Bug#1069520: sbcl: FTBFS on armhf: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:53: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
Hi, Tested this and it’s due to the 64t transition. The grovelled data changed: (sid_armhf-dchroot)pvaneynd@abel:~/sbcl-2.3.7$ diff -u ./crossbuild-runner/backends/arm/stuff-groveled-from-headers.lisp output/stuff-groveled-from-headers.lisp --- ./crossbuild-runner/backends/arm/stuff-groveled-from-headers.lisp 2023-07-29 07:59:39.0 + +++ output/stuff-groveled-from-headers.lisp 2023-07-29 07:59:39.0 + @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ (define-alien-type off-t (signed 64)) (define-alien-type size-t (unsigned 32)) (define-alien-type ssize-t (signed 32)) -(define-alien-type time-t (signed 32)) +(define-alien-type time-t (signed 64)) (define-alien-type suseconds-t (signed 32)) (define-alien-type uid-t (unsigned 32)) ;; Types in src/runtime/wrap.h. See that file for explantion. @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ (defconstant clock-process-cputime-id 2) ; #x2 (defconstant clock-realtime-alarm 8) ; #x8 (defconstant clock-realtime-coarse 5) ; #x5 +(defconstant clock-tai 11) ; #xb (defconstant clock-monotonic-coarse 6) ; #x6 (defconstant clock-monotonic-raw 4) ; #x4 (defconstant clock-boottime 7) ; #x7 @@ -149,11 +150,11 @@ ;;; structures (define-alien-type nil (struct timeval - (tv-sec (signed 32)) - (tv-usec (signed 32 + (tv-sec (signed 64)) + (tv-usec (signed 64 (define-alien-type nil (struct timespec - (tv-sec (signed 32)) + (tv-sec (signed 64)) (tv-nsec (signed 32 I honestly don’t understand how to use 64-bit values on this arch, so I created https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/2063340 Best regards, Peter
Bug#1069520: sbcl: FTBFS on armhf: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:53: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
This looks a lot like a problem between the `OBSERVED-INTERNAL-REAL-TIME-DELTA-SEC` which is a word and the new 64-bit counters. ❯ git grep observed-internal-real-time-delta-sec src/code/thread-structs.lisp: #-64-bit (observed-internal-real-time-delta-sec 0 :type sb-vm:word) src/code/unix.lisp: (sb-thread::thread-observed-internal-real-time-delta-sec thr)) While the current sources still have: ❯ grep -A 2 -B 2 '(tv-sec' crossbuild-runner/backends/arm/stuff-groveled-from-headers.lisp (define-alien-type nil (struct timeval (tv-sec (signed 32)) (tv-usec (signed 32 (define-alien-type nil (struct timespec (tv-sec (signed 32)) (tv-nsec (signed 32 I’m guessing that this is no longer the case on armhf anymore. I’m trying to test this on the porter box abel.debian.org. Best regards, Peter
Bug#1028471: cmucl: diff for NMU version 21d-2.1
Hi Adrian, Thanks for that. I was reading up on this 'source only' uploads. In general I agree with the idea, however for cmucl when a new major version gets released the rebuilding of the new version using the old version is non-trivial and not automated. So for major releases I do the rebuilding manually and then upload binaries+source. The binaries can rebuild the sources, but the old binaries cannot. Is this setup still supported with the new rules or is this the last hurrah from the cmucl package? Best regards, Peter
Bug#821150: cmucl: non-DFSG license
Hello Dmitry, As mentioned before: the community considers this an 'optional request' not a requirement. Unless you have further comments I intend to close this bug in a few weeks. Best regards, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/ God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson| signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#821150: cmucl: non-DFSG license
Hello Dmitry, On 19/04/16 23:18, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > But this requirement is not optional. License do not allow us to speculate > whether they are checking their post box or email and choose whether to > comply with this requirement... I checked and nobody is listening anymore at that email address, or at xerox in general. For all intents and purposes the upstream is gone. Furthermore I've discussed this with the CMUCL developers and they, being native English speakers, interpret this requirement "Any person obtaining a copy of this software is requested ..." is a request and this optional, not required. So SHOULD in the rfc2119 way, not MUST. Is there a precedent or ruling on the 'is requested' in licenses? Best regards, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/ God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson| signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#821150: cmucl: non-DFSG license
Hello Dmitry, On 16/04/16 04:21, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > The following files are licensed under non-DFSG compliant license: > > Files: > > > License: Xerox-LUN Checking the copy in sbcl for example is missing the clause, which I think you object to: > Any person obtaining a copy of this software is requested to send their > name and post office or electronic mail address to: >CommonLoops Coordinator >Xerox PARC > Coyote Hill Rd. >Palo Alto, CA 94304 > (or send Arpanet mail to commonloops-coordinator...@xerox.arpa) > . > Suggestions, comments and requests for improvements are also welcome. As the last release of PCL was in September 1992 and PARC stopped doing common lisp, I think that no-one is listening for any emails anymore and that we can simply remove this request. Would you agree to this? Best regards, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/ God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson| signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#806246: cmucl: FTBFS (missing build-depends)
Hello Santiago, > Seems like a missing Build-Depends on hardening-includes, the package > containing /usr/share/hardening-includes/hardening.make, so it > should be quite easy to fix. Turns out it's not so easy after all, I'm still working on it... > BTW: I wonder why this package does not exist for amd64. Is it a > bootstrapping problem as the extended description suggests? There is no upstream for amd64 (there was but it bitrotted). If you want cmucl on amd64 then I suggest that you use sbcl which is a based on cmucl, but with slightly different goals. One of which is having an amd64 port ;). Best regards, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/ God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson| signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#654255: cmucl: FTBFS: Error: Unbound symbol.
