Bug#538822: dash and sh diversions: wouldn't it be nice to fix 538822 and 540512?
Quoting Paul Gevers (elb...@debian.org): Hi all involved, [This is a ping]. Reading through RC bug 538822 and 540512 (which were already RC during Squeeze release in 2010) I have the feeling that it is known how these bug could be fixed and changes are available in the git repository. Shouldn't we discuss this with the release team and see if we can upload the latest changes? I tried to review them, but this is to complicated for me. If we can not get this fixed for Wheezy, do we (again) need release-notes to note the fact? Or just use the Pre-Depends as mentioned in bug 538822? Willing to help, if I can. IMHO (not involved in any of these packages), now is bad time to fix these bugs: too late in the release process. What's needed is someone taking care of them as soon as possible after the release of wheezy. Such important and hairy issues should be dealt with at the beginning of a release cycle and not when we're polishing things for a release. My 2 cents, only. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#540512: dash and sh diversions: wouldn't it be nice to fix 538822 and 540512?
Christian PERRIER wrote: IMHO (not involved in any of these packages), now is bad time to fix these bugs: too late in the release process. Yes, I think we should try to fix the diversion mess in experimental, ignoring the release cycle, and wait for wheezy+1 or later before including the changes in sid. Sorry I dropped the ball on this. Help testing and tweaking the patches is always welcome. On the plus side, this means we have time to make the appropriate debootstrap improvements to get this working cleanly and well. Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688377: ferm: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/default/ferm
Hi Alexander On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:14:06PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Attached is a tentative patch to solve this issue. Hope it can help! (I have not taken any NMU upload action, only attaching the patch here). Do you agree on the proposed solution? I can do more testing with it, and in case do a NMU. Regards, Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688603: mlterm: diff for NMU version 3.1.2-1.2
Hi Ahmed On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 01:31:01AM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote: On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 08:55:18AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: case $1 in install|upgrade) if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 3.0.9 ; then People who had already upgraded from earlier versions will still have an empty directory, so the version should be adjusted. rmdir /usr/share/doc/mlterm The directory is not guaranteed to be empty at this time. Also, you want to protect this with || true to make the script idempotent (see Policy §6.2). ---end quoted text--- Thanks for your comments, I fixed the above issues in the attached script (still not tested). Any news on this? Regards, Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: fixed 665747 in 9.6.1-1squeeze2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 665747 9.6.1-1squeeze2
Bug #665747 {Done: Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.org} [ecl] testing's
/usr/bin/ecl removed from stables maintscript during upgrade
Marked as fixed in versions ecl/9.6.1-1squeeze2.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
665747: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665747
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#646642: needs update for wheezy rhythmbox
Nobuhiro, Yes I have emailed the release team to see if these changes are appropriate for wheezy. I will ping them again Best regards Charlie Smotherman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690766: fix closes both Bug#690766 and Bug#691610 for rheolef
Hi Pierre, On 2012-10-29 14:23, saramito wrote: The debian files for sid and wheezy are now ready in SVN for upload as rheolef_6.1-3. If you're asking to have it sponsored please prepare a proper package and put it somewhere I can review it, like mentors.debian.org. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: severity of 691802 is wishlist
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # This bug is a request for a newer version of the package severity 691802 wishlist Bug #691802 [debian-keyring] debian-keyring: Getting rather stale Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691802: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691802 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691847: procps: ps ax crashes, random badness if libprocps0 not upgraded too
Package: procps Version: 1:3.3.4-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system The library in procps 3.3.4 snuck through an API change but the sonames were not updated. This means if you upgrade procps to 3.3.4 but use a 3.3.3 libproc then ps ax amongst other things breaks. /etc/rcS.d/S02udev uses ps (incorrectly but that's not relevant here) and assumes udev dies so no lvm mounts get mounted and then it all goes bad real quick. The solution is to downgrade to procps 3.3.3 OR upgrade the libprocps0 to 3.3.4 The S02udev fudge is to edit that file and remove the exit after ps is called at line 133. The testing fails to fail because the packages own libraries are used during testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages procps depends on: ii initscripts 2.88dsf-32 ii libc6 2.13-35 ii libncurses5 5.9-10 ii libncursesw5 5.9-10 ii libprocps01:3.3.3-2 ii libtinfo5 5.9-10 ii lsb-base 4.1+Debian7 Versions of packages procps recommends: ii psmisc 22.20-1 procps suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/sysctl.conf changed [not included] -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690766: fix closes both Bug#690766 and Bug#691610 for rheolef
Hi Jonathan, If you're asking to have it sponsored please prepare a proper package and put it somewhere I can review it, like mentors.debian.org. Please find in attachment the debian files for rheolef_6.1-3. They have been tested with pbuilder for wheezy and sid on i386 and amd64. These files are also available as : svn co svn+ssh://x...@svn.debian.org/svn/debian-science/packages/rheolef/trunk where xyz is your login. Please let me known if these files are ok now ? Thanks, Pierre -- pierre.saram...@imag.fr Directeur de Recherche CNRS Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France http://www-ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito rheolef_6.1-3.debian.tar.gz Description: Binary data
Processed: Reopen
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 644024
Bug #644024 {Done: Michael Hanke m...@debian.org} [kbibtex] [kbibtex] New
kbibtex detroy localfile information
Unarchived Bug 644024
reopen 644024
Bug #644024 {Done: Michael Hanke m...@debian.org} [kbibtex] [kbibtex] New
kbibtex detroy localfile information
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions kbibtex/0.4~beta1-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
644024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644024: Still here
found 644024 0.4-2 thanks This bug is still here and it destroy my files Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Still here
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 644024 0.4-2 Bug #644024 [kbibtex] [kbibtex] New kbibtex detroy localfile information Marked as found in versions kbibtex/0.4-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 644024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644024 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691860: flexbackup: Recommends non-free package as the first choice
Package: flexbackup Version: 1.2.1-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The main archive area You see afio (now in non-free) is listed as the first automatic choice for recommends. --\ Recommends (2) --- afio | dump | star | pax | zip | sharutils | binutils | lzma (= 4.43-2) | rsync There are only 2 packages which violates this policy text in 2.2.1 this way now in our archive. This package is one of it. (Another one is capi4hylafax) (There are some packages which lists non-free/contrib as alternative choices for depends and recommends. That is another story.) Anyway, this package seems to be abandoned. Bug reports with patches have not been responded for last 5 years. (Fixing this bug is as simple as moving afio to suggest.) I know this is not violation of wheezy release policy which ignores dependency in recommends but still serious bug. http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy.txt I think this is best dropped considering all the situation. popcon install: 209 (0.16%) vote: 69 (0.06) Regards, Osamu -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (10, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691394: marked as done (opendkim: DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Verifiers may inappropriately convey message trust)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:32:47 + with message-id e1ttbvz-0003xi...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#691394: fixed in opendkim 2.6.8-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #691394, regarding opendkim: DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Verifiers may inappropriately convey message trust to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691394 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: opendkim Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole See http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/268267, VU#268267 opendkim in squeeze, wheezy, sid offers no method to prevent use of keys less than 1024 bits. This is added in the new upstream release, 2.6.8, that was released just for this issue. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: opendkim Source-Version: 2.6.8-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of opendkim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 691...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com (supplier of updated opendkim package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:51:42 + Source: opendkim Binary: opendkim opendkim-tools libopendkim7 libopendkim-dev libvbr2 libvbr-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.6.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mike Markley m...@markley.org Changed-By: Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com Description: libopendkim-dev - Headers and development libraries for the OpenDKIM library libopendkim7 - Library for signing and verifying DomainKeys Identified Mail sign libvbr-dev - Headers and development libraries for the OpenDKIM VBR library libvbr2- Library for RFC 5518 Vouch By Reference (VBR) opendkim - Milter implementation of DomainKeys Identified Mail opendkim-tools - Set of command line tools for OpenDKIM Closes: 691394 Changes: opendkim (2.6.8-2) unstable; urgency=low . * No-change upload to unstable . opendkim (2.6.8-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream security release to add capability to exclude use of insecure keys (Closes: #691394, LP: #1071139) . opendkim (2.6.7-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream release - Drop obsolete configure option enable-selector_header . opendkim (2.6.6-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream release . opendkim (2.6.4-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream release Checksums-Sha1: 134d6df85f58ae0468078dae6863109d5e4ceb4d 2037 opendkim_2.6.8-2.dsc 0cc40fba3e34e3e8e624e38bf99a20cdbcae6340 13237 opendkim_2.6.8-2.diff.gz f0bfd90a8e0a9dc41b3f7d85a812b5594a9c6d6b 176954 opendkim_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb 4366c7afd977b24678aa223d574b7be3d38b3dff 167846 opendkim-tools_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb c0b818c6c977902e75d6bdc5d3692fb5b8f1e4cc 86740 libopendkim7_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb 949d8f75f7ad00cf78499e1688d07e633181ba41 173570 libopendkim-dev_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb 0d9113b4d808d6e2abe47b617352efc1fb28c2e7 34924 libvbr2_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb 656f7e0078465b1122f774d09461832d33ccdbac 39628 libvbr-dev_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 35f3248871362f267ac278705f1d0f3abbab4b279c778c984733971130b6c4fa 2037 opendkim_2.6.8-2.dsc cb72f94978b850c2af540550b625dab0e61362f3f37ce0bd8a0b2c64ebdf2e6a 13237 opendkim_2.6.8-2.diff.gz c5fcafd0168351ff77be1f6192799bd0056cc34066d730a44a977d1e3a93c6fa 176954 opendkim_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb f883a99e7750f0d21cf6529a5fe53525da971e142149dee84da0880f6de0e859 167846 opendkim-tools_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb 8b87e2667ab43a95af7611e363ecd06925be3f00d265224bd4c7739128d1fdae 86740 libopendkim7_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb a9987e5a3d53182f058aeb36b0f9dd1219a0be2eb220a786daf88ec64326eabb 173570 libopendkim-dev_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb a8e254b190c19f6172f240cbb0e49246e7f6b14ac902cf663d72dbe678db176a 34924 libvbr2_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb f130abb531d4f566b5f6ad8aacffe579b09a4d3fbc7ebdff1a0151fec82e718f 39628 libvbr-dev_2.6.8-2_amd64.deb Files: c527608444eea305abdf805467772cfd 2037 mail extra opendkim_2.6.8-2.dsc dc4d43a63f9691729ae9bc7eef27f7ea
Bug#590521: marked as done (gtk2-engines-qtcurve: modifies iceweasel configuration file)
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:51:30PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: * Build with -DQTC_MODIFY_MOZILLA=false: do not modify Iceweasel and/or Firefox settings. (Closes: #590521) Again? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590521#24 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590521#29 -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#691863: capi4hylafax: recommends isdnactivecards from contrib
Package: capi4hylafax Version: 1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The main archive area Hi good to see new people taking care packages. Thanks. You see isdnactivecards (in contrib) is listed as the first automatic choice for recommends. This violate Policy 2.2.1. There are only 2 packages which violates this policy text in 2.2.1 this way now in our archive. This package is one of it. (Another one is flexbackup which has no active maintainer and was orphaned.) (There are some packages which lists non-free/contrib as alternative choices for depends and recommends. That is not good but that is another story.) What is needed to comply with policy is moving isdnactivecards from Recommends to Suggests. Please consider. You can still upload and then request unblock bug report filed to Package: release.debian.org. When you do this, please add short note at the top of README.Debian explaining for what hardware situation you need to install isdnactivecards and its related non-free firmwares. As I see this program, user needs to read files in /usr/share/doc/capi4hylafax such as README.html and README.Debian to use this package. So user will not be affected in any negative way. I know this is not violation of wheezy release policy which ignores dependency in recommends but still serious bug. http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy.txt So this serious bug can be ignored and get into wheezy. But why not make this clean. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (10, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 627152 by 690574 Bug #627152 [alsa-source] alsa-source: FTBFS on Debian Testing amd64 627152 was not blocked by any bugs. 627152 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 627152: 690574 End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 627152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#590521: marked as done (gtk2-engines-qtcurve: modifies iceweasel configuration file)
Hi, * Build with -DQTC_MODIFY_MOZILLA=false: do not modify Iceweasel and/or Firefox settings. (Closes: #590521) Again? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590521#24 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590521#29 This file is not created or modified now. Is not this is an expected result? Regards, Boris
Processed: tpu: package fgfs-base/2.4.0-1+deb7u1
Processing control commands: tags 689785 patch Bug #689785 [fgfs-base] fgfs-base: missing Breaks: fgfs-atlas due to /u/s/g/FlightGear - /u/s/g/flightgear rename Added tag(s) patch. -- 689785: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689785 691872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691872 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689886: marked as done (Ships a folder in /var/run or /var/lock (Policy Manual section 9.3.2))
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:17:29 +
with message-id e1ttdzj-0004rb...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#689886: fixed in dancer-ircd 1.0.36-8.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689886,
regarding Ships a folder in /var/run or /var/lock (Policy Manual section 9.3.2)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
689886: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689886
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: dancer-ircd
Version: 1.0.36-8
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de reported in -devel that your package
(as well as 27 others) ships a folder either in /var/run or /var/lock. This
is forbidden by policy.
