.1~e3-1 Version: python-quantumclient/2012.1~e4-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2012-03-06 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! libexpat1 libdb4.8 mime-support python2.7-minimal python2.7 python-minimal python openssl python-dns python-pkg-resources python-formencode python-gflags python-paste python-pastedeploy quantum-common openvswitch-common uuid-runtime openvswitch-switch quantum-plugin-openvswitch quantum-server python-quantumclient Authentication warning overridden. Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Selecting previously unselected package libexpat1. (Reading database ... 10547 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libexpat1 (from .../libexpat1_2.0.1-7.2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libdb4.8. Unpacking libdb4.8 (from .../libdb4.8_4.8.30-11_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package mime-support. Unpacking mime-support (from .../mime-support_3.52-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python2.7-minimal. Unpacking python2.7-minimal (from .../python2.7-minimal_2.7.2-13_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python2.7. Unpacking python2.7 (from .../python2.7_2.7.2-13_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python-minimal. Unpacking python-minimal (from .../python-minimal_2.7.2-10_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python. Unpacking python (from .../python_2.7.2-10_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package openssl. Unpacking openssl (from .../openssl_1.0.0g-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python-dns. Unpacking python-dns (from .../python-dns_2.3.6-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python-pkg-resources. Unpacking python-pkg-resources (from .../python-pkg-resources_0.6.24-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python-formencode. Unpacking python-formencode (from .../python-formencode_1.2.4-2_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python-gflags. Unpacking python-gflags (from .../python-gflags_1.5.1-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python-paste. Unpacking python-paste (from .../python-paste_1.7.5.1-4_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python-pastedeploy. Unpacking python-pastedeploy (from .../python-pastedeploy_1.5.0-2_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package quantum-common. Unpacking quantum-common (from .../quantum-common_2012.1~e4-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package openvswitch-common. Unpacking openvswitch-common (from .../openvswitch-common_1.4.0-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package uuid-runtime. Unpacking uuid-runtime (from .../uuid-runtime_2.20.1-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package openvswitch-switch. Unpacking openvswitch-switch (from .../openvswitch-switch_1.4.0-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package quantum-plugin-openvswitch. Unpacking quantum-plugin-openvswitch (from .../quantum-plugin-openvswitch_2012.1~e3-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package quantum-server. Unpacking quantum-server (from .../quantum-server_2012.1~e3-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package python-quantumclient. Unpacking python-quantumclient (from .../python-quantumclient_2012.1~e4-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python-quantumclient_2012.1~e4-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/pyshared/quantum/__init__.py', which is also in package quantum-server 2012.1~e3-1 configured to not write apport reports Processing triggers for man-db ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/python-quantumclient_2012.1~e4-1_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and diversions should only be used when packages provide different implementations for the same functionality. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/quantum/__init__.py /usr/lib/p
Bug#662749: libnetcdfc++5 and libnetcdfc++4: error when trying to install together
Package: libnetcdfc++4,libnetcdfc++5 Version: libnetcdfc++4/1:4.1.3-5 Version: libnetcdfc++5/1:4.1.3-4 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2012-03-06 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! libkeyutils1 libkrb5support0 libk5crypto3 libkrb5-3 libgssapi-krb5-2 libsasl2-2 libldap-2.4-2 librtmp0 libssh2-1 libcurl3-gnutls libquadmath0 libgfortran3 libhdf5-7 libnetcdfc7 libnetcdfc++4 libnetcdfc++5 Authentication warning overridden. Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Selecting previously unselected package libkeyutils1. (Reading database ... 10547 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libkeyutils1 (from .../libkeyutils1_1.5.2-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libkrb5support0. Unpacking libkrb5support0 (from .../libkrb5support0_1.10+dfsg~beta1-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libk5crypto3. Unpacking libk5crypto3 (from .../libk5crypto3_1.10+dfsg~beta1-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libkrb5-3. Unpacking libkrb5-3 (from .../libkrb5-3_1.10+dfsg~beta1-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libgssapi-krb5-2. Unpacking libgssapi-krb5-2 (from .../libgssapi-krb5-2_1.10+dfsg~beta1-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libsasl2-2. Unpacking libsasl2-2 (from .../libsasl2-2_2.1.25.dfsg1-4_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libldap-2.4-2. Unpacking libldap-2.4-2 (from .../libldap-2.4-2_2.4.28-1.1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package librtmp0. Unpacking librtmp0 (from .../librtmp0_2.4+20111222.git4e06e21-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libssh2-1. Unpacking libssh2-1 (from .../libssh2-1_1.2.8-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libcurl3-gnutls. Unpacking libcurl3-gnutls (from .../libcurl3-gnutls_7.24.0-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libquadmath0. Unpacking libquadmath0 (from .../libquadmath0_4.6.3-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libgfortran3. Unpacking libgfortran3 (from .../libgfortran3_4.6.3-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libhdf5-7. Unpacking libhdf5-7 (from .../libhdf5-7_1.8.8-7.1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libnetcdfc7. Unpacking libnetcdfc7 (from .../libnetcdfc7_1%3a4.1.3-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libnetcdfc++4. Unpacking libnetcdfc++4 (from .../libnetcdfc++4_1%3a4.1.3-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously unselected package libnetcdfc++5. Unpacking libnetcdfc++5 (from .../libnetcdfc++5_1%3a4.1.3-4_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libnetcdfc++5_1%3a4.1.3-4_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libnetcdf_c++.so.4.1.0', which is also in package libnetcdfc++4 1:4.1.3-5 configured to not write apport reports Processing triggers for man-db ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libnetcdfc++5_1%3a4.1.3-4_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and diversions should only be used when packages provide different implementations for the same functionality. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /usr/lib/libnetcdf_c++.so.4 /usr/lib/libnetcdf_c++.so.4.1.0 This bug has been filed against both packages. If you, the maintainers of the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may then also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug. -Ralf. PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662748: highlight: fails to install, remove, distupgrade, and install again - prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user
Package: highlight Version: 3.7-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But this is not the real problem, the real problem is that this prompt shows up in the first place, as there was nobody modifying this conffile at all, the package has just been installed and upgraded... During a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install (in 'squeeze'), remove (but not purge), distupgrade to 'wheezy', and install again. Before the second installation the package is in config-files-remaining state. The configuration is remaining from the last version that was successfully configured - which is from the previous release. This is a violation of policy 10.7.3, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3, which says "[These scripts handling conffiles] must not ask unnecessary questions (particularly during upgrades), and must otherwise be good citizens." http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling should help with figuring out how to do this properly. In http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00675.html and followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with severity serious. Like a plain failure on initial install this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus the severity. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Setting up highlight-common (3.7-2) ... Configuration file `/etc/highlight/filetypes.conf' ==> Deleted (by you or by a script) since installation. ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : start a shell to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** filetypes.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing highlight-common (--configure): EOF on stdin at conffile prompt cheers, Andreas highlight_3.7-2.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#645349: marked as done (python-sqlkit: uninstallable: breaks "python (>= 2.7)")
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:25:11 +0100 with message-id <1331018711.21889.19.ca...@debiousci.pietrobattiston.it> and subject line Solved has caused the Debian Bug report #645349, regarding python-sqlkit: uninstallable: breaks "python (>= 2.7)" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 645349: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645349 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: python-sqlkit Version: 0.9.2.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python2.7 python-sqlkit is not installable in sid+experimental; it breaks "python (>= 2.7)", but only such version is available: | # apt-get install python-sqlkit | Reading package lists... Done | Building dependency tree | Reading state information... Done | Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have | requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable | distribution that some required packages have not yet been created | or been moved out of Incoming. | The following information may help to resolve the situation: | | The following packages have unmet dependencies: | python-sqlkit : Depends: python (>= 2.6.6-3+squeeze3~) but it is not going to be installed | Depends: python-dateutil but it is not going to be installed | Depends: python-gtk2 but it is not going to be installed | Depends: python-glade2 but it is not going to be installed | Depends: python-sqlalchemy but it is not going to be installed | Depends: python-pybabel but it is not going to be installed | E: Broken packages -- Jakub Wilk --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version 0.9.5-1 was just uploaded to unstable and is fine (in fact, a rebuild was sufficient). Version 0.9.2.1-1 will be automatically removed from experimental. Pietro --- End Message ---
Processed: Shouldn't migrate to testing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 661566 serious Bug #661566 [libnet-ssleay-perl] libnet-ssleay-perl: Segfault when lniked into an Apache/mod_ssl/mod_perl process Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 661566: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661566 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662746: mingw32-ocaml: fails to upgrade from squeeze
Package: mingw32-ocaml Version: 3.12.1+debian2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'squeeze'. It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'wheezy' fails. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): 1m0.4s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpyXsfqY', 'apt-get', '-yf', 'dist-upgrade'] 1m39.8s DUMP: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following NEW packages will be installed: cpp-4.6 gcc-4.6 gcc-4.6-base libdb5.1 libgmp10 liblzma5 libmount1 libmpc2 libpam-modules-bin libquadmath0 libsemanage-common libsemanage1 libtinfo-dev libtinfo5 libustr-1.0-1 mingw-w64-dev multiarch-support ucf The following packages have been kept back: mingw32-ocaml The following packages will be upgraded: apt base-files base-passwd bash binutils bsdutils coreutils cpp cpp-4.4 dash debconf debconf-i18n debianutils diffutils dpkg e2fslibs e2fsprogs findutils gcc gcc-4.4 gcc-4.4-base gnupg gpgv grep gzip hostname initscripts insserv libacl1 libattr1 libblkid1 libbz2-1.0 libc-bin libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6-dev libc6-i386 libcomerr2 libdb4.8 libfindlib-ocaml libfindlib-ocaml-dev libgcc1 libgdbm3 libgomp1 liblocale-gettext-perl libmpfr4 libncurses5 libncurses5-dev libpam-modules libpam-runtime libpam0g libreadline6 libselinux1 libsepol1 libslang2 libss2 libstdc++6 libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl libusb-0.1-4 libuuid1 linux-libc-dev login lsb-base mawk mingw32-binutils mount ncurses-base ncurses-bin ocaml-base-nox ocaml-findlib ocaml-interp ocaml-nox passwd perl-base readline-common sed sensible-utils sysv-rc sysvinit sysvinit-utils tar tzdata util-linux xz-utils zlib1g 86 upgraded, 18 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. [...] 1m0.4s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpyXsfqY', 'apt-get', '-yf', 'dist-upgrade'] 1m39.8s DUMP: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following NEW packages will be installed: cpp-4.6 gcc-4.6 gcc-4.6-base libdb5.1 libgmp10 liblzma5 libmount1 libmpc2 libpam-modules-bin libquadmath0 libsemanage-common libsemanage1 libtinfo-dev libtinfo5 libustr-1.0-1 mingw-w64-dev multiarch-support ucf The following packages have been kept back: mingw32-ocaml The following packages will be upgraded: apt base-files base-passwd bash binutils bsdutils coreutils cpp cpp-4.4 dash debconf debconf-i18n debianutils diffutils dpkg e2fslibs e2fsprogs findutils gcc gcc-4.4 gcc-4.4-base gnupg gpgv grep gzip hostname initscripts insserv libacl1 libattr1 libblkid1 libbz2-1.0 libc-bin libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6-dev libc6-i386 libcomerr2 libdb4.8 libfindlib-ocaml libfindlib-ocaml-dev libgcc1 libgdbm3 libgomp1 liblocale-gettext-perl libmpfr4 libncurses5 libncurses5-dev libpam-modules libpam-runtime libpam0g libreadline6 libselinux1 libsepol1 libslang2 libss2 libstdc++6 libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl libusb-0.1-4 libuuid1 linux-libc-dev login lsb-base mawk mingw32-binutils mount ncurses-base ncurses-bin ocaml-base-nox ocaml-findlib ocaml-interp ocaml-nox passwd perl-base readline-common sed sensible-utils sysv-rc sysvinit sysvinit-utils tar tzdata util-linux xz-utils zlib1g 86 upgraded, 18 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. [...] 1m40.5s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpyXsfqY', 'apt-cache', 'policy', 'mingw32-ocaml'] 1m40.5s DUMP: mingw32-ocaml: Installed: 3.11.2+debian4 Candidate: 3.12.1+debian2 Version table: 3.12.1+debian2 0 500 http://piatti.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main amd64 Packages *** 3.11.2+debian4 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1m40.5s DEBUG: Command ok: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpyXsfqY', 'apt-cache', 'policy', 'mingw32-ocaml'] 1m40.5s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpyXsfqY', 'apt-get', '-y', 'install', 'mingw32-ocaml'] 1m40.9s DUMP: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: mingw32-ocaml : Depends: mingw-ocaml but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages cheers, Andreas mingw32-ocaml_3.12.1+debian2.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#662741: netcat-openbsd: does not receive a server's response unless -q sec is specified
You've mentioned that using -q it works well, this helped me a lot! I
think I have found the solution now.
1087if (qflag == 0) {
1088shutdown(nfd, SHUT_WR);
1089close(wfd);
1090exit(0);
1091}
The call of exit() should be removed.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: retitle 662741 netcat-openbsd: readwrite() HUPs too early
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 662741 netcat-openbsd: readwrite() HUPs too early Bug #662741 [netcat-openbsd] netcat-openbsd: does not receive a server's response unless -q sec is specified Changed Bug title to 'netcat-openbsd: readwrite() HUPs too early' from 'netcat-openbsd: does not receive a server's response unless -q sec is specified' > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662741: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662741 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#662741: netcat-openbsd: does not receive a server's response unless -q sec is specified
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitile 662741 netcat-openbsd: readwrite() HUPs too early Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tags 662741 + confirmed Bug #662741 [netcat-openbsd] netcat-openbsd: does not receive a server's response unless -q sec is specified Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662741: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662741 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662741: netcat-openbsd: does not receive a server's response unless -q sec is specified
Package: netcat-openbsd Version: 1.105-1,1.105-2,1.105-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading to wheezy/sid version of netcat-openbsd, a script using nc does not function correctly. If it is run non-interactively, nc.openbsd quits silently before receiving a server's response unless -q sec option is specified: $ printf "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n" | nc.openbsd www.example.com 80 $ printf "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n" | nc.traditional www.example.com 80 HTTP/1.0 302 Found Location: http://www.iana.org/domains/example/ Server: BigIP Connection: close Content-Length: 0 $ printf "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n" | nc.openbsd -q 1 www.example.com 80 HTTP/1.0 302 Found Location: http://www.iana.org/domains/example/ Server: BigIP Connection: close Content-Length: 0 Note that typing input from terminal does not seem to be affected: $ nc.openbsd www.example.com 80 GET / HTTP/1.0 HTTP/1.0 302 Found Location: http://www.iana.org/domains/example/ Server: BigIP Connection: close Content-Length: 0 -- YOSHINO Yoshihito -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#652215: marked as done (libqt4pas: FTBFS: /build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/libqt4pas5.install: 1: /build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/libqt4pas5.install: usr/lib/*/libQt4Pas.s
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:19:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652215: fixed in libqt4pas 2.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652215, regarding libqt4pas: FTBFS: /build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/libqt4pas5.install: 1: /build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/libqt4pas5.install: usr/lib/*/libQt4Pas.so.*: not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 652215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652215 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: libqt4pas Version: 2.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering directory `/build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4' > install -m 755 -p "libQt4Pas.so.5.2.4" > "/build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libQt4Pas.so.5.2.4" > : --strip-unneeded > "/build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libQt4Pas.so.5.2.4" > ln -f -s "libQt4Pas.so.5.2.4" > "/build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libQt4Pas.so" > ln -f -s "libQt4Pas.so.5.2.4" > "/build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libQt4Pas.so.5" > ln -f -s "libQt4Pas.so.5.2.4" > "/build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libQt4Pas.so.5.2" > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4' > # If we don't have a multiarch-Qt, copy lib to multiarch path anyway > /build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/fix-multiarch.sh > TARGET=/build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/tmp > HOST_MULTIARCH=x86_64-linux-gnu > Multiarch host: x86_64-linux-gnu > Install target: /build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/tmp > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4' >dh_install -O--parallel > /build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/libqt4pas5.install: 1: > /build/libqt4pas-APLA1O/libqt4pas-2.4/debian/libqt4pas5.install: > usr/lib/*/libQt4Pas.so.*: not found > dh_install: problem reading debian/libqt4pas5.install: > make: *** [binary] Error 127 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/12/10/libqt4pas_2.4-2_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libqt4pas Source-Version: 2.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libqt4pas, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libqt4pas-dev_2.5-1_amd64.deb to main/libq/libqt4pas/libqt4pas-dev_2.5-1_amd64.deb libqt4pas5_2.5-1_amd64.deb to main/libq/libqt4pas/libqt4pas5_2.5-1_amd64.deb libqt4pas_2.5-1.debian.tar.gz to main/libq/libqt4pas/libqt4pas_2.5-1.debian.tar.gz libqt4pas_2.5-1.dsc to main/libq/libqt4pas/libqt4pas_2.5-1.dsc libqt4pas_2.5.orig.tar.gz to main/libq/libqt4pas/libqt4pas_2.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 652...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthias Klumpp (supplier of updated libqt4pas package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:10:20 +0100 Source: libqt4pas Binary: libqt4pas5 libqt4pas-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matthias Klumpp Changed-By: Matthias Klumpp Description: libqt4pas-dev - Development files for Qt4Pas libqt4pas5 - Qt4 interface bindings for Pascal Closes: 652215 Changes: libqt4pas (2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release: - Fixed Stack Alignment problems when Qt uses SSE. - Qt 4.5 to Qt 4.8 support - based on classes/methods available in Qt 4.5 but also compiles with Qt 4.8. and adds stack alignment compilation options when appropriate (Qt Version and Platfor
Processed: Re: Processed: Still occurs with current GNOME 3 in sid
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 645427 important Bug #645427 [gnome-power-manager] Stopped locking the screen when closing the laptop lid Bug #626544 [gnome-power-manager] gnome-screensaver: does not lock the screen in GNOME 3 when the computer goes to sleep Bug #647358 [gnome-power-manager] g-p-m doesn't lock the screen on lid-close because it uses an obsolete GConf key Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 645427: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645427 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645427: Processed: Still occurs with current GNOME 3 in sid
severity 645427 important
thanks
On 06.03.2012 06:51, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:37:38AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 06.03.2012 03:53, Josh Triplett wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 03:25:21AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 06.03.2012 03:15, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> reopen 645427
> Bug #645427 {Done: Michael Biebl }
> [gnome-power-manager] Stopped locking the screen when closing the laptop
> lid
> Bug #626544 {Done: Michael Biebl }
> [gnome-power-manager] gnome-screensaver: does not lock the screen in
> GNOME 3 when the computer goes to sleep
> Bug #647358 {Done: Michael Biebl }
> [gnome-power-manager] g-p-m doesn't lock the screen on lid-close because
> it uses an obsolete GConf key
..
