Bug#952169: libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 1
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Hi Lucas, because I have been long in responding, I just wanted to drop a quick note that I acknowledge your bug report. I need to do an upstream release to fix all the issues and I will try and do this ASAP. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas
Bug#684499: Streaming MOVE commands
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 21 Feb 2016, at 13:46, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias <gall...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: Hello Timo, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> writes: Thanks, looks like this was broken with Maildir and mbox formats. It also caused expunges in some other situations to be lost. Fixed: https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/950a6e61d6c2dac961ce031bdd8b2895bc32b827 Thanks a lot for the fix, testing it now! Is this patch suitable of being backported to 2.2.13? (Debian stable) Should be. This will definitely go into the upcoming 2.2.21 packages. (After a long period of stasis we're going to bring everything up to date again soon.) I don't know if the release team will allow it for stable even though it is a minor change but I'll definitely bring it up for their consideration. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jald...@debian.org>
Bug#796535: libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl: diff for NMU version 0.42-1.1
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015, gregor herrmann wrote: Control: tags 796535 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl (versioned as 0.42-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Hi Gregor, Thanks for the NMU. I'm also the upstream for this package and I've been preparing a new version that deals with this bug. But I also had an issue with Windows I wanted to fix and I only just solved it. I'll put out a new version today and then update the Debian package. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jald...@debian.org>
Bug#798821: dovecot-core: changed to systemd without documentation
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015, Frank Engler wrote: Package: dovecot-core Version: 1:2.2.13-12~deb8u1 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, last update introduced /lib/systemd/system/dovecot.socket and /lib/systemd/system/dovecot.service to handle startup. Despite the fact customized configuration - especially /etc/init.d/dovecot - might get ignored and these changes are within a /stable/ release these changes are not documented at all. I'm curious as to which version you upgraded from and could you have installed anything else which would trigger the use of systemd? systemd support was added way back in 1:2.1.7 (May-June 2012) and hasn't been touched since then. Certainly there is nothing in the latest update which involves it? In your last upgrade did you lose systemd-shim perhaps? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jald...@debian.org>
Bug#776094: dovecot-imapd: corrupts mailbox after trying to retrieve it
On Mon, 25 May 2015, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: Hi Santiago, On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:43:10PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: Jaldhar, Jelmer: This is serious data corruption bug, and we have a fix for it since 12 days ago. Is there any hope that a fix for this bug is included in Debian 8.1? Release managers say the queue for fixes will be frozen next weekend. Agreed that we should really try to get this fixed for 8.1. I've just uploaded 2.2.18. I will try to do a stable update as well, but am unfortunately low on Debian time. Help welcome. I know I've been missing in action for a long time but I'm finally free once again. Thanks Jelmer for taking care of things in my absence. I'll prepare the stable update tomorrow. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#773237: dovecot-core: Should not use UCF for 10-ssl.conf
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Santiago Vila wrote: My objection is that policy says that the conffile mechanism is only appropriate for files having a default that may work for everybody, and the rationale is that if most people need to modify it, then most people will get prompted on upgrades over and over again. The package has to ship some kind of default or the server will not start. As you say there isn't a default which will satisfy everyone so we expect it to be changed by many users. But with normal operation of dpkg, new versions of the package will silently overwrite the changes. The only way to prevent this is to make it a conffile. The current default disables SSL, which is insecure. We can't honestly claim that an insecure default will work for most people. Sure it will. You will be able to receive IMAP and POP3 mail which is what an imapd/pop3d does. As a best practice you _should_ do IMAP/POP3 over SSL but it is not required. And I fully agree that in this day and age the more encryption working out of the box the better. But this has to be done right because half-assed security is worse than no security at all. There are many different scenarios: self-signed certificate versus purchased from a CA, different locations, different expiration policies etc. The previous code was not accounting for all of this properly. So the only configuration the package can ship which will definitely work for all people is SSL disabled. Atleast now a security-minded user knows where he stands and can harden the package the way he wants. I encourage you to work on a centralized SSL cert handling facility for Debian that not only dovecot but all server packages can use. I will gladly use it. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#773237: dovecot-core: Should not use UCF for 10-ssl.conf
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Santiago Vila wrote: The only way? That's simply *not* true! It is perfectly allowed *not* to ship a configuration file inside the .deb and instead create it in the postinst, only if it does not exist. Creating the relevant configuration in postinst is what was broken in the first place. That's why I took it out. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#773237: dovecot-core: Should not use UCF for 10-ssl.conf
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Santiago Vila wrote: Creating the relevant configuration in postinst is what was broken in the first place. That's why I took it out. Bug number? References? Oh there have been various complaints about this or that use case for a long time. Unfortunately a lot of correspondence took place outside the BTS but #706216 and #730828 are examples. Here part of the problem was that originally following upstreams example, the certs were were created in /etc/ssl but I was asked in #608719 that they be moved to /etc/dovecot which other people did not want. #376146 asks to use the snakeoil cert like Ubuntu does but that was not considered a good idea for Debian when I asked about it. #763701 was a somewhat embarrassing example of me sucking at shell scripting. I contacted Mika about his offer to help but he never wrote back. Alas, this is what always happens when I ask for help. Looking through the bugs I see that I have been saying since 2005 that there should be a centralized utility for managing certs that all packages can use. This is the proper solution and everyone agrees it should be done but no one does it. So until that happens it is safest to leave the whole business to the end user which atleast is no worse than what he would have to do if he installed dovecot from upstream source. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#773237: dovecot-core: Should not use UCF for 10-ssl.conf
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Santiago Vila wrote: Sorry but I don't follow your line of reasoning. In those examples, the file 10-ssl.conf has SSL certificates by default. The point is that the code to do that was broken. But I'm not proposing that the default 10-ssl.conf has SSL enabled anymore. Everything I ask is that we avoid useless prompts in upgrades, which is what this bug is about, and it's also what policy says we should do. So: Why can't dovecot-core create the *current* file (the one *not* having SSL enabled) in the postinst instead of using UCF? Please don't tell me that you already tried that, because you have not. No I haven't but tell me how I am ensure that that people who have modified that file do not see their changes get destroyed. When you cover all the use cases I bet you fill find that ucf has been reinvented--badly no doubt. This would solve the problem of UCF asking the same question over and over again on upgrades. Why can't you do that? Using UCF for a file that everybody should change does not make any sense! people who want SSL != everybody. People who want SSL in one particular configuration != everyone who wants SSL. That's the whole problem. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#773237: dovecot-core: Should not use UCF for 10-ssl.conf
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Santiago Vila wrote: But we can leave the whole business of creating SSL certificates to the end user, and at the *same* time avoid useless UCF prompts on upgrades. If 10-ssl.conf exists and disables SSL, then upgraders with a previously working SSL configuration will face a nasty surprise. If 10-ssl.conf exists and enables SSL, then new installers without certificates (self-generated or otherwise) will find that the server doesn't start up which will cause dpkg to report an installation error. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#773237: dovecot-core: Should not use UCF for 10-ssl.conf
