Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Tuesday 27 November 07:03:19 UTC 2012 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/hyperestraier";>hyperestraier > tags 684535 + pending Bug #684535 [src:hyperestraier] hyperestraier: FTBFS on s390x Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/hyperestraier";>hyperestraier > tags 692419 + pending Bug #692419 [hyperestraier] hyperestraier: FTBFS: binary-indep target is corrupt not to generate doc package. Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 684535: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684535 692419: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692419 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 682735
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 682735 + patch Bug #682735 [python-cracklib] error reading header aborts python interpreter Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 682735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682735 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#676485: squeeze->wheezy dist-upgrade Could not perform immediate configuration on 'default-jre'
On 25.11.2012 13:27, David Kalnischkies wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Thanks for your detailed reply. >> So I went ahead and built a glib2.0 version where I've dropped "Breaks: >> eog (<< 3.2.2-3)". >> >> Unfortunately I've ran into the same problem again. apt-get dist-upgrade >> aborts at exactly the same point. > > Mhhh, thats "strange"… I had squeeze sources still enabled and with > those it actually works. Without it hangs on the following three too: > gdm3 (<< 3.0.3), gnome-control-center (<< 1:3), gnome-session (<< 3.0.0-3) fwiw, I can confirm that dropping those three breaks in addition to the one against eog, works around the problem and allows to successfully run a dist-upgrade. That said, those breaks were added for a reason, so if possible we would prefer to keep them. David, do you have other ideas how we can hint apt into the right direction and break the dep cycle? -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#694357: marked as done (libcsv-java-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: libcsv-java (<< 2.0-11))
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2012 04:17:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694357: fixed in libcsv-java 2.0-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #694357, regarding libcsv-java-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: libcsv-java (<< 2.0-11) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694357: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694357 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libcsv-java-doc Version: 2.0-11 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package libcsv-java. (Reading database ... 6286 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libcsv-java (from .../libcsv-java_2.0-10_all.deb) ... Setting up libcsv-java (2.0-10) ... Selecting previously deselected package libcsv-java-doc. (Reading database ... 6372 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libcsv-java-doc (from .../libcsv-java-doc_2.0-11_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libcsv-java-doc_2.0-11_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/help-doc.html', which is also in package libcsv-java 2.0-10 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/allclasses-frame.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/allclasses-noframe.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/com/csvreader/CsvReader.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/com/csvreader/CsvWriter.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/com/csvreader/package-frame.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/com/csvreader/package-summary.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/com/csvreader/package-tree.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/constant-values.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/deprecated-list.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/help-doc.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/index-all.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/index.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/overview-tree.html usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/package-list usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/resources/inherit.gif usr/share/doc/libcsv-java/api/stylesheet.css The -doc package was added in -11: libcsv-java (2.0-11) unstable; urgency=low * Split javadoc into separate package and add the javacsv.jar symlink to match the upstream jar name. The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libcsv-java-doc Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libcsv-java-doc Breaks: libcsv-java (<< 2.0-11) Replaces: libcsv-java (<< 2.0-11) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. libcsv-java=2.0-10_libcsv-java-doc=2.0-11.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libcsv-java Source-Version: 2.0-12 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libcsv-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. tony mancill (supplier of updated libcsv-java package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you be
Bug#677407: gnome-dbg: fails to upgrade from squeeze - apt does not find an upgrade path
On 26.11.2012 19:47, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2012-11-26 12:44, Simon McVittie wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 at 10:49:19 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> the problem I previously reported for gnome-dbg now also shows up for >>> gnome-core. >> >> Your log from 1st November is for gnome-dbg. Is this reproducible >> for gnome-core too, or only for gnome-dbg? > > squeeze2wheezy/main/affected/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+6.log >libglib2.0-0 : Breaks: eog (< 3.2.2-3) but 2.30.2-1 is to be installed > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be > caused by held packages. > > squeeze2wheezy/main/affected/gnome-core_1:3.4+6.log > E: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgstreamer0.10-0'. > > different issue, could be filed already, but I didn't have time to look > for 'immediate configuration' bugs check the dependenecy tree for > circular dependencies - and break them :-) Since eog triggered my attention, there is already [1] which might be relevant. Especially [2] and onwards. In the end, these are apt bugs it seems. But as we can't easily fix apt in squeeze, we will have to find a workaround somehow. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676485 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676485#42 -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#692440: tomcat7: CVE-2012-2733 CVE-2012-3439
On 11/17/2012 09:58 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch. > > Best wishes, > Mike Hi Mike, Thank you for preparing patches and uploading NMUs for tomcat6 and tomcat7! It's very much appreciated. I have imported the updated version into the respective packaging repos. Thank you, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Tagging Breaks+Rreplaces bugs providing a patch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 632443 + patch
Bug #632443 [kst-data] kst-data: missing Breaks+Replaces: kst-bin (<< 2.0.3)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 694396 + patch
Bug #694396 [gnome-panel-control] gnome-panel-control: missing Breaks+Replaces:
openbox (<< 3.4.11.2)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 694389 + patch
Bug #694389 [mythes-it] mythes-it: missing Breaks+Replaces:
openoffice.org-thesaurus-it (<< 1:0)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 694392 + patch
Bug #694392 [globus-common-progs] globus-common-progs: missing Breaks+Replaces:
grid-packaging-tools (<< 3.5)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 694376 + patch
Bug #694376 [dovecot-common] dovecot-common: missing Breaks+Replaces:
mailavenger (<< 0.8.1-4)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 694372 + patch
Bug #694372 [python-novaclient] python-novaclient: missing Breaks+Replaces:
simh (<< 3.8.1-3)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 694368 + patch
Bug #694368 [libfuzzy2,libfuzzy-dev] libfuzzy{2,-dev}: missing Breaks+Replaces:
ssdeep (<< 2.6)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 694361 + patch
Bug #694361 [phpunit-story] phpunit-story: missing Breaks+Repalces: phpunit (<<
3.6.10)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 694357 + patch
Bug #694357 [libcsv-java-doc] libcsv-java-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces:
libcsv-java (<< 2.0-11)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 694355 + patch
Bug #694355 [munin-doc] munin-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: munin-common (<< 2)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 694330 + patch
Bug #694330 [python-mako-doc] python-mako-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces:
python3-mako (<< 0.3.6-1)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 693984 + patch
Bug #693984 [libzorpll-dev] libzorpll-dev: fails to upgrade lenny -> squeeze ->
wheezy - trying to overwrite /usr/include/zorp/streamblob.h
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
632443: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632443
693984: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693984
694330: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694330
694355: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694355
694357: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694357
694361: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694361
694368: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694368
694372: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694372
694376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694376
694389: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694389
694392: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694392
694396: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694396
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692147: nmu
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > That seems awfully fragile. > It removes support for the previous path, as apparently used in squeeze. > It seems to break if there's more than one (or zero) paths matched by > the glob. I've uploaded a more robust fix to delayed/3. Please see attached. Best wishes, Mike javamorph.patch Description: Binary data
Bug#520753: ghostscript: diff for NMU version 9.05~dfsg-6.3
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> I have rescheduled it to 5 days (+4). Please test the new package in the mean >> time. > > I have not tested it, but do consider your approach to be an > improvement, Odyx. Since you have already offered to defend it for the > Release Team, I see no reason to delay it further: had I acted sooner on > this, I would have applied your fix and uploaded without delay at all. Since Jonas does not object, I have no reason to either. Please feel free to remove the delay and be prepared to defend it with the release team. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694502: libgfs-mpi-1.3-2: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgfs-1.3-1
Package: libgfs-mpi-1.3-2 Version: 20091109-dfsg.1-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package libgfs-mpi-1.3-2. Unpacking libgfs-mpi-1.3-2 (from .../libgfs-mpi-1.3-2_20110329-dfsg.2-1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgfs-mpi-1.3-2_20110329-dfsg.2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libgfs3D-1.3.so.2.0.0', which is also in package libgfs-1.3-1 20091109-dfsg.1-1 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/lib/libgfs2D-1.3.so.2 usr/lib/libgfs2D-1.3.so.2.0.0 usr/lib/libgfs3D-1.3.so.2 usr/lib/libgfs3D-1.3.so.2.0.0 The soname bump seems to have happened earlier, the packages were bumped in 20091109-dfsg.1-2: gerris (20091109-dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * libgfs library package names bumped up to reflect increment in library soname. The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libgfs-mpi-1.3-2 Breaks:n/a Replaces: libgfs-1.3-2 Conflicts: libgfs-1.3-2 The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libgfs-mpi-1.3-2 Breaks: libgfs-1.3-1 Replaces: libgfs-1.3-1 As libgfs-1.3-1 is no longer in Debian, the Breaks/Replaces can be unversioned. Or use consistent style and Conflicts instead of Breaks. Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. libgfs-1.3-1=20091109-dfsg.1-1_libgfs-mpi-1.3-2=20110329-dfsg.2-1.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#694500: nordugrid-arc-hed: missing Breaks+Replaces: nordugrid-arc-nox-client
Package: nordugrid-arc-hed Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package nordugrid-arc-hed. Unpacking nordugrid-arc-hed (from .../nordugrid-arc-hed_2.0.0-3_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nordugrid-arc-hed_2.0.0-3_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/arc/examples/echo/echo.wsdl', which is also in package nordugrid-arc-nox-client 1.1.0~rc6-2.1 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/arc/examples/echo/echo.wsdl echo.wsdl was present in nordugrid-arc-nox-client and added to nordugrid-arc-hed in 1.0.1-1 The following (related) relationships are currently defined: Package: nordugrid-arc-hed Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: nordugrid-arc-hed Breaks: nordugrid-arc-nox-client Replaces: nordugrid-arc-nox-client As nordugrid-arc-nox-client has been removed from Debian, the Breaks/Replaces can be unversioned. Or use a version like (<= 1.1.0~rc6-2.3+rm). Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. nordugrid-arc-nox-client=1.1.0~rc6-2.1_nordugrid-arc-hed=2.0.0-3.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#694403: Please ship an init script, not just a systemd unit
On 26.11.2012 19:10, David Paleino wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:34:27 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Until we ship the necessary helper tool, systemd units need to be >> enabled manually via systemctl enable > > Am I supposed to run that in postinst/prerm (disable)? Or should I just > document it in README.Debian? Or is it common knowledge among systemd users? For the time being, I wouldn't advise adding those calls manually to the maintainer scripts. Since systemctl is not guaranteed to be around, you would either have to add a hard dependency on systemd or make the systemctl calls conditional. Neither of those options is ideal. Adding this to README.Debian certainly doesn't hurt. Once we have the necessary support in debhelper etc. (which should land as in jessie), you can drop that note again. >> David, as for this particular case, when you ship a sysv init script, >> please consider naming it after the native systemd service file (i.e >> bootchart-done). Thanks. Btw, having initramfs integration as Steve pointed out, would be really nice. On my system loading the kernel and the initramfs already takes longer then booting the userspace. So having a chart of the initramfs would be really helpful. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#694498: python-djblets: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-django-djblets
Package: python-djblets Version: 0.7~git20120402+dfsg-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->sid (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package python-djblets. Unpacking python-djblets (from .../python-djblets_0.7~git20120402+dfsg-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python-djblets_0.7~git20120402+dfsg-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/pyshared/djblets/__init__.py', which is also in package python-django-djblets 0.5.10~alpha0+git201005030944-2 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to sid (but not within squeeze or sid itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->sid upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and sid on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/pyshared/djblets/* The following relationships are currently defined: Package: python-djblets Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: python-djblets Breaks:python-django-djblets Replaces: python-django-djblets As python-django-djblets is no longer in Debian, the Breaks/Replaces can be unversioned. As python-djblets is a re-introduction of python-django-djblets into Debian I would recommend to preserve history by appending the old changelog entries (and maybe add an artificial (0.5.10~alpha0+git201005030944-2+rm) changelog entry describing the removal and add something like "repackaged from scratch" to (0.7~git20120402+dfsg-1)). Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. python-django-djblets=0.5.10~alpha0+git201005030944-2_python-djblets=0.7~git20120402+dfsg-1.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#652315: marked as done (Get this out of testing until its rdepends have rebuilt)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:22:57 +0100 with message-id <50b3f9d1.6090...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Re: Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte') has caused the Debian Bug report #652315, regarding Get this out of testing until its rdepends have rebuilt to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 652315: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652315 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: illuminator Version: 0.11.0-8.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=illuminator&arch=sparc&ver=0.11.0-8.1&stamp=1323062646 > /usr/lib/lam/bin/mpicc -g -O2 -o .libs/tsview tsview-tsview.o > libluminate/.libs/libluminate.so -lpetsc -lncurses -lhistory -lreadline > /usr/bin/ld: tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte' > /usr/bin/ld: note: 'lam_mpi_byte' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/liblam.so.4 so > try adding it to the linker command line > /usr/lib/liblam.so.4: could not read symbols: Invalid operation > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[3]: *** [tsview] Error 1 Cheers, Julien --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Am 24.11.2012 15:53, schrieb Ivo De Decker: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:45:47PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: >> Found the problem. PETSc built on November 16 with mpi-defaults 0.6 >> which depended on LAM on non-openmpi arches. Now mpi-defaults 1.0.1 >> released 12/4 depends on MPICH2, so we have a mix of architectures >> installed. And mpi-defaults just went into testing today... Crap! >> >> It may be that other PETSc dependencies need rebuilding too... and there >> are a lot of them! Let's see: suitesparse, spooles, hypre, scotch, >> blacs-mpi, scalapack, mumps, all have to be rebuilt with MPICH2! What >> was built when: >> * suitesparse: April 15 2010 >> * spooles: May 11 2010 >> * hypre: August 15 2010 >> * scotch: April 6 2011 >> * blacs-mpi: August 29 2011 >> * scalapack: September 18 2011 >> * mumps: March 31 2011 >> None was built recently, all need to be rebuilt. mpi-defaults should >> not be in testing until at least these are rebuilt, probably others. >> >> Note: HDF5 is not a problem for PETSc because PETSc only links to it on >> OpenMPI platforms. I forgot why that is, maybe it's worth a try >> building PETSc against HDF5-mpich2? Maybe later... >> >> Okay, cloning this bug to a bunch of packages, see above. I've been an >> uploader to all except blacs-mpi and scalapack, and many of them could >> use some maintenance, this is a good excuse to spend time on them. :-) > > Adam, > > Is this bug still relevant? All the blocking bugs have been fixed, except > 651452, which is about illuminator, which is not in testing. > > Cheers, > > Ivo I think you meant to send this to #652315, not #651452 right? Anyway, I checked that all blocking bugs except illuminator are fixed in testing, so I'm closing this bug. Best regards, Tobias--- End Message ---
