Bug#1063746: Upload request for golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:54:04 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Tom Parkin writes: > > > Hi folks, > > > > Would someone mind please reviewing and uploading > > golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1? > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp > > Looks good, although there were no tag for the previous Debian upload so > diffing changes was a bit difficult. Do you still have the 0.1.6-2 tag > locally? If so would be good if you could push that. Uploaded anyway, > and I forgot to add a 'New upstream release' changelog entry, although > that should be pretty obvious from the version number anyway. Thanks Simon, much appreciated. In re: tags -- I'm not quite sure what's going on here. Nilesh tagged 0.1.6-2 I believe: I did have the tag in my repo although how I'd have it without it going via. salsa I'm not sure. Anyway, here it is: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp/-/tags/debian%2F0.1.6-2 All the best, Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1063746: Upload request for golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1
Tom Parkin writes: > Hi folks, > > Would someone mind please reviewing and uploading > golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1? > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp Looks good, although there were no tag for the previous Debian upload so diffing changes was a bit difficult. Do you still have the 0.1.6-2 tag locally? If so would be good if you could push that. Uploaded anyway, and I forgot to add a 'New upstream release' changelog entry, although that should be pretty obvious from the version number anyway. /Simon signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1063746: Upload request for golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1
Hi folks, Would someone mind please reviewing and uploading golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1? https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp The package is updated to remove the L2TPIP6 transport test, which is failing due to the backport of an upstream kernel regression to the stable kernel which at least Debian Bookworm is running. Once we have a fix for the kernel regression we can re-enable the unit test, but for the time being removing the test is the most direct approach for addressing the CI failures captured by #1063746. Thanks and best regards, Tom -- Tom Parkin Katalix Systems Ltd https://katalix.com Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development signature.asc Description: PGP signature
