Bug#728578: Hotot: upstream discontinued

[Hideki Yamane]

Hi,

 Unfortunetly, hotot upstream has orphaned this software :-(
 It means that does not provide fix to it anymore.
 For detail, see http://www.hotot.org/this-project-has-been-discontinued/

 If anyone doesn't create folk for it as new upstream, I'll file removal
 request for this package.

 Any suggestion are welcome, of course.


-- 
Hideki Yamane

Bug#740140: libecore-dbg: not installable in sid, libecore1 now provided by efl source package

[Ralf Treinen]

Package: libecore-dbg
Version: 1.7.7-2
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-outdated

Hello,

libecore-dbg is currently not installable in sid on amd64 since it depends
on libecore1 (= 1.7.7-2).

However, we have in sid/amd64 now libecore 1.8.5-2 . In fact, libecore is
now provided by the efl source package, so the way how this dependency
is generated in the ecore package has probably to be adapted.

Cheers -Ralf.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740053: python3-coverage: overwrites file in python3-coverage-dbg

[Dmitry Shachnev]

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:57:44 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> package python3-coverage
> notfound 740053 python3-coverage/3.7+dfsg.1-4
> found 740053 python3-coverage/3.7+dfsg.1-4+b1
[...]
> (Which is “3.7+dfsg.1-4+b1”; I'm updating the bug report accordingly.)

Sorry, this is wrong. According to BTS documentation [1]:

> found bugnumber [ version ]
> version may be a fully qualified version, of the form 
> sourcepackagename/version.

[1]: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control.en.html#found

So you need a *source* package name and version, i.e. 
python-coverage/3.7+dfsg.1-4,
just like in my original message. Note that there was never a …+b1 *source* 
upload.

Now BTS is confused and thinks that this bug is also present in stable (see the 
graph
in top-right corner of the bug report).

--
Dmitry Shachnev

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#740053: python3-coverage: overwrites file in python3-coverage-dbg

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> notfound 740053 python3-coverage/3.7+dfsg.1-4+b1
Bug #740053 [python3-coverage] python3-coverage: overwrites file in 
python3-coverage-dbg
The source python3-coverage and version 3.7+dfsg.1-4+b1 do not appear to match 
any binary packages
No longer marked as found in versions python3-coverage/3.7+dfsg.1-4+b1.
> reassign 740053 python3-coverage
Bug #740053 [python3-coverage] python3-coverage: overwrites file in 
python3-coverage-dbg
Ignoring request to reassign bug #740053 to the same package
> found 740053 3.7+dfsg.1-4+b1
Bug #740053 [python3-coverage] python3-coverage: overwrites file in 
python3-coverage-dbg
Marked as found in versions python-coverage/3.7+dfsg.1-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
740053: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740053
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740147: Public key for Debian Edu archive (ftpmas...@skolelinux.org) has EXPIRED in squeeze's package version

[Mike Gabriel]

Package: debian-edu-archive-keyring
Version: 2010.01.05
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: debian-edu

Hi,

6 days ago (2014-02-20) the key 0xA26FF456 shipped in the Debian  
squeeze version of package debian-edu-archive-keyring (version  
2010.01.05) has expired.


mike@minobo:~/tmp/edu/debian-edu-archive-keyring-2010.01.05/keyrings$  
gpg --list-key  ftpmas...@skolelinux.org

pub   1024D/A26FF456 2006-02-22 [verfallen: 2014-02-20]
uid  Skolelinux Archive Automatic Signing Key  



The key is used as archive key for the Debian Edu archive on  
ftp.skolelinux.org.


This key validity expiration breaks all Debian Edu squeeze  
installations, may it be from DVD/Netinst-CD or may it be via  
PXE-installation.


Marking this as a "grave" bug, as it completely breaks Debian Edu  
squeeze on all installed sites world-wide.


@Release team / @Debian Edu Users:
the Debian Edu team apologizes for not having this issue better on our radar.

@Release team:
We desperately hope for your support to get a quick solution for this problem.

My personal approach would be uploading a rebuild of  
debian-edu-archive-keyring 2013.05.20 versioned as 2013.05.20~deb6 to  
squeeze-proposed-updates. The same key in that newer package will  
expire in 2019, which will give people plenty of time to upgrade their  
running Debian Edu setups.


Mike

--

mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22  0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: sunwea...@debian.org, http://sunweavers.net



pgpn_VzF6CtGp.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur

Bug#724116: marked as done (resource-agents: FTBFS: /bin/bash: /install-sh: No such file or directory)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:22:08 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#724116: fixed in resource-agents 1:3.9.3+git20121009-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #724116,
regarding resource-agents: FTBFS: /bin/bash: /install-sh: No such file or 
directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
724116: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724116
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: resource-agents
Version: 1:3.9.3+git20121009-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130922 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering directory 
> `/«BUILDDIR»/resource-agents-3.9.3+git20121009/ldirectord/init.d'
> make[6]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
> /bin/bash /install-sh -d 
> /«BUILDDIR»/resource-agents-3.9.3+git20121009/debian/tmp/etc/init.d
> /bin/bash: /install-sh: No such file or directory
> make[6]: *** [install-initdSCRIPTS] Error 127

The full build log is available from:
   
http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2013/09/22/resource-agents_3.9.3+git20121009-3_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: resource-agents
Source-Version: 1:3.9.3+git20121009-3.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
resource-agents, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 724...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Salvatore Bonaccorso  (supplier of updated resource-agents 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:40:22 +0100
Source: resource-agents
Binary: resource-agents resource-agents-dev ldirectord
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1:3.9.3+git20121009-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian HA Maintainers 

Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso 
Description: 
 ldirectord - Monitors virtual services provided by LVS
 resource-agents - Cluster Resource Agents
 resource-agents-dev - Cluster Resource Agents Development files
Closes: 724116 739608
Changes: 
 resource-agents (1:3.9.3+git20121009-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Add 724116-fix-FTBFS.patch patch.
 Fixes "resource-agents: FTBFS: /bin/bash: /install-sh: No such file or
 directory".
 Thanks to William Grant  (Closes: #724116)
   * Add 0001-Disable-HTTPS-SSL-certificate-hostname-checking-tidy.patch patch.
 Fixes "ldirectord: fails to test HTTPS real servers". HTTPS checks with
 request/receive will fail under newer versions of the LWP module due to
 certificate name checking being enabled by default. This disables the
 check again so that service checking by IP only still succeeds.
 (Closes: #739608)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 e29b420775c57f7d2b76c9a0b4a3864ed0fd3754 2361 
resource-agents_3.9.3+git20121009-3.1.dsc
 ea9bea7f1a4f1bbf780aaf4c9e4df56e0cd46472 16284 
resource-agents_3.9.3+git20121009-3.1.debian.tar.xz
 f0a9792304c5d02b614bdbb494872c035a2fe21a 443790 
resource-agents_3.9.3+git20121009-3.1_amd64.deb
 afc6dee6327a697711455ecee31677c2e9d47386 13732 
resource-agents-dev_3.9.3+git20121009-3.1_amd64.deb
 5e51e51d39a9350396d147fe0ee8699b5edee546 61886 
ldirectord_3.9.3+git20121009-3.1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 b50f260ae56c10c5d50555665d935fee58cd760e2494998657cde1435d075ad1 2361 
resource-agents_3.9.3+git20121009-3.1.dsc
 34f82c9ddc9627f8f6a8df72548352988d2734b7bd185629ad600c3dd5e545c2 16284 
resource-agents_3.9.3+git20121009-3.1.debian.tar.xz
 075a2b2b031a2a2777e84657c3fddf519ea0d35c45fd63a8807d65b31ad5a8a5 443790 
resource-agents_3.9.3+git20121009-3.1_amd64.deb
 97588d5a0c52288088252edda

Bug#740147: Public key for Debian Edu archive (ftpmas...@skolelinux.org) has EXPIRED in squeeze's package version

[Petter Reinholdtsen]

[Mike Gabriel]
> My personal approach would be uploading a rebuild of
> debian-edu-archive-keyring 2013.05.20 versioned as 2013.05.20~deb6
> to squeeze-proposed-updates. The same key in that newer package will
> expire in 2019, which will give people plenty of time to upgrade
> their running Debian Edu setups.

I suspect this would solve PXE installs.

But will it be enough to solve ISO installs, or do we need to publish
new Squeeze ISOs with the new keyring package on the ISO for this to
work properly?

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740147: Public key for Debian Edu archive (ftpmas...@skolelinux.org) has EXPIRED in squeeze's package version

[Mike Gabriel]

Hi Petter,

On  Mi 26 Feb 2014 10:32:06 CET, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:


[Mike Gabriel]

My personal approach would be uploading a rebuild of
debian-edu-archive-keyring 2013.05.20 versioned as 2013.05.20~deb6
to squeeze-proposed-updates. The same key in that newer package will
expire in 2019, which will give people plenty of time to upgrade
their running Debian Edu setups.


I suspect this would solve PXE installs.


This will be solved. Yes.


But will it be enough to solve ISO installs, or do we need to publish
new Squeeze ISOs with the new keyring package on the ISO for this to
work properly?


I am not sure about this second part. Have wondered about it and then  
though that we should get started with phase I (upload of a new  
package version to squeeze-p-u), then test, then rebuild squeeze ISOs  
(if needed).


Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb


pgpwJ5ap4g4qc.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 738789 - unreproducible
Bug #738789 [src:libhamcrest-java] libhamcrest-java: FTBFS: bad class file: 
hamcrest-core-1.3.jar(org/hamcrest/Description.class)
Removed tag(s) unreproducible.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
738789: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738789
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#707900: marked as done (guile-pg: please migrate to guile-2.0)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:04:03 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#707900: fixed in guile-pg 0.46-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #707900,
regarding guile-pg: please migrate to guile-2.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
707900: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707900
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: guile-pg
Version: 0.16-5

Now that the freeze is over, I'm finally planning to remove guile-1.6
(and possibly guile-1.8) from Debian soon.  Please consider updating
guile-pg to guile-2.0.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: guile-pg
Source-Version: 0.46-0.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
guile-pg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 707...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hideki Yamane  (supplier of updated guile-pg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:05:30 +0900
Source: guile-pg
Binary: guile-pg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.46-0.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sam Hocevar 
Changed-By: Hideki Yamane 
Description: 
 guile-pg   - Guile bindings for the PostgreSQL client library
Closes: 707900
Changes: 
 guile-pg (0.46-0.1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * New upstream release
   * debian/watch
 - track upstream (and verify GPG)
   * debian/source/format
 - set "3.0 (quilt)"
   * debian/control
 - drop unnecessary quilt
 - Build-Depends: guile-2.0-dev (Closes: #707900)
 - Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9)
 - set Standards-Version: 3.9.5
 - drop "This is alpha code" from descriptions and rewrite it as upstream
   says
   * debian/rules
 - rewrite to DH7 style
 - enable hardening
 - once ignore test via override_dh_auto_test
   * debian/compat
 - set 9
   * remove empty debian/dirs
   * debian/patches
 - drop all patches
   + 010_build_flags.diff: drop, it's unnecessary
   + 010_data_path.diff: drop, it's unnecessary
   + 100_rebootstrap.diff: drop, it's unnecessary
   + 200_types.diff: drop, upstream removed target file
   + 201_guile1.8.diff: drop, upstream can use guile2.0
   + 300_texinfo.diff: drop, upstream removed target file
   * debian/copyright
 - update to copyright format 1.0 and license is now GPL-3+
   * temprary add debian/source/lintian-overrides to avoid lintian 
false-positive
Checksums-Sha1: 
 3e325b231d4cbc15e89b9a33803b9b79de4aa4b2 1757 guile-pg_0.46-0.1.dsc
 43ca4ca581b5885265eb9f6787eb80578443670e 514484 guile-pg_0.46.orig.tar.xz
 83c2f6f5f39b7ff964aa7a192e3d9eab538c3421 6324 guile-pg_0.46-0.1.debian.tar.xz
 06d742a5d45bea70028846c491013d42b939ead1 132288 guile-pg_0.46-0.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 7b15f1ac4ff01017cd275dd405293953ee33c956dca1bdb1d3d7f3aed1a6de8c 1757 
guile-pg_0.46-0.1.dsc
 1138284e3e87e8813393a335366dc2cd4114e886f977ceb1940049c301f3e9ca 514484 
guile-pg_0.46.orig.tar.xz
 a55c31bcfa7825545f0853e9653036c1daa83fe75d7bc08829d0efa8afdd9703 6324 
guile-pg_0.46-0.1.debian.tar.xz
 3774c9e8961e547d43c5bdb3a2679c735748dcaaa73787a32a66fe4394a90b8f 132288 
guile-pg_0.46-0.1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 09fff692b8b740e0b7c9380226ccbc89 1757 interpreters optional 
guile-pg_0.46-0.1.dsc
 379dd278c87bee044fe85b8e02091bea 514484 interpreters optional 
guile-pg_0.46.orig.tar.xz
 34d8a01093c861a92089407cca1276e2 6324 interpreters optional 
guile-pg_0.46-0.1.debian.tar.xz
 846a0dc81141eb8671271280ade84480 132288 interpreters optional 
guile-pg_0.46-0.1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTAIH8AAoJEF0yjQgqqrFADCcP/A7XcF+jTz9gvuXrLnEJ+m+y
np8D+Z+erzdf3W/Eo5hl/wczFDdgWnhiY662WO9Bo0T37JJunnsFEKdm94PZLAUZ
+QRDaEYQMA5AaN2MS7uohWbeSfJXbm5dvbXLia/h6C7dcesW8rmh3JH32fqHPUAO
EtGr1+GBGVvQr6JXCFqYqgxDbvcK9nKIi1+HGv64Xbfpsi+xsM

Processed: merging 739879 740028

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # These two are identical bugs
> merge 739879 740028
Bug #739879 [pycxx] pycxx needs an update for python3.4
Bug #740028 [pycxx] pycxx needs a rebuild and a patch to support python3.4
Merged 739879 740028
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
739879: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739879
740028: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740028
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: affects 739904

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> affects 739904 + hugin
Bug #739904 [libboost1.54-dev] /usr/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:202:16: 
error: 'uintptr_t' was not declared in this scope
Added indication that 739904 affects hugin
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
739904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: notfound 740106 in 0.15.4-1, found 740106 in 0.16.0-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> notfound 740106 0.15.4-1
Bug #740106 [src:libraw] libraw: FTBFS on 32-bit platforms: symbols not quite 
as expected
No longer marked as found in versions libraw/0.15.4-1.
> found 740106 0.16.0-1
Bug #740106 [src:libraw] libraw: FTBFS on 32-bit platforms: symbols not quite 
as expected
Marked as found in versions libraw/0.16.0-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
740106: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740106
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#731300: patch needs to be applied

[Vlad Orlov]

Dear Maintainer, please apply this patch mentioned above [1], it will make 
things easier.
Ubuntu and Mint already applied it and it works fine.

[1]  https://bugs.debian.org/731300#33

Bug#740117: haveged: spinning

[Jérémy Bobbio]

Control: severity -1 740117 important
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

Sorry, but haveged works just fine for many users so lowering the
severity to important.

> Haveged is just spinning and not comming anywhere :(
> Been watching it for hours doing that.  Uses one CPU at 100%.
> Upstream version 1.9.0 promisses improvements, although I have no idea
> if those address the problem I'm reporting.

I have just uploaded 1.9.1-1. Please try it.

-- 
Jérémy Bobbio.''`.
jeremy.bob...@irq7.fr   : :   : lu...@debian.org
`. `'`  lu...@torproject.org
  `-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#740117: haveged: spinning

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 740117 important
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #740117 [haveged] haveged: spinning
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
740117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: fixup

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 740117 important
Bug #740117 [haveged] haveged: spinning
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
740117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#731580: marked as done (qpxtool: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: 'int open(const char*, int, ...)' previously defined here)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:54:48 +0400
with message-id <485941393419...@web10h.yandex.ru>
and subject line qpxtool: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: 'int open(const char*, 
int, ...)' previously defined here
has caused the Debian Bug report #731580,
regarding qpxtool: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: 'int open(const char*, int, 
...)' previously defined here
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
731580: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731580
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: qpxtool
Version: 0.7.1.002-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

qpxtool fails to build on kfreebsd-* with:
| g++ -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -Wall -O2 -fPIC -DUSE_LIBPNG   -g -I. -I./include 
-I../include -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -c -o qpx_transport.o qpx_transport.cpp
| In file included from qpx_transport.cpp:15:0:
| /usr/include/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/bits/fcntl2.h: In function 'int open(const 
char*, int, ...)':
| ./include/qpx_transport.h:220:18: error: redefinition of 'int open(const 
char*, int, ...)'
|  #define open64   open
|   ^
| In file included from /usr/include/fcntl.h:279:0,
|  from qpx_transport.cpp:33:
| /usr/include/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/bits/fcntl2.h:41:1: error: 'int open(const 
char*, int, ...)' previously defined here
|  open (const char *__path, int __oflag, ...)
|  ^
| make[3]: *** [qpx_transport.o] Error 1

For a full build log see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qpxtool&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=0.7.1.002-6&stamp=1374582703

Regards
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 731580 0.7.2-1
thanks


Fixed in 0.7.2-1.--- End Message ---

Processed: qpxtool: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: 'int open(const char*, int, ...)' previously defined here

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 731580 0.7.2-1
Bug #731580 [src:qpxtool] qpxtool: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: 'int open(const 
char*, int, ...)' previously defined here
Marked as fixed in versions qpxtool/0.7.2-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
731580: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731580
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#728630:

[Leo Iannacone]

Dear maintainer,

The attached patch fixes FTBFS with Samba 4.

Can you please consider to apply it ?

Thanks in advance.

Leo.

-- 
Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on
Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com
GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25
Description: Include samba-4.0/libsmbclient.h instead of 
 libsmbclient.h to fix FTBFS with Samba 4.
Author: Leo Iannacone 
Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1283254
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/728630

---
 src/bookmarks.c |2 +-
 src/dulist.c|2 +-
 src/find-index-manage.c |2 +-
 src/fnet.c  |2 +-
 src/smb-pack.c  |2 +-
 src/smb-pack.h  |2 +-
 src/smbc.c  |2 +-
 src/ttlist.c|2 +-
 src/winpopup.c  |2 +-
 9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/src/bookmarks.c
+++ b/src/bookmarks.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 #endif /* not HAVE_STRING_H */
 
 #include 
-#include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include "dulist.h"
--- a/src/dulist.c
+++ b/src/dulist.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 
 #include 
 #include 
-#include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include "fnet.h"
--- a/src/find-index-manage.c
+++ b/src/find-index-manage.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
-#include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include "find-index-manage.h"
--- a/src/fnet.c
+++ b/src/fnet.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 #endif /* HAVE_STRINGS_H */
 #endif /* not HAVE_STRING_H */
 
-#include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
--- a/src/smb-pack.c
+++ b/src/smb-pack.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
-#include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include "smb-pack.h"
--- a/src/smb-pack.h
+++ b/src/smb-pack.h
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 #endif /* HAVE_STRINGS_H */
 #endif /* not HAVE_STRING_H */
 
-#include 
+#include 
 
 #define RstrCmp(src, dst) (!strcmp(src, dst))
 
--- a/src/smbc.c
+++ b/src/smbc.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
-#include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
--- a/src/ttlist.c
+++ b/src/ttlist.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 #endif /* HAVE_STRINGS_H */
 #endif /* not HAVE_STRING_H */
 
-#include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
--- a/src/winpopup.c
+++ b/src/winpopup.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 
 #include 
 #include 
-#include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include "winpopup.h"
 #include "debug.h"

Bug#740139: gnome-maps fails to start

[Simon McVittie]

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 at 08:38:48 +0100, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> Trying to start gnome-maps I get the following stderr output:
> 
> JS ERROR: !!!   Exception was: Gio.DBusError: Error calling
> StartServiceByName for org.freedesktop.GeoClue2:
> GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ChildExited: Launch helper exited
> with unknown return code 253

I don't suppose you had a locally-installed geoclue-2.0 in /usr/local or
anything like that?