reopen 773237 severity wishlist thanks On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Santiago Vila wrote: That is quite easy indeed: * The file is not included in the package.deb. * The very first time the package is installed, the file is created from the default by postinst. * On upgrades, you do nothing at all with the file. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#772703: postinst fails because of wrong path to 90-sieve-extprograms.conf
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Sven Hartge wrote: The postinst of the dovecot-sieve package searches for 90-sieve-extprograms.conf in the wrong place: Setting up dovecot-sieve (1:2.2.13-9) ... Error: The new file /usr/share/dovecot/90-sieve-extprograms.conf does not exist! dpkg: error processing package dovecot-sieve (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Obvious Fix: --- dovecot-2.2.13/debian/dovecot-sieve.postinst2014-12-09 12:18:44.0 +0100 +++ dovecot-2.2.13/debian/dovecot-sieve.postinst2014-12-10 11:02:37.0 +0100 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ if [ $1 = configure ]; then CONFFILES=conf.d/90-sieve.conf \ - 90-sieve-extprograms.conf + conf.d/90-sieve-extprograms.conf for conffile in $CONFFILES ; do # Tell ucf that the file in /usr/share/dovecot is the latest Yeah in my haste to upload -9 I forgot to fix this. -10 on its way... -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Found fix
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014, Chris Gilbert wrote: Hey guys, I banged away at this for a bit, not fully familiar with package development. Thanks so much for working on this. Your effort is greatly appreciated. I found through copious use of echos near the end I found it was simply hanging once complete, and ps showed it waiting for no obvious reason. I was able to resolve this by adding a db_stop to the end of the postinst script. Yes it is debconf which is hanging but why? After -6 there should be no more debconf questions in the package. Yet you have clearly shown that debconf is in fact waiting for a question in some cases. Perhaps there is a more complete/cleaner solution but for now I have added back the call to db_stop as you suggest in -9 which I shall be uploading shortly. Please test it and let me know if it solves the problem. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Bob Proulx wrote: How would previous changes to that file explain the current hang upon a --reinstall? At the present time the only changes I have outstanding are in the 10-mail.conf file. My theory was that somehow ucf was not registering that file in its database but never mind thats not it. Debian user Chris Gilbert did some testing on his own and found that explicitly stopping debconf prevents the hang. From my understanding of how it is supposed to work that shouldn't be necessary but apparently it works so lets try it. I have prepared -9 which I shall be uploading shortly. Please try it and let me know if it works. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
We may have a possible solution. I shall shortly be uploading -9. Please try it and let me know if it works for you. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014, Michael Hatzold wrote: This bug report applies to the latest ***four versions*** of dovecot-core (and maybe to dovecot-imapd), no problems with earlier versions: They are all using the same postinst code. Let us concentrate on 2.2.13 for now as this is the version that will go into Jessie. I have prepared 2.2.13-9 which I shall be uploading (to unstable) shortly. Please try it and let me know if it fixes the problem. If it does, I will prepare a new version of 2.2.15 (still for experimental.) -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
reopen 770695 severity 770695 grave thanks On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michael Hatzold wrote: dpkg --configure -a didn't work due the dpkg lock. While searching for other processes which might be in the way htop showed me a file called dovecot-core.po where the S column was marked Z . (I have no clue what this means or whether or not this is valuable info, I telling you anyway I case it is). It is. Unfortunately it makes the problem even more mysterious. That is the localization file for debconf questions. It was removed from the package several versions ago. The question is why is it still there? What is the output of: debconf-show dovecot-core After a reboot I could issue dpkg --configure -a which then configured dovecot-core, started the IMAP server and returned to the prompt. So you did not reboot after previous installs? Perhaps the .po file was cached somehow? I will ask some more experienced Debian people if they have any insight into what could be happening. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Michael Hatzold wrote: I ran this command: ~# LANG=C DEBCONF_DEBUG=.* dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/dovecot-core_1%3a2.2.13-9_amd64.deb debconf.log debconf logs debug output to stderr so you have to include 21 to get all the info. Try it like this: LANG=C DEBCONF_DEBUG=.* dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/dovecot-core_1%3a2.2.13-9_amd64.deb 21 debconf.log -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014, Tony Mantler wrote: I just tried upgrading from -7 to -8. I got a UCF dialog asking if I wanted to overwrite my ssl config file with one that has ssl turned off, and I declined. The installation then proceeded to hang after Starting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecot. with the usual defunct postinst: You are seeing the ucf dialog which is a good sign. Can you send me 1. Your /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf 2. The output of this command: ucfq dovecot-core Thanks. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
Tony, I forgot to ask you if you've tried -8 and if that has fixed the problem for you? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Bob Proulx wrote: 2. Did you edit /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf at all (from any version.) Not that I recall. I haven't done anything with the dovecot configuration for quite a while now. I'm concentrating on this file because it has upto now been the cause of the postinst hang in every report I've received but the thing is the 10-ssl.conf you sent me is precisely what we should expect to see after a successful upgrade to -8. So if you did have something different in your file it has already been overwritten. I don't suppose you use something like etckeeper do you? Or maybe some backup from around when you had -5 or 6 installed. Hmm... It appears to leave it in a state that reconfiguring again succeeds. # dpkg --configure -a Setting up dovecot-core (1:2.2.13-8) ... Starting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecot. Yes, by this time the new config file has been installed and whatever caused the hang has been overwritten. But again if I --reinstall then the problem is recreated. It is repeatable on my system. Unfortunately I can't reproduce this. Can you run the command ucfq dovecot-core before and after reinstalling? It will tell us if any config file has changed. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: 1. Which version were you originally upgrading from? 2. Did you edit /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf at all (from any version.) 3. Would you mind sending me the contents of that file? 4. During the upgrade do you remember seeing any message about updating that file? 5. This is a long shot but...do you have the ucf package installed? Sorry, one more question. Do the files /etc/dovecot/dovecot.pem and /etc/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem exist? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Bob Proulx wrote: Setting up dovecot-core (1:2.2.13-7) ... Replacing config file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf with new version Starting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecot. ...hang...never returns... Have you tried -8? which I uploaded earlier today? I think (hope(pray)) that did finally fix the upgrade issue. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Bob Proulx wrote: Sorry. The above was captured by me with -7. But during my reinstall tests just a few minutes ago it was with the -8 package. No change. The ps listings I showed were from the -8 package. Drat. 1. Which version were you originally upgrading from? 2. Did you edit /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf at all (from any version.) 3. Would you mind sending me the contents of that file? 4. During the upgrade do you remember seeing any message about updating that file? 5. This is a long shot but...do you have the ucf package installed? Past my bedtime now but if you can answer these questions, I'll look into this tomorrow. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Tony Mantler wrote: I'm trying to install dovecot-core (1:2.2.13-7) and I do have valid certificates in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf and the postinst script is still hanging. I don't believe this bug is fixed. No this is a different bug. :( See #771334 -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Tony Mantler wrote: I don't think that's the problem I'm seeing. I have valid keys in the default locations, in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.pem and /etc/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem I commented out the lines in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf and ran the package upgrade again, then re-enabled the lines in the conf file and my installation is now working with encryption enabled. The problem was definitely that the postinst script was hanging during upgrade. At the time the postinst was hanging, were ssl_key and ssl_cert commented out or not? As I understand the current situation -7 is installing a new version of 10-ssl.conf with those lines commented out when they shouldn't be. If they are not commented out and the postinst is still hanging then yes there is a (new?) problem. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Tony Mantler wrote: When postinst was hanging, those lines were not commented out. And just to confirm, this was when upgrading from -6 to -7? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#771334: upgrade hosed dovecot; Couldn't parse private ssl_key: error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line: Expecting: ANY PRIVATE KEY
