Bug#1041508: tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats

2023-09-04 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi,

On 04-09-2023 00:21, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:

I've just added an ignore hint for texlive-extra, as the
r-bioc-biocstyle issue is clearly less of a problem than this one (and
bug reports are filed).


Thanks for your response! When will the ignore hint be effective?


Immediately, but I had to decron britney2 because of issues with the 
BTS. That's now fixed, so I enabled britney2 just now and the first 
migration should happen at the 22:00 UTC run.


Paul


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1041508: tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats

2023-09-04 Thread Preuße

On 04.09.2023 00:21, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:

On 03.09.2023 07:20, Paul Gevers wrote:


Hello Paul,

I've just added an ignore hint for texlive-extra, as the 
r-bioc-biocstyle issue is clearly less of a problem than this one

(and bug reports are filed).


Thanks for your response! When will the ignore hint be effective?
Andreas T. uploaded my (untested) fix to unstable. So in case the fix is 

correct, r-bioc-biocstyle should stop blocking texlive-extra soon.

Hilmar
--
sigfault



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1041508: tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats

2023-09-03 Thread Preuße

On 03.09.2023 07:20, Paul Gevers wrote:

Hello Paul,


I've just added an ignore hint for texlive-extra, as the
r-bioc-biocstyle issue is clearly less of a problem than this one (and
bug reports are filed).


Thanks for your response! When will the ignore hint be effective?

Hilmar
--
sigfault



Processed: Re: Bug#1041508: tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats

2023-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 texlive-binaries
Bug #1041508 [tex-common] tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats
Bug reassigned from package 'tex-common' to 'texlive-binaries'.
No longer marked as found in versions tex-common/6.18.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1041508 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
1041508: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1041508
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1041508: tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats

2023-09-03 Thread Preuße

Control: reassign -1 texlive-binaries

On 20.07.2023 00:06, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:

Hi,


Upgrading tex-common seems to fail when attempting to rebuild formats
(log attached).


That issue is in texlive-binaries and has been solved there.

H.
--
sigfault



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1041508: tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats

2023-09-03 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Le samedi 02 septembre 2023 à 23:47 +0200, Preuße, Hilmar a écrit :
> Control: block -1 by 1050807
> 
> On 02.09.2023 07:57, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
> > appropriate ***
> > 
> >     * What led up to the situation?
> > 
> > routine upgrade of testing's tex-common
> > 
> >     * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> >   ineffective)?
> > 
> 
> I guess you run Debian testing right?

Right.

> The texlive-binaries recently migrated to testing, but the 
> texlive-base/texlive-extra/texlive-lang did not due to #1050807. 
> Therefore the fix for this issue did not enter testing yet.
> 
> Sorry, for the trouble, I should have added a "Breaks" statement to 
> texlive-binaries. Maybe it makes sense to do that now?

Yes, it does : that would avoid the same problem to other poor sods...

--
Emmanuel Charpentier


> 
> Hilmar
> -- 
> sigfault
> 



Processed: Re: Bug#1041508: tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats

2023-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #1041508 [tex-common] tex-common: fmutil fails to rebuild formats
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

-- 
1041508: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1041508
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems