Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions
Op wo 19 apr 2023 om 06:04 schreef Anton Gladky : > > Hi, > > boost-defaults_1.81.0 is in experimental. But boost1.81 > is also available in the Debian Bookworm [1]. > > [1] https://packages.debian.org/source/testing/boost1.81 Hi Anton, Ah, it's even available in bpo, thanks a lot! -- Olaf
Bug#990069: openssh-server: Not accepting new connections during Debian 10 -> 11 upgrade
Package: libc6 Version: 2.31-13 Followup-For: Bug #990069 X-Debbugs-Cc: olafvds...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, The original issue of not being able to open a new SSH connection during the upgrade still seems to be present. Greetings, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: 11.0 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-17-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU thread) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libcrypt1 1:4.4.18-4 ii libgcc-s1 10.2.1-6 Versions of packages libc6 recommends: ii libidn2-0 2.3.0-5 ii libnss-nis 3.1-4 ii libnss-nisplus 1.3-4 Versions of packages libc6 suggests: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.77 pn glibc-doc ii libc-l10n 2.31-13 ii locales2.31-13 -- debconf information: glibc/disable-screensaver: glibc/kernel-not-supported: * libraries/restart-without-asking: true glibc/upgrade: true glibc/kernel-too-old: glibc/restart-services: glibc/restart-failed:
Bug#990708: [debian-mysql] Bug#990708: Bug#990708: mariadb-server-10.5: upgrade problems due to galera-3 -> galera-4 switch
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 1:19 AM Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 1:12 PM Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:24 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > I wish somebody could contribute with exact steps on how to reproduce > > > the issue. So far I've gotten some half attempts at that but they > > > haven't been actionable for me. > > > > Hi Otto, > > > > I'd point to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089 > > Not sure why it's not reproducible with those steps. > > I don't see *the* steps, but I see a lot of messages about many > different steps. If you have them, why not copy-paste the steps here > in email so I can copy-paste them into a Debian Buster Docker > container and run the upgrade to isolate the regression? Docker might be the problem, I'd try a real VM. I do have this in a VM so I think we can easily repro this. // Fresh VM install from debian-10.9.0-i386-netinst.iso # history 1 visudo 2 rm /etc/motd 3 poweroff 4 apt install mariadb-server 5 dpkg -l|grep mariadb 6 sed -i 's/buster/bullseye/g' /etc/apt/sources.list 7 apt update 8 apt upgrade 9 apt dist-upgrade // output below 10 dpkg -l|grep mariadb // output below 11 apt dist-upgrade // output below 12 history -- Olaf
Bug#990708: [debian-mysql] Bug#990708: Bug#990708: mariadb-server-10.5: upgrade problems due to galera-3 -> galera-4 switch
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:24 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I wish somebody could contribute with exact steps on how to reproduce > the issue. So far I've gotten some half attempts at that but they > haven't been actionable for me. Hi Otto, I'd point to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089 Not sure why it's not reproducible with those steps. Greetings, -- Olaf
Bug#988089: [debian-mysql] Bug#988089: Bug#988089: mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade Debian 10 -> 11
> Op za 22 mei 2021 om 23:30 schreef Otto Kekäläinen : > > Would somebody like to review/test it? Doesn't seem to be working for me: # apt full-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: libpython-stdlib mariadb-client-10.3 mariadb-client-core-10.3 mariadb-server mariadb-server-10.3 mariadb-server-core-10.3 python python-minimal The following packages will be upgraded: galera-3 libpython2-stdlib libpython2.7-minimal libpython2.7-stdlib python2 python2-minimal python2.7 python2.7-minimal 8 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 8 to remove and 0 not upgraded. # apt dist-upgrade -o Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall=1 -o Debug::pkgDepCache::Marker=1 -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done MarkInstall initramfs-tools-core:amd64 < 0.140 @ii mK NPb IPb > FU=0 ignore old unsatisfied important dependency on pigz:amd64 Delayed Removing: libpython-stdlib:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for python2.7-minimal:amd64 (2.7.18-7) Delayed Removing: python:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for python2.7-minimal:amd64 (2.7.18-7) Delayed Removing: python-minimal:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for python2.7-minimal:amd64 (2.7.18-7) MarkInstall python2.7-minimal:amd64 < 2.7.16-2+deb10u1 -> 2.7.18-7 @ii umU Ib > FU=0 MarkDelete libpython-stdlib:amd64 < 2.7.16-1 @ii mK Ib > FU=0 MarkDelete python:amd64 < 2.7.16-1 @ii mK Ib > FU=0 MarkDelete python-minimal:amd64 < 2.7.16-1 @ii mK Ib > FU=0 MarkInstall iptables:amd64 < 1.8.7-1 @ii mK NPb IPb > FU=0 ignore old unsatisfied important dependency on nftables:amd64 MarkInstall mariadb-server:amd64 < 1:10.3.29-0+deb10u1 -> 1:10.5.10-2 @ii umU Ib > FU=0 Installing mariadb-server-10.5:amd64 as Depends of mariadb-server:amd64 Delayed Removing: mariadb-server-10.3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for mariadb-server-10.5:amd64 (1:10.5.10-2) Delayed Removing: mariadb-server-10.3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for mariadb-server-10.5:amd64 (1:10.5.10-2) MarkInstall mariadb-server-10.5:amd64 < none -> 1:10.5.10-2 @un uN Ib > FU=0 Installing galera-4:amd64 as Depends of mariadb-server-10.5:amd64 MarkKeep galera-3:amd64 < 25.3.25-2 -> 25.3.31-2+b1 @ii umU > FU=0 Delayed Removing: galera-3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for galera-4:amd64 (26.4.8-1) Delayed Removing: galera-3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for galera-4:amd64 (26.4.8-1) Delayed Removing: galera-3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for galera-4:amd64 (26.4.8-1) Delayed Removing: galera-3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for galera-4:amd64 (26.4.8-1) MarkInstall galera-4:amd64 < none -> 26.4.8-1 @un uN Ib > FU=0 MarkDelete galera-3:amd64 < 25.3.25-2 | 25.3.31-2+b1 @ii umH Ib > FU=0 Installing mariadb-client-10.5:amd64 as Depends of mariadb-server-10.5:amd64 Delayed Removing: mariadb-client-10.3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for mariadb-client-10.5:amd64 (1:10.5.10-2) Delayed Removing: mariadb-client-10.3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for mariadb-client-10.5:amd64 (1:10.5.10-2) Delayed Removing: mariadb-client-core-10.3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for mariadb-client-10.5:amd64 (1:10.5.10-2) MarkInstall mariadb-client-10.5:amd64 < none -> 1:10.5.10-2 @un uN Ib > FU=0 Installing mariadb-client-core-10.5:amd64 as Depends of mariadb-client-10.5:amd64 Delayed Removing: mariadb-client-core-10.3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for mariadb-client-core-10.5:amd64 (1:10.5.10-2) Delayed Removing: mariadb-client-core-10.3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for mariadb-client-core-10.5:amd64 (1:10.5.10-2) MarkInstall mariadb-client-core-10.5:amd64 < none -> 1:10.5.10-2 @un uN Ib > FU=0 MarkDelete mariadb-client-core-10.3:amd64 < 1:10.3.29-0+deb10u1 @ii mK Ib > FU=0 MarkDelete mariadb-client-10.3:amd64 < 1:10.3.29-0+deb10u1 @ii mK Ib > FU=0 Installing mariadb-server-core-10.5:amd64 as Depends of mariadb-server-10.5:amd64 Delayed Removing: mariadb-server-core-10.3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for mariadb-server-core-10.5:amd64 (1:10.5.10-2) Delayed Removing: mariadb-server-10.3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for mariadb-server-core-10.5:amd64 (1:10.5.10-2) Delayed Removing: mariadb-server-core-10.3:amd64 as upgrade is not an option for mariadb-server-core-10.5:amd64 (1:10.5.10-2) MarkInstall mariadb-server-core-10.5:amd64 < none -> 1:10.5.10-2 @un uN Ib > FU=0 MarkDelete mariadb-server-core-10.3:amd64 < 1:10.3.29-0+deb10u1 @ii mK Ib > FU=0 MarkDelete mariadb-server-10.3:amd64 < 1:10.3.29-0+deb10u1 @ii mK Ib > FU=0 MarkKeep python-minimal:amd64 < 2.7.16-1 @ii mR > FU=0 MarkInstall libcap2-bin:amd64 < 1:2.44-1 @ii mK NPb IPb > FU=0 ignore old unsatisfied important dependency on libpam-cap:a
Bug#988089: [debian-mysql] Bug#988089: Bug#988089: mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade Debian 10 -> 11
Op za 22 mei 2021 om 23:30 schreef Otto Kekäläinen : > > Hello! > > On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 4:18 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > > > >> > But as said, the bug #988089 can only be fixed by a change in galera-4 > >> > debian/control. Changing the mariadb-10.5 debian/control to > >> > recommends:galera-4 is a separate change. > >> Ok but I have no idea how this should be handled then. > > > > > > I outlined the exact galera-4 debugging steps in my email on May 13th. The > > solution can be found and also tested/validated easily with those steps. > > I had some spare time today and followed those steps, resulting in > this MR: https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/merge_requests/5 Thanks a lot! > Would somebody like to review/test it? Conflicts: galera, galera-3, ... Breaks: galera, galera-3 > When one binary package declares a conflict with another using a Conflicts > field, dpkg will refuse to allow them to be unpacked on the system at the > same time. This is a stronger restriction than Breaks, Based on the text I'd assume it doesn't make sense to have a package in both conflicts and breaks. Am I reading the text wrong? https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-conflicts -- Olaf
Bug#988089: [debian-mysql] Bug#988089: Bug#988089: mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade Debian 10 -> 11
Op vr 14 mei 2021 om 09:53 schreef Otto Kekäläinen : > Investigating (0) galera-4:amd64 < none -> 26.4.7-3 @un uN Ib > > Broken galera-4:amd64 Conflicts on galera-3:amd64 < 25.3.25-2 -> > 25.3.31-2+b1 @ii umU Ib > > Considering galera-3:amd64 0 as a solution to galera-4:amd64 0 > Holding Back galera-4:amd64 rather than change galera-3:amd64 I think here it should remove galera-3 rather than holding back galera4.. -- Olaf
Bug#928077: [debian-mysql] Bug#928077: mariadb-server-10.3: fails to start. init files don't create directory /run/mysqld
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 5:27 PM Michael Farmbauer wrote: > in the latest update the pid and socket files have been moved from > /var/run/mysqld to /run/mysqld. > > The directory /run/mysqld must be created in the init files: > > /etc/init.d/mysql > /var/lib/systemd/system/mariadb* > > Those file still create the directory /var/run/mysqld On my systems /var/run is a symlink to /run, is this not the case on your systems? # ls -l /var/run lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Jun 19 2017 /var/run -> /run
Bug#916310: Unstable?