Otherwise, this means dbus-daemon executed dbus-daemon-launch-helper,
instructing it to behave according to
/usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.GeoClue2.service,
and dbus-daemon-launch-helper exited 253 before the name
org.freedesktop.GeoClue2 appeared on the bus. That, in turn, probably
means that the process described in the .service file exited 253
(at least, I can't find any reason why d-d-l-h would exit 253; on success,
it uses exec() to become the target service).

That service file for reference:

[D-BUS Service]
Name=org.freedesktop.GeoClue2
Exec=/usr/lib/geoclue-2.0/geoclue -t 5
User=geoclue

> Is it somehow possible to start the geoclue2 dbus service manually to try and
> debug this?

Yes. The closest possible equivalent to what d-d-l-h does, without
actually executing it, would go something like this:

sudo -u geoclue env - \
DBUS_STARTER_ADDRESS=unix:path=/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket \
DBUS_STARTER_BUS_TYPE=system \
/usr/lib/geoclue-2.0/geoclue -t 5

or to go via d-d-l-h, maybe something like this:

sudo -u messagebus \
/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper \
org.freedesktop.GeoClue2

(dbus-daemon-launch-helper is setuid root so that it can switch privileges,
in this case to geoclue, and it only allows itself to be executed by
messagebus.)

>From IRC:
> < mlundblad> I managed to get it to start by first restarting 
>  dbus.service (I'm not sure if this is too be expected)

This is not meant to be necessary. If files in either /etc/dbus-1/system.d
or /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services are modified, the system dbus-daemon
is meant to reload itself automatically, using inotify (or kqueue on kFreeBSD).
You should see a syslog message like this:

Feb 26 12:42:29 archetype dbus[1328]: [system] Reloaded configuration

and I've confirmed that on my sid laptop,
`sudo touch /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.UPower.service`
and `sudo touch /etc/dbus-1/system.d/pulseaudio-system.conf` both provoke
that message (replace with any file in the appropriate directory if you
don't have those packages installed).

Just to be safe, I'm considering adding a trigger to dbus that registers
an interest in those two directories, calls its ReloadConfig method and
waits for it to finish whenever dpkg alters those directories.

S


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740097: Additional information

[Kai Lüke]

Some random suggestions to solve it:
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/644906/331-20-on-3-13-rc1-kernel/
http://rglinuxtech.com/?p=948
http://doertedev.github.io/posts/2014/01/gentoo-3-13-0-nvidia-quickfix.html
http://forum.siduction.org/index.php?topic=4139.0

Greets


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740147: Public key for Debian Edu archive (ftpmas...@skolelinux.org) has EXPIRED in squeeze's package version

[Adam D. Barratt]

[explicit CC to -release added]

On 2014-02-26 9:25, Mike Gabriel wrote:

6 days ago (2014-02-20) the key 0xA26FF456 shipped in the Debian
squeeze version of package debian-edu-archive-keyring (version
2010.01.05) has expired.

[...]

My personal approach would be uploading a rebuild of
debian-edu-archive-keyring 2013.05.20 versioned as 2013.05.20~deb6 to
squeeze-proposed-updates. The same key in that newer package will
expire in 2019, which will give people plenty of time to upgrade their
 running Debian Edu setups.


Will Debian Edu installs pick up a package from squeeze-pu 
automatically?


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740160: gnutls unusable with cacert SHA2-512 sigs

[Daniel Pocock]

Package: libgnutls26
Severity: serious
Version: 2.12.20-8


cacert.org recently started signing certs with sha512WithRSAEncryption

Consider the following scenario:

- some service running on a Debian stable (wheezy) host (e.g. slapd),
admin replaces their cacert certificate with one of these new certs

- clients (e.g. PAM LDAP module, Apache mod_authnz_ldap) on Debian hosts
linked against gnutls

Everything stops working when the replacement certificate is installed

Troubleshooting, the following is observed:

- running ldapsearch or similar commands, the user sees errors like:
ldap_sasl_bind(SIMPLE): Can't contact LDAP server (-1)
or with "-d 1" for debugging, there is more detail but it doesn't help:

TLS: can't connect: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received..
ldap_err2string
ldap_sasl_bind(SIMPLE): Can't contact LDAP server (-1)

- the user then tries openssl s_client

openssl s_client -connect ldap-host.example.org:636 -tls1 -CAfile
/etc/ssl/certs/cacert.org.pem

and it connects successfully

- if the user also tries gnutls-cli however, it does not work, failing
with errors like this:

  GnuTLS error: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received.

- then the admin tries putting their server (e.g. slapd) in debug mode
and sees errors like this

Could not negotiate a supported cipher suite

- the fact that openssl s_client worked and gnutls-cli did not work may
leave them feeling it is gnutls problems again (a Google search finds
plenty of old posts complaining about gnutls and suggesting people
should recompile everything with openssl)

- running gnutls-cli in debug mode, I notice the following:

$ gnutls-cli -p 636 --priority NORMAL:+SIGN-RSA-SHA512 -d 255
ldap-host.example.org

|<2>| EXT[SIGA]: sent signature algo (4.2) DSA-SHA256
|<2>| EXT[SIGA]: sent signature algo (4.1) RSA-SHA256
|<2>| EXT[SIGA]: sent signature algo (2.1) RSA-SHA1
|<2>| EXT[SIGA]: sent signature algo (2.2) DSA-SHA1

Even explicitly requesting SHA512 doesn't help:

gnutls-cli -p 636 --priority NORMAL:+SIGN-RSA-SHA512 -d 255
ldap-host.example.org

It seems that the gnutls client code in wheezy does not signal support
for the SHA512 stuff in the client hello message even if it is requested
in the cipher suite


$   gnutls-cli --list | grep 512
MACs: SHA1, MD5, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, MD2, RIPEMD160, MAC-NULL
PK-signatures: SIGN-RSA-SHA1, SIGN-RSA-SHA224, SIGN-RSA-SHA256,
SIGN-RSA-SHA384, SIGN-RSA-SHA512, SIGN-RSA-RMD160, SIGN-DSA-SHA1,
SIGN-DSA-SHA224, SIGN-DSA-SHA256, SIGN-RSA-MD5, SIGN-RSA-MD2

suggests that the RSA-SHA512 is present and should work, but it doesn't

This is likely to be particularly annoying for people to troubleshoot,
especially if they have only allocated 5-10 minutes to replace their
certificate and they end up spending hours digging through their logs
and pulling their hair out before they realize what is wrong


Looking at the connections with tcpdump, I notice:
- client sends SSL client hello
- server drops connection without sending more data back to client

A suggested workaround is for the admin to create their own local root
CA instead of relying on CA cert.  That means that the admin can ensure
that any changes to CA policy (e.g. using SHA512) are tested before
being forced on people.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740097: patch

[Kai Lüke]

So this patch should do it:

http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/nvidia-kmod/devel/nvidia_3.13_kernel.patch?revision=1.3&root=nonfree&view=markup


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740163: lxsession: lxlock/dm-tool lock is easily circumvented

[Marcin Szewczyk]

Package: lxsession
Version: 0.4.9.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

Dear Maintainer,

as described in bug #735854, locking doesn't work. It's a serious problem
because after invoking lxlock the screen switches to VT8 with a login prompt
and it looks like it locked the screen. The reality is the session stays
unlocked and you can return to it with Ctrl-Alt-F7.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lxsession depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-02.10.0-2
ii  libc6  2.17-97
ii  libcairo2  1.12.16-2
ii  libdbus-1-31.8.0-1
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2   0.102-1
ii  libfontconfig1 2.11.0-2
ii  libfreetype6   2.5.2-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.28.2-1+b1
ii  libgee20.6.8-1
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.38.2-5
ii  libgtk2.0-02.24.22-1
ii  libpango-1.0-0 1.36.0-1+b1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-01.36.0-1+b1
ii  libpangoft2-1.0-0  1.36.0-1+b1
ii  libpolkit-agent-1-00.105-4
ii  libpolkit-gobject-1-0  0.105-4
ii  libx11-6   2:1.6.2-1

Versions of packages lxsession recommends:
ii  consolekit   0.4.6-3+b1
ii  lxde-common  0.5.5-6
ii  openbox [x-window-manager]   3.5.2-6
ii  openssh-client [ssh-client]  1:6.5p1-4
ii  upower   0.9.23-2+b1

Versions of packages lxsession suggests:
ii  gpicview  0.2.4-1
ii  lxpanel   0.5.12-3
ii  pcmanfm   1.1.2-1

-- debconf-show failed


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#736392: octave-plplot: FTBFS with Octave 3.8

[Rafael Laboissiere]

* Matthias Klose  [2014-02-25 16:44]:


Am 25.02.2014 12:08, schrieb Matthias Klose:

trying to fix this in Ubuntu trusty (14.04), ...

 - applied the octave patch in swig2.0 (2.0.11-1ubuntu2)
 - plplot still fails to build, apparently with the
   very same error messages.
   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plplot/5.9.9-5ubuntu8

Is there anything additional needed?


with a quickly updated 5.10.0, I don't see the build failure anymore, however 
the octave tests hang ...


did work around it, and built some test packages at: 
https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/toolchain/+sourcepub/3940349/+listing-archive-extra


tracking issues at 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plplot/+bug/1284689


could you point me at the changes required for 5.9.9 to build using octave-3.8?


Is there a simple way to get your 5.10.0 preliminary package, for 
instance by using dget?


Rafael


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#739697: src:dolfin: FTBFS on armhf and mips: virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

[Johannes Ring]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:35 AM, peter green  wrote:
> peter green wrote:
>>
>> I've been doing some tests on this interestingly it failed for me much
>> earlier than on the buildd, maybe different systems give slightly different
>> ammounts of usable address space or something. Anyway reducing optimisation
>> levels etc doesn't seem to help, switching to 4.7 is looking more promising.
>
> 4.7 also ran into memory exhaustion problems (though later in the build
> than 4.8 did), 4.6 was able to build it successfully on armhf. Still
> need to test it on mips.

Thanks for testing. I think the simplest solution would be to disable
CGAL on armhf and mips. CGAL support in DOLFIN is planned to be
removed anyway.

