Bug#958312: marked as done (docker.io: signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation shortly after starting the daemon)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:04:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#958312: fixed in docker.io 19.03.7+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #958312,
regarding docker.io: signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation shortly after 
starting the daemon
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
958312: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958312
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: docker.io
Version: 19.03.7+dfsg1-1
Severity: critical
Tags: patch upstream
Justification: breaks unrelated software

Dear Maintainer,

The update to 19.03.7 led to a reproducible issue with docker shortly after
starting the daemon:

Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: panic: runtime error: invalid memory 
address or nil pointer dereference
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: [signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation 
code=0x1 addr=0x11 pc=0x55a05b5ac02b]
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: goroutine 2029 [running]:
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: 
github.com/docker/libnetwork.(*resolver).ServeDNS(0xc000e38380, 0x55a05cbea2c0, 
0xc0014b94a0, 0xc0018bd5f0)
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: 
/build/docker.io-CrAKu8/docker.io-19.03.7+dfsg1/.gopath/src/github.com/docker/libnetwork/resolver.go:487
 +0x79b
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: 
github.com/miekg/dns.(*Server).serveDNS(0xc000dab200, 0xc000c0f200, 0x21, 
0x200, 0xc0014b94a0)
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: 
/build/docker.io-CrAKu8/docker.io-19.03.7+dfsg1/.gopath/src/github.com/miekg/dns/server.go:609
 +0x2e2
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: 
github.com/miekg/dns.(*Server).serveUDPPacket(0xc000dab200, 0xc0011cf6b0, 
0xc000c0f200, 0x21, 0x200, 0xc00020a7e0, 0xc000fa7c00)
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: 
/build/docker.io-CrAKu8/docker.io-19.03.7+dfsg1/.gopath/src/github.com/miekg/dns/server.go:549
 +0xb4
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: created by 
github.com/miekg/dns.(*Server).serveUDP
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn dockerd[488555]: 
/build/docker.io-CrAKu8/docker.io-19.03.7+dfsg1/.gopath/src/github.com/miekg/dns/server.go:479
 +0x28c
Apr 20 14:30:27 fsn systemd[1]: docker.service: Main process exited, 
code=exited, status=2/INVALIDARGUMENT

Still testing out, but
https://github.com/SamWhited/libnetwork/commit/bea32b018c874ef35396ef46a3908ca0f9367d76
was merged in upstream, seems relevant and is part of upstream 19.03.8

So either apply that to 19.3.7 or update to 19.3.8?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, 
TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages docker.io depends on:
ii  adduser 3.118
ii  iptables1.8.4-3
ii  libc6   2.30-4
ii  libdevmapper1.02.1  2:1.02.167-1+b1
ii  libltdl72.4.6-14
ii  libnspr42:4.25-1
ii  libnss3 2:3.51-1
ii  libseccomp2 2.4.3-1+b1
ii  libsystemd0 245.5-1
ii  lsb-base11.1.0
ii  runc1.0.0~rc10+dfsg1-1
ii  tini0.18.0-1+b1

Versions of packages docker.io recommends:
ii  ca-certificates  20190110
ii  cgroupfs-mount   1.4
ii  git  1:2.26.1-1
ii  needrestart  3.5-1
ii  xz-utils 5.2.4-1+b1

Versions of packages docker.io suggests:
pn  aufs-tools 
ii  btrfs-progs5.6-1
ii  debootstrap1.0.123
pn  docker-doc 
ii  e2fsprogs  1.45.6-1
pn  rinse  
ii  xfsprogs   5.4.0-1
ii  zfsutils-linux [zfsutils]  0.8.3-2

-- no debconf information
>From bea32b018c874ef35396ef46a3908ca0f9367d76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Whited 
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:06:23 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fixes a panic in the DNS resolver

Under certain conditions it appears that the DNS response and returned
error can be nil. When this happens, checking resp.Truncated results in
a nil panic so we must first check that the response is not nil before
checking if a truncated response was received.

See moby/moby#40715

Signed-off-by: Sam Whited 
---
 resolver.go | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/resolver.go b/resolver.go
index 7e02a37a5b..

Bug#936873: Bug#727005: switch python bindings to python3

2020-04-21 Thread Boruch Baum
On 2020-03-18 15:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
> swig3 had support for Python3, and now we have swig 4.0 in the archive.  Any
> update on this?

I understood this to be for the debian hebrew packaging team, to approve
and apply the patch submitted by Andreas Henriksson[1] (the related debian bug
727005).

1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727005#14


--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1  7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0



Bug#956959: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Dmitry Smirnov ) (Bug#956959: fixed in xpra 3.0.9+dfsg1-1)

2020-04-21 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
reopen 956959
found 956959 3.0.9+dfsg1-1
thanks

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 01:39:17AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the xpra package:
> 
> #956959: can no longer connect after dist-upgrading server

Hi,

Unfortunately, 3.0.9 does not solve the problem. (I've upgraded both on the
client and the server.)

sesse@bigscreen:~$ xpra start ssh:sgunders@10.172.139.131 --start=urxvt
2020-04-21 09:59:40,056 Xpra GTK3 X11 client version 3.0.9-r26127 64-bit
2020-04-21 09:59:40,205  running on Linux Debian unstable sid
2020-04-21 09:59:40,206  window manager is 'Mutter (Muffin)'
2020-04-21 09:59:40,224 Warning: failed to import opencv:
2020-04-21 09:59:40,224  No module named 'cv2'
2020-04-21 09:59:40,224  webcam forwarding is disabled
2020-04-21 09:59:40,506 GStreamer version 1.16.2 for Python 3.8.2 64-bit
2020-04-21 09:59:40,587 No OpenGL_accelerate module loaded: No module named 
'OpenGL_accelerate'
2020-04-21 09:59:40,898 OpenGL enabled with GeForce GTX 950/PCIe/SSE2
2020-04-21 09:59:41,169 Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_8.2p1)
2020-04-21 09:59:41,827 Authentication (publickey) successful!
2020-04-21 09:59:42,466 missing some build information: cannot import name 
'build_info' from 'xpra' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/xpra/__init__.py)
2020-04-21 09:59:42,468  keyboard settings: rules=evdev, model=pc105, layout=no
2020-04-21 09:59:42,470  desktop size is 3840x2160 with 1 screen:
2020-04-21 09:59:42,470   :0.0 (1016x572 mm - DPI: 96x95) workarea: 3840x2120
2020-04-21 09:59:42,470 SAM HDMI-0 (521x293 mm - DPI: 187x187)
2020-04-21 09:59:42,512 Warning: the python netifaces package is missing
2020-04-21 09:59:42,630 Error: failed to receive anything, not an xpra server?
2020-04-21 09:59:42,630   could also be the wrong protocol, username, password 
or port
2020-04-21 09:59:42,630   or the session was not found
2020-04-21 09:59:42,631 Connection lost

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/



Processed: Re: Bug#956959 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Dmitry Smirnov ) (Bug#956959: fixed in xpra 3.0.9+dfsg1-1)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 956959
Bug #956959 {Done: Dmitry Smirnov } [xpra] can no longer 
connect after dist-upgrading server
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions xpra/3.0.9+dfsg1-1.
> found 956959 3.0.9+dfsg1-1
Bug #956959 [xpra] can no longer connect after dist-upgrading server
Marked as found in versions xpra/3.0.9+dfsg1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
956959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956959
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Bug#954499 marked as pending in python-eventlet

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #954499 [src:python-eventlet] python-eventlet: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: 
pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.7 3.8" returned exit code 13
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
954499: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954499
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#954499: marked as pending in python-eventlet

2020-04-21 Thread Ondřej Nový
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #954499 in python-eventlet reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-eventlet/-/commit/3a164a05d82821ea81186b3334ace74d1c8be084


New upstream release (Closes: #954499).


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/954499



Bug#954258: marked as done (src:r-cran-ranger: fails to migrate to testing for too long)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:42:56 +0200
with message-id 

and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #954258,
regarding src:r-cran-ranger: fails to migrate to testing for too long
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
954258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954258
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: r-cran-ranger
Version: 0.11.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 0.12.1-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync

Dear maintainer(s),

As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as
having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:r-cran-ranger
in its current version in unstable has been trying to migrate for 63
days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult.
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or
its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that
hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

I have marked the version in unstable as fixing this bug, so if that
version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bullseye, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-ranger




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Last version is now in testing.--- End Message ---


Bug#954600: marked as done (graphite-api: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:07:16 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#954600: fixed in graphite-api 1.1.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #954600,
regarding graphite-api: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i 
python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
954600: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954600
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: graphite-api
Version: 1.1.3-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200321 ftbfs-bullseye

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
>  debian/rules build
> dh build --with python3,sphinxdoc --buildsystem pybuild
>dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> I: pybuild base:217: python3.8 setup.py config 
> Warning: 'classifiers' should be a list, got type 'tuple'
> running config
>dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> I: pybuild base:217: /usr/bin/python3 setup.py build 
> Warning: 'classifiers' should be a list, got type 'tuple'
> running build
> running build_py
> creating /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/app.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/carbonlink.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/__init__.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/search.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/node.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/readers.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/storage.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/middleware.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/config.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/functions.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/intervals.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/encoders.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> copying graphite_api/utils.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api
> creating /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/_vendor
> copying graphite_api/_vendor/__init__.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/_vendor
> copying graphite_api/_vendor/whisper.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/_vendor
> creating /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/render
> copying graphite_api/render/datalib.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/render
> copying graphite_api/render/__init__.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/render
> copying graphite_api/render/grammar.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/render
> copying graphite_api/render/glyph.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/render
> copying graphite_api/render/attime.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/render
> creating /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/finders
> copying graphite_api/finders/__init__.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/finders
> copying graphite_api/finders/whisper.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/graphite_api/finders
> running egg_info
> creating graphite_api.egg-info
> writing graphite_api.egg-info/PKG-INFO
> writing dependency_links to graphite_api.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
> writing requirements to graphite_api.egg-info/requires.txt
> writing top-level names to graphite_api.egg-info/top_level.txt
> writing manifest file 'graphite_api.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
> reading manifest file 'graphite_api.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
> reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in'
> warning: no previously-included files matching '*' found under directory 
> 'tests'
> writing manifest file 'graphite_api.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
>dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> I: pybuild base:217: python3.8 setup.py test 
> Warning: 'classifiers' should be a list, got type 'tuple'
> running test
> WARNING: Testing via this command is deprecated and will be removed in a 
> future version. Users looking for a generic test entry point independent of 
> test runner are encouraged to use tox.
> running egg_info
> writing graphite_api.egg-info/PKG-INFO
> writing dependency_links to graphite_api.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
> writing

Bug#955176: marked as done (LGPL license missing)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:18:40 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#955176: fixed in syrthes 4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #955176,
regarding LGPL license missing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
955176: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955176
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: syrthes
Version: 4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1~exp1
Severity: serious
thanks

Dear Maintainer,

please add the missing LGPL licenses of some header files to your 
debian/copyright.