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Joey Hess wrote: After upgrading to this version, I cannot connect to dovecot's imap or pop servers. The only substantive change in -7 was to comment out the ssl_cert and ssl_key entries in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf. This is so people who do not have certificates set up (e.g. in new installs) don't run into this problem. But you are upgrading from an existing working setup right? In that case dpkg should have warned you that you are upgrading a conffile. Did that not happen? Actually I just looked and it seems the configuration files are not getting marked as conffiles even though we are handling them with ucfr. Let me investigate why this is happening. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#771334: upgrade hosed dovecot; Couldn't parse private ssl_key: error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line: Expecting: ANY PRIVATE KEY
After further investigation this seems to be the problem. Originally the dovecot-core postinst created self-signed ssl certificates and modified /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf to enable them. ucf managed upgrades to these files. As of 2.2.13-6 we stopped doing that. However this meant that new users who did not have certs got an error because dovecot tries to use the non-existent certificate. So in 2.2.13-7 the configuration is shipped with the ssl cert location bits commented out. Now new users and anyone who has modified the locations in ssl_cert and ssl_key can successfully install or upgrade. But people like you have a 10-ssl.conf that looks exactly like the default one in -6. So apparently ucf thinks you haven't modified the default configuration and blindly installs the new configuration on top of it. I don't know if that should be considered a bug in ucf but the workaround in dovecot-cores postinst I am thinking of is to check the values of ssl_cert and ssl_key and see if there are actually files there and if so, avoid commenting them out or maybe it will be simple to change the value of the ssl parameter to no by default. (It seems obvious but I have a nagging feeling it might not work. I'll experiment.) -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770695: Dovecot-core unable to finish its installation
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: Missing SSL certificate, as reported in #732263 Broken post-install script (this report). It was the missing certificates which were causing the postinst to hang. I have just uploaded 1:2.2.13-7 which should fix this problem. It is going into unstable now and will reach testing (Jessie) in another 10 days. If you want to continue with -6, you can fix it yourself by commenting out the ssl_cert and ssl_key entries from /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf (or making sure they point to valid certificates) and reinstalling. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org
Bug#749974: new maitreya push
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, Olly Betts wrote: I've NMUed wxsqlite3 to unstable, so please upload maitreya. I built the package in a freshly updated unstable pbuilder but its linked against libwxsqlite3-3.0-0. Is that right or have I in fact not got the latest packages? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#749974: new maitreya push
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, James Cowgill wrote: These are the correct packages, the name of the package wasn't changed when wxsqlite3 just got updated. The package name corresponds to: libwxsqlite3 = as in sqlite version 3 -3.0 = version of wxwidgets -0= soversion That's what I suspected but given that there is a transition going on I thought I'd better confirm to be on the safe side. I'll upload now. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#749974: new maitreya push
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, Olly Betts wrote: If jaldhar's not available for sponsoring, I'm happy to upload it - just let me know. I am. I'll get to it later tonight. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700350: dovecot-core: fails to upgrade from squeeze to bpo: Can't locate feature.pm in @INC
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, Niko Tyni wrote: It looks like the postinst of dovecot-core uses perl -E, which implicitly needs feature.pm, without depending on perl-modules. This works in sid/wheezy because feature.pm has since moved into perl-base, as Gregor noted. ... Hope this helps, Thanks for the patch but if the diagnosis is correct it seems it will not be needed as -7 took out the perl code. So backporting that should solve the problem. Unfortunately I am rather pressed for time right now and the other dovecot maintainers even more so. Micah can you take care of this? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694376: dovecot: diff for NMU version 1:2.1.7-6.1
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: What's the status? There was another delay but I am now ready to upload a new version. (I would do it now but its 2am and bad things have happened when I've done releases half asleep so tomorrow morning GMT-0400.) -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694376: dovecot: diff for NMU version 1:2.1.7-6.1
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: tags 694376 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for dovecot (versioned as 1:2.1.7-6.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Actually can you you cancel it? I'm taking advantage of the MLK long weekend to prepare a new update aimed at stable and I'll fold this in. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696817: dovecot destroys user ssl configuration
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Ian Zimmerman wrote: Ob-content: this looks like a rerun of #644121. That one got closed without ever getting resolved didn't it? I don't think it is the same problem because all the configuration files are protected by dpkg's upgrade mechanisms. The certificate stuff is a special case and it shouldn't be. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696817: dovecot destroys user ssl configuration
Sorry for not responding sooner I was unexpectedly swamped during the new year. On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Dominik George wrote: The breakage is even worse. 1. The code that causes the problem is intended to set the *new* path to the certificates. Why the f*** does it print $OLD_SSL_CERT ?? No the idea was that if you have the certs in the old location, only to update 10-ssl.conf and make sure it has the right configuration values otherwise leave them alone. 2. NEVER EVER touch user confiuration! It even breaks *own* paths set. 3. Why? 4. Why?? 5. Why??? The idea was to move the self-generated certs only. Obviously I did not consider the scenario where a user had their own certificates but did not remove the dummy certificates which leads me to... Here is a patch that leaves site-local confiuration as it is if it does not reference the default files and only touches it when it referenced the old default path before. It even uses the *new* path, sih ... did the maintainer even test this *once*? I do try and test this package as much as possible and I even had several other people test it before uploading but they didn't catch this either. The way Debians process is supposed to work is that packages get uploaded to unstable and with a wider audience problems will get caught before the package migrates to testing and mostly it works. But it seems that with dovecot people wait until it is already in testing before trying it which defeats the whole scheme. So what we really need is more testing before an upload even happens. In theory there is a team maintaining this package but in practice the others have even less free time than I do and this last year I have had next to no time at all. (I mean its been 3 weeks since this problem was reported and I'm only just responding. That would be unacceptable as a user even to me.) I try and recruit anyone who shows interest but that hasn't worked either so far. So once again, I ask anyone reading this who cares about the best possible dovecot package in Debian to pitch in. It's easy to get access to the source repository and I'll help in anyway I can even giving you ownership if you can do a better job. In the meantime I am preparing a new revision which will include your patch and better documentation of the situation. That's the best I can do for now. However, the only valid way to handle this is NOT handle it. Or do the modification in the ucf template *before* runnin ucf so it is merged into the confi file if and *only* if the user chooses to apply the chanes. Yes all this stuff needs to be moved over to ucf. I had someone offer to do this before the freeze began but then they disappeared and by that time it was too late for me to make such an invasive change. (See above.) -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696820: Acknowledgement (Error: open(/var/mail/USER) failed: Permission denied)
