Bug#970638: FIXED: jag: cannot upgrade from 0.3.6-1 to 0.3.8-1
Hi Andreas, Added in debian/control: Breaks+Replaces on jag-data. + Breaks: jag-data (<< 0.3.8) + Replaces: jag-data (<< 0.3.8) Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#953487: Bugs fixed in runescape/0.8-1
Hi, Improvements were made to the Runescape launcher, as reported. BUG #953487: - This bug contains "XS-Autobuild: yes" in d/control and also a warning about "Autobuilding" in d/copyright since the runescape/0.5-2 package which has not been changed since recent versions. BUG #956275: - Own icon created in SVG and PNG formats for this runescape launcher. BUG #956276: - Added in the script (runescape.sh) the integrity check with the hashsum of the downloaded file. - Added warning message via kdialog or zenity when executing the script, explaining what it does. Thanks see you soon! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#953487: fixed in runescape 0.7-1
Hi Markus, > I suggest we wait a little for a response from > non-f...@buildd.debian.org before we make another upload. However if > there is no response in two weeks, we can just proceed by making a > binary upload of runescape. Perfect, I will be waiting and I hope it is a positive answer. ;) > Bug #956275 can be resolved by replacing the runescape.png icon. The > license is most likely not BSD-2-clause. You should either document the > correct license, the image must be distributable at least, or you can > create or find your own icon. For instance you could create an image the > same size with a black, red or blue background and then you add the R S > initials in white. Simple icon, easily done. Removed icon that does not belong to the BSD-2-clause license and created the icon itself in SVG and PNG formats using the Inkscape software.[1] [1] https://gitlab.com/coringao/runescape/-/blob/master/src/runescape.png > Bug #956276 is about an additional verification step, e.g. to verify the > integrity of the launcher with a hashsum. You could store the value in a > text file in our Git repository and then fetch the value and compare it > with the hashsum of the binary before you run the java command. By > storing the value in Git we can adjust the value whenever there is a new > runescape update without having to make another Debian upload. This > could be especially useful for stable releases. In any case I would try > to avoid to hardcode the value. > > I don't consider bug #956276 release critical because there is no Debian > Policy justification for it and there is no more risk involved than > downloading the file with a web browser normally poses, so it should be > treated as a normal or important bug. What you can and should do is to > improve the package description. It should be clear that src:runescape > is a mere script that downloads and runs the runescape launcher and that > Debian cannot guarantee the integrity of this binary file because it is > non-free and it is closed source. So simply warn about that in the > package description and when your script is executed. The warning > message could be displayed in a text terminal or you could use zenity to > make it more user friendly and obvious. Added verification of the downloaded file against a hash in good condition. I thank Stephen Kitt for helping me. :D I added a friendly warning when running the launcher via kdialog or zenity.[2] [2] https://gitlab.com/coringao/runescape/-/blob/master/src/runescape.sh Once approved by non-f...@buildd.debian.org, I will update the package to version 0.8, where I will add this warning to the long description of "debian/control" and depends: kdialog | zenity. See you later! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#953487: fixed in runescape 0.7-1
Hi Markus, I hope everything is fine with you and your family. > I had uploaded the new version of runescape to fix bug 953487 because > you stated in > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953487#25 > > that the package has been whitelisted. Apparently this is not the case > hence I am writing to non-f...@buildd.debian.org again and I kindly ask > that runescape is whitelisted for autobuilding. The package is basically > a script and the license allows autobuilding. I am grateful that you uploaded this latest version of runescape, but I didn't quite understand what happened in those discussions in the posted messages. I will create a new icon and add a warning when starting the script, as mentioned in the message https://bugs.debian.org/953487#54 I want to thank Stephen for offering help in solving the problem of validating the downloaded JAR file, where I don't know how I do it at the moment. Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#953487: fixed in runescape 0.7-1
Hi Ivo, > This new version doesn't fix the autobuilding issue: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=runescape I don't understand how the package still has the autobuilding problem. I did several construction tests via pbuilder and sbuild and there were no problems, as shown in the attached file. :/ > Looking at the package, I also discovered some other issues, which I will file > as separate bugs. Ok, if you can help me with the solution of these problems that you encountered, I would be very grateful. And I will fix it as soon as possible. Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.79.0 (05 February 2020) on debian +==+ | runescape 0.7-1 (amd64) Fri, 10 Apr 2020 04:55:06 + | +==+ Package: runescape Version: 0.7-1 Source Version: 0.7-1 Distribution: unstable Machine Architecture: amd64 Host Architecture: amd64 Build Architecture: amd64 Build Type: binary I: NOTICE: Log filtering will replace 'var/run/schroot/mount/unstable-amd64-sbuild-fc24b32c-2ef2-471e-b205-948f47eacc05' with '<>' I: NOTICE: Log filtering will replace 'build/runescape-sc2aq8/resolver-HIG1xG' with '<>' +--+ | Update chroot| +--+ Hit:1 https://deb.debian.org/debian unstable InRelease Reading package lists... W: Download is performed unsandboxed as root as file '/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_InRelease' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Calculating upgrade... 