Thanks!
  Thorsten
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: syrthes
Source-Version: 4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1
Done: Gilles Filippini 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
syrthes, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 955...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gilles Filippini  (supplier of updated syrthes package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:30:25 +0200
Source: syrthes
Architecture: source
Version: 4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Gilles Filippini 
Closes: 955176 957857
Changes:
 syrthes (4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix FTBFS with GCC-10 (closes: #957857)
   * d/copyright: Fix missing LGPL license statement (closes: #955176)
   * Compat level 12
 .
   * Upload to unstable
Checksums-Sha1:
 8482124af7523babb410d841e88d6e56adde51b2 2206 
syrthes_4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1.dsc
 e16dd8e7d7f2d8c186938f9749fd31006672e425 14176 
syrthes_4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
 bf4e481288dfc6ae4029e0216ec83c80dbdd2c6e 13005 
syrthes_4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 ceaf528055143a70f713e60202020d5a2a710805f369fa256a083d2e6ff525ed 2206 
syrthes_4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1.dsc
 dba052c680e5ed38a859af00dc0962195629e6f599058b448d9d2b2fb973cda4 14176 
syrthes_4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
 1745fd86d1b73e37d886cf8f23edd9311b94c6fad041c972550cbd3af442eb81 13005 
syrthes_4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 085507c3533a4f355dc27fc834eed9eb 2206 science optional 
syrthes_4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1.dsc
 df38d9355d16bbff5b4b885c5a58f451 14176 science optional 
syrthes_4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
 18497ce0cf5ccbf2549ab75fd635a95e 13005 science optional 
syrthes_4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQFEBAEBCgAuFiEEoJObzArDE05WtIyR7+hsbH/+z4MFAl6e4YsQHHBpbmlAZGVi
aWFuLm9yZwAKCRDv6Gxsf/7Pg7oSB/9TRQ8yF2FRlg9t7KVrflIiGFD7oDvVqKsD
6VJ4BdgVUdJfE+w/XanfWmWo6XT4LantL3HyC8U3rJEFf3VYhprAHn0/qIaD9Xjs
uyEYcEmoerrbHrckr1g1dwSo3+mLkgbLhNMRab1/yBXXHwmQKqXCMVuNgdu+gF7+
Wp/cM8oyhATgN6pkucir5GhY4upnp2Swh4FQSWG3xhQNZ9A9kaRsV4Laqbd3UGMX
k1ZBmEtkXOZI5hC3QpdGP9ZQ6WtKGdSiy0zfDBJUcdwoxblDPwwvfWU9ZRvsxJoT
ULnty7BN8f4Gi0RNfImKKp6v+R09PUzoua1feSKAF36LvNCcQ+RG
=YTKl
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Bug#953376: Mailman 2 will be removed from Debian

2020-04-21 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi,

On Sun, March 8, 2020 20:01, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Package: src:mailman
> Version: 1:2.1.29-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>
> This package Depends/Build-Depends on python-dnspython which is an NBS
> cruft package.  Please update your package to use python3-dnspython, which
> is still provided (if the package will be ported to python3).

Mailman 2.1.x is Python 2 only.

Upstream has explicitly indicated there will be no effort to port it to
Python 3:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2019-April/084333.html

So it seems the time has come to remove Mailman 2 from Debian, and let
people migrate to Mailman 3.


Cheers,
Thijs



Bug#958398: rust-xdg: autopkgtest failure, permission denied.

2020-04-21 Thread peter green

Package: rust-xdg
Version: 2.2.0-2
Severity: serious

rust-xdg's autopkgtest is failing

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/r/rust-xdg/4759045/log.gz


 test_runtime_good stdout 
thread 'test_runtime_good' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Os { 
code: 1, kind: PermissionDenied, message: "Operation not permitted" }', 
src/libcore/result.rs:1165:5
stack backtrace:
0: ::fmt
1: core::fmt::write
2: std::io::Write::write_fmt
3: std::io::impls::>::write_fmt
4: std::panicking::default_hook::{{closure}}
5: std::panicking::default_hook
6: std::panicking::rust_panic_with_hook
7: std::panicking::continue_panic_fmt
8: rust_begin_unwind
9: core::panicking::panic_fmt
   10: core::result::unwrap_failed
   11: core::result::Result::unwrap
  at /usr/src/rustc-1.40.0/src/libcore/result.rs:933
   12: xdg::test_runtime_good
  at src/lib.rs:775
   13: xdg::test_runtime_good::{{closure}}
  at src/lib.rs:766
   14: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
  at /usr/src/rustc-1.40.0/src/libcore/ops/function.rs:227
   15:  as core::ops::function::FnOnce>::call_once
   16: __rust_maybe_catch_panic
   17: test::run_test_in_process
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose 
backtrace.

I would guess that this needs a fix similar to 
https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/commit/d79e7153031cbb2485d722b7bf4aec9d33b9a61e
 but implementing such a fix is beyond my skills.

This is blocking the migration of rust-xdg to testing and hence making newsboat 
unbuildable in testing.



Processed: unarchiving 948215, reopening 948215, tagging 948215

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unarchive 948215
Bug #948215 {Done: Daniel Leidert } [jekyll] FTBFS after 
ruby-i18n has been updated to version 1.x
Unarchived Bug 948215
> reopen 948215
Bug #948215 {Done: Daniel Leidert } [jekyll] FTBFS after 
ruby-i18n has been updated to version 1.x
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions jekyll/3.8.3+dfsg-7.
> tags 948215 + buster
Bug #948215 [jekyll] FTBFS after ruby-i18n has been updated to version 1.x
Added tag(s) buster.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
948215: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948215
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#948215: marked as pending in jekyll

2020-04-21 Thread Daniel Leidert
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #948215 in jekyll reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/jekyll/-/commit/3d727627cfe1caf54108d28353b7ea92d96c60f5


Add patch to allow Jekyll to run with ruby-i18n 1.x too

* d/patches/0017-allow-jekyll-to-run-with-ruby-i18n-1.x.patch: Add patch.
  - Allow ruby-i18n 0.x and 1.x (closes: #948215).
* d/patches/series: Add patch.


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/948215



Processed: Bug#948215 marked as pending in jekyll

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #948215 [jekyll] FTBFS after ruby-i18n has been updated to version 1.x
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
948215: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948215
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#958403: node-cross-spawn: unneeded for Debian, does risky path mangling, and does it wrong in current release 5.1.0

2020-04-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: node-cross-spawn
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

the sole purpose of Node.js module cross-spawn is to reimplement
builtin Node.js functions child_process.sync and child_process.spawnSync
compatible with Windows.

Code involved mangling paths using regular expressions,
which I fear can cause security issues if done wrong.

Current release 5.1.0 seems to be doing it wrong for Unix
(i.e. on platforms already implemented in Node.js),
judging from changelog entries of later releases.

According to its README.md,
on Debian it should be possible to simply replace
calls to cross-spawn.spawn with child_process.sync,
and calls to cross-spawn.sync with child_process.spawnSync.

Please let's avoid shipping this package with Bullseye
and instead patch the (quite few, it seems) reverse dependencies
to use node.js child_process() calls instead.

 - Jonas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=64E7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Bug#953376: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Bug#953376: Mailman 2 will be removed from Debian

2020-04-21 Thread Andrew Hodgson
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>On Sun, March 8, 2020 20:01, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Package: src:mailman
>> Version: 1:2.1.29-1
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>>
>> This package Depends/Build-Depends on python-dnspython which is an NBS 
>> cruft package.  Please update your package to use python3-dnspython, 
>> which is still provided (if the package will be ported to python3).

>Mailman 2.1.x is Python 2 only.

>Upstream has explicitly indicated there will be no effort to port it to Python 
>3:
>https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2019-April/084333.html

>So it seems the time has come to remove Mailman 2 from Debian, and let people 
>migrate to Mailman 3.

I thought this may be the case. I was looking at the possibility of whether I 
could build 2.1.30 even if it was to go in backports until the eventual removal 
of the package on the next Debian version, but would this removal cause 
problems for this?

Andrew.


Bug#958408: etherape: crashes with "critical: read_all() failed on control socket"

2020-04-21 Thread Berthold Müller
Package: etherape
Version: 0.9.18-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

starting etherape with 'sudo /usr/bin/etherape -n -i wlp2s0', I get:

EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:05.960: Protokoll sctp nicht unterstützt
EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:05.961: Protokoll ddp nicht unterstützt
EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:05.961: Protokoll ddp nicht unterstützt
EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:05.962: Protokoll ddp nicht unterstützt
EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:05.962: Protokoll ddp nicht unterstützt
EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:06.255: Ergebnis von get_interface: »«
EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:06.261: Verfügbare Schnittstellen für die Erfassung: 
usbmon5 usbmon4 usbmon3 usbmon2 usbmon1 nfqueue nflog lo any wlp2s0 enp1s0
EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:06.294: Verweistyp ist Ethernet
EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:06.296: Diagramm gestartet
EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:09.865: Neuer Knoten: IP: 10.0.1.4. Anzahl der Knoten 1
EtherApe-INFO: 17:31:09.866: Neuer Knoten: IP: 51.15.185.201. Anzahl der Knoten 
2
unexpected EOF in read_all()
critical: read_all() failed on control socket
Speicherzugriffsfehler

/var/log/syslog shows:

Apr 21 17:31:06 debian kernel: [38534.252175] device wlp2s0 entered promiscuous 
mode
Apr 21 17:31:06 debian dbus-daemon[378]: [system] Activating via systemd: 
service name='org.freedesktop.hostname1' 
unit='dbus-org.freedesktop.hostname1.service' requested by ':1.80' (uid=0 
pid=27621 comm="/usr/bin/etherape -n -i wlp2s0 ")
Apr 21 17:31:06 debian systemd[1]: Starting Hostname Service...
Apr 21 17:31:06 debian dbus-daemon[378]: [system] Successfully activated 
service 'org.freedesktop.hostname1'
Apr 21 17:31:06 debian systemd[1]: Started Hostname Service.
Apr 21 17:31:10 debian kernel: [38538.022726] etherape[27621]: segfault at 0 ip 
b6de3756 sp bfc87d18 error 4 in libc-2.28.so[b6ca1000+14e000]
Apr 21 17:31:10 debian kernel: [38538.022758] Code: 66 90 66 90 57 8b 4c 24 08 
66 0f 6e 4c 24 0c 66 0f ef d2 89 cf 66 0f 60 c9 66 0f 60 c9 83 e1 0f 66 0f 70 
c9 00 74 4d 83 e7 f0 <66> 0f 6f 07 66 0f 74 d0 66 0f 74 c1 66 0f d7 d2 66 0f d7 
c0 d3 fa
Apr 21 17:31:10 debian kernel: [38538.047907] device wlp2s0 left promiscuous 
mode
Apr 21 17:31:37 debian systemd[1]: systemd-hostnamed.service: Succeeded.

