Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2023 07:03:55 +0000
with message-id <e1ptk3h-00hbxi...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1034969: fixed in node-terser 5.16.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034969,
regarding terser: missing Breaks+Replaces for uglifyjs.terser when upgrading 
from bullseye
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1034969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034969
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: terser
Version: 5.16.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: dpkg unpack error

Attempting to unpack terser/5.16.4-1 from Debian bookworm
on a minimal Debian bullseye with uglifyjs.terser/4.1.2-8
installed, causes an unpack error from dpkg due to
/usr/share/nodejs/terser/bin/uglifyjs being contained in both packages.

| Selecting previously unselected package terser.
| dpkg: considering deconfiguration of uglifyjs.terser, which would be broken 
by installation of terser ...
| dpkg: yes, will deconfigure uglifyjs.terser (broken by terser)
| (Reading database ... 4922 files and directories currently installed.)
| Preparing to unpack ./terser_5.16.4-1_all.deb ...
| De-configuring uglifyjs.terser (4.1.2-8) ...
| Unpacking terser (5.16.4-1) ...
| dpkg: error processing archive ./terser_5.16.4-1_all.deb (--unpack):
|  trying to overwrite '/usr/share/nodejs/terser/bin/uglifyjs', which is also 
in package uglifyjs.terser 4.1.2-8
| Errors were encountered while processing:
|  ./terser_5.16.4-1_all.deb


Please ensure that terser has sufficient Breaks and Replaces declarations.

Helmut

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: node-terser
Source-Version: 5.16.5-2
Done: Yadd <y...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
node-terser, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1034...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yadd <y...@debian.org> (supplier of updated node-terser package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 06:52:23 +0400
Source: node-terser
Architecture: source
Version: 5.16.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers 
<pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Yadd <y...@debian.org>
Closes: 1034969
Changes:
 node-terser (5.16.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Duplicate Breaks field with Replaces (Closes: #1034969)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 4f4eb21c75ea4b5cceb463baef4fc848b6d2ba1c 2477 node-terser_5.16.5-2.dsc
 b2f1f6a96d2b24b9fdbd3a9529058dfeb2ad24fa 14080 
node-terser_5.16.5-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256: 
 6917cf41335baf42e4d14713b1e58c438df8b707039c2de735d53a2e3f0ed3e6 2477 
node-terser_5.16.5-2.dsc
 b239f53ca06cc93f79d09c3e0457e38a03d70e74c1473a1ea0557ace59eacfef 14080 
node-terser_5.16.5-2.debian.tar.xz
Files: 
 7bb5cb84f984a38fbccc2f9a8dc62d46 2477 javascript optional 
node-terser_5.16.5-2.dsc
 dc3aac2072970753f873014927c650d4 14080 javascript optional 
node-terser_5.16.5-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=m/Cz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to