Bug#1013933: Keep xsane out of Debian releases

2022-12-25 Thread Svein Engelsgjerd
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 17:29:53 + (UTC) Alexis PM 
 wrote:
> Please consider reducing the severity of the bug to allow the 
inclusion of xsane in the next stable release.

>
> xsane has no equivalent software available. Its GUI allows you to use 
advanced features of SANE not available graphically in other GUIs.

>
> xsane is usable in the currently packaged version (removed in testing 
due to this bug). It does not have any bug that prevent me from using it 
on a daily basis.

>
> At https://popcon.debian.org/by_inst xsane is ranked 2346, by 
comparison sane is ranked 7457.

>
> Its development is low in the last years, the last commit is from 6 
months ago ( https://gitlab.com/sane-project/frontend/xsane ), but this 
is not a reason to remove a software that is useful, usable, popular and 
no equivalent available.

>
> Thank you very much.
>
>

I agree. As long as there are no alternative, please keep xsane in the 
bookworm release. While the GUI has it's flaws it does NOT render the 
entire package unusable so removing it (when no alternative exist) is a 
bit drastic.



--
-
Regards
Svein Engelsgjerd



Bug#942877: goattracker sliently quits wiht exit code 1 on Debian Bullseye

2019-10-22 Thread Svein Engelsgjerd
Package: goattracker
Version: 2.75-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?
   Trying to start goattracker

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
   run it under gdb. Goattracker quits with exit code 1

   * What was the outcome of this action?
   Goattracker did not start

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
   An error message explaining to me why goattracker does not start (and 
preferably a working goattracker)



-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages goattracker depends on:
ii  libc62.29-2
ii  libgcc1  1:9.2.1-8
ii  libsdl1.2debian  1.2.15+dfsg2-5
ii  libstdc++6   9.2.1-8

goattracker recommends no packages.

Versions of packages goattracker suggests:
ii  milkytracker 1.02.00+dfsg-1
pn  opencubicplayer  
pn  schism   

-- no debconf information



Bug#890102: openshot: Openshot 2.4.1-2 will not start

2018-02-11 Thread Svein Engelsgjerd
Package: openshot
Version: 2.4.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
I ran an upgrade

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
I did not do anything special

   * What was the outcome of this action?
When I start openshot the GUI constantly flickers between the main window and 
the "welcome window" / tutorial dialog.
It is not possible to click the next button so the welcome window prevents the 
application from being useful.
(the desktop environment is XFCE)

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
I expect that the GUI does not flicker and does not constantly change focus 
between the two windows.

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages openshot depends on:
ii  openshot-qt  2.4.1-2

openshot recommends no packages.

openshot suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#874105: virtualbox: Virtualbox seems to conflict with BTRFS when trying to install ReactOS 0.4.6

2017-09-03 Thread Svein Engelsgjerd
Package: virtualbox
Version: 5.1.26-dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?
I wanted to try to install ReactOS 0.4.6. My rootfs is btrfs with 
metadata=raid10 and data=raid1
While VirtualBox was running dmesg showed a constant stream of csum failed root 
5 ino XXX off XXX csum XXX expected csum XXX mirror 1 messages.
Note that the mirror was always 1.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
I stopped the VM that was running the ReactOS installer. All the errors stopped
I ran a scrub on my btrfs filesystem afterwards. No errors detected.
I checked smart data for my SSD's No errors detected, no sign of wear.
I tried various file operations (md5sum, sha1sum, cp, hexeditor etc...) on the 
.vdi file - no corruption messages

   * What was the outcome of this action?
While this could just as easily be a btrfs bug I suspect that  VirtualBox's 
vboxdrv is the cause here.
I may be wrong about this, so my apologies if that is the case.
Btrfs fixes the corruptions and appear to be in a good state as long as the 
VirutalBox VM is not running.
qemu/kvm works fine. Using that instead.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
I expected no errors while running VirtualBox on top of my BTRFS rootfilessytem.

   * Other information:
While I did not experience any dataloss I fear that this is fragile and *might* 
cause dataloss for some.
this is the reason I classify this bug as grave. This is also causing me to 
avoid testing for a while
until I get some feedback on this one.

I am aware that BTRFS have it's share of bugs, but I run with a minimal 
configuration that have not caused
any issues for years (it has actually fixed a few silent data corruptions here 
and there).

So since my hardware and data checked out fine and the data is instact I think 
this could be a conflict
between the btrfs and/or vboxdrv module. I am not skilled enoguh to find that 
out for myself.

BTW: The VirtualBox vdi file contains a VFAT filesystem (reactos uses that). 
This does NOT appear to be
the issues as I have tested other stuff with VFAT without any issues.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages virtualbox depends on:
ii  adduser   3.116
ii  init-system-helpers   1.49
ii  iproute2  4.9.0-1
ii  libc6 2.24-14
ii  libcurl3-gnutls   7.55.0-1
ii  libdevmapper1.02.12:1.02.137-2+b1
ii  libgcc1   1:7.2.0-1
ii  libgsoap-2.8.49   2.8.49-1
ii  libpng16-16   1.6.31-1
ii  libpython3.5  3.5.4-2
ii  libsdl1.2debian   1.2.15+dfsg2-0.1
ii  libssl1.1 1.1.0f-4
ii  libstdc++67.2.0-1
ii  libvncserver1 0.9.11+dfsg-1
ii  libvpx4   1.6.1-3
ii  libx11-6  2:1.6.4-3
ii  libxcursor1   1:1.1.14-1+b4
ii  libxext6  2:1.3.3-1+b2
ii  libxml2   2.9.4+dfsg1-3.1
ii  libxmu6   2:1.1.2-2
ii  libxt61:1.1.5-1
ii  procps2:3.3.12-3
ii  python3   3.5.3-3
ii  python3.5 3.5.4-2
ii  virtualbox-dkms [virtualbox-modules]  5.1.26-dfsg-2
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-5