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013, Norbert Veber wrote: While I'm not 100% clear on how dovecot handles permissions, would the fix not be to set mail_access_groups=mail? Per http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Errors/ChgrpNoPerm Otherwise your default mail_location can not work unless it writes the files as root or something. This doesnt seem to be the case judging from the permission errors reported earlier. We want to avoid setting mail_access_group=mail because then a user would be able to read everyone elses mailbox. It should not in theory matter is mail_location is set appropriately but it looks like I'll have to investigate it further. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696820: Error: open(/var/mail/USER) failed: Permission denied
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: ...but something else must be going on as well: That change warned about in that accidentally silenced NEWS entry is way old, and what I did yesterday on multiple machines was update from 1:2.1.7-2. Seems to me that if I chose in earlier updates to keep my settings (as I suspect many would do, since that worked just fine!) the update process should have warned me about changing that file - it didn't! So regardless of that NEWS bug (which I have now reopened) I believe something is wrong here too. I'll redo the NEWS file in the next update so the various issues for upgraders are better explained and made more prominent. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696820: Acknowledgement (Error: open(/var/mail/USER) failed: Permission denied)
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012, Norbert Veber wrote: So it seems my config had no mail_location set, and worked fine that way. Then when I installed -6 it decided to set one causing it to stop working. Once I comment out that line everythign works fine again. I see README.Debian mentions something about this, but its supposed to be a non-fatal error. It seems it isnt? Normally it would be a non-fatal error but your /var/mail/%u did exist but didn't have write permission. Set mail_location appropriately and everything should work properly now and in the future. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696820: Error: open(/var/mail/USER) failed: Permission denied
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Latest package release changed /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf to hardcode mail_location to use mbox and /var/mail as mailspool. Upstream default of leaving that variable undefined is to try both mbox and Maildir. But I can't do that. See #693114. So I had to pick something as a default and mbox in /var/mail is the lowest common denominator. Therefore, this change breaks systems using Maildir! Workaround is to either comment out or explicitly use Maildir: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir Yes. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#676676: dovecot fails to empty the inbox
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Santiago Vila wrote: severity 676676 serious thanks I'm using dovecot-pop3d on a server which has just been upgraded from squeeze to wheezy, and found this bug as well. I confirm that without mail_privileged_group = mail mail is not removed from inbox. I'm marking this bug as RC because a) it should be easy to fix, and b) I really believe we should not release wheezy with this bug. Hopefully -6 which I just uploaded and contains the fix will be allowed into testing. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693224: dovecot-core - Needs Getopt/Std.pm
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Julien Cristau wrote: The ntp package provides more than just that one script. The rest doesn't need perl, so I would argue it's ok for ntp to not depend on perl, and the bug here is in dovecot. Well it is moot then because dovecot no longer uses ntp-wait. But I still don't understand why if even a small portion of the ntp packages functionality will fail to work without an additional package, it should not depend on or atleast recommend that package. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693224: dovecot-core - Needs Getopt/Std.pm
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Julien Cristau wrote: It does recommend it. It being perl or perl-modules? I think it ought to be the latter. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693224: dovecot-core - Needs Getopt/Std.pm
reassign 693224 ntp retitle 693224 ntp-wait - Needs Getopt/Std.pm thanks On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: dovecot-core Version: 1:2.1.7-2 Severity: serious The dovecot init script needs Getopt/Std.pm but there is no dependency. | [] Starting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecotCan't locate Getopt/Std.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/sbin/ntp-wait line 5. | BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/ntp-wait line 5. | . ok Bastian The script calls ntp-wait which is the one that actually needs Getopt::Std -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693114: dovecot-core: Mailboxes inaccessible after upgrade
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Hilko Bengen wrote: Package: dovecot Version: 1:2.1.7-4 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, After an update from 1:2.1.7-2 to 1:2.1.7-4, I could not access my mailboxes at ~/Maildir any more. (This may be related to #644121.) No I don't think so. This on the other hand: I noticed the following line in conf.d/10-mail.conf: , | mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u ` From /usr/share/doc/dovecot-core/README.Debian (and NEWS.Debian) * In conf.d/10-mail.conf, the default mail_location is set to mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u This has to be set because Dovecots auto-detection of mailboxes fails when a user has no mail. I tried to provide a reasonable default but advanced users will certainly want to change this. Related to this, you might see an error in the logs about dovecot not being able to chgrp certain files. This is because the default user mailboxes in Debian belong to group mail which dovecot is not part of (nor should be.) The Debian package has been patched so that the error will not be fatal but for a more permanent solution, see here: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Errors/ChgrpNoPerm for some discussion. Or you can set mail_location (and the equivalent settings in your MDA) so that mailboxes are in the users home directory. My git (etckeeper) repository shows that previously, mail_location had been commented out. Commenting it out again fixes the problem for me. (Is ~/Maildir the default value set at compile time?) No but auto-detection worked because you already had mail. If you hadn't you would have run into #623440 I'm really stuck as to how to handle this. Debian policy demands /var/mail be owned by group mail. If I had left the status quo, all new users would have had the same problem you've faced. But fixing it for them causes problems for you. I'm leaving this bug open in case you (or anyone else) have some solution but I really don't think anything more can be done. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#631257: dovecot: diff for NMU version 1:2.1.7-2.1
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, intrigeri wrote: All reproducible RC bugs against dovecot have been fixed in Git for a month. Can we expect a package suitable for a freeze unblock request to be uploaded any time soon? Actually #665407 revealed an issue that is imperetive to fix for the upload can happen. Hopefully we will get to the bottom of it very soon. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688197: Where is the upload
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Dominik George wrote: from your last post, I conclude that the fix is ready to be released. Yes I am confident this issue is resolved but We still have one huge problem, bug #665407. Upstream provided a fix but it does not seem to work. I have delayed the upload because I am still hoping we can come up with some solution though time is running short. Could you please upload the fixed version to unstable or, if you are not sure of it, provide the source package here for others to test? The dovecot package git repository can be found at git.debian.org/collab-maint/dovecot -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665487: dovecot-managesieved: Error upgrading dovecot with managesieved
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Gabriel Filion wrote: This bug concerns a somewhat old version (current version in both squeeze-backports and wheezy is 1:2.1.7-2). Also, the package dovecot-managesieved doesn't exist in the squeeze archive. So I can't install the same version as in the original report. Finally, the provided patch does not apply to the current dovecot-managesieved.postrm file, so I marked it as unreproducible. Thanks for looking into this. However the bug reporter was right about the underlying problem which is that dovecot restarts prematurely. This is still a concern in the current version. So in 1:2.1.7-3 which I am about to release soon, I aim to solve that problem with dpkg triggers. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665487: dovecot-managesieved: Error upgrading dovecot with managesieved
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Gabriel Filion wrote: great! :) if you need help in testing the new package, I can try and upgrade to it to confirm that the problem was solved. Are you comfortable with building a package from git? If so you can find the source at git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/dovecot.git otherwise let me know and I'll put binary packages up somewhere. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#685896: Updates?