Should it be in unstable? -- Olaf
Bug#863596: mytop can't installed
Hi Werner, > I don't know which source of mytop is included in mariadb-client-10.1 and > cannot estimate if the standalone package of mytop makes sense or not in > stretch. I assume the Maintainers of MariaDB do things right so I won't look > further into this. Would you be willing to continue maintaining mytop if the conflict with mariadb was resolved? Greetings, -- Olaf van der Spek
Bug#914565: php7.3-intl: Segfaults after apache2 graceful restart
Hi, I can't repro this, though I didn't setup a ssl vhost. Is Apache working on a request when it crashes? If so, is it always the same request? Does it also crash if you reload it manually? Gr, Olaf [Mon Nov 26 14:14:21.240183 2018] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 3554] AH00171: Graceful restart requested, doing restart AH00558: apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.1.1. Set the 'ServerName' directive globally to suppress this message [Mon Nov 26 14:14:21.281042 2018] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 3554] AH00163: Apache/2.4.37 (Debian) OpenSSL/1.1.1a configured -- resuming normal operations [Mon Nov 26 14:14:21.281526 2018] [core:notice] [pid 3554] AH00094: Command line: '/usr/sbin/apache2' -- Olaf van der Spek
Bug#914172: [debian-mysql] Bug#914172: mariadb-server-10.1: mariadb-server sec-update (10.1.37-0+deb9u1) uninstalls default-mysql-server, mysql-server, mariadb-server-10.1 & mariadb-client-10.1
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:45 AM Jeremy Davis wrote: > As of the (automated) installation of today's MariaDB server security update > (10.1.37-0+deb9u1) > all of our user's LAMP based appliances uninstalled mariadb-server (i.e. > default-mysql-server, > mysql-server, mariadb-server-10.1 & mariadb-client-10.1) and thus most of web > based software > stopped functioning. Ouch. IMO apt shouldn't be run in such a way that packages get removed automatically though.. > We're still not sure exactly what caused this, but would like to note the > issue. Updated dependencies perhaps, in particular: > * Add libconfig-inifiles-perl to mariadb-client-10.1 depends to fix mytop Note this is just a guess. Gr, Olaf
Bug#888095: [debian-mysql] Bug#888095: Bug#888095: Bug#888095:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > su 17. kesäk. 2018 klo 10.27 Pirate Praveen (prav...@debian.org) kirjoitti: >> >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:57:18 +0800 Andy Li wrote: >> > I'm sure you have been busy, but this issue has been there unfixed for >> > several months. >> > I would appreciate if you can spend a few minutes to answer our questions. >> > If you lack the time to maintain the package, would you let the Debian >> > MySQL Maintainers team temporally handle it? >> >> If it is team maintained, I don't think a team member needs to ask >> permission, and it could even be NMUed since it has been unfixed for >> long and blocking so many packages. > > If you want to help, please make a pull request on Salsa or even at > upstream. I would prefer nobody forces a substandard version of > MariaDB 10.3 into Debian because the cost of fixing it afterwards > becomes so high. Is there a To Do list? -- Olaf
Bug#892394: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#892394: boost1.63: build-depends on GCC 6
Dimitri John Ledkov: > boost1.65 has been rejected by ftp-masters, on copyright reasons. Hi Dimitri, Got a link? Not having Boost in Debian would be unfortunate. I'm sure there's a way to resolve this. Gr, -- Olaf
Bug#888095: [debian-mysql] Bug#888095: Bug#888095:
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > MariaDB 10.3 needs to be finalized and imported into Debian. After > that all the mess that are a fallout of a misfortunate upload of > mariadb-10.2 to Debian unstable will start to become resolved. Until > then we need to live with this, sorry. What's the status / ETA for 10.3 in Debian? Gr, -- Olaf
Bug#853008: mysql-server-5.7: purge could delete mariadb-server files with inadequate warning
Hi, > Anyone else have any good ideas on how to handle this? I do. The solution is quite simple: do not, ever, remove user data / databases. It makes everything so much simpler, both on the user side and on the dev side. No weird questions when installing, no databases gone by accident.. -- Olaf
Bug#862899: rsync: insufficient escaping/quoting of arguments
Hi, Any updates? -- Olaf
Bug#874367:
Same as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854382 but that one was only fixed in unstable, not stable.. -- Olaf
Bug#874367: awscli: 'AWSHTTPSConnection' object has no attribute 'ssl_context'
Dear Python team, Is there anything I can do to help fix this bug? Gr, -- Olaf
Bug#874367: awscli: 'AWSHTTPSConnection' object has no attribute 'ssl_context'
Package: awscli Version: 1.11.13-1 Severity: serious Justification: unkn Dear Maintainer, $ aws s3 ls 'AWSHTTPSConnection' object has no attribute 'ssl_context' Gr, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages awscli depends on: ii python3 3.5.3-1 ii python3-botocore1.4.70-1 ii python3-colorama0.3.7-1 ii python3-docutils0.13.1+dfsg-2 ii python3-rsa 3.4.2-1 ii python3-s3transfer 0.1.9-1 awscli recommends no packages. awscli suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
Bug#861913: mariadb-client-10.1: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/mytop', which is also in package mytop 1.9.1-4
2017-05-29 10:12 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý : > I am not sure about that. We still live in the strange dichotomy where > we consider that MySQL server might get installed from different > repository (or unstable) and the original "mytop" is meant to be used > with MySQL server (from Oracle). Is the one included with mariadb not fully compatible with the other one?
Bug#861913: mariadb-client-10.1: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/mytop', which is also in package mytop 1.9.1-4
Thanks! I was thinking, wouldn't it make sense to just update the original mytop package? 2017-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý : > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-mysql/mariadb-10.1.git/commit/?id=2a17c70476de768f1e166b65f4a1b3865ac9757f > > -- > Ondřej Surý > Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server > Knot Resolver (https://www.knot-resolver.cz/) – secure, privacy-aware, > fast DNS(SEC) resolver > Vše pro chleba (https://vseprochleba.cz) – Mouky ze mlýna a potřeby pro > pečení chleba všeho druhu > > On Mon, May 8, 2017, at 12:08, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> 2017-05-08 11:42 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý : >> > Definitely, I am just building the fixed version. I did a cleanup of >> > upstream files not being installed in the last bigger mariadb update, >> > and I was just not aware mytop was already packaged. Sorry for the >> > troubles. >> >> Shouldn't it also declare a Replaces? -- Olaf
Bug#861913: mariadb-client-10.1: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/mytop', which is also in package mytop 1.9.1-4
2017-05-08 11:42 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý : > Definitely, I am just building the fixed version. I did a cleanup of > upstream files not being installed in the last bigger mariadb update, > and I was just not aware mytop was already packaged. Sorry for the > troubles. Shouldn't it also declare a Replaces?
