Bug#1022051: /boot/vmlinuz-5.10.0-19-amd64: Same Here

2022-10-20 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.149-1
Followup-For: Bug #1022051

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?

Normal kernal package upgrade and reboot.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?

5.10.0-18 works fine.  5.10.0-19 always hangs with "flip_done timed out" before
I can get even a text console.

   * What was the outcome of this action?

Using older kernel for now.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

5.10.0-19 bootable.

- -- Package-specific info:
** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached

** Model information
sys_vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
product_name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
product_version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
chassis_vendor: Default string
chassis_version: Default string
bios_vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
bios_version: P2.00
board_vendor: ASRock
board_name: X399 Taichi
board_version: 

** Network interface configuration:
*** /etc/network/interfaces:

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

** PCI devices:
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 17h 
(Models 00h-0fh) Root Complex [1022:1450]
Subsystem: ASRock Incorporation Family 17h (Models 00h-0fh) Root 
Complex [1849:1450]
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- 

00:01.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 17h 
(Models 00h-1fh) PCIe Dummy Host Bridge [1022:1452]
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- Reset- FastB2B-
PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
Capabilities: 
Kernel driver in use: pcieport

00:01.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 17h 
(Models 00h-0fh) PCIe GPP Bridge [1022:1453] (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Subsystem: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 17h (Models 
00h-0fh) PCIe GPP Bridge [1022:1453]
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- Reset- FastB2B-
PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
Capabilities: 
Kernel driver in use: pcieport

00:02.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 17h 
(Models 00h-1fh) PCIe Dummy Host Bridge [1022:1452]
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- Reset- FastB2B-
PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
Capabilities: 
Kernel driver in use: pcieport

00:08.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 17h 
(Models 00h-1fh) PCIe Dummy Host Bridge [1022:1452]
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- Reset- FastB2B-
PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
Capabilities: 
Kernel driver in use: pcieport

00:14.0 SMBus [0c05]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] FCH SMBus Controller 
[1022:790b] (rev 59)
Subsystem: ASRock Incorporation FCH SMBus Controller [1849:]
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- 
SERR- TAbort- 
SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- 
Kernel driver in use: xhci_hcd
Kernel modules: xhci_pci

01:00.1 SATA controller [0106]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] X399 Series 
Chipset SATA Controller [1022:43b6] (rev 02) (prog-if 01 [AHCI 1.0])
Subsystem: ASMedia Technology Inc. X399 Series Chipset SATA Controller 
[1b21:1062]
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- 
Kernel driver in use: ahci
Kernel modules: ahci

01:00.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] X399 Series 
Chipset PCIe Bridge [1022:43b1] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Subsystem: ASMedia Technology Inc. X399 Series Chipset PCIe Bridge 
[1b21:0201]
Control: I/

Bug#977901: chromium: Inconsistent SEGV

2020-12-23 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 4:30:48 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 4:19:43 AM CST Michel Le Bihan wrote:
> > The Debian patch for #963548
> > https://salsa.debian.org/mimi8/chromium/-/blob/ece23b4ca107cd968ac9a40
> > 9f
> > 40eb11edf8a0266/debian/patches/fixes/serviceworker-double-destruction.pat
> > ch is clearly in upstream 87.0.4280.88:
> > https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/refs/tags/87.0.4280.88
> > :c
> > ontent/browser/service_worker/service_worker_container_host.cc;l=671-679
>
> Different destructor.  The old patch is for ServiceWorkerObjectHost, but we
> need a new patch for ServiceWorker*Registration*ObjectHost.

In particular, just above where you linked to, at line 629 (https://
source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/refs/tags/87.0.4280.88:content/
browser/service_worker/service_worker_container_host.cc;l=629) is the crashing 
line.

The fix for the back trace I finally got is to change that line like so: 
https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/
f27ad210062f61d06eb782214ee4fc8c19a1725b:content/browser/service_worker/
service_worker_container_host.cc;l=623-647

The f27ed21 commit does contain the fix for #963548, but lower down at line 
689: https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/
f27ad210062f61d06eb782214ee4fc8c19a1725b:content/browser/service_worker/
service_worker_container_host.cc;l=689-697

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
Twitter: @DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#977901: chromium: Inconsistent SEGV

2020-12-23 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 4:19:43 AM CST Michel Le Bihan wrote:
> The Debian patch for #963548
> https://salsa.debian.org/mimi8/chromium/-/blob/ece23b4ca107cd968ac9a409f
> 40eb11edf8a0266/debian/patches/fixes/serviceworker-double-destruction.patch
> is clearly in upstream 87.0.4280.88:
> https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/refs/tags/87.0.4280.88:c
> ontent/browser/service_worker/service_worker_container_host.cc;l=671-679

Different destructor.  The old patch is for ServiceWorkerObjectHost, but we 
need a new patch for ServiceWorker*Registration*ObjectHost.

