Bug#283896: libdbd-sqlite-perl: version mismatch with sqlite package.

2005-01-26 Thread Krzysztof Krzyzaniak
On pi, 2005-01-21 at 09:00 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
 Hi Steve,
 
 On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:44:22AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
 
   - First, this bug is not critical: it does not break unrelated
 packages or the whole system.  It is at most grave (if it makes
 the package unusable), or serious (if it's your opinion that this
 bug makes the package unsuitable for release for other reasons).
 
  It depends on how you understand unrelated packages.  It breaks
  existing scripts because the backend is changed from SQLite 2 to 3.
  SQLite 3 can't read files written by SQLite 2 and the error message
  that DBD outputs is rather confusing (much more generic than can't
  read files in SQLite 2 format).
 
  The package itself is usable, one must only pay attention to what one
  is doing.
 
  It's unsuitable for release with sarge because we don't know what
  upstream's plan is (maybe Krzysztof has already figured out something
  with upstream, but there's no record of that on the BTS).  I would very
  much prefer _not_ to release these packages with sarge unless this is
  fixed and an upgrade path is provided.  SQLite provides such path, only
  the Perl DBD is a mess.

Upstream author answered that he don't want to change name of package
(to dbd::sqlite3) but will provide another solution. He didn't tell
what he mind writing this. 

I am afraid I am not able to find solution myself so I'll donate this
package to Debian Perl Group. I will upload to Alioth this package as
soon as possible.

  eloy

-- 
* Allegro.pl / Aukro.cz / Au-Au.ru
* Krzysztof 'eloy' Krzyaniak
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Bug#283896: libdbd-sqlite-perl: version mismatch with sqlite package.

2005-01-21 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Hi Krzysztof,

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:33:16AM +0100, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote:

  Take look at
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2004/12/msg00030.html,
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2004/12/msg00039.html (and below).
  
  Question is in upstream changes and very confusing schema names. I'll
  try to work out this issue as soon as possible.

 any word on this?  I'm getting a bit tickled but this.  I've got the
 feeling that everytime I write a perl script using DBD::SQLite it's
 going to break without warning...

 Marcelo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#283896: libdbd-sqlite-perl: version mismatch with sqlite package.

2005-01-21 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Hi Steve,

On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:44:22AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:

  - First, this bug is not critical: it does not break unrelated
packages or the whole system.  It is at most grave (if it makes
the package unusable), or serious (if it's your opinion that this
bug makes the package unsuitable for release for other reasons).

 It depends on how you understand unrelated packages.  It breaks
 existing scripts because the backend is changed from SQLite 2 to 3.
 SQLite 3 can't read files written by SQLite 2 and the error message
 that DBD outputs is rather confusing (much more generic than can't
 read files in SQLite 2 format).

 The package itself is usable, one must only pay attention to what one
 is doing.

 It's unsuitable for release with sarge because we don't know what
 upstream's plan is (maybe Krzysztof has already figured out something
 with upstream, but there's no record of that on the BTS).  I would very
 much prefer _not_ to release these packages with sarge unless this is
 fixed and an upgrade path is provided.  SQLite provides such path, only
 the Perl DBD is a mess.

 Marcelo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]