Bug#861913: mariadb-client-10.1: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/mytop', which is also in package mytop 1.9.1-4
Hi Ondřej, Shouldn't it conflict / replace the mytop pkg? 2017-05-08 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý : > Hi Olaf, > > mytop is part of MariaDB a version that fixes little bugs here and > there: > > +=item Michael "Monty" Widenius > + > +Fixed a couple of minor bugs that gave warnings on startup. > +Added support for MariaDB (show MariaDB at top and % done). > +Cut long server version names to display width. > +Made 'State' length dynamic.
Bug#843160: udev: Me Too
Package: udev Followup-For: Bug #843160 Dear Maintainer, I've got an unstable system (for dev/testing) in a VM running 686-pae and I'm affected as well.. What's the simplest way to recover? I don't seem to end up on a recovery shell. Gr, Olaf P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:LNXSYSTM: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00 E: DRIVER=button E: MODALIAS=acpi:LNXPWRBN: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00/input/input3 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00/input/input3 E: EV=3 E: ID_FOR_SEAT=input-acpi-LNXPWRBN_00 E: ID_INPUT=1 E: ID_INPUT_KEY=1 E: ID_PATH=acpi-LNXPWRBN:00 E: ID_PATH_TAG=acpi-LNXPWRBN_00 E: KEY=10 0 E: MODALIAS=input:b0019vp0001e-e0,1,k74,ramlsfw E: NAME="Power Button" E: PHYS="LNXPWRBN/button/input0" E: PRODUCT=19/0/1/0 E: PROP=0 E: SUBSYSTEM=input E: TAGS=:seat: E: USEC_INITIALIZED=60676 P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00/input/input3/event1 N: input/event1 E: DEVNAME=/dev/input/event1 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00/input/input3/event1 E: ID_INPUT=1 E: ID_INPUT_KEY=1 E: ID_PATH=acpi-LNXPWRBN:00 E: ID_PATH_TAG=acpi-LNXPWRBN_00 E: MAJOR=13 E: MINOR=65 E: SUBSYSTEM=input E: TAGS=:power-switch: E: USEC_INITIALIZED=5556 P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:LNXSYBUS: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/LNXCPU:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/LNXCPU:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:LNXCPU: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/LNXCPU:01 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/LNXCPU:01 E: MODALIAS=acpi:LNXCPU: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/LNXCPU:02 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/LNXCPU:02 E: MODALIAS=acpi:LNXCPU: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/LNXCPU:03 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/LNXCPU:03 E: MODALIAS=acpi:LNXCPU: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0A08:PNP0A03: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/INT3F0D:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/INT3F0D:00 E: ID_VENDOR_FROM_DATABASE=Interphase Corporation E: MODALIAS=acpi:INT3F0D:PNP0C02: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi E: USEC_INITIALIZED=30107 P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/PNP0103:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/PNP0103:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0103: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/PNP0C01:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/PNP0C01:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0C01: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/PNP0C01:01 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/PNP0C01:01 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0C01: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00 E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/NTN0530:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/NTN0530:00 E: ID_VENDOR_FROM_DATABASE=Nuvoton Technology Corporation E: MODALIAS=acpi:NTN0530: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi E: USEC_INITIALIZED=30167 P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0100:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0100:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0100: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0200:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0200:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0200: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0303:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0303:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0303:PNP030B: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0401:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0401:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0401: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0501:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0501:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0501: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0700:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0700:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0700: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0800:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0800:00 E: MODALIAS=acpi:PNP0800: E: SUBSYSTEM=acpi P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PNP0B00:00 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:00/PN
Bug#731104: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#731104: lighttpd: missing automake dependency
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > lighttpd currently fails to build when using pbuilder. This is due > to a missing automake build dependency. Isn't automake part of autotools-dev? There's a dep on autotools-dev -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682210: [debian-mysql] Bug#682210: CVE-2012-1735 CVE-2012-0540 CVE-2012-1757 CVE-2012-1756 CVE-2012-1734 CVE-2012-1689
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Maybe we can switch to a FLOSS-friendly fork like mariadb after Wheezy > release... Postgres might be a better alternative. -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682232: [debian-mysql] Bug#682232: mysql-server-5.5: Fails to upgrade squeeze -> wheezy, does not start
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > [FAIL] Starting MySQL database server: mysqld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > failed! > Indeed, starting manually fails as well: What do the logs (syslog etc) say? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#675304: [debian-mysql] Bug#675304: reassigning
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > However it is also clear that an application with an embedded MySQL server, > like amarok, should avoiding making use of system wide MySQL config files to > insulate itself not just to changes in the Debian packaging but also > changes that the DBA makes to the MySQL configuration. amarok seems to have > done this now. Sure, but why was it doing this? Is it the default behaviour of the embedded MySQL server? And just wondering: why is Amarok using MySQL instead of something like sqlite? -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#674122: [debian-mysql] Fwd: Re: Bug#674122: otrs2: fails to upgrade from squeeze: Can't create table 'otrs2.#sql-1712_71
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > Patrick, > Some ideas. Not sure how the application works so not sure which is > most liekly to be deoable. > > * There is a --default-storage-engine=type start up option. If you let the > standard mysql scripts manage the mysqld process that one might not work. > > * It should be possible to convert that option into an option entry in the > my.cnf file. You should also be able to own your own my.cnf fragment in say > /etc/mysql/conf.d/otrs2 . Both are unacceptable, aren't they? Packages should not set MySQL-side options like the defaulst storage engine. > * If you only need to enforce the default engine in upgrade scripts (or the > creation of tables is confined in some other way) then this SQL would do it: > > set default_storage_engine = 'MyISAM'; This looks to be the only simple option. > However that will only persist as long as that connection. > > * Again you can use this SQL: > > set global default_storage_engine = 'MyISAM'; Again, not acceptable, IMO/ Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#672928: [debian-mysql] libdbi-drivers FTBS against latest MySQL
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: >> Are you sure this is right? >> Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically? >> >> Olaf > > > Normally yes, but I am pretty sure that the patch would not be backwards > compatible. What patch, exactly? -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#672928: [debian-mysql] libdbi-drivers FTBS against latest MySQL
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > Thomas, > I attach a patch to enbale libdbi-drivers to build against the latest Are you sure this is right? Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#670636: [debian-mysql] Bug#670636: Multiple security issues in April security release
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > Moritz, > The Debian MySQL team is debating pushing mysql 5.5 into unstable > (including the latest upstream releases), transitioning the dependencies and > dropping mysql 5.1. As such you probably won't see any activity on mysql > 5.1 at all unless it becomes clear that this plan is unfeasible for some > reason. What's the cost of doing a new 5.1 release? Shouldn't be much trouble (I assume). Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#660206: [debian-mysql] Bug#660206: Bug#660206: This is a regression
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:59 PM, micah anderson wrote: > I agree. However, the reality is that the security upgrade brought in > unrelated changes to the security upgrade and caused unrelated software > to break. The problem is that Oracle does not release individual security updates. So Debian can't provide them (easily) either. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#627300: Why grave?
On 28-3-2012 14:41, Andreas Ulm wrote: IMO it's grave because a main functionality of mysql is that you can write your own my.cnf and run mysql with your user. But because of this bug you can't use mytop while running mysql as your user. At my company each developer has his/her own mysql daemon running with an own config and noone of them can use mytop due to this error. Sounds more like severity: important important: a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone. Due to using grave, mytop has been removed from testing and is now unusable by everyone... if it hasn't been installed already. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#627300: Why grave?
Hi, > Severity: grave Why grave? Mytop works fine for most users. I'd suggest to downgrade this bug. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613592: /sbin/fdisk: Can't create at sector 63
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Alexander Kurtz wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 18:24 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> So what's the advantage of c/sfdisk? > > Well, it's smaller, has fewer dependencies and is installed on almost > every system. And since most administrators are familiar with it and it > is more than sufficient for most of the common tasks, there is no reason > not to keep it... Fair enough. It's still bad that I had trouble resizing a partition. :p -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613592: /sbin/fdisk: Can't create at sector 63
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Alexander Kurtz
wrote:
>> Isn't it kind of silly to have so many tools that try to do the same thing?
>
> GNU parted has way more features than {c,s,}fdisk will probably ever
> have; the most popular being perhaps support for a lot of different
> partition layouts[1] including the future standard GPT. And it can
> actually resize partitions...
So what's the advantage of c/sfdisk?