>
> Yes, easily. I created a new user account, logged in as that user, ran
> gnome-tweak-tool to change the settings described in my previous comment
> (change lid close from suspend to blank), closed the lid, reopened it,
> and observed the lack of an unlock screen.
Well, that's what I meant with local configuration. The default is
suspend-on-lid-close, and in this case the screen locks correctly.
This information is completely missing from your initial bug report. It
was not clear to me, that you had a custom configuration. (and I think
in this case #626544 shouldn't have been merged)
So, what you want is lock-on-blank, basically.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#662739: condor: fails to remove: find: `/var/run/condor': No such file or directory
Package: condor Version: 7.7.4+git3-gd7ce75b~dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to remove. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Removing condor ... invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d denied execution of stop. find: `/var/run/condor': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing condor (--remove): subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 cheers, Andreas condor_7.7.4+git3-gd7ce75b~dfsg.1-1.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#643470: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#643470: Status of isc-dhcp-client
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:48:48AM +, peter green wrote: > > >I just reviewed the most recent email I exchanged with the ISC product > >manager, and she actually said "end of February", although she wasn't a > >betting woman. > > > >So let's wait until March 1 to take stock of the situation. If no 4.2.4 > >upstream release has been made by March 1, I will check in with them to get > >an updated timeframe, and if it's anything more than a week or so, I'll > >repack the tarball. > It's now the 5th of match and still no new upstream release. Has any > progress with > upstream been made? I'll check in with them tomorrow. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#653960: marked as done (gzip: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'rpl_fstat' (in win32 build))
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:32:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#653960: fixed in gzip 1.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #653960, regarding gzip: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'rpl_fstat' (in win32 build) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 653960: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653960 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: gzip Version: 1.4-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... CC error.o CC exitfail.o CC fchdir.o ../../lib/fchdir.c: In function '_gl_register_fd': ../../lib/fchdir.c:153:7: warning: passing argument 2 of 'rpl_fstat' from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] ./sys/stat.h:355:12: note: expected 'struct _stat64 *' but argument is of type 'struct stat *' ../../lib/fchdir.c: At top level: ../../lib/fchdir.c:222:1: error: conflicting types for 'rpl_fstat' ./sys/stat.h:355:12: note: previous declaration of 'rpl_fstat' was here make[4]: *** [fchdir.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gzip-1.4/build-indep/lib' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gzip-1.4/build-indep/lib' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gzip-1.4/build-indep/lib' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gzip-1.4/build-indep' make: *** [build-indep-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: gzip Source-Version: 1.4-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gzip, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gzip-win32_1.4-3_all.deb to main/g/gzip/gzip-win32_1.4-3_all.deb gzip_1.4-3.debian.tar.gz to main/g/gzip/gzip_1.4-3.debian.tar.gz gzip_1.4-3.dsc to main/g/gzip/gzip_1.4-3.dsc gzip_1.4-3_i386.deb to main/g/gzip/gzip_1.4-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 653...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bdale Garbee (supplier of updated gzip package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:13:33 -0700 Source: gzip Binary: gzip gzip-win32 Architecture: source all i386 Version: 1.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bdale Garbee Changed-By: Bdale Garbee Description: gzip - GNU compression utilities gzip-win32 - GNU compression utility (win32 build) Closes: 653960 Changes: gzip (1.4-3) unstable; urgency=low . * patch from upstream for sys_stat.in.h to fix mingw32 builds, closes: #653960 Checksums-Sha1: 4517217619e9978bdf6503fc42f707ea92857b70 1847 gzip_1.4-3.dsc fb52705e70529ce7a5eabfc14c9b2fa65fa5f795 14777 gzip_1.4-3.debian.tar.gz b06c8caa7af845b7dcc80a88c88857d9d198ae76 81250 gzip-win32_1.4-3_all.deb b0d3189cd9aa9fe6136df25a3e29b6cd508a3233 98968 gzip_1.4-3_i386.deb Checksums-Sha256: 62101409ced88c92341954f97e3766e6494e1d81424216910d634530dee0008e 1847 gzip_1.4-3.dsc accd789f6ccd5fcc5eaa7164b50afbe5f1f48c8dc6fcf473ccf771b9bf3400aa 14777 gzip_1.4-3.debian.tar.gz 08908b5851f109d0fb4eee982f019db80b716775067c680e862fe54f54a4a12e 81250 gzip-win32_1.4-3_all.deb 897f737feac3d813db176c45597e82baac9920c1b423f424a230c62a93f33696 98968 gzip_1.4-3_i386.deb Files: d931774bf47edb770b25a995dcd692b2 1847 utils required gzip_1.4-3.dsc 8a8c801bf097234fd2d84551380091f6 14777 utils required gzip_1.4-3.debian.tar.gz 4bc18050ff6b3e176cc95a1b489ae745 81250 utils extra gzip-win32_1.4-3_all.deb 63d1f7d3db29b9a01601b8c826fc916b 98968 utils required gzip_1.4-3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBT1Wf+TqTYZbAldlBAQrJtBAAk0r7fvSJes5VOPXQE9XUVKqnAShKMRAu D/Q/ifmtFZGDEDRw9GvLLZZjupCtL5TBNW31U0KLwFLDBpS8o/PC4vlO+Apj0pQk +uASgk3pCmQjo5fgHHlA3Wv8ynbIC98cfFx07FwwjKfz5oVvVY7upXnIzJgsa+Uu Ur9ExA1EU7jqyDFo/xlpNnvXaLBwKcgmyHllZ18zw7TVS8vk2sxnYVu4KH9IotPn hfmU3mdRC6L+fhAPOLvyOKsm1bfhsqmfLzNDzX7FxiN7uuOmV/0YrfAoHOSsokRb hJWjlWoaTEHqeYj1mjlyFytEzX5TCXbjmXNWWt7cZh05hMsgelOKiSLQuzY8Os53 Xav9QjhB8+iqGngO1u8DfjsJ6SdG3lyd+aU3gvhY/E7ynrc1REo8x3nkeBkl9e3q HJG14DuyptbEK4tfvOsn
Bug#662737: apt-cacher: Fails to retrieve packages
Package: apt-cacher
Version: 1.7.3~rc4
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
*** Please type your report below this line ***
*some* clients fail to download packages. Some are pure Squeeze, others
include Squeeze-backports. All use apt (no aptitude, synaptic etc). I've
tried a number of repositories over the last four days. The error is the
same and I can't work out why it only seems to affect some boxen.
Example error message on clients (edited):-
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/cairomm/libcairomm-1.0-1_1.8.4-3_i386.deb
Connection failed
Site is good, and on the same machine:-
# wget -t 0
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/cairomm/libcairomm-1.0-1_1.8.4-3_i386.deb
--2012-03-06 14:18:10--
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/cairomm/libcairomm-1.0-1_1.8.4-3_i386.deb
Resolving http.us.debian.org... 64.50.233.100, 64.50.236.52,
128.30.2.36, ...
Connecting to http.us.debian.org|64.50.233.100|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 72176 (70K) [application/x-debian-package]
Saving to: `libcairomm-1.0-1_1.8.4-3_i386.deb'
100%[=>] 72,176 40.8K/s
in 1.7s
2012-03-06 14:18:16 (40.8 KB/s) - `libcairomm-1.0-1_1.8.4-3_i386.deb'
saved [72176/72176]
/var/log/apt-cacher/error.log (edited) shows:-
Tue Mar 6 14:12:11 2012|error [16392]: Failed to open/create
libcairomm-1.0-1_1.8.4-3_i386.deb for return: Permission denied at
/usr/sbin/apt-cacher line 696, line 4.
There is no /var/cache/apt-cacher/packages/
===/usr/sbin/apt-cacher lines 693-698 =
# Open/create cached file
for (my $cached_file = "$cfg->{cache_dir}/packages/$cache->{name}") {
unlink $cached_file if $cache->{status} && $cache->{status} eq
'NOCACHE'; # Ensure new file for Cache-Control: no-cache
sysopen($cache->{content}, $cached_file, O_RDWR|O_CREAT)
|| die "Failed to open/create $cached_file for return: $!";
}
I've tried different repositories - same type of errors on the same
clients. Likewise changing client IP addresses. If I duplicate
everything below /etc/apt from a working box nothing changes (same
error). The only thing I haven't been able to try is downloading the
exact same packages on a working box as on a non-working box.
Please let me know what additional logs, or config files I can attach,
or tests I can run.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages apt-cacher depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36.1 Debian configuration
management sy
ii dpkg 1.15.8.12 Debian package management
system
ii ed1.4-3 The classic UNIX line editor
ii libfilesys-df-perl0.92-3+b1 Module to obtain filesystem
disk s
ii libfreezethaw-perl0.5001-1 module to serialize and
deserializ
ii libio-interface-perl 1.05-1 socket methods to get/set
interfac
ii libnetaddr-ip-perl4.028+dfsg-1 IP address manipulation module
ii libsys-syscall-perl 0.23-1 module to access system
calls that
ii libwww-curl-perl 4.12-1 Perl bindings to libcurl
ii libwww-perl 5.836-1Perl HTTP/WWW client/server
librar
ii lsb-base 3.2-23.2squeeze1 Linux Standard Base 3.2
init scrip
ii perl 5.10.1-17squeeze3 Larry Wall's Practical
Extraction
ii update-inetd 4.38+nmu1+squeeze1 inetd configuration file
updater
Versions of packages apt-cacher recommends:
ii libberkeleydb-perl 0.42-1~squeeze1 use Berkeley DB 4 databases
from P
Versions of packages apt-cacher suggests:
pn libio-socket-inet6-perl(no description available)
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.conf changed:
log_dir = /var/log/apt-cacher/
group = www-data
user = www-data
allowed_hosts = 192.168.0.0/24
generate_reports = 1
/etc/default/apt-cacher changed:
AUTOSTART=1
-- debconf information:
* apt-cacher/mode: daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662200: libcvc3-5-jni and libcvc3-2-jni: error when trying to install together
I've uploaded a new package to mentors that addresses this and #662198. I decided to add a Replaces/Breaks on libcvc3-2-jni, since the file /usr/lib/jni/libcvc3jni.so appears to be necessary for the binary package to function. -Chris On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Christopher L Conway < christopherleecon...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:22:19PM -0500, Christopher L Conway wrote: >> >Not sure how to handle this. On the C++ side, the policy dictates a >> >libcvc3-X package with libcvc3.so.X and a libcvc3-X-dev package with >> >libcvc3.so -> libfoo.so.X. On the Java side, we don't have any >> headers to >> >install, so a libcvc3-X-jni-dev package seems like overkill just for >> a >> >libcvc3jni.so symlink. >> >> I have no idea about java packaging. Did you check what the debian Java >> policy says ? (not sure whether there is one, but at least there should >> exist such a policy :-) >> > > The Debian policy for Java on JNI packages ( > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x145.html) > provides no real guidance on this question akin to Debian Policy Sections > 8.1 and 8.5. > > -Chris > >
Bug#655809: marked as done (jenkins-json: FTBFS: org.kohsuke.stapler:json-lib:jar:2.1-rev7 missing)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 04:18:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#655809: fixed in jenkins-json 2.1-rev7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #655809,
regarding jenkins-json: FTBFS: org.kohsuke.stapler:json-lib:jar:2.1-rev7 missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
655809: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655809
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jenkins-json
Version: 2.1-rev7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> test -x debian/rules
> mkdir -p "."
> /usr/share/maven-debian-helper/copy-repo.sh
> /build/jenkins-json-zl_LW2/jenkins-json-2.1-rev7/debian
> mh_patchpoms -plibjenkins-json-java --debian-build --keep-pom-version
> --maven-repo=/build/jenkins-json-zl_LW2/jenkins-json-2.1-rev7/debian/maven-repo
>
> touch debian/stamp-poms-patched
> cp -r src/main/jdk15/* src/main/java/
> # before-build target may be used to unpatch the pom files, so we need to
> check if
> # patching the pom files is needed here, normally not
> if [ ! -f pom.xml.save ]; then \
> /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules patch-poms; \
> fi
> cd . && /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -noverify -cp
> /usr/share/maven2/boot/classworlds.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/lib/tools.jar
>
> -Dproperties.file.manual=/build/jenkins-json-zl_LW2/jenkins-json-2.1-rev7/debian/maven.properties
> -Dclassworlds.conf=/etc/maven2/m2-debian.conf
> org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher -s/etc/maven2/settings-debian.xml
> -Dmaven.repo.local=/build/jenkins-json-zl_LW2/jenkins-json-2.1-rev7/debian/maven-repo
> package
> [INFO]
> NOTE: Maven is executing in offline mode. Any artifacts not already in your
> local
> repository will be inaccessible.
>
> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Building json-lib
> [INFO]task-segment: [package]
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
> [WARNING] Using platform encoding (ANSI_X3.4-1968 actually) to copy filtered
> resources, i.e. build is platform dependent!
> [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
> /build/jenkins-json-zl_LW2/jenkins-json-2.1-rev7/src/main/resources
> [INFO]
>
> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
>
> Missing:
> --
> 1) oro:oro:jar:debian
>
> Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
>
> Then, install it using the command:
> mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=oro -DartifactId=oro
> -Dversion=debian -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
>
> Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file
> there:
> mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=oro -DartifactId=oro -Dversion=debian
> -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id]
>
> Path to dependency:
> 1) org.kohsuke.stapler:json-lib:jar:2.1-rev7
> 2) oro:oro:jar:debian
>
> --
> 1 required artifact is missing.
>
> for artifact:
> org.kohsuke.stapler:json-lib:jar:2.1-rev7
>
> from the specified remote repositories:
> central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)
>
>
>
> NOTE: Maven is executing in offline mode. Any artifacts not already in your
> local
> repository will be inaccessible.
