Bug#937834: python-iniparse: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Stuar, On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 2:57 AM Stuart Prescott wrote: > I've prepared an upload for this package and made a MR on salsa with the > relevant changes. > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/python-iniparse/merge_requests/1 Thank you. Please go ahead. Andrej also contacted me a while ago about moving it into DPMT Maintenance, about which I am happy. Do you need me to do an official RFA, or can you just update the Maintainer field with the next upload? Thank you. Ludovico
Bug#921704: tortoisehg: uninstallable with mercurial 4.9
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:39 AM Julien Cristau wrote: > Well it's going to be delayed by virtue of making tortoisehg and hg-git > uninstallable anyway, for now. Is there an ETA on a tortoise 4.9 > release? > > Let me check with upstream. Thanks, Ludovico
Bug#921704: tortoisehg: uninstallable with mercurial 4.9
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:58 AM Julien Cristau wrote: > > Thank you for the bug report. TortoiseHg 4.9 has not been released yet. > > > There's no need for the tags, and this will affect buster when mercurial > migrates so they're wrong anyway. > I see. Would it make sense to delay the migration of mercurial until an updated tortoisehg is migrated, so we avoid removing tortoisehg from testing, given the upcoming release? Thanks, Ludovico
Bug#921704: tortoisehg: uninstallable with mercurial 4.9
package src:tortoisehg tags 921704 + sid experimental thanks Thank you for the bug report. TortoiseHg 4.9 has not been released yet. Ludovico On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 12:09 AM Julien Cristau wrote: > Source: tortoisehg > Version: 4.8.1-0.1 > Severity: serious > X-Debbugs-Cc: James Cowgill > > Hi, > > mercurial 4.9 is now in sid, so tortoisehg needs an update. > > Cheers, > Julien >
Bug#920648: ntopng: missing libssl-dev dependency
Thank you for your help! Ludovico On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:24 PM peter green wrote: > I have uploaded a NMU fixing this bug, a debdiff is attatched. Per the NMU > guidelines since this RC bug is 7 days old with no maintainer response I > have uploaded the NMU without delay. > >
Bug#919907: ntopng FTBFS with ndpi 2.6
Thank you for bug report. I am going to upload ntopng 3.8 soon and it will fix the build against the latest ndpi. Ludovico On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 8:36 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: ntopng > Version: 2.4+dfsg1-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ntopng.html > > ... > g++ -g -Wall -I/build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1 > -I/build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1/include -I/usr/local/include > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/hiredis -I/usr/include/hiredis > -I/build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1/third-party/mongoose -I/usr/include/json-c > -I/usr/include/ndpi/libndpi > -I/build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1/third-party/LuaJIT-2.1.0-beta3/src -isystem > /usr/include/mit-krb5 -I/usr/include/pgm-5.2 > -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pgm-5.2/include -I/usr/include/mariadb > -I/usr/include/mariadb/mysql -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -I/build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1 -I/build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1/include > -I/usr/local/include > -I/build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1/third-party/http-client-c/src/ > -I/usr/include/openssl -DDATA_DIR='"/usr/share"' > -I/build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1/third-party/libgeohash > -I/build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1/third-party/patricia -g -O2 > -ffile-prefix-map=/build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1=. -fstack-protector-strong > -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c src/AlertCounter.cpp -o > src/AlertCounter.o > In file included from src/AlertCounter.cpp:22: > /build/1st/ntopng-3.2+dfsg1/include/ntop_includes.h:107:10: fatal error: > ndpi_main.h: No such file or directory > #include "ndpi_main.h" > ^ > compilation terminated. > make[2]: *** [Makefile:153: src/AlertCounter.o] Error 1 >
Bug#886133: ndpi: FTBFS on mips, s390x, powerpc, and ppc64: tests time out
Hi, I have an update on this: I have a patch for upstream review at https://github.com/ntop/nDPI/pull/506. It fixes this issue, but unittests still fail on s90x (and I guess on the other big endian archs), so no new upload for now, until I debug that. Ludovico
Bug#885955: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljvm
package src:jcc tags 885955 + confirmed pending thanks On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 3:06 PM Adam Borowskiwrote: > I'm afraid that your package fails to build on armhf, with: > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljvm > > It does succeed on at least amd64, though. > For some reason openjdk on that architecture does not have server/libjvm.so, but only client/libjsvm.so. I have added some fall-back logic. The upload is currently in the NEW queue. Thanks, Ludovico
Bug#886133: ndpi: FTBFS on mips, s390x, powerpc, and ppc64: tests time out
Thank you for looking into this. On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:15 PM Aaron M. Uckowrote: > > It so happens that I was having a brief look already :) > > Great, thanks! > > > The hang occurs inside the above while loop. Notice that the value > > loaded into "label" inside the loop never changes and this is the only > > variable the loop condition depends on. Therefore, if the initial loop > > condition is true, the program will loop forever. > > So I see. Perhaps the intent was to update mpls after bumping ip_offset. > Yes, there is clearly something missing. Probably mpls = (struct ndpi_mpls_header *) [ip_offset]; is missing from inside the loop. I will check on this before the end of the week, follow up with upstream, and patch. Thanks, Ludovico
Bug#883787: ntopng: Error "Missing CSRF parameter" in "Manage users" and "Preferences"
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the report. As you described, the issues is exactly the same as #856048, so I am going to merge the bugs. Given that this impacts a core functionality, it may qualify for a stable release update. I will check with the stable release team. Thanks, Ludovico On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:45 PM Daniel Aubrywrote: > Package: ntopng > Version: 2.4+dfsg1-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, > > This is fixed in ntopng/2.4+dfsg1-4 which is not available on debian > stretch. > > Please see bug #856048 for more details. > > It is not possible to access the "Manage users" and "Preferences" links on > the web interface. Both will display an error message: > > Script "/lua/admin/users.lua" returned an error: > Missing CSRF parameter > > Script "/lua/admin/prefs.lua" returned an error: > Missing CSRF parameter > > > This is the important changelog entry of version 2.4+dfsg1-4 > > * Update Check-for-presence-of-crsf-in-admin-scripts.patch to avoid the > 'Missing CSRF parameter' error (Closes: #856048). > > > Best Reards > Daniel > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 9.2 > APT prefers stable-updates > APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > > Versions of packages ntopng depends on: > ii init-system-helpers 1.48 > ii libc62.24-11+deb9u1 > ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.52.1-5+deb9u3 > ii libgcc1 1:6.3.0-18 > ii libgeoip11.6.9-4 > ii libhiredis0.13 0.13.3-2 > ii libjson-c3 0.12.1-1.1 > ii libluajit-5.1-2 2.0.4+dfsg-1+b1 > ii libmariadbclient18 10.1.26-0+deb9u1 > ii libndpi4 1.8-1 > ii libpcap0.8 1.8.1-3 > ii librrd8 1.6.0-1+b2 > ii libsqlite3-0 3.16.2-5 > ii libstdc++6 6.3.0-18 > ii libzmq5 4.2.1-4 > ii lsb-base 9.20161125 > ii ntopng-data 2.4+dfsg1-3 > ii redis-server 3:3.2.6-1 > ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5 > > ntopng recommends no packages. > > Versions of packages ntopng suggests: > pn geoip-database-contrib > > -- no debconf information >
Bug#816975: qutecom: should this package be removed?
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:34 PM Ludovico Cavedon <cave...@debian.org> wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up, I will submit a removal request now. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819848 Ludovico
Bug#816975: qutecom: should this package be removed?
Hi, On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:00 PM Sebastian Ramacherwrote: > quotecom seems to be dead upstream (qutecom.org is no longer reachable, > last > upstream release was four years ago) and has many bugs that will become RC > soonish: #803856 (ffmpeg transition), #812163 (GCC 6) and #816812 (Qt4 > WebKit > removal). > > So should quotecom be removed from unstable? > > I think so. No interest from the pkg-voip-maintainers group anyways: https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/2015-December/027732.html Thanks for bringing this up, I will submit a removal request now. Ludovico
Bug#760688: geoip-database-update script coding errors
Hi, first of all for the bug report and the suggestions. I am working in including them. On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 3:22 PM, roma1390 roma1...@gmail.com wrote: 1. general naming must be followed, and script named like other update-* scripts update-geoip-database-contrib I am not sure it is a *must* (I could not find this in the Debian policy, for example). The reason it is called geoip-database-contrib_update is that I find it helpful when the commands in a package start with the package name. However I see your point and I will also support the name you are suggesting. 2. file update has race conditions: - file is removed and later downloaded - file decompresion is in place, this exposes partial file to user 3. file download-update is not safe: wget can get redirect and name file with any name. so in /usr/share/GeoIP can be found files like index.html and others... 4. write is done to /usr which is many cases can safely be assumed that is read-only Make sense, fixing all of the above. Suggestions: 1. place databases to /var/lib/cache/GeoIP/ I am assuming you meant /var/cache/GeoIP. /var/cache is not the best place because if you remove that it it will not be re-created until the update script is run again. However /var/lib/geo-ip-database-contrib sounds good to me. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#760688: geoip-database-update script coding errors
package geoip-database-update severity 760688 normal thanks On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Ludovico Cavedon cave...@debian.org wrote: 2. file update has race conditions: - file is removed and later downloaded - file decompresion is in place, this exposes partial file to user 3. file download-update is not safe: wget can get redirect and name file with any name. so in /usr/share/GeoIP can be found files like index.html and others... Actually these issues are already fixed in version 1.9 - the decompression is not in place but to a temporary file - the output filename -O option is already passed to wget (so no arbitrary filename) - the .dat is not removed before downloading (although it is removed before renaming the new one, so there is a race condition that I am fixing). The security issue that was raising the severity to critical is not there, so I am downgrading it to normal and will provide an upload soon. Cheers, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#760990: ntopng: Several vulnerabilities fixed upstream in 1.2.1
Hi Luca, my understanding (supported by a simple test and code check) was that CVE-2014-4329 was fixed in version 1.2.0 https://svn.ntop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=379 However, as Salvatore noticed, it is announced as being fixed in version 1.2.1. Can you confirm which version fixed it, please? Thanks, Ludovico On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org wrote: Source: ntopng Severity: grave Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream Hi Ludovico, Marking this bugreport as grave, as more information seem a bit scarce, so was not able to identify the issues. There is an upstream report [1] which mentions several fixes were done in ntopng 1.2.1. [1] http://www.ntop.org/ndpi/released-ndpi-1-5-1-and-ntopng-1-2-1/ Fixes for - CVE-2014-5464 - CVE-2014-4329 Strangely this was marked as fixed in 1.2.0+dfsg1-1 in the security tracker at [2]. Is this information correct? [2] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-4329 - CVE-2014-5511, CVE-2014-5512, CVE-2014-5513, CVE-2014-5514, CVE-2014-5515 No information referenced for these in the advisory. Could you have a look at them and also clarify if CVE-2014-4329 version information is wrong in the tracker? Regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#757346: tortoisehg: toirtoisehg workbench crashes when viewing working directory