Hello Jakub, On 02/01/12 16:44, Jakub Wilk wrote: Source: cmucl Version: 20b-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source this is not really correct: in fact cmucl cannot be rebuild from source in unstable. It worked before :(. Or are you running stable perhaps? This must be due to some change either to the kernel, glibc or gcc. I have not been able to isolate this yet, and this would require using virtual machines to find the change which breaks the rebuild. This is quite time intensive. patches are welcome :) Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/ God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#617501: clisp does not run, claims to be missing a required file
Hello Anne, On 09/03/11 14:11, Anne C. Hanna wrote: /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/base/lisp.run: operating system error during load of initialization file `/usr/lib/clisp-2.49/base/lispinit.mem' [/build/buildd-clisp_2.49-3+b1-amd64-lEeikj/clisp-2.49/src/spvw_memfile.d:982] errno = ENOENT: No such file or directory. This indeed is a grave problem. I noticed that I have the same problem after installing that package. I'm currently investiating... Sorry about this issue, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/ God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#608017: clisp: error with no xlib, when start stumpwm
Hello, On 20/02/11 02:53, Wang Lei wrote: Today after upgrading clisp, stumpwm can't startup. Report no xlib. This is a problem of stumpwm I fear. With the new version of clisp clx is no longer build in, you need to also depend on the module clisp-module-clx. After installing this you can load clx dynamically: 3/pvaneynd@frost:~/fakeroot/clean/git/clisp :) $ clisp i i i i i i i ooooo o o I I I I I I I 8 8 8 8 8 o 88 I \ `+' / I 8 8 8 888 \ `-+-' / 8 8 8 o 8 `-__|__-'8 8 8 8 8 |8 o 8 8 o 8 8 --+-- o8oo ooo8ooo o 8 Welcome to GNU CLISP 2.49 (2010-07-07) http://clisp.cons.org/ Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Michael Stoll 1992, 1993 Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Marcus Daniels 1994-1997 Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Pierpaolo Bernardi, Sam Steingold 1998 Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Sam Steingold 1999-2000 Copyright (c) Sam Steingold, Bruno Haible 2001-2010 Type :h and hit Enter for context help. [1] (load /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/dynmod/clx.lisp) ;; Loading file /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/dynmod/clx.lisp ... ;; Loading file /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/clx/new-clx/clx-preload.lisp ... ;; Loaded file /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/clx/new-clx/clx-preload.lisp ;; Loading module clx from /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/dynmod/lib-clx.so ;; Loaded module clx from /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/dynmod/lib-clx.so ;; Loading file /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/clx/new-clx/clx.fas ... ;; Loaded file /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/clx/new-clx/clx.fas ;; Loading file /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/clx/new-clx/image.fas ... ;; Loaded file /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/clx/new-clx/image.fas ;; Loading file /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/clx/new-clx/resource.fas ... ;; Loaded file /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/clx/new-clx/resource.fas ;; Loaded file /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/dynmod/clx.lisp T [2] (find-package :XLIB) #PACKAGE XLIB [3] (describe *) #PACKAGE XLIB is the package named XLIB. It imports the external symbols of 1 package COMMON-LISP and exports 580 symbols ... -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/ God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#592768: complementary information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Stef, On 01/10/10 22:15, stef louise wrote: This was a little tricky. I successfully built and installed libsigsegv2_2.8 binary+dev Then the git build-package was successful, nonetheless it is uninstallable: # LANG=C dpkg -i ../clisp_2.49-1_powerpc.deb ... /var/cache/common-lisp-controller/0/clisp/common-lisp-controller/common-lisp-controller.fasSegmentation fault We need to find where it is failing. Could you rebuild the clisp image with --debug in the configure flags and then run clisp in gdb to see where it fails? LC_ALL=C LANG=C sudo gdb /usr/bin/clisp ... run -norc -q -M /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/full/lispinit-orig.mem [1] (progn (when (find-package :c-l-c) (delete-package :c-l-c)) (load /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/install-clc.lisp) (saveinitmem /usr/lib/clisp-2.49/full/lispinit.mem)) then get a backtrace of the failure. Best regards, Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMrAenAAoJEB4VNT76eIlaQKkP/1mdB8k+2ndfoc46NsLewnDl 75I7g3PDqwXSmrygZoscSgzxbHmzJG5pYCnA0iQ8BxLzRDmcIio/IG07g9w+pWcR ja7hBKY8JfL6f1pPZsZR7uprz9jHPGOqTUCJTMMYnzrCmdCc63HRefkYE85cL6RX Cr5IgK45lQB80Q7w7aCXLgtm1tfYCfD4Xp+9qGGOpR55wndcOyWnD0CVaTVbSMzE yLozzPFRxgwc1Baq/CqltfVXuBG2lY87UJyqGY0oKN25ACx6tiAqB6oKD8mlFolD VzGbuTJ+0+05qwNDNxTmbUTyHIO5SI6Up3juiyv8EQ5X5LED3xJBdO5zvlRr2T4A DtY8cfHZTVVI6sR2srtsYuwTmp04RCNiW1EGVMSMNzpIvnawgHG5grG8dWqGXNPk iDrNZA3rC/gMeezQ8su8QSryZZDQIa2H2VICDX95ryS7XtBMAiAnXm4IoSG5sfiJ 9RRXfmM5gPWUdH98ZPu7Z8n/4DBl7IsKRDw2KNRlNkvY8oOceafF3bjA2PCMoyJE kqxkYUoLg1ywtoJ4UW22TZRdxsCeQhVL51nr9gV3F12XeCHHCMXc++8NNUV5kv2R YHsRB2qLZ+iL+KUGZtxdAviwHIVjhkHFkHhXlZlAB4vk80lj50l4ImB1mh4z/3mL z89LjJ08wBjLhLU/dFoT =iME4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#592768: complementary information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Stef, On 22/09/10 21:53, stef louise wrote: I may have some time to check it by the end of the week. I know how to compile stuff, even quite complex projects, but I'm quite unfamiliar with git (even though I shouldn't), and I don't know where to find your git repository (googled a lil' bit but wrong keywords, I guess). You can do: git clone http://git.debian.org/git/pkg-common-lisp/clisp.git git checkout pvaneynd LC_ALL=C LANG=C git-buildpackage -uc -us --git-debian-branch=pvaneynd that should just work (TM). Best regards, Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMoN9sAAoJEB4VNT76eIlaFW0P/RAK0+hm+WY0wxEb/1ZOUONA AxuXVgn1FsCn9jGzcDuUVYGAVg6fWi93PWlTaX/qPuzOMku3E6N9sZcm3ajRx2Px c/zrS6DAgVwK8OYvofIIwXiyBWX9jwzvNfqIbBTLuAPrp2kEAjJq+31BxZXR9+un H/teNt21vaZwlRCA2URWKOQvnwHeBv0aJqG/wPBycIEbGw/zi8h8uXHFLuQoMlBl n1Dp34InDB3YVx/2t5NTKqbEhsMC6N8wHubd3Cb04gyUWBTxrRte386MqA3zTnS+ mbo0fiyh2qHjZBDphoSsUJJzge/v9NOrrevof6+ZvK6k2ns5utOOKYR+PluGWNEn J5qKh6q8CZ5UEr1tCx+XNK/yrwvstLy1UrOPgi6U7K6ZivDPzbxhNkjomZ7Hewec 3itKo5Ojr/ETfn9sDvqFf4bSzPPbMO89Rh/GIUs/E7tTlmtdhoT6/KubSHg+yKvc 4flfF4/pYIm2fP0ssUfHR8gB17dc8c6Wti+LObwXir/kAdMRnllUqWG2/rg3pkgY UCR7ORlOC/a3ctlg4h/wiFykXOgRPX/FOYyZly6pZKbAjghT9lOrGmaEWsD/BR7j knDsiVHyZROc9UDEOCTbhjw+99kbTy1QLZGs3wqzd6CBlGJiDXslWl1Mll3gVgo5 AS4li1ASyT8iALe2RRGV =5PZM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#592768: complementary information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Stef, On 16/09/10 21:57, stef louise wrote: /usr/share/common-lisp/source/common-lisp-controller/common-lisp-controller.lisp *** - handle_fault error2 ! address = 0x77dc3ba0 not in [0x699c60d8,0x69aa3000) ! I have a new clisp version prepared with a new upstream version that builds correctly on the build-machine I tried. You can either try the pvaneynd branch in the git repository or wait until I have some time to prepare and upload to experimental. Best regards, Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMkvrQAAoJEB4VNT76eIla+4IQAIhEVVtx+6w6iYJrQKZl5tPE giEoX9w3Q8+65dkuQHh+9ndw3wj+WU3r0YsbrBh67WMLYMg3UKnGijtqd7i6uZmJ oKnCblYT79G2yGmVtV7AkGjOVU7FVmcIicEgULKZ0plGmsD4RYLoqiEPK61lqEHS zfb7vfXNVUZbc0HjP8Guez9/gW4+jxYnpOixq9G5ctTwD/P+405qFkth7ZFAojcI B7a1QmP5VmmSu+LDiAp8N/3zll4qkIjCq8RphChKIJ6d0fGJ8hmHPfNremnI3YG/ RE0FMG/9fkQ+RK0Y+8v6L8+3GjFvlroWvJIQdIkyLJSmgo4TMIABBATQxrtuQwmO rkdDwLbXAxY3uD1CI6ueAobDYUdDqSCJfqj6fkNbY2i+ktrYJNUxwSEDuB5Axhoz H4jP2F0ZfTZ/HoALk8d97QNoLlfxGJJb+uhWeOXB4zB1J+ttJiMxyZKwuEM/HNUc 5j9qxpcIGuyMtwSbCyTtkRLM0yhkW8eMF54mmHH4fzr6jqMo1fDsSF3MINNi4Nfs nEDRrJHwPptJqnAATBTUZTQO8FkvPXnLbDSzgRd/sy/qNgNu4DruEmroD7E1nSTg drindQSzPTr/KT1Jq0Nrg68UQFPCy262D/4nJOLstK2Lm6rbF/Hdp19YTOSR6n6o 9gnsy7vbGRVRMUyWLOcs =i78Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#577210: tries to write FASL in wrong directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Faré, I'll try to update clc and friends as soon as possible. On 14/04/10 00:28, Faré wrote: 2- C-L-C needs to (asdf:clear-output-translations) and (asdf:clear-source-registry) right before it dumps images, for all implementations. ok 5- Short of including such hook, the simple solution is to use ASDF's builtin per-user cache facility, except maybe for the root user. ok but given that we don't have the 'use the root cache for fasl files' yet, I guess that the simplest is just to use the build-in cache. Not? Just to be clear: do to this I just need to remove all the customizations. Right? 