Bug#1037364: nextcloud-desktop: TLS initilization failed

2023-06-12 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: nextcloud-desktop
Version: 3.7.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

Nexcloud-Desktop is unable to connect the Nextcloud Server comaplining TLS 
initialization failed.

SSL Cert on Server is valid. Access with browser and from another computer 
still on Debian 11 works as expected.

   * What led up to the situation?

Upgrade from Debian 11 to Debian 12

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?

Searching via Google hints to an issue with QT and SSL Version.

   * What was the outcome of this action?

No solution found yet


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.0
  APT prefers stable-security
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=de_CH:de
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages nextcloud-desktop depends on:
ii  libc6  2.36-9
ii  libcloudproviders0 0.3.1-2
ii  libgcc-s1  12.2.0-14
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.74.6-2
ii  libkf5archive5 5.103.0-1
ii  libnextcloudsync0  3.7.3-1
ii  libqt5core5a   5.15.8+dfsg-11
ii  libqt5dbus55.15.8+dfsg-11
ii  libqt5gui5 5.15.8+dfsg-11
ii  libqt5keychain10.13.2-5
ii  libqt5network5 5.15.8+dfsg-11
ii  libqt5qml5 5.15.8+dfsg-3
ii  libqt5quick5   5.15.8+dfsg-3
ii  libqt5quickcontrols2-5 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii  libqt5sql5-sqlite  5.15.8+dfsg-11
ii  libqt5svg5 5.15.8-3
ii  libqt5webenginecore5   5.15.13+dfsg-1~deb12u1
ii  libqt5webenginewidgets55.15.13+dfsg-1~deb12u1
ii  libqt5widgets5 5.15.8+dfsg-11
ii  libstdc++6 12.2.0-14
ii  nextcloud-desktop-common   3.7.3-1
ii  nextcloud-desktop-l10n 3.7.3-1
ii  qml-module-qt-labs-platform5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii  qml-module-qtgraphicaleffects  5.15.8-2
ii  qml-module-qtqml   5.15.8+dfsg-3
ii  qml-module-qtqml-models2   5.15.8+dfsg-3
ii  qml-module-qtquick-controls2   5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii  qml-module-qtquick-dialogs 5.15.8-2
ii  qml-module-qtquick-layouts 5.15.8+dfsg-3
ii  qml-module-qtquick-window2 5.15.8+dfsg-3
ii  qml-module-qtquick25.15.8+dfsg-3

Versions of packages nextcloud-desktop recommends:
ii  nextcloud-desktop-doc  3.7.3-1

nextcloud-desktop suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#962262: opendmarc fails many emails without apparent reason

2020-06-05 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: opendmarc
Version: 1.3.2-6+deb10u1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

I started using DMARC and DKIM using both opendkim for signing and verification 
of DKIM Signatures
and opendmarc to check policies regarding domain alignment, report failurs, 
reject failed emails.

As I added myself in the CC I started wondering about the many failures. So I 
removed reject go get
the emails and check myself why they failed.

Example:

Return-Path: 
Received: from smtp-8fb4.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-8fb4.mail.infomaniak.ch 
[IPv6:2001:1600:4:17:0:0:0:8fb4])
by magma.woody.ch (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-14~deb10u1) with ESMTPS id 
0558TFJS016651
(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:29:16 +0200
Authentication-Results: magma.woody.ch;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=infomaniak.com 
header.i=@infomaniak.com header.b="CbZg5UxD";
dkim-atps=neutral
Authentication-Results: OpenDMARC; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) 
header.from=infomaniak.com
Received: from h2dmu11.infomaniak.ch (unknown [128.65.195.40])
by smtp-3-1000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 
49dbQr0WTqzlhZQ3;
Fri,  5 Jun 2020 10:29:08 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=infomaniak.com;
s=s1024; t=1591345748;
bh=HHIYggwIYZM6Vv4Bqgw/PkqYPHF6PS4+bI/YdDSwMTI=;
h=Date:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From;
b=CbZg5UxD8cVHlHVrsN2hDsaQrLFuflU8C9FQUQtyiBENgVwOjBvkvs7kIlUdFeJLK
 FZxplJjqTuBHGEny4W6zaaQJOcABz7dmPJbESItpdaHMPjFX+vfm/g5aKxEr1FJJLT
 F9lSw+3D/0+l+IhQ84TiwbXVXfSm5MktamR/Q3gk=
Received: from tickets.infomaniak.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by h2dmu11.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 0558T7lD002901;
Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:29:08 +0200
Message-ID: 
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:29:07 +0200
Subject: Re: [support #INK-ZIB-19449-823] Abuse report about 128.65.195.112
From: Support Infomaniak Network 
To: nicolask...@hotmail.com, nob...@woody.ch
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Mailer: Cerb 9.3.8 (Build 2019112401)
References: 

