Bug#1031649: wine: /usr/bin/wine64 still required
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023, 17:33 Jens Reyer wrote: > On 19.02.23 21:45, Floris Renaud wrote: > > Isn't this a bug in winetricks? When Wine is compiled the new way > > (--enable-archs=i386,x86_64), there isn't, as far as I know, a wine64 > file. > > > > From > > > https://github.com/Winetricks/winetricks/blob/master/src/winetricks#L3113 > > --- > > > > # Wrapper around winetricks_early_wine() > > # Same idea, but use $WINE_ARCH, i.e., always use wine64 for 64-bit > > prefixes > > # Currently only used by w_expand_env() > > winetricks_early_wine_arch() > > { > > WINE="${WINE_ARCH}" winetricks_early_wine "$@" > > } > > --- > > I see, thanks. Well, then it should probably be changed in winetricks > for this new Wine build. > > But still, this change (prompted by a similar issue in a non-default > Wine installation) breaks previously working setups in default > installations. I didn't think of that when originally mentioning this > as a solution, but now I think changing this now shortly before a Debian > release is not good. > Yes, it's arguably a bug in winetricks. Film what I gather upstream, it's also not yet fully supported. I would advise reverting for now. At least until upstream fully supports it.
Bug#885548: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#885548: winetricks: Don't recommend gksu
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Jens Reyerwrote: > control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Winetricks/winetricks/issues/912 > >> I won't be able to fix upstream for a few weeks, but I've filled a bug in >> the meantime: >> >> https://github.com/Winetricks/winetricks/issues/912 > > There have been a few patches upstream, so I guess we'll have a solution > soon. > > Greets > jre Yes, there's a pending PR, just sorting out some final issues with contributors before merging. If that doesn't happen by 2018/02/05, it should this week. -- -Austin GPG: 14FB D7EA A041 937B
Bug#815031: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#815031: wine: packaging depends fault
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Richard Jasminwrote: > Source: wine > Severity: critical > Tags: newcomer > Justification: breaks unrelated software > > Dear Maintainer, > > we have a SERIOUS depends issue going on with Jessie and multiarch(and any > spins based of Jessie). > > I thought it was just skype being a dick. Its not. > Try and install wine and you have the same scenario. > > What it boils down to is this: > > The installable package demands libav. > Libav demands every other libav package. > ASoundlibs are demanded. > > This demands (generic) openCL be installed, breaking any proprietary video > setup you may have(or at least in part).These packages have no need for either > libav, nor openCL. Wine doesn't use or depend on libav, I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that this is a Wine bug. > Only in rare cases is OpenCL needed. The wine apps that may need it, cannot > run > it due to other requirements.Skype doesnt need it. > > This was reported prior to DECEMBER 2014. > (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2257502) Ubuntu isn't Debian, and reports made on ubuntu forums aren't tracked in Debian's bug system.
Bug#812750: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#812750: wine: Gecko integration is broken
On Feb 9, 2016 11:08 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" <rho...@deb.at> wrote: > >Hi, > > * Austin English <austinengl...@gmail.com> [2016-02-09 17:45:02 CET]: > > On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" <rho...@deb.at> wrote: > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > > > * Ralf Jung <p...@ralfj.de> [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]: > > > > > > > From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is entirely broken. There > > > > > > > is no wine-gecko packaged in Debian > > > > > > > (the recommendation of libwine-gecko-2.40 is unsatisfiable), > > > >^ > > > > > > > > > > mingw64 is in main, what package are you referring to? > > > > > > > > No clue why you mention mingw64, I am to the package I did quote in my > > > > mail and this bugreport is about, libwine-gecko-2.40. > > > > > > I'm asking what recommended package is the problem. It's not on > > > packages.d.o and not specified in the mail as far as I can tell. > > Erm, it is both on packages.debian.org/wine32 and also in this > bugreport mentioned multiple times. So let me write it a third and > three time in this very email: > libwine-gecko-2.40 libwine-gecko-2.40 libwine-gecko-2.40 > > > Or is it that libwine-gecko-2.40 isn't in main that is the problem? I > > thought the problem was a gecko recommend. > > Maybe you should read what is written instead of guessing. > libwine-gecko-2.40 is not only not in main but not even nowhere in the > archive. > > So long, > Rhonda > -- > Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | > Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los| Wir sind Helden > Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang > Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los| Yes, I got it now. Being condescending was neither necessary nor helpful. Guess I'll go back to contributing upsream/elsewhere instead of trying to help Debian get a more functional Wine. Good luck.
