Bug#675940: maybe a work-around?

2012-07-04 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
On my Radeon HD 78xx, this workaround works fine.

On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 13:14 +0100, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
 There is someone with a work-around in the Unofficial AMD Bugzilla:
 
   http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522#c5

p.s. now there is an issue on fglrx-glx-ia32 Depends:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 fglrx-glx-ia32 : Depends: ia32-libs (= 20120102) but it is not going to be 
installed
  Depends: libfglrx-ia32 (= 1:12-6-2) but it is not going to be 
installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#666488: Patch to fix unresponsiveness after logging in to MSN account

2012-04-02 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi Alejandro,

Thanks for your report.
I spoke with upstream a few minutes ago: today there will be a new
version of emesene.
In the meantime, for those who can't use emenese, here's a workaround:

- open file 
/usr/share/emesene/emesene/e3/papylib/papyon/papyon/gnet/io/ssl_socket.py

- change the line 

context = OpenSSL.Context(OpenSSL.SSLv23_METHOD)

into

context = OpenSSL.Context(OpenSSL.SSLv3_METHOD)

- start emesne

Cheers,
Fabrizio.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#660084: evolution: Evolution crashes on startup

2012-03-23 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi,

with new nvidia-* packages, released yesterday on sid, all problems
seems solved.
Actually, I'm using

ii  nvidia-glx   295.33-1   NVIDIA 
metapackage

and evolution works fine (tried for three hours without crashes)

Thanks.
Cheers,

Fabrizio.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#660084: evolution: Evolution crashes on startup

2012-03-05 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi,

same problem here with these packages installed:

ii  evolution  3.2.2-1   groupware suite with mail client and organizer
ii  nvidia-glx 295.20-1  NVIDIA metapackage

In another machine, with radeon driver, evolution works fine so
I suppose it's not an evolution problem.
Searching in nvdia-glx bugs I found:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661253

As workaround: (really smashing)

- open terminal and run 'gdb evolution'
- once gdb is running (gdb) type 'run evolution'
- open a new terminal and type 'evolution'

Cheers,
Fabrizio.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#653009: every firmware postrm scripts deletes files that were not installed by the package

2011-12-23 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi,

On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 19:47 +0100, intrigeri+deb...@boum.org wrote:
 
 All three firmware-b43*.postrm run rm -rf /lib/firmware/b43 at purge
 and remove time, i.e. every such postrm script shipped by one of the
 firmware installer binary packages deletes files that were *not*
 installed by that package.
Right but in any case, if you want to purge or remove the package,
directory /lib/firmware/b43 needs to be removed regardless of the
firmware installed.

 (BTW, it seems to me the tag for 1:015-11 was not pushed in Git.)
True. Added now.

Fabrizio.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#638119: Removing giplet from unstable

2011-10-16 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi Salvatore,

Il giorno sab, 15/10/2011 alle 09.58 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso ha
scritto:
 Hi Fabrizio
 
 Last time I had contact with upstream, he told me due to lack of time
 he cannot port giplet for now. I suggest to remove giplet from
 unstable.

I sent a request for removing the package to ftp-master.

Cheers,
Fabrizio.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#636258: firmware-b43-installer: exits from postinst with error code 1

2011-08-01 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi Brian,

Il giorno lun, 01/08/2011 alle 19.23 +, brian m. carlson ha scritto:

 And this causes a failure with error 1 (as you can see by failed:1).

Perfect analysis!

 Adding || true to the end of the line makes it succeed, and I've
 attached a patch that does that.

Thank you very much for your patch.

 I've marked this grave since the
 package fails to install for any b43 user other than those using
 14e4:4320 rev 3.

I agree. The package is unusable so it's right to mark it as 'grave' 
However, it's now fixed.

Thank you.