In-Reply-To: 

[...]
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 
(magma.woody.ch [IPv6:2001:4060:dead:beef:0:0:0:1]); Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:29:16 
+0200 (CEST)
[...]
X-SNCH-Report:  Start der SNCH-SpamAssassin Auswertung
 0.8 BAYES_50   BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
-0.0 SPF_PASS   SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE  SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU  Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature 
from
author's domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK 
signature
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF  Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature 
from
envelope-from domain
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNEDMessage has a DKIM or DK signature, not 
necessarily
valid
 Ende der SNCH-SpamAssassin Auswertung

As you see, opendkim verified the signature and this passed.
Milter-Greylist passed SPF Test
SpamAssassin passed SPF and DKIM Tests

opendmarc would have rejected this email because of a policy failure (yes, 
another one of that source got rejected)

So let's check that:

Envelope Sender: supp...@infomaniak.com
From Header: supp...@infomaniak.com

Allignment strict!

infomaniak.com descriptive text "v=spf1 include:spf.infomaniak.ch 
include:_spf.mailrelay.rrpproxy.net -all"
relay.mail.infomaniak.ch descriptive text "v=spf1 ip4:45.157.188.8/29 
ip4:185.125.25.8/29 ip4:83.166.143.168/29 ip4:84.16.66.168/29 
ip6:2001:1600:3:17::/64 ip6:2001:1600:4:17::/64 -all"

Sender IP ist part of the SPF entry.

I come to no other conclusion, that email should have passed SFP / DKIM and the 
whole DMARC Test.

So I have to assume, opendmarc has a serious bug which causes those tests to 
fail in many cases.

Unfortunately i have not found any debug options which would lead to an outpout 
showing WHY exactly opendmarc is failing
on such emails.

Please advise.

-Benoît-


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=de_CH:de (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages opendmarc depends on:
ii  adduser3.118
ii  dbconfig-mysql 2.0.11+deb10u1
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.71
ii  libbsd00.9.1-2
ii  libc6  2.28-10
ii  libmilter1.0.1   

Bug#838499: wsjt: 9.7.r3639+dfsg-1 depends on numeric module which has been replaced by numpy

2016-09-21 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: wsjt
Version: 9.7.r3639+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

I just installed wsjt from the actual 'sid' releade. Unfortunately the package
is broken because, as I understand, it is depending from the numeric module
which has been replaced by numpy in sid.

$ wsjt
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/wsjt/wsjt.py", line 17, in 
from Numeric import zeros
ImportError: No module named Numeric


Thank for looking into this.

-Benoit-

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages wsjt depends on:
ii  libc6   2.23-5
ii  libfftw3-single33.3.4-2+b1
ii  libgcc1 1:6.1.1-11
ii  libgfortran36.1.1-11
ii  libportaudio2   19+svn20140130-1
ii  libquadmath06.1.1-11
ii  libsamplerate0  0.1.8-8
ii  lxterminal [x-terminal-emulator]0.2.0-1
ii  python  2.7.11-2
ii  python-imaging  3.3.1-1
ii  python-imaging-tk   2.6.1-2+deb8u2
ii  python-numpy1:1.11.1~rc1-1
ii  python-pil.imagetk [python-imaging-tk]  3.3.1-1
ii  python-support  1.0.15
ii  python-tk   2.7.11-2

wsjt recommends no packages.

wsjt suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#558423: Acknowledgement (calendarserver: Unable to PUT to non-file)

2009-11-28 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Hello

You can close the bug... (well or consider it as a documentation bug...)

 /usr/share/doc/calendarserver/README.Debian
 http://localhost:8008/calendars/users//calendar/ should state, that you 
should get the "Calendar homes:" URL
and add something like my-calendar.ics at the end.
 
After playing a bit more around with Apple iCAL I found out that a user could 
have multiple calendars on the server. So you have to specify a file and not 
just the directory. This was why I kept getting the error that the server did 
try to access a directory as a file.

-Benoit-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#558423: calendarserver: Unable to PUT to non-file

2009-11-28 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: calendarserver
Version: 1.2.dfsg-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi there

I did try to install the calendar server on two machines under 'etch' and 
'lenny'.

