Bug#698910: zoneminder: arbitrary command execution vulnerability

[Salvatore Bonaccorso]

Source: zoneminder
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

Hi

The following arbitrary command execution vulnerability was disclosed
for zoneminder:

 
http://itsecuritysolutions.org/2013-01-22-ZoneMinder-Video-Server-arbitrary-command-execution-vulnerability/

Regards,
Salvatore


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: [PATCH] Fix dropping privileges issue on setuid programs on systems with PAM/LDAP and GnuTLS/libgcrypt

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> notforwarded 368297
Bug #368297 [libldap-2.4-2] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps
Bug #545414 [libldap-2.4-2] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with "sudo: 
setreuid(ROOT_UID, user_uid): Operation not permitted" for ldap users
Bug #566351 [libldap-2.4-2] libgcrypt11: should not change user id as a side 
effect
Bug #579647 [libldap-2.4-2] nss-ldap changing uid due to using gcrypt 
somewhere...
Bug #601667 [libldap-2.4-2] libpam-smbpass migrate breaks su (squeeze)
Bug #628671 [libldap-2.4-2] passwd: Ordinary users can't change their passwords.
Bug #658896 [libldap-2.4-2] sudo: setresuid(ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID): 
Operation not permitted
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
368297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368297
545414: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545414
566351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566351
579647: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579647
601667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601667
628671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628671
658896: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658896
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: [PATCH] Fix dropping privileges issue on setuid programs on systems with PAM/LDAP and GnuTLS/libgcrypt

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 368297 libldap-2.4-2 2.4.31-1
Bug #368297 [libldap-2.4] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps
Bug #545414 [libldap-2.4] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with "sudo: setreuid(ROOT_UID, 
user_uid): Operation not permitted" for ldap users
Bug #566351 [libldap-2.4] libgcrypt11: should not change user id as a side 
effect
Bug #579647 [libldap-2.4] nss-ldap changing uid due to using gcrypt somewhere...
Bug #601667 [libldap-2.4] libpam-smbpass migrate breaks su (squeeze)
Bug #628671 [libldap-2.4] passwd: Ordinary users can't change their passwords.
Bug #658896 [libldap-2.4] sudo: setresuid(ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID): 
Operation not permitted
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap-2.4'
Bug reassigned from package 'libldap-2.4' to 'libldap-2.4-2'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libldap-2.4' to 'libldap-2.4-2'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libldap-2.4' to 'libldap-2.4-2'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libldap-2.4' to 'libldap-2.4-2'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libldap-2.4' to 'libldap-2.4-2'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libldap-2.4' to 'libldap-2.4-2'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libldap-2.4' to 'libldap-2.4-2'.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #368297 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #545414 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #566351 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #579647 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #601667 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #628671 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #658896 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #368297 [libldap-2.4-2] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps
Bug #545414 [libldap-2.4-2] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with "sudo: 
setreuid(ROOT_UID, user_uid): Operation not permitted" for ldap users
Bug #566351 [libldap-2.4-2] libgcrypt11: should not change user id as a side 
effect
Bug #579647 [libldap-2.4-2] nss-ldap changing uid due to using gcrypt 
somewhere...
Bug #601667 [libldap-2.4-2] libpam-smbpass migrate breaks su (squeeze)
Bug #628671 [libldap-2.4-2] passwd: Ordinary users can't change their passwords.
Bug #658896 [libldap-2.4-2] sudo: setresuid(ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID): 
Operation not permitted
Marked as found in versions openldap/2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions openldap/2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions openldap/2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions openldap/2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions openldap/2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions openldap/2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions openldap/2.4.31-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
368297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368297
545414: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545414
566351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566351
579647: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579647
601667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601667
628671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628671
658896: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658896
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#658896: LDAP, GnuTLS/libgcrypt

[Howard Chu]

Hi!


I have been digging on this issue and I found the ultimate cause of this
problem.


When sudo/su/passwd/ on
a system configured with PAM/LDAPs it chains into libldap, which uses
GnuTLS/libgcrypt to manage the TLS channel.


The problem is that when OpenLDAP calls gnutls_global_init(), this
function does nothing because OpenLDAP had previously already
initialized libgcrypt at some point on the stack (probably by mistake).


For the record, there is no mistake in OpenLDAP. And also for the record, we 
on the OpenLDAP Project warned you guys multiple times that GnuTLS/libgcrypt 
are broken by design, and should not be used. (E.g. as I noted here 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/sudo/+bug/423252/comments/62)


The libgcrypt documentation states in section 2.5 that you *must* set the 
thread callbacks before calling *any* other libgcrypt functions. libldap's 
code does that. It's not our fault that libgcrypt's design is so broken that 
even when you use it as documented it doesn't work. We've been telling you for 
*years* that GnuTLS is broken by design.


--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.   http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698822: closing 698822

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

close 698822 2:1.4.1-2~bpo60+1
thanks

#698822 ("Enigmail is incompatible with Icedove 10.0.12"
 (10.0.12-1~bpo60+1) - at least after upgrading") appears to be a bug
 report about version conflicts within backports.debian.org.

I've uploaded 2:1.4.1-2~bpo60+1 to backports.debian.org, and verified
that it resolves the problem reported.

Regards,

--dkg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: closing 698822

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> close 698822 2:1.4.1-2~bpo60+1
Bug #698822 [enigmail] [enigmail] "Enigmail is incompatible with Icedove 
10.0.12" (10.0.12-1~bpo60+1) - at least after upgrading
There is no source info for the package 'enigmail' at version 
'2:1.4.1-2~bpo60+1' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2:1.4.1-2~bpo60+1'
Marked as fixed in versions 2:1.4.1-2~bpo60+1.
Bug #698822 [enigmail] [enigmail] "Enigmail is incompatible with Icedove 
10.0.12" (10.0.12-1~bpo60+1) - at least after upgrading
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
698822: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698822
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#675315: Update 5.9 to 5.10?

[Andrey Gursky]

Hi Dominique,

2012/8/16, Andrey Gursky :
> There is a new upstream version:
> http://www.kitware.com/news/home/browse/VTK?2012_05_16&VTK+5.10+Now+Available
>
> Citation: ...In addition to new and updated classes, support for new
> compilers, such as Visual Studio 2011 and Clang, was added, along with
> a multitude of code quality improvements...
>
> Maybe it resolves the FTBFS problem and it would be worth to package it?

I've noticed that since 2+ weeks a new release 5.10.1-1 is there in
experimental. I was sure I'd be notified about it after this bug would
be closed. Have I overseen something preventing from closing it?

Regards,
Andrey


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: [PATCH] Fix dropping privileges issue on setuid programs on systems with PAM/LDAP and GnuTLS/libgcrypt

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 368297 libldap-2.4 2.4.31-1
Bug #368297 [libgcrypt11] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps
Bug #545414 [libgcrypt11] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with "sudo: setreuid(ROOT_UID, 
user_uid): Operation not permitted" for ldap users
Bug #566351 [libgcrypt11] libgcrypt11: should not change user id as a side 
effect
Bug #579647 [libgcrypt11] nss-ldap changing uid due to using gcrypt somewhere...
Bug #601667 [libgcrypt11] libpam-smbpass migrate breaks su (squeeze)
Bug #628671 [libgcrypt11] passwd: Ordinary users can't change their passwords.
Bug #658896 [libgcrypt11] sudo: setresuid(ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID): 
Operation not permitted
Bug reassigned from package 'libgcrypt11' to 'libldap-2.4'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libgcrypt11' to 'libldap-2.4'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libgcrypt11' to 'libldap-2.4'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libgcrypt11' to 'libldap-2.4'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libgcrypt11' to 'libldap-2.4'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libgcrypt11' to 'libldap-2.4'.
Bug reassigned from package 'libgcrypt11' to 'libldap-2.4'.
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap-2.4'
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap-2.4'
No longer marked as found in versions libgcrypt11/1.4.4-6.
No longer marked as found in versions libgcrypt11/1.4.4-6.
No longer marked as found in versions libgcrypt11/1.4.4-6.
No longer marked as found in versions libgcrypt11/1.4.4-6.
No longer marked as found in versions libgcrypt11/1.4.4-6.
No longer marked as found in versions libgcrypt11/1.4.4-6.
No longer marked as found in versions libgcrypt11/1.4.4-6.
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap-2.4'
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap-2.4'
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #368297 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #545414 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #566351 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #579647 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #601667 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #628671 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #658896 to the same values 
previously set
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap-2.4'
Bug #368297 [libldap-2.4] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps
Bug #545414 [libldap-2.4] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with "sudo: setreuid(ROOT_UID, 
user_uid): Operation not permitted" for ldap users
Bug #566351 [libldap-2.4] libgcrypt11: should not change user id as a side 
effect
Bug #579647 [libldap-2.4] nss-ldap changing uid due to using gcrypt somewhere...
Bug #601667 [libldap-2.4] libpam-smbpass migrate breaks su (squeeze)
Bug #628671 [libldap-2.4] passwd: Ordinary users can't change their passwords.
Bug #658896 [libldap-2.4] sudo: setresuid(ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID): 
Operation not permitted
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap-2.4'
There is no source info for the package 'libldap-2.4' at version '2.4.31-1' 
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.4.31-1'
Marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
Marked as found in versions 2.4.31-1.
Warning: Unknown package 'libldap-2.4'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
368297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368297
545414: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545414
566351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566351
579647: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579647
601667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601667
628671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628671
658896: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658896
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#368297: [PATCH] Fix dropping privileges issue on setuid programs on systems with PAM/LDAP and GnuTLS/libgcrypt

[Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez]

reassign 368297 libldap-2.4 2.4.31-1
thanks

Hi!


I have been digging on this issue and I found the ultimate cause of this
problem.


When sudo/su/passwd/ on
a system configured with PAM/LDAPs it chains into libldap, which uses
GnuTLS/libgcrypt to manage the TLS channel.