6- CLC needs to update ASDF to latest, anyway. What version do you suggest? 1.7xx or 1.6xxx? Thanks for your help! Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLzHVaAAoJEB4VNT76eIla28QP/2c0vnunRUIfIGyN+j8Ckwig vjvH6h9DuzunQYu8CDQocJZdj/mxm7HSdxczVJojVjiLR+7ORIJtm3a6SoTszHSx eLl/mcZ/mK/2ZDUAoIpaCvVPHjPzvoLI3qKzc6wJEQKx3ISH6CZZqzyID6DN0xdd Y+ypQL+WPYmNkUJ9dbFyqy+Ze9wrVYs+3u0sxHotyAFb+gGZu0HwOk0QWcze7Gw+ waAQvhvNCvV35k7Io75/IUcPpUXf1qUgF8Ept9FxO3rxzI04TI4iNYV+z05UgK+0 +SF9P9NAE9hpqSYlikEo4ie2PAk/5owE2ktAKIUK5cuc3H+vANWiN+jycnPFmsTc OzJC8a8xOC9dHURXvIyQit/KZzl02BfmvCphjJE51i7wd3YavY7P0v8Qxv1sbucK LnYQYkTnFpe/MftNdRITZf1syM43TByIDi0EEAHC9GVFFFZgLOi+AyVsom1F/bo7 MrIUGPj8ZA/hJs1OwkLgP/B9MQSvYmsngdU8zAeCk4QM4Ya0bZiZ1Yb8EGoN2Zbr QXe89p6WMhHw1fQYZVOOrzJ8kQvV/zDNNOAoJEh4tQHzoOstgcpG6P6XfUd8uxKx y7P8OI3piucbMzKWStkl+tQWNxCaIpVaCVAcUb42cQTBO+cGg7ARWQOavetWAUXs 08vFQYnMxOajlSb5Eg4+ =rgzU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#554081: this is due to the old libgc in unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, ECL needs a more recent version of libgc, but we only have 7.1 in experimental so until 446068 and 559345 are fixed in unstable we can only continue to use the included libgc (and libatomic-ops) version. If you do have patches that make libgc work on those architectures I would of course be interested in them. Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLn/JfAAoJEB4VNT76eIlaRZ4P/1fqRWcSr5hNT/W2yrZM8RBY mZhpi+aM6a9KK/Rv7AB2Ct81WKsqoo0yiDKYCsE2LOX450gpQWkrSH42z3ZRy7s0 t74iR3b4lNh/U4/y7A20EpzvBs7xp0pWXiQZ+CuDU054dNwv5jq1UzSCgirAB9xb Oa2xdzlF8tFEYiIkyhfC20MN3lTaQhp6Q2O7HPl+CrgrLhU1d9nVDNeGxZPYGSlI 4OcN/kCZo/4BsfeV11FkJhDfv78Tdwlt9HtgCT2XesLhe4ioIWPeWOVkiqSi9b9W 8ktsa6sTDLhJm5x0lWFZicl/ktctxJMwRts1VUASX6pepwxt+ga6J+6OKsrkFKxl w5xYfMFBfgleNDzVeDQuCw+phaSSHtSQHURXI7yxSKRbeUuY5FOe0Hdc7S2gPxa2 ilxgExibUlT5S28loPf4fPE2MYoYZEYHw6epsb8m8TlpXdQey2pzOF4icskm2FOx BSJA5YRG6izsTP1LZZ/fJjJF7PkRs4kzzJ/YgzVqPNn7+rLF5lgT5AfvEJu8lQ2o 2T6gvGdBCbjl16hSAYQ+wG9r2HCyWV+DlzCudivPRBoAvhL6QLLNlFG0dpChVSD9 989yesWPnW63LcL65KHp6lXYtcmTo00iS4RFlXBIYlMw1YwxEjBNzPaK8JqG+O6D jozwkPfxmokzsk7gOg2b =vvlN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560963: clc and central-registry issues
Hi all, These bugs only describe expected behavior. From 6.19 onwards common-lisp-controller is no longer doing this. I will update the clc documentation and add a NEWS file to point this out more clearly (I hope). I've attached the NEWS file for you to review. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| From version 6.19 onwards clc does not longer add the /usr/share/common-lisp/systems/ directory to asdf:*central-registry* The net effect of this is that just using (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op ...) will no longer work. The only way to load clc enabled packages now it to use (clc:clc-require :foo) You can also activate the clc packages using clc:with-clc-active so (clc:with-clc-active (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :foo)) will work too. This change was done so that using for example clbuild in Debian becomes possible again. Otherwise the packaged systems will interfere with the clbuild or locally generated systems. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#518744: cl-plplot: FTBFS: unhandled condition in --disable-debugger mode, , quitting
Hello all, Just FYI: cl-babel is now in Debian. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549264: cl-cffi: cffi depends on babel which is not part of debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I looked into babel and there is a small license issue to resolve first. I also am checking all dependencies just to be certain. Groetjes, Peter - -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJK9T5oAAoJEB4VNT76eIlabRMP/2lmZSx4hSlJMHw2Vm52iYGh fyfMrlngG0EQE22ZZKCkIlXR7STtkqDVxa5h1A1OPj1P7xe4hN1JYoOG1BCo2AvU ShkUoKY1RiShQ/Vq26gw0gJDwrGYePd2vHjwEAxBTF6qMhqWIhe7xiW9fGxuknfK 7qxZth/ojAbF/q9CAThgjACHnlOOfk3DsrEMWdMYv42R3uyFnhipVByv7koGADTJ Y73nSTTRlc7pyJAzVYXDZaXLCx9Cg+8Yf2dI/3jAJqblx6KGjTjpTDJFY4X3q6aJ yG3gRUWVQQRdDF89SOGYTc/RSvHTP4OWI3TKtlZUeJ77y34C4chnTfIzbvLh0iBy G7VeUiLtlhO2tgje7844NKkuonQeQAo3G3O6OnUpEG0yEVFSWpUN7uAuX3/oPXXe zxDMdUGcmJ0wZD+iOFXGb6/wWYNhSm/3vUsBcz1Pb0mFHK+yQIOPiGVmG3P6OYM8 gWd49R0hiTI7RjhAfcMnMZ1G6nnFU8gnAYVeUGoEQA7/XUFKkB2x07VytY+KM65q TAr8Lq07VwO4oSrE70wZVX/iJf4SSuPb1ZoOlxxSUYoagneE3v5i4/BV+nZCjQ0U z78sUJMVeAgfWS79hBhEMrtIXe8svgOLcQxMBfmwaZ0myAnCJ0yXLyNCcBPocgku m068iDbQnUCBpI8+0FN9 =CQKG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549264: cl-cffi: cffi depends on babel which is not part of debian
