Bug#1073218: src:vim-eblook: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thank you for answering quickly. Okay I realized that mistaken point. I uploaded binary and source. That is wrong. I needed to upload source only. And I choose 2) Wait option. You taught me improving point. Thanks again. Best Regard. Yukiharu On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:24:19 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > > How do I fix? > > Multiple options > 1) Upload a new version, but only upload source, without binary packages > 2) Wait, because I did the above to DELAYED [3] > 3) if you have the privileges, you could reschedule my upload to DELAYED > (but I doubt you have them). > > > This package uses vim script. That is why I choose 'arch:all'. - -- Yukiharu YABUKI -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEZ4rGejxaFgWBItYhcagC0LzRvJIFAmZu+dAACgkQcagC0LzR vJIJQxAAwej+GAacpKv0LG9gbWQmxWMbDiR/uKn9howM+yRe+cVkyaNpK+JItugv TclUe+UI4Jq2wrsrJuwhnwNS5AT4wvcD8zFP+oRXZQsByX5MmJ9cYjcdvOylT5+9 Ir6nXC18tMB6/8UX7RpgmfkSuFapIaRJzlprGA745DU9NN5qNpV4Qahz/vmqRNh+ jMepQ6hXOOJTznUumd8pYypqNcBWbkTBOVm0ndfNvzXuymNLQ9A7j3i1+PlCvv3b TC6ynQVw9YwFcQT5Zum+O5JhIZwSWdjsZyI9HPB7AxEX+4LrgOuxreMI+L4wNX2m g4HlnpDD5N43KJ4wDkqa3l/Dze4cQ/el7UAEhTN/yCJ9ybxt0fHSrDApyHzUDCCK hf7kOsoEzuijci0dE+toKDhxORJ/vzSfiNaUPM/u81doT3cCfNxrMFIeAYcXcV5y wEt3OoOoPCyNEebqAyu/T0MIvWTvEdw/bZUjiJGW21Bbf8PX2eJm5hzd1V09LGCh K8+SnAqx0Iha2BDnsg3xyznND+vsjWL0hG82aTyL1Ib2rnXLTAxtaVErvIvJKmsU XtpoAamg5C5aDENZDDhlVAjLgwItadSL9AlizWpb4qJ2P5cYnJ2mMcb+FxTR8fek ANaoDo4XEGWgLFuWmqgxtyvh0eeJF1MtpE4t+V6CEJW1SC7BO70= =1nxc -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#1073218: src:vim-eblook: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Release Team. I am wondering that vim-eblook package is out of sync. What point is wrong? How do I fix? This package uses vim script. That is why I choose 'arch:all'. On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 21:02:58 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Your package is only blocked because the arch:all binary package(s) > aren't built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure > doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will > shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this > bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload. - -- ++++++====+++====+++++ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: yab...@netfort.gr.jp クレクレタコラは好き / クレクレタコだはイヤ ++++++++++++++ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEZ4rGejxaFgWBItYhcagC0LzRvJIFAmZuLj8ACgkQcagC0LzR vJLHbg//RPH2z9E3j5gdlkGCF/S+Bg3AqZCbJrjTdA/cvgwRt5tfWZ1Xwq9Gf5F+ exhMCHmm+sIWbyHhVsarxXBKXaJKSGTcGFdiw/4/R0MajNIN2o/LwAlbWCY4k39E kIuWuq9xQXFIJ/e3tYSP5V+k3hVrVv5g5Zj8GB3Vc2Dfub7vjT+k+SzwkMcr6ghK vhLparI7vNLmYh21+DmHj4N9quaVkSjJEM+AsWqegTgtE5KjneFZzTM1+0FiVhBP hbMnjh/sZBXzV4g5GCVCgT9ozRwaVFplALwmIJeF1Oo915/VikHX0T5GMnB80ltS ReF9nwdRxJ76aSuqTm27VcidA0AptCEpWZIBYz1zadvcuAGaCqtzUZGjOvFgFkLX oakvwFdWOakUHo7/aFpL6C/EBLwBwJ7AnTGezmh9Zg1IdsmadKVIEeXRK2msE3Xt WnwVdrLzTF2vAIUd0CJ/xZwt7w1RonM/eRssvOLC9I516gNYqZYXx8/Jd0CUFNEJ wJl0LxexWYaEEGKLGuozHmE1nVLqlq7bdDZXuJSJzusJ/56Mi4+iDbZ1P13zqnfS faetpzWDj8AYRJGCi4nzDjZhxj+IKHYt4hGAcOGG6cjcv5Xu3ysf3XLZXW4bPaS3 vPrjbgPTG+yo+0jRd7iX7NeA8fFyBJx+vSSWkQz65cR0u3auPQU= =ulEi -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#1066624: xfireworks: FTBFS: etc.c:11:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘time’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi, Thanks for your comment. I'll try to enable -Werror=implicit-function-declaratin On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:58:32 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [snip] > This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see > https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration > > Relevant part (hopefully): > > cc -c arguments.c -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 > > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. > > -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat > > -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection > > etc.c: In function ‘InitializeRand’: > > etc.c:11:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘time’ > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > >11 | srand((unsigned)time(NULL)); > > | ^~~~ > > etc.c:2:1: note: ‘time’ is defined in header ‘’; did you forget to > > ‘#include ’? > > 1 | #include "etc.h" > > +++ |+#include > > 2 | > > cat xfireworks.1 | gzip -9 > xfireworks.6.gz > > gzip: warning: GZIP environment variable is deprecated; use an alias or > > script > > cat xfireworks.conf | ./mkconf > xfireworks_conf.h > > cc -c XFireworks.c -I/usr/X11R6/include -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g > > -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration > > -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong > > -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > make[1]: *** [Makefile:73: etc.o] Error 1 [snip] -- Yukiharu YABUKI