The problem is that when OpenLDAP calls gnutls_global_init(), this
function does nothing because OpenLDAP had previously already
initialized libgcrypt at some point on the stack (probably by mistake).

So, gnutls_global_init() checks that some basic initialization of
libgcrypt was already done and skips completely any action.

The problem is that gnutls_global_init() is supposed to set the flag
GCRYCTL_DISABLE_SECMEM which disables both the use of secure memory
*and* the "feature" of dropping privileges that libgcrypt has. [1]

So, what is happening is that the initialization of libgcrypt is not
being done as expected.

I cooked a very small patch that, just after calling
gnutls_global_init() checks if the initialization was successful, and if
was not, then it sets this flag (DISABLE_SECMEM)

I understand that (perhaps) the right fix could be to patch GnuTLS to
check for INITIALIZATION_FINISHED instead of ANY_INITIALIZATION. But
there are two problems with this:

 * One is that this could introduce some regression or bug on some
program that could be (wrongly) relying on this "feature" of GnuTLS.
Keep in mind that this code has been there since the beginning of the
project (I was blaming the git repository)


* The second problem is that GnutTLS (upstream) completely dropped the
support for libgcrypt (they even removed the code). So IMHO it don't
makes sense to fix GnuTLS at this point. For Jessie, GnuTLS should
switch to nettle. And OpenLDAP will have to switch to another crypto
library other than libgcrypt, or will have to patch the file
libraries/libldap/tls_g.c to stop using any GnuTLS code.


So, for the moment (Wheezy) I think the best approach to solve this bug
is to apply the small patch for OpenLDAP that I'm attaching.
It is the less intrusive approach to fix this bug. It don't needs to
touch anything on GnuTLS or libgcrypt. It is really fixing the problem
where is: OpenLDAP is not setting DISABLE_SECMEM when initializing
libgcrypt.

The approach taken by Ubuntu, to patch libgcrypt (LP: #423252), already
caused some regressions (LP: #1013798)


If someone wants to try it, I have uploaded the debs (AMD64) and the
sources to this URL:

http://ftp.neutrino.es/debian/OpenLDAP/


I tested that with this small patch the problem goes completely away.

Example of test:

1) Install current libldap-2.4-2 from Wheezy and test sudo:
root ~ # apt-get install --reinstall libldap-2.4-2=2.4.31-1

clopez ~ $ sudo whoami
[sudo] password for clopez:
sudo: PERM_ROOT: setresuid(0, -1, -1): Operation not permitted
sudo: unable to open /var/lib/sudo/clopez/8: Operation not permitted
sudo: unable to set supplementary group IDs: Operation not permitted
sudo: unable to execute /usr/bin/whoami: Operation not permitted


2) Install fixed libldap-2.4-2 and test sudo:
root ~ # wget
http://ftp.neutrino.es/debian/OpenLDAP/libldap-2.4-2_2.4.31-1.1_amd64.deb
root ~ # dpkg -i libldap-2.4-2_2.4.31-1.1_amd64.deb


clopez ~ $ sudo whoami
[sudo] password for clopez:
root
-

Therefore I'm reassigning this bug to libldap-2.4 (src:OpenLDAP)

Attached is also a debdiff for src:OpenLDAP


Read the comments inside the patch for further information.


I'm CC'ing libgcrypt/OpenLDAP/GnuTLS maintainers and will be later
reporting on Ubuntu's LP this.



Regards!


[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/03/msg00298.html
https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1181
diff -u openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog
--- openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog
+++ openldap-2.4.31/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+openldap (2.4.31-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+
+  [ Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez ]
+  * debian/patches/fix-dropping-privileges-by-libgcrypt-secmem.diff:
+Ensure that we don't use secure memory when libgcrypt is initialized.
+Avoids dropping privileges. Closes: #368297
+
+ -- Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez   Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:53:57 
+0100
+
 openldap (2.4.31-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -u openldap-2.4.31/debian/patches/series 
openldap-2.4.31/debian/patches/series
--- openldap-2.4.31/debian/patches/series
+++ openldap-2.4.31/debian/patches/series
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+fix-dropping-privileges-by-libgcrypt-secmem.diff
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- 
openldap-2.4.31.orig/debian/patches/fix-dropping-privileges-by-libgcrypt-secmem.diff
+++ 
openldap-2.4.31/debian/patches/fix-dropping-privileges-by-libgcrypt-secmem.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+Author: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez 
+Date: Thu Jan 24 22:38:25 2013 +0100
+Subject: Check if the call gnutls_global_init() succeded to initalize
+ libgcrypt. If not succeded then disable the use of secure memory.
+ gnutls_global_in

Bug#697402: bzr-gtk: causes crash in pydoc -k when python-gtk2 is also installed

[Jakub Wilk]

* Jakub Wilk , 2013-01-24, 23:48:

from gi.repository import Gtk
import _gtk

The last line should read:
from import _gtk


Third time lucky:
from gtk import _gtk

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698846: wiggle: non-DFSG document in source tarball

[NeilBrown]

On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:12:38 +0200 jari  wrote:

> Hi Neil,
> 
> Would you have any ideas for the *.ps file?
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698846
> 

I'm sorry, but I don't understand the question.  Maybe you could use more
words?

NeilBrown


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: Bug#698737: owncloud: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities (oC-SA-2013-001)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + patch
Bug #698737 [src:owncloud] owncloud: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities 
(oC-SA-2013-001)
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
698737: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698737
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#697402: bzr-gtk: causes crash in pydoc -k when python-gtk2 is also installed

[Jakub Wilk]

* Samuel Bronson , 2013-01-04, 16:20:

from gi.repository import Gtk
import _gtk


The last line should read:
from import _gtk


This bug should be reassigned somewhere else, but I haven't decided 
where yet. Anyway, here are some ideas how to fix (or "fix") it:


1) Make pydoc more robust. It could spawn a worker process, which would 
do all the nasty import job. If the worked process segfaulted, it 
wouldn't be a big deal, as a new one could be spawned.


2) Fix both python-gtk2 and python-gi, so that ImportError is thrown 
early if you try to load Gtk$n bindings and Gtk$((5-n)) are already in 
sys.modules. This should be easy to do on the python-gtk2 side, and 
probably way more tricky on the python-gi side. Also, this solves the 
problem only partially, because there are other Python extensions linked 
to libgtk2 or libgtk3. (Certainly too many too fix them all. :/)


3) Make libgtk2 and libgtk3 use symbol versioning. Probably not 
something that would be accepted for wheezy. :/


--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#663009: marked as done (sysvinit: (chroot) .init: timeout opening/writing control channel /run/initctl)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:03:00 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#663009: fixed in sysvinit 2.88dsf-38
has caused the Debian Bug report #663009,
regarding sysvinit: (chroot) .init: timeout opening/writing control channel 
/run/initctl
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663009: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663009
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sysvinit
Version: 2.88dsf-22
Severity: normal

Hello,

  When creating a foreign architecture chroot system on my system with 
multistrap, note that it does not seem to run preinst, I get to see this 
messages in the display (when running postinst scripts):

Setting up sysvinit (2.88dsf-22) ...
sysvinit: creating /run/initctl
sysvinit: restarting...init: timeout opening/writing control channel 
/run/initctl
.init: timeout opening/writing control channel /run/initctl
.init: timeout opening/writing control channel /run/initctl
.init: timeout opening/writing control channel /run/initctl
.init: timeout opening/writing control channel /run/initctl
.init: timeout opening/writing control channel /run/initctl
.init: timeout opening/writing control channel /run/initctl
.init: timeout opening/writing control channel /run/initctl
 failed.

 I wonder if this failure could get fixed somehow.

 Thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages sysvinit depends on:
ii  debianutils 4.2.1
ii  initscripts 2.88dsf-22
ii  libc6   2.13-26
ii  libselinux1 2.1.0-4.1
ii  libsepol1   2.1.0-1.2
ii  sysv-rc 2.88dsf-22
ii  sysvinit-utils  2.88dsf-22

sysvinit recommends no packages.

sysvinit suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sysvinit
Source-Version: 2.88dsf-38

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sysvinit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 663...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roger Leigh  (supplier of updated sysvinit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:43:55 +
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysvinit sysvinit-utils sysv-rc initscripts bootlogd
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.88dsf-38
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian sysvinit maintainers 

Changed-By: Roger Leigh 
Description: 
 bootlogd   - daemon to log boot messages
 initscripts - scripts for initializing and shutting down the system
 sysv-rc- System-V-like runlevel change mechanism
 sysvinit   - System-V-like init utilities
 sysvinit-utils - System-V-like utilities
Closes: 663009
Changes: 
 sysvinit (2.88dsf-38) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Roger Leigh ]:
   * If pidof fails in the sysvinit postinst or initscripts, default
 to PID 1 (for /sbin/init) (Closes: #663009).
   * Make fstab globbing in initscripts completely robust.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 88f330bb7791fe71f5dfbd0344b68400368c63c9 2342 sysvinit_2.88dsf-38.dsc
 27bcfa50d93c6c69cdfbe55e3a0523c9b21b7b90 210112 
sysvinit_2.88dsf-38.debian.tar.gz
 1c1502c406994718a82ff62052fe399b9620a66f 132872 sysvinit_2.88dsf-38_amd64.deb
 c80cc0a6b868714e08851febc20ef934a82549e0 99244 
sysvinit-utils_2.88dsf-38_amd64.deb
 5d86f8d08b2a15953e4db1ffe4c40a2680e636bc 81132 sysv-rc_2.88dsf-38_all.deb
 6beaeef9341d3ac19ae902353b7a86ee8c66036a 93836 initscripts_2.88dsf-38_amd64.deb
 26e54fd73c0fd2112981c6ac055da28b 54736 bootlogd_2.88dsf-38_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 e9400ca919c699703e30ab679b6b7174fa7e3593adb15d5a7f8f0599df12f89a 2342 
sysvinit_2.88dsf-38.dsc
 18651a21d664ae853295877c5e0c06a0764022f2d6f6bca71b5fcf368b4afe2d 210112 
sysvinit_2.88dsf-38.debian.tar.gz
 f7ab74f2cb15854e7f6b81fdfea820f1ac5ffcf93c7a1481139f365a9339a564 132872 
sysvinit_2.88dsf-38_amd64.deb
 0a5fee9cb3a29cfaccd4061546f9ebc157b4ba06695dd867

Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

[Jay Berkenbilt]

> > > grappa:~# debsums --changed
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/README
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/TODO
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/changelog.Debian.gz
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/changelog.gz
> >
> > This one seems clearish, a previous version of libtiff-tools used to
> > symlink /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools to /usr/share/doc/libtiff4. Also
> > the maintainer script removes the /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools on
> > upgrade if it's a directory and not symlink, which makes those
> > disappear only on upgrade not on a clean installation.
>
> This certainly needs to be fixed.