What I have done so far:

reinstalling

 - etherape (0.9.18-1)
 - etherape-data (0.9.18-1)
 - libgoocanvas-2.0-9 (2.0.4-1)
 - libgoocanvas-2.0-common (2.0.4-1)
 - libc6 (2.28-10)
 - libc6-dev (2.28-10)

But no success! (In Debian Jessie I've used etherape for many years without 
problems)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-8-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages etherape depends on:
ii  etherape-data0.9.18-1
ii  libatk1.0-0  2.30.0-2
ii  libc-ares2   1.14.0-1
ii  libc62.28-10
ii  libcairo-gobject21.16.0-4
ii  libcairo21.16.0-4
ii  libfribidi0  1.0.5-3.1+deb10u1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0   2.38.1+dfsg-1
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.58.3-2+deb10u2
ii  libgoocanvas-2.0-9   2.0.4-1
ii  libgtk-3-0   3.24.5-1
ii  libpango-1.0-0   1.42.4-7~deb10u1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0  1.42.4-7~deb10u1
ii  libpcap0.8   1.8.1-6
ii  libpopt0 1.16-12

etherape recommends no packages.

etherape suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


Bug#955081: marked as pending in deap

2020-04-21 Thread Christian Kastner
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #955081 in deap reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/deap/-/commit/4b6a0899db3b58784e5bf8a440289933785f24cf


Add Adapt-conf.py-for-sphinx-2.0.patch

Resolves a FTBFS with the new sphinx. (Closes: #955081)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/955081



Processed: Bug#955081 marked as pending in deap

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #955081 [src:deap] deap: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: ImportError: cannot import 
name 'algorithms' from 'deap' (../deap/__init__.py)
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
955081: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955081
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Bug#955054 marked as pending in pygments

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #955054 [src:pygments] pygments: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: Theme error: An 
error happened in rendering the page docs/api.
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
955054: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955054
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#955081: marked as done (deap: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: ImportError: cannot import name 'algorithms' from 'deap' (../deap/__init__.py))

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:33:48 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#955081: fixed in deap 1.3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #955081,
regarding deap: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: ImportError: cannot import name 
'algorithms' from 'deap' (../deap/__init__.py)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
955081: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955081
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: deap
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx2.4

Hi,

deap fails to build with Sphinx 2.4, currently available in
experimental.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>/doc'
> PYTHONPATH=/<>/../ sphinx-build -b html -d _build/doctrees   . 
> _build/html   
> Running Sphinx v2.4.3
> WARNING: Support for evaluating Python 2 syntax is deprecated and will be 
> removed in Sphinx 4.0. Convert /<>/doc/conf.py to Python 3 
> syntax.
> making output directory... done
> WARNING: favicon file 'deap_orange_icon_32.ico' does not exist
> loading intersphinx inventory from http://docs.python.org/objects.inv...
> loading intersphinx inventory from 
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/objects.inv...
> WARNING: failed to reach any of the inventories with the following issues:
> intersphinx inventory 'http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/objects.inv' not 
> fetchable due to : 
> HTTPConnectionPool(host='127.0.0.1', port=9): Max retries exceeded with url: 
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/objects.inv (Caused by ProxyError('Cannot 
> connect to proxy.', NewConnectionError(' object at 0x7f2db902bc70>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] 
> Connection refused')))
> WARNING: failed to reach any of the inventories with the following issues:
> intersphinx inventory 'http://docs.python.org/objects.inv' not fetchable due 
> to : 
> HTTPConnectionPool(host='127.0.0.1', port=9): Max retries exceeded with url: 
> http://docs.python.org/objects.inv (Caused by ProxyError('Cannot connect to 
> proxy.', NewConnectionError(' 0x7f2db87cb100>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] Connection 
> refused')))
> building [mo]: targets for 0 po files that are out of date
> building [html]: targets for 43 source files that are out of date
> updating environment: [new config] 43 added, 0 changed, 0 removed
> reading sources... [  2%] about
> reading sources... [  4%] api/algo
> reading sources... [  6%] api/base
> reading sources... [  9%] api/benchmarks
> reading sources... [ 11%] api/creator
> reading sources... [ 13%] api/gp
> reading sources... [ 16%] api/index
> reading sources... [ 18%] api/tools
> reading sources... [ 20%] contributing
> reading sources... [ 23%] examples/bipop_cmaes
> reading sources... [ 25%] examples/cmaes
> reading sources... [ 27%] examples/cmaes_plotting
> reading sources... [ 30%] examples/coev_coop
> reading sources... [ 32%] examples/eda
> reading sources... [ 34%] examples/es_fctmin
> reading sources... [ 37%] examples/es_onefifth
> reading sources... [ 39%] examples/ga_knapsack
> reading sources... [ 41%] examples/ga_onemax
> reading sources... [ 44%] examples/ga_onemax_numpy
> reading sources... [ 46%] examples/ga_onemax_short
> reading sources... [ 48%] examples/gp_ant
> reading sources... [ 51%] examples/gp_multiplexer
> reading sources... [ 53%] examples/gp_parity
> reading sources... [ 55%] examples/gp_spambase
> reading sources... [ 58%] examples/gp_symbreg
> reading sources... [ 60%] examples/index
> reading sources... [ 62%] examples/nsga3
> reading sources... [ 65%] examples/pso_basic
> reading sources... [ 67%] examples/pso_multiswarm
> reading sources... [ 69%] index
> reading sources... [ 72%] installation
> reading sources... [ 74%] overview
> reading sources... [ 76%] porting
> reading sources... [ 79%] releases
> reading sources... [ 81%] tutorials/advanced/benchmarking
> reading sources... [ 83%] tutorials/advanced/checkpoint
> reading sources... [ 86%] tutorials/advanced/constraints
> reading sources... [ 88%] tutorials/advanced/gp
> reading sources... [ 90%] tutorials/advanced/numpy
> reading sources... [ 93%] tutorials/basic/part1
> reading sources... [ 95%] tutorials/basic/part2
> reading sources... [ 97%] tutorials/basic/part3
> reading sources... [100%] tutorials/basic/part4
> 
> WARNING: autodoc: failed to import module 'algorithms' from module 'deap'; 
> the following exception was raised:
> No module named 'tools'
> WARNING: autodoc: failed to import function 'algorithms.eaSimple' from module 
> 'deap'; the fo

Bug#955054: marked as pending in pygments

2020-04-21 Thread Christian Kastner
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #955054 in pygments reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/pygments/-/commit/1c2457565eced489b16a59834a7a09806dd25ba1


Add Adapt-conf.py-for-sphinx-2.0.patch

Resolves a FTBFS with the new sphinx. (Closes: #955054)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/955054



Bug#955053: marked as done (scoop: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: Theme error: An error happened in rendering the page index.)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:35:03 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#955053: fixed in scoop 0.7.1.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #955053,
regarding scoop: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: Theme error: An error happened in 
rendering the page index.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
955053: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955053
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: scoop
Version: 0.7.1.1-6
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx2.4

Hi,

scoop fails to build with Sphinx 2.4, currently available in
experimental.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_auto_install
> I: pybuild base:217: /usr/bin/python3.7 setup.py install --root 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop 
> running install
> running build
> running build_py
> running install_lib
> creating /<>/debian/python3-scoop
> creating /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr
> creating /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib
> creating /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7
> creating /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages
> creating 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop
> copying /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/fallbacks.py 
> -> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop
> copying /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/shared.py -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/encapsulation.py -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop
> creating 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/_comm
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/_comm/scoopexceptions.py
>  -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/_comm
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/_comm/__init__.py -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/_comm
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/_comm/scooptcp.py -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/_comm
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/_comm/scoopzmq.py -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/_comm
> creating 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/_comm/__pycache__
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/_comm/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-37.pyc
>  -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/_comm/__pycache__
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/_comm/__pycache__/scoopzmq.cpython-37.pyc
>  -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/_comm/__pycache__
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/_comm/__pycache__/scoopexceptions.cpython-37.pyc
>  -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/_comm/__pycache__
> copying /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/_debug.py -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop
> copying /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/__init__.py 
> -> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop
> copying /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/__main__.py 
> -> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop
> creating 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/launch
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/launch/__init__.py 
> -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/launch
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/launch/brokerLaunch.py
>  -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/launch
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/launch/workerLaunch.py
>  -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/launch
> creating 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/discovery
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/discovery/__init__.py
>  -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/discovery
> creating 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/discovery/__pycache__
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/discovery/__pycache__/minusconf.cpython-37.pyc
>  -> 
> /<>/debian/python3-scoop/usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/scoop/discovery/__pycache__
> copying 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_scoop/build/scoop/discovery/__pycache__

Bug#953376: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Bug#953376: Mailman 2 will be removed from Debian

2020-04-21 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tue, April 21, 2020 18:02, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>>On Sun, March 8, 2020 20:01, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> Package: src:mailman
>>> Version: 1:2.1.29-1
>>> Severity: serious
>>> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>>>
>>> This package Depends/Build-Depends on python-dnspython which is an NBS
>>> cruft package.  Please update your package to use python3-dnspython,
>>> which is still provided (if the package will be ported to python3).
>
>>Mailman 2.1.x is Python 2 only.
>
>>Upstream has explicitly indicated there will be no effort to port it to
>> Python 3:
>>https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2019-April/084333.html
>
>>So it seems the time has come to remove Mailman 2 from Debian, and let
>> people migrate to Mailman 3.
>
> I thought this may be the case. I was looking at the possibility of
> whether I could build 2.1.30 even if it was to go in backports until the
> eventual removal of the package on the next Debian version, but would this
> removal cause problems for this?