This seems to be because dh_lisp is not setting dependencies correctly, so babel got removed by accident. Oops. We need to check why this is and now check all CL libraries. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#545625: ecl: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir.old': No such file or directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Lucas, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Why are you building in a lenny chroot ? Because I was testing before with a sid chroot, which worked and I got confused. So I redid a build of 9.8.4-1 in a clean chroot and ... it just worked... Groetjes, Peter - -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKuhTOAAoJEB4VNT76eIlaSaEQAIgt+sn+U8CQhhBHqM3TY3hj FCvR2YnWCUmmbAq7u7tarGEF4v3A9Hl+Wo/FKc4ydrARWggj5ti9R/PKFpeNRiT/ J5xTbX6I7AFc8QkZRnQMTXXcfOBjBibuG85V/R2P+jIxh+sjnBNVm566l/k/BynH 7CLcmGJ1GG3Wj7st1ysKpE0CIXpspBbOnu6GIiPpTtq8o9E5fV855z5ORyKaCOwD ji1H9acJy4XfRY7JNapil4bV9GXa/rJ7v1qZ+IZLluKcXBF1EyAwj1zb79+IkOtm eai1F+ljtV5pVTm7rwIIKgI8p3d6UUknVo+L7SCf2z6NdbMNtyCDj/HcgLQtwI4F BN+tItTaxVGtaJ7vjOnbqQNztoCpmxY6aRgx3Q9GmUoVquvzJkDJnP+CxEQZcUhu kTi1Qd9bU1jYb2MfW3TMM8A6QDJGKLHKAmjvH6FEEKfi313XHWU+/zd7QokUNPnQ XeVN03PVLUiz50IRth9pRVJ3NRIkc6X8Y0LyQ5UESCx3RhsIzVOsbZMbdMJYTx6d wCDLOausiuzMMwKfHdFq1VbEMgAxRvjKgxuyyUNMQi1kLag8Anbp9Jzz1rW4L40u iq9X7Y9h1jseVZ/Sc3BNlBj5ic3WrrLJUERU+fQycMTwOCMgylJhv9m3c9JY5YhG 5mCjwZkzhOAS59A8YQk6 =ehTs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#545625: ecl: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir.old': No such file or directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Lucas, I'm a bit surprised by this FTBFS as ecl is also auto-build for other platforms. What research did you do in this failure? Groetjes, Peter - -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKuP+fAAoJEB4VNT76eIlazDoQALSDZ3wQ8+N26BJCXc9U/kme TU9647/9W6lOL7+FdMcn2AJwO9ZDDhDkzViF3PNR7x/ODoAsu1UAQk+BCH6Hi9zj OhFC7+fXzWGD+XqUmnxe2DAdsZ4Cdo/m2lQr6oZzLiJfga6CiOkzwSJMuhLyEbtt WfP1wJCM3Y9QNMsZt/EuChXdOaJ0Qtfxw//Vb5UwAJoPiCKZ1qAmqSnpU/oCHMyn 6ar6NwR8auAMgwrfhJe15nOUm0nGCj0yj4xTSDORhCk2NVY8KoLfg1btLSwy2doJ RSoGB4Z+JDCqt+9Xakhresox1DJ3ogb3bdNtnTkBb5higfmk3GtjDi2eKwStDSGT IxQ0ijcZlvlIvI+K3qdBSLCet+bG38FPAJM+Nm1NiX2VnLGRTpkpcp8FSM0iO2/k G+2PX0DdlzNVVBYSKVyUbn3jQRuhZOfvTQ6mOW3O6eSCrDDFC2IagOb0UWeZdEJ1 lKckcsKZRGwTQ+KXh7EeMFXM4oKHZOwUasKNL6PsNeK0LUN9V1YUc3tcGaTVU4va TLgYNhCx/kk0VL4mTwDTA0XwKhGYs7oaQV6tvMZ4svdZGWE+2pU6+emfJ+ct6XLk LoJMtGABTmtr2AmIrHowrqih4oTsyhN1mQkwG4GM6Rt25Ov/YPYfRriBy+8tBi7G Tn3rYl7ELfpiF1GudKmE =tcEa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#545625: ecl: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir.old': No such file or directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Lucas, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 22/09/09 at 18:47 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote: I'm a bit surprised by this FTBFS as ecl is also auto-build for other platforms. What research did you do in this failure? I have done no research at all. But it's easily reproducible. Have you actually tried to build it in a clean, up-to-date chroot? Yes. install-info does give some error messages regarding /var/backups/infodir.bak , but it build correctly on a lenny chroot on amd64. How did you try this? Groetjes, Peter - -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKubCWAAoJEB4VNT76eIlabfIQAJj7mnNuXdjnK+Ae0mmqYdrV pK8N8s0CZCTjRJCqLsqY1q5FBnEZZHWRSd244SuunkaqV0eNtiIa8xXCctDM5Fy+ ZVKgo5xeBWxxtw+8dNu+2A+fjIIQ/09Ok0h+8tBQVnj8ptxy1dO+CnQkWmS5y4yd fOfXZ8youT1F6Ug1ozzwGc5y/RejW39KkBpr1pZ0Nf7i2VWg2YdpiPYkqymmkP3N skiWhyJFzRI+lwtbrh9SEentbXSbie4/CTpdkpBqcJq8/ar6s2pDzsWdpxqym0tN sgyIZeJMhk7MGcXbQFUNtYaDvW00fFcAL/hE+Z9DyYroq27nULLE2wr2vPlwBsBU cfO+KrAhU84kfe0tj5WXjNjcxjqdS2xpcdLD9ELQAUp0R4WSlcG6VAt0lYSXRqbi WyhXDVlQ24BBbyv6XvX6KBlWVCeCmA+4Ib+POKujF40be/rBy7a5v8oOtmjhutfs yUeepOwJqSB024AiK0wT3OlHMQu7MuQj7yZf5xXnoFdXsZNU9JVBtKourEhjG2r1 GyX18CCyPPrefG2unqaG+5ECNzenol6FUh2D71uE62NTyG420BuGJA+OjbxPInza d7cJMbSL/caNbSsRZiOryGhywoWGzgU94fucGn+mq2NIMdjEPwS3T2oyjY/be7u1 o/sqLDs6C3KLsGUvChqp =4CD+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#535305: 535305 Re: common-lisp-controller: update fails rebuilding sb-grovel,, asdf broken as a result