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Sébastien KALT sk...@throka.org wrote: If I downgrade mercurial to testing version (3.0.2-1) it doesn't crash. I've seen that there is a new upstream version for tortoisehg (http://tortoisehg.bitbucket.org/download/source.html) : 3.1 As mercurial is version 3.1 in Sid, the problem might be here. I am not able to reproduce the issue, but I am about to upload tortoisehg 3.1, please reopen if the problem persists. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#725665: nautilus-image-manipulator is marked for autoremoval from testing
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st wrote: I have just installed nautilus-image-manipulator in a fresh Sid installation (came with nautilus and python-nautilus as dependencies) and I didn't have any issues of any kind running nautilus and the extension. I assume this bug was indeed fixed with package 1.1-4? I am not having this problem either (amd64 testing). Even if the bug still exists for some people, the severity should be important, not grave. Thanks for looking into this, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#737444: [src:ntop] Sourceless file (minified)
Hi Bastien, On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 12:58 PM, bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: I could not find the source of: html/jquery-1.7.2.min.js html/jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js html/jqplot/jquery.jqplot.min.js Thank you for the bug report. For jqplot I will include the source in and minify it during build. For jquery(-ui), I see 3 options: 1) use the debian packaged version, and ignore the one on the tarball 2) as 1, but in addition removing it from the orig tarball (this would render the orig tarball useless for non-debian building) 3) as 1, but adding the non-minified source somewhere in the debian directory (but it is not going to be used anyways...). Option 1 look the most reasonable to me, but I want to check you are ok with it. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#725665: python-nautilus: ImportError: could not import gobject (could not find _PyGObject_API object)
Package: python-nautilus Version: 1.1-4 Followup-For: Bug #725665 Dear Maintainer, the problem is still happening for me ob python-nautilus 1.1-4: $ nautilus Initializing nautilus-gdu extension ImportError: could not import gobject (could not find _PyGObject_API object) (nautilus:13263): Nautilus-Python-WARNING **: pygobject initialization failed (nautilus:13263): Nautilus-Python-WARNING **: nautilus_python_init_python failed Thank you, Ludovico -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.10.7 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages python-nautilus depends on: ii gir1.2-nautilus-3.0 3.4.2-2 ii libatk1.0-0 2.10.0-2 ii libc62.17-93 ii libcairo-gobject21.12.16-2 ii libcairo21.12.16-2 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.28.2-1 ii libglib2.0-0 2.36.4-1 ii libgtk-3-0 3.8.4-1 ii libnautilus-extension1a 3.4.2-2 ii libpango-1.0-0 1.32.5-5+b1 ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.32.5-5+b1 ii libpython2.7 2.7.5-8 ii python-gi3.8.2-1 python-nautilus recommends no packages. python-nautilus suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693560: FTBFS against libav9
Hi Luk, On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote: Your package is blocking the libav9 transition and will likely be removed from testing unless a solution is found soon. Sorry about that and thank you for your notification. I will be travelling the next two days, I will address it as soon as I am back online. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#710757: tortoisehg: not installable in sid
package tortoisehg tags 710757 + confirmed pending sid thanks On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Ralf Treinen trei...@free.fr wrote: tortoisehg is not installable in sid since it depends on mercurial (= 2.1~), mercurial ( 2.3~) However, the version of mercurial available in sid is 2.6.1-1. Thank you for the report. I will upload tortoisehg 2.8 soon. Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702715: tortoisehg: broken pyqt4 version check
package tortoisehg forcemerge 702715 710453 tags 702715 + confirmed pending jessie sid thanks Hi, On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Matthew Gabeler-Lee chee...@fastcat.org wrote: This bug has now landed. As the packages in testing / unstable now stand, you cannot use tortoisehg. Thank you for the report and for looking into the issue. I am about to upload the latest version (2.8) which is not affected by this bug. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700442: Merging #700442 and #647275
package ntop forcemerge 700442 647275 thanks Merging #700442 and #647275. Thanks to Helmut Grohne for finding the cause of the double free. This problem has been already fixed in the latest upstream version by removing the code handling ip fragments. Being this a security related bug, I will soon prepare an update for the version in squeeze-backports. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700442: ntop reliably segfaults in searchFragments
