Bug#619936: Severity important
severity 619936 important thanks This might hinder me in getting the resulting bugfix into a point release, but anyway: The package is usable in most installations, so the definition of severity "important" is eminently suited. Regards Florian -- Florian Hinzmann private: m...@fhinzmann.de Debian: f...@debian.org PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#619936: Bugfix, first try
retitle 619936 dlint fails when output of dig is changed via .digrc
thanks
Hello Patrik!
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:24:35 +0200
Patrik Schindler wrote:
> Since dlint is a shell script, I will add debugging output here:
Thanks. Might have been the next step.
> How to cope with that properly?
I am not sure yet. A first try is this:
--- dlint.dist 2011-03-29 08:32:35.0 +0200
+++ dlint 2011-03-29 08:58:14.0 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#!/bin/sh
+#!/bin/dash
#
# program:dlint
# usage: dlint [-n] zone
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
# Check if dig is installed and get the version number.
# If version < 2.1, fail. If version 9 or greater, set special settings.
#
-ver=`dig localhost any | grep DiG | head -1 | sed -e 's/.*DiG
\([0-9.]*\).*/\1/'`
+ver=`dig -v 2>&1 | grep DiG | head -1 | sed -e 's/.*DiG \([0-9.]*\).*/\1/'`
ans=`echo $ver | awk '$1 >= 2.1 {print "ok"; exit}'` # floating
point math
if test x"$ans" != x"ok"; then
Replacing sh is needed as the redirection via "2>&1" might not
be supported by all shells. Using dash seems a good choice at
it is the default shell within Debian and a required package.
I'd better like a solution which works within every shell and
not change the shell used by dlint.
Again, I will look into this later, my time does not allow
anything more for the moment.
> Thanks for taking time and sorry for not debugging in the first place
> myself.
You are welcome - and no problem at all. Thank you for
debugging it now.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: m...@fhinzmann.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#619936: dlint: Dependencies not met for dig
Hello! Please allow another question before I return to this issue later: Which shell do you use when this problem occurs? Regards Florian -- Florian Hinzmannprivate: m...@fhinzmann.de Debian: f...@debian.org PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#619936: dlint: Dependencies not met for dig
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:43:34 +0200 Patrik Schindler wrote: > After upgrading from Lenny to Squeeze, dig will not start anymore. It says: > > ;; This program requires DiG version 2.1 or newer, which I cannot find. I did not dive very deep into this yet - but right now I don't understand it. dlint depends on dnsutils which ships /usr/bin/dig. Do you have (another) dig binary within your search path or within "/usr/ucb:/usr/bsd:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/share/bin:/usr/com/bin", what is what dlint searches. What does "type dig" resp. "which dig" and "dig -v" say? Regards Florian -- Florian Hinzmannprivate: m...@fhinzmann.de Debian: f...@debian.org PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#574331: libnet-dns-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:01:59 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > So far, failing to build because network is not available has always > been considered an RC bug. I will try to detect online connectivity or to fail non fatally without network access. If I fail, I will disable the tests again. -- Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de Debian: f...@debian.org PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#574331: libnet-dns-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:13:01 +0100 Florian Hinzmann wrote: > Do we have a policy or best practice on what to do about tests in > general and online tests in particular with respect to build daemons? Kind of P.S.: I assumed the build daemons would both - have online access and - use nocheck to save cpu cycles. Thinking about it now, it might be good to run the tests with the builds, especially to check them on every architecture. So one question remains: May I assume to have online access when building packages. Maybe I find a way to skip or timeout these non-fatally. AMD64 build fine otherwise (including the IPv4 online test): https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=libnet-dns-perl;ver=0.66-1;arch=ia64;stamp=1268659347 Greetings Florian -- Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de Debian: f...@debian.org PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#574331: libnet-dns-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Hello! On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:39:06 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Relevant part: > > make[1]: Entering directory > > `/build/user-libnet-dns-perl_0.66-1-amd64-jA4Owr/libnet-dns-perl-0.66' > > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" > > "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t > > # > > # These tests were ran with: > > # Net::DNS::VERSION: 0.66 > > # set environment variable NET_DNS_DEBUG to get all versions > > t/00-load.t ok > > t/00-pod.t . skipped: Test::Pod v0.95 required for testing > > POD > > t/00-version.t . ok > > # > > # > > # Executing heuristic to see if have unlimited view of the Internet > > # If the heuristic fails this could have various reasons probably having > > # nothing to do with bugs in Net::DNS > > # > > # > > t/001-connection-checks.t .. ok > > [...] > > Servers [193.0.14.129 198.41.0.4 ] did not give answers at > > /build/user-libnet-dns-perl_0.66-1-amd64-jA4Owr/libnet-dns-perl-0.66/blib/lib/Net/DNS/Resolver/Recurse.pm > > line 112. > > Servers [198.41.0.4 192.58.128.30 192.112.36.4 202.12.27.33 192.5.5.241 > > 128.63.2.53 192.36.148.17 192.33.4.12 192.228.79.201 199.7.83.42 > > 128.8.10.90 193.0.14.129 192.203.230.10 ] did not give answers at > > /build/user-libnet-dns-perl_0.66-1-amd64-jA4Owr/libnet-dns-perl-0.66/blib/lib/Net/DNS/Resolver/Recurse.pm > > line 112. > > [...] > > make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Terminated > > E: Caught signal 'Terminated': terminating immediately > > make: *** [build-stamp] Terminated > > Build killed with signal TERM after 60 minutes of inactivity > > > > Build finished at 20100317-0159 The test suite does include online checks. I had the whole test suite disabled within debian/rules before as to go easy on our build daemons. Now with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck I did enable them, but skip if nocheck was given. Do we have a policy or best practice on what to do about tests in general and online tests in particular with respect to build daemons? Regards Florian -- Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de Debian: f...@debian.org PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#488829: Thanks, upload pending
tags 488829 +pending thanks Hello! Thanks for your report and making a patch. I applied it to my working copy and will upload it soon. Regards Florian -- Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#463046: About removing XFMail
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:41:49 -0800 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this fix as a zero-day NMU. But I wonder, do you still use this package? > I was surprised when I fired up the program to see that it's based on XForms > and found the UI painful, and there are a *lot* of compile-time warnings > suggesting that the code is long unmaintained upstream. Should we consider > removing it from the archive as obsolete? Yes, we should. I tought about orphaning or removing it, but wanted to try and find a new maintainer first. Bringing the package into shape roughly might make this more easy. I do not use it any longer. When I used it I found the GUI ugly, but functional once I learned about its possibilities. On the other hand that was many years ago and now there are many more alternatives with regard to IMAP, PGP and keyboard shortcuts. And the standards about usability and appearance might have raised, too. ;) Proposal: I will RFA the package explaining it might be removed soon and then ask debian-devel and remainders of the upstream mailinglist if someone is willing to maintain it including large parts of upstream work. Remove it if no rescuer appears in time to do an last upload before the general freeze at latest. Opinions anyone? Steve? Regards Florian -- Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457445: libnet-dns-perl: CVE-2007-6341 possible remote denial of service vulnerability
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 16:25:25 +0100 Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > any news on this? I was in contact with Olaf Kolkman and Dick Franks upstream. I planned to upload something this weekend at the latest. It looks like Olaf will beat me with an upstream release I can use. Regards Florian -- Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457445: Status update: Fix pending
Hello! Upstream is preparing an update. I will use that solution or coordinate enhancements if need arises. It should be a matter of days. Regards Florian -- Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457445: libnet-dns-perl: CVE-2007-6341 possible remote denial of service vulnerability
Hello! On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:15:24 +0100 Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > what about this patch? I am not sure yet. I will investigate more deeply within the next days. I did contact the author of Net::DNS already. Regards Florian -- Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304976: build-dep is not bogus, but binary depends is missing
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:19:47 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's a relief, it means xfmail in the NMU should be working fine... Yes, it does work fine. I've installed and testet it. Thanks. Florian -- Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65 Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304976: build-dep is not bogus, but binary depends is missing
reopen 304976
thanks
Hello Henrique,
hello Steve!
The build dependency is fine. It's the binary depends that is
missing.
The NMU still links against libsasl:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/xfmail-sasl-stuff$ dpkg-deb -x xfmail_1.5.5-2.1_i386.deb
nmu-binary
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/xfmail-sasl-stuff$ ldd nmu-binary/usr/
bin/ lib/ share/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/xfmail-sasl-stuff$ ldd nmu-binary/usr/bin/xfmail |grep sasl
libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0xb7911000)
Two questions:
1) Is libsasl2-dev and libsasl2 going to be removed, too?
2) Any idea why ${shlibs:Depends} does not include libsaslX?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