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello David, Fredrik, Indeed the clc version 6.18 does not work with older versions of sbcl. I've had to change the native-file-kind package. However I've also added a Conflict against sbcl ( 1:1.0.29.0). So why did it want to install with an older version of sbcl? Groetjes, Peter - -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKsoYEAAoJEB4VNT76eIlaA/4P/2sA4AzWq69Gm+pxyd7lW91N TvCYCcH6Hry19gjK4fih9ZQyL92SKHHhnSC8wEGDLH1N1spTQkll9kB75pg1ljsx 5gTs6t8HNLzsNaQMZhP7KYeEf16WrDL8V8eNri1ivFRCH697664KMqmxC2cVsMCj EKgICWThlrwe7hYXry+NgVsS7juvJW0rblYxJLEUu1HXKkQWPbLFFy2+bJ4iZu8u rHYJongZ5GzdgDpJLFejUmzb/gJcjnQPNQw99E1MtfDgRyj2zz0cN4dDOo5YuMU9 wy0rxqgs/sRPwbFjT7o8hyfTXcRPiHc0m6Wfqn6oqEd0uus0RnkWMTqe2efl8W3i Odms7zrblV/GfAmTXVQUol6FxkMaxGapo8gYS2GLUln8hVDHxRznv7kPAOBVEU/S Pz+AmB20YIjQFHg4QTxrX2mX6JUkB92PBbJCotK4bH4JesxvtD0/3OmNnfr7O8T+ pPkzGPPHLhOfYR8PiVizkGK3IBcV9L2X+bNyY5WEU25WcHCwyrGwBnskp7eRawcj e7A6IMF0SW3sUluuV4VIIZECcjo27QBJYrqX41cQIQYgVm5uXpwCd097Q2Zuo5Tx lVOj5lVcrxs08uepIDwgt0qJmNjo5P6RhUhZwdE1hJ9/GhqqGbKH6ju1JUSGrClW FndR7Cev1BP1hM/MgNDG =ZVQb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#517205: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Evgeny, Evgeny M. Zubok wrote: Peter Van Eynde pvane...@debian.org writes: * Removed xref.lisp again and added a test in the makefile for it (Closes: #517205) And what about Lenny? Does this DFSG violation need a fix in stable distribution? Good question. $ tar zft slime_20080223.orig.tar.gz | grep xref slime-20080223/contrib/slime-xref-browser.el slime-20080223/xref.lisp Damn. We have the problem in stable too. I'll prepare a fix for that... But how. As I need to use a new 'upstream' version, I would have to use a new epoch... not? Groetjes, Peter - -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknxXnwACgkQ11ldN0tyliWP4QCgrirV03s7zfuVS06HZkhRSFwm O0YAn2usogAb3Z4IcpJxzUKjLMlybwXD =I8Kv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#469896: cl-geodesics - FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Can you describe how you build this package? I've tried to reproduce the problem with debuild binary-indep, but it nor debuild binary-arch produce the problem. Groetjes, Peter - -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH2viY11ldN0tyliURArjjAJ0V1YRAXKG8Qi69Opwn/gVdEgM3WgCeMW6b taoWis3WplR2iAoMb82Xe6A= =cSHm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#470447: cmucl: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [all] Error 133
Hi, On a real i386 rebuilding cmucl works. So I'm a bit confused as to why you see the problem. My guess is that the reason is that you are building on an AMD64 machine. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397987: sbcl: FTBFS: doc generation fails
On Saturday 11 November 2006 13:23, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:48:29AM +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
In the backtrace of
unhandled SB-INT:SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR in thread
#SB-THREAD:THREAD initial thread {A685791}:
The file /nonexistent/ does not exist.
I did not see that. It seems it tries to use $HOME, but it should not.
Ah. asdf _always_ used $HOME, and as the extentions are build using asdf it
will touch it. There was another bug that boiled down to that: 395156 ($HOME
was on a NFS share with squash-root set, installing clisp will fail).
If this is the cause of the problem the only thing I can do it set $HOME to
some value (/tmp or something) in debian/rules. Changing asdf would risk
making it too incompatible with the standard version...
Is this an acceptable solution?
Groetjes, Peter
--
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson|
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397987: sbcl: FTBFS: doc generation fails
Hi
I fear that the log you give does not give the basic reason
for the failure.
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:27:01 +0100, Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/sbcl-0.9.18.0/contrib/sb-sprof'
Failed contribs:
asdf-install
sb-aclrepl
sb-bsd-sockets
sb-cltl2
sb-grovel
sb-md5
sb-posix
sb-rotate-byte
sb-rt
sb-simple-streams
This is the main cause of the documentation failure later on.
In the backtrace of
unhandled SB-INT:SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR in thread #SB-THREAD:THREAD initial
thread {A685791}:
The file /nonexistent/ does not exist.
we find:
7: ((LAMBDA
(SB-PCL::.PV-CELL. SB-PCL::.NEXT-METHOD-CALL. SB-PCL::.ARG0.
SB-PCL::.ARG1.))
#unavailable argument
#unavailable argument
#ASDF:LOAD-OP NIL {A884029}
#ASDF:SYSTEM sb-rotate-byte {A7D83D9})
8: ((LAMBDA ()))
9: (SB-C::%WITH-COMPILATION-UNIT #CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {A896CF5})
10: (ASDF:OPERATE ASDF:LOAD-OP :SB-MD5)
11: (ASDF::MODULE-PROVIDE-ASDF :SB-MD5)
So it needs sb-md5 and sb-rotate-byte. These modules normally build
without any
known problem, but the logs of the building is not included. Do you have
them?