I was going to do an upload now, but ran into this bug:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739904

Hopefully, this will be fixed soon.

Johannes


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#736392: octave-plplot: FTBFS with Octave 3.8

[Matthias Klose]

Am 26.02.2014 14:15, schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Matthias Klose  [2014-02-25 16:44]:
> 
>> Am 25.02.2014 12:08, schrieb Matthias Klose:
>>> trying to fix this in Ubuntu trusty (14.04), ...
>>>
>>>  - applied the octave patch in swig2.0 (2.0.11-1ubuntu2)
>>>  - plplot still fails to build, apparently with the
>>>very same error messages.
>>>https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plplot/5.9.9-5ubuntu8
>>>
>>> Is there anything additional needed?
>>
>> with a quickly updated 5.10.0, I don't see the build failure anymore, however
>> the octave tests hang ...
>>
>> did work around it, and built some test packages at:
>> https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/toolchain/+sourcepub/3940349/+listing-archive-extra
>>
>>
>> tracking issues at 
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plplot/+bug/1284689
>>
>> could you point me at the changes required for 5.9.9 to build using 
>> octave-3.8?
> 
> Is there a simple way to get your 5.10.0 preliminary package, for instance by
> using dget?

found in this ppa:

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/doko/toolchain/ubuntu trusty main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/doko/toolchain/ubuntu trusty main

just the package: https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/toolchain/+packages
and look for the plplot dsc file.

I did now comment out the octave-plplot binary package in the control file for 
now.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: reassign 739807 to libboost1.54-dev, forcibly merging 739904 739807, affects 739904

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 739807 libboost1.54-dev 1.54.0-4
Bug #739807 [src:getfem++] FTBFS: error: 'uintptr_t' was not declared in this 
scope
Bug reassigned from package 'src:getfem++' to 'libboost1.54-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions getfem++/4.2.1~beta1~svn4482~dfsg-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #739807 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #739807 [libboost1.54-dev] FTBFS: error: 'uintptr_t' was not declared in 
this scope
Marked as found in versions boost1.54/1.54.0-4.
> forcemerge 739904 739807
Bug #739904 [libboost1.54-dev] /usr/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:202:16: 
error: 'uintptr_t' was not declared in this scope
Bug #739807 [libboost1.54-dev] FTBFS: error: 'uintptr_t' was not declared in 
this scope
Added indication that 739807 affects hugin
Added tag(s) patch.
Merged 739807 739904
> affects 739904 + getfem++
Bug #739904 [libboost1.54-dev] /usr/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:202:16: 
error: 'uintptr_t' was not declared in this scope
Bug #739807 [libboost1.54-dev] FTBFS: error: 'uintptr_t' was not declared in 
this scope
Added indication that 739904 affects getfem++
Added indication that 739807 affects getfem++
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
739807: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739807
739904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#739657: Maintainer scripts: execute command as another user: use sudo or su?

[Emilien Klein]

Hi Mentors,

TLDR: in order to execute a command as another user, should `sudo` or
`su --command` be used?


I'd like to get your opinion on how to best solve this issue:
I've got a package [0] that uses dbconfig-common to manage its
database. The database is owned by a specific user (not root).

In the pre- and postinst scripts, a command has to be performed as
that user (e.g. make a backup of the database).

I've at first used sudo to perform that, and it worked fine until
piuparts found an issue [1], since (as I hadn't realized) sudo is not
part of the base system (installed on 76% of popcon-reporting machines
[2])


I am wondering what the best way is to fix this. I see 2 solutions:
1. Depend on sudo
2. Use "su --command" instead


First lines from the respective manpages:
sudo, sudoedit - execute a command as another user
su - change user ID or become superuser


Following the Unix philosophy of using a collection of specialized
small tools that do one thing best, when performing an action as
another user it seems to be the correct thing to use a tool that
"execute a command as another user" rather than one whose primary goal
is "change user ID or become superuser".

But on the other hand, su is part of corutils (which is in the base
install), so using su would remove the need of installing a new
package for about 25% of our users.

What are your thoughts on this?

Thanks for getting a fellow Debian Maintainer out of his confusion!
(and let's hope it doesn't turn into a vi vs. Emacs debate ;) )
   +Emilien

[0] http://pts.debian.net/pkg/gnuhealth
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739657
[2] Looking at popcon (obvious notice about [un]reliability of that
data applies) data from 2014-02-24:
- There are 167453 registered popcon users that sent information
- corutils (package that amongst others, contains su) sports 167451
installations (99.998% of installs) [3]
- sudo reports 127695 installations (76% of installs) [4]
[3] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=sudo
[4] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=coreutils


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#731300: [Pkg-systemd-maintainers] Bug#731300: patch needs to be applied

[Michael Stapelberg]

Hi Vlad,

Vlad Orlov  writes:

> Dear Maintainer, please apply this patch mentioned above [1], it will make 
> things easier.
> Ubuntu and Mint already applied it and it works fine.
The Github patch link does not work for me.

I found this commit upstream which should fix the issue:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=baae0358f349870544884e405e82e4be7d8add9f

As it’ll require a logind restart, we’ll need to do some testing and not
just blindly apply it. Maybe I’ll get around to it later this evening.

-- 
Best regards,
Michael


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#739999: (no subject)

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Oh... this has been reproduce on trusty machine, I asked for a sync request of 
tomcat7, and the buildd failed to build from source
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/167631874/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-i386.tomcat7_7.0.52-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz

I don't know the rationale of this problem, because I cannot reproduce in my 
local pbuilder environment


Gianfranco 

Processed: block 739415 with 740106

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 739415 with 740106
Bug #739415 [release.debian.org] transition: libraw
739415 was not blocked by any bugs.
739415 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 739415: 740106
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
739415: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#734872: marked as done (tryton-modules-project-revenue: uninstallable in sid: unsatisfiable Depends: tryton-modules-timesheet-cost (>= 3.0))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:47:28 +0100
with message-id <20140226174728.4358e...@obelix.mbehrle.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#734872: [tryton-debian] Bug#734872: 
tryton-modules-project-revenue: uninstallable in sid: unsatisfiable Depends: 
tryton-modules-timesheet-cost (>= 3.0)
has caused the Debian Bug report #734872,
regarding tryton-modules-project-revenue: uninstallable in sid: unsatisfiable 
Depends: tryton-modules-timesheet-cost (>= 3.0)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
734872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734872
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tryton-modules-project-revenue
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
installable in sid:

tryton-modules-project-revenue/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: 
tryton-modules-timesheet-cost (>= 3.0)

tryton-modules-timesheet-cost is neither in experimental nor in NEW.


Cheers,

Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* Mathias Behrle: " Bug#734872: [tryton-debian] Bug#734872:
  tryton-modules-project-revenue: uninstallable in sid: unsatisfiable Depends:
  tryton-modules-timesheet-cost (>= 3.0)" (Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:16:45 +0100):

tryton-modules-timesheet-cost was uploaded to NEW (Thanks to Raphael Hertzog!)
and just entered unstable.

> tags 734872 + pending
> thanks
> 
> * Andreas Beckmann: " [tryton-debian] Bug#734872:
>   tryton-modules-project-revenue: uninstallable in sid: unsatisfiable Depends:
>   tryton-modules-timesheet-cost (>= 3.0)" (Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:32:32 +0100):
> 
> > Package: tryton-modules-project-revenue
> > Version: 3.0.0-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: sid
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: piuparts
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
> > installable in sid:
> > 
> > tryton-modules-project-revenue/i386 unsatisfiable Depends:
> > tryton-modules-timesheet-cost (>= 3.0)
> > 
> > tryton-modules-timesheet-cost is neither in experimental nor in NEW.
> 
> Package is currently on mentors [1] seeking for a sponsor. 
> 
> My last sponsor, Andreas Tille, has a reservation about the used compression
> format (gz recompressed to xz) of the orig tarball [2], introduced by my
> previous sponsor, Daniel Baumann.
> 
> This seems to have to be discussed on d-devel, which will be done when I am
> able to participate on this potentially lengthy discussion in a timely manner.
> 
> In case the compression format of the Tryton packages should be reverted to
> gz, this had to wait anyway until the next major release due to March 2014,
> because I don't want mixed source tarballs of the same version in the git
> repos.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mathias
> 
> [1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/tryton-modules-timesheet-cost
> [2]
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/tryton-debian/2013-December/000836.html
> ff.
> [3] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mathiasb%40m9s.biz
> [4] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2013/11/msg00045.html
> 



-- 

Mathias Behrle
PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#740053: Debian ‘python-coverage’ 3.7.1+dfsg.1-1 — Fix for bug#740053

[Ben Finney]

package python3-coverage
tags 740053 + pending
thanks

I have released ‘python-coverage’ 3.7.1+dfsg.1-1, addressing this bug among
others.

You can get the source package from Debian Mentors repository:

$ dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-coverage/python-coverage_3.7.1+dfsg.1-1.dsc

See the page for this package at mentors.debian.net
https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-coverage>. The usual sponsor
for this package has indicated they are busy, so another person to sponsor
this release would be welcome.

-- 
 \  “As soon as we abandon our own reason, and are content to rely |
  `\   upon authority, there is no end to our troubles.” —Bertrand |
_o__)Russell, _Unpopular Essays_, 1950 |
Ben Finney 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Debian ‘python-coverage’ 3.7.1+dfsg.1-1 — Fix for bug#740053

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> package python3-coverage
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 
'python3-coverage'
Limit currently set to 'package':'python3-coverage'

> tags 740053 + pending
Bug #740053 [python3-coverage] python3-coverage: overwrites file in 
python3-coverage-dbg
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
740053: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740053
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#736298: marked as done (rubberband-{vamp, ladspa}: unhandled symlink to directory conversion: /usr/share/doc/PACKAGE)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:34:03 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#736298: fixed in rubberband 1.8.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #736298,
regarding rubberband-{vamp, ladspa}: unhandled symlink to directory conversion: 
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
736298: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736298
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rubberband-vamp,rubberband-ladspa
Version: 1.8.1-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

an upgrade test with piuparts revealed that your package installs files
over existing symlinks and possibly overwrites files owned by other
packages. This usually means an old version of the package shipped a
symlink but that was later replaced by a real (and non-empty)
directory. This kind of overwriting another package's files cannot be
detected by dpkg.