Hi Helmut, On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Helmut Grohne h.gro...@cygnusnetworks.de wrote: I cannot send you a capture, because that could compromise the confidentiality of the data send by users. I am currently trying to reproduce the issue in a more controlled manner. I understand. Please keep in mind that I am feeding 50MB/s at 50kpps to ntop. Even tcpdump is unable to keep up with this rate (even in SCHED_FIFO) and drops about 0.1% of the packets when being asked to write them to /dev/shm. Running ntop on this system consumes a full cpu. It will likely drop more packets. When adding valgrind it will likely drop most of the packets. So this might be a reason for why I am unable to observe the issue using valgrind. Ok, makes sense. I will try the following: * Determine a small set of packets that reliably trigger some kind of crash. * Trying to reproduce the issue with fresh gdbm databases. This would be great. Having set of packets that can trigger the crash would be very useful. It looks like the code handling IP fragments is the culprit (or maybe the mostly affected one by the bug). Maybe running a tcpdump capturing only fragmented packets could help. ==11364== Thread 3: ==11364== Invalid read of size 8 ==11364==at 0x50CBB60: purgeOldFragmentEntries (ip.c:256) ==11364==by 0x50C9B96: purgeIdleHosts (hash.c:401) ==11364==by 0x50D7ABE: scanIdleLoop (ntop.c:683) ==11364==by 0x67A6B4F: start_thread (pthread_create.c:304) ==11364==by 0x5853A7C: clone (clone.S:112) ==11364== Address 0x149cdc10 is 48 bytes inside a block of size 72 free'd ==11364==at 0x4C27D4E: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:427) ==11364==by 0x50D6115: ntop_safefree (leaks.c:182) ==11364==by 0x50CB7E7: deleteFragment (ip.c:113) ==11364==by 0x50CBB94: purgeOldFragmentEntries (ip.c:265) ==11364==by 0x50C9B96: purgeIdleHosts (hash.c:401) ==11364==by 0x50D7ABE: scanIdleLoop (ntop.c:683) ==11364==by 0x67A6B4F: start_thread (pthread_create.c:304) ==11364==by 0x5853A7C: clone (clone.S:112) This is very interesting indeed. Even if it does not cause a crash, this code is apparently operating on a segment that has already been freed. I will look a bit more into in the following days. Thanks for your help, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700442: ntop reliably segfaults in searchFragments
package ntop severity 700442 important thanks Hi, On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Helmut Grohne h.gro...@cygnusnetworks.de wrote: Running ntop under gdb. In most cases it segfaults within the first 10 seconds. Thank you for the report. I am downgrading the severity on the bug to important, as the bug does not render it completely unusable to everyone. In fact I have multiple installations of ntop running without crashing. Are you able to send me a network capture that would make it crash? Alternatively, can you run it under valgrind until it crashes, please? Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#695422: ntop: links with both libssl and libgdbm and is mainly GPL-licensed without linking exception
Hi, On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Giovanni Rapagnani g...@ideanet.be wrote: a 3rd solution is to recompile without ssl support. Yes. Turns out that porting to gnutls is not as simple as the openssl wrapper is not enough. I will apply your patch this weekend. Thanks! Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#695422: ntop: links with both libssl and libgdbm and is mainly GPL-licensed without linking exception
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org wrote: Even if there's no *direct* linking of libgdm3 with libssl, it is my understanding that there is indeed an issue, as long as one single binary executable is linked with both libgdm3 and libssl. I believe that this follows from Section 3 of the GNU GPL v2. gdbm is the Program released under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 or later. The binary executable linked with it is a work based on it (according to the FSF's legal theory of linking, which is usually assumed to be valid by the Debian Project, in order to stay on the safe side...), and Section 3 states, in part: | 3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, | under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of | Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following: | | a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable | source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections | 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, | [or other methods to make the source available...] Hence, one has to make the source code available under the terms of Sections 1 and 2, that is to say, among other things licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of [the GNU GPL v2] (see clause 2b). I follow your reasoning and it makes sense to me. However, Section 2 defines a work based on it [the Program] as a modification. We are not making any modification to it. Nevertheless, I see how you can argue that, according to the FSF and Section 2b, ntop contains libgdm3. So basically, are you telling me that *any* code that is dynamically linked against a gpl library is automatically relicensed under GPL, including the python interpreter for example? This does not sound right to me... Cheers, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#695422: ntop: links with both libssl and libgdbm and is mainly GPL-licensed without linking exception
Hi Francesco, On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Francesco Poli (wintermute) invernom...@paranoici.org wrote: I noticed that ntop is mainly licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 or later, with only one file (ssl.c) having an OpenSSL linking exception. However, ntop seems to link with libssl (which is notoriously GPL-incompatible) and also seems to link with libgdbm (which [1] is licensed under the GNU GPL v2 or later, with no OpenSSL linking exception). [1] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/g/gdbm/gdbm_1.8.3-11/libgdbm3.copyright This does not look like an issue to me. There is no linking from libgdm3 to openssl, and libgdm3 makes no use of openssl, so the problematic clauses of the openssl do not apply to to libgdm3. I am under the impression that several ntop source GPL-licensed files get compiled into a binary that links with libssl, but do not have any OpenSSL linking exception. The only source code file which uses openssl is ssl_utils.c and it has an openssl exception. I thought that was enough. However, I did some reading to refresh my memory on the topic and I can see how this could be interpreted to apply to all source code files that to into the binary. The possible solutions I can think of are: A) ntop is modified so that it can link with GNUTLS, instead of OpenSSL I can try to do this. Hopefully the release team will accept the patch. B) an OpenSSL linking exception is granted to all the relevant files by the respective copyright holders and also to I do not think this is feasible as there are far too many contributors. Thank you for the report, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692732: src:ntop: non-free files in main (CC-BY-NC)