Lintian detects the problem and warns as follow:
/var/run may be a temporary filesystem, so any directories or files needed
/there must be created dynamically at boot time.
Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 9.3.2 (Writing the scripts) for
details.
Severity: serious, Certainty: possible
Check: files, Type: binary, udeb
which is why I am reporting this bug with severity serious (and there fore,
release critical).
Please fix your package. I have attached what I believe is a good fix the
problem, however, I haven't tried it, and I haven't tested if something more
for creating the necessary folder at runtime should be added. Please make
sure to test before applying the patch blindly.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -u dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/init.d dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/init.d
--- dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/init.d
+++ dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/init.d
@@ -16,11 +16,19 @@
DAEMON=/usr/sbin/dancer-ircd
NAME=dancer-ircd
DESC=dancer-ircd
+RUNDIR=/var/run/dancer-ircd
test -f $DAEMON || exit 0
set -e
+if [ ! -d ${RUNDIR} ] ; then
+ mkdir -p ${RUNDIR} || true
+ if [ -d ${RUNDIR} ] ; then
+ chown dancer:dancer ${RUNDIR}
+ fi
+fi
+
case $1 in
start)
echo -n Starting $DESC:
diff -u dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/dancer-ircd.dirs dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/dancer-ircd.dirs
--- dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/dancer-ircd.dirs
+++ dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/dancer-ircd.dirs
@@ -7 +6,0 @@
-var/run/dancer-ircd
diff -u dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/dancer-ircd.postinst dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/dancer-ircd.postinst
--- dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/dancer-ircd.postinst
+++ dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/dancer-ircd.postinst
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
# limitation. Someday it will be fixed
chown $USER:$USER /var/log/dancer-ircd
- chown $USER:$USER /var/run/dancer-ircd
chown $USER:$USER /var/lib/dancer-ircd
chown $USER:$USER /var/lib/dancer-ircd/dline.conf
chown $USER:$USER /var/lib/dancer-ircd/kline.conf
diff -u dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/changelog dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/changelog
--- dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/changelog
+++ dancer-ircd-1.0.36/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dancer-ircd (1.0.36-8.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fixes handling of /var/run/dancer-ircd life cycle (Closes: #XX).
+
+ -- Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org Sun, 07 Oct 2012 10:42:26 +
+
dancer-ircd (1.0.36-8) unstable; urgency=medium
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.7.3.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: dancer-ircd
Source-Version: 1.0.36-8.1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dancer-ircd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 689...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thomas Preud'homme robo...@debian.org (supplier of updated dancer-ircd
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:12:29 +0100
Source: dancer-ircd
Binary: dancer-ircd dancer-ircd-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.0.36-8.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurélien GÉRÔME a...@roxor.cx
Changed-By: Thomas Preud'homme robo...@debian.org
Description:
dancer-ircd - an IRC server designed for centrally maintained network
dancer-ircd-doc - Dancer documentation
Closes: 689886
Changes:
dancer-ircd (1.0.36-8.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Create /var/run/dancer-ircd at runtime (Closes:
Processed: tagging 691853, severity of 691853 is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 691853 + confirmed Bug #691853 [libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl] libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid Added tag(s) confirmed. # reason: FTBFS severity 691853 serious Bug #691853 [libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl] libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#681870: marked as done (vim-addon-manager: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/vim/addon_manager.rb:125:in `map_override_lines': undefined method `override_file' for #Vim::AddonManager::Logger:0x0000000103
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:02:35 + with message-id e1ttegx-0004tm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#681870: fixed in vim-addon-manager 0.5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #681870, regarding vim-addon-manager: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/vim/addon_manager.rb:125:in `map_override_lines': undefined method `override_file' for #Vim::AddonManager::Logger:0x000103dda0 @verbosity=1 (NoMethodError) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 681870: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681870 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: vim-addon-manager Version: 0.5.0 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi With vim-addon-manager enable/disable one get the error mentioned in the subject and one cannot disable/enable a plugin. - cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-cut- carnil@sid:~/.vim/plugin$ vim-addon-manager status gnupg # Name User Status System Status gnupg installed removed carnil@sid:~/.vim/plugin$ vim-addon-manager disable gnupg /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/vim/addon_manager.rb:125:in `map_override_lines': undefined method `override_file' for #Vim::AddonManager::Logger:0x000103dda0 @verbosity=1 (NoMethodError) from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/vim/addon_manager.rb:70:in `disable' from /usr/bin/vim-addon-manager:281:in `main' carnil@sid:~/.vim/plugin$ ls -l total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 carnil carnil 39 Jul 17 11:11 gnupg.vim - /usr/share/vim-scripts/plugin/gnupg.vim carnil@sid:~/.vim/plugin$ vim-addon-manager remove gnupg Info: removing installed addon 'gnupg' from /home/carnil/.vim carnil@sid:~/.vim/plugin$ ls -l total 0 carnil@sid:~/.vim/plugin$ - cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-cut- Regards, Salvatore - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQBU0fAAoJEHidbwV/2GP++RUQAOzBt2KFGGBompqpobVT6tQ6 NMV48LuC8isycrBWuv0mfL+9xB/3sSjVcRS4J73CINAhrN2N7XT34l4hMLPkS0xr Fbof5yVdBCtPfMV93WZ1V2ecTEdXak5PbrQgBLcdgyuN4IVGMmkA4LE9J15d/V/t 2AJcQDPCU/TN2lVWpwBCmasaGZjSKs0OQZf62s8K47XWDeh0S0im29OkCQPQHt3n +lLx4GDSNfXp9Qo/k92iBpWaPWx2fgpwfKkCPXAY9oHc6p5RjJF4xFemnJi1pWWr o/aUsD+iT1HgRnAUz8+Ex3OOhV+wzVrgFdKJUZIuqrsSkBPf3Tmn0d9DKzeSn6th Ur/0t3pyUWosp7SnX9mmAL9JoMljJgCOQwk0uuy3m0zWWaxmvLg/0xBKtuhbKodt t7Yc6+sA5aEquyXSc7ihSY+4uIlke7g0yy9tcOxKYU4bDFpJbrGGB/x638sZ6J0l 52xo/kGPKu3CIAfSh8M0P0ULCLyz3hfjWrWS4YcvnNuU7ow6BdB37a3iAVn3fd/Q WmW2cGUC7t9NQch/7t47OKvnyVnbKm6IHaLWIyQqhAkwt+xa4AyNTTNk0VEhtmvu xtz5qto6Wtw0vQ4U31EaSYIzRRKcwFE4UUa+aMfrTWEgfvabG8FuAoifv52evQQ0 H55OAKzdTXkVDDERNm+y =E6og -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: vim-addon-manager Source-Version: 0.5.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vim-addon-manager, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 681...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org (supplier of updated vim-addon-manager package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:39:20 +0100 Source: vim-addon-manager Binary: vim-addon-manager Architecture: source all Version: 0.5.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Vim Maintainers pkg-vim-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org Description: vim-addon-manager - manager of addons for the Vim editor Closes: 681870 Changes: vim-addon-manager (0.5.1) unstable; urgency=low . [ James McCoy ] * Fix calls to override_file and logger.info. (Closes: #681870) . [ Antonio Terceiro ] * Fix regression that caused bash completion file to not be installed. * Fix bash completion function to work with alternative program
Bug#688604: Bug#688603: mlterm: diff for NMU version 3.1.2-1.2
Hello, On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:39:37AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Any news on this? ---end quoted text--- The fix is committed to git: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/mlterm.git;a=commit;h=732766172c77c36bf03c3281065f6eea51c60451 -- أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688069: Pending fixes for bugs in the liblocale-subcountry-perl package
tag 688069 + pending thanks Some bugs in the liblocale-subcountry-perl package are closed in revision 64daa689702f13a34d07fe86cd5d719c29b5d0e0 in branch 'master' by gregor herrmann The full diff can be seen at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/liblocale-subcountry-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=64daa68 Commit message: Add patch package.patch from Ivan Kohler: add a package declaration. Closes: #688069 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the liblocale-subcountry-perl package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 688069 + pending Bug #688069 [liblocale-subcountry-perl] liblocale-subcountry-perl: Version checks fail (our $VERSION moved before package Locale::SubCountry) Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688069: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688069 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: found 691723 in 0.05~02-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 691723 0.05~02-2 Bug #691723 [libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl] libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl: New upstream release 0.07 Marked as found in versions libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl/0.05~02-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691723 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688069: marked as done (liblocale-subcountry-perl: Version checks fail (our $VERSION moved before package Locale::SubCountry))