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613592: /sbin/fdisk: Can't create at sector 63
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Alexander Kurtz wrote: > That's hardly a bug: True > * If you delete something, data loss is the expected outcome. True, but deleting and recreating was advised in a number of how to's. > * If you want to do advanced operations like resizing a partition, > use more advanced tools like parted. Isn't it kind of silly to have so many tools that try to do the same thing? > * The fact that fdisk doesn't let you start partitions before > sector 2048 is a feature, not a bug ;-). This is used to ensure > the correct alignment of partitions on modern hard drives with a > (physical) sector size of more than 512 bytes. > * However, fdisk will still let you create partitions that start > at sector 63, if you are in DOS-compatible mode, i.e. don't > specify -c as parameter. It wasn't clear to me at all what DOS-compatibility meant, so I had no idea that'd allow me to create a partition at sector 63. Greetings, Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613589: /sbin/cfdisk: Bad Table error after fresh Squeeze install
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:36:28AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors >> wrote: >> > Olaf van der Spek writes: >> >> In that case it should be forwarded upstream. >> > >> > Sure, but I couldn't find the upstream BTS. I was just adding extra info >> > to the bug report since I hit the same bug. >> >> Let's CC the author of the patch. >> >> Hi Karel, >> >> We're hitting a check you added to this utility. We think it's a bug. >> Could you have a look at it? >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613589 > > Fixed by commit 73356e0553bd9ac00f556891a4798064c0ee6849 (v2.19). Thanks. Do you know where the upstream bug tracker can be found? -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613589: /sbin/cfdisk: Bad Table error after fresh Squeeze install
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Olaf van der Spek writes: >> In that case it should be forwarded upstream. > > Sure, but I couldn't find the upstream BTS. I was just adding extra info > to the bug report since I hit the same bug. Let's CC the author of the patch. Hi Karel, We're hitting a check you added to this utility. We think it's a bug. Could you have a look at it? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613589 -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613589: /sbin/cfdisk: Bad Table error after fresh Squeeze install
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
wrote:
> if (last >= total_size) {
> *errmsg = _("Partition ends in the final partial cylinder");
> return -1;
> }
>
> and the check was added in
>
> commit 7eda085c41faa3445b4b168ce78ab18dab87d98a
> Author: Karel Zak
> Date: Thu Dec 7 00:25:39 2006 +0100
>
> Imported from util-linux-2.9v tarball.
>
>
> but I don't really know what to do about this. Maybe the error message
In that case it should be forwarded upstream.
--
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#614044: mysql-5.1-server: fails to build from source
| [Changing misc_word_char(X) into something which is still valid:] Does it work if you don't change anything? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#614716: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#614716: Bug#614716: lighttpd: leaves dangling alternatives on upgrade
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >> What's the real problem of a dangling alternative? > > I'm not sure exactly which section (probably 6.8) but this is or should > be a policy violation. Alternatives aren't mentioned in 6.8. -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#614716: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#614716: lighttpd: leaves dangling alternatives on upgrade
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > lighttpd split out the spawn-fcgi binary and manual page to spawn-fcgi > but does not handle removal of the alternatives. As a result anyone Would be nice if this was taken care of automatically (by dh, dpkg or something else). > upgrading from lenny to squeeze who has recommends turned off will have > dangling alternatives. What's the real problem of a dangling alternative? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613592: /sbin/fdisk: Can't create at sector 63
Package: util-linux Version: 2.17.2-9 Severity: serious File: /sbin/fdisk Justification: Near Data Loss Hi, I wanted to resize a partition, so I deleted it and recreated it (is there no better way?). After this, the system no longer booted... Turns out the old partition started at sector 63 and the new partition can't start before sector 2048. Not so good. Greetings, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'unstable'), (1, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages util-linux depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.38 Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg1.15.8.10Debian package management system ii initscripts 2.88dsf-13.1 scripts for initializing and shutt ii install-info4.13a.dfsg.1-6 Manage installed documentation in ii libblkid1 2.17.2-9 block device id library ii libc6 2.11.2-11Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libncurses5 5.7+20100313-5 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libselinux1 2.0.96-1 SELinux runtime shared libraries ii libslang2 2.2.2-4 The S-Lang programming library - r ii libuuid12.17.2-9 Universally Unique ID library ii lsb-base3.2-27 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii tzdata 2011a-1 time zone and daylight-saving time ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime util-linux recommends no packages. Versions of packages util-linux suggests: ii console-tools1:0.2.3dbs-69.1 Linux console and font utilities pn dosfstools (no description available) pn util-linux-locales (no description available) -- debconf information: util-linux/noauto-with-nonzero-passnum: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613589: /sbin/cfdisk: Bad Table error after fresh Squeeze install
Package: util-linux Version: 2.17.2-9 Severity: serious File: /sbin/cfdisk Justification: Doesn't start Hi, Just installed Squeeze. cfdisk refuses to start: FATAL ERROR: Bad primary partition 1: Partition ends in the final partial cylinder fdisk says: Disk /dev/sda: 17.2 GB, 17179869184 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2088 cylinders, total 33554432 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x10a0 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 *20483208806316043008 83 Linux /dev/sda23209011033552383 7311375 Extended /dev/sda53209011233552383 731136 82 Linux swap / Solaris Disk /dev/sdb: 17.2 GB, 17179869184 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2088 cylinders, total 33554432 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0005972d Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb120483354371916770836 83 Linux Greetings, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'unstable'), (1, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages util-linux depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.38 Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg1.15.8.10Debian package management system ii initscripts 2.88dsf-13.1 scripts for initializing and shutt ii install-info4.13a.dfsg.1-6 Manage installed documentation in ii libblkid1 2.17.2-9 block device id library ii libc6 2.11.2-11Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libncurses5 5.7+20100313-5 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libselinux1 2.0.96-1 SELinux runtime shared libraries ii libslang2 2.2.2-4 The S-Lang programming library - r ii libuuid12.17.2-9 Universally Unique ID library ii lsb-base3.2-27 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii tzdata 2011a-1 time zone and daylight-saving time ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime util-linux recommends no packages. Versions of packages util-linux suggests: ii console-tools1:0.2.3dbs-69.1 Linux console and font utilities pn dosfstools (no description available) pn util-linux-locales (no description available) -- debconf information: util-linux/noauto-with-nonzero-passnum: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#606543: clamav-freshclam: affected by privilege escalation vulnerability in logrotate
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: >> These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely >> is affected by the vulnerability: >> >> --- >> chmod 640 $FRESHCLAMLOGFILE >> chown "$dbowner":adm $FRESHCLAMLOGFILE >> --- >> > > What is wrong about these two lines? And even from ... It suggests the daemon itself creates the file. Copytruncate suggests logrotate also creates the file. Logrotate runs as root, so if the attacker (running as daemon user) creates the symlink, logrotate might overwrite an arbitrary file (I guess). Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 08/26/2010 01:39 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >>> The upload itself can probably be arranged one way or the other. Of more >>> immediate concern would be if the release team would accept such an upload >>> into squeeze - if not it's probably better to also not put it into sid. >> >> Hi release team, >> >> The Lighttpd version in testing depends on ipv6only = true. Since this >> was changed to ipv6only = false, the daemon fails to start. >> 1.4.27/1.4.28 fixes this, along with a big number of other things. >> Could this be uploaded to unstable and would it be accepted into Squeeze? >> > > Yes. > Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact debian-release > if update is needed) Is a separate request necessary to unblock? If so, please unblock lighttpd. Greetings, Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595321: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#595321: lighttpd: daemon fails to start
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Will Boyd wrote: > I am at something of a loss to diagnose or debug this, since the "FamErrlist" > message is apparently harmless and no other information is forthcoming. Try strace -s 80 lighttpd -D -f /etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf Does cat /var/log/lighttpd/error.log say something? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: lighttpd: can't bind to port: :: 80 Address already in use
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > # killall apache2 > # dpkg --configure -a > Setting up lighttpd (1.4.28-1) ... > Starting web server: lighttpd. > # echo $? > 0 > > I had uninstalled but not purged apache and clearly I do not know > how to use netstat. :( You're kidding me, right? :p I guess uninstalling didn't succeed either. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: lighttpd: can't bind to port: :: 80 Address already in use