Versions of packages virtualbox recommends:
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  13.0.6-1+b2
ii  libqt5core5a  5.9.1+dfsg-9
ii  libqt5opengl5 5.9.1+dfsg-9
ii  libqt5widgets55.9.1+dfsg-9
ii  virtualbox-qt 5.1.26-dfsg-2

Versions of packages virtualbox suggests:
ii  vde22.3.2+r586-2.1
pn  virtualbox-guest-additions-iso  

-- no debconf information



Bug#863290: src:linux: no warning that btrfs RAID5/6 is buggered up

2017-06-04 Thread Svein Engelsgjerd
Package: src:linux
Followup-For: Bug #863290

Dear Maintainer,

I would like voice my concern as well. Btrfs RAID5/6 really needs a warning.
These days most (if not all) of the problems you see with Btrfs is caused by
the unstable features (https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Status).

RAID5/6 in kernel 4.9 is less than stellar and should absolutely not be used
for anything except testing and experimentation.

RAID1 actually needs a warning too. It will not work as "classic" RAID1 e.g.
it need to be able to make two copies always to not get stuck in read only mode.
You will not loose your data which is a good thing, but to be safe you need a
minimum of 3 devices (I would prefer four or more to be on the safe side).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64
 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



Bug#844285: pidgin: steals (warps) mouse cursor (not just focus) when new message comes in [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2017-02-25 Thread Svein Engelsgjerd
Package: pidgin
Followup-For: Bug #844285

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
Read the bugreport

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
For what it's worth. I have also been using Pidgin (on XFCE4) for years. Never 
observed the mentioned bug.

   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages pidgin depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0 2.22.0-1
ii  libc6   2.24-9
ii  libcairo2   1.14.8-1
ii  libdbus-1-3 1.10.16-1
ii  libdbus-glib-1-20.108-2
ii  libfontconfig1  2.11.0-6.7
ii  libfreetype62.6.3-3+b1
ii  libgadu31:1.12.1-4
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0  2.36.4-1
ii  libglib2.0-02.50.2-2
ii  libgstreamer1.0-0   1.10.3-1
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.24.31-2
ii  libgtkspell02.0.16-1.1
ii  libice6 2:1.0.9-1+b1
ii  libpango-1.0-0  1.40.3-3
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.40.3-3
ii  libpangoft2-1.0-0   1.40.3-3
ii  libpurple0  2.11.0-3
ii  libsm6  2:1.2.2-1+b1
ii  libx11-62:1.6.4-3
ii  libxss1 1:1.2.2-1
ii  perl-base [perlapi-5.24.1]  5.24.1-1
ii  pidgin-data 2.11.0-3

Versions of packages pidgin recommends:
ii  gstreamer1.0-alsa  1.10.3-1
ii  gstreamer1.0-libav 1.10.3-1
ii  gstreamer1.0-plugins-base  1.10.3-1
ii  gstreamer1.0-plugins-good  1.10.3-1
ii  gstreamer1.0-pulseaudio1.10.3-1

Versions of packages pidgin suggests:
ii  libsqlite3-0  3.16.2-2

-- no debconf information



Bug#827022: fs-uae: FS-UAE segfaults when started

2016-06-11 Thread Svein Engelsgjerd
Package: fs-uae
Version: 2.6.2+dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,


   * What led up to the situation?
Trying to start fs-uae

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
I did not do anything other than start it.

   * What was the outcome of this action?
Since I did nothing there was no outcome

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
I expected fs-uae to start



-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages fs-uae depends on:
ii  libc6 2.22-9
ii  libfreetype6  2.6.3-3+b1
ii  libgcc1   1:6.1.1-4
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  11.2.2-1
ii  libglew1.13   1.13.0-2
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.48.1-1
ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1]9.0.0-2.1
ii  libmpeg2-40.5.1-7
ii  libopenal11:1.17.2-1
ii  libpng16-16   1.6.21-5
ii  libsdl2-2.0-0 2.0.4+dfsg2-1
ii  libstdc++66.1.1-4
ii  libx11-6  2:1.6.3-1
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1

fs-uae recommends no packages.

fs-uae suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#767996: fs-uae-launcher fails to launch fsuae

2014-11-03 Thread Svein Engelsgjerd
Package: fs-uae-launcher
Version: 2.4.1+ds-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?

A upgrade of the system. Sadly can't say when it happened

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?

starting fs-uae-launcher with this fixes the problem.
__GL_WRITE_TEXT_SECTION=0 fs-uae-launcher

   * What was the outcome of this action?
fs-uae-launcher now launches fsuae seemingly without any issues.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
I expected fsuae to work "out of box" without this workaround.
As far as I was told this is a nvidia problem and not exactly a problem
with fsuae per.se. However I still think that as long as this is a known problem
with nvidia a workaround should be considered since it basically makes 
fs-uae-launcher
useless. (Using nvidia packages from the debian repos)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages fs-uae-launcher depends on:
ii  fs-uae 2.4.1+ds-2
ii  python 2.7.8-1
ii  python-pyside  1.2.2-1
ii  python-setuptools  5.5.1-1

fs-uae-launcher recommends no packages.

fs-uae-launcher suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org