>
>
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Total time: 19 seconds
> [INFO] Finished at: Fri Jan 13 00:46:30 CET 2012
> [INFO] Final Memory: 9M/724M
> [INFO]
>
> make: *** [mvn-build] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/01/12/jenkins-json_2.1-rev7-1_lsid64.buildlog
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a cl
Bug#661715: marked as done (FTBFS)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 04:02:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#661715: fixed in jcaptcha 2.0~alpha1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #661715,
regarding FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
661715: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661715
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jcaptcha
Version: 2.0~alpha1-2
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build from source:
dh_installlogrotate -plibjcaptcha-java
dh_installlogcheck -plibjcaptcha-java
dh_installchangelogs -plibjcaptcha-java
dh_installudev -plibjcaptcha-java
dh_lintian -plibjcaptcha-java
dh_bugfiles -plibjcaptcha-java
dh_install -plibjcaptcha-java
dh_link -plibjcaptcha-java
dh_buildinfo -plibjcaptcha-java
dh_installmime -plibjcaptcha-java
dh_installgsettings -plibjcaptcha-java
jh_installlibs -plibjcaptcha-java
jh_classpath -plibjcaptcha-java
IO error: opening
debian/libjcaptcha-java/debian/libjcaptcha-java/usr/share/java/jcaptcha-integration-simple-servlet.jar
for read : Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
at /usr/share/perl5/Archive/Zip/Archive.pm line 546
Archive::Zip::Archive::read('Archive::Zip::Archive=HASH(0x20e9080)',
'debian/libjcaptcha-java/debian/libjcaptcha-java/usr/share/jav...') called at
/usr/bin/jh_manifest line 295
main::update_jar('debian/libjcaptcha-java/debian/libjcaptcha-java/usr/share/jav...',
undef) called at /usr/bin/jh_manifest line 142
jh_manifest: Could not read
debian/libjcaptcha-java/debian/libjcaptcha-java/usr/share/java/jcaptcha-integration-simple-servlet.jar:
Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
make: *** [binary-post-install/libjcaptcha-java] Fehler 1
dpkg-buildpackage: Fehler: Fehler-Exitstatus von fakeroot debian/rules binary
war 2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jcaptcha
Source-Version: 2.0~alpha1-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jcaptcha, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
jcaptcha_2.0~alpha1-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/j/jcaptcha/jcaptcha_2.0~alpha1-3.debian.tar.gz
jcaptcha_2.0~alpha1-3.dsc
to main/j/jcaptcha/jcaptcha_2.0~alpha1-3.dsc
libjcaptcha-java-doc_2.0~alpha1-3_all.deb
to main/j/jcaptcha/libjcaptcha-java-doc_2.0~alpha1-3_all.deb
libjcaptcha-java_2.0~alpha1-3_all.deb
to main/j/jcaptcha/libjcaptcha-java_2.0~alpha1-3_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 661...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Page (supplier of updated jcaptcha package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:11:14 +
Source: jcaptcha
Binary: libjcaptcha-java libjcaptcha-java-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0~alpha1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
Changed-By: James Page
Description:
libjcaptcha-java - Java framework for CAPTCHA definition and integration
libjcaptcha-java-doc - Documentation for JCaptcha
Closes: 661715
Changes:
jcaptcha (2.0~alpha1-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix FTBFS (Closes: #661715):
- d/libjcaptcha-java.poms: Added missing --java-lib flags to ensure
jar files are installed to /usr/share/java.
* Bumped Standards-Version: 3.9.3:
- d/copyright: Updated Format to refer to new policy, renamed obsolete
field names.
Checksums-Sha1:
4468367c064cb16a109b42e4beaf22373aa2046e 2334 jcaptcha_2.0~alpha1-3.dsc
f2dc298ce931c1a0f91e03594758d87e8950479c 5362
jcaptcha_2.0~alpha1-3.debian.tar.gz
c484a8a202196a7251257a08baa0cbfac0cb552a 361848
libjcaptcha-java_2.0~alpha1-3_all.deb
65db03f5da7a024a7cf83c43f84caac021e66306 1381192
libjcaptcha-java-doc_2.0~alpha1-3_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
35c97f44a0967a8f1a0140e393dafac68d540fe3e0a96c737f233afd9f107264 2334
jcaptcha_2.0~alpha1-3.dsc
231c4dc029d223942f09a6c887b360b67d3138622084b27f750f576a8c635863 5362
jcaptcha_2.0~alpha1-3.debian.tar.gz
e454551d06f32240fe352e9e78b3f8c9c9502a16f2c05c52e13e6bb016272af0 361848
libjcaptcha-java_2.0~alpha1-3_all.deb
a4ec3598063681ad0efbaa3ff449f0eb97688a9ea25e1768d0e3b4e9721fae4b 1381192
libjcaptcha-java-doc_2.0~alpha1-3_all.deb
Files:
d29e4d0
Bug#660596: marked as done (sdpa: FTBFS on architecture that openblas is not supported)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 04:04:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660596: fixed in sdpa 7.3.6.dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #660596,
regarding sdpa: FTBFS on architecture that openblas is not supported
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
660596: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sdpa
Version: 7.3.6.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
sdpa FTBFS on architecture that openblas is not supported.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sdpa
Other architecture has to set it to use blas.
Please check your package.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sdpa
Source-Version: 7.3.6.dfsg-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sdpa, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libsdpa-dev_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
to main/s/sdpa/libsdpa-dev_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/s/sdpa/sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2.dsc
to main/s/sdpa/sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2.dsc
sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
to main/s/sdpa/sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
sdpam_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
to main/s/sdpa/sdpam_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 660...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Makoto Yamashita (supplier of updated sdpa
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:00:00 +0900
Source: sdpa
Binary: sdpa libsdpa-dev sdpam
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 7.3.6.dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Makoto Yamashita
Changed-By: Makoto Yamashita
Description:
libsdpa-dev - Callable library and examples of SDPA
sdpa - High-performance package for SemiDefinite Programs
sdpam - Matlab/Octave interface of SDPA
Closes: 660596
Changes:
sdpa (7.3.6.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Change Dendency so that if openblas is available,
use openblas; otherwise atlas. (closes: #660596)
* Update Standards-Version to 3.9.3
Checksums-Sha1:
93387103717400bddc8ec18d5d45f8324f6e9717 2156 sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2.dsc
a4750804810d4f8d0a6bf01691dd17c21470e176 4118 sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
75595afd329e3a7686d17c6ba0f053b3d16d9b73 3155888 sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
cbc5d0f7523ee0003b53193c7e00f7e2e774e85c 221084
libsdpa-dev_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
d2650aa653d81ea2e304a2d314bced065197c79c 6423838 sdpam_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
58b695f40cc8a0afaefa6047b9dbd87909ccdb6da36f3ecaef362c477fb3713a 2156
sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2.dsc
2f79bf6f024d26726d6ea7d5e72d6c09a63c8f5e63c8f85db8f2670f72535f88 4118
sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
06042ab59b366e47b416f417649c439557c86d480af6af5f92303e17ec290284 3155888
sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
56cdab93835f1b7208c9008bbf6befb164dd975fd858a04c70c63da9941edc5b 221084
libsdpa-dev_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
df863420d5836b52174a21e60b525a3b4b475227dd3319c331194ad9f1d63ff1 6423838
sdpam_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
Files:
49c93a444f2cefdc70869b142528c641 2156 math extra sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2.dsc
4cd27c8365d15be8e5d19d693f54349a 4118 math extra
sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
2d49223ca596a8aff6e076ed7b659d15 3155888 math extra sdpa_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
6cbc99c65e9d2773d9e103b137ebee96 221084 libdevel extra
libsdpa-dev_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
877c39d1847cd4259678183a81b6bbb5 6423838 math extra
sdpam_7.3.6.dfsg-2_amd64.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPVYPfAAoJEDIkf7tArR+mQWAP+gMm1QFdWdHpumAkEbhX2vfA
PK1R0IT94ppOpH/xZIGIgiVXjrqF2R2DwW7Op+t+cY6Z9BW/DGkN8GbtQOMOAqY6
JEJmOfxFCdIShkc0XHgpCfDdlAuRYAnomihCfzta0UXvmb6LmonUntnnywuxH2+C
0DJ8mEzyvyT5gqkPxuLSvxUuwHB5TJVsSOkvL7mB2C7jM11Cjp3dSBRAWHKN0VAU
2SKeOg7N/kA3LUSkplzdQEVwrNGBbO8XO2hoVcjmZCl58NQCKrBzGLOPgL7QWFU/
3cSXEaSaz85wFfbnlZ5rxwnTKnf0+sasZ3ha0z9jo0GQOtoBf6pk66wCmaKe+/eG
JgIt9OrtzXSIwNdJN7A21t493Cf9NNmLprYjWLPxGmZ4AgSrMM2aVHJe4v1+lMCX
IRl/8X536qtkTOFaG232vT3bKYDqFruX0zv9oDvgP
Bug#662586: marked as done (FTBFS)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 03:48:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662586: fixed in mozc 1.3.975.102-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #662586, regarding FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 662586: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662586 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: mozc Version: 1.3.975.102-1 Severity: serious Your package fails to build from source: RULE genproto_session_genproto_2 out_linux/Release/obj/gen/proto_out/session/state.pb.h ['protoc', 'session/state.proto', '--cpp_out=/home/jmm/mozc-1.3.975.102/out_linux/Release/obj/gen/proto_out'] TOUCH out_linux/Release/obj.target/session/genproto_session.stamp CXX(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/client/client/client.o CXX(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/client/client/server_launcher.o AR(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/client/libclient.a CXX(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/language_dependent_spec_japanese/languages/japanese/lang_dep_spec.o AR(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/languages/japanese/liblanguage_dependent_spec_japanese.a ACTION gen_mozc_xml_gen_mozc_xml out_linux/Release/obj/gen/unix/ibus/mozc.xml TOUCH out_linux/Release/obj.target/unix/ibus/gen_mozc_xml.stamp CXX(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/ibus_mozc_lib/unix/ibus/engine_registrar.o CXX(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/ibus_mozc_lib/unix/ibus/key_translator.o CXX(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/ibus_mozc_lib/unix/ibus/mozc_engine.o unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc: In member function 'virtual void mozc::ibus::MozcEngine::PropertyActivate(IBusEngine*, const gchar*, guint)': unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:630:56: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named 'sub_props' unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:631:43: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named 'key' unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:650:61: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named 'sub_props' unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:651:41: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named 'key' unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc: In member function 'void mozc::ibus::MozcEngine::UpdateCompositionModeIcon(IBusEngine*, mozc::commands::CompositionMode)': unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:1106:61: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named 'sub_props' unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:1107:38: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named 'key' make[2]: *** [out_linux/Release/obj.target/ibus_mozc_lib/unix/ibus/mozc_engine.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jmm/mozc-1.3.975.102' Traceback (most recent call last): File "build_mozc.py", line 1192, in main() File "build_mozc.py", line 1180, in main BuildMain(cmd_opts, cmd_args, original_directory_name) File "build_mozc.py", line 983, in BuildMain BuildOnLinux(options, targets, original_directory_name) File "build_mozc.py", line 781, in BuildOnLinux RunOrDie([make_command] + build_args + target_names) File "build_mozc.py", line 352, in RunOrDie '=='])) __main__.RunOrDieError: == ERROR: make -j1 MAKE_JOBS=1 BUILDTYPE=Release builddir_name=out_linux ibus_mozc scim_mozc scim_mozc_setup mozc_emacs_helper uim-mozc mozc_server mozc_tool == make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_build] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jmm/mozc-1.3.975.102' make: *** [build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: mozc Source-Version: 1.3.975.102-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mozc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: emacs-mozc-bin_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb to main/m/mozc/emacs-mozc-bin_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb emacs-mozc_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb to main/m/mozc/emacs-mozc_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb ibus-mozc_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb to main/m/mozc/ibus-mozc_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb mozc-server_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb to main/m/mozc/mozc-server_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb mozc-utils-gui_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb to main/m/mozc/mozc-utils-gui_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb mozc_1.3.975.102-2.debian.tar.gz to main/m/mozc/mozc_1.3.975.102-2.debian.tar.gz mozc_1.3.975.102-2.dsc to main/m/mozc/mozc_1.3.975.102-2.dsc scim-mozc_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb to main/m/mozc/scim-mozc_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb uim-mozc_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb to main/m/mozc/uim-mozc_1.3.975.102-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 662...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will
Bug#649896: marked as done (Does not start: "Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0")
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 03:49:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#649896: fixed in shrinksafe 1.7.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #649896, regarding Does not start: "Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 649896: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649896 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: shrinksafe Version: 1.6.1-1 Severity: grave Hello, thank you for packaging shrinksafe. Unfortunately it does not work: no matter how I invoke it, it quits with the same CRC mismatch error: $ shrinksafe Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0 $ shrinksafe --help Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0 $ shrinksafe json2.js > json2.min.js Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0 $ shrinksafe yuppi yuppi yuppi doo Error! CRCs do not match! Got 1a6cd7b3, expected 0 Best regards, Enrico -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages shrinksafe depends on: ii default-jre [java6-runtime]1:1.6-43 ii jarwrapper 0.37 ii openjdk-6-jre [java6-runtime] 6b23~pre11-1 ii rhino 1.7R3-2 shrinksafe recommends no packages. shrinksafe suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: shrinksafe Source-Version: 1.7.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of shrinksafe, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: shrinksafe_1.7.2-1.debian.tar.gz to main/s/shrinksafe/shrinksafe_1.7.2-1.debian.tar.gz shrinksafe_1.7.2-1.dsc to main/s/shrinksafe/shrinksafe_1.7.2-1.dsc shrinksafe_1.7.2-1_all.deb to main/s/shrinksafe/shrinksafe_1.7.2-1_all.deb shrinksafe_1.7.2.orig.tar.gz to main/s/shrinksafe/shrinksafe_1.7.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 649...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jason Morawski (supplier of updated shrinksafe package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:05:29 -0500 Source: shrinksafe Binary: shrinksafe Architecture: source all Version: 1.7.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jason Morawski Changed-By: Jason Morawski Description: shrinksafe - JavaScript "compression" system Closes: 649896 Changes: shrinksafe (1.7.2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream version * Update Build-Depends: javahelper >= 0.40 (Closes: #649896). Checksums-Sha1: 8b6f4652ecc595a97c8ba4ad5fbb6fa4c710dd17 1157 shrinksafe_1.7.2-1.dsc 33927d827e2d14b61e9270202a39661be4df1928 26914 shrinksafe_1.7.2.orig.tar.gz b858ec47661dc26256e3ae89c3bd116b7371381e 12348 shrinksafe_1.7.2-1.debian.tar.gz 32a2e6ba5f69301e3dff4524c57138a810e97a12 30862 shrinksafe_1.7.2-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 6e13c9de2d426b644127d87ae9785749f7788e4dfb10cb06c02a08922589baa5 1157 shrinksafe_1.7.2-1.dsc 9f0b7407ad9082bc55ab79017363d3245b1f4ca5770c557dcb189ebeb6cdff0b 26914 shrinksafe_1.7.2.orig.tar.gz 2fca416a1b0bee6e9833d8d7d5cef6aeaecc961841d9b4064c10db388fa6f207 12348 shrinksafe_1.7.2-1.debian.tar.gz 2d461bd4127ab43ced88055d07b9f1d8a9137dbe1aee90f89e1fce3a56291063 30862 shrinksafe_1.7.2-1_all.deb Files: 11f3062f091ebe1ffd5f4a59f0b4cd77 1157 devel optional shrinksafe_1.7.2-1.dsc 01abba23cba6b76da6b91e119a72834f 26914 devel optional shrinksafe_1.7.2.orig.tar.gz 096a2d5b64c765d26b82cb5a2d9626ad 12348 devel optional shrinksafe_1.7.2-1.debian.tar.gz 4c93579e1389f8ed36db9bdc50f3ea2c 30862 devel optional shrinksafe_1.7.2-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk9Vh20ACgkQ+C5cwEsrK54CuACcC9LJHPdB217c09pZLn1j5F+s UBAAoNubB1C5rXLkbox0RJwXmWx6k9WT =0pli -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 662091 + help Bug #662091 [w3c-sgml-lib] w3c-sgml-lib: sends SGML parsers to an sgml.dcl that isn't there Added tag(s) help. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662091: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662091 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645427: Processed: Still occurs with current GNOME 3 in sid
On 06.03.2012 03:53, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 03:25:21AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 06.03.2012 03:15, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>>>
reopen 645427
>>> Bug #645427 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
>>> Stopped locking the screen when closing the laptop lid
>>> Bug #626544 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
>>> gnome-screensaver: does not lock the screen in GNOME 3 when the computer
>>> goes to sleep
>>> Bug #647358 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
>>> g-p-m doesn't lock the screen on lid-close because it uses an obsolete
>>> GConf key
>>> 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
>>> you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
thanks
>>
>> Why did you re-open?
>
> For some reason, my mail made it to control@bugs but not to 645427@bugs.
> (It happened the first time because I needed to unarchive, but I sent
> the second one after unarchiving, so I don't know why *that* one didn't
> go through. I also don't know why only two of those three bugs
> reopened, and 645427 didn't.) I've included it below:
Please file a new bug next time, so we have the exact versions of the
affected packages.
Are you running gnome-shell/fallback/some-other-de?
Is this problem reproducible with a fresh user account?
Screen-locking works perfectly here, so I'm suspecting some local
(mis)configuration.
Could you attach a "gsettings list-recursively" dump, please
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#662628: Workaround.