Bug#853219: vim-voom can not work with vim 8
Package: vim-voom Version: 5.1-3 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, I installed vim-voom in sid. I found grave bug. When I use VOoM with vim 8, I found a error which is "Can not find completion function missing". It means that you can not use VOoM with vim8. But I work VOoM with vim7 in jessie. 3 days ago, I found new upstream release. It works with vim 8. Strech which is next release will ship with vim 8. Please update new upstream as soon as possible. -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.7 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ja_JP.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages vim-voom depends on: ii vim-nox 2:7.4.488-7+deb8u1 Versions of packages vim-voom recommends: ii vim-addon-manager 0.5.3 vim-voom suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- ++++++++====+++====+++ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: yab...@netfort.gr.jp クレクレタコラは好き / クレクレタコだはイヤ ++++++++++++++
Bug#798360: vim-voom: fails to install: vim-voom.postinst: line 23: vim-addon-manager: command not found
Thank you for reporting. I realized vim-voom package has depended vim-addon-manager. vim-policy tells me, do not install vim plugin automatically. I'll remove preinst, postinst, prerm scripts. Then, I write how to work round in README.debian. I have done piuparts except upgrad test. That are fine. On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:44:05 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: vim-voom > Version: 5.1-2 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As > per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for > a release, thus the severity. > > >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > Selecting previously unselected package vim-voom. > (Reading database ... > (Reading database ... 11248 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to unpack .../vim-voom_5.1-2_all.deb ... > /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 19: /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: vim-addons: > not found > Unpacking vim-voom (5.1-2) ... > Setting up vim-voom (5.1-2) ... > /var/lib/dpkg/info/vim-voom.postinst: line 23: vim-addon-manager: command > not found > dpkg: error processing package vim-voom (--configure): >subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status > 127 > Errors were encountered while processing: >vim-voom > > > cheers, > > Andreas -- ++++++++++++++ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: yab...@netfort.gr.jp ++++++++++++++ pgp1OMVT86Mf6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#768723: Is this FTBfS cause by pry?
Hello, there I checked build log. This build log tells us pry should put "*[spc][spc]" but, pry replied "*[spc]". Lucas, Can you check pry build in sbuild? if pry gives "*[spc]" is pry's bug, but pry gives "*[spc][spc]" is not pry's bug. If pry echos two spaces, test framework or low level (Maybe in buffering?) has a bug. That is why, It is difficult to reproduce this bug. I rebuild pry and test "def x" by hand. I checked pry echos two spaces. Lucas, please try your binary. and try to test "def x" by hand. Best Yukiharu. -- ====+++====+++++++++++ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: yab...@netfort.gr.jp ++++++++++++++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#684839: scim-prime: FTBFS: scim_prime_imengine_setup.cpp:131:8: error: 'GtkTooltips' does not name a type
hi, Lucas I checked your build log. It seems to me that you need to wait nmu fix until migrating testing from sid. You made dash board tells me "RC bug affecting testing only (ensure the package migrates)" -- ++++++++++++====++ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: yab...@netfort.gr.jp ++++++++++++++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678890: scim: fail to start scim after latest upgrade
reassign 678890 prime thanks Hi, guys It seems to me that this issue based on ruby transition. prime package should change point from '/usr/bin/env ruby' to '/usr/bin/ruby1.8' in src directory in deban source. I made fixed package, if omote-san does not have time. I will do NMU. -- Yukiharu YABUKI -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573905: When will a new package be uploaded?