> I also think that it might be an upstream bug, but can't confirm unless
> tested and reproducible in Google Chrome.

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070 is originally 
reported against *Chrome* 87.0.4278.0
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
Twitter: @DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#977901: Similarities to 963548

2020-12-23 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963548 also has a fix 
(https://salsa.debian.org/chromium-team/chromium/-/commit/
b904fa41d40b967dcc8f6984db52f7a2f6a2c83d) related to the cyclic 
SerivceWorker.*ObjectHost objects and their deletion.

The chromium team noticed the same thing: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/
chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070#c15 (in the other direction)

It's been an Chromium issue for a while with no clear fix on how to handle 
cyclic service dependencies in general: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/
issues/detail?id=1135070#c18
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
Twitter: @DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#977901: chromium: Inconsistent SEGV

2020-12-23 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 3:49:06 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 2:38:32 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > I got a crash (attached)
> 
> Looks like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070 to
> me, which has a fix, but I haven't yet figured out what release(s) the fix
> made it into.

Doesn't look to me like it has made it into a release at all, but I'm just 
using the Git tools to navigate the repository, not all the depot tools.

---8<---
bss@monster % git tag -l --contains f27ad210062f61d06eb782214ee4fc8c19a1725b
bss@monster % git branch -r --contains 
f27ad210062f61d06eb782214ee4fc8c19a1725b --list
  origin/HEAD -> origin/master
  origin/lkgr
  origin/lkgr-android-internal
  origin/lkgr-ios-internal
  origin/master
--->8---

So, I guess it's an "upstream" bug?
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
Twitter: @DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#977901: chromium: Inconsistent SEGV

2020-12-23 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 2:38:32 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I got a crash (attached)

Looks like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070 to 
me, which has a fix, but I haven't yet figured out what release(s) the fix 
made it into.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
Twitter: @DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#977901: chromium: Inconsistent SEGV

2020-12-23 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 11:22:21 PM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I'll have to play around with disabling extensions to see which one(s) cause
> a crash within 30 minutes.  Super annoying since I do use every one of them
> literally every day. :(

Looks like maybe Proxy SwitchyOmega (which is thankfully open source).  Things 
had been going fine under the debugger for hours with no extensions, and then 
I got a crash (attached) within minutes of enabling it.

Unfortunately, I need this extension enabled in order to access client network 
websites behind a proxy server behind a VPN.  So, I'm not sure what I can do 
(or if I can even reproduce the error).

