Bug#708666: libvxl1-dev and libgst-dev: error when trying to install together
Il 17/05/2013 16:57, Ralf Treinen ha scritto:
> This bug has been filed against both packages. If you, the maintainers of
> the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
> resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may then
> also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug.
Since libgst-dev supports pkg-config, it should not be a problem to move
the libgst.so library to a subdirectory of ${libdir}.
Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#590277: gnu-smalltalk: FTBFS on sparc: timeout in the test suite
Fixed in 3.2.4-1, please close. Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#590277: (no subject)
upstream release 3.2.1 added a 1-minute timeout to all tests. This will at the very least change the infinite loop into a failure and will possibly show other failures. The relevant commit is 06d7a0f2b5faea40ea8701b8772d8ef0841766bd. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/smalltalk.git/commit/?id=06d7a0 Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#577908: gnu-smalltalk: FTBFS: tests failed
On 04/15/2010 10:06 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: gnu-smalltalk Version: 3.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: squeeze sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100415 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Known issue, Robert Collins is supposed to do an NMU sometime soon. Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#571428: gnu-smalltalk: FTBFS: tests failed
121: Sport FAILED (testsuite.at:159) 122: Swazoo FAILED (testsuite.at:160) Fixed by upstream patches 482e75acb44fcf652f29f21bb541e4b00ad5ba52 3d09834cf13e5b21b99e53c18bdac6806de9f4ab 856dc0874f1c642afc36c0d0f3e5b4a15a0d318b Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#463296: (no subject)
ssed was a kind of experimentation ground for what became sed 4.0. If you want to drop it altogether fine, but if not the NMU should really be done to close this release criteria bug. Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559809: CVE-2009-3736 update
I don't recall if I already posted this; fixed upstream by commit 232557c9. Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559809: CVE-2009-3736 local privilege escalation
If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the CVE id in your changelog entry. fixed by the upstream patch 232557c9e5a24f5dbd18ad9a2106cafb74e4e0cf Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551075: sed: incomplete multibyte sequences are treated improperly
On 10/15/2009 02:41 PM, WANG Yunfeng wrote: > Package: sed > Version: 4.2.1-3 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software I applied the patch upstream, thanks. Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#477312: Info received (Bug#477312: Log for failed build of gnu-smalltalk_3.1~rc3-3 (dist=experimental))
Oops, sorry, I was using a -O0 binary. I can reproduce it now. The fix will go upstream. Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#477312: Log for failed build of gnu-smalltalk_3.1~rc3-3 (dist=experimental)
I cannot reproduce the cobjects.st failure using the included libffi. Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#477312: Log for failed build of gnu-smalltalk_3.1~rc3-3 (dist=experimental)
It's a dangling pointer that for no reason should show up rarely, and
for no reason should show up only on ia64, but it does.
Anyway the attached patch, which I'll commit upstream after some more
testing, fixes it. The idea is that a nomemory hook is now able to
divert the allocation to another memory arena.
Here is a more reduced testcase for fun:
ObjectMemory compact.
173 timesRepeat: [ String new: 4450 ].