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:47:33 + with message-id e1tteyt-000500...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#688069: fixed in liblocale-subcountry-perl 1.56-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #688069, regarding liblocale-subcountry-perl: Version checks fail (our $VERSION moved before package Locale::SubCountry) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688069: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688069 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: liblocale-subcountry-perl Version: 1.56-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream patch Justification: (Team) Package maintainer's opinion - package unsuitable for release $ perl -e 'use Locale::SubCountry 54' Locale::SubCountry does not define $Locale::SubCountry::VERSION--version check failed at -e line 1. Sometime after version 1.50, our $VERSION = 1.xx was moved to the top of the code, above any package declaration. It is therefore not declaring $Locale::SubCountry::VERSION, and previously-working version checks like use Locale::SubCountry 1.42 now throw a fatal error. The patch below adds a package Locale::SubCountry to the beginning of the code. This seems like typical / best practice for modules, to avoid any symbol exports from the intial use statements from polluting the main:: namespace. --- SubCountry.pm.ORIG 2012-09-18 13:02:15.702774878 -0700 +++ SubCountry.pm 2012-09-18 13:30:04.351443803 -0700 @@ -314,6 +314,8 @@ #--- +package Locale::SubCountry; + use strict; use warnings; use locale; -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages liblocale-subcountry-perl depends on: ii perl 5.14.2-13 liblocale-subcountry-perl recommends no packages. liblocale-subcountry-perl suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Ivan Kohler President and Head Geek, Freeside Internet Services, Inc. http://freeside.biz/ Debian GNU/Linux developer | CPAN author | cat person | ski addict ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: liblocale-subcountry-perl Source-Version: 1.56-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of liblocale-subcountry-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 688...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated liblocale-subcountry-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:44:18 +0100 Source: liblocale-subcountry-perl Binary: liblocale-subcountry-perl Architecture: source all Version: 1.56-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Description: liblocale-subcountry-perl - module for converting state/province names to/from code Closes: 688069 Changes: liblocale-subcountry-perl (1.56-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Add patch package.patch from Ivan Kohler: add a package declaration. (Closes: #688069) * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes). Checksums-Sha1: 45f73d9716393a62a1a41808ee16eeefa2fdea00 2331 liblocale-subcountry-perl_1.56-2.dsc ef351868e0ae20dbdf00bef600ba789eadc2bf1c 4151 liblocale-subcountry-perl_1.56-2.debian.tar.gz 4f5fefa8f0d3b869bacd38769315e643e0f99984 83402 liblocale-subcountry-perl_1.56-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: d7a636c9929b58eb6216e8baae22d3cfd7353546b3f2fa188dcb7891a562b780 2331 liblocale-subcountry-perl_1.56-2.dsc 7760a8978b09fe6f7151a95a7dcdff864277511d1e616697c4799ecedc2cb6ad 4151 liblocale-subcountry-perl_1.56-2.debian.tar.gz fe6e2866463b41fb5bf1ba924b6140ac8a6d8747d8b306dc3cc823da90f166c0 83402 liblocale-subcountry-perl_1.56-2_all.deb Files: bf92a8c956005169d3540250581da96b 2331 perl optional
Bug#690355: marked as done (libfile-data-perl: (virtually) empty binary package)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:47:28 + with message-id e1tteyo-0004xa...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#690355: fixed in libfile-data-perl 1.16-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #690355, regarding libfile-data-perl: (virtually) empty binary package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690355: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690355 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libfile-data-perl Version: 1.16-1 Severity: serious Justification: virtually empty binary package -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi This was noticed in #debian-perl by jonas. libfile-data-perl's binary package is virtually empty: dpkg-deb -c libfile-data-perl_1.16-1_all.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2012-08-08 01:26 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2012-08-08 01:26 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2012-08-08 01:26 ./usr/share/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2012-08-08 01:26 ./usr/share/doc/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2012-08-08 01:26 ./usr/share/doc/libfile-data-perl/ - -rw-r--r-- root/root 181 2012-06-03 17:57 ./usr/share/doc/libfile-data-perl/README - -rw-r--r-- root/root 229 2012-06-03 17:58 ./usr/share/doc/libfile-data-perl/TODO - -rw-r--r-- root/root 1953 2012-08-08 01:26 ./usr/share/doc/libfile-data-perl/buildinfo_all.gz - -rw-r--r-- root/root 1658 2012-08-08 00:23 ./usr/share/doc/libfile-data-perl/copyright - -rw-r--r-- root/root 168 2012-08-08 01:24 ./usr/share/doc/libfile-data-perl/changelog.Debian.gz - -rw-r--r-- root/root 145 2007-02-27 16:48 ./usr/share/doc/libfile-data-perl/changelog.gz Regards, Salvatore - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQeQU/AAoJEHidbwV/2GP+bc8QANuf0AvGUXr8GDFAZU0YIQnG spVLtygL/jDazDkym/iJRiX9ghnlzN1GMaLf6gqLKoaotPGikdd3+iYW8v5Rtvgo unbaJV8O6RSjf+n6ReiRM0lnOkrg9VMLDl6B+TqodNt6KbhJKYSI900BFZDUFJ3H kbiHNg7dZBluUtKDZWZvtcHtccnTa7XGnk9KYqCVXgU+7vQ11oUoUrFMUO7cckJ4 EGHs8uXLCyOIlGe6I5MvMKsJPPWdDqCU/u+9iu6mJlXEoOART9MkCtZc7y65TYx9 GaePG10e1GYYC+z98O1SucNQfD85joFqHfSAS5LovtRYFK6GkAQl6VTr5+6J5h8O tA3LozvvoKB3A8Z9jpG/Hq2ZMlU72xpG/FmHof/bDgFkeqGbTGzDzuwk2bHX+u1w sS0NawOfyQXovHAg4sGJefrGxU80+2uDU6YVRZlfFIHAxW/tuMOFckL//UXjoOkQ 5gVvKLRY9JhMckkjKi6U53sP7beqEvHwCWPkCdTTDOI8m6QYbjDOMOzNJ8bNtbA0 aIKXlZMbnKs9pC+XRKJVre+isHkonTCPDD5S5PuL0wyQLI+CheFhna9oIiIwUIof WAAm2V9TfNbSQQ349dv3K7uilzHs1cscwSbHAPStmy/eiTRo6HuguT0a4DjAYtM7 025zuysyMe/KPb8W9WA3 =dEgm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libfile-data-perl Source-Version: 1.16-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libfile-data-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 690...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated libfile-data-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:34:28 +0100 Source: libfile-data-perl Binary: libfile-data-perl Architecture: source all Version: 1.16-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Description: libfile-data-perl - interface to file data Closes: 690355 Changes: libfile-data-perl (1.16-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * Add patch install_pm.patch: tell Makefile.PL which module to install. (Closes: #690355) Checksums-Sha1: 287c7826beb56575f857c4834954bd223339363b 2042 libfile-data-perl_1.16-2.dsc 65894a722991ad4f0ef23a684790f0d5dfdf564d 2662 libfile-data-perl_1.16-2.debian.tar.gz 73b0ad29a393d4b458d1f6a4ef0200342967db97 23236 libfile-data-perl_1.16-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 82cd98b123f836f87187e0dbdad8d441b603bacf140bfff754a0d035c6178445 2042
Bug#691863: capi4hylafax: recommends isdnactivecards from contrib
Hello Osamu, Osamu Aoki wrote on 2012-10-30 22:48: Hi good to see new people taking care packages. Thanks. It is one of my important packages (I maintain this package since 2012-06-14). What is needed to comply with policy is moving isdnactivecards from Recommends to Suggests. Please consider. You can still upload and then request unblock bug report filed to Package: release.debian.org. I already know them because of #682135 and I had tried to update the package since August (with some more fixes). But it is very difficult to get a sponsor who uploads to unstable before the release team accept this update. And after some mails with the release team I didn't get the approval for this update. Finally I stopped updating and wait for wheezy. When you do this, please add short note at the top of README.Debian explaining for what hardware situation you need to install isdnactivecards and its related non-free firmwares. As I see this program, user needs to read files in /usr/share/doc/capi4hylafax such as README.html and README.Debian to use this package. So user will not be affected in any negative way. Thanks for this hint. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691723: Pending fixes for bugs in the libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl package
tag 691723 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl package are closed in revision 19a39515852400adb34255642b11f1a13b25a44e in branch 'master' by gregor herrmann The full diff can be seen at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=19a3951 Commit message: New patch gateway.patch: change IPPay gateway server/path. Thanks: Ivan Kohler for backporting the patch. Closes: #691723 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 691723 + pending Bug #691723 [libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl] libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl: New upstream release 0.07 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691723 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Reason: FTBFS severity 691850 serious Bug #691850 [libcatalyst-view-excel-template-plus-perl] libcatalyst-view-excel-template-plus-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' severity 691855 serious Bug #691855 [libcatalyst-view-pdf-reuse-perl] libcatalyst-view-pdf-reuse-perl: Package FTBFS in Debian Sid Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691850 691855: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691855 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691723: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl: New upstream release 0.07
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:08:43 -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote: Regarding squeeze, a 0.07 package should be uploaded to squeeze-updates. Alternatively, the relevant changes (parts of https://www.freeside.biz/gitweb/?p=Business-OnlinePayment-IPPay.git;a=commitdiff;h=1f19e67636476c7119cfb41920c5b176e617c697) could be backported to 0.06. I think a minimal patch for 0.06 and, with approval of the release team, an upload to stable-proposed-updates is the most realistic way. Regarding wheezy, we should ask for a freeze exception for 0.07. Alternatively, like above, we could backport just the relevant chagnes and uplaod to testing-proposed-updates. Again, I think a backported fix would be the best; and we don't need t-p-u since testing and unstable have the same version. So 0.06-2 with the necessary fix, uploaded to unstable + an unblock bug should be fine. (Except someone gets an approval for 0.07-1 from the RT.) Here is the requested patch for 0.06. Thanks! For the record, I am moving for the next several weeks and then away visiting family, so my time is limited until December. Any help with the suggested releng steps described above would certainly be welcome. 0.06-2 uploaded to unstable, unblock request filed. I'll look at stable now. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Die Fantastischen Vier: MFG live signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#691723: marked as done (libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl: New upstream release 0.07)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:17:26 + with message-id e1ttfro-0003p8...