This is indeed not possible, because Backports requires package versions
to come from testing and mailman is already no longer in testing.

Continued support for any mailman 2.x packages needs to be outside of the
Debian archive since Debian will have removed Python 2 both from stable
and testing/unstable starting from the next release.


Cheers,
Thijs

Cheers,
Thijs



Bug#958352: marked as done (xfig: autopkgtest needs update for new version of debhelper: hidden problem)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:35:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#958352: fixed in xfig 1:3.2.7b-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #958352,
regarding xfig: autopkgtest needs update for new version of debhelper: hidden 
problem
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
958352: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958352
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xfig
Version: 1:3.2.7b-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, debhel...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:debhelper

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of debhelper the autopkgtest of xfig fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
debhelper from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
testing. In tabular form:

   passfail
debhelper  from testing13
xfig   from testing1:3.2.7b-2
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. I don't spot
anything in there, you may want to avoid redirecting to /dev/null during
testing.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of debhelper to
testing [1]. Of course, debhelper shouldn't just break your autopkgtest
(or even worse, your package), but it seems to me that the change in
debhelper was intended and your package needs to update to the new
situation.

If this is a real problem in your package (and not only in your
autopkgtest), the right binary package(s) from debhelper should really
add a versioned Breaks on the unfixed version of (one of your)
package(s). Note: the Breaks is nice even if the issue is only in the
autopkgtest as it helps the migration software to figure out the right
versions to combine in the tests.

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=debhelper

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/x/xfig/5068355/log.gz

autopkgtest [01:32:00]: test xfig-testsuite: [---
Running autoconf
Running dh_auto_configure
Building required test programs
Running testsuite
/bin/bash './testsuite' AUTOTEST_PATH='/usr/bin'
## --- ##
## xfig 3.2.7b test suite. ##
## --- ##

Rudimentary tests

  1: Report version  ok
  2: Validate desktop file   ok

Integration tests

  3: ignore too many comment lines, ticket #47   ok

Unit tests

  4: Allow coordinates equal to INT_MIN  FAILED
(testsuite.at:82)
  5: Test round_coords() FAILED
(testsuite.at:87)

## - ##
## Test results. ##
## - ##

ERROR: All 5 tests were run,
2 failed unexpectedly.
## -- ##
## testsuite.log was created. ##
## -- ##

Please send `tests/testsuite.log' and all information you think might help:

   To: 
   Subject: [xfig 3.2.7b] testsuite: 4 5 failed

You may investigate any problem if you feel able to do so, in which
case the test suite provides a good starting point.  Its output may
be found below `tests/testsuite.dir'.

make: *** [Makefile:618: installcheck-local] Error 1
autopkgtest [01:32:05]: test xfig-testsuite: ---]
autopkgtest [01:32:05]: test xfig-testsuite:  - - - - - - - - - -
results - - - - - - - - - -
xfig-testsuite   FAIL stderr: ERROR: All 5 tests were run,



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xfig
Source-Version: 1:3.2.7b-3
Done: Roland Rosenfeld 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 958...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roland Rosenfeld  (supplier of updated xfig package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

Bug#958415: src:mir-core: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2020-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: mir-core
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.0.2-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync

Dear maintainer(s),

As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as
having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:mir-core in
its current version in unstable has been trying to migrate for 60 days
[2]. Hence, I am filing this bug.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult.
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or
its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that
hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if
that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bullseye, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=mir-core




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: src:mir-core: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> close -1 1.0.2-1
Bug #958415 [src:mir-core] src:mir-core: fails to migrate to testing for too 
long
Marked as fixed in versions mir-core/1.0.2-1.
Bug #958415 [src:mir-core] src:mir-core: fails to migrate to testing for too 
long
Marked Bug as done

-- 
958415: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: fixed 948215 in 3.8.3+dfsg-7

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 948215 3.8.3+dfsg-7
Bug #948215 [jekyll] FTBFS after ruby-i18n has been updated to version 1.x
Marked as fixed in versions jekyll/3.8.3+dfsg-7.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
948215: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948215
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#925754: Fixed in newer release of libopenshot / libopenshot-audio

2020-04-21 Thread John Scott
Control: block 925754 by 925755
Control: notforwarded 925754
Control: forwarded 925755 
https://github.com/OpenShot/libopenshot-audio/issues/33

Hi,

> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:08:55 +0100 Matthias Klose  wrote:
> > libopenshot-audio 0.1.8 still fails to build
> 
> Quite right, sorry. libopenshot-audio-0.1.8 fixed building with GCC *less
> than* 9,
> but GCC9 coming along broke it again.
> 
> On Fedora / RPM Fusion we were building with commit 7001b68[1],
> which was at the time an unreleased commit on the development branch.
> 
> However, since then both 0.1.9 and 0.2.0 have been released,
> including fixes to build with GCC 9 and 10 respectively, IIRC.
> (I know 0.2.0 builds with GCC 10 for sure, since I've done it myself.)
> 
> Current releases:
> 
> libopenshot-audio-0.2.0:
> https://github.com/OpenShot/libopenshot-audio/archive/v0.2.0.tar.gz
> 
> libopenshot-0.2.5:
> https://github.com/OpenShot/libopenshot/archive/v0.2.5.tar.gz
> 
> OpenShot 2.5.1 (openshot-qt):
> https://github.com/OpenShot/openshot-qt/archive/v2.5.1.tar.gz
> 
> 
> [1]:
> https://github.com/OpenShot/libopenshot-audio/commit/7001b68787c0881a44bcafba98cccae509a31644

libopenshot-audio builds with Clang without any modifications. Using this
OpenShot (again with Clang) gets a bit farther:
/usr/include/libopenshot-audio/JuceLibraryCode/modules/juce_audio_basics/../juce_core/unit_tests/juce_UnitTest.h:73:17:
 note: candidate found by name lookup is 'juce::UnitTest'
class JUCE_API  UnitTest
^
/<>/tests/Cache_Tests.cpp:50:2: error: reference to 'UnitTest' is 
ambiguous

I've seen this is fixed in a commit upstream, and I think cherrypicking it
helped, but the -audio Debian package uses the Juce embedded code copies
instead of the ones in juce-modules-source as best as I can tell.

I'm uneasy about this and hope that a new release of OpenShot made with the
practices described in /usr/share/doc/juce-modules-source/README.Debian will
make an elegant solution.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#952181: marked as done (pkg-config: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:03:39 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#952181: fixed in pkg-config 0.29.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952181,
regarding pkg-config: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 
returned exit code 2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
952181: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952181
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pkg-config
Version: 0.29-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/check'
> PASS: check-cflags
> PASS: check-libs
> PASS: check-mixed-flags
> PASS: check-non-l-flags
> PASS: check-define-variable
> PASS: check-libs-private
> PASS: check-requires-private
> PASS: check-circular-requires
> PASS: check-includedir
> PASS: check-conflicts
> PASS: check-missing
> PASS: check-special-flags
> PASS: check-sort-order
> PASS: check-duplicate-flags
> PASS: check-whitespace
> PASS: check-cmd-options
> PASS: check-version
> PASS: check-requires-version
> ../pkg-config --list-all :
> 'sub1   Subdirectory package 1 - Test package 1 for subdirectory
> broken Broken package - Module with broken .pc file
> sub2   Subdirectory package 2 - Test package 2 for subdirectory' != 'sub1   
> Subdirectory package 1 - Test package 1 for subdirectory
> sub2   Subdirectory package 2 - Test package 2 for subdirectory
> broken Broken package - Module with broken .pc file'
> FAIL: check-print-options
> PASS: check-path
> PASS: check-sysroot
> PASS: check-uninstalled
> PASS: check-debug
> PASS: check-gtk
> PASS: check-tilde
> PASS: check-relocatable
> ==
> 1 of 26 tests failed
> Please report to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=pkg-config
> ==
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:427: check-TESTS] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/<>/check'
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:553: check-am] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/<>/check'
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:706: check-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
> dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/02/22/pkg-config_0.29-6_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pkg-config
Source-Version: 0.29.2-1
Done: Tollef Fog Heen 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pkg-config, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 952...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Tollef Fog Heen  (supplier of updated pkg-config package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 20:30:00 +0200
Source: pkg-config
Architecture: source
Version: 0.29.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen 
Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen 
Closes: 732797 922173 952181
Changes:
 pkg-config (0.29.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version.  Closes: #922173
 - Fixes pkg.m4 output to report the modules that were missing.
   Closes: #732797
   * Import patch from Philip Withnall  to make
 print_package_list()'s output deterministic, to avoid breaking
 check/check-print-options.  Closes: #952181.
Checksums-Sha1:
 dfa5b25d36c315477b78c19ceeb71ff6a6406625 1771 pkg-config_0.29.2-1.dsc
 76e501663b29cb7580245720edfb6106164fad2b 2016830 pkg-config_0.29.2.orig.tar.gz
 8f864494b36ce23977e34d75336f2bff067dfb5b 9202 pkg-config_0.29.2-1.dif

Processed: src:olive-editor: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> close -1 20200210-1
Bug #958416 [src:olive-editor] src:olive-editor: fails to migrate to testing 
for too long
Marked as fixed in versions olive-editor/20200210-1.
Bug #958416 [src:olive-editor] src:olive-editor: fails to migrate to testing 
for too long
Marked Bug as done
> block -1 by 950564
Bug #958416 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:olive-editor] 
src:olive-editor: fails to migrate to testing for too long
958416 was not blocked by any bugs.
958416 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 958416: 950564

