Bug#768618:
I'm not into the deadlines for jessie release but is there still a chance to get pacemaker back into the upcoming jessie release? This is quite a show stopper to ship debian 8 without a working cluster stack. Cheers, Stefan
Bug#745641: ITA: downtimed
retitle 745641 ITA: downtimed -- monitor of downtime, shutdown, and crashes thanks Hi Mats, i will take over your package and will prepare an upload within the next few hours. An initial sponsor upload would be nice as I'm only DM. Thank you. Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745641:
retitle 745641 Bug #745641 [ssl-cert-check] Missing dependencies thanks Ups! Sorry - wrong bug id. Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745219: crmsh: diff for NMU version 1.2.6+git+e77add-1.2
tags 745219 + patch tags 745219 + pending thanks [Replace XX with correct value] Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for crmsh (versioned as 1.2.6+git+e77add-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru crmsh-1.2.6+git+e77add/debian/changelog crmsh-1.2.6+git+e77add/debian/changelog --- crmsh-1.2.6+git+e77add/debian/changelog 2014-03-22 16:50:26.0 +0100 +++ crmsh-1.2.6+git+e77add/debian/changelog 2014-04-25 17:46:43.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +crmsh (1.2.6+git+e77add-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Depend on python-yaml to fix grave bug (Closes: #745219) + + -- Stefan Bauer (Cubewerk GmbH) stefan.ba...@cubewerk.de Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:46:39 +0200 + crmsh (1.2.6+git+e77add-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru crmsh-1.2.6+git+e77add/debian/control crmsh-1.2.6+git+e77add/debian/control --- crmsh-1.2.6+git+e77add/debian/control 2014-03-22 17:33:43.0 +0100 +++ crmsh-1.2.6+git+e77add/debian/control 2014-04-25 18:03:50.0 +0200 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Package: crmsh Architecture: any -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, python (= 2.6.6-9), python-support (= 0.90), python-lxml +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, python (= 2.6.6-9), python-support (= 0.90), python-lxml, python-yaml Recommends: pacemaker (= 1.1.8-1) Replaces: pacemaker ( 1.1.8-1) Breaks: pacemaker ( 1.1.8-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745737: AW: Bug#745737: scli segfaults on show command
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:Richard Lucassen debian-bugrepo...@xaq.nl Gesendet: Do 24.04.2014 17:57 Betreff:Bug#745737: scli segfaults on show command An: Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org; Package: scli Version: 0.4.0-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, When a server is queried for a large number of entries, scli segfaults. I've seen this on Debian Wheezy and Debian testing, both querying Ubuntu-8.04-LTS servers as well as Debian Wheezy servers. When a query is sent to an unconfigured Debian snmp server (system info only), everything seems to be ok. I'm checking currently with upstream. We can so far not trigger the behavior. Cheers Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745641: ssl-cert-check: diff for NMU version 3.27-1.1
tags 745641 + patch tags 745641 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ssl-cert-check (versioned as 3.27-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru ssl-cert-check-3.27/debian/changelog ssl-cert-check-3.27/debian/changelog --- ssl-cert-check-3.27/debian/changelog2013-05-09 02:44:30.0 +0200 +++ ssl-cert-check-3.27/debian/changelog2014-04-25 20:36:24.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +ssl-cert-check (3.27-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Depend on openssl and add Recommends: bsd-mailx | mailx +Thanks to Adam Majer (Closes: #745641). + + -- Stefan Bauer (Cubewerk GmbH) stefan.ba...@cubewerk.de Fri, 25 Apr 2014 20:36:09 +0200 + ssl-cert-check (3.27-1) unstable; urgency=low * debian/copyright: Update Format URL diff -Nru ssl-cert-check-3.27/debian/control ssl-cert-check-3.27/debian/control --- ssl-cert-check-3.27/debian/control 2013-05-09 02:44:30.0 +0200 +++ ssl-cert-check-3.27/debian/control 2014-04-25 20:36:07.0 +0200 @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ Package: ssl-cert-check Architecture: all -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, openssl +Recommends: bsd-mailx | mailx Description: proactively handling X.509 certificate expiration ssl-cert-check is a small shell script which checks digital certificate expiration. It can also check local certificate files and network -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745737: AW: Bug#745737: scli segfaults on show command
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:Richard Lucassen spamt...@xaq.nl Here you are: (gdb) run /usr/bin/scli /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1. 100 scli version 0.4.0 (c) 2001-2010 Juergen Schoenwaelder 500 snmp: no access to '/usr/bin/scli': Permission denied Richard, can you check your permissions? Thats the first error message that jumps to my mind from your log. Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#672926: AW: patch for netstat usage in oidentd init script