Groetjes, Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397575: cmucl: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `src/docs/cmu-user/index.html': No such file or directory
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:21:01 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package failed to build on i386. This turns out to be hevea problem: hevea -fix cmu-user.hva cmu-user.tex ./cmu-user.hva:13: Warning: Not (re)-defining environment 'minipage' with \newenvironment ./cmu-user.hva:137: Warning: Unknown counter: footer in \setcounter Giving up command: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up command: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up command: \input Giving up command: \ifthenelse Giving up command: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up command: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up command: \@@iter Giving up command: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up command: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up command: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up command: \usepackage /usr/share/hevea/xspace.hva:2: Fatal error: Command: \xspace defined at initialisation (if input is plain LaTeX, please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adios make[3]: *** [cmu-user.html] Error 2 I've seen a fix in upstream CVS and will investigate this. Groetjes, Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386075: FTBFS on sparc
Alle Tuesday 05 September 2006 06:17, Jurij Smakov ha scritto: Latest version of clisp fails to build on sparc [0]: Hello, As on the buildd host it seems to work I'm lowering the severity to normal, but this does not mean I'm going to ignore this problem. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386897: FTBFS on sparc: maximum interrupt nesting depth (32) exceeded
Alle Tuesday 12 September 2006 18:38, Jurij Smakov ha scritto: Hi, Yesterday I have successfully rebuilt sbcl in a up-to-date pbuilder chroot on sparc. The log of the build is available at http://www.wooyd.org/debian/misc/sbcl-build.log.bz2 Very helpful indeed. Perhaps it was some transient failure and the build just has to be retried? I've had a few build failures on sparc before. Something is not working right, but I do not know what. Could you give me the details of this machine: CPU Kernel used Memory gcc version used what is the outout of 'cat /proc/self/maps' Thanks in advance. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387121: libhal1: changes abi - vmware (and possibly vmware-player) fail to start
Package: libhal1 Version: 0.5.7.1-1+b1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Hello, After the upgrade from 0.5.7.1-1 to 0.5.7.1-1+b1 vmware fails to start. Browsing a bit find a thread talking about this problem on ubuntu and a bugreport there: http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?messageID=470367 https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/hal/+bug/59232 They talk about a ABI change in this version. Feel free to adapt the severity of this problem at will. Groetjes, Peter -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.11-mine89 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365230: mcvs should not be build on non-FFI enabled architectures
Hello, As clisp does not provide a FFI on: arm hppa ia64 m68k s390 mcvs should not be build on those architectures. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#373697: [cl-debian] Bug#373697: clisp_1:2.38-5 (ia64/unstable): FTBFS: [interpreted.mem] Aborted
Hello Steve, Alle Sunday 18 June 2006 20:46, Steve Langasek ha scritto: Hmm, the latest ia64 upload seems to be failing with a different error: [...] *** - UNIX error while GETWD: [...] http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=clisparch=ia64ver=1%3A2.38-6stamp=1150624217file=log I have no idea what that means, hopefully you do. This is strange as the build-by-hand on merulo worked. I've asked to install the build-depends on clisp on that machine so I can a 'real' debuild. You should have access to the sid chroot on vore for this, except that vore doesn't seem to be responsive right now. :/ This has been the case for quite some time already :-(. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#373697: [cl-debian] Bug#373697: clisp_1:2.38-5 (ia64/unstable): FTBFS: [interpreted.mem] Aborted
Hello Steve, Alle Thursday 15 June 2006 07:26, Steve Langasek ha scritto: The failure on ia64 is: [...] echo '(setq *clhs-root-default* http://www.lisp.org/HyperSpec/;)' config.lisp ./lisp.run -B . -N locale -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -Emisc 1:1 -norc -m 1400KW -x (and (load \init.lisp\) (sys::%saveinitmem) (ext::exit)) (ext::exit t) make[1]: *** [interpreted.mem] Aborted For this I could experiment a little and found a workaround: use -O0 to compile :-(. I opened a bug in the clisp bts: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=101355aid=1506857group_id=1355 The arm failure looks like it may have been a temporarily broken header file on arm, or it may be a bad #define in clisp. I'm trying to build clisp on leisner.debian.org at the moment, but progress seems slow. The sparc one is completely different from the other two; it's not currently a release-critical issue, but should be treated with a high priority since sparc may be re-added as a release candidate soon. I fear that without access to a sid chroot on sparc it will be impossible for me to go and fix this bug. A similar bug was opened for powerpc (#364688) and that I can not reproduce on any powerpc machine I have access to. My gut feeling is that with -O0 they too would disappear, so I'll wait for the results of the mips compile and then upload a package that forces -O0 on ia64, sparc and powerpc. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369607: is uninstallable (cl-flexi-streams doesn't exist)
Hello, On Wednesday 31 May 2006 00:17, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: You're depending on a non-existant package (and I don't see something fitting waiting in NEW). http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html - flexi-streams 0.5.3-1 source all unstable 2 weeks Peter Van Eynde Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#364688: clisp sigsegv crashes
Hello, I tried to reproduce the problem on an ibook G4 running a 2.6 kernel and clisp 2.38-5 just worked fine. When I return from a trip round .mx (a week) I will try to reproduce the results on the porting machines we have. Any more info you could send me would be appreciated. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361275: [cl-debian] Bug#361275: cl-swank: swank-loader looks for a ChangeLog file that doesn't exist
On Friday 07 April 2006 17:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to run slime from emacs in the usual way with M-x slime.
I get in the *inferior-lisp* buffer:
[1] ;; Loading file /usr/share/common-lisp/source/slime/swank-loader.
lisp ...
*** - FILE-WRITE-DATE: file #P/usr/share/common-
lisp/source/slime/ChangeLog does not exist
This is strange as we create a ChangeLog file in the appropriate elc directory
when installing for a emacs variant.
See /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/slime:
...
ELCDIR=/usr/share/${FLAVOR}/site-lisp/${PACKAGE}
..
cd ${ELCDIR}
...
ln -s /usr/share/doc/${PACKAGE}/changelog ChangeLog
So it should not search for the ChangLog file there.
Maybe the installation itself went wrong? Does anyone else has this problem?
Groetjes, Peter
--
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson|
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352627: /etc/cedilla-config.lisp is full of errors
On Monday 13 February 2006 03:16, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: Package: cedilla Version: 0.5-2 Severity: serious Serious? Why? That file /etc/cedilla-config.lisp provided with cedilla is full of of references to wrong locations of files and therefore it renders the whole package almost unusable. Well. That file is not automatically generated. Upstream is working on it, but I've not heard any progress in that area recently. Typically this kind of error messages are seen: WARNING: Unable to read AFM file /usr/share/texmf/fonts/afm/adobe/symbol/psyr.afm: nonexistent directory: #P/usr/share/texmf/fonts/afm/adobe/ Aha. The location of the tetex-extra files changed. This I can fix. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344525: [cl-debian] Bug#344525: clisp_1:2.36-2(m68k/unstable): Using wrong compiler/missing b-deps
On Friday 23 December 2005 13:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Actually upstream seems to have problems supporting the m68k architecture and unless they find a solution soonish I will remove it from the architectures list. :-( Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340646: ftbfs [sparc] [spvw_memfile.d:834] errno = ENOENT: No such file or directory.
