Bug#579494: socat is GPLv2-only, links against GPLv3 libreadline6
Package: socat Version: 1.7.1.2-1 Severity: serious Socat is licensed under the GPLv2, according to the "README" file, not GPLv2 or later. The debian package is built against libreadline6, which is under GPLv3 or later. Since GPLv2 and GPLv3 are incompatible, this is a license violation. I'd suggest making socat Build-Depend on libreadline5-dev again to solve this problem. (Which thus unfixes bug 553853; that should be marked wontfix, since fixing it necessarily involves a license violation.) James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560963: cl-cffi: Loading cffi fails
This is probably related to bug 560781. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#543730: SIP 4.8 has a new (non-free?) license
Source: sip4-qt3 Version: 4.8.1-1 Severity: serious The copyright file in the package contains the license for SIP 4.0 not SIP 4.8. (That's a bug in itself...) The *actual* SIP 4.8 license (contained in the file named "LICENSE") is substantially different. In particular, it now contains a new clause: 4. Licensee may not use SIP 4.8.1 to generate Python bindings for any C or C++ library for which bindings are already provided by Riverbank. As I understand things, this makes the license non-free due to DFSG6 "No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor", and furthermore, not GPL-compatible. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#487374: FTBFS: Cannnot calculate stack trace
I built this package successfully on amd64 by adding: DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --enable-frame-pointers to debian/rules. I expect that should be conditional upon the arch being amd64 but I don't know how to do that. Unfortunately, the build failures on powerpc and ia64 look to be completely different problems. James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#485955: gdb: completely fails to detect frames
Could this be the same bug as: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390722 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/gdb/+bug/111869 ? (with patch available) James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#422452: bzr-svn missing dependancy on python-pysqlite2
Package: bzr-svn Version: 0.3.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 *** Please type your report below this line *** Running 'bzr branch' emits: Needs at least Python2.5 or Python2.4 with the pysqlite2 module Unable to load plugin 'svn' from '/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ bzrlib/plugins' And indeed, bzr-svn is unusable. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1.1381_FC3smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages bzr-svn depends on: ii bzr 0.15-1 bazaar-ng, the next- generation dis ii python 2.4.4-2 An interactive high- level object-o ii python-central 0.5.12 register and build utility for Pyt ii python-subversion 1.4.2dfsg1-2 Python bindings for Subversion ii python2.4 2.4.4-3 An interactive high- level object-o bzr-svn recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