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org Gesendet: Di 04.12.2012 00:04 Betreff:Re: patch for netstat usage in oidentd init script An: Andreas Henriksson andr...@fatal.se; CC: 672...@bugs.debian.org; Stefan Bauer stefan.ba...@cubewerk.de; On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 17:08:46 +0100 Andreas Henriksson andr...@fatal.se wrote: See attached patch for optionally calling netstat (and awk) based on existance. Added bonus is alternative usage of iproute (and awk) for same functionality. The patch works for me. As Roger suggested, adding the dependency is a good idea, because otherwise the automatic adding of the -P option which the init script does is not working and the user does not know why. Therefore, I NMUed a version of oidentd with your patch and a dependency on iproute | net-tools. I am NMUing because I could not find any Debian activity by Stefan Bauer (the maintainer of oidentd) in 2012 at all and this bug has been open since 2012-05-14. Stefan: Do you still want to actively maintain oidentd? Hi Michael, sorry but i dont have time anymore for the debian packages i hold currently. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Stefan Bauer -- Tel +49 8621 996 02 37 Fax +49 3212 115 00 47 stefan.ba...@cubewerk.de | Cubewerk GmbH | Herzog-Otto-Straße 32 | D-83308 Trostberg | www.cubewerk.de - www.cubewerk.at - www.cubewerk.eu | HRB 22195 AG Traunstein | Geschäftsführer: Stefan Bauer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#619912: ipsec-tools: built in an unclean environment, depends on libssl1.0.0 (i386)
Am 28.03.2011 14:43, schrieb Julien Cristau: On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 14:29:53 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote: Am 28.03.2011 14:17, schrieb Julien Cristau: Package: ipsec-tools Version: 1:0.8.0-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'll schedule a binNMU. You can do this if you want. But i have a correct build ready to upload here. your choice! Well, unless you're going to fix #619687 a source upload isn't needed. The i386 binNMU is now building. Well 619687 is not interesting anymore as there is already a newer version in unstable. Kind of the same build problems but at different location. thanks for the binNMU. Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: 36D1 1570 DCAD B767 EABE F60D 6BCA 7AD4 79EB C4EC plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#593381: libmotif4-dbg and lesstif2-dbg: error when trying to install together
reassign 593381 libmotif4-dbg tags 593381 + fixed pending thanks there will be soon a fixed package on mentors.debian.net - a sponsoring of this package would be kind. Cheers Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#587461: `Createform' implicitly converted to pointer at main.c:113
tags 587461 fixed pending thanks Thank you for your report. A new package is soon at mentors, awaiting sponsoring. Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#583334: racoon and openswan: error when trying to install together
Am 31.05.2010 10:27, Rene Mayrhofer schrieb: On 05/27/2010 11:12 AM, Stefan Bauer wrote: Am 27.05.2010 11:05, Rene Mayrhofer schrieb: We could also simply add a mutual Conflicts, as there seems to be no reason to have both racoon and openswan installed. Actually, quite a few years ago (back in freeswan days...) it was decided between all IPsec-ish package maintainers to Provide and Conflict with a virtual ike-server package. For some reason, this seems to have been dropped. How about reviving this idea? openswan and strongswan-ikev[12] still provide ike-server, but don't conflict with it at the moment. Shall we just change that (I would need to figure out how to do this with two strongswan binary packages that actually don't conflict with each other, though)? I like it to give users the chance to decide if they want to have different software installed even if they serve the same purpose. So a conflict is not the best solution from my point of view. It might be handy to have both deamons installed alongside eachother for testing and stuff. Even tough this case is not happening quite often, it happens to the bug reporter. What is your opinion about that? I'm not sure if anybody would want both daemons installed at the same time - the bug report was created based on an automated installation test, AFAIK. Well ok. Let's take your ideas and use Provide and Conflict with a virtual ike-package. I will adjust the ipsec-tools/racoon package after i see your updated package in unstable. Might that be ok for you? Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#583334: racoon and openswan: error when trying to install together