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > net.ipv6.bindv6only = 1 > > Wait, wasn't that changed back in netbase? Well, yes, for _new_ > installs, but this is a conffile so it keeps the existing value > for existing installations. That sucks, IMO it should've been set to 0 before the file being removed. > My own analysis is the same as before: relying on anything about > the bindv6only setting is just asking for trouble. lighttpd needs to > set or clear the IPV6_V6ONLY option itself for ipv6 sockets, or > autoconfigure correctly at runtime. This bug was about Lighttpd relying on v6only = 1. So in your case it should've worked. Lighttpd actually sets v6only = 1 itself (AFAIK) now. Could you try with a clean conf and post a strace of the error? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > That are not your "changes". I thought Mehdi wanted the contents. > If you want, that your new build gets uploaded to Debian by a sponsor, you > have to build and check your package+changes+diff and after that upload the > whole to any space with the .dsc etc. A sponsor should not be necessary, as Lighttpd has three uploaders: Krzysztof Krzyżaniak (eloy) (u), Torsten Marek (u), Pierre Habouzit (u) Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 08/29/2010 05:59 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> No upload yet? >> >> Waiting on someone with upload rights. >> > > Do you have a .dsc ready somewhere? I do have a .dsc, but I'm not sure it's ready. Changelog probably needs to be fixed up. Format: 3.0 (quilt) Source: lighttpd Binary: lighttpd, lighttpd-doc, lighttpd-mod-mysql-vhost, lighttpd-mod-trigger-b4-dl, lighttpd-mod-cml, lighttpd-mod-magnet, lighttpd-mod-webdav Architecture: any Version: 1.4.28-1 Maintainer: Debian lighttpd maintainers Uploaders: Krzysztof Krzyżaniak (eloy) , Torsten Marek , Pierre Habouzit Homepage: http://www.lighttpd.net Standards-Version: 3.9.1.0 Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-lighttpd/lighttpd/trunk Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7), mime-support, libssl-dev, zlib1g-dev, libbz2-dev, libattr1-dev, libpcre3-dev, libmysqlclient-dev, libfam-dev, libldap2-dev, libfcgi-dev, libgdbm-dev, libmemcache-dev, liblua5.1-0-dev, pkg-config, uuid-dev, libsqlite3-dev, libxml2-dev, libkrb5-dev, perl Checksums-Sha1: b0febca9df85138ce5c7c0aeb0fe5e39cc24800f 808347 lighttpd_1.4.28.orig.tar.gz ff920c41ac3bf90e5e500966c3c8e14f4e278e5b 24697 lighttpd_1.4.28-1.debian.tar.gz Checksums-Sha256: af15f92a9e57fc2e1d001c19572af80d284be4230784bb3ef7764af7ae2c4801 808347 lighttpd_1.4.28.orig.tar.gz e06ec7af87c1312a10870f35fc690d8bcb99cebe8cc73aa31f56b4990885ac5e 24697 lighttpd_1.4.28-1.debian.tar.gz Files: 717940522d7bc6f402c2f7f2b97cc4ca 808347 lighttpd_1.4.28.orig.tar.gz 3e5f7262eb36a5c93d10161db8baff83 24697 lighttpd_1.4.28-1.debian.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > No upload yet? Waiting on someone with upload rights. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default
> The upload itself can probably be arranged one way or the other. Of more > immediate concern would be if the release team would accept such an upload > into squeeze - if not it's probably better to also not put it into sid. Hi release team, The Lighttpd version in testing depends on ipv6only = true. Since this was changed to ipv6only = false, the daemon fails to start. 1.4.27/1.4.28 fixes this, along with a big number of other things. Could this be uploaded to unstable and would it be accepted into Squeeze? Greetings, Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564556: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#564556: Bug#564556: lighttpd still unusable by default
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >>> SVN contains a fixed version, 1.4.27. It can be uploaded, but it seems >>> Eloy isn't around to do that. >> >> The upload itself can probably be arranged one way or the other. Of more >> immediate concern would be if the release team would accept such an upload >> into squeeze - if not it's probably better to also not put it into sid. How about uploading it to experimental while we're waiting for an answer from the release team? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#582937: xdebug doesn't show local variables with PHP 5.3
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Martin Meredith wrote: > On 16/06/10 16:54, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> Given that 2.1.0rc1 has been released, please package it. >> > An RC is not a stable release, I know, but it's better than the current version. > I'll consult with Derick on this one Great. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#582937: xdebug doesn't show local variables with PHP 5.3
Given that 2.1.0rc1 has been released, please package it. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#582937: xdebug doesn't show local variables with PHP 5.3
Package: php5-xdebug Version: 2.0.5-1+b1 Severity: grave Hi, Does the packaged version of xdebug support 5.3 at all? Mine just crashed and upstream appears to say xdebug >= 2.1 is required for 5.3. Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages php5-xdebug depends on: ii libc6 2.11.1-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii php5-cgi [phpapi-20090626+lfs 5.3.2-1server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php5-cli [phpapi-20090626+lfs 5.3.2-1command-line interpreter for the p ii ucf 3.0025 Update Configuration File: preserv php5-xdebug recommends no packages. php5-xdebug suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#572031: [pkg-lighttpd] Bug#572031: closed by John Ham (Bug#572031: fixed in lighttpd 1.4.26-1.1)
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi > > Dne Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:39:17 + > ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) napsal(a): > >> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report >> which was filed against the lighttpd package: >> >> #572031: lighttpd: fails to start with current OpenSSL >> >> It has been closed by John Ham . >> >> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. >> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a >> better one in a separate message then please contact John Ham >> by >> replying to this email. > > It looks like this NMU has been forgotten and 1.4.26-2 reintroduces > this issue. Oops, you're right... Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#577009: php5-cgi: php-cgi uses 500+ mb memory
Package: php5-cgi Version: 5.3.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: Memory leaks might affect the entire system Hi, I'm not sure why php is using so much memory. The system has 8 gb real and 4 gb swap and the OOM killer has been invoked several times already. /etc/php5/cgi/php.ini: memory_limit = 128M top: 14092 www-data 20 0 589m 466m 17m S3 5.8 9:36.17 php-cgi 14094 www-data 20 0 571m 449m 17m S3 5.6 9:58.46 php-cgi 14091 www-data 20 0 569m 446m 17m S 11 5.6 10:37.29 php-cgi 15371 www-data 20 0 210m 86m 16m S5 1.1 2:15.79 php-cgi $ dpkg -l|grep php5 ii php5-cgi5.3.1-5 server-side, HTML-embedded scripting language (CGI binary) ii php5-cli5.3.1-5 command-line interpreter for the php5 scripting language ii php5-common 5.3.1-5 Common files for packages built from the php5 source ii php5-gd 5.3.1-5 GD module for php5 ii php5-mcrypt 5.3.1-5 MCrypt module for php5 ii php5-mysql 5.3.1-5 MySQL module for php5 ii php5-suhosin0.9.29-1+b1 advanced protection module for php5 ii php5-xcache 1.3.0-6 Fast, stable PHP opcode cacher Greetings, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages php5-cgi depends on: ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.5-4 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.10.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcomerr2 1.41.11-1 common error description library ii libdb4.8 4.8.26-1 Berkeley v4.8 Database Libraries [ ii libgssapi-krb5-2 1.8+dfsg~alpha1-7 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - k ii libk5crypto3 1.8+dfsg~alpha1-7 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - C ii libkrb5-3 1.8+dfsg~alpha1-7 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libmagic1 5.04-1File type determination library us ii libpcre3 7.8-3 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libssl0.9.80.9.8n-1 SSL shared libraries ii libxml22.7.7.dfsg-1 GNOME XML library ii mime-support 3.48-1MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap ii php5-common5.3.1-5 Common files for packages built fr ii tzdata 2010f-2 time zone and daylight-saving time ii ucf3.0025Update Configuration File: preserv ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime php5-cgi recommends no packages. Versions of packages php5-cgi suggests: pn php-pear (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#571255: (no subject)
Can't udev depend on the newer kernel required so it gets installed automatically? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#574283: samba: Doesn't bind to IPv4
Package: samba Version: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: IPv4 is kinda required Hi, Samba binds only to IPv6 and not to IPv4. I think this breaks stuff. Greetings, Olaf $ sudo netstat -nlp Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1284/sshd tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:250.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1544/exim4 tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:44738 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 785/rpc.statd tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:3306 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1197/mysqld tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 774/portmap tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1051/lighttpd tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::*LISTEN 1284/sshd tcp6 0 0 ::1:25 :::*LISTEN 1544/exim4 tcp6 0 0 :::445 :::*LISTEN 942/smbd tcp6 0 0 :::139 :::*LISTEN 942/smbd tcp6 0 0 :::80 :::*LISTEN 1051/lighttpd udp0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:* 774/portmap udp0 0 0.0.0.0:44793 0.0.0.0:* 785/rpc.statd udp0 0 0.0.0.0:961 0.0.0.0:* 785/rpc.statd udp0 0 0.0.0.0:68 0.0.0.0:* 1005/dhclient3 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages samba depends on: ii adduser3.112 add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.28Debian configuration management sy ii libacl12.2.49-2 Access control list shared library ii libattr1 1:2.4.44-1Extended attribute shared library ii libc6 2.10.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcap21:2.17-2 support for getting/setting POSIX. ii libcomerr2 1.41.10-1 common error description library ii libcups2 1.4.2-4 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libgnutls262.8.5-2 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libgssapi-krb5-2 1.8+dfsg~alpha1-7 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - k ii libk5crypto3 1.8+dfsg~alpha1-7 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - C ii libkrb5-3 1.8+dfsg~alpha1-7 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap-2.4-2 2.4.17-2.1OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam-modules 1.1.1-2 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 1.1.1-2 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpopt0 1.15-1lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libtalloc2 2.0.1-1 hierarchical pool based memory all ii libwbclient0 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1Samba winbind client library ii lsb-base 3.2-23Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii procps 1:3.2.8-8 /proc file system utilities ii samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1common files used by both the Samb ii update-inetd 4.36 inetd configuration file updater ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime Versions of packages samba recommends: ii logrotate 3.7.8-4Log rotation utility Versions of packages samba suggests: pn ctdb (no description available) pn ldb-tools (no description available) pn openbsd-inetd | inet-superser (no description available) pn smbldap-tools (no description available) -- debconf information: samba/run_mode: daemons samba/generate_smbpasswd: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568735: lighttpd: Security Announce: slow request DoS/OOM attack
Package: lighttpd Version: 1.4.25-1 Severity: critical Hi, http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-1987 doesn't appear to be fixed in unstable yet. Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'unstable'), (1, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages lighttpd depends on: ii libattr1 1:2.4.43-2Extended attribute shared library ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.5-1 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.7-18lenny2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfam02.7.0-13.3+lenny1 Client library to control the FAM ii libldap-2.4-2 2.4.11-1+lenny1 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpcre3 7.8-2+b1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libssl0.9.80.9.8k-7 SSL shared libraries ii libterm-readline-perl- 1.0302-1 Perl implementation of Readline li ii lsb-base 3.2-20Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii mime-support 3.44-1MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime Versions of packages lighttpd recommends: ii spawn-fcgi1.6.2-3A fastcgi process spawner Versions of packages lighttpd suggests: ii apache2-utils 2.2.9-10+lenny6 utility programs for webservers ii openssl 0.9.8g-15+lenny6 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a pn rrdtool(no description available) -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#545751: (no subject)
Looks like a dupe of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539479 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#535044: Still vulnerable?