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#691723: fixed in libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl 0.06-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #691723, regarding libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl: New upstream release 0.07 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691723 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl Version: 0.06-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: In (team) package maintainer and upstream's opinion, package unsuitable for release -- will soon be mostly unusable New upstream release 0.07 is available. Importantly, IPPay changed the gateway's server name and path, and will soon turn off the old gateway, so versions before 0.07 will stop working at that time. Regarding squeeze, a 0.07 package should be uploaded to squeeze-updates. Alternatively, the relevant changes (parts of https://www.freeside.biz/gitweb/?p=Business-OnlinePayment-IPPay.git;a=commitdiff;h=1f19e67636476c7119cfb41920c5b176e617c697) could be backported to 0.06. Regarding wheezy, we should ask for a freeze exception for 0.07. Alternatively, like above, we could backport just the relevant chagnes and uplaod to testing-proposed-updates. -- _ivan ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl Source-Version: 0.06-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 691...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:59:17 +0100 Source: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl Binary: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.06-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Description: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl - backend for IPPay in Business::OnlinePayment framework Closes: 691723 Changes: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl (0.06-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * New patch gateway.patch: change IPPay gateway server/path. Thanks to Ivan Kohler for backporting the patch. (Closes: #691723) Checksums-Sha1: 3e49ada9442dd94530fade7ad3abd75ad37b4f86 2450 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.06-2.dsc 1dd582fb606afe3dfb540cefc435fb8f4ca6c976 3863 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.06-2.debian.tar.gz c15d78c68a6818c9c0956102f607144095f57820 12606 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.06-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: d522885ae69b873e56c9d2528603a121f87b806e68634a72662d51b3c975f3b5 2450 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.06-2.dsc cc5c2596a131f0185f5b7ecbfd9617901df599a509741946f2a630a22e857e52 3863 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.06-2.debian.tar.gz 3ee54a3536bfdf38cfbe270e0e114103ef702d38837e86a67061446f5458041d 12606 libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.06-2_all.deb Files: 3569d28dbcc16b04e1c87ede3dfb6db6 2450 perl optional libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.06-2.dsc d1792664542e50b6a2413da79e58cc2f 3863 perl optional libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.06-2.debian.tar.gz f34d6601222fc3e7588ece5f70fcd8f5 12606 perl optional libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl_0.06-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkAevAAoJELs6aAGGSaoGJkQQAL4NPT5T9djmVkODyv8dM8ll iDC0OSj0ktoCsl/BDyTOCjGSBlK+asPmdQsJiOX5sCRWyw+fm46IRAUJrrXOuX7n U1ve1AM/hO/d2R7fPJrgRPDveUDBH5P/glc1XhUihGZhGU7dhCY9R6rx6NsvRP6e KXQrxSaH3IZ19N9rSTLH7q7SA/f+EdAmW75nDYIwN2CX311rLu0z2Vluz3y2S5zw GzeXoSoS8qWs0FyA+rJ/rEVBJISA2aFF3bkWwNjzrvcp3p3bYyW89QheP16e5qNd /xNIV7AumsazsTZEOxnXqlvOOoKHFWvhKrsSeEVKvtjcNQa+AOPONL185WDlOJWk MoC3xCiseKS6ovCHJigF/eFTIeiNC6btyJPHHNXYv9eZgaYAqyjshbl7LYPSME+b
Bug#689779: marked as done (pptpd: modifies conffiles during squeeze2wheezy upgrade (policy 10.7.3): /etc/pptpd.conf, /etc/init.d/pptpd, /etc/ppp/pptpd-options)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:17:32 + with message-id e1ttfru-0003uk...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#689779: fixed in pptpd 1.3.4-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #689779, regarding pptpd: modifies conffiles during squeeze2wheezy upgrade (policy 10.7.3): /etc/pptpd.conf, /etc/init.d/pptpd, /etc/ppp/pptpd-options to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 689779: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689779 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: pptpd Version: 1.3.4-5 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles. This is forbidden by the policy, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files 10.7.3: [...] The easy way to achieve this behavior is to make the configuration file a conffile. [...] This implies that the default version will be part of the package distribution, and must not be modified by the maintainer scripts during installation (or at any other time). Note that once a package ships a modified version of that conffile, dpkg will prompt the user for an action how to handle the upgrade of this modified conffile (that was not modified by the user). Further in 10.7.3: [...] must not ask unnecessary questions (particularly during upgrades) [...] If a configuration file is customized by a maintainer script after having asked some debconf questions, it may not be marked as a conffile. Instead a template could be installed in /usr/share and used by the postinst script to fill in the custom values and create (or update) the configuration file (preserving any user modifications!). This file must be removed during postrm purge. ucf(1) may help with these tasks. See also http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling In https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/09/msg00412.html and followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with severity serious. debsums reports modification of the following files, from the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): /etc/pptpd.conf /etc/init.d/pptpd /etc/ppp/pptpd-options I couldn't reproduce this on a normal installation, it happens only on upgrades. cheers, Andreas pptpd_1.3.4-5.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pptpd Source-Version: 1.3.4-5.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pptpd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 689...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de (supplier of updated pptpd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:19:04 +0100 Source: pptpd Binary: pptpd bcrelay Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.3.4-5.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Rene Mayrhofer rm...@debian.org Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Description: bcrelay- Broadcast relay daemon pptpd - PoPToP Point to Point Tunneling Server Closes: 689779 Changes: pptpd (1.3.4-5.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload * Remove debian/conffiles, avoids debsum mismatches regarding conffiles (Closes: #689779) Checksums-Sha1: bb0749ae3d0d91a01623ceaf02f7fd29e79e854a 1077 pptpd_1.3.4-5.1.dsc 790518e09b33fd0c9e0c79c69de536d0c03e3261 12561 pptpd_1.3.4-5.1.diff.gz da525ab5dc201dea00f81941902990b2b7a102e2 94744 pptpd_1.3.4-5.1_i386.deb e965263e933810461a6cbad083de42e19caa7aaf 22410 bcrelay_1.3.4-5.1_i386.deb Checksums-Sha256: 605a618af59c5489495a12c1fc5d93dcfc345cb85c06dd68590542a2a5fc52ba 1077 pptpd_1.3.4-5.1.dsc 306714b22426e70e32b3f29b657dd1053072a443636c1ee67014eb778f2b7a89 12561 pptpd_1.3.4-5.1.diff.gz 9802627153efc821a1a52b2a1978e4ab6c4730927849998a0732e24f7bc71822 94744 pptpd_1.3.4-5.1_i386.deb 1feed9d2cdaf859a18f101688006f67f9f1c335b9672b3428a4ce52790d9189b 22410 bcrelay_1.3.4-5.1_i386.deb Files: 37be42fe93c09e49de5f7df22292d2a6 1077 net optional pptpd_1.3.4-5.1.dsc 494dc106bc3a1d88eef507be71e2d48d 12561 net optional
Bug#691883: Multiple security issues
Package: mahara Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following security issues need to be fixed in mahara. Remember we're in freeze, so please only upload minimal security fixes: CVE-2012-2247: https://mahara.org/interaction/forum/topic.php?id=4938 https://bugs.launchpad.net/mahara/+bug/1061980 CVE-2012-2246: https://mahara.org/interaction/forum/topic.php?id=493 https://bugs.launchpad.net/mahara/+bug/1057240 CVE-2012-2244: https://mahara.org/interaction/forum/topic.php?id=4936 https://bugs.launchpad.net/mahara/+bug/1057238 CVE-2012-2243 https://mahara.org/interaction/forum/topic.php?id=4937 https://bugs.launchpad.net/mahara/+bug/1055232 https://bugs.launchpad.net/mahara/+bug/1063480 Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659301: problem
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:43:52PM +0400, Pavel Baranov wrote: Package: icedove Version: 3.0.11-1+squeeze7 Severity: normal Hello! After upgrade the debian system to version 6.0.4, ice dove write: /usr/lib/icedove/icedove-bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/icedove/components/libimgicon.so: undefined symbol: NS_Get_ServiceManager after remove libimgicon.so write: /usr/lib/icedove/icedove-bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/icedove/components/libmailcomps.so: undefined symbol: NS_CStringContainerInit After removing libimgicon.so and libmailcomps.so run. I am using Debian 6.0.4, kernel linux-image-2.6.32-5-686, icedove-3.0.11-1+squeeze7, icedove-l10n-ru-3.0.10-1 Does this still occur with Squeeze 6.0.6? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659994: [regression] icedove: symbol lookup error: [...]/libdbusservice.so: undefined symbol: NS_Alloc
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, Am 21.02.2012 19:46, schrieb Christoph Goehre: On Mi, Feb 15, 2012 at 05:34:45 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: since the last security update for icedove, the program does not start on several computers here. Instead the following error message is displayed: /usr/lib/icedove/icedove-bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/icedove/components/libdbusservice.so: undefined symbol: NS_Alloc I could reproduce it, but I need to move my .icedove profile away. If I downgrade to libc6 version 2.11.2-10, everything is working fine. So here my steps to reproduce: 1) add deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20111215/ squeeze main to /etc/apt/sources.list and run 'apt-get update' 2) install older libc6 apt-get install libc-bin=2.11.2-10 libc-dev-bin=2.11.2-10 libc6=2.11.2-10 libc6-dev=2.11.2-10 libc6-i386=2.11.2-10 locales=2.11.2-10 3) rerun Icedove Same here: icedove starts with the older version of libc6, but not with version 2.11.3-3. The same is true when also downgrading icedove to 3.0.11-1+squeeze6 (works with old libc6, not with newer libc6). I can also upgrade libc6 to 2.11.3-3 and icedove continues working, but if I also change the version of icedove (by either upgrading or downgrading), icedove again refuses to start. So this seems to be something triggered by running icedove after an update. Does this still occur with Squeeze 6.0.6 ? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671483: icedove: crashes on startup with failed assertion
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:04:59PM +0100, Tim Chadburn wrote:
Package: icedove
Version: 3.0.11-1+squeeze9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I've had icedove working fine for ages, up to and including the last version
(3.0.11-1+squeeze8), but the latest version (3.0.11-1+squeeze9) breaks it.
When
icedove is started, the icedove window appears for about a second, and then,
while the status bar at the bottom says Looking for folders..., Icedove
crashes with the following terminal output:
icedove-bin: gconv.c:75: __gconv: Assertion `outbuf != ((void *)0) *outbuf
!= ((void *)0)' failed.
