Bug#566518: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#566518: bad libvdpau symlink
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 15:50 +0100, Tobias Wich wrote: > Hello, > > I have a similar problem with the vdpau package. My system informations are > the same as Remi's but I'm totally missing > the symlink. Adding the link as Remi proposed didn't work for me as > applications are expecting libvdpau in > /usr/lib/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 > > Adding this symlink solves my problems using vdpau in mplayer based video > players. Thanks all for pointing this out. Something is definitely wrong here. > ___ > Pkg-nvidia-devel mailing list > pkg-nvidia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-nvidia-devel -- ---- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#561239: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#561239: nvidia-glx_190.42-3_i386.deb with broken dependancy: package nvidia-kernel-190.42 does not exist
> nvidia-glx > Package nvidia-kernel-190.42 does not exist. Nvidia-kernel-source for kernel > 2.6.32-trunk-686 not usable with older nvidia-glx-package. > You need to build a kernel module using module-assistant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560984: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#560984: nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-source: Can't build due to spelling errors in the rules-file
>Package name: nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-source > Version: 96.43.14-1 > > Can't build due to spelling errors in the rules-file: > How are you building it? I just tried it with module-assistant and it worked fine. > Line 31: "binary-modules" > the doc tells: "binary_modules" > > Line 52:"dh_gencontrol -- -v$(VERSION)" > should be: "dh_gencontrol -v$(VERSION)" > > > > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: squeeze/sid > APT prefers hardy > APT policy: (500, 'hardy'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) > Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > > Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-source depends on: > ii debhelper 7.4.10 helper programs for debian/rules > ii dpatch2.0.31 patch maintenance system for > Debia > ii make 3.81-7 An utility for Directing > compilati > ii sed 4.2.1-6The GNU sed stream editor > > Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-source recommends: > ii devscripts2.10.59scripts to make the life of a > Debi > ii kernel-package12.031 A utility for building Linux > kerne > pn nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx (no description available) > > nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-source suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > > > > _______ > Pkg-nvidia-devel mailing list > pkg-nvidia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-nvidia-devel -- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556594: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#556594: [nvidia-glx-dev] Depends on and conflicts with >= nvidia-glx_190.42
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 01:51 +0100, Peter Fritzsche wrote: > Package: nvidia-glx-dev > Version: 190.42-1 > Severity: serious > > Wanted to install the nevest version and cannot do it because it depends and > conflicts with the same version of nvidia-glx. > > From the control file: > Depends: nvidia-glx (>= 190.42) > Conflicts: libgl-dev, mesa-common-dev, nvidia-glx (>= 190.42) Crap. I set the next version to the same number -- -------- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#534873: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#534873: Bug#534873: would be nice if nvidia-glx-ia32 185.18.14-2 amd64 could be in testing as soon as possible
> So can we build and upload the kernel modules or should we bug the > kernel-modules-non-free package person to add us (since that should > now work)? > We probably should go ahead with that soon. For all but 71xx which I think we will drop for this release since it no longer works. -- -------- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#534873: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#534873: Bug#534873: would be nice if nvidia-glx-ia32 185.18.14-2 amd64 could be in testing as soon as possible
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:36 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:56:32AM -0700, Randall Donald wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:04 +0200, Pierre Bauduin wrote: > > > Package: nvidia-glx-ia32 > > > Severity: serious > > > > > What's funny about this is you want a package to be in testing but > > filing a RC bug just added to reasons preventing that. > > What does it take for non-free packages to move to testing? Is it > automatic or not? With 2.6.30 now in testing, nvidia-glx no longer > works in testing until we get the new version moved in. > The testing transition first requires a kernel module package to satisfy the dependancy. Add to that no RC bugs. And even then some manual trickery might be required. -- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548840: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#548840: nvidia-kernel-source: Fails to compile
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 23:14 -0400, Liam Healy wrote: > Package: nvidia-kernel-source > Version: 173.14.09-5 Unfortunately, this version is not new enough to build against 2.6.30. -- ---- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#543487: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#543487: [nvidia-glx] Uninstallable because of conflicts with ia32-apt-get and ia32-*
> sudo apt-get -f install > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Correcting dependencies...Done > The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer > required: > ia32-libs-tools libvlccore0 > Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. > The following extra packages will be installed: > nvidia-glx > The following packages will be REMOVED > ia32-apt-get ia32-libavahi-client3 ia32-libcomerr2 ia32-libcups2 > ia32-libdrm- > intel1 ia32-libdrm2 ia32-libexif12 > ia32-libgl1-mesa-dri ia32-libgl1-mesa-glx ia32-libglu1-mesa > ia32-libgnutls26 > ia32-libgphoto2-2 ia32-libgphoto2-port0 > ia32-libgssapi-krb5-2 ia32-libieee1284-3 ia32-libk5crypto3 > ia32-libkeyutils1 > ia32-libkrb5-3 ia32-libkrb5support0 > ia32-libldap-2.4-2 ia32-libltdl7 ia32-libqt4-gui ia32-libqt4-opengl ia32- > libsane ia32-libsane-extras ia32-libsasl2-2 > ia32-libsasl2-modules ia32-libsmbios2 ia32-libtasn1-3 ia32-libusb-0.1-4 > ia32- > libv4l-0 ia32-libwine-gl ia32-libwine-gphoto2 > ia32-libwine-ldap ia32-libwine-print ia32-libwine-sane ia32-libxcomposite1 > ia32-libxdamage1 ia32-libxss1 ia32-libxv1 > ia32-wine nvidia-glx-ia32 skype > The following packages will be upgraded: > nvidia-glx > 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 43 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > This is all fine. ia32-libs has been reinstated after ia32-apt-get failed to get support from the masses. You'll have to install nvidia-glx-ia32 on its own afterwards. -- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#543487: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#543487: [nvidia-glx] Uninstallable because of conflicts with ia32-apt-get and ia32-*
Can you please set your language to English before submitting program output for a bug. Thanks, Randy -- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#543248: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#543248: nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx: Package is uninstallable (NOT a divert problem!)