Hi, I installed a new server with Debian Lenny last week. phpMyAdmin was working, now it's not. Is pMA still vulnerable? /var/lib/phpmyadmin# ls -l total 8 -rw-r- 1 root www-data 60 2009-09-15 19:20 blowfish_secret.inc.php -rw-rw 1 root www-data 635 2009-09-20 18:00 config.inc.php # dpkg -l|grep phpmyadmin ii phpmyadmin 4:2.11.8.1-5+lenny1 # cat config.inc.php * Generated by: phpMyAdmin 2.11.8.1deb5+lenny1 setup script by Michal Cihar * Version: $Id: setup.php 11423 2008-07-24 17:26:05Z lem9 $ * Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:00:39 GMT */ /* Servers configuration */ $i = 0; /* Server (config:root) [1] */ $i++; $cfg['Servers'][$i]['host___phpinfo_'] = 'localhost'; $cfg['Servers'][$i]['extension'] = 'mysqli'; $cfg['Servers'][$i]['connect_type'] = 'tcp'; $cfg['Servers'][$i]['compress'] = false; $cfg['Servers'][$i]['auth_type'] = 'config'; $cfg['Servers'][$i]['user'] = 'root'; /* End of servers configuration */ ?> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#538449: (no subject)
Your title and body don't seem consistent... Should it be with or without 16? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#526222: >= 4.6
Hi, Just wondering, why doesn't it depend on like libdb-dev >= 4.6? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536668: lighttpd: Static HTML file results in Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Package: lighttpd Version: 1.4.23-2 Severity: normal Hi, GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: 192.168.1.7 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Keep-Alive: 300 Connection: keep-alive Cache-Control: max-age=0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: application/octet-stream Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 3585 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:43:33 GMT Server: lighttpd/1.4.23 Greetings, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages lighttpd depends on: ii libattr1 1:2.4.43-3Extended attribute shared library ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.5-3 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.9-19GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfam02.7.0-14 Client library to control the FAM ii libldap-2.4-2 2.4.15-1.1OpenLDAP libraries ii libpcre3 7.8-2+b1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libssl0.9.80.9.8k-3 SSL shared libraries ii libterm-readline-perl- 1.0302-1 Perl implementation of Readline li ii lsb-base 3.2-22Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii mime-support 3.46-1MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14 compression library - runtime Versions of packages lighttpd recommends: pn spawn-fcgi (no description available) Versions of packages lighttpd suggests: pn apache2-utils (no description available) ii openssl 0.9.8k-3 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a pn rrdtool(no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#483822: -
Package: molly-guard Followup-For: Bug #483822 And it appears to be fixed in testing: debian:~# reboot W: molly-guard: SSH session detected! Please type in hostname of the machine to reboot: Good thing I asked; I won't reboot debian ... W: aborting reboot due to 30-query-hostname exiting with code 1. debian:~# su - olaf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo reboot W: molly-guard: SSH session detected! Please type in hostname of the machine to reboot: Good thing I asked; I won't reboot debian ... W: aborting reboot due to 30-query-hostname exiting with code 1. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages molly-guard depends on: ii procps 1:3.2.7-8 /proc file system utilities ii sysvinit 2.86.ds1-59 System-V-like init utilities molly-guard recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#483822: -
Package: molly-guard Version: 0.2.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #483822 Hi, On a fresh minimal Debian system, via SSH: debian:~# reboot molly-guard: SSH session detected! Please type in hostname of the machine to reboot: Good thing I asked; I won't reboot debian ... debian:~# su - olaf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo reboot Broadcast message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (pts/0) (Wed Jun 18 15:15:30 2008): The system is going down for reboot NOW! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages molly-guard depends on: ii sysvinit 2.86.ds1-38 System-V-like init utilities molly-guard recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#483822: (no subject)
martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.06.17.1109 +0200]: So this won't be fixed in stable? No. Doesn't that make this package fairly useless in stable? It does not, for me. Your usage scenario is quite special, it seems. You also didn't provide any useful information, such as traces or more exact information on why it fails to guard the shutdown. Note that I'm not the original submitter. For me, it didn't guard a reboot done via SSH, while I assumed it should guard this. Is it supposed to guard the reboot in this scenario (on Etch)? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#483822: (no subject)
So this won't be fixed in stable? Doesn't that make this package fairly useless in stable? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#477668: (no subject)
> since mysql doesn't bother to fix this, maybe debian will, or at least debian could not put affected mysql servers into stable So Lenny should ship MySQL 4.1? Or not ship MySQL at all? That doesn't seem like an improvement over the current situation, as many, many users are using MySQL and removing MySQL from stable will not help them. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#466663: Stable?
