Hello Fathi,
thank you for bringing this to my attention. I need some time to investigate
this issue, check what options are available and modify the code accordingly.
A quick check showed that using sudo and mount.cifs umount would work (you
need no entry in /etc/fstab in this case), but this is not really a solution
for users who cannot gain super user privileges to change /etc/sudoers.
fusesmb seems to need a lot of configuration (I haven't used it until now).
Maybe this is the way to go, but I'm a bit reluctant to implement support for
it...
Best regards
Alexander
Am Mittwoch, 17. März 2010 schrieb Fathi Boudra:
Hi Alexander,
The following bug has been reported:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574269
The related changes was done on cifs-utils:
cifs-utils (2:4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* As of this version, the mount.cifs binary is no longer setuid due to
upstream concerns about the audit status of this code. As a
consequence, users will no longer be able to run mount.cifs directly to
mount shares unless mount points have been individually configured in
/etc/fstab with the user mount option.
Sites that require their users to retain the ability to mount arbitrary
CIFS shares without system-level configuration may want to consider
using the fusesmb package instead.
-- Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:07:14 -0800
It seems smb4k should migrate to fusesmb or maybe you have a better
proposal ?
Cheers,
Fathi
--
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with
experience... (unknown)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