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
Twitter: @DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/
Thread 1 "chromium" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
__GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
50  ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0  __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
#1  0x73857537 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#2  0x5a982805 in base::debug::BreakDebugger() ()
#3  0x5a909ed6 in logging::LogMessage::~LogMessage() ()
#4  0x5a90a24e in logging::LogMessage::~LogMessage() ()
#5  0x5a90bc4a in base::subtle::RefCountedBase::ReleaseImpl() const ()
#6  0x5930078b in 
content::ServiceWorkerRegistrationObjectHost::~ServiceWorkerRegistrationObjectHost()
 ()
#7  0x593007ce in 
content::ServiceWorkerRegistrationObjectHost::~ServiceWorkerRegistrationObjectHost()
 ()
#8  0x58821ca7 in std::_Rb_tree > >, 
std::_Select1st > > >, std::less, std::allocator > > > 
>::_M_erase(std::_Rb_tree_node > > >*) ()
#9  0x592a97c3 in 
content::ServiceWorkerContainerHost::~ServiceWorkerContainerHost() ()
#10 0x592dfd99 in content::ServiceWorkerHost::~ServiceWorkerHost() ()
#11 0x5932f921 in 
content::ServiceWorkerVersion::~ServiceWorkerVersion() ()
#12 0x5932fbde in 
content::ServiceWorkerVersion::~ServiceWorkerVersion() ()
#13 0x592fc847 in 
content::ServiceWorkerRegistration::~ServiceWorkerRegistration() ()
#14 0x592fc89e in 
content::ServiceWorkerRegistration::~ServiceWorkerRegistration() ()
#15 0x593007a0 in 
content::ServiceWorkerRegistrationObjectHost::~ServiceWorkerRegistrationObjectHost()
 ()
#16 0x593007ce in 
content::ServiceWorkerRegistrationObjectHost::~ServiceWorkerRegistrationObjectHost()
 ()
#17 0x58821ca7 in std::_Rb_tree > >, 
std::_Select1st > > >, std::less, std::allocator > > > 
>::_M_erase(std::_Rb_tree_node > > >*) ()
#18 0x58b98403 in std::_Rb_tree > >, 
std::_Select1st > > >, std::less, std::allocator > > > 
>::_M_erase_aux(std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator > > >, 
std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator > > >) ()
#19 0x58f36e3c in 
mojo::ReceiverSetBase >, 
void>::OnDisconnect(unsigned long, unsigned int, 
std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > 
const&) ()
#20 0x5af13f9f in 
mojo::InterfaceEndpointClient::NotifyError(base::Optional
 const&) ()
#21 0x5af1a5a7 in 
mojo::internal::MultiplexRouter::ProcessNotifyErrorTask(mojo::internal::MultiplexRouter::Task*,
 mojo::internal::MultiplexRouter::ClientCallBehavior, 
base::SequencedTaskRunner*) ()
#22 0x5af188b9 in 
mojo::internal::MultiplexRouter::ProcessTasks(mojo::internal::MultiplexRouter::ClientCallBehavior,
 base::SequencedTaskRunner*) ()
#23 0x5af1770e in 
mojo::internal::MultiplexRouter::OnPipeConnectionError(bool) ()
#24 0x5af11128 in mojo::Connector::HandleError(bool, bool) ()
#25 0x5af2aebe in mojo::SimpleWatcher::OnHandleReady(int, unsigned int, 
mojo::HandleSignalsState const&) ()
#26 0x5af2b336 in 
base::internal::Invoker, int, unsigned int, 
mojo::HandleSignalsState>, void ()>::RunOnce(base::internal::BindStateBase*) ()
#27 0x5a9497d4 in base::TaskAnnotator::RunTask(char const*, 
base::PendingTask*) ()
#28 0x5a959aa9 in 
base::sequence_manager::internal::ThreadControllerWithMessagePumpImpl::DoWorkImpl(base::sequence_manager::LazyNow*)
 ()
#29 0x5a9597ac in 
base::sequence_manager::internal::ThreadControllerWithMessagePumpImpl::DoWork() 
()
#30 0x5a90d8da in 
base::MessagePumpGlib::Run(base::MessagePump::Delegate*) ()
#31 0x5a95a10d in 
base::sequence_manager::internal::ThreadControllerWithMessagePumpImpl::Run(bool,
 base::TimeDelta) ()
#32 0x5a9301a0 in base::RunLoop::Run() ()
#33 0x5aae564c in ChromeBrowserMainParts::MainMessageLoopRun(int*) ()
#34 0x58ecb8a2 in content::BrowserMainLoop::RunMainMessageLoopParts() ()
#35 0

Bug#977901: chromium: Inconsistent SEGV

2020-12-22 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 10:47:31 PM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> All my extensions were pulled down during the Google Sync and ran fine on 87
> for roughly an hour -- that's twice as long as my longest browser session
> for version 87 on the old profile.
> 
> I still convinced this is a bug -- nothing in my profile should cause a
> SEGV, ref_count violation, or corrupted double-linked list.  But, there's
> at least a workaround, that I'm going to take advantage of, to create a
> new, blank profile and either sync or manually import (or likely a
> combination of both) all your settings into the new profile.

So, it seems one of the _settings_ of one of my extensions is causing the 
problem.  Restored my _settings_ (same list of extensions), and got a crash in 
10 minutes.

*That* is annoying, but not a chromium bug.  Feel free to close this at your 
leisure.

I'll have to play around with disabling extensions to see which one(s) cause a 
crash within 30 minutes.  Super annoying since I do use every one of them 
literally every day. :(
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
Twitter: @DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#977901: chromium: Inconsistent SEGV

2020-12-22 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 5:26:04 PM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 23:43:23 +0100 Michel Le Bihan  
wrote:
> > I was not able to reproduce those crashes.
> 
> That's unfortunate.  I'm up to 50 just today.  I'm probably going to have to
> downgrade to 83 at least until there's another update.

Downgrading was a mixed bag (browser was stable, but audio/video stopped 
working (!)) .  So, I tried again with 87.

Rather than just disabling my extensions, I tried from a brand-new profile and 
an empty cache.  So far, I'm not able to reproduce the crashing on the new 
profile.

Unfortunately, I have about a half-dozen extensions that have at least some 
configuration that isn't synchronized anywhere else, so I need to go back to 
83 and the old profile, dump/export/backup all their settings to a file (or 
take notes), then go back to 87 and the new profile and restore/import/apply 
all those settings in the new profile.

