Bug#821463: Info received (Bug#821463:NOT fixed in chromium-browser 50.0.2661.75-2)
Interestingly the new package chromium (50.0.2661.94-1~deb8u1) [security] does not have the Aw snap! in gmailbug, unlike the Sid 50.0.2661.94 version. On 1 May 2016 at 06:28, Bryan Cebuliak wrote: > Aw snap! The bug persists in the latest 50.0.2661.94 update. > > On 30 April 2016 at 15:12, Debian Bug Tracking System < > ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote: > >> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding >> this Bug report. >> >> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message >> has been received. >> >> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other >> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. >> >> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): >> Debian Chromium Maintainers >> >> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please >> send it to 821...@bugs.debian.org. >> >> Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish >> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. >> >> -- >> 821463: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821463 >> Debian Bug Tracking System >> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems >> > >
Bug#821463: Info received (Bug#821463:NOT fixed in chromium-browser 50.0.2661.75-2)
Aw snap! The bug persists in the latest 50.0.2661.94 update. On 30 April 2016 at 15:12, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding > this Bug report. > > This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message > has been received. > > Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other > interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. > > Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): > Debian Chromium Maintainers > > If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please > send it to 821...@bugs.debian.org. > > Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish > to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. > > -- > 821463: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821463 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems >
Bug#821463: NOT fixed in chromium-browser 50.0.2661.75-2
This bug is not the same as bug 821154 and is not yet fixed. Still "Aw snap " when using gmail. The bug does not appear on chromium (50.0.2661.75-1~deb8u1) [security].
Bug#622280: two workarounds necessary now for gnucash to start
In the meantime, Gnucash maintainers have wisely reverted
Gnucash 2.4.5-2 back to guile 1.6 for us bleeding users.
On 1 May 2011 08:38, Bryan Cebuliak wrote:
> The problem with the catalogue only started at 1.8.8+1-1 and
> persists to 1.8.8+1-2.
>
> On 1 May 2011 01:02, Rob Browning wrote:
>> Rob Browning writes:
>>
>>> Bryan Cebuliak writes:
>>>
>>>> Correct, Jacek. Both guile-1.8-dev and your manual fix are needed
>>>> for gnucash to start with guile 1.8.8. Should this be a new
>>>> bug or are developers onto it?
>>
>>> I'm not sure, but I think the problem may have been that the catalog
>>> needs to be updated whenever either the Guile or SLIB packages are
>>> upgraded, which wasn't possible via guile-X.Y-slib alone, but I'm
>>> wondering if it might be possible now, via triggers. I'll have to do
>>> some investigation.
>>
>> Jacek Politowski writes:
>>
>>> After migration to guile-1.8 there is slib modules(?) catalogue
>>> missing ('slibcat' file), which probably should be created by some
>>> postinst scripts (either slib's or guile's).
>>
>> Actually, I forgot to ask. Was this with 1.8.8+1-1 (or newer), or some
>> older version? As of 1.8.8+1-1, I reinstated the guile-1.8-slib
>> package, and it should handle creating the catalog (though gnucash will
>> have to depend on it).
>>
>> Actually, though, now that I think about it, Gnucash should hold off on
>> adding that dependency. I'm starting to wonder if triggers might allow
>> us to drop guile-1.8-slib altogether (again), and just have the main
>> guile package handle managing the catalog.
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Rob Browning
>> rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
>> GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
>>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#622280: two workarounds necessary now for gnucash to start
The problem with the catalogue only started at 1.8.8+1-1 and
persists to 1.8.8+1-2.
On 1 May 2011 01:02, Rob Browning wrote:
> Rob Browning writes:
>
>> Bryan Cebuliak writes:
>>
>>> Correct, Jacek. Both guile-1.8-dev and your manual fix are needed
>>> for gnucash to start with guile 1.8.8. Should this be a new
>>> bug or are developers onto it?
>
>> I'm not sure, but I think the problem may have been that the catalog
>> needs to be updated whenever either the Guile or SLIB packages are
>> upgraded, which wasn't possible via guile-X.Y-slib alone, but I'm
>> wondering if it might be possible now, via triggers. I'll have to do
>> some investigation.
>
> Jacek Politowski writes:
>
>> After migration to guile-1.8 there is slib modules(?) catalogue
>> missing ('slibcat' file), which probably should be created by some
>> postinst scripts (either slib's or guile's).
>
> Actually, I forgot to ask. Was this with 1.8.8+1-1 (or newer), or some
> older version? As of 1.8.8+1-1, I reinstated the guile-1.8-slib
> package, and it should handle creating the catalog (though gnucash will
> have to depend on it).