Wow.  All this stuff happened so long ago that I didn't even remember
ever having done this.  It seems like I added this preinst at some time
when switching from directories to symlinks, and at some later time,
probably decided that was a bad idea and switched back to directories
without remembering about the preinst.  Or maybe the package was using
symlinks when I originally inherited it.  I can dig through my svn logs
and figure out what's going on.

It seems to me that the current behavior is that all the tiff binary
packages have real directories in /usr/share/doc.  In this case, the
mostly right thing for the preinst to do is to unconditionally delete
/usr/share/doc/PKG if it is a symlink.  If someone is upgrading from a
version before it was ever a symlink to a current version, everything is
fine, and if someone is upgrading from a version that was a symlink, it
should still be fine.  Does that sound right?

This bug will likely affect the tiff3 source package as well.  If it
does, I will duplicate the bug and assign it there too.

The thing I find strangest about this is that there is nothing in the
changelog for the tiff packages indicating about changing back and forth
between these things being symlinks and directories.  I'm really
surprised that I wouldn't have mentioned something that in the
changelog.  Well, I have svn logs going back to when I first took over
this package, so I'm sure I'll be able to sort it out.  I'll double
check all the assumptions I made above in case I'm doing something
different from what I think I'm doing.  (I should probably run fsck on
my brain just to be safe.)

-- 
Jay Berkenbilt 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # upgrade problem
> severity 691180 serious
Bug #691180 [connman] connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
691180: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: bug 697974 is forwarded to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1619

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 697974 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1619
Bug #697974 [axis2c] axis2c: CVE-2012-6107: Does not verify that the server 
hostname matches a domain name in the subject's CN or subjectAltName field of 
the x.509 certificate
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1619'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
697974: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697974
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #698827 {Done: Abou Al Montacir } [src:lazarus] 
src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control
Bug #698828 {Done: Abou Al Montacir } [src:lazarus] 
src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions lazarus/0.9.30.4-4.
No longer marked as fixed in versions lazarus/0.9.30.4-4.
> notfixed -1 0.9.30.4-4
Bug #698827 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control
Bug #698828 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #698827 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #698828 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
698827: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698827
698828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: reopen -1

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 22:05 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Sorry bu I did not understand why this is a serious issue, can you please 
> clarify this?
> > but additional binaries were included in the upload:
> control file is indeed modified upon build, based on control.in entry
> as you already guessed. What is wrong with this?

For one thing, it breaks build reproducibility, as this bug
demonstrates.

See the "debian/control breakge #2" section of
http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html for a more detailed
treatment of the issues.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #698827 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control
Bug #698828 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build
Bug 698827 is not marked as done; doing nothing.

-- 
698827: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698827
698828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

[Ansgar Burchardt]

Control: reopen -1
Control: notfixed -1 0.9.30.4-4

Abou Al Montacir  writes:
> fixed 698827 0.9.30.4-4
That's wrong. The merged bug is *not* fixed in that version.

> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 08:55 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: 1
>
> Sorry bu I did not understand why this is a serious issue, can you please 
> clarify this?
>
>> but additional binaries were included in the upload:
>
> control file is indeed modified upon build, based on control.in entry as
> you already guessed. What is wrong with this?

See [1], "debian/control breakage #2". And look at the broken NMU.

Ansgar

  [1] 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#691180: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

[Jonathan Nieder]

Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 24.01.2013 09:22, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>> Fixing this properly would presumably require an iptables update in
>> testing (either bumping shlibs or, better, backporting the
>> introduction of a separate libxtables9 package from sid) followed by a
>> binnmu.
>
> Introducing new binary packages via tpu at this stage of a freeze doesn't
> immediately meet my definition of "better", fwiw...

Sure.  It's better because without a separate package the upgrade path
is complicated.  With a separate package:

install libxtables9
upgrade packages that use libxtables
upgrade iptables

Without a separate package:

deconfigure packages that use libxtables
upgrade iptables
upgrade packages that use libxtables

In other words, having a separate package allows both versions of
the library to coexist on the filesystem.

Here are the Reverse-build-dependencies of iptables-dev: collectd,
connman, iproute, linux-igd, nufw, perlipq, shaperd, west-chamber,
xtables-addons.

Of those, only connman and xtables-addons declare a dependency on
libxtables9.  It looks like the transition wasn't finished in sid. :(


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698879: Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 15:05 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I'd be eager and delighted to fix this bug as a part of pushing out
> e2fsprogs 1.42.7, but I'd like to get a ruling from the release team
> that this is something they would support.  Whether the justification
> is this particular symlink bug, or resize2fs potentially causing data
> loss for > 16TB file systems, either is fine with me.  :-)

A tidied up version of the diff between the current sid / wheezy
packages and the 1.42.7 in experimental comes to

 111 files changed, 2577 insertions(+), 1319 deletions(-)

That's more than we'd generally be happy to accept at this point,
particularly when the symlink bug is purely in the Debian packaging.
(imo, ommv...)

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698828: marked as done (src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:05:40 +0100
with message-id <1359061540.22057.7.ca...@no.domain.at.all>
and subject line Re: Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in 
d/control
has caused the Debian Bug report #698827,
regarding src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
698827: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698827
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:lazarus
Severity: serious

In at least version 0.9.30.4-1.1 and 0.9.30.4-4 debian/rules has a target
debian-files that is called during binary builds that will regenerate
debian/control.

I expect this to be the reason for the problem reported in #698827.

Ansgar
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 698827 0.9.30.4-4
thanks

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 08:55 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:

> Package: src:lazarus
> Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1

This was already fixed in 0.9.30.4-4 which is in sid since few days

> Severity: serious
> Justification: 1

Sorry bu I did not understand why this is a serious issue, can you please 
clarify this?

> but additional binaries were included in the upload:

control file is indeed modified upon build, based on control.in entry as
you already guessed. What is wrong with this?

Cheers,



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---

Bug#698827: marked as done (src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:05:40 +0100
with message-id <1359061540.22057.7.ca...@no.domain.at.all>
and subject line Re: Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in 
d/control
has caused the Debian Bug report #698827,
regarding src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
698827: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698827
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:lazarus
Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: 1

The .dsc says

  Source: lazarus
  Binary: lazarus, lazarus-src, lazarus-ide, lazarus-ide-gtk2, lazarus-ide-qt4, 
lcl, lcl-utils, lcl-units, lcl-nogui, lcl-gtk2, lcl-qt4, lazarus-doc
  Architecture: all i386 powerpc sparc amd64 armel armhf
  Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1

but additional binaries were included in the upload:

/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/queue/done/2012/06/15/lazarus_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.changes:
Files: 
 3367d401c2dbbc8052f9457275de00bc 2522 devel optional lazarus_0.9.30.4-1.1.dsc
 31dba864805eb6a6b8ef930ccbc9fc75 29317 devel optional 
lazarus_0.9.30.4-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 7ec2fd5593ae628f0583478aab54f787 6034398 devel optional 
lazarus-ide-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 a60c964c9fe1fee870b6cb05d5964226 6582310 devel optional 
lazarus-ide-gtk2-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 8694c72ec212fedad6db2c0103a6c921 19548 devel optional 
lazarus-ide-qt4-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 a60327f2da60c9c5392f2de5b1689b72 19310 devel optional 
lcl-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 864d4e6c7282939c2bc90fba796b2ff9 5411864 devel optional 
lcl-utils-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 25834d816e0c6cc1fb3d008b6f179f95 29071554 devel optional 
lcl-units-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 c1a3b8f5de0a06fe207447987f37107a 48278 devel optional 
lcl-nogui-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 b1297dab0b5483bad53e32f80101e046 1324586 devel optional 
lcl-gtk2-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 bb60b085595eb36979ca1c9619ffa671 19520 devel optional 
lcl-qt4-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 34e5e6bf0862d90ee892fee538fa4075 19252 devel optional 
lazarus-ide_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 98aa5525b2f6102f2eecab27afd941e6 19270 devel optional 
lazarus-ide-gtk2_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 4146d65774aeaad3ebe0c0699edd4a8a 19314 devel optional 
lazarus-ide-qt4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 a10ee72f72fa2c8b74f26e85731fb501 19216 devel optional 
lcl_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 71c49bd8856f5ff1e9078472bed9ee23 19242 devel optional 
lcl-utils_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 40ac96689339c74f8b65c42dcfa32a76 19246 devel optional 
lcl-units_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 8a2ce505a64918941d1fbd131147ea6b 19268 devel optional 
lcl-nogui_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 0bd5ae2b695c45e498bed3dae480ca90 19252 devel optional 
lcl-gtk2_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 6316b8ec83b3242a32b944eebaff5ef5 19282 devel optional 
lcl-qt4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 5d2053bd7fba0484150bcdfd178ff58c 19746 devel optional 
lazarus-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb
 15f6039102c8c33231b66551f44f6223 14069226 devel optional 
lazarus-src-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb
 c4514cd1ee9f38f77ccd50597ed0ee61 2994074 doc optional 
lazarus-doc-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb
 cdeeff18bd5834778c5e78cef67e808a 19248 devel optional 
lazarus_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb
 aa9bec4f8f789e275d64f470c7309012 19296 devel optional 
lazarus-src_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb
 ff524cba64d0d039599820f5f4d899ae 19304 doc optional 
lazarus-doc_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb

Ansgar
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 698827 0.9.30.4-4
thanks

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 08:55 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:

> Package: src:lazarus
> Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1

This was already fixed in 0.9.30.4-4 which is in sid since few days

> Severity: serious
> Justification: 1

Sorry bu I did not understand why this is a serious issue, can you please 
clarify this?

