Bug#290597: fails to configure because gs-common is not configured
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:37:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > reassign 290597 gs-common > thanks > > Matt, > > All of the high-level apt tools should be capable of breaking this kind of > dependency loop between gs-gpl and gs-common, so the most apparent reason > for this kind of failure would be that gs-common could not be configured for > reasons other than this dependency loop. I think we really need to see the > output of trying to install gs-common on this system in order to debug this. OK. I'll reproduce the problem Monday and send more information. -- Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290597: fails to configure because gs-common is not configured
reassign 290597 gs-common thanks Matt, All of the high-level apt tools should be capable of breaking this kind of dependency loop between gs-gpl and gs-common, so the most apparent reason for this kind of failure would be that gs-common could not be configured for reasons other than this dependency loop. I think we really need to see the output of trying to install gs-common on this system in order to debug this. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#290597: fails to configure because gs-common is not configured
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:02:54PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:48:28PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > I don't quite understand how this would be gs-gpl's fault, it's either > > > gs-common (because of an error during the configuration) or apt/dpkg, > > > isn't it? Do you have a complete log of the install, I suspect there > > > was an error during configuring gs-common. > > > > I reported it against gs-gpl because that was what failed to compile. Oops. I meant configure, not compile. > > There appears to be a dependency loop between gs-gpl, gs-common, and > > gs. > > Ok, now I understand. Although I find it rather normal that gs-gpl > depends on gs-common but rather weird that gs-common in turn depends > on gs. I would therefor propose to reassign the bug to gs-common. That sounds good to me. -- Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290597: fails to configure because gs-common is not configured
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:48:28PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > I don't quite understand how this would be gs-gpl's fault, it's either > > gs-common (because of an error during the configuration) or apt/dpkg, > > isn't it? Do you have a complete log of the install, I suspect there > > was an error during configuring gs-common. > > I reported it against gs-gpl because that was what failed to compile. > There appears to be a dependency loop between gs-gpl, gs-common, and > gs. Ok, now I understand. Although I find it rather normal that gs-gpl depends on gs-common but rather weird that gs-common in turn depends on gs. I would therefor propose to reassign the bug to gs-common. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290597: fails to configure because gs-common is not configured
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:16:45PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > > The Desktop task failed to install while installing Debian because > > gs-gpl failed to configure because gs-common was not configured: > > > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gs-gpl: > > gs-gpl depends on gs-common (>= 0.2); however: > >Package gs-common is not configured yet. > > dpkg: error processing gs-gpl (--configure): > > dependency problems - leaving unconfigured > > I don't quite understand how this would be gs-gpl's fault, it's either > gs-common (because of an error during the configuration) or apt/dpkg, > isn't it? Do you have a complete log of the install, I suspect there > was an error during configuring gs-common. I reported it against gs-gpl because that was what failed to compile. There appears to be a dependency loop between gs-gpl, gs-common, and gs. -- Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290597: fails to configure because gs-common is not configured
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:16:45PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > The Desktop task failed to install while installing Debian because > gs-gpl failed to configure because gs-common was not configured: > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gs-gpl: > gs-gpl depends on gs-common (>= 0.2); however: >Package gs-common is not configured yet. > dpkg: error processing gs-gpl (--configure): > dependency problems - leaving unconfigured I don't quite understand how this would be gs-gpl's fault, it's either gs-common (because of an error during the configuration) or apt/dpkg, isn't it? Do you have a complete log of the install, I suspect there was an error during configuring gs-common. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290597: fails to configure because gs-common is not configured
Package: gs-gpl Version: 8.01-5 Severity: serious The Desktop task failed to install while installing Debian because gs-gpl failed to configure because gs-common was not configured: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gs-gpl: gs-gpl depends on gs-common (>= 0.2); however: Package gs-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing gs-gpl (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured -- Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