>
> Actually, though, now that I think about it, Gnucash should hold off on
> adding that dependency. I'm starting to wonder if triggers might allow
> us to drop guile-1.8-slib altogether (again), and just have the main
> guile package handle managing the catalog.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Rob Browning
> rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
> GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#622280: two workarounds necessary now for gnucash to start
Correct, Jacek. Both guile-1.8-dev and your manual fix are needed for gnucash to start with guile 1.8.8. Should this be a new bug or are developers onto it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#622280: on update to guile 1.8.8 workaround is failing
On update to guile 1.8.8 the previous workaround does not work and Gnucash does not start. $ gnucash gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc relocation support was disabled at configure time. Backtrace: In unknown file: ?: 0* [primitive-load-path "c-interface.scm"] In /usr/share/gnucash/scm/c-interface.scm: 21: 1* [slib:require hash-table] In /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/require.scm: 141: 2 (cond ((not feature) (set! *catalog* #f)) ((slib:provided? feature)) ...) 145: 3 (let* ((path #)) (cond (# #) (# # #) (# # #) ...)) 145: 4* [catalog:get hash-table] 76: 5* (if (not *catalog*) (let* ((slibcat #)) (cond (# # #)) ...)) 77: 6 (let* ((slibcat #)) (cond (# # #)) (cond (slibcat #)) ...) 78: 7* (cond ((not #) (slib:load-source #) (set! slibcat #))) 79: 8* [# . extra)> "/usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/mklibcat"] 205: 9 [with-load-pathname "/usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/mklibcat" ...] In /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/guile.init: ... 152: 10 [dynamic-wind # # #] In unknown file: ?: 11* [#] In /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/require.scm: 207: 12* [apply # #] In unknown file: ?: 13 [slib:load "/usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/mklibcat"] ... ?: 14 [dynamic-wind # # #] ?: 15* [#] In /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/guile.init: 395: 16* (let* ((errinfo #)) (if (and errinfo #) (apply throw errinfo))) 398: 17 (if (and errinfo (catch # # #)) (apply throw errinfo)) In unknown file: ... ?: 18 [throw] /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/guile.init:398:17: In procedure open-file in expression (if (and errinfo #) (apply throw errinfo)): /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/guile.init:398:17: Permission denied: "/usr/share/guile/1.8/slibcat" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556046: ATA drive root partition "does not exist"
Is this relevant? udev creates broken initrd http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554364 2009/11/16 Bryan Cebuliak > Is this relevant? Will test later unless someone else does: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devmapper/+bug/358654 > > 2009/11/14 Bryan Cebuliak > > This bug may be a duplicate of 556046: >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556046 >> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555702<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556046> > >
Bug#556046: ATA drive root partition "does not exist"
Is this relevant? Will test later unless someone else does: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devmapper/+bug/358654 2009/11/14 Bryan Cebuliak > This bug may be a duplicate of 556046: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556046 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555702<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556046>
Bug#556046: ATA drive root partition "does not exist"
This bug may be a duplicate of 556046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556046
Bug#441363: Fwd: Bug#441363: old gnucash does not start
-- Forwarded message -- From: Bryan Cebuliak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sep 15, 2007 7:47 AM Subject: Re: Bug#441363: old gnucash does not start To: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dear Thomas, Yes. The stable upstream Gnucash does not require g-wrap. See: http://www.gnucash.org/ "..To install GnuCash on other platforms, users will need Gnome 2, guile, and slib. Neither the currently used swig nor the previously used g-wrap packages are needed anymore when compiling from tarball or when installing a binary..." Guile 1.6 does just fine on my Debian Sid partition, as long as guile 1.8, including its g-wrap dependant, is not installed at the time of building gnucash. I am happily doing my accounts again. Though, apparently, the scheduled transactions can not be read by versions of Gnucash 2.0 or less. As for SLIB and Guile. It appears to be last year's problem resurfaced according to the upstream discussion which you have read here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347922 Seems to be something to do with loading SLIB's guile.init at the appropriate moment, according to Quillian Rutherford. Cheers Bryan On 9/15/07, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 15:20 +1000, Bryan Cebuliak wrote: > > Current stable gnucash 2.2.1 will build properly as long as guile > > 1.8 [and its dependants] is[are] not installed. Guile 1.8 can be > > installed later with no interference. See: > > http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building > > Is this true even if we are using g-wrap? Part of the problem, AIUI, is > that Debian's g-wrap requires guile-1.8. > > Thomas > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441363: old gnucash does not start
> Dear Thomas, > Yes. The stable upstream Gnucash does not require g-wrap. See: > http://www.gnucash.org/ > "..To install GnuCash on other platforms, users will need Gnome 2, > guile, and slib. Neither the currently used swig nor the previously > used g-wrap packages are needed anymore when compiling from tarball or > when installing a binary..." > > Guile 1.6 does just fine on my Debian Sid partition, as long as guile > 1.8, including its g-wrap dependant, is not installed at the time of > building gnucash. > > I am happily doing my accounts again. Though, apparently, the > scheduled transactions can not be read by versions of Gnucash 2.0 or > less. > > As for SLIB and Guile. It appears to be last year's problem resurfaced > according to the upstream discussion which you have read here: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347922 > Seems to be something to do with loading SLIB's guile.init at the > appropriate moment, according to Quillian Rutherford. > Cheers > Bryan > On 9/15/07, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 15:20 +1000, Bryan Cebuliak wrote: > > > Current stable gnucash 2.2.1 will build properly as long as guile > > > 1.8 [and its dependants] is[are] not installed. Guile 1.8 can be > > > installed later with no interference. See: > > > http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building > > > > Is this true even if we are using g-wrap? Part of the problem, AIUI, is > > that Debian's g-wrap requires guile-1.8. > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441363: old gnucash does not start
Current stable gnucash 2.2.1 will build properly as long as guile 1.8 [and its dependants] is[are] not installed. Guile 1.8 can be installed later with no interference. See: http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