> but additional binaries were included in the upload:

control file is indeed modified upon build, based on control.in entry as
you already guessed. What is wrong with this?

Cheers,



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---

Processed: Re: Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 698827 0.9.30.4-4
Bug #698827 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control
Bug #698828 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build
Marked as fixed in versions lazarus/0.9.30.4-4.
Marked as fixed in versions lazarus/0.9.30.4-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
698827: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698827
698828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

[Abou Al Montacir]

fixed 698827 0.9.30.4-4
thanks

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 08:55 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:

> Package: src:lazarus
> Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1

This was already fixed in 0.9.30.4-4 which is in sid since few days

> Severity: serious
> Justification: 1

Sorry bu I did not understand why this is a serious issue, can you please 
clarify this?

> but additional binaries were included in the upload:

control file is indeed modified upon build, based on control.in entry as
you already guessed. What is wrong with this?

Cheers,



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Processed: merge 698828 698827

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> merge 698828 698827
Bug #698828 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build
Bug #698828 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build
Marked as found in versions lazarus/0.9.30.4-1.1.
Bug #698827 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control
Merged 698827 698828
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
698827: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698827
698828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698879: Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

[Theodore Ts'o]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:41:38PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ Sven, thanks for the investigation on e2fsck-static! ]
> 
> Please see the bug log for further details and logs, it's a split of a
> conglomerate bug, but the gist of it (should) be quoted below.
> 
> I've still set the severity to serious, even if the issue is caused by
> very old packages, because as long as this is not handled during an
> upgrade of a release cycle, then the problem is bound to possibly be
> carried over from release to release.

Is this really considered a serious bug?  If so, I'd love to use this
as an excuse to upgrade e2fsprogs to 1.42.7 since it fixes some pretty
catastrophic data corruption bugs for users who try to resize file
systems larger than 16TB, but when I looked at the most recent
requirement that wheezy was frozen for all but serious and above error
messages, and looking at the definition of "serious", "grave", and
"critical", it wasn't obvious that there were sufficient number of
users who use > 16TB file systems that I could in all honesty justify
trying to ask the release team for a freeze exception for e2fsprogs.

I'd be eager and delighted to fix this bug as a part of pushing out
e2fsprogs 1.42.7, but I'd like to get a ruling from the release team
that this is something they would support.  Whether the justification
is this particular symlink bug, or resize2fs potentially causing data
loss for > 16TB file systems, either is fine with me.  :-)

Thanks,

- Ted


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#689016: nagios-nrpe-server: /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop, does not stops the daemon

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 689016 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #689016 [nagios-nrpe-server] nagios-nrpe-server: 
/etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop, does not stops the daemon
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
689016: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689016
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#689016: nagios-nrpe-server: /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop, does not stops the daemon

[Alexander Wirt]

tag 689016 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, wforumw wrote:

> Package: nagios-nrpe-server
> Version: 2.13-1
> Severity: normal
> 
> /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop - does not stop the daemon.
> You need to kill it manually and then start the daemon again.
> I have several servers (approx 20) running this version and all have this 
> issue
Hum, sorry for being so late. But I am not able to reproduce this bug:

root@smithers:~# /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server start
[ ok ] Starting nagios-nrpe: nagios-nrpe.
root@smithers:~# pgrep nrpe
24527
root@smithers:~# /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop
[ ok ] Stopping nagios-nrpe: nagios-nrpe.
root@smithers:~# pgrep nrpe
root@smithers:~# 

Can you send me the output of bash -x /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop ?

Thanks

Alex


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: m68k is not a release arch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 696844 important
Bug #696844 [src:pmw] pmw: FTBFS due to pointer, integer and sign bit confusion 
(argh!)
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
696844: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696844
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #698745 [dpkg] dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
> clone -1 -2
Bug #698745 [dpkg] dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package
Bug 698745 cloned as bug 698879
> reassign -1 src:tiff
Bug #698745 [dpkg] dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package
Bug reassigned from package 'dpkg' to 'src:tiff'.
No longer marked as found in versions dpkg/1.16.9.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #698745 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle -1 tiff: Incorrect /usr/share/doc symlink to doc transition
Bug #698745 [src:tiff] dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a 
package
Changed Bug title to 'tiff: Incorrect /usr/share/doc symlink to doc transition' 
from 'dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package'
> found -1 3.8.2-7
Bug #698745 [src:tiff] tiff: Incorrect /usr/share/doc symlink to doc transition
Marked as found in versions tiff/3.8.2-7.
> reassign -2 src:e2fsprogs
Bug #698879 [dpkg] dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package
Bug reassigned from package 'dpkg' to 'src:e2fsprogs'.
No longer marked as found in versions dpkg/1.16.9.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #698879 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle -2 e2fsprogs: Unhandled /usr/share/doc symlink to doc transition
Bug #698879 [src:e2fsprogs] dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a 
package
Changed Bug title to 'e2fsprogs: Unhandled /usr/share/doc symlink to doc 
transition' from 'dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package'
> found -2 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02+dfsg-1
Bug #698879 [src:e2fsprogs] e2fsprogs: Unhandled /usr/share/doc symlink to doc 
transition
Marked as found in versions e2fsprogs/1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02+dfsg-1.

-- 
698745: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698745
698879: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698879
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

[Guillem Jover]

Control: severity -1 serious
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -1 src:tiff
Control: retitle -1 tiff: Incorrect /usr/share/doc symlink to doc transition
Control: found -1 3.8.2-7
Control: reassign -2 src:e2fsprogs
Control: retitle -2 e2fsprogs: Unhandled /usr/share/doc symlink to doc 
transition
Control: found -2 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02+dfsg-1

[ Sven, thanks for the investigation on e2fsck-static! ]

Please see the bug log for further details and logs, it's a split of a
conglomerate bug, but the gist of it (should) be quoted below.

I've still set the severity to serious, even if the issue is caused by
very old packages, because as long as this is not handled during an
upgrade of a release cycle, then the problem is bound to possibly be
carried over from release to release.

On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 20:40:20 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-01-23 12:35 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 03:40:34 +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> > > Package: dpkg
> > > Version: 1.16.9
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> >
> > I doubt this is a problem in dpkg, otherwise this should have shown
> > up early on. From the looks of it, it seems specific problems in those
> > packages you list, probably from fragile /use/share/doc/ symlink
> > transition handling, and symlinks remaining on the system from packages
> > older than the ones in squeeze.
> 
> That seems to be correct.
> 
> > It seems the only involved packages are e2fsck-static, e2fsprogs,
> > libtiff-tools, libtiff4 and libtiffxx0c2.
> >
> > > grappa:~# md5sum /usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs/copyright
> > > 726570c997e520841dbf8f7611b173ae  /usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs/copyright
> > > 
> > > grappa:~# grep copyright /var/lib/dpkg/info/e2fsprogs.md5sums 
> > > 51a47eee51e75de66777fc781af2f063  usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs/copyright
> >
> > I'll check these out later today.
> 
> The e2fsck-static package switched from a symlink to a directory in
> /usr/share/doc with version 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02+dfsg-1, but
> apparently never included a maintainer script to remove the symlink.
> Not sure if it is worth fixing that three Debian releases later.
>
> > > grappa:~# debsums --changed
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/README
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/TODO
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/changelog.Debian.gz
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/changelog.gz
> >
> > This one seems clearish, a previous version of libtiff-tools used to
> > symlink /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools to /usr/share/doc/libtiff4. Also
> > the maintainer script removes the /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools on
> > upgrade if it's a directory and not symlink, which makes those
> > disappear only on upgrade not on a clean installation.
> 
> This certainly needs to be fixed.

Regards,
Guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

[Guillem Jover]

On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 20:45:36 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-01-23 19:58 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
> >> I'll check this further and most probably reassign to the other
> >> packages.
> >
> > And probably lower the bug severity, as IMHO, "grave" (or any RC
> > severity) is overflated.

Sure, didn't want to mangle any state w/o having verified the facts
first. :)

> Well, "serious" might be correct, but the bugs only affect systems that
> were installed prior to Lenny so a lower severity could be in order.

If those do not get handled at some point then those problems will be
carried over upgrade after upgrade, so I think serious is justified.

Thanks,
Guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698871: [Pkg-sssd-devel] Bug#698871: CVE-2013-0219 CVE-2013-0220

[Timo Aaltonen]

On 24.01.2013 20:30, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:

Package: sssd
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Hi,
multiple security issues have been discovered in sssd. Please see the Red Hat
bugzilla entries for details and patches:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0219
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0220


Yep, I'm aware of them and will prepare an upload later.

--
t


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698871: CVE-2013-0219 CVE-2013-0220

[Moritz Muehlenhoff]

Package: sssd
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Hi,
multiple security issues have been discovered in sssd. Please see the Red Hat
bugzilla entries for details and patches:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0219
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0220

Cheers,
Moritz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: severity of 689016 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 689016 serious
Bug #689016 [nagios-nrpe-server] nagios-nrpe-server: 
/etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop, does not stops the daemon
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
689016: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689016
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694908: Redistribution of OBO Relation Ontology inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

[Chris Mungall]

Note the note at the top of the web page - OBO_REL is deprecated.

The new relation ontology is here:
http://code.google.com/p/obo-relations/

• Code license
• New BSD License
•
• Content license
• Creative Commons 3.0 BY

If you need to distribute the legacy one by all means do it, it should be CC 
3.0 BY like most of the OBO ontologies.

