Bug#1069909: dcraw: diff for NMU version 9.28-5.1

2024-05-29 Thread Eriberto Mota
> Dear Eriberto,
> 
>   thank you for preparing of the upload. I think it
> is completelly ready to be published thanks to you.
> 
> Best regards,
> FH
> --
> PS. Sorry I am late, the end semester is hectic.

Hi Filip,

Thanks for your reply. I just uploaded the NMU revision.

I wish you a good end of the semester.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#1071975: dh-make: Don't include 'Multi-Arch: foreign' in debian/control

2024-05-26 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Source: dh-make
Version: 2.202302
Severity: serious
Justification: Multiarch false promises
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org, hel...@subdivi.de, 
chris.obb...@collabora.com

Dear dh-make maintainers,

This bug is related to #1040542 and to commit d411b19 on Salsa[1].

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dh-make/-/commit/d411b19

Currently, the dh_make command adds 'Multi-Arch: foreign' automatically to
several packages. This implies that Multiarch will honor all items present
here[2] in all new packages sent to Debian and made by people that don't
know Multiarch (including some sponsors).

[2] https://wiki.debian.org/DependencyHell#Multi-Arch:_foreign

The natural consequence will be once such a package enters the archive, the
Multiarch:hinter will suggest more 'Multi-Arch: foreign' based on this promise
and before too long we have an archive polluted with false promises, rendering
Multiarch useless.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#1069909: dcraw: diff for NMU version 9.28-5.1

2024-05-25 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 1069909 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for dcraw (versioned as 9.28-5.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel or delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -Nru dcraw-9.28/debian/changelog dcraw-9.28/debian/changelog
--- dcraw-9.28/debian/changelog 2024-03-26 06:42:04.0 -0300
+++ dcraw-9.28/debian/changelog 2024-05-25 12:18:40.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+dcraw (9.28-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/patches/remove-duplicate-memmem.patch: created to avoid a FTBFS
+caused by a redundant duplicate implementation of memmem(). Thanks to
+Steve Langasek . (Closes: #1069909)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sat, 25 May 2024 12:18:40 
-0300
+
 dcraw (9.28-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Added missing headers for Fuji cameras; Closes: #1066465
diff -Nru dcraw-9.28/debian/patches/remove-duplicate-memmem.patch 
dcraw-9.28/debian/patches/remove-duplicate-memmem.patch
--- dcraw-9.28/debian/patches/remove-duplicate-memmem.patch 1969-12-31 
21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ dcraw-9.28/debian/patches/remove-duplicate-memmem.patch 2024-05-25 
12:18:40.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+Description: don't reimplement memmem()
+ memmem() is implemented in glibc, don't have a redundant duplicate
+ implementation with a different prototype.
+Author: Steve Langasek 
+Last-Update: 2024-04-09
+Forwarded: no
+
+Index: dcraw-9.28/parse.c
+===
+--- dcraw-9.28.orig/parse.c
 dcraw-9.28/parse.c
+@@ -1213,16 +1213,6 @@
+   }
+ }
+ 
+-char *memmem (char *haystack, size_t haystacklen,
+-  char *needle, size_t needlelen)
+-{
+-  char *c;
+-  for (c = haystack; c <= haystack + haystacklen - needlelen; c++)
+-if (!memcmp (c, needle, needlelen))
+-  return c;
+-  return NULL;
+-}
+-
+ /*
+Identify which camera created this file, and set global variables
+accordingly.Return nonzero if the file cannot be decoded.
diff -Nru dcraw-9.28/debian/patches/series dcraw-9.28/debian/patches/series
--- dcraw-9.28/debian/patches/series2024-03-26 06:42:04.0 -0300
+++ dcraw-9.28/debian/patches/series2024-05-25 12:18:40.0 -0300
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
 iowrap.diff
 0009-missing_headers.patch
 0010-Fuji-headers.patch
+remove-duplicate-memmem.patch



Bug#1071541: FTBFS: obs-source-clone/audio-wrapper.c:134:25: error: ‘circlebuf_push_back’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]

2024-05-20 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
KGS/obs-source-clone2/obs-source-clone-0.1.4/source-clone.c:88:17: error: 
‘circlebuf_free’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
   88 | circlebuf_free(>audio_data[i]);
  | ^~
/usr/include/obs/util/circlebuf.h:46:35: note: declared here
   46 | OBS_DEPRECATED static inline void circlebuf_free(struct circlebuf *cb)
  |   ^~
/PKGS/obs-source-clone2/obs-source-clone-0.1.4/source-clone.c:90:9: error: 
‘circlebuf_free’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
   90 | circlebuf_free(>audio_frames);
  | ^~
/usr/include/obs/util/circlebuf.h:46:35: note: declared here
   46 | OBS_DEPRECATED static inline void circlebuf_free(struct circlebuf *cb)
  |   ^~
/PKGS/obs-source-clone2/obs-source-clone-0.1.4/source-clone.c:91:9: error: 
‘circlebuf_free’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
   91 | circlebuf_free(>audio_timestamps);
  | ^~
/usr/include/obs/util/circlebuf.h:46:35: note: declared here
   46 | OBS_DEPRECATED static inline void circlebuf_free(struct circlebuf *cb)
  |   ^~
/PKGS/obs-source-clone2/obs-source-clone-0.1.4/source-clone.c: In function 
‘source_clone_video_tick’:
/PKGS/obs-source-clone2/obs-source-clone-0.1.4/source-clone.c:588:17: error: 
‘circlebuf_pop_front’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
  588 | circlebuf_pop_front(>audio_frames, 
,
  | ^~~
/usr/include/obs/util/circlebuf.h:291:35: note: declared here
  291 | OBS_DEPRECATED static inline void circlebuf_pop_front(struct circlebuf 
*cb,
  |   ^~~
/PKGS/obs-source-clone2/obs-source-clone-0.1.4/source-clone.c:590:17: error: 
‘circlebuf_pop_front’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
  590 | circlebuf_pop_front(>audio_timestamps,
  | ^~~
/usr/include/obs/util/circlebuf.h:291:35: note: declared here
  291 | OBS_DEPRECATED static inline void circlebuf_pop_front(struct circlebuf 
*cb,
  |   ^~~
/PKGS/obs-source-clone2/obs-source-clone-0.1.4/source-clone.c:598:25: error: 
‘circlebuf_pop_front’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
  598 | circlebuf_pop_front(>audio_data[i], 
NULL,
  | ^~~
/usr/include/obs/util/circlebuf.h:291:35: note: declared here
  291 | OBS_DEPRECATED static inline void circlebuf_pop_front(struct circlebuf 
*cb,
  |   ^~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/source-clone.dir/build.make:93: 
CMakeFiles/source-clone.dir/audio-wrapper.c.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/source-clone.dir/build.make:79: 
CMakeFiles/source-clone.dir/source-clone.c.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory 
'/PKGS/obs-source-clone2/obs-source-clone-0.1.4/obj-i686-linux-gnu'
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:86: CMakeFiles/source-clone.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory 
'/PKGS/obs-source-clone2/obs-source-clone-0.1.4/obj-i686-linux-gnu'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:159: all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory 
'/PKGS/obs-source-clone2/obs-source-clone-0.1.4/obj-i686-linux-gnu'
dh_auto_build: error: cd obj-i686-linux-gnu && make -j16 "INSTALL=install 
--strip-program=true" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
make: *** [debian/rules:17: binary] Error 25

Eriberto


Bug#1071017: FTBFS: source-copy.cpp:615:31: error: ‘void obs_sceneitem_get_info(const obs_sceneitem_t*, obs_transform_info*)’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]

2024-05-19 Thread Eriberto Mota
The current new upstream release (0.2.3) also will FTBFS.

Eriberto



Bug#1071007: sherlock: Must not ship /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/__init__.py

2024-05-18 Thread Eriberto
Em sáb., 18 de mai. de 2024 às 21:08, Samuel Henrique
 escreveu:
>
> Control: reopen -1 =
>
> I see on git that the bug was closed with a Conflicts+Replaces stanza, but
> that's not the correct solution for this issue.
>
> As discussed on this bugreport, the fix is to not ship the file.
>
> Reopening to block the problematic package to migrate to testing.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Samuel Henrique 
>

In addition, 'Conflicts' is a very extreme solution for many use cases.

Eriberto



Bug#1071273: skales: Architecture should be 'all'

2024-05-17 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Source: skales
Version: 0.20170929-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 5.6.8

The package only provides executables made in Python, but it is
using 'Architecture: any'.

Eriberto



Bug#1071017: FTBFS: source-copy.cpp:615:31: error: ‘void obs_sceneitem_get_info(const obs_sceneitem_t*, obs_transform_info*)’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]

2024-05-12 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: obs-source-copy
Version: 0.2.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: FTBFS

When rebuilding the source code, we got:

/usr/bin/c++ -DHAVE_OBSCONFIG_H -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NO_DEBUG 
-DQT_WIDGETS_LIB -Dsource_copy_EXPORTS 
-I/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/source-copy_autogen/include
 -isystem /usr/include/obs -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt6/QtWidgets 
-isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt6 -isystem 
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt6/QtCore -isystem 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt6/mkspecs/linux-g++ -isystem 
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt6/QtGui -g -O2 
-ffile-prefix-map=/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC 
-Werror -Wextra -Wvla -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wswitch -Wunused-parameter 
-Wno-unused-function -Wno-missing-field-initializers -fno-strict-aliasing 
-Wconversion-null -fPIC -mmmx -msse -msse2 -MD -MT 
CMakeFiles/source-copy.dir/source-copy.cpp.o -MF 
CMakeFiles/source-copy.dir/source-copy.cpp.o.d -o 
CMakeFiles/source-copy.dir/source-copy.cpp.o -c 
/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/source-copy.cpp
/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/source-copy.cpp: In function 
‘obs_data_t* GetTransformData(obs_sceneitem_t*)’:
/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/source-copy.cpp:595:31: error: 
‘void obs_sceneitem_get_info(const obs_sceneitem_t*, obs_transform_info*)’ is 
deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
  595 | obs_sceneitem_get_info(item, );
  | ~~^
In file included from 
/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/source-copy.hpp:3,
 from 
/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/source-copy.cpp:1:
/usr/include/obs/obs.h:1889:1: note: declared here
 1889 | obs_sceneitem_get_info(const obs_sceneitem_t *item,
  | ^~
/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/source-copy.cpp: In function 
‘void LoadTransform(obs_sceneitem_t*, obs_data_t*)’:
/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/source-copy.cpp:615:31: error: 
‘void obs_sceneitem_get_info(const obs_sceneitem_t*, obs_transform_info*)’ is 
deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
  615 | obs_sceneitem_get_info(item, );
  | ~~^
/usr/include/obs/obs.h:1889:1: note: declared here
 1889 | obs_sceneitem_get_info(const obs_sceneitem_t *item,
  | ^~
/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/source-copy.cpp:624:31: error: 
‘void obs_sceneitem_set_info(obs_sceneitem_t*, const obs_transform_info*)’ is 
deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
  624 | obs_sceneitem_set_info(item, );
  | ~~^
/usr/include/obs/obs.h:1892:1: note: declared here
 1892 | obs_sceneitem_set_info(obs_sceneitem_t *item,
  | ^~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/source-copy.dir/build.make:100: 
CMakeFiles/source-copy.dir/source-copy.cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory 
'/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:89: CMakeFiles/source-copy.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory 
'/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:159: all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory 
'/PKGS/obs-source-copy/1/obs-source-copy-0.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
dh_auto_build: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j16 "INSTALL=install 
--strip-program=true" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
make: *** [debian/rules:14: binary] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2
debuild: fatal error at line 1184:
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -ui failed

Eriberto


Bug#1055540: obs-time-source: FTBFS on several archs: linker input file not found

2023-11-13 Thread Eriberto Mota
Some tests were made over Debian, Alpine and Fedora and the issue causing
the FTBFS is present only on Debian. The Meson finds the libobs, but fails
to build using it. Maybe it can be something related to #998853.

The upstream doesn't have a solution because he uses Alpine and the build
is perfect there (this bug is unreproducible outside of Debian).

My solution (or temporary solution): commonly, plugins for OBS are build
with CMake, so I made a patch[1] to use it instead of Meson. This solution
works fine and it is based in CMakeLists.txt files provided by Exeldro in
several plugins, like obs-move-transition[2].

[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/obs-time-source/-/blob/debian/master/debian/patches/010_use-cmake.patch
[2] 
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/obs-move-transition/-/blob/debian/master/CMakeLists.txt

Eriberto



Bug#1055540: obs-time-source: FTBFS on several archs: linker input file not found

2023-11-07 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: obs-time-source
Version: 0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: Fails to Build from Source
X-Debbugs-Cc: ~krystianch/public-in...@lists.sr.ht

The package fails to build from source on several architectures.

An example for arm64:

cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 ninja -j4 -v
[1/2] cc -Itime-source.so.p -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/obs 
-I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/harfbuzz 
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/libmount 
-I/usr/include/blkid -I/usr/include/fribidi -I/usr/include/cairo 
-I/usr/include/pixman-1 -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall 
-Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Wpedantic -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -mbranch-protection=standard -Wdate-time 
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -pthread -DHAVE_OBSCONFIG_H -DSIMDE_ENABLE_OPENMP 
'$<$,$>:-fopenmp-simd>'
 
'$<$,$>:-fopenmp-simd>'
 -MD -MQ time-source.so.p/time-source.c.o -MF 
time-source.so.p/time-source.c.o.d -o time-source.so.p/time-source.c.o -c 
../time-source.c
FAILED: time-source.so.p/time-source.c.o 
cc -Itime-source.so.p -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/obs -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include 
-I/usr/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng16 
-I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -I/usr/include/fribidi 
-I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -fdiagnostics-color=always 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Wpedantic -g -O2 
-ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
-fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security 
-mbranch-protection=standard -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -pthread 
-DHAVE_OBSCONFIG_H -DSIMDE_ENABLE_OPENMP 
'$<$,$>:-fopenmp-simd>'
 
'$<$,$>:-fopenmp-simd>'
 -MD -MQ time-source.so.p/time-source.c.o -MF 
time-source.so.p/time-source.c.o.d -o time-source.so.p/time-source.c.o -c 
../time-source.c
../time-source.c: In function ‘time_source_update’:
../time-source.c:95:9: warning: ‘__builtin_strncpy’ specified bound 64 equals 
destination size [-Wstringop-truncation]
   95 | strncpy(context->format, obs_data_get_string(settings, 
"format"),
  | ^
cc: warning: 
$<$,$>:-fopenmp-simd>:
 linker input file unused because linking not done
cc: error: 
$<$,$>:-fopenmp-simd>:
 linker input file not found: No such file or directory
cc: warning: 
$<$,$>:-fopenmp-simd>:
 linker input file unused because linking not done
cc: error: 
$<$,$>:-fopenmp-simd>:
 linker input file not found: No such file or directory
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
dh_auto_build: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 ninja -j4 -v 
returned exit code 1
make: *** [debian/rules:13: binary-arch] Error 25

Eriberto



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-13-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=pt_BR:pt:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages obs-time-source depends on:
ii  libc62.36-9+deb12u3
ii  libcairo21.16.0-7
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.74.6-2
ii  libobs0  29.0.2+dfsg-1+b1
ii  libpango-1.0-0   1.50.12+ds-1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0  1.50.12+ds-1
ii  obs-studio   29.0.2+dfsg-1+b1

obs-time-source recommends no packages.

obs-time-source suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


Bug#1054237: jdupes: data loss behaviour from fdupes

2023-10-19 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: jdupes
Version: 1.12-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream patch
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

>From the upstream in a private message:

jdupes inherited interactive deletion from fdupes and there were zero
input safeguards. A user tried to use ranges "2-4" and files 3 and 4 were
deleted, not preserved. This is a major data loss concern because the
behavior is destructive and contrary to user expectations. In the latest
commit I've placed heavy safeguards in the interactive deletion code that
should prevent all of the invalid input scenarios I can conceive.

