Bug#317873: libaspell15c2: Broken dependency in unstable
Package: libaspell15c2 Followup-For: Bug #317873 I'd just like to confirm that the last distupgrade (15/7/2005) tends to fail because of this package. It is however enough to exclude gaim/gaim-data and gedit/gedit-common from upgrade to go straight without problems. I also tried to pull Gaim from experimental, but the dependency is broken also there. (and I am still lmao on "Go run gentoo or something and leave me alone.") -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2-vasquez Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#427514: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4
Subject: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4 Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.21-5~snapshot.8808 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system *** Please type your report below this line *** Hi there, since I have installed 2.6.21-4 from unstable I cannot boot my system anymore. First my configuration: an Asus A8N-E (nforce4) motherboard with two SATA disks. The disks are configured in a software RAID1 using mdadm: /dev/md0 is my / /dev/md1 is my swap /dev/md2 is my /home If I start the system with 2.6.20 it boots fine. Here's a picture of the end of the initramfs and the start of the normal boot: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/530049031/ The system reaches /sbin/init and it boots just fine. Here is what happens with 2.6.21: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/530049047/ Something goes wrong in the initramfs, and despite /dev/md0 is started, it can't be mounted. At this point I have tried to toy around in the initramfs, read the /scripts directory but couldn't understand how to make the system move along. (btw, I could really use a pager in there... I hate vi :D) It should be noted that I can start my other two RAID arrays without problems! Please ignore the fact that my 2.6.21 is now a snapshot from the Debian Kernel Team (btw, I have tried also 2.6.22rc3 but the problem is still there) as the problem arised with the upgrade from 2.6.21-3 and -4 from unstable. I don't recall any udev or initramfs-tools upgrade that could have broken the system, especially since 2.6.20 works just fine. Additionally the changelog between -3 and -4 is extremely short so no luck there. Thanks for any help you might give me. -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64 depends on: ii e2fsprog 1.39+1.40-WIP-2007.04.07+dfsg-2 ext2 file system utilities and lib ii initramf 0.88tools for generating an initramfs ii module-i 3.3-pre11-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [l 0.0.12-20 Yet Another mkInitRD linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64 recommends no packages. -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.21-1-amd64: true shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.21-1-amd64: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/preinst/abort-install-2.6.21-1-amd64: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.21-1-amd64: true linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.21-1-amd64: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.21-1-amd64: true linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.21-1-amd64: true linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.21-1-amd64: true linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.21-1-amd64: true linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.21-1-amd64: true linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.21-1-amd64: true linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.21-1-amd64: true linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.21-1-amd64: false linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.21-1-amd64: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.21-1-amd64: true linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/preinst/initrd-2.6.21-1-amd64: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: * linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.21-1-amd64: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.21-1-amd64: false linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.21-1-amd64: -- BOFH excuse #38: secretary plugged hairdryer into UPS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#427972: Followup to #427514 and #428399
Hi there, I am writing in this bug cause noone seems to be able to help me in the aforementioned #427514 and #428399. I have the same issues on a RAID 1 system. I'll copy paste all the info I gathered by reading the previous messages. ---start I found this bug and I think that it's what's blocking my report #427514. I guess my 2.6.20 works because its initramfs has been created with the old version, while the newer kernels don't because of initramfs-tools = 0.88. Anyway, I have checked what has been suggested in the thread: /lib/udev/vol_id -t /dev/md0 and the output was LVM2_member To my surprise, since I never had LVM on this machine. In #427972 it was suggested that it could be the partitioner's fault: this machine has been partitioned only once at install time, with the d-i. Should this be reported against d-i or against (I think) parted? It is potentially very very troublesome... Anyway, I have tried to blank the sectors of the two partitions member of /dev/md0 as well as /dev/md0 itself, but with no luck, the output is still the same and the system does not boot. Is there any additional idea? It's worth noticing that if I mount manually the root: mount -t ext3 /dev/md0 /root and then exit the initramfs, the system boots just fine. That's why I think it's the same issue as the one of the OP here. ---end-- Thanks for any help, please ask for any additional info you might need! -- Campbell's Law: Nature abhors a vacuous experimenter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#394519: openafs-modules-source: Cannot authenticate to my cell - "pioctl failed"