On Jan 24, 2013, at 7:06 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Hi Chris,
> 
> I hope you are fine and got my last mail.  In case you might need some
> time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to
> give us some confirmation that you are working on this.  Any response
> from your side (or somebody else in charge for OBO Relation Ontology)
> will be helpful.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>  Andreas.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:40:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>> 
>> I'm writing you on the behalf of the Debian Med team which has included
>> the EMBOSS suite into official Debian distribution.  The EMBOSS suite
>> does contain some files of the OBO Relation Ontology.  I failed to find
>> any licensing or contact information at
>> 
>>   http://obofoundry.org/ro/
>> 
>> but I noticed that you are the maintainer of this page and you might at
>> least be able to forward this request.  So I hope is fine to contact
>> you.  Please note that I have put the according bug tracker e-mail to
>> this mail which makes this mail publicly available.  While we would
>> finally need a public statement please make sure you drop this CC in
>> case you prefer that your response is not publicly readable.
>> 
>> By packaging the EMBOSS suite the Debian operating system is currently
>> redistributing some files from OBO Relation Ontology indirectly, because
>> EMBOSS has included these since version 6.4
>> (http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/emboss).
>> 
>> Debian considers copyrights and licenses very seriously, and our system
>> only contains Free software, that is, materials that our users can
>> freely use, modify and redistribute themselves. In addition to our
>> system, we have a "non-free" archive in which, as a convenience for our
>> users, we redistribute works that give less freedoms to our users.
>> 
>> In order to evaluate if works containing OBO Relation Ontology files can
>> at least be distributed in our "non-free" area, I would like to know if
>> Pathway ontology is available under other terms of use or licenses, that
>> allow redistributing OBO Relation Ontology files.  You might even like
>> to follow the Gene Ontology Consortium that has put its database under a
>> Creative Commons BY (Attribution 3.0 Unported) license[1].
>> 
>> Kind regards and thanks for providing OBO Relation Ontology
>> 
>>   Andreas.
>> 
>> [1] https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GOHELP-147
>> 
>> -- 
>> http://fam-tille.de
>> 
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694589: lastfmproxy: python module/script files in wrong location

[Romain Beauxis]

Hi,

2013/1/24 Andreas Tille :
> I'm sorry to say that I became immediately uninterested when I noticed
> that the package became a candidate for removal from Wheezy.  I'm not
> using the package and I just wanted to help speeding up the release.
> So I will definitely not take over.
>
> Sorry for not beeing really helpful

That's fine. I don't think this software project is still active anyway..

R.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694589: lastfmproxy: python module/script files in wrong location

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Romain,

I'm sorry to say that I became immediately uninterested when I noticed
that the package became a candidate for removal from Wheezy.  I'm not
using the package and I just wanted to help speeding up the release.
So I will definitely not take over.

Sorry for not beeing really helpful

  Andreas.

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:07:17AM -0600, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> 2013/1/24 Andreas Tille :
> > Hi,
> 
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> > I wonder whether it would help if I would just dh_python2-ify (switching
> > from cdbs to dh) to solve this problem.  I do not feel prepared to fix the
> > issue in cdbs but I did some dh based Python packages - so feel free to
> > ping me if this is accepted.
> >
> > On the other hand popcon seems to show
> >
> >http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=lastfmproxy
> >
> > that the best days of this package are over - I also can not see any
> > reverse dependencies.  Kicking this leaf package from testing would be
> > perfectly fine for me personally.
> >
> > BTW, I would also inject the packaging into collab-maint (svn or git -
> > whatever you prefer.)
> 
> Thanks for your care! Feel free to upload a fixed version, either
> NMUed or even taking the package over..
> 
> Have a good day,
> Romain
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694589: lastfmproxy: python module/script files in wrong location

[Romain Beauxis]

2013/1/24 Andreas Tille :
> Hi,

Hi Andreas,

> I wonder whether it would help if I would just dh_python2-ify (switching
> from cdbs to dh) to solve this problem.  I do not feel prepared to fix the
> issue in cdbs but I did some dh based Python packages - so feel free to
> ping me if this is accepted.
>
> On the other hand popcon seems to show
>
>http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=lastfmproxy
>
> that the best days of this package are over - I also can not see any
> reverse dependencies.  Kicking this leaf package from testing would be
> perfectly fine for me personally.
>
> BTW, I would also inject the packaging into collab-maint (svn or git -
> whatever you prefer.)

Thanks for your care! Feel free to upload a fixed version, either
NMUed or even taking the package over..

Have a good day,
Romain


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: reassign 698740 to gnome-panel, tagging 698740

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 698740 gnome-panel 3.4.2.1-3
Bug #698740 [gnome-applets] gnome-applets: Force-Quit applet freezes/crashes, 
refuses to recognize mouse clicks or escape key
Bug reassigned from package 'gnome-applets' to 'gnome-panel'.
No longer marked as found in versions gnome-applets/3.4.1-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #698740 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #698740 [gnome-panel] gnome-applets: Force-Quit applet freezes/crashes, 
refuses to recognize mouse clicks or escape key
Marked as found in versions gnome-panel/3.4.2.1-3.
> tags 698740 + confirmed
Bug #698740 [gnome-panel] gnome-applets: Force-Quit applet freezes/crashes, 
refuses to recognize mouse clicks or escape key
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
698740: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698740
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#672524: bitcoin: FTBFS[any-i386]: testsuite errors

[Laurent Bigonville]

Hello,

It's interesting to note that the package is building fine in Ubuntu on
i386.

Cheers

Laurent Bigonville


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694908: Status update (Was: Bug#694908: Contains non-free data)

[Andreas Tille]

Another status update:  Just pinged all those authors that did not yet
responded since the last status update

   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694908#97

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698832: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

[Dominik George]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Control: tags 698635 + patch pending

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of package "gosa". The upload
would fix RC bug #698635.

 Package name: gosa
 Version : 2.7.4-4.1
 Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

 gosa  - Web Based LDAP Administration Program
 gosa-desktop - Desktop integration for GOsa²
 gosa-dev   - GOsa² development utilities
 gosa-help-de - German online help for GOsa²
 gosa-help-en - English online help for GOsa
 gosa-help-fr - French online help for GOsa²
 gosa-help-nl - Dutch online help for GOsa
 gosa-plugin-connectivity - connectivity plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-dhcp - dhcp plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-dhcp-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² dhcp plugin
 gosa-plugin-dns - dns plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-dns-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² dns plugin
 gosa-plugin-fai - fai plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-fai-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² fai plugin
 gosa-plugin-gofax - gofax plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-gofon - gofon plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-goto - goto plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-kolab - kolab plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-kolab-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² kolab plugin
 gosa-plugin-ldapmanager - ldapmanager plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-mail - base mail plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-mit-krb5 - mit-krb5 plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-mit-krb5-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² mit-krb5 plugin
 gosa-plugin-nagios - nagios plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-nagios-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² nagios plugin
 gosa-plugin-netatalk - netatalk plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-opengroupware - opengroupware plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-openxchange - openxchange plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-openxchange-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² openxchange plugin
 gosa-plugin-opsi - opsi plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-phpgw - phpgw plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-phpgw-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² phpgw plugin
 gosa-plugin-phpscheduleit - phpscheduleit plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-phpscheduleit-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² phpscheduleit plugin
 gosa-plugin-pptp - pptp plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-pptp-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² pptp plugin
 gosa-plugin-pureftpd - pureftpd plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-pureftpd-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² pureftpd plugin
 gosa-plugin-rolemanagement - rolemanagement plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-rsyslog - rsyslog plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-samba - samba3 plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-scalix - scalix plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-squid - squid plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-ssh - ssh plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-ssh-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² ssh plugin
 gosa-plugin-sudo - sudo plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-sudo-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² sudo plugin
 gosa-plugin-systems - systems plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-uw-imap - uw-imap plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-plugin-webdav - webdav plugin for GOsa²
 gosa-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/gosa


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gosa/gosa_2.7.4-4.1.dsc

Changes since the last upload: see attached debdiff.

Regards,
 Dominik George

-- 
diff -Nru gosa-2.7.4/debian/changelog gosa-2.7.4/debian/changelog
--- gosa-2.7.4/debian/changelog 2012-06-19 09:37:20.0 +0200
+++ gosa-2.7.4/debian/changelog 2013-01-24 15:53:57.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gosa (2.7.4-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Only call a2enmod in postinst if it is available
+(Closes: #698635, thanks to Matthias Rampke).
+
+ -- Dominik George   Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:52:09 +0100
+
 gosa (2.7.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New smarty3 package fixes problems with template loading. This
diff -Nru gosa-2.7.4/debian/gosa.postinst gosa-2.7.4/debian/gosa.postinst
--- gosa-2.7.4/debian/gosa.postinst 2013-01-24 15:49:52.0 +0100
+++ gosa-2.7.4/debian/gosa.postinst 2013-01-24 15:50:52.0 +0100
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
   fi
   
   # Add support for RequestHeader
-  a2enmod headers
+  [[ -x /usr/sbin/a2enmod ]] && a2enmod headers
 
   # Finally restart servers
   if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags 698635 + patch pending
Bug #698635 [gosa] gosa: package configuration calls a2enmod even if apache is 
not installed
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #698635 to the same tags previously set

-- 
698635: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698635
698832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags 698635 + patch pending
Bug #698635 [gosa] gosa: package configuration calls a2enmod even if apache is 
not installed
Added tag(s) pending and patch.