The commit 4888e85[1] can and should be immediately applied to ALL
versions of jdupes that are being distributed. It should cleanly apply
and work without modification to every remotely recent version spanning
several years back.

[1] https://codeberg.org/jbruchon/jdupes/commit/4888e85



Bug#1050942: FTBFS: Failed 1/1 test programs. 5/246 subtests failed.

2023-09-13 Thread Eriberto
Em qua., 13 de set. de 2023 às 03:12, Simon Ruderich
 escreveu:
>
> Hi Eriberto,
>
> should be fixed in fb2c46d [2].
>
> Best,
> Simon
>
> [2]: 
> https://ruderich.org/simon/gitweb/?p=blhc/blhc.git;a=commitdiff;h=fb2c46d23c6052c714729d70d33d54011374689b

Thanks Simon! Have a nice day.



Bug#1050942: FTBFS: Failed 1/1 test programs. 5/246 subtests failed.

2023-08-31 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: blhc
Version: 0.13-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs upstream
Justification: fails to build from source
X-Debbugs-Cc: eribe...@debian.org, Simon Ruderich 

Dear Simon Ruderich,

Currently blhc fails to build from source in Debian Sid. This issue was
detected in Salsa[1].

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/blhc/-/jobs/4635438

I also tested it in a fresh jail:

dh_auto_test
/usr/bin/perl Build test --verbose 1

#   Failed test './t/logs/arch-avr32 --color (output)'
#   at t/tests.t line 45.
#  got: 'Use of uninitialized value $os in pattern match (m//) at 
./bin/blhc line 1194.
# Use of uninitialized value $cpu in pattern match (m//) at ./bin/blhc line 
1198.
# Use of uninitialized value $cpu in pattern match (m//) at ./bin/blhc line 
1202.
# LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,relro): gcc -o test test.o
# CFLAGS missing (-fstack-protector-strong): gcc -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 
-Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -Wall -c test.c
# LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,relro): gcc -o test test.o
# '
# expected: 'CFLAGS missing (-fstack-protector-strong): gcc 
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security 
-Wall -c test.c
# '

#   Failed test './t/logs/arch-avr32 (output)'
#   at t/tests.t line 45.
#  got: 'Use of uninitialized value $os in pattern match (m//) at 
./bin/blhc line 1194.
# Use of uninitialized value $cpu in pattern match (m//) at ./bin/blhc line 
1198.
# Use of uninitialized value $cpu in pattern match (m//) at ./bin/blhc line 
1202.

[...]

# checking './t/logs/debian-hardening-wrapper'...
# HARDENING WRAPPER: no checks possible, aborting
# '

#   Failed test './t/logs/arch-i386 ./t/logs/arch-amd64 ./t/logs/arch-avr32 
./t/logs/ignore-flag --ignore-arch-flag i386:-fstack-protector-strong 
--ignore-arch-flag mipsel:-Werror=format-security (output)'
#   at t/tests.t line 45.
#  got: 'Use of uninitialized value $os in pattern match (m//) at 
./bin/blhc line 1194.
# Use of uninitialized value $cpu in pattern match (m//) at ./bin/blhc line 
1198.
# Use of uninitialized value $cpu in pattern match (m//) at ./bin/blhc line 
1202.

[...]

# CFLAGS missing (-O2): gcc -g -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
-Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c test-c.c
# '

#   Failed test './t/logs/arch-i386 ./t/logs/arch-amd64 ./t/logs/arch-avr32 
./t/logs/ignore-line --ignore-arch-line "i386:gcc .+ -fPIE .+" 
--ignore-arch-line "mipsel:gcc .+ -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now .+" (output)'
#   at t/tests.t line 45.
#  got: 'Use of uninitialized value $os in pattern match (m//) at 
./bin/blhc line 1194.
# Use of uninitialized value $cpu in pattern match (m//) at ./bin/blhc line 
1198.
# Use of uninitialized value $cpu in pattern match (m//) at ./bin/blhc line 
1202.

[...]


# Looks like you failed 5 tests of 246.
t/tests.t ..
1..246
[...]
not ok 14 - ./t/logs/arch-avr32 --color (output)
[...]
not ok 164 - ./t/logs/arch-avr32 (output)
[...]
not ok 242 - ./t/logs/bad-ldflags ./t/logs/empty ./t/logs/arch-avr32 
./t/logs/debian-hardening-wrapper (output)
[...]
not ok 244 - ./t/logs/arch-i386 ./t/logs/arch-amd64 ./t/logs/arch-avr32 
./t/logs/ignore-flag --ignore-arch-flag i386:-fstack-protector-strong 
--ignore-arch-flag mipsel:-Werror=format-security (output)
[...]
not ok 246 - ./t/logs/arch-i386 ./t/logs/arch-amd64 ./t/logs/arch-avr32 
./t/logs/ignore-line --ignore-arch-line "i386:gcc .+ -fPIE .+" 
--ignore-arch-line "mipsel:gcc .+ -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now .+" (output)
Dubious, test returned 5 (wstat 1280, 0x500)
Failed 5/246 subtests 

Test Summary Report
---
t/tests.t (Wstat: 1280 (exited 5) Tests: 246 Failed: 5)
  Failed tests:  14, 164, 242, 244, 246
  Non-zero exit status: 5
Files=1, Tests=246,  3 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  2.46 cusr  0.37 
csys =  2.85 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/1 test programs. 5/246 subtests failed.


Regards,

Eriberto

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-11-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
C.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C.UTF-8
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: unable to detect

Versions of packages blhc depends on:
ii  libdpkg-perl  1.22.0

blhc recommends no packages.

blhc suggests no packages.

-- debconf-show failed



Bug#1042315: marked as pending in wfuzz

2023-08-18 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1042315 in wfuzz reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/wfuzz/-/commit/b1d8aef1a52b7ce9cb08bfde029ba0b16786f752


Merge branch 'debian/master' into 'debian/master'

Add patch from upstream PR 347 to fix pyparsing dependency (Closes: #1042315)

See merge request pkg-security-team/wfuzz!1


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1042315



Bug#1042315: marked as pending in wfuzz

2023-08-18 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1042315 in wfuzz reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/wfuzz/-/commit/bffefb79ef27d31cd586ae0aac88d350ff2ad483


Add patch from upstream PR 347 to fix pyparsing dependency (Closes: #1042315)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1042315



Bug#1041332: mrtg: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/mrtg/mrtg.cfg

2023-08-09 Thread Eriberto Mota
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
> This is forbidden by the policy, see
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#configuration-files

Hi Andreas,

Thanks for your time and help.

I decided to change the current action from the debconf by a warning for
the final user. I will make it soon.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#1042409: python3-distorm3,libdistorm3-3: undeclared file conflict /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdistorm3.so.3

2023-07-27 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi Helmut,

> Package: python3-distorm3,libdistorm3-3
> Version: 3.5.2b-1
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hi,
> 
> both libdistorm3-3 and python3-distorm3 contain
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdistorm3.so.3. When coinstalling these
> packages, an unpack error results. I suspect that the python one
> shouldn't contain the shared library. Do you concur?

You are right, but I am not able to reproduce this issue in my machine
using debuild / dpkg-buildpackage -A / dpkg-buildpackage -B.

I think this issue was caused by a dh_link in debian/rules. I will try
a new upload with the following change:

-override_dh_link:
+override_dh_link-arch:
dh_link usr/lib/${DEB_TARGET_MULTIARCH}/libdistorm3.so.$(LIB_R_VERSION) 
\
 usr/lib/${DEB_TARGET_MULTIARCH}/libdistorm3.so.3

If this change fixes the issue, I will close this bug manually.

Cheers,

Eriberto



Bug#1041332: mrtg: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/mrtg/mrtg.cfg

2023-07-20 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi Andreas,

On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:22:21 +0200
Andreas Beckmann  wrote:

> Package: mrtg
> Version: 2.17.10-5+deb12u1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
> Control: block 1040860 with -1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
> This is forbidden by the policy, see
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#configuration-files

[...]
 
> I'd suggest to withdraw the 2.17.10-5+deb12u1 bookworm-pu update and
> revisit that for the next point release (there is no time left to fix
> this properly before saturday). I have some idea how this could be
> solved better, but I need to try that first.

Thanks a lot for spotting this issue. My current (emergency) plans:

1. Reopening the bug #1039103 and make it as wontfix, quoting #1040860.
2. Reverting the changes in Sid.
3. Asking to Release Team how to proceed (is possible to drop the PU or
   need I to send a new PU as a revision to revert the changes?).
4. Making a new PU if needed.

What you think about this?

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#1038752: libjodycode2: A shared library package cannot be a transitional package on a different soversion

2023-06-22 Thread Eriberto
Em quinta-feira, 22 de junho de 2023, Adrian Bunk 
escreveu:

> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:12:58PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
>
> Hi Eriberto,
>
> > Em ter., 20 de jun. de 2023 às 18:18, Adrian Bunk 
> escreveu:
> >...
> > > A shared library package libjodycode2 provides the shared library
> > > libjodycode.so.2, and not providing it breaks reverse dependencies.
> > >
> > > libjodycode2 must either provide libjodycode.so.2 by shipping it
> > > or depending on a package that does ship it, or libjodycode2 must
> > > be dropped. Anything other than dropping it would be highly unusual.
> >
> >
> > In at the moment, only jdupes depends of the libjodycode"X" on Debian,
> > so I think that libjodycode2 (transitional) must be dropped, right?
> > (jdupes 1.24 was replaced by jdupes 1.25, that depends of the
> > libjodycode3).
>
> A transitional libjodycode2 shouldn't ever have existed since it causes
> breakage of reverse dependencies (in this case only jdupes).
>
> Never having libjodycode2 would also automatically make it an
> auto- transition at [1] showing what packages need rebuilding.



 Thanks for the clarification. Your words are very useful for my to learn a
bit more about libs.



> > > A transitional package libjodycode2-dev would be possible,
> > > but there is no real benefit for a just created package.
> > >
> > > The -dev package should be named libjodycode-dev,
> > > which is a stable name.
> >
> > What is the right way to make this? Renaming to libjodycode-dev,
> > dropping libjodycode3-dev and sending again to NEW? Should I use
> > Breaks and Replaces to make a reference to libjodycode3-dev?
>
> Sounds like a good plan to me.



Thanks! Package already in NEW.

Eriberto


> > Thanks for your attention.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Eriberto
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
> [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/
>


Bug#1038752: libjodycode2: A shared library package cannot be a transitional package on a different soversion

2023-06-21 Thread Eriberto
Em qua., 21 de jun. de 2023 às 23:58, Jody Bruchon
 escreveu:
>
> Thanks for all that information! While I'm here, I should also point out
> that another Debian package will eventually have to adopt libjodycode as
> well: winregfs [1]. Fortunately it doesn't use any of the APIs that
> changed between libjodycode 2 and 3 so changing what it needs to link to
> is as simple as recompiling and pointing it to the correct libjodycode.h
> header.
>
> [1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/utils/winregfs


Thanks again Jody. The winregfs is maintained by my close friend Giovani.

I am ending the revision libjodycode_3.0.1-3.


> On 2023-06-21 10:14 PM, Eriberto wrote:
> > Hi Jody!
> >
> > Em qua., 21 de jun. de 2023 às 21:09, Tritech - Jody
> >  escreveu:
> >> Hi! I'm upstream. Would it be helpful if I provided a way to build a 
> >> compatibility shim libjodycode.so.2 with the old API 2 interfaces that 
> >> translates and links to the API 3 version? I'd be happy to provide that if 
> >> desired.
> > I think this is not needed because all these new packages don't
> > arrived to Debian Testing yet. The jdupes 1.25.0 already killed the
> > 1.24.0, so libjodycode2 is no longer useful for Debian. I will follow
> > the changes purposed by Adrian. I will start changing the packaging of
> > the lib. Furthermore, I was wrong when making a -dev package with
> > soname number attached. It was a mistake. The changes will make the
> > lib arrives to NEW queue again.
> >
> > Thanks a lot Adrian and Jody.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Eriberto
>



Bug#1038752: libjodycode2: A shared library package cannot be a transitional package on a different soversion

2023-06-21 Thread Eriberto
Hi Jody!

Em qua., 21 de jun. de 2023 às 21:09, Tritech - Jody
 escreveu:
>
> Hi! I'm upstream. Would it be helpful if I provided a way to build a 
> compatibility shim libjodycode.so.2 with the old API 2 interfaces that 
> translates and links to the API 3 version? I'd be happy to provide that if 
> desired.

I think this is not needed because all these new packages don't
arrived to Debian Testing yet. The jdupes 1.25.0 already killed the
1.24.0, so libjodycode2 is no longer useful for Debian. I will follow
the changes purposed by Adrian. I will start changing the packaging of
the lib. Furthermore, I was wrong when making a -dev package with
soname number attached. It was a mistake. The changes will make the
lib arrives to NEW queue again.

Thanks a lot Adrian and Jody.