/usr/lib/icedove/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 4455 Aborted
$prog ${1+$@}
Does this still occur with Squeeze 6.0.6?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682019: icedove: Please package thunderbird 14. The bug fix list is impressive.
severity 682019 wishlist thanks On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:28:37PM +0200, valette wrote: Package: icedove Version: 11.0-1 Severity: wishlist Thunderbird is now loagging 3 versions behind. Wheezy will ship icedove based on the ESR 10.x branch to allow keeping the same security patches for iceweasel, iceape and icedove. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689417: opencryptoki: CVE-2012-4454 CVE-2012-4455
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:57:38PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 14:37 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Please see the thread starting at http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/07/2 for details. I've had a quick look at this bug to see if it can be fixed in Debian. There are four patches referenced in the thread (I haven't verified if there are more patches required): - http://opencryptoki.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=opencryptoki/opencryptoki;a=commitdiff;h=b7fcb3eb0319183348f1f4fb90ede4edd6487c30 32 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 1166 deletions(-) This change is huge and mainly seems to be quivalent to setting SPINXPL as defined and ensuring SYSVSEM isn't. There are however a few other changes in there which may be due to the removal of the compatibility code. This patch doesn't apply cleanly to 2.3.1 in Debian but I've managed to manually fix it (attached is a version if anyone is interested). - http://opencryptoki.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=opencryptoki/opencryptoki;a=commitdiff;h=58345488c9351d9be9a4be27c8b407c2706a33a9 31 files changed, 2975 insertions(+), 280 deletions(-) Lots of changes in the tests but it also seems to contain some cleanups related to the previous change, a change from lock_shm() to XProcLock(), some moving of locks to /var/lock and a few other changes. - http://opencryptoki.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=opencryptoki/opencryptoki;a=commitdiff;h=8a63b3b17d34718d0f8c7525f93b5eb3c623076a 23 files changed, 449 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) Includes a FAQ typo fix and the introduction of a lot of new code. - http://opencryptoki.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=opencryptoki/opencryptoki;a=commitdiff;h=5667edb52cd27b7e512f48f823b4bcc6b872ab15 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Very small change in the Makfile which creates the lock directory. Should not be relevant for Debian because subdirectories of /var/lock should be created on the fly. The changes are huge and can probably not be easily backported to Debian's 2.3.1. A few other options come to mind: - see if upstream can provide patches for 2.3.1 - see if the necessary fixes can be made some other way - upgrade to upstream 2.4.2 - remove from wheezy (the only reverse dependency for opencryptoki seems to be tpm-tools) Anyway, I don't think I can do much more for this bug because I'm afraid it will take a little more time than I have available at the moment. I was having a look and I though I would just add my notes to the bug log. Good luck with this bug! ;) Removing opencryptoki from Wheezy seems best to me. We should't keep outdated crypto toolkits without an active maintainer in the archive. CCing the Pierre, the tpm-tools maintainer to see, whether tpm-tools is usable withput opencryptoki or whether he's interested in adopting it himself. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690672: librdmacm: CVE-2012-4516
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:14:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 13:33 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Whilst this has now been fixed in unstable, it was via the upload of a new upstream which adds over 2000 lines of new code (and doesn't even directly include the security fix) and with a debhelper compat bump thrown in on the packaging side. [...] I can easily prepare a 1.0.15-2 package that has just the CVE fix in it relative to what's in wheezy, but is there anywhere I can upload it to so that it gets into wheezy? Yes, t-p-u. :-) (i.e. testing-proposed-updates). A version of 1.0.15-1+deb7u1 would be more conventional here, in order to indicate that the upload was made out of sequence and specifically targeted at wheezy rather than unstable. 1.0.15-2 would work, assuming it's never been used for any upload to Debian. Please prepare the upload, using wheezy as the distribution in the changelog and attach the debdiff to a release.debian.org unblock bug - reportbug will create a correctly usertagged bug - indicating in the body of the report that it's intended for t-p-u. We'll check the debdiff and assuming everything is okay you can then upload to ftp-master as usual. Roland, can you please post the debdiff? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: icedove: Please package thunderbird 14. The bug fix list is impressive.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 682019 wishlist Bug #682019 [icedove] icedove: Please package thunderbird 14. The bug fix list is impressive. Bug #682403 [icedove] icedove: New upstream (14)/3 missing (security related) updates Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'grave' Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 682019: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682019 682403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682403 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691723: squeeze patch
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:27:19 -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote: Didn't realize squeeze had an earlier version. Here is a patch for squeeze. Not sure I got the Deb version increment right for this situation. Thanks, updated package prepared in git (squeeze branch) and pu bug sent to the release team. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Ostbahn-Kurti Die Chefpartie: Neiche Schoin signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: fgfs-base: diff for NMU version 2.6.0-1.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 689785 + pending Bug #689785 [fgfs-base] fgfs-base: missing Breaks: fgfs-atlas due to /u/s/g/FlightGear - /u/s/g/flightgear rename Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689785: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689785 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689785: fgfs-base: diff for NMU version 2.6.0-1.1
tags 689785 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for fgfs-base (versioned as 2.6.0-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. I also prepared a version to tpu (versioned as 2.4.0-1+deb7u1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/12 (see #691872). Regards. David diff -Nru fgfs-base-2.6.0/debian/changelog fgfs-base-2.6.0/debian/changelog --- fgfs-base-2.6.0/debian/changelog 2012-07-15 22:55:48.0 -0400 +++ fgfs-base-2.6.0/debian/changelog 2012-10-30 11:54:43.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +fgfs-base (2.6.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * debian/control: Breaks: fgfs-atlas (= 0.3.1-2+b999) for fgfs-atlas. +Closes: #689785. + + -- David Prévot taf...@debian.org Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:54:35 -0400 + fgfs-base (2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. diff -Nru fgfs-base-2.6.0/debian/control fgfs-base-2.6.0/debian/control --- fgfs-base-2.6.0/debian/control 2012-07-15 22:44:41.0 -0400 +++ fgfs-base-2.6.0/debian/control 2012-10-30 11:53:45.0 -0400 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Package: fgfs-base Architecture: all Depends: tzdata -Breaks: flightgear ( 2.6.0) +Breaks: flightgear ( 2.6.0), fgfs-atlas (= 0.3.1-2+b999) Description: Flight Gear Flight Simulator -- base files Flight Gear is a free and highly sophisticated flight simulator. . signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed (with 1 errors): your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 622986 - fix-upstream Unknown tag/s: fix-upstream. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore squeeze squeeze-ignore wheezy wheezy-ignore. Bug #622986 [kmail] kmail: KMail crashes right after login Requested to remove no tags; doing nothing. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622986 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Tuesday 30 October 19:03:37 UTC 2012 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: ruby-capistrano-ext tags 657822 + pending Bug #657822 [wnpp] ITP: ruby-capistrano-ext -- Useful task libraries and methods for Capistrano Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: mpdris2 tags 687258 + pending Bug #687258 [wnpp] ITP: mpdris2 -- media player interface (MPRIS2) bridge for MPD Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: a href=http://packages.qa.debian.org/procps;procps/a tags 677903 + pending Bug #677903 [procps] procps: vmstat crashes with SIGFPE Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: a href=http://packages.qa.debian.org/procps;procps/a tags 691847 + pending Bug #691847 [procps] procps: ps ax crashes, random badness if libprocps0 not upgraded too Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: ruby-rails-i18n tags 691858 + pending Bug #691858 [wnpp] ITP: ruby-rails-i18n -- locale data and translations to internationalize and/or localize Rails applications Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 657822: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657822 677903: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677903 687258: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687258 691847: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691847 691858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691858 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691202: marked as done (Missing B-D to cdbs)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:13:37 + with message-id 509026e1.2000...@rossfamily.co.uk and subject line Invalid has caused the Debian Bug report #691202, regarding Missing B-D to cdbs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691202: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691202 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libswingx1-java Version: 1:1.0-1 Severity: serious Package is missing B-D to cdbs and as such FTBFS. Marking as serious. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This bug cannot be reproduced - the package builds fine in clean chroots.---End Message---
Bug#691203: marked as done (Missing B-D to ant)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:13:58 + with message-id 509026f6.1050...@rossfamily.co.uk and subject line Invalid has caused the Debian Bug report #691203, regarding Missing B-D to ant to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libswingx1-java Version: 1:1.0-1 Severity: serious I cannot build the package on a stable system. It currently fails with: mkdir -p . cd . /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -classpath /usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/java/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/lib/tools.jar -Dant.home=/usr/share/ant org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dpackage=swingx1 -Dversion=1.0 -buildfile debian/build.xml package javadoc Buildfile: /tmp/libswingx1-java-1.0/debian/build.xml package: BUILD FAILED /tmp/libswingx1-java-1.0/debian/build.xml:37: The following error occurred while executing this line: /tmp/libswingx1-java-1.0/debian/build.xml:21: The following error occurred while executing this line: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /usr/share/maven-ant-helper/maven-build.xml (No such file or directory) at java.io.FileInputStream.open(Native Method) at java.io.FileInputStream.init(FileInputStream.java:137) at org.apache.tools.ant.helper.ProjectHelper2.parse(ProjectHelper2.java:246) at org.apache.tools.ant.helper.ProjectHelper2.parse(ProjectHelper2.java:177) at org.apache.tools.ant.ProjectHelper.configureProject(ProjectHelper.java:80) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Ant.execute(Ant.java:392) at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:106) at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Sequential.execute(Sequential.java:68) at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:106) at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.MacroInstance.execute(MacroInstance.java:398) at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:106) at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348) at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:390) at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:411) at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1360) at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1329) at org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExecutor.java:41) at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1212) at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:801) at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.startAnt(Main.java:218) at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.start(Main.java:180) at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.main(Main.java:269) Total time: 0 seconds make: *** [debian/stamp-ant-build] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This bug cannot be reproduced - the package builds fine in clean chroots.---End Message---
Bug#681870: bumping severity
severity 681870 important thanks On 30.10.2012 02:12, Michael Biebl wrote: severity 681870 grave thanks Hi, just tried vim-addon-manager today. With this bug, the tool is basically useless. Bumping the severity since I think this should be fixed for wheezy. My bad, apparently I have to use the install command to enable an addon and not the enable command. Should have read the man page more carefully. So I'm lowering the severity again. That said, it still would be nice to see the fix in wheezy. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: bumping severity
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 681870 important
Bug #681870 {Done: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org}
[src:vim-addon-manager] vim-addon-manager:
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/vim/addon_manager.rb:125:in `map_override_lines':
undefined method `override_file' for
#Vim::AddonManager::Logger:0x000103dda0 @verbosity=1 (NoMethodError)
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
681870: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681870
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691890: general: sudoers problem
Package: general Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash I can not install any software, because if I type 'sudo su' and type the correct Password I get only: USER is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported. I am the Admin, but I cannot do anything to personalyse my KDE Debian System. I also cannot edit the sudoers file, witch is empty, because I have not the Privileges to edit/Save the file Please send me help per e-mail Thank you! PS: I am sorry for my bad english, I am german -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 691863 682135 Bug #691863 [capi4hylafax] capi4hylafax: recommends isdnactivecards from contrib Bug #682135 [capi4hylafax] capi4hylafax: recommends isdnactivecards from contrib Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' Merged 682135 691863 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 682135: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682135 691863: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691863 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677861: lftp: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef __int32_t gl_intptr_t'
Hello Robert Millan! On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:44:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2012/6/17 Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org: ../lib/stdint.h:295:18: error: 'gl_intptr_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef long int gl_intptr_t' The problem is that lib/stdint.h is hijacking system headers with definitions such as: #define intptr_t gl_intptr_t #define uintptr_t gl_uintptr_t It also does undef prior to that. So if system headers got included first, it should work but it seems it gets included after (and that's why it looks like the system header is defining gl_intptr_t when it's really typedefing intptr_t). Looks like lib/stdint.in.h tries to include the system header first, if it has been detected as existing (and configure output seems to indicate that it did find it). I guess someone needs to untangle all the preprocessor and configure macros in lib/stdint.in.h. If someone from the kfreebsd camp could post the generated lib/stdint.h that would be helpful to be able to see things a bit more clearly. causing them to missbehave. These defines need to be removed. If you want intptr_t, etc, you can get them from stdint.h as usual. Just removing this part of stdint.in.h could be used as a hack to get things to build on kfreebsd (since it's not used on linux), sure. That's not suitable for upstream though Another possibility to hack around the problem could be to add #define __intptr_t_defined to stdint.in.h. Still ugly, but would hopefully avoid breaking (upstream target) platforms that do need the (re)defines. Begs to be asked why kfreebsd headers aren't C99 compatible though... or are the configure tests invalid? Or wait, I don't want to know. -- Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#685812: ABI change in 1.6.1 version
I found the cause of this bug: in numpy/core/include/numpy/ndarraytypes.h, in the enum NPY_TYPES, the value NPY_CHAR has changed between NumPy 1.5 and 1.6 (more precisely, it was increased by 3, because new types were introduced). python-scientific uses this enum value at several places (under its alias PyArray_CHAR). Hence the bug. I verified that replacing PyArray_CHAR by (PyArray_CHAR+3) in python-scientific and then compiling against NumPy 1.5 creates a package which is ABI compatible with NumPy 1.6. This is clearly an ABI breakage in NumPy. I don't see how to fix it without bumping the ABI number. Since NPY_CHAR must apparently come after NPY_NTYPES in the enum (the latter counts the number of types), it seems difficult to patch NumPy 1.6 so that NPY_CHAR keeps the same value as in 1.5. What remains unclear to me is whether NPY_CHAR is really meant to be part of the external API. It looks like the NumPy maintainers are well-aware of ABI compatibility issues in this very enum (see the comments in the 1.6 source file), so maybe the change is on purpose. In that latter case, it is python-scientific which is buggy. That remains to be clarified. -- .''`.Sébastien Villemot : :' :Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594 pgp5jgWBcAA5b.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#691860: [PATCH] Remove non-free recommendation
tags 691860 + patch thanks flexbackup_1.2.1-6.1.debdiff Description: Binary data
Processed: [PATCH] Remove non-free recommendation
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 691860 + patch Bug #691860 [flexbackup] flexbackup: Recommends non-free package as the first choice Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691860: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691860 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691890: marked as done (general: sudoers problem)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:26:05 + with message-id 1351628765.13356.19.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk and subject line Re: Bug#691890: general: sudoers problem has caused the Debian Bug report #691890, regarding general: sudoers problem to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691890 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: general Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash I can not install any software, because if I type 'sudo su' and type the correct Password I get only: USER is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported. I am the Admin, but I cannot do anything to personalyse my KDE Debian System. I also cannot edit the sudoers file, witch is empty, because I have not the Privileges to edit/Save the file Please send me help per e-mail Thank you! PS: I am sorry for my bad english, I am german ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 21:10 +0100, Y wrote: Package: general Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash I can not install any software, because if I type 'sudo su' and type the correct Password I get only: USER is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported. I am the Admin, but I cannot do anything to personalyse my KDE Debian System. I also cannot edit the sudoers file, witch is empty, because I have not the Privileges to edit/Save the file This is not a bug. Remember not to delete /etc/sudoers again. Please send me help per e-mail Thank you! PS: I am sorry for my bad english, I am german Then ask for help on debian-user-ger...@lists.debian.org Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Humans are not rational beings; they are rationalising beings. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message---
Processed: tagging 685812
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 685812 - moreinfo Bug #685812 [python-numpy] ABI change in 1.6.1 version Removed tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 685812: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685812 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691863: api4hylafax: recommends isdnactivecards from contrib
What is needed to comply with policy is moving isdnactivecards from Recommends to Suggests. Please consider. You can still upload and then request unblock bug report filed to Package: release.debian.org. I already know them because of #682135 and I had tried to update the package since August (with some more fixes). But it is very difficult to get a sponsor who uploads to unstable before the release team accept this update. And after some mails with the release team I didn't get the approval for this update. Finally I stopped updating and wait for wheezy. As the maintainer of this package, it is your responsibility to set the appropriate bug severity so that the rest of us know how critical the issue is, and how important the sponsorship would be. Finally, I don't see a request on sponsorship-requests anyway: http://bugs.debian.org/sponsorship-requests Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 641732
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Probably missing a sid tag tags 641732 + sid Bug #641732 [apt-p2p] apt-p2p: Failed to load application: cannot import name OpProgress Bug #635969 [apt-p2p] /usr/sbin/apt-p2p: Failed to load application: cannot import name OpProgress Added tag(s) sid. Added tag(s) sid. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 635969: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635969 641732: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641732 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691860: flexbackup: Recommends non-free package as the first choice
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/2. Please see attached patch. Best wishes, Mike flexbackup.patch Description: Binary data
Processed: reassign bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 691890 sudo
Bug #691890 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [general] general:
sudoers problem
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'sudo'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #691890 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #691890 to the same values
previously set
severity 691890 normal
Bug #691890 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [sudo] general:
sudoers problem
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
691890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691890
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677861: lftp: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef __int32_t gl_intptr_t'
Andreas Henriksson andr...@fatal.se writes:
I guess someone needs to untangle all the preprocessor and configure
macros in lib/stdint.in.h.
If someone from the kfreebsd camp could post the generated lib/stdint.h
that would be helpful to be able to see things a bit more clearly.
For the version in wheezy
/* DO NOT EDIT! GENERATED AUTOMATICALLY! */
/* Copyright (C) 2001-2002, 2004-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Written by Paul Eggert, Bruno Haible, Sam Steingold, Peter Burwood.
This file is part of gnulib.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option)
any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/. */
/*
* ISO C 99 stdint.h for platforms that lack it.
* http://www.opengroup.org/susv3xbd/stdint.h.html
*/
#ifndef _GL_STDINT_H
#if __GNUC__ = 3
#pragma GCC system_header
#endif
/* When including a system file that in turn includes inttypes.h,
use the system inttypes.h, not our substitute. This avoids
problems with (for example) VMS, whose sys/bitypes.h includes
inttypes.h. */
#define _GL_JUST_INCLUDE_SYSTEM_INTTYPES_H
/* On Android (Bionic libc), sys/types.h includes this file before
having defined 'time_t'. Therefore in this case avoid including
other system header files; just include the system's stdint.h.
Ideally we should test __BIONIC__ here, but it is only defined after
sys/cdefs.h has been included; hence test __ANDROID__ instead. */
#if defined __ANDROID__ \
defined _SYS_TYPES_H_ !defined _SSIZE_T_DEFINED_
# include_next stdint.h
#else
/* Get those types that are already defined in other system include
files, so that we can #define int8_t signed char below without
worrying about a later system include file containing a typedef
signed char int8_t; that will get messed up by our macro. Our
macros should all be consistent with the system versions, except
for the fast types and macros, which we recommend against using
in public interfaces due to compiler differences. */
#if 1
# if defined __sgi ! defined __c99
/* Bypass IRIX's stdint.h if in C89 mode, since it merely annoys users
with This header file is to be used only for c99 mode compilations
diagnostics. */
# define __STDINT_H__
# endif
/* Some pre-C++11 stdint.h implementations need this. */
# ifdef __cplusplus
# ifndef __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
# define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS 1
# endif
# ifndef __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
# define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS 1
# endif
# endif
/* Other systems may have an incomplete or buggy stdint.h.
Include it before inttypes.h, since any #include stdint.h
in inttypes.h would reinclude us, skipping our contents because
_GL_STDINT_H is defined.
The include_next requires a split double-inclusion guard. */
# include_next stdint.h
#endif
#if ! defined _GL_STDINT_H ! defined _GL_JUST_INCLUDE_SYSTEM_STDINT_H
#define _GL_STDINT_H
/* sys/types.h defines some of the stdint.h types as well, on glibc,
IRIX 6.5, and OpenBSD 3.8 (via machine/types.h).
AIX 5.2 sys/types.h isn't needed and causes troubles.
MacOS X 10.4.6 sys/types.h includes stdint.h (which is us), but
relies on the system stdint.h definitions, so include
sys/types.h after stdint.h. */
#if 1 ! defined _AIX
# include sys/types.h
#endif
/* Get LONG_MIN, LONG_MAX, ULONG_MAX. */
#include limits.h
#if 1
/* In OpenBSD 3.8, inttypes.h includes machine/types.h, which defines
int{8,16,32,64}_t, uint{8,16,32,64}_t and __BIT_TYPES_DEFINED__.
inttypes.h also defines intptr_t and uintptr_t. */
# include inttypes.h
#elif 0
/* Solaris 7 sys/inttypes.h has the types except the *_fast*_t types, and
the macros except for *_FAST*_*, INTPTR_MIN, PTRDIFF_MIN, PTRDIFF_MAX. */
# include sys/inttypes.h
#endif
#if 1 ! defined __BIT_TYPES_DEFINED__
/* Linux libc4 = 4.6.7 and libc5 have a sys/bitypes.h that defines
int{8,16,32,64}_t and __BIT_TYPES_DEFINED__. In libc5 = 5.2.2 it is
included by sys/types.h. */
# include sys/bitypes.h
#endif
#undef _GL_JUST_INCLUDE_SYSTEM_INTTYPES_H
/* Minimum and maximum values for an integer type under the usual assumption.
Return an unspecified value if BITS == 0, adding a check to pacify
picky compilers. */
#define _STDINT_MIN(signed, bits, zero) \
((signed) ? (- ((zero) + 1) ((bits) ? (bits) - 1 : 0)) : (zero))
#define _STDINT_MAX(signed, bits, zero) \
((signed) \
? ~ _STDINT_MIN (signed, bits, zero) \
: /* The expression for the unsigned
Bug#536736: ncurses-hexedit: Seg faults when you search for text that is not in the file.
