Bug#175604: cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils
clone 175604 -1 reassign -1 ftp.debian.org severity -1 normal retitle -1 RM: cxx -- RoM; unusable with current binutils thanks On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 06:18:43PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 21:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > > > Since the cxx package is now unusable with current binutils, is there any > > reason to keep this package around in the archive? > Now that you mention it, no, it's not part of sarge but is still part of > woody (since it works there). Too bad, it was a neat compiler. Ok, let's ask for it to be removed then. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#175604: cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 175604 -1 Bug#175604: cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils Bug 175604 cloned as bug 314228. > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug#314228: cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils Bug reassigned from package `cxx' to `ftp.debian.org'. > severity -1 normal Bug#314228: cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils Severity set to `normal'. > retitle -1 RM: cxx -- RoM; unusable with current binutils Bug#314228: cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#175604: cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils
Hello Steve, Now that you mention it, no, it's not part of sarge but is still part of woody (since it works there). Too bad, it was a neat compiler. Thanks. On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 21:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Since the cxx package is now unusable with current binutils, is there any > reason to keep this package around in the archive? > > Thanks, -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#175604: cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils
Hi Adam, Since the cxx package is now unusable with current binutils, is there any reason to keep this package around in the archive? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