-- 
958416: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958416
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: Fixed in newer release of libopenshot / libopenshot-audio

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> block 925754 by 925755
Bug #925754 [src:libopenshot] libopenshot: ftbfs with GCC-9
925754 was blocked by: 925723 925755
925754 was not blocking any bugs.
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #925754 to the same blocks 
previously set
> notforwarded 925754
Bug #925754 [src:libopenshot] libopenshot: ftbfs with GCC-9
Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#925754 to the same 
value
> forwarded 925755 https://github.com/OpenShot/libopenshot-audio/issues/33
Bug #925755 [src:libopenshot-audio] libopenshot-audio: ftbfs with GCC-9
Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#925755 to the same 
value

-- 
925754: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925754
925755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925755
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#958416: src:olive-editor: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2020-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: olive-editor
Version: 2019-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 20200210-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 950564

Dear maintainer(s),

As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as
having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:olive-editor
in its current version in unstable has been trying to migrate for 60
days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult.
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or
its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that
hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if
that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bullseye, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=olive-editor




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: Re: Fixed in newer release of libopenshot / libopenshot-audio

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> block 925754 by 925755
Bug #925754 [src:libopenshot] libopenshot: ftbfs with GCC-9
925754 was blocked by: 925723
925754 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 925754: 925755
> notforwarded 925754
Bug #925754 [src:libopenshot] libopenshot: ftbfs with GCC-9
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
> forwarded 925755 https://github.com/OpenShot/libopenshot-audio/issues/33
Bug #925755 [src:libopenshot-audio] libopenshot-audio: ftbfs with GCC-9
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://github.com/OpenShot/libopenshot-audio/issues/33'.

-- 
925754: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925754
925755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925755
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: swi-prolog breaks eye autopkgtest: Failed 7/15 subtests

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> found -1 swi-prolog/8.1.28+dfsg-1
Bug #958419 [src:swi-prolog, src:eye] swi-prolog breaks eye autopkgtest: Failed 
7/15 subtests
Marked as found in versions swi-prolog/8.1.28+dfsg-1.
> found -1 eye/19.0928.2249~ds-1
Bug #958419 [src:swi-prolog, src:eye] swi-prolog breaks eye autopkgtest: Failed 
7/15 subtests
Marked as found in versions eye/19.0928.2249~ds-1.

-- 
958419: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958419
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#958419: swi-prolog breaks eye autopkgtest: Failed 7/15 subtests

2020-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: swi-prolog, eye
Control: found -1 swi-prolog/8.1.28+dfsg-1
Control: found -1 eye/19.0928.2249~ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of swi-prolog the autopkgtest of eye fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
swi-prolog from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
testing. In tabular form:

   passfail
swi-prolog from testing8.1.28+dfsg-1
eyefrom testing19.0928.2249~ds-1
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of swi-prolog to
testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report
against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=swi-prolog

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/e/eye/5057663/log.gz

autopkgtest [05:57:12]: test command1: prove debian/tests/*.t
autopkgtest [05:57:12]: test command1: [---

#   Failed test 'Process terminated without a signal'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 9.
#  got: '6'
# expected: '0'

#   Failed test 'bare command, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 11.
#   '[FATAL ERROR: at Sun Apr 19 05:57:12 2020
#   /usr/bin/eye.pvm: incompatible version (file: 66, Prolog: 67)]
# '
# doesn't match '(?^:Usage: eye.pvm)'

#   Failed test 'Process terminated without a signal'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 13.
#  got: '6'
# expected: '0'

#   Failed test 'help, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 15.
#   '[FATAL ERROR: at Sun Apr 19 05:57:12 2020
#   /usr/bin/eye.pvm: incompatible version (file: 66, Prolog: 67)]
# '
# doesn't match '(?^:Usage: eye.pvm)'

#   Failed test 'Process terminated without a signal'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 17.
#  got: '6'
# expected: '0'

#   Failed test 'help, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 18.
#   ''
# doesn't match '(?^:r:because)'

#   Failed test 'help, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 19.
#   '[FATAL ERROR: at Sun Apr 19 05:57:12 2020
#   /usr/bin/eye.pvm: incompatible version (file: 66, Prolog: 67)]
# '
# doesn't match '(?^s:starting .*\nGET .*\nnetworking .*\nreasoning)'
# Looks like you failed 7 tests of 15.
debian/tests/eye.pvm.t ..
Dubious, test returned 7 (wstat 1792, 0x700)
Failed 7/15 subtests

Test Summary Report
---
debian/tests/eye.pvm.t (Wstat: 1792 Tests: 15 Failed: 7)
  Failed tests:  2, 5, 7, 10, 12, 14-15
  Non-zero exit status: 7
Files=1, Tests=15,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr  0.00 sys +  0.06 cusr
0.01 csys =  0.10 CPU)
Result: FAIL
autopkgtest [05:57:13]: test command1: ---]



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#958421: node-cli-boxes breaks node-boxen autopkgtest: TypeError: Invalid border style: single-double

2020-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: node-cli-boxes, node-boxen
Control: found -1 node-cli-boxes/2.2.0-2
Control: found -1 node-boxen/1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of node-cli-boxes the autopkgtest of node-boxen
fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
of node-cli-boxes from unstable. It passes when run with only packages
from testing. In tabular form:

   passfail
node-cli-boxes from testing2.2.0-2
node-boxen from testing1.3.0-1
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. As the
autopkgtest succeeds in unstable and node-boxen is blocked by the
migration of node-cli-boxen, I strongly believe that a *versioned*
(test) dependency and/or breaks is missing somewhere. If node-cli-boxes
really breaks node-boxen 1.3.0-1, it should add a versioned breaks.
After that, the migration software will test the combination from
unstable for the migration.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of node-cli-boxes to
testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report
against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=node-cli-boxes

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/node-boxen/5068858/log.gz

/usr/share/nodejs/boxen/index.js:48
throw new TypeError(`Invalid border style: 
${borderStyle}`);
^

TypeError: Invalid border style: single-double
at getBorderChars (/usr/share/nodejs/boxen/index.js:48:10)
at module.exports (/usr/share/nodejs/boxen/index.js:86:16)
at Test.t
(/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.ytsynf20/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/smokeAc3ms5/test.js:196:13)
at Test.bound [as _cb] (/usr/lib/nodejs/tape/lib/test.js:87:32)
at Test.run (/usr/lib/nodejs/tape/lib/test.js:106:10)
at Test.bound [as run] (/usr/lib/nodejs/tape/lib/test.js:87:32)
at Immediate.next (/usr/lib/nodejs/tape/lib/results.js:71:15)
at runCallback (timers.js:705:18)
at tryOnImmediate (timers.js:676:5)
at processImmediate (timers.js:658:5)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: node-cli-boxes breaks node-boxen autopkgtest: TypeError: Invalid border style: single-double

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> found -1 node-cli-boxes/2.2.0-2
Bug #958421 [src:node-cli-boxes, src:node-boxen] node-cli-boxes breaks 
node-boxen autopkgtest: TypeError: Invalid border style: single-double
Marked as found in versions node-cli-boxes/2.2.0-2.
> found -1 node-boxen/1.3.0-1
Bug #958421 [src:node-cli-boxes, src:node-boxen] node-cli-boxes breaks 
node-boxen autopkgtest: TypeError: Invalid border style: single-double
Marked as found in versions node-boxen/1.3.0-1.

-- 
958421: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958421
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#956842: printrun: FTBFS with python 3.8

2020-04-21 Thread Arnaldo Pirrone

Hi,
I need that package too, but it won't install right now.
Please consider fixing it.



Bug#958423: php-defaults breaks php-codecoverage autopkgtest: Class 'DOMDocument' not found

2020-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: php-defaults, php-codecoverage
Control: found -1 php-defaults/75
Control: found -1 php-codecoverage/7.0.10+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of php-defaults the autopkgtest of php-codecoverage
fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
of php-defaults from unstable. It passes when run with only packages
from testing. In tabular form:

   passfail
php-defaults   from testing75
php-codecoverage   from testing7.0.10+dfsg-1
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. The
autopkgtest passes in unstable, so it seems that php-defaults needs to
migrate together with some other package at the same time, but there's
no package relation in place to force that. I reported a similar error
message in bug #953727, but that was re-assigned to xdebug.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of php-defaults to
testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report
against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=php-defaults

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/php-codecoverage/5030079/log.gz

autopkgtest [14:13:53]: test command1: mkdir --parents vendor ; cp
debian/autoload.php vendor ; phpunit
autopkgtest [14:13:53]: test command1: [---
Class 'DOMDocument' not found
autopkgtest [14:13:54]: test command1: ---]



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: php-defaults breaks php-codecoverage autopkgtest: Class 'DOMDocument' not found

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> found -1 php-defaults/75
Bug #958423 [src:php-defaults, src:php-codecoverage] php-defaults breaks 
php-codecoverage autopkgtest: Class 'DOMDocument' not found
Marked as found in versions php-defaults/75.
> found -1 php-codecoverage/7.0.10+dfsg-1
Bug #958423 [src:php-defaults, src:php-codecoverage] php-defaults breaks 
php-codecoverage autopkgtest: Class 'DOMDocument' not found
Marked as found in versions php-codecoverage/7.0.10+dfsg-1.

-- 
958423: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958423
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: php-defaults breaks php-sabredav autopkgtest: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> found -1 php-defaults/75
Bug #958424 [src:php-defaults, src:php-sabredav] php-defaults breaks 
php-sabredav autopkgtest: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool
Marked as found in versions php-defaults/75.
> found -1 php-sabredav/1.8.12-8
Bug #958424 [src:php-defaults, src:php-sabredav] php-defaults breaks 
php-sabredav autopkgtest: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool
Marked as found in versions php-sabredav/1.8.12-8.