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/2. Please see attached patch. Best wishes, Mike ncurses.patch Description: Binary data
Bug#691853: libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please see attached patch. Best wishes, Mike libapp.patch Description: Binary data
Bug#691850: libcatalyst-view-excel-template-plus-perl: FTBFS
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please see attached patch. Best wishes, Mike excel.patch Description: Binary data
Bug#691855: libcatalyst-view-pdf-reuse-perl: Package FTBFS
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please see attached patch. Best wishes, Mike pdf.patch Description: Binary data
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 689420 grave Bug #689420 [src:linux] Linux does not boot on Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor (2.60GHz Turbo) Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689420 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: notfound 689420 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64/3.2.30-1 ..., found 689420 in linux/3.2.30-1 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 689420 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64/3.2.30-1 Bug #689420 [src:linux] Linux does not boot on Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor (2.60GHz Turbo) The source linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 and version 3.2.30-1 do not appear to match any binary packages No longer marked as found in versions linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64/3.2.30-1. notfound 689420 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64/3.2.32-1 Bug #689420 [src:linux] Linux does not boot on Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor (2.60GHz Turbo) The source linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 and version 3.2.32-1 do not appear to match any binary packages No longer marked as found in versions linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64/3.2.32-1. found 689420 linux/3.2.30-1 Bug #689420 [src:linux] Linux does not boot on Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor (2.60GHz Turbo) Marked as found in versions linux/3.2.30-1. found 689420 linux/3.2.32-1 Bug #689420 [src:linux] Linux does not boot on Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor (2.60GHz Turbo) Marked as found in versions linux/3.2.32-1. severity 689420 important Bug #689420 [src:linux] Linux does not boot on Intel Core i7-3720QM Processor (2.60GHz Turbo) Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689420 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691853: Pending fixes for bugs in the libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl package
tag 691853 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl package are closed in revision 11e2d1510493581da36aec098572c9c5c686173c in branch 'master' by Salvatore Bonaccorso The full diff can be seen at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=11e2d15 Commit message: Add missing (build-)dependencies Fix FTBFS due to missing (build-)dependencies on App::Cmd and Term::ReadKey. Add (Build-)Depends(-Indep) on libapp-cmd-perl and libterm-readkey-perl. Thanks: Angel Abad an...@debian.org Closes: #691853 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 691853 + pending Bug #691853 [libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl] libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691850: libcatalyst-view-excel-template-plus-perl: FTBFS
Michael Gilbert schrieb am Tuesday, den 30. October 2012: Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please see attached patch. Please revert this upload, I want to do it on my own. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691855: libcatalyst-view-pdf-reuse-perl: Package FTBFS
Michael Gilbert schrieb am Tuesday, den 30. October 2012: Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please see attached patch. Please revert this upload, I want to do this on my own. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691863: api4hylafax: recommends isdnactivecards from contrib
Hello Michael, In June I was very lucky as I got the overtaken package 'capi4hylafax' still in testing before freeze. Since then I have found some small problems with the package and I searched for a way to update the package in the freeze period (I am only DM). Michael Gilbert wrote on 2012-10-30 16:41: As the maintainer of this package, it is your responsibility to set the appropriate bug severity so that the rest of us know how critical the issue is, and how important the sponsorship would be. In theory I know I can change bug severities, but in respect to the person who send a bug report I do it not often. Finally, I don't see a request on sponsorship-requests anyway: http://bugs.debian.org/sponsorship-requests I uploaded to mentors.d.n at 05.08.2012 and wrote an RFS at 06.08.2012. Then I had some responses from Bart Martens with questions to the fixes in this package. It seemed the fixes are not so important for the wheezy release. Then I have removed my update and the RFS where closed (by Bart Martens at 19.08.2012). Then I have started my request at 14.08.2012 to the release-team about update permission of this package. In October Julien Cristau had answered and asked some questions about the fixes of the updated packages. Some changes seems to be irrelevant or must be resolved in another way. Finally it remained only the fix because of the recommended package isdnactivecards. Now with the new bug report (the second about the same problem) it seems this problem should be solved. On the other hand this problem creates no problem while installing or using capi4hylafax. And now I have the same question as weeks before: is it important enough to ask again the release team about permission for an updated package? I think only this item is not worth enough for an updated package. But on the other side it is against the policy ... --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691853: marked as done (libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:17:26 +
with message-id e1ttk7i-0007oc...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#691853: fixed in libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl 1.003-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #691853,
regarding libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
691853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691853
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl
Version: 1.003-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu raring ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer, this packages FTBFS in clean pbuilder chroot, it
should Build-Depends on libapp-cmd-perl and libterm-readkey-perl to
build fine.
Thanks for your work!
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/control: {Build-}Depends on libapp-cmd-perl and libterm-
readkey-perl, fix FTBFS
Thanks for considering the patch.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers quantal-updates
APT policy: (500, 'quantal-updates'), (500, 'quantal-security'), (500,
'quantal-proposed'), (500, 'quantal'), (100, 'quantal-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.5.0-18-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl-1.003/debian/changelog libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl-1.003/debian/changelog
diff -Nru libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl-1.003/debian/control libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl-1.003/debian/control
--- libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl-1.003/debian/control 2012-08-06 23:14:54.0 +0200
+++ libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl-1.003/debian/control 2012-10-30 13:00:20.0 +0100
@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
dh-buildinfo,
libossp-uuid-perl,
libsub-exporter-perl,
- libsub-install-perl
+ libsub-install-perl,
+ libapp-cmd-perl,
+ libterm-readkey-perl
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
Standards-Version: 3.9.3
diff -Nru libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl-1.003/debian/rules libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl-1.003/debian/rules
--- libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl-1.003/debian/rules 2012-08-05 11:21:42.0 +0200
+++ libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl-1.003/debian/rules 2012-10-30 12:59:49.0 +0100
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
DEB_UPSTREAM_TARBALL_MD5 =
# Needed both by upstream build and (always) at runtime
-deps = libossp-uuid-perl, libsub-exporter-perl, libsub-install-perl
+deps = libossp-uuid-perl, libsub-exporter-perl, libsub-install-perl, libapp-cmd-perl, libterm-readkey-perl
CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS += , $(deps)
CDBS_DEPENDS_ALL = $(deps)
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl
Source-Version: 1.003-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP
archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 691...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org (supplier of updated
libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:58:32 +0100
Source: libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl
Binary: libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.003-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
Description:
libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl - plug prompting routines into your commands
Closes: 691853
Changes:
libapp-cmd-plugin-prompt-perl (1.003-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Team upload.
* Fix URL in Vcs-Git field in debian/control
* Add missing (build-)dependencies.
Fix FTBFS due to missing (build-)dependencies on App::Cmd and
Term::ReadKey. Add (Build-)Depends(-Indep) on libapp-cmd-perl and
libterm-readkey-perl.
Thanks to Angel Abad an...@debian.org (Closes: #691853)
Checksums-Sha1:
Processed: Re: Bug#689859: dpkg: error processing libapache2-svn (--configure)
Processing control commands: tags -1 moreinfo Bug #689859 [libapache2-svn] dpkg: error processing libapache2-svn (--configure) Added tag(s) moreinfo. severity -1 normal Bug #689859 [libapache2-svn] dpkg: error processing libapache2-svn (--configure) Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' -- 689859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689859: dpkg: error processing libapache2-svn (--configure)
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: severity -1 normal On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 12:26:28PM +0200, Charlie wrote: Package: libapache2-svn […] -- Configuration Files: /etc/apache2/mods-available/authz_svn.load [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/etc/apache2/mods-available/authz_svn.load' /etc/apache2/mods-available/dav_svn.conf [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/etc/apache2/mods-available/dav_svn.conf' /etc/apache2/mods-available/dav_svn.load [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/etc/apache2/mods-available/dav_svn.load' Why are they missing? reproducable on any system created via xen-create-image with wheezy as target platform. I'm not able to reproduce it either, please do provide more information so it can be reproducible. Lowering severity until that happens. Regards David signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#691863: api4hylafax: recommends isdnactivecards from contrib
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: And now I have the same question as weeks before: is it important enough to ask again the release team about permission for an updated package? I think only this item is not worth enough for an updated package. But on the other side it is against the policy ... You don't need to ask the release team about it since, being an rc issue now, there needs to be an updated package; preferably one containing only the rc fix. Please prepare that and submit a sponsorship-requests bug, and I will review it. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#683671: dash doesn't ignore SIGINT when running a command that traps SIGINT
I think that the current status may badly affect the usual use of some applications like Emacs. The fact that there are, AFAIK, no workarounds (except by not using dash, e.g. by changing the /bin/sh symlink) makes me think that it should still be a RC bug. Would you mind if this were reassigned to release-notes? It would say something along the lines of Dash is not yet ready as an interactive shell, bash is currently the only recommended posix-compliant shell. You will experience issues such as #683671 using dash interactively. In the meantime, this should be reported to the upstream dash developers so they can start working on a fix. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689506: moodle: diff for NMU version 2.2.3.dfsg-2.4
Control: found -1 2.2.3.dfsg-2.4 On Sunday, 28. October 2012 17:48:08 Didier Raboud wrote: I've prepared an NMU for moodle (versioned as 2.2.3.dfsg-2.4) and uploaded it straight away. This seems to introduce a regression, the package is no longer installable: Selecting previously unselected package moodle. (Reading database ... 11831 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking moodle (from .../moodle_2.2.3.dfsg-2.4_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/moodle_2.2.3.dfsg-2.4_all.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/moodle_2.2.3.dfsg-2.4_all.deb Looking at the debdiff, I think 1) there is a set -e missing 2) [ -h /usr/share/moodle/lib/yui ] rm -f /usr/share/moodle/lib/yui should be [ ! -h /usr/share/moodle/lib/yui ] || rm -f /usr/share/moodle/lib/yui I haven't made any attempt to debug this problem by looking at the actual maintainer scripts. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: moodle: diff for NMU version 2.2.3.dfsg-2.4
Processing control commands:
found -1 2.2.3.dfsg-2.4
Bug #689506 {Done: Didier Raboud o...@debian.org} [moodle] moodle: upgrade
squeeze-wheezy deletes /usr/share/moodle/lib/yui tree
Marked as found in versions moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.4; no longer marked as fixed in
versions moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.4 and reopened.