Bug#694397: marked as done (calligrawords-data: missing Breaks+Replaces: koffice-data)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:04:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694397: fixed in calligra 1:2.4.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #694397, regarding calligrawords-data: missing Breaks+Replaces: koffice-data to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694397 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: calligrawords-data Version: 1:2.4.3-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package koffice-data. (Reading database ... 6286 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking koffice-data (from .../koffice-data_1%3a2.2.1-4_all.deb) ... Setting up koffice-data (1:2.2.1-4) ... Selecting previously deselected package calligrawords-data. (Reading database ... 6724 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking calligrawords-data (from .../calligrawords-data_1%3a2.4.3-2_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/calligrawords-data_1%3a2.4.3-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/templates/TextDocument.desktop', which is also in package koffice-data 1:2.2.1-4 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/templates/.source/TextDocument.kwt usr/share/templates/TextDocument.desktop The following relationships are currently defined: Package: calligrawords-data Conflicts: n/a Breaks:calligra-data (<< 1:2.4.3-2) Replaces: calligra-data (<< 1:2.4.3-2) The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: calligrawords-data Breaks: koffice-data Replaces: koffice-data Unversioned Breaks/Replaces should be fine since koffice-data was removed from Debian. Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. koffice-data=1:2.2.1-4_calligrawords-data=1:2.4.3-2.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: calligra Source-Version: 1:2.4.3-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of calligra, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer (supplier of updated calligra package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:34:10 -0300 Source: calligra Binary: calligra karbon kexi kexi-calligrasheets-driver kexi-mysql-driver kexi-postgresql-driver kexi-xbase-driver kexi-sybase-driver kexi-web-form-widget kexi-map-form-widget calligra-reports-web-element calligra-reports-map-element krita krita-data kthesaurus calligrasheets calligraplan calligrawords calligrawords-data calligrastage calligraflow calligraflow-data braindump calligramobile calligra-libs calligra-data okular-backend-odp calligra-dbg Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1:2.4.3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Changed-By: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer Descri
Bug#690153: marked as done (jscribble: FTBFS: tests timeout)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:48:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#690153: fixed in jscribble 1.7.7-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #690153, regarding jscribble: FTBFS: tests timeout to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690153 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: jscribble Version: 1.7.7-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20121010 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' > javac -encoding UTF-8 -classpath /usr/share/java/junit.jar -sourcepath > .:jscribble tests/jscribble/notebook/WriteoutThreadTest.java > javac -encoding UTF-8 -classpath /usr/share/java/junit.jar -sourcepath > .:jscribble tests/jscribble/notebook/NoteSheetTest.java > javac -encoding UTF-8 -classpath /usr/share/java/junit.jar -sourcepath > .:jscribble tests/jscribble/notebook/NoteSheetFileFilterTest.java > javac -encoding UTF-8 -classpath /usr/share/java/junit.jar -sourcepath > .:jscribble tests/jscribble/notebook/NoteBookTest.java > javac -encoding UTF-8 -classpath /usr/share/java/junit.jar -sourcepath > .:jscribble tests/jscribble/notebook/NoteBookCompressorTest.java > javac -encoding UTF-8 -classpath /usr/share/java/junit.jar -sourcepath > .:jscribble tests/jscribble/helpers/FileComparatorTest.java > javac -encoding UTF-8 -classpath /usr/share/java/junit.jar -sourcepath > .:jscribble tests/jscribble/drawPanel/HelpItemTest.java > javac -encoding UTF-8 -classpath /usr/share/java/junit.jar -sourcepath > .:jscribble tests/jscribble/VersionNameTest.java > javac -encoding UTF-8 -classpath /usr/share/java/junit.jar -sourcepath > .:jscribble tests/JscribbleTestSuite.java > junit -text tests.JscribbleTestSuite > make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs > make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs > make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > make[2]: *** [test] Error 1 > Build killed with signal TERM after 60 minutes of inactivity > > Build finished at 20121010-0542 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/10/10/jscribble_1.7.7-1.1_wheezy.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: jscribble Source-Version: 1.7.7-1.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jscribble, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 690...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Banck (supplier of updated jscribble package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:00:02 +0100 Source: jscribble Binary: jscribble Architecture: source all Version: 1.7.7-1.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Banck Changed-By: Michael Banck Description: jscribble - graphical notepad for use with a pen tablet Closes: 690153 Changes: jscribble (1.7.7-1.2) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/patches/disable_NoteBookTest.patch: New patch, removes tests/jscribble/notebook/NoteBookTest.java as it hangs when building with sbuild. The test-target in the top-level Makefile had to be changed so junit would not try to build the backup java file in .pc/ (Closes: #690153). Checksums-Sha1: 905a0d1901a0236b1a105dff322bedfbe5ae8f83 1160 jscribble_1.7.7-1.2.dsc 7217d003af3616204fb06a64
Processed: Fix committed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 691441 + pending Bug #691441 [libqglviewer-qt4-2] libqglviewer-qt4-2: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691441: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691441 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691441: Fix committed
tags 691441 + pending thanks The fix is committed to a git-repo and will be included into the next upload. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/libqglviewer.git;a=commitdiff;h=f0627f1b17ac931593f8065602e904f0274afe5a http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/libqglviewer.git;a=commitdiff;h=f79e4f840895889220d4904cc54a6d275b96967b Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694471: libstrongswan: missing Breaks+Replaces: strongswan-ikev2 (<< 4.6.4)
On 2012-11-26 22:50, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Thanks for the report, but before filing them can you at least check for > duplicates? Oops, must have missed that one ... and even one of my own :-( Sorry for the noise. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#652378: marked as done (CVE-2011-1431 in TLS patch)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:55:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#692558: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #652378, regarding CVE-2011-1431 in TLS patch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 652378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652378 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: qmail Severity: important Tags: security The source package embeds the qmail TLS patch, which is affected by this STARTTLS issue: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-1431 It appears as if the TLS patch isn't applied, it makes sense however to update the patch anyway. BTW, shouldn't this package be removed altogether now that netqmail is in the archive? Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.03-49.3+rm Dear submitter, as the package qmail has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/692558 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#694471: libstrongswan: missing Breaks+Replaces: strongswan-ikev2 (<< 4.6.4)
Control: forcemerge 681312 694471 On lun., 2012-11-26 at 18:16 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Hi, > > automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the > same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has > detected the following problem: Thanks for the report, but before filing them can you at least check for duplicates? Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#694471: libstrongswan: missing Breaks+Replaces: strongswan-ikev2 (<< 4.6.4)
Processing control commands: > forcemerge 681312 694471 Bug #681312 [libstrongswan] libstrongswan: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/ipsec/plugins/libstrongswan-attr-sql.so Bug #694471 [libstrongswan] libstrongswan: missing Breaks+Replaces: strongswan-ikev2 (<< 4.6.4) Added indication that 694471 affects strongswan-ikev2 Marked as found in versions strongswan/4.6.4-5. Bug #681312 [libstrongswan] libstrongswan: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/ipsec/plugins/libstrongswan-attr-sql.so Marked as found in versions strongswan/4.6.4-1. Merged 681312 694471 -- 681312: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681312 694471: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694471 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693158: marked as done (Xorg: symbol lookup error: ...penmount_drv.so: undefined symbol: xf86XInputSetScreen)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:41:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#694386: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #693158,
regarding Xorg: symbol lookup error: ...penmount_drv.so: undefined symbol:
xf86XInputSetScreen
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
693158: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693158
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-xorg-input-penmount
Version: 1:1.5.0-1+b2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
penmount driver will crash the Xorg server on every touch attempt because it
seems to use outdated API functions:
Xorg: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/penmount_drv.so:
undefined symbol: xf86XInputSetScreen
the attached patch fixes it (at the expense of probably losing multiple screen
support, but at least for single-screen setups the package remains useful and
stable).
additional info on my setup:
/etc/udev/rules.d/50-input-penmount.rules
ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="penmount_end"
KERNEL=="ttyS3" ENV{NAME}="PenMount Serial Touch Screen",
ENV{SUBSYSTEM}="input", ENV{ID_INPUT}="1", ENV{ID_INPUT_MOUSE}="1"
LABEL="penmount_end"
/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-input-penmount.conf
Section "InputClass"
Identifier "Penmount Touch Screen"
MatchIsPointer "on"
MatchDevicePath "/dev/ttyS3"
Driver "penmount"
Option "Device" "/dev/ttyS3"
Option "ControllerModel""DMC9000"
Option "ReportingMode" "raw"
Option "MinX" "112"
Option "MaxX" "892"
Option "MinY" "120"
Option "MaxY" "888"
Option "InvertY""1"
Option "InvertX""1"
#Option "ScreenNumber" "0"
#Option "ButtonNumber" "1"
#Option "SwapXY" "0"
EndSection
-- Package-specific info:
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Nov 10 20:25 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/Xorg
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2027892 Sep 30 14:42 /usr/bin/Xorg
VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus:
--
00:01.1 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Geode LX
Video [1022:2081]
/etc/X11/xorg.conf does not exist.
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d does not exist.
KMS configuration files:
/etc/modprobe.d/radeon-kms.conf:
options radeon modeset=1
Kernel version (/proc/version):
---
Linux version 3.2.0-4-486 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3
(Debian 4.6.3-12) ) #1 Debian 3.2.32-1
Xorg X server log files on system:
--
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10888 Nov 13 15:19 /var/log/Xorg.2.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 21244 Nov 13 19:28 /var/log/Xorg.1.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20707 Nov 13 19:40 /var/log/Xorg.0.log
Contents of most recent Xorg X server log file (/var/log/Xorg.0.log):
-
[ 2977.405]
X.Org X Server 1.12.4
Release Date: 2012-08-27
[ 2977.405] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[ 2977.405] Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 i686 Debian
[ 2977.405] Current Operating System: Linux telkamp 3.2.0-4-486 #1 Debian
3.2.32-1 i586
[ 2977.405] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-4-486
root=UUID=b491cd27-043f-4212-babe-5c2f6940c9e3 ro video=lxfb:1024x768-32@60
quiet
[ 2977.406] Build Date: 30 September 2012 12:36:23PM
[ 2977.406] xorg-server 2:1.12.4-1 (Julien Cristau )
[ 2977.406] Current version of pixman: 0.26.0
[ 2977.406]Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
[ 2977.406] Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
[ 2977.407] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Nov 13 19:40:52
2012
[ 2977.407] (==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
[ 2977.409] (==) No Layout section. Using the first Screen section.
[ 2977.409] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults.
[ 2977.409] (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen Section" (0)
[ 2977.409] (**) | |-->Monitor ""
[ 2977.411] (==) No monitor specified for screen "Default Screen Section".
Using a default monitor configuration.
[ 2977.412] (==) Automatically adding devices
[ 2977.412] (==) Automatically enabling devices
[
Bug#689285: marked as done (tgmochikit: contains files without license)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:42:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694480: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #689285, regarding tgmochikit: contains files without license to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 689285: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689285 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: tgmochikit Version: 1.4.2-2 Severity: serious The file tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4_r1383/unpacked/Sortable.js contains this : | Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us) | Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org) | | See scriptaculous.js for full license. I don't find any file named scriptaculous.js in the package. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.4.2-2.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package tgmochikit has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/694480 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#627508: marked as done (Conflict between dconf and dconf-tools ?)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:38:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694160: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #627508, regarding Conflict between dconf and dconf-tools ? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 627508: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627508 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: dconf, dconf-tools Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.1 Le vendredi 20 mai 2011 à 06:55 +, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > Hi all, > There are two different tools, dconf (for getting hardware info > and comparing it with other systems) and the dconf-tools (which are > for saving and manipulating desktop .configuration files) as shown > below :- > There seems to be though a conflict (which I don't understand why ) > between the two packages as both are different. Can somebody explain ? > I do see the conflict line in dconf-tools > > 'Conflicts: dconf' Damn it, you’re right. This goes directly against Policy. Leo, what do you think could be done about this? Since dconf is not a very widespread tool, I’d appreciate if you could rename the binary - and maybe also the package name, since it’s confusing for users who look for GNOME-related packages and stomp on a sysadmin tool. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.5.1-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package dconf has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/694160 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Processed: bugs in stable
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 684889 2.11.3-4
Bug #684889 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [eglibc] eglibc:
CVE-2012-3480
There is no source info for the package 'eglibc' at version '2.11.3-4' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.11.3-4'
Marked as found in versions 2.11.3-4.
> unarchive 689314
Bug #689314 {Done: Niko Tyni } [perl] perl: segfaults when
echoing a very long string [CVE-2012-5195]
Unarchived Bug 689314
> found 689314 5.10.1-17squeeze3
Bug #689314 {Done: Niko Tyni } [perl] perl: segfaults when
echoing a very long string [CVE-2012-5195]
Marked as found in versions perl/5.10.1-17squeeze3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
684889: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684889
689314: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689314
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#677861: lftp: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef __int32_t gl_intptr_t'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 677861 patch Bug #677861 [src:lftp] lftp: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef __int32_t gl_intptr_t' Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677861 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677861: lftp: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef __int32_t gl_intptr_t'
tags 677861 patch thanks On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 08:22:24PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [...] > Installed in fischer's sid chroot. Thanks. The attached patch works around the issue on kFreeBSD. Build tested in the sid chroot on fischer.debian.org. Hopefully kFreeBSD porters or package maintainers can now pick this up and discuss a suitable long term solution for gnulib on kFreeBSD with gnulib upstream?! -- Andreas Henriksson Description: prevent sys/_stdint.h from redefining intptr_t et.al. Author: Andreas Henriksson Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/677861 Forwarded: no --- lftp-4.3.6.orig/lib/stdint.in.h +++ lftp-4.3.6/lib/stdint.in.h @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ _@GUARD_PREFIX@_STDINT_H is defined. The include_next requires a split double-inclusion guard. */ # @INCLUDE_NEXT@ @NEXT_STDINT_H@ +#ifdef __FreeBSD_kernel__ +// prevent sys/_stdint.h from being included and redefine intptr_t et.al. +#define _SYS__STDINT_H_ +#endif #endif #if ! defined _@GUARD_PREFIX@_STDINT_H && ! defined _GL_JUST_INCLUDE_SYSTEM_STDINT_H signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688682: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/dma/dma.conf
Hi, On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:32:38PM +0100, Laszlo Kajan wrote: > Control: tag -1 + pending > > Implemented Arno's suggestion, debdiff attached. I have uplaoded Laszlo's patch unchanged to DELAYED/5-day, his debdiff still applies. Best regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659155: Status of kdeadmin 4:4.8.4-2 (bug 659155)?
Control: tag -1 -patch -pending I have uploaded version 4:4.8.4-2 which adds a warning in the user interface. Once it gets into Wheezy the severity should be downgraded to normal, as the bug is still there but users have a warning about it. -- You are the Doc, Doc! Marty McFly To Dr. Emmett Brown, Back to the Future III Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: Re: Bug#659155: Status of kdeadmin 4:4.8.4-2 (bug 659155)?