Hi, What about stable? Greetings, Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#451889: netselect-apt: Etch is affected
Package: netselect-apt Version: 0.3.ds1-10 Followup-For: Bug #451889 Hi, Etch is affected. It would be nice to get this fixed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages netselect-apt depends on: ii netselect 0.3.ds1-10 Choose the fastest server automati ii wget 1.10.2-2 retrieves files from the web netselect-apt recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#434546: closed by Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#434546: fixed in lighttpd 1.4.16-1)
On 7/27/07, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Urgency: low Shouldn't updates containing security fixes be uploaded with a high(er) urgency? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#434546: lighttpd: 1.4.16 has been released and contains security fixes
Package: lighttpd Version: 1.4.15-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, Lighttpd 1.4.16 has been released and contains security fixes, see http://www.lighttpd.net/2007/7/24/1-4-16-let-s-ship-it -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages lighttpd depends on: ii libattr12.4.32-1 Extended attribute shared library ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.3-6 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libldap22.1.30-13.3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpcre36.7-1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8c-4 SSL shared libraries ii lsb-base3.1-23.1 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii mime-support3.39-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap ii perl5.8.8-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages lighttpd recommends: ii php5-cgi 5.2.0-8+etch7 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#433962: libc6-dev: error including
This is not a bug, it is because you have to #include now that we used the headers officially exported by the linux tree, and not linux-kernel-headers anymore. Why doesn't the header include that file itself if it's always needed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#433806: (no subject)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=428368 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#426330: sqwebmail: Reproduced
On 6/17/07, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: > Package: sqwebmail > Version: 0.53.3-5 > Followup-For: Bug #426330 > > Hi, > > I reproduced this on a fresh Etch install, see below. > However, I think this is a bug in Apache, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=415698 > Yes, I agree with you. So why don't you reassign the report to Apache? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#426330: sqwebmail: Reproduced
Package: sqwebmail Version: 0.53.3-5 Followup-For: Bug #426330 Hi, I reproduced this on a fresh Etch install, see below. However, I think this is a bug in Apache, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=415698 # ls -l /usr/lib/cgi-bin ls: /usr/lib/cgi-bin: No such file or directory # apt-get install sqwebmail Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Suggested packages: courier-doc courier-pcp The following NEW packages will be installed: sqwebmail 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Need to get 805kB of archives. After unpacking 2384kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://ftp.surfnet.nl etch/main sqwebmail 0.53.3-5 [805kB] Fetched 805kB in 1s (680kB/s) Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package sqwebmail. (Reading database ... 14248 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking sqwebmail (from .../sqwebmail_0.53.3-5_i386.deb) ... Setting up sqwebmail (0.53.3-5) ... cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/lib/cgi-bin/sqwebmail': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing sqwebmail (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: sqwebmail E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-486 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages sqwebmail depends on: ii apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd] 2.2.3-4 Traditional model for Apache HTTPD ii courier-authlib 0.58-4 Courier authentication library ii courier-base0.53.3-5 Courier Mail Server - Base system ii courier-maildrop0.53.3-5 Courier Mail Server - Mail deliver ii cron3.0pl1-100 management of regular background p ii exim4-daemon-heavy [mail-tr 4.63-17 exim MTA (v4) daemon with extended ii expect 5.43.0-8 A program that can automate intera ii iamerican [ispell-dictionar 3.1.20.0-4.3 An American English dictionary for ii ispell 3.1.20.0-4.3 International Ispell (an interacti ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfam0 2.7.0-12 Client library to control the FAM ii libgdbm31.8.3-3 GNU dbm database routines (runtime ii libldap22.1.30-13.3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpcre36.7-1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi sqwebmail recommends no packages. -- debconf information: sqwebmail/dictionary: default sqwebmail/install-www-backup: symlink sqwebmail/install-www: symlink sqwebmail/calendarmode: local -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#422254: lighttpd: When?
Package: lighttpd Followup-For: Bug #422254 Hi, This bug doesn't look harmless. What is the reason it hasn't been fixed yet? Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages lighttpd depends on: ii libattr11:2.4.32-1.1 Extended attribute shared library ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.3-7 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.5-9+b1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libldap22.1.30-13.4 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpcre36.7-1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8e-5 SSL shared libraries ii lsb-base3.1-23.1 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii mime-support3.39-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap ii perl5.8.8-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-15 compression library - runtime Versions of packages lighttpd recommends: ii php5-cgi 5.2.2-2server-side, HTML-embedded scripti -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#418672: (no subject)
> i think it's fairly common knowledge that this is to be expected when installing mysql, as you will find this to be the case for every other distribution of unix/linux that includes mysql. Unfortunately, yes. It's also upstreams fault. But why can't Debian do better? A apt-get install mysql-server after a default Debian Etch install does not ask for a password. If that's due to the priority, the priority of the question should be raised. Although I'll say again that I'd prefer an auto generated random password that the install script stores somewhere securely. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#418672: mysql-server-5.0: Creates root accounts without password on upgrade
Hi,
Cc: Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
I didn't receive your mail. :(
mysql -e 'update mysql.user set password=PASSWORD("foo") where user="root";
flush privileges;'
mysql -pfoo -e 'delete from mysql.user where user="root" and host="copelandia";
flush privileges;'
That's not what I did.
mysql> delete from mysql.user where host = 'debian';
mysql> update mysql.user set host = '%', password = password('1234')
where user = 'root';
mysql> flush privileges;
In particular, you didn't change host to %.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#418672: mysql-server-5.0: Creates root accounts without password on upgrade
Package: mysql-server-5.0 Version: 5.0.38-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Hi, I pressed Enter when it asked for a new password for root (root already had a password). Three rows were inserted into mysql.user: (0x6c6f63616c686f7374, 0x726f6f74, '', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', '', '', '', '', 0, 0, 0, 0), (0x632e787769732e6e6574, 0x726f6f74, '', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', '', '', '', '', 0, 0, 0, 0), (0x3132372e302e302e31, 0x726f6f74, '', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', 'Y', '', '', '', '', 0, 0, 0, 0); One for 127.0.0.1, one for localhost and one for 'hostname'. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mysql -u root -p Enter password: ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password: NO) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following packages will be upgraded: mysql-server-5.0 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/25.4MB of archives. After unpacking 287kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 32257 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace mysql-server-5.0 5.0.36-1 (using .../mysql-server-5.0_5.0.38-1_i386.deb) ... Stopping MySQL database server: mysqld. Stopping MySQL database server: mysqld. Unpacking replacement mysql-server-5.0 ... Setting up mysql-server-5.0 (5.0.38-1) ... Stopping MySQL database server: mysqld. Starting MySQL database server: mysqld. Checking for corrupt, not cleanly closed and upgrade needing tables.. Configuring mysql-server-5.0 It is highly recommended that you set a password for the MySQL administrative "root" user. If you do not provide a password no changes will be made to the account. New password for MySQL "root" user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mysql -u root -p Enter password: Reading table information for completion of table and column names You can turn off this feature to get a quicker startup with -A Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 10 Server version: 5.0.38-Debian_1-log Debian etch distribution Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer. mysql> -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages mysql-server-5.0 depends on: ii adduser 3.102Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.13 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdbi-perl 1.53-1 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-21 GCC support library ii libmysqlclient15off 5.0.38-1 mysql database client library ii libncurses5 5.5-5Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline55.2-2GNU readline and history libraries ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-21 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwrap07.6.dbs-13 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii lsb-base3.1-23.1 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii mysql-client-5.05.0.38-1 mysql database client binaries ii mysql-common5.0.38-1 mysql database common files (e.g. ii passwd 1:4.0.18.1-7 change and administer password and ii perl5.8.8-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii psmisc 22.3-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages mysql-server-5.0 recommends: ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent -- debconf information: mysql-server-5.0/really_downgrade: false * mysql-server-5.0/need_sarge_compat: false mysql-server-5.0/start_on_boot: true mysql-server/error_setting_password: mysql-server-5.0/mysql_update_hints1: mysql-server-5.0/nis_warning: mysql-server-5.0/postrm_remove_databases: false mysql-server-5.0/need_sarge_compat_done: true mysql-server-5.0/no_upgrade_with_isam_tables: * mysql-server-5.0/mysql_install_db_notes: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391864: Removing apache2-common fails: API module structure `actions_module' in file /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
Hi, I'm still getting the DSO error although the bug is supposed to be fixed. Is there something trivial I missed (again)? Greetings, Olaf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get update Get:1 http://ftp.debian.nl testing Release.gpg [189B] Get:2 http://ftp.debian.nl unstable Release.gpg [189B] Get:3 http://ftp.debian.nl experimental Release.gpg [189B] Get:4 http://ftp.surfnet.nl testing Release.gpg [189B] Hit http://ftp.debian.nl testing Release Hit http://ftp.debian.nl unstable Release Hit http://ftp.debian.nl experimental Release Get:5 http://ftp.surfnet.nl unstable Release.gpg [189B] Hit http://ftp.debian.nl testing/main Packages/DiffIndex Get:6 http://ftp.surfnet.nl experimental Release.gpg [189B] Hit http://ftp.surfnet.nl testing Release Get:7 http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release.gpg [189B] Hit http://ftp.debian.nl testing/main Sources/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.debian.nl unstable/main Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.surfnet.nl unstable Release Hit http://ftp.surfnet.nl experimental Release Hit http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release Hit http://ftp.debian.nl experimental/main Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.surfnet.nl testing/main Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.surfnet.nl unstable/main Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.surfnet.nl unstable/main Sources/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.surfnet.nl experimental/main Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages Hit http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages Fetched 7B in 6s (1B/s) Reading package lists... Done [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: apache2-mpm-prefork: Depends: apache2.2-common (= 2.2.3-1) but it is not installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get -f -V install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: apache2-mpm-prefork (2.2.3-2) apache2.2-common (2.2.3-2) The following packages will be REMOVED: apache2-common (2.0.55-4.2) The following NEW packages will be installed: apache2.2-common (2.2.3-2) The following packages will be upgraded: apache2-mpm-prefork (2.2.3-1 => 2.2.3-2) 1 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 56 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/1333kB of archives. After unpacking 389kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 41594 files and directories currently installed.) Removing apache2-common ... Stopping apache 2.0 web server...apache2: Syntax error on line 116 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/actions.load: API module structure `actions_module' in file /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO? failed! invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action "stop" failed. dpkg: error processing apache2-common (--remove): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: apache2-common E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# -- Olaf van der Spek http://xccu.sf.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386661: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#386661: sysv-rc: Quick way out: exim4 -> exim?