A workaround may be possible. I had similar problems with this package and found that if I change the Video Output to "X11 video output (XCB)" from "Default" VLC will play videos. The problem for me was that the package was defaulting to "XVideo output (XCB)" which was not found. Trying to play videos would then would peg my processor resulting in having to Kill the process. I'm not sure what changed in the package upgrade to cause this problem though. Good Luck! "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." -- Mark Twain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#655970: Bug# 655970 - cman | corosync
Hi Nicolas, As a corosync/pacemaker user, I would like to see the dependency of "cman | corosync" remain. I would not like the package to return to a just cman dependency. Maybe for the test "[ ! -f /etc/cluster/cluster.conf ]", if using corosync it could test for "/etc/corosync/corosync.conf". And maybe "cman_tool status" could test for "/etc/init.d/corosync status". Thanks, Deric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#660730: marked as done (FTBFS)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 02:52:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#660730: fixed in bzr-svn 1.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #660730, regarding FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 660730: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660730 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: bzr-svn Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: serious Your package fails to build from source: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/testtools/runtest.py", line 169, in _run_user return fn(*args, **kwargs) AssertionError: Different number of acquired and released or broken locks. acquired=[LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/branch-lock, vgyrbjrrihsumvunv8o0), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/repository/lock, 0kry5q8wq8ctsb0uzq63), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/repository/lock, fl0coismm0xbfaduy8ow), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/repository/lock, j5x4a0q625q2xblqp6zf), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/branch-lock, r121n03g3b970bb3dyiw), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with _wt/work/e/.bzr/branches/abranch/lock, fvkwuwn31vgjbis0jdx1), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/branches/abranch/lock, n62w73kg60i1oh0e19bw), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/branches/abranch/lock, 1yj65sd2qxtj6h2evdbn), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/checkout/lock, grxg2116nhbgusaw34xy)] released=[LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/branch-lock, vgyrbjrrihsumvunv8o0), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/repository/lock, 0kry5q8wq8ctsb0uzq63), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/repository/lock, fl0coismm0xbfaduy8ow), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/repository/lock, j5x4a0q625q2xblqp6zf), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/branch-lock, r121n03g3b970bb3dyiw), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with _wt/work/e/.bzr/branches/abranch/lock, fvkwuwn31vgjbis0jdx1), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/branches/abranch/lock, n62w73kg60i1oh0e19bw), LockResult(file:///tmp/testbzr-oT5Q2w.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.svn.tests.test_convert.TestConversion.test_shared_import_with_wt/work/e/.bzr/branches/abranch/lock, 1yj65sd2qxtj6h2evdbn)] broken=[] -- Ran 2889 tests in 870.004s FAILED (failures=3, errors=3, known_failure_count=3) 644 tests skipped Missing feature 'FTPServer' skipped 2 tests. make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Fehler 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jmm/bzr-svn-1.2.0' make: *** [build] Fehler 2 dpkg-buildpackage: Fehler: Fehler-Exitstatus von debian/rules build war 2 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: bzr-svn Source-Version: 1.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bzr-svn, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bzr-svn_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.gz to main/b/bzr-svn/bzr-svn_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.gz bzr-svn_1.2.1-1.dsc to main/b/bzr-svn/bzr-svn_1.2.1-1.dsc bzr-svn_1.2.1-1_all.deb to main/b/bzr-svn/bzr-svn_1.2.1-1_all.deb bzr-sv
Bug#645427: Processed: Still occurs with current GNOME 3 in sid
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 03:25:21AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 06.03.2012 03:15, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> >> reopen 645427
> > Bug #645427 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
> > Stopped locking the screen when closing the laptop lid
> > Bug #626544 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
> > gnome-screensaver: does not lock the screen in GNOME 3 when the computer
> > goes to sleep
> > Bug #647358 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
> > g-p-m doesn't lock the screen on lid-close because it uses an obsolete
> > GConf key
> > 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
> > you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> >> thanks
>
> Why did you re-open?
For some reason, my mail made it to control@bugs but not to 645427@bugs.
(It happened the first time because I needed to unarchive, but I sent
the second one after unarchiving, so I don't know why *that* one didn't
go through. I also don't know why only two of those three bugs
reopened, and 645427 didn't.) I've included it below:
- Forwarded message from Josh Triplett -
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 18:10:57 -0800
From: Josh Triplett
To: 645...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: cont...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Still occurs with current GNOME 3 in sid
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
reopen 645427
thanks
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:06:09PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> gnome-screensaver (3.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Bump dependency on gnome-session-bin to (>= 3.0) to avoid partial
> upgrades
> which can result in having the screen no longer locked on lid-close.
> Closes: #645427
I just upgraded my system to GNOME 3, and I've updated all components
without any partial upgrade. I still observe this problem. I set GNOME
to blank the screen on lid close
(/org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-ac-action=blank and
/org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/power/lid-close-battery-action=blank),
and I confirmed that the screensaver configuration says to lock
immediately (/org/gnome/desktop/screensaver/lock-enabled=true and
/org/gnome/desktop/screensaver/lock-delay=0). Nonetheless, if I close
the laptop lid, the screen blanks but does not lock.
- Josh Triplett
- End forwarded message -
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645427: Processed: Still occurs with current GNOME 3 in sid
On 06.03.2012 03:15, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> reopen 645427
> Bug #645427 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
> Stopped locking the screen when closing the laptop lid
> Bug #626544 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
> gnome-screensaver: does not lock the screen in GNOME 3 when the computer goes
> to sleep
> Bug #647358 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
> g-p-m doesn't lock the screen on lid-close because it uses an obsolete GConf
> key
> 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
> you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
>> thanks
Why did you re-open?
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Still occurs with current GNOME 3 in sid
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 645427
Bug #645427 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
Stopped locking the screen when closing the laptop lid
Bug #626544 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
gnome-screensaver: does not lock the screen in GNOME 3 when the computer goes
to sleep
Bug #647358 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
g-p-m doesn't lock the screen on lid-close because it uses an obsolete GConf key
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
645427: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645427
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: unarchiving 645427
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 645427
Bug #645427 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
Stopped locking the screen when closing the laptop lid
Bug #626544 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
gnome-screensaver: does not lock the screen in GNOME 3 when the computer goes
to sleep
Bug #647358 {Done: Michael Biebl } [gnome-power-manager]
g-p-m doesn't lock the screen on lid-close because it uses an obsolete GConf key
Unarchived Bug 645427
Unarchived Bug 626544
Unarchived Bug 647358
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
645427: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645427
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#579028: pbuilder: installs untrusted packages without asking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:29:25AM +0100, Simon Ruderich wrote: > I tested it with the official Debian repository, signed and > unsigned local repositories and it works fine for me. But I'm > only a "normal" pbuilder user, so I might have missed something. > Please test the patch. Just noticed that I overlooked the last few messages. My patch doesn't fix these usecases, disabling the check works though. Regards, Simon - -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPVW99AAoJEJL+/bfkTDL50a0P/1iJ2tjgTCBxgnj7I3F2a0Dy LkfUalxy+mgC1y3cFFhHofVAZWjzFY8OniAPCcQdv2hRj7OAGwvwTKpk2gcwhDeH MLti5cmdF8W2+AFRmym/e63mc0HOi4EEhiHlV6zuP+Hr366dosvHuR1ZYWPiOmPe MTc3hbCv0KBWrJeYe8AsKZP7FHSn0+T3/pvPKIfG+P5NweGQOMt/hmdmptHO88Hw BlB1bbvKX1C78hyOQnWEOZhZljWLF6bttGvqpZPzyssII8JlyunLOGNixy3otzZj fMDhv0p0OUNoIfbZL1WybqOk1vuQ5YyeIUC+7KDHTzK5EJmwbRX8UOfMhJ0mZZgI K5M17d+po3Cbtyw/asJUMfVJ7ontdKzK4FahojoICJh0ybaJ1i5GHscgCQMOnYtb cPxsyS3SArArI8q2wk1JuBk0+DSk7Rx5UfxGpVxNvCY6IbSMieSc/Yakct1+vbEn K0o1nRg9G4IZnnppDrchLdIF8gJB5uynS5hERiIQzsmDMUOr5+YpWY3ujpkYD/Vd gWEVaNz/Tg6T6DLJToU/zy4BpnGiNJWY9D12fA1w1ty/lI4ZrjHp7LMkYO2f0gC1 PyNEw6Xe4XVa8aEdwWo4iSPOypl/eGVvzpvX35KWMAgR2EK/uo84Wv8OpPWF76pm +YVcWXbHzENONikzyTsl =atNi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#579028: pbuilder: installs untrusted packages without asking
Package: pbuilder Version: 0.206 Tags: patch Followup-For: Bug #579028 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Maintainer, The attached patch changes the defaults to always enforce signed repositories and aborts if an untrusted/manipulated package is installed. It adds the new option --keyring (APTKEYRINGS) to add additional keyrings, which are then used to verify the (local) signed repositories. This way no untrusted packages can be installed. To still allow untrusted/unsigned repositories - they are a very bad idea and allow remote attackers performing a MITM to take over the system, including all built packages - the new option - --allow-untrusted (ALLOWUNTRUSTED) was added. I tested it with the official Debian repository, signed and unsigned local repositories and it works fine for me. But I'm only a "normal" pbuilder user, so I might have missed something. Please test the patch. I haven't tested it with cdebootstrap, but it should work as well. The old PBUILDERSATISFYDEPENDSOPT --check-key option was deprecated and is no longer used (it emits a warning now) as validation is the default now. The patch also contains documentation updates for the new options/variables and updates for the NEWS file describing the necessary changes to continue using untrusted packages (but please don't do that - especially as a Debian developer). Please have a look and include the patch as soon as possible to fix this security issue. Regards, Simon - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages pbuilder depends on: ii cdebootstrap 0.5.8+b1 ii coreutils 8.13-3 ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.41 ii debianutils4.2.1 ii debootstrap1.0.38 ii dpkg-dev 1.16.1.2 ii wget 1.13.4-2 Versions of packages pbuilder recommends: pn devscripts 2.11.4 pn fakeroot1.18.2-1 pn sudo Versions of packages pbuilder suggests: pn cowdancer pn gdebi-core pn pbuilder-uml - -- debconf information excluded -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPVWhvAAoJEJL+/bfkTDL5ivAP/iayE8NRQnyk2HW8R+NiRXU3 uavLilwwpmEZyuciu8GxMQIAhT9HYd/DlkhF9I+yBSd30TO3fl0xW7YV9SaIZ+bv IPwnZbHri4KfeV9Zob/gd2jrT9A2QCoFRW0ny4XNCK3NvtWH5KuH+TG2Mq5CQqdN j4VJ3+76oJcbQbU7AUYXfvKDAsEb7gX+VwTEFLS4GrPkni/FIQJ8HHJhlTscyuCD gQANCoRFZHVSMaas3xqi9KYFKgVS4BZ5Z/9FZuLeY5kWBfcbnIhQloVOWTQZIMRI PhnqP1g62XlPu71K3a/Y2RMAcy3Gs6sUbW4OianIr2iskCndejih/MCb+3LmBFCg Ekxi/CcJGrc7a0pV57Qs8Iwkm1siRZZUxcp4xdD3mo9iayoOt4sfFyrvBCYryilQ 7JKpQc3iNoV3EQql6KBu5G+GmFFWHmokpLvVY27n8LgkV2YSb2wrgxqXPfxcYHj7 0j/y2MFw+HOX/d5YSESMLxn9aiZBi7CkMtlMemzqizxlNlL/+OOZiDsi4vdH8L/j Y0c2i9efjNeooc0/B9wASu/Ck8SWV8wW1EcfTag0p9Rp0avy4hoQUmG+MtgQsV0l MQuWWysyxeJFX4Z8ooau82L6sIGC0L073JH6Y/C7uTOz9gKt+e5tV3fnU+pkWpqH oF3CcmlykKX4SYzhUI/e =6EPj -END PGP SIGNATURE- >From cadc48fb599d436577a6efedc7f25e175652a3a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: From: Simon Ruderich Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 02:00:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Enforce valid signed repositories by default. --- debian/NEWS | 19 ++ debian/pbuilder-test/00_prepinstall |2 +- pbuilder-checkparams| 18 + pbuilder-createbuildenv |5 pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude|2 +- pbuilder-satisfydepends-checkparams | 19 + pbuilder-updatebuildenv |6 + pbuilder.8 | 20 ++- pbuilderrc | 23 + pbuilderrc.5| 36 ++ 10 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/NEWS b/debian/NEWS index 6d144b9..80d36e9 100644 --- a/debian/NEWS +++ b/debian/NEWS @@ -1,3 +1,22 @@ +pbuilder (0.207) unstable; urgency=low + + The default configuration will now only install trusted packages. This + prevents building packages with manipulated sources or a system compromise + due to a man-in-the-middle attack. + + However this also prevents installing packages from unsigned repositories by + default. + + If you really want to continue using unsigned repositories, you have to set + ALLOWUNTRUSTED=yes in your .pbuilderrc or use the --allow-untrusted option. + But if possible use a signed repository and set the used keys with the new + --keyring option (can be passed multiple times). + + Due to this change the PBUILDERSATISFYDEPENDSOPT option --check-key is no + longer necessary and thus deprecated. + + -- Simon Ruderich Tue, 06 Mar 2012 02:02:38 +0100 + pbuilder (0.197) unstable; urgency=low The default configuration will now enable ccache. To
Bug#660269: marked as done (FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: cat: /tmp/sslh_test.pid: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:50:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#660269: fixed in sslh 1.10-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #660269, regarding FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: cat: /tmp/sslh_test.pid: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 660269: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660269 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: sslh Version: 1.10-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source sslh fails to build from source on kfreebsd-*, but built in the past: Connection refused ***Test: big message Connection refused ***Test: Stalled connection Connection refused Connection refused cat: /tmp/sslh_test.pid: No such file or directory killing Can't kill a non-numeric process ID at ./t line 192. # Looks like your test exited with 1 before it could output anything. make[1]: *** [test] Error 1 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sslh&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1.10-1&stamp=1328484132 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sslh&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=1.10-1&stamp=1328499099 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: sslh Source-Version: 1.10-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sslh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sslh_1.10-2.debian.tar.gz to main/s/sslh/sslh_1.10-2.debian.tar.gz sslh_1.10-2.dsc to main/s/sslh/sslh_1.10-2.dsc sslh_1.10-2_i386.deb to main/s/sslh/sslh_1.10-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 660...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Guillaume Delacour (supplier of updated sslh package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:45:07 +0100 Source: sslh Binary: sslh Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.10-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillaume Delacour Changed-By: Guillaume Delacour Description: sslh - ssl/ssh multiplexer Closes: 660269 Changes: sslh (1.10-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/patch/ftbfs_ip6-localhost.diff: Fix FTBFS if ip6-localhost don't resolv to ::1 (Closes: #660269) * debian/copyright: Update Format to 1.0 * debian/control: Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.3 (no changes needed) Checksums-Sha1: 876175981a5a20021034ae83b6ae0a8a2ef67fa6 1220 sslh_1.10-2.dsc b61db0057dcabe048c96f8119a8cfebd131a624e 15275 sslh_1.10-2.debian.tar.gz 632006dccb70911248f00afd35804c755cb068d3 36766 sslh_1.10-2_i386.deb Checksums-Sha256: a833c1ec55e36370f80309d50d45fec2043d859a08f12920180567dc3968e333 1220 sslh_1.10-2.dsc 0aeb6ff225415ff72363e862e9adf53fb6aa5cfdf1bd23b9bda6a42d4c6c74c6 15275 sslh_1.10-2.debian.tar.gz 28a75b1cc8e00652cc15eef132d3af187b4bdfdaccd4f85546f764fc28d31780 36766 sslh_1.10-2_i386.deb Files: 3a0b8ecf9e6f11eda1110fc752434525 1220 net extra sslh_1.10-2.dsc b31f3e44b4eace1e5b18e853d76d6cfe 15275 net extra sslh_1.10-2.debian.tar.gz c4b7022966d4520b6bf1259c8465c8e0 36766 net extra sslh_1.10-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk9VXJcACgkQ8KmKTEzW49JAbgCeNeE/4M1WsfR97SKNLzC1g8c9 m/gAn3E8CxeOLWmXqLUkyujLv14AeGUw =E1kY -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#662724: resolvconf: fail cp resolv.conf under /etc/resolvconf/run
Package: resolvconf Version: 1.64 Severity: serious Hello, Installing resolvconf (versioned 1.64) when creating a local chroot, fails to copy resolv.conf under /etc/resolvconf/run as the run directory does not exists when it is trying to copy the file. Chroot is created under QEmu, but here you have the error I get: root@polynomio:/# dpkg --configure -a Setting up resolvconf (1.64) ... /usr/bin/locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory /usr/bin/locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory /usr/bin/locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Dialog debconf: (No usable dialog-like program is installed, so the dialog based frontend cannot be used. at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Dialog.pm line 75.) debconf: falling back to frontend: Readline debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Readline debconf: (This frontend requires a controlling tty.) debconf: falling back to frontend: Teletype Unsupported ioctl: cmd=0x80046601 /usr/bin/lsattr: Function not implemented While reading flags on /etc/resolv.conf /bin/cp: cannot create regular file `/etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing resolvconf (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: resolvconf Kind regards -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Tue Mar 6 00:13:11 UTC 2012 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: lsb > tags 586191 + pending Bug #586191 [lsb] lsb: What about LSB 4? Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: pytables > tags 661287 + pending Bug #661287 [src:pytables] pytables: FTBFS on armel: tests failed Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: pytables > tags 661286 + pending Bug #661286 [src:pytables] pytables: FTBFS on mipsel and sparc: Bus error Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 661286: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661286 661287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661287 586191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586191 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#662586: FTBFS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 662586 confirmed Bug #662586 [mozc] FTBFS Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662586: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662586 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662586: FTBFS
tags 662586 confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Thanks, I fixed.