Package: openafs-modules-source Version: 1.4.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi there, I have upgraded my Debian Sid and rebuilt the openafs kernel module against my kernel 2.6.18 (stock Debian kernel). I have used m-a: # m-a a-i openafs it worked alright just like always. The module loads without errors and the service can be restarted without failure. Although it is not possible to obtain a token from my cell with the following error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ klog -principal -cell XXX.XX Password: Unable to authenticate to AFS because a pioctl failed. The password is obviously correct. I have found this page: http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/course/15-491/readings.html where it is said: Unable to authenticate to AFS because a pioctl failed. The openafs driver hasn't loaded properly. The TA or instructor may need to re-install the driver because a Kubuntu security update has replaced the kernel with a newer one. I have checked dmesg and /var/log/messages for errors, but nothing: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dmesg | grep afs openafs: module license 'http://www.openafs.org/dl/license10.html' taints kernel. Please suggest some other place to look for possible failures. If you think this might be related to the setup of the cell I am trying to connect to, let me know and I'll ask my sysadmins. Thanks for any help! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-amd64 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages openafs-modules-source depends on: ii bison 1:2.3.dfsg-4 A parser generator that is compati ii debhelper 5.0.40 helper programs for debian/rules ii flex2.5.33-9 A fast lexical analyzer generator. ii kernel-package 10.062 A utility for building Linux kerne ii module-assistant0.10.7 tool to make module package creati openafs-modules-source recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#394661: kernel-package 10.063 didn't fix this issue
Package: kernel-package Version: 10.063 Followup-For: Bug #394661 Hi there, I just wanted to report that the latest version of kernel-package does not fix the issue. The workaround proposed by Sven still applies. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-powerpc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kernel-package depends on: ii dpkg 1.13.24package maintenance system for Deb ii dpkg-dev 1.13.24package building tools for Debian ii file 4.17-4 Determines file type using "magic" ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:4.1.1-13 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-4.0 [c-compiler] 4.0.3-7The GNU C compiler ii gcc-4.1 [c-compiler] 4.1.1-17 The GNU C compiler ii gettext 0.15-2 GNU Internationalization utilities ii make 3.81-3 The GNU version of the "make" util ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii po-debconf1.0.7 manage translated Debconf template Versions of packages kernel-package recommends: ii bzip21.0.3-6 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Development Librari -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#394661: kernel-package 10.063 didn't fix this issue
Manoj Srivastava wrote: Well, can you provide some logs of the error mode? Can you start by removing the ./debian directory, building a new kernel image, and capture the full installation log? Actually it wasn't happening with a homemade kernel, but upgrading the normal linux-image-2.6.18 package. The error displayed is exactly the same reported in the original bug report. I will need a couple of days to try with a homemade kernel. Without any details, it is hard to find out where the problem is, since it does not seem to affect my machines. I have the impression this is PPC specific, since I cannot observe it on my AMD64 machine either. Maybe Sven can comment further? -- BOFH excuse #27: radiosity depletion -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399600: deluge-torrent does not start
Sam Morris wrote: What is the output of the 'locale' command on your system? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ locale LANG=C LANGUAGE=en_CH:en_US:en_GB:en LC_CTYPE="C" LC_NUMERIC="C" LC_TIME="C" LC_COLLATE="C" LC_MONETARY="C" LC_MESSAGES="C" LC_PAPER="C" LC_NAME="C" LC_ADDRESS="C" LC_TELEPHONE="C" LC_MEASUREMENT="C" LC_IDENTIFICATION="C" LC_ALL= Could you try running 'LANG=C deluge-torrent'? I had already tried that (I had a similar problem with another software), but nothing changes, same error. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#414535: Workaround for this bug
Hi there, looks like that launching your java application by preloading the libXinerama shipped by Debian solves the problem: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6532373 It works just fine for Azureus: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/azureus$ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 /opt/azureus/azureus Hope this helps, there's not much Debian can do about this. -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Refill srl dal 1993, il compatibile per stampante di qualità . 5000 prodotti in pronta consegna, consegna in 24h, assistenza telefonica da tecnici specializzati Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=5192&d=28-3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