Processing control commands: > tag -1 -patch -pending Bug #659155 [system-config-printer-kde] Hangs when trying to add a new printer Removed tag(s) patch. Bug #659155 [system-config-printer-kde] Hangs when trying to add a new printer Removed tag(s) pending. -- 659155: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659155 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694461: marked as done (libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (<< 0.4.3-2))
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:02:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694461: fixed in gtk-vnc 0.5.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #694461, regarding libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (<< 0.4.3-2) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694461 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg Version: 0.4.3-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg. Unpacking libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (from .../libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg_0.4.1-4_amd64.deb) ... Setting up libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (0.4.1-4) ... Selecting previously deselected package libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg. Unpacking libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg (from .../libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg_0.5.0-3_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg_0.5.0-3_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgvnc-1.0.so.0.0.1', which is also in package libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg 0.4.1-4 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgvnc-1.0.so.0.0.1 The libgvnc* packages were split off recently: gtk-vnc (0.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * Split out libgvnc-1.0 The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: libgtk-vnc-1.0-dbg (<= 0.4.3-1) The replaced package name has a typo: the SOVERSION part is missing. The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg Breaks: libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (<< 0.4.3-2) Replaces: libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (<< 0.4.3-2) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg=0.4.1-4_libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg=0.5.0-3.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: gtk-vnc Source-Version: 0.5.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gtk-vnc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Guido Günther (supplier of updated gtk-vnc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:44:25 +0100 Source: gtk-vnc Binary: libgvnc-1.0-0 libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg libgvnc-1.0-dev libgtk-vnc-1.0-0 libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg libgtk-vnc-1.0-dev libgtk-vnc-2.0-0 libgtk-vnc-2.0-0-dbg libgtk-vnc-2.0-dev gir1.2-gtk-vnc-2.0 python-gtk-vnc mozilla-gtk-vnc gvncviewer Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Libvirt Maintainers Changed-By: Guido Günther Description: gir1.2-gtk-vnc-2.0 - GObject introspection data for GTK-VNC. gvncviewer - VNC viewer using gtk-vnc libgtk-vnc-1.0-0 - VNC viewer widget for GTK+2 (runtime libraries) libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg - VNC viewer widget for GTK+2 (debugging symbols) libgtk-vnc-1.0-dev - VNC viewer widget for GTK+2 (development f
Bug#694365: release.debian.org: unblock: aephea/10.008-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package aephea
This upload fixes RC bug #694365 (file conflict between two packages).
unblock aephea/10.008-2
Thanks,
Joost
PS: full diff between aephea 10.008-1 (currently in testing/wheezy)
and the proposed one is:
diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/changelog aephea-10.008/debian/changelog
--- aephea-10.008/debian/changelog 2011-05-12 02:13:25.0 +0200
+++ aephea-10.008/debian/changelog 2012-11-26 10:14:28.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+aephea (10.008-2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control: add missing Breaks+Replaces: zoem-doc, to enable upgrades
+from squeeze to wheezy. Thanks Andreas Beckmann. (Closes: #694365)
+
+ -- Joost van Baal-Ilić Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:13:51 +0100
+
aephea (10.008-1) unstable; urgency=low
* First upload (Closes: #620479).
diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/control aephea-10.008/debian/control
--- aephea-10.008/debian/control2011-04-27 07:40:21.0 +0200
+++ aephea-10.008/debian/control2012-11-26 10:12:59.0 +0100
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
Package: aephea
Architecture: all
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Breaks: zoem-doc
+Replaces: zoem-doc
Recommends: zoem
Description: text-based authoring tool for HTML
Aephea is an HTML authoring framework. It enforces HTML well-formedness
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677054: marked as done (nut-client: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#677054: fixed in nut 2.6.4-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #677054, regarding nut-client: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 677054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677054 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: nut-client Version: 2.6.4-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But this is not the real problem, the real problem is that this prompt shows up in the first place, as there was nobody modifying this conffile at all, the package has just been installed and upgraded... This is a violation of policy 10.7.3, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3, which says "[These scripts handling conffiles] must not ask unnecessary questions (particularly during upgrades), and must otherwise be good citizens." http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling should help with figuring out how to do this properly. In http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00675.html and followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with severity serious. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Setting up nut-client (2.6.4-1) ... Configuration file `/etc/nut/nut.conf' ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : start a shell to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** nut.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing nut-client (--configure): EOF on stdin at conffile prompt cheers, Andreas nut_2.6.4-1.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: nut Source-Version: 2.6.4-2.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nut, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 677...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sébastien Villemot (supplier of updated nut package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:09:33 +0100 Source: nut Binary: nut nut-server nut-client nut-cgi nut-snmp nut-xml nut-powerman-pdu nut-doc libupsclient1 libupsclient1-dev python-nut nut-monitor libups-nut-perl Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2.6.4-2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Arnaud Quette Changed-By: Sébastien Villemot Description: libups-nut-perl - network UPS tools - Perl bindings for NUT server libupsclient1 - network UPS tools - client library libupsclient1-dev - network UPS tools - development files nut- network UPS tools - metapackage nut-cgi- network UPS tools - web interface nut-client - network UPS tools - clients nut-doc- network UPS tools - documentation nut-monitor - network UPS tools - GUI application to monitor UPS status nut-powerman-pdu - network UPS tools - PowerMan PDU driver nut-server - network UPS tools - core system nut-snmp - network UPS tools - SNMP driver nut-xml- network UPS tools - XML/HTTP driver python-nut - network UPS tools - Python bindings for NUT server Closes: 677054 Changes: nut (2.6.4-2.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/nut-client.preinst: revert /etc/nut/nut.conf mangling done by older versions of the postinst (Closes: #677054) Checksums-Sha1: 61a966858a148d3dee6817b6faeab891212a94ba 2698 nut_2.6.4-2.1.dsc 7605198c2503b2884574888fb6a2b0b86cdd3d44 38992 nut_2.6.4-2.1.debian.tar.gz d6c830f845bb79df0fd774cb
Bug#694486: lib/LWP/Authen/Wsse.pm uses Digest::SHA1
Package: liblwp-authen-wsse-perl Version: 0.05-1 Severity: serious lib/LWP/Authen/Wsse.pm uses Digest::SHA1 which is no longer in Debian. It should use Digest::SHA instead which is part of the core modules included with the perl interpreter since 5.10. In most cases just replacing Digest::SHA1 by Digest::SHA should be enough. Also change Digest/SHA1.pm to Digest/SHA.pm. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694483: CVEs: CVE-2012-2882 CVE-2012-5359 CVE-2012-5360 CVE-2012-5361
Source: libav Version: 0.8.4 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Dear Maintainer, I have here another series of CVEs for ffmpeg/libav: CVE-2012-2882 CVE-2012-5359 CVE-2012-5360 CVE-2012-5361 For the last 3 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/msvr/msvr12-017 claims that they are fixed in ffmpeg 0.11, but the available information on all of them is a bit thin. Thanks for all the good work! AW -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'), (40, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.29 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677861: lftp: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef __int32_t gl_intptr_t'
Hello, Michael Stapelberg (26/11/2012): > Andreas Henriksson writes: > > Hopefully the explanation of this mail makes more sense. > > Anyone with a kFreeBSD installation are welcome to try to build > > lftp with any of the solutions discussed to see how much further > > this gets us. > This is slightly off-topic, but aren’t porter boxes supposed to help > with that? I fail to see how I can use them (e.g. fischer.debian.org) in > this very case: I don’t have root access, so I cannot install the > build-deps of lftp. Do I really have to send a request and wait for some > human to install the deps before I can do any work on this? yes: http://dsa.debian.org/doc/install-req/ Installed in fischer's sid chroot. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688847: Unclear status of CVE-2012-2774 CVE-2012-2783 CVE-2012-2791 CVE-2012-2797 CVE-2012-2803 CVE-2012-2804
I just had a look at the above mentioned problems and I am a bit unsure about their status. As far as I can see the fixes are not applied, the status in http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libav still lists these issues as open, but the bug is closed. Are these problems real? Are they fixed? cu AW -- [...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet) Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#692295: marked as done (Uses SIGHUP instead of SIGTERM for graceful shutdown)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:02:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#692295: fixed in couchdb 1.2.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #692295, regarding Uses SIGHUP instead of SIGTERM for graceful shutdown to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 692295: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692295 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: couchdb Version: 1.2.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I think i encountered a regression of "couchdb: Init script doesn't stop or restart the server" (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681549) in current couchdb from unstable. The initscript doen't stop/restart couchdb: root@debian-wheezy:~# pgrep -u couchdb 3435 3449 3451 3468 3483 root@debian-wheezy:~# /etc/init.d/couchdb stop [ ok ] Stopping database server: couchdb. root@debian-wheezy:~# sleep 5 root@debian-wheezy:~# pgrep -u couchdb 3435 3449 3451 3468 3483 I'm using a fresh debian-testing in a vagrant box. I need to install couchdb from unstable, because i can't install couchdb from testing in an automated environment due to "couchdb: missing write permission for /var/run/couchdb" (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681549). Thanx for caring, Varac -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (1, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages couchdb depends on: ii adduser 3.113+nmu3 ii erlang-base 1:15.b.1-dfsg-3 ii erlang-crypto1:15.b.1-dfsg-3 ii erlang-eunit 1:15.b.1-dfsg-3 ii erlang-inets 1:15.b.1-dfsg-3 ii erlang-os-mon1:15.b.1-dfsg-3 ii erlang-ssl 1:15.b.1-dfsg-3 ii erlang-syntax-tools 1:15.b.1-dfsg-3 ii erlang-tools 1:15.b.1-dfsg-3 ii erlang-xmerl 1:15.b.1-dfsg-3 ii libc62.13-35 ii libcurl3 7.26.0-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.1-7 ii libicu48 4.8.1.1-9 ii libjs-jquery 1.7.2+debian-2.1 ii libjs-jquery-form6-1 ii libmozjs185-1.0 1.8.5-1.0.0+dfsg-3.1 ii libstdc++6 4.7.1-7 ii lsb-base 4.1+Debian7 ii procps 1:3.3.3-2 couchdb recommends no packages. couchdb suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/couchdb/local.ini changed [not included] /etc/init.d/couchdb changed [not included] -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: couchdb Source-Version: 1.2.0-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of couchdb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 692...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) (supplier of updated couchdb package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:24:24 +0100 Source: couchdb Binary: couchdb Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.2.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) Changed-By: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) Description: couchdb- RESTful document oriented database Closes: 652172 692295 Changes: couchdb (1.2.0-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Rework couchdb own run directory (updates: #681549). * Use SIGTERM instead of SIGHUP for graceful shutdown (closes: #692295). * Wait until complete stop of service. * Use couchdb user for logrotate (closes: #652172). Checksums-Sha1: 9f67fd5adafcc10eb6e4b94eb5a3316b0d94b36d 1243 couchdb_1.2.0-3.dsc a2318921c9e9ddaacf52d7d2725e7e06c7042a1c 9844 couchdb_1.2.0-3.debian.tar.gz d3031b81b0b235659e555e790343d34b1aff3ada 1026764 couchdb_1.2.0-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c1d56b9c716a49d36e03fa578538cd007b743814b94385f2f95fb19f9a2d1a75 1243 couchdb_1.2.0-3.dsc cd003e545fa4457ab2b2ce4fe0d9c1d87339c39f7f207815b9a55ba49642dc72 9844 couchdb_1.2.0-3.debian.tar.gz fa203b05e7b13951bd29e0b39058cedac050a3701edded7f0457b1f2db4e33a2 1026764 co
Bug#692791: Proposed patch now available...