This bug was revised next upload.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2012/3/5 Moritz Muehlenhoff :
> Package: mozc
> Version: 1.3.975.102-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Your package fails to build from source:
>
> RULE genproto_session_genproto_2
> out_linux/Release/obj/gen/proto_out/session/state.pb.h
> ['protoc', 'session/state.proto',
> '--cpp_out=/home/jmm/mozc-1.3.975.102/out_linux/Release/obj/gen/proto_out']
> TOUCH out_linux/Release/obj.target/session/genproto_session.stamp
> CXX(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/client/client/client.o
> CXX(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/client/client/server_launcher.o
> AR(target) out_linux/Release/obj.target/client/libclient.a
> CXX(target)
> out_linux/Release/obj.target/language_dependent_spec_japanese/languages/japanese/lang_dep_spec.o
> AR(target)
> out_linux/Release/obj.target/languages/japanese/liblanguage_dependent_spec_japanese.a
> ACTION gen_mozc_xml_gen_mozc_xml out_linux/Release/obj/gen/unix/ibus/mozc.xml
> TOUCH out_linux/Release/obj.target/unix/ibus/gen_mozc_xml.stamp
> CXX(target)
> out_linux/Release/obj.target/ibus_mozc_lib/unix/ibus/engine_registrar.o
> CXX(target)
> out_linux/Release/obj.target/ibus_mozc_lib/unix/ibus/key_translator.o
> CXX(target)
> out_linux/Release/obj.target/ibus_mozc_lib/unix/ibus/mozc_engine.o
> unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc: In member function 'virtual void
> mozc::ibus::MozcEngine::PropertyActivate(IBusEngine*, const gchar*, guint)':
> unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:630:56: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named
> 'sub_props'
> unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:631:43: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named
> 'key'
> unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:650:61: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named
> 'sub_props'
> unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:651:41: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named
> 'key'
> unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc: In member function 'void
> mozc::ibus::MozcEngine::UpdateCompositionModeIcon(IBusEngine*,
> mozc::commands::CompositionMode)':
> unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:1106:61: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named
> 'sub_props'
> unix/ibus/mozc_engine.cc:1107:38: error: 'IBusProperty' has no member named
> 'key'
> make[2]: ***
> [out_linux/Release/obj.target/ibus_mozc_lib/unix/ibus/mozc_engine.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jmm/mozc-1.3.975.102'
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "build_mozc.py", line 1192, in
> main()
> File "build_mozc.py", line 1180, in main
> BuildMain(cmd_opts, cmd_args, original_directory_name)
> File "build_mozc.py", line 983, in BuildMain
> BuildOnLinux(options, targets, original_directory_name)
> File "build_mozc.py", line 781, in BuildOnLinux
> RunOrDie([make_command] + build_args + target_names)
> File "build_mozc.py", line 352, in RunOrDie
> '==']))
> __main__.RunOrDieError:
> ==
> ERROR: make -j1 MAKE_JOBS=1 BUILDTYPE=Release builddir_name=out_linux
> ibus_mozc scim_mozc scim_mozc_setup mozc_emacs_helper uim-mozc mozc_server
> mozc_tool
> ==
> make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jmm/mozc-1.3.975.102'
> make: *** [build] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
>
>
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549056: marked as done (pan: Still uses gmime2.2)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:53:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662149: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #629775, regarding pan: Still uses gmime2.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 629775: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629775 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: pan Version: 0.132-3.1 Severity: normal User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: oldlibs gmime2.2 pan currently still uses GMime version 2.2 (libgmime-2.0-2a). However, there is a newer GMime version in the archive (gmime2.4), with an incompatible (although very close) API. GMime 2.2 will be eventually phased out in favor of this version. Please port pan to gmime2.4 as soon as possible. It is very likely that a new upstream version will include that change for most packages; if there is none available yet, you should forward this request upstream. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' âI recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand thingsâ -- Jörg Schilling --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.133-1.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package pan has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/662149 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#629775: marked as done (pan: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libgmime-2.0-2-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:53:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662149: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #629775, regarding pan: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libgmime-2.0-2-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 629775: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629775 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: pan Version: 0.133-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──┐ > │ Install pan build dependencies (apt-based resolver) > │ > └──┘ > > Installing build dependencies > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree... > Reading state information... > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > sbuild-build-depends-pan-dummy : Depends: libgmime-2.0-2-dev but it is not > installable > E: Broken packages The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/06/07/pan_0.133-1.1_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.133-1.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package pan has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/662149 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#629775: marked as done (pan: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libgmime-2.0-2-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:53:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662149: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #549056, regarding pan: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libgmime-2.0-2-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 549056: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549056 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: pan Version: 0.133-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──┐ > │ Install pan build dependencies (apt-based resolver) > │ > └──┘ > > Installing build dependencies > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree... > Reading state information... > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > sbuild-build-depends-pan-dummy : Depends: libgmime-2.0-2-dev but it is not > installable > E: Broken packages The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/06/07/pan_0.133-1.1_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.133-1.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package pan has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/662149 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#549056: marked as done (pan: Still uses gmime2.2)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:53:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662149: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #549056, regarding pan: Still uses gmime2.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 549056: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549056 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: pan Version: 0.132-3.1 Severity: normal User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: oldlibs gmime2.2 pan currently still uses GMime version 2.2 (libgmime-2.0-2a). However, there is a newer GMime version in the archive (gmime2.4), with an incompatible (although very close) API. GMime 2.2 will be eventually phased out in favor of this version. Please port pan to gmime2.4 as soon as possible. It is very likely that a new upstream version will include that change for most packages; if there is none available yet, you should forward this request upstream. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' âI recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand thingsâ -- Jörg Schilling --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.133-1.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package pan has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/662149 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#630893: ax25-apps: Should be removed from main
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:16:19PM +, Javi Merino wrote: > > Package: ax25-apps > > Hi, > > Jeff White was contacted in June 2011 asking him to relicence the code > but he didn't reply. This package should be moved to non-free. > How, exactly, does commenting on a bug report with absolutely NO NEW INFORMATION do anything except increase the noise level in the BTS and mailing lists? We are working on a resolution to the issue. Pat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662091: help
Samuel, I am sorry you had issues with w3c-sgml-lib. I put the package together because what went before (w3c-dtd-xhtml) could not be kept up with the w3C which I saw as the upstream. Some things I did in the package wee an attempt at backwards compatibility. However I am now busy with quite a few other things and I reckon you know how this stuff works better than I do. So I would really appreciate it if you were able to offer a patch. -- Nicholas Bamber | http://www.periapt.co.uk/ PGP key 3BFFE73C from pgp.mit.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#654939: mtpfs: broken overnight
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 01:49:11AM +0100, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > Just stopped working. I could use it yesterday, but not today. > The only thing I can recall, which may or may not be related is an > upgrade of util-linux and mount. > > The command 'mtpfs /media/mountpoint' returns exit status succes. > But 'ls' shows something odd: > > d? ? ?? ?? /media/mountpoint It worked for me with -o allow_other (it seemed to work for root without that option). Also, there is 1.1 available and as my new phone only supports MTP I would be glad to adopt the package. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#662635: marked as done (qtiplot: FTBFS: minigzip.c patch fails)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:36:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662635: fixed in qtiplot 0.9.8.8-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #662635, regarding qtiplot: FTBFS: minigzip.c patch fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 662635: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662635 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: qtiplot Version: 0.9.8.8-3 Severity: serious Your package fails to build from source: jmm@squeezeamd64:~/qtiplot-0.9.8.8$ dpkg-buildpackage dpkg-buildpackage: source package qtiplot dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.9.8.8-3 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Scott Howard dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 dpkg-source --before-build qtiplot-0.9.8.8 fakeroot debian/rules clean dh clean --parallel --with python2 dh_testdir -O--parallel dh_auto_clean -O--parallel dh_clean -O--parallel dpkg-source -b qtiplot-0.9.8.8 dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: info: building qtiplot using existing ./qtiplot_0.9.8.8.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: building qtiplot in qtiplot_0.9.8.8-3.debian.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: building qtiplot in qtiplot_0.9.8.8-3.dsc debian/rules build dh build --parallel --with python2 dh_testdir -O--parallel debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jmm/qtiplot-0.9.8.8' /bin/gunzip -c /usr/share/doc/zlib1g-dev/examples/minigzip.c.gz > minigzip.c /usr/bin/patch -p1 < debian/patches-zlib/minigzip.diff patching file minigzip.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 256. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file minigzip.c.rej make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_configure] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jmm/qtiplot-0.9.8.8' make: *** [build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: qtiplot Source-Version: 0.9.8.8-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qtiplot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qtiplot-doc_0.9.8.8-4_all.deb to main/q/qtiplot/qtiplot-doc_0.9.8.8-4_all.deb qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4.debian.tar.gz to main/q/qtiplot/qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4.debian.tar.gz qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4.dsc to main/q/qtiplot/qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4.dsc qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4_i386.deb to main/q/qtiplot/qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 662...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Howard (supplier of updated qtiplot package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:27:26 -0500 Source: qtiplot Binary: qtiplot qtiplot-doc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.9.8.8-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team Changed-By: Scott Howard Description: qtiplot- data analysis and scientific plotting qtiplot-doc - data analysis and scientific plotting (documentation) Closes: 662635 Changes: qtiplot (0.9.8.8-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated debian/patches-zlib/minizip.diff for new version of zlib1g-dev (Closes: #662635) Checksums-Sha1: b7e1462b0a793365fd95f98c18667ef7dab4de57 1821 qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4.dsc 4b886e2f49f09d54f8d1d3e500dd1ddbbc88903f 18132 qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4.debian.tar.gz e9dbc8ff62c1ab8388391ffc134cf42c777518f8 3807700 qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4_i386.deb 9434adf14226cb57e2d91fa48e7aa22fd570a9c0 17663028 qtiplot-doc_0.9.8.8-4_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 11ebcf6ab8a92039bbf07c8fbbc236a4deee54953bee04bc6246b2a56b2c 1821 qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4.dsc 7b82cd70ebf0aefb125644d6050f2a4c3d4fc03b12279713565c483373fcc96e 18132 qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4.debian.tar.gz 39816e662aaf41b79e487341d9e5e5a28028d361a68aca0777c52adfa1ee3079 3807700 qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4_i386.deb d4bfef403e24c2c388565f3c7cee1fdd701859a5524eb353de7f3e8317e2f698 17663028 qtiplot-doc_0.9.8.8-4_all.deb Files: ac7126dd9fd907d30a0a4d2aedb17192 1821 math optional qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4.dsc a07bc4ff30f26e4d134931afa2a47cea 18132 math optional qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4.debian.tar.gz e483f1a0f09cbe2ee3f1da17ac4dbd8a 3807700 math optional qtiplot_0.9.8.8-4_i386.deb c163b4c7100a8668b709b09fbc13388d 17663028 doc optional qtiplo
Bug#654430: marked as done (vips: FTBFS(kfreebsd): fatal error: linux/types.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:26:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#654430: fixed in vips 7.26.7-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #654430, regarding vips: FTBFS(kfreebsd): fatal error: linux/types.h: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 654430: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654430 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:vips Version: 7.26.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds: /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../libvips/include -DG_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS -pthread -fopenmp -I/usr/lib/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/orc-0.4 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/libexif -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/OpenEXR -I/usr/include/ImageMagick -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -Wall -c -o im_video_v4l1.lo im_video_v4l1.c libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../libvips/include -DG_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS -pthread -fopenmp -I/usr/lib/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/orc-0.4 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/libexif -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/OpenEXR -I/usr/include/ImageMagick -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -Wall -c im_video_v4l1.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/im_video_v4l1.o im_video_v4l1.c:56:25: fatal error: linux/types.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[4]: *** [im_video_v4l1.lo] Error 1 Full build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=vips&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=7.26.7-1&stamp=1325445697 Regards Christoph If you have further questions please mail debian-...@lists.debian.org --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: vips Source-Version: 7.26.7-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vips, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libvips-dev_7.26.7-4_amd64.deb to main/v/vips/libvips-dev_7.26.7-4_amd64.deb libvips-doc_7.26.7-4_all.deb to main/v/vips/libvips-doc_7.26.7-4_all.deb libvips-tools_7.26.7-4_amd64.deb to main/v/vips/libvips-tools_7.26.7-4_amd64.deb libvips15_7.26.7-4_amd64.deb to main/v/vips/libvips15_7.26.7-4_amd64.deb python-vipscc_7.26.7-4_amd64.deb to main/v/vips/python-vipscc_7.26.7-4_amd64.deb vips_7.26.7-4.debian.tar.gz to main/v/vips/vips_7.26.7-4.debian.tar.gz vips_7.26.7-4.dsc to main/v/vips/vips_7.26.7-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 654...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jay Berkenbilt (supplier of updated vips package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:41:02 -0500 Source: vips Binary: libvips15 libvips-dev libvips-tools python-vipscc libvips-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 7.26.7-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jay Berkenbilt Changed-By: Jay Berkenbilt Description: libvips-dev - image processing system good for very large images (dev) libvips-doc - image processing system good for very large images (doc) libvips-tools - image processing system good for very large images (tools) libvips15 - image processing system good for very large images python-vipscc - image processing system good for very large images (tools) Closes: 654430 Changes: vips (7.26.7-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Explicitly disable v4l on kfreebsd architectures. Hopefully it's really right this time. (Closes: #654430) Checksums-Sha1: dcadaae4ee7c215edc2be24c55e15db686a1b10e 2303 vips_7.26.7-4.dsc 36f57694f195914280edfb2c57e28d6011d4b518 7899 vips_7.26.7-4.debian.tar.gz
Bug#660947: lebiniou: diff for NMU version 3.15-1.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Hector, You can go with this patch for now, looks OK to me Thanks ! - -- Olivier -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9VO1sACgkQpqVXaJzJYNLAqACfVkfVpTtmaD6dWXss4wN2hxqy NJ8An3enmfqAQImP1+BktjQOm6tsUdF+ =XnGx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662706: src:libmesh: unbuildable/uninstallable with newer petsc/slepc
Package: src:libmesh
Version: 0.7.1-2
Severity: serious
libmesh {build-,}depends on petsc 3.1 and slepc 3.1. Those have been
replaced by a 3.2 version in sid, so libmesh needs an update.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#662705: taglib: multiple vulnerabilities in taglib
Source: taglib Severity: serious Hi, multiple vulnerabilities were found in taglib 1.7 (not sure about Squeeze status). Two of theme were already allocated CVEs (CVE-2012-1107 and CVE-2012-1108_ and two should have them allocated soon. More details can be found on the oss-sec thread at http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/04/2 and in the taglib mail at http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/taglib-devel/2012-March/002186.html Regards, -- Yves-Alexis -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#660961: marked as done (www.debian.org: Long description of packages no longer shown)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:40:35 +0100 with message-id and subject line closing 657557 has caused the Debian Bug report #657557, regarding www.debian.org: Long description of packages no longer shown to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 657557: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657557 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal If you visit a page like: http://packages.debian.org/sid/makepasswd There used to be long description of the package as well. It is no longer displayed. Please restore the long description as it provides useful information about the package. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Long descriptions are displayed correctly, so I'm closing this bug. Thanks, -- Michał Kułach (pl DDTP team) --- End Message ---
Bug#657557: marked as done (packages.debian.org: Missing long descriptions)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:40:35 +0100 with message-id and subject line closing 657557 has caused the Debian Bug report #657557, regarding packages.debian.org: Missing long descriptions to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 657557: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657557 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: serious All long descriptions from testing, unstable and experimental are missing from packages.debian.org. Sorry if I overestimate severity. -- Michał Kułach (pl DDTP team) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Long descriptions are displayed correctly, so I'm closing this bug. Thanks, -- Michał Kułach (pl DDTP team) --- End Message ---
Bug#649060: marked as done (libtokyocabinet-perl: FTBFS on mipsel)
Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2012 22:24:49 +0100 with message-id <20120305212449.GA29575@elende> and subject line Re: Bug#649060: libtokyocabinet-perl: FTBFS on mipsel has caused the Debian Bug report #649060, regarding libtokyocabinet-perl: FTBFS on mipsel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 649060: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649060 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libtokyocabinet-perl Version: 1.34-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) See the logs at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libtokyocabinet-perl&arch=mipsel&ver=1.34-1%2Bb2&stamp=1321430826 and https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libtokyocabinet-perl&arch=mipsel&ver=1.34-1%2Bb2&stamp=1321362585 A couple of tests fail with Bus error. Cheers, Julien --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi Alessandro On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:13:22PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:17:40PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi wb-team! > > > > libtokyocabinet-perl had a build failure on mipsel [1]. > > > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/649060 > > > > Bug [2] was now fixed in src:tokyocabinet, which caused already there > > the bus error failure. Could you thus re-schedule a build for > > libtokyocabinet-perl? > > > > [2] http://bugs.debian.org/659554 > > > > dw libtokyocabinet-perl_1.34-1 . mipsel . -m 'libtokyocabinet-dev (>= > > 1.4.37-9)' > > Looks like it has been re-built [0]. Should we close this bug now? > > Cheers > > [0] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libtokyocabinet-perl Indeed, I was waiting for it, after wb-team rescheduled it. Done now. Regards, Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message ---
Processed: still broken in other versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 654430 7.26.7-2 Bug #654430 [src:vips] vips: FTBFS(kfreebsd): fatal error: linux/types.h: No such file or directory Bug Marked as found in versions vips/7.26.7-2. > found 654430 7.26.7-3 Bug #654430 [src:vips] vips: FTBFS(kfreebsd): fatal error: linux/types.h: No such file or directory Bug Marked as found in versions vips/7.26.7-3. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654430: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654430 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#653960: marked as forwarded (gzip: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'rpl_fstat' (in win32 build))
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:21:42 -0700 with message-id <87lineyf1l@gag.com> has caused the report #653960, regarding gzip: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'rpl_fstat' (in win32 build) to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) bug-g...@gnu.org (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 653960: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653960 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Is there a fix or workaround for this error when cross-compiling gzip with i686-w64-mingw32-gcc? We build such an executable in the Debian package build to support the debian-installer team. A quick scan through the gzip and gnulib git repositories didn't point to anything obvious. Bdale --- Begin Message --- Source: gzip Version: 1.4-2 Severity: serious >From my pbuilder build log: ... CC error.o CC exitfail.o CC fchdir.o ../../lib/fchdir.c: In function '_gl_register_fd': ../../lib/fchdir.c:153:7: warning: passing argument 2 of 'rpl_fstat' from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] ./sys/stat.h:355:12: note: expected 'struct _stat64 *' but argument is of type 'struct stat *' ../../lib/fchdir.c: At top level: ../../lib/fchdir.c:222:1: error: conflicting types for 'rpl_fstat' ./sys/stat.h:355:12: note: previous declaration of 'rpl_fstat' was here make[4]: *** [fchdir.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gzip-1.4/build-indep/lib' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gzip-1.4/build-indep/lib' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gzip-1.4/build-indep/lib' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gzip-1.4/build-indep' make: *** [build-indep-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler --- End Message --- pgpQX3hPfeq9v.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#641479: Ping: alpine: Contains non-free code
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Edward Allcutt wrote: This is RC and appears to need a maintainer upload with a repacked upstream tarball, regardless of whether upstream will accept patches. Are any of the maintainers planning to handle this soon? You're right that in the near term, a fresh upload is required. I will work on that soon. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#619391: marked as done (gedit-latex-plugin: Does not load automatically when opening tex files)
Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2012 21:57:09 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#619391:
has caused the Debian Bug report #619391,
regarding gedit-latex-plugin: Does not load automatically when opening tex files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
619391: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619391
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gedit-latex-plugin
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The latex plugin for gedit seems broken in wheezy. It no longer loads
when opening a tex file or creating a new TeX document. This renders the
package unusable for me
$ gedit &
/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py:232:
GtkWarning: IA__gtk_accel_label_set_accel_closure: assertion
`gtk_accel_group_from_accel_closure (accel_closure) != NULL' failed
menu.add(gtk_action.create_menu_item())
2011-03-23 10:13:52,465 WARNING GeditWindowDecorator - There is already a
decorator for tab
candres@debturion:~$ Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py", line
735, in _on_load
self._adjust_editor()
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py", line
794, in _adjust_editor
editor_class.__init__(self._editor, self, file)
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/__init__.py", line
428, in __init__
self.init(file, self._window_context)
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/latex/editor.py", line
111, in init
self.__master_file ## call master_file property to have it initialized.