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Martín Ferrari wrote: Hi Jaldhar, Any updates on this? I was looking at the list of bugs we worked on during the BSP, and found this is still open. Also, you say you were working on a new release, which might not be welcomed by the RT during a freeze... If you don't have the time now, please say so, and we will upload an NMU again. Unfortunately all kinds of things are going wrong in RL so progress has been much slower than I wanted but this change and many other bugfixes are in git and a new release will happen Real Soon Now. The primary holdup now is a fix for #608719. Because of the freeze I want to give the release managers absolutely no reason to reject the package so I'm being extra cautious and checking and double checking I'm handling this right. Sorry for the delay. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org
Bug#631257: dovecot: diff for NMU version 1:2.1.7-2.1
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ulrich Dangel wrote: tags 685896 + pending tags 631257 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for dovecot (versioned as 1:2.1.7-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Actually you can cancel it. After a long bout of inactivity I'm working on a new revision of the package and I will fold your changes into it. If you like, you can make future changes directly into a branch of the dovecot git repository. (It's in collab-maint so you should already have access.) -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644121: dovecot-core wont configure (latest version)
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, shawn wrote: If you guys tried to hack around this, then the hack is broken. cause i can't configure the latest version of dovecot-core cause perl launching ucf keeps crashing I'll look into it but I don't think this is a dovecot-related problem. More likely ucf and/or perl. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#627744: libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl: Can't locate object method lib/Foo/Bar.pm via package Module::Starter
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Source: libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl Version: 0.30-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid Justification: FTBFS Hi libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl FTBFS in testsuite with the following: Thanks I've been meaning to look into this error for a while, I'll try and get to it today. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#604325: Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Ana Guerrero wrote: skim did not make into Squeeze due to a RC bug, I guess nobody cared enough about it to fix it (or answer the bug report). Is it ok if I go ahead a file the package for removal? I thought it was already scheduled for removal? In any case the answer is yes. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#603513: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#603513: yui: multiple xss issues in included swf files
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Jaldhar, please prepare an yeu upload which updates the security-buggy SWF from from 603513. Sorry it took me long enough but I have just uploaded 2.8.2r1~squeeze-1 which contains updated SWF files. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#603513: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#603513: yui: multiple xss issues in included swf files
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Thomas Goirand wrote: Take care if you do that: there's some reverse dependencies involved! I'd rather that you just remove the swf files from the package, and create a non-free package for them. There's many cases were you will need yui, but not the attached swf files!!! Good point. There are only four components that include swf files. It should be possible to seperate them out into a non-free package. I'll bear that in mind if there is no way to keep it all in main. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#603513: yui: multiple xss issues in included swf files
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Jaldhar, what's the status of this security bug? Sorry for the delayed response, it is the Thanksgiving holiday in the US. I worked on the package today. The problem is the that some of the affected swf files might not be buildable with tools available in Debian. I've put out a call for help but the package may need to be removed if no solution can be found. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#599521: [dovecot] New Upstream version 1.2.15 fix two ACL bugs
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Miotto Paolo wrote: I think this is a important security fix, because without it a user can gain access to other mailboxes or, worst, admin rights an shared mailboxes. It would be a Good Thing(TM) to have version 1.2.15 in Squeeze. I am inclined to agree with you. I'll try and prepare an upload as soon as possible. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591199: Bug#591383: About not building swf files from source
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:10:09PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: We have 2 RC bugs (#591199, #591383) in yui package, about .swf files in package. On this weekend, I will have more time and if you have not been working to fixing it, I would like to do it. Sorry for not getting in touch with you earlier. I have been working on this. But if you could look at #512915 I would appreciate it. Any progress on this? They're still unfixed. Kind regards, Philipp Kern I'm still missing the source to three of the eight .swf files. Thankyou for reminding me to prod Yahoo about this. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#591199: About not building swf files from source
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jaldhar, We have 2 RC bugs (#591199, #591383) in yui package, about .swf files in package. On this weekend, I will have more time and if you have not been working to fixing it, I would like to do it. Sorry for not getting in touch with you earlier. I have been working on this. But if you could look at #512915 I would appreciate it. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557601: v1.2.8 fixes a security problem in v1.2 releases.