Cheers,
Fabrizio.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#636077: [firmware-b43-installer] Firmware-b43-installer fails on recognized chip after upgrade to linux 3.0

2011-07-31 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi Rubén,

Il giorno dom, 31/07/2011 alle 13.14 +0200, Rubén Gómez Antolí ha
scritto:

  Console cut --
 mac-lobo:~# dpkg -i --force-all firmware-b43-installer_014-6_all.deb
 (Leyendo la base de datos ... 360895 ficheros o directorios instalados 
 actualmente.)
 Preparando para reemplazar firmware-b43-installer 1:014-6 (usando 
 firmware-b43-installer_014-6_all.deb) ...
 Desempaquetando el reemplazo de firmware-b43-installer ...
 dpkg: firmware-b43-installer: problemas de dependencias, pero se 
 configurará de todas formas
   tal y como se solicitó:
   firmware-b43-installer depende de b43-fwcutter (= 1:014-6); sin embargo:
La versión de `b43-fwcutter' en el sistema es 1:014-5.
 Configurando firmware-b43-installer (1:014-6) ...

You need to remove manually 1:014-5 version of b43-fwcutter
Please do the following

# dpkg -P b43-fwcutter firmware-b43-installer

# wget http://packages.fabreg.it/incoming/b43-fwcutter_014-6_i386.deb
# wget http://packages.fabreg.it/incoming/firmware-b43-installer_014-6_all.deb

# dpkg -i b43-fwcutter_014-6_i386.deb firmware-b43-installer_014-6_all.deb

Please let me know.
Thank you.

Cheers,
Fabrizio.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#636077: [firmware-b43-installer] Firmware-b43-installer fails on recognized chip after upgrade to linux 3.0

2011-07-31 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi Rubén,

Il giorno dom, 31/07/2011 alle 22.34 +0200, Rubén Gómez Antolí ha
scritto:

 dpkg: error processing b43-fwcutter_014-6_i386.deb (--install):
   package architecture (i386) does not match system (powerpc)

This is a different problem. Now your chip card card is correctly
recognized.
b43-fwcutter can't be install on powerpc architecture but I don't think
this issue is introduced with latest update.
(I'll check better all the previous versions of package if there was a
compatibility with powercpc architecture)

My idea is:

- close this bug with the new version b43-fwcutter_014-6 (because the
problem you reported is fixed)
- open a new bug for requesting powerpc architecture. (before open this
new bug, please let me check all the oldest version package)

Cheers,
Fabrizio.






signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#636077: [firmware-b43-installer] Firmware-b43-installer fails on recognized chip after upgrade to linux 3.0

2011-07-31 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Il giorno dom, 31/07/2011 alle 23.49 +0200, Rubén Gómez Antolí ha
scritto:

 
  This is a different problem. Now your chip card card is correctly
  recognized.
 
 Yes.

Perfect :-)

 
 Yes, I too.

 
 I think exits a PowerPC package for b43-fwcutter on older versions, but 
 I can't check it.
 

My fault. I checked the previous versions of package and 
I found an old bug reported
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517032
on powerpc architecture, so the package worked for it.

This is a bug.
Feel free to file a new bug for it.

Thank you.
Cheers.

Fabrizio.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#636077: [firmware-b43-installer] Firmware-b43-installer fails on recognized chip after upgrade to linux 3.0

2011-07-30 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
tags 636077 + pending fixed unreproducible
thanks

Hi Lobo,

thank you for your bug report.

 BCM4306 rev3:

and this was the reason why b43-fwcutter gets the legacy firmware.
Legacy is for BCM4306 rev 02

 Please, tell me if you need some more data.


No, thanks.
I can't tested the package with my latest modification because I haven't
your card type. However I tried with a 'fake' lspci for simulate your
card and it works
But before upload I want to be sure it works fine so please, get it from
my website

http://packages.fabreg.it/incoming/

and test it: if it works I can ask for upload to official repository.

Thank you.