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/typecheck/__init__.py",
line 1365, in fake_function
return fake_function.__check_result(func, result)
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/typecheck/__init__.py",
line 1488, in __check_return
raise TypeCheckError("Return value: ", return_vals, e)
GeditLaTeXPlugin.src.typecheck.TypeCheckError: Return value: for None, expected
, got
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py", line
586, in _on_tab_removed
self._tab_decorators[tab].destroy()
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py", line
866, in destroy
self._editor.destroy()
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/latex/editor.py", line
578, in destroy
self._document.destroy()
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'destroy'
/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py:859: Warning:
/build/buildd-glib2.0_2.28.1-1+b1-amd64-6erLbp/glib2.0-2.28.1/./gobject/gsignal.c:2392:
instance `0xd261b0' has no handler with id `2535'
self._text_buffer.disconnect(handler)
/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py:859: Warning:
/build/buildd-glib2.0_2.28.1-1+b1-amd64-6erLbp/glib2.0-2.28.1/./gobject/gsignal.c:2392:
instance `0xd261b0' has no handler with id `2536'
self._text_buffer.disconnect(handler)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/__init__.py", line 99, in
deactivate
self._window_decorators[window].destroy()
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py", line
641, in destroy
self._tab_decorators[tab].destroy()
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py", line
862, in destroy
del self._window_decorator
AttributeError: _window_decorator
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py", line
631, in _on_window_destroyed
self.destroy()
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/base/decorators.py", line
636, in destroy
self._preferences.remove_monitor(self)
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/GeditLaTeXPlugin/src/preferences/__init__.py",
line 165, in remove_monitor
del self.__monitors[self.__monitors.index(monitor)]
ValueError: list.index(x): x not in list
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages gedit-latex-plugin depends on:
ii gedit 2.30.4-2 official text editor of the GNOME
ii python 2.6.6-3+squeeze6 interactive high-level
Processed: reopening bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 654430
Bug #654430 {Done: Jay Berkenbilt } [src:vips] vips:
FTBFS(kfreebsd): fatal error: linux/types.h: No such file or directory
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
654430: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654430
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: severity of 301239 is important
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 301239 important Bug #301239 [mii-diag] mii-diag: does not know about Gigabit Ethernet Bug #320804 [mii-diag] mii-diag: no gigabit support? Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 301239: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=301239 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662697: nginx-extras: Package removes nginx.conf and other config files on upgrade.
Package: nginx-extras Version: 1.1.16-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, while upgrading (via apt-get upgrade), the package removes its configuration files. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=sl_SI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sl_SI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages nginx-extras depends on: ii libc6 2.13-27 ii libgd2-xpm 2.0.36~rc1~dfsg-6 ii libgeoip1 1.4.8+dfsg-3 ii liblua5.1-0 5.1.4-12 ii libpcre38.12-4 ii libperl5.14 5.14.2-9 ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.0g-1 ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-7 ii libxslt1.1 1.1.26-8 ii nginx-common1.1.16-1 ii perl5.14.2-9 ii perl-base [perlapi-5.14.2] 5.14.2-9 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2 nginx-extras recommends no packages. nginx-extras suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#574235: wims: installation fails due to metafont failure
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 574235 3.65+svn20090927-2
Bug #574235 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" } [wims] wims:
installation fails
Bug Marked as found in versions wims/3.65+svn20090927-2 and reopened.
> reopen 574235
Bug #574235 [wims] wims: installation fails
Bug 574235 is not marked as done; doing nothing.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
574235: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574235
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#660084: evolution: Evolution crashes on startup
Hi, same problem here with these packages installed: ii evolution 3.2.2-1 groupware suite with mail client and organizer ii nvidia-glx 295.20-1 NVIDIA metapackage In another machine, with radeon driver, evolution works fine so I suppose it's not an evolution problem. Searching in nvdia-glx bugs I found: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661253 As workaround: (really smashing) - open terminal and run 'gdb evolution' - once gdb is running (gdb) type 'run evolution' - open a new terminal and type 'evolution' Cheers, Fabrizio. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#574235: wims: installation fails due to metafont failure
found 574235 3.65+svn20090927-2 reopen 574235 thanks The fix in 3.65+svn20090927-2 is necessary (it adds the missing font sources), but not sufficient because postinst uses the fonts before mktexlsr is called. The package works only properly (i.e. finds the fonts it installed) if between unpacking and configuring wims some other tex package was configured and called mktexlsr. The small patch attached to this bug fixes this by moving the mktexlsr call in postinst before the other latex commands that use the fonts. This should be fixed in squeeze, too. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#574235: marked as done (wims: installation fails)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:49:14 + with message-id <1330976954.3959.1.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Fixing up version status again has caused the Debian Bug report #574235, regarding wims: installation fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 574235: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574235 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wims Version: 3.65+svn20090927-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: instest-20100316 instest Hi, While testing the installation of all packages in unstable, I ran into the following problem: > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree... > Reading state information... > Suggested packages: > wims-java-applets > Recommended packages: > yacas gap wims-extra-all wims-extra > The following NEW packages will be installed: > wims > 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > Need to get 16.6MB of archives. > After this operation, 52.3MB of additional disk space will be used. > WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! > wims > Authentication warning overridden. > Get:1 http://localhost sid/main wims 3.65+svn20090927-1 [16.6MB] > Preconfiguring packages ... > Fetched 16.6MB in 7s (2120kB/s) > Selecting previously deselected package wims. > (Reading database ... 33092 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking wims (from .../wims_3.65+svn20090927-1_amd64.deb) ... > Creating wims user. > Processing triggers for wims-modules ... > Indexed 17 modules. > Indexed 0 cn sheets. > Indexed 17 en sheets. > Indexed 0 es sheets. > Indexed 68 fr sheets. > Indexed 0 it sheets. > Indexed 0 nl sheets. > bin/mkindex: 179: cannot create mkindex.log: Permission denied > bin/mkindex: 184: cannot create index.log: Permission denied > Cutting photo beach: 368 x 247 > Cutting photo bird: 320 x 240 > Cutting photo bloom: 320 x 240 > Cutting photo grchateau: 240 x 240 > Cutting photo quartic: 240 x 240 > Cutting photo road: 362 x 246 > Cutting photo suzhou: 315 x 194 > Cutting ../photos/beach.gif: 368 x 247 > q=2x2 > q=2x3 > q=3x3 > q=3x4 > q=4x5 > Cutting ../photos/bird.gif: 320 x 240 > q=2x2 > q=2x3 > q=3x3 > q=3x4 > q=4x5 > Cutting ../photos/bloom.gif: 320 x 240 > q=2x2 > q=2x3 > q=3x3 > q=3x4 > q=4x5 > Cutting ../photos/grchateau.gif: 240 x 240 > q=2x2 > q=2x3 > q=3x3 > q=3x4 > q=4x5 > Cutting ../photos/quartic.gif: 240 x 240 > q=2x2 > q=2x3 > q=3x3 > q=3x4 > q=4x5 > Cutting ../photos/road.gif: 362 x 246 > q=2x2 > q=2x3 > q=3x3 > q=3x4 > q=4x5 > Cutting ../photos/suzhou.gif: 315 x 194 > q=2x2 > q=2x3 > q=3x3 > q=3x4 > q=4x5 > rm: cannot remove `default/icon.css': No such file or directory > touch: cannot touch `default/icon.css': Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > ls: cannot access default/*.gif: No such file or directory > mv: cannot stat `icon.css': No such file or directory > rm: cannot remove `jalon/icon.css': No such file or directory > touch: cannot touch `jalon/icon.css': Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denied > /var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/themes/mkindex: 24: cannot create icon.css: > Permission denie
Bug#651811: wine-unstable: FTBFS on amd64
Dear Maintainer, This bug is related to bug 638418. Possible solution is to manually replace /usr/include/asm directory to a symlink to /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/asm. -- Nicolas Le Cam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661694: FTBFS
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:41:24PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: jbossas4 > Version: 4.2.3.GA-6 > Severity: serious > > Your package fails to build from source: This is the same bug #655775. I'm not merging them yet since I'm not quite sure if the fix goes in libhibernate-jbosscache-java or in jbossas4. -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/ "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#620936: Bug#662197: Removed package(s) from unstable
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:55:52 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > > --- Reason --- > > RoQA; RC buggy, upstream repo is empty > > -- > Whilst I wouldn't argue with the RC buggy comment, the upstream repo is at: > http://git.gnome.org/browse/perl-Clutter > and certainly isn't empty. Well, it doesn't look much better than when I looked at it the last time, cf. #620936. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Elliott Sharp: Gullible signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301239: mii-diag: should not be released in Wheezy without gigabit ethernet support (#301239)
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl [2012-03-05 12:41 +0100]: > > Am 04.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Carsten Hey: > > >> There are also a lot of network interfaces that don't have MDIO-managed > >> PHYs, and then there are 10G PHYs with a different register set (see > >> IEEE 802.3 clause 45). This is why Linux provides the ethtool API to > >> get PHY state with a little more abstraction. > >> > >> I suggest that you refer to ethtool as the preferred tool for modern > >> network drivers, but leave mii-diag around for old drivers that don't > >> support the ethtool API. I don't see any need to remove it as it should > >> still work for that old hardware. > > Ben's arguments and his suggestion are plausible. Alex, please consider > > running "bts severity 301239 important" :) > > Hmmm... Considering what Ben said (I didn't knew there are network > cards not supportied by ethtool, and maintained the package mostly for > the lazy like me, who don't want to learn a new thing), I wasn't aware of this too. This seems to be the missing argument that lead to our, from my current point of view, wrong agreement about mii-diag being not in a releasable state. > I'd like to propose the following solution: > > What about adding a hint to README.Debian and the package description, > pointing out, that it is a legacy package for older network cards, > pointing to ethtool for newer hardware, and adding a suggest:ethtool > to the package. When elvm broke my system by just installing it to be able to read the included documentation, I looked if there is a README.Debian explaining why it did so, but in general I do not read the README.Debian of random tools I use - so I'm not convinced that this reaches many users. But additionally to mentioning it in the package description (which is a great idea and IMHO justifies the additional work of the translation teams to update the package description's translations), adding a note to README.Debian seems to be sane. The main argument for adding this to the package description is that users should be aware of this issue before they install the package, but to be able to read README.Debian they need to install the package first. You could also add a short note "See /usr/share/doc/mii-diag/README.Debian for an explanation why mii-diag does not correctly detect Gigabit Ethernet or better." to the man page. Obviously just adding documentation does not fix the bug (completely) and after being aware of the things Ben explained, we seem to agree that this bug is not release critical. Maybe you, as maintainer, could adapt the severity? Carsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#643820: key-mon: fails to start; python-gtk2 issue loading svg?
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:28:29 +0100, Andrea Colangelo wrote: > I was unable to reproduce your bug. Same here (ans apparently also for Axel, since he tagged the bug unreproducible). I suggest to close the bug, since - 3 people can't reproduce it at different times - if there was a bug it was in a different package probably - there's no response from the submitter Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Rolling Stones signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#579028: Allow --check-key to be reliably cleared once set
On 03/04/2012 01:51 PM, Neil Williams wrote: > Mixing suites, mixing access sites, use inside and outside restrictive > networks, these are all use-cases for having multiple config files for > pbuilder and some will require SecureApt to be turned off. Hopefully those days will be over soon: apt 0.8.16 (in experimental) has an option to disable signature checking for specific sources.list entries. This way you can have an (unsigned) local repository, but signatures for any repository accessed via network will still be checked. See #596498 for more details. You still need an option to disable signature checking when working with older versions of apt, but it should be enabled by default. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#660231: This is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 660231 important Bug #660231 [python2.7-dev] python2.7-dev: Broken symlink to static library libpython2.7.a Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > tags 660231 + pending Bug #660231 [python2.7-dev] python2.7-dev: Broken symlink to static library libpython2.7.a Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 660231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660231 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#660231: This is serious
severity 660231 important tags 660231 + pending thanks On 05.03.2012 15:59, Felipe Sateler wrote: severity 660231 serious thanks This breaks unrelated software. Thus severity serious. while the symlink is broken, python-config should be used to get the name and the path of the library. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662599: libmail-imapclient-perl: FTBFS: Test suite failure
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:09:29PM +0100, Gilles LAMIRAL wrote: > >>> t/bodystructure.t .. 1/41 Can't call method "at" on unblessed reference > >>> at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/RecDescent.pm line 3109. > > > > More likely Parse::RecDescent changes. > > https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=74733 > > We have to discover what change in Parse::RecDescent breaks the > Mail-IMAPClient code. Just recompiling the grammars seems to fix this. perl -MParse::RecDescent - lib/Mail/IMAPClient/Thread.grammar \ Mail::IMAPClient::Thread && \ mv Thread.pm lib/Mail/IMAPClient/ perl -MParse::RecDescent - lib/Mail/IMAPClient/BodyStructure/Parse.grammar \ Mail::IMAPClient::BodyStructure::Parse && \ mv Parse.pm lib/Mail/IMAPClient/BodyStructure/ It might be a good idea to either do this during the Debian build or use the -standalone parameter to PreCompile(), which embeds Parse::RecDescent into the compiled grammar .pm file. I think I prefer the first approach, as it makes sure regressions are found before users run into them (for example, when they want to modify the grammar for their own purposes and only then find out it can't be compiled with current versions of Parse::RecDescent.) -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662595: marked as done (FTBFS)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662595: fixed in parcimonie 0.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #662595, regarding FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 662595: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662595 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: parcimonie Version: 0.6-1 Severity: serious Your package fails to build from source: dh override_dh_auto_build make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jmm/parcimonie-0.6' debian/rules override_dh_auto_test make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jmm/parcimonie-0.6' xvfb-run -a dh_auto_test t/00-load_all.t ... Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display ":99". t/00-load_all.t ... ok t/05-init-keyring.t ... 1/3 gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found t/05-init-keyring.t ... ok t/30-pickRandomItems.t ok t/31-gpgPublicKeys.t .. ok t/32-keyserver_defined_on_command_line.t .. ok t/33-checkGpgHasDefinedKeyserver.t ok t/91-gpgRecvKeys.t 1/2 gpg: requesting key 135EA668 from hkp server keys.indymedia.org gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. gpg: Total number processed: 0 at t/91-gpgRecvKeys.t line 22 # Looks like you planned 2 tests but ran 1. # Looks like your test exited with 2 just after 1. t/91-gpgRecvKeys.t Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) Failed 1/2 subtests t/author-critic.t . skipped: these tests are for testing by the author t/release-eol.t ... skipped: these tests are for release candidate testing t/release-no-tabs.t ... skipped: these tests are for release candidate testing t/release-pod-coverage.t .. skipped: these tests are for release candidate testing t/release-pod-syntax.t skipped: these tests are for release candidate testing Test Summary Report --- t/91-gpgRecvKeys.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 1 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 2 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 2 tests but ran 1. Files=12, Tests=29, 7 wallclock secs ( 0.09 usr 0.23 sys + 3.04 cusr 1.12 csys = 4.48 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/12 test programs. 0/29 subtests failed. dh_auto_test: perl Build test returned exit code 255 make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 255 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jmm/parcimonie-0.6' make: *** [build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: parcimonie Source-Version: 0.6-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of parcimonie, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: parcimonie_0.6-2.debian.tar.gz to main/p/parcimonie/parcimonie_0.6-2.debian.tar.gz parcimonie_0.6-2.dsc to main/p/parcimonie/parcimonie_0.6-2.dsc parcimonie_0.6-2_all.deb to main/p/parcimonie/parcimonie_0.6-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 662...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. intrigeri (supplier of updated parcimonie package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:59:43 +0100 Source: parcimonie Binary: parcimonie Architecture: source all Version: 0.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: intrigeri Changed-By: intrigeri Description: parcimonie - privacy-friendly helper to refresh a GnuPG keyring Closes: 662595 Changes: parcimonie (0.6-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix my name. * Add Lintian overrides for false positives. * Set my email address to my shiny new @debian.org one. * Update specification URL in debian/copyright. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3, no change required. * New patch (cherry-picked from upstream Git): 0001-Testsuite-use-pool.sks-keyservers.net-instead-of-key.patch (Closes: #662595) Checksums-Sha1: e9e4bce1fc282e8eb5b3ab9db24427252081d97f 2742 parcimonie_0.6-2.dsc 8b54da25e7a742b4e0077d56e0959f17a645a73f 4859 parc
Bug#649060: libtokyocabinet-perl: FTBFS on mipsel
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:17:40PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi wb-team!
