Processed: Re: Bug#1009417: saga: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1009417 [src:saga] saga: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils". Added tag(s) patch. -- 1009417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009417 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1009417: saga: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
Control: tags -1 patch
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:55:44PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/12/22 20:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > checking for python script directory (pythondir)...
> > > ${PYTHON_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
> > > checking for python extension module directory (pyexecdir)...
> > > ${PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
> > > checking for python3.10... (cached) /usr/bin/python3
> > > checking for a version of Python >= '2.1.0'... yes
> > > checking for the distutils Python package... no
> > > configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
> > > Please check your Python installation. The error was:
> > > :1: DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated and
> > > slated for removal in Python 3.12. Use setuptools or check PEP 632 for
> > > potential alternatives
>
> Johan can you fix this (upstream)?
>...
The minimal fix of silencing the deprecation warning is attached.
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
cu
Adrian
Description: Silence the distutils deprecation message that caused FTBFS
Author: Adrian Bunk
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1009417
--- saga-7.3.0+dfsg.orig/m4/ax_python_devel.m4
+++ saga-7.3.0+dfsg/m4/ax_python_devel.m4
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ variable to configure. See ``configure -
# Check if you have distutils, else fail
#
AC_MSG_CHECKING([for the distutils Python package])
- ac_distutils_result=`$PYTHON -c "import distutils" 2>&1`
+ ac_distutils_result=`$PYTHON -c "import distutils" 2>/dev/null`
if test -z "$ac_distutils_result"; then
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
else
Bug#1009417: saga: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
I will check.
The mRMR issue has been addressed. I will target a new release (and change
the build system to cmake, as autotools will be deprecated next release).
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:55 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> On 4/12/22 20:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> checking for python script directory (pythondir)...
> ${PYTHON_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
> >> checking for python extension module directory (pyexecdir)...
> ${PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
> >> checking for python3.10... (cached) /usr/bin/python3
> >> checking for a version of Python >= '2.1.0'... yes
> >> checking for the distutils Python package... no
> >> configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
> >> Please check your Python installation. The error was:
> >> :1: DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated and
> slated for removal in Python 3.12. Use setuptools or check PEP 632 for
> potential alternatives
>
> Johan can you fix this (upstream)?
>
> And has the mRMR license issue been addressed upstream to unblock
> updating the package to 8.x?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
> --
> GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
> Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
>
Bug#1009417: saga: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
On 4/12/22 20:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
checking for python script directory (pythondir)...
${PYTHON_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
checking for python extension module directory (pyexecdir)...
${PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
checking for python3.10... (cached) /usr/bin/python3
checking for a version of Python >= '2.1.0'... yes
checking for the distutils Python package... no
configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
Please check your Python installation. The error was:
:1: DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated and slated
for removal in Python 3.12. Use setuptools or check PEP 632 for potential alternatives
Johan can you fix this (upstream)?
And has the mRMR license issue been addressed upstream to unblock
updating the package to 8.x?
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Bug#1009417: saga: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
Source: saga
Version: 7.3.0+dfsg-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for python script directory (pythondir)...
> ${PYTHON_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
> checking for python extension module directory (pyexecdir)...
> ${PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
> checking for python3.10... (cached) /usr/bin/python3
> checking for a version of Python >= '2.1.0'... yes
> checking for the distutils Python package... no
> configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".
> Please check your Python installation. The error was:
> :1: DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated and
> slated for removal in Python 3.12. Use setuptools or check PEP 632 for
> potential alternatives
> tail -v -n \+0 config.log
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/04/12/saga_7.3.0+dfsg-7_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220412;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220412&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