OK, I've posted proposed patches for CUPS 1.6 and trunk (1.7); patches for older versions of CUPS will be substantially similar (might be some churn due to new configuration directives) Available at: http://www.cups.org/str.php?L4223 Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694469: marked as done (node-backbone: missing Breaks+Replaces: libjs-backbone (<< 0.5.3-3))
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:47:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694469: fixed in backbone 0.9.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #694469, regarding node-backbone: missing Breaks+Replaces: libjs-backbone (<< 0.5.3-3) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694469: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694469 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: node-backbone Version: 0.5.3-3 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: wheezy->sid (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously unselected package libjs-backbone. Unpacking libjs-backbone (from .../libjs-backbone_0.5.3-2+deb7u1_all.deb) ... Setting up libjs-underscore (1.1.6-1+deb7u1) ... Setting up libjs-backbone (0.5.3-2+deb7u1) ... Selecting previously unselected package node-backbone. Unpacking node-backbone (from .../node-backbone_0.9.2-2_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/node-backbone_0.9.2-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/nodejs/backbone.js', which is also in package libjs-backbone 0.5.3-2+deb7u1 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from wheezy to sid (but not within wheezy or sid itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on wheezy->sid upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for wheezy and sid on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/lib/nodejs/backbone.js node-backbone was split from libjs-backbone in 0.5.3-3 The following relationships are currently defined: Package: node-backbone Depends: libjs-backbone Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: node-backbone Breaks: libjs-backbone (<< 0.5.3-3) Replaces: libjs-backbone (<< 0.5.3-3) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. libjs-backbone=0.5.3-2+deb7u1_node-backbone=0.9.2-2.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: backbone Source-Version: 0.9.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of backbone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jonas Smedegaard (supplier of updated backbone package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:09:26 +0100 Source: backbone Binary: libjs-backbone node-backbone Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard Description: libjs-backbone - some Backbone for JavaScript applications - browser library node-backbone - some Backbone for JavaScript applications - Node module Closes: 694469 Changes: backbone (0.9.2-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix break and replace older libjs* package shipping also node* file. Closes: bug#694469. Thanks to Andreas Beckmann. Checksums-Sha1: ca246827382c7337f1bb89e9b69a4cfe30bb7f2c 2058 backbone_0.9.2-3.dsc 508dd1d0503af9a0a9edd9645f2007cd3780ed4d 5889 backbone_0.9.2-3.debian.tar.gz e1b4c299a2ac392c2cfc9992cefead6623b9d5e1 74416 libjs-backbone_0.9.2-3_all.deb 007a5637cab8b8c1f48d2a912aea3a4ed02e30ef 48826 node-backbone_0.9.2-3_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: eab080
Bug#677407: gnome-dbg: fails to upgrade from squeeze - apt does not find an upgrade path
On 2012-11-26 12:44, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 at 10:49:19 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> the problem I previously reported for gnome-dbg now also shows up for >> gnome-core. > > Your log from 1st November is for gnome-dbg. Is this reproducible > for gnome-core too, or only for gnome-dbg? squeeze2wheezy/main/affected/gnome-dbg_1:3.4+6.log libglib2.0-0 : Breaks: eog (< 3.2.2-3) but 2.30.2-1 is to be installed E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. squeeze2wheezy/main/affected/gnome-core_1:3.4+6.log E: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgstreamer0.10-0'. different issue, could be filed already, but I didn't have time to look for 'immediate configuration' bugs check the dependenecy tree for circular dependencies - and break them :-) > Could you please explain how an apt or GNOME developer with no particular > knowledge of piuparts or pbuilder can reproduce this upgrade issue? (I > use sbuild for my package uploads, so I don't have a working pbuilder > setup; in his message of 13th October, Neil Williams performed a > "realistic" upgrade test of gnome-dbg in a Squeeze virtual machine, > which was successful.) the piuparts logs contain the piuparts command line, installing piuparts from sid and rerunning that command should work (just drop all the experimental flags piuparts complains it does not know, e.g. --allow-database, they should not be needed for checking the gnome issues) > Would an artificial dependency, gnome-dbg Depends: gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 > or even gnome-core Depends: gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10, perhaps reassure apt that > it > was doing the right thing by installing gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 and > dropping gir1.0-gstreamer-0.10? Or is there something else that src:meta-gnome > could do to hint apt to do the right thing? That could work. Or try to find a library in the involved dependency tree that has a high score and try to add another Breaks: gir1.0-gstreamer-0.10 Perhaps it loses this battle ... (the metapackages usually have a low score) If you put such packages (for amd64) somewhere, I could make some tests. > Perhaps another way to convince apt to DTRT would be to change the > dependency > > libseed-gtk3-0 D: gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 | libgstreamer0.10-0 (< 0.10.25-3) > > and remove the obsolete alternative (the second branch), to make the > "right answer" more obvious? since squeeze has 0.10.30-1, this should be cleaned up, but it won't help (as it's not a possible solution, i.e. there is no old package that could be kept to satisfy this) Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#685524: marked as done (After upgrading to 4:4.8.2+dfsg-1 kwin segfaults on startup)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:36:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#685524: fixed in qt4-x11 4:4.8.2+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #685524, regarding After upgrading to 4:4.8.2+dfsg-1 kwin segfaults on startup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685524: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685524 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: qt4-x11 Version: 4:4.8.2+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Starting KDE with qt4 version 4:4.8.2+dfsg-1 installed causes kwin to segfault on startup somewhere in libpthread, with 4:4.8.2-2+b1 everything works as expected. I'll see if I can generate a proper backtrace.. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.6.0-rc2 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: qt4-x11 Source-Version: 4:4.8.2+dfsg-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qt4-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 685...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer (supplier of updated qt4-x11 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:08:14 -0300 Source: qt4-x11 Binary: libqtcore4 libqt4-core libqtgui4 libqt4-gui libqt4-network libqt4-opengl libqt4-script libqt4-scripttools libqt4-sql libqt4-sql-ibase libqt4-sql-mysql libqt4-sql-odbc libqt4-sql-psql libqt4-sql-sqlite libqt4-sql-sqlite2 libqt4-sql-tds libqt4-svg libqt4-webkit libqt4-xml libqt4-xmlpatterns libqt4-dbus libqt4-qt3support libqt4-designer libqt4-help libqt4-assistant libqt4-test libqt4-phonon libqt4-declarative libqt4-declarative-folderlistmodel libqt4-declarative-gestures libqt4-declarative-particles libqt4-declarative-shaders libqt4-dev libqt4-dev-bin libqt4-private-dev libqt4-opengl-dev libqt4-dbg libqt4-designer-dbg libqt4-qt3support-dbg libqt4-script-dbg libqt4-webkit-dbg libqt4-xmlpatterns-dbg qt4-bin-dbg qt4-demos-dbg qt4-designer qt4-dev-tools qt4-qmake qt4-qtconfig qt4-demos qt4-qmlviewer qt4-linguist-tools qdbus qt4-doc qt4-doc-html Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 4:4.8.2+dfsg-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Changed-By: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer Description: libqt4-assistant - transitional package for Qt 4 assistant module libqt4-core - transitional package for Qt 4 core non-GUI runtime libraries libqt4-dbg - Qt 4 library debugging symbols libqt4-dbus - Qt 4 D-Bus module libqt4-declarative - Qt 4 Declarative module libqt4-declarative-folderlistmodel - Qt 4 folderlistmodel QML plugin libqt4-declarative-gestures - Qt 4 gestures QML plugin libqt4-declarative-particles - Qt 4 particles QML plugin libqt4-declarative-shaders - Qt 4 shaders QML plugin libqt4-designer - Qt 4 designer module libqt4-designer-dbg - Qt 4 designer library debugging symbols libqt4-dev - Qt 4 development files libqt4-dev-bin - Qt 4 development programs libqt4-gui - transitional package for Qt 4 GUI runtime libraries libqt4-help - Qt 4 help module libqt4-network - Qt 4 network module libqt4-opengl - Qt 4 OpenGL module libqt4-opengl-dev - Qt 4 OpenGL library development files libqt4-phonon - Qt 4 Phonon module libqt4-private-dev - Qt 4 private development files libqt4-qt3support - Qt 3 compatibility library for Qt 4 libqt4-qt3support-dbg - Qt 3 compatibility library for Qt 4 debugging symbols libqt4-script - Qt 4 script module libqt4-script-dbg - Qt 4 script library debugging symbols libqt4-scripttools - Qt 4 script tools module libqt4-sql - Qt 4 SQL module libqt4-sql-ibase - Qt 4 InterBase/FireBird database driver libqt4-sql-mysql - Qt 4 MySQL database driver libqt4-sql-odbc - Qt 4 ODBC database driver libqt4-sql-psql - Qt 4 PostgreSQL database driver libqt4-sql-sqlite - Qt 4 SQLite 3 database drive
Bug#694474: MasonX::Request::WithMultiSession needs Digest::SHA1
Package: libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl Version: 0.30-3 Severity: serious perl -MMasonX::Request::WithMultiSession fails: % perl -MMasonX::Request::WithMultiSession Can't locate Digest/SHA1.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/share/perl5/MasonX/Request/WithMultiSession.pm line 5. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/MasonX/Request/WithMultiSession.pm line 5. Compilation failed in require. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted. The use of Digest::SHA1 should be replaced with Digest::SHA (which is provided by the perl package and needs no additional dependency). Ansgar -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-32-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl depends on: ii libapache-session-perl 1.89-1 ii libapache-session-wrapper-perl 0.34-1 ii libhtml-mason-perl 1:1.50-1 ii perl [perl5]5.14.2-15 Versions of packages libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl recommends: pn libapache2-mod-perl2 libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Bug #628919: Starting with kernel v3.0, chronyd will refuse to start
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package chrony
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'chrony'
Limit currently set to 'package':'chrony'
> fixed 628919 1.24-3.1+deb7u1
Bug #628919 {Done: John Hasler } [chrony]
/usr/sbin/chronyd: Starting with kernel v3.0, chronyd will refuse to start
Bug #638252 {Done: John Hasler } [chrony] chrony refuses
to start on kernel 3.x
Marked as fixed in versions chrony/1.24-3.1+deb7u1.
Marked as fixed in versions chrony/1.24-3.1+deb7u1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
628919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628919
638252: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638252
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694403: Please ship an init script, not just a systemd unit
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:34:27 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi, > > > In practice, my experience is that if I install bootchart, then install > > bootchart2 without purging bootchart, and boot with systemd, systemd gets > > very confused and leaves the bootchart daemon running indefinitely. In > > contrast, if I boot with sysvinit, the init script in /etc/rc2.d/ does a > > perfectly adequate job of stopping bootchartd at the right point. So the > > lack of sysvinit integration looks to actually hurt integration with systemd > > too. > > systemd doesn't get "very confused". The bug here is, that bootchart2 > ships systemd unit files, but doesn't actually enable them. > The systemd unit responsible for stopping the bootchart daemon is called > bootchart-done.service. > Until we ship the necessary helper tool, systemd units need to be > enabled manually via systemctl enable Am I supposed to run that in postinst/prerm (disable)? Or should I just document it in README.Debian? Or is it common knowledge among systemd users? > David, as for this particular case, when you ship a sysv init script, > please consider naming it after the native systemd service file (i.e > bootchart-done). ACK. Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#694395: marked as done (libshell-command-perl: missing Breaks+Replaces: libextutils-command-perl)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:32:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694395: fixed in libshell-command-perl 0.06-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #694395, regarding libshell-command-perl: missing Breaks+Replaces: libextutils-command-perl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694395: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694395 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libshell-command-perl Version: 0.06-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package libextutils-command-perl. Unpacking libextutils-command-perl (from .../libextutils-command-perl_1.16-1_all.deb) ... Setting up libextutils-command-perl (1.16-1) ... Selecting previously deselected package libshell-command-perl. (Reading database ... 7700 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libshell-command-perl (from .../libshell-command-perl_0.06-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libshell-command-perl_0.06-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/perl5/Shell/Command.pm', which is also in package libextutils-command-perl 1.16-1 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/man/man3/Shell::Command.3pm.gz usr/share/perl5/Shell/Command.pm The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libshell-command-perl Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libshell-command-perl Breaks: libextutils-command-perl Replaces: libextutils-command-perl As libextutils-command-perl has been removed from Debian, the Breaks/ Replaces can be unversioned. Alternatively Conflicts: libextutils-command-perl could be used instead of Breaks+Replaces. Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. libextutils-command-perl=1.16-1_libshell-command-perl=0.06-1.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libshell-command-perl Source-Version: 0.06-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libshell-command-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Salvatore Bonaccorso (supplier of updated libshell-command-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:12:29 +0100 Source: libshell-command-perl Binary: libshell-command-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.06-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso Description: libshell-command-perl - cross-platform functions emulating common shell commands Closes: 694395 Changes: libshell-command-perl (0.06-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * Correct Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git URLs. * Add Breaks and Replaces on libextutils-command-perl. As libextutils-command-perl has been removed from
Bug#694403: Please ship an init script, not just a systemd unit
Hi, > In practice, my experience is that if I install bootchart, then install > bootchart2 without purging bootchart, and boot with systemd, systemd gets > very confused and leaves the bootchart daemon running indefinitely. In > contrast, if I boot with sysvinit, the init script in /etc/rc2.d/ does a > perfectly adequate job of stopping bootchartd at the right point. So the > lack of sysvinit integration looks to actually hurt integration with systemd > too. systemd doesn't get "very confused". The bug here is, that bootchart2 ships systemd unit files, but doesn't actually enable them. The systemd unit responsible for stopping the bootchart daemon is called bootchart-done.service. Until we ship the necessary helper tool, systemd units need to be enabled manually via systemctl enable David, as for this particular case, when you ship a sysv init script, please consider naming it after the native systemd service file (i.e bootchart-done). Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#677191: Bug#132355: Bug#677191: emacsen-common: errors while upgrading to wheezy(some time ago) => wheezy(today)
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:07:46PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:28:23PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > > Hi, > > > > (Meta: I was going to express my intent to NMU emacsen-common to fix the > > #676424 RC bug, when I discovered that the package had another one > > (#677191) => trying to understand what can be done with that one first.) > > > > Rob Browning wrote (26 Jun 2012 02:08:56 GMT) : > > > Agustin Martin writes: > > >> As pointed out in #132355, using single dashed -no-site-file should > > >> work for both XEmacs and (although undocumented) FSF Emacs. > > >> > > >> If maintainer wants to be in the safe side and use only documented > > >> features I expect something like attached patch to work for > > >> emacsen-common. > > > > > > OK, I either hadn't seen this before, or just forgot. It looks an > > > update to emacsen-common would be in order, right? > > > > Reading these bugs log, it's not clear to me whether the single-dashed > > option idea: > > > > 1. has any chance to fix #677191 and friends > > 2. was tried in the context of the Squeeze -> Wheezy dist-upgrade > > #132355 is about decreasing verbosity when byte-compiling emacsen-common. > When I mentioned it in #677191 I did not yet know what was causing the > #677191 problem and thought that some of the files loaded at init might > be related, but few messages below in #677191 that was discarded and the > real reason for this problem become more evident. > > The -no-site-file changes now seems mostly a cosmetic issue for XEmacs > with no relation at all to #677191. Looking again at xemacs21 status I see that it is not in testing and that sid version ships the missing symlinks in the package instead of creating them from a postinst on configuration. I would expect that this should make all lisp stuff available during emacsen-common configuration, thus fixing both #677191 and #619367 as well as #670292, closed with sid upload. As a matter of fact I no longer see the problem in squeeze->sid upgrade. Can others still reproduce the problem? -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694471: libstrongswan: missing Breaks+Replaces: strongswan-ikev2 (<< 4.6.4)
Package: libstrongswan Version: 4.6.4-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->sid (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package strongswan-ikev2. Unpacking strongswan-ikev2 (from .../strongswan-ikev2_4.4.1-5.2_amd64.deb) ... Setting up strongswan-ikev2 (4.4.1-5.2) ... Preparing to replace libstrongswan 4.4.1-5.2 (using .../libstrongswan_4.6.4-5_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libstrongswan ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libstrongswan_4.6.4-5_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/ipsec/plugins/libstrongswan-attr-sql.so', which is also in package strongswan-ikev2 4.4.1-5.2 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to sid (but not within squeeze or sid itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->sid upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and sid on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/lib/ipsec/plugins/libstrongswan-attr-sql.so usr/lib/ipsec/plugins/libstrongswan-attr.so usr/lib/ipsec/plugins/libstrongswan-curl.so usr/lib/ipsec/plugins/libstrongswan-kernel-netlink.so usr/lib/ipsec/plugins/libstrongswan-ldap.so The plugins were moved around recently: strongswan (4.6.4-1) experimental; urgency=low - move ldap, curl, kernel-netlink and attr* plugins to libstrongswan, since they are used by pluto too. closes: #611846 The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libstrongswan Conflicts: strongswan (<< 4.2.12-1) Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libstrongswan Breaks: strongswan-ikev2 (<< 4.6.4) Replaces: strongswan-ikev2 (<< 4.6.4) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. strongswan-ikev2=4.4.1-5.2_libstrongswan=4.6.4-5.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Processed: Re: Bug#685524: Reopen #685524