Cheers,

Eriberto



Bug#1038752: libjodycode2: A shared library package cannot be a transitional package on a different soversion

2023-06-20 Thread Eriberto
Hi Adrian,

Initially, thanks for your help.

Em ter., 20 de jun. de 2023 às 18:18, Adrian Bunk  escreveu:
>
> Package: libjodycode2
> Version: 3.0.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Control: affects -1 src:phcpack jdupes
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=phcpack=amd64=2.4.86%2Bdfsg-5=1687282110=0
>
> ...
> jdupes -l src/Python/PHCpy3/doc/build/html/_images/math
> jdupes: error while loading shared libraries: libjodycode.so.2: cannot open 
> shared object file: No such file or directory
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:44: override_dh_auto_build-arch] Error 127


I packaged this lib after the freeze and I sent it to NEW queue in
June, 13. The package was approved in June, 15. However, the upstream
dropped the libjodycode2 in June, 16, releasing libjodycode3. The
jdupes in stable don't depend on a lib. jdupes 1.24 depends on the
libjodycode2 and the new jdupes 1.25 depends on the libjodycode3. I
uploaded libjodycode3 to unstable this morning, but jdupes was 1.24,
depending on the libjdupes2. Some hours after this, I uploaded jdupes
1.25.


> A shared library package libjodycode2 provides the shared library
> libjodycode.so.2, and not providing it breaks reverse dependencies.
>
> libjodycode2 must either provide libjodycode.so.2 by shipping it
> or depending on a package that does ship it, or libjodycode2 must
> be dropped. Anything other than dropping it would be highly unusual.


In at the moment, only jdupes depends of the libjodycode"X" on Debian,
so I think that libjodycode2 (transitional) must be dropped, right?
(jdupes 1.24 was replaced by jdupes 1.25, that depends of the
libjodycode3).


> A transitional package libjodycode2-dev would be possible,
> but there is no real benefit for a just created package.
>
> The -dev package should be named libjodycode-dev,
> which is a stable name.

What is the right way to make this? Renaming to libjodycode-dev,
dropping libjodycode3-dev and sending again to NEW? Should I use
Breaks and Replaces to make a reference to libjodycode3-dev?

Thanks for your attention.

Cheers,

Eriberto



Bug#1033608: Exception: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'core.pe.photo'

2023-04-04 Thread Eriberto Mota
Control: severity 1033608 important

After several checks and tests, I got the following conclusions:

- The symlinks are present in the packages provided via Debian repositories.
- The package, when installed via APT on Sid and Bookworm, is working
  correctly.
- Building the package in a fresh jail generates the symlinks.

A single test:

eriberto@canopus:/tmp$ apt download dupeguru
Get:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm/main amd64 dupeguru amd64 
4.3.1-3+b1 [439 kB]
Fetched 439 kB in 0s (39.9 MB/s)

eriberto@canopus:/tmp$ dpkg -c dupeguru_4.3.1-3+b1_amd64.deb | egrep '\->'
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2023-01-04 10:05 ./usr/bin/dupeguru -> 
../share/dupeguru/run.py
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2023-01-04 10:05 ./usr/share/dupeguru/core/pe -> 
../../../lib/dupeguru/core/pe
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2023-01-04 10:05 ./usr/share/dupeguru/qt/pe -> 
../../../lib/dupeguru/qt/pe
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2023-01-04 10:05 
./usr/share/pixmaps/dupeguru.png -> ../dupeguru/dgse_logo_128.png


I can't see any issue with this package. Considering that an RC bug over this
package affects forensics-extra, I am decreasing the severity from grave to 
important.

Ionut, are you installing this package via APT?

Best regards,

Eriberto



Bug#1024589: dislocker: FTBFS with ruby3.1: mv: cannot stat '/<>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libdislocker*': No such file or directory

2023-02-27 Thread Eriberto Mota
Em seg., 27 de fev. de 2023 às 06:42, Santiago Vila
 escreveu:
>
> El 26/2/23 a las 0:04, Adrian Bunk escribió:
> > The Ubuntu diff has a fix for this issue caused by merged /usr
> > (untested).
>
> Note: Such diff was actually already in #1017937. I've just merged
> both bugs. Also, I've tested the diff and confirm that it works.
>
> Thanks.

Today I talked to Giovani, and he's a little busy because of a Masters
Course. It asked me to upload the fix. I'll do it. Thanks guys.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#1021616: obs-text-slideshow: FTBFS with OBS 28

2022-10-11 Thread Eriberto Mota
Opsss... obs-studio 28.0.1, not 28.1.2.



Bug#1021616: obs-text-slideshow: FTBFS with OBS 28

2022-10-11 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: obs-text-slideshow
Version: 1.5.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

The current source code on Debian FTBFS with obs-studio 28.1.2.

dh_auto_configure: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && cmake
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_SYSCONFDIR=/etc -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LOCALSTATEDIR=/var
-DCMAKE_EXPORT_NO_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=ON -DCMAKE_FIND_USE_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=OFF
-DCMAKE_FIND_PACKAGE_NO_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=ON
-DFETCHCONTENT_FULLY_DISCONNECTED=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RUNSTATEDIR=/run
-DCMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY=ON "-GUnix Makefiles"
-DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib/x86_64-linux-gnu ..
returned exit code 1
make: *** [debian/rules:11: binary] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2
debuild: fatal error at line 1182:
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -ui failed

Eriberto



Bug#1021448: apt-venv: autopkgtest regression: output on stderr

2022-10-08 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: apt-venv
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious

Dear maintainer,

A recent upload of apt-venv introduced CI tests that fail over some
architectures. See below an example for arm64.

[...]
Ign:37 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/multiverse arm64 Packages
Err:19 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main arm64 Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
Ign:21 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/universe arm64 Packages
Ign:23 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/restricted arm64 Packages
Ign:25 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/multiverse arm64 Packages
Err:31 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main arm64 Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
Ign:33 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/universe arm64 Packages
Ign:35 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/restricted arm64 Packages
Ign:37 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/multiverse arm64 Packages
Fetched 27.4 MB in 10s (2692 kB/s)
Reading package lists...
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages 
 404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
Welcome to apt virtual environment for jammy release.
All the configuration is available in /home/debci/.config/apt-venv/jammy
You may want run first "apt-get update"
autopkgtest [11:14:36]: test apt-cache-update.sh: ---]
autopkgtest [11:14:36]: test apt-cache-update.sh:  - - - - - - - - - - results 
- - - - - - - - - -
apt-cache-update.sh  FAIL stderr: E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
autopkgtest [11:14:36]: test apt-cache-update.sh:  - - - - - - - - - - stderr - 
- - - - - - - - -
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.38 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.38 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.38 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages 
 404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages 
 404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.



Bug#1021445: apt-venv: autopkgtest regression: output on stderr

2022-10-08 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: apt-venv
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Braulio Henrique Marques Souto 

Dear maintainer,

A recent upload of apt-venv introduced CI tests that fail over some
architectures. See below an example for arm64.

[...]
Ign:37 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/multiverse arm64 Packages
Err:19 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main arm64 Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
Ign:21 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/universe arm64 Packages
Ign:23 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/restricted arm64 Packages
Ign:25 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/multiverse arm64 Packages
Err:31 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main arm64 Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
Ign:33 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/universe arm64 Packages
Ign:35 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/restricted arm64 Packages
Ign:37 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/multiverse arm64 Packages
Fetched 27.4 MB in 10s (2692 kB/s)
Reading package lists...
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages 
 404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
Welcome to apt virtual environment for jammy release.
All the configuration is available in /home/debci/.config/apt-venv/jammy
You may want run first "apt-get update"
autopkgtest [11:14:36]: test apt-cache-update.sh: ---]
autopkgtest [11:14:36]: test apt-cache-update.sh:  - - - - - - - - - - results 
- - - - - - - - - -
apt-cache-update.sh  FAIL stderr: E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
autopkgtest [11:14:36]: test apt-cache-update.sh:  - - - - - - - - - - stderr - 
- - - - - - - - -
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.38 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.38 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.38 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages 
 404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages 
 404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.



Bug#1021441: apt-venv: autopkgtest regression: output on stderr

2022-10-08 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: apt-venv
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Braulio Henrique Marques Souto 

Dear maintainer,

A recent upload of apt-venv introduced CI tests that fail over some
architectures. See below an example for arm64.

[...]
Ign:37 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/multiverse arm64 Packages
Err:19 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main arm64 Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
Ign:21 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/universe arm64 Packages
Ign:23 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/restricted arm64 Packages
Ign:25 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/multiverse arm64 Packages
Err:31 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main arm64 Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
Ign:33 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/universe arm64 Packages
Ign:35 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/restricted arm64 Packages
Ign:37 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/multiverse arm64 Packages
Fetched 27.4 MB in 10s (2692 kB/s)
Reading package lists...
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages 
 404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
Welcome to apt virtual environment for jammy release.
All the configuration is available in /home/debci/.config/apt-venv/jammy
You may want run first "apt-get update"
autopkgtest [11:14:36]: test apt-cache-update.sh: ---]
autopkgtest [11:14:36]: test apt-cache-update.sh:  - - - - - - - - - - results 
- - - - - - - - - -
apt-cache-update.sh  FAIL stderr: E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
autopkgtest [11:14:36]: test apt-cache-update.sh:  - - - - - - - - - - stderr - 
- - - - - - - - -
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.38 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.38 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.38 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages 
 404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
E: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-security/main/binary-arm64/Packages
  404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.39 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy/main/binary-arm64/Packages  404  
Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Failed to fetch 
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy-updates/main/binary-arm64/Packages 
 404  Not Found [IP: 185.125.190.36 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.



Bug#1021358: libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from 1.5.2-2 revision

2022-10-06 Thread Eriberto Mota
To avoid a new breaking when upgrading my jail, I made a "local" NMU
to remove the duplicate manpage from a package. I am not familiar with
pam packaging, so I choosen libpam-modules-bin.manpages. When
installing my "local NMU", I got:

dpkg: error processing archive
/PKGS/libpam-modules-bin/libpam-modules-bin_1.5.2-3.1_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man8/pam_namespace_helper.8.gz',
which is also in package libpam-module
s:amd64 1.5.2-2
Errors were encountered while processing:
/PKGS/libpam-modules-bin/libpam-modules-bin_1.5.2-3.1_amd64.deb

After fixing this new issue, the package was installed fine.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#1021358: libpam-modules-bin: fails when upgrading from 1.5.2-2 revision

2022-10-06 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: libpam-modules-bin
Version: 1.5.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear maintainer,

When upgrading my jail Sid, I got:

Preparing to unpack .../libpam-modules-bin_1.5.2-3_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libpam-modules-bin (1.5.2-3) over (1.5.2-2) ...
dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-modules-bin_1.5.2-3_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5.gz', which is also
 in package libpam-modules:amd64 1.5.2-2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-modules-bin_1.5.2-3_amd64.deb

Thanks!

Eriberto



Bug#1016828: poc-streamer: flaky autopkgtest: regularly times out on i386

2022-08-21 Thread Eriberto
> I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package because it was
> showing up on our "slow" page [1]. I noticed that there were several
> runs that took 8:21 (our timeout time per test times 3), while
> successful runs more in the order of a minute.
>
> Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on
> regressions in testing, flaky tests, i.e. tests that flip between
> passing and failing without changes to the list of installed packages,
> are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these
> tests.
[...]
>
> [1] https://ci.debian.net/status/slow/

Hi Paul,

I noticed that superficial tests around pob-2250, pob-3119 and pob-fec
are failing. I set a timeout (3 minutes) for these tests and I set
them as flaky. I hope these procedures fix all issues.

Cheers,

Eriberto



Bug#1016557: xfonts-cronyx: Non-DFSG file

2022-08-02 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Source: xfonts-cronyx
Version: 2.3.8
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: eribe...@debian.org

The license for tryfont/ISO8859-5 says:

---
Copyright (c) 1991-1995 Unicode, Inc.  All Rights reserved.

This file is provided as-is by Unicode, Inc. (The Unicode Consortium).
No claims are made as to fitness for any particular purpose.  No
warranties of any kind are expressed or implied.  The recipient
agrees to determine applicability of information provided.  If this
file has been provided on magnetic media by Unicode, Inc., the sole
remedy for any claim will be exchange of defective media within 90
days of receipt.

Recipient is granted the right to make copies in any form for
internal distribution and to freely use the information supplied
in the creation of products supporting Unicode.  Unicode, Inc.
specifically excludes the right to re-distribute this file directly
to third parties or other organizations whether for profit or not.
---

Eriberto



Bug#1016457: clif: non-DFSG source code in clif

2022-07-31 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: clif
Version: 0.90.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: eribe...@debian.org

The file ch-lex.c doesn't have a license on its header. However, starting at
line 927, I noticed the following text:

--
/*  Copyright (c) 1989 AT */
/*All Rights Reserved   */

/*  THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF AT */
/*  The copyright notice above does not evidence any*/
/*  actual or intended publication of such source code. */

#pragma ident   "@(#)ncform 6.8 95/02/11 SMI"
--

It's clear to me that part of the file includes a non-free source code.