package src:ntop tags 692732 + confirmed thanks Hi, On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:39:53AM +, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Files: countmin.h Copyright: 2003-2004, G. Cormode License: CC-BY-NC That is obviously a non-free, GPL-incompatible license. countmin.c is also licensed under CC-BY-NC. This is not listed in debian/copyright. Thanks for the report. I must have missed those 2 files. After further investigation I have realized also prng.[ch] are under the same license. I have written to the author to see if we can get a double license CC-BY-NC and GPL, but I have not received an answer yet. I am going to talk to ntop upstream, and see what are the options for replacing it. Cheers, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689831: gconf-cleaner: Impossible to backup configuration
Andrew, gconf-cleaner has been abandoned by upstream for a while now and I do not believe it in a shape suitable for a stable release, so I am going to ask removal from Debian. Thanks for reporting the issue, Cheers, Ludovico On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com wrote: This was reported upstream at: http://code.google.com/p/gconf-cleaner/issues/detail?id=18 It was also reported in Ubuntu at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/gconf-cleaner/+bug/764041 The issue seems to be that gconf-cleaner does not support the Schema value: http://developer.gnome.org/gconf/2.32/gconf-gconf-schema.html#GConfSchema -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething Debian Maintainer http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678558: tortoisehg-nautilus: TortoiseHg does not work at all
package tortoisehg-nautilus severity 678558 normal tags 678558 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Ludovico Cavedon ludovico.cave...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Leandro Doctors ldoct...@gmail.com wrote: The TortoiseHg contextual menu does not appear (either in Hg-managed or non Hg- managed folders) I am not able to reproduce the the problem. Could you try: [...] Lowering severity, as I am not able to reproduce it and I was not able to get more feedback. Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679749: src:ntop: maintainer address bounces
package src:ntop merge 679734 679749 thanks On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote: The maintainer address bounces: jor...@linuxgen.com retry timeout exceeded Thanks for the report. I am trying to reach Jordan. Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678558: tortoisehg-nautilus: TortoiseHg does not work at all
Hi, On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Leandro Doctors ldoct...@gmail.com wrote: The TortoiseHg contextual menu does not appear (either in Hg-managed or non Hg- managed folders) I am not able to reproduce the the problem. Could you try: -starting thg from a terinal? Does it work? -start nautilus from a terminal and paste me the output -do you have the /usr/share/nautilus-python/extensions/nautilus-thg.py file? Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644697: tortoisehg-nautilus: Please transition to nautilus 3 and GObject introspection
package tortoisehg-nautilus forcemerge 644697 612574 tags 644697 + confirmed thanks On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:46 AM, j...@debian.org wrote: The introduction of nautilus 3 to unstable is imminent. In this version, the extensions interface has changed, and tortoisehg-nautilus requires changes to support this version: * porting to GTK+ 3 * porting from PyGTK to the GObject Introspection mechanism Unfortunately upstream has no interest in porting the extension to gtk 3, so I am going to remove the tortoisehg nautilus extension. Cheers, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644585: jcc: FTBFS: Java JDK directory '/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-arm' does not exist.
package jcc tags 644585 + confirmed pending thanks On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org wrote: jcc FTBFS on armel, powerpc and sh4. Thank you for the patch. I have made some changes and I am uploading the new package. It should now be more robust and not fail of all the openjdk supported sarchitectures. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#626713: ntop crashes my kernel
package ntop severity 626713 important tags 626713 + moreinfo thanks Lowering severity as looks like it is dependent on your specific a hardware and is likely to be a kernel bug. However, I need some more information (see previous message) before reassigning the bug. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#626713: ntop crashes my kernel
Hi, On 05/14/2011 08:20 AM, Robert wrote: Installing this package will eventually crash my system and renders it unbootable. (FWIW, iftop works fine.) I appear to be using e1000 for my network driver and my computer is a Dell Optiplex GX280. It sounds like a kernel bug rather then a ntop bug, but I need more information here: how did it crash? what messages do you see before the system stops the booting process? Thanks for reporting your issue, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#619103: The problem is indeed python-qscintilla2
package tortoisehg forcemerge 619103 619096 thanks Hi, thank you for debugging the issue and sorry for the silence, I was travelling with no internet connection. On 03/26/2011 12:10 PM, Christian Ohm wrote: As mentioned in #619096, this problem is indeed caused by python-qscintilla2, and a local rebuild of that package fixes it. Ok, I have just requested a binNMU [1] for the architectures with build +b1. Thanks, Ludovico [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619974 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613696: qutecom: FTBFS: Build-Depends on non-existing libqtwebkit-dev
On Feb 16, 2011 9:39 AM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote: You're build depending on libqtwebkit-dev | libqt4-dev ( 4:4.7), the buildd software will only consider libqtwebkit-dev and that's not in unstable. Oh, I see. Is there any way I can make a build-depends work with both qt 4.6 and 4.7, i.e. libqtwebkit-dev exist only for 4.7, or will I have to change the build depends anyway when 4.7 hit unstable? Thanks, Ludovico
Bug#611173: Fails to install
