Bug#959994: codeville: Consider removing this package
Hello. I agree with this assessment. If you can submit it immediately, that would be fine with me. Marie Janssen --- Jamuraa --- jamu...@base0.net --- jamu...@debian.org On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:48 PM Boyuan Yang wrote: > Source: codeville > Severity: serious > Version: 0.8.0-2.1 > Tags: sid bullseye > X-Debbugs-CC: jamu...@debian.org > > Dear Debian codeville maintainer, > > It seems that package codevilla has a dead upstream since at least 2014. > It is > a discontinued VCS thus it doesn't make any sense to keep it in Debian > archive. Besides, this software is now affected by python2 removal. > > As a result, I am proposing to have this package removed from Debian. I > will > submit a removal request to FTP Masters 7 days later (after May 14, 2020). > If > you have any thoughts, please let me know *immediately*. > > -- > Best Regards, > Boyuan Yang >
Bug#536903: bogosort: FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred while parsing Depends field: libc6 dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | install-info
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Simon McVittie wrote: > >> However, I'm not sure whether Debian really benefits enough from having >> bogosort to resolve this RC bug by fixing it rather than removing it: > > I agree. I also value Ansgar contribution - sorry to shoot it down. > > Michael, you're currently listed as the maintainer of bogosort. Would you > object greatly if one of us filed an RM bug? > > Due to timing issues wrt squeeze (and also I understand you are very busy > these days) I think it would be better if this defaulted to one of us filing > the bug if no objection is forthcoming in, say, 3 weeks. I originally packaged it as a curiosity, so I have no objection to it being removed from the distribution. It's not as useful as a shuffler now that shuf is in an essential package, and there are better ways to tax your CPU than running pathologically bad sorting algorithms. Michael Janssen --- Jamuraa --- jamu...@base0.net --- jamu...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#323556: debian BTS 323556: bittorent-gui vs. wxPython
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 12:41 -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote: > > > I see the same error, of course. Poking around the > > various wxgtk packages in sid at the moment, I don't > > see a libwxgtk2.4-1-python. Maybe the debs changed again? > > I guess the right dependency now is python-wxgtk2.4. > > I haven't tried anything yet. > > Looks like they changed it again :) Updated the patch and am attaching > it to the bug report with this message. > > > Have you heard any rumblings on this from either the > > wxgtk folk or the bittorrent folk? > > Nope, but I think it is part of the addition of wx2.6 and general > cleanup of wx packages that has been coming for a while. Yet another > transition for the post-sarge fun. Well, good thing I didn't upload that one. I'll get this change in and upload tomorrow. Thanks for the (further) heads up. -- Michael Janssen --- Jamuraa --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315510: bittorrent: 3.2.4-4 fails to connect to peers (3.2.4-3sarge0.1 works fine)
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Tim Van Holder wrote: > Package: bittorrent > Version: 3.4.2-3sarge0.1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > After upgrading bittorrent to 3.4.2-4 it ceased to work - it will > start up fine but wait forever on the 'connecting to peers' prompt. > Downgrading to the version on stable fixes this, so it must be > a recently introduced change. I'm behind a NAT firewall, so perhaps > the changes in port usage are to blame? Can you give me more information on how the new one doesn't work? I did test it behind a NAT and on a "normal" connection, so I don't think it is related to that. If you could run a lsof with the program running it may be useful. Also it could be the case that you just did not wait long enough - NATed peers have a startup time which is much slower because other peers cannot connect to them, and there is a certain amount of wait time for a new peer in the swarm. -- Michael Janssen --- Jamuraa --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