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. +--+ | Fetch source files | +--+ Local sources - /home/coringao/sandbox/runescape.pkg/runescape_0.7-1.dsc exists in /home/coringao/sandbox/runescape.pkg; copying to chroot I: NOTICE: Log filtering will replace 'build/runescape-sc2aq8/runescape-0.7' with '<>' I: NOTICE: Log filtering will replace 'build/runescape-sc2aq8' with '<>' +--+ | Install package build dependencies | +--+ Setup apt archive - Merged Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 12), default-jdk-headless | default-jdk, build-essential, fakeroot Filtered Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 12), default-jdk-headless, build-essential, fakeroot dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy' in '/<>/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy.deb'. Ign:1 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ InRelease Get:2 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Release [957 B] Ign:3 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg Get:4 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Sources [388 B] Get:5 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Packages [466 B] Fetched 1811 B in 0s (69.8 kB/s) Reading package lists... W: Download is performed unsandboxed as root as file '/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/_build_runescape-sc2aq8_resolver-HIG1xG_apt%5farchive_._InRelease' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) Reading package lists... Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver) Installing build dependencies Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following additional packages will be installed: autoconf automake autopoint autotools-dev bsdmainutils ca-certificates-java debhelper default-jdk-headless default-jre-headless dh-autoreconf dh-strip-nondeterminism dwz file fontconfig-config fonts-dejavu-core gettext gettext-base groff-base intltool-debian java-common libarchive-zip-perl libasound2 libasound2-data libavahi-client3 libavahi-common-data libavahi-common3 libbsd0 libcroco3 libcups2 libdbus-1-3 libdebhelper-perl libelf1 libexpat1 libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl libfontconfig1 libfreetype6 libglib2.0-0 libgssapi-krb5-2 libicu63 libjpeg62-turbo libk5crypto3 libkeyutils1 libkrb5-3 libkrb5support0 liblcms2-2 libmagic-mgc libmagic1 libnspr4 libnss3 libpcsclite1 libpipeline1 libpng16-16 libsigsegv2 libsqlite3-0 libsub-override
Bug#953487: Runescape package: Autobuilding
Hi, I come to warn that the runescape package can be built automatically and there is "XS-Autobuild: yes" added to debian/control[1] and notified to debian/copyright[2]. --- Disclaimer: The contents of this package can not be distributed as part of the Debian distribution. It is provided in the non-free file area for the convenience of Debian users. . Autobuilding: According the license there are no problems to build this software on several architectures automatically and distributing it. --- [1] https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/runescape/-/blob/debian/master/debian/control [2] https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/runescape/-/blob/debian/master/debian/copyright See you! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#953487: Bug#954055: RFS: runescape/0.7-1 [RC] -- Multiplayer online game set in a fantasy world
Hi Juhani, > Please confirm how you are fixing #953487. debian/control already > > contains XS-Autobuild: yes. Have you followed through with the process > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#non-free-buildd > > and sent to non-f...@buildd.debian.org? Have they responded? The package already contains "XS-Autobuild: yes" in d/control and also a warning about "Autobuilding" in d/copyright since the runescape/0.5-2 package that was not changed in this release[1]. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/runescape/-/blob/debian/master/debian/changelog What I didn't do at the moment was to send an email to non-f...@buildd.debian.org, which I will do immediately. Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#953487: marked as pending in runescape
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #953487 in runescape reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/runescape/-/commit/9b3d6ff837e1f2cdb9be62e4bc220c1dcdca075a Import Debian changes 0.7-1 runescape (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. (Closes: #953487, #953714) * debian/control: + Bumped Standards-Version to 4.5.0. + Added in Build-Depends: default-jdk-headless | default-jdk. + Added in Depends: default-jre-headless. * Added autopkgtest. * debian/copyright: + Copyright information organized for contacts. + Copyright updated for current years (2020). * Update debian/upstream/metadata years (2020). (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/953487
Bug#953714: marked as pending in runescape
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #953714 in runescape reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/runescape/-/commit/9b3d6ff837e1f2cdb9be62e4bc220c1dcdca075a Import Debian changes 0.7-1 runescape (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. (Closes: #953487, #953714) * debian/control: + Bumped Standards-Version to 4.5.0. + Added in Build-Depends: default-jdk-headless | default-jdk. + Added in Depends: default-jre-headless. * Added autopkgtest. * debian/copyright: + Copyright information organized for contacts. + Copyright updated for current years (2020). * Update debian/upstream/metadata years (2020). (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/953714
Bug#952066: jag: FTBFS: SDL_mixer.h:25:10: fatal error: SDL_stdinc.h: No such file or directory
Hi, A new version of jag/0.3.6-1 was released where the following fixes were made[1]: * Fixed -> in the source files. * Added "pkg-config --cflags sdl2" and "pkg-config --libs sdl2 SDL2_mixer" in the game.pro file. [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/jag Bye! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#952066: marked as pending in jag
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952066 in jag reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/jag/-/commit/9cbd064208d6c4885ac6afeca8fe837c936601ec
Import Debian changes 0.3.6-1
jag (0.3.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release. FTBFS bug fixed. (Closes: #952066)
* debian/control:
+ Bumped Standards-Version to 4.5.0.