On the later one I did a minimum change of the config, just removed the binding 
to 'localhost' to be able to access my server from outside.

Still I can reproduce the Problem:

2009-11-28 20:01:47+0100 [-] [caldav-8008]  [HTTPChannel,2,IP] GET 
/calendars/users/admin/calendar/ HTTP/1.1
2009-11-28 20:02:00+0100 [-] [caldav-8008]  [HTTPChannel,4,IP] PUT 
/calendars/users/admin/calendar/ HTTP/1.1
2009-11-28 20:02:00+0100 [-] [caldav-8008]  [HTTPChannel,4,IP] 'Unable to PUT 
to non-file: 
/var/spool/caldavd/calendars/__uids__/38eae584-2b75-582b-a058-018391d1003f/calendar'

After some time googleing and trying to find helpfull documentation on
how to set access rights etc, it looks like some parts of twisted.web try to 
access
a directory as a file...

Any idea how to resolve that problem?

-Benoit-

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages calendarserver depends on:
ii  adduser 3.110add and remove users and groups
ii  lsb-base3.2-20   Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii  python  2.5.2-3  An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-central  0.6.8register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python-dateutil 1.4.1-2  powerful extensions to the standar
ii  python-kerberos 1.0+svn2455-1A GSSAPI interface module for Pyth
ii  python-openssl  0.7-2Python wrapper around the OpenSSL 
ii  python-pysqlite22.4.1-1  Python interface to SQLite 3
ii  python-twisted-calendar 0.2.0.svn19773-5 Twisted components for Apple's Cal
ii  python-vobject  0.6.0-1  parse iCalendar and VCards in Pyth
ii  python-xattr0.4-4module for manipulating filesystem
ii  python-xml  0.8.4-10.1   XML tools for Python
ii  ssl-cert1.0.23   simple debconf wrapper for OpenSSL

calendarserver recommends no packages.

Versions of packages calendarserver suggests:
pn  python-pydirector  (no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#516780: Acknowledgement (iceweasel: Iceweasel segfaults after etch => lenny upgrade)

2009-02-23 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Hello

The Bug realy seams to be related to the flash plugin. After removing this, 
iceweasel worked again.

-Benoit-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#516780: iceweasel: Iceweasel segfaults after etch => lenny upgrade

2009-02-23 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: iceweasel
Version: 3.0.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi

I just upgraded from etch to lenny. Now iceweasels segfault even when startet 
in safe mode with everything disabled.

Trace of what happens before crashing:

access("/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/kaffeineplugin.so", F_OK) = 0
access("/usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so", F_OK) = 0
access("/usr/local/j2re1.4.2/plugin/i386/mozilla/libjavaplugin_oji.so", F_OK) = 0
stat64("/home/benoit/.mozilla/firefox/miuih5qt.default/pluginreg.dat", 
0xb1501bdc) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
lstat64("/home/benoit/.mozilla/firefox/miuih5qt.default/pluginreg.dat", 
0xb1501bdc) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
access("/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins", F_OK) = 0
open("/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins", 
O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = 36
fstat64(36, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
getdents(36, /* 5 entries */, 4096) = 128
lstat64("/usr", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
lstat64("/usr/lib", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=81920, ...}) = 0
lstat64("/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) 
= 0
lstat64("/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, 
st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
lstat64("/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins/libflashplayer.so", 
{st_mode=S_IFLNK|0777, st_size=43, ...}) = 0
readlink("/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins/libflashplayer.so", 
"../../flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so"..., 4096) = 43
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++

Strange, shouldn't safe mode prevent iceweasel from loading any libraries?

-Benoit-

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages iceweasel depends on:
ii  debianutils  2.30Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  fontconfig   2.6.0-3 generic font configuration library
ii  libc62.7-18  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1  1:4.3.2-1.1 GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.16.6-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.12.11-4   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libnspr4-0d  4.7.1-4 NetScape Portable Runtime Library
ii  libstdc++6   4.3.2-1.1   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  procps   1:3.2.7-11  /proc file system utilities
ii  psmisc   22.6-1  Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii  xulrunner-1.91.9.0.6-1   XUL + XPCOM application runner

iceweasel recommends no packages.

Versions of packages iceweasel suggests:
pn  latex-xft-fonts(no description available)
ii  libkrb53  1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-5 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
pn  mozplugger (no description available)
pn  ttf-mathematica4.1 (no description available)
pn  xfonts-mathml  (no description available)
ii  xprint2:1.4.2-10 X11 print system (binary)
pn  xulrunner-1.9-gnome-s  (no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#488934: licq: ICQ Protocal Changes: Unknown sign on error: 0x1C.

