Processed: Re: src:libdmx Bug#1035474: Don't include in Bookworm?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 1035474 -1 Bug #1035474 [src:libdmx] Don't include in trixie? Bug 1035474 cloned as bug 1070350 > block 1035474 by -1 Bug #1035474 [src:libdmx] Don't include in trixie? 1035474 was not blocked by any bugs. 1035474 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1035474: 1070350 > reassign -1 xorg-dev Bug #1070350 [src:libdmx] Don't include in trixie? Bug reassigned from package 'src:libdmx' to 'xorg-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions libdmx/1:1.1.4-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1070350 to the same values previously set > retitle -1 xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev Bug #1070350 [xorg-dev] Don't include in trixie? Changed Bug title to 'xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev' from 'Don't include in trixie?'. > found -1 1:7.7+23 Bug #1070350 [xorg-dev] xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev Marked as found in versions xorg/1:7.7+23. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1035474: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035474 1070350: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070350 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1035474: src:libdmx Bug#1035474: Don't include in Bookworm?
clone 1035474 -1 block 1035474 by -1 reassign -1 xorg-dev retitle -1 xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev found -1 1:7.7+23 thanks On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:50:16 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:28:02AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti 3.5.2023 klo 20.44: > > Source: libdmx > > Version: 1:1.1.4-2 > > Severity: serious > > > > The Xorg folks mentioned at https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/05/02/3: > > > > | We have also announced that we plan to retire the following packages soon > > | and while their gitlab repos are not yet archived, we expect they will be > > | archived in the future, and encourage distros that still ship them to > > | consider retiring them on your side as well: > > | > > | lib/libdmx: > > | The Xdmx server was removed from the xorg-server sources in > > | xorg-server 21 (released Oct. 2021), so this is only useful > > | for communicating with Xdmx from the 1.20 and older releases. > > > > Given that Bookworm has xorg-server 21 and there are no rdeps in the archive, > > let's exclude it from bookworm (and remove entirely eventually)? > > sounds good Unfortunately I missed that xorg-dev depends on libdmx-dev, so this will have to wait until after the Bookworm release. Let's make a bug for xorg-dev then. I'm *assuming* it's no longer needed. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1035474: Don't include in Bookworm?
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:28:02AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti 3.5.2023 klo 20.44: > > Source: libdmx > > Version: 1:1.1.4-2 > > Severity: serious > > > > The Xorg folks mentioned at > > https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/05/02/3: > > > > | We have also announced that we plan to retire the following packages soon > > | and while their gitlab repos are not yet archived, we expect they will be > > | archived in the future, and encourage distros that still ship them to > > | consider retiring them on your side as well: > > | > > | lib/libdmx: > > | The Xdmx server was removed from the xorg-server sources in > > | xorg-server 21 (released Oct. 2021), so this is only useful > > | for communicating with Xdmx from the 1.20 and older releases. > > > > Given that Bookworm has xorg-server 21 and there are no rdeps in the > > archive, > > let's exclude it from bookworm (and remove entirely eventually)? > > sounds good Unfortunately I missed that xorg-dev depends on libdmx-dev, so this will have to wait until after the Bookworm release. Cheers, Moritz
Bug#1035474: Don't include in Bookworm?
Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti 3.5.2023 klo 20.44: Source: libdmx Version: 1:1.1.4-2 Severity: serious The Xorg folks mentioned at https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/05/02/3: | We have also announced that we plan to retire the following packages soon | and while their gitlab repos are not yet archived, we expect they will be | archived in the future, and encourage distros that still ship them to | consider retiring them on your side as well: | | lib/libdmx: | The Xdmx server was removed from the xorg-server sources in | xorg-server 21 (released Oct. 2021), so this is only useful | for communicating with Xdmx from the 1.20 and older releases. Given that Bookworm has xorg-server 21 and there are no rdeps in the archive, let's exclude it from bookworm (and remove entirely eventually)? sounds good -- t
Bug#1035474: Don't include in Bookworm?
Source: libdmx Version: 1:1.1.4-2 Severity: serious The Xorg folks mentioned at https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/05/02/3: | We have also announced that we plan to retire the following packages soon | and while their gitlab repos are not yet archived, we expect they will be | archived in the future, and encourage distros that still ship them to | consider retiring them on your side as well: | | lib/libdmx: | The Xdmx server was removed from the xorg-server sources in | xorg-server 21 (released Oct. 2021), so this is only useful | for communicating with Xdmx from the 1.20 and older releases. Given that Bookworm has xorg-server 21 and there are no rdeps in the archive, let's exclude it from bookworm (and remove entirely eventually)? Cheers, Moritz
