Bug#950747: projectl: Projectl fails to run with current libgphobos76

2020-02-05 Thread Moshe Piekarski
Package: projectl
Version: 1.001.dfsg1-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

projectl, which has a last changelog entry from april 2018 fails with
error: symbol lookup error: projectl: undefined symbol:
_D4core4stdc5errno5errnoFNbNdNiNeZi
Some googling suggests that this symbol belongs to the D runtime
(libgphobos76) which in 2018 was compiled from gcc-8 but today is compiled from 
gcc-9.
I built and installed the package locally and it works fine.
Please update the libgphobos76 dependency (and possibly make it a transition).

Thank you,
Moshe Piekarski

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (400, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages projectl depends on:
ii  libc62.29-9
ii  libgcc1  1:9.2.1-25
ii  libgl1   1.3.0-7
ii  libgphobos76 9.2.1-25
ii  libsdl-mixer1.2  1.2.12-16+b1
ii  libsdl1.2debian  1.2.15+dfsg2-5

projectl recommends no packages.

projectl suggests no packages.

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=Td/2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Bug#929338: wordplay: Non-dfsg license

2019-05-21 Thread Moshe Piekarski
Package: wordplay
Version: 7.22-19
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

the license is nondfsg compatible

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages wordplay depends on:
ii  libc6  2.28-10

wordplay recommends no packages.

wordplay suggests no packages.

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQJNBAEBCAA3FiEEXbk7X2RxJi0NGP5lMn/Nf3K/IoEFAlzkeGwZHGRlYmlhbi5i
dWdzQG1lbGFjaGltLm5ldAAKCRAyf81/cr8igV3lD/98Hgf5dJxM2MatL728jeF9
juKhuomVIBuvjDByi6jKJEHEJiZAzpfqRbH6ZG7QYTNK9yVRpBpIzXoqEvg33jsj
HTrYLQfB9ya7f5wvgJ8UfKHW4cHvLaJIXbVcS71QOUZJF3hcWOKPXsS911qbzC+f
uMYQopK4HuRps+eTHrDG7nxspFmPvD7KKEBQKV72CIG5p6rS+VibV1CI+WrYfCv5
vNsiGO4vGy0rj/5rh/u4oy5IypsphVM2k7I2v/20fF6cyDRF0VyoAELMOx41/hBi
+uzBXj1A2ICR8uEGTSiYy2mPgPImgZSjCbIAk40akfJc4Suwoy7ZauEweYShzaH0
0kmJ4IhMgopGMhKkQsqoFR5KG1vG8nu1gllaZ0P2Qo34Pi9B1LgjI4OUSvHPNyR+
DN1Hil/xjMT8EzFXlkOMGhRKLFYqiz1Wu0dz699ZrUWlp4dSNEr70mlGEzyQsabz
Dlo0p7uv6hCL4JodGlM96DQu8xvMp38kE44OM/g77c9cWmbOMhjAB62xJcc7VlvX
Cxz62rL37PBTYSTzOd+Y5t55oLeXt+waTc+Bqty7aE6nqBXDYLRmKjiBDuJKG1R8
OfUvUwoUysW5hWDkbP+zlxTJZ/GmBUCPlLj9f1HToSkrRwYjckrn6Jl4UDnMjw1L
Pe/SW3D+9gVmz2mWd5KjOg==
=sdqo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Bug#922947: retroarch-assets: please don’t use hinted Roboto fonts

2019-03-13 Thread Moshe Piekarski
Package: retroarch-assets
Version: 1.3.6+git20160731+dfsg1-1
Followup-For: Bug #922947

Being as roboto-hinted reverted until after the buster release, perhaps the 
priority should be set to normal so that retroarch can be included in 
buster.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages retroarch-assets depends on:
ii  fonts-roboto 2:0~20170802-3
ii  fonts-roboto-hinted  2:0~20170802-3

retroarch-assets recommends no packages.

retroarch-assets suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#920900: libicu-dev: Command icu-config disappeared from libicu-dev

2019-02-01 Thread Moshe Piekarski
Package: libicu-dev
Followup-For: Bug #920900

Just pointing out that the changelog for the upgrade specifically mentions this 
change.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libicu-dev depends on:
ii  icu-devtools  63.1-6
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]  2.28-5
ii  libicu63  63.1-6

libicu-dev recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libicu-dev suggests:
ii  icu-doc  63.1-5

-- no debconf information