-- 
698635: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698635
698853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698853
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694908: Redistribution of Sequence Ontology inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

[Andreas Tille]

Hello Karen,

I hope you are fine and got my last mail.  In case you might need some
time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to
give us some confirmation that you are working on this.  Any response
from your side (or somebody else in charge for Sequence Ontology) will
be helpful.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:56:51PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hello Karen,
> 
> I'm writing you on the behalf of the Debian Med team which has included
> the EMBOSS suite into official Debian distribution.  The EMBOSS suite
> does contain the file so.obo of the Sequence Ontology.  I failed to find
> any licensing information at
> 
>http://www.sequenceontology.org/
> 
> So I hope is fine to contact you as your are listed under "drop a note
> to".  Please note that I have put the according bug tracker e-mail to
> this mail which makes this mail publicly available.  While we would
> finally need a public statement please make sure you drop this CC in
> case you prefer that your response is not publicly readable.
> 
> By packaging the EMBOSS suite the Debian operating system is currently
> redistributing the file so.obo from Sequence Ontology indirectly,
> because EMBOSS has included these since version 6.4
> (http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/emboss).
> 
> Debian considers copyrights and licenses very seriously, and our system
> only contains Free software, that is, materials that our users can
> freely use, modify and redistribute themselves. In addition to our
> system, we have a "non-free" archive in which, as a convenience for our
> users, we redistribute works that give less freedoms to our users.
> 
> In order to evaluate if works containing Sequence Ontology files can at
> least be distributed in our "non-free" area, I would like to know if
> Sequence Ontology is available under other terms of use or licenses,
> that allow redistributing Sequence Ontology files.  You might even like
> to follow the Gene Ontology Consortium that has put its database under a
> Creative Commons BY (Attribution 3.0 Unported) license[1].
> 
> Kind regards and thanks for providing Sequence Ontology
> 
>Andreas.
> 
> [1] https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GOHELP-147
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694908: Redistribution of Pathway ontology inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

[Andreas Tille]

Hello Victoria,

I hope you are fine and got my last mail.  In case you might need some
time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to
give us some confirmation that you are working on this.  Any response
from your side (or somebody else in charge for Pathway ontology) will be
helpful.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:44:58PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hello Victoria,
> 
> I'm writing you on the behalf of the Debian Med team which has included
> the EMBOSS suite into official Debian distribution.  The EMBOSS suite
> does contain some files of the Pathway ontology and the site
> 
>http://www.obofoundry.org/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?id=pathway
> 
> lists you as contact.  So I hope is fine to contact you.  Please note
> that I have put the according bug tracker e-mail to this mail which
> makes this mail publicly available.  While we would finally need a
> public statement please make sure you drop this CC in case you prefer
> that your response is not publicly readable.
> 
> By packaging the EMBOSS suite the Debian operating system is currently
> redistributing some files from Pathway ontology indirectly, because
> EMBOSS has included these since version 6.4
> (http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/emboss).
> 
> Debian considers copyrights and licenses very seriously, and our system
> only contains Free software, that is, materials that our users can
> freely use, modify and redistribute themselves. In addition to our
> system, we have a "non-free" archive in which, as a convenience for our
> users, we redistribute works that give less freedoms to our users.
> 
> In order to evaluate if works containing Pathway ontology files can at
> least be distributed in our "non-free" area, I would like to know if
> Pathway ontology is available under other terms of use or licenses, that
> allow redistributing Evidence codes ontology files.  You might even like
> to follow the Gene Ontology Consortium that has put its database under a
> Creative Commons BY (Attribution 3.0 Unported) license[1].
> 
> Kind regards and thanks for providing Pathway ontology
> 
>Andreas.
> 
> [1] https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GOHELP-147
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de
> 
> - End forwarded message -
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694908: Redistribution of OBO Relation Ontology inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Chris,

I hope you are fine and got my last mail.  In case you might need some
time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to
give us some confirmation that you are working on this.  Any response
from your side (or somebody else in charge for OBO Relation Ontology)
will be helpful.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:40:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> I'm writing you on the behalf of the Debian Med team which has included
> the EMBOSS suite into official Debian distribution.  The EMBOSS suite
> does contain some files of the OBO Relation Ontology.  I failed to find
> any licensing or contact information at
> 
>http://obofoundry.org/ro/
> 
> but I noticed that you are the maintainer of this page and you might at
> least be able to forward this request.  So I hope is fine to contact
> you.  Please note that I have put the according bug tracker e-mail to
> this mail which makes this mail publicly available.  While we would
> finally need a public statement please make sure you drop this CC in
> case you prefer that your response is not publicly readable.
> 
> By packaging the EMBOSS suite the Debian operating system is currently
> redistributing some files from OBO Relation Ontology indirectly, because
> EMBOSS has included these since version 6.4
> (http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/emboss).
> 
> Debian considers copyrights and licenses very seriously, and our system
> only contains Free software, that is, materials that our users can
> freely use, modify and redistribute themselves. In addition to our
> system, we have a "non-free" archive in which, as a convenience for our
> users, we redistribute works that give less freedoms to our users.
> 
> In order to evaluate if works containing OBO Relation Ontology files can
> at least be distributed in our "non-free" area, I would like to know if
> Pathway ontology is available under other terms of use or licenses, that
> allow redistributing OBO Relation Ontology files.  You might even like
> to follow the Gene Ontology Consortium that has put its database under a
> Creative Commons BY (Attribution 3.0 Unported) license[1].
> 
> Kind regards and thanks for providing OBO Relation Ontology
> 
>Andreas.
> 
> [1] https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GOHELP-147
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694908: Redistribution of Evidence codes inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

[Andreas Tille]

Hello Michelle,

I hope you are fine and got my last mail.  In case you might need some
time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to
give us some confirmation that you are working on this.  Any response
from your side (or somebody else in charge for Evidence codes) will be
helpful.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:30:40PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hello Michelle,
> 
> I'm writing you on the behalf of the Debian Med team which has included
> the EMBOSS suite into official Debian distribution.  The EMBOSS suite
> does contain some files of the Evidence codes ontology and the site
> 
>http://www.obofoundry.org/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?id=evidence_code
> 
> lists you as contact.  So I hope is fine to contact you.  Please note
> that I have put the according bug tracker e-mail to this mail which
> makes this mail publicly available.  While we would finally need a
> public statement please make sure you drop this CC in case you prefer
> that your response is not publicly readable.
> 
> By packaging the EMBOSS suite the Debian operating system is currently
> redistributing some files from Evidence codes ontology indirectly, which
> incorporates some Evidence codes ontology files since its version 6.4
> (http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/emboss).
> 
> Debian considers copyrights and licenses very seriously, and our system
> only contains Free software, that is, materials that our users can
> freely use, modify and redistribute themselves. In addition to our
> system, we have a "non-free" archive in which, as a convenience for our
> users, we redistribute works that give less freedoms to our users.
> 
> In order to evaluate if works containing Evidence codes ontology files
> can at least be distributed in our "non-free" area, I would like to know
> if Evidence codes ontology is available under other terms of use or
> licenses, that allow redistributing Evidence codes ontology files.  You
> might even like to follow the Gene Ontology Consortium that has put its
> database under a Creative Commons BY (Attribution 3.0 Unported)
> license[1].
> 
> Kind regards and thanks for providing Evidence codes
> 
>Andreas.
> 
> [1] https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GOHELP-147
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694589: lastfmproxy: python module/script files in wrong location

[Andreas Tille]

Hi,

I wonder whether it would help if I would just dh_python2-ify (switching
from cdbs to dh) to solve this problem.  I do not feel prepared to fix the
issue in cdbs but I did some dh based Python packages - so feel free to
ping me if this is accepted.

On the other hand popcon seems to show

   http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=lastfmproxy

that the best days of this package are over - I also can not see any
reverse dependencies.  Kicking this leaf package from testing would be
perfectly fine for me personally.

BTW, I would also inject the packaging into collab-maint (svn or git -
whatever you prefer.)

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#658739: libnss-ldapd/libpam-ldapd not a solution

[Martijn van Brummelen]

The suggested solution of using libnss-ldap/libpam-ldapd is not a solution
for this problem, since libnss-ldap/libpam-ldapd does not provide nested
groups.

Regards,
Martijn van Brummelen


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#696011: virtualbox: kernel modules fail to build against linux kernel v3.7

[Chris Knadle]

Unfortunately I find that even with the patch, the VirtualBox modules will not 
compile when built with upstream Linux 3.6.11 and 3.7.4 from the linux-stable 
Git tree.  They build fine against upstream 3.5.7.


...
kmk[3]: Entering directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.6.11'
  LD  /home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/built-in.o
  CC [M]  /home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/linux/VBoxPci-
linux.o
  CC [M]  /home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/VBoxPci.o
In file included from 
/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/VBoxPciInternal.h:34:0,
 from 
/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/VBoxPci.c:38:
include/linux/iommu.h: In function ‘iommu_group_alloc’:
include/linux/iommu.h:272:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ERR_PTR’ 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
include/linux/iommu.h:272:2: warning: return makes pointer from integer 
without a cast [enabled by default]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
kmk[3]: *** [/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/VBoxPci.o] 
Error 1
kmk[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
kmk[3]: Leaving directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.6.11'
kmk[3]: Entering directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.6.11'
kmk[3]: *** Exiting with status 2
kmk[2]: *** [/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci] Error 2
kmk[2]: Leaving directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.6.11'
kmk[1]: *** [_module_/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox] Error 2
kmk[1]: Leaving directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.6.11'
kmk: *** [binary-modules] Error 2
kmk: Leaving directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox'
make[1]: *** [kdist_build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox'
Module /home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox failed.
Hit return to Continue



...
kmk[3]: Entering directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.7.4'
  LD  /home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/built-in.o
  CC [M]  /home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/linux/VBoxPci-
linux.o
  CC [M]  /home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/VBoxPci.o
In file included from 
/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/VBoxPciInternal.h:34:0,
 from 
/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/VBoxPci.c:38:
include/linux/iommu.h: In function ‘iommu_group_alloc’:
include/linux/iommu.h:272:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ERR_PTR’ 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
include/linux/iommu.h:272:2: warning: return makes pointer from integer 
without a cast [enabled by default]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
kmk[3]: *** [/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci/VBoxPci.o] 
Error 1
kmk[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
kmk[3]: Leaving directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.7.4'
kmk[3]: Entering directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.7.4'
kmk[3]: *** Exiting with status 2
kmk[2]: *** [/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox/vboxpci] Error 2
kmk[2]: Leaving directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.7.4'
kmk[1]: *** [_module_/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox] Error 2
kmk[1]: Leaving directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.7.4'
kmk: *** [binary-modules] Error 2
kmk: Leaving directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox'
make[1]: *** [kdist_build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox'
Module /home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/modules/virtualbox failed.
Hit return to Continue



  -- Chris

--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698129: marked as done (unionfs-fuse: Depends on fuse-utils; uninstallable in sid)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:32:28 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#698129: fixed in unionfs-fuse 0.24-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #698129,
regarding unionfs-fuse: Depends on fuse-utils; uninstallable in sid
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
698129: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698129
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: unionfs-fuse
Version: 0.24-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils

Hi

unionfs-fuse 0.24-2.1 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable
fuse-utils was dropped. This makes unionfs-fuse uninstallable in sid.
Wheezy is not directly affected as the transitional package
fuse-utils is still present there, so tagging this 'sid' only.