This was observed on the following upgrade paths:

  wheezy -> jessie

For /usr/share/doc/PACKAGE this may not be problematic as long as both
packages are installed, ship byte-for-byte identical files and are
upgraded in lockstep. But once one of the involved packages gets
removed, the other one will lose its documentation files, too,
including the copyright file, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile

For other overwritten locations anything interesting may happen.

Note that dpkg intentionally does not replace directories with symlinks
and vice versa, you need the maintainer scripts to do this.
See in particular the end of point 4 in
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-unpackphase

It is recommended to use the dpkg-maintscript-helper commands
'dir_to_symlink' and 'symlink_to_dir' (available since dpkg 1.17.2)
to perform the conversion, ideally using d/$PACKAGE.mainstscript.
See dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) and dh_installdeb(1) for details.


>From the attached log (usually somewhere in the middle...):

0m47.3s ERROR: FAIL: silently overwrites files via directory symlinks:
  /usr/share/doc/rubberband-vamp/changelog.Debian.gz (rubberband-vamp) != 
/usr/share/doc/librubberband2/changelog.Debian.gz (librubberband2:amd64)
  /usr/share/doc/rubberband-vamp/changelog.gz (rubberband-vamp) != 
/usr/share/doc/librubberband2/changelog.gz (librubberband2:amd64)
  /usr/share/doc/rubberband-vamp/copyright (rubberband-vamp) != 
/usr/share/doc/librubberband2/copyright (librubberband2:amd64)

0m35.8s ERROR: FAIL: silently overwrites files via directory symlinks:
  /usr/share/doc/rubberband-ladspa/changelog.Debian.gz (rubberband-ladspa) != 
/usr/share/doc/librubberband2/changelog.Debian.gz (librubberband2:amd64)
  /usr/share/doc/rubberband-ladspa/changelog.gz (rubberband-ladspa) != 
/usr/share/doc/librubberband2/changelog.gz (librubberband2:amd64)
  /usr/share/doc/rubberband-ladspa/copyright (rubberband-ladspa) != 
/usr/share/doc/librubberband2/copyright (librubberband2:amd64)


cheers,

Andreas


rubberband-vamp_1.8.1-4.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rubberband
Source-Version: 1.8.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rubberband, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 736...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jaromír Mikeš  (supplier of updated rubberband package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:13:00 +0100
Source: rubberband
Binary: librubberband2 librubberband-dev rubberband-cli rubberband-ladspa 
rubberband-vamp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.8.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jaromír Mikeš 
Description: 
 librubberband-dev - audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library 
(development fil
 librubberband2 - audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library
 rubberband-cli - audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting utility
 rubberband-ladspa - LADSPA plugin for audio pitch-shifting
 rub

Bug#737452: jquery.min.js

[George Lorch]

jquery.min.js is actually not used directly by any of the documentation pages 
and was apparently placed within the source tree at some point by mistake. It 
will be removed from the package.

--
George O. Lorch III
Software Engineer, Percona
+1-888-401-3401 x542 US/Arizona (GMT -7)
skype: george.ormond.lorch.iii


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740160: gnutls unusable with cacert SHA2-512 sigs

[Andreas Metzler]

On 2014-02-26 Daniel Pocock  wrote:
> Package: libgnutls26
> Severity: serious
> Version: 2.12.20-8

[...]
> - running gnutls-cli in debug mode, I notice the following:
[...]

Can you check whether this is fixed in GnuTLS 3.x? - It is available
in wheezy-backports.

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed (with 1 errors): forcibly merging 737921 740160

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forcemerge 737921 740160
Bug #737921 [gnutls26] [TLS1.2] gnutls only likes SHA1 and SHA256 certificates
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #740160 is 'libgnutls26' not 'gnutls26'
Failed to forcibly merge 737921: Did not alter merged bugs
Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x2f16510)', 
'requester', 'Daniel Kahn Gillmor ', 'request_addr', 
'cont...@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid', 
'<1393440944-3352-bts-...@fifthhorseman.net>', 'request_subject', ...) called 
at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 552
eval {...} called at 
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 551
Debbugs::Control::Service::control_line('line', undef, 'clonebugs', 
'HASH(0x2e982a0)', 'limit', 'HASH(0x2e8e810)', 'common_control_options', 
'ARRAY(0x2e8e858)', 'errors', ...) called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 474

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
737921: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737921
740160: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740160
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740160: gnutls unusable with cacert SHA2-512 sigs

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

On 02/26/2014 01:17 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-02-26 Daniel Pocock  wrote:
>> Package: libgnutls26
>> Severity: serious
>> Version: 2.12.20-8
> 
> [...]
>> - running gnutls-cli in debug mode, I notice the following:
> [...]
> 
> Can you check whether this is fixed in GnuTLS 3.x? - It is available
> in wheezy-backports.

This has been discussed already at https://bugs.debian.org/737921, let's
follow up there.

--dkg



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#740160: gnutls unusable with cacert SHA2-512 sigs

[Daniel Pocock]

On 26/02/14 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-02-26 Daniel Pocock  wrote:
>> Package: libgnutls26
>> Severity: serious
>> Version: 2.12.20-8
> 
> [...]
>> - running gnutls-cli in debug mode, I notice the following:
> [...]
> 
> Can you check whether this is fixed in GnuTLS 3.x? - It is available
> in wheezy-backports.
> 

I already removed the cacert.org certs from that server and changed to
another root so it is not something I can test immediately.

Even if 3.x fixes it, people will still be using wheezy for another good
12-18 months so this probably needs to go in a security update to avoid
massive inconvenience (unless cacert.org decides to go back to SHA-256)

Also, I started a thread on the cacert mailing list about this issue:

https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert/2014-02/msg1.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#739744: [lintian] Block

[bastien ROUCARIES]

Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.21

strange name is a tar regression:

bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ ls
'\   \  \\
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ tar -cf test.tar * 
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ tar -tf test.tar
'\\ 
\\
\\
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ mkdir extract
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ cd extract/
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase/extract$ tar -xf ../test.tar 
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase/extract$ ls
'\   \
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase/extract$ tar --version
tar (GNU tar) 1.27.1
Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Licence GPLv3+ : GNU GPL version 3 ou ultérieure 

Ceci est un logiciel libre : vous êtes libre de le modifier et de le 
redistribuer.
Il est fourni SANS GARANTIE, dans la mesure de ce que permet la loi.

Écrit par John Gilmore et Jay Fenlason.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#733496: Code copy of older Mozilla code

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Hi Moritz,

Laurent spoke to Mike regarding this and Mike said he was thinking/planning on
dropping libmozjs packages from src:iceweasel (please correct. The only possible
alternative is to have a code copy as a separate source package (as we have done
with mozjs and now with mozjs17). Note that depending on mozjs from iceweasel
would have a big impact on stable when iceweasel is upgraded.

I don't think this is a big problem. At least for my use case (gjs & gnome-shell
and a few other gnome apps) the executed javascript code is the application code
shipped in their packages, not some random webpages. So we're not exposed to
malicious code.

Regards,
Emilio


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740199: [regression] tar mess up \ and \\ files

[bastien ROUCARIES]

Package: tar
Version: 1.27.1-1
Severity: serious

Serious because it is a regression and it break at least lintian...

strange name is a tar regression:

bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ ls
'\   \  \\
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ tar -cf test.tar * 
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ tar -tf test.tar
'\\ 
\\
\\
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ mkdir extract
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ cd extract/
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase/extract$ tar -xf ../test.tar 
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase/extract$ ls
'\   \
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase/extract$ tar --version
tar (GNU tar) 1.27.1
Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Licence GPLv3+ : GNU GPL version 3 ou ultérieure 

Ceci est un logiciel libre : vous êtes libre de le modifier et de le 
redistribuer.
Il est fourni SANS GARANTIE, dans la mesure de ce que permet la loi.

Écrit par John Gilmore et Jay Fenlason.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: block 739744 with 740199

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 739744 with 740199
Bug #739744 [lintian] lintian: FTBFS test failures
739744 was not blocked by any bugs.
739744 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 739744: 740199
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
739744: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739744
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740147: Public key for Debian Edu archive (ftpmas...@skolelinux.org) has EXPIRED in squeeze's package version

[Mike Gabriel]

Hi Adam,

thanks for your reply.

On  Mi 26 Feb 2014 14:17:05 CET, Adam D. Barratt wrote:


[explicit CC to -release added]

On 2014-02-26 9:25, Mike Gabriel wrote:

6 days ago (2014-02-20) the key 0xA26FF456 shipped in the Debian
squeeze version of package debian-edu-archive-keyring (version
2010.01.05) has expired.

[...]

My personal approach would be uploading a rebuild of
debian-edu-archive-keyring 2013.05.20 versioned as 2013.05.20~deb6 to
squeeze-proposed-updates. The same key in that newer package will
expire in 2019, which will give people plenty of time to upgrade their
running Debian Edu setups.


Will Debian Edu installs pick up a package from squeeze-pu automatically?


Not from squeeze-p-u, but from squeeze-u. Deployed installations using  
PXE-install will be cured after the new keyring package appears in  
squeeze-updates.


For the DVD installation we probably have to rebuild our Debian Edu  
DVDs. During the build process, packages from squeeze-updates  
supersede packages in the point release, so the DVD build should be  
fine then, as well.


Greets+Thanks,
Mike

--

mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22  0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: sunwea...@debian.org, http://sunweavers.net



pgpQg_MHiWvdv.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur

Bug#740147: Public key for Debian Edu archive (ftpmas...@skolelinux.org) has EXPIRED in squeeze's package version

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 20:11 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On  Mi 26 Feb 2014 14:17:05 CET, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 2014-02-26 9:25, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> >> My personal approach would be uploading a rebuild of
> >> debian-edu-archive-keyring 2013.05.20 versioned as 2013.05.20~deb6 to
> >> squeeze-proposed-updates. The same key in that newer package will
> >> expire in 2019, which will give people plenty of time to upgrade their
> >> running Debian Edu setups.
> >
> > Will Debian Edu installs pick up a package from squeeze-pu automatically?
> 
> Not from squeeze-p-u, but from squeeze-u. Deployed installations using  
> PXE-install will be cured after the new keyring package appears in  
> squeeze-updates.

fwiw, I've just re-read your original mail, and it doesn't mention
squeeze-updates anywhere, which is why I asked... (or is this a
debian-edu-specific version of squeeze-updates?)