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #685524 [qt4-x11] After upgrading to 4:4.8.2+dfsg-1 kwin segfaults on startup Added tag(s) pending. -- 685524: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685524 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#685524: Reopen #685524
Control: tag -1 pending On Sun 25 Nov 2012 07:11:33 Arto Jantunen escribió: > The changelog for -3 includes "Add fix_jit_crash_on_x86_64.patch, which > avoids 32-bit branch offset overflows. Taken from upstream." This is > either the same patch that was removed in -2, or a new patch causing the > same symptoms. Here is a backtrace from lightdm-kde-greeter (I'm not > currently running kwin, but I assume it would crash the same way): My bad, I added the patch to solve this but failed to add it in debian/series. Thanks for noticing! -- Without us [Free Software developers], people would study computer science and programming without ever having seen a real program in its entirety. That's like becoming writers without ever having read a complete book. Matthias Ettrich, founder of the KDE project. http://www.efytimes.com/efytimes/25412/news.htm Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#694469: node-backbone: missing Breaks+Replaces: libjs-backbone (<< 0.5.3-3)
Package: node-backbone Version: 0.5.3-3 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: wheezy->sid (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously unselected package libjs-backbone. Unpacking libjs-backbone (from .../libjs-backbone_0.5.3-2+deb7u1_all.deb) ... Setting up libjs-underscore (1.1.6-1+deb7u1) ... Setting up libjs-backbone (0.5.3-2+deb7u1) ... Selecting previously unselected package node-backbone. Unpacking node-backbone (from .../node-backbone_0.9.2-2_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/node-backbone_0.9.2-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/nodejs/backbone.js', which is also in package libjs-backbone 0.5.3-2+deb7u1 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from wheezy to sid (but not within wheezy or sid itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on wheezy->sid upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for wheezy and sid on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/lib/nodejs/backbone.js node-backbone was split from libjs-backbone in 0.5.3-3 The following relationships are currently defined: Package: node-backbone Depends: libjs-backbone Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: node-backbone Breaks: libjs-backbone (<< 0.5.3-3) Replaces: libjs-backbone (<< 0.5.3-3) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. libjs-backbone=0.5.3-2+deb7u1_node-backbone=0.9.2-2.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#694468: libldns-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: ldnsutils (<< 1.6.13-3)
Package: libldns-dev Version: 1.6.13-3 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: wheezy->sid (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously unselected package ldnsutils. Unpacking ldnsutils (from .../ldnsutils_1.6.13-1_amd64.deb) ... Setting up ldnsutils (1.6.13-1) ... Selecting previously unselected package libldns-dev. Unpacking libldns-dev (from .../libldns-dev_1.6.13-3_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libldns-dev_1.6.13-3_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/ldns-config.1.gz', which is also in package ldnsutils 1.6.13-1 dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libldns-dev_1.6.13-3_amd64.deb This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from wheezy to sid (but not within wheezy or sid itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/man/man1/ldns-config.1.gz The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libldns-dev Conflicts: n/a Breaks:ldnsutil (<< 1.6.13-2) Replaces: ldnsutil (<< 1.6.13-2) Wrong package name: ldnsutil*s* insufficient version: the man page was still there in -2 The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libldns-dev Breaks:ldnsutils (<< 1.6.13-3) Replaces: ldnsutils (<< 1.6.13-3) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. ldnsutils=1.6.13-1_libldns-dev=1.6.13-3.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#694403: Please ship an init script, not just a systemd unit
tags 694403 confirmed pending thanks Hello Steve, On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:42:54 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > [..] > > In practice, my experience is that if I install bootchart, then install > bootchart2 without purging bootchart, and boot with systemd, systemd gets > very confused and leaves the bootchart daemon running indefinitely. In > contrast, if I boot with sysvinit, the init script in /etc/rc2.d/ does a > perfectly adequate job of stopping bootchartd at the right point. So the > lack of sysvinit integration looks to actually hurt integration with systemd > too. Could you please test the attached initscript? Or, alternatively, do you want a compiled package to test? I wrote it basing on /etc/init.d/skeleton, and on what bootchartd is expected to do (i.e. when you do "/etc/init.d/bootchart2 start", it actually *stops* the daemon). I'm not a systemd user, so I would be glad if you could test this for me, before doing an upload to sid :) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 bootchart2.init Description: Binary data signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#694461: libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (<< 0.4.3-2)
Package: libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg Version: 0.4.3-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg. Unpacking libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (from .../libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg_0.4.1-4_amd64.deb) ... Setting up libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (0.4.1-4) ... Selecting previously deselected package libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg. Unpacking libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg (from .../libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg_0.5.0-3_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg_0.5.0-3_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgvnc-1.0.so.0.0.1', which is also in package libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg 0.4.1-4 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgvnc-1.0.so.0.0.1 The libgvnc* packages were split off recently: gtk-vnc (0.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * Split out libgvnc-1.0 The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: libgtk-vnc-1.0-dbg (<= 0.4.3-1) The replaced package name has a typo: the SOVERSION part is missing. The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg Breaks: libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (<< 0.4.3-2) Replaces: libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg (<< 0.4.3-2) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. libgtk-vnc-1.0-0-dbg=0.4.1-4_libgvnc-1.0-0-dbg=0.5.0-3.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Processed: tagging 694397
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 694397 + pending Bug #694397 [calligrawords-data] calligrawords-data: missing Breaks+Replaces: koffice-data Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 694397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694397 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 694459 by 694308 Bug #694459 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: lcdf-typetools/2.92+dfsg1-1.1 [NMU] [RC] 694459 was not blocked by any bugs. 694459 was blocking: 694352 Added blocking bug(s) of 694459: 694308 > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 694459: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694459 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694283: marked as done (libcanberra-gtk-common-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: libcanberra-gtk-dev (<< 0.26))
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:32:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694283: fixed in libcanberra 0.28-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #694283, regarding libcanberra-gtk-common-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: libcanberra-gtk-dev (<< 0.26) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694283: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694283 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libcanberra-gtk-common-dev Version: 0.28-5 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Control: found -1 0.26-1 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package libcanberra-gtk-dev. Unpacking libcanberra-gtk-dev (from .../libcanberra-gtk-dev_0.24-1_amd64.deb) ... Setting up libcanberra-gtk-dev (0.24-1) ... Selecting previously deselected package libcanberra-gtk-common-dev. Unpacking libcanberra-gtk-common-dev (from .../libcanberra-gtk-common-dev_0.28-5_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libcanberra-gtk-common-dev_0.28-5_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/vala/vapi/libcanberra-gtk.vapi', which is also in package libcanberra-gtk-dev 0.24-1 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/include/canberra-gtk.h usr/share/vala/vapi/libcanberra-gtk.vapi These files were split from libcanberra-gtk-dev recently: libcanberra (0.26-1) experimental; urgency=low * Split header and vapi used for both gtk2 and gtk3 into libcanberra-gtk-common-dev The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libcanberra-gtk-common-dev Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libcanberra-gtk-common-dev Breaks: libcanberra-gtk-dev (<< 0.26) Replaces: libcanberra-gtk-dev (<< 0.26) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. libcanberra-gtk-dev=0.24-1_libcanberra-gtk-common-dev=0.28-5.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libcanberra Source-Version: 0.28-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libcanberra, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Josselin Mouette (supplier of updated libcanberra package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:07:47 +0100 Source: libcanberra Binary: libcanberra0 libcanberra0-dbg libcanberra-dev libcanberra-pulse libcanberra-pulse-dbg libcanberra-gstreamer libcanberra-gstreamer-dbg libcanberra-gtk0 libcanberra-gtk0-dbg libcanberra-gtk-common-dev libcanberra-gtk-dev libcanberra-gtk-module libcanberra-gtk-module-dbg libcanberra-gtk3-0 libcanberra-gtk3-0-dbg libcanberra-gtk3-dev libcanberra-gtk3-module gnome-session-canberra libcanberra-gtk3-module-dbg libcanberra-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.28-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers Changed-By: Josselin Mouette Descriptio
Processed: block
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 694459 Bug #694352 [lcdf-typetools] [lcdf-typetools] lcdf-typetool include non free adobe data; glyph list 694352 was not blocked by any bugs. 694352 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 694352: 694459 -- 694352: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694352 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Patch
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #694352 [lcdf-typetools] [lcdf-typetools] lcdf-typetool include non free adobe data; glyph list Added tag(s) patch. -- 694352: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694352 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694352: Patch
Package: lcdf-typetools control: tags -1 + patch I have a patch and a new package waiting under mentors I join the debian part. the dfsg part is only removing the offending file from the tar ball Bastien -- Dr-Ing Bastien ROUCARIÈS uUniversité de Cergy/SATIE ENS Cachan lcdf-typetools_2.92+dfsg1-1.1.debian.tar.gz Description: application/compressed-tar
Bug#674047: marked as done (gnome-documents: Search fails with "Error invoking Tracker.next_finish()")
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:02:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#674047: fixed in gnome-documents 0.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #674047, regarding gnome-documents: Search fails with "Error invoking Tracker.next_finish()" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 674047: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674047 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gnome-documents Version: 0.4.2-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I found a bug in gnome-documents that render it unusable. When you start writing a search you get no documents show at all but instead an error message like this "Error invoking Tracker.next_finish()" After that you can't go back to the initial documents showing or perform another search and thats render the app complete unusefull I think it was already reported upstream here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671169 Hope you can collaborate in the solution of this bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_PE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=es_PE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gnome-documents depends on: ii dconf-gsettings-backend [gsettings-backend] 0.12.1-1 ii gir1.2-atk-1.0 2.4.0-2 ii gir1.2-clutter-1.0 1.10.4-3 ii gir1.2-evince-3.03.4.0-2 ii gir1.2-freedesktop 1.32.1-1 ii gir1.2-gdata-0.0 0.12.0-1 ii gir1.2-gdkpixbuf-2.0 2.26.1-1 ii gir1.2-glib-2.0 1.32.1-1 ii gir1.2-goa-1.0 3.4.1-1 ii gir1.2-gtk-3.0 3.4.2-1 ii gir1.2-gtkclutter-1.01.2.0-2 ii gir1.2-pango-1.0 1.30.0-1 ii gir1.2-soup-2.4 2.38.1-2 ii gir1.2-tracker-0.14 0.14.1-1 ii gjs 1.32.0-2 ii libc62.13-32 ii libcairo21.12.2-1 ii libevdocument3-4 3.4.0-2 ii libevview3-3 3.4.0-2 ii libgdata13 0.12.0-1 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.1-1 ii libglib2.0-0 2.32.2-1 ii libgnome-desktop-3-2 3.4.1-2 ii libgoa-1.0-0 3.4.1-1 ii libgtk-3-0 3.4.2-1 ii liboauth00.9.4-3+b1 ii libpango1.0-01.30.0-1 ii libsoup2.4-1 2.38.1-2 ii libtracker-sparql-0.14-0 0.14.1-1 ii tracker 0.14.1-1 Versions of packages gnome-documents recommends: ii unoconv 0.5-1 gnome-documents suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: gnome-documents Source-Version: 0.4.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnome-documents, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 674...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Josselin Mouette (supplier of updated gnome-documents package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:31:24 +0100 Source: gnome-documents Binary: gnome-documents Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.4.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers Changed-By: Josselin Mouette Description: gnome-documents - Document manager for GNOME Closes: 674047 Changes: gnome-documents (0.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low . * 01_tracker_cancellations.patch: from upstream git. Correctly handle Tracker cancellations with the new GError API. Closes: #674047.
Bug#694359: marked as done (libcroco-tools: missing Breaks+Replaces: libcroco3 (<< 0.6.2-2))
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:49:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694359: fixed in libcroco 0.6.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #694359, regarding libcroco-tools: missing Breaks+Replaces: libcroco3 (<< 0.6.2-2) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694359: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694359 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libcroco-tools Version: 0.6.2-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package libcroco3. Unpacking libcroco3 (from .../libcroco3_0.6.2-1_amd64.deb) ... Setting up libcroco3 (0.6.2-1) ... Selecting previously deselected package libcroco-tools. (Reading database ... 6405 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libcroco-tools (from .../libcroco-tools_0.6.6-1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libcroco-tools_0.6.6-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/csslint-0.6', which is also in package libcroco3 0.6.2-1 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/bin/csslint-0.6 The -tools package was added recently: libcroco (0.6.2-2) unstable; urgency=low * Move csslint to a new libcroco-tools package, for multiarch cleanliness. The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libcroco-tools Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a Depends: libcroco3 (>= 0.6.2) The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libcroco-tools Breaks: libcroco3 (<< 0.6.2-2) Replaces: libcroco3 (<< 0.6.2-2) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. libcroco3=0.6.2-1_libcroco-tools=0.6.6-1.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libcroco Source-Version: 0.6.6-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libcroco, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Josselin Mouette (supplier of updated libcroco package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:51:18 +0100 Source: libcroco Binary: libcroco3-dev libcroco3 libcroco-tools Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.6.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers Changed-By: Josselin Mouette Description: libcroco-tools - Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) parsing and manipulation toolkit - ut libcroco3 - Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) parsing and manipulation toolkit libcroco3-dev - Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) parsing and manipulation toolkit Closes: 694359 Changes: libcroco (0.6.6-2) unstable; urgency=low . * libcroco-tools breaks/replaces libcroco3 (<< 0.6.2-2). Closes: #694359. Checksums-Sha1: 7413a6e982b5561a44c43bd6d2d0acb2335d3547 1668 libcroco_0.6.6-2.dsc a65518e4cd28a857f3a0849cb907b6f5332400ca 7607 libcroco_0.6.6-2.debian.tar.gz 9f9b0963f8565bca73ec2404050f6a3f081eecf0 156088 li
Bug#694336: marked as done (python-gdata: sourceless Windows binaries)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:49:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694336: fixed in python-gdata 2.0.17+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #694336, regarding python-gdata: sourceless Windows binaries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694336: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694336 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: python-gdata Version: 2.0.17-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Lintian reports: P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Cipher/IDEA.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Cipher/RC5.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Hash/RIPEMD.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Hash/MD4.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Cipher/CAST.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Cipher/ARC4.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Cipher/DES3.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Hash/SHA256.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Hash/MD2.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Cipher/XOR.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Cipher/ARC2.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Cipher/Blowfish.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Cipher/DES.pyd P: python-gdata source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary src/gdata/Crypto/Cipher/AES.pyd As far as I can see, source for these files is not included in the upstream tarball. -- Jakub Wilk --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: python-gdata Source-Version: 2.0.17+dfsg-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-gdata, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dmitry Shachnev (supplier of updated python-gdata package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:43:03 +0400 Source: python-gdata Binary: python-gdata python-gdata-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.17+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team Changed-By: Dmitry Shachnev Description: python-gdata - Google Data Python client library python-gdata-doc - Google Data Python client library, documentation and examples Closes: 694289 694336 Changes: python-gdata (2.0.17+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Add missing Breaks/Replaces for python-gdata (<< 2.0.14-2) to python-gdata-doc (closes: #694289, thanks to Andreas Beckmann for the bug report). * Remove non-free .pyd files from upstream tarball (closes: #694336, thanks to Jakub Wilk for the bug report). + Add debian/get-orig-source.sh script. + Add get-orig-source target to debian/rules and update debian/watch. * Move chmod calls to debian/get-orig-source.sh, so that file permissions do not differ before and after the build. Checksums-Sha1: 8ceb22f124575ef5c87cb2531ac1f26e4e1566dd 2180 python-gdata_2.0.17+dfsg-1.dsc 398fe72fbd0e27ed41448f2fbc307bb695384f13 2377640 python-gdata_2.0.17+dfsg.orig.tar.gz 9badeb21757ffb6b3abbaa08c609dd334c893c5d 7191 python-gdata_2.0.17+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz bd82a9189f6041f17bdd41e47d6ba3073f4a69f3 517096 python-gdata_2.0.17+dfsg-1_all.deb 23304483fa08f3b3b9f863fab7f32bd103724fb2 1678344 python-gdata-doc_2.0.17+dfsg-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: ca267db37747e00f5258fbe4a43d078c23ec0a3309cfb2fac01c07f583094e16 2180 python-gdata_2.0.17+dfsg-1.dsc 1c44c98a744f7f2a8fc79bdc38aa6799a1eb729154bab228acecc5ecba6b3f62 2377640 python-gdata_2.0.17+dfsg.orig.tar.gz a241273489672049d5e1db7dbf7d2b9f42c29d0d137b44130423
