Bug#1033732: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2apic
On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 03:13:05PM +0200, Guy Durrieu wrote: > Yes it does. Thanks for testing. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Bug#1033732: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2apic
Hi Guy, On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 03:13:05PM +0200, Guy Durrieu wrote: > Le 02/04/2023 à 12:57, Borislav Petkov a écrit : > > > On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu > > wrote: > > > My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after > > > upgrading to 6.1.20 and resulted in a kernel panic: > > Does this fix it: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=x86/urgent > > > > Thx. > > > Yes it does. Thanks, the commit will be part of the next upload: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/692 Thanks for your time put in debugging the issue. Regards, Salvatore
Bug#1033732: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2apic
Le 02/04/2023 à 12:57, Borislav Petkov a écrit : On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu wrote: My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after upgrading to 6.1.20 and resulted in a kernel panic: Does this fix it: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=x86/urgent Thx. Yes it does. Regards. -- Guy Durrieu
Bug#1033732: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2apic
On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu wrote: >My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after >upgrading to 6.1.20 and resulted in a kernel panic: Does this fix it: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=x86/urgent Thx. -- Sent from a small device: formatting sucks and brevity is inevitable.
Bug#1033732: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2apic
Le 05/01/2023 à 05:10, Kishon Vijay Abraham I a écrit : Section 5.2.12.12 Processor Local x2APIC Structure in the ACPI v6.5 spec mandates that both "enabled" and "online capable" Local APIC Flags should be used to determine if the processor is usable or not. However, Linux doesn't use the "online capable" flag for x2APIC to determine if the processor is usable. As a result, cpu_possible_mask has incorrect value and results in more memory getting allocated for per_cpu variables than it is going to be used. Make sure Linux parses both "enabled" and "online capable" flags for x2APIC to correctly determine if the processor is usable. Fixes: aa06e20f1be6 ("x86/ACPI: Don't add CPUs that are not online capable") Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) Reported-by: Leo Duran Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Hello everyone, My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after upgrading to 6.1.20 and resulted in a kernel panic: --- [ 0.117782] Kernel panic — not syncing: timer doesn’t work through Interrupt-remapped IO-APIC [ 0.117848] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.1.0-7-and64 #1 Debian 6.1.20-1 [ 0.117913] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. ABS50M-Gaming 3/AB350M-Gaming 3-CF, BIOS F50d 07/02/2020 [ 0.117982] Call Trace: [ 0.118634] [ 0.118685] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x5c [ 0.118143] panic+0x118/0x2ed [ 0.118198] panic_if_irq_remap.cold+0x5/0x5 [ 0.118256] setup_I0_APIC+0x3db/0x64b [ 0.118313] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x23/0x40 [ 0.118372] ? clear_IO_APIC_pin+0x169/0x240 [ 0.118429] apic_intr_node_init+0x101/0x106 [ 0.118485] x86_late_time_init+0x20/0x34 [ 0.118542] start_kerne1+0x667/0x727 [ 0.118598] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xe5/0xeb [ 0.118658] [ 0.118711] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: timer doesn’t work through Interrupt-remapped IO-APIC J--- --- I tried an update of the BIOS up to F51h without any effect. I sent a bug report to Debian Bug Tracking System. In reply Bjørn Mork identified ce7d894bed1a539a8d6cff42f6f78f9db0c9c26b from the linux-6.1.y branch as the likely culprit. After building a 6.1.20 kernel with just that commit reverted, my system boots normally again. I reported that all tohttps://bugs.debian.org/1033732 and were asked to report the issue 'upstream' (which is what that mail is). Hope it will help! Best regards. -- Guy Durrieu