Hi, all I have just made nmu package. But, I haven't been uploaded yet. Because this is my first time of source format 3.0 quilt. And this patch should apply before configure. I uploaded temporally space, please check it. http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~yabuki/tmp/ On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 20:00:00 -0400 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:19:50AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 18.03.2010, 12:08 -0400 schrieb Roberto C.Sánchez: > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:25:08PM +0700, Yukiharu YABUKI wrote: > > > > Tags: 573905 + patch > > > > > > > > Sorry guys. > > > > > > > > I attached wrong patch. > > > > This patch is correct. > > > > > > This looks much better. Thanks very much for looking at this and taking > > > care of it, as I have been too swamped to really solve this. > > > > Roberto, do you plan to upload a new package or do you want someone to > > do a NMU? > > > > > > Thanks to everyone working on this bug, > > > An NMU would be fantastic. I do not know when I will have time to work > on this package in the very near future. > > Regards, > > -Roberto > > -- > Roberto C. Sánchez > http://people.connexer.com/~roberto > http://www.connexer.com > -- ====++++++++++++++ 〒550-0002 大阪市西区江戸堀2-1-1 江戸堀センタービル9F KIIRE JAPAN Inc. http://www.kiire.co.jp/ TEL : 090-2041-8170 FAX : 06-6225-1212 Yukiharu YABUKI (矢吹幸治) ++++++++++++++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573905: e:libbfd. libbfd-simple.a
Tags: 573905 + patch Sorry guys. I attached wrong patch. This patch is correct. static-libbfd-v2.patch Description: Binary data
Bug#573905: libbfd. libbfd-simple.a
Tags: patch Hi, there This patch applied once then I built oprofile package. It look fine. Please check this patch. I am ready to upload nmu package. Regards Yukiharu. bug537744.patch Description: Binary data
Bug#573905: libbfd.a libbfd-simple.a
Hi, there. I found oprofile patch in debian/patches. And It was not apply now. I suppose you already knew binutils-dev provide "/usr/lib/libbfd.a". And multiarch-binutils provide "/usr/lib/libbfd-simple.a". I guess applied the patch. Then while build script making exceute file, Build script check (1)link libbfd-simple.a (2)if (1) failed link libbfd.a. Is my understanding correct? I guess that m4/binutils.m4 has to be modify. Regards. Yukiharu -- ++++++++++====+++====+ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: yab...@netfort.gr.jp ++++++++++++++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#569875: libi18n-ruby: drop ruby1.9.0 binary package
Subject: libi18n-ruby: drop ruby1.9.0 binary package
Followup-For: Bug #569875
Package: libi18n-ruby
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I am sorry last patch was incomplete.
I have just made patch for dropping ruby1.9.0 binary.
The debdiff are attached. I will upload for Delay 3 days
Hello from the 2010 Thai BSP:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianThailand/MiniDebCamp2010/BSP
Cheers,
- Yukiharu
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
diff -u libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/control libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/control
--- libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/control
+++ libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/control
@@ -34,12 +33,0 @@
-
-Package: libi18n-ruby1.9
-Architecture: all
-Depends: libruby1.9, ${misc:Depends}
-Description: I18n and localization solution (Ruby 1.9)
- Implementation of the Ruby on Rails I18n core API. This is the same I18n
- library included in the Ruby on Rails framework, but provided outside of
- that framework for those who wish to use it without pulling the entire
- Ruby on Rails framework.
- .
- This package is built for Ruby 1.9.
-
diff -u libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/changelog libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/changelog
--- libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/changelog
+++ libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libi18n-ruby (0.1.1~git20081120-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Drop ruby1.9.0 binary package.(Cloese #569875)
+
+ -- YABUKI Yukiharu Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:40:29 +0700
+
libi18n-ruby (0.1.1~git20081120-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Update package section to ruby to comply with new archive layout.