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: Package: dovecot Severity: critical Tags: security from http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2009-November/000143.html This is mainly to fix the 0777 base_dir creation issue, which could be considered a security hole, exploitable by local users. An attacker could for example replace Dovecot's auth socket and log in as other users. Gaining root privileges isn't possible though. This affects only v1.2 users, v1.1 and older versions were creating the directory with 0755 permission. Thanks for the heads up. I am in the process of packaging this version. Security team: We were going to take this opportunity to migrate to the 3.0 (quilt) format. Is this likely to cause problems for you? Would you prefer we waited until after this upload? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#540493: libcgi-application-basic-plugin-bundle-perl: diff for NMU version 0.4+nmu1
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: tags 540493 + patch pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libcgi-application-basic-plugin-bundle-perl (versioned as 0.4+nmu1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2, according to devref §5.11.1. The patch uses a better version predicate for an already existing Conflicts and adds a new Replaces relationship. Both measures ensures that upgrade from the Lenny version would work without a file overwrite error. In fact, the bug this NMU is fixing is not reproducible with the current Squeeze versions, but only with the +lenny1 version visible in the log against the current Squeeze version. Thanks for doing this. I've been short of time plus I've been playing around with moving this package to the 3.0 format thus making my sources temporarily unuploadable. Once that is all sorted out I will add the patch. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org
Bug#539474: dovecot-imapd fails accessing mailbox
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1:1.2.2-1 Severity: grave Just after upgrading to the new dovecot version I'm not more able to access the default mboxi (not Maildir), it fails with: Aug 1 10:53:15 klecker dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=frankie, method=PLAIN, rip=151.53.252.113, lip=150.145.84.32, TLS Aug 1 10:53:15 klecker dovecot: IMAP(frankie): Fatal: MBOX_WRITE_LOCKS: Invalid value fnctl and the connection is closed. In this version we changed mbox_write_locks to fnctl dotlock to conform with Debian policy. Changing back to dotlock fnctl should allow you access again. But I wonder why it is not working for you? Are you storing the mboxes on NFS or something like that? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#539474: dovecot-imapd fails accessing mailbox
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: Yes, changing back the locking method solves the problem. No it is a simple local filesystem. This is a stupid thing I think, fnctl should be spelled fcntl. Note that it is NOT explicitly set in the default file, just commented out, so the default value is simply badly set, somewhere Aargh you're right. The locking patch has fcntl misspelled everywhere. I'll fix it and do a new upload. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#537077: Dovecot-antispam: package is out of sync with dovecot version in unstable
I just uploaded 1.2.1-2 on behalf of the Dovecot maintainers. dovecot-antispam will need to be upgraded to 1.2 to work with this version. Ron, I think you should go ahead and do the NMU ASAP given that the antispam plugin is unusable in its current state. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#537158: [dovecot-imapd] Balks at sieve conf variables, will not work without them
severity 537158 important thanks On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, David Baron wrote: Note that neither a reinstall nor a dpkg-reconfigure of dovecot gave me the option to replace or view the maintainer's conf file. That's the way dpkg works; once you've edited the file, it is assumed you do not want the system to tamper with it. The way to restore the maintainers version of a configuration file is to remove or move it away and then reinstall. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522490: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#522490: [Indlinux-group] AksharYogini font family released
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Guntupalli Karunakar (karuna...@indlinux.org): I had met with font publishers again, their position is clear to keep the status as is, with no change in terms and conditions. So I guess font will remain as non-free for Debian. Not remain, but become. The font is currently distributed in Debian mainand should not. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522490 To debian-in-workers: AksharYogini font is not likely to be non free. It *is* non free. Karunakar words are very clear about this. The patch is trivial: drop it from ttf-indic-fonts and eventually create a ttf-indic-fonts-nonfree source package with it included. Again, something has to be done as this release critical bug is likely to make the entire ttf-indic-fonts package dropped from Debian main, which is certainly not what we want. As I finally have some time again I was getting ready to write a nice letter explaining why it is really in the designers best interests to make their font truly free software but it looks like it's going to be futile. ttf-indic-fonts-nonfree it is. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#466796: has no business starting a server by default; existing implementation massively insecure; debconf used incorrectly and throws away passwords
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote: OK, so removing some stuff was easy. However, an upgrade to the new version of festival would now put me in the following dilemma: Upon upgrade, the package would disown the /etc/init.d/festival file. Do I remove it upon upgrade? But what if users who have modified it don't want it to be removed? See e.g. http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382956: Reassign
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Alexander Sack wrote: Why seamonkey has been rejected? I would really be curious about that info. A packaging issue? I hope it was not a licensing issue. No it was packaging issues. Three pages worth of lintian errors! -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376222: dovecot-common: dovecot dies immediately
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Neil Roeth wrote: From the strace output I just sent, it appears that the child process is failing to find the function epoll_create(), which a quick Google shows is a function introduced in Linux kernel 2.5.44. I suppose it's relevant that I am running a 2.4 kernel. :-) Yes this is the same conclusion I reached. But dovecot should not be using it by default. Looks like the configure check may be broken? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376222: dovecot-common: dovecot dies immediately
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Neil Roeth wrote: On Jul 2, Fabio Tranchitella ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On sab, 01 lug 2006, Neil Roeth wrote: Content-Description: message body text strace output is attached. Hi Neil, could you please run again strace with the -f switch, in order to trace the child process too? Sure, attached. This appears to be your problem here: epoll_create(128) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented) write(2, Fatal: , 7) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor) write(2, epoll_create(): Bad file descrip..., 35) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor) write(2, \n, 1) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor) Does your kernel not support epoll? The other question is why is dovecot trying to use it? I thought you needed to have a special configure option to enable it and poll(2) is used by default. Investigating... -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374783: seems to be broken in SSL only
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote: I'm seeing the same issue; however, while IMAPS does indeed not work, netstat -tl shows me that dovecot does properly listen to port 143, i.e., the regular IMAP port. Hi Johnathan and Wouter, Upstream thinks this is fixed in 1.0rc1 which is in unstable. Can you try it and confirm? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376222: dovecot-common: dovecot dies immediately
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Neil Roeth wrote: Package: dovecot-common Version: 1.0.rc1-1 Severity: grave File: /usr/sbin/dovecot I upgraded from 1.0beta9-1 to 1.0rc1-1, and was immediately unable to contact the IMAP server. I tried starting it by hand, both by executing /etc/init.d/dovecot start as well as by running start-stop-daemon by hand, with no luck. I checked if /usr/sbin/dovecot was running, and it was not. I synced up my dovecot.conf with the one from the package as much as possible without changing what I needed, and that didn't help (it took a while, too, since that file appears to have undergone a gratuitous reshuffling of the contents). I also attempted to change the config file to turn on various bits of logging, but that did not help, it did not get that far. I found that no matter what, /usr/sbin/dovecot just does not run at all. Downgrading back to 1.0beta9-1 resolved the problem. What if anything do the logs say? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376222: dovecot-common: dovecot dies immediately