Please change this dependency to fuse.

Regards,

Salvatore 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: unionfs-fuse
Source-Version: 0.24-2.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
unionfs-fuse, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 698...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ansgar Burchardt  (supplier of updated unionfs-fuse package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:35:47 +0100
Source: unionfs-fuse
Binary: unionfs-fuse
Architecture: amd64 source
Version: 0.24-2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernd Schubert 
Changed-By: Ansgar Burchardt 
Closes: 698129
Description: 
 unionfs-fuse - Fuse implementation of unionfs
Changes: 
 unionfs-fuse (0.24-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Depend on fuse instead of fuse-utils. (Closes: #698129)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 9ceec79e36c3f37bdbda3c8c913d41b82a366ea8 1736 unionfs-fuse_0.24-2.2.dsc
 3d2058a198b5b7d087ce5d4e9a4eaa320bf9f85b 5667 
unionfs-fuse_0.24-2.2.debian.tar.gz
 9ec76dbba5927e525540c255f208ec7a934dc53f 28916 unionfs-fuse_0.24-2.2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 3481ae0e32dde57849641fb13cd2c85c349718b145bb25e975550ed84058b2ed 1736 
unionfs-fuse_0.24-2.2.dsc
 8bfa97aa1dd15853dd89acc84252f2c1a9b8d3c19105e3cf8089d705e586295b 5667 
unionfs-fuse_0.24-2.2.debian.tar.gz
 cb809c3e82685439e4a917500b9f4502ef8aac4cc8c5de53e1abbac7d795a323 28916 
unionfs-fuse_0.24-2.2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 4f0f03931e905717ec5ba5d263a02c8e 1736 misc optional unionfs-fuse_0.24-2.2.dsc
 0dfac495a03ca85c15dfb74c49b57614 5667 misc optional 
unionfs-fuse_0.24-2.2.debian.tar.gz
 42c2aea9e6c443c07d0411c1af416b4c 28916 misc optional 
unionfs-fuse_0.24-2.2_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=ml+H
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---

Processed: Bug#698846 forwarded to upstream

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 698846 Neil Brown 
Bug #698846 [src:wiggle] non-DFSG document in source tarball
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'Neil Brown '.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
698846: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698846
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698846: Fwd: Bug#698846: wiggle: non-DFSG document in source tarball

[jari]

Hi Neil,

Would you have any ideas for the *.ps file?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698846

Thanks,
Jari


- Forwarded message from Robert Ransom  -
| Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:51:37 -0800
| Subject: Bug#698846: non-DFSG document in source tarball
| 
| Source: wiggle
| Version: 0.8-2
| Severity: serious
| 
| DOC/diff.ps in wiggle_0.8.orig.tar.gz (also present as a Git blob in
| the .git/ directory) is not provided in its preferred form for
| modification, and is also not clearly redistributable.
| 
| DOC/diff.ps is also present in wiggle_0.6.orig.tar.gz .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698846: non-DFSG document in source tarball

[Robert Ransom]

Source: wiggle
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: serious

DOC/diff.ps in wiggle_0.8.orig.tar.gz (also present as a Git blob in
the .git/ directory) is not provided in its preferred form for
modification, and is also not clearly redistributable.

DOC/diff.ps is also present in wiggle_0.6.orig.tar.gz .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698832: [Tails-dev] Bug#698832: keepassx: icons license and copyright information is missing

[Robert Ransom]

On 1/24/13, intrig...@debian.org  wrote:

> I see that Felix Geyer added this information to the COPYING file in
> upstream 2.x rewrite Git repository [2], so if the icon files are the
> same as in the 0.4 series, then the fix should be pretty easy.

None of the icon files present in the 0.4.3 tarball are in the 2.x
repository (as of commit 23c787c4dd3c52f912a7e910db1aab7db423eb7f).


Robert Ransom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698837: Bug#695774 cloned and reopened to #698837

[Jérémy Lal]

On 24/01/2013 10:42, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> rake aborted!
> Please install the pgsql adapter: `gem install activerecord-pgsql-adapter` 
> (cannot load such file -- active_record/connection_adapters/pgsql_adapter)

Cloning and reopening.

The bug fixed at #695774 was also serious enough to be fixed asap,
and really got me confused - sorry for that.

Now going back to that pgsql adapter problem : could you make sure
/etc/redmine/default/database.yml
contains :
  production:
adapter: postgresql


Thank you for your patience.

Jérémy.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#695774: closed by Jérémy Lal (Bug#695774: fixed in redmine 1.4.4+dfsg1-2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> clone 695774 -1
Bug #695774 {Done: Jérémy Lal } [redmine] redmine: fails to 
upgrade, says something about a pgsql_adapter
Bug 695774 cloned as bug 698837
> reopen -1
Bug #698837 {Done: Jérémy Lal } [redmine] redmine: fails to 
upgrade, says something about a pgsql_adapter
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2.
> retitle 695774 "Configures same dbuser by default, which overwrites generated 
> password"
Bug #695774 {Done: Jérémy Lal } [redmine] redmine: fails to 
upgrade, says something about a pgsql_adapter
Changed Bug title to '"Configures same dbuser by default, which overwrites 
generated password"' from 'redmine: fails to upgrade, says something about a 
pgsql_adapter'
> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
695774: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695774
698837: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698837
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#691180: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

[Adam D. Barratt]

On 24.01.2013 09:22, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:


close 691180
thanks

Hi,

there have been new uploads of connman both into testing and 
unstable,

the issue has been resolved as the package has been rebuilt in both
cases.

[...]

In wheezy, there is instead an unversioned dependency on iptables,
which is not enough to ensure the correct shared library is present:

[...]

Fixing this properly would presumably require an iptables update in
testing (either bumping shlibs or, better, backporting the
introduction of a separate libxtables9 package from sid) followed by 
a

binnmu.


Introducing new binary packages via tpu at this stage of a freeze 
doesn't immediately meet my definition of "better", fwiw...


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#696210: Acknowledgement (no video, only audio)

[intrigeri]

Hi Antoine,

Antoine Beaupré wrote (18 Dec 2012 05:36:43 GMT) :
> So I guess this may be moved to the gstreamer backend package, [...]

Can you please try to reproduce the minitube side of the bug (#696210)
after upgrading the binary packages built from gst-plugins-bad0 to the
version in sid, that fixes #681652? (You may have to reinstall
phonon-backend-gstreamer, if you have removed it as indicated by your
previous message, and verify that you can reproduce the bug before the
upgrade).

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694473: Bug#691318: Bug#694473 session extension causes endless recursion after graceful reload

[Olivier Berger]

Hi.

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 09:47:52PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have pulled Stephan's patch and the one from referenced bug. Could
> you please confirm that this fixes the issue (5.4.4-12),

Thanks alot.

I've just tested with 5.4.4-12 from unstable, and it seems to fix the issue : I 
can now make edits in the mediawiki installed with fusionforge right after an 
/etc/init.d/apache2 reload without a segmentation fault :-)

> and if not
> would there be anyone willing to try php5 from experimental (5.4.11-1)
> if that fixes the issue? (Probably not, but it's a worth trying.)
> 

FWIW, I won't test it : machine in production.

Hope this helps.

Best regards,
-- 
Olivier BERGER 
http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694473: [php-maint] Bug#691318: Bug#691318: Maybe duplicate of 694473 ?

[Olivier Berger]

Hi.

Ondřej Surý  writes:

> There's a slight problem and that is I can't reproduce the problem
> with 5.4.4-11 in amd64 wheezy chroot neither with mediawiki package
> nor the vanilla mediawiki 1.20.2, so I cannot confirm if the 5.4.4-12
> fixed the error or not.
>
> Could one of the affected people please confirm?  Unless you confirm
> the bug is fixed, it cannot be propagated to wheezy, and I would
> really much like to avoid releasing wheezy with a RC bug in PHP.
>

I've just tested posting a mediawiki edit on my fusionforge server
installed with 5.4.4-11 and could reproduce the problem right after an
/etc/init.d/apache2 reload.

Will now test 5.4.4-12 and report.

Best regards,

-- 
Olivier BERGER 
http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#661018: Bug#698341: RM: spatialite-tools/3.0.0~beta20110817-3

[David Paleino]

Hello Andreas, hello everybody,

On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:55:54 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:

> [..]

before continuing, please check #698341.
There have been developments, and I asked for comments about two possible
uploads. I'm waiting for comments by the RT on what to do.

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#695774: closed by Jérémy Lal (Bug#695774: fixed in redmine 1.4.4+dfsg1-2)

[Thorsten Glaser]

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
> better one in a separate message then please contact Jérémy Lal 
>  by
> replying to this email.

Hm.

I set debconf priority to low, added sid to sources.list
and upgraded redmine{,-pgsql} and answered its questions.

I still get:

(Reading database ... 47986 files and directories currently installed.) 