2008-07-02 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: licq
Version: 1.3.4-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable


Mirabillis apparently has changed the protocol of LICQ to prevent 3rd party 
clients to connect.
Licq is also affected and cannot connect anymore.

Unknown sign on error: 0x1C.

The Licq coders have already built a patch:

http://www.licq.org/ticket/1637

-Benoit-

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20.2
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages licq depends on:
ii  libc6  2.3.6.ds1-13etch5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc11:4.1.1-21GCC support library
ii  libgpg-error0  1.4-1 library for common error values an
ii  libgpgme11 1.1.2-5   GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy
ii  libssl0.9.80.9.8c-4etch3 SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++6 4.1.1-21  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  licq-plugin-console [l 1.3.4-2   console user interface plug-in for
ii  licq-plugin-kde [licq- 1.3.4-2   graphical user interface plug-in f
ii  licq-plugin-msn [licq- 1.3.4-2   MSN plug-in for Licq
ii  licq-plugin-qt [licq-p 1.3.4-2   graphical user interface plug-in f

Versions of packages licq recommends:
ii  sox   12.17.9-1  A universal sound sample translato

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#382007: clamav: Clam AntiVirus Win32-UPX Heap Overflow (Remote DOS or Exploit)

2006-08-08 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: clamav
Version: 0.88.3-0volatile1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: causes serious data loss


Looks like this has not been reported yet:

http://www.overflow.pl/adv/clamav_upx_heap.txt
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/76523
http://www.clamav.net/security/0.88.4.html

-Benoit-

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages clamav depends on:
ii  clamav-freshclam [cla 0.88.3-0volatile1  downloads clamav virus databases f
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libclamav10.88.3-0volatile1  virus scanner library
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2  compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#372126: bind9: Memory explosion or race condition on delete of 20'000 records.

2006-06-08 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: bind9
Version: 1:9.3.2-1bpo1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


Hi

I just found and could reproduce a very strange problem.

We use bind for a DNS RBL. We store additional information like a timestamp 
inside a TXT record of an entry...

Usually bind uses about 200MB Memory and has no problem at all with zone files 
of the size of about 100MB.

Now we had a situation where 2 TXT entries were generated on a single 
hostname within one of the zonefiles.

If you then tryed to delete all those entries in one go:

nsupdate
> update delete host.example.com.
>

This caused bind to use up to 3GB of memory, stopping answering queries or 
accepting updates for several minutes up to hours...

This could be reproduced several times.

After manualy deleting the entries from the zone file. Operation resumed to 
normal.

Any idea? Sounds like a severe bug to me.

-Benoit-

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.11
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages bind9 depends on:
ii  adduser   3.63   Add and remove users and groups
ii  libbind9-01:9.3.2-1bpo1  BIND9 Shared Library used by BIND
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdns21  1:9.3.2-1bpo1  DNS Shared Library used by BIND
ii  libisc11  1:9.3.2-1bpo1  ISC Shared Library used by BIND
ii  libisccc0 1:9.3.2-1bpo1  Command Channel Library used by BI
ii  libisccfg11:9.3.2-1bpo1  Config File Handling Library used 
ii  liblwres9 1:9.3.2-1bpo1  Lightweight Resolver Library used 
ii  libssl0.9.7   0.9.7e-3sarge1 SSL shared libraries
ii  lsb-base  3.1-4bpo1  Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
ii  netbase   4.21   Basic TCP/IP networking system

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#367630: nagios-plugins: check_nagios is missing

2006-05-17 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: nagios-plugins
Version: 1.4.2-4bpo1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


After Upgrading to 1.4 from backports I noticed the check_nagios plugin
is missing so nagios cannot figure out if it is running. No controlling
can be perfomed from the web-gui anymore.

-Benoit-

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-386
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages nagios-plugins depends on:
ii  nagios-plugins-basic 1.4.2-4bpo1 Plugins for the nagios network mon
ii  nagios-plugins-standard  1.4.2-4bpo1 Plugins for the nagios network mon

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#330338: login: Same Problem with man-pages in german

2005-09-27 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: login
Version: 1:4.0.3-39
Followup-For: Bug #330338


dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/login_1%3a4.0.12-2_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/de/man1/login.1.gz', which is also in 
package manpages-de

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages login depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpam-modules0.76-23Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii  libpam-runtime0.76-23Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  libpam0g  0.76-23Pluggable Authentication Modules l

login recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#314433: acknowledged by developer (Bug#314433: fixed in razor 2.720-1)

2005-06-29 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Am Dienstag, 28. Juni 2005 05.18 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
> Fix to corrupted emails crashing razor (Closes: #314433)
>      This fix is a hack (from freeBSD).  Hopefully the next version will
> fix the issue correctly.  The version of razor released with stable (2.67)
> is not vulnerable to the particular emails that crash 2.7, but it is
> believed to be possible to create an email that would crash 2.67.