package ntop forcemerge 609070 611173 thanks On 01/26/2011 03:44 AM, Kartik Mistry wrote: While installing ntop, Setting up ntop (3:4.0.3+dfsg1-1) ... dpkg: error processing ntop (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 30 configured to not write apport reports Errors were encountered while processing: ntop Yeah, this is a known issue of 4.0.3+dfsg1-1, which is fixed by the new version just uploaded to unstable. Thanks! Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#607637: ntop: fails to install
package ntop tags 607637 + confirmed pending thanks On 12/20/2010 02:24 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: Setting up ntop (3:4.0.3+dfsg1-1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ntop.config: 60: netstat: not found Thanks for reporting the issue. I have added a dependency on net-tools for next upload. Cheers, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#607637: ntop: fails to install
On 12/20/2010 03:31 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 15:18:27 +0100, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: On 12/20/2010 02:24 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: Setting up ntop (3:4.0.3+dfsg1-1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ntop.config: 60: netstat: not found Thanks for reporting the issue. I have added a dependency on net-tools for next upload. The config script must work with only Essential packages installed (policy 3.9.1). Uhm, you are right. I changed the script to get the interface list from /proc and dropped the dependency. Thanks! Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595446: Re: ntop: diff for NMU version 3:3.3-14.1
Hi Alexander, On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Sure, I rescheduled them to delayed/15. But if you would rather provide backports and not release the package, wouldn't it make sense to cancel it alltogether? I am going to co-maintain ntop with Jordan. As you have probably seen, we have just uploaded a new version of ntop changing the maintainers and fixing the RC bug, as a temporary package until ntop 4 is ready. We are are now going to ask removal from squeeze though. Thanks for you patch and NMU! Cheers, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550947: qutecom segfaults at startup
package qutecom severity important thanks Giuseppe Sacco wrote: giuse...@scarafaggio:~$ OWLOGGER_DEFAULT=debug qutecom -style plastique (debug) 09:01:38 [Common] int main(int, char**): Started (debug) 09:01:38 [File] virtual bool FileReader::open(): loading /usr/share/qutecom//config/config.xml (debug) 09:01:38 [Purple] void* PurpleMainEventLoop(void*): Starting gMainLoop (debug) 09:01:38 [File] virtual bool FileReader::open(): loading /home/giuseppe/.qutecom/config.xml (debug) 09:01:38 [File] virtual bool FileReader::open(): loading /home/giuseppe/.qutecom/config.xml (debug) 09:01:40 [Purple] virtual PurpleIMFactory::~PurpleIMFactory(): Stopping gMainLoop It might be related to the content of ~/.qutecom directory, as I am not able to reproduce it. Could you please try to rename it? (Do not just delete it, as the old version may become useful for debugging). Btw: I am lowering the severity as this bug does not seem to affect the majority of the users. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550947: qutecom segfaults at startup
Hi, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Since last update on unstable, qutecom does not start anymore. This is a backtrace of what is happening: Thanks for the backtrace. Could you please also attach the output to the terminal when starting it with OWLOGGER_DEFAULT=debug qutecom -style plastique ? Thank you! Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542979: graphviz: FTBFS: gv_tcl.cpp:2052: error: expected, unqualified-id before '%' token
package graphviz tags 542979 + patch thanks Hi, I am attaching a couple of patches I had to apply to make graphviz compile. 30_fix_ftbfs_gv_i.patch fixes the problem described in this bug. Some code processed by swig has to be moved at the beginning out of the { } block. However, the package will still FTBFS because of a changed parameter of swig (-php, instead of -php5). See patch 40_swig_php_param.patch I was not able to recover since which version swig changed that option. It would be wise to put that version in the Build-Depends. As a final note: graphviz will FTBFS also if tcl8.4 or previous are installed, so Build-Conflicts: tcl8.4, tcl8.3 should be added to the control file. Thanks, Ludovico Description: fix swig-processed file Author: Ludovico Cavedon ludovico.cave...@gmail.com Forwarded: not-needed Index: graphviz-2.20.2/tclpkg/gv/gv.i === --- graphviz-2.20.2.orig/tclpkg/gv/gv.i 2009-09-22 00:57:05.0 -0700 +++ graphviz-2.20.2/tclpkg/gv/gv.i 2009-09-22 00:57:21.0 -0700 @@ -15,6 +15,20 @@ **/ %module gv + +#ifdef SWIGTCL +// A typemap telling SWIG to ignore an argument for input +// However, we still need to pass a pointer to the C function +%typemap(in,numinputs=0) char *outdata (char *temp) { + $1 = temp; +} +// A typemap defining how to return an argument by appending it to the result +%typemap(argout) char *outdata { + Tcl_Obj *o = Tcl_NewStringObj($1); + Tcl_ListObjAppendElement(interp,$result,o); +} +#endif + %{ /* some language headers (e.g. php.h, ruby.h) leave these defined */ @@ -371,18 +385,4 @@ extern bool write(Agraph_t *g, char *filename); extern bool write(Agraph_t *g, FILE *f); - -#ifdef SWIGTCL -// A typemap telling SWIG to ignore an argument for input -// However, we still need to pass a pointer to the C function -%typemap(in,numinputs=0) char *outdata (char *temp) { - $1 = temp; -} -// A typemap defining how to return an argument by appending it to the result -%typemap(argout) char *outdata { - Tcl_Obj *o = Tcl_NewStringObj($1); - Tcl_ListObjAppendElement(interp,$result,o); -} -#endif - %} Description: use -php instead of -php5 with swig Author: Ludovico Cavedon ludovico.cave...