Cheers,
Fabrizio.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#552163: compiz does not work with nvidia driver

2009-10-23 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Package: compiz
Version: 0.8.2-6
Severity: grave

compiz --replace give me this message:

Checking for Xgl: not present. 
xset q doesn't reveal the location of the log file. Using
fallback /var/log/Xorg.0.log 
Detected PCI ID for VGA: 01:00.0 0300: 10de:0191 (rev a2) (prog-if 00
[VGA controller])
Checking for texture_from_pixmap: present. 
Checking for non power of two support: present. 
Checking for Composite extension: present. 
Checking screen 1Comparing resolution (1680x1050) to maximum 3D texture
size (8192): Passed.
Checking for Software Rasterizer: Not present. 
Checking for nVidia: present. 
Checking for FBConfig: present. 
running under gnome seesion, checking for gnomecompat
Checking for Xgl: not present. 
Backend : ini
Integration : true
Profile : default
Adding plugins
Initializing core options...done
Initializing commands options...done
Initializing water options...done
Initializing annotate options...done
Initializing gnomecompat options...done
Initializing resize options...done
Initializing zoom options...done
Initializing screenshot options...done
Initializing minimize options...done
Initializing svg options...done
Initializing clone options...done
inotify_add_watch: No such file or directory
Initializing decoration options...done
Initializing place options...done
Initializing blur options...done
Initializing obs options...done
Initializing wobbly options...done
/usr/bin/compiz.real (video) - Warn: No 8 bit GLX pixmap format,
disabling YV12 image format
Initializing video options...done
Initializing fade options...done
/usr/bin/compiz.real (cube) - Warn: Failed to load
slide: /usr/share/gdm/themes/Human/ubuntu.png
Initializing cube options...done
Initializing rotate options...done
Initializing scale options...done
Initializing switcher options...done
Initializing move options...done
*** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/compiz.real: corrupted double-linked
list: 0x09e54cd8 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb7d3eb31]
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb7d405c9]
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x6d)[0xb7d432dd]
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1[0xb7e9d97c]
=== Memory map: 
08048000-0807c000 r-xp  08:01 40989  /usr/bin/compiz.real
0807c000-0807d000 rw-p 00033000 08:01 40989  /usr/bin/compiz.real
09af2000-0a934000 rw-p  00:00 0  [heap]
b355c000-b357 r-xp  08:01
1883   /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.10.1.so
b357-b3571000 ---p 00014000 08:01
1883   /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.10.1.so
b3571000-b3572000 r--p 00014000 08:01
1883   /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.10.1.so
b3572000-b3573000 rw-p 00015000 08:01
1883   /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.10.1.so
b3573000-b3575000 rw-p  00:00 0 
b378-b3787000 r-xp  08:01
1888   /lib/i686/cmov/librt-2.10.1.so
b3787000-b3788000 r--p 6000 08:01
1888   /lib/i686/cmov/librt-2.10.1.so
b3788000-b3789000 rw-p 7000 08:01
1888   /lib/i686/cmov/librt-2.10.1.so
b64dc000-b64f8000 r-xp  08:01 1616   /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b64f8000-b64f9000 rw-p 0001c000 08:01 1616   /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b64f9000-b65df000 r-xp  08:01 785/usr/lib/libstdc
++.so.6.0.13
b65df000-b65e3000 r--p 000e5000 08:01 785/usr/lib/libstdc
++.so.6.0.13
b65e3000-b65e4000 rw-p 000e9000 08:01 785/usr/lib/libstdc
++.so.6.0.13
b65e4000-b65eb000 rw-p  00:00 0 
b65eb000-b65ff000 r-xp  08:01
148994 /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0
b65ff000-b660 rw-p 00014000 08:01
148994 /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0
b660f000-b6612000 r-xp  08:01
148989 /usr/lib/compizconfig/backends/libini.so
b6612000-b6613000 rw-p 2000 08:01
148989 /usr/lib/compizconfig/backends/libini.so
b6617000-b6817000 rw-s 0ed92000 00:0d 8506   /dev/nvidia0
b691b000-b691c000 rw-s fac06000 00:0d 8506   /dev/nvidia0
b6a9f000-b6ad5000 rw-p  00:00 0 
b6ad5000-b6af6000 rw-s  00:08 0  /SYSV (deleted)
b6af6000-b6af8000 rw-p  00:00 0 
b6af8000-b6afc000 r-xp  08:01
17932  /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0
b6afc000-b6afd000 rw-p 3000 08:01
17932  /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0
b6afd000-b6aff000 r-xp  08:01
17918  /usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0
b6aff000-b6b0 rw-p 1000 08:01
17918  /usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0
b6b0-b6b01000 r-xp  08:01
79011  /usr/lib/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.190.32
b6b01000-b6b02000 rw-p  08:01
79011  /usr/lib/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.190.32
b6b02000-b7b0b000 r-xp  08:01
78942  /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.190.32
b7b0b000-b7b51000 rwxp 01008000 08:01
78942  /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.190.32
b7b51000-b7b5f000 rwxp  00:00 0 
b7b5f000-b7b6 rw-p  00:00 0 
b7b6-b7b78000 r-xp  08:01
17943  /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.1.0
b7b78000-b7b79000 rw-p 00017000 08:01
17943  /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.1.0
b7b79000-b7b7c000 r-xp  08:01
59345  /usr/lib/libxcb-atom.so.1.0.0
b7b7c000-b7b7d000 rw-p 2000 08:01
59345  