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:28 +0300, David Baron wrote: > Package: nvidia-glx-legacy-71xx > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Installing this baby will happily remove all of xorg. > Not surprising since I don't think 71xx has been updated to support xorg 1.5 yet. We should probably check on that. > Hint: Nvidia's version reports: > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: > / AllocateScreenPrivateIndex > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: squeeze/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (650, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, > 'experimental') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-davidb (PREEMPT) > Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > > > > ___ > Pkg-nvidia-devel mailing list > pkg-nvidia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-nvidia-devel -- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#534873: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#534873: would be nice if nvidia-glx-ia32 185.18.14-2 amd64 could be in testing as soon as possible
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:04 +0200, Pierre Bauduin wrote: > Package: nvidia-glx-ia32 > Severity: serious > What's funny about this is you want a package to be in testing but filing a RC bug just added to reasons preventing that. > Trying to find out why it was not in testing yet, I looked at this > page: > http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=nvidia-glx-ia32 you need to use the source package name http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=nvidia-graphics-drivers > that I can't find libcuda.so.185.18.14. > cuda has been separated out now -- ------------ Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536545: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#536545: uninstallable
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 21:09 -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: > Package: nvidia-glx-ia32 > Version: 185.18.14-1 > Severity: grave > > nvidia-glx-ia32 now depends on 'ia32-libx11-6' and 'ia32-libxext6'. > Architecture. Those packages aren't in the archive. Am I supposed to > be using ia32-apt-get to install them? > Yes I believe so. -- -------- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536293: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#536293: nvidia-glx: shlibs file has obsolete package xlibmesa-gl as a dependency
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 17:11 -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > Package: nvidia-glx > Version: 185.18.14-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Justification: Policy 2.2 > Instead the resulting dependency should be 'libgl1-mesa-glx | libgl1' like > from > the main libgl library. > I suppose you didn't look at other bugs before reporting this. The shlibs stuff is fixed and sitting in NEW. > The 'nvidia-glx.shlibs' file should be written like this > > libGL 1 libgl1-mesa-glx | libgl1 > libGLcore 1 libgl1-mesa-glx | libgl1 > libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic 1 nvidia-glx > libnvidia-tls 1 nvidia-glx > > -- Package-specific info: > uname -r: > Linux andres-desktop 2.6.30-1-686 #1 SMP Sun Jun 14 16:11:32 UTC 2009 i686 > GNU/Linux > > > /proc/version: > Linux version 2.6.30-1-686 (Debian 2.6.30-1) (wa...@debian.org) (gcc version > 4.3.3 (Debian 4.3.3-11) ) #1 SMP Sun Jun 14 16:11:32 UTC 2009 > > > /proc/driver/nvidia/version: > > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G98 [GeForce 8400 GS] > (rev a1) > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: squeeze/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Versions of packages nvidia-glx depends on: > ii libc6 2.9-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries > ii libgcc1 1:4.4.0-10 GCC support library > ii libgl1-mesa-glx [li 7.4.4-1 A free implementation of the > OpenG > ii libx11-62:1.2.1-1X11 client-side library > ii libxext62:1.0.4-1X11 miscellaneous extension > librar > ii nvidia-kernel-2.6.2 185.18.14-1+2.6.29-5 NVIDIA binary kernel module for > Li > ii nvidia-kernel-2.6.3 185.18.14-1+2.6.30-1 NVIDIA binary kernel module for > Li > ii x11-common 1:7.4+3 X Window System (X.Org) > infrastruc > ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14compression library - runtime > > nvidia-glx recommends no packages. > > Versions of packages nvidia-glx suggests: > ii nvidia-kernel-source 185.18.14-1 NVIDIA binary kernel module > source > ii nvidia-settings 180.22-1Tool of configuring the NVIDIA > gra > > -- no debconf information > > > > ___ > Pkg-nvidia-devel mailing list > pkg-nvidia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-nvidia-devel -- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#534873: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#534873: [patch] emul/ia32-linux transition
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 21:04 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > tag 534873 + patch > thanks > > Attached is a patch for the /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib => /usr/lib32 > transition of the nvidia-graphics-drivers packages. > Applied and checked in. Unfortunately due to a small vacation I won't be able to upload this until Sunday. Author: rdonald Date: Wed Jul 1 22:10:13 2009 New Revision: 562 URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-nvidia/?sc=1&rev=562 Log: ia32 transition -- ------------ Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#533217: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#533217: nvidia-kernel-source 185.18.14-1 does not build under vanilla 2.6.28 or 2.6.30
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 19:20 +0200, Alain Cabiran wrote: > Package: nvidia-kernel-source > Version: 185.18.14-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I looked at "rules" file and there is not "kdist" target. Does > this source depend on more recent packages than lenny ones or > is it really broken ? > Yes the kdist target is still missing. The changelog mentions that module-assistant is still the only working build method. -- ---- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520706: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#520706: Bug#520706: nvidia-kernel-source: It still does not work.