Bug#694291: marked as done (liblscp-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: liblscp-dev (<< 0.5.6-4))
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:49:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694291: fixed in liblscp 0.5.6-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #694291, regarding liblscp-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: liblscp-dev (<< 0.5.6-4) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694291: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694291 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: liblscp-doc Version: 0.5.6-4 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package liblscp2. (Reading database ... 6286 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking liblscp2 (from .../liblscp2_0.5.5-1+cvs080828_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package liblscp-dev. Unpacking liblscp-dev (from .../liblscp-dev_0.5.5-1+cvs080828_amd64.deb) ... Setting up liblscp2 (0.5.5-1+cvs080828) ... Setting up liblscp-dev (0.5.5-1+cvs080828) ... Selecting previously deselected package liblscp-doc. (Reading database ... 6373 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking liblscp-doc (from .../liblscp-doc_0.5.6-5_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/liblscp-doc_0.5.6-5_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc-base/liblscp', which is also in package liblscp-dev 0.5.5-1+cvs080828 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/doc-base/liblscp The documentation was recently moved to a separate package: liblscp (0.5.6-4) unstable; urgency=low * Move developers reference's HTML files from the -dev package into a new arch-indep package: liblscp-doc (Closes: #656881). The following relationships are currently defined: Package: liblscp-doc Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: liblscp-doc Breaks: liblscp-dev (<< 0.5.6-4) Replaces: liblscp-dev (<< 0.5.6-4) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. liblscp-dev=0.5.5-1+cvs080828_liblscp-doc=0.5.6-5.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: liblscp Source-Version: 0.5.6-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of liblscp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alessio Treglia (supplier of updated liblscp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:52:33 + Source: liblscp Binary: liblscp-dbg liblscp-dev liblscp-doc liblscp6 Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 0.5.6-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By: Alessio Treglia Description: liblscp-dbg - LinuxSampler Control Protocol library - debugging symbols liblscp-dev - Development files for LinuxSampler Control Protocol library liblscp-doc - Documentation for LinuxSampler Control Protocol library liblscp6 - LinuxSampler Control Protocol wrapper libra
Bug#694274: marked as done (libgmerlin-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: gmerlin-data (<< 1.0.0~dfsg-13))
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:48:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694274: fixed in gmerlin 1.2.0~dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #694274, regarding libgmerlin-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: gmerlin-data (<< 1.0.0~dfsg-13) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694274: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694274 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libgmerlin-dev Version: 1.2.0~dfsg-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package gmerlin-data. (Reading database ... 6286 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gmerlin-data (from .../gmerlin-data_0.4.3-2_all.deb) ... Setting up gmerlin-data (0.4.3-2) ... Selecting previously deselected package libgmerlin-dev. Unpacking libgmerlin-dev (from .../libgmerlin-dev_1.2.0~dfsg-2+b1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgmerlin-dev_1.2.0~dfsg-2+b1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gmerlin/plugin.sym', which is also in package gmerlin-data 0.4.3-2 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/gmerlin/plugin.sym That file was recently moved around: gmerlin (1.0.0~dfsg-13) unstable; urgency=low * Move /usr/share/gmerlin/plugin.sym back into libgmerlin-dev. (LP: #935120) The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libgmerlin-dev Conflicts: n/a Breaks:libgmerlin-common (<= 1.0.0~dfsg-12) Replaces: libgmerlin-common (<= 1.0.0~dfsg-12) Maybe libgmerlin-common was the wrong package ... The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libgmerlin-dev Breaks: gmerlin-data (<< 1.0.0~dfsg-13) Replaces: gmerlin-data (<< 1.0.0~dfsg-13) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. gmerlin-data=0.4.3-2_libgmerlin-dev=1.2.0~dfsg-2+b1.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: gmerlin Source-Version: 1.2.0~dfsg-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gmerlin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alessio Treglia (supplier of updated gmerlin package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:28:56 + Source: gmerlin Binary: gmerlin gmerlin-plugins-base gmerlin-doc gmerlin-data gmerlin-dbg libgmerlin0 libgmerlin-common libgmerlin-dev libgmerlin-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1.2.0~dfsg-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By: Alessio Treglia Description: gmerlin- multiformat media player gmerlin-data - multiformat media player - data files gmerlin-dbg - debugging symbols for gmerlin gmerlin-doc - multiformat media player - documentation files gmerlin-plugins-base - gmerlin plugins from the "base" set libgmerlin-common - core library for gmerlin - common runtime fil
Bug#694289: marked as done (python-gdata-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-gdata (<< 2.0.14-2))
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:49:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694289: fixed in python-gdata 2.0.17+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #694289, regarding python-gdata-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-gdata (<< 2.0.14-2) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694289: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694289 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: python-gdata-doc Version: 2.0.14-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package python-gdata. Unpacking python-gdata (from .../python-gdata_2.0.8-1.1_all.deb) ... Setting up python-gdata (2.0.8-1.1) ... Processing triggers for python-support ... Selecting previously deselected package python-gdata-doc. (Reading database ... 7547 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking python-gdata-doc (from .../python-gdata-doc_2.0.17-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python-gdata-doc_2.0.17-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc-base/python-gdata', which is also in package python-gdata 2.0.8-1.1 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/doc-base/python-gdata The documentation was split out recently: python-gdata (2.0.14-2) unstable; urgency=low * Split out the documentation and examples in a separate package The following relationships are currently defined: Package: python-gdata-doc Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: python-gdata-doc Breaks: python-gdata (<< 2.0.14-2) Replaces: python-gdata (<< 2.0.14-2) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. python-gdata=2.0.8-1.1_python-gdata-doc=2.0.17-1.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: python-gdata Source-Version: 2.0.17+dfsg-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-gdata, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dmitry Shachnev (supplier of updated python-gdata package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:43:03 +0400 Source: python-gdata Binary: python-gdata python-gdata-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.17+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team Changed-By: Dmitry Shachnev Description: python-gdata - Google Data Python client library python-gdata-doc - Google Data Python client library, documentation and examples Closes: 694289 694336 Changes: python-gdata (2.0.17+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Add missing Breaks/Replaces for python-gdata (<< 2.0.14-2) to python-gdata-doc (closes: #694289, thanks to Andreas Beckmann for the bug report). * Remove non-free .pyd files from upstream tarball (closes: #694336, thanks to Jakub Wilk for the bug rep
Bug#689012: marked as done (chrony: Refuses to start: Fatal error : Cannot read information from uname, sorry)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:47:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#689012: fixed in chrony 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #689012, regarding chrony: Refuses to start: Fatal error : Cannot read information from uname, sorry to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 689012: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689012 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: chrony Version: 1.24-3.1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, chronyd doesn't start on my two machines running wheezy (both amd64). The message is: sys_linux.c:688:(get_version_specific_details)[28-08:24:12] Initial txc.tick=1 txc.freq=0 (0.) txc.offset=0 => hz=100 shift_hz=7 sys_linux.c:704:(get_version_specific_details)[28-08:24:12] set_config_hz=0 hz=100 shift_hz=7 basic_freq_scale=1.2800 nominal_tick=1 slew_delta_tick=833 max_tick_bias=1000 sys_linux.c:739:(get_version_specific_details)[28-08:24:12] Fatal error : Cannot read information from uname, sorry Please fix it before the release of wheezy, I think the package is silently not working on a lot of machines out in the wild! Best regards, Andreas Juch -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (850, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages chrony depends on: ii dpkg 1.16.8 ii install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-10 ii libc6 2.13-35 ii libncurses5 5.9-10 ii libreadline5 5.2-11 ii timelimit 1.8-1 ii ucf 3.0025+nmu3 Versions of packages chrony recommends: ii udev 175-7 chrony suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: chrony Source-Version: 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of chrony, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 689...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joachim Wiedorn (supplier of updated chrony package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:01:01 +0100 Source: chrony Binary: chrony Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 Distribution: wheezy Urgency: medium Maintainer: John G. Hasler Changed-By: Joachim Wiedorn Description: chrony - Sets your computer's clock from time servers on the Net Closes: 689012 691340 Changes: chrony (1.24-3.1+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. . * Fix: Remove obsolete check for supported kernel versions (rtc_linux.c) to run also for kernel versions 3.0 and higher. Since kernel 2.2 all kernels have RTC support. Backport of upstream patch for version 1.26. Solves: #642209 for version 1.24. Closes: #691340 . * Fix: Enable full support for kernel versions 3.0 and higher (sys_linux.c) and ignore nonexistent patch level of kernel version (which come with some kernel versions). Backport of upstream patch for version 1.26. Solves: #628919 for version 1.24. Closes: #689012 Checksums-Sha1: c28eca8b1ce2b7ccd510dc212adca3d0bdd5e9b0 1689 chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1.dsc adbbe05018ad9c9a4e80d0aced015478393a78ec 137636 chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1.diff.gz a4b0a94f2bcbac9add68fc9ecdf66462f84be5c2 364350 chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 188551b3d63a7978e5d65dc7c91d6c22841850c0ab1afdf02374fc20c417d57b 1689 chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1.dsc 3860680f1f2c39ec7c9af9de05e5fb001e94f5ca8166c8d8f4aa640eb74064e9 137636 chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1.diff.gz 0e79bda37afb5b69297c62cd0c1e9651664e6e453a88eea6f9a530cbe1cf1262 364350 chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1_amd64.deb Files: 5f7ae18de04322710e3013110389ed04 1689 admin extra chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1.dsc f99672e8a6b154ac4fb670e5fa911f86 137636 admin extra chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1.diff.gz 2440ed960c625d10ebeca735b115c717 364350 admin extra chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGB
Bug#691340: marked as done (chrony: Chrony Version 1.24 from wheezy does not work on kernel 3.x)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:47:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#691340: fixed in chrony 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #691340, regarding chrony: Chrony Version 1.24 from wheezy does not work on kernel 3.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691340: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691340 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: chrony Version: 1.24-3.1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Hello, there are quite a few packages (kerberos in my case) which are dependant on a relatively exact time. I actually could not log in to my freshly installed kerberized wheezy system due to a mayor clock skew produced by a malfunctioning chrony daemon. The Version of chrony currently supplied with wheezy does have a runable daemon, but this daemon is unable to set the system clock at all. The reason for this are actually two bugs in debian BTS which have already been fixed in unstable, but only partially in the the Version which wheezy ended up with after the feature freeze. I'm talking about the following bugs: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628919 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642209 The state of the wheezy Version is that bug #628919 has been fixed incompletely. This led to bugreport #642209 which has then been fixed in unstable only by means of using a newer upstream version. There are two possible ways to fix the version supplied with wheezy: 1. Migrate to Version 1.26-2 from sid (no unsatisfiable dependancies in wheezy) 2. Apply the simple patch supplied in bug report #642209 Regards Sven -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.6.3-00694-g9017061 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages chrony depends on: ii dpkg 1.16.8 ii install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-10 ii libc6 2.13-35 ii libncurses5 5.9-10 ii libreadline5 5.2-12 ii timelimit 1.8-1 ii ucf 3.0025+nmu3 Versions of packages chrony recommends: ii udev 175-7 chrony suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: chrony Source-Version: 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of chrony, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 691...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joachim Wiedorn (supplier of updated chrony package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:01:01 +0100 Source: chrony Binary: chrony Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 Distribution: wheezy Urgency: medium Maintainer: John G. Hasler Changed-By: Joachim Wiedorn Description: chrony - Sets your computer's clock from time servers on the Net Closes: 689012 691340 Changes: chrony (1.24-3.1+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. . * Fix: Remove obsolete check for supported kernel versions (rtc_linux.c) to run also for kernel versions 3.0 and higher. Since kernel 2.2 all kernels have RTC support. Backport of upstream patch for version 1.26. Solves: #642209 for version 1.24. Closes: #691340 . * Fix: Enable full support for kernel versions 3.0 and higher (sys_linux.c) and ignore nonexistent patch level of kernel version (which come with some kernel versions). Backport of upstream patch for version 1.26. Solves: #628919 for version 1.24. Closes: #689012 Checksums-Sha1: c28eca8b1ce2b7ccd510dc212adca3d0bdd5e9b0 1689 chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1.dsc adbbe05018ad9c9a4e80d0aced015478393a78ec 137636 chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1.diff.gz a4b0a94f2bcbac9add68fc9ecdf66462f84be5c2 364350 chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 188551b3d63a7978e5d65dc7c91d6c22841850c0ab1afdf02374fc20c417d57b 1689 chrony_1.24-3.1+deb7u1.dsc 3860680f1f2c39ec7c9af9de05e5fb001e94f5ca8166c8d8f4aa
Bug#694407: freeradius: CVE-2011-4966
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:24:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-4966 > for details and a link to the upstream fix. AFAICT this is a year old, so apparently it's not really so important? :) Do you think we should take the opportunity to upload the fix for #689419 to stable? -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694433: marked as done (user no longer a member of a tenant still can use EC2 token)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:47:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694433: fixed in keystone 2012.1.1-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #694433, regarding user no longer a member of a tenant still can use EC2 token to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694433: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694433 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: keystone Version: 2012.1.1-10 Severity: grave As per the github commit: https://github.com/openstack/keystone/commit/8735009dc5b895db265a1cd573f39f4acfca2a19 It is possible that a user is no longer a member of a tenant when they attempt to use an ec2 token. This checks to make sure that the user still has at least one valid role in the tenant before authenticating them. This should automatically work for the s3 version as well since it is a subclass. I'm ATM working on uploading the fix. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: keystone Source-Version: 2012.1.1-11 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of keystone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thomas Goirand (supplier of updated keystone package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:05:33 + Source: keystone Binary: python-keystone keystone keystone-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2012.1.1-11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: PKG OpenStack Changed-By: Thomas Goirand Description: keystone - OpenStack identity service keystone-doc - OpenStack identity service - documentation python-keystone - OpenStack identity service - library Closes: 693056 694433 Changes: keystone (2012.1.1-11) unstable; urgency=high . * Applies security patch from upstream: Ensures User is member of tenant in ec2 validation (Closes: #694433). * Added Japanese debconf template translation, thanks to victory (Closes: #693056). Checksums-Sha1: ff62a252d12af150e0d710eba0362a417e7c56f1 1902 keystone_2012.1.1-11.dsc cef6a9abd9b9650dc3c5062bf513fbd82571cc98 26275 keystone_2012.1.1-11.debian.tar.gz abaf293fffe6c24f596bc2d0b6073898825909c7 92982 python-keystone_2012.1.1-11_all.deb c15f3f4638b12a2eb645b9446098efcac719355f 18254 keystone_2012.1.1-11_all.deb 3c55a4ae8f07494af901e6000f37a28cd56390a6 240332 keystone-doc_2012.1.1-11_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2c5b72eea193b8f66a97c540aedac999cb97e9268b174b989bdc5119735bfc59 1902 keystone_2012.1.1-11.dsc f12860d8354a171b64545d7413eb77851425092547cab185d59aafb80ee8dfb3 26275 keystone_2012.1.1-11.debian.tar.gz 25b1fd102dbfc3e1e4664fbd5ba52b4c7fcf2619c24f9aad48d9ef977ad3c9e9 92982 python-keystone_2012.1.1-11_all.deb ebb850933a4b8db10f08a2ab4981f7c660381ba8e1f33d85c101ad9e88c245c8 18254 keystone_2012.1.1-11_all.deb 02761cf4f85efd685bf34a4cece3f390f4f911d674a2402c1f6891dfcb8185c7 240332 keystone-doc_2012.1.1-11_all.deb Files: 8e28ae2f466251f5dcca91784acf7cf5 1902 net extra keystone_2012.1.1-11.dsc 0c56b070539a6d5f89a62f70593512b1 26275 net extra keystone_2012.1.1-11.debian.tar.gz 429c9aa66f57be9dc9541434db91c24d 92982 python extra python-keystone_2012.1.1-11_all.deb c81744d02d2f0c8827c8509e98a0d49e 18254 python extra keystone_2012.1.1-11_all.deb 42b8d8ac692842e5c6fe12c2517b3145 240332 doc extra keystone-doc_2012.1.1-11_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlCzfuEACgkQl4M9yZjvmknLeACg2fNokiLeBKjQaTrUVCbHsBIl tf0AoKG+Owl/OPumQTttpvW1oJftHJdf =NkIk -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#690128: inn2: conffile disappearing during squeeze->wheezy upgrade: /etc/news/motd.news
Hi Russ,
With current newsreaders the motd is just annoying.