+ Set Rules-Requires-Root to no.
- Removed ${source:Version} from Depends.
* debian/copyright:
+ Added copyright information for contact.
+ Copyright updated for current years (2020).
* Update debian/upstream/metadata years (2020).
* Removed d/jag.6 and d/jag.desktop.
* debian/jag.install:
+ Binary file path changed.
+ Changed the path of the jag.desktop file.
* debian/manpages: Changed the path of the jag.6 file.
* debian/rules: Removed override_dh_auto_clean.
(this message was generated automatically)
--
Greetings
https://bugs.debian.org/952066
Bug#952049: pekka-kana-2: FTBFS: SDL_image.h:100:24: error: missing binary operator before token "("
Hi Markus, > I have uploaded pekka-kana-2 to unstable. The pristine-tar commit for > version 1.2.6 was missing. Please don't forget to include it next time. Added version 1.2.6 of pristine-tar.[1] [1] https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/pekka-kana-2/-/tree/pristine-tar Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#952049: pekka-kana-2: FTBFS: SDL_image.h:100:24: error: missing binary operator before token "("
Hi, Thank you very much for notifying me about the bug and the fix. I made a new version of pekka-kana-2/1.2.6-1[1] fixing this bug and improvements. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952422 See you later! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#935669: assaultcube-data (1.2.0.2.1-3) in enabled autobuilding
Hi Philipp, > Within the TEXTURES part of the "Other" license there are a few that do > not actually allow the textures to be shipped. Do we have a reasonable > assumption that it is actually the "Other" license's cover text that > applies to them? For instance I'm concerned about these (with no > expectation of covering them exhaustively): I understand that, in short, most of these licenses of each author of these textures were concerned with the commercialization of these textures and the non-disclosure of the authors. And many of these authors over the years have had their websites, blogs, and emails disabled. In the assaultcube-data package is disclosing all authors, contacts and their licenses. What I can do is research and contact these authors of these textures and let us know more about the license. If you find it necessary. Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#935669: assaultcube-data (1.2.0.2.1-3) in enabled autobuilding
Hi, The assaultcube-data (1.2.0.2.1-3) package includes "XS-Autobuild: yes" in the header portion of "debian/control"[1] and the disclaimer compliance with the licenses contained in "debian/copyright"[2] where It's okay to create the software automatically across multiple architectures and distribute it. [1] https://sources.debian.org/src/assaultcube-data/1.2.0.2.1-3/debian/control [2] https://sources.debian.org/src/assaultcube-data/1.2.0.2.1-3/debian/copyright If so, could you approve this package or do I need to target something else? Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#935669: assaultcube-data: Outdated version makes assaultcube uninstallable
Hi Reiner, > I think the problem is that assaultcube-data 1.2.0.2.1-2 was uploaded > source-only. Someone needs to do a new upload including the arch:all > binary package, as it is in non-free (which the buildds don't seem to > build). I suspected it was, so I added "Multi-Arch: Foreign". I don't know if it's the correct one. > I think this change [0] does not help, as you can't enforce a version > on a suggested package: > > > -Suggests: assaultcube > > +Suggests: assaultcube (>= 1.2.0.2.1) I will be removing and awaiting sponsor review. Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#935669: assaultcube-data: Outdated version makes assaultcube uninstallable
Hi Simon, > Alternatively, if it's legally and technically OK to build assaultcube-data > on buildds, a maintainer can mark it to be autobuilt and do source uploads: > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#non-free-buildd "XS-Autobuild: yes" is in debian/control[0] and commented in debian/copyright[1]. [0] https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/assaultcube data/blob/master/debian/control [1] https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/assaultcube-data/blob/master/debian/copyright Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#935669: assaultcube-data: Outdated version makes assaultcube uninstallable
Hi, > The assaultcube package got updated to version 1.2.0.2.1-1, but the > matching assaultcube-data package has not been uploaded which makes > the former to be currently uninstallable in unstable. I have made some changes to debian/control, please review the package again. If it continues to go wrong, could someone guide me to solve this problem? Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#935669: marked as pending in assaultcube-data
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #935669 in assaultcube-data reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/assaultcube-data/commit/18e771a67cdbac1c0485d5b1da6703577832583b Import Debian changes 1.2.0.2.1-3 assaultcube-data (1.2.0.2.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/control: (Closes: #935669) + Add Multi-Arch: foreign to all the binary packages. + Fixed Breaks+Replaces+Suggests relationship on assaultcube-data to avoid problems when upgrading from package. (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/935669