All my extensions were pulled down during the Google Sync and ran fine on 87 
for roughly an hour -- that's twice as long as my longest browser session for 
version 87 on the old profile.

I still convinced this is a bug -- nothing in my profile should cause a SEGV, 
ref_count violation, or corrupted double-linked list.  But, there's at least a 
workaround, that I'm going to take advantage of, to create a new, blank 
profile and either sync or manually import (or likely a combination of both) 
all your settings into the new profile.

It's not going to be a kind experience for people upgrading from buster to 
bullseye, especially since the crashes make it hard to export settings from 
your old profile.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
Twitter: @DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#977901: chromium: Inconsistent SEGV

2020-12-22 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 23:43:23 +0100 Michel Le Bihan  wrote:
> Installing `chromium-dbgsym` should be enough. Please run Chromium with
> the `--debug` flag like: `chromium --debug`.

See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963711#10

Chromium crashes on startup if I use the "-g" or "--debug" options.  After I 
issue a "run" at the "(gdb)" prompt, there's some time (a few seconds), but I 
never get a GUI window and then it crashes.  I do get a usable back trace for 
the crash on startup, which I added to that bug.

> I was not able to reproduce those crashes.

That's unfortunate.  I'm up to 50 just today.  I'm probably going to have to 
downgrade to 83 at least until there's another update.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
Twitter: @DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#608220: hugs98: FTBFS (sort of): Socket.hsc: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct ucred'

2010-12-31 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <201012291227.36061.mindboosterno...@gmail.com> (Message #10), Marcos 
Marado wrote:
>Couldn't this be something similar to this one?
>http://trac.haskell.org/network/ticket/20

Looks very similar.  I wasn't able to look at the linked patch because the URL 
now gives a 404.  Perhaps the patch can be retrieved from the history of GHC 
v6.11..v6.12.

In <20101231161502.gy14...@debian.org> (Message #15), Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>This seems to go away once the attached patch applied.

I'm a bit concerned about automatically adding _GNU_SOURCE to the compiler 
flags.  I know I've got a few programs banging around that fail to compile 
when that is applied, because they requires the POSIX version of strerror_r.  
In particular, this could change the results of previous AC_COMPILE tests.

Does the patch work without the nested AC_COMPILE_IFELSE?  If not, I'd say 
apply and fix any potential fallout later.  Otherwise, it would be good to 
drop it.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#607988: Confirmation

2010-12-31 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
Just wanted to confirm that I have seen this on both my systems where I've 
upgraded to the Squeeze version of the python package.  Most of the dangling 
symlinks were in /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/reportlab, but I believe 
there were a few others that had to be removed from /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-
packages.

The package(s) that created the symlinks should be responsible for removing 
them, but I think the patch provided by Mr. Dreimann (or something similar) 
should be applied to prevent the package upgrade failures.  (Any dpkg error is 
rather intimidating to new users.)
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#532065: java-gcj-compat-dev failure to install

2009-06-15 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <200906081535.31671.dschep...@gmail.com>, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>The problem is that neither gcj, gcj-jdk, nor java-gcj-compat-dev depends
> on gcj-4.3 anymore.  An "apt-get install default-jdk-builddep gcj-4.3"
> works fine in a chroot.  So it should be enough just to add gcj-4.3 as a
> dependency of one of those packages.

Stable gcj:
Version: 4:4.3.2-2
Depends:
cpp (>= 4:4.3.2-2),
gij (>= 4:4.3.2-2),
gcj-4.3 (>= 4.3.2-1)

Testing gcj:
Version: 4:4.3.3-5
Depends:
cpp (>= 4:4.3.3-5),
gij (>= 4:4.3.3-5),
gcj-4.3 (>= 4.3.3-2)

Unstable gcj-jdk:
Version: 4:4.3.3-9
Depends:
libgcj-common (>= 1:4.4.0-7),
gcj-jre (>= 4:4.3.3-9),
java-gcj-compat-dev (>= 1.0.80),
gcj-4.3 (>= 4.3.3-2)


No matter what flavor you are pulling from gcj+gcj-jdk should Depend on 
gcj-4.3.  So, the quoted diagnosis is surely wrong.  I think instead that 
default-jdk is missing a Depend on gcj-jdk OR java-gcj-compat-dev is missing 
a Depend on gcj-jdk.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net  ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#489593: Can I haz stack frames plz?

2008-07-09 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
Once you get the SIGSEGV in gdb, please use the bt command to produce a full 
backtrace.  Before generating another backtrace, please install 
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libc6-dbg if possible.  (Not sure if it will 
work with ldconfig broken.)

Thank you for your effort so far.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.