@gmail.com Index: graphviz-2.20.2/tclpkg/gv/Makefile.am === --- graphviz-2.20.2.orig/tclpkg/gv/Makefile.am 2008-04-29 11:19:41.0 -0700 +++ graphviz-2.20.2/tclpkg/gv/Makefile.am 2009-09-22 01:36:54.0 -0700 @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ gv.php: gv_php.cpp php_gv.h: gv_php.cpp gv_php.cpp: gv.i - $(SWIG) -c++ -php5 -o gv_php.cpp $(srcdir)/gv.i + $(SWIG) -c++ -php -o gv_php.cpp $(srcdir)/gv.i pkgpythondir = $(pkglibdir)/python PYTHON_data = gv.py Index: graphviz-2.20.2/tclpkg/gv/Makefile.in === --- graphviz-2.20.2.orig/tclpkg/gv/Makefile.in 2008-06-25 16:20:31.0 -0700 +++ graphviz-2.20.2/tclpkg/gv/Makefile.in 2009-09-22 01:36:54.0 -0700 @@ -2521,7 +2521,7 @@ gv.php: gv_php.cpp php_gv.h: gv_php.cpp gv_php.cpp: gv.i - $(SWIG) -c++ -php5 -o gv_php.cpp $(srcdir)/gv.i + $(SWIG) -c++ -php -o gv_php.cpp $(srcdir)/gv.i $(PYTHON_data): gv_python.cpp gv_python.cpp: gv.i $(SWIG) -c++ -python -o gv_python.cpp $(srcdir)/gv.i Index: graphviz-2.20.2/configure === --- graphviz-2.20.2.orig/configure 2009-09-22 01:37:20.0 -0700 +++ graphviz-2.20.2/configure 2009-09-22 01:37:29.0 -0700 @@ -27290,8 +27290,8 @@ if test x$use_swig != xYes; then use_php=No (swig not available) else -if test `$SWIG -help 21 | $GREP -c '\-php5 *- Generate'` = 0; then - use_php=No (swig does not support -php5 option) +if test `$SWIG -help 21 | $GREP -c '\-php *- Generate'` = 0; then + use_php=No (swig does not support -php option) else # Extract the first word of php, so it can be a program name with args. set dummy php; ac_word=$2 Index: graphviz-2.20.2/configure.ac === --- graphviz-2.20.2.orig/configure.ac 2009-09-22 01:37:03.0 -0700 +++ graphviz-2.20.2/configure.ac 2009-09-22 01:37:18.0 -0700 @@ -946,8 +946,8 @@ if test x$use_swig != xYes; then use_php=No (swig not available) else -if test `$SWIG -help 21 | $GREP -c '\-php5 *- Generate'` = 0; then - use_php=No (swig does not support -php5 option) +if test `$SWIG -help 21 | $GREP -c '\-php *- Generate'` = 0; then + use_php=No (swig does not support -php option) else AC_CHECK_PROG(PHP,php,php) if test x$PHP = x; then
Bug#514220: ca-certificates: debconf update destroys local config
Hi, gdm can be run even without an X server (e.g. for remote login), so it is not correct to have it depend on xorg server components. It should rather recommend them, but I see it already recommends xserver-xorg, which in turn depends on the mouse and keyboard drivers. Are there reasons not to install xserver-xorg but still want to have other pieces of the xserver? In that case we could add an explicit Recommends: on these two packages, but not Depends. My 2 cents, Cheers, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#514220: ca-certificates: debconf update destroys local config
Ludovico Cavedon wrote: gdm can be run even without an X server (e.g. for remote login), so it Whops, sorry, wrong bug :( Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#533724: gdm: missing dependency locks up keyboard/mouse
Hi, gdm can be run even without an X server (e.g. for remote login), so it is not correct to have it depend on xorg server components. It should rather recommend them, but I see it already recommends xserver-xorg, which in turn depends on the mouse and keyboard drivers. Are there reasons not to install xserver-xorg but still want to have other pieces of the xserver? In that case we could add an explicit Recommends: on these two packages, but not Depends. My 2 cents, Cheers, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#487638: opencv FTBFS
Nicolau Werneck wrote: So let me list some facts, and please tell me if I forgot something, or if I got anything wrong: 1_ The whole problem started because OpenCV uses some function in ffmpeg that became obsolete after i-don't-know-what version. yes, opencv isusing the img_resample API that after at a while being deprecated has been removed from the ffmpeg library. Applications should use the swscale API instead. Unfortunately I do not know more details about that :( 3_ Debian has some restrictions regarding ffmpeg, and the official version has a number of relevant modifications from upstream. Many Debian users opt for the bootlegged ffmpeg package instead. I do not think this is affecting opencv. official debian ffmpeg has been removed of mpeg4-based encoders. The rest should be the same. 4_ Everything should work fine with a certain Debian SVN version of ffmpeg and a certain other Debian OpenCV package. Yes, a part from the fact that right know the build of opencv on sid would fail because of the missing API. Actually I realized that this is not a correct FTBFS. If you build the package as is it will not fail. It will be build without video support because the new version of ffmpeg changed the include paths. If you fix the paths, *than* it will FTBFS because of the wrong API. I was to quick in tagging it as FTBFS, feel free do reduce severity. However without video support the package is useless for me, because I am using it. What I still don't know exactly is: 1_ Does any Debian package of ffmpeg already implement this new functions from ffmpeg, or are we still holding to the deprecated mechanism? Or are we keeping both by any chance? I know qutecom, for example, had this problem and is now using the swscale API for video. In other words: Does the Debian way today means using the deprecated functions (img_conv)? If so, when are we going to make the switch to the more recent mechanisms? I think we need to patch opencv to use the new API. Looks like bug 487638 has a patch... Thanks for the attention, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521493: qutecom_2.2~rc3.dfsg1-4(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: error: invalid conversion from 'int' to 'PixelFormat'
package qutecom tags 521493 + confirmed pending thanks Yes, I know: during the wait time in the NEW queue, some incompatible changes were made to ffmpeg :( The new upload is ready. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#517147: wengophone: FTBFS: Could not find FFmpeg
package: wengophone tags 517147 + confirmed pending thanks Hi, wengophone changed name into qutecom. The new package is sitting in the NEW queue and will fix this problem. As soon as it gets accepted, I will fire a bug for removal wengophone. Thank you for reporting, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#517147: wengophone: FTBFS: Could not find FFmpeg
package wengophone tags 517147 + confirmed pending thanks Hi, wengophone changed name into qutecom. The new package is sitting in the NEW queue and will fix this problem. As soon as it gets accepted, I will fire a bug for removal wengophone. Thank you for reporting, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#487540: [wengophone] qtwengophoen links against not fould shaored libraries.