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 15:06 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:10:54PM +0200, Anders Lagerås wrote: > > I don't use module-assistant > > with debian/rules binary_modules > > Well that's the problem then. So far it was only tested and setup to > work with module-assistant and linux-modules-2.6-nonfree. > > What arguments/environment do you pass along to binary_modules? It was > never meant to be used without arguments after all. > I'm guessing a VERSION variable needs to be set, but I haven't looked yet. -- ---- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#523716: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#523716: Bug#523716: Another build failure...
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 14:07 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 08:44:27AM -0700, Randall Donald wrote: > > > > > > > > > > KSRC=/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-686-bigmem \ > > > > KVERS=2.6.29-1-686-bigmem debian/rules binary_modules > > > > > > That is no longer a complete set of headers and you can't build against > > > it like that. The kernel team says that is no longer supported. > > > > > > > The strange thing here is that is how I tested mine (and didn't see the > > dh_clean problem). > > Did you remember to rm -rf /usr/src/modules/nvidia-* between runs to > avoid any existing files there from contaminating the test? Yup. I will try again though. Maybe I am on crack. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#523716: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#523716: Bug#523716: Another build failure...
> > > > KSRC=/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-686-bigmem \ > > KVERS=2.6.29-1-686-bigmem debian/rules binary_modules > > That is no longer a complete set of headers and you can't build against > it like that. The kernel team says that is no longer supported. > The strange thing here is that is how I tested mine (and didn't see the dh_clean problem). -- -------- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#523716: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#523716: nvidia-kernel-source: Does not build here either, but other problem
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 10:52 +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote: > Package: nvidia-kernel-source > Version: 180.44-1 > Severity: normal > > The package does not build here either, but it fails with the following > message: > > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel' > make[1]: *** Keine Regel, um »kdist_image« zu erstellen. Schluss. > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel' > Module /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel failed. > > The second line reads in english: *** No rule to make "kdist_image"... > How are you building this? -- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521862: More info about the evolution startup crash
Package: evolution Version: 2.24.5-2 Severity: normal I'll add that I have this issue as well and had to force install sqlite3 and libsqlite3-0 3.5.9-6 to get it to work again. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (200, 'unstable'), (9, 'testing'), (2, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages evolution depends on: ii dbus 1.2.12-1simple interprocess messaging syst ii evolution-common 2.24.5-2architecture independent files for ii evolution-data-s 2.24.5-3evolution database backend server ii gconf2 2.24.0-7GNOME configuration database syste ii gnome-icon-theme 2.24.0-4GNOME Desktop icon theme ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.20-2Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.24.0-2The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbluetooth23.36-1 Library to use the BlueZ Linux Blu ii libbonobo2-0 2.24.1-1Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.24.1-1The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.9-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo21.8.6-2+b1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libcamel1.2-14 2.24.5-3The Evolution MIME message handlin ii libdbus-1-3 1.2.12-1simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.80-3 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libebackend1.2-0 2.24.5-3Utility library for evolution data ii libebook1.2-92.24.5-3Client library for evolution addre ii libecal1.2-7 2.24.5-3Client library for evolution calen ii libedataserver1. 2.24.5-3Utility library for evolution data ii libedataserverui 2.24.5-3GUI utility library for evolution ii libegroupwise1.2 2.24.5-3Client library for accessing group ii libenchant1c2a 1.4.2-3.3 a wrapper library for various spel ii libexchange-stor 2.24.5-3Client library for accessing Excha ii libfontconfig1 2.6.0-3 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.3.9-4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgconf2-4 2.24.0-7GNOME configuration database syste ii libgdata-google1 2.24.5-3Client library for accessing Googl ii libgdata1.2-12.24.5-3Client library for accessing Googl ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.3-1 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.20.0-2The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-pilot2 2.0.15-2.4 Support libraries for gnome-pilot ii libgnome2-0 2.24.1-2The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2- 2.20.1.1-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.24.1-1The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 1:2.24.0-3 GNOME Virtual File System (runtime ii libgtk2.0-0 2.14.7-5The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkhtml-edito 3.24.5-2HTML rendering/editing library - e ii libgtkhtml3.14-1 3.24.5-2HTML rendering/editing library - r ii libhal1 0.5.11-8Hardware Abstraction Layer - share ii libice6 2:1.0.5-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libldap-2.4-22.4.15-1OpenLDAP libraries ii libnm-glib0 0.7.0.99-1 network management framework (GLib ii libnotify1 [libn 0.4.5-1 sends desktop notifications to a n ii libnspr4-0d 4.7.1-4 NetScape Portable Runtime Library ii libnss3-1d 3.12.2.with.ckbi.1.73-1 Network Security Service libraries ii liborbit21:2.14.17-0.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.22.4-3Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpisock9 0.12.3-10 library for communicating with a P ii libpisync1 0.12.3-10 synchronization library for PalmOS ii libpopt0 1.14-4 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 2:1.1.0-2 X11 Session Management library ii libsoup2.4-1 2.24.3-2an HTTP library implementation in ii libsqlite3-0 3.5.9-6 SQLite 3 shared library ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-13 userspace USB programming library ii libx11-6 2:1.2-1 X11 client-side library ii libxml2 2.7.3.dfsg-1GNOME XML library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-13 compression library - runtime Vers