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Olaf van der Spek] The quick way out fix doesn't appear to be safe. :( Yes. Terribly sorry I did not discover its problem with removed but not purged packages before uploading it. This script is safer: for p in `dpkg -S /etc/init.d/*|cut -d: -f1|sort -u`; do if dpkg --get-selections $p | grep -qw install ; then echo reinstalling $p apt-get --reinstall install $p fi done Isn't it possible to just run the postinst scripts of these packages again? > Bcc: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Just wondering, isn't Bcc supposed to be invisible? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#375088: acknowledged by developer (Fixed)
Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:22 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Are you sure? Yes: It worked for me too today. But not yesterday. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#375088: acknowledged by developer (Fixed)
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Are you sure? $ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-image-2.6-686: Depends: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 (= 2.6.16-14) but 2.6.16-15 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#375088: linux-image-2.6-686 has unmet dependencies
Package: linux-image-2.6-686 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, $ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-image-2.6-686: Depends: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 (= 2.6.16-14) but 2.6.16-15 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374777: closed by Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#374777: ntp-server: init scripts fails on upgrade and upgrade fails)
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: So, it's the version 8.2 that failed to stop at this point. dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... Stopping NTP server: ntpdinvoke-rc.d: initscript ntp-server, action "stop" failed. This is the new version of the prerm script, but not the new version of the init.d script. So I still believe this is fixed in 1:4.2.0a+stable-9, so I'm closing this. If you have any problems, or think this needs fixing, feel free to ask. So how should one fix this situation? apt-get dist-upgrade doesn't fix it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374777: ntp-server: init scripts fails on upgrade and upgrade fails
Package: ntp-server Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, The new version seems to have an issue with the init script too, although the previous bugs have been closed. $ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following packages will be upgraded: ntp-server 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/34.2kB of archives. After unpacking 73.7kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 43116 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace ntp-server 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2 (using .../ntp-server_1%3a4.2.0a+stable-9_i386.deb) ... Stopping NTP server: ntpdinvoke-rc.d: initscript ntp-server, action "stop" failed. dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... Stopping NTP server: ntpdinvoke-rc.d: initscript ntp-server, action "stop" failed. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ntp-server_1%3a4.2.0a+stable-9_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/ntp-server_1%3a4.2.0a+stable-9_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages ntp-server depends on: ii ntp1:4.2.0a+stable-9 Network Time Protocol: network uti ii ntp-simple 1:4.2.0a+stable-9 Network Time Protocol: daemon for ntp-server recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#373901: dpkg: error processing python2.3 (--configure): TypeError: unindexable object
Package: python2.3 Version: 2.3.5-14 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Setting up python2.3 (2.3.5-14) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1365, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1359, in main rv = action.run(global_options) File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 892, in run pkg.set_default_runtime_from_version_info() File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 575, in set_default_runtime_from_version_info self.default_runtime = get_runtime_for_version(versions[0]) TypeError: unindexable object dpkg: error processing python2.3 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of python: python depends on python2.3 (>= 2.3.5-1); however: Package python2.3 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing python (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up libstdc++6-4.1-dev (4.1.1-5) ... Errors were encountered while processing: python2.3 python E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages python2.3 depends on: ii libbz2-1.01.0.3-2high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdb4.3 4.3.29-5 Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [ ii libncurses5 5.5-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline5 5.1-7 GNU readline and history libraries ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8b-2 SSL shared libraries ii python-central0.4.16 register and build utility for Pyt ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-11 compression library - runtime Versions of packages python2.3 recommends: pn python2.3-cjkcodecs | python2 (no description available) pn python2.3-cjkcodecs | python2 (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341705:
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=16218 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341705: Crashing again in 5.0.16
Hi, Version 5.0.16 is also crashing, but with more info in syslog. Without the delayed the query works fine. On another 5.0.16 server the query also works fine so maybe a bit of load is needed. CREATE TABLE `xwi_login_failures` ( `ipa` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `gsku` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `name` varchar(9) NOT NULL default '', `pass` varchar(8) NOT NULL default '', `serial` varchar(22) default NULL, `sid` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `msg` varchar(255) NOT NULL default '', `time` int(11) NOT NULL default '0' ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1; insert delayed into xwi_login_failures (ipa, gsku, name, pass, serial, sid, msg, time) values (0,0,"","",NULL,0,"",0); ERROR 2013 (HY000): Lost connection to MySQL server during query mysql> insert delayed into xwi_login_failures (ipa, gsku, name, pass, serial, sid, msg, time) values (0,0,"","",NULL,0,"",0); ERROR 2006 (HY000): MySQL server has gone away No connection. Trying to reconnect... Connection id:5 Current database: xcc ERROR 2013 (HY000): Lost connection to MySQL server during query mysql> Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: mysqld got signal 11; Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: This could be because you hit a bug. It is also possible that this binary Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: or one of the libraries it was linked against is corrupt, improperly built, Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: or misconfigured. This error can also be caused by malfunctioning hardware. Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: We will try our best to scrape up some info that will hopefully help diagnose Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: the problem, but since we have already crashed, something is definitely wrong Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: and this may fail. Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: key_buffer_size=16777216 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: read_buffer_size=131072 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: max_used_connections=31 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: max_connections=100 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: threads_connected=32 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: It is possible that mysqld could use up to Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: key_buffer_size + (read_buffer_size + sort_buffer_size)*max_connections = 233983 K Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: bytes of memory Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: Hope that's ok; if not, decrease some variables in the equation. Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: thd=0x8af53b0 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: Attempting backtrace. You can use the following information to find out Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: where mysqld died. If you see no messages after this, something went Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: terribly wrong... Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: Cannot determine thread, fp=0xb0ca8fcc, backtrace may not be correct. Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: Stack range sanity check OK, backtrace follows: Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: 0x81890fb Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: 0xe420 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: (nil) Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: 0x81ea24f Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: 0x819f17b Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: 0x81a2288 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: 0x81a2849 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: 0x81a382d Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: 0x81a40d5 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: 0xb7f19cfd Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: 0xb7d5d13e Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: New value of fp=(nil) failed sanity check, terminating stack trace! Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: Please read http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/Using_stack_trace.html and follow instructions on how to resolve the stack trace. Resolved Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: stack trace is much more helpful in diagnosing the problem, so please do Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: resolve it Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: Trying to get some variables. Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: Some pointers may be invalid and cause the dump to abort... Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: thd->query at 0x8b29630 = insert delayed into xwi_login_failures (ipa, gsku, name, pass, serial, sid, msg, time) values (0,0,"","",NULL,0,"",0) Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: thd->thread_id=1 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: The manual page at http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Crashing.html contains Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: information that should help you find out what is causing the crash. Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld_safe[4218]: Number of processes running now: 0 Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld_safe[4220]: restarted -- Olaf van der Spek http://xccu.sf.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341705: more information?
sean finney wrote: > i've created an etch pbuilder chroot and produced some debs: > > http://people.debian.org/~seanius/mysql/etch/ > > i haven't verified anything about these other than the fact that they > built sucessfully, so a once-over would be appreciated. after i've > heard back from the first brave soul to test them out that there are > no problems, i'll go ahead and send them to tpu if there are no > objections. It seems I've ran out of testing virtual machines and I'm away this weekend. I'll not be able to test before Tuesday. -- Olaf van der Spek http://xwis.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341705: more information?
sean finney wrote: notfound 341705 5.0.16-1 thanks On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:32:58PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: If/when binutils gets fixed it's at least another 10 days. What about testing-proposed-updates? honestly, it's more work/time than i'm willing to give, and i'm reluctant to put work into a problem that will eventually solve itself. unfortunately, christian's out for the next week, so i can't know what his take on it is. if you feel strong enough about it to prepare an update for tpu on your own (where the fix is backported as a dpatch file), i'd be willing to look at it though. Isn't it possible (and much easier) to compile 5.0.16 completely in a testing dev environment and upload that? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341705: more information?
sean finney wrote: hi, On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:52:22PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: well, if you're not able/willing to try the version in unstable, then i suggest that we do the following: I can confirm that the linked reduced test case does not crash in 5.0.16-Debian_1. okay, i wasn't sure if the bugreport in question was in fact the same problem, or if it's an unrelated one. i've noticed that mysql seems to crash quite a bit :) - downgrade the severity to "important". Why? - mark it as notfound in 5.0.16 If I didn't test it, how can you claim the notfound? well, we have to do at least one of the above if we ever want something to migrate into testing. True, but not without actually verifying it's gone in 5.0.16 of course (which is now done). - wait for 5.0.16 to make it to testing. But for how long? beats me :) If/when binutils gets fixed it's at least another 10 days. What about testing-proposed-updates? -- Olaf van der Spek http://xwis.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
