Bug#367618: expect: Confirmation of bug

2006-05-19 Thread Jeremy Dinsel
Package: expect
Version: 5.43.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #367618


I can confirm that this bug is occuring for more than one person.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.14
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages expect depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  tcl8.48.4.12-1   Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8

expect recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#328418: evolution 2.4 uninstalable due to missing packages

2005-10-03 Thread Jeremy Dinsel
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 07:34, Björn Heide wrote:
> 
> What you see on the new-list are _source_ packages, while
> libgtkhtml3.8-15 and libgal2.6-common are _binary_ packages. They are
> build from gtkhtml3.8 and gal2.6, respectively.

Thanks for your reply. I realize that ftp-master has source packages and
will build the packages for distribution. However, I'm still unclear why
the packages are still pending and haven't made it into experimental or
unstable yet. If I could get the source packages and compile them on my
own, I would like to do that. I have been hoping to use and test the
evolution 2.4.0-2 package (released almost one month ago).

-j




Bug#328418: evolution 2.4 uninstalable due to missing packages

2005-10-02 Thread Jeremy Dinsel

Marga,

You posted that the package dependencies for evolution 2.4.0-2 are
waiting in the ftp-master queue on September 15th. When I look at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html, I see that gtkhtml3.8 is waiting
(3 weeks), but I cannot see libgtkhtml3.8-15 or libgal2.6-common.

Do you know what may be causing these two packages from appearing in
ftp-master (which I assume prevents them from showing up in experimental
or unstable)? 

Best regards,
-j




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part