Eriberto



Bug#965921: zemberek-server: diff for NMU version 0.7.1-12.4

2022-07-10 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965921 + patch
Control: tags 965921 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for zemberek-server (versioned as 0.7.1-12.4) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if Ishould delay
it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u zemberek-server-0.7.1/debian/changelog 
zemberek-server-0.7.1/debian/changelog
--- zemberek-server-0.7.1/debian/changelog
+++ zemberek-server-0.7.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+zemberek-server (0.7.1-12.4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/compat: bumped compat level to 7. (Closes: #965921)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:08:28 
-0300
+
 zemberek-server (0.7.1-12.3) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non maintainer upload by the Reproducible Builds team.
diff -u zemberek-server-0.7.1/debian/compat zemberek-server-0.7.1/debian/compat
--- zemberek-server-0.7.1/debian/compat
+++ zemberek-server-0.7.1/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5
+7



Bug#1010493: ltrace: diff for NMU version 0.7.3-6.3

2022-05-02 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 1010493 + patch
Control: tags 1010493 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for ltrace (versioned as 0.7.3-6.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -Nru ltrace-0.7.3/debian/changelog ltrace-0.7.3/debian/changelog
--- ltrace-0.7.3/debian/changelog   2022-03-30 20:48:13.0 -0300
+++ ltrace-0.7.3/debian/changelog   2022-05-02 20:51:56.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+ltrace (0.7.3-6.3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: disabled use of -Werror to avoid a FTBFS in mipsel, alpha and
+ia64 when using DH level 13. Thanks to Paul Gevers .
+(Closes: #1010493)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Mon, 02 May 2022 20:51:56 
-0300
+
 ltrace (0.7.3-6.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru ltrace-0.7.3/debian/rules ltrace-0.7.3/debian/rules
--- ltrace-0.7.3/debian/rules   2022-03-30 20:48:13.0 -0300
+++ ltrace-0.7.3/debian/rules   2022-05-02 20:51:07.0 -0300
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
dh $@
 
 override_dh_auto_configure:
-   dh_auto_configure -- --with-libunwind=no
+   dh_auto_configure -- --with-libunwind=no --disable-werror
 
 override_dh_install:
dh_install



Bug#1010493: ltrace: FTBFS on mipsel: directive argument is null

2022-05-02 Thread Eriberto Mota
Em seg., 2 de mai. de 2022 às 16:21, Paul Gevers  escreveu:
>
> Source: ltrace
> Version: 0.7.3-6.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo , 
> Joao Eriberto Mota Filho 
>
> Dear all,
>
> Thanks for fixing RC bugs in your package. However, the last upload of ltrace 
> failed to build from source on mipsel, while it built there successfully in 
> the past. Can you please have a look?
>
> Paul
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ltrace=mipsel=0.7.3-6.2=1649617481=0
>
> Making all in mips
[...]
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Thanks a lot for pointing this out Paul. The right fix will need
changes in source code and I am not able to make it. Thus, as a
workaround, I will disable werror and this action will fix the build
in some architectures.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#965910: xtron: diff for NMU version 1.1a-14.2

2022-04-22 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965910 + patch
Control: tags 965910 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for xtron (versioned as 1.1a-14.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u xtron-1.1a/debian/changelog xtron-1.1a/debian/changelog
--- xtron-1.1a/debian/changelog
+++ xtron-1.1a/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xtron (1.1a-14.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/compat: bumped compat level to 7. (Closes: #965910)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 20:18:27 
-0300
+
 xtron (1.1a-14.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u xtron-1.1a/debian/compat xtron-1.1a/debian/compat
--- xtron-1.1a/debian/compat
+++ xtron-1.1a/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5
+7



Bug#965911: yasat: diff for NMU version 848-1.2

2022-04-22 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965911 + patch
Control: tags 965911 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for yasat (versioned as 848-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -Nru yasat-848/debian/changelog yasat-848/debian/changelog
--- yasat-848/debian/changelog  2021-01-03 15:56:33.0 -0300
+++ yasat-848/debian/changelog  2022-04-22 19:36:32.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+yasat (848-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - Closes: #965911
+  * debian/clean: created to remove some files created from the build process
+and forgotten after this. This action will allow package to build twice.
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:36:32 
-0300
+
 yasat (848-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non maintainer upload by the Reproducible Builds team.
diff -Nru yasat-848/debian/clean yasat-848/debian/clean
--- yasat-848/debian/clean  1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ yasat-848/debian/clean  2022-04-22 19:36:32.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+tests/test_rsa.pem
+tests/test_rsa_password.pem
+tests/yasat_global.advice
+yasat.advices
diff -Nru yasat-848/debian/compat yasat-848/debian/compat
--- yasat-848/debian/compat 2014-01-24 11:29:46.0 -0200
+++ yasat-848/debian/compat 1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -Nru yasat-848/debian/control yasat-848/debian/control
--- yasat-848/debian/control2016-08-30 06:04:43.0 -0300
+++ yasat-848/debian/control2022-04-22 19:36:32.0 -0300
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: utils
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Corentin LABBE 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50)
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
 Standards-Version: 3.9.8
 Homepage: http://yasat.sourceforge.net/
 



Bug#965922: zpspell: diff for NMU version 0.4.3-4.2

2022-04-22 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965922 + patch
Control: tags 965922 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for zpspell (versioned as 0.4.3-4.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u zpspell-0.4.3/debian/compat zpspell-0.4.3/debian/compat
--- zpspell-0.4.3/debian/compat
+++ zpspell-0.4.3/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5
+7
diff -u zpspell-0.4.3/debian/changelog zpspell-0.4.3/debian/changelog
--- zpspell-0.4.3/debian/changelog
+++ zpspell-0.4.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+zpspell (0.4.3-4.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/compat: bumped level to 7. (Closes: #965922)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:23:46 
-0300
+
 zpspell (0.4.3-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.



Bug#965463: cntlm: diff for NMU version 0.92.3-1.1

2022-04-17 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965463 + patch
Control: tags 965463 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for cntlm (versioned as 0.92.3-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u cntlm-0.92.3/debian/changelog cntlm-0.92.3/debian/changelog
--- cntlm-0.92.3/debian/changelog
+++ cntlm-0.92.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+cntlm (0.92.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - debian/rules: using 'dh_prep' instead of 'dh_clean -k' because the
+'-k' option is not supported since compat 12.
+  - Closes: #965463
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:10:54 
-0300
+
 cntlm (0.92.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release. Closes: #652725, #588920.
diff -u cntlm-0.92.3/debian/control cntlm-0.92.3/debian/control
--- cntlm-0.92.3/debian/control
+++ cntlm-0.92.3/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: net
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: David Watson 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5)
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
 Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 Vcs-Git: git://planetwatson.co.uk/cntlm
 Vcs-Browser: http://projects.planetwatson.co.uk/repositories/show/cntlm
reverted:
--- cntlm-0.92.3/debian/compat
+++ cntlm-0.92.3.orig/debian/compat
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -u cntlm-0.92.3/debian/rules cntlm-0.92.3/debian/rules
--- cntlm-0.92.3/debian/rules
+++ cntlm-0.92.3/debian/rules
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 install: build
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
-   dh_clean -k 
+   dh_prep
dh_installdirs
 
# Add here commands to install the package into debian/cntlm.



Bug#965455: chrootuid: diff for NMU version 1.3-6.1

2022-04-17 Thread Eriberto
Em dom., 17 de abr. de 2022 às 05:48, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
 escreveu:
>
> Dear João,
>
> Thanks for preparing, the patch looks ok to me.
>
> Saludos,
>
> Javier

Thanks Javier! I will kill the delay.

Have a nice day.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#965462: clif: diff for NMU version 0.93-9.2

2022-04-16 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965462 + patch
Control: tags 965462 + pending
Control: tags 999095 + patch
Control: tags 999095 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for clif (versioned as 0.93-9.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -Nru clif-0.93/debian/changelog clif-0.93/debian/changelog
--- clif-0.93/debian/changelog  2015-11-02 08:21:14.0 -0200
+++ clif-0.93/debian/changelog  2022-04-16 21:29:06.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+clif (0.93-9.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - debian/rules: using 'dh_prep' instead of 'dh_clean -k' because the
+'-k' option is not supported since compat 12.
+  - Closes: #965462
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #999095)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sat, 16 Apr 2022 21:29:06 
-0300
+
 clif (0.93-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru clif-0.93/debian/compat clif-0.93/debian/compat
--- clif-0.93/debian/compat 2010-01-03 13:27:41.0 -0200
+++ clif-0.93/debian/compat 1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -Nru clif-0.93/debian/control clif-0.93/debian/control
--- clif-0.93/debian/control2015-11-02 08:19:46.0 -0200
+++ clif-0.93/debian/control2022-04-16 21:29:06.0 -0300
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: interpreters
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Sam Hocevar 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0), libx11-dev, libxt-dev, texlive, libelf-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), libx11-dev, libxt-dev, texlive, 
libelf-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.8.3
 
 Package: clif
diff -Nru clif-0.93/debian/rules clif-0.93/debian/rules
--- clif-0.93/debian/rules  2010-01-03 14:11:32.0 -0200
+++ clif-0.93/debian/rules  2022-04-16 21:29:06.0 -0300
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 install: build
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
-   dh_clean -k
+   dh_prep
$(MAKE) install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/clif
dh_installdirs usr/bin usr/lib/clif
dh_install clif usr/bin
@@ -83,5 +83,6 @@
dh_builddeb
 
 binary: binary-indep binary-arch
-.PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install configure
-
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
+.PHONY: build clean build-arch build-indep binary-indep binary-arch binary 
install configure



Bug#965468: clamassassin: diff for NMU version 1.2.4-1.2

2022-04-16 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965468 + patch
Control: tags 965468 + pending
Control: tags 999015 + patch
Control: tags 999015 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for clamassassin (versioned as 1.2.4-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/changelog clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/changelog
--- clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/changelog
+++ clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+clamassassin (1.2.4-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - Closes: #965468
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #999015)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sat, 16 Apr 2022 19:47:25 
-0300
+
 clamassassin (1.2.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non maintainer upload by the Reproducible Builds team.
reverted:
--- clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/compat
+++ clamassassin-1.2.4.orig/debian/compat
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -u clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/control clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/control
--- clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/control
+++ clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: mail
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Robert S. Edmonds 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5)
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 
 Package: clamassassin
diff -u clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/rules clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/rules
--- clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/rules
+++ clamassassin-1.2.4/debian/rules
@@ -36,5 +36,7 @@
dh_builddeb
 
 binary: binary-indep
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
 
-.PHONY: build clean install binary-arch binary-indep binary
+.PHONY: build build-arch build-indep clean install binary-arch binary-indep 
binary



Bug#965455: chrootuid: diff for NMU version 1.3-6.1

2022-04-16 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965455 + patch
Control: tags 965455 + pending
Control: tags 998939 + patch
Control: tags 998939 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for chrootuid (versioned as 1.3-6.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u chrootuid-1.3/debian/rules chrootuid-1.3/debian/rules
--- chrootuid-1.3/debian/rules
+++ chrootuid-1.3/debian/rules
@@ -53,4 +53,6 @@
dh_builddeb
 
 binary: binary-indep binary-arch
-.PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install configure
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
+.PHONY: build build-arch build-indep clean binary-indep binary-arch binary 
install configure
diff -u chrootuid-1.3/debian/control chrootuid-1.3/debian/control
--- chrootuid-1.3/debian/control
+++ chrootuid-1.3/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: admin
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0)
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
 Standards-Version: 3.9.1.0
 Homepage: http://ftp.porcupine.org/pub/security/index.html
 
diff -u chrootuid-1.3/debian/changelog chrootuid-1.3/debian/changelog
--- chrootuid-1.3/debian/changelog
+++ chrootuid-1.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+chrootuid (1.3-6.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - Closes: #965455
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #998939)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sat, 16 Apr 2022 17:10:27 
-0300
+
 chrootuid (1.3-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Change maintainer's e-mail address
reverted:
--- chrootuid-1.3/debian/compat
+++ chrootuid-1.3.orig/debian/compat
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5



Bug#965457: choosewm: diff for NMU version 0.1.6-3.1

2022-04-16 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965457 + patch
Control: tags 965457 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for choosewm (versioned as 0.1.6-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -Nru choosewm-0.1.6/debian/changelog choosewm-0.1.6/debian/changelog
--- choosewm-0.1.6/debian/changelog 2011-08-24 05:52:20.0 -0300
+++ choosewm-0.1.6/debian/changelog 2022-04-16 16:58:21.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+choosewm (0.1.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - Closes: #965457
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:58:21 
-0300
+
 choosewm (0.1.6-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * quick fix to make it build again until I have time for
diff -Nru choosewm-0.1.6/debian/compat choosewm-0.1.6/debian/compat
--- choosewm-0.1.6/debian/compat2011-05-23 05:16:54.0 -0300
+++ choosewm-0.1.6/debian/compat1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -Nru choosewm-0.1.6/debian/control choosewm-0.1.6/debian/control
--- choosewm-0.1.6/debian/control   2011-05-23 06:23:19.0 -0300
+++ choosewm-0.1.6/debian/control   2022-04-16 16:58:21.0 -0300
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: x11
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), libglib2.0-dev, libpango1.0-dev, 
libatk1.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libcairo2-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), libglib2.0-dev, libpango1.0-dev, 
libatk1.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libcairo2-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.9.2
 
 Package: choosewm



Bug#965440: bplay: diff for NMU version 0.991-10.1

2022-04-16 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965440 + patch
Control: tags 965440 + pending
Control: tags 999139 + patch
Control: tags 999139 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for bplay (versioned as 0.991-10.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u bplay-0.991/debian/changelog bplay-0.991/debian/changelog
--- bplay-0.991/debian/changelog
+++ bplay-0.991/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+bplay (0.991-10.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - Closes: #965440
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #999139)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:32:45 
-0300
+
 bplay (0.991-10) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Install the manpages. (Closes: #327759)
diff -u bplay-0.991/debian/control bplay-0.991/debian/control
--- bplay-0.991/debian/control
+++ bplay-0.991/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: sound
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Carlos Laviola 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.0)
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2.2
 
 Package: bplay
reverted:
--- bplay-0.991/debian/compat
+++ bplay-0.991.orig/debian/compat
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -u bplay-0.991/debian/rules bplay-0.991/debian/rules
--- bplay-0.991/debian/rules
+++ bplay-0.991/debian/rules
@@ -58,5 +58,7 @@
 # Below here is fairly generic really
 
 binary:binary-arch
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
 
-.PHONY: build binary binary-arch binary-indep clean checkroot
+.PHONY: build build-arch build-indep binary binary-arch binary-indep clean 
checkroot



Bug#668477: cadaver: diff for NMU version 0.23.3-2.2 (new upload)

2022-04-16 Thread Eriberto Mota
I sent a new upload now, with 10 days/delay, with the last changes plus
removing no longer needed debian/README.source.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#1005981: redet: diff for NMU version 8.26-1.5