Am 27.05.2010 09:04, Ralf Treinen schrieb: This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and diversions should only be used when packages provide different implementations for the same functionality. Hi Ralf, thank you for your report. Do you really think, removing the manpage in one package might be clever? As both packages are using the same function under the hood, both packages need to have an appropriate manpage for this. Both packages manpages include almost the same informations in their manpage. I only see some FIXME-tags in the openswan manpages. I would like to either rename the manpages shipped with racoon or let openswan-maintainers do that. I'm looking forward to get some response from the openswan-guys. Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#583334: racoon and openswan: error when trying to install together
Am 27.05.2010 11:05, Rene Mayrhofer schrieb: We could also simply add a mutual Conflicts, as there seems to be no reason to have both racoon and openswan installed. Actually, quite a few years ago (back in freeswan days...) it was decided between all IPsec-ish package maintainers to Provide and Conflict with a virtual ike-server package. For some reason, this seems to have been dropped. How about reviving this idea? openswan and strongswan-ikev[12] still provide ike-server, but don't conflict with it at the moment. Shall we just change that (I would need to figure out how to do this with two strongswan binary packages that actually don't conflict with each other, though)? I like it to give users the chance to decide if they want to have different software installed even if they serve the same purpose. So a conflict is not the best solution from my point of view. It might be handy to have both deamons installed alongside eachother for testing and stuff. Even tough this case is not happening quite often, it happens to the bug reporter. What is your opinion about that? Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#581407: dansguardian - problem accessing ssl-pages without appropriate exceptions
Package: dansguardian Version: 2.9.9.4-1+lenny1 Severity: serious Hi, host without an entry in the exceptioniplist get a timeout trying to access a https webpages. If i add them either into exceptioniplist or add the webpage as an exception, i can load them properly. There should be at least! an information for the user, that https-traffic is not allowed by the appropriate host! This is a bug and took me 2 days to figure out. Not to mention ,that this is a productive environment without options to just go ahead with a newer version. Maybe this is the default behavior to block ssl-pages without exceptions but anyway,there should be a blocked information for the user - so the admin can adjust configurations to fit the needs. this is already reported against dansguardian: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=722098aid=3000607group_id=131757 Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#569937: net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 breaks some buggy programs
Ross, after a lot of testing, i can't confirm your problem: Debian stable with latest kernel No matter if /proc/sys/net/ipv6/bindv6only is set to 0 or 1 I associated a connection and the link was up and used for 30 minutes without any breaks at all. (within this time, there also have been several forced rekeying processes to test this as well) I give this bug 5 more days so people have enough time to come up with facts / informations about this bug. After that i'll close that bug as it is not reproducable in my lab. thanks Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#569937: net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 breaks some buggy programs
Ross, i just extended my testings to 2 additional archs (amd64 and sparc) - same results. thanks Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573426: Please remove old lenny netinstaller as it points to missing kernel modules
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: serious Please remove the first lenny installer ... ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-sparc/20090123/images/netboot as the boot.img loads an old kernel where the required kernel modules are gone on all ftp servers. 2.6.26-1-sparc64 is used in the installer only 2.6.26-2-sparc64 and the appropriate kernel modules are available on the ftp-servers. Cheers -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573211: linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64 - Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64 Version: 2.6.26-21 Severity: critical Hi, i'm using the netinstall method to put debian on my sun V120 stations. (i took the netinst.img dated 13:46 30-01-10) from here: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-sparc/current/images/netboot/ I had no problem with linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64 but linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64 drops a Kernel panic. Additional informations here - other people also discovered that problem. http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-sp...@lists.debian.org/msg22126.html Probably any change between package 2.6.26-1 and 2.6.26-2 caused that problem. Older versions like 2.6.18 work also very well (like the old etch installer) This is a serious problem for me. Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573211: problem also persists in current unstable package