package wengophone forcemerge 486948 487540 severity 486948 grave thanks Mazen NEIFER wrote: Now that wengophone package was upgraded, it could not find libphapi.so. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:trunk]$qtwengophone qtwengophone: error while loading shared libraries: ../../../../wifo/phapi/libphapi.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Yes, known problem :( , merging with bug #487540. I'm setting severity of the bug to grave as this is a dependency error (needs to depend on a new package or require shared library name to be updated). I think severity is correct. Actually the shared library is in the same package: the problem is that it is being searched in the wrong path :( An upload will arrive shortly. Thank you for reporting, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479920: wengophone: FTBFS: CMake Error: x11: X11_INCLUDE_DIRS and X11_INCLUDE_DIR empty, check that X11 is declared before x11
Andreas Metzler wrote: adding libx11-dev, python2.5-dev to Build-Depends works around the abovementioned bug. However building still fails when the application is linked [...] /tmp/WENGO/wengophone-2.1.2.dfsg0/wengophone/src/WengoPhoneBuildId.cpp:84: undefined reference to `avcodec_version()' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Yes, it needs a patch in order to compile against the new ffmpeg. I have the fix ready. It should be uploaded soon by Marco. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479920: wengophone: FTBFS: CMake Error: x11: X11_INCLUDE_DIRS and X11_INCLUDE_DIR empty, check that X11 is declared before x11
Andreas Metzler wrote: adding libx11-dev, python2.5-dev to Build-Depends works around the abovementioned bug. However building still fails when the application is linked [...] /tmp/WENGO/wengophone-2.1.2.dfsg0/wengophone/src/WengoPhoneBuildId.cpp:84: undefined reference to `avcodec_version()' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Yes, it needs a patch in order to compile against the new ffmpeg. I have the fix ready. It should be uploaded soon by Marco. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#471385: Wengophone crashes whenever initiating a call
package wengophone tags 471385 + pending thanks On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Ludovico Cavedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mazen NEIFER wrote: After starting Wengophone, just try to initiate a call (123 for example). Then you will not be able to hear the message and when you will hangup it will crash immediately. It started to happen to me too, after some library upgrade, I guess. The code for managing alsa devices is quite buggy in the last stable release. I imported the relvant code from branch 2.2 after the refactoring done by Alec Leamas and the problem seems to be solved for me. An upload should come soon. Regards, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#471385: Wengophone crashes whenever initiating a call
package wengophone tags 471385 + confirmed thanks Mazen NEIFER wrote: After starting Wengophone, just try to initiate a call (123 for example). Then you will not be able to hear the message and when you will hangup it will crash immediately. It started to happen to me too, after some library upgrade, I guess. (debug) 22:44:12 void PhoneCall::setState(EnumPhoneCallState::PhoneCallState): call state changed callId=1 state=PhoneCallStateTalking (info) 22:44:12 virtual bool PhApiWrapper::isCallEncrypted(int): Call with callId 1 has encryption mode 0 (debug) 22:44:13 void QtPhoneCall::rejectCall(): phone call hangup Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x4580a950 (LWP 11790)] 0x2b8f5aacb951 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libasound.so.2 (gdb) bt #0 0x2b8f5aacb951 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libasound.so.2 #1 0x2b8f5aaef0e1 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libasound.so.2 #2 0x2b8f5aac2ac6 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libasound.so.2 #3 0x2b8f5aacd232 in snd_pcm_mmap_writei () from /usr/lib/libasound.so.2 #4 0x2b8f589477eb in alsa_stream_write (as=0x13c4e40, buf=0x45809bb0, len=value optimized out) at /build/buildd/wengophone-2.1.2.dfsg0/wifo/phapi/phmedia-alsa.c:450 #5 0x2b8f58940f7a in ph_audio_io_thread (p=value optimized out) at /build/buildd/wengophone-2.1.2.dfsg0/wifo/phapi/phmedia-audio.c:898 #6 0x2b8f58992f24 in cgt_timer_thread (parg=value optimized out) at /build/buildd/wengophone-2.1.2.dfsg0/libs/timer/src/clock_gettime/impl_timer.c:122 #7 0x2b8f5a63efc7 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #8 0x2b8f5c0f429d in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6 #9 0x in ?? () The backtrace is not exactly the same, but I think the cause is the same, as it is happening at the same time. I find it particularly difficult to debug, as I do not know much about programming with alsa. Regards, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#438419: CVE-2007-4366: WengoPhone DoS vulnerability
package wengophone tag 43841 + confirmed upstream thanks Luca Bruno wrote: It looks like openwengo project hasn't yet released a patch, but they're working on it: http://dev.openwengo.com/pipermail/wengophone-devel/2007-August/006412.html I also opened a ticket on openwengo trac: http://dev.openwengo.com/trac/openwengo/trac.fcgi/ticket/1759 Thank you for reporting, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]