2022-04-15 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 1005981 + patch

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for redet (versioned as 8.26-1.5) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -Nru redet-8.26/debian/changelog redet-8.26/debian/changelog
--- redet-8.26/debian/changelog 2022-04-16 02:32:24.0 -0300
+++ redet-8.26/debian/changelog 2022-04-16 02:26:50.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+redet (8.26-1.5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Migrated to DebSrc 3.0. Consequently:
+  - Migrated the current patch from dpatch to quilt.
+  - Closes: #1005981
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sat, 16 Apr 2022 02:26:50 
-0300
+
 redet (8.26-1.4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non maintainer upload by the Reproducible Builds team.
diff -Nru redet-8.26/debian/control redet-8.26/debian/control
--- redet-8.26/debian/control   2022-04-16 02:32:24.0 -0300
+++ redet-8.26/debian/control   2022-04-16 02:23:26.0 -0300
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: x11
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Bartosz Fenski 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dpatch
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), quilt (>= 0.40)
 Standards-Version: 3.9.8
 Homepage: http://www.billposer.org/Software/redet.html
 
diff -Nru redet-8.26/debian/patches/00list redet-8.26/debian/patches/00list
--- redet-8.26/debian/patches/00list2022-04-16 02:32:24.0 -0300
+++ redet-8.26/debian/patches/00list1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-01_path
diff -Nru redet-8.26/debian/patches/01_path.dpatch 
redet-8.26/debian/patches/01_path.dpatch
--- redet-8.26/debian/patches/01_path.dpatch2022-04-16 02:32:24.0 
-0300
+++ redet-8.26/debian/patches/01_path.dpatch1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 
-0300
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-#! /bin/sh -e
-## redet.dpatch
-## Bartosz Fenski 
-
-patch_opts="${patch_opts:--f --no-backup-if-mismatch ${2:+-d $2}}"
-
-if [ $# -ne 1 ]; then
-echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
-exit 1
-fi
-case "$1" in
-   -patch) patch $patch_opts -p1 < $0;;
-   -unpatch) patch $patch_opts -R -p1 < $0;;
-   *)
-   echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as 
argument"
-   exit 1;;
-esac
- 
-exit 0
-
-@DPATCH@
-diff -ru redet-6.13.orig/redet.tcl redet-6.13/redet.tcl
 redet-6.13.orig/redet.tcl  2005-07-28 10:53:55.0 +0200
-+++ redet-6.13/redet.tcl   2005-07-28 11:46:40.0 +0200
-@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
- set HistoryFile  ".redethist";
- set JournalFile  ".redetlog";
- set ColorFile".redetcolors";
--set NonBinPath [file join /usr local share Redet];
-+set NonBinPath [file join /usr share doc redet-doc];
- 
- #Portability
- #Figure out what system we are running on
diff -Nru redet-8.26/debian/patches/01_path.patch 
redet-8.26/debian/patches/01_path.patch
--- redet-8.26/debian/patches/01_path.patch 1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 
-0300
+++ redet-8.26/debian/patches/01_path.patch 2022-04-16 02:26:15.0 
-0300
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Author: Bartosz Fenski 
+Description: fix the path and name of docs.
+Index: redet-8.26/redet.tcl
+===
+--- redet-8.26.orig/redet.tcl
 redet-8.26/redet.tcl
+@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ set InitFile ".redetrc";
+ set HistoryFile  ".redethist";
+ set JournalFile  ".redetlog";
+ set ColorFile".redetcolors";
+-set NonBinPath [file join /usr local share Redet];
++set NonBinPath [file join /usr share doc redet-doc];
+ 
+ #Flags showing whether windows are editable
+ set INDEditableP 0;
diff -Nru redet-8.26/debian/patches/series redet-8.26/debian/patches/series
--- redet-8.26/debian/patches/series1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ redet-8.26/debian/patches/series2022-04-16 02:23:25.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+01_path.patch
diff -Nru redet-8.26/debian/rules redet-8.26/debian/rules
--- redet-8.26/debian/rules 2022-04-16 02:32:24.0 -0300
+++ redet-8.26/debian/rules 2022-04-16 02:23:26.0 -0300
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 # This has to be exported to make some magic below work.
 export DH_OPTIONS
 
-include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make
+include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
 
 CFLAGS = -Wall -g
 
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 
 build-arch:
 build-indep: build-indep-stamp
-build-indep-stamp: patch-stamp configure-stamp 
+build-indep-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN) configure-stamp 
 
touch build-indep-stamp
 
diff -Nru redet-8.26/debian/source/format redet-8.26/debian/source/format
--- redet-8.26/debian/source/format 1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ redet-8.26/debian/source/format 2022-04-16 02:26:50.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+3.0 (quilt)



Bug#998919: iisemulator: diff for NMU version 0.95-3.4

2022-04-15 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 998919 + patch
Control: tags 998919 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for iisemulator (versioned as 0.95-3.4) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u iisemulator-0.95/debian/changelog iisemulator-0.95/debian/changelog
--- iisemulator-0.95/debian/changelog
+++ iisemulator-0.95/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+iisemulator (0.95-3.4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #998919)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sat, 16 Apr 2022 02:11:23 
-0300
+
 iisemulator (0.95-3.3) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non maintainer upload by the Reproducible Builds team.
diff -u iisemulator-0.95/debian/rules iisemulator-0.95/debian/rules
--- iisemulator-0.95/debian/rules
+++ iisemulator-0.95/debian/rules
@@ -72,4 +72,6 @@
dh_builddeb
 
 binary: binary-indep binary-arch
-.PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install configure
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
+.PHONY: build clean build-arch build-indep binary-indep binary-arch binary 
install configure



Bug#999268: vncsnapshot: diff for NMU version 1.2a-5.2

2022-04-15 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 999268 + patch
Control: tags 999268 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for vncsnapshot (versioned as 1.2a-5.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -Nru vncsnapshot-1.2a/debian/changelog vncsnapshot-1.2a/debian/changelog
--- vncsnapshot-1.2a/debian/changelog   2012-06-06 13:56:25.0 -0300
+++ vncsnapshot-1.2a/debian/changelog   2022-04-16 02:00:41.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+vncsnapshot (1.2a-5.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #999268)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sat, 16 Apr 2022 02:00:41 
-0300
+
 vncsnapshot (1.2a-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru vncsnapshot-1.2a/debian/rules vncsnapshot-1.2a/debian/rules
--- vncsnapshot-1.2a/debian/rules   2012-06-06 13:55:44.0 -0300
+++ vncsnapshot-1.2a/debian/rules   2022-04-16 02:00:41.0 -0300
@@ -66,4 +66,6 @@
dh_builddeb
 
 binary: binary-indep binary-arch
-.PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install configure
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
+.PHONY: build clean build-arch build-indep binary-indep binary-arch binary 
install configure



Bug#668477: cadaver: diff for NMU version 0.23.3-2.2

2022-04-15 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 668477 + pending
Control: tags 965443 + patch
Control: tags 965443 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for cadaver (versioned as 0.23.3-2.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -Nru cadaver-0.23.3/debian/changelog cadaver-0.23.3/debian/changelog
--- cadaver-0.23.3/debian/changelog 2022-04-16 01:41:44.0 -0300
+++ cadaver-0.23.3/debian/changelog 2022-04-15 21:27:34.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+cadaver (0.23.3-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Migrated to DebSrc 3.0. Consequently:
+  - debian/source/options: created to ignore changes in config.guess and
+config.sub.
+  - Migrated the current patch from dpatch to quilt.
+  - Closes: #668477
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - debian/rules: using 'dh_prep' instead of 'dh_clean -k' because the
+'-k' option is not supported since compat 12.
+  - Closes: #965443
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Fri, 15 Apr 2022 21:27:34 
-0300
+
 cadaver (0.23.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru cadaver-0.23.3/debian/compat cadaver-0.23.3/debian/compat
--- cadaver-0.23.3/debian/compat2022-04-16 01:41:44.0 -0300
+++ cadaver-0.23.3/debian/compat1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -Nru cadaver-0.23.3/debian/control cadaver-0.23.3/debian/control
--- cadaver-0.23.3/debian/control   2022-04-16 01:41:44.0 -0300
+++ cadaver-0.23.3/debian/control   2022-04-15 21:27:34.0 -0300
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: web
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Sebastian Harl 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), dpkg-dev (>= 1.14.6), dpatch,
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), dpkg-dev (>= 1.14.6), quilt (>= 0.40),
  autotools-dev,
  libgcrypt20-dev,
  libncurses5-dev,
diff -Nru cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/00list 
cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/00list
--- cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/00list2022-04-16 01:41:44.0 
-0300
+++ cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/00list1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 
-0300
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-manpage_hyphen.dpatch
-
diff -Nru cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/manpage_hyphen.dpatch 
cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/manpage_hyphen.dpatch
--- cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/manpage_hyphen.dpatch 2022-04-16 
01:41:44.0 -0300
+++ cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/manpage_hyphen.dpatch 1969-12-31 
21:00:00.0 -0300
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
-## manpage_hyphen.dpatch by Sebastian Harl 
-##
-## DP: Do not use hyphens as minus signs.
-
-@DPATCH@
-
 a/doc/cadaver.1
-+++ b/doc/cadaver.1
-@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
- .SH NAME
- cadaver \- A command\-line WebDAV client for Unix. 
- .SH SYNOPSIS
--cadaver [-trp[-r file][-p host[:port]]][-V][-h] http://hostname[:port]/path
-+cadaver [\-trp[\-r file][\-p host[:port]]][\-V][\-h] 
http://hostname[:port]/path
- .SH DESCRIPTION
- .B cadaver 
- supports file upload, download, on-screen display, namespace operations
-@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
- .IP
- .SH FILES
- .IP "~/.cadaverrc"
--Individual user settings that can override cadaver defaults and to script 
cadaver. Can be changed by the "--rcfile" option.
-+Individual user settings that can override cadaver defaults and to script 
cadaver. Can be changed by the "\-\-rcfile" option.
- .IP "~/.netrc"
- Login and initialization information used by the auto-login process. See
- section "THE .netrc FILE" for details.
diff -Nru cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/manpage_hyphen.patch 
cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/manpage_hyphen.patch
--- cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/manpage_hyphen.patch  1969-12-31 
21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ cadaver-0.23.3/debian/patches/manpage_hyphen.patch  2022-04-15 
21:27:34.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Author: Sebastian Harl 
+Description: Do not use hyphens as minus signs.
+--- cadaver-0.23.3.orig/doc/cadaver.1
 cadaver-0.23.3/doc/cadaver.1
+@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
+ .SH NAME
+ cadaver \- A command\-line WebDAV client for Unix. 
+ .SH SYNOPSIS
+-cadaver [-trp[-r file][-p host[:port]]][-V][-h] http://hostname[:port]/path
++cadaver [\-trp[\-r file][\-p host[:port]]][\-V][\-h] 
http://hostname[:port]/path
+ .SH DESCRIPTION
+ .B cadaver 
+ supports file upload, download, on-screen display, namespace operations
+@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ Connects to a server called secure.examp
+ .IP
+ .SH FILES
+ .IP "~/.cadaverrc"
+-Individual user settings that can override cadaver defaults and to script 
cadaver. Can be changed by the "--rcfile" option.
++Individual user settings that can override cadaver defaults and to script 
cadaver. Can be changed by the "\-\-rcfile" option.
+ .IP "~/.netrc"

Bug#965418: asql: diff for NMU version 1.6-1.2

2022-04-14 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: asql
Version: 1.6-1.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch  pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for asql (versioned as 1.6-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -Nru asql-1.6/debian/changelog asql-1.6/debian/changelog
--- asql-1.6/debian/changelog   2021-01-05 14:29:40.0 -0300
+++ asql-1.6/debian/changelog   2022-04-14 13:40:34.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+asql (1.6-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - debian/rules: using 'dh_prep' instead of 'dh_clean -k' because the
+'-k' option is not supported since compat 12.
+  - Closes: #965418
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #999113)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:40:34 
-0300
+
 asql (1.6-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non maintainer upload by the Reproducible Builds team.
diff -Nru asql-1.6/debian/compat asql-1.6/debian/compat
--- asql-1.6/debian/compat  2010-10-04 17:19:07.0 -0300
+++ asql-1.6/debian/compat  1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -Nru asql-1.6/debian/control asql-1.6/debian/control
--- asql-1.6/debian/control 2010-10-04 17:19:07.0 -0300
+++ asql-1.6/debian/control 2022-04-14 13:40:34.0 -0300
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: admin
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Steve Kemp 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.0)
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
 Standards-Version: 3.8.4
 Homepage: http://www.steve.org.uk/Software/asql/
 
diff -Nru asql-1.6/debian/rules asql-1.6/debian/rules
--- asql-1.6/debian/rules   2010-10-04 17:19:07.0 -0300
+++ asql-1.6/debian/rules   2022-04-14 13:40:34.0 -0300
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 install: build
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
-   dh_clean -k
+   dh_prep
dh_installdirs
make install PREFIX=`pwd`/debian/asql
mkdir -p `pwd`/debian/asql/usr/share/man/man8/
@@ -51,4 +51,6 @@
 # We have nothing to do here
 
 binary: binary-indep binary-arch
-.PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install 
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
+.PHONY: build build-arch build-indep clean binary-indep binary-arch binary 
install



Bug#999182: perforate: diff for NMU version 1.2-5.2

2022-04-06 Thread Eriberto
Em qua., 6 de abr. de 2022 às 16:09, Reuben Thomas  escreveu:
>
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 at 18:15, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho  
> wrote:
>>
>> Control: tags 999182 + patch
>> Control: tags 999182 + pending
>>
>> Dear maintainer,
>>
>> I've prepared an NMU for perforate (versioned as 1.2-5.2) and uploaded it
>> to DELAYED/1 (a decreased time because the package is set as LowNMU, but
>> 1 day because I prefer to put a delay time).
>
>
> Thanks for this, Eriberto!
>
> Actually, I could do with some help with perforate. I am trying to update it 
> *and* change the package name to "finddup", as a) there isn't a binary called 
> perforate, which is confusing; and b) the zum utility (which does the 
> "perforation") isn't actually that useful on modern systems. I believe most 
> users are interested in finddup. I've also added "findcore" to find core 
> files.
>
> The current version of the package upstream is at 
> https://github.com/rrthomas/finddup/
>
> I've made attempts to upload it as a new package in 2018 and 2021 and failed 
> each time (for perfectly good reasons).
>
> If there's anything you could do to help get the new upstream version into 
> Debian, that would be fantastic.
>
> --
> https://rrt.sc3d.org

Hi Reuben,

Sorry, but I don't wish to have a major link with this package. My
intention is to do a simple NMU.

Good luck.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#999182: perforate: diff for NMU version 1.2-5.2

2022-04-06 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 999182 + patch
Control: tags 999182 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for perforate (versioned as 1.2-5.2) and uploaded it
to DELAYED/1 (a decreased time because the package is set as LowNMU, but
1 day because I prefer to put a delay time).