Aehm...

2.67-1 crashes with the example email I submitted to you.

ii  razor 2.670-1   
spam-catcher using a collaborative filtering network

# spamassassin -t < email.txt
Segmentation fault

Regards
-Benoit-
-- 
SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM / Hormel's new miracle meat in a can
Tastes fine, saves time. / If you want something grand, / Ask for SPAM!
  - Hormel's 1937 jingle for SPAM

Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia sh: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/-phobia


pgpVFziyJiDxf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#316094: sendmail: Enabling IPv6 breaks submit.mc (Deferred:Connection refused by [127.0.0.1])

2005-06-28 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.13.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss


Hi Cowboy

I did desperately try to track down this error I saw on different systems:

Jun 28 13:53:41 go sendmail[18911]: j5SBrfKk018911: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
ctladdr=benoit (1024/100), 
delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=31826, relay=[127.0.0.1] 
[127.0.0.1], 
dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred:Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]

Usualy after purging the config and re-installing sendmail everything was 
fine until I 
enabled IPv6 according to the advice in sendmail.mc file which reads:


dnl # If you want to support IPv6, switch the commented/uncommentd lines
FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MTA-v6, Port=smtp, Addr=::1')dnl
dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet,  Name=MTA-v4, Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MSP-v6, Port=submission, Addr=::1')dnl
dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet,  Name=MSP-v4, Port=submission, 
Addr=127.0.0.1')dnl


If you do this, sendmail only binds to the IPv6 Localhost and is not able to 
transmit emails 
from the MTA to the queue runner (or vice versa?).

You have to twitch submit.mc too:

FEATURE(`msp', `[IPv6:::1]', `MSA')dnl


I remember that older versions of sendmail didn't habe that problem, because 
listening on IPv6 
did mean you also opened the IPv4 socket.

Probably this has changes somewhen either in the Kernel or in sendmail itself.

-Benoit-

-- Package-specific info:
Ouput of /usr/share/bug/sendmail/script:

ls -alR /etc/mail:
/etc/mail:
insgesamt 224
drwxr-sr-x4 smmta smmsp  4096 2005-06-28 13:56 .
drwxr-xr-x  115 root  root   8192 2005-06-28 13:47 ..
-rw---1 root  root   4211 2005-06-28 13:46 access
-rw-r-1 smmta smmsp 12288 2005-06-28 13:47 access.db
lrwxrwxrwx1 root  smmsp10 2005-06-28 13:46 aliases -> ../aliases
-rw-r-1 smmta smmsp 12288 2005-06-28 13:47 aliases.db
-rw-r--r--1 root  smmsp  3095 2005-06-28 13:53 databases
-rw-r--r--1 root  smmsp35 2005-06-28 13:46 default-auth-info
-rw-r--r--1 root  root   5588 2005-06-03 18:51 helpfile
-rw-r--r--1 root  smmsp13 2005-06-28 13:46 local-host-names
drwxr-sr-x2 smmta smmsp  4096 2005-06-28 13:47 m4
-rw-r-1 root  smmsp 0 2005-06-28 13:53 mailertable
-rw-r-1 root  smmsp 12288 2005-06-28 13:53 mailertable.db
-rwxr-xr--1 root  smmsp  9911 2005-06-28 13:53 Makefile
-rw-r--r--1 root  smmsp 63816 2005-06-28 13:53 sendmail.cf
-rw-r--r--1 root  root  11882 2005-06-28 13:47 sendmail.conf
-rw-r--r--1 root  smmsp  3891 2005-06-28 13:53 sendmail.mc
-rw-r--r--1 root  smmsp 43944 2005-06-28 13:56 submit.cf
-rw-r--r--1 root  smmsp  2325 2005-06-28 13:56 submit.mc
drwxr-xr-x2 smmta smmsp  4096 2005-06-28 13:46 tls
-rw-r--r--1 root  smmsp 0 2005-06-28 13:46 trusted-users