Bug#812750: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#812750: wine: Gecko integration is broken
On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine"wrote: > > severity 812750 serious > thanks > > Hi! > > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]: > > >From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is entirely broken. There is no wine-gecko packaged in Debian > > (the recommendation of libwine-gecko-2.40 is unsatisfiable), > > From policy: > > In addition, the packages in _main_ > * must not require or recommend a package outside of _main_ for > compilation or execution (thus, the package must not declare a > "Pre-Depends", "Depends", "Recommends", "Build-Depends", or > "Build-Depends-Indep" relationship on a non-_main_ package), > > Given that the package Recommends a package that isn't available in the > pool this is a policy violation. > > Thanks, > Rhonda > -- > Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | > Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los| Wir sind Helden > Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang > Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los| > > ___ > pkg-wine-party mailing list > pkg-wine-pa...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-wine-party mingw64 is in main, what package are you referring to?
Bug#812750: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#812750: wine: Gecko integration is broken
On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" <rho...@deb.at> wrote: > > * Austin English <austinengl...@gmail.com> [2016-02-09 17:19:30 CET]: > > On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" <rho...@deb.at> wrote: > > > severity 812750 serious > > > thanks > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > * Ralf Jung <p...@ralfj.de> [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]: > > > > From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is entirely broken. There > > > > is no wine-gecko packaged in Debian > > > > (the recommendation of libwine-gecko-2.40 is unsatisfiable), >^ > > > > > > From policy: > > > > > > In addition, the packages in _main_ > > > * must not require or recommend a package outside of _main_ for > > > compilation or execution (thus, the package must not declare a > > > "Pre-Depends", "Depends", "Recommends", "Build-Depends", or > > > "Build-Depends-Indep" relationship on a non-_main_ package), > > > > > > Given that the package Recommends a package that isn't available in the > > > pool this is a policy violation. > > > > mingw64 is in main, what package are you referring to? > > No clue why you mention mingw64, I am to the package I did quote in my > mail and this bugreport is about, libwine-gecko-2.40. > > Hope that helps, > Rhonda > -- > Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | > Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los| Wir sind Helden > Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang > Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los| I'm asking what recommended package is the problem. It's not on packages.d.o and not specified in the mail as far as I can tell.
Bug#812750: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#812750: wine: Gecko integration is broken
On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" <rho...@deb.at> wrote: > > > > * Austin English <austinengl...@gmail.com> [2016-02-09 17:19:30 CET]: > > > On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" <rho...@deb.at> wrote: > > > > severity 812750 serious > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > * Ralf Jung <p...@ralfj.de> [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]: > > > > > From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is entirely broken. There > > > > > is no wine-gecko packaged in Debian > > > > > (the recommendation of libwine-gecko-2.40 is unsatisfiable), > >^ > > > > > > > > From policy: > > > > > > > > In addition, the packages in _main_ > > > > * must not require or recommend a package outside of _main_ for > > > > compilation or execution (thus, the package must not declare a > > > > "Pre-Depends", "Depends", "Recommends", "Build-Depends", or > > > > "Build-Depends-Indep" relationship on a non-_main_ package), > > > > > > > > Given that the package Recommends a package that isn't available in the > > > > pool this is a policy violation. > > > > > > mingw64 is in main, what package are you referring to? > > > > No clue why you mention mingw64, I am to the package I did quote in my > > mail and this bugreport is about, libwine-gecko-2.40. > > > > Hope that helps, > > Rhonda > > -- > > Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | > > Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los| Wir sind Helden > > Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang > > Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los| > > I'm asking what recommended package is the problem. It's not on packages.d.o and not specified in the mail as far as I can tell. Or is it that libwine-gecko-2.40 isn't in main that is the problem? I thought the problem was a gecko recommend. So the question is why gecko isn't in main. I suppose there's a bug, I haven't checked (on mobile).
Bug#793879: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#793879: wine: Failed to connect to the mount manager
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us wrote: Package: wine Version: 1.6.2-20 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Attempted to get a Windows program to work under WINE. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Using an existing install (from Fedora 21) I launched the program only to receive several errors. It appears that the errors revolve around Wine Configuration not being able to connect to the mount manager leading to no drives being configured. I've uninstalled and reinstalled wine and have removed my ~/.wine. * What was the outcome of this action? Problem still exists. $ winecfg fixme:service:scmdatabase_autostart_services Auto-start service LMountMgr failed to start: 2 err:winecfg:open_mountmgr failed to open mount manager err 2 * What outcome did you expect instead? Program would run under wine. Downgrading Wine and maintaining the same WINEPREFIX is not supported. You need to reinstall your application under Debian's wine instead of transferring your WINEPREFIX from Fedora (which is probably on 1.7.4x+ -- -Austin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#741702: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#741702: wine-unstable: not yet ready for stable release
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.orgwrote: package: src:wine-unstable severity: serious version: 1.7.14-1 Blocking since I intend to do some big changes and don't want the package going into testing yet. Best wishes, Mike ___ pkg-wine-party mailing list pkg-wine-pa...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-wine-party I'm curious, what changes? -- -Austin