-- 
958424: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958424
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#958424: php-defaults breaks php-sabredav autopkgtest: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool

2020-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: php-defaults, php-sabredav
Control: found -1 php-defaults/75
Control: found -1 php-sabredav/1.8.12-8
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of php-defaults the autopkgtest of php-sabredav
fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
of php-defaults from unstable. It passes when run with only packages
from testing. In tabular form:

   passfail
php-defaults   from testing75
php-sabredav   from testing1.8.12-8
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of php-defaults to
testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report
against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=php-defaults

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/php-sabredav/5082295/log.gz

There were 2 errors:

1) Sabre\DAV\Auth\Backend\AbstractDigestTest::testAuthenticateNoHeaders
Trying to access array offset on value of type bool

/usr/share/php/Sabre/HTTP/DigestAuth.php:125
/usr/share/php/Sabre/DAV/Auth/Backend/AbstractDigest.php:61
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.r33sttz0/downtmp/build.m2T/src/tests/Sabre/DAV/Auth/Backend/AbstractDigestTest.php:22

2) Sabre\HTTP\DigestAuthTest::testInvalidDigest2
Trying to access array offset on value of type bool

/usr/share/php/Sabre/HTTP/DigestAuth.php:136
/usr/share/php/Sabre/HTTP/DigestAuth.php:100
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.r33sttz0/downtmp/build.m2T/src/tests/Sabre/HTTP/DigestAuthTest.php:164



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: Re: adios: FTBFS (error: could not find mpi library for Fortran)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #955715 [src:adios] adios: FTBFS (error: could not find mpi library for 
Fortran)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

-- 
955715: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955715
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: closing 953697

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> close 953697
Bug #953697 [src:rust-derive-more] src:rust-derive-more: fails to migrate to 
testing for too long
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
953697: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953697
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#937144: Bug#937769: getting python-linecache2/python-traceback2 fixes into testing (FAO traceback2, funcsigs nipype and numba maintainers).

2020-04-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 4/20/20 2:51 PM, peter green wrote:
> On 20/04/2020 08:57, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Option 1: fix all four packages to be python 2 free.
>>>
>>> Option 2: Remove python2 stuff from traceback2, python-funcsigs and
>>> numba. Break the dependencies of nipype in sid.
>>>
>>> Option 3: Remove python2 stuff from traceback2, modify python-funcsigs
>>> so it still builds the python2 package but does not run tests with
>>> python 2.
>> Funcsigs is a backport of the PEP 362 function signature features from
>> Python 3.3's inspect module.
> Thanks for the info.
>> Python 2 has never been removed from this
>> package. Though instead, we shall remove this source package entirely
>> from Debian.
> # Broken Depends:
> nipype: python-nipype
> pytest: pypy-pytest
> python-logfury: python3-logfury
> python-oslo.utils: python3-oslo.utils
> 
> # Broken Build-Depends:
> beaker: python3-funcsigs
> kombu: python3-funcsigs
> nipype: python-funcsigs
> pagure: python3-funcsigs
> pytest: pypy-funcsigs
> python-oslo.log: python3-funcsigs
> python-oslo.utils: python3-funcsigs (>= 0.4)
> ripe-atlas-cousteau: python3-funcsigs

You can remove all of the python-oslo* from the list. The versions in
Experimental, which are the next version of OpenStack, are fixed. In 2
weeks of time, I'll upload all what I staged in Experimental to Sid
(maybe 150 packages?) and that's going to fix it all.

For the others, probably I should start filling bugs...

> If what you say is correct then it sounds like the python3-funcsigs
> revese depedencies could be dealt with fairly easily.
> 
> But that still leaves the question of what to do about the dependency of
> pytest on pypy-funcsigs ? should pypy modules be removed from pytest and
> it's reverse-dependencies in the same way that regular python2 modules
> were? how feasible is that? are pypy-* packages only useful with python2
> pypy or are they also useful with python3 pypy?

I really don't know about pypy. Probably the pypy-pytest should indeed
go away, as the initial plan was to switch to pypy3. Maybe tumbleweed
(Stefano Rivera) would be able to answer. I'm adding him as Cc.

>> Traceback2 *already* has Python 2 support removed in Sid. I uploaded
>> this on the 21st of march, pressured by its potential autoremoval.
> 
> Sorry it seems I got my package names mixed up when writing the list of
> options. I said traceback2 where I meant unittest2.

So, if I'm following correctly, what you seem to propose, is to remove
Python 2 from unittest2. If that's the case, then I agree with such a
plan. I just didn't dare to do it yet.

Though in fact, I already worked on that, but stopped, also because
unittest2 FTBFS when I try building it on my laptop. So I've pushed it
in its normal Git repo [1] under a py2-removal branch. If anyone has
some time available to look at it, that'd be nice (I currently don't...).

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/unittest2/



Bug#925755: Fixed in newer release of libopenshot / libopenshot-audio

2020-04-21 Thread FeRD
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:04:59 -0400 John Scott  wrote:
>
> libopenshot-audio builds with Clang without any modifications. Using this
> OpenShot (again with Clang) gets a bit farther:
>
/usr/include/libopenshot-audio/JuceLibraryCode/modules/juce_audio_basics/../juce_core/unit_tests/juce_UnitTest.h:73:17:
note: candidate found by name lookup is 'juce::UnitTest'
> class JUCE_API  UnitTest
> ^
> /<>/tests/Cache_Tests.cpp:50:2: error: reference to
'UnitTest' is ambiguous
>
> I've seen this is fixed in a commit upstream, and I think cherrypicking it
> helped, but the -audio Debian package uses the Juce embedded code copies
> instead of the ones in juce-modules-source as best as I can tell.

What version of libopenshot is that result from? The Clang namespacing was
fixed
with the merge of 2a1fe80[1] on 2019-10-29, and would be included in both
libopenshot-0.2.4 and libopenshot-0.2.5.

That's a merge commit and it touches a bunch of files, but basically all of
our headers now qualify juce symbols with the juce:: namespace prefix,  and
the test sources now #define DONT_SET_USING_JUCE_NAMESPACE
which prevents JUCE from exporting its symbols into the global namespace.

AFAICT that's the only way to prevent UnitTest++ and JUCE from clashing
over ambiguous 'UnitTest' symbols. But all this should have been solved
months ago.

> I'm uneasy about this and hope that a new release of OpenShot made with
the
> practices described in /usr/share/doc/juce-modules-source/README.Debian
will
> make an elegant solution.

Is there a copy of that file online somewhere? It's not part of the JUCE
distribution as far as I can tell, and it's definitely not located at that
path
on my Fedora machine.

[1]: https://github.com/OpenShot/libopenshot/commit/2a1fe80


Bug#937144: Bug#937769: getting python-linecache2/python-traceback2 fixes into testing (FAO traceback2, funcsigs nipype and numba maintainers).

2020-04-21 Thread stefanor
Hi Thomas (2020.04.21_21:20:16_+)
> > But that still leaves the question of what to do about the dependency of
> > pytest on pypy-funcsigs ? should pypy modules be removed from pytest and
> > it's reverse-dependencies in the same way that regular python2 modules
> > were? how feasible is that? are pypy-* packages only useful with python2
> > pypy or are they also useful with python3 pypy?

Pretty much, yes.

pypy itself (the python 2.7 pypy) will continue to exist for the
foreseeable future, to support building pypy3. But we don't need to ship
modules for it. I'd be pretty happy if we had working virtualenv, and
nothing else.

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272



Bug#954594: marked as done (golang-github-inconshreveable-log15: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/inconshreveable/log15 github.com/inconshreve

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:35:46 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#954594: fixed in golang-github-inconshreveable-log15 2.15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #954594,
regarding golang-github-inconshreveable-log15: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd 
obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 
github.com/inconshreveable/log15 github.com/inconshreveable/log15/ext 
github.com/inconshreveable/log15/term returned exit code 1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
954594: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954594
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: golang-github-inconshreveable-log15
Version: 2.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200321 ftbfs-bullseye

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
>  debian/rules build
> dh build --buildsystem=golang --with=golang
>dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=golang
>dh_autoreconf -O--buildsystem=golang
>dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=golang
>dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=golang
>   cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go install -trimpath -v -p 4 
> github.com/inconshreveable/log15 github.com/inconshreveable/log15/ext 
> github.com/inconshreveable/log15/term
> internal/race
> runtime/internal/sys
> runtime/internal/atomic
> internal/cpu
> sync/atomic
> runtime/internal/math
> unicode
> internal/bytealg
> unicode/utf8
> encoding
> math/bits
> internal/testlog
> unicode/utf16
> math
> internal/nettrace
> runtime/cgo
> runtime
> internal/reflectlite
> sync
> internal/singleflight
> math/rand
> errors
> sort
> io
> strconv
> internal/oserror
> vendor/golang.org/x/net/dns/dnsmessage
> syscall
> bytes
> reflect
> strings
> internal/syscall/unix
> time
> github.com/inconshreveable/log15/term
> context
> internal/poll
> internal/fmtsort
> encoding/binary
> os
> encoding/base64
> golang.org/x/sys/unix
> fmt
> net
> github.com/go-stack/stack
> encoding/json
> github.com/mattn/go-isatty
> log
> github.com/mattn/go-colorable
> log/syslog
> github.com/inconshreveable/log15
> github.com/inconshreveable/log15/ext
>dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=golang
>   cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 
> github.com/inconshreveable/log15 github.com/inconshreveable/log15/ext 
> github.com/inconshreveable/log15/term
> === RUN   TestLazy
> === PAUSE TestLazy
> === RUN   TestInvalidLazy
> === PAUSE TestInvalidLazy
> === RUN   TestCtx
> === PAUSE TestCtx
> === RUN   TestJson
> === PAUSE TestJson
> === RUN   TestJSONMap
> --- PASS: TestJSONMap (0.00s)
> === RUN   TestLogfmt
> === PAUSE TestLogfmt
> === RUN   TestMultiHandler
> === PAUSE TestMultiHandler
> === RUN   TestBufferedHandler
> === PAUSE TestBufferedHandler
> === RUN   TestLogContext
> === PAUSE TestLogContext
> === RUN   TestMapCtx
> === PAUSE TestMapCtx
> === RUN   TestLvlFilterHandler
> === PAUSE TestLvlFilterHandler
> === RUN   TestNetHandler
> === PAUSE TestNetHandler
> === RUN   TestMatchFilterHandler
> === PAUSE TestMatchFilterHandler
> === RUN   TestMatchFilterBuiltin
> === PAUSE TestMatchFilterBuiltin
> === RUN   TestFailoverHandler
> === PAUSE TestFailoverHandler
> === RUN   TestIndependentSetHandler
> === PAUSE TestIndependentSetHandler
> === RUN   TestInheritHandler
> === PAUSE TestInheritHandler
> === RUN   TestCallerFileHandler
> === PAUSE TestCallerFileHandler
> === RUN   TestCallerFuncHandler
> === PAUSE TestCallerFuncHandler
> === RUN   TestCallerStackHandler
> === PAUSE TestCallerStackHandler
> === RUN   TestConcurrent
> --- PASS: TestConcurrent (0.05s)
> === CONT  TestLazy
> --- PASS: TestLazy (0.00s)
> === CONT  TestCallerStackHandler
> TestCallerStackHandler: log15_test.go:555: Wrong context value, got 
> [/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/github.com/inconshreveable/log15/log15_test.go:523
>  
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/github.com/inconshreveable/log15/log15_test.go:526
>  /usr/lib/go-1.14/src/testing/testing.go:992 
> /usr/lib/go-1.14/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:1373] expected string matching 
> [/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/github.com/inconshreveable/log15/log15_test.go:523
>  
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/github.com/inconshreveable/log15/log15_test.go:526]
> === CONT  TestLvlFilterHandler
> === CONT  TestIndependentSetHandler
> --- PASS: TestIndependentSetHandler (0.00s)
> === CONT  TestMatchFilterBuiltin
> --- FAIL: TestCallerStackHandler (0.00s)
> === CONT  TestMatchFilterHandler
> --- PASS: TestMatchFilterBuiltin (0.00s)
> === CONT  TestNetHandler
> === CONT  T