Bug#443795: amule-utils-gui: amulegui doesn't starts

2007-09-24 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Package: amule-utils-gui
Version: 2.1.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: unknow

When I try to start amulegui I get:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ amulegui 
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module gnomebreakpad: libgnomebreakpad.so: cannot 
open shared object file: No such file or directory
*** glibc detected *** amulegui: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x08411e90 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x1bb)[0xb74478ab]
/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_free+0x31)[0xb6d60961]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0[0xb78e3bfe]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN8wxButton10SetDefaultEv+0x74)[0xb78e3cf4]
amulegui[0x816762b]
amulegui[0x80689e6]
amulegui[0x80696d2]
amulegui[0x806c8c2]
amulegui(_ZN12wxAppConsole10CallOnInitEv+0x11)[0x8071f11]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_Z7wxEntryRiPPw+0x40)[0xb76af430]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_Z7wxEntryRiPPc+0x36)[0xb76af506]
amulegui(_ZN10wxWindowDC6DoBlitEP4wxDCiiibii+0xe2c)[0x8067140]
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0)[0xb73f0050]
amulegui(_ZN13wxInputStream5SeekIEx10wxSeekMode+0x3d)[0x80669c1]
=== Memory map: 
08048000-08218000 r-xp  08:01 145455 /usr/bin/amulegui
08218000-0821c000 rw-p 001d 08:01 145455 /usr/bin/amulegui
0821c000-084fb000 rw-p 0821c000 00:00 0  [heap]
b6766000-b67f2000 r--p  08:01 23686  
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf
b67f2000-b6821000 r-xp  08:01 35785  
/usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.2000.0
b6821000-b6822000 rw-p 0002f000 08:01 35785  
/usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0.2000.0
b6822000-b686 r-xp  08:01 31589  
/usr/lib/libgnomeprintui-2-2.so.0.1.0
b686-b6862000 rw-p 0003d000 08:01 31589  
/usr/lib/libgnomeprintui-2-2.so.0.1.0
b6862000-b6979000 r-xp  08:01 3188   /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.30
b6979000-b697e000 rw-p 00117000 08:01 3188   /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.6.30
b697e000-b697f000 rw-p b697e000 00:00 0 
b697f000-b6994000 r-xp  08:01 35590  
/usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.19
b6994000-b6995000 rw-p 00014000 08:01 35590  
/usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2.3.19
b6995000-b69fa000 r-xp  08:01 69838  
/usr/lib/libgnomeprint-2-2.so.0.1.0
b69fa000-b69fc000 rw-p 00065000 08:01 69838  
/usr/lib/libgnomeprint-2-2.so.0.1.0
b6a02000-b6a06000 r-xp  08:01 35883  
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so
b6a06000-b6a07000 rw-p 3000 08:01 35883  
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so
b6a08000-b6a0a000 r-xp  08:01 18453  
/usr/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
b6a0a000-b6a0b000 rw-p 1000 08:01 18453  
/usr/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
b6a0b000-b6a11000 r--s  08:01 72733  
/var/cache/fontconfig/945677eb7aeaf62f1d50efc3fb3ec7d8-x86.cache-2
b6a11000-b6a17000 r--s  08:01 81455  
/var/cache/fontconfig/6d41288fd70b0be22e8c3a91e032eec0-x86.cache-2
b6a17000-b6a18000 r--s  08:01 72729  