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Neil Roeth wrote: Thanks for the quick response. I see this in /tmp/dovecot.log, which is what I had log_path set to in dovecot.conf for a while: dovecot: 2006-06-28 23:02:29 Error: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): utimes() failed with mbox file /var/mail/virtual_mailboxes/athenamontes sori.org/neil/inbox: Operation not permitted but I think that is unrelated, I got the same message the day before in /var/log/mail/mail.warn, when everything was working fine. In /var/log/syslog, I had just this: Jun 28 20:56:56 ml330 dovecot: Killed with signal 15 which corresponds to the old version being killed as the new version was being installed. can you run an strace on /usr/sbin/dovecot and tell me the results? Are you sure there is nothing else listening on TCP port 143? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#373227: dovecot: child 7590 (auth-worker) killed with signal 11
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Stijn Tintel wrote: Package: dovecot Version: 1.0.beta8-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After doing aptitude update / dist-upgrade tonight, I cannot authenticate to my dovecot mailserver anymore. I enabled debugging both for mail and auth, but I didn't find anything useful in the logs. You are using mysql right? There was a problem with the security patch applied in -3 and mysql. It will be fixed in the next update. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340008: Upgrading dovecot overwrites installed SSL keys
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Andrew Maier wrote: I think I worked around the problem by giving the ssl keys a different name from the self created ones and I think this worked. Do you remember if at the time, the self created one was named imapd.pem or dovecot.pem? Hello, haven't heard back from either of you. If this isn't such a big deal I'll downgrade the severity again. In any case I've been told this bug doesn't qualify to be fixed in sarge. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340008: Upgrading dovecot overwrites installed SSL keys
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Andrew Maier wrote: Hi, Sorry for not replying. (Monday was a holiday in Geneva, so I was out). To be honest I cannot recall correctly. But I do know, that my certificate is called impad.pem (in /etc/ssl/certs) in dovecot.conf and that I have commented out the lines to /etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem, so the file looks like this: Thanks, it does help. This problem was fixed in later versions of the dovecot package. Now I'll just wait to see if Dominic has anything to add and then downgrade the bug. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340008: Upgrading dovecot overwrites installed SSL keys
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Andrew Maier wrote: I think I worked around the problem by giving the ssl keys a different name from the self created ones and I think this worked. Do you remember if at the time, the self created one was named imapd.pem or dovecot.pem? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340008: Upgrading dovecot overwrites installed SSL keys
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: severity 340008 grave thanks I have increased the severity of this bug as overwriting the SSL key is data loss. This affects the recent security upgrade in sarge which makes it especially visible. I'd asked the original reporter about the circumstances in which this occurs but didn't get a reply. Actually now I don't even see that message in the bug report so he may never have received it. If so Andrew, sorry I've ignored this bug for so long. Is this the same problem as in #337715? If so it has been dealt with in etch and sid but is still an issue in sarge. It is perhaps worth reissuing this erratum having fixed this problem. If there is interest in this I am happy to provide the fix. Yes please send me any information you have ASAP so we can deal with this promptly. There is another security issue which has to be dealt with (#369359) so the chances are very good a fix for this problem will be accepted for sarge. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361859: dovecot-imapd: login only succeeds from localhost
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: I am about to upload 1.0.beta7. Please let me know if it fixes the problem. If not, send your dovecot.conf (with any private info obscured of course.) and any other details about your setup e.g. are you using LDAP, SASL etc. Did you get a chance to test 1.0.beta7? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361859: dovecot-imapd: login only succeeds from localhost
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Stefan [UTF-8] Völkel wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1.0.beta5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After the last update I can only log log in from localhost. Neither my old config file, nor the one packaged (with things like ip changed) worked. I am about to upload 1.0.beta7. Please let me know if it fixes the problem. If not, send your dovecot.conf (with any private info obscured of course.) and any other details about your setup e.g. are you using LDAP, SASL etc. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
Bug#353307: Bug#333962: Bug#353307: dovecot: 1.0.beta2-1 doesn't include deliver, previous version did
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: Il giorno ven, 17/02/2006 alle 16.59 +, Alex Pimperton ha scritto: I second the part about having dovecot-lda packaged, I'd really like the seive support it introduces. I've prepared the packages with both dovecot-lda and drac support, but considering that I don't use these things I'd prefer if somebody could try them and give me some feedback. http://people.debian.org/~kobold/dovecot/ Has anyone had a chance to test Fabios packages yet? We would really like to get this version uploaded ASAP. btw, we will probably have to drop the drac support for the time being as Debians' drac package is a bit broken. Hopefully that will get resolved soon. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#353307: Bug#333962: Bug#353307: dovecot: 1.0.beta2-1 doesn't include deliver, previous version did
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Jacob Elder wrote: The sieve component is working for me so far in my limited test. Here is the ~/.dovecot.sieve I am using. That's good enough for me! :-) I am uploading 1.0beta3-1 now and it will be available in unstable tomorrow evening. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#353307: dovecot: 1.0.beta2-1 doesn't include deliver, previous version did
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Jacob Elder wrote: Package: dovecot Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The previos version of this package included /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver. This version does not. There was no warning of any kind that deliver would be removed. Anyone using deliver as a local deliver agent will lose all incoming mail. 2006-01-08 22:47 Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] * configure.in: Removed deliver until it's working again You're right there should have been a warning about this though. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352228: dovecot-common: Overwrites config files
tag 352228 unreproducible severity 352228 normal thanks On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Hans Fugal wrote: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf and /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf I'm sorry I see absolutely no way dpkg could have just decided to overwrite your config. You must have some setting somewhere that tells it to do this. I'm not going to close the bug report because there may be something I'm missing but I'm reducing the severity. Dovecot will not be able to enter testing otherwise. I would appreciate it if you would keep me informed on any new info you find about this bug and I'm sorry we cannot come to a definitive resolution yet. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352228: dovecot-common: Overwrites config files
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Hans Fugal wrote: The entire config was rewritten with the default, and my config was moved to dovecot.conf.dpkg-old. I know debian conffiles are supposed to keep changes, and that's why I filed a bug report. It did this to me last time I upgraded as well, but at that juncture the config file format had changed so drastically I figured it was on purpose. Was your original config in /etc or /etc/dovecot? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352228: dovecot-common: Overwrites config files
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Hans Fugal wrote:
On upgrade, overwrites configuration files in /etc/dovecot, specifically
(in my case) /etc/dovecot/dovecot{,-ldap}.conf.
