Bug#1054249: (no subject)

2024-03-28 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Can this solution be brought too bookworm, either through stable-updates 
(preferably) or otherwise backports?


The current package is not useable.



Bug#1009417: saga: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".

2022-04-13 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
I will check.

The mRMR issue has been addressed. I will target a new release (and change
the build system to cmake, as autotools will be deprecated next release).

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:55 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg 
wrote:

> On 4/12/22 20:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> checking for python script directory (pythondir)...
> ${PYTHON_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
> >> checking for python extension module directory (pyexecdir)...
> ${PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
> >> checking for python3.10... (cached) /usr/bin/python3
> >> checking for a version of Python >= '2.1.0'... yes
> >> checking for the distutils Python package... no
> >> configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
> >> Please check your Python installation. The error was:
> >> :1: DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated and
> slated for removal in Python 3.12. Use setuptools or check PEP 632 for
> potential alternatives
>
> Johan can you fix this (upstream)?
>
> And has the mRMR license issue been addressed upstream to unblock
> updating the package to 8.x?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
> --
>   GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
> Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
>


Bug#808248: SAGA 2.2.2 (source) contains non-free code

2015-12-17 Thread Johan Van de Wauw

Source: saga
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: serious

While starting packaging SAGA 2.2.3 I noticed that the previous package 
somehow contains the files which should have been excluded as documented 
in the debian/copyright file.


Note that this does not really affect the binary package as the code is 
not used in the build- the results should be identical.


I'll proceed creating a package for SAGA 2.2.3, but I wanted to document 
this error in version 2.2.2-1 in Debian.




Bug#788408: rasterio: FTBFS w/cython 0.22.x

2015-06-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote:
 Source: rasterio
 Version: 0.15.1-1
 Severity: serious
 Justification: fails to build from source

 Builds of rasterio with cython 0.22.x have been failing because cython
 now checks that signatures' and definitions' exception specifications agree:


This is fixed upstream: https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio/pull/373

I will fix this asap.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#754752: Shouldn't this bug be closed?

2014-11-07 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
It seems that we have cython 0.21.1-1 built on mips in the archives now.
I'm wondering if this bug should not be closed or downgraded now.

Johan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#764353:

2014-10-13 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Thanks for your patch,

It indeed looks logical, i've sent it upstream as well.

I just started looking deeper into the issue on s390x. The issue is
produced when running the fortran tests. Since fedora does not build
fortran extensions for hdf4 their patches will not be of any use here.

If I don't manage to find/receive a reasonable fix this week I think I
will disable the failing test and upload a new version containing your
fixes (and file a seperate bug for the disabled test).

Johan

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:46 AM,  ferse...@br.ibm.com wrote:
 Hello Johan.

 I have applied one of the patches gathered from the link you sent. That
 allowed the package to build successfully.
 The other one does not seem to work.
 The debdiff is attached to this msg.

 Regards.

 Fernando



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#758165: gcc-4.9 devirtualisation bug affecting wxwidgets3.0 now fixed

2014-10-08 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:40:46PM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:51:37PM -0300, Olly Betts wrote:
  There's an issue with devirtualisation in GCC 4.9 which wx3 triggers,
  which may be connected:
 
  https://bugs.debian.org/752733

 This was fixed in gcc-4.9 4.9.1-14, so it would be useful to check if
 libwx-perl and sage now work OK on armel and armhf, or if there's
 something else going on here.

 I tried building libwx-perl on armel / abel.debian.org in a jessie chroot
 (the build dependencies are uninstallable in sid right now), with gcc-4.9
 4.9.1-16, and still got

 t/01_load.t ... 1/6 Can't load 
 '/home/ntyni/libwx-perl-0.9923/blib/arch/auto/Wx/PropertyGrid/PropertyGrid.so'
  for module Wx::PropertyGrid:  at 
 /home/ntyni/libwx-perl-0.9923/blib/lib/Wx/Mini.pm line 74.

 which looks like the problem is still present.
On armhf, I managed to get saga gui linking again.

Johan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#764353: libhdf4: FTBFS on s390x and ppc64el: test failures

2014-10-07 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
I'm aware of the issues.
I've asked for porter access to see if I can fix these problems.

Johan

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Rebecca Palmer rebecca_pal...@zoho.com wrote:
 Source: libhdf4
 Severity: serious
 Version: 4.2.10-2

 libhdf4 FTBFS in the (newly enabled) test suite on s390x and ppc64el.

 On s390x, the test setup program crashes:
 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libhdf4arch=s390xver=4.2.10-2stamp=1412545742

  ===
  HDF Library Fortran Interface Tests Setup
  ===
 *** Error in `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/HDF4.2.10/hdf/test/.libs/lt-fortestF': free():
 invalid next size (fast): 0xafeb3fd0 ***

 Program received signal SIGABRT: Process abort signal.

 Backtrace for this error:
 #0  0x3FFFD066C57
 #1  0x3FFFD0673B5
 #2  0x39721F3
 #3  0x3FFFCE3340C
 #4  0x3FFFCE34A0D
 #5  0x3FFFCE7D491
 #6  0x3FFFCE83EFD
 #7  0x3FFFCE84ED3
 #8  0x3FFFD2A38B1
 #9  0x3FFFD2A41FD
 #10  0x80007DB5 in MAIN__ at fortestF.f:?
 Aborted
 

 On ppc64el,

 The testsuite went in a loop, so the log is too big to be sent (12GB).

 Aurelien


 ___
 Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
 pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#764353: libhdf4: FTBFS on s390x and ppc64el: test failures

2014-10-07 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Breno Leitao bren...@br.ibm.com wrote:
 On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:12:32 +0200 Johan Van de Wauw 
 johan.vandew...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm aware of the issues.
 I've asked for porter access to see if I can fix these problems.
 For what arch? For ppc64el, we have the machine pastel that is available as a
 porterbox.

 Let me know if you are having access to it.

I requested access for both ppc64el and s390x. If you already have
access and would like to help, I'd recommend to look at fedora who
most likely fixed these issues already:

for ppc64el: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134385
for s390x : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099806


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#755361: saga: FTBFS on arm*: undefined reference to `wxCommandEvent::Clone() const'

2014-08-06 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
As mentioned on the list I think this issue is due to a bug in gcc/wxwidgets.

https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2014/08/msg00011.html

As a workaround I will try building saga on arm/armel without gui
support for now.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#669468: saga: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvigraimpex-dev

2012-06-11 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine
fran...@debian.org wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:39:19PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   sbuild-build-depends-saga-dummy : Depends: libvigraimpex-dev but it is 
  not going to be installed
  E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
  apt-get failed.

 It seems to me that both libtiff4-dev and libtiff5-dev are requested for 
 building which
 leads to a failure. I think that a simple or dependency would be enough to
 avoid problems.

The dependency on libvigraimpex-dev can be dropped. It is only used by
one module.
The configure script checks for the presence of the library, so in
fact no other changes are needed.

I'll fix it in git.

Johan



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org