Bug#955068: marked as done (skimage: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: dh_sphinxdoc: error: debian/python-skimage-doc/usr/share/doc/python-skimage-doc/html/./../dev/_static/docversions.js is missing)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:41:05 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#955068: fixed in skimage 0.16.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #955068,
regarding skimage: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: dh_sphinxdoc: error: 
debian/python-skimage-doc/usr/share/doc/python-skimage-doc/html/./../dev/_static/docversions.js
 is missing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
955068: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955068
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: skimage
Version: 0.16.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx2.4

Hi,

skimage fails to build with Sphinx 2.4, currently available in
experimental.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>/doc'
> python3.8 tools/build_modref_templates.py
> /<>/doc/tools/apigen.py:205: UserWarning: Viewer requires Qt
>   mod = __import__(uri, fromlist=[uri.split('.')[-1]])
> WARNING: Empty - skimage.external
> WARNING: Empty - skimage.scripts
> outdir:  
> 27 files written
> Build API docs...done.
> Copying release notes
> python3.8 -m sphinx -b html -d build/doctrees  -D mathjax_path=MathJax.js 
> source build/html
> Running Sphinx v2.4.3
> Adding copy buttons to code blocks...
> making output directory... done
> [autosummary] generating autosummary for: api/api.rst, api/skimage.color.rst, 
> api/skimage.data.rst, api/skimage.draw.rst, api/skimage.exposure.rst, 
> api/skimage.external.tifffile.rst, api/skimage.feature.rst, 
> api/skimage.filters.rank.rst, api/skimage.filters.rst, 
> api/skimage.future.graph.rst, ..., user_guide/getting_started.rst, 
> user_guide/numpy_images.rst, user_guide/plugins.rst, 
> user_guide/transforming_image_data.rst, 
> user_guide/tutorial_parallelization.rst, 
> user_guide/tutorial_segmentation.rst, user_guide/tutorials.rst, 
> user_guide/video.rst, user_guide/viewer.rst, values.rst
> loading intersphinx inventory from 
> /usr/share/doc/python3.7/html/objects.inv...
> loading intersphinx inventory from ./_intersphinx/numpy-objects.inv...
> /usr/lib/python3.8/importlib/__init__.py:127: UserWarning: Viewer requires Qt
>   return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
> WARNING: failed to reach any of the inventories with the following issues:
> intersphinx inventory '/usr/share/doc/python3.7/html/objects.inv' not 
> fetchable due to : [Errno 2] No such file or 
> directory: '/usr/share/doc/python3.7/html/objects.inv'
> loading intersphinx inventory from ./_intersphinx/scipy-objects.inv...
> loading intersphinx inventory from ./_intersphinx/sklearn-objects.inv...
> loading intersphinx inventory from 
> /usr/share/doc/python-matplotlib-doc/html/objects.inv...
> generating gallery...
> generating gallery for auto_examples/data... [ 33%] plot_specific.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/data... [ 66%] plot_scientific.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/data... [100%] plot_general.py
> 
> generating gallery for auto_examples/numpy_operations... [ 50%] 
> plot_camera_numpy.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/numpy_operations... [100%] 
> plot_view_as_blocks.py
> 
> generating gallery for auto_examples/color_exposure... [ 10%] 
> plot_rgb_to_gray.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/color_exposure... [ 20%] 
> plot_rgb_to_hsv.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/color_exposure... [ 30%] 
> plot_histogram_matching.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/color_exposure... [ 40%] 
> plot_ihc_color_separation.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/color_exposure... [ 50%] 
> plot_adapt_rgb.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/color_exposure... [ 60%] 
> plot_regional_maxima.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/color_exposure... [ 70%] 
> plot_local_equalize.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/color_exposure... [ 80%] 
> plot_log_gamma.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/color_exposure... [ 90%] plot_equalize.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/color_exposure... [100%] 
> plot_tinting_grayscale_images.py
> 
> generating gallery for auto_examples/edges... [  7%] plot_contours.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/edges... [ 15%] plot_convex_hull.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/edges... [ 23%] plot_canny.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/edges... [ 30%] plot_marching_cubes.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/edges... [ 38%] plot_ridge_filter.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/edges... [ 46%] plot_active_contours.py
> generating gallery for auto_examples/edges... [ 53%] plot_shapes.py
> generating gall

Bug#955097: marked as done (yade: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: latex error)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:43:02 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#955097: fixed in yade 2020.01a-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #955097,
regarding yade: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: latex error
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
955097: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955097
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: yade
Version: 2020.01a-6
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx2.4

Hi,

yade fails to build with Sphinx 2.4, currently available in
experimental.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/debian/build'
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'preinstall'.
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/<>/debian/build'
> Install the project...
> /usr/bin/cmake -P cmake_install.cmake
> -- Install configuration: "None"
> -- Installing: /<>/debian/tmp/usr/bin/yade-batch
> -- Installing: /<>/debian/tmp/usr/bin/yade
> CMake Error: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/yade.py': permission 
> denied
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/config.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/libVersions.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/__init__.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/DEM-PFV-check.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkAvoidSelfInteractionMask.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkBlockGen.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkCapillaryModels.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkClumpHopper.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkColliderConstantness.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkColliderCorrectness.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkDEM-PFVPressureInjection.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkGravity.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkJCFpm.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkLiquidMigration.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkList.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkLubrication.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkLubricationWithRoughness.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkMPI.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkPolyhedraCrush.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkPotentialBlocks.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkPotentialParticles.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkSaveLoadClumps.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkTestDummy.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkTestTriax.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkViscElEng.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkViscElPM.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkViscElPM2.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkWeight.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/checkWirePM.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/checks/check_TwoPhaseFlowEngine_PressureInjection.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/gui/testGui.sh
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/gui/testGuiEmpty.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/yade/py/yade/tests/gui/testGuiSimple.py
> -- Installing: 
> /<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-g

Bug#958419: marked as done (swi-prolog breaks eye autopkgtest: Failed 7/15 subtests)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:48:42 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#958419: fixed in eye 20.0411.2226~ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #958419,
regarding swi-prolog breaks eye autopkgtest: Failed 7/15 subtests
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
958419: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958419
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: swi-prolog, eye
Control: found -1 swi-prolog/8.1.28+dfsg-1
Control: found -1 eye/19.0928.2249~ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of swi-prolog the autopkgtest of eye fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
swi-prolog from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
testing. In tabular form:

   passfail
swi-prolog from testing8.1.28+dfsg-1
eyefrom testing19.0928.2249~ds-1
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of swi-prolog to
testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report
against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=swi-prolog

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/e/eye/5057663/log.gz

autopkgtest [05:57:12]: test command1: prove debian/tests/*.t
autopkgtest [05:57:12]: test command1: [---

#   Failed test 'Process terminated without a signal'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 9.
#  got: '6'
# expected: '0'

#   Failed test 'bare command, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 11.
#   '[FATAL ERROR: at Sun Apr 19 05:57:12 2020
#   /usr/bin/eye.pvm: incompatible version (file: 66, Prolog: 67)]
# '
# doesn't match '(?^:Usage: eye.pvm)'

#   Failed test 'Process terminated without a signal'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 13.
#  got: '6'
# expected: '0'

#   Failed test 'help, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 15.
#   '[FATAL ERROR: at Sun Apr 19 05:57:12 2020
#   /usr/bin/eye.pvm: incompatible version (file: 66, Prolog: 67)]
# '
# doesn't match '(?^:Usage: eye.pvm)'

#   Failed test 'Process terminated without a signal'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 17.
#  got: '6'
# expected: '0'

#   Failed test 'help, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 18.
#   ''
# doesn't match '(?^:r:because)'

#   Failed test 'help, stderr'
#   at debian/tests/eye.pvm.t line 19.
#   '[FATAL ERROR: at Sun Apr 19 05:57:12 2020
#   /usr/bin/eye.pvm: incompatible version (file: 66, Prolog: 67)]
# '
# doesn't match '(?^s:starting .*\nGET .*\nnetworking .*\nreasoning)'
# Looks like you failed 7 tests of 15.
debian/tests/eye.pvm.t ..
Dubious, test returned 7 (wstat 1792, 0x700)
Failed 7/15 subtests

Test Summary Report
---
debian/tests/eye.pvm.t (Wstat: 1792 Tests: 15 Failed: 7)
  Failed tests:  2, 5, 7, 10, 12, 14-15
  Non-zero exit status: 7
Files=1, Tests=15,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr  0.00 sys +  0.06 cusr
0.01 csys =  0.10 CPU)
Result: FAIL
autopkgtest [05:57:13]: test command1: ---]



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: eye
Source-Version: 20.0411.2226~ds-1
Done: Jonas Smedegaard 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
eye, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 958...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jonas Smedegaard  (supplier of updated eye package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2

Processed: RFS: fdkaac/1.0.0-1 [RC] -- command line encoder frontend for libfdk-aac

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> block 955248 by -1
Bug #955248 [src:fdkaac] fdkaac: FTBFS against fdk-aac 2.0.1-1
955248 was not blocked by any bugs.
955248 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 955248: 958428

-- 
955248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955248
958428: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958428
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#955248: fdkaac: diff for NMU version 1.0.0-0.1

2020-04-21 Thread Marius Gavrilescu
Håvard Flaget Aasen  writes:

> Control: tags 955248 + patch
> Control: tags 955248 + pending
>
>
> Dear maintainer,
> I've prepared an NMU for fdkaac (versioned as 1.0.0-0.1) and uploaded it
> to mentors. Please feel free to tell me if I should delete it.