/etc/mail/m4:
insgesamt 8
drwxr-sr-x  2 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:47 .
drwxr-sr-x  4 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:56 ..
-rw-r-  1 root  smmsp0 2005-06-28 13:47 dialup.m4
-rw-r-  1 root  smmsp0 2005-06-28 13:47 provider.m4

/etc/mail/tls:
insgesamt 44
drwxr-xr-x  2 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:46 .
drwxr-sr-x  4 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:56 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 root  root 7 2005-06-28 13:46 no_prompt
-rw---  1 root  root  1191 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-client.cfg
-rw-r--r--  1 root  smmsp 1155 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-client.crt
-rw---  1 root  root   976 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-client.csr
-rw-r-  1 root  smmsp 1675 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-common.key
-rw---  1 root  root 0 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-common.prm
-rw---  1 root  root  1191 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-server.cfg
-rw-r--r--  1 root  smmsp 1155 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-server.crt
-rw---  1 root  root   976 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-server.csr
-rwxr--r--  1 root  root  3145 2005-06-28 13:47 starttls.m4

sendmail.conf:
DAEMON_NETMODE="Static";
DAEMON_NETIF="lo";
DAEMON_MODE="Daemon";
DAEMON_PARMS="";
DAEMON_HOSTSTATS="No";
DAEMON_MAILSTATS="No";
QUEUE_MODE="${DAEMON_MODE}";
QUEUE_INTERVAL="10m";
QUEUE_PARMS="";
MSP_MODE="Cron";
MSP_INTERVAL="20m";
MSP_PARMS="";
MSP_MAILSTATS="${DAEMON_MAILSTATS}";
MISC_PARMS="";
CRON_MAILTO="root";
CRON_PARMS="";
LOG_CMDS="No";
HANDS_OFF="No";
AGE_DATA="";
DAEMON_RUNASUSER="No";
DAEMON_STATS="${DAEMON_MAILSTATS}";
MSP_STATS="${MSP_MAILSTATS}";


sendmail.mc:
divert(-1)dnl
divert(0)dnl
define(`_USE_ETC_MAIL_')dnl
include(`/usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl
VERSIONID(`$Id: sendmail.mc, v 8.13.4-3 2005-06-03 16:49:22 cowboy Exp $')
OSTYPE(`debian')dnl
DOMAIN(`debian-mta')dnl
undefine(`confHOST_STATUS_DIRECTORY')dnl#DAEMON_HOSTSTATS=
FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MTA-v6, Port=smtp, Addr=::1')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MSP-v6, Port=submission, Addr=::1')dnl
define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS',dnl
`needmailhelo,needexpnhelo,needvrfyhelo,restrictqrun,res

Bug#315711: raidtools2: Missing lsraid raidhotadd raidhotremove etc after stable upgrade

2005-06-25 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: raidtools2
Version: 1.00.4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi Raidtools Maintainer

I don't know if this problem is related to raidtools2 but I seam to have 
massive problems since sarge got stable.

I don't seam to find all tools needed to manage my raid-sets anymore. I'm not 
even able to find a packet containing lsraid...
Even cronjobs complain that lsraid is missing.

Manpages still are present for all those tools. Just te binaries are not there.

Where have they gone?

-Benoit-

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages raidtools2 depends on:
ii  mdadm 1.9.0-4Manage MD devices aka Linux Softwa

-- debconf information:
* raidtools2/init:
  raidtools2/oldraid:
  raidtools2/nosupport:
* raidtools2/autostart: false


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#314433: crafted emails get razor to segfault

2005-06-16 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Package: razor
Version: 2.670-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: causes non-serious data loss


Hi Razor Maintainer

Special crafted emails can be used to DOS razor.

Some examples of such emails can be found on:

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7244345&forum_id=10149

The Problem has been fixed in Razor 2.71:
http://razor.sourceforge.net/

Regards
-Benoit-

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages razor depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdigest-hmac-perl 1.01-3   create standard message integrity 
pn  libdigest-md5-perl   Not found.
ii  libdigest-nilsimsa-perl 0.06-2   Nilsimsa message digest algorithm
ii  libdigest-sha1-perl 2.10-1   NIST SHA-1 message digest algorith
pn  libmime-base64-perl  Not found.
ii  libnet-dns-perl 0.48-1   Perform DNS queries from a Perl sc
ii  liburi-perl 1.35-1   Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii  perl [libtime-hires-perl]   5.8.4-8  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  perl-modules [libtest-simpl 5.8.4-8  Core Perl modules

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]