Bug#504661: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#504661: A summary of issues
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 17:44 +, marcos.mar...@sonae.com wrote: > Hi there, > > Can you please tell me the status on this issue? > > Thanks, Truthfully the status is: there has been no work done on this issue. Most of my time has been spent trying to get 173xx out the door. The fix is to replace the old style diversions with the new ones plus any clean up. I certainly don't consider this an RC bug though. Regards, Randy -- -------- Randall Donald ra...@khensu.org http://www.khensu.orgrdon...@debian.org Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#504661: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#504661: nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx-dev: /usr/lib/libGL.so symlink broken
> > % chase /usr/lib/libGL.so > chase: /usr/lib/libGL.so.100.14.19: No such file or directory > so your /usr/lib/GL.so is pointing to /usr/lib/libGL.so.100.14.19 ??? Maybe the symlink remained from a previous install and didn't get overwritten. The init script must not check. > Also, how come it's the nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx package that diverts > libGL.so, not this one? > Because people use libgl1-mesa-dev to compile against Mesa. > > > ___ > Pkg-nvidia-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-nvidia-devel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#483650: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#483650: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: 'Xen kernel' breaks 'nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx-source'.
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 13:27 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 01:58:38PM -0700, Randall Donald wrote: > > Len, > > > > any news on that 71xx Xen patch? > > I am currently trying to do that, but I see 2.6.26 requires a new 71.xx > version from nvidia. I was trying to do this on my amd64 system, but it > would appear 71.xx doesn't come in an amd64 version, only i386. I guess > being that old that might make sense, but there are AGP systems with > amd64 in them, so it doesn't entirely make sense. Maybe I just can't > find the package, or there is only one file to download from nvidia for > it. http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_amd64_71.86.06.html > -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#483650: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#483650: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: 'Xen kernel' breaks 'nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx-source'.
Len, any news on that 71xx Xen patch? -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#495478: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#495478: nvidia-glx-ia32: Contains no actual 32-bit GL libraries
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/nonfree/nvidia-graphics-drivers$ dpkg-deb -c > nvidia-glx-ia32_173.14.09-3_amd64.deb > > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 ./ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 ./usr/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 ./usr/share/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 ./usr/share/doc/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 > ./usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx-ia32/ > -rw-r--r-- root/root 7906 2008-07-24 20:57 > ./usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx-ia32/copyright > -rw-r--r-- root/root 8013 2008-07-24 20:56 > ./usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx-ia32/changelog.Debian.gz > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 ./emul/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 ./emul/ia32-linux/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/ > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/tls/ > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 > ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so -> libGLcore.so.173.14.09 > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 > ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libcuda.so -> libcuda.so.173.14.09 > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 > ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.173.14.09 > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 > ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libnvidia-tls.so.1 -> libnvidia-tls.so.173.14.09 > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2008-07-24 20:57 > ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGL.so -> libGL.so.173.14.09 That is strange. I do not get that. Mine is: dpkg -c nvidia-glx-ia32_173.14.09-3_amd64.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/tls/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 2288 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.173.14.09 -rw-r--r-- root/root 13886208 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.173.14.09 -rw-r--r-- root/root671684 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGL.so.173.14.09 -rw-r--r-- root/root 2240 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libnvidia-tls.so.173.14.09 drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./usr/share/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./usr/share/doc/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx-ia32/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 7906 2008-07-24 10:46 ./usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx-ia32/copyright -rw-r--r-- root/root 8013 2008-07-24 10:45 ./usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx-ia32/changelog.Debian.gz lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libcuda.so -> libcuda.so.173.14.09 lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libnvidia-tls.so.1 -> libnvidia-tls.so.173.14.09 lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2008-07-24 10:46 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so -> libGLcore.so Did you build the package yourself? -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494201: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#494201: [nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx] Not installable because of unmet dependencies