>
> libtokyocabinet-perl had a build failure on mipsel [1].
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/649060
>
> Bug [2] was now fixed in src:tokyocabinet, which caused already there
> the bus error failure. Could you thus re-schedule a build for
> libtokyocabinet-perl?
>
> [2] http://bugs.debian.org/659554
>
> dw libtokyocabinet-perl_1.34-1 . mipsel . -m 'libtokyocabinet-dev (>=
> 1.4.37-9)'
Looks like it has been re-built [0]. Should we close this bug now?
Cheers
[0] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libtokyocabinet-perl
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;;eg;say~~reverse'
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#662680: python-sphere: missing dependency on python
Package: python-sphere Version: 3.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 Changelog for the current version reads: * B-D on python-support. Closes: #642474 However, in the very same version compat was bumped to 9 (which is not mentioned in the changelog at all). One of the behavioral changes in compat 9 is: - dh does not default to enabling --with=python-support As a consquence, the package doesn't use any Python helper, and hence doesn't bytecompile its Python modules and doesn't have versioned dependency on Python. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662658: x86info: FTBFS(kfreebsd): fatal error: asm/mtrr.h: No such file or directory
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:33:59PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Mark Brown writes: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:51:01PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > > > >> gcc -g -O2 -Werror -Wall -Wshadow -Wextra -Wmissing-declarations > >> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wredundant-decls -c -o mtrr.o mtrr.c > >> mtrr.c:11:22: fatal error: asm/mtrr.h: No such file or directory > > This is *really* FreeBSD specific, have you looked into how FreeBSD > > provides this functionality now? > As I definitely don't have the time to care for all kfreebsd-specific > build failures on my on (I get all of the failures due to being buildd > admin) I'd be happy if you can keep your questions on debian-bsd@ and > not relying on me personally. "You" in this context is the porters - for an obviously platform specific thing like this I'd assumed you'd included them in the discussion somehow (eg, by having the list automatically pick up the usertag). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662677: python-pastescript: needs a versioned dependency on python-paste (>= 1.7.5.1-2~)
Package: python-pastescript Version: 1.7.3-7 Severity: serious All modules in the same namespace must migrate from python-central to dh_python2 in lockstep, otherwise partial upgrades, backports and such fail (the current backport of python-pastescript is a nice example, with it installed paste.script doesn't even import). -- Arto Jantunen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662678: python-paste: needs to add Breaks: python-pastescript (<< 1.7.3-7~)
Package: python-paste Version: 1.7.5.1-2 Severity: serious All modules in the same namespace must migrate from python-central to dh_python2 in lockstep, otherwise partial upgrades, backports and such fail. -- Arto Jantunen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662634: Uses phpapi, but doesn't define dependency on it (Broken with PHP 5.4)
Hi Vincent, phpapi-20100525 is the correct version: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/php54.html O. 2012/3/5 Vincent Danjean : > Le 05/03/2012 17:22, Ondřej Surý a écrit : >> Thanks for the quick fix. > > Looking at the built of my package (chroot amd64 sid up-to-date), I see > that the computed dependency is phpapi-20100525. Does it really build > against the old version of php? Do I need to change something? Or will > the php/release team made a binary upload after a rebuild in a updated > sid environment? > > Regards, > Vincent > > -- > Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org > GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87 > Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html > APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main > -- Ondřej Surý -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662634: Uses phpapi, but doesn't define dependency on it (Broken with PHP 5.4)
Le 05/03/2012 17:22, Ondřej Surý a écrit : > Thanks for the quick fix. Looking at the built of my package (chroot amd64 sid up-to-date), I see that the computed dependency is phpapi-20100525. Does it really build against the old version of php? Do I need to change something? Or will the php/release team made a binary upload after a rebuild in a updated sid environment? Regards, Vincent -- Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87 Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662654: marked as done (wdiff: FTBFS: texi2html: not found)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:36:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662654: fixed in wdiff 1.1.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #662654, regarding wdiff: FTBFS: texi2html: not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 662654: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662654 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:wdiff Version: 1.1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the buildds: make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-wdiff_1.1.0-1-kfreebsd-i386-YcR4VC/wdiff-1.1.0' make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-wdiff_1.1.0-1-kfreebsd-i386-YcR4VC/wdiff-1.1.0' make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-wdiff_1.1.0-1-kfreebsd-i386-YcR4VC/wdiff-1.1.0' dh_install -a debian/rules override_dh_installdocs make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-wdiff_1.1.0-1-kfreebsd-i386-YcR4VC/wdiff-1.1.0' cd doc && texi2html wdiff.texi /bin/sh: 1: texi2html: not found make[1]: *** [override_dh_installdocs] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-wdiff_1.1.0-1-kfreebsd-i386-YcR4VC/wdiff-1.1.0' make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2 Full build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=wdiff&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=1.1.0-1&stamp=1330277658 Regards Christoph --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: wdiff Source-Version: 1.1.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wdiff, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wdiff-doc_1.1.0-2_all.deb to main/w/wdiff/wdiff-doc_1.1.0-2_all.deb wdiff_1.1.0-2.debian.tar.gz to main/w/wdiff/wdiff_1.1.0-2.debian.tar.gz wdiff_1.1.0-2.dsc to main/w/wdiff/wdiff_1.1.0-2.dsc wdiff_1.1.0-2_amd64.deb to main/w/wdiff/wdiff_1.1.0-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 662...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Santiago Vila (supplier of updated wdiff package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:54:16 +0100 Source: wdiff Binary: wdiff wdiff-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.1.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Santiago Vila Changed-By: Santiago Vila Description: wdiff - Compares two files word by word wdiff-doc - Documentation for GNU wdiff Closes: 662654 Changes: wdiff (1.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Move texi2html to Build-Depends. Closes: #662654. * Use dh version 9. Checksums-Sha1: 318d752f3a2d2631e2d7cfcd808dc8ef4d3a7d9d 1425 wdiff_1.1.0-2.dsc 2640d010a2abf54eba090917e9a542f7cc5401b2 5142 wdiff_1.1.0-2.debian.tar.gz 455c81739759d83305ad20ff7a735e55a8395132 200234 wdiff_1.1.0-2_amd64.deb 3b67b1d69fcd8673b38fe9584586a1171c22e25d 43786 wdiff-doc_1.1.0-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 6aef3372af668a3bb47d160a93f187585c9db43ea93505803548493d2134503b 1425 wdiff_1.1.0-2.dsc 994a66fd86063663956c99199ec771bb6d1fd7c87a3f5febd5bbdfbb68fdc692 5142 wdiff_1.1.0-2.debian.tar.gz f013d6a95023f6c0a9135045a1ae05b19552e06a846922bd8c71aa14ddd9526e 200234 wdiff_1.1.0-2_amd64.deb e49c0800fb23b38d48cf7626b8a710b51266dc1ab4c7ea38f744d40a5ac85209 43786 wdiff-doc_1.1.0-2_all.deb Files: a17f6790a6c06661ff393acdac7ac2f7 1425 text optional wdiff_1.1.0-2.dsc 8d4d7f551cb6ea7b15d1fd920e03984e 5142 text optional wdiff_1.1.0-2.debian.tar.gz 8b457fac3ad9dfebad75bf45e2373598 200234 text optional wdiff_1.1.0-2_amd64.deb b77ad18f490698bbe3fe988f5904fcf4 43786 doc optional wdiff-doc_1.1.0-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPVOLYAAoJEEHOfwufG4syc88H/1PIPZuiik3Z8T8mvihytvqu D1prLVaduR7bRW7XTAFKDRVZ5PNWykmv1mY4lRMwBQdHmWrBckZ/MsYIvTqG45m9 AzYJ7czpYTQzLdFW7AMnjtvN9VqllPMQ1FKsDraI8PfkOlM6YNAazOU6EmRHm+T7 zXMqUpvPDpa8OL6PArB+DqciuHWnldSdOygPTPTL16otlRO8AmTBGTEPKAJ+Gy5P QA7QTboJqu3ldr9PjBz/N1ZAcdaK2mayuZSPHclhln6pEyWlNf5tV2itnzcrrc0z zgwOF/t+vRs3zkCJs9AqdTjQe3/yfec9YCy+E2ib78cZFW/Dp/r4SMKUNaxr+dE= =iCXd -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#662658: x86info: FTBFS(kfreebsd): fatal error: asm/mtrr.h: No such file or directory
Hi! Mark Brown writes: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:51:01PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > >> gcc -g -O2 -Werror -Wall -Wshadow -Wextra -Wmissing-declarations >> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wredundant-decls -c -o mtrr.o mtrr.c >> mtrr.c:11:22: fatal error: asm/mtrr.h: No such file or directory >> compilation terminated. >> make[1]: *** [mtrr.o] Error 1 >> make[1]: Leaving directory >> `/build/buildd-x86info_1.30-1-kfreebsd-amd64-fQtF1K/x86info-1.30' >> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 > > This is *really* FreeBSD specific, have you looked into how FreeBSD > provides this functionality now? As I definitely don't have the time to care for all kfreebsd-specific build failures on my on (I get all of the failures due to being buildd admin) I'd be happy if you can keep your questions on debian-bsd@ and not relying on me personally. Thanks Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662654: wdiff: FTBFS: texi2html: not found
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Christoph Egger wrote: > Package: src:wdiff > Version: 1.1.0-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid wheezy > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > Hi! > > Your package failed to build on the buildds: > > make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'. > make[3]: Leaving directory > `/build/buildd-wdiff_1.1.0-1-kfreebsd-i386-YcR4VC/wdiff-1.1.0' > make[2]: Leaving directory > `/build/buildd-wdiff_1.1.0-1-kfreebsd-i386-YcR4VC/wdiff-1.1.0' > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/build/buildd-wdiff_1.1.0-1-kfreebsd-i386-YcR4VC/wdiff-1.1.0' >dh_install -a >debian/rules override_dh_installdocs > make[1]: Entering directory > `/build/buildd-wdiff_1.1.0-1-kfreebsd-i386-YcR4VC/wdiff-1.1.0' > cd doc && texi2html wdiff.texi > /bin/sh: 1: texi2html: not found > make[1]: *** [override_dh_installdocs] Error 127 > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/build/buildd-wdiff_1.1.0-1-kfreebsd-i386-YcR4VC/wdiff-1.1.0' > make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2 Thanks a lot for the report. This bug is a side effect of conversion to dh. As texi2html is such a small script, I've simply put it in Build-Depends (previously it was in Build-Depends-Indep). A fixed version is in the upload queue. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662634: Uses phpapi, but doesn't define dependency on it (Broken with PHP 5.4)
Thanks for the quick fix. 2012/3/5 Vincent Danjean : > Would it be possible to have a lintian check for this ? I am not sure whether it is possible, but I will speak with lintian people about possible check for that. O. -- Ondřej Surý -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662676: Hitting the add button causes a segfault
Package: gnome-contacts Version: 3.2.2-2 Severity: grave I ran gnome-contacts, tried hitting the add button, and got a segfault. Full terminal transcript: ~$ gnome-contacts (gnome-contacts:5700): folks-DEBUG: individual-aggregator.vala:310: Setting primary store IDs to defaults. (gnome-contacts:5700): folks-DEBUG: individual-aggregator.vala:338: Primary store IDs are 'eds' and 'system'. (gnome-contacts:5700): folks-WARNING **: Failed to find primary PersonaStore with type ID 'eds' and ID 'system'. Individuals will not be linked properly and creating new links between Personas will not work. The configured primary PersonaStore's backend may not be installed. If you are unsure, check with your distribution. Segmentation fault Note that all the messages before "Segmentation fault" appeared immediately after starting gnome-contacts, before I hit the add button. - Josh Triplett -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gnome-contacts depends on: ii libc6 2.13-27 ii libcairo2 1.10.2-6.2 ii libebook-1.2-123.2.2-1 ii libedataserver-1.2-15 3.2.2-1 ii libfolks-telepathy25 0.6.6-1 ii libfolks25 0.6.6-1 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.24.1-1 ii libgee20.6.1-3 ii libglib2.0-0 2.30.2-6 ii libgnome-desktop-3-2 3.2.1-3 ii libgoa-1.0-0 3.2.1-3 ii libgtk-3-0 3.2.3-1 ii libnotify4 0.7.4-1 ii libpango1.0-0 1.29.4-2 ii libtelepathy-glib0 0.16.2-1+b1 Versions of packages gnome-contacts recommends: pn libfolks-eds25 gnome-contacts suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#655223: marked as done (ndiswrapper-dkms: Does not compile on linux >= 3.2.0-rcX)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:10:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#655223: fixed in ndiswrapper 1.57-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #655223, regarding ndiswrapper-dkms: Does not compile on linux >= 3.2.0-rcX to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 655223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655223 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: ndiswrapper-dkms Version: 1.57~rc1 Severity: important The supplied version no longer compiles with (recently launched) 3.2.0 kernel, nor it's release candidates. Current upstream from trunk compiles and runs just fine. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-rc4-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ndiswrapper-dkms depends on: ii dkms 2.2.0.3-1 ndiswrapper-dkms recommends no packages. ndiswrapper-dkms suggests no packages. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: ndiswrapper Source-Version: 1.57-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ndiswrapper, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ndiswrapper-common_1.57-1_all.deb to main/n/ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper-common_1.57-1_all.deb ndiswrapper-dkms_1.57-1_all.deb to main/n/ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper-dkms_1.57-1_all.deb ndiswrapper-source_1.57-1_all.deb to main/n/ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper-source_1.57-1_all.deb ndiswrapper-utils-1.9_1.57-1_amd64.deb to main/n/ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper-utils-1.9_1.57-1_amd64.deb ndiswrapper_1.57-1.debian.tar.gz to main/n/ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper_1.57-1.debian.tar.gz ndiswrapper_1.57-1.dsc to main/n/ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper_1.57-1.dsc ndiswrapper_1.57.orig.tar.gz to main/n/ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper_1.57.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 655...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Julian Andres Klode (supplier of updated ndiswrapper package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:49:02 +0100 Source: ndiswrapper Binary: ndiswrapper-common ndiswrapper-utils-1.9 ndiswrapper-source ndiswrapper-dkms Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1.57-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Julian Andres Klode Changed-By: Julian Andres Klode Description: ndiswrapper-common - Common scripts required to use the utilities for ndiswrapper ndiswrapper-dkms - Source for the ndiswrapper Linux kernel module (DKMS) ndiswrapper-source - Source for the ndiswrapper Linux kernel module ndiswrapper-utils-1.9 - Userspace utilities for the ndiswrapper Linux kernel module Closes: 655223 655249 Changes: ndiswrapper (1.57-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Imported Upstream version 1.57 - Fixes build with kernel 3.2 (Closes: #655223, LP: #910597) * Enable hardening build flags (Closes: #655249) * patches/ndiswrapper-harden.patch: Use $(shell X) instead of `X` * Update to Policy 3.9.3, copyright-format 1.0 Checksums-Sha1: 1f3c8d53acba97444c31cac2a1212541678deb79 1491 ndiswrapper_1.57-1.dsc faa896fd16e43fb93f4e10d9e9f76027c7e6d402 198971 ndiswrapper_1.57.orig.tar.gz 1023092c4fb24a9cefb95947b6196ccaf69838ef 12936 ndiswrapper_1.57-1.debian.tar.gz 59adfca9dcfdb2c95eb09ccd02b7d92ee23cf647 21784 ndiswrapper-common_1.57-1_all.deb 150fb7f5f644a904d7fbad58181b7255a299a0c7 163190 ndiswrapper-source_1.57-1_all.deb 81eef193c3f2474dd36c083f05973c7b1895f61a 192078 ndiswrapper-dkms_1.57-1_all.deb 3a4aba9368834e930ceb5dacab7a91ca9f2dd5f6 36778 ndiswrapper-utils-1.9_1.57-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: b13bc907e86ec2e26fcef83e4ff60a1d176db210054ef42f8da100d16fb61ab5 1491 ndiswrapper_1.57-1.dsc 208699faa01ab8ca707cb8a28db20417d07887f993c0830dd34c7d9c4f84a56c 198971 ndiswrapper_1.57.orig.tar.gz 956787d1b87876407cd30f7a6cfd44ee522b6a302bb8ea8d5b5618ee44f37e86 12936 ndiswrapper_1.57-1.debian.tar.gz e1604637aeef33c874f352753b9a34042e1cb6d985703f0144361dff155645c8 21784 ndiswrapper-common_1.57-1_all.deb a96a9e
Bug#662200: libcvc3-5-jni and libcvc3-2-jni: error when trying to install together
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:22:19PM -0500, Christopher L Conway wrote: > >Not sure how to handle this. On the C++ side, the policy dictates a > >libcvc3-X package with libcvc3.so.X and a libcvc3-X-dev package with > >libcvc3.so -> libfoo.so.X. On the Java side, we don't have any > headers to > >install, so a libcvc3-X-jni-dev package seems like overkill just for a > >libcvc3jni.so symlink. > > I have no idea about java packaging. Did you check what the debian Java > policy says ? (not sure whether there is one, but at least there should > exist such a policy :-) > The Debian policy for Java on JNI packages ( http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x145.html) provides no real guidance on this question akin to Debian Policy Sections 8.1 and 8.5. -Chris