: rtc core: registered m48t59 as rtc0 [ 212.481472] TCP cubic registered [ 212.524531] NET: Registered protocol family 10 [ 212.585158] lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions [ 212.641620] Mobile IPv6 [ 212.673717] NET: Registered protocol family 17 [ 212.732542] registered taskstats version 1 [ 212.786963] rtc-m48t59 rtc-m48t59.0: setting system clock to 2010-03-09 15:52:30 UTC (1268149950) [ 213.359842] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs [ 213.438872] sungem.c:v0.98 8/24/03 David S. Miller (da...@redhat.com) [ 213.524336] usbcore: registered new interface driver hub [ 213.599156] eth0: Sun GEM (PCI) 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:03:ba:2f:f4:c4 [ 213.690764] eth0: Found Generic MII PHY [ 213.742146] usbcore: registered new device driver usb [ 213.829897] ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver [ 213.923584] eth1: Sun GEM (PCI) 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:03:ba:2f:f4:c5 [ 214.015198] eth1: Found Generic MII PHY [ 214.087171] ohci_hcd: USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver [ 214.212832] ohci_hcd :01:0c.3: OHCI Host Controller [ 214.339000] ohci_hcd :01:0c.3: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 [ 214.437248] ohci_hcd :01:0c.3: irq 7, io mem 0x1ffe200 [ 214.572714] usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0001 [ 214.662026] usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 [ 214.757091] usb usb1: Product: OHCI Host Controller [ 214.821395] usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.32-3-sparc64 ohci_hcd [ 214.903834] usb usb1: SerialNumber: :01:0c.3 [ 214.965851] usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 215.039932] hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found [ 215.089473] hub 1-0:1.0: 4 ports detected [ 215.142947] ohci_hcd :01:05.3: OHCI Host Controller [ 215.212162] ohci_hcd :01:05.3: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2 [ 215.310030] ohci_hcd :01:05.3: irq 10, io mem 0x1ffe500 [ 215.444690] usb usb2: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0001 [ 215.534065] usb usb2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 [ 215.629135] usb usb2: Product: OHCI Host Controller [ 215.693289] usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.32-3-sparc64 ohci_hcd [ 215.775772] usb usb2: SerialNumber: :01:05.3 [ 215.837540] usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 215.911495] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found [ 215.960932] hub 2-0:1.0: 4 ports detected [ 216.020880] eth0: Link is up at 10 Mbps, half-duplex. Starting system log daemon: syslogd, klogd. [ 232.841910] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference [ 232.916317] tsk-{mm,active_mm}-context = 0594 [ 232.989633] tsk-{mm,active_mm}-pgd = f8001d14a000 [ 233.058583] Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler! [ 233.147006] Press Stop-A (L1-A) to return to the boot prom Same goes for ...: Linux version 2.6.30-2-sparc64 (Debian 2.6.30-8) (wa...@debian.org) -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#569937: net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 breaks some buggy programs
submitter 569937 Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us thanks Ross, i'm trying to narrow the problems for this bug down. Could you please provide a few more informations: Which version of racoon and ipsec-tools did you use while you had vpn breaks? Whats the content of your /etc/gai.conf What's the output of lsof -iudp:500 thanks Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#569937: net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 breaks some buggy programs
forwarded 569937 https://trac.ipsec-tools.net/ticket/323 thanks Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: E80A 50D5 2D46 341C A887 F05D 5C81 5858 DCEF 8C34 plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#545102: oidentd: Fails to upgrade complaining about cross-device link
* GSR gsr.b...@infernal-iceberg.com [05.09.2009 01:06]: Error installing /tmp/inetdcf8BDpi to /etc/inetd.conf: Invalid cross-device link dpkg: warning: old pre-removal script returned error exit status 18 close 545102 thanks this is not a bug in oidentd - it's related with the last update of update-inetd: Please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544927 -- cubewerk -- stefan.ba...@cubewerk.de IT-Beratung + Planung --- Tel +49 8621 996 02 37 Herzog-Otto-Straße 32 --- Fax +49 7211 513 38551 83308 Trostberg www.cubewerk.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#544927: oidentd: Error installing /tmp/inetdcf3dFWo to /etc/inetd.conf: Invalid cross-device link
Is /tmp mounted with noexec? A workaround is to set in /etc/apt/apt.conf DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {mount -o remount,exec /tmp;}; DPkg::Post-Invoke {mount -o remount /tmp;}; -- Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org