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 22:34 +0200, Gerhard Wondrak wrote: > Package: nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx > Version: 96.43.05+1-1 > Severity: serious > >From the package description: Please see the nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-source package for building the kernel module required by this package. -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441975: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#441975: nvidia-glx should only provide the TLS version
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 01:16 +0100, Chris Reeves wrote: > Your thoughts and input would be much appreciated. > I was working on this yesterday based on your email. Just to confirm, will providing TLS-enabled libnvidia-tls in both /usr/lib and /usr/lib/tls work? -- ---- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#489389: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#489389: nvidia-glx: xserver does not start, complains about missing libwfb.so
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 14:01 +0200, Julien Langer wrote: > Also there's no libwfb.so on my system. Maybe because of my slightly > older xserver-xorg-core version 1.3.0? > That's exactly the reason. You'll need to upgrade or pull the nvidia one out of the source. it looks like we might need to add another dependancy. -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#483074: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#483074: Bug#483074: nvidia-kernel-source: same problem with make-kpkg
> That's the contents of the tar file. It would appear that the > permissions on the patches directory is in fact screwed up. We better > fix that. > Ah crap. I'll fix that tonight. -- ------------ Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#474734: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#474734: nvidia-kernel-source: X server doesn't recognize the correct version
Out of interest, how did you install the 16.09 version? do you have two nvidia.ko under /lib/modules/2.6.24-1-amd64/ ? I'll try to reproduce this later tonight. -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#474734: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#474734: nvidia-kernel-source: X server doesn't recognize the correct version
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 18:11 +0200, Sébastien MARQUE wrote: > hi Randall, > # cd modules/nvidia-kernel Try removing this directory first before untarring. > > -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB
Bug#474734: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#474734: nvidia-kernel-source: X server doesn't recognize the correct version
> After upgrading the nvidia-kernel-source package, then de-tarring it, I > compiled it, it gave me a .deb file stamped 169.12, I installed it compiled it how? -- ---- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#463467: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#463467: nvidia-glx: can't install, conficts with libgl1-mesa-swx11
> libgl1-mesa-swx11 conflicts with nvidia-glx That isn't my problem or bug. libgl1-mesa-swx11 in fact conflicts with all other opengl implementations i.e. Conflicts: libgl1, libgl1-mesa-swrast, mesag3, mesag3+ggi, mesag3-glide, mesag3-glide2, nvidia-glx If you need a libgl1 implementation installed nvidia-glx will co-exist (by way of diversions) with libgl1-mesa-glx. -- ---- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#459848: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#459848: 169.07-1 kernel module does not build with m-a due to packaging issues
> What's more, when I rename the tarball back to > /usr/share/nvidia-kernel-source.tar.bz2 and run m-a, then build fails with: > Hi again, I need more specifics to reproduce your issue. 1) Are you running as a normal user? 2) what module-assistant arguments or steps did you use? -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#459848: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#459848: 169.07-1 kernel module does not build with m-a due to packaging issues
> m-a no longer finds a kernel module source tarball because it was > renamed to /usr/share/nvidia-kernel.tar.bz2 I hope this isn't why the severity is serious. > $ ls -ld /usr/src/modass/usr_src/modules/nvidia-kernel/debian/patches.old/ > drw-r-Sr-- 2 modax src 4096 2008-01-07 22:51 patches.old/ > > $ ls -l /usr/src/modass/usr_src/modules/nvidia-kernel/debian/patches* > total 0 > ?- ? ? ? ?? > /usr/src/modass/usr_src/modules/nvidia-kernel/debian/patches.old/00list > ?- ? ? ? ?? > /usr/src/modass/usr_src/modules/nvidia-kernel/debian/patches.old/01_sysfs > ?- ? ? ? ?? > /usr/src/modass/usr_src/modules/nvidia-kernel/debian/patches.old/02_pcialias > ?- ? ? ? ?? > /usr/src/modass/usr_src/modules/nvidia-kernel/debian/patches.old/03_pci_get_class > ?- ? ? ? ?? > /usr/src/modass/usr_src/modules/nvidia-kernel/debian/patches.old/04_minion > Ok that is interesting. Ok I see why I didn't come across this. Thank you for reporting it. -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#458295: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#458295: nvidia-kernel-source: does not build using amd64 kernel using 32-bit userland
can you send me the output of "uname -a" and "dpkg-architecture" please. I'm trying to build a detection routine to decide which nv-kernel.o to include. thanks randy -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#432182: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#432182: Bug
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 17:45 +0200, David Lopez Zajara (Er_Maqui) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > 3 months later and the bug still here. Now, found on 100.14.19. > I'm wondering what you expect me to do about your freezes? Given the non-free status of the drivers I can't really fix anything. The policy I and other maintainers have used is to provide the latest and most card supporting versions unless there is a huge issue that is usually acknowledged by nvidia. The 9625 beta drivers with their problem of not working on NV20s are an example of this. > And, now I have broken the apt-get because nvidia-glx searches for > nvidia-kernel 100.14.19, and my module version is 100.14.09 > (functional). If correct these fail, the system uninstall the > Xserver-xorg package because nvidia-kernel depends on it. > I don't quite understand what you are saying here. Are you wondering how to build a kernel module? -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#446106: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#446106: nvidia-glx fails to install