Dear Håvard,

Thanks for preparing a package.
I've updated the upstream version to 1.0.0 in my git repository
and uploaded a package to mentors.

You can now delete the NMU from mentors.
-- 
Marius Gavrilescu



Processed: closing 843137

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> close 843137
Bug #843137 [sbuild] sbuild: fails to deal with sid chroots (missing gpg)
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
843137: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843137
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#958430: Vagrant libvirt image debian/buster64 version 10.3.0 grub error

2020-04-21 Thread Pascal De Vuyst
Package: cloud.debian.org
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

The libvirt image debian/buster64 version 10.3.0 fails to boot an gives grub 
error below.
No files seems to be available under /boot

Booting from Hard Disk...
error: file `/boot/grub/i386-pc/normal.mod' not found.
Entering rescue mode...
grub rescue> ls (hd0,msdos1)/boot

grub rescue> 

Thanks,
Pascal



Processed: py2removal bugs severity updates - 2020-04-21 23:51:24.549470+00:00

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2 
> from bullseye
> #  * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> #  * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # See https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/11/msg0.html
> # and https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/12/msg00076.html
> # and https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/03/msg00087.html
> # mail threads for more details on this severity update
> # python-sqlalchemy is a module and has 0 external rdeps or not in testing
> # python-sqlalchemy-ext is a module and has 0 external rdeps or not in testing
> severity 938555 serious
Bug #938555 [src:sqlalchemy] sqlalchemy: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
938555: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938555
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#885518: marked as done (lptools: Recommends unmaintained pygtk)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Apr 2020 02:33:48 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#885518: fixed in lptools 0.2.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #885518,
regarding lptools: Recommends unmaintained pygtk
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
885518: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885518
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lptools
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: serious
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: oldlibs pygtk
Tags: sid buster

pygtk is unmaintained upstream. It has not had a release since GNOME 3
was released in 2011.

The way forward is to port your app to use GObject Introspection
bindings (and gtk3).

For more information on GObject Introspection see [1] and [2].

Please try to do this before the Buster release as we're going to
try to remove pygtk this cycle.

If you have any question don't hesitate to ask.

[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GObjectIntrospection
[2] https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/PyGObject

On behalf of the Debian GNOME team,
Jeremy Bicha
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lptools
Source-Version: 0.2.0-6
Done: =?utf-8?q?Jelmer_Vernoo=C4=B3?= 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lptools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 885...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jelmer Vernooij  (supplier of updated lptools package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 01:42:55 +
Source: lptools
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Nathan Handler 
Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij 
Closes: 885518
Changes:
 lptools (0.2.0-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Drop recommends of deprecated pygtk, as well as the two scripts that
 use it: lp-review-notifier and lp-review-list. Closes: #885518
   * Update standards version to 4.5.0, no changes needed.
   * Set Bug-Database / Bug-Submit fields.
   * Set Rules-Requires-Root.
Checksums-Sha1:
 87bbcbb75e0c1be1d3948289fe9133fae0fa0d29 1926 lptools_0.2.0-6.dsc
 7b8778cf14c890b67de6e4c4ea668c5763d529ad 9048 lptools_0.2.0-6.debian.tar.xz
 76a17b41ec2d1165f8b9a763c984d658c0694516 6010 lptools_0.2.0-6_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 1358c0dfdd14d4f33f8e72a901e0a2326f781bb6fd24c612081a1837a21464c1 1926 
lptools_0.2.0-6.dsc
 c35ef03b73a20f84326eeb4ef807ff8ff5017dc12e33f5db884d39ead3f58c20 9048 
lptools_0.2.0-6.debian.tar.xz
 d98637a809e60bc22ed2cba24ccd79fa634961725b78149f58f0fd2c68bc8c42 6010 
lptools_0.2.0-6_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 684879b3b82de2c08f46250bbcd19d2c 1926 python optional lptools_0.2.0-6.dsc
 946f508d4ed0afcdfeaec7ad4e16d7ea 9048 python optional 
lptools_0.2.0-6.debian.tar.xz
 2852d301544d14ab470ae32fe93747f8 6010 python optional 
lptools_0.2.0-6_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=6L8b
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Bug#947564: marked as done (FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1)

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 23:34:00 -0400
with message-id <6d4f97f03f62a009b98f3e9ce0af66ab800a0101.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Fixed in gpick_0.2.6~rc1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #947564,
regarding FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
947564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947564
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gpick
Version:  0.2.6~rc1-1
Severity: important
Usertags: scons_ftbfs


Hello, 

in the context of the change to Python3 also Scons was revised. With
the current version 3.1.2-1 from Experimental the changeover is
finished so far. 

However, an error occurred while building your package. The build log
is attached.

Please check it and fix the error.

CU
Jörg

-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:  https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema:  SYR8SJXB
Wire: @joergfringsfuerst
Skype:joergpenguin
Ring: jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.

dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies: libdbus-glib-1-dev (>= 
0.76) libboost-dev lemon ragel libboost-test-dev libboost-system-dev 
libboost-filesystem-dev
W: Unmet build-dependency in source
dh clean
   debian/rules override_dh_clean
make[1]: Entering directory 
'/data/entwicklung/linux/debian/trans_scons/gpick-0.2.6~rc1'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
scons -c -C src
Could not change directory to 
/data/entwicklung/linux/debian/trans_scons/gpick-0.2.6~rc1/src
scons: Entering directory 
`/data/entwicklung/linux/debian/trans_scons/gpick-0.2.6~rc1/src'
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
scons: done reading SConscript files.
scons: Cleaning targets ...
scons: done cleaning targets.
Removing autogenerated file .sconsign.dblite
find -name "*.pyc" -delete
rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
rm -rf .sconsign.dblite config.log .sconf_temp/ build/
dh_clean
make[1]: Leaving directory 
'/data/entwicklung/linux/debian/trans_scons/gpick-0.2.6~rc1'
dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
dpkg-source: info: building gpick using existing ./gpick_0.2.6~rc1.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series
dpkg-source: info: building gpick in gpick_0.2.6~rc1-1.debian.tar.xz
dpkg-source: info: building gpick in gpick_0.2.6~rc1-1.dsc
I: Generating source changes file for original dsc
dpkg-genchanges: info: including full source code in upload
W: cgroups are not available on the host, not using them.
I: pbuilder: network access will be disabled during build
I: Current time: Fri Dec 27 13:37:12 CET 2019
I: pbuilder-time-stamp: 1577450232
I: Building the build Environment
I: extracting base tarball [/var/cache/pbuilder/sid-amd64-base.tgz]
I: copying local configuration
I: mounting /proc filesystem
I: mounting /sys filesystem
I: creating /{dev,run}/shm
I: mounting /dev/pts filesystem
I: redirecting /dev/ptmx to /dev/pts/ptmx
I: Mounting /var/cache/debs
I: policy-rc.d already exists
W: Could not create compatibility symlink because /tmp/buildd exists and 
it is not a directory
I: Obtaining the cached apt archive contents
I: Copying source file
I: copying [../gpick_0.2.6~rc1-1.dsc]
I: copying [../gpick_0.2.6~rc1.orig.tar.gz]
I: copying [../gpick_0.2.6~rc1-1.debian.tar.xz]
I: Extracting source
dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package (gpick_0.2.6~rc1-1.dsc)
dpkg-source: info: extracting gpick in gpick-0.2.6~rc1
dpkg-source: info: unpacking gpick_0.2.6~rc1.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: unpacking gpick_0.2.6~rc1-1.debian.tar.xz
dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series
dpkg-source: info: applying 01_reproducible_build.patch
dpkg-source: info: applying 02_desktop_file.patch
dpkg-source: info: applying 04_appdata_file_path.patch
I: using fakeroot in build.
I: Installing the build-deps
I: user script /var/cache/pbuilder/build//571568/tmp/hooks/D05deps 
starting
Get:1 file:/var/cache/debs ./ InRelease
Ign:1 file:/var/cache/debs ./ InRelease
Get:2 file:/var/cache/debs ./ Release
Ign:2 file:/var/cache/debs ./ Release
Get:3 file:/var/cache/debs ./ Packages
Ign:3 file:/var/cache/debs ./ Packag

Bug#937144: Bug#937769: getting python-linecache2/python-traceback2 fixes into testing (FAO traceback2, funcsigs nipype and numba maintainers).

2020-04-21 Thread Valentin Vidić
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:20:16PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> You can remove all of the python-oslo* from the list. The versions in
> Experimental, which are the next version of OpenStack, are fixed. In 2
> weeks of time, I'll upload all what I staged in Experimental to Sid
> (maybe 150 packages?) and that's going to fix it all.

Will the new OpenStack version also fix this issue?

#955116 python-murano-pkg-check: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: AttributeError:
'Sphinx' object has no attribute 'info'

-- 
Valentin



Bug#958191: patch

2020-04-21 Thread Antonio Russo
Control: tag -1 patch

I've opened a merge request [1] addressing this.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dracut/-/merge_requests/1



Processed: patch

2020-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 patch
Bug #958191 [dracut] processor microcode is not loaded (not dracut: early cpio 
is not produced)
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
958191: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#942988: displaycal: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-04-21 Thread Christian Marillat
On 17 avril 2020 11:32, Scott Talbert  wrote:

[...]

> It looks like upstream doesn't seem to be making much progress on
> this.  Do you think that we need to start working on Python 3 support
> ourselves?

Duplicate work is a bad idea.

Otherwise upstream is still active in displaycal forums (18/04/2020) :

https://hub.displaycal.net/forums/topic/battery-life/

Christian