Yeah, I'm inclined to agree with this, and wonder if INN should change its
upstream behavior to install a sample in a path other than the one used by
innd and nnrpd.
That would also be fine, yes.
Couldn't we install them as ${PATHETC}/motd.innd.sample and
${PATHETC}/motd.nnrpd.sample or should they be in a separate path?
In the latter case, would the ${PATHETC}/samples directory be fine?
Shouldn't we do the same for the ${PATHETC}/subscriptions file? It already
contains a list of newsgroups.
What for files like ${PATHETC}/actsync.ign? Maybe the default behaviour
is not the expected one.
my guess is that most sites
never set a MOTD, so installing one that's displayed by default is
probably not the right default behavior.
Too bad that news clients do not behave smarter...
They should cache a local copy or fingerprint of the message of the day
so that they could display the message to the user only upon modification.
Besides, they should provide a way to force the cached information to be
refreshed...
--
Julien ÉLIE
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 690006
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 690006 - wheezy Bug #690006 [src:fluidsynth] fluidsynth: FTBFS Removed tag(s) wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 690006: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690006 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694091: bcrypt: Tries to load whole file into memory regardless of the size
Hi Kevin, Kevin Coyner writes: > I'm on the road right now, but would be happy to upload a new version later > tonight or early tomorrow morning. Thanks. Please let us know when you are done. In the meantime, new upstream has merged the fix and also improved error messages and fixed a memory leak: https://github.com/casta/bcrypt/commit/64d9a16b158f2872bf3af80c2f01ee400c04c381 -- Best regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 694433
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 694433 + security Bug #694433 [keystone] user no longer a member of a tenant still can use EC2 token Added tag(s) security. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 694433: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694433 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694433: user no longer a member of a tenant still can use EC2 token
Package: keystone Version: 2012.1.1-10 Severity: grave As per the github commit: https://github.com/openstack/keystone/commit/8735009dc5b895db265a1cd573f39f4acfca2a19 It is possible that a user is no longer a member of a tenant when they attempt to use an ec2 token. This checks to make sure that the user still has at least one valid role in the tenant before authenticating them. This should automatically work for the s3 version as well since it is a subclass. I'm ATM working on uploading the fix. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692295: Wrong diff
Hi, the first diff I posted was invalid. See the CCed RFS for the correct patch. -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692295: RFS: couchdb/1.2.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couchdb". The upload would fix
RC bug #692295.
* Package name: couchdb
Version : 1.2.0-2.1
* URL : http://couchdb.apache.org/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : misc
It builds those binary packages:
couchdb- RESTful document oriented database
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/couchdb
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/couchdb/couchdb_1.2.0-2.1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
couchdb (1.2.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Use SIGTERM instead of SIGHUP for graceful shutdown
(Closes: #692295) [varacanero]
-- Dominik George Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:54:05 +0100
The debdiff is attached.
Regards,
Dominik George
diff -Nru couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog
--- couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog 2012-07-19 20:35:03.0 +0200
+++ couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog 2012-11-26 12:55:21.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+couchdb (1.2.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Use SIGTERM instead of SIGHUP for graceful shutdown
+(Closes: #692295) [varacanero]
+
+ -- Dominik George Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:54:05 +0100
+
couchdb (1.2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Make couchdb user own its run directory (closes: #681549).
diff -Nru couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/couchdb_sighup.patch couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/couchdb_sighup.patch
--- couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/couchdb_sighup.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/couchdb_sighup.patch 2012-11-26 12:57:45.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Description: Use SIGTERM instead of SIGHUP for graceful shutdown
+ The SIGHUP couchdb uses by default for a graceful shutdown does not
+ work reliably in Debian as apt, when installing the package, SigIgn
+ masks SIGHUP for all its child processes. This is intentional and hard
+ to work around, and CouchDB does a graceful shutdown with SIGTERM as
+ well so there is no reason to use SIGHUP.
+Author: Dominik George
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/692295
+
+---
+
+--- couchdb-1.2.0.orig/bin/couchdb.tpl.in
couchdb-1.2.0/bin/couchdb.tpl.in
+@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ stop_couchdb () {
+ echo > $PID_FILE
+ fi
+ if kill -0 $PID 2> /dev/null; then
+-if kill -1 $PID 2> /dev/null; then
++if kill -15 $PID 2> /dev/null; then
+ if test "$1" = "false"; then
+ echo "Apache CouchDB has been shutdown."
+ else
diff -Nru couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/series couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/series
--- couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/series 2012-07-19 20:46:55.0 +0200
+++ couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/series 2012-11-26 12:55:43.0 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
force-reload.patch
couchdb_own_rundir.patch
+couchdb_sighup.patch
Processed: Workaround in couchdb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 692295 couchdb 1.2.0-2 Bug #692295 [erlang] does not properly set up signal handling Bug reassigned from package 'erlang' to 'couchdb'. No longer marked as found in versions erlang/1:15.b.2-dfsg-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #692295 to the same values previously set Bug #692295 [couchdb] does not properly set up signal handling Marked as found in versions couchdb/1.2.0-2. > found 692295 1.2.0-1 Bug #692295 [couchdb] does not properly set up signal handling Marked as found in versions couchdb/1.2.0-1. > retitle 692295 Uses SIGHUP instead of SIGTERM for graceful shutdown Bug #692295 [couchdb] does not properly set up signal handling Changed Bug title to 'Uses SIGHUP instead of SIGTERM for graceful shutdown' from 'does not properly set up signal handling' > tags 692295 + patch Bug #692295 [couchdb] Uses SIGHUP instead of SIGTERM for graceful shutdown Added tag(s) patch. > tags 692295 + upstream Bug #692295 [couchdb] Uses SIGHUP instead of SIGTERM for graceful shutdown Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #692295 to the same tags previously set > severity 692295 serious Bug #692295 [couchdb] Uses SIGHUP instead of SIGTERM for graceful shutdown Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 692295: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692295 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693208: clang unable to link trivial test program on armhf
On 26/11/2012 12:42, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> Hello Sylvestre,
>
> Installing clang and llvm-runtime packages on my Debian testing, here is
> what I get :
>
> $ cat hello.c
> #include
> int main (void) {
> printf ("Hello, world!\n");
> return 0;
> }
> $ clang -emit-llvm -c hello.c && lli hello.o
> lli: hello.o: unknown type in type table
>
> However, installing llvm-3.1-runtime as well, 3.1 being the LLVM version
> clang is based on, I get (forcing the lli version to 3.1) :
>
> $ clang -emit-llvm -c hello.c && lli-3.1 hello.o
> Hello, world!
I am not sure to see how it is related to the bug 693208 ?
> I think asking our users to explicitly use versioned LLVM tools with clang
> is wrong. In the future, I think you should base clang on the default LLVM
> version, even if a newer LLVM version is available in the repositories.
I don't understand what you mean:
In wheezy, llvm-default install llvm 3.0:
http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/llvm
and the version of clang in wheezy is 3.0:
http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/clang
> Regarding the current clang packages in the repositories (3.0 in testing,
> 3.1 in unstable), you would have to add an epoch to downgrade clang to 3.0
> in unstable with a fix and then have to fix migrated to testing. This would
> also fix the issue above, but epochs are, well, not beautiful...
>
> What is your opinion regarding those issues?
I don't know. It is why I asked to the release team for guidance.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694363: marked as done (libdconf-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: valac (<< 0.9.5))
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:02:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694363: fixed in d-conf 0.12.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #694363, regarding libdconf-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: valac (<< 0.9.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694363: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694363 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libdconf-dev Version: 0.5.1-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package valac. Unpacking valac (from .../valac_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb) ... Setting up valac (0.8.1-2) ... Selecting previously deselected package libdconf-dev. Unpacking libdconf-dev (from .../libdconf-dev_0.12.1-2_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libdconf-dev_0.12.1-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/vala/vapi/dconf.vapi', which is also in package valac 0.8.1-2 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/vala/vapi/dconf.vapi Probably added to libdconf-dev in d-conf (0.5.1-2) experimental; urgency=low * debian/libdconf-dev.install: - Install .vapi file valac 0.9.5-1 was the first valac package no longer shipping dconf.vapi The following relationships are currently defined: Package: libdconf-dev Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: libdconf-dev Breaks: valac (<< 0.9.5) Replaces: valac (<< 0.9.5) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. valac=0.8.1-2_libdconf-dev=0.12.1-2.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: d-conf Source-Version: 0.12.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of d-conf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Josselin Mouette (supplier of updated d-conf package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:27:35 +0100 Source: d-conf Binary: libdconf0 libdconf-dev libdconf-dbg libdconf-dbus-1-0 libdconf-dbus-1-dev libdconf-dbus-1-dbg libdconf-doc dconf-tools dconf-gsettings-backend dconf-service Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.12.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers Changed-By: Josselin Mouette Description: dconf-gsettings-backend - simple configuration storage system - GSettings back-end dconf-service - simple configuration storage system - D-Bus service dconf-tools - simple configuration storage system - utilities libdconf-dbg - simple configuration storage system - debugging symbols libdconf-dbus-1-0 - simple configuration storage system - D-Bus library libdconf-dbus-1-dbg - simple configuration storage system - D-Bus debug symbols libdconf-dbus-1-dev - simple configuration storage system - D-Bus development files libdconf-dev - simple configuration storage system -
Bug#520753: ghostscript: diff for NMU version 9.05~dfsg-6.3
First of all, thanks to *both* og you for caring about this issue. Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2012-11-26 09:42:02) > Le dimanche, 25 novembre 2012 19.15:39, Michael Gilbert a écrit : > > I personally prefer the one-line fix for wheezy due to simplicity. > > I think the "nice" but large fix should wait till jessie. > > I very much disagree here. Let me explain why: first, if look closely, > it's not a "big" fix: we drop the postinst completely in favour of a > two-lines file that is installed in /usr/share/cups/ppd-updaters/. Agreed. > Getting rid of that duplication for Wheezy is worth it IMHO. > > > Also, a 1-day delay for an already fixed bug doesn't seem right. > > I have rescheduled it to 5 days (+4). Please test the new package in the mean > time. I have not tested it, but do consider your approach to be an improvement, Odyx. Since you have already offered to defend it for the Release Team, I see no reason to delay it further: had I acted sooner on this, I would have applied your fix and uploaded without delay at all. - Jonas signature.asc Description: signature
Processed: tagging 676732
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 676732 + patch Bug #676732 [src:tucnak2] tucnak2: FTBFS: rotar.c:25:45: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 676732: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676732 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#676732: tucnak2: FTBFS: rotar.c:25:45: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
Hi, I can confirm that adding "libhamlib-dev, libfftw3-dev" to Build-Depends fixes this. Thanks, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tag as pending
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 694301 + pending Bug #694301 [gnome-settings-daemon] gnome-settings-daemon: ibus integration makes ibus useless Added tag(s) pending. > tags 691656 + pending Bug #691656 [gnome-control-center] gnome-control-center should depends on libibus-1-5 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691656 694301: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694301 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690067: syslog-ng-core: symlink conffile issues
Enrico Zini writes: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:56:16AM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote: > >> Mostly for myself, but replacing the symlinks with real conffiles that >> .include the former symlink targets may be an even better course of >> action. I'll test that over the next few days, and see how upgrades >> behave. > > Hi, any news? Sorry, I forgot to follow up on this it seems. I tested the unit files that simply .include'd the real ones, and that works nicely. Tested the upgrade path too, seems smooth. I promised the maintainer to prepare patches suitable for wheezy, including this one, but did not get around to do them yet. With a bit of luck, I'll have some free time to make this happen around next week. (For what it's worth, the fix is available in my git tree at [1] and [2]) [1]: https://github.com/algernon/syslog-ng/commit/cd7611244c818ccc14328cddb20467adb9d7851f.patch [2]: https://github.com/algernon/syslog-ng/commit/da0cd112858fef0b6263233877edee13ff890d90.patch -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694301: tag as pending
tags 694301 + pending tags 691656 + pending thanks I have committed necessary changes to Debian's gnome-settings-daemon and gnome-control-center repository to disable IBus integration for experimental. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693208: clang unable to link trivial test program on armhf
Hello Sylvestre,
Installing clang and llvm-runtime packages on my Debian testing, here is
what I get :
$ cat hello.c
#include
int main (void) {
printf ("Hello, world!\n");
return 0;
}
$ clang -emit-llvm -c hello.c && lli hello.o
lli: hello.o: unknown type in type table
However, installing llvm-3.1-runtime as well, 3.1 being the LLVM version
clang is based on, I get (forcing the lli version to 3.1) :
$ clang -emit-llvm -c hello.c && lli-3.1 hello.o
Hello, world!
I think asking our users to explicitly use versioned LLVM tools with clang
is wrong. In the future, I think you should base clang on the default LLVM
version, even if a newer LLVM version is available in the repositories.
Regarding the current clang packages in the repositories (3.0 in testing,
3.1 in unstable), you would have to add an epoch to downgrade clang to 3.0
in unstable with a fix and then have to fix migrated to testing. This would
also fix the issue above, but epochs are, well, not beautiful...
What is your opinion regarding those issues?
Cheers,
Arthur.
2012/11/26 Sylvestre Ledru
> On 14/11/2012 11:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:24:50 +, peter green wrote:
> >
> >> I have attatched a diff which I would like to upload to TPU are the
> >> maintainer and release team happy with this? I have tested that the
> >> patch does not break linking on armel with either bfd or gold.