> Sven, that was a really good piece of advice. aptitude indicated that the > problem was a conflict with package libgl1-mesa-swx11. I could not remove > that package without killing xorg&kde. But I could install libgl1-mesa-glx - > that removed libgl1-mesa-swx11 and a few other libraries while evidently > satisfying the necessary dependencies. After that, installing nvidia-glx > worked. > So what you ran into is the Conflict libgl1-mesa-swx11 has with nvidia-glx? This certainly isn't a bug with nvidia-glx. If anything it is a issue with apt-get not resolving the dependencies correctly. -- ------------ Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#446106: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#446106: nvidia-glx fails to install
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 16:28 +0200, Peder Chr. =?UTF-8?Q?N=C3=B8rgaard ?= wrote: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > kdelibs4c2a: Depends: xbase-clients but it is not going to be installed > xserver-xorg-core: Depends: xserver-xorg but it is not going to be installed > E: Broken packages > This probably has nothing to do with nvidia-glx. Have you tried running apt-get install -f ? -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#443112: xserver-xorg is uninstalled whenever I try to install new nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 21:30 +0200, Marek Turnovec wrote: > After my last update/upgrade of Debian unstable, I realized, that > xserver-xorg and some related packages where uninstalled because of new > version of nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx. When I tried to install xserver-xorg, > it uninstalled the nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx package. > > What is the problem? What I should do to resolve this? I need 96xx > version, because I have nVidia GeForce4 MX 440 Go graphics adapter. And > I can't change it is integrated in my notebook... Xorg 7.3 has entered unstable. It conflicts with packages providing xserver-xorg-video-1.0 such as the nvidia-glx suite. This is due to the ABI change. I would recommend grabbing xserver-xorg-core (and possibly others) from testing or to force install the nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx package and add -ignoreABI to your X starting procedure. -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441234: nvidia-glx: Cannot load nvidia driver with linux-image-2.6.22+10
> ,[ COLUMNS=130 dlocate -l nvidia|grep '^i'|cut -dN -f1 ] > ii nvidia-glx 100.14.11-1 > ii nvidia-kernel-2.6-k7 1.0.8776+6 > ii nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-4-k7 1.0.8776+6 > ii nvidia-kernel-2.6.22-1-k7 100.14.11-1 > ii nvidia-kernel-common 20051028+1-0.1 > ii nvidia-kernel-source 100.14.11-1 > ` > > ,[ /usr/share/bug/nvidia-glx/script 3>&1 ] > uname -r: > Linux athene 2.6.22-2-k7 #1 SMP Fri Aug 31 01:02:37 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux > I don't see a nvidia-kernel-2.6.22-2-k7 module in the list above. Could it be that you just don't have a module built for this kernel ? regards, randy -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437131: nvidia-kernel-source - provided patches does not apply
On Fri, 2007-10-08 at 17:19 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Severity: serious Hardly. These patches aren't even run anymore. > The patches in the source does not apply. > > | $ tar -xzf /usr/src/nvidia-kernel-source.tar.gz > | $ cd modules/nvidia-kernel/ > | modules/nvidia-kernel$ ./debian/rules > | modules/nvidia-kernel$ dpatch apply-all > | applying patch 01_sysfs to ./ ... failed. Like I said above the applying of these patches has been disabled in the normal build. Why are you applying them manually? Regards, randy -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#434529: nvidia-glx: won't install due to missing package
> nvidia-glx: Depends: nvidia-kernel-100.14.11 but it is not installable Build it from nvidia-kernel-source Using module-assistant is the easiest way. -- ---- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#432320: nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 - missing updates for 2.6.21
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 13:43 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 > Version: 1.0.8776+6 > Severity: serious > > nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 needs to be updated to 2.6.21. > > Bastian > Well there is a patch (http://grizach.sc18.info/nvpatch/) for 2.6.21 but I'm not sure how legal it is regarding the paravirtualization gpl-only problem. I have only become aware of the workaround recently (at least one that had an explanation) and had hoped 2.6.22 would be out by now. I'll investigate integrating it then. -- ------------ Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#428782: closed by Filipus Klutiero
> i have continued to defend the validity. the bug is obvious. the > package is uninstallable. this is considered a show stopping / > release critical bug. > What I'm not quite understanding is whether you think that a binary module package must exist in the archive or you are unwilling to build a module from nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-source yourself. Anyways, nvidia-graphics-legacy-96xx-modules-(i386|amd64) have been just uploaded to NEW so you'll have pre-build binary modules soon. -- ------------ Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#428782: closed by Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Close)
> there are no nvdia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6.18-4-* packages. > Not yet, no. Maybe by Monday there will be if I get around to it. Though they'll probably be for 9672 and 2.6.18-4. -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#427732: nvidia-kernel-legacy-source: Invalid module format when loading the module (package built via module-assistant).
