Bug#1023149: pandoc: diff for NMU version 2.17.1.1-1.1
Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-11-24 03:00:41) > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Control: tags 1023149 + patch > > Control: tags 1023149 + pending > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I've prepared an NMU for pandoc (versioned as 2.17.1.1-1.1) and uploaded > > it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. > > Can this NMU be accepted ASAP? > > Assuming I'm reading excuses correctly, I believe this is preventing a > massive number of haskell packages from migrating to testing. I welcome this bugfix and agree: @Adrian, please release it without further delay. Unfortunately I cannot take over and release now myself, as my GPG key has expired so I cannot do package uploads until the next batch update of the keyring data (which was estimated to happen two days ago, so will probably happen soonish). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#1023149: pandoc: diff for NMU version 2.17.1.1-1.1
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:00:41PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Control: tags 1023149 + patch > > Control: tags 1023149 + pending > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I've prepared an NMU for pandoc (versioned as 2.17.1.1-1.1) and uploaded > > it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. > > Can this NMU be accepted ASAP? > > Assuming I'm reading excuses correctly, I believe this is preventing a > massive number of haskell packages from migrating to testing. I assume this is approval from a member of the maintainer team, and have rescheduled pandoc for immediate upload. > Thanks, > Scott cu Adrian
Bug#1023149: pandoc: diff for NMU version 2.17.1.1-1.1
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Adrian Bunk wrote: Control: tags 1023149 + patch Control: tags 1023149 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for pandoc (versioned as 2.17.1.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. Can this NMU be accepted ASAP? Assuming I'm reading excuses correctly, I believe this is preventing a massive number of haskell packages from migrating to testing. Thanks, Scott
Bug#1023149: pandoc: diff for NMU version 2.17.1.1-1.1
Control: tags 1023149 + patch Control: tags 1023149 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for pandoc (versioned as 2.17.1.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru pandoc-2.17.1.1/debian/changelog pandoc-2.17.1.1/debian/changelog --- pandoc-2.17.1.1/debian/changelog 2022-08-13 17:45:31.0 +0300 +++ pandoc-2.17.1.1/debian/changelog 2022-11-19 15:13:51.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +pandoc (2.17.1.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Workaround i386 FTBFS with -O0. (Closes: #1023149) + + -- Adrian Bunk Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:13:51 +0200 + pandoc (2.17.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ upstream ] diff -Nru pandoc-2.17.1.1/debian/rules pandoc-2.17.1.1/debian/rules --- pandoc-2.17.1.1/debian/rules 2022-08-13 17:27:42.0 +0300 +++ pandoc-2.17.1.1/debian/rules 2022-11-19 15:13:49.0 +0200 @@ -192,6 +192,10 @@ DEB_SETUP_GHC_CONFIGURE_ARGS += --ghc-options="-optc--param -optcggc-min-expand=10 -O0" endif +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU), i386)) +DEB_SETUP_GHC_CONFIGURE_ARGS += --ghc-options="-O0" +endif + DEB_SETUP_GHC_CONFIGURE_ARGS += $(if $(filter nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),,-ftests) DEB_INSTALL_DOCS_ALL += README.md