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u perforate-1.2/debian/changelog perforate-1.2/debian/changelog
--- perforate-1.2/debian/changelog
+++ perforate-1.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+perforate (1.2-5.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #999182)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Wed, 06 Apr 2022 13:52:52 
-0300
+
 perforate (1.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u perforate-1.2/debian/rules perforate-1.2/debian/rules
--- perforate-1.2/debian/rules
+++ perforate-1.2/debian/rules
@@ -45,4 +45,6 @@
 
 binary-indep: build
 
-.PHONY: clean build binary binary-arch binary-indep
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
+.PHONY: clean build build-arch build-indep binary binary-arch binary-indep



Bug#999204: whereami: diff for NMU version 0.3.34-0.5

2022-04-05 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 999204 + patch
Control: tags 999204 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for whereami (versioned as 0.3.34-0.5) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u whereami-0.3.34/debian/changelog whereami-0.3.34/debian/changelog
--- whereami-0.3.34/debian/changelog
+++ whereami-0.3.34/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+whereami (0.3.34-0.5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #999204)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:58:14 
-0300
+
 whereami (0.3.34-0.4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u whereami-0.3.34/debian/rules whereami-0.3.34/debian/rules
--- whereami-0.3.34/debian/rules
+++ whereami-0.3.34/debian/rules
@@ -105,4 +105,6 @@
 source diff:
@echo >&2 'source and diff are obsolete - use dpkg-source -b'; false
 
-.PHONY: binary-arch binary-indep clean
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
+.PHONY: build-arch build-indep binary-arch binary-indep clean



Bug#999009: scanssh: diff for NMU version 2.0-4.2

2022-04-05 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 999009 + patch
Control: tags 999009 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for scanssh (versioned as 2.0-4.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u scanssh-2.0/debian/changelog scanssh-2.0/debian/changelog
--- scanssh-2.0/debian/changelog
+++ scanssh-2.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+scanssh (2.0-4.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #999009)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:50:08 
-0300
+
 scanssh (2.0-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u scanssh-2.0/debian/rules scanssh-2.0/debian/rules
--- scanssh-2.0/debian/rules
+++ scanssh-2.0/debian/rules
@@ -91,4 +91,6 @@
dh_builddeb
 
 binary: binary-indep binary-arch
-.PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install configure
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
+.PHONY: build build-arch build-indep clean binary-indep binary-arch binary 
install configure



Bug#999064: parchive: diff for NMU version 1.1-4.2

2022-04-05 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 999064 + patch
Control: tags 999064 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for parchive (versioned as 1.1-4.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u parchive-1.1/debian/changelog parchive-1.1/debian/changelog
--- parchive-1.1/debian/changelog
+++ parchive-1.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+parchive (1.1-4.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #999064)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:41:54 
-0300
+
 parchive (1.1-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u parchive-1.1/debian/rules parchive-1.1/debian/rules
--- parchive-1.1/debian/rules
+++ parchive-1.1/debian/rules
@@ -82,4 +82,6 @@
dh_builddeb
 
 binary: binary-indep binary-arch
-.PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install configure
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
+.PHONY: build build-arch build-indep clean binary-indep binary-arch binary 
install configure



Bug#999020: devio: diff for NMU version 1.2-1.3

2022-04-05 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 999020 + patch
Control: tags 999020 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for devio (versioned as 1.2-1.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u devio-1.2/debian/changelog devio-1.2/debian/changelog
--- devio-1.2/debian/changelog
+++ devio-1.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+devio (1.2-1.3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
+(Closes: #999020)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:25:12 
-0300
+
 devio (1.2-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u devio-1.2/debian/rules devio-1.2/debian/rules
--- devio-1.2/debian/rules
+++ devio-1.2/debian/rules
@@ -83,4 +83,6 @@
dh_builddeb
 
 binary: binary-indep binary-arch
-.PHONY: build clean binary-indep binary-arch binary install
+build-arch: build
+build-indep: build
+.PHONY: build build-arch build-indep clean binary-indep binary-arch binary 
install



Bug#965555: glurp: diff for NMU version 0.12.3-1.1

2022-02-01 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 96 + patch
Control: tags 96 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for glurp (versioned as 0.12.3-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer or cancel the upload.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u glurp-0.12.3/debian/changelog glurp-0.12.3/debian/changelog
--- glurp-0.12.3/debian/changelog
+++ glurp-0.12.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+glurp (0.12.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+   * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+   - debian/compat: removed.
+   - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+ Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+   - Closes: #96
+   * Dropped CDBS in favor of the debhelper to allow the build system to use
+ DH level greater than 11. Consequently:
+   - debian/control: removed no longer needed cdbs from Build-Depends
+ field.
+   - debian/rules: changed from CDBS to DH.
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Tue, 01 Feb 2022 23:55:04 
-0300
+
 glurp (0.12.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release (Closes: #333640, #379667, #385088, #359096, #581933).
reverted:
--- glurp-0.12.3/debian/compat
+++ glurp-0.12.3.orig/debian/compat
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -u glurp-0.12.3/debian/rules glurp-0.12.3/debian/rules
--- glurp-0.12.3/debian/rules
+++ glurp-0.12.3/debian/rules
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
 
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk
+%:
+   dh $@
 
diff -u glurp-0.12.3/debian/control glurp-0.12.3/debian/control
--- glurp-0.12.3/debian/control
+++ glurp-0.12.3/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: x11
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.4), libglib2.0-dev (>= 
2.4), libmpd-dev, cdbs
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.4), libglib2.0-dev 
(>= 2.4), libmpd-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.8.4
 Homepage: http://sourceforge.net/projects/glurp/
 



Bug#965431: bfbtester: diff for NMU version 2.0.1-7.2

2022-01-28 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965431 + patch
Control: tags 965431 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for bfbtester (versioned as 2.0.1-7.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer or cancel it.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/rules bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/rules
--- bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/rules
+++ bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/rules
@@ -1,13 +1,4 @@
 #!/usr/bin/make -f
-  
-DEB_INSTALL_MANPAGES_bfbtester := debian/bfbtester.1
-
-common-configure-impl::
-   cd $(DEB_BUILDDIR); touch aclocal.m4 && touch Makefile.in && \
-   touch src/Makefile.in && touch src/config.h.in && \
-   touch src/bfbt/Makefile && touch configure
-
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk
 
+%:
+   dh $@
diff -u bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/changelog bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/changelog
--- bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/changelog
+++ bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
+bfbtester (2.0.1-7.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - Closes: #965431
+  * Dropped CDBS in favor of the debhelper to allow the build system to use
+DH level greater than 11. Consequently:
+  - debian/control: removed no longer needed cdbs and autotools-dev from
+Build-Depends field.
+  - debian/manpages: created to install the manpage.
+  - debian/rules: changed from CDBS to DH.
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 22:14:01 
-0300
+
 bfbtester (2.0.1-7.1) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/control bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/control
--- bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/control
+++ bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: utils
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Uwe Hermann 
-Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 5), autotools-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 
 Package: bfbtester
reverted:
--- bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/compat
+++ bfbtester-2.0.1.orig/debian/compat
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- bfbtester-2.0.1.orig/debian/manpages
+++ bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/manpages
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+debian/bfbtester.1



Bug#1002213: dmitry: diff for NMU version 1.3a-1.2

2022-01-28 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 1002213 + patch
Control: tags 1002213 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for dmitry (versioned as 1.3a-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer or cancel the upload.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u dmitry-1.3a/debian/changelog dmitry-1.3a/debian/changelog
--- dmitry-1.3a/debian/changelog
+++ dmitry-1.3a/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+dmitry (1.3a-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - Closes: #1002213
+  * Dropped CDBS in favor of the debhelper to allow the build system to use
+DH level greater than 11. Consequently:
+  - debian/control: removed no longer needed cdbs and autotools-dev from
+Build-Depends field.
+  - debian/rules: changed from CDBS to DH.
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 21:25:23 
-0300
+
 dmitry (1.3a-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
reverted:
--- dmitry-1.3a/debian/compat
+++ dmitry-1.3a.orig/debian/compat
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -u dmitry-1.3a/debian/control dmitry-1.3a/debian/control
--- dmitry-1.3a/debian/control
+++ dmitry-1.3a/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: net
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Runa Sandvik 
-Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 7), autotools-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
 Standards-Version: 3.8.0
 Homepage: http://www.mor-pah.net/index.php?file=projects/dmitry
 
diff -u dmitry-1.3a/debian/rules dmitry-1.3a/debian/rules
--- dmitry-1.3a/debian/rules
+++ dmitry-1.3a/debian/rules
@@ -5,5 +5,5 @@
 # Workaround for #957142
 export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fcommon
 
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk
+%:
+   dh $@



Bug#1004019: Should forensics-extra drop the dependendency on smb-nat?

2022-01-19 Thread Eriberto
Em qua., 19 de jan. de 2022 às 09:48, Adrian Bunk  escreveu:
>
> Package: forensics-extra
> Version: 2.34
> Severity: serious
> Control: block 1004018 by -1
>
> Does the 25 year old smb-nat provide any functionality that is
> not also provided by Samba tools (that were originally written
> by the same author)?
>

Hi Adrian,

Thanks for your tip. I will remove this package from forensics-extra.

Cheers,

Eriberto



Bug#998358: Subject: grepmail: autopkgtest doesn't do anything

2021-11-10 Thread Eriberto
Em qua., 10 de nov. de 2021 às 18:55, Paul Gevers  escreveu:
>
> Hi Eriberto,
>
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:57:37 -0300 Eriberto  wrote:
> > ow, Marcos will package the new upstream
> > release and he will fix this mistake. In a final action, he will send
> > a SPU to fix a specific issue.
>
> Please be aware that grepmail will be removed from testing in 7 days if
> the issue isn't fixed. Obviously, the package can come back later too,
> but just so you know.

Thanks Paul.  Marcos is a bit busy these days, so I will fix this issue now.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#998358: Subject: grepmail: autopkgtest doesn't do anything

2021-11-02 Thread Eriberto
Thanks a lot Paul.

Really, in our machines the package is built and Makefile  exists. I
need to check some packages of mine. I think there are some tests
around grepmail in upstream source. However, don't worry because this
upload was a first work. Now, Marcos will package the new upstream
release and he will fix this mistake. In a final action, he will send
a SPU to fix a specific issue.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#978883: pnscan: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70

2021-08-25 Thread Eriberto Mota
Control: tags 978883 unreproducible moreinfo
Control: severity 978883 important

Hi Matthias,

I can't reproduce it in a fresh jail with autoconf 2.70/2.71 and
GCC-10/11. I tested this package and 32 other packages with the same
bug. I wasn't able to reproduce this issue in 18 packages. Maybe it is
a failure in a robot.

This issue is causing AUTORM in forensics-all and forensics-extra.

Can you recheck? As an additional information, the package builds twice.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#978906: tcpxtract: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70

2021-08-25 Thread Eriberto Mota
Control: tags 978906 unreproducible moreinfo
Control: severity 978906 important

Hi Matthias,

I can't reproduce it in a fresh jail with autoconf 2.70/2.71 and
GCC-10/11. I tested this package and 32 other packages with the same
bug. I wasn't able to reproduce this issue in 18 packages. Maybe it is
a failure in a robot.

This issue is causing AUTORM in forensics-all and forensics-extra.

Can you recheck?

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#978905: tcpreplay: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70

2021-08-25 Thread Eriberto Mota
Em qua., 25 de ago. de 2021 às 06:30, Christoph Biedl
 escreveu:
>
> Control: tags 978905 unreproducible moreinfo
>
> Matthias Klose wrote...
>
> > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
> > autoconf 2.70, but succeeds to build with autoconf 2.69. The
> > severity of this report will be raised before the bookworm release,
> > so nothing has to be done for the bullseye release.
>
> Now looking into this, I cannot reproduce the issue in a pure Debian
> build chroot, both usrmerged and non-usrmerged (in case that ever
> matters).

Indeed.

The same case for pnscan and tcpxtract, both causing AUTORM for
forensics-all and forensics-extra.

Yesterday I tested 33 packages. I wasn't able to reproduce the issue
in 18 packages.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#988254: FTBFS: Missing build dependency on txt2man

2021-05-08 Thread Eriberto Mota
Control: severity 988254 normal
Control: tags 988254 moreinfo unreproducible

Em sáb., 8 de mai. de 2021 às 18:21, Wyatt Ward  escreveu:
>
> Package: axel
> Version: 2.17.10-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When building axel from sources (with dpkg-buildpackage), the build fails
> partway through unless txt2man is installed. txt2man is not currently listed
> under the 'Build-Depends' field in debian/control.
>
> After manually installing txt2man, the build completes normally.
>
> I was building it on my powerbook (powerpc), but have also noticed this on one
> of my amd64 machines (which I am sending this message from, hence the 'built
> successfully in the past' message).
>
> This is likely my first Debian bug report, so I apologise in advance if I did
> this wrong. I am letting 'reportbug' determine the severity but I don't
> personally see it as a huge deal. If it's actually a policy violation, then I
> guess that's why.
>
> Errors:
>
> /bin/bash: line 2: txt2man: command not found
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:1146: doc/axel.1] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/wyatt/development/axel/axel-git-debian'
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:676: all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/wyatt/development/axel/axel-git-debian'
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:452: all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/wyatt/development/axel/axel-git-debian'
> dh_auto_build: error: make -j1 returned exit code 2
> make: *** [debian/rules:7: binary] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit 
> status 2


Hi Wyatt ,

Thanks for your message.

axel 2.17.10-2 arrived in unstable on 2021-04-01 and it was
successfully built by all supported architectures in Debian[1]. I did
a new check now in my jail and all right in the axel. Considering it,
I am sure the problem is on your side. Please, describe step to step
all your procedures to build, starting with the source acquisition,
and I will be able to point the cause of the failure.

[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=axel

Best regards,

Eriberto



Bug#986246: axel: flaky autopkgtest (on ci.d.n arm64) due to output on stderr: Connection gone.

2021-04-01 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi Paul,

Em qui., 1 de abr. de 2021 às 10:24, Paul Gevers  escreveu:
>
> Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, I looked into
> the history of your autopkgtest [1] and I noticed it fails regularly on
> arm64. I have copied some of the output below. Can
> you please look into it and fix it? Either suppress this particular case
>  of output to stderr if you still want to catch the rest, or add an
> allow-stderr restriction to your test cases.

Thanks a lot for your help. I decided to add allow-stderr in some tests.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#984647: forensics-extra's autopkg tests always fail on 32bit archs

2021-03-06 Thread Eriberto
Hi Matthias,

Thanks a lot for your report. This issue was identificated in 2.28
version by me. I wrote in file list-of-packages-extra:

-stegosuite FED
+stegosuite FGR # FIXME, dependencies not available for i386 in autopkgtest

In other words, I moved stegosuite from Depends (in forensics-extra)
to Recommends (in forensics-extra-gui). However, because of a mistake
of mine, a new debian/control file wasn't generated by gen-control.sh
command. I will release the revision 2.29 to fix it. Thanks again.