Use nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx-source On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 02:06 -0300, Leandro Lucarella wrote: > Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-source > Version: 1.0.7184-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > I build nvidia-kernel-legacy-source via module-assistant: > > #> module-assistant prepare # gets linux-headers-2.6.21-1-k7 (2.6.21-4) among > others > #> module-assistant build nvidia--kernel-legacy-source # builds ok > #> module-assistant install nvidia--kernel-legacy-source # installs ok > #> modprobe nvidia > FATAL: Error inserting nvidia (/lib/modules/2.6.21-1-k7/nvidia/nvidia.ko): > Invalid module format > > The same happened with 2.6.20, I didn't report it because I thought it was > some temporary problem, but apparently that's not the case :( > > I have linux-image-2.6.21-1-k7 (2.6.21-4). > > #> lspci | grep VGA > 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NVCrush11 [GeForce2 MX > Integrated Graphics] (rev b1) > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: lenny/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core) > Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-legacy-source depends on: > ii debhelper 5.0.50 helper programs for debian/rules > ii dpatch2.0.25 patch maintenance system for > Debia > ii make 3.81-3 The GNU version of the "make" > util > ii sed 4.1.5-2The GNU sed stream editor > > Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-legacy-source recommends: > ii devscripts2.10.4 Scripts to make the life of a > Debi > ii kernel-package11.001 A utility for building Linux > kerne > pn nvidia-glx-legacy (no description available) > > -- no debconf information > -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#423711: nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx: Uninstallable, clashes with xserver-xorg-core
Can you try out the packages at : http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia/temp/ and report back to me. thanks. -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#423711: nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx: Uninstallable, clashes with xserver-xorg-core
ah crap. thanks. -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#423592: xorg crashes when trying to load the nvidia_drv.so
> (II) LoadModule: "dri" > (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libdri.so > (II) Module dri: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > compiled for 1.3.0, module version = 1.0.0 > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3 Can you disble this please as per the new xserver-xorg changelog with Disable "dri" and try again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400129: nvidia-glx: fails to uninstall: dpkg-divert error
> $ sudo dpkg --purge nvidia-glx > (Reading database ... 291706 files and directories currently installed.) > Removing nvidia-glx ... > dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting `/usr/lib/libGL.so' with > different file `/usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.xlibmesa', not allowed > dpkg: error processing nvidia-glx (--purge): > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2 > Errors were encountered while processing: > nvidia-glx > > nvidia-glx does purge if I remove libgl1-mesa-dev first. > Hmm, I wonder if this has to do with the file created by the init script. I'll try to reproduce this tonight. -- ---- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397685: kernel module uninstallable
Does http://www.khensu.org/nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-1-686_1.0.7184 +2_i386.deb work for you? It loads for me. -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397027: nvidia-glx: Can't start Xorg - wrong version of NVIDIA X driver
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 15:10 +0100, Johannes Bittner wrote: > Package: nvidia-glx > Version: 1.0.8776-1 > Severity: grave Well I don't quite buy that yet. > As you can see, everything got updated to the current version. But Xorg > fails to start. What follows is a cut-out of Xorg.0.log: > > --start-- > (**) NVIDIA(0): Use of NVIDIA internal AGP requested > (EE) NVIDIA(0): Version mismatch detected between the NVIDIA X driver and the > (EE) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GLX module. X driver version: 1.0-8774; GLX module > (EE) NVIDIA(0): version: 1.0-8776. Please try reinstalling the NVIDIA > (EE) NVIDIA(0): driver. Strange, Can you show me the output of ls /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ -l and ls /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/ -l -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363324: Dummy bug
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:19 -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > Sure. > This bug should normally be closed, as nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 is > no longer in testing and therefore nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 can't > FTBFS in testing anymore. However, when nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-2-686 and > company reach testing and nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 is old enough, > britney will transition nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 to testing unless a > RC bug prevents that, since britney ignores build-dependencies and won't > realize that letting nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 transition will make > it instantly FTBFS if nvidia-graphics-drivers (and therefore > nvidia-kernel-source) isn't in testing then. So since there won't be any modules in testing, will nvidia-graphics-drivers be forced in first? -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363324: Dummy bug
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 15:52 -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > Note that this bug no longer applies, but is kept open as a dummy > britney-helping bug to avoid the package to reenter testing once > linux-2.6 is updated, in case nvidia-graphics-drivers is not in testing > then. > That's a bit confusing. Would you care to explain that again? -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#393573: nvidia-glx: Buffer Overflow in NVIDIA Binary Graphics Driver For Linux leads to arbitrary code execution
Just a heads up: I'll try to get the 1.0.8776 bug fix release packages created tonight plus modules and such. -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#393573: Fixed upstream
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 01:38 +0200, Marco Amadori wrote: > As reported here [0] this bug seems to be fixed upstream in the new beta > driver 1.0-9625 [1] and 1.0-9626. > However true, we can't forget that these are beta drivers. I'm probably going to wait a bit to see what NVIDIA's response is or probe them if there isn't one. -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#389274: #389274 nvidia-kernel-2.6.17-1-686: not built against the latest kernel