Preparing to replace redmine-pgsql 1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1 (using 
.../redmine-pgsql_1.4.4+dfsg1-2_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement redmine-pgsql ...
Preparing to replace redmine 1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1 (using 
.../redmine_1.4.4+dfsg1-2_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement redmine ...
Setting up redmine-pgsql (1.4.4+dfsg1-2) ...
Setting up redmine (1.4.4+dfsg1-2) ...
dbconfig-common: writing config to 
/etc/dbconfig-common/redmine/instances/default.conf

Creating config file /etc/redmine/default/database.yml.new with new version
creating postgres user redmine:  already exists.
resetting password:  success.
creating database redmine_default: already exists.
dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password
Populating database for redmine instance "default".
This may take a while.
NOTE: Gem.source_index is deprecated, use Specification. It will be removed on 
or after 2011-11-01.
Gem.source_index called from 
/usr/share/redmine/vendor/rails/railties/lib/rails/gem_dependency.rb:21.
rake aborted!
Please install the pgsql adapter: `gem install activerecord-pgsql-adapter` 
(cannot load such file -- active_record/connection_adapters/pgsql_adapter)

Tasks: TOP => db:migrate => environment
(See full trace by running task with --trace)
Error when running rake db:migrate, check database configuration.
dpkg: error processing redmine (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 redmine
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-314
HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
Geschäftsführer: Boris Esser, Sebastian Mancke


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698832: keepassx: icons license and copyright information is missing

[intrigeri]

Package: keepassx
Version: 0.4.3-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: tails-...@boum.org

Hi,

Robert Ransom discovered [1] that some icons shipped with keepassx are
missing license and copyright information. Quoting him:

  "The icons in share/keepassx/icons/ appear to be from the Oxygen
  theme, and appear to be missing both their copyright and license
  information (Oxygen is LGPL) and their preferred form for
  modification (especially clientic.png)."

I see that Felix Geyer added this information to the COPYING file in
upstream 2.x rewrite Git repository [2], so if the icon files are the
same as in the 0.4 series, then the fix should be pretty easy.

[1] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2013-January/002420.html
[2] git://gitorious.org/keepassx/keepassx.git

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 691180 - sid experimental
Bug #691180 [connman] connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7
Removed tag(s) sid and experimental.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
691180: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 691180 connman/1.0-1.1+wheezy1
Bug #691180 {Done: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz } 
[connman] connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7
Marked as found in versions connman/1.0-1.1+wheezy1 and reopened.
> fixed 691180 connman/1.0-1.2
Bug #691180 [connman] connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7
Marked as fixed in versions connman/1.0-1.2.
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
691180: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#691180: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

[Jonathan Nieder]

found 691180 connman/1.0-1.1+wheezy1
fixed 691180 connman/1.0-1.2
quit

Hi Adrian,

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:

> close 691180
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> there have been new uploads of connman both into testing and unstable,
> the issue has been resolved as the package has been rebuilt in both
> cases.

This has been fixed in sid but not in wheezy. :(

In sid, the dependency on libxtables9 avoids trouble:

 $ cupt show connman/sid | egrep 'Version|Depends|Conflicts|Breaks'
 Version: 1.0-1.2
 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.9), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.1.1), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.28.0), 
libgnutls26 (>= 2.12.17-0), libxtables9, dbus, lsb-base

In wheezy, there is instead an unversioned dependency on iptables,
which is not enough to ensure the correct shared library is present:

 $ cupt show connman/wheezy | egrep 'Version|Depends|Conflicts|Breaks'
 Version: 1.0-1.1+wheezy1
 Depends: iptables, libc6 (>= 2.9), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.1.1), libglib2.0-0 (>= 
2.28.0), libgnutls26 (>= 2.12.17-0), dbus, lsb-base

Fixing this properly would presumably require an iptables update in
testing (either bumping shlibs or, better, backporting the
introduction of a separate libxtables9 package from sid) followed by a
binnmu.

Hope that helps,
Jonathan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698042: NMU for python-visual versioned 5.12-1.5

[Sébastien Villemot]

Control: tags 681701 + pending
Control: tags 698042 + pending

Dear Maintainer,

I uploaded to DELAYED/2 a NMU of python-visual fixing this bug. Please
find the debdiff attached. Don't hesitate to tell me if I should delay
the upload longer.

Cheers,

-- 
 .''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
  `-  GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594

diff -u python-visual-5.12/debian/control.in python-visual-5.12/debian/control.in
--- python-visual-5.12/debian/control.in
+++ python-visual-5.12/debian/control.in
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
 
 Package: python-visual
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends},
+ python-numpy (>= 1:1.6.1), python-numpy-abi9
 Suggests: ${cdbs:Suggests}
 XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions}
 Description: VPython 3D scientific visualization library
diff -u python-visual-5.12/debian/control python-visual-5.12/debian/control
--- python-visual-5.12/debian/control
+++ python-visual-5.12/debian/control
@@ -6,12 +6,13 @@
 Standards-Version: 3.8.3
 XS-Python-Version: all
 Homepage: http://www.vpython.org
-Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org:/git/collab-maint/python-visual.git
+Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/python-visual.git
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/python-visual.git
 
 Package: python-visual
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends},
+ python-numpy (>= 1:1.6.1), python-numpy-abi9
 Suggests: ${cdbs:Suggests}
 XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions}
 Description: VPython 3D scientific visualization library
diff -u python-visual-5.12/debian/changelog python-visual-5.12/debian/changelog
--- python-visual-5.12/debian/changelog
+++ python-visual-5.12/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+python-visual (1:5.12-1.5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+
+  [ Sébastien Villemot ]
+  * Rebuild against python-numpy >= 1:1.6.1 because of ABI change (see
+#685812), and add Depends on python-numpy (>= 1:1.6.1) and
+python-numpy-abi9 in order to support partial upgrades.
+(Closes: #698042)
+
+  [ Paul Tagliamonte ]
+  * debian/control: fix invalid Vcs-Git tag. (Closes: #681701)
+
+ -- Sébastien Villemot   Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:12:55 +0100
+
 python-visual (1:5.12-1.4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Processed: NMU for python-visual versioned 5.12-1.5

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags 681701 + pending
Bug #681701 [python-visual] invalid Vcs-Git tag
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 698042 + pending
Bug #698042 [python-visual] python-visual: needs rebuild because of 
python-numpy ABI change and must add corresponding versioned dependency
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
681701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681701
698042: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698042
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: NMU for python-visual versioned 5.12-1.5

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags 681701 + pending
Bug #681701 [python-visual] invalid Vcs-Git tag
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #681701 to the same tags previously set
> tags 698042 + pending
Bug #698042 [python-visual] python-visual: needs rebuild because of 
python-numpy ABI change and must add corresponding versioned dependency
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #698042 to the same tags previously set

-- 
681701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681701
698042: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698042
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698828: src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build

[Ansgar Burchardt]

Package: src:lazarus
Severity: serious

In at least version 0.9.30.4-1.1 and 0.9.30.4-4 debian/rules has a target
debian-files that is called during binary builds that will regenerate
debian/control.

I expect this to be the reason for the problem reported in #698827.

Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

[Ansgar Burchardt]

Package: src:lazarus
Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: 1

The .dsc says

  Source: lazarus
  Binary: lazarus, lazarus-src, lazarus-ide, lazarus-ide-gtk2, lazarus-ide-qt4, 
lcl, lcl-utils, lcl-units, lcl-nogui, lcl-gtk2, lcl-qt4, lazarus-doc
  Architecture: all i386 powerpc sparc amd64 armel armhf
  Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1

but additional binaries were included in the upload:

/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/queue/done/2012/06/15/lazarus_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.changes:
Files: 
 3367d401c2dbbc8052f9457275de00bc 2522 devel optional lazarus_0.9.30.4-1.1.dsc
 31dba864805eb6a6b8ef930ccbc9fc75 29317 devel optional 
lazarus_0.9.30.4-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 7ec2fd5593ae628f0583478aab54f787 6034398 devel optional 
lazarus-ide-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 a60c964c9fe1fee870b6cb05d5964226 6582310 devel optional 
lazarus-ide-gtk2-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 8694c72ec212fedad6db2c0103a6c921 19548 devel optional 
lazarus-ide-qt4-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 a60327f2da60c9c5392f2de5b1689b72 19310 devel optional 
lcl-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 864d4e6c7282939c2bc90fba796b2ff9 5411864 devel optional 
lcl-utils-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 25834d816e0c6cc1fb3d008b6f179f95 29071554 devel optional 
lcl-units-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 c1a3b8f5de0a06fe207447987f37107a 48278 devel optional 
lcl-nogui-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 b1297dab0b5483bad53e32f80101e046 1324586 devel optional 
lcl-gtk2-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 bb60b085595eb36979ca1c9619ffa671 19520 devel optional 
lcl-qt4-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 34e5e6bf0862d90ee892fee538fa4075 19252 devel optional 
lazarus-ide_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 98aa5525b2f6102f2eecab27afd941e6 19270 devel optional 
lazarus-ide-gtk2_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 4146d65774aeaad3ebe0c0699edd4a8a 19314 devel optional 
lazarus-ide-qt4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 a10ee72f72fa2c8b74f26e85731fb501 19216 devel optional 
lcl_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 71c49bd8856f5ff1e9078472bed9ee23 19242 devel optional 
lcl-utils_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 40ac96689339c74f8b65c42dcfa32a76 19246 devel optional 
lcl-units_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 8a2ce505a64918941d1fbd131147ea6b 19268 devel optional 
lcl-nogui_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 0bd5ae2b695c45e498bed3dae480ca90 19252 devel optional 
lcl-gtk2_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 6316b8ec83b3242a32b944eebaff5ef5 19282 devel optional 
lcl-qt4_0.9.30.4-1.1_amd64.deb
 5d2053bd7fba0484150bcdfd178ff58c 19746 devel optional 
lazarus-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb
 15f6039102c8c33231b66551f44f6223 14069226 devel optional 
lazarus-src-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb
 c4514cd1ee9f38f77ccd50597ed0ee61 2994074 doc optional 
lazarus-doc-0.9.30.4_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb
 cdeeff18bd5834778c5e78cef67e808a 19248 devel optional 
lazarus_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb
 aa9bec4f8f789e275d64f470c7309012 19296 devel optional 
lazarus-src_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb
 ff524cba64d0d039599820f5f4d899ae 19304 doc optional 
lazarus-doc_0.9.30.4-1.1_all.deb

Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org