Hmm, I find this a little difficult to believe. The Debian package system
doesn't overwrite conffiles unless you specifically ask it to. Which
version were you upgrading from? Did the entire configuration get
overwritten or only certain settings?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU)
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Lukas Ruf wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-04 16:48]: today, dovecot calmed down. Now, everything seems to work as expected. Sorry for my impatience. Does this mean the bug can be closed now? Btw, was NFS involved at all? Stale NFS handles can cause this type of behavior. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes 90% CPU)
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: Uh? I don't understand.. is this a real bug or something else happend? Could you please help me in digging into to problem? Fabio, See [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the dovecot list. Quote: DH parameters are now set for SSL to get forward secrecy, and Dovecot doesn't really start until it sees them for the first time. The first generation may take minutes, or even longer if you have an old computer. Timo, Do you recommend we include pregenerated parameters? How would we do that? Lukas, in /var/log/mail.log do you see anything about generating SSL parameters at the time dovecot started going crazy? If not it was probably NFS related. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344169: pgp4pine: after 3 wrong passwords sends email plaintext instead of aborting
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Ville Reijonen wrote: Pine accesses pgp4pine as a filter when selected for sending: Send message (filtered thru pgp4pine as [EMAIL PROTECTED])? Yes ([EMAIL PROTECTED] substituted in examples) Next appears pgp4pine appears asking: - - You know all recipient keys. You may: a) Sign and encrypt the message ...etc - - selecting a appears: - - You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: First Last [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024-bit DSA key, ID 6F4E7E16, created 2005-11-01 - - entering wrong passphrase: - - gpg: Invalid passphrase; please try again ... You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: First Last [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024-bit DSA key, ID 6F4E7E16, created 2005-11-01 - - this repeats three times, but on third time with wrong password pgp4pine returns the message back to pine without an error so pine then sends it as filtered - but in this case as uncrypted mail to receiver. Error should be reported to pine same way as when aborting pgp4pine by pressing ctrl-c. Hi, sorry I didn't reply to this bug for so long. I finally had some time to look at it and I believe I have fixed the problem. -2 was just uploaded to the archive and should be available tomorrow. If there is still an issue let me know. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324877: libdevice-serialport-perl still tries to find serial port
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote: package libdevice-serialport-perl found 324877 1.002-0.2 tag 324877 - fixed thanks I'm still seeing the original build failure for libdevice-serialport-perl with the latest upload, using pbuilder: Are you sure you are using the latest upload? I cannot reproduce this and in fact, make test is commented out so I can't even imagine how this could happen. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336036: dovecot-imapd: user's inbox corruption
severity 336036 normal thanks On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Al Nikolov wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 0.99.14-1 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Hopefully, this was happen with only one user's inbox. I'm not sure about where to look for true cause if this effect. My guess is the mbox is indeed corrupt. Can you check for e.g. double from (minus the colon) header lines? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336569: Dovecot with nss_ldap - different uid received form getpwnam
severity 336569 normal
thanks
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Pawel Jarosz wrote:
Hi,
yes, it's code change, see in:
./dovecot-1.0.alpha3/src/auth/userdb-passwd.c:
24 if (strcasecmp(pw-pw_name, auth_request-user) != 0) {
25 /* try to catch broken NSS implementations (nss_ldap) */
26 i_fatal(BROKEN NSS IMPLEMENTATION:
27 getpwnam() lookup returned different user than was
28 requested (%s != %s).,
29 pw-pw_name, auth_request-user);
30 }
I did'nt grep on other releases sources, but feeling this bug, I relayed on
mail form author.
Actually this code is in testing release, but upgrade priority from 0.9x to
1.0 is set to low,
and I hope, lot of users considered to wait with upgrade, and they shoudn't.
Ah I'm sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying. The way Debian
releases work, code once frozen, is never upgraded except for security
problems and I don't think this quite counts. I'll ask about it though.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336140: dovecot-common: does not start - login process died too early
reassign 336140 libssl0.9.8 merge 336140 334180 thanks On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Andy Grover wrote: Package: dovecot-common Version: 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Oct 27 23:06:48 tabla dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.alpha3 starting up Oct 27 23:06:49 tabla dovecot: Login process died too early - shutting down Oct 27 23:06:49 tabla dovecot: pop3-login: Can't load certificate file /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared library Oct 27 23:06:49 tabla dovecot: pop3-login: Can't load certificate file /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared library Oct 27 23:06:49 tabla dovecot: child 5056 (login) returned error 89 Oct 27 23:06:49 tabla dovecot: child 5057 (login) returned error 89 Tried reinstalling etc, same error. dovecot.pem is there. Thanks -- Andy This is a known problem with the current libssl. See bug #334180 for details. In the meantime, revert to dovecot 1.0alpha3-2 which can be found at http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/10/08/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/ -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334180: Dovecot problems on Debian
If you have been bitten by bug #334180 and dovecot 1.0alpha3-2.0.1 rest assured the problem is being worked on. In the meantime you should downgrade to -2 which can be found at: http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/10/08/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/ -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324470: dovecot-imapd works for me
severity 324470 normal thanks On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael R Head wrote: I had prevented myself from upgrading to the latest version of dovecot due to this grave bug. I've upgraded and haven't had a problem with Maildir delivery. Thanks for the report Mike. Olivier, can you confirm if 1.0.alpha3 solves your problem? Because other people have it working I suspect this is a local configuration problem at your end but I don't immediately notice anything in the config you posted that could cause it. Let me know if it still doesn't work and we can investigate further. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324877: libdevice-serialport-perl: FTBFS: Trying to find a serial port for testing...
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Kurt Roeckx wrote: found 324877 1.002-0.1 thanks Hi, It's now failing to build with: mknod debian/ttyS47 c 4 111 mknod: `debian/ttyS47': Operation not permitted mknod() is a privileged system call, you need root/CAP_MKNOD for this. I built this package under pbuilder 0.128 and the standard 2.6.8 kernel on sarge so it must be a permissions (or capabilities) problem of some sort. Another possibility is you could have tried to build it on a partition mounted nodev. I have to wonder why it failed to build in the first place, every system really should have something like a /dev/ttyS1 or /dev/tty1, and I think the problem was on the submitters setup rather than a bug in the package. If pbuilder does not have those thing in /dev, I'd say it's a problem with pbuilder. It does but it would cause output to the real /dev/ttyS1 which could be a bad thing if you have e.g. a modem hanging off it. Perhaps the only foolproof solution is to disable the tests. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312057: [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#312057: webmin-core depends on webmin-firewall ?
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: webmin-core Version: 1.200-1 Followup-For: Bug #312057 webmin-bandwidth depends on webmin-firewall. Now that webmin-core include webmin-bandwidth should not webmin-core depends on webmin-firewall ? webmin-core should not include webmin-bandwidth. That was a packaging mistake on my part. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