Eriberto



Bug#979978: lime-forensics-dkms: unable to make or make install due to error set_fs

2021-01-12 Thread Eriberto Mota
Thanks a lot Gregory and Paul.

I will use a PR from upstream site[1]. I tested this patch and it works fine.

The patch used in Ubuntu seems a bit wrong[2].

[1] https://github.com/504ensicsLabs/LiME/pull/85
[2] https://github.com/504ensicsLabs/LiME/pull/83

Cheers,

Eriberto

Em ter., 12 de jan. de 2021 às 11:26, Paul Wise  escreveu:
>
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags -1 - ftbfs
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:00:57 -0500 Gregory Lamarche wrote:
>
> >* What was the outcome of this action? instead of building the modules 
> > it just errors out and gives error
>
> It looks like Ubuntu have a patch for this:
>
> https://patches.ubuntu.com/l/lime-forensics/lime-forensics_1.9.1-1ubuntu1.patch
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



Bug#969841: mac-robber: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

2020-09-16 Thread Eriberto Mota
Thank you Samuel.

In my personal opinion, this bug is not serious. So, I will set it as
"normal" soon.

I will wait for forensics-samples (in NEW) to fix this bug.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#970473: libgs9-common: Fails to install

2020-09-16 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: libgs9-common
Version: 9.53.1~dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: eribe...@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

When trying to install libgs9-common in Sid, I got the following message:

 The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libgs9-common : Depends: fonts-urw-base35 (< 20170801.1.0~) but 20200910-1 is 
to be installed
  Recommends: fonts-droid-fallback but it is not going to be 
installed
 E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

The cause is today fonts-urw-base35 20200910-1 arrived to Sid[1].

[1] 
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1176330/accepted-fonts-urw-base35-20200910-1-source-into-unstable/

I think a re-upload of ghostscript will fix the problem.

Best regards,

Eriberto



Bug#969835: iwatch: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

2020-09-15 Thread Eriberto Mota
Please, can you explain why this bug is marked as serious?

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#957657: packeth: diff for NMU version 1.6.5-2.1

2020-08-20 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 957657 + patch
Control: tags 957657 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for packeth (versioned as 1.6.5-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel or delay it longer.

Regards.

diff -Nru packeth-1.6.5/debian/changelog packeth-1.6.5/debian/changelog
--- packeth-1.6.5/debian/changelog  2011-09-13 10:10:02.0 -0300
+++ packeth-1.6.5/debian/changelog  2020-08-20 15:05:18.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+packeth (1.6.5-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: added -fcommon to CFLAGS as a workaround
+to fix a FTBFS with GCC-10. (Closes: #957657)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:05:18 
-0300
+
 packeth (1.6.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fix FTBFS because of wrong link order, thanks to Colin Watson
diff -Nru packeth-1.6.5/debian/rules packeth-1.6.5/debian/rules
--- packeth-1.6.5/debian/rules  2011-09-13 10:10:02.0 -0300
+++ packeth-1.6.5/debian/rules  2020-08-20 15:05:18.0 -0300
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.
 #export DH_VERBOSE=1
 
-export CFLAGS = -Wall -g -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations
+export CFLAGS = -Wall -g -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations -fcommon
 export LDFLAGS = -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed
 
 override_dh_auto_install:



Bug#957219: foremost: diff for NMU version 1.5.7-9.1

2020-08-20 Thread Eriberto
Glad to help!

Em qui., 20 de ago. de 2020 às 12:24, Raúl Benencia  escreveu:
>
> Hi Joao,
>
> This is perfect. Thanks for taking care of it.
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:52:30PM -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> > Control: tags 957219 + patch
> > Control: tags 957219 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for foremost (versioned as 1.5.7-9.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should cancel or delay it longer.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > diff -Nru foremost-1.5.7/debian/changelog foremost-1.5.7/debian/changelog
> > --- foremost-1.5.7/debian/changelog   2019-06-12 12:08:06.0 -0300
> > +++ foremost-1.5.7/debian/changelog   2020-08-19 15:38:47.0 -0300
> > @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
> > +foremost (1.5.7-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> > +
> > +  * Non-maintainer upload.
> > +  * debian/rules: added DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND variable as a workaround 
> > to fix
> > +a FTBFS with GCC-10. (Closes: #957219)
> > +
> > + -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 
> > 15:38:47 -0300
> > +
> >  foremost (1.5.7-9) unstable; urgency=medium
> >
> >* Fix extra byte at the tail of recovered zip files if -t all is
> > diff -Nru foremost-1.5.7/debian/rules foremost-1.5.7/debian/rules
> > --- foremost-1.5.7/debian/rules   2018-06-11 02:27:20.0 -0300
> > +++ foremost-1.5.7/debian/rules   2020-08-19 15:38:47.0 -0300
> > @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
> >  #export DH_VERBOSE=1
> >  export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=+all
> >
> > +# Workaround for #957219
> > +export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fcommon
> > +
> >  %:
> >   dh $@
> >



Bug#957219: foremost: diff for NMU version 1.5.7-9.1

2020-08-19 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 957219 + patch
Control: tags 957219 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for foremost (versioned as 1.5.7-9.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel or delay it longer.

Regards.

diff -Nru foremost-1.5.7/debian/changelog foremost-1.5.7/debian/changelog
--- foremost-1.5.7/debian/changelog 2019-06-12 12:08:06.0 -0300
+++ foremost-1.5.7/debian/changelog 2020-08-19 15:38:47.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+foremost (1.5.7-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: added DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND variable as a workaround to fix
+a FTBFS with GCC-10. (Closes: #957219)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:38:47 
-0300
+
 foremost (1.5.7-9) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Fix extra byte at the tail of recovered zip files if -t all is
diff -Nru foremost-1.5.7/debian/rules foremost-1.5.7/debian/rules
--- foremost-1.5.7/debian/rules 2018-06-11 02:27:20.0 -0300
+++ foremost-1.5.7/debian/rules 2020-08-19 15:38:47.0 -0300
@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
 #export DH_VERBOSE=1
 export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=+all
 
+# Workaround for #957219
+export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fcommon
+
 %:
dh $@
 



Bug#963154: nmapsi4: Must not be arch:any

2020-06-22 Thread Eriberto
Em sáb., 20 de jun. de 2020 às 10:00, Adrian Bunk  escreveu:
>
> There are plenty of packages in the archive whose build dependencies
> cannot be fulfilled on all release architectures.
>
> This is not a problem.

Ok, thanks Adrian. I fixed forensics-all, affected by this change.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#963154: nmapsi4: Must not be arch:any

2020-06-19 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: nmapsi4
Version: 0.5~alpha2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Dear Maintainer,

nmapsi4 fails to build from source in several architectures since 0.5~alpha2-1
revision.

nmapsi4 build depends of qtwebengine5-dev. Since 5.9.1+dfsg-5 revision, released
in 30 Sep 2017, qtwebengine5-dev is only available for amd64, arm64, armhf, i386
and mipsel. Consequently, now nmapsi4 FTBFS in armel, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x,
alpha, hppa, hurd-i386, ia64, m68k, powerpc, ppc64, riscv64, sh4, sparc64 and
x32.

The following patch fixes the FTBFS in nmapsi4:

diff -Nru nmapsi4-0.5~alpha2/debian/control nmapsi4-0.5~alpha2/debian/control
--- nmapsi4-0.5~alpha2/debian/control   2020-05-22 12:50:04.0 -0300
+++ nmapsi4-0.5~alpha2/debian/control   2020-06-19 14:33:47.0 -0300
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 Rules-Requires-Root: no
 
 Package: nmapsi4
-Architecture: any
+Architecture: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 mipsel
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, nmap, bind9-dnsutils
 Description: graphical interface to nmap, the network scanner
  NmapSI4 is a complete Qt-based Gui with the design goal to provide a complete

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#960899: [Python-modules-team] Bug#960899: paramiko: diff for NMU version 2.7.1-1.1

2020-06-12 Thread Eriberto Mota
Em sáb., 13 de jun. de 2020 às 01:21, Sandro Tosi  escreveu:
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:45 AM César Túlio  wrote:
> >
> > Control: tags 960899 + patch
> > Control: tags 960899 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for paramiko (versioned as 2.7.1-1.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer or cancel the NMU.
>
> hold off with this please; i'd much rather for you to submit an MR at
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/paramiko

Hi Sandro,

It is part of a local sprint. I am cancelling the upload now.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#962673: cunit: autopkgtest failure: stdio.h: No such file or directory

2020-06-11 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Source: cunit
Version: 2.1-3-dfsg-2.2
Severity: serious

Autopkgtest fails since last NMU with the following messages:

autopkgtest [17:33:49]: test test.sh: [---
debian/tests/test.c:1:10: fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory
1 | #include 
  |  ^
compilation terminated.
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.m92mckta/downtmp/build.vSN/src/debian/tests/test.sh: 8: 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.m92mckta/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/test: not found
debian/tests/test.c:1:10: fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory
1 | #include 
  |  ^
compilation terminated.
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.m92mckta/downtmp/build.vSN/src/debian/tests/test.sh: 8: 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.m92mckta/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/test: not found
autopkgtest [17:33:49]: test test.sh: ---]
autopkgtest [17:33:49]: test test.sh:  - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - 
- - - -
test.sh  FAIL non-zero exit status 127
autopkgtest [17:33:50]: test test.sh:  - - - - - - - - - - stderr - - - - - - - 
- - -
debian/tests/test.c:1:10: fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory
1 | #include 
  |  ^
compilation terminated.
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.m92mckta/downtmp/build.vSN/src/debian/tests/test.sh: 8: 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.m92mckta/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/test: not found
debian/tests/test.c:1:10: fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory
1 | #include 
  |  ^
compilation terminated.
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.m92mckta/downtmp/build.vSN/src/debian/tests/test.sh: 8: 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.m92mckta/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/test: not found
autopkgtest [17:33:50]:  summary
test.sh  FAIL non-zero exit status 127


The release team has announced [1] that failing autopkgtest are now considered
RC in testing. The full log from autopkgtest is availble here[2].

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
[2] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/c/cunit/5861880/log.gz

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#962643: cunit: broken NMU does FTBFS

2020-06-11 Thread Eriberto
All right with build now! \o/

However, I can see the CI tests failing again and we will need a new
NMU. We will work over it now (using Salsa to approve the local
changes in tests). I will open a bug.

Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 13:22, Adrian Bunk  escreveu:
>
> Something unrelated missing on your list:
> debdiff between previous and current binary packages.
> Both file differences and dependency differences are worth checking.

Added, thanks!
>
> > We are in a local sprint. We are monitoring all builds to prevent
> > issues. We are 17 people working around several issues.
> >...
>
> Ah, I already wondered about all the Brazilian names in
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred.html


Yes. We are 14 collaborators and 3 sponsors.


> I hope I did not come across as unfriendly, more than 100k unwanted LOC
> in the debdiff was just a shock while still drinking my wake-up black tea.

I understand you first impressions and I know your nice work around
Debian. You're welcome.

Cheers,

Eriberto



Bug#962643: cunit: broken NMU does FTBFS

2020-06-11 Thread Eriberto
Hi Adrian, how are you?

Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 03:15, Adrian Bunk  escreveu:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 08:46:23AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >...
> > The diffstat of this NMU is
> >  510 files changed, 139791 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > It is the responsibility of the sponsor (Cc'ed) to verify that
> > sponsored uploads are not broken:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_is_the_process_for_sponsoring_a_package.3F
>
> I have to take that back, it is actually likely that this went wrong on
> the sponsor side due to verifying the package:
>
> The debdiff in #960715 looks OK.
>
> Building a source package for upload after having done a testbuild
> can cause this kind of problems, when the source tree is not clean
> many unwanted changes might end up in the new source package.

Thanks a lot for your comments.

The problem is caused by several files in directories created by
package inside debian/ (build, build-ncurses e tmp-ncurses) and not
cleaned by dh_clean. Initially, Regis did a fix for this but I asked
him to remove it because an NMU should not modify some things in
third-party packages (cleanup wasn't a RC target). So, I did a double
check using my sponsor checklist[1], I ran debuild and cowbuilder.
After this I did a debuild -S and the trash inside debian/ was sent.
Sorry for this.

[1] http://bit.ly/pkgcheck

We are in a local sprint. We are monitoring all builds to prevent
issues. We are 17 people working around several issues. Don't worry
because this issue will be fixed today with a NMU without delay and
with an override_dh_autoclean.

Thanks a lot for your help.

Cheers,

Eriberto



Bug#831104: xevil: diff for NMU version 2.02r2-10.1

2020-06-06 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 831104 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for xevil (versioned as 2.02r2-10.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer or cancel the NMU.

Regards,

Eriberto

--- xevil-2.02r2/debian/changelog
+++ xevil-2.02r2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+xevil (2.02r2-10.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fixed FTBFS with GCC 6 and higher. Thanks to Javier Serrano
+Polo . (Closes: #831104)
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Sun, 07 Jun 2020 02:11:06 
-0300
+
 xevil (2.02r2-10) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fixed bug that sometimes prevented X resources from being read properly.
diff -u xevil-2.02r2/cmn/utils.h xevil-2.02r2/cmn/utils.h
--- xevil-2.02r2/cmn/utils.h
+++ xevil-2.02r2/cmn/utils.h
@@ -98,11 +98,11 @@
 #define MSEC_PER_CLOCK (1.0e3 / CLOCKS_PER_SEC) 
 #endif
 
-#ifndef max
-#define max(a,b)   (ab ? b : a)
+#ifndef MIN
+#define MIN(a,b)   (a>b ? b : a)
 #endif
 
 #if X11
diff -u xevil-2.02r2/cmn/game.cpp xevil-2.02r2/cmn/game.cpp
--- xevil-2.02r2/cmn/game.cpp
+++ xevil-2.02r2/cmn/game.cpp
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@
   assert(maximums[weapons[n]->classId] == 0);
 
   // Don't allow objectWorldPercent values that are too small.
-  float objWPercent = (float)max(weapons[n]->objectWorldPercent,
+  float objWPercent = (float)MAX(weapons[n]->objectWorldPercent,
  OBJECT_WORLD_PERCENT_MIN);
 
   maximums[weapons[n]->classId] = (int)ceil(areaFactor * objWPercent);
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@
 for (n = 0; n < oItemsNum; n++) {
   // Check not already set.
   assert(maximums[oItems[n]->classId] == 0);
-  float objWPercent = (float)max(oItems[n]->objectWorldPercent,
+  float objWPercent = (float)MAX(oItems[n]->objectWorldPercent,
  OBJECT_WORLD_PERCENT_MIN);
 
   maximums[oItems[n]->classId] = (int)ceil(areaFactor * objWPercent);
diff -u xevil-2.02r2/debian/changelog xevil-2.02r2/debian/changelog



Bug#962065: rdist: Non-free license

2020-06-02 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: rdist
Version: 6.1.5
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1

The current version of rdist in Debian says in Copyright file and in every
headers:

/*
 * Copyright (c) 1992-1998 Michael A. Cooper.
 * This software may be freely used and distributed provided it is not
 * sold for profit or used in part or in whole for commercial gain
 * without prior written agreement, and the author is credited
 * appropriately.
 */
/*
 * Copyright (c) 1983 Regents of the University of California.
 * All rights reserved.
 *
 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
 * are met:
 * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
 *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
 * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
 *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
 *documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
 * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
 *must display the following acknowledgement:
 *  This product includes software developed by the University of
 *  California, Berkeley and its contributors.
 * 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
 *may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
 *without specific prior written permission.
 *
 * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
 * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
 * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
 * ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
 * FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
 * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
 * OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
 * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
 * LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
 * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
 * SUCH DAMAGE.
 */


It sounds like a multi-licensed source code, as "Special and BSD-4-Clause". The
Special slice (Copyright (c) 1992-1998 Michael A. Cooper) is non-DFSG
compliant.