Hello, I'm a bit confused. From http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mcvsver=1.0.13-11arch=ia64stamp=1133382079file=logas=raw I see clisp-dev getting installed, but no clisp as described. However: 0/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/fakeroot/repository/clisp :) $ LC_ALL=C LANG=C apt-cache depends clisp-dev clisp-dev Depends: clisp |Depends: libreadline5-dev ... and the control file both _do_ specify a dependency on clisp. So, why isn't clisp getting fetched by the apt-get install ... clisp-dev ? I even checked on merulo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid Executing shell in chroot: /chroot/sid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache depends clisp-dev clisp-dev Depends: clisp ... On the same machine, same chroot: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-get install --simulate --option 'Debug::NoLocking=1' clisp-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: cl-asdf clisp common-lisp-controller libreadline5-dev libsigsegv-dev Suggested packages: clisp-doc slime Recommended packages: sbcl lisp-compiler The following NEW packages will be installed: cl-asdf clisp clisp-dev common-lisp-controller libreadline5-dev libsigsegv-dev 0 upgraded, 6 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. Inst cl-asdf (1.89-1 Debian:unstable) Inst common-lisp-controller (4.26 Debian:unstable) Inst clisp (1:2.35-9 Debian:unstable) Inst libreadline5-dev (5.0-11 Debian:unstable) Inst libsigsegv-dev (2.2-2 Debian:unstable) Inst clisp-dev (1:2.35-9 Debian:unstable) Conf cl-asdf (1.89-1 Debian:unstable) Conf common-lisp-controller (4.26 Debian:unstable) Conf clisp (1:2.35-9 Debian:unstable) Conf libreadline5-dev (5.0-11 Debian:unstable) Conf libsigsegv-dev (2.2-2 Debian:unstable) Conf clisp-dev (1:2.35-9 Debian:unstable) Note it does fetch clisp. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338529: mcvs: FTBFS: dangling symlink /usr/lib/clisp/base/lispinit.mem
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:37, Roland Stigge wrote: Is the clisp package configured? This should not happen if the package is configured. Without the build dependencies configured, pbuilder wouldn't even try to compile the package. Did you try? I think I have found the problem...but it is in common-lisp-controller instead. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338529: mcvs: FTBFS: dangling symlink /usr/lib/clisp/base/lispinit.mem
On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:29, Roland Stigge wrote: cd code; ./install.sh /usr /tmp/buildd/mcvs-1.0.13/debian/mcvs/ /usr/lib/clisp/base/lisp.run: operating system error during load of initialization file `/usr/lib/clisp/base/lispinit.mem' [spvw_memfile.d:834] Is the clisp package configured? This should not happen if the package is configured. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337994: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/bin/clisp: No such file or directory
On Monday 07 November 2005 19:33, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.6.0-9 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source sbcl failed to build on a sparc buildd and other buildds, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. I've been trying to explain this. How comes that there is no /usr/bin/clisp if clisp is installed? Is the clisp package broken for non-x86 architectures? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337258: cmucl: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Cannot find src/docs/interface/toolkit.dvi
Hello, On Thursday 03 November 2005 16:13, Daniel Schepler wrote: This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) entering extended mode (./internals.tex ... Output written on toolkit.pdf (8 pages, 102048 bytes). ... With what version of latex-bin is this? I get: 1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/fakeroot/repository/cmucl/src/docs/interface :) $ latex internals.tex This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) entering extended mode (./internals.tex LaTeX2e 2003/12/01 Babel v3.8d and hyphenation patterns for american, french, german, ngerman, b ahasa, basque, bulgarian, catalan, croatian, czech, danish, dutch, esperanto, e stonian, finnish, greek, icelandic, irish, italian, latin, magyar, norsk, polis h, portuges, romanian, russian, serbian, slovak, slovene, spanish, swedish, tur kish, ukrainian, nohyphenation, loaded. (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/article.cls Document Class: article 2004/02/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/size10.clo)) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/a4wide/a4wide.sty (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/ntgclass/a4.sty)) (./internals.aux) LaTeX Warning: No \author given. (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/omscmr.fd) Underfull \hbox (badness 1) in paragraph at lines 20--21 Underfull \hbox (badness 1) in paragraph at lines 55--56 [1] Underfull \hbox (badness 1) in paragraph at lines 84--85 Underfull \hbox (badness 1) in paragraph at lines 99--100 Underfull \hbox (badness 1) in paragraph at lines 108--110 [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] (./internals.aux) ) (see the transcript file for additional information) Output written on internals.dvi (7 pages, 23200 bytes). Transcript written on internals.log. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330468: sbcl: Can't start sbcl with kernel 2.4.27-2-686
On Friday 30 September 2005 10:48, Didier Verna wrote: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Expect a 2.4 sbcl, without threading, in my people.debian.org repositry soon. Thanks. BTW, I'm surprised that precompiled 2.4 kernels don't support multi-threading ? They do, but in 2.4 threading was done in a completely different way when in 2.6. For the C world this resulted in a move from pthreads to the NPTL library, for sbcl this enabled the use of more complex features. The end effect is that it now only works for a 2.6 kernel, even 2.4 kernel that are patched to allow the use of the NPTL library seem to pose intermittend problems, so I decided it was better to err on the side of caution. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330468: sbcl: Can't start sbcl with kernel 2.4.27-2-686
Hello, On Wednesday 28 September 2005 10:06, Didier Verna wrote: ... which I consider a bug since the Debian package installed just fine, I fear a debian package cannot depend on a given kernel version. and there don't seem to be an alternative sbcl package usable for me. I don't want to use a 2.6 kernel on my machine. Expect a 2.4 sbcl, without threading, in my people.debian.org repositry soon. I expect that the next version of debian will have a 2.6 kernel by default, so this problem should get fixed. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#321197: [cl-debian] Bug#321197: cl-port: logical host not yet defined: CLOCC
René van Bevern wrote: attached is a patch that defines the CLOCC logical pathname host correctly. Thanks, but I investigated this and it turned out that the cclan version that was the base for the old package just ignored the whole lpn thing. So I took over that solution. Sorry that for once I reacted more or less in a timely manner to a bugreport :-S. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson|
Bug#301792: sbcl contains file also in package sbcl-common
Andreas Liebig wrote: in Debian unstable, sbcl depends on sbcl-common, but conflicts with it: I had already fixed this problem, but the upload failed and I forgot to redo it. :-( There are fixed packages on people.debian.org/~pvaneynd/new-sbcl. I will reupload them asap. Sorry, Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