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 22:52 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > will an nvidia-kernel-2.6.17-2-686 package be uploaded or is the new > nvidia driver only being built for the 2.6.18 kernels? > Only 2.6.18 kernels. It will be the kernel for etch. > mike > -- Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#390796: no nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules packages for current nvidia-glx-legacy
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 21:51 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Randall, > Howdy Steve, > The nvidia-glx-legacy package is uninstallable in unstable, and not being > updated in testing, because there are no nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386 > packages built for the current version. As this prevents bug #372252 from > being fixed in testing, this will most probably result in nvidia-glx-legacy > being dropped from etch if new binary packages aren't made available soon. > Ok, I'll build some today. > Does the module/driver ABI really change so frequently that each upstream > version needs its own ABI declaration? Unfortunately, they are expected to match. > Oh well, assuming for the moment > that this is the case, attached is a simple patch to update for the latest > kernel version and the latest nvidia ABI. I'm happy to NMU for this if you > don't have time to get to it. > Thanks, but I can get to this today so I have it in subversion. Out of interest, has etch's kernel been decided on yet? > BTW, are there any plans to provide prepackaged modules for the amd64 > n-g-d-l packages? > Yes I'll do these too. Thanks for being so helpful. -- Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#366756: AMD64: nvidia-glx deadlock (Xorg 7.0)
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 14:21 -0700, Johannes Graumann wrote: > I'm left with a deadlock situation - and non-functional X setup - after > initiating the upgrade to x11-common (Xorg 7.0). > nvidia-glx can't be upgraded since it depends on > nividia-kernel-1.0.8756, which is > unavailable. Until I have amd64 prebuilt modules ready you'll have to build your own via nvidia-kernel-source. -- Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#366243: nvidia-settings: Crashed with X Window System error
On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 13:27 +0200, Markus Schulz wrote: > ../nvidia-settings > The program 'nvidia-settings' received an X Window System error. > This probably reflects a bug in the program. > The error was 'BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)'. > (Details: serial 93 error_code 8 request_code 146 minor_code 4) > (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; >that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. >To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line >option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful >backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) I'm glad someone else reported this. I didn't know if it was just my computer or not. The binary that is included with the NVIDIA installer works just fine so it looks like I'm going to have to fire off an email asking what source they used to build it. Thanks, Randy -- Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362424: package nvidia-glx won't install
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 13:57 +0200, alex wrote: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: >nvidia-glx: Depends: nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 but it is not installable > E: Broken packages > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# Not willing to build your own kernel module from nvidia-kernel-source eh? Well prebuilt modules will be uploaded today and should enter the archive within a few days. -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#208198: proposed bug fix /3
I appreciate your help in this but I belive this is the wrong solution. What needs to happen is libGL.so when xlibmesa-gl-dev is installed must still point to the real libGL.so.1.2 which is now diverted to /usr/lib/nvidia. So in sense, libGL.so -> /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa And on top of this if nvidia-glx-dev is installed libGL.so would then point to the NVIDIA lib. Using the NVIDIA lib would cause incorrect linking. Regards -- Randall Donald -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329316: Does this still occur
Does the event in this bug report (329316) still occur under 8178 or 7174 legacy packages? -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347552: nvidia-kernel-2.6.14-2-686: cannot install: no relevant kernel-image available
> Please correct dependency or recompile for current 2.6.15 kernel. > Thanx, all the best, Well it's not a dependency, but a recommends. Still it is incorrect and I'll get a new version up right away. Thanks for pointing this out. -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341754: nvidia-kernel-source: nvidia kernel module build with kernel source 2.6.14.3 fails to load
> - > nvidia: Unknown symbol register_ioctl32_conversion > nvidia: Unknown symbol unregister_ioctl32_conversion > -- > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 3.1 > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Ugh. > Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3 1.0.7174 requires a patch to make it work. I haven't included it yet but you can find the amd64 one at http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=50150 Kernels about 2.6.12-rc require it. You could also try 1.0.7676 from http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia if they support your card. -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306843: nvidia-kernel-common: nvidia module not found when XFree86 starts
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 22:29 +0200, Gijs Hillenius wrote: > Package: nvidia-kernel-common > Version: 1.0.7174-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hello, > > this is an up to date debian box. XFree86 won't start. It complains: > Loadmodule: "nvidia" > Warning, couldn't open module "nvidia" > Failed to load module "nvidia" (module does not exist, 0) > Did you install nvidia-glx ? -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296907: nvclock policy issue followup, patch included
> place a Recommends: on nvidia-glx. > Actually it would have to be a Suggests: to stay in main as Recommends follow the same rules as Depends: regarding non-free relations. Thanks for the patch though. Kind regards, randy -- ---- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#267799: Ping about nvidia packages that fails to auto-load kernel module
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 14:29 +0100, Pierre Machard wrote: > Hi Randall, > > > do you plan to fix this bug in a near future ? I installed a Sarge Yes I do. I'm hoping on adding some mechanics to nvidia-kernel-common -- -------- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