--
689506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689506
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#683671: dash doesn't ignore SIGINT when running a command that traps SIGINT
Michael Gilbert wrote: I think that the current status may badly affect the usual use of some applications like Emacs. The fact that there are, AFAIK, no workarounds (except by not using dash, e.g. by changing the /bin/sh symlink) makes me think that it should still be a RC bug. Would you mind if this were reassigned to release-notes? It would say something along the lines of Dash is not yet ready as an interactive shell, bash is currently the only recommended posix-compliant shell. I think that's an overstatement. Maybe Dash in Debian is not intended to be used as an interactive shell could be accurate, though. Please don't reassign this bug, but feel free to clone it and lower the severity. Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690672: marked as done (librdmacm: CVE-2012-4516)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:47:27 + with message-id e1ttkal-0006vc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#690672: fixed in librdmacm 1.0.15-1+deb7u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690672, regarding librdmacm: CVE-2012-4516 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690672: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690672 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: librdmacm Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-4516 for details an a patch. Cheers, Moritz ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: librdmacm Source-Version: 1.0.15-1+deb7u1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of librdmacm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 690...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Roland Dreier r...@debian.org (supplier of updated librdmacm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:48:07 -0700 Source: librdmacm Binary: librdmacm1 librdmacm-dev librdmacm1-dbg rdmacm-utils Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.0.15-1+deb7u1 Distribution: wheezy Urgency: high Maintainer: Roland Dreier r...@debian.org Changed-By: Roland Dreier r...@debian.org Description: librdmacm-dev - Development files for the librdmacm library librdmacm1 - Library for managing RDMA connections librdmacm1-dbg - Debugging symbols for the librdmacm library rdmacm-utils - Examples for the librdmacm library Closes: 690672 Changes: librdmacm (1.0.15-1+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=high . * Security fix: apply 01-CVE-2012-4516-no-default-acm-port.patch (Closes: #690672) Checksums-Sha1: 324573f03859270c50491f70d2465f7a3df12e98 1959 librdmacm_1.0.15-1+deb7u1.dsc bed27edac7783643caeb10d138da8d45b9b3dd57 4546 librdmacm_1.0.15-1+deb7u1.debian.tar.gz 7c6182c7b33014cfa2b1eac2a76dc7c9fda8d362 19026 librdmacm1_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb aca7051fa6d0c66de87c1a4be73ea2d3eccb3e57 73168 librdmacm-dev_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb ad35e445601d086f07877fe6aec798cf43892009 185622 librdmacm1-dbg_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb d11137d9ab46e4d29bd8f03856183b5b27c7af33 40902 rdmacm-utils_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 1af54b04387781cbfda8cfc4e207b079c5858ca336abac70fe723caf23ff5a70 1959 librdmacm_1.0.15-1+deb7u1.dsc c0e317220ba60f3e86665903d62740ae3812c69f74c2de7076b9c5e6d5687200 4546 librdmacm_1.0.15-1+deb7u1.debian.tar.gz 853bf68765e5d32de093e4b085b921de919fef375fa5680bd7b94366a168dcc1 19026 librdmacm1_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb ec355630e4ae78ae0b158e40574aeb58a3f0097b9ad1dd07d06ac9db0897d429 73168 librdmacm-dev_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb d6a85577eda2497cfd9035461cdb0008d5b4a40edc33d737425c0b0e3dae9ee3 185622 librdmacm1-dbg_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb 3a58b7b6f862068732fe6c80de32ae24a8de47f6bd00bb71667f97ee8e73c1cd 40902 rdmacm-utils_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb Files: b7586ce1fcabfb3ffda17b4f324d5f55 1959 libs extra librdmacm_1.0.15-1+deb7u1.dsc e6ea88c1a0e6d3864888a72406c35e9a 4546 libs extra librdmacm_1.0.15-1+deb7u1.debian.tar.gz 69ad041d2f59ae635123745ff63df30f 19026 libs extra librdmacm1_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb 23fa9ac9ae93b892fb9f42888af06689 73168 libdevel extra librdmacm-dev_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb bceeca75cffb9b3966b48678a258d116 185622 debug extra librdmacm1-dbg_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb f846179a91b5837590d811c9ebf8005f 40902 net extra rdmacm-utils_1.0.15-1+deb7u1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkFbbAAoJEN3H7Pu0+DFpIvcP/1SXfeH5VEQnquD8NdSZkprL Dqet+q/hMecHQ/gCqVmNljMlSYRi8aqXsWrqhHO/I25BJSef0nIe8jvtg22xG+zv nGbbFM4VMGgRbL4FlqM3a/8knZcSbFosBmM0etorH9rDNT+LqU3GptbPsu0wh2c0 QHmPk1tOlknD1d7ybZ5cAyA8rKAjiH+Z5KU05ZlsKmyyX76cubn8/nudkFD7m4cw kBsLfFr1BrukiVNk/qtylUW5MJZZO0/8QhZhxPDmk0tFhuYY1ekB190laSZ3bDpe vDxCHByyxZeEd7ZZqcp0l18V4EROf31YtJyiSqjzVLvMxlpJHYzTNKPTt3ZWRgbE jj9kty2nKzhZDs5PCSBXC6C60N8heBcLngL/NAw4WAKhyRJU2QJrdlrSUMMXWQDi YPfLBQWrjgwH1BWkdout41fdMzAGtsBBEcIYafPoT3+n7sPPGq/ADOH5X6rSoR5s
Bug#691863: api4hylafax: recommends isdnactivecards from contrib
Hello Michael, Michael Gilbert wrote on 2012-10-30 18:33: Please prepare that and submit a sponsorship-requests bug, and I will review it. O.K. I will do it in the next days. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690937: marked as done (gajim segfaults and hangs randomly)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:17:32 + with message-id e1ttl3s-00032b...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#690937: fixed in gajim 0.15.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #690937, regarding gajim segfaults and hangs randomly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690937: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690937 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: gajim Version: 0.15.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: renders package unusable Hi, (First, I'm sorry not to provide more information.) Gajim segfaults and hangs randomly for me. The segfaults seem to happen specifically when closing the windows by pressing 'ESC' (but not each time). Lucas -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (800, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable'), (150, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages gajim depends on: ii dnsutils 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4.2 ii python 2.7.3~rc2-1 ii python-gtk2 2.24.0-3 Versions of packages gajim recommends: ii dbus 1.6.0-1 ii notification-daemon 0.7.5-1 ii python-crypto2.6-2 ii python-dbus 1.1.1-1 ii python-openssl 0.13-2 ii python-pyasn10.1.3-1 Versions of packages gajim suggests: ii aspell-en 7.1-0-1 ii avahi-daemon0.6.31-1 pn dvipng none ii gnome-keyring 3.4.1-5 ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly 0.10.19-2+b2 ii libgtkspell02.0.16-1 ii nautilus-sendto 3.0.3-2+b1 ii network-manager 0.9.4.0-5 ii python-avahi0.6.31-1 pn python-farstreamnone ii python-gconf2.28.1+dfsg-1 ii python-gnome2 2.28.1+dfsg-1 ii python-gnomekeyring 2.32.0+dfsg-2+b1 pn python-gupnp-igdnone pn python-kerberos none ii python-pycurl 7.19.0-5 ii texlive-latex-base 2012.20120611-4 -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: gajim Source-Version: 0.15.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gajim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 690...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org (supplier of updated gajim package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:02:36 +0200 Source: gajim Binary: gajim Architecture: source all Version: 0.15.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org Changed-By: Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org Description: gajim - Jabber client written in PyGTK Closes: 690937 Changes: gajim (0.15.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * re-add missing 0.15-1.1 changelog entry * add a patch to prevent a traceback. * add a patch to fix a crash. Closes: #690937 Checksums-Sha1: 51f11a0caf692bc8898e8490468d76ea58674148 1856 gajim_0.15.1-2.dsc 9f3a48fc57b9368e79fd60708290129d42024f23 6990 gajim_0.15.1-2.debian.tar.gz 26d9e4ba9b7eb59c015f2dc1ee5c941c9917ad9a 4819846 gajim_0.15.1-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 394fed493337783615622e6419f75c3e74e9f28d2d451f1b7ff751daf09d55ed 1856 gajim_0.15.1-2.dsc acef91fe11cddeae374d15494a2c784f2b6c156adb3996c2b8633055913b50d0 6990 gajim_0.15.1-2.debian.tar.gz 657c87cc00df15b74a213392fc448d3596fff3ff8b9f5dd76012e2b757341fba 4819846 gajim_0.15.1-2_all.deb Files: e897d693fb8c78d9dea2cf62d953bae2 1856 net optional gajim_0.15.1-2.dsc cc7987c45985327946262f25da26304d 6990 net optional gajim_0.15.1-2.debian.tar.gz 582b26e275d5a8a9862d70372f71f551 4819846 net optional gajim_0.15.1-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQkEL9AAoJEOryzVHFAGgZtgAQAKYtfVNGUzwz82UjO/RS8WUG w/ZUaukPi7JLqYxTmEwO0+dlaBxDWbB9Kuv2VThcEiQxFesGcEj+L0KLIBFYUjVC
Bug#683671: dash doesn't ignore SIGINT when running a command that traps SIGINT
On 2012-10-30 15:46:40 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Michael Gilbert wrote: Would you mind if this were reassigned to release-notes? It would say something along the lines of Dash is not yet ready as an interactive shell, bash is currently the only recommended posix-compliant shell. I think that's an overstatement. Maybe Dash in Debian is not intended to be used as an interactive shell could be accurate, though. The word interactive is incorrect, because when the shell is used to run some program (e.g. via C's system() function), it is not interactive. Please don't reassign this bug, but feel free to clone it and lower the severity. Yes, this is really a bug in dash IMHO, but Emacs is partly in fault because the Ctrl-G will also send the signal in the other processes in the same process group an Emacs (though this may not be very common). The current situation is extremely annoying. :( -- Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.net/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 684186 grave Bug #684186 [gnome-settings-daemon] gnome-power-manager: Critical battery level doesn't lead to action (hibernate) Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' retitle 684186 gnome-settings-daemon: fails to execute action on low Bug #684186 [gnome-settings-daemon] gnome-power-manager: Critical battery level doesn't lead to action (hibernate) Changed Bug title to 'gnome-settings-daemon: fails to execute action on low' from 'gnome-power-manager: Critical battery level doesn't lead to action (hibernate)' battery condition Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 684186: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684186 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 684186 gnome-settings-daemon: fails to execute action on low battery condition Bug #684186 [gnome-settings-daemon] gnome-settings-daemon: fails to execute action on low Changed Bug title to 'gnome-settings-daemon: fails to execute action on low battery condition' from 'gnome-settings-daemon: fails to execute action on low' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 684186: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684186 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#689154: unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4
Processing control commands: unblock 687875 by 689154 Bug #687875 [gnunet-server] gnunet-server: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) 687875 was blocked by: 689154 687875 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 687875: 689154 unblock 687881 by 689154 Bug #687881 [gnunet-client] gnunet-client: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) 687881 was blocked by: 689154 687881 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 687881: 689154 unblock 687883 by 689154 Bug #687883 [gnunet-dbg] gnunet-dbg: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) 687883 was blocked by: 689154 687883 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 687883: 689154 unblock 688486 by 689154 Bug #688486 [src:gnunet] gnunet: Patch for kfreebsd 688486 was blocked by: 689154 688486 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 688486: 689154 unblock 688590 by 689154 Bug #688590 [src:gnunet] src:gnunet: ftbfs on ia64 (/lib vs /usr/lib confusion) 688590 was blocked by: 689154 688590 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 688590: 689154 unblock 686238 by 689154 Bug #686238 [gnunet-server] gnunet-server: Access from `unbound UNIX client' denied to service `namestore' 686238 was blocked by: 689154 686238 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 686238: 689154 unblock 684997 by 689154 Bug #684997 [gnunet-common] Wrong libgcrypt11 dependency version 684997 was blocked by: 689154 684997 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 684997: 689154 unblock 688484 by 689154 Bug #688484 [src:gnunet] gnunet: uninstallable on hurd-i386 688484 was blocked by: 689154 688484 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 688484: 689154 unblock 690860 by 689154 Bug #690860 [src:gnunet] gnunet-server, gnunet-client: shouldn't depend on gettext 690860 was blocked by: 689154 690860 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 690860: 689154 unblock 684317 by 689154 Bug #684317 [gnunet-server] gnunet-server: Unable to publish: Access from `unbound UNIX client' denied to service `datastore' 684317 was blocked by: 689154 684317 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 684317: 689154 -- 684317: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684317 684997: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684997 686238: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686238 687875: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687875 687881: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687881 687883: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687883 688484: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688484 688486: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688486 688590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688590 689154: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689154 690860: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690860 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
