Bug#1012795: libengine-gost-openssl1.1: Shared library file in /
This seems to be caused by last NMU :( libengine-gost-openssl 3.0.1-1, which fixes that (and other) problem, and also deprecates libengine-gost-openssl1.1, is in the NEW queue. I will leave the bug open, though, until it installs in the archive, as a reminder. Thanks for the report! On Tue, Jun 14, 2022, 11:39 Cédric Hannotier wrote: > Package: libengine-gost-openssl1.1 > Version: 1.1.0.3-1.1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > The package is ill-configured and end up > putting gost.so in the root of the filesystem (/gost.so), > as shown in [1]. > The source of the issue is [2], which is empty... > > [1] > https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libengine-gost-openssl1.1/filelist > [2] > https://sources.debian.org/src/libengine-gost-openssl1.1/1.1.0.3-1.1/debian/rules/#L22 > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: bookworm/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, > 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 5.17.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) > Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=en_US:en > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled > > Versions of packages libengine-gost-openssl1.1 depends on: > ii libc62.33-7 > ii libssl3 3.0.3-7 > > libengine-gost-openssl1.1 recommends no packages. > > libengine-gost-openssl1.1 suggests no packages. > > -- > > Cédric Hannotier >
Bug#1006391: NMU: libengine-gost-openssl1.1: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0
Thanks for the NMU! The package isn't abandoned, I just discovered I have some technical problems with my DD key :( Once that is resolved, I will upload latest engine version which is intended to work in 3.0 environment. On Sat, May 21, 2022, 02:00 Bastian Germann wrote: > The right thing to do to solve this would be importing the new release. > I NMU this with the already existing Ubuntu patches so it does not block > the openssl migration. > > As the package seems to be abandoned, add already handed-in cross-compile > patch as well. > The debidff is enclosed.
Bug#520711: Bug still here?
I personally haven't seen it with the images I built yesterday, so I guess all the necessary libc parts are in place now. On 4/25/09, Christian Perrier wrote: > Hello Rick, > > Do you still experience the "Bad archive mirror" problem you were > experiencing with Debian Installer Squeeze images? > > > -- > > > -- Regards, Wartan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#440950: [Fwd: Bug#444950: No fixed]
What does gnucash bug #444950 has to do with qgit's number #440950? Thank you for removing my package from testing :( On Jan 14, 2008 5:33 AM, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Saïvann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:14:52 -0500 > Subject: Bug#444950: No fixed > I confirm that it's not fixed too. Here's the clean debdiff patch which > fix this problem : > > http://upload.leservicetechnique.com/bugs/gnucashdesktop.debdiff > > -- > Saïvann > > > > -- Regards, Wartan.
Bug#441280: qgit: new upstream available, fixes #440950 and also data corruption
On 9/10/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > cloned this bug as #441570 since my NMU will fix #440950 and > the data corruption. Thanks a lot for help! I'll upload new upstream release in few days. -- Regards, Wartan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#412451: Package unusable
On 3/17/07, Aurélien GÉRÔME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I came upon this while wanting to try qgit and really felt frustrated. To my mind, our users deserve better. I can prepare a NMU if you do not have the time to deal with it, just let me know... Sure they do. I'll upload 1.5.5 today. -- Regards, Wartan.
Bug#378496: A correct patch
For the reference. -- Regards, Wartan. firegl.patch Description: Binary data
Bug#347211: fookb: FTBFS: missing build-dependency
On 1/9/06, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Automatic build of fookb_3.0-2 on maxwell by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 79 > > Build started at 20060109-1318 Hmm. That's kfreebsd? Could you please show a relevant part of config.log where it fails to find X installed? I can't really understand how this may happen if you've all the build-depends satisfied.. -- Regards, Wartan.