Bug#1004018: Is smb-nat still useful?

2022-04-26 Thread Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)

Hi Adrian,


I just went into this package and found it might be still useful. The 
purpose of this package is different than the samba tools.


This package is trying to test some simple security holes that a samba 
server might expose.
It will try to iterate all public shares. And tries to login into it by 
common user names and passwords.


So it seems to me that this package is still useful.

I'll prepare a NMU soon. I'll send a debdiff, waiting for 10 days. And 
then I'll upload to delay/10 queue.

Migrate to debhelper 13 and debsrc3.0 seems not very hard to me.

Yours,
Paul



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1004018: Is smb-nat still useful?

2022-01-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: smb-nat
Version: 1:1.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm sid

Does smb-nat provide any functionality that is not also provided
by Samba tools (that were originally written by the same author)?