Bug#569875: libi18n-ruby: drop ruby1.9.0 binary package
Subject: libi18n-ruby: drop ruby1.9.0 binary package Followup-For: Bug #569875 Package: libi18n-ruby Tags: patch *** Please type your report below this line *** I have just made patch for dropping ruby1.9.0 binary. The debdiff are attached. Is it OK for NMU? Hello from the 2010 Thai BSP: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianThailand/MiniDebCamp2010/BSP Cheers, - Yukiharu -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash diff -u libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/changelog libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/changelog --- libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/changelog +++ libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libi18n-ruby (0.1.1~git20081120-3.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * drop ruby1.9.0 binary package. + + -- YABUKI Yukiharu Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:38:49 +0700 + libi18n-ruby (0.1.1~git20081120-3) unstable; urgency=low * Update package section to ruby to comply with new archive layout. diff -u libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/control libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/control --- libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/control +++ libi18n-ruby-0.1.1~git20081120/debian/control @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Athena Capital Research Uploaders: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers , Roberto C. Sanchez Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), cdbs, ruby-pkg-tools (>= 0.14) -Standards-Version: 3.8.3 +Standards-Version: 3.8.4 Homepage: http://rails-i18n.org/ Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-ruby-extras/trunk/libi18n-ruby/ Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-ruby-extras/trunk/libi18n-ruby/
Bug#573620: FYI:MagickLibSubversion was replaced
Hi there. I just investigate for this issue in BPS in Khon Kean (mini DebCamp2010). MagickLibSubversion was replaced with MagickLibAddendum after it is version 2.5.9. This url seems interesting. Have a look http://osdir.com/ml/general/2010-03/msg10760.html I got your patch in svn.debian.org by debcheckout. Thanks for your maintainance works. Regards Yukiharu. -- ++++++++++++++ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: yab...@netfort.gr.jp ++++++++++++++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#527782: migemo: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: textutils
Hello Folks. It seems to me that textutils transition period was finished. Then textutils package removed. And, AMD64 environment need to install coreutils. coreutils package provides textutils package function. I made a minimal patch. = I found other lintian report when I rebuild this package. - Need to update standard version - debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error -- should be change "[ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) clean RUBY=$(RUBYPATH)" W: migemo: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/migemo-client W: migemo: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/migemo-grep W: migemo: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/migemo-server - Have to make manpages - W: migemo: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file -- Need to update copyright file. - W: migemo: depends-on-old-emacs depends: emacs21 This is unsure. I checked upstream web page. They sure that migemo worked on Emacs 20.7, 21.2.1, XEmacs 21.4. I guess migemo work on Newer Emacs. But I did not try yet. -- ++++++++++++====++ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: yab...@netfort.gr.jp ++++++++++++++ diff -ru migemo-0.40/debian/control migemo-0.40.yabuki/debian/control --- migemo-0.40/debian/control 2009-05-13 16:01:57.0 +0900 +++ migemo-0.40.yabuki/debian/control 2009-05-13 16:04:08.0 +0900 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Fumitoshi UKAI Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0) -Build-Depends-Indep: ruby, ruby1.8-dev, libromkan-ruby, libbsearch-ruby, skkdic, textutils, emacs21 | emacsen, automake +Build-Depends-Indep: ruby, ruby1.8-dev, libromkan-ruby, libbsearch-ruby, skkdic, coreutils, emacs21 | emacsen, automake Standards-Version: 3.7.2 Package: migemo
Bug#520818: [apt-build] apt-build fails to install
Hi, Arnfinn Ringvold I read your bug report. And I checked postinst in apt-build. I wonder that why does "mkdir -p" command fails. If you keep the environment or reprocedure the environment, Please give us result of "debconf-show auto-build". like below. yab...@yelona:~$ (LANG=C;debconf-show apt-build) debconf: DbDriver "passwords" warning: could not open /var/cache/debconf/passwords.dat: Permission denied apt-build/arch_amd: k6 apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4 apt-build/options: * apt-build/arch_intel: core2 apt-build/arch_arm: armv2 apt-build/make_options: * apt-build/olevel: Medium apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64 * apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true -- ++++++++====+++====+++ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: yab...@netfort.gr.jp ++++++++++++++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#403745: yc-el: install script fails when it is invoked repeatedly
Hi I fixed the problem. And yc-el_4.0.13-7 will be upload soon. -- ++++++++++++++ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian GNU/Linux mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++++++++++++++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