Bug#652644: marked as done (software-center: Software-center hangs on start)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:02:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652644: fixed in aptdaemon 0.43+bzr769-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652644, regarding software-center: Software-center hangs on start to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 652644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652644 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: software-center Version: 5.1.2debian1 Severity: important When trying to start software-center it just hangs while using 100% CPU until it is manually killed. I get this error message while the window does nothing: 2011-12-19 16:25:07,970 - dbus.connection - ERROR - Exception in handler for D-Bus signal: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dbus/connection.py", line 214, in maybe_handle_message self._handler(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 71, in signal_cb callback(new_owner) File "/usr/share/software- center/softwarecenter/backend/installbackend_impl/aptd.py", line 148, in _register_active_transactions_watch current, queued = apt_daemon.GetActiveTransactions() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dbus/proxies.py", line 143, in __call__ **keywords) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dbus/connection.py", line 630, in call_blocking message, timeout) DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Message did not receive a reply (timeout by message bus) I am using the software-center in experimental, but had the exact same problem with the version from testing. (upgraded because reportbug said I should) /Marcus -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=sv_SE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages software-center depends on: ii app-install-data2010.11.17 ii aptdaemon 0.43+bzr707-1 ii gir1.2-glib-2.0 1.31.0-2 ii gir1.2-gmenu-3.03.2.0.1-2 ii gir1.2-gtk-3.0 3.2.2-3 ii gir1.2-webkit-3.0 1.6.1-5+b1 ii gnome-icon-theme3.2.1.2-1 ii lsb-release 3.2-28 ii policykit-1 0.103-1 ii policykit-1-gnome 0.105-1 ii python 2.7.2-9 ii python-apt 0.8.0 ii python-aptdaemon0.43+bzr707-1 ii python-aptdaemon.gtk3widgets0.43+bzr707-1 ii python-dbus 0.84.0-2 ii python-defer1.0.2+bzr481-1 ii python-gi-cairo [python-gobject-cairo] 3.0.2-4 ii python-gobject 3.0.2-4 ii python-lazr.restfulclient 0.12.0-1 ii python-xapian 1.2.7-1 ii python-xdg 0.19-3 Versions of packages software-center recommends: ii apt-xapian-index 0.44 ii gir1.2-launchpad-integration-3.0 ii lzma 4.43-14 ii sessioninstaller 0.20-1 ii software-properties-gtk 0.76.7debian2+nmu1 ii update-notifier 0.99.3debian10 ii zeitgeist-core0.8.2-1 software-center suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: aptdaemon Source-Version: 0.43+bzr769-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of aptdaemon, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: aptdaemon-data_0.43+bzr769-1_all.deb to main/a/aptdaemon/aptdaemon-data_0.43+bzr769-1_all.deb aptdaemon_0.43+bzr769-1.debian.tar.gz to main/a/aptdaemon/aptdaemon_0.43+bzr769-1.debian.tar.gz aptdaemon_0.43+bzr769-1.dsc to main/a/aptdaemon/aptdaemon_0.43+bzr769-1.dsc aptdaemon_0.43+bzr769-1_all.deb to main/a/aptdaemon/aptdaemon_0.43+bzr769-1_all.deb aptdaemon_0.43+bzr769.orig.tar.gz to main/a/aptdaemon/aptdaemon_0.43+bzr769.orig.tar.gz python-aptdaemon-gtk_0.43+bzr769-1_all.deb to main/a/aptdaemon/python-aptdaemon-gtk_0.43+bzr769-1_all.deb python-aptdaemon.gtk3widgets_0.43+bzr769-1_all.deb to main/a/aptdaemon/python-aptdaemon.gtk3widgets_0.43+bzr769-1_all.deb python-aptdaemon.gtkwidgets_0.43+bzr769-1_all.deb to main/a/aptdaemon/python-aptdaemon
Processed: user debian...@lists.debian.org, usertagging 644539, usertagging 645349, affects 661396 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was deb...@abeckmann.de).
> usertags 644539 piuparts
Bug#644539: python-software-properties: not installable: Depends: python (<
2.7) but 2.7.2-7 is to be installed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
> usertags 645349 piuparts
Bug#645349: python-sqlkit: uninstallable: breaks "python (>= 2.7)"
Usertags were: piuparts.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
> affects 661396 + libtonezone-dev
Bug #661396 [libtonezone2.0] libtonezone2.0: fails to upgrade from lenny to
squeeze to wheezy - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/libtonezone.so.1
Added indication that 661396 affects libtonezone-dev
> affects 655702 + libqdbm++-dev
Bug #655702 {Done: KURASHIKI Satoru } [libxqdbm-dev]
libxqdbm-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite ...
Added indication that 655702 affects libqdbm++-dev
> affects 662643 + libconfig8-dev libconfig++8-dev
Bug #662643 [libconfig-dev] libconfig-dev: fails to upgrade from 'testing' -
trying to overwrite /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libconfig.pc
Added indication that 662643 affects libconfig8-dev and libconfig++8-dev
> found 656113 wims-extra-es/3.64-1
Bug #656113 [wims] wims: fails to install - bin/mkindex: cannot create
mkindex.log: Permission denied
The source wims-extra-es and version 3.64-1 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Bug Marked as found in versions wims-extra-es/3.64-1.
> found 661040 ldap2dns/0.3.1-3
Bug #661040 [bind9] bind9: fails to purge - bad interaction with debconf
Bug Marked as found in versions ldap2dns/0.3.1-3.
> affects 657408 + epiphany-browser-dev
Bug #657408 {Done: Gustavo Noronha Silva }
[libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0-dev] libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0-dev: fails to upgrade
from squeeze - trying to overwrite ...
Added indication that 657408 affects epiphany-browser-dev
> usertags 661590 piuparts
Bug#661590: doc-rfc-misc: tries to overwrite
/usr/share/doc/RFC/links/rfc1145.txt.gz in doc-rfc-others 20100731-1
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
> affects 661590 + doc-rfc doc-rfc-others
Bug #661590 [doc-rfc-misc] doc-rfc-misc: tries to overwrite
/usr/share/doc/RFC/links/rfc1145.txt.gz in doc-rfc-others 20100731-1
Added indication that 661590 affects doc-rfc and doc-rfc-others
> found 660346 odin/1.8.4-1
Bug #660346 [dcmtk] fails to purge - rmdir: failed to remove /var/lib/dcmtk/db:
Directory not empty
Bug Marked as found in versions odin/1.8.4-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
660346: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660346
662643: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662643
661396: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661396
657408: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657408
661590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661590
655702: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655702
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 662067 pending Bug #662067 [glance-api] glance-api: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user Added tag(s) pending. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662067: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662067 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662644: marked as done (pysendfile: breaks python-sendfile)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:50:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662644: fixed in pysendfile 2.0.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #662644, regarding pysendfile: breaks python-sendfile to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 662644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662644 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: pysendfile Version: 2.0.0-2 Severity: serious pysendfile breaks python-sendfile without actually declaring Breaks (or Conflicts). If you co-install those two packages, even uninstalling pysendfile won't help: # apt-get install -qq python-sendfile debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed Selecting previously unselected package python-sendfile. (Reading database ... 11542 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking python-sendfile (from .../python-sendfile_1.2.4-1+b2_amd64.deb) ... Setting up python-sendfile (1.2.4-1+b2) ... Processing triggers for python-support ... # python -c 'import sendfile; print(sendfile)' # apt-get install -qq pysendfile && apt-get remove -qq pysendfile debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed Selecting previously unselected package pysendfile. (Reading database ... 11557 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking pysendfile (from .../pysendfile_2.0.0-2_amd64.deb) ... Replacing files in old package python-sendfile ... Setting up pysendfile (2.0.0-2) ... (Reading database ... 11577 files and directories currently installed.) Removing pysendfile ... # python -c 'import sendfile; print(sendfile)' Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ImportError: No module named sendfile -- Jakub Wilk --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: pysendfile Source-Version: 2.0.0-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pysendfile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pysendfile_2.0.0-3.debian.tar.gz to main/p/pysendfile/pysendfile_2.0.0-3.debian.tar.gz pysendfile_2.0.0-3.dsc to main/p/pysendfile/pysendfile_2.0.0-3.dsc pysendfile_2.0.0-3_amd64.deb to main/p/pysendfile/pysendfile_2.0.0-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 662...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ghe Rivero (supplier of updated pysendfile package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:30:24 +0100 Source: pysendfile Binary: pysendfile Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.0.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ghe Rivero Changed-By: Ghe Rivero Description: pysendfile - python interface to sendfile(2) system call Closes: 662644 Changes: pysendfile (2.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Conflicts with python-sendfile (Closes: #662644) Checksums-Sha1: df368147da9e3687369000916fb1ebf286216287 1064 pysendfile_2.0.0-3.dsc 3bb761822683bc52bd5a5693e3d695d049078e36 1833 pysendfile_2.0.0-3.debian.tar.gz e10c3dc2e3c042b1dbbe4bd7e0de7c3c7060b2f1 8132 pysendfile_2.0.0-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 9f28ba3e18203148a5dc319a6f58129e682a55fed6d90ad46ba1fa81be94ea7f 1064 pysendfile_2.0.0-3.dsc fd29e05b7a77d56ae05054a9686fb65dc498e03f48398e216a830058030cf202 1833 pysendfile_2.0.0-3.debian.tar.gz ee3fabf4b4e9e5cc383e86a05f587de33e50a37129202140708fbb7a00d55cee 8132 pysendfile_2.0.0-3_amd64.deb Files: 16d7f1b7f5fd184cb8970f4adbb5f464 1064 python optional pysendfile_2.0.0-3.dsc b93b80deb612f53ecb296465179886e9 1833 python optional pysendfile_2.0.0-3.debian.tar.gz cba697fb58975c8ecc7841fc3bb3153b 8132 python optional pysendfile_2.0.0-3_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk9U3WIACgkQZttaNibwIPdgGQCfaP9sktAA1H0v/pkTIwEwo287 QJMAnj53okzFUPXwmE2odMMRvOMMYq9P =ZDSn -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#662634: marked as done (Uses phpapi, but doesn't define dependency on it (Broken with PHP 5.4))
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:50:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#662634: fixed in owfs 2.8p14-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #662634,
regarding Uses phpapi, but doesn't define dependency on it (Broken with PHP 5.4)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
662634: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662634
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libow-php5
Version: 2.8p14-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Hi,
your package links and uses phpapi, but doesn't define correct
dependency on it. This breaks libow-php5 when used with PHP 5.4 which
just landed in unstable, because of changed phpapi.
Please add something like:
echo "php:Depends=phpapi-`php-config5 --phpapi`" >>
debian/libow-php5.substvars
after dh_shlibs call and ${php:Depends} to debian/control. Patch:
--- control.orig 2012-03-05 13:00:30.260935007 +
+++ control 2012-03-05 13:00:40.167924448 +
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ Description: FTP daemon providing access
Package: libow-php5
Architecture: any
Section: web
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${php:Depends}
Description: Dallas 1-wire support: PHP5 bindings
The 1-Wire bus is a cheap low-speed bus for devices like weather
sensors, access control, etc. It can be attached to your system via
--- rules.orig2012-03-05 12:59:30.912914561 +
+++ rules 2012-03-05 12:59:34.041434825 +
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ override_dh_strip:
override_dh_makeshlibs:
dh_makeshlibs --no-package libow-php5 --no-package libow-tcl
+ echo "php:Depends=phpapi-`php-config5 --phpapi`" >>
debian/libow-php5.substvars
clean:
$(DH) clean
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: owfs
Source-Version: 2.8p14-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
owfs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libow-2.8-14_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/libow-2.8-14_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
libow-dev_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/libow-dev_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
libow-perl_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/libow-perl_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
libow-php5_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/libow-php5_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
libow-tcl_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/libow-tcl_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
libowcapi-2.8-14_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/libowcapi-2.8-14_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
libownet-2.8-14_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/libownet-2.8-14_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
libownet-dev_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/libownet-dev_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
libownet-perl_2.8p14-4_all.deb
to main/o/owfs/libownet-perl_2.8p14-4_all.deb
libownet-php_2.8p14-4_all.deb
to main/o/owfs/libownet-php_2.8p14-4_all.deb
ow-shell_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/ow-shell_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
owfs-common_2.8p14-4_all.deb
to main/o/owfs/owfs-common_2.8p14-4_all.deb
owfs-dbg_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/owfs-dbg_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
owfs-doc_2.8p14-4_all.deb
to main/o/owfs/owfs-doc_2.8p14-4_all.deb
owfs-fuse_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/owfs-fuse_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
owfs_2.8p14-4.debian.tar.gz
to main/o/owfs/owfs_2.8p14-4.debian.tar.gz
owfs_2.8p14-4.dsc
to main/o/owfs/owfs_2.8p14-4.dsc
owfs_2.8p14-4_all.deb
to main/o/owfs/owfs_2.8p14-4_all.deb
owftpd_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/owftpd_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
owhttpd_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/owhttpd_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
owserver_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/owserver_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
python-ow_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
to main/o/owfs/python-ow_2.8p14-4_amd64.deb
python-ownet_2.8p14-4_all.deb
to main/o/owfs/python-ownet_2.8p14-4_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 662...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Vincent Danjean (supplier of updated owfs package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Bug#662067: [Openstack-devel] Bug#662067: glance-api: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user
Working on it. The same issue occurs with glance-registry. Ghe Rivero On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: glance-api > Version: 2012.1~e4-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts > upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then > prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. > But this is not the real problem, the real problem is that this prompt > shows up in the first place, as there was nobody modifying this conffile > at all, the package has just been installed and upgraded... > > This is a violation of policy 10.7.3, see > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3, > which says "[These scripts handling conffiles] must not ask unnecessary > questions (particularly during upgrades), and must otherwise be good > citizens." > > http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling should help with figuring > out how to do this properly. > > In http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00675.html and > followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with > severity serious. > > >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > Setting up glance-api (2012.1~e4-1) ... > > Configuration file `/etc/glance/glance-api.conf' > ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. > ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. > What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: > Y or I : install the package maintainer's version > N or O : keep your currently-installed version > D : show the differences between the versions > Z : start a shell to examine the situation > The default action is to keep your current version. > *** glance-api.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing > glance-api (--configure): > EOF on stdin at conffile prompt > > > cheers, > > Andreas > > ___ > Openstack-devel mailing list > openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/openstack-devel > -- .''`. Pienso, Luego Incordio : :' : `. `' `- www.debian.org www.hispalinux.es GPG Key: 26F020F7 GPG fingerprint: 4986 39DA D152 050B 4699 9A71 66DB 5A36 26F0 20F7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