Regards,

Eriberto



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=pt_BR:pt:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages rdist depends on:
ii  libc6  2.28-10

rdist recommends no packages.

rdist suggests no packages.



Bug#955777: forensics-all: depends on neopi which was removed from unstable

2020-04-04 Thread Eriberto
Em sáb., 4 de abr. de 2020 às 17:59, Sebastian Ramacher
 escreveu:
>
> neopi was removed from unstable (see #955518). Please drop it from
> forensics-all's Depends.


Thanks Sebastian! I will fix it today.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#951120: hydra: Non-free licence exception

2020-02-12 Thread Eriberto
Em qua., 12 de fev. de 2020 às 10:17, Raphael Hertzog
 escreveu:
>
> I'd rather convince upstream to fix this. I opened a ticket here:
> https://github.com/vanhauser-thc/thc-hydra/issues/497

Is a good idea change the help too. I also saw the following message:

$ hydra -h
Hydra v8.8 (c) 2019 by van Hauser/THC - Please do not use in military
or secret service organizations, or for illegal purposes.

Syntax: hydra [[[-l LOGIN|-L FILE] [-p PASS|-P FILE]] | [-C FILE]] [-e
nsr] [-o FILE] [-t TASKS] [-M FILE [-T TASKS]] [-w TIME] [-W TIME]
[-f] [-s PORT] [-x MIN:MAX:CHARSET] [-c TIME] [-ISOuvVd46]
[service://server[:PORT][/OPT]]

Cheers,

Eriberto



Bug#946906: autoremoval looking at Recommends field

2019-12-17 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: serious

>From https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/autoremovals.cgi:

   forensics-all: buggy deps aircrack-ng, flagged for removal in 18 days

>From https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/forensics-all:

   Version 3.12 of forensics-all is marked for autoremoval from testing
   on Sat 04 Jan 2020. It depends (transitively) on aircrack-ng, affected
   by #936113. You should try to prevent the removal by fixing these RC
   bugs.

However, since version 3.11 aircrack-ng is a recommended package, not a
dependency. From Sid:

   $ apt-cache depends forensics-all | grep aircrack
 Recommends: aircrack-ng

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Eriberto


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
C.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: unable to detect



Bug#945234: cupp: Renaming cupp3 to cupp breaks Debian Sid/Bullseye repository

2019-11-21 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi Marcio,

Em qui., 21 de nov. de 2019 às 14:10, Marcio Souza
 escreveu:
>
> Em 21/11/2019 13:50, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho escreveu:
> > Source: cupp
> > Version: 0.0+20160624.git07f9b8-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> Hi Eriberto
>
> > After renaming cupp3 to cupp suddenly and without coordinate with other
> > maintainers, forensics-extra packages (and maybe others) was affected.
> > If it is a forced needed transition, please coordinate the action before
> > make it.
> Sorry for this, I should have coordinated it.
>
> > If you only need rename the package from now on because a light reason
> > as Python 2 removing, please follow these instructions[1]. IMO, this is
> > the solution for cupp. Note that you package will arrives to NEW queue.
> The cupp source package generated two binaries: cupp and cupp3, respectively
> the version for python2 and python3. The new upstream version of cupp
> [1] removed
> the python2 implementation, so the cupp3 lost its purpose, as we started
> having only the python3 version.
>
> So in debian release [2], I removed the cupp3 of cupp source package, I
> don't rename the package.

Sorry, I didn't make myself understood. In other words, is not
recommendable remove a package from Debian without coordinate it.
Considering that you removed cupp3 suddenly, the best way to fix it
without disrupt other packages/users is adopt the same procedure as
renaming a package (this procedure is also used to rename but it not
just to rename).

> Could you modify the dependencies of forensics-extra to use cupp package
> instead of cupp3? [3].

Sure, I will do it soon.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#866419: cfv: diff for NMU version 1.18.3-2.1

2019-07-24 Thread Eriberto Mota
Control: tags 866419 + patch
Control: tags 866419 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for cfv (versioned as 1.18.3-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards.

diff -Nru cfv-1.18.3/debian/changelog cfv-1.18.3/debian/changelog
--- cfv-1.18.3/debian/changelog 2012-05-10 15:43:38.0 -0300
+++ cfv-1.18.3/debian/changelog 2019-07-24 12:55:20.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+cfv (1.18.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix a FTBFS: (Closes: #866419)
+  - debian/control: changed from python-imaging to python-pil in
+Suggests field. Thanks to David Gnedt .
+  - debian/patches/10_fix-python.patch: created to fix PIL namespace.
+Thanks to David Gnedt .
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Wed, 24 Jul 2019
12:55:20 -0300
+
 cfv (1.18.3-2) unstable; urgency=low

   * Package cleanup below by Jari Aalto  - thanks!
diff -Nru cfv-1.18.3/debian/control cfv-1.18.3/debian/control
--- cfv-1.18.3/debian/control   2012-05-10 15:36:48.0 -0300
+++ cfv-1.18.3/debian/control   2019-07-24 12:55:20.0 -0300
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 Package: cfv
 Architecture: all
 Depends: ${python:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
-Suggests: python-imaging, bittorrent | bittornado
+Suggests: python-pil, bittorrent | bittornado
 Description: versatile file checksum creator and verifier
  cfv is a utility to test and create a wide range of checksum
  verification files. It currently supports testing and creating
diff -Nru cfv-1.18.3/debian/patches/10_fix-python.patch
cfv-1.18.3/debian/patches/10_fix-python.patch
--- cfv-1.18.3/debian/patches/10_fix-python.patch   1969-12-31
21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ cfv-1.18.3/debian/patches/10_fix-python.patch   2019-07-24
12:55:20.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+Description: fix PIL namespace
+Author: David Gnedt 
+Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/866419
+Last-Update: 2019-03-13
+Index: cfv-1.18.3/cfv
+===
+--- cfv-1.18.3.orig/cfv
 cfv-1.18.3/cfv
+@@ -1837,7 +1837,7 @@ def getimagedimensions(filename):
+   if filename == '':
+   return '0','0'
+   try:
+-  import Image
++  from PIL import Image
+   im1=Image.open(filename)
+   return map(str, im1.size)
+   except (ImportError, IOError):
+@@ -1910,7 +1910,7 @@ class JPEGSheriff_CRC(ChksumType, CRC_Mi
+   file.write('Generated at: %s\n'%time.strftime('%a, %d
%b %Y %H:%M:%S',time.gmtime(time.time(
+   file.write('Find  it  at: http://cfv.sourceforge.net/\n\n')
+   try:
+-  import Image
++  from PIL import Image
+   self.use_dimensions=1 should this be made
optional somehow?
+   except ImportError:
+   self.use_dimensions=0
diff -Nru cfv-1.18.3/debian/patches/series cfv-1.18.3/debian/patches/series
--- cfv-1.18.3/debian/patches/series2012-05-10 15:36:48.0 -0300
+++ cfv-1.18.3/debian/patches/series2019-07-24 12:55:20.0 -0300
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 # 01-color.patch
+10_fix-python.patch



Bug#932796: Non-DFSG license in dyndns.pl file

2019-07-23 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: dyndns
Version: 2016.1021-3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream

When searching for a license inside dyndns.pl, I found the information shown
below:

  #!/usr/bin/perl
  #
  #   Copyright
  #
  #   Copyright (C) 1999-2016 Jari Aalto
  #
  #   License
  #
  #   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
  #   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
  #   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
  #   (at your option) any later version.

  [...]

  

  [...]

The last block says about a PROPRIETARY source code. This notice was shown two
times in dyndns main file.

Regards,

Eriberto

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)



Bug#928728: testssl.sh: missing dependencies

2019-05-17 Thread Eriberto
Em sex, 17 de mai de 2019 às 20:43, Eriberto Mota
 escreveu:
>
> So, package needs bsdmailutils and procps.
>

s/bsdmailutils/bsdmainutils/



Bug#928728: testssl.sh: missing dependencies

2019-05-17 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi Lee,

Thanks for your report. I can confirm it:

Fatal error: Neither "dig", "host", "drill" or "nslookup" is present

So, package needs dnsutils | ldnsutils (dnsutils also provide host).

/usr/bin/testssl: line 8865: hexdump: command not found
/usr/bin/testssl: line 1236: ps: command not found

So, package needs bsdmailutils and procps.

I will fix it.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#926335: closed by Joao Eriberto Mota Filho (Bug#926335: fixed in forensics-extra 2.8)

2019-04-04 Thread Eriberto
Em qui, 4 de abr de 2019 às 05:35, Andreas Beckmann  escreveu:
>
> Thanks.
>
> Unblock request filed: #926374


Thanks a lot Andreas!

Eriberto



Bug#919850: python3-link-grammar: broken symlink: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/linkgrammar/_clinkgrammar.so -> _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1

2019-02-09 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi,

After dh_install:

python3-link-grammar
└── usr
└── lib
└── python3.7
└── site-packages
├── linkgrammar
│   ├── clinkgrammar.py
│   ├── _clinkgrammar.so -> _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1
│   ├── _clinkgrammar.so.5 -> _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1
│   ├── _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── linkgrammar.py
│   └── __pycache__
│   ├── clinkgrammar.cpython-37.opt-1.pyc
│   ├── clinkgrammar.cpython-37.pyc
│   ├── __init__.cpython-37.opt-1.pyc
│   ├── __init__.cpython-37.pyc
│   ├── linkgrammar.cpython-37.opt-1.pyc
│   └── linkgrammar.cpython-37.pyc
└── linkgrammar.pth

After dh_python3:

python3-link-grammar
└── usr
├── lib
│   ├── python3
│   │   └── dist-packages
│   │   ├── linkgrammar
│   │   │   ├── clinkgrammar.py
│   │   │   ├── _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1
│   │   │   ├── __init__.py
│   │   │   └── linkgrammar.py
│   │   └── linkgrammar.pth
│   └── python3.7
│   └── site-packages
│   └── linkgrammar
│   └── _clinkgrammar.so -> _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1

So, the link was not moved or recreated by dh_python3.

Eriberto


Bug#917898: libvisual-0.4-dev: Broken include path in pkg-config file

2019-01-17 Thread Eriberto
Hi Tim,

Em seg, 31 de dez de 2018 às 11:54, Tim Müller  escreveu:
>
> $ pkg-config --cflags libvisual-0.4
> -I/usr/include/libvisual-0.4
>
> $ ls /usr/include/libvisual-0.4
> ls: cannot access '/usr/include/libvisual-0.4': No such file or directory
>
> Only /usr/include/libvisual exists. It's not clear to me why it was renamed, 
> having the major/API version in the subdirectory name is good practice, so 
> that in case a new version with a different API/ABI is made it can be 
> installed in parallel.


I adopted libvisual some years ago. Originally, it was installing
include files in '/usr/include/libvisual-0.4'. In november 2018, I
created a test for autopkgtest (debian/tests/). The test called all .h
files and failed because these headers called
'/usr/include/libvisual'. So, I "fixed" the path for include files in
0.4.0-13 revision. I will revert this action and add a symlink to fix
the problem without more noising.

> In any case, this will cause everyone who uses this package via pkg-config 
> (e.g. gst-plugins-base) to FTBFS.
>
> Cheers
>  Tim

Thanks!

Cheers,

Eriberto

Hi Tim,

I adopted



Bug#915431: dc3dd FTBFS with glibc 2.28

2018-12-11 Thread Eriberto Mota
Em seg, 3 de dez de 2018 às 18:42, Adrian Bunk  escreveu:
>
> Source: dc3dd
> Version: 7.2.646-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/dc3dd.html
>
> ...
> freadahead.c: In function 'freadahead':
> freadahead.c:69:3: error: #error "Please port gnulib freadahead.c to your 
> platform! Look at the definition of fflush, fread, ungetc on your system, 
> then report this to bug-gnulib."
>   #error "Please port gnulib freadahead.c to your platform! Look at the 
> definition of fflush, fread, ungetc on your system, then report this to 
> bug-gnulib."
>^
> gcc  -I.   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2   -g -O2 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/build/1st/dc3dd-7.2.646=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o full-read.o full-read.c
> make[4]: *** [Makefile:1470: freadahead.o] Error 1
>
>
> See #915151 for background.
>


Hi all,

I will apply the patch available here[1].

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dc3dd/

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#915043: nikto: missing build on all

2018-11-29 Thread Eriberto
Em qui, 29 de nov de 2018 às 16:56, Vincent Bernat  escreveu:
>
>  ❦ 29 novembre 2018 16:51 -0200, Eriberto Mota :
>
> > I've prepared an NMU for nikto (versioned as 1:2.1.5-3.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
>
> Thanks. You can upload it right now if you want.

Thanks! I will do it.

Cheers,

Eriberto



Bug#915043: nikto: missing build on all

2018-11-29 Thread Eriberto Mota
Control: tags 915043 + patch
Control: tags 915043 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for nikto (versioned as 1:2.1.5-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Eriberto



  1   2   3   >