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740147: Public key for Debian Edu archive (ftpmas...@skolelinux.org) has EXPIRED in squeeze's package version

[Mike Gabriel]

Hi Adam,

On  Mi 26 Feb 2014 21:18:38 CET, Adam D. Barratt wrote:


On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 20:11 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:

On  Mi 26 Feb 2014 14:17:05 CET, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2014-02-26 9:25, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>> My personal approach would be uploading a rebuild of
>> debian-edu-archive-keyring 2013.05.20 versioned as 2013.05.20~deb6 to
>> squeeze-proposed-updates. The same key in that newer package will
>> expire in 2019, which will give people plenty of time to upgrade their
>> running Debian Edu setups.
>
> Will Debian Edu installs pick up a package from squeeze-pu automatically?

Not from squeeze-p-u, but from squeeze-u. Deployed installations using
PXE-install will be cured after the new keyring package appears in
squeeze-updates.


fwiw, I've just re-read your original mail, and it doesn't mention
squeeze-updates anywhere, which is why I asked... (or is this a


Ah right, ok. I assumed that there is a/some transition from  
squeeze-proposed-updates to squeeze-updates and that this transition  
hopefully can be accelerated with a portion of good will. ;-) I  
apologize for my innocent knowledge of the (old)stable release workflow.



debian-edu-specific version of squeeze-updates?)


No, it is Debian's squeeze-updates / squeeze-proposed-updates I am  
talking about.


The installation of debian-edu-archive-keyring from official Debian  
archives opens up PGP'ed access for follow-up package installations  
from ftp.skolelinux.org. We don't provide many packages there, but  
some of the important ones, esp. for Debian Edu squeeze.


Greets,
Mike

--

mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22  0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: sunwea...@debian.org, http://sunweavers.net



pgpM1vEzL9vMm.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur

Bug#740200: src:nvidia-graphics-modules: needs update for linux 3.13

[Ansgar Burchardt]

Package: src:nvidia-graphics-modules
Version: 319.82+3.12+1
Severity: serious

nvidia-graphics-modules build-depends on linux-headers-3.12-1-*, but
the current version in unstable is linux-headers-3.13-1-*.

Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740147: Public key for Debian Edu archive (ftpmas...@skolelinux.org) has EXPIRED in squeeze's package version

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 20:33 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On  Mi 26 Feb 2014 21:18:38 CET, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 20:11 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> >> On  Mi 26 Feb 2014 14:17:05 CET, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> > Will Debian Edu installs pick up a package from squeeze-pu automatically?
> >>
> >> Not from squeeze-p-u, but from squeeze-u. Deployed installations using
> >> PXE-install will be cured after the new keyring package appears in
> >> squeeze-updates.
> >
> > fwiw, I've just re-read your original mail, and it doesn't mention
> > squeeze-updates anywhere, which is why I asked... (or is this a
> 
> Ah right, ok. I assumed that there is a/some transition from  
> squeeze-proposed-updates to squeeze-updates and that this transition  
> hopefully can be accelerated with a portion of good will. ;-)

There is, but it's a manual process that only occurs for a subset of
packages (partly because it requires us writing and sending an
announcement mail, and partly because it removes the point if too large
a proportion of packages end up in -updates); for a package which most
users of "pure" squeeze are unlikely to have installed to begin with,
it's helpful to be explicit about your expectations.

In any case, rather than continuing this fascinating conversation in the
RC bug log :-), please open a pu bug report with the proposed changes.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 739890 + pending
Bug #739890 [python-mock] some tests fail with python3.4
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
739890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739890
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740147: Public key for Debian Edu archive (ftpmas...@skolelinux.org) has EXPIRED in squeeze's package version

[Mike Gabriel]

Hi Adam,

On  Mi 26 Feb 2014 21:42:20 CET, Adam D. Barratt wrote:


On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 20:33 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:

On  Mi 26 Feb 2014 21:18:38 CET, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 20:11 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>> On  Mi 26 Feb 2014 14:17:05 CET, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Will Debian Edu installs pick up a package from squeeze-pu  
automatically?

>>
>> Not from squeeze-p-u, but from squeeze-u. Deployed installations using
>> PXE-install will be cured after the new keyring package appears in
>> squeeze-updates.
>
> fwiw, I've just re-read your original mail, and it doesn't mention
> squeeze-updates anywhere, which is why I asked... (or is this a

Ah right, ok. I assumed that there is a/some transition from
squeeze-proposed-updates to squeeze-updates and that this transition
hopefully can be accelerated with a portion of good will. ;-)


There is, but it's a manual process that only occurs for a subset of
packages (partly because it requires us writing and sending an
announcement mail, and partly because it removes the point if too large
a proportion of packages end up in -updates); for a package which most
users of "pure" squeeze are unlikely to have installed to begin with,
it's helpful to be explicit about your expectations.

In any case, rather than continuing this fascinating conversation in the
RC bug log :-), please open a pu bug report with the proposed changes.


OK. Will do that first thing (my) tomorrow morning.

Thanks!
Mike

--

mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22  0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: sunwea...@debian.org, http://sunweavers.net



pgpp7LkCyvZVR.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur

Processed: Re: [lintian] Block

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> block -1 by 740199
Bug #739744 [lintian] lintian: FTBFS test failures
739744 was blocked by: 740199
739744 was not blocking any bugs.
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #739744 to the same blocks 
previously set

-- 
739744: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739744
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#739744: [lintian] Block

[Bastien ROUCARIES]

control: block -1 by 740199

2014-02-26 21:40 GMT+01:00 bastien ROUCARIES :
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.5.21
>
> strange name is a tar regression:
>
> bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ ls
> '\   \  \\
> bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ tar -cf test.tar *
> bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ tar -tf test.tar
> '\\
> \\
> \\
> bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ mkdir extract
> bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase$ cd extract/
> bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase/extract$ tar -xf ../test.tar
> bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase/extract$ ls
> '\   \
> bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp/testcase/extract$ tar --version
> tar (GNU tar) 1.27.1
> Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> Licence GPLv3+ : GNU GPL version 3 ou ultérieure 
> 
> Ceci est un logiciel libre : vous êtes libre de le modifier et de le 
> redistribuer.
> Il est fourni SANS GARANTIE, dans la mesure de ce que permet la loi.
>
> Écrit par John Gilmore et Jay Fenlason.
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#710760: marked as done (monodevelop-monogame: not installable in sid)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:16:59 +0100
with message-id <20140226211659.gc11...@free.fr>
and subject line done
has caused the Debian Bug report #710760,
regarding monodevelop-monogame: not installable in sid
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
710760: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710760
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: monodevelop-monogame
Version: 2.5.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-outdated

Hi,

monodevelop-monogame is not installable in sid since it depends on

  monodevelop (>= 3.0.3.2), monodevelop (<< 3.0.3.2.),

However, the version of monodevelop available in sid is 4.0.5+dfsg-1.

-Ralf.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.5.1+dfsg-4

this has been fixed with version 2.5.1+dfsg-4. --- End Message ---

Bug#739890: marked as done (some tests fail with python3.4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:21:01 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#739890: fixed in python-mock 1.0.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #739890,
regarding some tests fail with python3.4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
739890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739890
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-mock
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid jessie
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.4

the tests fail with python3.4:

==
ERROR: test_create_autopsec (tests.testcallable.TestCallable)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/tests/testcallable.py", line 143, in
test_create_autopsec
mock = create_autospec(X)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 2193, in create_autospec
_check_signature(spec, mock, is_type, instance)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 213, in _check_signature
_copy_func_details(func, checksig)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 221, in 
_copy_func_details
funcopy.__module__ = func.__module__
AttributeError: 'wrapper_descriptor' object has no attribute '__module__'

==
ERROR: test_create_autospec_instance (tests.testcallable.TestCallable)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/tests/testcallable.py", line 152, in
test_create_autospec_instance
mock = create_autospec(SomeClass, instance=True)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 2193, in create_autospec
_check_signature(spec, mock, is_type, instance)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 213, in _check_signature
_copy_func_details(func, checksig)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 221, in 
_copy_func_details
funcopy.__module__ = func.__module__
AttributeError: 'method-wrapper' object has no attribute '__module__'

==
ERROR: test_attributes (tests.testhelpers.SpecSignatureTest)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/tests/testhelpers.py", line 451, in
test_attributes
sub_mock = create_autospec(Sub)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 2193, in create_autospec
_check_signature(spec, mock, is_type, instance)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 213, in _check_signature
_copy_func_details(func, checksig)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 221, in 
_copy_func_details
funcopy.__module__ = func.__module__
AttributeError: 'wrapper_descriptor' object has no attribute '__module__'

==
ERROR: test_autospec_functions_with_self_in_odd_place
(tests.testhelpers.SpecSignatureTest)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/tests/testhelpers.py", line 832, in
test_autospec_functions_with_self_in_odd_place
a = create_autospec(Foo)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 2193, in create_autospec
_check_signature(spec, mock, is_type, instance)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 213, in _check_signature
_copy_func_details(func, checksig)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 221, in 
_copy_func_details
funcopy.__module__ = func.__module__
AttributeError: 'wrapper_descriptor' object has no attribute '__module__'

==
ERROR: test_autospec_property (tests.testhelpers.SpecSignatureTest)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/tests/testhelpers.py", line 843, in
test_autospec_property
foo = create_autospec(Foo)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 2193, in create_autospec
_check_signature(spec, mock, is_type, instance)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line 213, in _check_signature
_copy_func_details(func, checksig)
  File "/build/buildd/python-mock-1.0.1/mock.py", line

Bug#713116: marked as done (monogame: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: monodevelop (< 3.0.3.2.) but 4.0.5+dfsg-1 is to be installed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:23:22 +0100
with message-id <20140226212322.gd11...@free.fr>
and subject line done
has caused the Debian Bug report #713116,
regarding monogame: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: monodevelop (< 
3.0.3.2.) but 4.0.5+dfsg-1 is to be installed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
713116: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=713116
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: monogame
Version: 2.5.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> ┌──┐
> │ Install monogame build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
>  │
> └──┘
> 
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  sbuild-build-depends-monogame-dummy : Depends: monodevelop (< 3.0.3.2.) but 
> 4.0.5+dfsg-1 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.