> >>
> >> P.S. it seems the version in unstable has regressed from the version
> >> in testing and does not link a trivial test app successfully on either
> >> armel or armhf I have not investigated details of that (IMO fixing
> >> wheezy is more important than fixing a package that is in sid and
> >> unlikely to make it for wheezy).
> >>
> > Having a fix in sid is a prerequisite for anything regarding wheezy.
> So, to fix this issue, should I do the following ?
>
> * ask for a removal of clang 3.1 in unstable
> * upload a version 3.0 in unstable with Peter patch
> * ask for an exception
>
> Thanks
> Sylvestre
>
> ___
> Pkg-llvm-team mailing list
> pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-llvm-team
>
Bug#677407: gnome-dbg: fails to upgrade from squeeze - apt does not find an upgrade path
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 at 10:49:19 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > the problem I previously reported for gnome-dbg now also shows up for > gnome-core. Your log from 1st November is for gnome-dbg. Is this reproducible for gnome-core too, or only for gnome-dbg? Could you please explain how an apt or GNOME developer with no particular knowledge of piuparts or pbuilder can reproduce this upgrade issue? (I use sbuild for my package uploads, so I don't have a working pbuilder setup; in his message of 13th October, Neil Williams performed a "realistic" upgrade test of gnome-dbg in a Squeeze virtual machine, which was successful.) On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 at 23:04:52 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Still reproducible in squeeze->wheezy upgrades, new logfile with > problemresolver debug output attached. The problems still seem to start here: > Investigating (0) gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 [ amd64 ] < none -> 0.10.36-1 > ( > introspection ) > Broken gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10:amd64 Conflicts on gir1.0-gstreamer-0.10 [ > amd64 ] < 0.10.30-1 > ( libs ) > Considering gir1.0-gstreamer-0.10:amd64 1 as a solution to > gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10:amd64 1 > Holding Back gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10:amd64 rather than change > gir1.0-gstreamer-0.10:amd64 That's not the answer we want: apt should be willing to remove gir1.0-gstreamer-0.10:amd64. Unfortunately, gir1.0-gstreamer-0.10 and gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 both have a score of 1, and apt seems to tie-break in the wrong direction. > Broken libseed-gtk3-0:amd64 Depends on gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 [ amd64 ] < > none -> 0.10.36-1 > ( introspection ) > Considering gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10:amd64 1 as a solution to > libseed-gtk3-0:amd64 5 > Holding Back libseed-gtk3-0:amd64 rather than change > gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10:amd64 This is the result of the above; that breaks libpeas, which breaks various applications. Would an artificial dependency, gnome-dbg Depends: gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 or even gnome-core Depends: gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10, perhaps reassure apt that it was doing the right thing by installing gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 and dropping gir1.0-gstreamer-0.10? Or is there something else that src:meta-gnome could do to hint apt to do the right thing? I call this dependency "artificial" because gnome-core has no particular reason to depend on a random GIR file; but if doing so for the wheezy release would help the upgrade, it would be fairly harmless to do so, because they're already related by these chains: gnome-core Depends: gnome-sushi Depends: gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 gnome-core D: eog D: libpeas-1.0-0 D: libseed-gtk3-0 D: gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 Perhaps another way to convince apt to DTRT would be to change the dependency libseed-gtk3-0 D: gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10 | libgstreamer0.10-0 (< 0.10.25-3) and remove the obsolete alternative (the second branch), to make the "right answer" more obvious? Regards, S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690410: Puredata 0.43.2-4 crashing due to _FORTIFY_SOURCE with large patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-28 06:44, Matthew Grant wrote: > > Talk to upstream before turning on _FORTIFY_SOURCE please. > i double-checked and tried to run a fairly big patch and couldn't reproduce the crash. do you think you could produce a minimal patch showing the problem and send that to me (in private, if you prefer), so i can trigger the bug myself? fgmasdr IOhannes PS: while i'm not "the" upstream, i am involved in upstream development :-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCzTPIACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQaTQCfbGhatQgKyPXnatp6n1B6ZR2G JDgAnRNAv3FOf9TLhRWJn2WyD6Vv//5q =Xotd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694417: bbdb: package installation creates /root/.gnupg/*
Package: bbdb Version: 2.36-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed that your package creates files in /root. From the attached log (scroll to the bottom): 1m4.7s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system: /root/.gnupg/ not owned /root/.gnupg/gpg.conf not owned /root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg not owned /root/.gnupg/secring.gpg not owned Creating stuff in /root is a FHS and policy violation. (And of course these files should not be deleted by maintainer scripts.) But it is also an indication that the package operation may depend on root's .gnupg configuration (and package installation might even fail if that configuration is broken). That would be a case for "configuration files not in /etc". Cheers, Andreas bbdb_2.36-2.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#694340: libgconf2-4: libgconf built with the dbus backend requires dbus-glib to be initialized with threading
On 26/11/2012 17:28, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 26 novembre 2012 à 07:49 +0800, Chow Loong Jin a écrit : >>> Maybe we should just port GConf to GDBus instead, which doesn’t have >>> this issue, but this is not a small change. >> >> That was mentioned in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683830, but >> given that it isn't a small change, it's probably not going to happen for >> Wheezy. Can we slap a downstream patch in the meantime? This bug causes >> Banshee >> to crash pretty reliably. > > But we can’t fix the bug by introducing another bug. > > After reading the upstream discussion, I am convinced your patch is a > bad idea, since it will fix banshee but might trigger crashes in other > applications. > > Only a port to GDBus would do the trick, unfortunately. I guess we'll have to hack in a patch further downstream then. Perhaps gconf-sharp. I think I might have tried sometime back, but I don't recall why that didn't work. -- Kind regards, Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#693208: clang unable to link trivial test program on armhf
On 14/11/2012 11:45, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:24:50 +, peter green wrote: > >> I have attatched a diff which I would like to upload to TPU are the >> maintainer and release team happy with this? I have tested that the >> patch does not break linking on armel with either bfd or gold. >> >> P.S. it seems the version in unstable has regressed from the version >> in testing and does not link a trivial test app successfully on either >> armel or armhf I have not investigated details of that (IMO fixing >> wheezy is more important than fixing a package that is in sid and >> unlikely to make it for wheezy). >> > Having a fix in sid is a prerequisite for anything regarding wheezy. So, to fix this issue, should I do the following ? * ask for a removal of clang 3.1 in unstable * upload a version 3.0 in unstable with Peter patch * ask for an exception Thanks Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693893: unblock: kawari8/8.2.8-7
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Dear release team,
kawari8 currently segfault on testing amd64. Renders the package
unusable on testing amd64. The bug report is #693893.
I've applied a patch from the upstream BTS and the package is already
uploaded to sid.
Please consider unblocking package kawari8.
The debdiff is as attachment.
Many Thanks,
Paul
unblock kawari8/8.2.8-7
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.utf8, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
PaulLiu (劉穎駿)
E-mail: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
diff -u kawari8-8.2.8/debian/changelog kawari8-8.2.8/debian/changelog
--- kawari8-8.2.8/debian/changelog
+++ kawari8-8.2.8/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+kawari8 (8.2.8-7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix segfaults on 64bit arch (Closes: #693893)
+- Add patch 009_kawari8-64bit-fix.patch
+- Thanks to Shyouzou Sugitani
+
+ -- Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:50:41 +0800
+
kawari8 (8.2.8-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- kawari8-8.2.8.orig/debian/patches/009_kawari8-64bit-fix.patch
+++ kawari8-8.2.8/debian/patches/009_kawari8-64bit-fix.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+diff -ur ../dist/src/kis/kis_file.cpp ./src/kis/kis_file.cpp
+--- src/kis/kis_file.cpp 2012-11-21 22:21:11.0 +0900
src/kis/kis_file.cpp 2012-11-21 22:17:14.0 +0900
+@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
+ string dirname=PathToBaseDir(CanonicalPath(Engine->GetDataPath(), args[1]));
+ string filename=PathToFileName(CanonicalPath(Engine->GetDataPath(), args[1]));
+
+- unsigned int pos=ctow(dirname).rfind(FILE_SEPARATOR);
++ string::size_type pos=ctow(dirname).rfind(FILE_SEPARATOR);
+ if(pos==string::npos) {
+ // ¥Õ¥ë¥Ñ¥¹¤Ê¤Î¤Ëdirname¤ËFILE_SEPARATOR¤¬¤Ê¤¤¾ì¹ç¡¢¿äÄê¤Ç¥ë¡¼¥È
+ // FILE_SEPARATOR¤òÄɲä·¥«¥ì¥ó¥È¥Ç¥£¥ì¥¯¥È¥ê¤È¤Î¸íǧ¤òËɤ°
+diff -ur ../dist/src/kis/kis_split.cpp ./src/kis/kis_split.cpp
+--- src/kis/kis_split.cpp 2012-11-21 22:21:01.0 +0900
src/kis/kis_split.cpp 2012-11-21 22:17:00.0 +0900
+@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
+ if (!HasNext())
+ return "";
+
+- unsigned int idx; // ÃíÌÜÃæ¤Î¥Ý¥¤¥ó¥¿
++ string::size_type idx; // ÃíÌÜÃæ¤Î¥Ý¥¤¥ó¥¿
+ string ret;
+ if(cs.length()==0){
+ // ¶èÀÚ¤êʸ»ú̵¤·
+diff -ur ../dist/src/libkawari/kawari_code.cpp ./src/libkawari/kawari_code.cpp
+--- src/libkawari/kawari_code.cpp 2012-11-21 22:20:12.0 +0900
src/libkawari/kawari_code.cpp 2012-11-21 22:15:50.0 +0900
+@@ -112,11 +112,11 @@
+ const static wstring wdq=ctow("\"");
+ wstring ws=ctow(s);
+ wstring retstr=ctow("\"");
+- unsigned int len=ws.size();
+- unsigned int pos=0;
++ wstring::size_type len=ws.size();
++ wstring::size_type pos=0;
+
+ while(pos
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#693460: (no subject)
Hi, Thanks for all the activity on this bug. I have a couple of comments i) finding this bug (and, well, some of the associated code quality issues with bcrypt) has persuaded me that I don't want to use bcrypt for any data I care about. ii) "gpg -c --cipher-algo aes" is almost certainly a better solution to the problem of wanting to reliable encrypt data with passphrase protection iii) since I'm an arrogant so and so, I think I'd go further and suggest that we should discourage new users from using bcrypt; instead we should try and fix it enough that people who already have files encrypted using it can continue to decrypt them in the future. Maybe even put a note to this effect in the package description? Regards, Matthew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693893: kawari8 segfaults on 64bit Linux
severity 693893 grave tags 693893 + patch thanks -- PaulLiu (劉穎駿) E-mail: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: kawari8 segfaults on 64bit Linux
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 693893 grave
Bug #693893 {Done: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) } [kawari8]
kawari8 segfaults on 64bit Linux
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> tags 693893 + patch
Bug #693893 {Done: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) } [kawari8]
kawari8 segfaults on 64bit Linux
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
693893: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693893
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677054: nut-client: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user
Hi Sebastien 2012/11/23 Sébastien Villemot > Control: tags -1 + patch > > Laurent Bigonville writes: > > > The bug (maintainer script modifying conffile) that bring us to this > > situation (prompting the user for a file he has not modified himself) > > is not happening in the version in wheezy and the root cause is fixed > > (bug #684392) in sid. > > > > The user will still be prompted when upgrading from squeeze (that's > > why I didn't close that bug) BUT chances, in a normal situation, that > > the user didn't changed that file by himself is close to zero, as that > > file is controlling which part of the NUT software > > (client/server/standalone) is running. > > > > If somebody want to provide a patch, I would apply it with joy but I'm > > quite busy now and I'm not sure how to do that properly (handling > > upgrade being aborted,...). > > Please find attached a patch that should fix this bug. It implements the > dirty hack in nut-client.preinst. With this patch applied, upgrades from > squeeze go without smoothly without prompting. > this should indeed fix the issue, as best as it can, considering the big mess of this situation. Could you please also handle the NMU? Thanks a lot for your patch. cheers, Arnaud -- Engineering Linux/Unix Expert - Opensource Solutions Lead - Eaton - http://opensource.eaton.com NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr
Bug#694286: marked as done (fstrcmp: missing Breaks+Replaces: libfstrcmp-dev (<< 0.4))
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:00:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694286: fixed in fstrcmp 0.5.D001-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #694286, regarding fstrcmp: missing Breaks+Replaces: libfstrcmp-dev (<< 0.4) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694286: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694286 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: fstrcmp Version: 0.4.D001-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package libfstrcmp0. (Reading database ... 6286 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libfstrcmp0 (from .../libfstrcmp0_0.3.D001-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libfstrcmp-dev. Unpacking libfstrcmp-dev (from .../libfstrcmp-dev_0.3.D001-1_amd64.deb) ... Setting up libfstrcmp0 (0.3.D001-1) ... Setting up libfstrcmp-dev (0.3.D001-1) ... Selecting previously deselected package fstrcmp. (Reading database ... 6369 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking fstrcmp (from .../fstrcmp_0.4.D001-1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fstrcmp_0.4.D001-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man3/fstrcoll.3.gz', which is also in package libfstrcmp-dev 0.3.D001-1 This is a serious bug as it makes installation/upgrade fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. As this problem can be demonstrated during partial upgrades from squeeze to wheezy (but not within squeeze or wheezy itself), this indicates a missing or insufficiently versioned Replaces+Breaks relationship. But since this particular upgrade ordering is not forbidden by any dependency relationship, it is possible that apt (or $PACKAGE_MANAGER) will use this erroneus path on squeeze->wheezy upgrades. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents files for squeeze and wheezy on amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/share/man/man3/fmemcmp.3.gz usr/share/man/man3/fmemcmpi.3.gz usr/share/man/man3/fstrcasecmp.3.gz usr/share/man/man3/fstrcasecmpi.3.gz usr/share/man/man3/fstrcmp.3.gz usr/share/man/man3/fstrcmpi.3.gz usr/share/man/man3/fstrcoll.3.gz usr/share/man/man3/fstrcolli.3.gz usr/share/man/man3/fwcscmp.3.gz usr/share/man/man3/fwcscmpi.3.gz The following relationships are currently defined: Package: fstrcmp Conflicts: n/a Breaks:n/a Replaces: n/a The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of these files (http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces): Package: fstrcmp Breaks: libfstrcmp-dev (<< 0.4) Replaces: libfstrcmp-dev (<< 0.4) Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/. libfstrcmp-dev=0.3.D001-1_fstrcmp=0.4.D001-1.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: fstrcmp Source-Version: 0.5.D001-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fstrcmp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 694...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Miller (supplier of updated fstrcmp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:03:41 +1100 Source: fstrcmp Binary: fstrcmp fstrcmp-doc libfstrcmp0 libfstrcmp0-dbg libfstrcmp-dev Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 0.5.D001-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Miller Changed-By: Peter Miller Description: fstrcmp- fuzzy comparison of strings fstrcmp-doc - fuzzy string compare library - documentation libfstrcmp-dev - fuzzy string compare library - dev