/var/cache/fontconfig/4794a0821666d79190d59a36cb4f44b5-x86.cache-2
b6a18000-b6a28000 r--s  08:01 72726  
/var/cache/fontconfig/cabbd14511b9e8a55e92af97fb3a0461-x86.cache-2
b6a28000-b6a2a000 r--s  08:01 77591  
/var/cache/fontconfig/e13b20fdb08344e0e664864cc2ede53d-x86.cache-2
b6a2a000-b6a6a000 r--s  08:01 77590  
/var/cache/fontconfig/eeebfc908bd29a90773fd860017aada4-x86.cache-2
b6a6a000-b6aaa000 r--s  08:01 72721  
/var/cache/fontconfig/21a99156bb11811cef641abeda519a45-x86.cache-2
b6aaa000-b6ad r-xp  08:01 96933  
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libclearlooks.so
b6ad-b6ad1000 rw-p 00025000 08:01 96933  
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libclearlooks.so
b6ad1000-b6ada000 r-xp  08:01 28949  
/lib/i686/cmov/libnss_files-2.6.1.so
b6ada000-b6adc000 rw-p 8000 08:01 28949  
/lib/i686/cmov/libnss_files-2.6.1.so
b6adc000-b6ae4000 r-xp  08:01 28956  
/lib/i686/cmov/libnss_nis-2.6.1.so
b6ae4000-b6ae6000 rw-p 7000 08:01 28956  
/lib/i686/cmov/libnss_nis-2.6.1.so
b6ae6000-b6afa000 r-xp  08:01 24457  /lib/i686/cmov/libnsl-2.6.1.so
b6afa000-b6afc000 rw-p 00013000 08:01 24457  /lib/i686/cmov/libnsl-2.6.1.so
b6afc000-b6afe000 rw-p b6afc000 00:00 0 
b6afe000-b6b05000 r-xp  08:01 27945  
/lib/i686/cmov/libnss_compat-2.6.1.so
b6b05000-b6b07000 rw-p 6000 08:01 27945  
/lib/i686/cmov/libnss_compat-2.6.1.so
b6b07000-b6b0d000 r-xp  08:01 35750  /usr/lib/libgailutil.so.18.0.1
b6b0d000-b6b0e000 rw-p 6000 08:01 35750  /usr/lib/libgailutil.so.18.0.1
b6b0e000-b6b11000 r--s  08:01 81536  
/var/cache/fontconfig/8ab5f685cd6d8ba67c37c908faf08172-x86.cache-2
b6b11000-b6b16000 r--s  08:01 81535  
/var/cache/fontconfig/a960c40fc9306f090224a04585f8a963-x86.cache-2
b6b16000-b6b19000 rw-p b6b16000 00:00 0 
b6b19000-b6b45000 r-xp  08:01 18464  
/usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.1800.2
b6b45000-b6b46000 rw-p 0002c000 08:01 18464  

Bug#434642:

2007-07-25 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
I can confirm too.

In console or xterm, it works fine.

When I use arrow up I get ;A
When I use arrow down I get ;B

Thanks.
Fabrizio




Bug#415670: Postfix error

2007-03-22 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi,

I can confirm best  solution, at the moment, is to upgrade OpenSSL
packages from unstable repository, using apt-pinning or a different
way.
I've update it and now totally works fine.

Best Regards.

Fabrizio


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#415670: Postfix error

2007-03-22 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
For sure. But actually, for example, the it.debian.org repository is not
yet updated, so alternatively you can use the solution I said before. (or
get the new postfix packages from one updated repository and install it)


 On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:11:37AM +0100, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:

 I can confirm best  solution, at the moment, is to upgrade OpenSSL
 packages from unstable repository, using apt-pinning or a different
 way.
 I've update it and now totally works fine.

 No, the best solution at the moment is to install the 2.3.8-2+b1 postfix
 package that is already available in testing.

 --
 Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
 Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/