The full build log is available from:
   
http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2013/06/20/monogame_2.5.1+dfsg-3_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.5.1+dfsg-4

this has been fixed in 2.5.1+dfsg-4.--- End Message ---

Bug#721721: Fix for symlink problem

[Anders Jonsson]

Greetings,
I have analyzed this bug and found a fix.

The faulty symlink is caused by that there are two different postgis 
versions stated in the package. One general in Version.config, and one 
specifically for JDBC in java/jdbc/pom.xml.


However, the debian/rules file uses a single variable POSTGIS_VERSION 
retrieved from Version.config for both of these, ignoring the value for 
JDBC.


The attached patch retrieves a new variable POSTGIS_JDBC_VERSION from 
java/jdbc/pom.xml and uses it in the creation of the symlink which now 
works.



Furthermore this bug blocks debbug #713278 (Osmosis FTBFS). If one 
manages to workaround the Checkstyle version being too recent, it 
instead fails to build as postgis can't be found due to this incorrect 
symlink.



Regards,
Anders Jonsson
--- debian/rules2014-01-23 17:26:35.0 +0100
+++ debian/rules2014-02-26 21:27:43.067459182 +0100
@@ -242,7 +242,11 @@
 
 #  Link the resulting JAR file, so it's available via it's old
 #  name. (Even if postgis-jdbc.jar might be more appropriate.)
-   ln -sf postgis-jdbc-$(POSTGIS_VERSION).jar \
+   POSTGIS_JDBC_MAJOR_VERSION=$(shell cat java/jdbc/pom.xml | grep 
"" | cut -d ">" -f2 | cut -d "<" -f1); \
+   POSTGIS_JDBC_MINOR_VERSION=$(shell cat java/jdbc/pom.xml | grep 
"" | cut -d ">" -f2 | cut -d "<" -f1); \
+   POSTGIS_JDBC_MICRO_VERSION=$(shell cat java/jdbc/pom.xml | grep 
"" | cut -d ">" -f2 | cut -d "<" -f1); \
+   
POSTGIS_JDBC_VERSION=$$POSTGIS_JDBC_MAJOR_VERSION.$$POSTGIS_JDBC_MINOR_VERSION.$$POSTGIS_JDBC_MICRO_VERSION;
 \
+   ln -sf postgis-jdbc-$$POSTGIS_JDBC_VERSION.jar \
$(CURDIR)/debian/libpostgis-java/usr/share/java/postgis.jar
 
 install-arch: build-arch

Bug#736180: marked as done ([kicad] Missing module (footprint) files)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:05:14 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#736180: fixed in kicad 0.20140224+bzr4027-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #736180,
regarding [kicad] Missing module (footprint) files
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
736180: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kicad
Version: 0.20131208+bzr4024-1
Severity: normal

Hi,

after upgrade to this version (in testing) i cannot assign the
modules (footprints) to components anymore and then i cannot develop the
PCBs.

When i open the CvPcb to assign footprints, i get message window with
title "Load error" and message: "Some files could not be found!" with
list the missing *.mod files (manually typed, i cannot copy&paste it):

- sockets.mod
- connect.mod
- discret.mod
- pin_array.mod
- divers.mod
- smd_capacitors.mod
- smd_crystal&oscilator.mod
- smd_dil.mod
- smd_transistors.mod
- libcms.mod
- display.mod
- led.mod
- dip_sockets.mod
- pga_sockets.mod
- valves.mod

regards

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.12-1-amd64


-- 
Slavko
http://slavino.sk


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: kicad
Source-Version: 0.20140224+bzr4027-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kicad, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 736...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
georg...@debian.org (supplier of updated kicad package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:40:26 +0100
Source: kicad
Binary: kicad kicad-common kicad-doc-de kicad-doc-en kicad-doc-es kicad-doc-fr 
kicad-doc-it kicad-doc-hu kicad-doc-pl kicad-doc-pt kicad-doc-ru kicad-doc-zh-cn
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.20140224+bzr4027-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Georges Khaznadar 
Changed-By: georg...@debian.org
Description: 
 kicad  - Electronic schematic and PCB design software
 kicad-common - Common files used by kicad
 kicad-doc-de - Kicad help files (German)
 kicad-doc-en - Kicad help files (English)
 kicad-doc-es - Kicad help files (Spanish)
 kicad-doc-fr - Kicad help files (French)
 kicad-doc-hu - Kicad help files (Hungarian)
 kicad-doc-it - Kicad help files (Italian)
 kicad-doc-pl - Kicad help files (Polish)
 kicad-doc-pt - Kicad help files (Portuguese)
 kicad-doc-ru - Kicad help files (Russian)
 kicad-doc-zh-cn - Kicad help files (Simplified Chinese)
Closes: 707956 712259 736180 737933
Changes: 
 kicad (0.20140224+bzr4027-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * changed the lp: repository for kicad's library in order to match active
 repositories listed at
 
https://code.launchpad.net/kicad/+branches?field.lifecycle=ALL&field.lifecycle-empty-marker=1&field.sort_by=most+recently+changed+first&field.sort_by-empty-marker=1
 the file debian/get-kicad.sh should be more efficient now.
 Closes: #712259
   * modified the script debian/clean_sourceless_pdf: more formats are allowed
 for source files, and the search for source files is now case-insensitive.
 names without prefixes are allowed too (they are directory names)
   * fixed a few wrong permissions in packaged files
   * modified the package assignation for files in usr/share/applications
   * modified the script debian/get-kicad.sh to add a minimum set of
 legacy footprints. Closes: #736180; Closes: #707956
   * removed bloated .ps files from the source package. Closes: #737933
   * added a dependency on imagemagick to mamange the icons at build time
Checksums-Sha1: 
 0614ceece56d46625b1454e321904edff3479abd 1982 kicad_0.20140224+bzr4027-1.dsc
 35def523ddb5616d945feffd002eab568e835901 200976718 
kicad_0.20140224+bzr4027.orig.tar.gz
 06e5a6cf77066057a237d38a3142cee6dffd1d9a 11968 
kicad_0.20140224+bzr4027-1.debian.tar.xz
 287b212fa0989612f5f19257e98c8117ffcf3667 3459074 
kicad_0.20140224+bzr4027-1_amd64.deb
 2c29d7334228c72c650f12201d677789c777f4f6 26702422 
kicad-common_0.20140224+bzr4027-1_all.deb

Processed: postgis bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 721721 patch
Bug #721721 [libpostgis-java] libpostgis-java: Installs incorrect symlink
Added tag(s) patch.
> block 729203 by 721721
Bug #729203 [wnpp] ITP: ffmpeg -- complete, cross-platform solution to record, 
convert and stream audio and video
729203 was not blocked by any bugs.
729203 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 729203: 721721
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
721721: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721721
729203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729203
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: osmosis build blocked by faulty postgis symlink

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 713278 by 721721
Bug #713278 [src:osmosis] osmosis: FTBFS: [ivy:resolve] :: 
com.puppycrawl.tools#checkstyle;5.4: not found
713278 was not blocked by any bugs.
713278 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 713278: 721721
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
713278: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=713278
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: remove wrong block number

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unblock 729203 by 721721
Bug #729203 [wnpp] ITP: ffmpeg -- complete, cross-platform solution to record, 
convert and stream audio and video
729203 was blocked by: 721721
729203 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 729203: 721721
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
729203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729203
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740212: qbittorrent: qbittorrent fails to start with undefined symbol: _ZN10libtorrent6detail14integer_to_strEPcil

[Aaron]

Package: qbittorrent
Version: 3.1.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

As the subject says, qbittorrent fails to start with symbol lookup
error: qbittorrent: undefined symbol:
_ZN10libtorrent6detail14integer_to_strEPcil

I think that the problem started to occur after libtorrent-rasterbar7
update from version 0.16.11-2.1 to version 0.16.13-1.

GDB trace:

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
[New Thread 0x71327700 (LWP 23144)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe0dfd700 (LWP 23147)]
[New Thread 0x7fffdbfff700 (LWP 23148)]
/usr/bin/qbittorrent: symbol lookup error: /usr/bin/qbittorrent:
undefined symbol: _ZN10libtorrent6detail14integer_to_strEPcil
[Thread 0x7fffe0dfd700 (LWP 23147) exited]
[Thread 0x71327700 (LWP 23144) exited]
[Thread 0x77fc8780 (LWP 23139) exited]
[Inferior 1 (process 23139) exited with code 0177]

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (450, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages qbittorrent depends on:
ii  geoip-database 20140212-1
ii  libboost-system1.54.0  1.54.0-4+b1
ii  libc6  2.17-97
ii  libgcc11:4.8.2-16
ii  libqt4-dbus4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1
ii  libqt4-network 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1
ii  libqt4-xml 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1
ii  libqtcore4 4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1
ii  libqtgui4  4:4.8.5+git209-g718fae5+dfsg-1
ii  libstdc++6 4.8.2-16
ii  libtorrent-rasterbar7  0.16.13-1
ii  python 2.7.5-5
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1

qbittorrent recommends no packages.