ObjectMemory compact
Paolo
diff --git a/libgst/alloc.c b/libgst/alloc.c
index 47c20b8..8c44efe 100644
--- a/libgst/alloc.c
+++ b/libgst/alloc.c
@@ -261,8 +261,11 @@ nospace:
if (h->heap_limit && h->heap_total <= h->heap_limit
&& h->heap_total + nsz > h->heap_limit && h->nomemory)
{
- h->nomemory (h, nsz);
- break;
+ h = h->nomemory (h, nsz);
+ if (h)
+ break;
+ else
+ return NULL;
}
case 2:
diff --git a/libgst/alloc.h b/libgst/alloc.h
index 61c2825..fa9e592 100644
--- a/libgst/alloc.h
+++ b/libgst/alloc.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ heap_block;
typedef struct heap_data heap_data;
typedef void (*allocating_hook_t) (heap_data *, heap_block *, size_t);
-typedef void (*nomemory_hook_t) (heap_data *, size_t);
+typedef heap_data *(*nomemory_hook_t) (heap_data *, size_t);
struct heap_data
{
diff --git a/libgst/oop.c b/libgst/oop.c
index 4568277..6df0343 100644
--- a/libgst/oop.c
+++ b/libgst/oop.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int oldspace_sigsegv_handler (void* fault_address,
int serious);
#endif
/* Hook that triggers garbage collection. */
-static void oldspace_nomemory (heap_data *h, size_t sz);
+static heap_data *oldspace_nomemory (heap_data *h, size_t sz);
/* Answer the number of fields to be scanned in the object starting
at OBJ, with the given FLAGS on its OOP. */
@@ -891,11 +891,16 @@ oldspace_before_freeing (heap_data *h, heap_block *blk,
size_t sz)
_gst_mem_protect ((PTR) blk, sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
}
-void
+heap_data *
oldspace_nomemory (heap_data *h, size_t sz)
{
if (!_gst_gc_running)
-_gst_global_gc (sz);
+{
+ _gst_global_gc (sz);
+ return _gst_mem.old;
+}
+ else
+return NULL;
}
#ifndef NO_SIGSEGV_HANDLING
Bug#477312: Log for failed build of gnu-smalltalk_3.1~rc3-3 (dist=experimental)
Reduced testcase (reproducing on testdrive): Object extend [ breakIt: anInteger [ 1 to: anInteger do: [ :each | String new: each ]. ] ] #(4450 2) do: [:each | self breakIt: each]. Can you confirm? (Just do "./gst foo.st" where foo.st is the above). Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#477312: Log for failed build of gnu-smalltalk_3.1~rc3-3 (dist=experimental)
Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 05:58:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> ./libtool *copy_arguments_from_above* gdb --args gst -f scripts/Test.st >> -vp Swazoo > > gdb refuses to provide a backtrace, sadly: what about a core dump (ulimit -c unlimited, then tests/gst -f scripts/Test.st -vp Swazoo)? Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#477312: Log for failed build of gnu-smalltalk_3.1~rc3-3 (dist=experimental)
Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 04:01:04PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> -result = 7.70 >>>> +result = 2305843009213693952.00 >> Will try to make a standalone testcase. >>>> ./testsuite.at:159: exit code was 139, expected 0 >> Can you get a backtrace (e.g. from a coredump)? > > If you tell me how to run a single test sensibly without running > ./testsuite then I can easily provide you with a backtrace. (: Sure. From the top build directory you can do tests/gst -f scripts/Test.st -vp Swazoo If you want to run in gdb, do sh -x tests/gst -f scripts/Test.st -vp Swazoo and then execute ./libtool *copy_arguments_from_above* gdb --args gst -f scripts/Test.st -vp Swazoo Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#477312: Log for failed build of gnu-smalltalk_3.1~rc3-3 (dist=experimental)
>> -result = 7.70 >> +result = 2305843009213693952.00 Will try to make a standalone testcase. >> ./testsuite.at:159: exit code was 139, expected 0 Can you get a backtrace (e.g. from a coredump)? Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#477312: FTBFS (ia64/experimental): Test suite failure (120)
Thomas Girard wrote: Hello, Le mardi 22 avril 2008 à 13:15 +0200, Paolo Bonzini a écrit : It might be that rebuilding fixes the failure. I saw random failures of Swazoo here too, it might be a race condition or something like that. Paolo, could this error be fixed by the patch[1]? Regards, Thomas [1] http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=smalltalk.git;a=commitdiff;h=dfd82e2fef20429c40f0deaedc2154e9c10f5802 Hmm... I think I saw it less often after that patch, but the symptom of that patch was a bug in Seaside. It cannot hurt though. Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#477312: FTBFS (ia64/experimental): Test suite failure (120)
It might be that rebuilding fixes the failure. I saw random failures of Swazoo here too, it might be a race condition or something like that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415637: gnu-smalltalk_2.3.3-2(experimental/ia64/alkman):
>> | config.status: linking ./src/ia64/ffitarget.h to include/ffitarget.h >> | config.status: error: ./src/ia64/ffitarget.h: file not found >> | configure: error: ./configure failed for libffi >> | make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 > > The libffi/src/ia64/ffitarget.h is indeed missing in the smalltalk > tarball. It is available in upstream's arch repo, so I'll report this > issue upstream. Thanks for the report, I'm subscribed to debian smalltalk bugs ;-) I'll fix it in a moment. Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