Versions of packages qbittorrent suggests:
ii  qbittorrent-dbg  3.1.3-1

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: osmosis patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 713278 patch
Bug #713278 [src:osmosis] osmosis: FTBFS: [ivy:resolve] :: 
com.puppycrawl.tools#checkstyle;5.4: not found
Added tag(s) patch.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
713278: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=713278
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#733330: still there

[markus . hoenicka]

Mathieu Malaterre writes:
 > Control: reopen -1
 > Control: found -1 refdb/1.0.1-1
 > 
 > The bug is still there in release 1.0.1:
 > 
 > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=refdb&arch=i386&ver=1.0.1-1&stamp=1391636439
 > 
 > gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"refdb\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"refdb\"
 > -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"1.0.1\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"refdb\ 1.0.1\"
 > -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"refdb\"
 > -DVERSION=\"1.0.1\" -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -DREADLINE42=1 -DHAVE_ICONV=1
 > -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1
 > -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1
 > -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1
 > -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_SOCKLEN_T=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_FCNTL_H=1
 > -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_FILE_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1
 > -DHAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H=1 -DHAVE_SYSLOG_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1
 > -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1 -DRETSIGTYPE=void -DHAVE_STRFTIME=1
 > -DHAVE_MKFIFO=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTNAME=1 -DHAVE_SELECT=1 -DHAVE_SOCKET=1
 > -DHAVE_STRCSPN=1 -DHAVE_STRSTR=1 -DHAVE_STRTOLL=1 -DHAVE_ATOLL=1 -I.
 > -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc/refdb\" -DULLSPEC=\"%llu\" -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -g
 > -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
 > -Werror=format-security -O2 -c -o risxhandler.o risxhandler.c
 > risxhandler.c: In function 'risx_end_handler':
 > risxhandler.c:794:7: warning: passing argument 2 of 'iconv' from
 > incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
 >if (iconv(ptr_ardata->conv_descriptor, &my_instring, &inlength,
 > &my_elvalue, &outlength) == (size_t)(-1)) {
 >^
 > In file included from risxhandler.c:43:0:
 > /usr/include/iconv.h:42:15: note: expected 'char ** __restrict__' but
 > argument is of type 'const char **'
 >  extern size_t iconv (iconv_t __cd, char **__restrict __inbuf,
 >^
 > In file included from /usr/include/string.h:638:0,
 >  from risxhandler.c:39:
 > In function 'strcpy',
 > inlined from 'risx_end_handler' at risxhandler.c:1393:12:
 > /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/bits/string3.h:104:3: warning: call to
 > __builtin___memcpy_chk will always overflow destination buffer
 > [enabled by default]
 >return __builtin___strcpy_chk (__dest, __src, __bos (__dest));
 >^
 > In function 'strcpy',
 > inlined from 'risx_end_handler' at risxhandler.c:1396:12:
 > /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/bits/string3.h:104:3: warning: call to
 > __builtin___memcpy_chk will always overflow destination buffer
 > [enabled by default]
 >return __builtin___strcpy_chk (__dest, __src, __bos (__dest));
 >^
 > 

I've fixed that bug in svn, see revision 781. I've also uploaded an
updated tarball (refdb-1.0.2.tar.gz) to SF.

regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Hoenicka
http://www.mhoenicka.de
AQ score 38


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#713278: checkstyle version update patch

[Anders Jonsson]

Good evening,

the FTBFS is in testing and unstable and is caused by checkstyle there 
being 5.7 rather than 5.4 that is expected by this version of osmosis.


Attached is a patch that makes it build again, tested in Jessie. It is 
based on osmosis upstream commit

https://github.com/openstreetmap/osmosis/commit/fe7b77d182b0a8c30118e2b53712cc3aa629c73e
that updated checkstyle to 5.6, together with a change in a quilt patch 
to set checkstyle version to debian rather than 5.4.


Worth noting is that even with this patch, it will fail to build since 
it runs into bug #721721. I have proposed a patch at that bug that makes 
the symlink work. With these fixes together, osmosis once more builds.



Regards,
Anders Jonsson
>From b62749dcaf12eee32adb9ef9a303480ce7876e20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anders Jonsson 
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:40:30 +0100
Subject: fix FTBFS by allowing checkstyle newer than 5.4

---
 build-support/checkstyle.xml  | 7 ---
 build-support/config/ant-build-common.properties  | 2 +-
 debian/control| 2 +-
 debian/patches/04-fix_dependencies_versions.patch | 3 ++-
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/build-support/checkstyle.xml b/build-support/checkstyle.xml
index e77c3a5..9465657 100644
--- a/build-support/checkstyle.xml
+++ b/build-support/checkstyle.xml
@@ -7,8 +7,9 @@
 
 
 
-
-
+
+
+
 
 
 
@@ -23,6 +24,7 @@
 
+
 
 
 
@@ -111,7 +113,6 @@
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
diff --git a/debian/patches/04-fix_dependencies_versions.patch 
b/debian/patches/04-fix_dependencies_versions.patch
index 7ae2bde..da59fbb 100644
--- a/debian/patches/04-fix_dependencies_versions.patch
+++ b/debian/patches/04-fix_dependencies_versions.patch
@@ -15,10 +15,11 @@ Index: 
osmosis/build-support/config/ant-build-common.properties
 @@ -2,19 +2,18 @@
  
  # 3rd Party Library Versions
- dependency.version.checkstyle=5.4
+-dependency.version.checkstyle=5.4
 -dependency.version.classworlds=2.4
 -dependency.version.commons-codec=1.5
 -dependency.version.commons-compress=1.2
++dependency.version.checkstyle=debian
 +dependency.version.classworlds=debian
 +dependency.version.commons-codec=debian
 +dependency.version.commons-compress=debian
-- 
1.8.5.3

Bug#740219: FTBFS on armel: modules in more than one package

[Wookey]

Source: linux
Version: 3.13.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)


End of the build log at:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux&arch=armel&ver=3.13.4-1&stamp=1393291598

...
kernel-wedge find-dups 3.13-1-orion5x
some modules are in more than one package
debian/jffs2-modules-3.13-1-orion5x-di 
lib/modules/3.13-1-orion5x/kernel/lib/lzo/lzo_compress.ko
debian/btrfs-modules-3.13-1-orion5x-di 
lib/modules/3.13-1-orion5x/kernel/lib/lzo/lzo_compress.ko
command exited with status 1
make[2]: *** [install-udeb_armel] Error 2
make[1]: *** [binary-arch_armel] Error 2

I noticed this because I'm waiting for matching multiarch linux-libc-dev package
versions to allow building cross-toolchains targetting armel.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
armhf

Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#733496: Code copy of older Mozilla code

[Mike Hommey]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 08:53:32PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hi Moritz,
> 
> Laurent spoke to Mike regarding this and Mike said he was thinking/planning on
> dropping libmozjs packages from src:iceweasel (please correct. The only 
> possible
> alternative is to have a code copy as a separate source package (as we have 
> done
> with mozjs and now with mozjs17). Note that depending on mozjs from iceweasel
> would have a big impact on stable when iceweasel is upgraded.

Indeed. The js API and ABI are both highly unstable, so having it
shipped by iceweasel ensures all rdependencies using it will suffer. The
same can be said of xulrunner, and I'm seriously considering killing the
package too (in fact, I'm also pushing to kill it upstream, providing
the functionality itself off firefox). As of current packaging, libmozjs
is gone from the iceweasel 29 package on mozilla.debian.net. I'm tempted
to make it go away as soon as 28.

> I don't think this is a big problem. At least for my use case (gjs & 
> gnome-shell
> and a few other gnome apps) the executed javascript code is the application 
> code
> shipped in their packages, not some random webpages. So we're not exposed to
> malicious code.

... assuming no malicious code is on the gnome shell extensions web
site... That being said, without exploiting the js engine, they probably
can already do a lot of harm.

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: closing 735831

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> close 735831 0.36-1
Bug #735831 [src:monkeysphere] monkeysphere: FTBFS: Tests failures
Marked as fixed in versions monkeysphere/0.36-1.
Bug #735831 [src:monkeysphere] monkeysphere: FTBFS: Tests failures
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
735831: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735831
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#735831: closing 735831

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

close 735831 0.36-1
thanks

with gnupg 1.4.16-1.1, monkeysphere builds fine from source.  it should be able 
to propagate back into testing.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#733496: Code copy of older Mozilla code

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Hi Vincent,

Vincent Cheng wrote:
> 0ad upstream is already working (and making good progress) on
> migrating to ESR 24, and should be done in time for their next
> release. I can't speak on behalf of all the other packages that depend
> on spidermonkey currently though.

Have you seen #739132 ? Do you have any plans to upload mozjs 24? Given mozjs17
hasn't entered testing and has very few rdeps, maybe we could go directly for
mozjs24 and work towards getting rid of mozjs17 and mozjs185 (to avoid having
several mozjs in testing / stable).

Regards,
Emilio


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#733496: Code copy of older Mozilla code

[Vincent Cheng]

Hi Emilio,

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
 wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> 0ad upstream is already working (and making good progress) on
>> migrating to ESR 24, and should be done in time for their next
>> release. I can't speak on behalf of all the other packages that depend
>> on spidermonkey currently though.
>
> Have you seen #739132 ? Do you have any plans to upload mozjs 24? Given 
> mozjs17
> hasn't entered testing and has very few rdeps, maybe we could go directly for
> mozjs24 and work towards getting rid of mozjs17 and mozjs185 (to avoid having
> several mozjs in testing / stable).

I have no plans to upload mozjs 24 (I'd rather not maintain it by
myself), but if the iceweasel and/or gnome maintainers would like a
helping hand or even a co-maintainer, I'd be glad to help.

Regards,
Vincent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740226: does not work with python-lxml 3.3.1-1

[Russ Allbery]

Package: xml2rfc
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: serious

Since python-lxml was upgraded to 3.3.1-1, xml2rfc no longer works.
It fails with the following backtrace:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/xml2rfc", line 225, in 
main()
  File "/usr/bin/xml2rfc", line 139, in main
xmlrfc = parser.parse()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/xml2rfc/parser.py", line 373, in parse
context.resolvers.add(caching_resolver)
AttributeError: 'lxml.etree.iterparse' object has no attribute 'resolvers'

Downgrading python-lxml to 3.2.0-1+b1 from snapshot.debian.org
fixes the problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages xml2rfc depends on:
ii  python   2.7.5-5
ii  python-lxml  3.2.0-1+b1
pn  python:any   
ii  sgml-base1.26+nmu4

xml2rfc recommends no packages.

xml2rfc suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org